JP6415139B2 - Focus detection apparatus, imaging apparatus, focus detection method, and focus detection program - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a focus detection apparatus used in an imaging apparatus such as a digital video camera or a digital still camera, and more particularly to an apparatus that performs focus detection by a phase difference detection method.

  In focus detection by the phase difference detection method, a pair of image signals obtained by photoelectrically converting a pair of subject images formed by light beams from different areas (hereinafter referred to as pupil areas) of the exit pupil of the imaging optical system. A phase difference is calculated, and a defocus amount of the imaging optical system is calculated from the phase difference. Dividing the luminous flux from the exit pupil into luminous fluxes (a pair of subject images) from different pupil regions and performing photoelectric conversion is called pupil division.

  As a focus detection device based on a phase difference detection method for performing such pupil division, for example, there is one disclosed in Patent Document 1. In this focus detection device, a microlens (hereinafter referred to as ML) is provided for each focus detection pixel of a light receiving element (imaging element), and a pair of photoelectric sensors each decentered with respect to the optical axis of the microlens in one focus detection pixel. By providing a conversion unit (hereinafter referred to as PD), pupil division is possible.

  However, in the conventional phase difference detection method, when a glossy subject is imaged on the surface, the component of the specular reflection light (hereinafter referred to as the specular reflection component) of the light reflected on the surface enters the focus detection device. As a result, accurate focus detection may not be possible. With respect to this problem, Patent Document 2 discloses a focus detection device that is less affected by the specular reflection component by performing focus detection using a light beam whose specular reflection component is reduced by a polarizing filter.

  Further, Patent Document 3 estimates a light source color by regarding an integration result of a difference between a pixel value brighter than the average and a pixel value darker than the average pixel value of an image obtained by imaging as a specular reflection component, A method for obtaining a white balance gain so that the light source color is close to white is disclosed.

JP 2007-133087 A JP 2012-247356 A JP 2007-013415 A

  However, in the focus detection device disclosed in Patent Document 2, it is necessary to prepare a special optical element called a polarization filter in order to reduce the specular reflection component. Further, the method disclosed in Patent Document 3 merely estimates the integration result of the obtained difference values as a specular reflection component (light source color), and does not specify the position where the specular reflection component exists.

  The present invention provides a focus detection apparatus, an imaging apparatus including the focus detection apparatus, and a focus detection method capable of performing high-precision focus detection with reduced influence of a specular reflection component without using a special optical element. .

A focus detection apparatus according to one aspect of the present invention outputs an output from a photoelectric conversion element that photoelectrically converts a pair of object images formed by light beams that have passed through different regions of an exit pupil of an optical system, out of light from an object. A light source color that obtains information about the color of a light source that illuminates an object using a signal obtained by imaging the object using a calculation unit that calculates a defocus amount by performing a correlation operation on a pair of generated image signals comprising an acquisition unit, a calculation means, from the result of comparing the color indicated by the difference in color and a pair image signal indicating information about the color of the light source, determining a specular reflection light component from the object of said difference The defocus amount is calculated based on the determination result .

In addition, a focus detection apparatus according to another aspect of the present invention includes a plurality of object images that photoelectrically convert a pair of object images formed by light beams that have passed through different regions in an exit pupil of an optical system, out of light from an object. Calculating means for performing a correlation operation on a pair of image signals generated using an output from the photoelectric conversion element to generate a plurality of correlation evaluation values, and calculating a defocus amount of the optical system using the correlation evaluation values; A light source color acquisition means for acquiring information relating to the color of the light source that illuminates the object using a signal obtained by imaging the object, and the computing means includes information relating to the color of the light source and a pair of image signals. And the defocus amount is calculated by reducing the weight of the correlation evaluation value corresponding to the output by the specular reflection light from the object .

  An imaging device having the focus detection device also constitutes another aspect of the present invention.

The focus detection method according to another aspect of the present invention includes a photoelectric conversion element that photoelectrically converts a pair of object images formed by light beams that have passed through different regions in an exit pupil of an optical system among light from an object. using the output from the calculating a defocus amount, to obtain information about the color of the light source illuminating the object with a signal obtained by imaging an object, in the calculation of the defocus amount, information regarding the color of the light source from the results of comparing the color indicated by the difference in color and a pair image signal indicating determines specular reflection light component from the object of said difference, and characterized in that to calculate a defocus amount based on the determination result To do.

In addition, a focus detection method according to another aspect of the present invention includes a plurality of object images photoelectrically converted from a pair of object images formed by light beams that have passed through different regions in an exit pupil of an optical system, out of light from an object. A correlation calculation is performed on a pair of image signals generated using the output from the photoelectric conversion element to generate a plurality of correlation evaluation values, and the defocus amount of the optical system is calculated using the correlation evaluation values, Information on the color of the light source that illuminates the object is obtained using the signal obtained by imaging, and in calculating the defocus amount, the specular reflected light from the object is obtained using the information on the color of the light source and a pair of image signals. The defocus amount is calculated by lowering the weight of the correlation evaluation value corresponding to the output of .

  A focus detection program that is a computer program that causes a computer to execute processing corresponding to the focus detection method also constitutes another aspect of the present invention.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to calculate a defocus amount with high accuracy while reducing the influence of specular reflection light from an object without using a special optical element. Therefore, by using this defocus amount, high focusing accuracy can be obtained, and a high-quality captured image can be obtained.

