JP5769222B1 - Appropriate evaluation system, user terminal, server, and appropriate evaluation application - Google Patents

Abstract

An object of the present invention is to associate IMEI, SIM, hardware ID, and the like with a user name, specify a user, suppress repeated evaluation of the same user, and improve reliability of an evaluation result. The evaluation system includes a user terminal and a server, and performs evaluation of an object by a user. The user terminal 2 includes a user reception unit 4 that receives input of user information Z including a user name N, and an evaluation reception unit 5 that receives evaluation data H. The server 3 evaluates the object G based on the evaluation data H. The user terminal 2 and / or the server 3 includes the terminal information J including at least one of the international mobile device identification number D1, the subscriber identification module D2, and the hardware identifier D3 as the user name. A user identification unit 7 that can identify the user U in a one-to-one correspondence with N is provided. [Selection] Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to a proper evaluation system, a user terminal, a server, and a proper evaluation program (appropriate evaluation application) that have a user terminal and a server and perform proper evaluation of an object by a user.

Conventionally, a word-of-mouth information distribution method is known (see Patent Document 1).
This word-of-mouth information distribution method manages word-of-mouth information and user information, and scores each user and / or word-of-mouth information based on the number of reviews of word-of-mouth information and / or the result of voting on word-of-mouth information from users who have reviewed word-of-mouth information. And dynamically changing the layout in the word-of-mouth information page based on the score information and / or issuing a coupon to the user.

JP 2004-326557 A

However, the word-of-mouth information distribution method described in Patent Document 1 allows voting for each terminal of a voter (user) such as a mobile terminal (smart phone, mobile phone) or desktop PC, even for the same voter. I can't prevent it.
That is, since the same voter can arbitrarily manipulate the voting result by repeatedly voting repeatedly, the reliability of the distributed information is very low.

  In view of such a point, the present invention relates an international portable device identification number (IMEI), a subscriber identification module (SIM), a hardware identifier (hardware ID), and the like in a one-to-one correspondence with a user name. The purpose is to provide an appropriate evaluation system, a user terminal, a server, and an appropriate evaluation program (appropriate evaluation application) that can suppress repeated evaluation of the same user and improve the reliability of evaluation results by specifying users. To do.

An evaluation system 1 according to the present invention is an evaluation system that includes a user terminal 2 and a server 3 and performs an evaluation of an object G by a user U. The user terminal 2 receives a user name from the user U. A user reception unit 4 that receives input of user information Z including N, and an evaluation reception unit 5 that receives evaluation data H from the user U. The server 3 is based on the evaluation data H received by the evaluation reception unit 5 The user terminal 2 and / or the server 3 includes the international portable device identification number D1 of the user terminal 2, the subscriber identification of the user U, and the evaluation calculation unit 6 that calculates the evaluation of the object G as the terminal information J comprising at least one of the modules D2 and the user terminal 2 of the hardware identifier D3, in association with the user name N in a one-to-one, the user U Constant includes a user identifying unit 7, the user terminal 2, the user to change one terminal information J1 which is associated with the user identification unit 7 to a single user name N1, the other terminal information J2 The user terminal 2 and / or the server 3 has a change number C of terminal information corresponding to the user name N1 by the specific change receiving unit 8 that is greater than or equal to a predetermined value. A change excluding unit 9 that excludes the evaluation data H1 by the user name N1 newly received by the evaluation receiving unit 5 from the basis of the evaluation calculation by the evaluation calculating unit 6; And

The second feature of the evaluation system 1 according to the present invention is that, in addition to the first feature, the user terminal 2 and / or the server 3 has one user name N1 and one associated with the user identification unit 7. A user storage unit 10 that stores one terminal information J1 as a set, and a new reception by the evaluation reception unit 5 for one set of the user name N1 and terminal information J1 stored in the user storage unit 10 If differ only either one is one of the user names N terminal information J in the evaluation data H and the newly accepted evaluation data H, is excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation in the evaluation calculation unit 6 differences It is in the point provided with the exclusion part 11.

A third feature of the evaluation system 1 according to the present invention is that, in addition to the first or second feature, the user terminal 2 and / or the server 3 receives the evaluation data H from the user U by the evaluation receiving unit 5. was evaluated based on the time T, the evaluation data H the newly accepted by the evaluation acceptance unit 5, in that it includes a date excluding unit 12 excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation in the evaluation calculation unit 6.

A fourth feature of the evaluation system 1 according to the present invention is that, in addition to any of the first to third features, the user terminal 2 and / or the server 3 can receive evaluation data from the user U at the evaluation receiving unit 5. Based on the evaluation date and time storage unit 13 that stores at least the previous evaluation date and time T ′ that received H, and the evaluation interval K from when the previous evaluation date and time T ′ until new evaluation data H is received, the evaluation reception unit 5 the evaluation data H the newly accepted, in that it includes an interval excluding unit 14 excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation in the evaluation calculation unit 6.

A fifth feature of the evaluation system 1 according to the present invention is that, in addition to any of the first to fourth features, the user terminal 2 includes a location acquisition unit 15 that acquires location information P of the user terminal 2. The user terminal 2 and / or the server 3 includes the evaluation data H newly received by the evaluation receiving unit 5 based on the position information P, and the basis for the evaluation calculation by the evaluation calculating unit 6 in that it includes a position excluding unit 16 excluded from.

A sixth feature of the evaluation system 1 according to the present invention is that, in addition to any of the first to fifth features, the object G is a business G ′, and the user terminal 2 is connected to the user U. There exists an advertisement display part 17 which displays the advertisement of the business of a business type different from the said business G 'which receives evaluation.

Due to these characteristics, an international mobile equipment identification number (International Mobile Equipment Identity, abbreviated as “IMEI”) D1, a subscriber identification module (Subscriber Identity Module, abbreviated as “SIM”) D2, and a hardware identification data (Hardware Identification Data (Hardware) ID, hardware ID)) The terminal information J including D3 is made to correspond to the user name N on a one-to-one basis so that the user U can be specified. Since it is possible to recognize that evaluation is performed by changing the user terminal 2 such as a PC (that is, the same user U repeatedly evaluates the same object G), it is arbitrary (the evaluation result is intentionally determined). It becomes a check (suppression) of repeated evaluation for the user U (who intends to make it better or worse).
As a result, the reliability of the evaluation result can be improved (simultaneous realization of “suppression of repeated evaluation of the same user” and “improvement of reliability of the evaluation result”).

In addition, when the number of changes C of the terminal information corresponding to the user name N1 is equal to or greater than a predetermined value, a change exclusion unit 9 is provided that can exclude the evaluation data H1 by the newly accepted user name N1 from the basis of the evaluation calculation. As a result, if the same user U changes the terminal information J (that is, the user terminal 2) such as IMEI, SIM, and hardware ID many times (more than a predetermined number of times), By excluding the object G from the basis for calculating the evaluation, it is possible to arbitrarily prevent the operation of the evaluation result and further improve the reliability of the evaluation result.
Note that the evaluation system 1 of the present invention can accept any user U with the evaluation accepting unit 5 and can accept the evaluation itself without being noticed by the user U. You can choose.
In addition, the present invention also includes a specific change receiving unit 8 that changes one terminal information J1 corresponding to the user name N1 to other terminal information J2, so that the user U submerges the user terminal 2 or the like. Even when the user terminal 2 is unavoidably changed due to an unexpected failure, if the change count C is appropriate, it can be handled.

Furthermore, when either the user name N of the evaluation data H newly received or the terminal information J is different from the user name N1 and the terminal information J1 stored in the user storage unit 10, they are newly received. By providing the difference exclusion unit 11 capable of excluding the obtained evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation, the same user U evaluates the object G from the different terminal information J while having the same user name N. If the same user U is evaluated from different user terminals 2, the user G is excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation of the object G and the user U is not aware of the evaluation result operation prevention and reliability. Can be further improved.
In addition, also when the difference exclusion part 11 evaluates the target object G from the same terminal information J, although it is a different user name N, the different user U evaluated from the same user terminal 2, or the same Assuming that the user U has evaluated from the same user terminal 2 using different user names N, the user U can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation of the object G.

  Then, based on the evaluation date / time T when the evaluation data H is received from the user U, the date / time exclusion unit 12 that can exclude the newly received evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation is provided, so that the object G can be removed in real time. If an evaluation is received during a time period that cannot be evaluated (for example, if the object G is a restaurant or the like, it is usually not open), the user U actually visits the store / If there is a possibility that the evaluation has been performed without experiencing it, it is possible to reduce the operation rate of the evaluation result and improve the reliability by lowering the ratio as a basis for the evaluation calculation or excluding it in some cases.

  Furthermore, an interval exclusion unit 14 that can exclude the newly received evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation based on the evaluation interval K from the previous evaluation date and time T ′ until the new evaluation data H is received is provided. For example, when an evaluation is received every day for a target G that cannot be evaluated many times in a short period of time (for example, a target G such as a barber shop or a beauty salon that does not go every day). However, there is a possibility that the user U has actually evaluated without visiting the store / experience, and by reducing or excluding the ratio used as the basis for the evaluation calculation, the operation of the evaluation result is prevented and the reliability is improved. realizable.

In addition to these, based on the position information P of the user terminal 2, the newly received evaluation data H may be provided with a position excluding unit 16 that can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation. Prevention and improvement of reliability can be achieved.
Further, the object G is not a product or the like, but a business G ′ (for example, a restaurant business such as the above-mentioned restaurant, a barber shop, a beauty salon store business, a courier company business, etc.), and a user The terminal 2 may be provided with an advertisement display unit 17 for displaying an advertisement of a business G ′ (evaluation target business G ′) that receives an evaluation from the user U and a business of a different industry, Compared to displaying an advertisement of the same industry as the business G ′ to be evaluated, the possibility of the user U flowing to another business (other stores, etc.) of the same industry is reduced, and the business G ′ (store to be evaluated) Etc.) It is possible to perform a more pure evaluation only by actually visiting or experiencing the store.

The user terminal 2 according to the present invention is a user terminal that communicates with the server 3 and evaluates the object G by the user U, and receives input of user information Z including the user name N from the user U. The mobile terminal device includes a user reception unit 4, an evaluation reception unit 5 that receives evaluation data H from the user U, and a terminal communication unit 21 that transmits the evaluation data H to the server 3. The terminal information J including at least one of the number D1, the subscriber identification module D2 of the user U and the hardware identifier D3 of the user terminal 2 is associated with the user name N on a one-to-one basis , and identified with the user identification unit 7 which, the user terminal 2, one terminal information J1 which is associated with the user identification unit 7 to a single user name N1, another terminal information The user terminal 2 includes a specific change accepting unit 8 that accepts the change to J2 from the user U, and the user terminal 2 has a predetermined number of changes C of the terminal information corresponding to the user name N1 by the specific change accepting unit 8. In the case described above , the first feature is that a change excluding unit 9 that excludes the evaluation data H1 by the user name N1 newly received by the evaluation receiving unit 5 from the basis of the evaluation calculation is provided .

  With this feature, in the user terminal 2, the terminal information J including the international mobile device identification number (IMEI) D1, the subscriber identification module (SIM) D2, and the hardware identifier (hardware ID) D3 is paired with the user name N. By making it possible to identify the user U corresponding to 1, it is possible to suppress (suppress) repeated evaluation for an arbitrary user U, and improve the reliability of the evaluation result.

The server 3 according to the present invention is a server that communicates with the user terminal 2 and evaluates the object G by the user U. The server 3 receives the user name N of the user U from the user terminal 2. And the server communication unit 22 that receives the evaluation data H from the user U, and the evaluation calculation unit 6 that calculates the evaluation of the object G based on the received evaluation data H. Terminal information J including at least one of an international portable device identification number D1, a subscriber identification module D2 of the user U and a hardware identifier D3 of the user terminal 2 is associated with the user name N on a one-to-one basis, comprising a user identifying unit 7 specific to the user U, the server communication unit 22, from the user terminal 2, receives also change terminal information J corresponding to the user name N In both cases, the server 3 excludes the evaluation data H newly received from the user terminal 2 by the server communication unit 22 from the basis of the evaluation calculation when the change count C of the terminal information J is equal to or greater than the change threshold β. The first feature is that a change exclusion unit 9 is provided .

An evaluation program 50 according to the present invention is an evaluation program that includes a user terminal 2 and a server 3 and is used in an evaluation system that evaluates an object G by a user U. The evaluation program 50 includes the user terminal 2 and the user A user acceptance step S-N for accepting input of user information Z including its own user name N from U, and an evaluation acceptance step SH for accepting evaluation data H from the user U, and the user terminal 2 and / or The user receiving step includes terminal information J including at least one of an international portable device identification number D1 of the user terminal 2, a subscriber identification module D2 of the user U, and a hardware identifier D3 of the user terminal 2 in the server 3. in association with the user name N in a one-to-one received in S-N, the actual user specific step S-T specific to the user U Were allowed to, the server 3, to execute the evaluation calculating step S-C for calculating an evaluation of the object G evaluation data H received by the evaluation acceptance step S-H as a basis Rutotomoni, the user terminal 2 Is also configured to execute a specific change reception step SJ for receiving a change of the terminal information J corresponding to the user name N between the user reception step SN and the evaluation reception step SH, and the server 3 The evaluation calculation step S-C executed by the method includes a change exclusion step S-R1 that excludes the evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation when the number of changes C of the terminal information J is equal to or greater than the change threshold β. Zheng Rukoto the first feature.

