JP6344731B1 - Content evaluation system - Google Patents

Abstract

A content evaluation system capable of stably operating a plurality of user terminals is provided. A content evaluation system includes storage means for storing information including evaluation time information acquired by an evaluation time information acquisition means and content evaluation information acquired by the content evaluation information acquisition means as overall information; Common to the evaluation time information possessed by each of the plurality of overall information, the transmission means for transmitting through the communication line, the overall information collecting means for receiving the entire information transmitted by the transmitting means and collecting the plurality of overall information Based on the integrated determination unit (step S25B) for determining whether or not one overall information and one or more other pieces of overall information can be integrated, and the integrated determination unit determines that integration is possible, Integrated information generating means (step S28B) for generating integrated information obtained by integrating one entire information and one or more other entire information. [Selection] Figure 11

Description

  The present invention relates to a content evaluation system that evaluates content such as lectures, lectures, presentations or performances, business negotiations, interviews, interviews, and movies, animations, commercials, or music.

  Currently, a system is known in which a plurality of mobile terminals can be synchronized to share and integrate information via a server, and a predetermined work can be performed jointly by synchronization.

  For example, in the synchronous input system of Patent Document 1, when a pairing operation is performed on a plurality of client terminals, the server terminal analyzes the request and determines permission for pairing. When pairing is permitted, a response of permission is sent to a plurality of client terminals.

  Thereby, one virtual keyboard comes to be displayed using the screens of a plurality of client terminals. For character input using the virtual keyboard, information on the reference time at the time of input is transmitted to the server terminal, so that a series of input information is sorted by the reference time, and a synchronous operation in the order as entered by the user is realized. (Paragraphs 0072-0074, FIG. 8).

JP-A-2015-88898

  However, in the system of Patent Document 1, since it was necessary to pair a plurality of client terminals first, it took time and effort. In addition, when inputting characters from a client terminal, that is, when integrating multiple pieces of information, communication is always performed with the server terminal, so depending on the radio wave conditions, communication may take a long time or communication may be interrupted. There was a problem of not doing.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above-described points, and an object thereof is to provide a content evaluation system capable of stably operating a plurality of user terminals.

The content evaluation system of the first invention is an evaluation time information acquisition means for acquiring evaluation time information specified from any two of a record start time, a record time, and an end time, and is an evaluation target of the record Information including content evaluation information acquisition means for acquiring content evaluation information, which is evaluation for content, the evaluation time information acquired by the evaluation time information acquisition means, and the content evaluation information acquired by the content evaluation information acquisition means Storage means for storing the entire information of the record, and transmission of the entire information of the record transmitted through the telecommunication line whenever necessary when connected to the telecommunication line , and when not connected thereafter and means receives the entire information of the records sent by the transmission means, a plurality of pre The overall information collecting means for collecting the entire information of the record, based on the commonality of the evaluation time information each entire information of the plurality of the records have, of 1 of the record overall information and other 1 or more Integrated determination means for determining whether or not the entire information of the record can be integrated; and the integrated determination means includes the entire information of the one record and the entire information of the other one or more records. And integrated information generating means for generating integrated information obtained by integrating these , the integrated information generating means uses the entire information of the one record as reference overall information, and the other information Among the evaluation time information included in the whole information of one or a plurality of the records, a period specified from any two of the start time, the recording time, and the end time of the record, Those that overlap at least a portion serial reference the entire information, characterized in that integrated into the reference whole information.

In the first invention, evaluation acquires evaluation time information the time information acquiring means acquires the content evaluation information acquisition unit content evaluation information, the evaluation time information and content evaluation information, the local disk or the like as a whole information record Is stored in the storage means.

Thereafter, the transmission means transmits the entire information of the record through the telecommunications line whenever necessary when connected to the telecommunications line, and when the connection is not established , the whole information collecting means transmits a plurality of overall information. Collect in one place. Each of the plurality of pieces of overall information has evaluation time information. However, the integrated determination unit determines whether or not based on the commonality of the evaluation time information of one whole information and other whole information (not necessarily one). It is determined whether or not the information can be integrated. The integrated information generating unit generates integrated information obtained by integrating the entire information of one and the other total information when it is determined that the integrated information can be integrated. By processing a plurality of pieces of overall information in this way, the system can be operated stably.

Further , when integrating one whole information and other whole information, the integrated information generating means determines one whole information as reference whole information. Of the evaluation time information included in the different overall information, the start time of the record, the period identified from any of the recording time and the end time, select the ones that overlap at least partially with the reference overall information , Integrate into the whole standard information. Thereby, the evaluation time information of the whole reference information and the content evaluation information of other whole information having a partly common period can be integrated and recorded as one relevant evaluation.

Further, in the content evaluation system according to the first aspect, in addition to the evaluation time information, the integration determination unit matches owner information between the entire reference information and the entire information of the one or more other records. It is preferable to determine whether or not integration is possible based on the above.

According to this configuration, the integration determination unit basically determines whether or not a plurality of pieces of overall information can be integrated based on the coincidence of the evaluation time information. The integrated determination unit also determines whether the owner information, venue information, or position information matches . This makes it possible to recommend more relevant integrated information candidates.

Further, in the evaluation system of the contents of the first invention, the start time, it is preferable that the a recording or recording start time of the content.

  According to this configuration, when the evaluator evaluates the content during the recording or reproduction of the content, the evaluation is accepted. The evaluator can evaluate the content in real time during the recording of the content, and can evaluate the content after carefully examining the content during the reproduction of the content. Note that the content to be reproduced is not limited to recording and recording files, but includes a PDF file in which operation information and the like are described.

