JP5510783B2 - A system for evaluating the effects of drugs on cells - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention calculates the cell growth rate and cell death induction rate for each cell, and calculates three characteristics of the cell population (cell population growth rate, cell death induction rate, and diversity of cell characteristics). And a system for evaluating the influence of a drug on cells.

Currently, it is said that there are dozens of anticancer drugs used for cancer chemotherapy, but anticancer drugs with a high killing rate against cancer cells often have strong side effects, so you can set a lower dose, When the administration period is delayed, the cancer cells are only partially killed (Fractional Killing), the surviving cells acquire resistance, and the original anticancer drug no longer provides sufficient killing effect (Non-patent documents 1, 2, and 3). Doing so would use another, more powerful anticancer drug, and could make cancer patients increasingly suffer from side effects.
Rather, an anticancer agent with a low killing effect on cancer cells and a high cell growth inhibitory effect has few side effects on the patient and the tumor itself does not grow, so it can be expected to coexist with cancer for a long time. Recently, the importance of such anticancer agents having a cell growth inhibitory effect has been attracting attention. For example, sorafenib inhibits Raf kinase, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) kinase, and KIT kinase, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation and angiogenesis (Reference 4). ). The development of drugs that suppress the proliferation of cancer cells is being actively carried out, and the development of highly accurate drug screening methods is desired (Patent Documents 1 and 2).
In the development of anticancer agents, typically, the process proceeds in the order of “drug discovery research”, “preclinical research (pharmacokinetics)”, “clinical research”, and “clinical trial”. In “Drug Discovery Research”, tests are conducted in the order of identification, synthesis, characterization, drug efficacy screening, and assay of candidate compounds, and compounds that have utility in these tests are advanced to preclinical research.
In many cases, identification of candidate compounds and screening of drug efficacy are performed using model cells and using cell proliferation and cancer markers as indicators (in vitro experiments). As a method for evaluating drug efficacy using cell proliferation as an index, (1) Prepare a drug-added cell group and a drug-free cell group (control), measure the number of cells after a certain period of drug addition, and count the number of cells with the control. (2) The number of cells immediately before the addition of the drug is measured, and the number of cells after a certain time after the addition of the drug is measured. In addition, in order to accurately know the cell death inducing ability, accurate counting of dead cells is also performed (Patent Document 3, etc.).

However, in these conventional in vitro experiments, even when the change in the number of cells before and after the addition of the drug gives the same numerical value, A: “Cancer cells grow on the one hand but die on the other hand” The phenomenon of B: “Cancellation of cancer cells stops” is not distinguished. That is, the ability of anticancer agents to inhibit cell growth and the ability to induce cell death are not distinguished. In the case of a type A drug, even if some cancer cells are completely killed, the remaining cancer cells survive and continue to grow, so there are many opportunities for DNA replication during cell division. Inheritance of genetic mutations increases the risk of acquiring continuous drug resistance. On the other hand, since the type B drug suppresses the growth of the entire cancer cell, there is little chance of genetic mutation, so there is less risk of acquiring drug resistance, and it is effective as an anticancer drug growth inhibitor or other anticancer drug. There is a high possibility of a drug useful as an auxiliary drug.
In fact, in clinical research sites, anti-cancer drug-added and non-added cell groups (placebo group) are prepared, and the size of the cancer tissue is reduced compared to the control when comparing the efficacy of the cancer tissue. Even in this case, it is not possible to distinguish whether “the proliferation of cancer cells is suppressed” or “the number of viable cells does not increase as a result of induction of cancer cell death”. Based on experience, the clinician also evaluates the morphology of the cancer cells. Even if the number of surviving cancer cells is small, the malignancy of the remaining cancer cells is high (for example, a shape in which cell proliferation is considered to be active). In the case where the effect of the drug is judged to be low, and the number of surviving cancer cells is many but their cell state is poor (for example, a shape in which cell growth is thought to be stopped), the effect of the drug Is judged to be high.
This indicates the importance of distinguishing between the above-mentioned A-type and B-type drugs in the development of anticancer drugs. In drug discovery research prior to clinical research, the A- and B-type drugs are sufficiently distinguished. Evaluation is thought to contribute to reducing the cost of the drug discovery process by avoiding unnecessary experiments in high-cost clinical research. Therefore, there is a strong demand for the development of screening methods that distinguish between A and B type drugs. ing. In other words, even if the cell death inducing activity to cancer cells is weak, a method of screening for a drug having a cell death inducing activity uniformly on all cancer cells or an agent that suppresses proliferation on all cancer cells. Offer is required.

JP 2000-86531 A JP 2001-316289 A WO2007 / 018316

Spencer, S.L., Gaudet, S., Albeck, J. G., Burke, J. M., Sorger, P. K. (2009) Nature. 459, 428-432. Bastiaens, P. (2009) Nature. 459, 334-335. Newsom-Davis, T., Prieske, S., Walczak, H. (2009) Apoptosis. 14, 607-623. Wilhelm, S., Carter, C., Lynch, M., Lowinger, T., Dumas, J., Smith, RA, Schwartz, B., Simantov, R., Kelley, S. (2006) Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 5, 835-844. Ashkenazi, A., Herbst R. S. (2008) J. Clincal Invest., 118, 1979-1990. Fujita, S., Ota, E., Sasaki, C., Takano, K., Miyake, M. *, Miyake, J. (2007) J. Biosci. Bioeng., 104, 329-333. Fujita, S., Takano, K., Ota, E., Yoshikawa, T., Sasaki, C., Sano, T., Miyake, M. *, Miyake, J. (2008) Method in Mol Biol., Min , WP.eds.Humana Press, In press.

