JP6025233B1 - Disaster action support system - Google Patents

Abstract

[PROBLEMS] To reduce the time from disaster detection to completion of initial disaster response and efficiently prevent disaster damage by efficiently assigning each task specified in SOP to workers on site. Provide an action support system. SOP database 101, spatial information database 102, attribute information database 103, disaster information receiving unit 104, location information receiving unit 105, SOP selection unit 106, SOP execution unit 107, mission information transmission Unit 108. The SOP selection unit selects a predetermined SOP corresponding to the disaster type identified based on the disaster information from a plurality of SOPs. The SOP execution unit is defined in the predetermined SOP based on the disaster occurrence point, the spatial information of the target space 10, the location information of the plurality of workers W1 to W3, and the attribute information of the plurality of workers. Select the required number of workers for each mission. [Selection] Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to a disaster action support system that supports the actions of workers on site in the event of a disaster.

  For example, when a disaster such as a fire occurs in a facility such as a power plant, on-site workers are based on a standard work procedure manual (hereinafter referred to as “SOP (Standard Operating Procedure)”) in which response actions at the time of the disaster are defined. May conduct initial disaster response. However, in the event of a disaster, if the disaster prevention staff and on-site workers are not familiar with the contents of the SOP, or do not carry the SOP, it may take time for the initial disaster response, and disaster damage may increase. There is.

  In order to solve the delay in the initial response to disasters described above, a disaster action system that can present appropriate disaster action manuals for each user in consideration of the disaster type as well as user attributes It has been developed (Patent Document 1).

JP 2007-102263 A

  By the way, since the action manual at the time of a disaster is generally written for all staff members and employees, only a part is described about the duties each individual is in charge of at the time of a disaster. For this reason, even if an appropriate disaster action manual is presented as in Patent Document 1, it takes time for each person in charge to search for a place where the task he / she is responsible for is described. In addition, when a person in charge of a predetermined task is not present at the site when a disaster occurs, troubles such as urgently assigning the task to another person at the site occur. As a result, it takes time for the initial disaster response, and there is a risk of disaster damage spreading.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and its purpose is to efficiently assign each task specified in the SOP to an on-site worker, so that the time from disaster detection to completion of the initial disaster response is achieved. It is to provide a disaster action support system that can shorten the period and prevent the spread of disaster damage.

(1) In order to solve the above-described problem, the present invention provides a plurality of actions corresponding to each disaster type in a disaster action support system that supports actions of a plurality of workers in the target space when a disaster occurs in the target space. An SOP database storing SOP; a spatial information database storing spatial information of the target space; an attribute information database storing attribute information of the plurality of workers; and a disaster information receiving unit for receiving disaster information A location information receiving unit that receives location information of the plurality of workers, and an SOP selection unit that selects a predetermined SOP corresponding to the disaster type identified based on the disaster information from the plurality of SOPs. , a SOP execution unit for selecting the constant workers Tokoro and for each of the plurality of tasks defined in the predetermined SOP from the plurality of workers, the predetermined appointed Information in the disaster action system including a mission information transmitting unit for transmitting to the portable terminal the predetermined workers possessed, said predetermined SOP is composed of a plurality of unit SOP, of the plurality of unit SOP Each specifies information including the execution point, required number of persons, and urgency for at least one mission to be performed at each target execution time defined by the elapsed time starting from the time of disaster detection, and inputs instructions of disaster prevention personnel And a display unit that displays the plurality of unit SOPs in a flowchart based on the respective target execution times, and the SOP execution unit receives an execution instruction via the input unit 110. The predetermined SOP can be executed for each unit SOP, and the SOP execution unit can determine the required number of people according to the urgency of the predetermined mission. Also many workers and those adapted to select as said predetermined workers.

  (2) In the disaster action support system according to the above (1), preferably, the SOP execution unit preferentially selects a worker having a short path length to the point of execution of the predetermined task as the predetermined worker. It shall be.

( 3 ) In the disaster action support system according to (1) or (2) , preferably, the SOP selection unit changes the predetermined SOP to another SOP in response to a change instruction via the input unit. It shall be configured to be able to.