  In the server 3 and the evaluation program 50, the terminal information J including the international portable device identification number (IMEI) D1, the subscriber identification module (SIM) D2, and the hardware identifier (hardware ID) D3 is one-to-one with the user name N. Also, by executing the user specifying step ST that can specify the user U and calculating the evaluation of the object G based on the evaluation data H received in the evaluation receiving step SH, It is possible to suppress the repeated evaluation to the user U and improve the reliability of the evaluation result.

  According to the evaluation system, the user terminal, the server, and the evaluation program according to the present invention, an international mobile device identification number (IMEI), a subscriber identification module (SIM), a hardware identifier (hardware ID), etc. By making it possible to specify a user in a one-to-one correspondence, “suppression of repeated evaluation of the same user” and “improvement of reliability of evaluation results” can be achieved.

It is a schematic diagram which shows the evaluation system which concerns on 1st-6th embodiment of this invention. It is the schematic which illustrates the evaluation reception screen (evaluation reception part) of the user terminal of the evaluation system which concerns on 1st Embodiment of this invention, and an advertisement display part. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the evaluation start screen (display part) of the user terminal of the evaluation system concerning a 1st embodiment, and the advertisement display part contained in this. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the object search screen (object search part) of the user terminal of the evaluation system concerning a 1st embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates a candidate selection screen (object search part) of a user terminal of an evaluation system concerning a 1st embodiment, and an advertising display part. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the candidate detailed screen (target search part) of the user terminal of the evaluation system which concerns on 1st Embodiment, and an advertisement display part. It is a schematic diagram which illustrates the screen when the evaluation program which concerns on 1st Embodiment of this invention is downloaded to the user terminal. It is a flowchart which shows the evaluation program which concerns on 1st Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the modification of the evaluation program which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a flowchart which shows the evaluation program which concerns on 2nd Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the evaluation program which concerns on 3rd Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the evaluation program which concerns on 4th Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the evaluation program which concerns on 5th Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the evaluation program which concerns on 6th Embodiment of this invention.

<Overall configuration of evaluation system 1>
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
1 to 6 show an evaluation system 1 according to the first embodiment of the present invention (particularly, FIG. 1 also shows the first to sixth embodiments).
The evaluation system 1 of the present invention including the first embodiment is a system that includes a user terminal 2 and a server 3 and performs an evaluation of the object G by the user U.
2 to 6, the character string “Tabe” at the left end indicates an example of the name of the evaluation system 1.

In the user terminal 2 in FIG. 1, the specific change receiving unit 8 in the second embodiment to be described later and the position acquisition unit 15 in the sixth embodiment are shown, but the specific change receiving unit 8 and the position acquisition unit 15 are shown. However, the evaluation system 1 may have any configuration such that both are not provided, only one is provided, or both are provided.
In addition, in an evaluation calculation unit 6 to be described later in the server 3 in FIG. 1, a change exclusion unit 9 in the second embodiment described later, a difference exclusion unit 11 in the third embodiment, and a date exclusion unit 12 in the fourth embodiment. Although the interval exclusion unit 14 in the fifth embodiment and the position exclusion unit 16 in the sixth embodiment are shown, the evaluation system 1 includes all of these exclusion units 9, 11, 12, 14, and 16. There may be any configuration such as not having, at least one, or having all.
Further, in the database 34 described later in the server 3 in FIG. 1, the user storage unit 10 in the second embodiment described later, the difference exclusion unit 11 in the third embodiment, the date exclusion unit 12 in the fourth embodiment, the first Although the space | interval exclusion part 14 in 5 embodiment and the position exclusion part 16 in 6th Embodiment are shown, the evaluation system 1 may not be equipped with these exclusion parts 9, 11, 12, 14, and 16 all. Any configuration such as having at least one or all of them may be used.

<Object G>
In the present invention, “object G” means a restaurant service business such as a restaurant or pub, a barber shop such as a barber shop, a beauty business such as a hair salon, or a business such as a medical business such as dentistry, internal medicine, or surgery ( (Industry) In addition to G ', items that are sold (including auctions) or offered free of charge on actual stores and networks W (bags, travel tours, etc.) G " There is no particular limitation as long as it can be achieved.
In addition to the restaurant service business mentioned above, business G 'is classified into the Japanese standard industry classification (revised October 2013, enforced April 1, 2014; hereinafter referred to as "industrial classification") Indicated agriculture, forestry, fishery, mining, quarrying, gravel extraction, construction, manufacturing, electricity, gas, heat supply, water, information and telecommunications, transportation, postal, wholesale, retail, Financial industry, insurance industry, real estate industry, goods rental industry, academic research, specialized / technical service industry, lodging industry, life-related service industry, entertainment industry, education, learning support industry, medical care, welfare, multi-service industry, service industry ( It includes any industry (business) such as those not classified elsewhere), public service (excluding those classified elsewhere), and inseparable industries.

  In the present invention, the business G ′ to be evaluated and the “business of different industries” are business (industry) in which at least one of the major classification, middle classification, small classification, and fine classification in the industrial classification is different. Meaning, for example, if it is “business of different industries” for the food service industry, it includes those with different major classifications such as “agriculture”, “forestry”, “fishing” with different major classifications in the industrial classification, Even if “M” is the same as the restaurant service industry, “accommodation business” in which the medium classification in the industrial classification is different is also included in the “business of different industries”.

Further, as an example, if the restaurant service business by the “restaurant” in the middle class of the industrial classification is the object G (business G ′), the “take-out / delivery restaurant service industry” in the middle class in the industrial class is “different” Included in “businesses in industry”.
If the restaurant service industry by “Dining room, restaurant (excluding specialty restaurants)” in the sub-category of the industrial category is the object G (business G '), the “Soba / Udon store” with a different sub-category in the industrial category is “ Included in “Businesses of different industries”.

In addition, the object G such as the business G ′ described up to now has three levels of stars such as Level, Diamond, Gold, and Silver, Platinum, and Copper. 5) and the like may be assigned, and these levels may be determined by the evaluation calculation unit 6 described later performing evaluation calculation based on the evaluation data H from the user U.
Further, the object G such as the business G ′ described above may have an assigned type (Type), and there is an age-restricted type (for example, a pub that handles alcohol in the food service industry G ′, The user U such as a bar may be a type (adult-only type) that cannot be entered by a minor U (under 20 years old in Japan, under 18 years old in the United States, etc.). In addition, when a minor user U evaluates, it may be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation by the evaluation calculation unit 6 or the like described later.

The business name of the object G such as the business G ′, the level evaluated by the user U, the type for adults only, the location of the store that performs the food service industry G ′ that is the object G, etc. Let it be information X.
Hereinafter, the object G will be described in detail as the business G ′ (particularly, the food service industry G ′).

<User terminal 2>
As shown in FIGS. 1-6, the user terminal 2 which concerns on 1st Embodiment of this invention receives the user reception part 4 which receives the user information Z including the user name N, and the evaluation data H according to the user terminal 2. This is a terminal equipped with an evaluation receiving unit 5.
The user terminal 2 includes a terminal information acquisition unit 31 that can acquire terminal information J, which will be described later, of the user terminal 2, a display unit 32 that displays input fields such as the target information X of the target G and the user name N (target Including an advertisement display unit 17 that displays an advertisement of the object G), a target search unit 33 that can search the target G, a terminal name J, terminal information J, and evaluation data H that can be transmitted to the server 3. You may have.
If the user terminal 2 includes at least the user reception unit 4 and the evaluation reception unit 5 among those described above, the mobile terminal (smart phone, mobile phone, tablet terminal, PHS, PDA (personal digital assistant), etc.) In addition, any configuration such as a notebook PC or a desktop PC may be used.

Further, the user terminal 2 may not include the user reception unit 4 and the evaluation reception unit 5 from the beginning. For example, an evaluation program (evaluation application) 50 including the user reception unit 4 and the evaluation reception unit 5 may be installed on the Internet. It is also possible to download from the network W such as the user receiving unit 4 and the evaluation receiving unit 5.
In addition, the user terminal 2 has terminal information J such as an international portable device identification number (IMEI) D1 and a hardware identifier (hardware ID) D3.
In the following, it is assumed that the user terminal 2 is mainly a smartphone.

<User reception unit 4>
As shown in FIG. 1, the user reception unit 4 receives input of user information Z including the user name N of the user U from the user U, and receives input of user information Z such as the user name N. Any configuration may be used as long as it is possible.
For example, when the user terminal 2 is a smartphone, the user reception unit 4 includes an input field such as a user name N displayed on the smartphone screen and a touch panel operated by the user U with a finger, a touch pen, or the like. May be.

If the user terminal 2 is a desktop PC or the like, the user reception unit 4 may be configured with an input field such as a user name N displayed on the display screen, and a keyboard or mouse operated by the user U. good.
Further, the user reception unit 4 has a function of displaying an input field such as a user name N on a smartphone or a display screen, and user information Z such as a user name N corresponding to an operation of a touch panel, a keyboard, a mouse, and the like by the user U. You may have the program (application) which performs the function etc. which are input, and its part.

<User name N, user information Z>
Here, “user name N” in the present invention refers to a string of characters such as alphabets, numbers, symbols, etc. that can be input to the user terminal 2 by the user reception unit 4 by the user U who wants to evaluate the object G. (Character string), and this character string is processed by the evaluation system 1 as the user name N representing the name of the user U himself.
As the user name N, there are no particular restrictions on the type of characters, the number of characters, capitalization or lowercase, half-width or full-width, etc. For example, in the uppermost row in FIGS. The column “Yuhohoo 231” indicates the user name N of the user U.

In addition to the user name N, the user reception unit 4 receives the user information Z such as the password of the user U, the date of birth (age), and the postal code (home postal code or work postal code). Other information to be received may be the area visited mainly within one week, the total amount of expenses used in one week, or the like.
In addition, the user reception unit 4 can include an address (residence, home address, office address, etc.), occupation, affiliation (organization name), gender, actual certificate (license, insurance card, passport). Or the like, a delivery address (Shipping Address) of a premium, which will be described later, may be received as the user information Z.

Note that the home area (Home Area, for example, a circle with a radius of 10 km) HA of each user U may be set from the postal code or address received from the user U.
The user reception unit 4 may be configured to ask the user U whether user information Z other than the user name N may be received.
In addition to this, the user reception unit 4 adds three levels to the user U such as level, diamond, gold, and silver, platinum, and copper. For example, if the silver level user U evaluates the object G 100 times, it becomes the gold level or the gold level user U becomes the object G. If the evaluation of 100 is performed 100 times, it becomes a diamond level, or all or one of the date of birth or zip code, which is the user information Z other than the user name N by the user U of the silver or gold level, mainly the area visited. When the part is input to the user reception part 4 and / or when the terminal information J to be described later is permitted to be acquired, the structure may be directly at the diamond level.

<Evaluation reception part 5>
As shown in FIG. 2, the evaluation reception part 5 receives the evaluation data H with respect to the target object G (food service industry G ') from the user U, and can receive the evaluation data H (input reception). As long as it is, any configuration may be used.
For example, when the user terminal 2 is a smartphone, the evaluation receiving unit 5 may be configured by an evaluation input field 5a displayed on the screen of the smartphone and a touch panel operated by the user U with a finger or a touch pen ( An example of the evaluation input field 5a will be described later with reference to FIG. 2 (evaluation acceptance screen).

If the user terminal 2 is a desktop PC or the like, the evaluation receiving unit 5 may be configured with an input field for the evaluation data H displayed on the display screen, a keyboard, a mouse, and the like operated by the user U. .
Moreover, the evaluation reception part 5 also performs the function of displaying the input column of the evaluation data H on the screen of the smartphone or the display, the function of inputting the evaluation data H according to the operation of the touch panel, keyboard, mouse, etc. by the user U May have a program (application) or a part thereof.

<Evaluation data H>
Here, “evaluation data H” in the present invention refers to a stage evaluation that can be input to the user terminal 2 by the evaluation receiving unit 5 by the user U who wants to evaluate the object G (food service industry G ′). In addition to scores, points, and reviews (impressions), such as diamonds, diamonds, golds, silvers, and other stars, platinum, copper, and copper. Any format may be used as long as the content is for evaluating the object G such as the food service industry G ′.
Note that FIG. 2 exemplifies the evaluation reception column 5a in the user terminal (smart phone) 2 and the types of evaluation data H received from the evaluation reception column 5a.

In this example, the evaluation data H includes a restaurant service G ′ whose restaurant name (or tavern) is “Torikizoku (registered trademark) 1” as an object G, “Service (Service)”, “Food (Food) ) ”,“ Location ”,“ Atmosphere ”,“ Price ”, for example, the number of stars such as gold or silver attached to each item may be evaluated. The height of evaluation may be expressed.
In addition to the above five items, items such as “Quantity” and “Speed” can be evaluated, and conversely, less than five items can be evaluated. May be given a predetermined score (for example, a score of 0 or more and 20 or less), or the number of stars to which one user U can be attached may be limited for each item or star type.

In addition, the same user U inputs evaluation repeatedly many times, arbitrarily operates the evaluation result of the object G (food service industry G ′ etc.), and the evaluation data H for the object G Since there is a possibility that the reliability may be lowered, there is a case where the user U himself / herself is evaluated whether or not a valid evaluation is performed.
In such a case, the user terminal 2 has an evaluation level (Level) for the user U itself (for example, the right end in the uppermost stage of FIGS. 2 to 6 (an example of the name “Tabe” of the evaluation system 1) In addition to silver (Silver) as shown on the right), diamonds (Diamond), platinum (Platinum), etc., and when there are more than three evaluation levels, the evaluation level such as "Level 4" (E.g., numbers).