  The present invention relates to a drug that has a cell death-inducing activity uniformly for all cancer cells, a drug that suppresses the growth of all cancer cells, or an auxiliary drug that acts uniformly on cancer. The purpose is to provide screening methods and appropriate evaluation systems that lead to development of

As a result of analyzing the shortcomings of the conventional screening methods for anticancer agents to achieve the above object, the present inventors have found that the phenomenon that “cancer cells grow while they die on the one hand” and “the growth of cancer cells stops” It has been found that the fact that these are not distinguished from each other is that evaluation over time is insufficient, and that the ability to suppress cell growth and the ability to induce cell death are not distinguished.
From another point of view, the conventional method is based on the premise that the cell population obtained from a cancer tissue or cultured cancer cell line obtained from a single patient is uniform, and depends on the individuality of each cell. The effect cannot be distinguished. In other words, “the drug strongly induces cell death in one part of the cell but has little effect on other cells” and “is weak but uniformly induces cell death or suppresses proliferation. It is also not able to distinguish "if you do".
Thus, conventionally, since cells have been handled in groups, the response of the cells to the drug is averaged and expressed. Therefore, assuming an extreme example, in the conventional drug evaluation system, the cell death induction rate 50 However, it is not the case that cell death is induced in 50% of all cancer cells, but half of the cancer cells have 100% drug resistance and the other half have drug resistance. The case of 0% is also conceivable, but the addition of a drug in that case is merely screening for a high-grade cancer that is likely to acquire drug resistance.
In the experiments using established cell lines, which are usually premised on a uniform cell population, the present inventors actually have extremely diverse individual cell responses, and change from cell to cell and with time. I thought that the cell evaluation in consideration of For example, TRAIL is known as a drug that induces cell death specifically for cancer cells (Non-patent Document 5), but on the other hand, cell responses to TRAIL vary widely, and even in a clonal cell population, it is uniform. It was found that no cell death was induced (FIG. 1) (Non-patent Document 1).

Therefore, the inventors seeded and cultured cell populations such as cancer cells at low density to form colonies of a certain size (about 4-16), and acquired cell images over time before adding the drug. In addition, the cell response (cell death induction rate and cell growth rate) for each colony to the drug was accurately calculated by comparing the cell image acquired over time after the drug was added with the above image. .
Based on the “cell death induction rate” and “cell proliferation rate” calculated for each cell in this way, the cell response along with the tendency of drug response of the entire cell population (cell death induction rate, cell growth rate) The variation “standard deviation” of both data for each can be calculated. At that time, by applying the anticancer drug candidate substance as an additive agent, each candidate substance can be evaluated accurately and simply, so that cell death is uniformly induced for all cells, or at least It became possible to select ideal anti-cancer drug candidates that are less prone to drug resistance that uniformly suppresses growth. It is also possible to select an anticancer agent enhancer candidate for an anticancer agent that has the effect of causing a known anticancer agent to act uniformly on the target cancer cell population.