( 4 ) In a disaster action support system that supports the actions of a plurality of parties in a target space including a disaster occurrence place and its neighboring space, a series of actions to be executed when a certain disaster occurs is a plurality of unit SOPs. An SOP database in which SOPs defined in series are stored; a spatial information database in which spatial information of the target space is stored; an attribute information database in which attribute information of the plurality of parties is stored; and the plurality of parties The location information database in which the location information is stored, the contents of a certain mission included in a unit SOP in the plurality of unit SOPs, and the certain information among the plurality of parties based on the attribute information. Extract at least one candidate suitable for the mission, and based on the destination (execution location) of the certain mission, the location information of the candidate, and the spatial information An SOP execution unit that calculates an index value indicating a time required for arrival at a destination for each candidate and determines a person in charge of the certain task from the candidates based on the index value; When executing the unit SOP, it is provided with a mission information transmission unit that transmits information on the certain mission to a portable terminal possessed by a person in charge of the certain mission.

  According to the present invention, since each task defined in the SOP is efficiently assigned to a worker on site, the time from disaster detection to completion of initial disaster response is shortened, and the spread of disaster damage can be prevented. .

It is a figure showing a schematic structure of a disaster action support system concerning one embodiment of the present invention. It is a figure which shows schematic structure of SOP. It is a flowchart which shows the selection / determination process of SOP by the action support system at the time of a disaster. It is the flowchart which displayed the several unit SOP which comprises SOP in the time series format. It is a flowchart which shows the detail of the execution process of the unit SOP by an SOP execution part. It is a figure which shows the spatial information of object space with the positional information on a disaster sensor and a surveillance camera, and the location information of a worker. It is a figure which shows a mode that each mission prescribed | regulated by unit SOP is allocated to each worker in a target space.

  Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In addition, in each figure, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected to the same member and the overlapping description is abbreviate | omitted suitably.

  FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a schematic configuration of a disaster action support system according to an embodiment.

  A disaster action support system (hereinafter simply referred to as a “system”) 100 is configured such that when a disaster such as a fire occurs in a target space 10 such as a power plant, a plurality of workers W1 to W3,. In response to the standard work procedure manual (hereinafter referred to as “SOP (Standard Operating Procedure)”), each of the workers W1 to W3,... It is arranged in a management space 20 such as a center. Although the target space 10 and the management space 20 are shown separately in the drawing, the management space 20 may be included in the target space 10.

  The system 100 includes, for example, a computer having an input device, a storage device (for example, a memory, a hard disk), an arithmetic control device (for example, a CPU), and an output device, and is an SOP database (referred to as “SOPDB” in FIG. 1) 101. , A spatial information database (indicated as “spatial DB” in FIG. 1) 102, an attribute information database 103, a disaster information receiving unit 104, a location information receiving unit 105, an SOP selecting unit 106, and an SOP executing unit 107. A mission information transmitting unit 108, a display unit (for example, a display device such as a liquid crystal monitor) 109, and an input unit (for example, an input device such as a keyboard, mouse, or touch panel) 110.

  In the SOP database 101, electronic information (for example, the contents of a paper medium SOP (indicated as “paper SOP” in FIG. 1) 22 stored in the management space 20 is converted into a format that can be executed and referred to by a computer. (Refer to the table in FIG. 2).

  In the spatial information database 102, the spatial information of the target space 10 (for example, the structure of the target facility (including the rooms on each floor and its internal layout, etc.), the location of equipment that can cause disasters, the arrangement of various pipes including water supply and drainage, The layout of the electrical equipment, the target facility, and 3D modeling data in the vicinity thereof are stored. The spatial information includes a plurality of disaster sensors SS1 to SSn installed at various locations in the target space 10, a plurality of surveillance cameras CC1 to CCn, equipment and devices (for example, a fire extinguisher) used for each mission in the SOP, and a speaker. Location information is also included.

  The attribute information database 103 stores attribute information (for example, affiliation, job type, position, qualification, etc.) of a plurality of workers W1 to W3,.