1 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of an imaging apparatus that is Embodiment 1 of the present invention. 2 is a front view of a unit pixel cell of an image sensor used in Embodiment 1. FIG. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a principle of focus detection using pixel values of divided PDs according to the first embodiment. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a principle of obtaining specular reflection light from a difference of correlation calculation in the first embodiment. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of pixel block division in the first embodiment. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of SAD values in the first embodiment. FIG. 2 is a front view showing an image sensor used in Embodiment 1. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating A and B image signals and differences between them in the first embodiment. 3 is a flowchart illustrating focus detection processing according to the first embodiment. FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of an imaging apparatus that is Embodiment 2 of the present invention. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of selecting a focus detection area in the second embodiment. 10 is a flowchart illustrating focus detection processing according to the second embodiment.

  Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 shows a configuration of an imaging apparatus 100 such as a digital video camera or a digital still camera, which is Embodiment 1 of the present invention. The optical unit 101 includes an imaging optical system including a plurality of lenses including a focus lens for performing focus adjustment, a shutter, and a diaphragm, and a lens control unit that controls the operation of the imaging optical system. The drive control unit 112 outputs a signal for controlling driving of a focus lens (autofocus: AF) included in the optical unit 101 in accordance with an output from a focus detection unit 108 described later.

  The image sensor 102 as a photoelectric conversion element is configured by a CMOS sensor in which unit pixel cells are arranged in a two-dimensional matrix. The exposure amount of the image sensor 102 is controlled by a shutter included in the optical unit 101. The imaging optical system forms a subject image (object image) on a light beam from the subject (object). This subject image is photoelectrically converted by the image sensor 102, and the electric charge accumulated in a pair of photoelectric conversion units (described later) configured in each unit pixel cell by the photoelectric conversion is output to the A / D conversion unit 103 as an analog signal. .

  FIG. 2 shows one unit pixel cell 1 in the image sensor 102. The unit pixel cell 1 includes one microlens (hereinafter referred to as ML) 2 and a pair of photoelectric conversion units (hereinafter referred to as divided PDs) 1a and 1b that are eccentrically arranged on the opposite sides with respect to the optical axis of ML2. And have. The division PDs 1a and 1b perform pupil division by receiving light beams that have passed through different pupil regions in the exit pupil of the imaging optical system through the common ML2. In other words, the divided PDs 1a and 1b function as pixels that view the subject with parallax via ML2. In the image sensor 102, a plurality of such unit pixel cells are arranged as shown in FIG.

  The plurality of unit pixel cells on the image sensor 102 includes a plurality of unit pixel cells with color filters for red (R), green (G), and blue (B) arranged in a Bayer array. In the Bayer array, two G unit pixel cells are arranged at one diagonal position among two horizontal × vertical unit pixel cells, and one unit for R and one at the other diagonal position. Pixel cells are arranged.

  The divided PD 1a in the plural (RGB) unit pixel cells 1 is used as an A image pixel group that photoelectrically converts the A image among the pair of subject images for focus detection by the phase difference detection method, and the divided PD 1b is a pair of subject images. Are used as a group of B image pixels for photoelectrically converting the B image. The AF that performs focus detection by the phase difference detection method using the A-image and B-image pixel groups provided in the image sensor in this manner is referred to as an imaging surface phase difference AF.

  In this embodiment, as described later, an image sensor 102 capable of acquiring a captured image is used as a focus detection photoelectric conversion element. However, a photoelectric conversion dedicated to focus detection provided separately from such an image sensor. An element (such as an AF sensor) may be used.

  The A / D conversion unit 103 converts the analog signal output from the image sensor 102 into a digital signal (pixel signal) and outputs the digital signal to the capture unit 104. The A / D converter 103 includes a CDS circuit that reduces noise, a non-linear amplifier circuit that amplifies an analog signal before conversion into a digital signal, and the like.

  The capture unit (imaging unit) 104 generates an A image signal for each color from the pixel signals corresponding to the A image pixel group for each RGB color output from the A / D conversion unit 103, and for each RGB color A B image signal for each color is generated from pixel signals corresponding to the B image pixel group. The capture unit 104 outputs the A image and B image signals for each color to the WB calculation correction unit 109 and the focus detection unit 108. It can also be said that the A image signal and the B image signal are a pair of parallax images having parallax. In the following description, the A image signal and the B image signal are collectively referred to as a pair of AF image signals.

  In addition, the capture unit 104 generates an imaging pixel signal for each color as a composite signal of pixel signals from the RGB A image and B image pixel groups output from the A / D conversion unit 103, and The pixel signal is output to the WB calculation correction unit 109. The RGB imaging pixel signals are used to generate a captured image (live view image and recording image). The imaging pixel signal and the pair of AF image signals are signals obtained by imaging a subject (photographing the subject image).

  A WB calculation correction unit 109 serving as a light source color acquisition unit acquires a white balance evaluation value (hereinafter referred to as a WB evaluation value) to be described later from at least one of RGB imaging pixel signals or a pair of AF image signals. A white balance gain is calculated based on the evaluation value. Then, while outputting the WB evaluation value to the focus detection unit 108, the imaging pixel signal is corrected using the white balance gain (hereinafter referred to as WB correction), and the imaging pixel signal after the WB correction is synchronized processing unit 110. Output to.