The present invention has been completed based on these findings, and is as follows.
[1] A method for evaluating or screening a drug having a cell death-inducing effect and / or a cell growth-inhibiting effect on a target cancer cell, comprising at least the following steps (1) to (4);
(1) A step of seeding cancer cells on a culture plate or cell chip at a low density and culturing to form colonies for each individual cell,
(2) After processing a part of the colony group with the test drug, the cell images are recorded over time while culturing, and the number of viable cells and dead cells are counted for each colony every unit time. Cell proliferation rate L (sample) and cell death induction rate D (sample) of each colony
Record the cell images over time while culturing without treating the other part of the colony group with the test drug, and count the number of living and dead cells for each colony per unit time. Calculating the cell growth rate L (control) and cell death induction rate D (control) of each colony
(3) The cell growth rate average value μ (L (sample)) and cell death induction rate average value μ (D (sample)) of the entire cell population treated with the test drug in step (2) are used as the cell growth of each colony. Calculated as an arithmetic mean value of the rate L (sample) and the cell death induction rate D (sample),
The cell growth rate average value μ (L (control)) and cell death induction rate average value μ (D (control)) of the entire cell population not subjected to the test drug treatment in step (2) are used as the cell growth rate of each colony. Calculating each of the arithmetic mean values of L (control) and cell death induction rate D (control),
(4) The calculated μ (L (sample)) and μ (L (control)) are compared, and μ (L (ratio)) = μ (L (sample)) / μ (L (control)) When x100 (%) is less than 100 (%), the test drug is evaluated as a drug having a high cell growth inhibitory effect, and is selected.
The calculated μ (D (sample)) and μ (D (control)) are compared, and μ (D (ratio)) = μ (D (sample)) / μ (D (control)) × 100 ( %) Is greater than 100 (%), and the test drug is evaluated and selected as a drug having a high cell death-inducing effect.
[2] In addition to the steps (1) to (4) described in [1], the following method (5) and (6) is further provided as a control experiment;
(5) Applying the same method as in steps (1) and (2) to normal cells, forming colonies for each normal cell, and applying each test drug to each colony Cell proliferation rate CL (control) and cell death induction rate CD (control) and cell death induction rate CD (control) for each colony when the test drug treatment is not performed. ,
As the respective arithmetic mean values, the cell proliferation rate average value μ (CL (sample)) and cell death induction rate average value μ (CD (sample)) of the entire cell population treated with the test drug, and the test drug treatment Calculate the average cell growth rate μ (CL (control)) and cell death induction rate μ (CD (control)) of the whole cell population not performed, μ (CL (sample)) and μ (CL (control)) ) (Μ (CL (ratio)) which is a ratio to), and μ (CD (ratio)) which is a ratio between μ (CD (sample)) and μ (CD (control)),
(6) Whether μ (CL (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and (CD (sample)) is μ (CD (sample)) <1% Or μ (CL (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and μ (CD (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CD (ratio)) <200% And a process of evaluating and selecting that the action of the test drug is highly useful.
[3] In addition to the steps (1) to (4) described in [1] or the steps (5) to (6) described in [2], the following steps (7) to (7) The method according to [1] or [2], wherein (9) is provided;
(7) The standard deviation σ (L (sample)) of the cell growth rate of the whole cell population treated with the test drug is expressed as the cell growth rate L (sample) for each colony and the average value μ of the cell growth rate of the whole cell population ( L (sample)), and the coefficient of variation of the proliferation rate of the entire cell population treated with the test drug “CV (L (sample)) = σ (L (sample)) / μ (L (sample)) "
The standard deviation σ (L (control)) of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population not subjected to the test drug treatment is calculated as the cell growth rate L (control) for each colony and the average value μ (L (V) (L (control)) = σ (L (control)) / μ ( L (control)) ",
(8) The standard deviation σ (D (sample)) of the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population treated with the test drug is the average of the cell death induction rate D (sample) for each colony and the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population After calculation using the difference from the value μ (D (sample)), the coefficient of variation of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population treated with the test drug “C.V. (D (sample)) = σ (D ( sample)) / μ (D (sample)) ”
The standard deviation σ (D (control)) of the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population not subjected to the test drug treatment is the average value of the cell death induction rate L (control) for each colony and the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population. After calculating using the difference from μ (D (control)), the coefficient of variation of the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population treated with the test drug “C.V. (D (control)) = σ (D (control) )) / Μ (D (control)) ”,
(9) CV (L (ratio)) = CV (L (sample)) / CV (L), which is the ratio of the coefficient of variation of both cell growth rates determined in the above step (8). (control)) × 100, and / or CV (D (ratio)) = CV (D (), which is the ratio of the coefficient of variation of both cell death induction rates determined in the step (6). sample)) / C.V. (D (control)) × 100 is less than 100%, the test drug has partial cell growth inhibition and / or cell growth rate and / or cell death induction rate. Or the process of selecting and evaluating that it is a chemical | medical agent which can suppress partial cell death (Fractional Killing).
[4] A method for evaluating or screening an auxiliary agent for amplifying the cell death-inducing effect and / or cell proliferation-suppressing effect of a known anticancer agent or causing it to act uniformly on individual cells, comprising the following step (1) A method comprising: (4);
(1) A step of seeding cancer cells on a culture plate or cell chip at a low density and culturing to form colonies for each individual cell,
(2) After part of the colony group is treated with the known anticancer agent and the test auxiliary agent in combination, the cell images are recorded over time while culturing, and the number of viable cells and dead cells are determined for each colony per unit time. Count, and calculate the cell growth rate L (sample) and cell death induction rate D (sample) of each colony per unit time,
After the other part of the colony group was treated with the known anticancer agent alone, the cell images were recorded over time while culturing, and the number of living and dead cells was counted for each colony per unit time. Calculate the cell growth rate L (control) and cell death induction rate D (control) of each colony per hour,
(3) Average cell growth rate μ (L (sample)) and cell death induction average value μ (D (sample)) of the whole cell population treated in combination with the known anticancer drug and test auxiliary drug in step (2) Calculating the arithmetic mean values of the cell growth rate L (sample) and cell death induction rate D (sample) of each colony,
The average cell growth rate μ (L (control)) and the average cell death induction rate μ (D (control)) of the entire cell population treated with only the known anticancer agent in the step (2) are expressed as the cell growth rate L of each colony. (control) and a step of calculating as an arithmetic mean value of cell death induction rate D (control),
(4) The calculated μ (L (sample)) and μ (L (control)) are compared, and μ (L (ratio)) = μ (L (sample)) / μ (L (control)) When x100 (%) is less than 100 (%), the test auxiliary drug is selected as a drug having a high cell growth suppression amplification effect,
The calculated μ (D (sample)) and μ (D (control)) are compared, and μ (D (ratio)) = μ (D (sample)) / μ (D (control)) × 100 ( %) Is greater than 100 (%), and the test auxiliary drug is evaluated and selected as a drug having a high cell death inducing effect.
[5] In addition to the steps (1) to (4) described in the above [4], the following steps (5) and (6) are further provided as a control experiment in a system not using a known anticancer agent. 4];
(5) Only the test auxiliary drug is applied to the colony group of cancer cells by using only the test auxiliary drug without using a known anticancer agent, and applying the same method as in the steps (1) and (2). Cell proliferation rate CL (sample) and cell death induction rate CD (sample) for each colony when the above treatment was applied, cell proliferation rate CL (control) for each colony when the test auxiliary drug is not applied, and Calculate the cell death induction rate CD (control),
As the respective arithmetic mean values, the cell proliferation rate average value μ (CL (sample)) and cell death induction rate average value μ (CD (sample)) of the entire cancer cell population when the test auxiliary drug treatment was performed, and the subject Calculating the average cell growth rate μ (CL (control)) and average cell death induction rate μ (CD (control)) of the entire cancer cell population not subjected to the test supplement treatment;
(6) Whether μ (CL (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and (CD (sample)) is μ (CD (sample)) <1% Or μ (CL (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and μ (CD (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CD (ratio)) <200% And a process of evaluating and selecting the usefulness of the action of the test auxiliary drug.
[6] In addition to the case where the steps (1) to (4) described in the above [4] or the steps (5) to (6) described in the above [5] are provided, the following steps (7) to The method according to [4] or [5], wherein (9) is provided;
(7) The standard deviation σ (L (sample)) of the cell growth rate of the whole cell population treated with the test auxiliary drug in combination is the average of the cell growth rate L (sample) for each colony and the cell growth rate of the whole cell population. After calculating using the difference from the value μ (L (sample)), the coefficient of variation of the proliferation rate of the entire cell population treated with the test auxiliary drug in combination “C.V. (L (sample)) = σ (L (sample)) / μ (L (sample)) ”
The standard deviation σ (L (control)) of the cell growth rate of the whole cell population treated only with the known anticancer agent is calculated as the cell growth rate L (control) for each colony and the average value μ (L ( control)), and the coefficient of variation of the proliferation rate of the entire cell population treated with only the known anticancer agent “C.V. (L (control)) = σ (L (control)) / μ ( L (control)) ",
(8) The standard deviation σ (D (sample)) of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population treated with the test auxiliary agent is used, and the cell death induction rate D (sample) for each colony and the cell death induction of the entire cell population After calculating using the difference from the average value μ (D (sample)) of the rate, the coefficient of variation of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population treated with the test auxiliary drug in combination “C.V. (D (sample)) ) = Σ (D (sample)) / μ (D (sample)) ”
The standard deviation σ (D (control)) of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population treated only with the known anticancer agent is the cell death induction rate L (control) for each colony and the average value μ of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population μ After calculating using the difference from (D (control)), the coefficient of variation of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population treated only with the known anticancer agent “C.V. (D (control)) = σ (D (control) )) / Μ (D (control)) ”,
(9) CV (L (ratio)) = CV (L (sample)) / CV (L), which is the ratio of the coefficient of variation of both cell growth rates determined in the above step (8). (control)) × 100, and / or CV (D (ratio)) = C.V. (D ( sample)) / C.V. (D (control)) × 100 is less than 100%, the test auxiliary drug partially inhibits cell growth in terms of cell growth rate and / or cell death induction rate. And / or evaluating and selecting a drug capable of amplifying the suppression of fractional killing.
[7] The target cancer cell according to any one of [4] to [6], wherein a cancer cell that has been treated with a known anticancer agent in advance and has become resistant to the anticancer agent is selected and used. The method described.
[8] The method according to [7] above, wherein the test auxiliary drug to be evaluated or screened is an auxiliary drug for recovering the sensitivity of cancer cells that have become known anticancer drug resistance.
[9] The method according to [7] or [8], wherein the known anticancer agent is TRAIL, and the test auxiliary agent is an agent that inhibits expression of a siRNA preparation or a gene containing a sequence targeted by the siRNA. .
[10] An auxiliary drug for restoring the TRAIL sensitivity of cancer cells that have become resistant to the anticancer drug TRAIL, or for enhancing the anticancer drug action of TRAIL, comprising a drug that inhibits the expression of the MDM2, MCL1, or POU2F1 gene as an active ingredient.
[11] The auxiliary drug according to [10], wherein the drug that inhibits expression of the MDM2, MCL1, or POU2F1 gene is an siRNA preparation that targets the MDM2, MCL1, or POU2F1 gene.
[12] The auxiliary drug according to [11], wherein the siRNA preparation contains an oligonucleotide having any one of base sequences selected from the base sequences represented by SEQ ID NOs: 2, 6, 10, and 11 as an active ingredient. .