Moreover, although the evaluation reception part 5 cannot receive multiple evaluation data H with respect to the same target object G (food service industry G 'etc.) by the same user U in parallel, the same target object G by the same user U It may be possible to update (update) the evaluation data H with respect to the number of users U evaluated for each object G, the number of updated users U, and the like. Absent.
Since such an evaluation receiving unit 5 can receive the evaluation itself for the user U of any evaluation level, it is reflected in the evaluation calculation by the later-described evaluation calculating unit 6 without noticing the user U. It is also possible not to let it.

<Terminal information acquisition unit 31, terminal information J>
As shown in FIG. 1, the user terminal 2 is at least one of the international mobile device identification number D1 of the user terminal 2 itself, the subscriber identification module D2 of the user U, and the hardware identifier D3 of the user terminal 2. As long as the terminal information J including one can be acquired, any configuration may be used, but even if the terminal information J is acquired by the terminal information acquisition unit 31 (the user terminal 2 includes the terminal information acquisition unit 31). It does not matter.
The terminal information J acquired by the terminal information acquisition unit 31 will be described below.

<International Mobile Device Identification Number (IMEI) D1>
When the user terminal 2 is a mobile terminal such as a smartphone, an international mobile device identification number (identification number assigned to a mobile phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA or data communication terminal), and some satellite phones ( International Mobile Equipment Identity (“IMEI” for short)) D1 may be included in the terminal information J.
The international portable device identification number D1 is made up of a number representing a manufacturer, model, country of origin, serial number, check digit, or software version number (Software Version Number (SVN)).

<Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) D2>
In addition to the international portable equipment identification number (IMEI) D1, when the user terminal 2 is a mobile terminal such as a smartphone, the user U (subscriber) who uses the user terminal 2 is assigned to the user terminal 2 A subscriber identity module (“SIM” for short) D2 is provided.
In the present invention, “SIM (or SIM card, UIM (User Identity Module), USIM (User Subscriber Identity Module))” is “mobile phone (mobile communication terminal) defined in JIS-X-6901: 2003”. IC module for registering subscriber number etc.).

Therefore, it can be said that the subscriber number registered in the subscriber identification module D2 is information accompanying the user terminal 2 used by the subscriber (user U), and is registered in the subscriber identification module D2. Among the information, at least the subscriber number may be included in the terminal information J.
The “terminal information J including the subscriber identification module D2 of the user U” in the present invention means information such as a subscriber number registered in the subscriber identification module D2.

<Hardware identifier (hardware ID) D3>
In addition to the above-described international portable device identification number D1 and subscriber identification module D2, not only when the user terminal 2 is a portable terminal such as a smartphone, a mobile phone, a tablet terminal, a PHS, or a PDA, but also a desktop PC or notebook The hardware information (Hardware Identification Data (Hardware ID)) D3 of each user terminal 2 may be included in the terminal information J, including the case of a PC.
The hardware identifier D3 may be a hardware identifier (ASHWID (Application Specific Hardware ID)) specific to each application (program) such as the evaluation program (appropriate evaluation application) 50 of the present invention.

The ASHWID is binary data having an indefinite length, and has a meaning in units of 4 bytes. Therefore, the length is an integral multiple of 4 bytes.
Among these 4 bytes, the first 2 bytes include the type of component (for example, processor CPU ID, memory size, disk device serial number, network adapter, audio adapter, docking station, mobile broadband device ID, Bluetooth ( (Registered trademark) address, a value indicating a system BIOS (Basic Input / Output System) is stored, and a value indicating each component in the user terminal 2 (a value generated from each component) is stored in the latter 2 bytes. Yes.

In addition to the above-described international portable device identification number D1, subscriber identification module D2, and hardware identifier D3, the terminal information acquisition unit 31 uses the user information U as the terminal information J to specify a predetermined user name N and a predetermined user terminal 2. If the terminal information acquisition unit 31 can acquire the information when it is registered in the evaluation system 1 of the present invention (at the time of user registration), other terminal information (for example, a contractor unique identifier (ID) or a subscriber identification module) An international mobile subscriber identity number (International Mobile Subscriber Identity, abbreviated as “IMSI”) stored in D2 may be included.
Further, it is only necessary that the terminal information J includes at least one of the international portable device identification number D1, the subscriber identification module D2, the hardware identifier D3, and other information described so far. It may include two or more of the international portable device identification number D1, the subscriber identification module D2, the hardware identifier D3, and other information.
The timing for acquiring the terminal information J may be any timing as long as it is before the user U is specified by the user specifying unit 7 to be described later. For example, the user information Z such as the user name N described above can be acquired. The timing of accepting the input and / or the timing immediately before the user U is actually specified may be used.

<Display unit 32>
As shown in FIGS. 1 to 6, if the user terminal 2 can accept the user information Z such as the user name N by the user accepting unit 4 described above or the evaluation data H by the evaluation accepting unit 5, Any configuration may be used, but a display unit 32 may be provided for displaying an input column for a user name N or the like, an input column for evaluation data H, and a search word input column for a target search unit 33 described later. .
The display unit 32 corresponds to a touch panel if the user terminal 2 is a smartphone, corresponds to the screen if the user terminal 2 is a mobile phone, and displays a display screen if the user terminal 2 is a desktop PC. It corresponds to the section 32.

The display unit 32 displays a user information Z input field such as a user name N, an evaluation data H input field, a search word input field, and the like. It can be said that it constitutes a part of 33.
Here, taking FIG. 3 (evaluation start screen) as an example, what the display unit 32 displays will be described in detail below.

As illustrated in FIG. 3, at the left end of the second row from the top in the display unit 32 of the user terminal 2, the user U (user U whose user name N is “Yuhohoo231”) at the silver level is now It is displayed that the evaluation as a silver level was performed 99 times.
In addition, at the right end of the second row from the top in the display unit 32, the user U displays that the next level (gold level) can be raised if the evaluation as the silver level is performed once more. Yes.

In the third row from the top in the display unit 32 illustrated in FIG. 3, a lottery (drawing) is displayed. At the left end of the third row from the top of the display unit 32, the user U enters the lottery. Indicates that you are eligible to participate.
In addition, the right end of the third row from the top of the display unit 32 displays that the next lottery will be held on December 1, 2014.

Here, let us mention the lottery.
The lottery is for providing a chance for the user U to obtain a prize (for example, a gift card or a coupon). The user U performs evaluation a predetermined number of times, for example, as a silver level. May be held every 100 times).

If the lottery held regularly is described, the number of evaluations by the user U will be the standard for the next holding time. Although the evaluation by the user U at the gold level means that the evaluation was performed twice as the silver level, the evaluation by the user U at the diamond level was expressed as the silver level. It is good also as a structure which means having evaluated 5 times.
In addition, when the user U makes more evaluations in the lottery, the prize is always given regularly (for example, every time the evaluation is performed 1000 times as the silver level). good.

Although a lottery is not essential for the evaluation system 1, this lottery becomes a suction force that attracts many users U, and at the same time increases the number of evaluations on the object G by the evaluation system 1, and is appropriate for the user U. It can be said that the reliability of the evaluation results can be further improved because a prize cannot be obtained without performing a thorough evaluation.
Moreover, many users U gather and many appropriate evaluations are performed, so that the number of food service companies G ′ and the like participating as the object G in the evaluation system 1 and the evaluation program 50 of the present invention increases.
Furthermore, the object G such as the participating food service industry G ′ and the object G ″ is a motivation to provide a more appropriate service and quality in order to obtain a high evaluation for the user U who performs an appropriate evaluation, There are merits on both the user U side and the object G side.

In the upper left of the fourth row from the top in the display unit 32 illustrated in FIG. 3, when converted as a level of gold or the like sequentially from the top (as will be described later, the food and drink that is the location of the user terminal 2 and the object G) For example, when the location of the store of service industry G 'is the same), the user U has performed 50 evaluations, and when converted to a silver level, the user U has 49 evaluations. What has been done (As these 50 times and 49 times, the evaluation performed when the user U is at the silver level is 99 times), and the average of the evaluation to the object G that the user U has performed so far is ,% Is displayed as 75%.
Below these in the fourth row, a button to be pressed when the user U, who is received by the user receiving unit 4 with the user name N “Yuhohoo231”, starts a new evaluation, is displayed.

The advertisement of the object G may be displayed on the bottom level of the display unit 32 illustrated in FIG. 3, and this portion is referred to as the advertisement display unit 17.
Therefore, it can be said that the display unit 32 includes the advertisement display unit 17 in a part thereof.

<Advertising display unit 17>
The advertisement display unit 17 is shown in FIGS.
The advertisement display unit 17 displays the advertisement of the object G such as the business G ′ such as the restaurant service industry or the object G ″, and can have any configuration as long as the advertisement of the object G can be displayed. May be.

When the target G to be displayed is the business G ′, the advertisement display unit 17 may display an advertisement of a business in a business type different from the business G ′ that receives an evaluation from the user U.
As a result, it is possible that the user U flows to other businesses (other stores, etc.) of the same industry as compared with the case where advertisements of the same industry as the business G ′ to be evaluated are displayed while obtaining advertising revenue. It is possible to perform a more pure evaluation only by reducing and actually visiting / experienced in the business G ′ (store, etc.) to be evaluated.

2, 3, 5, and 6 are a poultry farming industry G ′, which is an industry different from the food service industry G ′.
In addition to this, when the business G ′, which is the object G, is a dental medical business (dental clinic), the advertisement display unit 17 displays an advertisement of a manufacturing industry or a retail business such as a toothbrush or a toothpaste. If they are different, there is no limitation on the business G ′ that is the object G and the business G ′ to be advertised.

<Target search unit 33>
As shown in FIGS. 4 to 6, the user terminal 2 may have any configuration as long as the user U can search for an object G (food service industry G ′) or the like that the user U wants to evaluate. The object search part 33 which can search the thing G may be provided.
For example, when the user terminal 2 is a smartphone, the target search unit 33 includes a search word input field (see FIG. 4) and a search result field (see FIG. 5) displayed on the smartphone screen, and the user U You may be comprised by the touchscreen operated with a finger, a touch pen, etc.

If the user terminal 2 is a desktop PC or the like, the target search unit 33 is configured with an input field and a search result field that are displayed on a display screen, a keyboard and a mouse operated by the user U, and the like. Also good.
In addition, the user reception unit 4 has a function of displaying a search word input field and a search result field on a smartphone or a display screen, a function of inputting a search word corresponding to an operation of a touch panel, a keyboard, a mouse, and the like by the user U. May include a program (application) that executes or a part thereof.

Note that FIG. 4 (target search screen) is an example of the search word input field, and does not cause the user U to input an arbitrary search word, but the prefecture, city, nearest station, price desired by the user U A configuration in which information mainly required for searching, such as a belt, is input may be used.
FIG. 5 (candidate selection screen) is also an example of the search result column. For the candidates for the object G (“Torikizoku (registered trademark) 1” to “Torikizoku (registered trademark) 5” in FIG. 5), the food service industry G The information (name, address, telephone number) of the object G such as a store such as', and the evaluation value calculated so far for the object G (in FIG. 5, in% display such as 77% or “N / R ( No Record, meaning that it has not been evaluated))) or the like is displayed, and the user U may select from the retrieved candidates by looking at the information on the object G.

FIG. 6 (candidate detail screen) is an example of a candidate for the object G (object information X) selected by the user U. In the fourth row from the top in this screen, the candidates are evaluated in order from the top. (89% in% display in FIG. 6), the total number of stars currently assigned to each user U for the candidate (for example, five-level rating stars attached to each item such as Food) The total number of stars given to each user U including the updated amount during the validity period for the candidate may be displayed on the display unit 32.
Below the total number of stars, etc., as a detailed evaluation of the candidate, “food” is an average of 90% (4/5 in stars (4 stars out of 5)). Similarly, “Service” averages 69% (3/5 stars), “Atmosphere” averages 99% (5/5 stars), and “Price” averages 90% (4/5 for the number of stars) and 10% on average for the “location” (1/5 for the number of stars) may be displayed.

Below these details of the evaluation, a button to be pressed when the object G is selected as the candidate on which the user U is displayed may be displayed.
Under this button, in addition to the user name N, the date of birth (age) of the user U, the zip code (home), so that the user identification unit 7 can easily identify the user U and perform more appropriate evaluation. When the user information Z such as the zip code or the work zip code is received by the user receiving unit 4, the terminal information J such as the international portable device identification number D1 and the subscriber identification module D2 hardware identifier D3 described above is stored in the terminal. When the information acquisition unit 31 acquires the information, it may be displayed that even the user U at the silver level can immediately evaluate the object G as the diamond level.

<Terminal communication unit 21>
As shown in FIG. 1, the user terminal 2 has any configuration as long as it transmits the user information Z such as the user name N, the terminal information J, and the evaluation data H to the server 3 described later. However, the terminal communication unit 21 may transmit the evaluation data H and the like to the server 3 (that is, the user terminal 2 may include the terminal communication unit 21).
The terminal communication unit 21 communicates with the server 3 (the server communication unit 22 of the server 3) via a telephone network or a network W such as the Internet, LAN, MAN, WAN, etc. The evaluation data H may be transmitted to the server 3, or conversely, the object information X of the object G (food service industry G ′) described above may be received from the server 3.

The terminal communication unit 21 communicates with the server 3 via the network W, such as after the user U inputs the user name N or the like at the user reception unit 4, and receives the received user name N or the like at least once. 3 to send.
The terminal communication unit 21 communicates with the server 3 via the network W if, for example, after the terminal information acquisition unit 31 or the like has acquired the terminal information J such as the international portable device identification number D1 of the user terminal 2. The acquired terminal information J is also transmitted to the server 3 whenever the user U evaluates the object G (food service industry G ′ or the like).