In the content evaluation system according to the first aspect of the present invention, the content evaluation information includes a primary evaluation that is a simple evaluation indicating a time point of evaluation between a start time and an end time of the record , and an evaluation after the primary evaluation. It is preferable to include secondary evaluation in which the person fills in the contents.

  According to this configuration, the content evaluation information includes a primary evaluation and a secondary evaluation, and the evaluator can perform a primary evaluation on the content (for example, a simple evaluation that adds “+” and “−” to the time point information). Evaluation) and secondary evaluation (e.g., evaluation for entering comments) can be performed. Thereby, integrated integrated information is enriched and the use value of content evaluation information can be increased.

A second invention is a content evaluation system comprising a user terminal device owned by each user and a server device that manages predetermined information, wherein the user terminal device has a record start time, a record time, and an end time. Evaluation time information acquisition means for acquiring evaluation time information specified from any two of them, content evaluation information acquisition means for acquiring content evaluation information that is an evaluation of the content that is the evaluation target of the record, and the evaluation and the evaluation time information the time information acquisition means has acquired, a storage means for storing information including said content evaluation information which the content evaluation information acquisition unit acquires as the whole information of the record, the entire information of the record, at any time when you are connected to a telecommunications line, in time, which was later connected to when you are not connected, the electrical And a transmitting means for transmitting through the signal line, wherein the server apparatus receives the whole information of the record transmitted by the transmitting means, the whole information collection means for collecting the entire information of the plurality of records, Based on the commonality of the evaluation time information possessed by each of the plurality of overall information of the plurality of records, the entire information of one of the plurality of records and the one or more of the other records An integrated determination unit that determines whether or not the entire information can be integrated; and when the determination unit determines that integration is possible, the entire information of the one record is used as reference overall information, and the other 1 or more of said evaluation time information overall information of the record having the start time of the record period specified from any two of the recording time and the end time, Those that overlap at least a portion serial reference the entire information, characterized in that it comprises, as the integrated information generation means for generating integrated information by integrating to the reference the entire information.

In the second invention, the evaluation time information acquisition unit of the user terminal apparatus acquires the evaluation time information, the content evaluation information acquisition unit acquires the content evaluation information, and the evaluation time information and the content evaluation information are the entire information of the record. Is stored in a storage means (such as a local disk) of the user terminal device. Then, the transmission means included in the user terminal device transmits the entire record information to the server device as needed when connected to the telecommunications line through the telecommunications line, and to the server device when connected afterwards when not connected .

  Further, the overall information acquisition unit of the server device acquires the transmitted overall information. Here, each of the plurality of pieces of overall information has evaluation time information. However, the integrated determination unit of the server device uses the common evaluation time information of one piece of whole information and other pieces of whole information (not necessarily one). Based on the property, it is determined whether or not it is possible to integrate such information.

The integrated information generating means of the server apparatus determines the one whole information as the reference whole information when integrating the one whole information and the other whole information. Of the evaluation time information included in the different overall information, the start time of the record, the period identified from any of the recording time and the end time, select the ones that overlap at least partially with the reference overall information , Integrate into the whole standard information. After the plurality of overall information is transmitted from the user terminal device, it is stored in the overall information collecting means of the server device and both devices are in a synchronized state, so that the user terminal device can be operated stably. By integrating the evaluation time information of the overall reference information and the content evaluation information of other overall information having a partly common period, it can be recorded as one relevant evaluation.

It is the schematic of the content evaluation system which is embodiment of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the internal structure of the server of the system of FIG. It is a block diagram which shows the internal structure of the terminal of the system of FIG. It is a flowchart of evaluation routine R1 performed at a user terminal. It is an example of the screen display (standby screen) of a terminal. It is an example of the screen display (primary evaluation input screen) of a terminal. It is an example of the screen display (record storage screen) of the terminal. It is an example of the screen display (secondary evaluation standby screen) of a terminal. It is an example of the screen display (secondary evaluation input screen) of a terminal. It is a flowchart of synchronous routine R2 performed with a server and a user terminal. It is a flowchart of the record version comparison process of synchronous routine R2. It is a flowchart of evaluation routine R3 performed with a server and a user terminal. It is an example of the data structure of a record . It is an example of the header information in a record . It is a figure explaining integration of a record . It is an example of the data structure of the record after integration. It is an example of the screen display (statistical display of a content piece) of a terminal.

  Below, the content evaluation system which is embodiment of this invention is demonstrated, referring drawings.

  First, FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a content evaluation system 1 of the present embodiment. As shown in the figure, the content evaluation system 1 mainly includes a server 10 (“server apparatus” of the present invention) and user terminals 20A to 20C operated by users (viewers and evaluators) who evaluate the content (the present invention). "User terminal device"). For convenience of explanation, the number of user terminals is three, but there are theoretically infinite number of such user terminals.

  The server 10 and user terminals 20A to 20C (hereinafter referred to as user terminals 20) can transmit and receive data to and from each other by a network NW (communication path), for example, a communication protocol such as TCP / IP. The network NW is constructed by, for example, the Internet, a LAN (Local Area Network), a dedicated communication line (for example, a CATV line), a mobile communication network (including a base station), or a gateway.

  Next, FIG. 2 shows an internal configuration diagram of the server 10. The server 10 is a device in which a mass storage device 13, a system control unit 15, and a data communication unit 17 cooperate via a system bus 11.

  The large-capacity storage device 13 (the “whole information collecting means” of the present invention) is configured by, for example, a hard disk device, SSD (Solid State Drive), etc., and stores various programs such as operating system and server software. ing.