  Evaluation of response tendency to various cancer cells can be performed accurately with respect to existing anticancer agents and anticancer drug candidate substances. In addition, screening for candidate substances for new anticancer agents or anticancer action potentiators can be easily performed, and drug resistance is unlikely to occur. Ideal anticancer agents that can induce cell death or proliferation suppression uniformly for all cells. This technology contributes to the development of In addition, by making various known siRNAs act as test drugs against target cancers and evaluating cancer genes that should be targeted by anticancer agents, each type of cancer, It is also a technology that leads to treatment according to the stage. It can also be used to search for drugs that sensitize anticancer drug resistant strains that have already become resistant strains.

Effect of different drug (TRAIL) for each cell colony HeLa cells are seeded in a 24-well plate. At this time, the cells are seeded at a very low density so that colonies can be distinguished. After culturing for 48 hours, TRAIL was added, and the response to TRAIL for each colony was observed. As a result, the response of the drug to TRAIL was different for each colony. For example, cell death is partially induced in the cell group in the upper left circle, all cells are killed in the lower circle, and many cells are alive in the upper right circle. Flow chart of system process of the present invention Procedure for evaluating the cause of acquiring TRAIL resistance in cancer cells Confirmation of introduction of control siRNA For A-D, Cy3 Labeled Negative Control siRNA was reverse transfected and photographed 48 hours later, E introduced Non Target siRNA, F introduced Cell Death siRNA. Cell phase contrast image (x4) scale bar 100μm Cell fluorescence image (x4) scale bar 100 μm, showing that siRNA has been introduced into the cell. C. Cell phase contrast image (x20) scale bar 50μm Cell fluorescence image (x20) s scale bar 50μm siRNA is localized in the cell cytoplasm. E. Cell phase contrast image (x4) scale bar 100μm F. Cell phase contrast image (x4) scale bar 100 μm Cell Death siRNA is introduced into the cell to induce cell death. Screening of genes involved in sensitization of TRAIL-resistant HeLa cells HeLa cells are seeded in 24-well plates on which siRNA is immobilized. At this time, the cells are seeded at a very low density so that colonies can be distinguished. The seeded cells adhere to the bottom surface of the plate, and siRNA is introduced into the cells from the bottom surface. After culturing for 48 hours, TRAIL was added, and the response to TRAIL for each colony was observed. Survival rate change after TRAIL exposure A.HeLa wild strain (N = 20), B. HeLa strain surviving after TRAIL exposure (N = 27) 4 hours from 1 hour after addition of TRAIL from acquired time-series cell images Measure cell population viability for each

1. System Process of the Present Invention The system of the present invention includes the following steps (FIG. 2).
(1) Cell image acquisition step (1-1) A target cell population (such as cancer cells) is seeded on a culture plate or cell chip at a low density and cultured to form colonies of a certain size. In that case, it is seed | inoculated so that the cell number in each well of a culture plate which has many wells may become one each, and after 1 to 60 hours, Preferably it cultures for 3 to 48 hours, and colonies of each cell To form.
(1-2) One part of the colony group is used as a control. That is, while continuing the culture without subjecting to the test drug, the cell image is obtained over time for two or more colonies and usually the same number of colonies as the drug-treated colony group. Cell images are acquired at intervals. This control image acquisition is preferably performed at the same time as the following (1-4), but is not necessarily performed at the same time, and can be performed in advance. Here, since the control is a negative control (negative control), it includes not only the case where the test drug is not added but also the case where a placebo drug which is ineffective (placebo drug) is added. Since there are multiple types of controls, the following 4. Will be described in detail.
(1-3) Two or more types of test agents to be tested, preferably four or more types, more preferably 10 types or more, and usually 6 to 100 types, and 2 colonies or more of target cells, preferably 4 colonies As mentioned above, More than 10 colonies or more, Usually 6-100 colonies are processed simultaneously. Since the evaluation is performed using the average value of the values indicated by each colony, the more accurate evaluation becomes possible as the number of target colonies increases. In the case of nucleic acids such as siRNA and nucleic acid for gene therapy, they are introduced into cells by transfection using an appropriate vector or carrier. The present invention can also be applied to accurately evaluate the degree of emergence of resistant strains of a specific drug, for example, a commercially available cancer therapeutic drug, but in that case, there may be only one type of test drug. obtain.
During drug administration, it is preferable to perform a positive control (positive control) together with a negative control (negative control). Here, a negative control (negative control) is a case where a drug is not added or a placebo drug is added as described above, and a positive control (positive control) is a drug whose known effect is confirmed. Refers to a control experiment.
(1-4) After adding the test drug (or negative control drug or positive control drug), cell images are acquired over time. Specifically, cell images are acquired every 5 minutes to 1 hour for 10 hours or longer, preferably every 10 to 30 minutes for 24 hours to 96 hours. At that time, it is preferable that all test drugs are simultaneously processed with respect to the target colony group, and cell images are acquired at the same time intervals including the control. However, in the case of a control that does not perform the test drug treatment, it may be acquired in advance.