  The disaster information receiving unit 104 receives detection signals and images from the plurality of disaster sensors SS1 to SSn and the plurality of monitoring cameras CC1 to CCn installed in various places in the target space 10 via the communication network 30. These pieces of information are displayed on the display unit 109. Thereby, the disaster prevention person in charge 21 can monitor the occurrence of the disaster.

  The SOP selection unit 106 specifies a disaster type based on information received from the disaster information reception unit 104 (detection signals of the disaster sensors SS1 to SSn and video images of the monitoring cameras CC1 to CCn), and corresponds to the disaster type. The SOP is selected from a plurality of SOPs stored in the SOP database 101. When there are a large number of SOPs for each disaster type, it may take a considerable amount of time to search for an SOP suitable for the disaster that has occurred. However, by providing the SOP selection unit 106, Since the selection of the SOP suitable for the disaster type is automatically executed, the time required for specifying the disaster type and selecting the SOP can be reduced.

  The disaster type specified by the SOP selection unit 106 and the selected SOP can be displayed on the display unit 109. Thereby, the disaster prevention person in charge 21 can confirm whether appropriate SOP was extracted. If it is difficult to specify only one disaster type using only the disaster information, a plurality of SOPs estimated from the disaster information are displayed on the display unit 109, and the final decision is made in the format required by the disaster prevention officer 21. It may be adopted. The SOP selection unit 106 can also change the selected SOP to another SOP in response to a change instruction from the disaster prevention officer 21.

  The location information receiving unit 105 has mobile terminals M1 to M3 possessed by workers W1 to W3, ... in the target space 10 via radio base stations or the like (not shown) connected to the communication network 30, respectively. ,... Are periodically received to grasp predetermined information of each worker W1 to W3,. As the mobile terminals M1 to M3,..., Terminals capable of wireless communication such as mobile phones, PHS, smartphones, tablet terminals, and the like can be used.

  The SOP execution unit 107 receives the execution instruction from the disaster prevention person 21, the spatial information of the target space 10 stored in the spatial information database 102, the disaster occurrence point information received from the disaster information reception unit 104, and the location information Each unit included in the SOP selected by the SOP selection unit 106 while referring to the location information of the plurality of workers W1 to W3 received from the reception unit 105 and the attribute information stored in the attribute information database 103 An SOP (to be described later) assignment process to a worker and an execution process for each unit SOP are performed. The progress status of the SOP (whether or not each unit SOP is executed in the selected SOP and the contents of each unit SOP) is displayed on the display unit 109. Thereby, the disaster prevention person in charge 21 can manage the progress of SOP.

  The mission information transmitting unit 108 includes information about the tasks assigned to the workers W1 to W3,... By the SOP execution unit 107 via the communication network 30, and the portable terminals M1 to M1 possessed by the workers W1 to W3,. Transmit to M3,.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of the SOP.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the SOP 200 includes a plurality of execution units (hereinafter referred to as “unit SOPs”) 201, 202, 203,. The unit SOP defines information on at least one mission to be performed at each predetermined target execution time (including the mission content, execution point (destination), required number of persons, urgency, etc.). In the following, the target execution time is defined by the elapsed time from the time of disaster detection, and is expressed as X (minutes): YY (seconds) (X and Y are numbers from 0 to 9).

  In the example shown in FIG. 2, in the first unit SOP 201, at the elapsed time 0:00, the mission [X1] is performed at the point [A] by one worker (affiliation to the F section F1 section), and the mission [Y1] Stipulates that two workers (G section G1 affiliation) should be performed at point [B], and that the task [Z1] should be performed by three workers (no affiliation) at point [C]. ing. In the second unit SOP 202, at the elapsed time 0:30, the mission [X2] is performed at the point [B] by two workers (affiliation with the H section H1), and the mission [Y2] is 3 at the point [C]. It is defined that the task [Z2] should be performed by one worker (F section F2 affiliation) at the point [D]. In the third unit SOP 203, at the elapsed time 1:00, the mission [X3] is performed by three workers (no affiliation) at the point [C], and the mission [Y3] is performed by one person at the point [D]. It is defined that work [Z3] should be performed by two workers (F department F3 affiliation) at point [E]. Here, since the disaster occurrence point and the location points of the workers W1 to W3, ... at the time of the disaster occurrence are not constant, which mission should be performed by which worker may be defined by the SOP 200. In the embodiment, as will be described later, the final decision is made by the system 100 when a disaster occurs. In this embodiment, affiliation is considered in selecting an operator. However, depending on the content of the mission, the occupation type, position, and qualification (hazardous material handler, etc.) of the worker may be considered. . This makes it possible to assign more appropriate workers to each mission.

  FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing SOP selection / determination processing by the system 100. Hereinafter, each step constituting the flow will be described in order.

  The flow of FIG. 3 is started by an instruction via the input unit 110 of the disaster prevention person in charge 21, and the disaster information receiving unit 104 receives the detection signals of the disaster sensors SS1 to SSn (step S100), and the monitoring cameras CC1 to CCn. A video is received (step S200). Subsequently, based on the detection signals and position information of the disaster sensors SS1 to SSn and the video and position information of the monitoring cameras CC1 to CCn, the disaster type is identified (step S300), and the disaster occurrence point is identified (step S400). .

  The SOP selection unit 106 selects an SOP corresponding to the disaster type specified by the disaster information reception unit 104 from the SOP database 101, and displays the selected SOP on the display unit 109 (step S500). The disaster prevention officer 21 confirms the SOP selection result displayed on the display unit 109. The disaster prevention officer 21 can also change the corresponding SOP via the input unit 110 as necessary.

  The SOP executing unit 107 specifies the target space 10 from the disaster occurrence point specified by the disaster information receiving unit 104, and selects the spatial information corresponding to the target space 10 from the spatial information database 102 (step S600). Since this step does not affect the SOP decision, it can be executed independently of the flow of FIG.

  The display unit 109 displays a plurality of unit SOPs constituting the SOP selected by the SOP selection unit 106 in a time series format (for example, a flowchart format as shown in FIG. 4) (step S700). If it is information that can identify the SOP selected in S500 (for example, SOP name or simple contents), it can be displayed in place of the time series of a plurality of unit SOPs.

  The SOP execution unit 107 receives a determination instruction from the disaster prevention person 21 via the input unit 110, and determines an SOP to be executed (step S800).

  Hereinafter, the description will be continued assuming that the execution of the SOP 200 of FIG. 2 is determined by the flow of FIG.

  FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a plurality of unit SOPs constituting the SOP determined in step S800 of FIG. 3 in a time series format, and the flowchart is displayed on the display screen of the display unit 109. When the disaster prevention person 21 selects a desired unit SOP on the display screen by using the input unit 110 (instructs execution), the assignment of the worker to each mission defined in the unit SOP and the mission information to the worker Is to be executed. That is, the symbol of each unit SOP in the flowchart of FIG. 4 functions not only as an order display function of each unit SOP but also as an execution button of each unit SOP.

  The SOP execution unit 107 receives the execution instruction from the disaster prevention person in charge 21 and executes processing of each unit SOP (first unit SOP, second unit SOP, third unit SOP,...) (Steps S810 to S850,...). ). Moreover, although it is normal to perform each unit SOP according to the order shown in FIG. 4, it is not always necessary to execute each unit SOP according to the order shown in FIG. The execution order of the unit SOPs can be changed, or the execution of a specific unit SOP can be omitted or executed multiple times. This makes it possible to respond flexibly according to the disaster situation. It should be noted that the display of the executed unit SOP may be changed so that it can be distinguished from the unexecuted one, or the number of executions of each unit SOP may be displayed numerically. Furthermore, the performance rate of the mission defined for each unit SOP may be displayed as a numerical value or a graphic.

  FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing details of the first unit SOP execution process (step S810 in FIG. 4) by the SOP execution unit 107. Hereinafter, each step constituting the flow will be described in order.

  The location information receiving unit 105 receives the location information of each worker in the target space 10 via the communication network 30 (step S811).

  The SOP execution unit 107 selects a worker in charge of each task defined in the unit SOP based on the disaster occurrence point, the spatial information of the target space 10, the location information of each worker W1 to W3, and the attribute information. (Step S812). Hereinafter, an example of a specific selection method will be described.