  Further, as shown in the figure, the large-capacity storage device 13 includes an identification information database (hereinafter referred to as DB) 13a, a content DB 13b, and evaluation information and content pieces DB 13c.

  Various programs may be acquired from another server or the like via the network NW, or may be read via various drive devices. That is, various programs stored in the mass storage device 13 (including programs for executing server-side processing of “synchronization routine R2” and “integration routine R3” described later) can be transmitted via the network NW. It can also be transferred by recording on a computer-readable recording medium.

  The system control unit 15 (“integration determination unit”, “integrated information generation unit” of the present invention) is constituted by a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 15a, a ROM (Read Only Memory) 15b, a RAM (Random Access Memory) 15c, and the like. It is configured and functions as a computer. Various functions are realized by the CPU 15a reading and executing various programs stored in the ROM 15b and the large-capacity storage device 13.

  The data communication unit 17 is connected to the network NW described above, and transmits / receives various data to / from other devices such as the user terminal 20.

  Next, FIG. 3 shows an internal configuration diagram of the user terminal 20. The user terminal 20 is a device in which a mass storage device 23, a system control unit 25, an input unit 27, an output unit 29, and a data communication unit 31 cooperate with each other via a system bus 21.

Examples of the user terminal 20 include a smartphone, a mobile phone, a personal computer (PC), a tablet PC, a feature phone, and a PDA (Personal Digital Assistant). As an example of media information to be described later, since recorded content is common, it is preferable that the user terminal has a built-in camera like a smartphone or a tablet PC. However, the user terminal is not limited to a device incorporating a camera.

  The large-capacity storage device 23 (“storage means” of the present invention) is constituted by, for example, a hard disk device, SSD, flash memory, etc., and stores various programs such as an operating system and software for user terminals.

  These various programs may be acquired from another server device or the like via the network NW, or may be read via various drive devices. That is, various programs stored in the large-capacity storage device 23 (including programs for executing processing on the user terminal 20 side of “synchronization routine R2” and “integration routine R3” described later) are transmitted via the network NW. The data can be transmitted, and can be recorded and transferred to a computer-readable recording medium.

  The system control unit 25 (“evaluation time information acquisition unit” and “content evaluation information acquisition unit” of the present invention) includes a CPU 25a, a ROM 25b, a RAM 25c, and the like, and functions as a computer. Various functions are realized by the CPU 25a reading and executing various programs stored in the ROM 25b and the large-capacity storage device 23.

  The input unit 27 is an input device such as a keyboard, mouse, touch pad, touch panel, stylus pen, voice input device, acceleration sensor, or tilt sensor. The output unit 29 is, for example, a display that displays video and / or a speaker that emits sound.

  The data communication unit 31 (“transmission unit” of the present invention) is connected to the network NW described above, and transmits and receives various data to and from other devices such as the server 10.

  Next, an evaluation routine R1 executed by the user terminal 20 in the content evaluation system will be described with reference to FIG. In addition, in order to supplement the description of each step of the evaluation routine R1, FIGS.

  The evaluation routine R1 is a process executed by the user terminal 20. Here, a case will be described as an example where a recorded content in which a demonstration of another person (an example of the “content” of the present invention) is recorded and further evaluated.

  Note that the evaluation routine R1 may be executed, for example, when an application that executes the evaluation routine R1 is started in the user terminal 20, or when the user terminal 20 is a dedicated machine, the power is turned on. In this case, the evaluation routine R1 may be executed.

  First, the system control unit 25 of the user terminal 20 causes the output unit 29 to display a standby screen that is in an input standby state for starting evaluation (step S11). FIG. 5 is an example in which a standby screen is displayed on the display 41 of the user terminal 20. In the following description, it is assumed that the display 41 is a touch panel.

  The standby screen is composed of items necessary for evaluating the contents of “evaluation criteria”, “FB (feedback) evaluation input during recording”, “setting of in-flight mode”, “advanced function”, and “PDF shooting”. ing. In addition, since an image (not recorded) by the camera is displayed behind these items, it can be used as a reference for confirming the arrangement of persons and the like.

  For example, “FB evaluation input during recording” can be switched by an on / off button. Further, when “only FB” of “advance function” is selected, it is possible to set only the evaluation data without including recording and recording data as record information to be integrated (details will be described later). Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S12.

  In addition, when evaluating an existing recording / recording file instead of evaluating it while recording / recording real-time content, select “Record Duplication” in “Advanced Function” to select the file. Can be specified.

  In step S12, the system control unit 25 determines whether to start evaluation. This determination is made based on whether or not the start button 46 below the standby screen has been operated by the user within a predetermined time from the start of display of the standby screen. Note that the user terminal 20 may receive a signal from the server 10 to determine the start of evaluation.

  When it is determined that the evaluation has not started yet (step S12: NO), the system control unit 25 loops until the user starts the evaluation. That is, the standby screen is displayed while the standby screen is displayed, waiting for user input. On the other hand, when it is determined that the evaluation is started (step S12: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S13.

  In step S <b> 13, the system control unit 25 causes the output unit 29 to display an evaluation input screen. For example, when evaluating a moving image (recorded content), recording by a camera is started here. FIG. 6 is an example in which an evaluation input screen (primary evaluation input screen) on which a primary evaluation that is simple, intuitive, and sequential evaluation of the user is input is displayed on the display 41 of the user terminal 20. Note that an evaluation result bar 48 to be described later is not displayed at the time when recording is started.

  In the evaluation input screen, an evaluation display unit 45 is arranged below the camera screen unit 43. The camera screen unit 43 is an area where, for example, an image from a camera built in the user terminal 20 or connected to the user terminal 20 is displayed. The evaluation display unit 45 is an area in which information including evaluation input by the user (“content evaluation information” of the present invention) is displayed.