(2) Data processing step (2-1) The number of living cells and the number of dead cells per colony and unit time are counted.
(2-2) “Cell proliferation rate” and “cell death induction rate” are calculated for each colony.
(2-3) Cell responses (cell death induction rate and cell growth rate) for each colony are integrated to obtain an average value, and the “average cell death induction rate” and “average cell growth rate” of the entire cell population Is calculated.
(2-4) Evaluate to what extent the cell death induction rate and cell proliferation rate for each colony vary with respect to both rates of the entire cell population. As an index at that time, “standard deviation” and “variation coefficient” are calculated.
(2-5) What percentage of the average cell death induction rate and average cell proliferation rate compared to the negative control group (negative control) value is “the ratio of the average value to the control group”, the cell death induction rate The percentage of the coefficient of variation relative to the control group is calculated as to what percentage each coefficient of variation of the cell growth rate is compared with the value of the negative control group (negative control).

(3) Drug evaluation step or cell population characterization step The drug is evaluated according to the following indices according to the obtained numerical values.
(1) Effects on cell proliferation
(2) Effects on cell death
(3) Ability to suppress fractional cell death
(4) Time dependence of drug action

2. Cell population targeted by the present invention As the target cell population in the present invention, in the case of drug evaluation, proliferative cultured cells that are readily available, typically cultured cancer cells such as Hela cells, When the characteristics of a cell population are used for determination, proliferative and culturable cells such as various cancer cells, bone marrow cells, tissue stem cells collected from patients are targeted. In addition, since the present invention can be applied to bacteria such as pathogenic microorganisms and yeasts, the term “cell” in the present invention includes these microorganisms.
Moreover, when seed | inoculating on a cell chip | tip, the state which seed | inoculates a cell at low density, ie, thinly and widely, does not contact cells. In that case, for example, cells are suspended under the culture conditions recommended by ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) such as DMEM + 10% FBS, and the number is about 2 to 20, preferably about 4 to 16 cells / cell. Sow. It is preferable to seed one cell at a time in different wells.
At that time, a commercially available medium can be used as the medium. Moreover, in order to prepare humoral factors, the growth of cells is faster when the medium previously used for culturing the same type of cells is used as it is.

3. Drugs Targeted in the Present Invention Target drugs in the present invention include existing anticancer agents, cell death inducers, cell growth inhibitors, or substances that enhance the action of these drugs, and these drug candidates are selected. Therefore, it may be a screening target test substance. Typical substances that enhance cell death induction or growth suppression include antibodies that recognize cell surface antigens, or fragments thereof, T cell receptors or soluble fragments thereof, as well as siRNA, Nucleic acids such as expression vectors containing genes such as sense, ribozyme, and tumor suppressor gene are also targeted.
Here, if various existing drugs such as commercially available anticancer drugs are targeted, the efficacy of these existing drugs against various cancer cells can be evaluated. In that case, it can be used for examination of the drug concentration at the time of administration, the number of times of administration, the timing of administration, the combination with other drugs and compounds to be used together, the timing (time) of administration and the combination thereof. Moreover, the influence of the cell by overexpression of these genes or gene suppression can be evaluated using known siRNA and a gene expression vector, and, thereby, the gene which should be a target of an anticancer agent can be evaluated.
Screening for excellent anticancer agents, cell death inducers, cell growth inhibitors, or candidate substances that enhance the action of these agents by using known cultured cancer cells and test substances whose functions have not been identified Is possible. When siRNA or an expression vector is used as a test substance, it is possible to screen for genes that can be targeted for drug design.
That is, by applying the present invention using various known siRNAs as test agents, each siRNA can be evaluated, so that the siRNA itself can be used as a drug, but at the same time the siRNA acts. Since the target gene to be identified can be identified, it becomes possible to develop a new anticancer agent targeting the identified target oncogene.
As a specific existing excellent anticancer agent, TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand), which is attracting attention as an anticancer agent that specifically induces cell death in cancer cells, is also known as an anticancer agent that can easily form resistant strains. Therefore, this is a suitable example. In addition, CPT (camptothecin), paclitaxel, docetaxel and the like are also preferable targets.
In addition, using known anticancer drugs, monoclonal antibodies that recognize specific cancer markers, siRNA and gene expression vectors, and observing the behavior of individual cells in the test cell population, create a profile of the test cell population can do. For example, by creating a profile using an approved known drug for a patient-derived cell, it is possible to select an optimal drug for the patient, and there is an effect that a doctor can easily make a treatment plan.

When treating target cells with a test drug or allowing a test drug to act, in the case of low molecular weight compounds, proteins, peptides, etc., melt or suspend them in a known buffer and add them to the medium. Say. Moreover, in the case of siRNA, nucleic acid for gene therapy, etc., it refers to introduction into cells after transfection with an appropriate gene introduction vector or a known carrier. At that time, a plurality of test substances, or a test substance and a known drug may be combined to act, and the gene introduction treatment and the addition to the medium may be performed simultaneously.
As a typical example, transfection of siRNA (small RNA with the function of specifically knocking down target gene expression) and gene expression plasmids enhances or suppresses the expression of each gene in the cell. can do. By transfecting target cancer cells with siRNA or expression plasmid corresponding to each gene and observing the response of the cancer cell for each cell, the function of each gene (cell proliferation / suppression, induction of cell death) Can act uniformly on all cells).
In addition, as an evaluation system as an auxiliary agent for known anticancer drugs such as TRAIL, it is also effective to observe a synergistic effect with TRAIL by introducing multiple types of known oncogene-related siRNA and expression plasmid into cells in parallel. .
In particular, in the case of an anticancer agent that is easy to produce a resistant strain such as TRAIL among known anticancer agents, first, a TRAIL resistant strain is prepared, and the test drug is allowed to act by using the resistant strain as a target cancer cell, thereby sensing TRAIL resistance. It is possible to search for drugs to be converted. When evaluated in combination with TRAIL, TRAIL auxiliary drugs that enhance or complement (homogenize) the cell death-inducing action of TRAIL can be screened.