  Here, the WB evaluation value will be described. The WB evaluation value is a value used so that white can be accurately captured under various light sources, and is a value representing the color of a white subject under the light source during imaging. In general, there is a method of calculating an WB evaluation value by detecting an imaging region including a subject estimated to be white and integrating R, G, and B values in the imaging region. Further, as disclosed in Patent Document 3, the integration result of the difference between the pixel value brighter than the average and the pixel value darker than the pixel value of the image obtained by imaging is regarded as a specular reflection component, and the subject is There is also a method for calculating the WB evaluation value by estimating the color of the illuminating light source. Among these, although the latter method disclosed in Patent Document 3 is used in the present embodiment, the WB evaluation value may be calculated by other methods. In the present embodiment, this WB evaluation value is calculated for each pixel block that is divided and set by the focus detection unit 108 described later.

  The focus detection unit 108 performs focus detection processing for detecting (calculating) a defocus amount indicating the focus state of the imaging optical system. Specifically, the focus detection unit 108 performs a correlation operation such as a SAD (Sum of Absolute Difference) method on the A image signal and the B image signal input from the capture unit 104 to generate a correlation evaluation value. Furthermore, the focus detection unit 108 performs correction described later on the correlation evaluation value using the WB evaluation value input from the WB calculation correction unit 109. The correlation calculation method may be another method such as an SSD (Sum of Squared Difference) method. Then, the defocus amount of the imaging optical system is calculated using the corrected correlation evaluation value, and the result is output to the drive control unit 112. The WB calculation correction unit 109 and the focus detection unit 108 constitute a focus detection device.

  The synchronization processing unit 110 performs a synchronization process (demosaicing) on the RGB pixel signal after WB correction input from the WB calculation correction unit 109 to generate a color photographed image. The synchronization processing unit 110 outputs the color photographed image data to the external recording device 111 after performing image reduction represented by noise reduction and JPEG.

  The external recording device 111 records the color photographed image output from the synchronization processing unit 110 on a memory card represented by an SD card or the like.

  Next, focus detection processing performed by the focus detection unit 108 will be described in detail with reference to the flowchart of FIG. As shown in FIG. 1, the focus detection unit 108 includes a correlation calculation unit 105, a correlation accumulation buffer 106, a specular reflection correction unit 107, and a defocus amount calculation unit 115. The correlation calculation unit 105 and the defocus amount calculation unit 115 constitute a calculation unit, and the specular reflection correction unit 107 constitutes a correction unit. As a computer, the focus detection unit 108 performs focus detection processing in steps S11 to S17 shown in FIG. 9 according to a focus detection program that is a computer program.

  In step S <b> 11, the correlation calculation unit 105 divides all pixels on the image sensor 102 into a plurality (64 in this example) of pixel blocks as shown in FIG. 5. Each pixel block includes a plurality of pixels (unit pixel cells). Then, in step S12, the correlation calculation unit 105 performs correlation calculation while shifting the pixels of the A image signal and B image signal for each pixel block obtained from the capture unit 104 by one pixel. At this time, the correlation calculation unit 105 outputs the correlation calculation result for each one-pixel shift to the correlation accumulation buffer 106 in step S13. The correlation accumulation buffer 106 stores (accumulates) the correlation evaluation value for each one-pixel shift amount.

  The relationship between the content of the correlation calculation and the correlation evaluation value obtained by the correlation calculation and the focus state of the imaging optical system will be described with reference to FIG. Here, the case where the correlation calculation is performed by the above-described SAD method will be described. The correlation calculation performed by the SAD method is called an SAD calculation, and the correlation evaluation value obtained by the SAD calculation is called an SAD evaluation value.

  FIG. 3 shows 13 unit pixel cells P1 to P13 corresponding to the unit pixel cell including the pair of divided PDs 1a and 1b shown in FIG. It is shown in a line. Here, it is assumed that these 13 unit pixel cells P1 to P13 are provided for each color of RGB. Each unit pixel cell performs pupil division on the exit pupil of the imaging optical system.

The capture unit 104 described above generates an A image signal and a B image signal of the same color using outputs from the divided PDs 1a and 1b of the unit pixel cells P1 to P13 of the same color. That is, the A image signal and B image signal of R, the A image signal and B image signal of G, and the A image signal and B image signal of B are generated. The correlation calculation unit 105 obtains the SAD evaluation value C between corresponding points (corresponding unit pixel cells) in the A image signal and the B image signal for each color by the SAD calculation represented by the following equation (1).
C = Σ | YAn−YBm | (1)
YAn and YBm are signal values (pixel values) obtained from the nth and mth (n, m = 1 to 13) unit pixel cells of the signal values of the A image signal and the B image signal, respectively. YAn and YBm substantially coincide with each other, and the SAD evaluation value C is minimized, that is, the amount of deviation (phase difference) nm between the A image signal and the B image signal when the degree of correlation is the highest, and the imaging optical system The defocus amount (including the defocus direction) can be calculated.

  As shown in FIG. 3A, in the in-focus state, both the A image and the B image are formed on the unit pixel cell P5 by the light flux from the photographing optical system. For this reason, the A image signal and the B image signal generated from the output from the pixel group for A image and the pixel group for B image (divided PD1a, 1b) of the unit pixel cell P5 (n, m = 5) substantially coincide. At this time, the shift amount between the A image signal and the B image signal, that is, the image shift amount d (a) between the A image and the B image is substantially 0 (baseline length that is the interval between the divided PDs 1a and 1b in the unit pixel cell P5). Equivalent value).