  In the evaluation display unit 45, an evaluation stage display unit 45A is arranged on the right side, and an evaluation result display unit 45B is arranged on the left side. As shown in FIG. 6, the evaluation stage display unit 45A is divided into five areas in the vertical direction, and shows a symbol “++” indicating an evaluation that the two areas are good from the top, an evaluation that it is slightly good. The symbol “+” is marked.

  In addition, a symbol “-” indicating bad evaluation and a symbol “-” indicating slightly bad evaluation are written in two regions from the bottom. In the middle area, the elapsed time from the start of evaluation, that is, the elapsed time from the start of recording is displayed.

  Further, the evaluation result display unit 45B is divided into five regions in the vertical direction, similarly to the evaluation stage display unit 45A. The evaluation result bar 48 is a bar display that starts from the boundary between the evaluation stage display unit 45A and the evaluation result display unit 45B and moves to the left as time passes.

  Further, when the user performs an operation such as tapping at the time when the evaluation input screen is displayed, an evaluation pop-up 47 is displayed in the area of the camera screen unit 43. Then, the user who is recording or viewing the content can input the intuitive evaluation (primary evaluation) felt at that time by swiping the display 41 of the user terminal 20 (the area of the camera screen unit 43). When the primary evaluation operation is accepted.

  As an operation of the primary evaluation, for example, an evaluation “+” is input that it is slightly better to swipe the area of the camera screen unit 43 upward once, and it is preferable to swipe upward twice within a predetermined time. Evaluation “++” is entered.

  In addition, if the area of the camera screen unit 43 is swiped down once, the evaluation “−” is input as being slightly bad, and if it is swiped down twice within a certain time, the evaluation “−−” is input as bad. Is done.

  While the evaluation is not input, the evaluation result bar 48 appears from the boundary between the middle region of the evaluation stage display unit 45A where the elapsed time is displayed and the evaluation result display unit 45B. When the evaluation is input, the evaluation result bar 48 is determined from the boundary between the evaluation result display unit 45B and a region where a symbol (for example, “++”) indicating the input evaluation is written for a certain time from the input of the evaluation. Appears. As a result, as shown in FIG. 6, the evaluation input results are displayed in time series on the evaluation input screen. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S14.

  In step S14, the system control unit 25 determines whether or not the above-described primary evaluation operation has been detected. When it is determined that the primary evaluation operation has been detected (step S14: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S15. On the other hand, when it is determined that the primary evaluation operation has not yet been detected (step S14: NO), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S17.

In step S15, the system control unit 25 records primary evaluation information. Here, the primary evaluation information includes inter primary evaluation operation initiated time or that period, the contents of the primary evaluation ( "content evaluation information" of the present invention). The time data is based on the time of the clock in each user terminal, but if the time is deviated from the exact time, a method for obtaining the exact time from radio waves and adjusting the deviation is adopted. Also good. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S16.

  In step S16, the system control unit 25 generates and stores a content piece. Here, the content piece is a continuous or intermittent part of the recorded content, and is generated based on the primary evaluation information stored in the mass storage device 23 of the user terminal 20.

  The content piece can also be generated by, for example, cutting out a predetermined time or a predetermined time (for example, 10 seconds before and after) before and after the time when the primary evaluation operation of the recorded content is performed. In this way, when generating a content piece, the primary evaluation that is a reference for cutting out and the content piece are linked and recorded. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S17.

  In step S17, the system control unit 25 determines whether or not to end the evaluation. This determination is made based on, for example, whether or not the end button 49 (see FIG. 6) displayed in the camera screen portion 43 of the evaluation input screen is operated by the user. Note that, in a mode in which content recorded in advance is reproduced, the evaluation is automatically terminated when the reproduction of the content is completed.

  When it is determined that the evaluation is not yet finished (step S17: NO), the system control unit 25 returns to step S14 and performs the subsequent processing. On the other hand, when it is determined to end the evaluation (step S17: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S18.

  In step S18, the system control unit 25 causes the output unit 29 to display a record storage screen. Here, the user inputs the owner of the record. FIG. 7 is an example in which a record storage screen is displayed on the display 41 of the user terminal 20. The record storage screen includes items such as “record name”, “shared by team”, and “record owner”.

  For example, by setting the owner (owner) of the record as the presenter of the presentation, in addition to the period information specified from any two of the record start time, record time, and end time, the same owner Records can be recognized as integration candidates based on information. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S19.

  In step S19, the system control unit 25 causes the output unit 29 to display a secondary evaluation standby screen. FIG. 8 is an example in which a secondary evaluation standby screen is displayed on the display 41 of the user terminal 20. On the secondary evaluation stand-by screen, a representative image display unit 50 is arranged above and an evaluation list unit 51 is arranged below.

  The representative image display unit 50 displays the recorded demonstration content, which is an extracted image extracted from the recorded content by the primary evaluation. The user can confirm which part of the content has been subjected to the primary evaluation by viewing the extracted image.

  The evaluation list section 51 includes an overall evaluation column 53 and an individual evaluation column 55. The user can input an overall evaluation (overall comment) for the content by tapping the overall evaluation column 53 of the evaluation list unit 51.

  The individual evaluation column 55 is generated corresponding to each primary evaluation. In FIG. 8, two individual evaluation fields 55a and 55b are generated. The contents of the primary evaluation corresponding to each individual evaluation and the playback time of the content piece linked to the primary evaluation in the content are shown. Contains information.