4). Selection of Control (4-1) Evaluation of Anticancer Agent or Candidate Substance, Control and Control Experiment in Screening System Cell growth rate per unit time when test drug is added to each colony of cancer cells (L ) And cell death induction rate (D) are measured. In the case of a test drug, they are expressed as L (sample) and D (sample). The case where the test drug is not added (or the placebo drug is added) is expressed as L (control) and D (control). However, in the case of anticancer drug candidate screening, in order to withstand practical use, it is preferable that damage to normal cells is as small as possible. Therefore, it is preferable to conduct a control experiment on normal cells. In other words, the same process is performed for the other treatments only by changing the target cells from cancer cells to normal cells. In that case, when the test drug treatment is applied to normal cells, it is expressed as LC (sample) and DC (sample), and when no test drug is added, it is expressed as LC (control) and DC (control). .

(4-2) Evaluation of an auxiliary agent for an anticancer agent or a candidate substance thereof, control and control experiment in screening system When the test agent is an auxiliary agent, an effect of enhancing the cell death inducing effect of the anticancer agent using a known anticancer agent, or The extent of the effect that helps the anticancer agent to act uniformly will be evaluated or such an auxiliary agent will be screened. In that case, when a test auxiliary drug is used in combination with an anticancer drug for cancer cells, it is expressed as L (sample) and D (sample), and only the anticancer drug (or placebo drug) is added without adding the test auxiliary drug. + Anticancer agent) is expressed as L (control) and D (control). In addition, since the auxiliary drug is only for the purpose of enhancing and homogenizing the effect of the anticancer agent, even if it is against cancer cells, there is a concern about strong side effects if only the auxiliary drug has a strong effect, Poor utility. Therefore, as a further control system, the case where only an auxiliary drug (candidate) is added to cancer cells without adding an anticancer agent corresponds to LC (sample) and DC (sample), and nothing is added (or placebo) (When a drug is added) corresponds to LC (control) and DC (control).
In the screening of ancillary drugs, cancer cells that have acquired resistance to known anticancer agents are used as target cancer cells, that is, cancer that has been previously treated with known anticancer agents and has acquired resistance to the anticancer agents. After forming cells, an auxiliary drug that returns the anticancer drug resistant strain to a sensitive strain can be selected by allowing a known anticancer drug and an auxiliary drug candidate to act. The auxiliary agent can be screened for an auxiliary agent having a high effect of enhancing and / or homogenizing the cell death-inducing effect on the anticancer agent.
In addition, when the auxiliary drug is narrowed down by the auxiliary drug screening system, it is preferable to further provide a control experiment using normal cells to confirm that the damage to normal cells is small.
In the examples of the known anticancer drug TRAIL used in the examples of the present invention and various siRNAs of candidate auxiliary drugs, the TRAIL (+), siRNA (+) system is L (sample) and each clone of the target cancer cell. D (sample), TRAIL (+), siRNA (-) system is L (control) and D (control), and TRAIL (-), siRNA (+) is LC (sample) and DC ( sample), and TRAIL (-) and siRNA (-) are expressed as LC (control) and DC (control).

5. In the present invention, after the drug treatment, it is necessary to count the number of living cells and the number of dead cells for each colony and unit time. The counting at that time can be performed under a microscope when the number of colonies and the number of cells is small, but is usually performed by image processing by a computer. Note that dead cells are peeled off from the plate and can be easily determined from the shape. In addition, by using Crystal Violet and Carcein-AM that can stain only living cells, and Ethidium homodimer (EthD-1) that can stain only dead cells, measurement using a fluorescence microscope can be performed.

6). Calculation Method of Cell Proliferation Rate, Cell Death Induction Rate, and Standard Deviation First, cell growth rate and cell death induction rate are calculated for each colony according to the following formula.

Cell growth rate per unit time [L]:
L = Exp {ln (L (t + Δt) / Lt) / Δt} x100
L: Cell growth rate (%)
L (t + Δt): Number of cells surviving in time (t + Δt)
Lt: Number of cells that survive in time (t)
L (t + Δt) / Lt: Cell growth rate during time (Δt) Cell growth rate per unit time under various conditions When expressing [L] separately, L is L (Sample), L (Control) , CL (Sample), CL (Control).

Induction rate of cell death per unit time [D]:
D = 1-Exp [ln {1- (D (t + Δt) -Dt) / (L (t + Δt) + D (t + Δt) -Dt)} / Δt] x100
D: Induction rate of cell death (%)
D (t + Δt) -Dt: Number of dead cells between time t and time (t + Δt)
L (t + Δt): Number of cells surviving in time (t + Δt)
L (t + Δt) + D (t + Δt) -Dt: Number of cells in time (t + Δt) (total of live and dead cells)
(D (t + Δt) -Dt) / (L (t + Δt) + D (t + Δt) -Dt): Cell death induction rate during time (Δt) Induction of cell death per unit time under various conditions When expressing the rate [D] separately, D is expressed as D (Sample), D (Control), CD (Sample), and CD (Control).