  When the imaging optical system is in the rear pin state, the imaging position of the imaging optical system is on the unit pixel cell P5 (n = 5) for the A image and on the unit pixel cell P9 (m = 9) for the B image. It is formed. At this time, the image shift amount d (b) obtained by the SAD calculation has a non-zero value (n−m = −4). Further, when the imaging optical system is in the front pin state, the A image is formed on the unit pixel cell P9 (n = 9), and the B image is formed on the unit pixel cell P5 (m = 5). At this time, the image shift amount d (c) obtained by the SAD calculation is the same as the image shift amount d (b) but has a different sign (nm = 4).

  This is because the A image pixel group and the B image pixel group see the same subject in the focused state, but only the image shift amounts d (b) and d (c) in the rear pin state and the front pin state. This is because the subject that is displaced is viewed.

  In steps S12 and S13, the correlation calculation unit 105 and the correlation accumulation buffer 106 perform the SAD calculation and the accumulation of the SAD evaluation value for each RGB color. The defocus amount calculation unit 115 passes through steps S14 to S16 to be described later, and finally, in step S17, the image shift amount d that minimizes the sum of the SAD evaluation values for each color and the above-described baseline length. The defocus amount of the imaging optical system is calculated by a known calculation method using. The defocus amount here includes the defocus direction. Thereafter, the defocus amount calculation unit 115 outputs the calculated defocus amount to the drive control unit 112. The drive control unit 112 calculates the movement amount (including the movement direction) of the focus lens from the defocus amount, and moves the focus lens according to the calculation result. Thereby, a focused state is obtained.

  The SAD evaluation value will be described in more detail with reference to FIG. 8A and FIG. FIG. 8A shows an A image signal (and B image signal) obtained as a pixel value in a one-dimensional direction in the A image pixel group (and B image pixel group), and the horizontal axis represents the pixel. The position and the vertical position indicate pixel values. The A image and B image pixel groups ideally see the same subject image. For this reason, in an ideal state where the light received by these pixel groups does not include a component of specular reflection light (hereinafter referred to as a specular reflection component) or an occlusion region does not exist in the subject image, On the B image pixel group, the same A image and B image having different pixel positions are formed.

  FIG. 6 shows the SAD evaluation value (vertical axis) calculated by Equation (1) for each pixel shift amount (horizontal axis) and accumulated in the correlation accumulation buffer 106. The solid line indicates the SAD evaluation value for each pixel shift amount of the A image and the B image in the state where there is no specular reflection component. In this solid line, the SAD evaluation value is minimum at the point A (pixel shift amount 8). At this time, the defocus amount calculation unit 115 calculates the defocus amount based on the image shift amount d at the point A.

  In step S14, the specular reflection correction unit 107 obtains the color ratio of the difference value between the A image and B image signals for each color (hereinafter referred to as AF image difference value). In step S15, the specular reflection correction unit 107 determines whether the color ratio of the AF image difference value is close to the color ratio of the WB evaluation value acquired from the WB calculation correction unit 109 (information on the color of the light source). . When the color ratio of the AF image difference value is close to the color ratio of the WB evaluation value, the specular reflection correction unit 107 corrects the specular reflection component with respect to the sum value of the SAD evaluation values for each color in step S16. This correction is for reducing (preferably removing) the influence of the specular reflection component from the SAD evaluation value (summed value), and is referred to as specular reflection correction in the following description. The color ratio of the AF image difference value and the color ratio of the WB evaluation value will be described in detail later.

  Here, the case where it is preferable to perform the specular reflection correction on the SAD evaluation value will be specifically described with reference to FIGS. FIG. 8B, in contrast to FIG. 8A, shows an A image signal obtained from an A image pixel group that receives an A image including a specular reflection component, and FIG. 5 shows a B image signal obtained from a B image pixel group that receives a B image including a specular reflection component. FIG. 8D shows the difference in the A image and B image signals (however, in the aligned state) shown in FIGS. 8B and 8C in the focused state.

  Originally, in the in-focus state, the A image and B image signals coincide with each other, so the difference between them should be zero. However, since a specular reflection component is included in the A and B images, a difference appears in the A and B image signals as shown in FIG. When the SAD evaluation values are calculated for the A and B image signals shown in FIGS. 8B and 8C, the SAD at the point A corresponding to the original in-focus position as shown by the broken line in FIG. The SAD evaluation value at point B is smaller than the evaluation value. Therefore, the focus detection unit 108 calculates the defocus amount based on the image shift amount with respect to the point B. That is, the defocus amount is erroneously calculated.

  The difference shown in FIG. 8D represents a specular reflection component, which will be described in detail later, in other words, the color of the light source that illuminates the subject (hereinafter referred to as the light source color). A difference value representing the difference between the A image signal and the B image signal is obtained for each RGB color, and the difference value of each color is compared with the light source color corresponding to the WB evaluation value, whereby the difference between the A image signal and the B image signal is obtained. It is possible to determine whether it is caused by a specular reflection component or because it is out of focus.

  Next, a method for calculating the color ratio of the AF image difference value and the color ratio of the WB evaluation value and a method for comparing these color ratios will be described.