<Server 3>
As shown in FIG. 1, the server 3 calculates the evaluation of the object G (food service industry G ′ or the like) based on the evaluation data H, and the terminal information J described above as the user name N. A user specifying unit 7 that can specify the user U in a one-to-one correspondence is provided.
The server 3 includes a server communication unit 22 that can receive the user name N and the like, the terminal information J, and the evaluation data H from the user terminal 2, a user name N and the terminal information J, and a pair of the user name N and the terminal information J (described later) 1 set, 1 set), evaluation data H for the object G (food service industry G ′), evaluation date / time T of the evaluation data H, previous evaluation date / time T ′, user U ’s own evaluation level associated with the user name N, There may be provided a database (storage unit) 34 for associating and storing the evaluation interval K, position information P, and the like.
As long as the server 3 includes at least the evaluation calculation unit 6 or the like, the server 3 may be configured not only from a single computer or workstation but also from a LAN including a plurality of computers.

The “server” in the present invention refers to a “functional device that provides a shared service to workstations and other functional devices via a data network” defined in JIS-X-0009: 1997.
The “database” in the present invention is “a collection of data supporting a plurality of application business fields defined in JIS-X-0001: 1994, and represents the relationship between the characteristics of the data and the corresponding entities. "Organized according to the conceptual structure described".

The server 3 is also considered to be a part of a network W that is an aggregate of a telephone network, a LAN, and the like. Storage, application, and service) (virtualized).
Therefore, it can be said that the evaluation calculation unit 6 and the user identification unit 7 described above are placed on the server 3 and the network W at the same time.

Moreover, since the server 3 is virtualized, it can be said that the evaluation system 1 of the present invention is a “grid system”.
Note that the “grid system” in the present invention is defined by “JIS-X-7301: 2010”, which requires necessary resources without being aware of the physical location and hardware of resources such as computers, storage, and networks. A system that can be used as often as necessary and is a heterogeneous and / or geographically distributed system that integrates multiple computer resources using virtualization technology.

Furthermore, the server 3 is a place on the network W where the evaluation calculation unit 6 and the user identification unit 7 and the database (storage unit) 34 such as the user name N, the terminal information J, and the evaluation data H from the user terminal 2 are placed. It can be said that it has secured.
As described above, in order to secure a place on the network W, a provider contract is made with a provider that provides a service (a provider of an Internet connection service).
As long as these functions are realized, the server 3 may have any configuration.

The server 3 may have an FTP server and be connected to the network W via a firewall.
In addition to the firewall described above, the server 3 may have anti-virus software (application software that detects, removes, and disables computer viruses), and also has either a firewall or anti-virus software. It is also good to have.

<Evaluation calculation unit 6>
As shown in FIG. 1, the evaluation calculation unit 6 calculates the evaluation of the object G (food service industry G ′ or the like) based on the evaluation data H received by the evaluation reception unit 5 described above. Any configuration may be used as long as the evaluation calculation based on the evaluation data H can be performed.
For example, the evaluation calculation unit 6 may be a program (application) or a part thereof having a function of calculating the evaluation of the object G such as the food service industry G ′ on the basis of the evaluation data H. As described above, the server 3 may be a place on the network W secured by the server 3.

Thus, when the evaluation calculation part 6 is placed on the network W, a plurality of objects G such as one restaurant service industry G ′ (or a restaurant that performs the restaurant service industry G ′) are used. It can be said that the object G can be evaluated more appropriately by communicating from the user terminal 2 of the user U to the server 3 and using the evaluation data H from many users U as a basis.
Furthermore, the evaluation calculation unit 6 does not use all the evaluation data H transmitted from the user terminal 2 as the basis for the evaluation of the object G as it is, and depending on the specification result of the user specification unit 7 described later, Even if all or a part is excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation of the object G (the predetermined evaluation data H includes a predetermined value (for example, 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3,. 4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, etc., a value of 0.0 to 1.0 (hereinafter referred to as “exclusion coefficient α”)) Multiplication may also be used as a basis for calculating the evaluation of the object G).
In other words, the evaluation system 1 of the present invention allows the evaluation calculation unit 6 to accept any user U with the evaluation receiving unit 5, so that the evaluation itself can be received without being noticed by the user U. It is also possible not to reflect in the calculation.

<User identification unit 7>
As shown in FIG. 1, the user specifying unit 7 makes it possible to specify the user U by associating the terminal information J including the international portable device identification number D1 described above with the user name N on a one-to-one basis. It is.
In the present invention, “the terminal information J can be identified with the user name N on a one-to-one basis to identify the user U” means that the terminal information J is the user name N (the user information Z including at least the user name N). And the user specifying unit 7 (and / or the user specifying step ST described later) that can also specify the user U in a one-to-one correspondence with the object G (food service industry) When evaluating G ′), it does not necessarily mean that the specification by the user specifying unit 7 (and / or the user specifying step ST described later) is always performed.

The user identification unit 7 associates the terminal information J with the user name N on a one-to-one basis (for example, associates one terminal information “J1” with one user name “N1”), and the user U Any configuration can be used as long as it can be specified.
For example, the user specifying unit 7 may be a program (application) having a function that allows the user U to be specified by associating the user name N with the terminal information J, or a part thereof. The server 3 may be a place on the network W secured.

User identification unit 7 makes user name N and terminal information J correspond one-to-one (that is, one user name “N1” and one terminal information “J1” pair (one set, one set) The timing may be any time as long as the user “U1” of the user name “N1” performs the evaluation (before the evaluation data “H1” is received as the user name “N1”). For example, the user terminal 2, when the user name “N1” is received by the user receiving unit 4, the terminal information “J1” is also acquired by the terminal information acquiring unit 31, and the user name “N1” and the terminal information “J1” are acquired from the user terminal 2. You may transmit to the server 3 and it is made to respond | correspond 1 to 1 in the user specific part 7.
In addition, as a timing of association, not when the user name “N1” is received, but when the evaluation data “H1” is first received by the evaluation receiving unit 5, the terminal information “J1” is also acquired by the terminal information acquiring unit 31. In this case, the user name “N1” and the terminal information “J1” are transmitted from the user terminal 2 to the server 3 and corresponded one-to-one. The identification shown may be performed.

<Identification by user identification unit 7>
The identification by the user identification unit 7 is that the terminal information when the user name “N1” and the terminal information “J1” (e.g., one set) are associated with each other and evaluated with the same user name “N1” In the case of <1> that is the same as the terminal information “J1” set in advance, the evaluation is from the user “U1” with the user name “N1” (if the user is “U1”) Specific).
On the other hand, the specification by the user specifying unit 7 is that the terminal information when the user name “N1” and the terminal information “J1” (one set) are associated with each other and evaluated with the same user name “N1”. , “J1” and other terminal information J such as “J2”, which is different from the previously set terminal information “J1” <2>, the user name is actually “N1”. It may include not being an evaluation from the user “U1” (identifying that the user is not “U1”).

In addition, for the identification by the user identification unit 7, the user terminal 2 having the same terminal information “J1” is used after associating the pair (one set) of the user name “N1” and the terminal information “J1”. Nevertheless, in the case of <3> in which the evaluation is performed with other user names N such as “N2” having different user names, there is a possibility of evaluation by the user “U1” (the user is “U1”). May be specified).
On the other hand, in the case of <3>, which is the same as described above, the possibility of each evaluation by other users U such as users “U1” and “U2” which are really different in user names “N1” and “N2” etc. The identification by the user identification unit 7 may be included (identification that there is a possibility of each evaluation by the users “U1” and “U2”).

Further, the identification by the user identification unit 7 is “N2” or the like, which is different from “N1” after the user name “N1” and the terminal information “J1” pair (one set) are associated with each other. In the case of <4> in which the terminal information when the evaluation is performed with a different user name “N2” or the like is “J2” or the like that is different from “J1”, it is naturally not an evaluation from the user “U1” (user May be specified as not being “U1”.
In the case <4> described above, if the pair (one set) of the user name “N2” and the terminal information “J2” is associated with each other, the user “U2” or the like is not the user “U1”. It may be included in the specification by the user specifying unit 7 that the user is specified as “U2” instead of “U1”.

Whether the predetermined user name N (such as “N1” and “N2”) is the same or different in the user specifying unit 7 is the same as the character strings input as the user name N in the user receiving unit 4 Judged by no.
In addition, whether or not the predetermined terminal information J (“J1” and “J2”, etc.) is the same or different in the user specifying unit 7 is determined based on at least the international portable device identification number D1 and the subscriber identification module D2 included in each terminal information J. (Subscriber number, etc.), hardware identifier D3, and other information types are compared with each other to determine whether all the information (or a part of the information) matches.

<Evaluation calculation unit 6 according to identification result of user identification unit 7>
According to the identification result of the user identification unit 7, for example, the evaluation data transmitted with the user name “N1” from the user terminal 2 whose terminal information is “J1” is the evaluation data “H1” by the user “U1”. When it is specified that there is a part (in the case of a part of <1> described above), the evaluation calculation unit 6 includes all of the evaluation data “H1” of the user “U1” (the evaluation data “of the user“ U1 ”“ H1 ”multiplied by an exclusion coefficient α of 1.0) may be used as the basis for the evaluation calculation of the object G (food service industry G ′).
On the other hand, according to the identification result of the user identification unit 7, for example, the user name is transmitted as evaluation data of “N1” from the user terminal 2 whose terminal information is “J2” different from “J1”, and the user “U1” Is determined to be not evaluation data “H1” (in the case of <2> described above), the evaluation calculation unit 6 converts all of the evaluation data “H1” of the user “U1” It may be excluded from the basis of evaluation calculation of G (food service industry G ′) (based on the evaluation data “H1” of the user “U1” multiplied by an exclusion coefficient α of 0.0).

In the case of <2>, when some pieces of information match in the terminal information “J1” and “J2”, the evaluation calculation unit 6 calculates the evaluation of the object G (food service industry G ′). Are excluded from a part of the evaluation data “H1” of the user “U1” (exclusion coefficients of 0.1 or more and 0.9 or more such as 0.5 in the evaluation data “H1” of the user “U1”). It may be based on (multiply α).
Also, depending on the information that matches in the terminal information “J1” and “J2”, the value of the exclusion coefficient α may be changed. For example, the subscriber of the user U (subscriber) who uses the user terminal 2 itself In the case of <2-1> where the subscriber identification module D2 in which the number is registered matches but does not match other information, the exclusion coefficient α is set to 0 such as 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, etc. It may be a value not less than 5 and less than 1.0.

If the international portable device identification number D1 other than the subscriber identification module D2 and the hardware identifier D3 match but do not match other information <2-2>, the exclusion coefficient α is set to 0.5, etc. It may be a value greater than 0 and less than 1.0, and other information other than the international portable device identification number D1, subscriber identification module D2, and hardware identifier D3 matches, but does not match other information <2- In the case of 3>, the exclusion coefficient α may be a value greater than 0.0 and less than 0.5, such as 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4.
Furthermore, the terminal information J includes two or more of the international portable device identification number D1, the subscriber identification module D2, the hardware identifier D3, and other information, and the two or more pieces of information match <2 In the case of −4>, the exclusion coefficient α having a larger value than the exclusion coefficient α when the pieces of information match may be used.

In addition, according to the identification result of the user identification unit 7, for example, the evaluation data transmitted with the user name “N1” from the user terminal 2 whose terminal information is “J1” is the evaluation data “U1” When it is determined that there is a possibility of “H1” (in the case of <3> described above), the evaluation calculation unit 6 converts a part of the evaluation data “H1” of the user “U1” to the object G (Eating and drinking service industry G ′) excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation (excluded from 0.1 to 0.9 or higher such as 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, etc. in the evaluation data “H1” of the user “U1”) It may be based on the factor α.
In addition, according to the identification result of the user identification unit 7, for example, an evaluation transmitted from the user terminal 2 whose terminal information is other terminal information J such as “J2” as the other user name N such as “N2”. Naturally, when it is specified that there is a possibility that the data is not the user “U1” but the evaluation data “H2” by the user “U2” or the like (in the case of <4> described above), naturally, the evaluation calculation unit 6 The evaluation data “H1” of the user “U1” is not used as the basis for the evaluation calculation of the object G (food service industry G ′). The exclusion coefficient α is 0.0).
However, after associating a pair (one set) of the user name “N2” and the like with the terminal information “J2” in advance, depending on the specific result of the user name “N2” and the terminal information “J2”, etc. As described above, the evaluation calculation unit 6 may exclude all or part of the evaluation data “H2” or the like from the basis of the evaluation calculation of the object G depending on the specification result of the user specifying unit 7.

As described so far, the terminal information J including the international portable device identification number D1, the subscriber identification module D2, and the hardware identifier D3 is associated with the user name N on a one-to-one basis so that the user U can be specified. Thus, the same user U is evaluating by changing the user terminal 2 such as a smartphone, a mobile phone, or a desktop PC (that is, the same user U repeatedly evaluates the same object G) Therefore, it is possible to check (suppress) repeated evaluation for an arbitrary user U (who intends to intentionally improve or deteriorate the evaluation result).
As a result, the reliability of the evaluation result can be improved (simultaneous realization of “suppression of repeated evaluation of the same user” and “improvement of reliability of the evaluation result”).