  On the secondary evaluation standby screen, the user can input a more detailed secondary evaluation for the primary evaluation corresponding to the selected individual evaluation field 55 by tapping the area of the individual evaluation field 55. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S20.

  In step S20, the system control unit 25 performs input standby for secondary evaluation. The secondary evaluation shifts when the user taps the area of the individual evaluation column 55 on the secondary evaluation standby screen (see FIG. 8).

  FIG. 9 is an example in which a secondary evaluation input screen is displayed on the display 41 of the user terminal 20. As shown in the figure, on the secondary evaluation input screen, a reproduction screen portion 57 is disposed above and a secondary evaluation input screen portion 59 is disposed below the reproduction screen portion 57. In the reproduction screen unit 57, the content piece corresponding to the selected individual evaluation and associated with the primary evaluation is reproduced.

  Further, the secondary evaluation input screen section 59 includes a comment selection field 61 and a free comment field 63. The user can tap the area of the comment selection column 61 to select a predetermined comment, or tap the area of the free comment column 63 to input characters and perform secondary evaluation. Then, it progresses to step S21.

  In step S <b> 21, the system control unit 25 determines whether or not to end the secondary evaluation input standby. This determination is made based on, for example, whether or not the user has operated the end button 49 displayed on the reproduction screen portion 57 of the secondary evaluation input screen.

  When it is determined that the input standby for the secondary evaluation is not finished (step S21: NO), the system control unit 25 returns to step S20 and performs the subsequent processing. On the other hand, when it is determined that the input standby for the secondary evaluation is to be ended (step S21: YES), the system control unit 25 ends the evaluation routine R1.

  Next, the synchronization routine R2 executed between the server 10 and the user terminal 20 in the content evaluation system will be described with reference to FIGS. 10A and 10B.

  The synchronization routine R <b> 2 is a process executed by data transmission / reception between the server 10 and the user terminal 20, and record information (described later) is synchronized between the server 10 and the user terminal 20 by this process.

  First, the data communication unit 31 of the user terminal 20 transmits the identification information ID (step S1A). Specifically, the data communication unit 31 transmits an identification information ID (details will be described later) identifying the current record information to the server 10. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S2A.

  Here, the system control unit 15 of the server 10 performs an ID authentication process after step S1A (step S1B). This is a process of authenticating the identification information ID transmitted from the user terminal 20. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S2B.

  In step S2B, the data communication unit 17 of the server 10 transmits success or failure of the ID authentication process. Specifically, the data communication unit 17 transmits success or failure of the ID authentication process in step S1A to the user terminal 20. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S3B.

  Here, when returning to the process of the user terminal 20, in step S2A, the system control unit 25 of the user terminal 20 determines whether or not the success or failure of the ID authentication process has been received. If it is determined that the success or failure of the ID authentication process has not yet been received (step S2A: NO), the system control unit 25 loops until receiving the success or failure of the ID authentication process. On the other hand, when it is determined that the success or failure of the ID authentication process has been received (step S2A: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S3A.

  In step S3A, the system control unit 25 determines whether or not the result of the ID authentication has been successful. If the result of the ID authentication is a failure (step S3A: NO), the system control unit 25 returns to step S1A. On the other hand, if the result of the ID authentication is successful (step S3A: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S4A.

  In step S4A, the system control unit 25 acquires record information from the database. Here, the record information includes recorded contents (including recorded contents) stored in the mass storage device 23 (database) of the user terminal 20 and evaluation information (primary information) by the evaluation routine R1 (see FIG. 4). And / or a content piece related to primary evaluation information and / or secondary evaluation information). Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S5A.

In step S5A, the system control unit 25 determines whether or not it is connected to the network. If currently not connected to the network (step S5A: NO), the system control unit 25 ends the synchronization routine R2. On the other hand, if currently connected to the network (step S5A: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S6A .

In step S6A, the data communication unit 31 transmits record information. Specifically, the data communication unit 31 transmits the record information acquired in step S4A to the server 10. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S7A .

  Here, returning to the processing of the server 10, in step S3B, the system control unit 15 determines whether or not record information has been received. When it is determined that the record information has not been received yet (step S3B: NO), the system control unit 15 loops until the record information is received. On the other hand, when it is determined that the record information has been received (step S3B: YES), the system control unit 15 proceeds to step S4B.

  In step S4B, the system control unit 15 determines whether there is matching record information. When there is record information in which the period specified from any two of the start time, the recording time, and the end time is partially matched (step S4B: YES), the system control unit 15 proceeds to step S6B. On the other hand, when there is no matching record (step S4B: NO), the system control unit 15 proceeds to step S5B.

  In step S5B, the system control unit 15 stores the current record information. Specifically, the record information transmitted from the user terminal 20 is stored in the mass storage device 13 of the server 10. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S6B.

  In step S6B, the data communication unit 17 transmits matching record information. Specifically, the data communication unit 17 transmits the matching record information searched in step S4B to the user terminal 20. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S7B.

  Here, when returning to the processing of the user terminal 20, in step S7A, the system control unit 25 determines whether or not record information has been received. When it is determined that the record information has not been received yet (step S7A: NO), the system control unit 25 loops until the record information is received. On the other hand, when it is determined that the record information has been received (step S7A: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S8A.

  In step S8A, the system control unit 25 performs a record version comparison process. Details of the record version comparison process will be described below with reference to FIG. 10B.

  In the following process, the system control unit 25 compares the version information of the record that was last synchronized with the version of the record information in the user terminal and the version of the record information in the server received in step S7A.