First, in step S14, the specular reflection correction unit 107 calculates the ratios (color ratios) Rr1 and Br1 of the AF image difference values ΔR and ΔB of R and B to the AF image difference value ΔG of R and B for each pixel position (2). , (3).
Rr1 = ΔR / ΔG (2)
Br1 = ΔB / ΔG (3)
Further, in the same step, the specular reflection correction unit 107 calculates the color ratios Rr2 and Br2 of the R and B WB evaluation values WBR and WBB with respect to the G WB evaluation value WBG for each pixel position according to equations (4) and (5). calculate.
Rr2 = WBR / WBG (4)
Br2 = WBB / WBG (5)
Next, in the same step, the specular reflection correcting unit 107 obtains a comparison value from the Rr1, Br1 and Rr2, Br2 at the same pixel position by the equation (6).
^{√ {(Rr1-Rr2) 2} + (Br1-Br2) 2} ··· (6)
In step S15, the specular reflection correction unit 107 determines that the AF image difference value is close to the light source color, that is, is caused by the specular reflection component, when the comparison value is equal to or smaller than the predetermined value. In this case, in step S16, the specular reflection correction unit 107 multiplies the SAD evaluation value (total value) by a correction coefficient in accordance with the comparison value, thereby reducing the specular reflection correction in the SAD evaluation value. I do.

  Here, the smaller the value of Equation (6), the lower the reliability of the SAD evaluation value. The correction coefficient has a value (a value of 1 or more) that makes the result of multiplying this by the SAD evaluation value larger than the original SAD evaluation value. A table for selecting one or more correction coefficients may be prepared according to the value of Expression (6).

  When the comparison value is larger than the predetermined value, it is determined that the AF image difference value is not caused by the specular reflection component, and the defocus amount calculation unit 115 does not perform the specular reflection correction in step S17. The defocus amount is calculated using the value.

  Thus, in this embodiment, whether or not the AF image difference value is caused by the specular reflection component is determined by comparison with the WB evaluation value, and the SAD is determined according to the determination that the AF image difference value is caused by the specular reflection component. Specular reflection correction is performed on the evaluation value. Thereby, the defocus amount can be calculated using the SAD evaluation value having high reliability. In other words, the reliability of the defocus amount can be increased.

  The dotted line in FIG. 6 indicates the SAD evaluation value after specular reflection correction. In this corrected SAD evaluation value, the SAD evaluation value at point A corresponding to the original in-focus position is smaller than the SAD evaluation value at point B. For this reason, the defocus amount calculation unit 115 calculates the defocus amount based on the image shift amount with respect to the point A. Thereby, erroneous calculation of the defocus amount due to the influence of the specular reflection component is avoided.

  Next, the principle that a specular reflection component appears as an AF image difference value by SAD calculation will be described. Reflected light from the object reflects diffusely reflected light that reflects the color of the object without reflection direction (hereinafter referred to as diffuse reflection component) and reflects the light source color without reflecting the color of the object with reflection directionality And a specular reflection component. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 4, a part of the light incident on the subject 401 from the light source 400 is reflected in all directions as diffuse reflection components (indicated by thin solid lines and thin dotted lines in the figure), and the rest is specularly reflected. It is reflected mainly in the regular reflection direction as a component (indicated by a thick solid line and a thick dotted line in the figure).

  In FIG. 4, the imaging devices 402 and 403 image the subject 401 from spatially different positions. The irregular reflection component reflected from the subject 401 in the direction of the imaging device 402 is indicated by a thin solid line, and the specular reflection component is indicated by a thick solid line. Further, the irregular reflection component 406 reflected in the direction of the imaging device 403 is indicated by a thin dotted line, and the specular reflection component 407 is indicated by a thick dotted line.

  As described above, since the irregular reflection component representing the color of the subject travels in all directions, no difference occurs even if the irregular reflection component is imaged from the imaging devices 402 and 403 arranged at different positions. On the other hand, the specular reflection component has the highest intensity in the regular reflection direction whose reflection angle is equal to the incident angle from the light source 400. For example, the specular reflection component 406 reflected by the point 404 on the subject 401 has the highest intensity in the regular reflection direction toward the imaging device 402, and the specular reflection component 407 reflected by the point 405 is the positive reflection toward the imaging device 403. It has the highest intensity in the reflection direction. On the contrary, almost only the irregular reflection component is incident on the imaging device 403 from the point 404, and only the irregular reflection component is incident on the imaging device 402 from the point 405. That is, the intensity (light quantity) of the specular reflection component that can be observed by the imaging apparatus changes according to the spatial position of the imaging apparatus with respect to the reflection position of the light on the subject.

Here, when the intensity of the reflected light when the reflected light from the point 404 is observed by the imaging devices 402 and 403 are respectively A1 and A2, A1 and A2 are expressed by the following equations (7) and (8), respectively. expressed.
A1 = I1 + D (7)
A2 = I2 + D (8)
However, I1 is a specular reflection component incident on the imaging device 402 from the point 404, I2 is a specular reflection component incident on the imaging device 403 from the point 404, and D is a diffuse reflection component incident on the imaging devices 402 and 403 from the point 404. is there. The irregular reflection components D from the same point 404 on the subject 401 can be regarded as the same regardless of the positions of the imaging devices 402 and 403.