<Server communication unit 22>
As shown in FIG. 1, if the server 3 receives the user information Z such as the user name N, the terminal information J, and the evaluation data H from the user terminal 2 (or the terminal communication unit 21), The terminal information J and the like may be received from the user terminal 2 by the server communication unit 22 (that is, the server 3 may include the server communication unit 22).
The server communication unit 22 communicates with the user terminal 2 (the terminal communication unit 21 of the user terminal 2) via the network W described above, and receives the terminal information J, the user name N, and the evaluation data H from the user terminal 2. Conversely, the object information X of the object G (food service industry G ′) described above may be transmitted to the user terminal 2.

The server communication unit 22 is the same as the terminal communication unit 21. After the user U inputs the user name N or the like at the user reception unit 4, the server communication unit 22 communicates with the user terminal 2 via the network W and receives the user communication. The user name N is received from the user terminal 2 at least once.
The server communication unit 22 communicates with the user terminal 2 via the network W if the terminal information acquisition unit 31 or the like has acquired the terminal information J such as the international portable device identification number D1 of the user terminal 2. And the acquired terminal information J is also received from the user terminal 2 whenever the user U evaluates the target object G (food service industry G ′).

<Modification of First Embodiment of Evaluation System 1>
In the evaluation system 1, the user terminal 2 may include the user specifying unit 7 described above.
The server 3 receives the identification result of the user identification unit 7 transmitted from the user terminal 2, and this identification result is used as the basis for the evaluation calculation of the object G (food service industry G ′) by the evaluation calculation unit 6. Judging.

The user specifying unit 7 may be provided from the user terminal 2 to the server 3 (in the user terminal 2 and the server 3). In this case, the user specifying unit 7 is a terminal information acquisition unit in the user terminal 2. 31 and a database (storage unit) 34 in the server 3 may be included.
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation system 1 are the same as those in the first embodiment.
Next, the evaluation program 50 executed by the evaluation system 1 will be described.

<First Embodiment of Evaluation Program 50>
7 and 8 show an evaluation program 50 according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

As illustrated in FIG. 7, the evaluation program 50 first sends the electronic file of the evaluation program 50 to the user terminal 2 (smart phone in FIG. 7) from the download site such as the server 3 described above via the network W or the like. to download.
For example, the downloaded electronic file may be displayed as an icon 50 ′ on the display unit 32 of the user terminal 2.
The evaluation program 50 is installed in the user terminal 2 by double-tapping or double-clicking the icon (electronic file) 50 ′.
The following describes the evaluation program 50 after installation.

  FIG. 8 shows a flowchart of the evaluation program 50 according to the first embodiment of the present invention. The flow of the evaluation program 50 will be described below (steps S1 to S8).

<Step S1>
Step S1 is a step for starting the evaluation program 50. After the step S1 is executed by the evaluation system 1 (user terminal 2), the process proceeds to the next step S2.

<Step S2 (User Acceptance Step SN)>
Step S2 is a step of accepting input of user information Z including the user name N of the user U by the user accepting unit 4, and after making the user terminal 2 in the evaluation system 1 execute this step S2, the next step S3 Move on.
Therefore, it can be said that this step S2 is user reception step SN.
In step S2 (user reception step SN), a user reception screen (such as a new registration button on the login screen) is displayed on the display unit 32 of the user terminal 2, and the user U who uses the evaluation system 1 for the first time is notified to the user. Any configuration may be employed such as a configuration in which the user information Z including the user name N of the user U is input by the reception unit 4 and the processing proceeds to the next step S3, or a screen dedicated to new user registration.

<Step S3>
Step S3 is a step in which the user U selects whether or not to start the evaluation of the object G such as the food service industry G ′. When the user terminal 2 in the evaluation system 1 executes this step S3, If “Yes (start evaluation)” is selected, the process proceeds to the next step S4, and if “No (end evaluation)” is selected, the process proceeds to step S8 indicating the end.
In step S3, a login screen is displayed on the display unit 32 of the user terminal 2, and the user name N, the password, etc., of the user U that has been entered by the user U who has already entered the user information Z including the user name N are displayed. If the user name N or the like is not appropriate, the user is not logged in or the input user name or the like is not registered. It may be configured as follows.

<Step S4 (Evaluation Acceptance Step SH)>
Step S4 is a step of receiving the evaluation data H for the object G by the user U in the evaluation receiving unit 5. After the user terminal 2 in the evaluation system 1 executes this step S4, the process proceeds to the next step S5.
Therefore, it can be said that this step S3 is also an evaluation acceptance step SH.
Moreover, step S4 (evaluation reception step SH) is good also as a structure which performs the search of target objects G, such as the food service industry G 'which the user U wants to evaluate in the target search part 33. FIG.

<Step S5 (User Specification Step ST)>
In step S5, terminal information J including at least one of the international portable device identification number D1 of the user terminal 2, the subscriber identification module D2 of the user U, and the hardware identifier D3 of the user terminal 2 is obtained by the user identification unit 7 in step S2. This is a step in which the user U can be identified in a one-to-one correspondence with the user name N received in (user reception step SN), and this step S5 is the server 3 (and / or user terminal 2) in the evaluation system 1 ), The process proceeds to the next step S6.
Therefore, this step S5 can also be said to be a user specifying step ST.
In the evaluation program 50 of the present invention, the server 3 (and / or the user terminal 2) executes this step S5 (user specifying step ST), and then the next step S6 is executed.

<Step S6 (Evaluation Calculation Step SC)>
Step S6 is a step in which the evaluation calculation unit 6 calculates the evaluation of the object G based on all or part of the evaluation data H received in step S4 (evaluation reception step SH). After making the server 3 in the evaluation system 1 execute, the process proceeds to the next step S7.
Therefore, this step S6 can be said to be an evaluation calculation step SC.
In this way, after the user specifying step ST that can specify the user U is executed, the evaluation receiving step SH that calculates the evaluation of the object G based on all or part of the received evaluation data H is performed. By executing this, it is possible to suppress the repeated evaluation to the user U and improve the reliability of the evaluation result.

<Steps S7 and S8>
Step S7 is a step for allowing the user U to select whether or not to end the evaluation of the object G such as the food service industry G ′. When the user terminal 2 in the evaluation system 1 executes this step S7, If “Yes (end evaluation)” is selected, the process proceeds to step S8 which means end, and if “No (restart evaluation)” is selected, the process returns to the above-described step S4 (evaluation receiving step SH).

<Modification of First Embodiment of Evaluation Program 50>
FIG. 9 shows a flowchart of a modification of the evaluation program 50 according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
In this modification, the most different point from the first embodiment is that the steps (steps S2 ′, S4 ′ (terminal information acquisition step SS)) for acquiring the terminal information J are clarified, and other steps. Since S1 to S8 are the same as those in the first embodiment, steps S2 ′ and S4 ′ will be mainly described in detail.

<Step S2 ′ (Terminal Information Acquisition Step SS)>
In step S2 ′, after the above-described step S2 (user reception step S-N) is executed, the terminal information acquisition unit 31 uses the international portable device identification number D1, the subscriber identification module D2, and the hardware in the user terminal 2. This is a step of acquiring terminal information J including at least one of the identifiers D3. After causing the user terminal 2 in the evaluation system 1 to execute step S2 ′, the process proceeds to step S3 described above.
Therefore, it can be said that this step S2 ′ is a terminal information acquisition step SS.
Step S2 ′ (terminal information acquisition step SS) may be a step in which the terminal information acquisition unit 31 determines whether the user terminal 2 is a mobile terminal such as a smartphone or a mobile phone. This step S2 If “Yes (is a mobile terminal)” is determined when “is executed”, the terminal information acquisition unit 31 acquires the terminal information J such as the international mobile device identification number D1, the subscriber identification module D2, and the like. If the determination is “No (not a mobile terminal)”, the terminal information acquisition unit 31 acquires the terminal information J such as the hardware identifier D3 and moves to the next step S3. It may be a configuration.

<Step S4 ′ (Terminal Information Acquisition Step SS)>
Step S4 ′ is also the same as step S2 ′, and after the above-described step S2 (user reception step SN) is executed, the terminal information acquisition unit 31 includes the terminal including the international portable device identification number D1 in the user terminal 2. This is a step for acquiring information J. After step S4 ′ is executed by the user terminal 2 in the evaluation system 1, the process proceeds to the above-described step S5 (user specifying step ST).
Therefore, this step S4 ′ can also be said to be a terminal information acquisition step SS.
Further, step S4 ′ (terminal information acquisition step SS) may be a step in which the terminal information acquisition unit 31 determines whether or not the user terminal 2 is a portable terminal, as described above in step S2 ′. If it is determined “Yes (is a mobile terminal)” when step S4 ′ is executed, the terminal information acquisition unit 31 acquires terminal information J such as the international mobile device identification number D1, the subscriber identification module D2, and the like. Then, the process proceeds to the next step S5 (user identification step ST), and if it is determined as “No (not a mobile terminal)”, the terminal information acquisition unit 31 acquires the terminal information J such as the hardware identifier D3. Any configuration, such as a configuration for moving to the next step S5 (user specifying step ST), may be used.
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation program 50 are the same as those in the first embodiment.

<Second Embodiment of Evaluation System 1>
FIG. 1 also shows an evaluation system 1 according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
The second embodiment is most different from the first embodiment in that the specific change receiving unit 8 receives a change of a pair (one set) of the user name N1 and the terminal information J1, and the number of changes C by the specific change receiving unit 8. Is equal to or greater than a predetermined value, the change exclusion unit 9 is provided that can exclude the evaluation data H1 by the user name N1 from the basis of the evaluation calculation.

<Specific change acceptance unit 8>
As shown in FIG. 1, the specific change receiving unit 8 changes from the user U that one terminal information J1 associated with one user name N1 in the user specifying unit 7 is changed to other terminal information J2. As with other receiving units (user receiving unit 4 and evaluation receiving unit 5), the user terminal 2 is provided.
The specific change accepting unit 8 may have any configuration as long as it can accept the change of the pair (set) of the user name N and the terminal information J. For example, when the user terminal 2 is a smartphone, Similarly to the user reception unit 4 and the like, the input field of other terminal information J2 displayed on the screen of the smartphone and a touch panel operated by the user U with a finger, a touch pen, or the like may be used.

If the user terminal 2 is a desktop PC or the like, the specific change accepting unit 8 is configured with an input field for other terminal information J2 displayed on the display screen, a keyboard or a mouse operated by the user U, and the like. It may be done.
Further, the specific change receiving unit 8 has a function of displaying an input field of other terminal information J2 on the screen of the smartphone or the display, and inputs other terminal information J2 according to the operation of the touch panel, keyboard, mouse, etc. by the user U. A program (application) for executing a function to be executed or a part thereof.

<Change Exclusion Unit 9>
As shown in FIG. 1, the change excluding unit 9 has a change count C of the terminal information J corresponding to the user name N1 by the specific change accepting unit 8 equal to or greater than a predetermined value (hereinafter referred to as “change threshold β”). In some cases, the evaluation data H1 by the user name N1 newly received by the evaluation receiving unit 5 can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation by the evaluation calculating unit 6, and similarly to the evaluation calculating unit 6 etc. 3 is provided.
The change exclusion unit 9 may have any configuration as long as the evaluation data H1 by the user name N1 can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation when the number of changes C of the terminal information J is equal to or greater than the change threshold β. For example, when the number of changes C is equal to or greater than the change threshold β, it may be a program (application) or a part thereof having a function of excluding the evaluation data H1 from the basis of the evaluation calculation. The server 3 may be a place on the network W secured.
The change exclusion unit 9 may be provided in the user terminal 2 or may be provided from the user terminal 2 to the server 3 (in the user terminal 2 and the server 3).

Note that the change excluding unit 9 may exclude all of the evaluation data H1 based on the user name N1 as in the evaluation calculating unit 6 but may be part of the basis for the evaluation calculation (the change excluding unit 9 may evaluate the evaluation). It can be said that it is included in the calculation unit 6).
In other words, the change excluding unit 9 adds the exclusion coefficient α (for example, the change count C greatly exceeds the change threshold β to the evaluation data H1 of the user name N1 depending on the change count C of the terminal information J corresponding to the user name N1. The basis for the evaluation calculation of the object G is 0.0, if the number of changes C exceeds the change threshold β only once, 0.5, etc. It is also good.

The evaluation system 1 of the present invention can accept any user U by the change excluding unit 9 and the evaluation receiving unit 5 can receive the evaluation itself. When the number of changes C is equal to or greater than the change threshold β, it can be not reflected in the evaluation calculation.
The evaluation system 1 of the present invention also includes a specific change receiving unit 8 that changes one terminal information J1 corresponding to the user name N1 to other terminal information J2, so that the user U submerges the user terminal 2. Even when the user terminal 2 is unavoidably changed due to an unexpected failure such as, or when the model is changed, an appropriate change count C can be handled.

<Change threshold β>
Therefore, it is divided into whether or not to exclude the evaluation data H1 of the user name N1 from the basis of the evaluation calculation with an appropriate change threshold β with respect to the change count C of the terminal information J corresponding to the user name N1 described above. .
The change threshold β is not particularly limited. For example, the change threshold β is 2 (that is, the change count C of the terminal information J is allowed up to one time, and after the second change count C, all or part of the evaluation data H1). Is excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation, 3 (that is, when the number of changes C is allowed up to 2 and all or part of the evaluation data H1 is excluded after the third), or a value of 4 or more It does not matter.