σ(L): 細胞集団全体の細胞増殖率の標準偏差 (%)
Li: i番目のコロニーの細胞増殖率
各種条件における細胞集団全体の細胞増殖率の標準偏差[σ(L)]を区別して表記する場合、σ(L)をσ(L(Sample))、σ(L(Control))、σ(CL(Sample))、σ(CL(Control))と表記する。

細胞集団全体の細胞の増殖率の変動係数 [C.V.(L)]：
C.V.(L) =σ(L) /μ(L) x 100
C.V.(L): 細胞集団全体の細胞の増殖率の変動係数 (%)\
各種条件における細胞集団全体の細胞の増殖率の変動係数 [C.V.(L)]を区別して表記する場合、C.V. (L)をC.V. (L(Sample))、C.V. (L(Control))、C.V. (CL(Sample))、C.V. (CL(Control))と表記する。

細胞集団全体の細胞死誘導率の平均値 [μ(D)]：
μ(D) = (D₁+D₂+・・・+D_n)/n:
μ(D): 細胞集団全体の細胞死誘導率の平均値 (%)
D_n: n番のコロニーの細胞死誘導率 (%)
各種条件における細胞集団全体の細胞増殖率の平均値 [μ(D)]を区別して表記する場合、μ(D)をμ(D(Sample))、μ(D(Control))、μ(CD(Sample))、μ(CD(Control))と表記する。

細胞集団全体の細胞死誘導率の標準偏差 [σ(D)]：

σ(D): 細胞集団全体の細胞死誘導率の標準偏差 (%)
Di: i番目のコロニーの細胞死誘導率 (%)
各種条件における細胞集団全体の細胞死誘導率の標準偏差 [σ(D)]を区別して表記する場合、σ(D)をσ(D(Sample))、σ(D(Control))、σ(CD(Sample))、σ(CD(Control))と表記する。

細胞集団全体の細胞死誘導率の変動係数 [C.V.(D)]：
C.V.(D) =σ(D) /μ(D) x 100
C.V.(D): 細胞集団全体の細胞死誘導率の変動係数 (%)
各種条件における細胞集団全体の細胞死誘導率の変動係数 [C.V.(D)]を区別して表記する場合、C.V. (D)をC.V. (D(Sample))、C.V. (D(Control))、C.V. (CD(Sample))、C.V. (CD(Control))と表記する。 Then, according to the following formula, the arithmetic mean value, standard deviation, and variation coefficient of the cell response (cell proliferation rate and cell death induction rate) for each colony are calculated according to the following formula.

Average cell growth rate of the entire cell population [μ (L)]:
μ (L) = (L ₁ + L ₂ + ... + L _n ) / n:
μ (L): Average cell growth across the cell population (%)
L _n : Cell growth rate of the nth colony (%)
n: Number of cells When expressing the average cell growth rate [μ (L)] of the entire cell population under various conditions, μ (L) is expressed as μ (L (Sample)), μ (L (Control)) , Μ (CL (Sample)), μ (CL (Control)).

Standard deviation [σ (L)] of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population:

σ (L): Standard deviation (%) of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population
Li: Cell growth rate of the i-th colony When distinguishing the standard deviation [σ (L)] of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population under various conditions, σ (L) is expressed as σ (L (Sample)), σ (L (Control)), σ (CL (Sample)), σ (CL (Control)).

Coefficient of variation of cell growth rate throughout the cell population [CV (L)]:
CV (L) = σ (L) / μ (L) x 100
CV (L): coefficient of variation (%) of cell growth rate across the cell population
CV (L) is expressed as CV (L (Sample)), CV (L (Sample)), CV (L (Control)), CV ( CL (Sample)) and CV (CL (Control)).

Mean value of cell death induction rate of entire cell population [μ (D)]:
μ (D) = (D ₁ + D ₂ + ... + D _n ) / n:
μ (D): Average cell death induction rate of entire cell population (%)
D _n : Cell death induction rate of the nth colony (%)
When the average value of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population under various conditions is expressed separately [μ (D)], μ (D) is expressed as μ (D (Sample)), μ (D (Control)), μ (CD (Sample)), μ (CD (Control)).

Standard deviation [σ (D)] of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population:

σ (D): Standard deviation of cell death induction rate of entire cell population (%)
Di: Cell death induction rate of i-th colony (%)
When distinguishing the standard deviation [σ (D)] of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population under various conditions, σ (D) is expressed as σ (D (Sample)), σ (D (Control)), σ ( CD (Sample)) and σ (CD (Control)).

Coefficient of variation of cell death induction rate across the cell population [CV (D)]:
CV (D) = σ (D) / μ (D) x 100
CV (D): Coefficient of variation (%) in the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population
When differentiating the coefficient of variation [CV (D)] of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population under various conditions, CV (D) is expressed as CV (D (Sample)), CV (D (Control)), CV ( CD (Sample)) and CV (CD (Control)).

According to each of the above formulas, L (sample) and L (control), preferably LC (sample) and LC (control) are obtained as the growth rate for each colony per unit time. D (sample) and D (control), preferably DC (sample) and DC (control) are determined as cell death induction rates for each colony.
Subsequently, an arithmetic mean value of these values, a standard deviation and a coefficient of variation as required are obtained, and a response of the cell as a cell population is calculated. Specifically, μ (L (sample)) and μ (L (control)) of cell growth rate per unit time of the entire cell population, preferably μ (LC (sample)) and μ (LC ( control)), and μ (D (sample)) and μ (D (control)) of cell death induction rate per unit time of the entire cell population, preferably μ (DC (sample)) and μ (DC ( control)).
If necessary, the standard deviations σ (L (sample)) and σ (L (control)) of the cell growth rate per unit time of the entire cell population, preferably σ (LC (sample)) and σ (LC (control)) is obtained, and the standard deviations σ (D (sample)) and σ (D (control)) of cell death induction rate per unit time of the entire cell population are preferably σ (DC (sample) ) And σ (DC (control)). If necessary, the coefficient of variation CV (L (sample)) and CV (L (control)) of the cell growth rate per unit time of the entire cell population, preferably CV (LC (sample)) and CV ( LC (control)), and coefficient of variation CV (D (sample)) and CV (D (control)) of cell death induction rate per unit time of the entire cell population, preferably CV (DC (sample)) and CV (DC (control)) may be obtained.