Here, I1 and I2 are expressed by equations (9) and (10), respectively, according to Fong's reflection model.
I1 = iW (α) cos θ1 (9)
I2 = iW (α) cos θ2 (10)
Here, i is the intensity of the incident light, W (α) is the specular reflectance in the regular reflection direction of the subject, and θ1 and θ2 are deviation angles of the imaging devices 402 and 403 from the regular reflection direction. In the equations (9) and (10), the intensity i of the incident light is the intensity of the same light emitted from the light source 400, and W (α) is the reflectance at the same point of the subject. It is the same regardless of the position of 403. On the other hand, the shift angles θ1 and θ2 vary depending on the positions of the imaging devices 402 and 403. Therefore, the values of cos θ1 and cos θ2 change between the images obtained by imaging from the imaging devices 402 and 403 even though they are the same point (corresponding point).

When A1-A2 is calculated using the equations (7) to (10), the following equation (11) is obtained.
A1-A2 = iW (α) (cos θ1-cos θ2) (11)
From equation (11), it can be seen that the reflected light from the point 404 observed by the imaging devices 402 and 403 having different spatial positions is a multiple of the incident light from the light source 400. This means that the same characteristics as the incident light from the light source 400 can be obtained from the value of A1-A2. Since the result of Expression (11) is the same regardless of the color, the image pickup devices 402 and 403 are replaced with pixel groups for A image and B image for each RGB color to obtain AF image difference values for each color. The color ratio of incident light from the light source 400 (that is, the light source color) can be obtained.

  As described above, in this embodiment, the WB evaluation value is used to determine that the AF image difference value is caused by the specular reflection component, and then the specular reflection component (light source color) of the SAD evaluation value is determined. By performing correction to reduce the influence, it is possible to obtain a corrected SAD evaluation value with high reliability. That is, the corrected SAD evaluation value in which the influence of the specular reflection component is reduced can be obtained without using a special optical element such as a polarizing filter. Therefore, by calculating the defocus amount using the post-correction SAD evaluation value, it is possible to improve the defocus amount calculation accuracy, and hence the AF accuracy.

  In the first embodiment, the influence of the specular reflection component determined using the white balance (WB) evaluation value on the result of correlation calculation (SAD evaluation value) in all (64) pixel blocks that are divided and set. The case where the correction to be reduced is performed to improve the accuracy of the SAD evaluation value has been described. On the other hand, in the second embodiment of the present invention, the accuracy of the SAD evaluation value used for calculating the defocus amount is increased by excluding the pixel block receiving the specular reflection component as the target of the correlation calculation. Will be described.

  FIG. 10 shows the configuration of the imaging apparatus 900 in the present embodiment. In FIG. 10, the same reference numerals as those in the first embodiment are given to the same components as those in the first embodiment (FIG. 1), and the description thereof is omitted.

  In the imaging apparatus 900, a reliability evaluation unit 901 and a focus detection area determination unit 905 are added to the imaging apparatus 100 of the first embodiment. Further, the focus detection unit 906 has a difference described later from the focus detection unit 108 of the first embodiment, and constitutes a calculation unit.

  As in the first embodiment, the analog signal output from the image sensor 102 is converted into a digital signal by the A / D conversion unit 103 and input to the capture unit 104. The capture unit 104 generates an A image signal for each color from the pixel signals corresponding to the A image pixel group for each RGB color output from the A / D conversion unit 103, and for the B image for each RGB color A B image signal for each color is generated from pixel signals corresponding to the pixel group. The capture unit 104 outputs the A and B image signals for each color to the WB calculation correction unit 109, the reliability evaluation unit 901, and the focus detection unit 906. Further, the capture unit 104 generates an imaging pixel signal for each color as a composite signal of pixel signals from the A and B image pixel groups for each RGB color output from the A / D conversion unit 103. These image pickup pixel signals are output to the WB calculation correction unit 109.

  The reliability evaluation unit 901 evaluates the reliability of the pixel signal obtained in the focus detection area described later using the output of the WB calculation correction unit 109. The reliability evaluation unit 901 includes a difference calculation unit 902, a difference value comparison unit 903, and a specular reflection count unit 904. The difference calculation unit 902 and the difference value comparison unit 903 constitute a specular reflection detection unit. The WB calculation correction unit 109, the reliability evaluation unit 901, and the focus detection unit 906 constitute a focus detection device.

  Next, focus detection processing performed by the reliability evaluation unit 901 and the focus detection unit 906 will be described in detail with reference to the flowchart of FIG. The reliability evaluation unit 901 and the focus detection unit 906 perform focus detection processing in steps S21 to S30 illustrated in FIG. 12 according to a focus detection program that is a computer program as a computer.

  In step S21, the difference calculation unit 902 selects two or more selected arbitrarily or automatically according to a predetermined algorithm from the plurality (64) of pixel blocks described in FIG. A focus detection area including a pixel block is set. In step S22, the difference calculation unit 902 integrates the RGB pixel signals obtained by the specific pixel block among the pixel blocks in the focus detection area for each color. Further, in the same step, the difference calculation unit 902 integrates RGB pixel signals obtained in pixel blocks adjacent to the specific pixel block (hereinafter referred to as adjacent pixel blocks) in the focus detection region for each color.

  Subsequently, in step S23, the difference calculation unit 902 obtains a difference value for each color between the integration value of the pixel signal in the specific pixel block and the integration value of the pixel signal in the adjacent pixel block, and the difference value for each color. Is output to the difference value comparison unit 903. In the following description, the integrated value of the pixel signal in each pixel block is also referred to as the output of each pixel block, and the difference value between the output of the specific pixel block and the output of the adjacent pixel block is referred to as a block output difference value.