In addition, the change threshold β may be reset every predetermined period (half year, one year, several years, etc.), for example, may be set to 1 every year.
In this case, the number of changes C of the terminal information J is allowed up to one time and less than one year after the terminal information J1 is associated with the user name N1 as a pair (set). Reset to zero. Less than one year after resetting, the number of changes C is allowed up to one, and resetting and resetting the number of changes C to 0 again after one year is repeated every year.
Naturally, the change threshold β is 2 or more every year, 1 or 2 every 6 months, 1 or 2 every several years, or conversely, a shorter period (for example, 1 1 or 2 or more per week, 1 month, several months, etc.).
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation system 1 are the same as those in the first embodiment.

<Evaluation Program 50 of Second Embodiment>
FIG. 10 is a flowchart of the evaluation program 50 according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
The second embodiment is most different from the first embodiment in that step S3-2 (specific change acceptance step SJ) for accepting a change in the terminal information J corresponding to the user name N is added, as described above. Step S6 (evaluation calculation step S-C) includes a step (change exclusion step S-R1) of excluding the evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation when the change count C of the terminal information J is equal to or greater than the change threshold β. Since the other steps S1 to S5, S7, and S8 are the same as those in the first embodiment, steps S3-2 and S6 are mainly described in detail.

<Step S3-2 (Specific Change Acceptance Step SJ)>
In step S3-2, after “Yes” is selected in step S3 described above, one terminal information J1 associated with one user name N1 is changed to other terminal information J2 by the specific change receiving unit 8. This is a step of accepting this from the user U, and after causing the user terminal 2 in the evaluation system 1 to execute this step S3-2, the process proceeds to the above-described step S4.
Therefore, it can be said that this step S3-2 is a specific change receiving step SJ.

<Step S6 (Change Exclusion Step S-R1)>
In step S6 described above, after the above-described step S5 (user identification step ST) is executed, the change exclusion unit 9 causes the change count C of the terminal information J corresponding to the user name N1 to be greater than or equal to the change threshold β. In some cases, the evaluation data H1 by the newly received user name N1 includes a step that can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation. After the server 3 in the evaluation system 1 executes this step S6, the process proceeds to step S7 described above.
Therefore, it can be said that this step S6 includes a change exclusion step S-R1.
The change exclusion step S-R1 included in step S6 may be a step in which the change exclusion unit 9 determines whether or not the number of changes C of the terminal information J is equal to or greater than the change threshold β. -When R1 is executed, if it is determined to be “Yes (is greater than or equal to the change threshold β)”, the change excluding unit 9 converts the evaluation data H1 based on the user name N1 or all of the evaluation data H1 After excluding from the basis, the evaluation calculation of the object G is performed based on the evaluation data H1 after being excluded by the evaluation calculating unit 6, and the process proceeds to the next step S7, where “No (is less than the change threshold β)”. If determined, any configuration may be employed, such as a configuration in which the evaluation calculation unit 6 performs evaluation calculation of the object G based on the evaluation data H1 based on the user name N1 and moves to the next step S7 as usual.

The change exclusion step S-R1 may be independent from step S6 (evaluation calculation step SC). Furthermore, the change exclusion step S-R1 is executed by the user terminal 2 or from the user terminal 2. It may be executed over the server 3 (that is, the user terminal 2 and the server 3).
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation program 50 are the same as those in the first embodiment.

<Third Embodiment of Evaluation System 1>
FIG. 1 also shows an evaluation system 1 according to a third embodiment of the present invention.
The third embodiment is most different from the first and second embodiments in that the user storage unit 10 stores one user name N1 and one terminal information J1 as one set, and the stored user name N1 and terminal. A difference exclusion unit 11 is provided that can exclude newly received evaluation data H from the basis of evaluation calculation when only one of the pair with the information J1 is different.

<User storage unit 10>
As shown in FIG. 1, the user storage unit 10 stores one user name N1 and one terminal information J1 associated with each other by the user specifying unit 7 as one set (pair). Any configuration is possible as long as N1 and one terminal information J1 can be stored as a pair.
For example, the user storage unit 10 may be provided in the server 3 or may be a storage device such as a hard disk or memory placed in a location on the network W secured by the server 3.

When provided in the server 3 as described above, it can be said that the user storage unit 10 is included in the database (storage unit) 34 described above.
In addition, the user storage unit 10 may be provided in the user terminal 2 or may be provided from the user terminal 2 to the server 3 (in the user terminal 2 and the server 3).

<Difference exclusion unit 11>
As shown in FIG. 1, the difference exclusion unit 11 receives the evaluation data H newly received by the evaluation reception unit 5 for one set of the user name N1 and the terminal information J1 stored in the user storage unit 10. If only one of the user name N and the terminal information J is different, the newly received evaluation data H can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation in the evaluation calculation unit 6, and The server 3 is provided in the same manner as the calculation unit 6 and the change exclusion unit 9.
The difference exclusion unit 11 may have any configuration as long as the evaluation data H can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation when only one of the user name N and the terminal information J is different. For example, when only one of the user name N and the terminal information J is different, it may be a program (application) having a function of excluding the evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation or a part thereof. This program may be placed at a location on the network W secured by the server 3.

More specifically, the user specifying unit 7 described above associates a pair (one set) of the user name “N1” and the terminal information “J1”, and then evaluates with the same user name “N1”. The user name when the terminal information is “J2” or the like different from “J1” or when the user terminal 2 having the same terminal information “J1” is used. In the case of <3> in which the evaluation is performed with different “N2” or the like, the evaluation reception unit 5 newly received one set of the user name N1 and the terminal information J1 stored in the user storage unit 10 It can also be said that only one of the user name N and the terminal information J in the evaluation data H is different.
The difference exclusion unit 11 excludes the evaluation data “H1” or “H2” from the user name “N1” or “N2”, as in the evaluation calculation unit 6 or the change exclusion unit 9, from the basis of the evaluation calculation. Or all of them may be part of them.

  That is, when only one of the user name N and the terminal information J is different, the difference exclusion unit 11 adds the exclusion coefficient α (for example, the evaluation data “H1” such as the user name “N1”). A value obtained by multiplying a value of 0.0 or more and 1.0 or less, such as 0.5, may be used as a basis for the evaluation calculation of the object G.

Therefore, in the evaluation system 1 of the present invention, when the same user U evaluates the object G from the different terminal information J while having the same user name N, the same user U has different user terminals 2. As a result, it is possible to realize the prevention of the operation of the evaluation result and the further improvement of the reliability without the user U being aware of it by excluding it from the basis of the evaluation calculation of the object G.
In addition, also when the difference exclusion part 11 evaluates the target object G from the same terminal information J, although it is a different user name N, the different user U evaluated from the same user terminal 2, or the same Assuming that the user U has evaluated from the same user terminal 2 using different user names N, the user U can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation of the object G.

It can be said that such a change excluding unit 9 is included in the user specifying unit 7 and the evaluation calculating unit 6 described above.
The difference exclusion unit 11 may be provided in the user terminal 2 or may be provided from the user terminal 2 to the server 3 (in the user terminal 2 and the server 3).
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation system 1 are the same as those in the first and second embodiments.

<Third Embodiment of Evaluation Program 50>
FIG. 11 is a flowchart of the evaluation program 50 according to the third embodiment of the present invention.
The third embodiment is most different from the first and second embodiments. Step S5-2 (user storage step SM) stores one user name N1 and one terminal information J1 associated with each other as a set. When only one of the pair of the user name N1 and the terminal information J1 is different from the point added with the above-described step S6 (evaluation calculation step S-C), the evaluation data H is evaluated and calculated. Steps S1 to S5, S7, and S8 are the same as those in the first and second embodiments. S6 is mainly explained in detail.

<Step S5-2 (User Storage Step SM)>
In step S5-2, after executing the above-described step S5 (user specifying step ST) to associate one user name N1 and one terminal information J1 as one set (pair), the user storage unit 10 This is a step of storing one set of one user name N1 and one terminal information J1. After the step S5-2 is executed by the user terminal 2 (and / or the server 3) in the evaluation system 1, the next step Move to S6.
Therefore, it can be said that this step S5-2 is also a user storage step SM.

<Step S6 (difference exclusion step S-R2)>
In step S6 described above, evaluation data newly received for one set of the stored user name N1 and terminal information J1 after step S5-2 (user storage step SM) is executed. In the case where only one of the user name N and terminal information J in H is different, the difference excluding unit 11 includes a step capable of excluding new evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation, and this step S6 is evaluated system After the server 3 in FIG. 1 executes the process, the process proceeds to step S7 described above.
Therefore, it can be said that this step S6 includes a difference exclusion step S-R2.
The difference exclusion step S-R2 included in step S6 may be a step of determining whether only one of the set of the user name N1 and the terminal information J1 is different. If it is determined as “Yes (difference)” when the exclusion step S-R2 is executed, the difference exclusion unit 11 converts all or part of the evaluation data H1 based on the user name N1 into the basis for calculating the evaluation of the object G If the evaluation object H is evaluated based on the evaluation data H1 after being excluded from the evaluation calculation unit 6 and then moved to the next step S7, and “No (not different)” is determined. As described above, any configuration may be employed such as a configuration in which the evaluation calculation unit 6 performs evaluation calculation of the object G based on the evaluation data H1 based on the user name N1 and moves to the next step S7.

Note that the difference exclusion step S-R2 may be independent of step S6 (evaluation calculation step SC). Further, the difference exclusion step S-R2 may be executed by the user terminal 2 or from the user terminal 2. It may be executed over the server 3 (that is, the user terminal 2 and the server 3).
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation program 50 are the same as those in the first and second embodiments.

<Fourth Embodiment of Evaluation System 1>
FIG. 1 also shows an evaluation system 1 according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention.
The fourth embodiment is most different from the first to third embodiments in that it includes a date and time exclusion unit 12 that can exclude the evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation based on the received evaluation date and time T. .

<Date Exclusion Unit 12>
As shown in FIG. 1, the date and time exclusion unit 12 uses the evaluation calculation unit 6 to transfer the newly received evaluation data H based on the evaluation date and time T when the evaluation reception unit 5 received the evaluation data H from the user U. The server 3 is provided in the same manner as the evaluation calculation unit 6 and the respective exclusion units (the change exclusion unit 9 and the difference exclusion unit 11).
The date and time exclusion unit 12 may have any configuration as long as the evaluation data H can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation based on the received evaluation date and time T. May be a program (application) or a part thereof having a function of excluding from the basis of evaluation calculation, and this program may be placed in a location on the network W secured by the server 3. Absent.

The date and time excluding unit 12 may exclude all of the evaluation data H by the user name N as in the evaluation calculating unit 6 and each of the excluding units 9 and 11 as well as a part of the evaluation calculation basis.
That is, the date and time exclusion unit 12 also multiplies the evaluation data H of the user name N by the exclusion coefficient α (for example, a value of 0.0 or more and 1.0 or less, such as 0.5) based on the evaluation date and time T. May be used as the basis for the evaluation calculation of the object G.

<Evaluation date and time T>
There is no particular limitation on the evaluation date and time T based on when the date and time exclusion unit 12 excludes, but for example, a general business hours such as the restaurant service industry G ′ for the restaurant service industry G ′ such as a family restaurant If the evaluation data H is received at a time away from the store or before the opening of the store (after midnight (Masako, 24:00), midnight, early morning, such as 4:00 am, 5:00 am, etc.) Part or all may be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation.
As another example, even when the evaluation date and time T is a regular holiday, a closed day, such as a food service company G ′ that is the object G, or during a long holiday (Golden Week, Bon (summer holiday), New Year's holiday, etc.) All or a part of the evaluation data H may be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation.

  Therefore, the evaluation system 1 of the present invention has received an evaluation on the date and time when the object G cannot be evaluated in real time (for example, if the object G is a store such as a restaurant, it is usually not open). In this case, the user U may have made an evaluation without actually visiting the store / experience. Prevention and improvement of reliability can be realized.

It can be said that such a date exclusion unit 12 is included in the evaluation calculation unit 6 described above.
The date exclusion unit 12 may be provided in the user terminal 2 or may be provided from the user terminal 2 to the server 3 (in the user terminal 2 and the server 3).
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation system 1 are the same as those in the first to third embodiments.

<Fourth Embodiment of Evaluation Program 50>
FIG. 12 shows a flowchart of the evaluation program 50 according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention.
The fourth embodiment is most different from the first to third embodiments in that the evaluation data H is obtained from the basis of the evaluation calculation based on the received evaluation date / time T in step S6 (evaluation calculation step SC) described above. Steps to be excluded (date and time exclusion step S-R3) are included, and other steps S1 to S5, S7, and S8 are the same as those in the first to third embodiments, so step S6 will be mainly described in detail.

<Step S6 (Date Exclusion Step S-R3)>
In step S6 described above, after the above-described step S5 (user specifying step ST) is executed, the date and time exclusion unit 12 newly accepts the evaluation data H from the user U based on the evaluation date and time T. The evaluation data H includes a step that can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation. After the server 3 in the evaluation system 1 executes the step S6, the process proceeds to the above-described step S7.
Therefore, it can be said that this step S6 includes a date and time exclusion step S-R3.
Further, the date and time exclusion step S-R3 included in step S6 may be a step of determining whether or not the evaluation date and time T is a date and time when the object G cannot be evaluated in real time. The date and time exclusion step S-R3 is executed. If it is determined as “Yes (date and time that cannot be evaluated in real time)”, the date and time excluding unit 12 excludes all or part of the evaluation data H by the user name N from the basis of the evaluation calculation of the object G. After that, the evaluation calculation of the object G is performed based on the evaluation data H after being excluded by the evaluation calculation unit 6, and the process proceeds to the next step S7, where “No (not a date and time that cannot be evaluated in real time)” is determined. For example, as usual, the evaluation calculation unit 6 performs any evaluation calculation of the object G based on the evaluation data H based on the user name N, and then moves to the next step S7. Good.