  For example, when executing the mission [Y1] of the first unit SOP 201, the SOP execution unit 107 first confirms the affiliation corresponding to the mission [Y1], and assigns the candidate in charge to the worker belonging to the “G department G1 section”. squeeze. Next, each route length from the location point of each worker belonging to "G section G1 section" to the execution point [B] of mission [X1] is calculated, and the required number of workers (2 people) are route length. Priority should be given to short workers. As a result, it is possible to promptly gather the required number of workers at the point of execution of the mission.

  Note that the SOP execution unit 107 may be configured so as to select more workers than the required number in accordance with the urgency of the task in consideration of the effective utilization of human resources and the certainty of the task execution. For example, the required number of tasks [X1] is one, but since the degree of urgency is “high”, a larger number of workers (for example, three people) may be selected. As a result, even if any of the selected workers (three persons) arrives at the task execution point in a delayed manner, the required number of workers (1) can be added to the task execution point without re-selecting the worker. Name) workers can be secured, and work start delays at the mission performance point can be prevented. In this case, it is preferable to share information between the selected workers (three persons) and the person in charge of disaster prevention who first arrived at the mission execution point. This is because it is possible to grasp who has arrived at the mission execution point, and the other two persons who have become surplus personnel can be assigned to other duties or can be sent to evacuation.

  The mission information transmission unit 108 transmits the contents of the missions assigned to the workers W1 to W3,... To the mobile terminals M1 to M3, etc. possessed by the workers W1 to W3,... (Step S813). . As a transmission format, an e-mail or a short message can be used, and an image, a moving image, audio data, or the like can be transmitted as an attached file.

  Since the flow of the unit SOP execution process (steps S820 to S850,...) After the second unit SOP is the same as that of the above-described first unit SOP execution process, description thereof will be omitted.

  Next, the operation of the system 100 when a fire occurs in the target space 10 will be described.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating the spatial information of the target space 10 together with the position information of the disaster sensors SS1 to SS6 and the monitoring cameras CC1 to CC6 and the location information of the workers W1 to W5.

  The system 100 identifies the disaster type via the disaster sensor SS2 and the surveillance camera CC2 disposed in the vicinity of the fire occurrence point P1, selects the SOP corresponding to the disaster type (for example, electric fire), and then the person in charge of disaster prevention 21 (displayed on the display unit 109).

  The disaster prevention person in charge 21 checks whether or not the presented SOP is appropriate, instructs the system 100 to change the SOP as necessary, and then instructs the system 100 to determine the SOP.

  The system 100 presents each unit SOP of the determined SOP to the disaster prevention person 21 in a time series format (for example, a flowchart format as shown in FIG. 4) (displays on the display unit 109). The disaster prevention officer 21 instructs the system 100 to execute each unit SOP using the elapsed time of each unit SOP as a guide.

  The system 100 executes the unit SOP (for example, the first unit SOP 201) instructed to be executed by the disaster prevention person 21.

  The system 100 assigns each task to the workers W1 to W5,... Based on the positions of the tasks defined in the first unit SOP 201 and the workers 11 to 13,. Information of each mission is transmitted to the mobile terminals M1 to M5,.

  FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a state in which a plurality of tasks defined in the first unit SOP 201 are assigned to the workers W1 to W5 in the target space 10.

  In the example shown in FIG. 7, the task “perform fire extinguishing activities at the fire occurrence point P1” is performed on the worker W3 having the shortest path length from the location point to the fire occurrence point P1 and the worker W4 having the next smallest path length. Assigned and assigned to the worker 11 with a short path length from the location point to the emergency exit P2, the task of “evacuate from the emergency exit P2 to the outside”, and work with a short route length from the location point to the in-house broadcasting device (not shown) The worker W2 is assigned the task of “in-house broadcasting of the fire occurrence status”, and the worker W4 who is outdoors is assigned the task of “waiting on the spot”. The information of each mission is assigned to the workers W1 to W5. It is transmitted to each of the portable terminals M1 to M5 possessed.