  In step S24, the difference value comparison unit 903 calculates the color ratio of the block output difference value, and further compares the color ratio of the block output difference value with the color ratio of the WB evaluation value output from the WB calculation correction unit 109. Calculate the value. As the WB evaluation value at this time, it is desirable to use a value in the focus detection region to which the specific and adjacent pixel block to which the block output difference value is calculated belongs. In step S25, the difference value comparison unit 903 determines whether or not the comparison value exceeds a first predetermined value. When the value is equal to or smaller than the predetermined value, it is determined that the specific pixel block receives the specular reflection component. Such a specular reflection component determination method is disclosed in Patent Document 3.

  Here, the calculation of the color ratio of the block output difference value and the color ratio of the WB evaluation value performed by the difference value comparison unit 903 in steps S24 and S25 and a method of comparing these color ratios will be described.

  First, the difference value comparison unit 903 calculates the color ratio of the R and B block output difference values output from the difference calculation unit 902 to the G block output difference value using the equations (2) and (3) shown in the first embodiment. ). Also, the difference value comparison unit 903 calculates the color ratio of the R and B WB evaluation values to the G WB evaluation value by using equations (4) and (5). In this embodiment, the difference value comparison unit 903 sets the color ratio of the R and B WB evaluation values to Rr1 and Br1, and sets the color ratio of the R and B block output difference values to Rr2 and Br2. The comparison value is calculated using equation (6) shown in FIG. The difference value comparison unit 903 determines that the specific pixel block receives the specular reflection component if the comparison value is equal to or less than the first predetermined value, and determines the specular reflection component if it exceeds the first predetermined value. It is determined that no light is received. In the former case, the difference value comparison unit 903 performs an increment output to the specular reflection count unit 904 in step S26. In the latter case, it can be considered that the block output difference value indicates a difference due to the texture of the subject, and the process proceeds to step S28 without performing increment output.

  In step S27, the specular reflection counting unit 904 counts the number of pixel blocks that receive the specular reflection component (first pixel block: hereinafter referred to as specular reflection pixel block) according to the increment output of the difference value comparison unit 903. Is incremented by one. Then, the number of specular reflection pixel blocks after the increment is output to the focus detection area determination unit 905.

  Next, in step S28, the focus detection area determination unit 905 determines whether the focus detection area is suitable for calculating the defocus amount (focus detection) based on the number of specular reflection pixel blocks output from the specular reflection count unit 904. Determine whether or not. The determination result is output to the focus detection unit 906.

  FIG. 11 shows an example of the focus detection area. In this figure, a focus detection area including nine pixel blocks 19, 20, 21, 27, 28, 29, 35, 36, and 37 out of 64 pixel blocks is indicated by being surrounded by a bold line. The three pixel blocks 21, 28 and 37 hatched in the focus detection area are specular reflection pixel blocks. The focus detection area determination unit 905 compares the number of specular reflection pixel blocks output from the specular reflection count unit 904 with a second predetermined value (whether the second predetermined value or less). Or not).

  When it is determined that the focus detection in the focus detection area is “suitable” (for example, the number of specular reflection pixel blocks is equal to or smaller than the second predetermined value “6”), the focus detection unit 906 performs the process of step S29. Do. In step S29, the focus detection unit 906 performs correlation calculation for each pixel block (second pixel block) different from the specular reflection pixel blocks 21, 28, and 37 in the focus detection area. The focus detection unit 906 calculates the defocus amount using the image shift amount of the A image and the B image (signal) in the correlation calculation result (minimum point of the SAD evaluation value), and the result is calculated as a drive control unit. To 112.

  On the other hand, when it is determined that the focus detection in the focus detection region is “unsuitable” (for example, when the number of specular reflection pixel blocks is larger than the second predetermined value “6”), the focus detection unit 906, in step S30, A warning that the focus cannot be detected in the focus detection area is displayed or by voice.

  As described above, in this embodiment, a specular reflection pixel block receiving a specular reflection component is detected and excluded from the pixel block used for focus detection without using a special optical element such as a polarizing filter. Thereby, it can be avoided that the defocus amount is erroneously calculated due to the influence of the specular reflection component and the AF accuracy is lowered. In other words, the defocus amount calculation accuracy and AF accuracy can be improved. Moreover, since the specular reflection pixel block to be excluded is specified after determining that the output for each pixel block is an output by the specular reflection component using the WB evaluation value, the reliability of the specular reflection pixel block characteristics is improved. Can do.

  Further, in this embodiment, when the number of specular reflection pixel blocks is larger than the second predetermined value in the focus detection area selected by the user or the like, focus detection in the focus detection area is limited. A decrease in calculation accuracy and AF accuracy can be prevented.

  In this embodiment, each block output difference value obtained by the difference calculation unit 902 is compared with the WB evaluation value to identify the specular reflection pixel block in the focus detection area, and the focal point is determined based on the number of specular reflection pixel blocks. The case where the suitability of focus detection in the detection area is determined has been described. However, the suitability of focus detection in the focus detection area may be determined according to the result of comparing the value obtained by integrating the outputs of all the pixel blocks in the focus detection area with the WB evaluation value.

  Further, in the present embodiment, the case where the difference value of the integral value of the pixel signal for each pixel block is used to specify the specular reflection pixel block has been described. However, as in the first embodiment, the alignment A is performed. A difference value between the image and the B image signal may be used. In addition to these methods, any calculation method may be used as long as it can specify the specular reflection pixel block.