The date and time exclusion step S-R3 may be independent from step S6 (evaluation calculation step SC). Further, the date and time exclusion step S-R3 may be executed by the user terminal 2 or from the user terminal 2. It may be executed over the server 3 (that is, the user terminal 2 and the server 3).
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation program 50 are the same as those in the first to third embodiments.

<Fifth Embodiment of Evaluation System 1>
FIG. 1 also shows an evaluation system 1 according to the fifth embodiment of the present invention.
The fifth embodiment is most different from the first to fourth embodiments in that the date and time storage unit 13 stores the previous evaluation date and time T ′ and the like that received the evaluation data H, and a new evaluation from the previous evaluation date and time T ′. The point is that it includes an interval exclusion unit 14 that can exclude the evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation based on the evaluation interval K until the data H is received.

<Date storage unit 13>
As shown in FIG. 1, the date / time storage unit 12 may have any configuration as long as it can store at least the previous evaluation date / time T ′ when the evaluation receiving unit 5 received the evaluation data H from the user U. good.
For example, the date and time storage unit 12 may be provided in the server 3 or may be a storage device such as a hard disk or memory placed at a location on the network W secured by the server 3.

When provided in the server 3 as described above, it can be said that the date and time storage unit 12 is included in the database (storage unit) 34 described above.
In addition, the date storage unit 12 may be provided in the user terminal 2 or may be provided from the user terminal 2 to the server 3 (in the user terminal 2 and the server 3).

<Interval Exclusion Unit 14>
As shown in FIG. 1, the interval exclusion unit 14 uses the evaluation interval K from the previous evaluation date and time T ′ until the new evaluation data H is received, to evaluate the newly received evaluation data H as an evaluation calculation unit. 6, which can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation in 6, and is provided in the server 3 in the same manner as the evaluation calculation unit 6, the change exclusion unit 9, the difference exclusion unit 11, and the like.
The interval exclusion unit 14 may have any configuration as long as the evaluation data H can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation based on the evaluation interval K. For example, the interval exclusion unit 14 evaluates the evaluation data H based on the evaluation interval K. It may be a program (application) having a function excluded from the basis of calculation or a part thereof, and this program may be placed in a location on the network W secured by the server 3.

The interval exclusion unit 14 may exclude all of the evaluation data H by the user name N as in the case of the evaluation calculation unit 6 and each of the exclusion units 9, 11, and 12, but may exclude a part thereof. .
That is, the interval exclusion unit 14 also multiplies the evaluation data H of the user name N by the exclusion coefficient α (for example, a value of 0.0 or more and 1.0 or less, such as 0.5) based on the evaluation interval K. May be used as the basis for the evaluation calculation of the object G.

<Evaluation interval K, evaluation limit number γ>
The evaluation interval K based on the exclusion by the interval exclusion unit 14 is not particularly limited. For example, the evaluation interval K from the previous evaluation date / time T ′ until the new evaluation data H is received is the limit interval Δ (one week). Or several weeks, one month or several months, one year or several years, one day or several days, etc.) at the same interval (on the date before the limit interval Δ has passed since the previous evaluation date T ') When the evaluation data H for the object G such as the same barber, beauty, and restaurant service industry G ′ is received from the user name N, a part or all of the evaluation data H is excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation. Also good.
As another example, as described above, a predetermined period (one week, several weeks, one month, several months, one year, several years, one day, several days, etc.) is set as the evaluation interval K, and the evaluation interval K is within this period. The evaluation data H for the object G such as the same restaurant service industry G ′ is received from the same user name N over a predetermined number of times (one or more times, hereinafter referred to as “evaluation limit number γ”). In some cases, part or all of the evaluation data H may be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation.

In addition, the evaluation limit number γ (one or more times) is set within an evaluation interval K that is a predetermined period (one week or several weeks, one month or several months, one year or several years, one day or several days, etc.). Even when the evaluation data H for the object G such as a predetermined number of food service companies G ′ is received from the same user name N, part or all of the evaluation data H is excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation. Also good.
This is because the number of objects G that the same user U can actually experience in a predetermined period (for example, the number of restaurants that can actually eat and drink in one day, that is, the evaluation limit number γ) This is because even the object G ″ has its own limit, and the evaluation data H received by exceeding the limit number may include cases where it is not actually experienced, and lacks reliability.

The evaluation limit number γ may vary depending on the level of the user U. For example, if the user U is at the silver level, five different objects G can be obtained in one day (24 hours) of the evaluation interval K ( 5 times), if the user U is at the gold level, up to 7 (7 times) different objects G in one day (24 hours), if the user U is at the diamond level, 1 day ( It is good also as a structure which can evaluate up to ten different objects G (10 times) in 24 hours (of course, if one day (24 hours) of the evaluation interval K has passed, the number of evaluated objects is reset to 0. )
In addition, the user U who tried to evaluate exceeding the evaluation limit number γ is one case (one time) for any business G ′ in the industrial classification in one day (24 hours) of the subsequent evaluation interval K. (That is, a configuration in which the evaluation limit number γ is unbound and evaluation can be performed only once within the evaluation interval K (a penalty is given)).

  Therefore, the evaluation system 1 of the present invention evaluates the object G that cannot be evaluated many times in a short period of time (for example, the object G such as a barber shop or a beauty salon that does not go every day) every day. Even in the case of reception, etc., there is a possibility that the user U has actually evaluated without actually visiting the store / experience. Operation prevention and improved reliability can be realized.

It can be said that such an interval exclusion unit 14 is also included in the evaluation calculation unit 6 described above.
The interval exclusion unit 14 (or the evaluation calculation unit 6) described above, when the user U tries to evaluate beyond the evaluation limit number γ or when the evaluation limit number γ is unbound, Even if the level, the type of the object G such as an adult-only type, the evaluation date T, the evaluation limit number γ, etc. are appropriate, a part or all of the evaluation data H may be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation. .
The interval exclusion unit 14 may be provided in the user terminal 2 or may be provided from the user terminal 2 to the server 3 (in the user terminal 2 and the server 3).
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation system 1 are the same as those in the first to fourth embodiments.

<Fifth Embodiment of Evaluation Program 50>
FIG. 13 shows a flowchart of the evaluation program 50 according to the fifth embodiment of the present invention.
The fifth embodiment is most different from the first to fourth embodiments in that step S4-2 (date storage step SK) for storing the previous evaluation date T ′ and the like when the evaluation data H is received is added. In step S6 (evaluation calculation step SC) described above, the step of excluding the evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation based on the evaluation interval K from the previous evaluation date T ′ until the new evaluation data H is received. (Spacing exclusion step S-R4) is included, and other steps S1 to S5, S7, and S8 are the same as those in the first to fourth embodiments, so steps S4-2 and S6 will be mainly described in detail. .

<Step S4-2 (Date Storage Step SK)>
Step S4-2 is a step of storing at least the previous evaluation date / time T ′ when the evaluation data H is received by the date / time storage unit 13 after executing the above-described step S4 (evaluation receiving step SH). After step S4-2 is executed by the user terminal 2 (and / or the server 3) in the evaluation system 1, the process proceeds to the next step S5 (user specifying step ST).
Therefore, this step S4-2 can also be said to be a date storage step SK.

<Step S6 (Interval Exclusion Step S-R4)>
In step S6 described above, after the above-described step S5 (user specifying step ST) is executed, the interval exclusion unit 14 performs an evaluation interval K until a new evaluation data H is received from the previous evaluation date T ′. Based on the above, including a step that can exclude the new evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation. After the server 3 in the evaluation system 1 executes this step S6, the process proceeds to the above-described step S7.
Therefore, it can be said that this step S6 includes an interval exclusion step S-R4.
In addition, the interval exclusion step S-R4 included in step S6 is performed with the same user name N whether the evaluation interval K is shorter than the limit interval Δ and / or exceeds the evaluation limit number γ within the evaluation interval K. This step may be a step for determining whether or not the evaluation has been performed. When this interval exclusion step S-R4 is executed, if “Yes (short and / or exceeded)” is determined, the interval exclusion is performed. After all or part of the evaluation data H by the user name N is excluded from the basis for the evaluation calculation of the object G in the unit 14, the evaluation of the object G is performed based on the evaluation data H after being excluded by the evaluation calculation unit 6. If the calculation is performed and the process proceeds to the next step S7 and “No (not shorter and / or not exceeded)” is determined, the evaluation calculation unit 6 uses the evaluation data H based on the user name N as a basis as usual. Perform evaluation calculation of object G Any configuration such as a configuration for moving to the next step S7 may be used.

Note that the interval exclusion step S-R4 may be independent of step S6 (evaluation calculation step SC). Further, the interval exclusion step S-R4 may be executed by the user terminal 2 or from the user terminal 2. It may be executed over the server 3 (that is, the user terminal 2 and the server 3).
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation program 50 are the same as those in the first to fourth embodiments.

<Sixth Embodiment of Evaluation System 1>
FIG. 1 also shows an evaluation system 1 according to a sixth embodiment of the present invention.
The sixth embodiment is most different from the first to fifth embodiments in that the position acquisition unit 15 that can acquire the position information P of the user terminal 2 and the evaluation data H based on the evaluation information based on the position information P. It is the point provided with the position exclusion part 16 which can be excluded.

<Position acquisition unit 15>
As shown in FIG. 1, the position acquisition unit 15 can acquire the position information P of the user terminal 2 and is provided in the user terminal 2.
The position acquisition unit 15 may have any configuration as long as the position information P of the user terminal 2 can be acquired. For example, the position acquisition unit 15 may be a GPS (Global Positioning System) or an assisted GPS (Global Positioning System). Assisted Global Positioning System, A-GPS, auxiliary GPS) may be used.
The timing at which the location information P of the user terminal 2 is acquired by the location acquisition unit 15 may be any timing as long as there is no problem when the location exclusion unit 16 described later excludes the evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation. When the user U inputs the evaluation data H of the object G such as the eating and drinking service industry G ′ in the evaluation receiving unit 5, or after the user U inputs the evaluation data H of the object G, the user specifying unit 7 The period from when the user U inputs the evaluation data H of the object G to when the evaluation calculation unit 6 performs the evaluation calculation of the object G may be performed until U is specified.

In addition, if the user terminal 2 communicates using a telephone network among mobile terminals such as a tablet terminal, a PHS, and a PDA in addition to a smartphone or a mobile phone, the base of the mobile phone or PHS at the end of the telephone network Location information by a station (specified by the distance from one or more base stations depending on the strength and time difference of radio waves reaching the base station), location information by a wireless LAN base unit such as WiFi (registered trademark) (wireless LAN base unit The distance from one or a plurality of wireless LAN base units, etc., depending on the strength of radio waves and time differences that reach the mobile phone)), the position information by the GPS, A-GPS, base station, and the position information by the wireless LAN base unit described so far Combinations are also acceptable.
Such a position acquisition part 15 is good also as acquiring the positional information P of the user terminal 2 for every predetermined time (1 hour, several hours, 1 minute, several minutes etc.).

When the user terminal 2 is not a mobile object such as a desktop PC, the position information P of the user terminal 2 is the user U's address (residence) of the user information Z (residence, home address). It may be the home area HA set from the user's U postal code (home postal code or work postal code) or the like.
In addition, when the user terminal 2 is not a moving object, if the object G is a store that performs a restaurant service business G ′ or the like, it is rarely evaluated when the user actually visits the store, and returns to the home or the like. Therefore, the food service industry G ′ and the like will be evaluated.

<Position exclusion unit 16>
As shown in FIG. 1, the position excluding unit 16 can exclude the newly received evaluation data H from the basis of the evaluation calculation in the evaluation calculating unit 6 based on the position information P. The server 3 is provided in the same manner as the evaluation calculation unit 6, change exclusion unit 9, difference exclusion unit 11, date and time exclusion unit 12, interval exclusion unit 14, and the like.
The position exclusion unit 16 may have any configuration as long as the evaluation data H can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation based on the position information P. For example, the position exclusion unit 16 evaluates the evaluation data H based on the position information P. It may be a program (application) having a function excluded from the basis of calculation or a part thereof, and this program may be placed in a location on the network W secured by the server 3.

The position exclusion unit 16 may exclude all of the evaluation data H based on the user name N as in the case of the evaluation calculation unit 6 and each of the exclusion units 9, 11, 12, and 14, although it may be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation. I do not care.
That is, the position exclusion unit 16 also multiplies the evaluation data H of the user name N by the exclusion coefficient α (for example, a value of 0.0 or more and 1.0 or less, such as 0.5) based on the position information P. May be used as the basis for the evaluation calculation of the object G.

<Location information P>
The position information P based on the exclusion by the position exclusion unit 16 is not particularly limited. For example, the location of the user terminal 2 (user U) obtained from the position information P when the evaluation data H is newly received is One of the evaluation data H when the location of the object G such as the restaurant service industry G ′ is very far from the location value of the object G (prefectures, regions, and countries where the location of the user terminal 2 and the location of the object G are different) Part or all may be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation.
As another example, the history of the position information P of the user terminal 2 is stored in the position storage unit 35, and the location of the user terminal 2 (user U) until now obtained from the history of the position information P is Even in the case where the location of the object G has not overlapped or approached, the evaluation data H may be partially or entirely excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation.
Therefore, the evaluation system 1 of the present invention can further prevent operation of the evaluation result and improve the reliability.