  First, the system control unit 25 determines whether the version of the record information last synchronized is the same as the version of the record information in the user terminal and the version of the record information in the server (Step S8A-). 1). When both are the same (step S8A-1: YES), the system control unit 25 ends the record version comparison process. This case is referred to as case C1. On the other hand, when both are not the same (step S8A-1: NO), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S8A-2.

  In step S8A-2, the system control unit 25 uses the record information version in the user terminal that is the same as the version of the record information that was synchronized last, and the record information version in the server that was synchronized last. Determine if it is higher than the version. When this condition is not satisfied (step S8A-2: NO), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S8A-5. On the other hand, when this condition is satisfied (step S8A-2: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S8A-3. This case is referred to as case C2.

  In step S8A-3, the system control unit 25 overwrites the record information in the user terminal with the record information in the server. By this processing, the record information in the server having a higher version is stored in the mass storage device 23 of the user terminal 20. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S8A-4.

  In step S8A-4, the system control unit 25 updates the version of the record information. By this process, the record information in the server stored in step S8A-3 is determined as the final synchronization. Thereafter, the record version comparison process ends.

  Next, a case where the condition of step S8A-2 is not satisfied will be described. In this case, the system control unit 25 determines whether both the version of the record information in the user terminal and the version of the record information in the server are higher than the version of the record information synchronized last (step S8A-). 5).

  When this condition is not satisfied (step S8A-5: NO), the system control unit 25 ends the record version comparison process. This case is referred to as case C3. On the other hand, when this condition is satisfied (step S8A-5: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S8A-6.

  In step S8A-6, the system control unit 25 causes the output unit 29 to display a selection message. Specifically, a message stating “which of the record information in the user terminal and the record information in the server applies” is displayed on the display 41 of the user terminal 20. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S8A-7.

  In step S8A-7, the system control unit 25 determines whether to apply the record information in the server. When the record information in the server is applied (step S8A-7: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S8A-3 and performs the subsequent processing. This case is referred to as case C4.

  On the other hand, when the record information in the server is not applied (step S8A-7: NO), the record information in the user terminal is applied, and the system control unit 25 ends the record version comparison process. This case is referred to as Case C5.

  Returning to FIG. 10A, in the record version comparison process in step S8A, in cases C1, C2, and C4, the system control unit 25 ends the synchronization routine R2. On the other hand, if it is case C3 or C5 in the record version comparison process, the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S9A.

  In step S9A, the data communication unit 31 transmits record information. Here, the data communication unit 31 transmits the record information in the user terminal to be applied this time to the server 10. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S10A.

  Here, returning to the processing of the server 10, in step S7B, the system control unit 15 determines whether or not record information has been received. When it is determined that the record information has not been received yet (step S7B: NO), the system control unit 15 loops until the record information is received. On the other hand, when it is determined that the record information has been received (step S7B: YES), the system control unit 15 proceeds to step S8B.

  In step S8B, the system control unit 15 overwrites the record information in the server with the record information of the user terminal. By this process, the record in the user terminal 20 having a higher version is stored in the mass storage device 13 of the server 10. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S9B.

  In step S9B, the system control unit 25 updates the version information of the record. With this process, the record information in the user terminal 20 stored in step S9B is confirmed as the final synchronization. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S10B.

  In step S10B, the data communication unit 17 transmits a synchronization completion notification. Specifically, the data communication unit 17 transmits to the user terminal 20 that the synchronization process has been completed in step S9B. Thereafter, the synchronization routine R2 is terminated.

  Here, when returning to the processing of the user terminal 20, in step S10A, the system control unit 25 determines whether or not a completion notification has been received. When it is determined that the completion notification has not yet been received (step S10A: NO), the system control unit 25 loops until the completion notification is received. On the other hand, when it is determined that the completion notification has been received (step S10A: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S11A.

  Finally, in step S11A, the system control unit 25 updates the version of the record information. With this process, the record information is determined as the final synchronization even in case C3 or C5 in the record version comparison process in step S8A. Thereafter, the synchronization routine R2 is terminated.

Thus, in the synchronization routine R2, the record information is synchronized between the server 10 and the user terminal 20. Note that this synchronization processing may be performed automatically or manually after a while when not connected to the Internet.

  Next, an integration routine R3 executed by the server 10 and the user terminal 20 in the content evaluation system will be described with reference to FIG. In addition, in order to supplement the description of each step of the integration routine R3, FIGS.

The integration routine R3 is a process executed by data transmission / reception between the server 10 and the user terminal 20, and a plurality of record information is integrated into one by this process.

  First, the data communication unit 31 of the user terminal 20 transmits the identification information ID (step S21A). Specifically, the data communication unit 31 transmits an identification information ID for identifying the current record to the server 10. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S22A.

  Here, the system control unit 15 of the server 10 performs an ID authentication process after step S21A (step S21B). Specifically, it is a process of authenticating the identification information ID transmitted from the user terminal 20. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S22B.

  In step S22B, the data communication unit 17 of the server 10 transmits success or failure of the ID authentication process. Specifically, the data communication unit 17 transmits success or failure of the ID authentication process in step S21B to the user terminal 20. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S23B.

  Here, when returning to the process of the user terminal 20, in step S22A, the system control unit 25 determines whether or not the success or failure of the ID authentication process has been received. When it is determined that the success or failure of the ID authentication process has not yet been received (step S22A: NO), the system control unit 25 loops until receiving the success or failure of the ID authentication process. On the other hand, when it is determined that the success or failure of the ID authentication process has been received (step S22A: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S23A.

  In step S23A, the system control unit 25 determines whether or not the result of the ID authentication has been successful. When the result of the ID authentication is a failure (step S23A: NO), the system control unit 25 returns to step S21A. On the other hand, when the result of the ID authentication is successful (step S23A: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S24A.