  Further, in each of the above-described embodiments, the case where AF is performed using only the focus detection result (defocus amount) by the phase difference detection method has been described. However, even if AF is performed using the focus detection result by the contrast detection method. Good.

  Each embodiment described above is only a representative example, and various modifications and changes can be made to each embodiment in carrying out the present invention.

101 Optical unit 1 Unit pixel cell 2 Microlenses 1a and 1b Split PD
108,906 Focus detection unit

Claims (12)

Correlation calculation for a pair of image signals generated using the output from a photoelectric conversion element that photoelectrically converts a pair of object images formed by light beams that have passed through different areas in the exit pupil of the optical system among the light from the object calculating means for calculating a defocus amount performed,
Light source color acquisition means for acquiring information relating to the color of the light source that illuminates the object using a signal obtained by imaging the object ;
It said computing means from the result of comparing the color indicated by the difference in color between the pair of image signals indicating information about the color of the light source, to determine the specular reflection light component from the object of the difference, the determination result The defocus amount is calculated based on the focus detection device. The focus detection apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the calculation unit generates a correlation evaluation value by the correlation calculation, and calculates the defocus amount using the correlation evaluation value. The calculation means generates a plurality of correlation evaluation values using outputs from the plurality of photoelectric conversion elements, reduces the weight of the correlation evaluation value corresponding to the specular reflection light component, and calculates the correlation evaluation values from the plurality of correlation evaluation values. The focus detection apparatus according to claim 2, wherein a defocus amount is calculated. The computing means generates a plurality of correlation evaluation values using outputs from the plurality of photoelectric conversion elements, and calculates the defocus amount using only the correlation evaluation values corresponding to the specular reflection light component. The focus detection apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the focus detection apparatus is a focus detection apparatus. In the focus detection region including two or more pixel blocks among the plurality of pixel blocks respectively corresponding to the outputs from the plurality of photoelectric conversion elements, the calculation unit has a number of first pixel blocks corresponding to the specular reflection component. When the value is equal to or less than a predetermined value, the defocus amount is calculated using the pair of image signals generated using an output from a second pixel block different from the first pixel block included in the focus detection area. focus detecting apparatus according to any one of be calculated from claim 1, wherein 4. When the number of the first pixel blocks is greater than the predetermined value in the focus detection area, the calculation means uses the output from the second pixel block included in the focus detection area. 6. The focus detection apparatus according to claim 5 , wherein calculation of the amount is limited. The focus detection device according to any one of claims 1 to 6 ,
An imaging apparatus comprising a plurality of the photoelectric conversion elements. Calculates a defocus amount using an output from the photoelectric conversion element for photoelectrically converting a pair of object images formed by light beams passing through different regions in the exit pupil of the optical system of the light from the object,
Obtaining information about the color of the light source that illuminates the object using a signal obtained by imaging the object;
Wherein the defocus amount calculated from the result of comparing the color indicated by the difference in color between the pair of image signals indicating information about the color of the light source, to determine the specular reflection light component from said object of said difference, A focus detection method that calculates the defocus amount based on the determination result . A pair of image signals generated using outputs from a plurality of photoelectric conversion elements that respectively photoelectrically convert a pair of object images formed by light beams that have passed through different regions in the exit pupil of the optical system among light from the object Calculating means for calculating a defocus amount of the optical system using the correlation evaluation value;
Light source color acquisition means for acquiring information relating to the color of the light source that illuminates the object using a signal obtained by imaging the object;
The calculation means calculates the defocus amount by reducing the weight of the correlation evaluation value corresponding to the output by the specular reflection light from the object, using the information on the color of the light source and the pair of image signals. A focus detection device. A pair of image signals generated using outputs from a plurality of photoelectric conversion elements that respectively photoelectrically convert a pair of object images formed by light beams that have passed through different regions in the exit pupil of the optical system among light from the object To generate a plurality of correlation evaluation values by calculating a defocus amount of the optical system using the correlation evaluation values,
Obtaining information about the color of the light source that illuminates the object using a signal obtained by imaging the object;
In the calculation of the defocus amount, the information on the color of the light source and the pair of image signals are used to reduce the weight of the correlation evaluation value corresponding to the output by the specularly reflected light from the object, thereby reducing the defocus amount. A focus detection method characterized by calculating. A computer program that causes a computer to perform the following processing:
It is the defocus amount is calculated using the output from the photoelectric conversion element for photoelectrically converting a pair of object images formed by light beams passing through different regions in the exit pupil of the optical system of the light from the object,
Obtaining information on the color of the light source that illuminates the object using a signal obtained by imaging the object;
In the calculation of the defocus amount, the specular reflection component from the object of the difference is determined from the result of comparing the color indicated by the information on the color of the light source and the color indicated by the difference in the pair of image signals , A focus detection program that calculates the defocus amount based on the determination result . A computer program that causes a computer to perform the following processing:
A pair of image signals generated using outputs from a plurality of photoelectric conversion elements that respectively photoelectrically convert a pair of object images formed by light beams that have passed through different regions in the exit pupil of the optical system among light from the object A plurality of correlation evaluation values are generated by performing a correlation calculation on the optical system, and the defocus amount of the optical system is calculated using the correlation evaluation values.
Obtaining information on the color of the light source that illuminates the object using a signal obtained by imaging the object ;
Using the information on the color of the light source and the pair of image signals, the defocus amount is calculated by reducing the weight of the correlation evaluation value corresponding to the output by the specular reflection light from the object. Detection program.