  Note that the messages in FIG. 7 are transmitted to the mobile terminals M1 to M5, respectively, but accompanying information can also be transmitted. For example, map information indicating a route to the emergency exit P2 can be transmitted to the portable terminal M1 in addition to the message in the drawing. Broadcast contents can be transmitted as text to the portable terminal M2. The mobile terminals M3 and M4 can transmit map information indicating the route to the point P1 and the position information of the appliance (fire extinguisher, etc.) used for fire fighting activities.

  The system 100 receives the execution instruction from the disaster prevention person in charge 21 and executes the other units SOP 202, 203,.

  According to the present embodiment, the workers in charge of the tasks defined in the units SOP 201, 202,... Constituting the SOP 200 are designated as the disaster occurrence point, the spatial information of the target space 10, and the on-site workers W1 to W5. By selecting based on the location information and attribute information of ..., each task is efficiently assigned to the workers W1 to W5, ... on site, so the time from disaster detection to completion of initial disaster response is shortened. Damage can be prevented from spreading.

  In addition, since the present embodiment includes the SOP selection unit 106, the disaster type specification and the SOP selection suitable for the disaster type are automatically executed. Therefore, the time required for the disaster type specification and the SOP selection is reduced. It can be shortened.

<Appendix>
In the above, the disaster information receiving unit 104 receives various information input from the plurality of disaster sensors SS1 to SSn and the plurality of monitoring cameras CC1 to CCn as disaster information, and identifies the type of disaster that occurred based on the disaster information However, it is also possible to add a disaster information database storing disaster information in general to the system 100 and extract the disaster information of the database to specify the type of disaster. The information stored in the database includes the time series of data output from disaster sensors and surveillance cameras, disaster location information, disaster progress information, inaccessibility information, power outage information, restoration of facilities and equipment, etc. There is information.

  In the calculation of the path length when assigning the task to each worker in step S812 in FIG. 5, if there is a place where traffic is impossible in the target space 10 due to the occurrence of a disaster, the disaster information and the space information Based on the above, it is preferable to appropriately calculate and use a route that bypasses the location. If the route length is calculated in this way, assignment of tasks can be examined based on the exact route length, and the safety of each worker can be improved. Further, for a mission with low immediacy, for example, a route length giving priority to safety over the arrival time may be calculated, and the route length may be used for examination of assignment of the mission.

  It is assumed that there is at least one task to which at least one worker needs to be assigned in the duties of the plurality of unit SOPs described above. That is, some missions of each unit SOP may not require assignment of workers, and some workers may not be assigned assignments at all.

  Regarding the determination of the SOP to be executed described with reference to FIG. 3, the case where the disaster prevention person in charge 21 determines based on the selection by the SOP selection unit 106 has been described above. The SOP may be selected and determined. That is, the flow of FIG. 3 can be omitted.

  The assignment of duties to workers by the SOP execution unit 107 is not limited to the time when a disaster occurs but may be any timing after the occurrence of a disaster, and is applicable from the viewpoint of minimizing the error in the location information of each worker. It is preferable to execute a unit SOP that includes. Further, the above embodiment does not prohibit all assignment before the occurrence of a disaster, but also allows assignment of some duties before the occurrence of a disaster.

  In the above example, the “location information” of each worker is determined by using the location information of the mobile terminal possessed by each worker, but the working hours of each worker (the attendance date of each worker, the attendance time, the departure time) Time, vacation, break time, etc.) and work place (for example, the worker's office will be the office, the field worker will be the work place, etc. May be added to the system 100 of FIG. 1, and the location information of each worker may be estimated based on the information in the database. When the communication status of the mobile terminal is bad or when the position information of the mobile terminal has a large error, the location accuracy may be improved by estimating in this way.

  The mission information transmission unit 108 is configured to transmit the mission information to each worker's mobile terminal. However, the mission information transmission unit 108 is suitable for the location information of the speaker from the speakers installed in the disaster occurrence facility and its neighboring / related facilities. The system may be configured such that sound and / or alarms are generated.

  The “target space” may include a neighboring space in addition to a facility (such as a power plant) where a disaster has occurred. In the above example, the system constructed to support the actions of workers at disaster-occurring facilities has been explained, but not only the workers but also the nearby residents of the disaster-occurring place, fire stations, police stations, national and local governments. A system may be constructed to support the actions of all parties involved in disasters, including administrative and medical facilities and their employees.