In step S24A, the data communication unit 31 inquires about the evaluation record list. Specifically, the server 10 is inquired about the list of record information of the user terminal 20. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S25A.

Here, FIG. 12 shows the data structure of the above-described record information (record) .

  One record includes “media information”, “FB (Feed Back) information”, and “header information” (see “record A”). An example of “media information” is “moving image” data, but “audio” data (see “record B”) or a PDF file including operation information may be used. This PDF file is recorded by selecting “PDF shooting” on the standby screen (advance function) shown in FIG. 5 and displaying and operating the PDF file.

  Since a plurality of “FB information” may be generated for one record, “FBA-1” to “FBA-3” are shown as examples. One record may be only one of “media information” and “FB information”.

  FIG. 13 shows the contents of “header information”. As illustrated, the “header information” includes “identification information ID”, “evaluation start time”, “evaluation end time”, “owner ID”, and “terminal ID”. It should be noted that even when any two of “evaluation start time” and “evaluation time” or “evaluation end time” and “evaluation time” are combined, it can be information when integrating the records. The “terminal ID” is an ID for identifying the user terminal 20.

  Here, returning to the processing of the server 10, in step S23B, the system control unit 15 determines whether or not an inquiry has been received. When it is determined that the inquiry has not been received yet (step S23B: NO), the system control unit 15 loops until the inquiry is received. On the other hand, when it is determined that the inquiry has been received (step S23B: YES), the system control unit 15 proceeds to step S24B.

In step S24B, the system control unit 15 searches for an integrable file. Here, FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating records (header information) transmitted from the plurality of user terminals 20 to the server 10.

(A) The storage record 1 is “header information” of the record transmitted to the server 10 in the synchronization routine R2. The system control unit 15, one or more records (e.g., save record 1-3 in FIG. 14) to search for available integrated file in. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S25B.

  In step S25B, the system control unit 15 determines whether there is a file that can be integrated. When it is determined that there is no file that can be integrated (step S25B: NO), the system control unit 15 ends the integration routine R3. On the other hand, when it is determined that there is a file that can be integrated (step S25B: YES), the system control unit 15 proceeds to step S26B.

  In step S26B, the data communication unit 17 transmits a list of files that can be integrated. Note that (b) storage record 2 and (c) storage record 3 in FIG. 14 are data stored in the large-capacity storage device 13 (content DB 13b).

  (B) Concerning the storage record 2, (a) there is no overlap of periods specified from the storage record 1 and the “evaluation start time” and “evaluation end time”, so integration is impossible. However, regarding (c) saved record 3, the period specified from (a) saved record 1 and "evaluation start time" and "evaluation end time" partially overlaps and can be integrated. Accordingly, the data communication unit 17 transmits to the user terminal 20 (c) a list of files that can be integrated including the saved record 3.

Further, the fact that the “owner ID” of each record matches is added to the integration condition. Note that “terminal IDs” do not need to match. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S27B.

  Here, when returning to the processing of the user terminal 20, in step S25A, the system control unit 25 determines whether or not a list of files that can be integrated has been received. When it is determined that the list of files that can be integrated has not been received yet (step S25A: NO), the system control unit 25 ends the integration routine R3. On the other hand, if it is determined that a file that can be integrated has been received (step S25A: YES), the system control unit 25 proceeds to step S26A.

  In step S26A, the system control unit 25 determines whether an integration operation has been accepted. For example, the integration operation is accepted when the user operates an “integration button” (not shown) displayed on the screen of the user terminal 20.

  If it is determined that the integration operation has not yet been accepted (step S26A: NO), the system control unit 25 ends the integration routine R3. On the other hand, when it determines with integrated operation having been received (step S26A: YES), the system control part 25 progresses to step S27A.

  In step S27A, the data communication unit 31 transmits an integration request. Specifically, the data communication unit 31 transmits an integration request to the server 10. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S28A.

  Here, returning to the processing of the server 10, in step S27B, the system control unit 15 determines whether or not an integration request has been received. If it is determined that the integration request has not been received (step S27B: NO), the system control unit 15 ends the integration routine R3. On the other hand, when it is determined that the integration request has been received (step S27B: YES), the system control unit 15 proceeds to step S28B.

In step S28B, the system control unit 15 executes integration processing. Specifically, the system control unit 15 acquires the evaluation start time and evaluation end time of the integration destination data. In the example of FIG. 14, since the integration destination data is (a) saved record 1 (“reference entire information” of the present invention), the evaluation start time (2017/06/01/13: 30) and evaluation end of this file The time (2017/06/01/14: 00) is acquired.

  Thereafter, the system control unit 15 generates an integrated file. Thereby, an integrated file ("integrated information" of the present invention) is generated from (a) stored record 1 and (c) stored record 3 in the example of FIG.

Here, FIG. 15 shows the data structure of the record after integration. As shown in the drawing, one record is composed of “media information”, “FB (Feed Back) information”, and “header information”. However, when “record A” and “record B” in FIG. 11 are integrated, “media information” exists in “record B” in addition to “moving picture A” that existed in “record A”. The “speech B” that was being played is included.

  Similarly, “FB information” includes “FBB-1” to “FBA-1” to “FBA-3” that existed in “record B” in addition to “FBA-1” to “FBA-3” that existed in “record A”. FBB-3 "is included. The “header information” maintains the “header information A” on the integrated side.

  Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S29B. It should be noted that some of the primary evaluation information and content pieces as described above may be integrated without being deleted.