In addition, when the position storage part 35 is provided in the server 3, it can be said that the said position storage part 35 is contained in the database (storage part) 34 mentioned above.
It can also be said that the position excluding unit 16 is also included in the above-described evaluation calculating unit 6.

The position exclusion unit 16 (or the evaluation calculation unit 6) described above is obtained from the location of the object G and the position information P when evaluating the object G such as the food service industry G ′ where the user U is. When the location of the user terminal 2 (user U) is the same (substantially the same), if the evaluation limit number γ, the type of the object G such as an adult-only type, the evaluation date and time T, etc. are appropriate, the user U's It is good also as a structure which can perform evaluation calculation based on the evaluation data H as a diamond type irrespective of a level.
In addition, the position excluding unit 16 (or the evaluation calculating unit 6) is configured so that the user terminal 2 (user U) can be obtained even if the location of the user terminal 2 (user U) obtained from the location information P is not the same as the location of the object G. ) And the object G are in the home area HA where the postal code of the user U is defined, the evaluation data according to the type of the user U if the evaluation limit number γ is appropriate. The configuration in which evaluation calculation can be performed on the basis of H and the location of the user terminal 2 (user U) is outside the home area HA of the user U, but the location of the object G is within the home area HA of the user U In this case, if the evaluation limit number γ or the like is appropriate, a configuration in which evaluation calculation can be performed based on the evaluation data H as the silver type regardless of the level of the user U, the location of the user terminal 2 (user U) Also object G Is also outside the home area HA of the user U and the location of the user terminal 2 and the location of the object G are not the same (substantially the same), a part or all of the evaluation data H is obtained from the basis of the evaluation calculation. Configuration to be excluded, when the location of the user terminal 2 (user U) is in the home area HA of the user U and the location of the object G is outside the home area HA of the user U, the type of the object G If the evaluation date and time T is appropriate, the location of the user terminal 2 (user U) obtained from the position information P, in addition to the configuration in which evaluation calculation can be performed based on the evaluation data H corresponding to the evaluation limit number γ, etc. A configuration may be adopted in which evaluation calculation can be performed based on the evaluation data H according to the type of the user U.

The position excluding unit 16 may be provided in the user terminal 2 or may be provided from the user terminal 2 to the server 3 (in the user terminal 2 and the server 3).
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation system 1 are the same as those in the first to fifth embodiments.

<Sixth Embodiment of Evaluation Program 50>
FIG. 14 shows a flowchart of an evaluation program 50 according to the sixth embodiment of the present invention.
The sixth embodiment is most different from the first to fifth embodiments in that step S4-3 (position acquisition step SP) for acquiring the position information P of the user terminal 2 is added, and step S6 described above. (Evaluation calculation step S-C) includes a step (position exclusion step S-R5) in which the evaluation data H is excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation based on the position information P. Other steps S1 to S5 , S7, and S8 are the same as those in the first to fifth embodiments, so steps S4-3 and S6 will be mainly described in detail.

<Step S4-3 (Position Acquisition Step SP)>
Step S4-3 is a step in which the position information P of the user terminal 2 can be acquired by the position acquisition unit 15 after executing the above-described step S4 (evaluation reception step SH). This step S4-3 Is then executed by the user terminal 2 in the evaluation system 1, and then the process proceeds to the next step S5 (user identification step ST).
Therefore, this step S4-3 can also be said to be a position acquisition step SP.

<Step S6 (position exclusion step S-R5)>
In step S6 described above, after the above-described step S5 (user specifying step ST) is executed, the position exclusion unit 16 uses the evaluation data H newly received based on the position information P as the evaluation calculation unit. 6 includes a step that can be excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation in Step 6. After the server 3 in the evaluation system 1 executes Step S6, the process proceeds to Step S7 described above.
Therefore, it can be said that this step S6 includes position exclusion step S-R5.
The position exclusion step S-R5 included in step S6 includes whether or not the location of the user terminal 2 obtained from the location information P of the user U, which is the type of “gold”, is substantially the same as the location of the object G; / Or a step of determining whether or not the location of the user terminal 2 obtained from the location information P of the user U of the “silver” type is substantially the same as the location of the object G, this location exclusion step If it is determined that “Yes (“ gold ”type and / or“ silver ”type and the location is substantially the same)” when S-R5 is executed, the position excluding unit 16 selects “ As the user U who is a type of “diamond”, the entire evaluation data H is used as the basis for the evaluation calculation of the object G, and thereafter the evaluation calculation of the object G is performed by the evaluation calculation unit 6, and the process proceeds to the next step S 7. No ("gold" type, and If the location exclusion unit 16 determines that all or part of the evaluation data H by the user name N (the user U) is evaluated, the object G is evaluated. Any configuration may be employed, such as a configuration in which the evaluation calculation of the object G is performed based on the evaluation data H after being excluded from the calculation calculation unit 6 and then moved to the next step S7 after being excluded from the calculation basis. .

Note that the position exclusion step S-R5 may be independent of step S6 (evaluation calculation step SC). Further, the position exclusion step S-R5 may be executed by the user terminal 2 or from the user terminal 2. It may be executed over the server 3 (that is, the user terminal 2 and the server 3).
Other configurations, operational effects, and usage modes of the evaluation program 50 are the same as those in the first to fifth embodiments.

<Others>
The present invention is not limited to the embodiment described above. Each configuration of the evaluation system 1, the evaluation program (application) 50, etc., or the overall structure, shape, dimensions, and the like can be appropriately changed in accordance with the spirit of the present invention.
The use by the user U of the evaluation system 1 or the download of the evaluation program 50 may be free of charge.

  The evaluation system and the evaluation program according to the present invention are evaluated as objects to be evaluated, such as restaurants and pubs, barber shops such as barber shops, beauty businesses such as beauty salons, dentistry, internal medicine, surgery, etc. In addition to G's medical business (industry) G ', products sold on actual stores and on the network W, and provided for free (food, travel tours, etc.) G "as well as videos and images It can be used for any content that can be evaluated, such as video content, political parties, and policies.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Evaluation system 2 User terminal 3 Server 4 User reception part 5 Evaluation reception part 6 Evaluation calculation part 7 User specification part 8 Specific change reception part 9 Change exclusion part 10 User memory | storage part 11 Difference exclusion part 12 Date exclusion part 13 Date storage part 14 Interval exclusion unit 15 Position acquisition unit 16 Position exclusion unit 17 Advertisement display unit 21 Terminal communication unit 22 Server communication unit 50 Evaluation program U User G Object G ′ Business N User name N1 One user name Z User information H Evaluation data D1 International Mobile device identification number D2 Subscriber identification module D3 Hardware identifier J Terminal information J1 One terminal information J2 Other terminal information C Number of changes in terminal information T Evaluation date T T Previous evaluation date K Evaluation interval P Location information SN User reception step SH Evaluation reception step ST User identification step SC Evaluation calculation step

Claims (9)

An evaluation system that includes a user terminal (2) and a server (3), and evaluates an object (G) by a user (U),
The user terminal (2) includes a user reception unit (4) that receives input of user information (Z) including its user name (N) from the user (U), and evaluation data (H) from the user (U). ) To receive an evaluation reception unit (5)
The server (3) includes an evaluation calculation unit (6) that calculates the evaluation of the object (G) based on the evaluation data (H) received by the evaluation reception unit (5).
The user terminal (2) and / or the server (3)
A terminal including at least one of an international portable device identification number (D1) of the user terminal (2), a subscriber identification module (D2) of the user (U), and a hardware identifier (D3) of the user terminal (2) A user specifying unit (7) for specifying the user (U) by associating the information (J) with the user name (N) on a one-to-one basis ,
The user terminal (2) changes the one terminal information (J1) associated with one user name (N1) in the user specifying unit (7) to another terminal information (J2). A specific change receiving unit (8) for receiving from (U),
The user terminal (2) and / or the server (3)
When the number of changes (C) of the terminal information corresponding to the user name (N1) by the specific change receiving unit (8) is a predetermined value or more, the user name (N1) newly received by the evaluation receiving unit (5) ) Is provided with a change excluding unit (9) that excludes the evaluation data (H1) from the evaluation calculation basis in the evaluation calculating unit (6) . The user terminal (2) and / or the server (3)
A user storage unit (10) for storing one user name (N1) and one terminal information (J1) associated with each other in the user specifying unit (7);
The user in the evaluation data (H) newly received by the evaluation receiving unit (5) for one set of the user name (N1) and terminal information (J1) stored in the user storage unit (10) When only one of the name (N) and the terminal information (J) is different, the newly received evaluation data (H) is excluded from the basis of the evaluation calculation in the evaluation calculation unit (6) The evaluation system according to claim 1, further comprising a difference exclusion unit (11). The user terminal (2) and / or the server (3)
Based on the evaluation date (T) when the evaluation data (H) is received from the user (U) by the evaluation reception unit (5), the evaluation data (H) newly received by the evaluation reception unit (5) evaluation system according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that it comprises a time excluding unit to exclude (12) from the evaluation calculation basis of the evaluation calculation unit (6). The user terminal (2) and / or the server (3)
A date and time storage unit (13) for storing at least the previous evaluation date and time (T ′) when the evaluation data (H) is received from the user (U) in the evaluation reception unit (5);
Based on the evaluation interval (K) from the previous evaluation date and time (T ′) until the new evaluation data (H) is received, the evaluation data (H) newly received by the evaluation receiving unit (5) evaluation system according to any one of claim 1 to 3, characterized in that it comprises a spacing excluding unit for excluding from the evaluation calculation basis of the evaluation calculation unit (6) (14). The user terminal (2) includes a position acquisition unit (15) that acquires position information (P) of the user terminal (2).
The user terminal (2) and / or the server (3)
On the basis of the position information (P), the evaluation accepting unit (5) the newly received evaluation data (H), the evaluation calculation unit position excluding unit for excluding from the basis for evaluation calculated in (6) (16 The evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 4 , further comprising: The object (G) is a business (G ′),
The said user terminal (2) is provided with the advertisement display part (17) which displays the advertisement of the business of a business type different from the said business (G ') which receives evaluation from the said user (U). Item 6. The evaluation system according to any one of Items 1 to 5 . A user terminal that communicates with a server (3) and evaluates an object (G) by a user (U),
A user reception unit (4) that receives input of user information (Z) including its user name (N) from the user (U), and an evaluation reception unit (5) that receives evaluation data (H) from the user (U) And a terminal communication unit (21) for transmitting the evaluation data (H) to the server (3),
A terminal including at least one of an international portable device identification number (D1) of the user terminal (2), a subscriber identification module (D2) of the user (U), and a hardware identifier (D3) of the user terminal (2) A user specifying unit (7) for specifying the user (U) by associating the information (J) with the user name (N) on a one-to-one basis ,
The user terminal (2) changes the one terminal information (J1) associated with one user name (N1) in the user specifying unit (7) to another terminal information (J2). A specific change receiving unit (8) for receiving from (U),
When the number of changes (C) of the terminal information corresponding to the user name (N1) by the specific change receiving unit (8) is greater than or equal to a predetermined value, the user terminal (2) is newly updated by the evaluation receiving unit (5). A user terminal comprising: a change excluding unit (9) for excluding evaluation data (H1) based on the user name (N1) received from the basis of evaluation calculation . A server that communicates with a user terminal (2) and evaluates an object (G) by a user (U),
The server (3) receives from the user terminal (2) a server communication unit (22) that receives the user (U) own user name (N) and evaluation data (H) from the user (U); An evaluation calculation unit (6) for calculating the evaluation of the object (G) based on the received evaluation data (H);
A terminal including at least one of an international portable device identification number (D1) of the user terminal (2), a subscriber identification module (D2) of the user (U), and a hardware identifier (D3) of the user terminal (2) A user specifying unit (7) for specifying the user (U) by associating the information (J) with the user name (N) on a one-to-one basis ,
The server communication unit (22) receives a change of the terminal information (J) corresponding to the user name (N) from the user terminal (2),
The server (3) receives the evaluation newly received from the user terminal (2) by the server communication unit (22) when the change count (C) of the terminal information (J) is equal to or greater than a change threshold (β). A server comprising a change exclusion unit (9) for excluding data (H) from the basis of evaluation calculation . An evaluation program used in an evaluation system that includes a user terminal (2) and a server (3) and performs an evaluation of an object (G) by a user (U),
A user reception step (SN) for receiving input of user information (Z) including the user name (N) from the user (U) to the user terminal (2), and evaluation data from the user (U) An evaluation receiving step (SH) for receiving (H) is executed;
In the user terminal (2) and / or server (3),
A terminal including at least one of an international portable device identification number (D1) of the user terminal (2), a subscriber identification module (D2) of the user (U), and a hardware identifier (D3) of the user terminal (2) A user specifying step (ST) for specifying the user (U) in a one-to-one correspondence with the user name (N) received in the user receiving step (SN) in the information (J). After running
Wherein the server (3), Ru to execute the evaluation calculating step for calculating an evaluation of the evaluation acceptance step (S-H) in the object evaluation data (H) as a basis for acceptance (G) (S-C) With
The user terminal (2) accepts a change in terminal information (J) corresponding to the user name (N) between the user acceptance step (SN) and the evaluation acceptance step (SH). The specific change acceptance step (S-J) is also executed,
The evaluation calculation step (SC) executed by the server (3) evaluates the evaluation data (H) when the number of changes (C) of the terminal information (J) is equal to or greater than a change threshold (β). exclude changes excluded steps from the basis for calculating (S-R1) includes an evaluation program characterized Rukoto.