  In FIG. 2, only one affiliation of a worker who should execute each task is defined. However, a plurality of affiliations can be defined, and in the case where a plurality of affiliations are defined, it is possible to determine the priority order of affiliation. For example, if the worker belonging to the first priority does not exist within the range of the predetermined route length from the mission execution point, whether the worker belonging to the second priority exists within the route length. It is determined whether or not, and if it exists, the task is assigned to the worker. The same applies to the third and subsequent priorities. By assigning priorities to affiliations in this way, even if the most suitable affiliation worker does not exist in the vicinity of the mission execution point, a similar affiliation worker existing in the vicinity is directed to the execution point. You can advance the mission start time.

  As mentioned above, although one Embodiment of this invention was explained in full detail, this invention is not limited to above-described embodiment, Various modifications are included. For example, the above-described embodiment has been described in detail for easy understanding of the present invention, and is not necessarily limited to one having all the configurations described.

  In addition, each configuration relating to the computer (system 100), functions and execution processes of the respective configurations, etc. are partly or entirely hardware (for example, logic for executing each function is designed by an integrated circuit). It may be realized with. Further, the configuration related to the computer may be a program (software) that realizes each function related to the configuration of the control device by being read and executed by an arithmetic processing device (for example, a CPU). Information related to the program can be stored in, for example, a semiconductor memory (flash memory, SSD, etc.), a magnetic storage device (hard disk drive, etc.), a recording medium (magnetic disk, optical disc, etc.), and the like.

  DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 ... Target space, 20 ... Management space, 21 ... Disaster prevention person in charge, 22 ... Paper SOP, 30 ... Communication network, 100 ... Disaster action support system, 101 ... SOP database, 102 ... Spatial information database, 103 ... Attribute information database 104 ... Disaster information receiving unit 105 ... Location information receiving unit 106 ... SOP selecting unit 107 ... SOP executing unit 108 ... Mission information transmitting unit 109 ... Display unit 110 ... Input unit 200 ... SOP 201 ... 1st unit SOP, 202 ... 2nd unit SOP, 203 ... 3rd unit SOP, CC1-CCn ... surveillance camera, M1-M4 ... mobile terminal, P1 ... fire occurrence point, P2 ... emergency exit, SS1-SSn ... disaster sensor, W1-W5 ... Workers.

Claims (3)

In a disaster action support system that supports the actions of multiple workers in the target space when a disaster occurs in the target space,
An SOP database storing a plurality of SOPs corresponding to each disaster type;
A spatial information database storing spatial information of the target space;
An attribute information database storing attribute information of the plurality of workers;
A disaster information receiver for receiving disaster information;
A location information receiving unit for receiving location information of the plurality of workers;
An SOP selection unit that selects a predetermined SOP corresponding to the disaster type specified based on the disaster information from the plurality of SOPs;
And SOP execution unit for selecting the constant workers Tokoro and for each of the plurality of tasks defined in the predetermined SOP from the plurality of workers,
In a disaster action system comprising a mission information transmission unit that transmits information on the predetermined mission to a portable terminal possessed by the predetermined worker ,
The predetermined SOP is composed of a plurality of unit SOPs,
Each of the plurality of unit SOPs defines information including an execution point, a required number of persons, and an urgency level regarding at least one mission to be performed at each target execution time defined by an elapsed time from the time of disaster detection,
An input unit for inputting an instruction of a person in charge of disaster prevention, and a display unit for displaying the plurality of unit SOPs in a flowchart based on respective target execution times;
The SOP execution unit is configured to execute the predetermined SOP for each unit SOP by selecting any of the plurality of unit SOPs displayed on the display unit via the input unit,
The SOP execution unit is configured to select more workers than the required number of workers as the predetermined workers according to the urgency level of the predetermined task . In the disaster action support system according to claim 1,
The SOP execution unit preferentially selects a worker having a small route length to the point where the predetermined task is performed as the predetermined worker, as a disaster action support system. In the disaster action support system according to claim 1 or 2 ,
The SOP selection unit is configured to be able to change the predetermined SOP to another SOP in response to a change instruction via the input unit .

Images