  In step S29B, the data communication unit 17 transmits the integrated file. Specifically, the data communication unit 17 transmits the integrated file created in step S28B to the user terminal 20. Thereafter, the integration routine R3 is terminated.

  Here, when returning to the processing of the user terminal 20, in step S28A, the system control unit 25 determines whether or not an integrated file has been received. When it is determined that the integrated file has not yet been received (step S28A: NO), the system control unit 25 loops until the integrated file is received. On the other hand, when it is determined that the integrated file has been received (step S28A: YES), the system control unit 25 ends the integration routine R3.

As described above, the server 10 and the user terminal 20 are linked to determine whether a plurality of records can be integrated, and when it is determined that integration is possible, the integration is executed. In the above example, two records are integrated, but it is also possible to integrate three or more records .

The record integration is a simple mode in which the user simply operates the “integration button” displayed on the screen of the user terminal 20. For example, the recording content (video) of the person giving the presentation and the evaluation thereof may be integrated, or the recording content of the person giving the presentation and the recording content of the slide of the presentation may be integrated. . Two or more recorded contents can be integrated, and there is no limit on the number. A PDF file including operation information is also an object of integration.

Furthermore, the records may be automatically integrated if the integration conditions such as the evaluation start time and the evaluation end time and the integration conditions for matching the owner ID are satisfied. In this case, the contents may have no correlation.

The media information of the record includes a playback content generated when the recorded content is played back. The user can also evaluate the playback content and integrate the evaluation. In this case, the reproduction start time is set as the evaluation start time.

  You may make it take statistics about which part and how many people are evaluating with respect to a recording content or reproduction | regeneration content, and you may make it display as statistical information. Thereby, it can be used to analyze the content and the reaction of the viewer.

  FIG. 16 shows a display in which the distribution of content pieces is easy to see instead of FIG. By displaying the evaluation status for each evaluator around the central time axis, the number of evaluations and the evaluation time according to the evaluator can be visually recognized.

  An evaluation of a predetermined standard (for example, a person who made a presentation previously) is defined for recorded content or playback content, and an evaluation that can be compared with the standard is performed and displayed as evaluation information. Good. Also by this, it is possible to analyze contents and the like and extract useful information.

  The configuration of the terminal or server, the evaluation routines, or the display and input modes in the above-described embodiments are merely examples, and can be changed as appropriate according to the application. For example, each step in each evaluation routine may be performed by either the server or the user terminal regardless of the above example.

10 server 11 system bus 13 mass storage device 15 system control unit 17 data communication unit 20 user terminal 21 system bus 23 mass storage device 25 system control unit 27 input unit 29 output unit 31 data communication unit

Claims (5)

Start time of the record, and evaluation time information acquiring means for acquiring evaluation time information identified either from two of the recording time and the end time,
Content evaluation information acquisition means for acquiring content evaluation information that is an evaluation of the content that is the evaluation target of the record ;
Storage means for storing information including the evaluation time information acquired by the evaluation time information acquisition means and the content evaluation information acquired by the content evaluation information acquisition means as overall information of the record ;
Transmitting means for transmitting the entire information of the record through the telecommunications line at any time when connected to the telecommunications line , and at the subsequent connection when not connected ,
Receiving overall information of the record transmitted by the transmitting means, and collecting overall information of a plurality of the records ,
Whether or not the overall information of one record and the overall information of one or more other records can be integrated based on the commonality of the evaluation time information included in each of the overall information of the plurality of records Integrated determination means for determining whether or not
Integrated information generating means for generating integrated information obtained by integrating the whole information of the one record and the whole information of the other one or more records when the integrated judging means determines that the whole information of the other one or more records can be integrated; , equipped with a,
The integrated information generation means uses the overall information of the one record as reference overall information, and among the evaluation time information included in the overall information of the one or more other records, the start time and recording time of the record And a content evaluation system in which a period specified from any two of the end times and at least a part of the reference whole information is integrated into the whole reference information . The integration determination means determines whether or not integration is possible based on a match of owner information between the entire reference information and the entire information of the one or more other records in addition to the evaluation time information. The content evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the determination is performed. The start time, the content evaluation system according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the a recording or recording start time of the content. The content evaluation information includes a primary evaluation that is a simple evaluation indicating the time of evaluation between the start time and the end time of the record , and a secondary evaluation in which the evaluator enters the contents after the primary evaluation. The content evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the content evaluation system is included. A content evaluation system comprising a user terminal device owned by each user and a server device that manages predetermined information,
The user terminal device
Start time of the record, and evaluation time information acquiring means for acquiring evaluation time information identified either from two of the recording time and the end time,
Content evaluation information acquisition means for acquiring content evaluation information that is an evaluation of the content that is the evaluation target of the record ;
Storage means for storing information including the evaluation time information acquired by the evaluation time information acquisition means and the content evaluation information acquired by the content evaluation information acquisition means as overall information of the record ;
Transmitting means for transmitting the entire information of the record through the telecommunications line at any time when connected to the telecommunications line , and when connected afterwards when not connected ,
The server device
Receiving overall information of the record transmitted by the transmitting means, and collecting overall information of a plurality of the records ,
Based on the commonality of the evaluation time information possessed by each of the plurality of overall information of the plurality of records, the entire information of one of the plurality of records and the one or more of the other records Integrated determination means for determining whether or not the entire information can be integrated;
When said determination means determines that can integrate, the one of the whole information of the record as a reference the entire information, among the evaluation time information the entire information of another one or more of the records has, of the record Integrated information generating means for generating integrated information in which a period specified from any two of a start time, a recording time, and an end time is integrated with the entire reference information, at least partially overlapping with the entire reference information A content evaluation system comprising:

Images