Next, according to the following formula, “cell response by test group (sample)” for each of “arithmetic mean value and variation coefficient of cell response (cell proliferation rate and cell death induction rate) by negative control drug (negative control)” The ratio of “arithmetic mean value of cell proliferation rate and cell death induction rate” and coefficient of variation ”is calculated according to the following formula.

Ratio of average value of average cell growth rate relative to control group [μ (L (ratio))]:
μ (L (ratio)) = μ (L (sample)) / μ (L (control)) x 100
μ (L (ratio)): Ratio of `` average cell growth rate of the whole cell population to which the test drug was added '' to `` average cell growth rate of the whole cell population to which the negative control drug was added '' (%)
μ (L (sample)): Average cell growth rate (%) of the entire cell population to which the test drug was added
μ (L (control)): Average cell growth rate (%) of the whole cell population with negative control drug added

Ratio of coefficient of variation of cell growth rate relative to control group [CV (L (ratio))]:
CV (L (ratio)) = CV (L (sample)) / CV (L (control)) x 100
CV (L (ratio)): Ratio of `` variation coefficient of cell growth rate of the whole cell population to which the test drug was added '' to `` variation coefficient of cell growth rate of the whole cell population to which the negative control drug was added '' (%)
CV (L (sample)): coefficient of variation (%) of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population to which the test drug was added
CV (L (control)): Coefficient of variation (%) of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population with negative control added

Ratio of average value of cell death induction rate to control group [μ (D (ratio))]:
μ (D (ratio)) = μ (D (sample)) / μ (D (control)) x 100
μ (D (ratio)): “Induction rate of cell death in the whole cell population to which the test drug (sample) is added” vs. “average cell death induction rate in the whole cell population to which the negative control agent (negative control) is added” % Of "average value of"
μ (D (sample)): Average cell death induction rate of the entire cell population to which the test drug is added (%)
μ (D (control)): Mean value of cell death induction rate of whole cell population to which negative control drug was added (%)

Ratio of coefficient of variation of cell death induction rate relative to control group [CV (D (ratio))]:
CV (D (ratio)) = CV (D (sample)) / CV (D (control)) x 100
CV (D (ratio)): Ratio of the `` variation coefficient of the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population to which the test drug was added '' to the `` variation coefficient of the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population to which the negative control drug was added '' ( %)
CV (D (sample)): coefficient of variation (%) of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population to which the test drug was added
CV (D (control)): Coefficient of variation (%) in the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population to which the negative control drug was added

Similarly, in the case of control cells (normal cells in the anticancer drug screening system, anticancer drug (−) cancer cells in the auxiliary drug screening system), the average cell growth rate ratio μ (CL (ratio)), cell death induction rate The average value ratio μ (CD (ratio)), the cell growth rate variation coefficient ratio CV (CL (ratio)) and the cell induction rate variation coefficient ratio CV (CD (ratio)) are as follows: Can be sought.
μ (CL (ratio)) = μ (CL (sample)) / μ (CL (control)) × 100 (%)
μ (CD (ratio)) = μ (CD (sample)) / μ (CD (control)) × 100 (%)
CV (CL (ratio)) = CV (CL (sample)) / CV (CL (control)) x 100 (%)
CV (CD (ratio)) = CV (CD (sample)) / CV (CD (control)) x 100 (%)

7). Evaluation for test drug 5. According to the numerical value obtained in step (1), the test drug is evaluated with the following index. For known drugs, the following indices (1) to (1) are examined for the drug concentration at the time of administration, the number of times of administration, the timing of administration, combinations with other drugs to be used in combination, compounds, etc. Perform based on 4) and evaluate the optimum conditions. For unknown drugs, the following indices (1) to (4) are examined based on the drug concentration at the time of administration, the number of times of administration, the timing of administration, combinations with other drugs, compounds, etc. ) Based on the optimal drug screening.

(1) Effect on cell proliferation Average cell growth rate μ (L () of cancer cell group (sample group) to which test drug was added and cancer cell group (control group) to which negative control drug was added sample)) and μ (L (control)). Specifically, μ (L (ratio)) = μ (L (sample)) / μ (L (control)) × 100 is calculated and the value of μ (L (ratio)) is evaluated. If μ (L (ratio)) <100 (%), the sample group was able to suppress cancer cell growth more strongly than the control group. On the other hand, the average cell growth rate μ (CL (sample)) and μ (μ) of the normal cell group (sample group) to which the test drug was added and the normal cell group (control group) to which the negative control drug was added CL (control)). Specifically, μ (CL (ratio)) = μ (CL (sample)) / μ (CL (control)) × 100 is calculated, and the value of μ (CL (ratio)) is evaluated. The closer the value of μ (CL (ratio)) is to 100 (%), the more effective the anticancer agent has no effect on the proliferation of normal cells, and the less the side effects of the drug, the higher the usefulness.
In the case of evaluation or screening of an auxiliary drug that enhances the anticancer drug action of a known anticancer drug, a cancer cell group (sample group) treated with a known anticancer drug and a test auxiliary drug in combination and a cancer cell group treated with only the known anticancer drug (control group) The average values μ (L (sample)) and μ (L (control)) of the cell growth rates are compared. Specifically, μ (L (ratio)) = μ (L (sample)) / μ (L (control)) × 100 is calculated and the value of μ (L (ratio)) is evaluated. If μ (L (ratio)) <100 (%), the sample group was able to suppress cancer cell growth more strongly than the control group, and the auxiliary drug enhanced the anticancer effect of the known anticancer drug. Indicates that On the other hand, the average cell growth rates μ (CL (sample)) and μ of the cancer cell group treated with the test auxiliary drug (sample group) and the cancer cell group when the test auxiliary drug is not applied (control group) Compare (CL (control)). Specifically, μ (CL (ratio)) = μ (CL (sample)) / μ (CL (control)) × 100 is calculated, and the value of μ (CL (ratio)) is evaluated. The closer the value of μ (CL (ratio)) is to 100 (%), the more the administration of the auxiliary drug has no effect on the cell growth rate, and the higher the usefulness as an auxiliary drug.

(2) Influence on cell death Average cell death induction rate μ (D (D (D) of cancer cell group (sample group) to which test drug was added and cancer cell group (control group) to which negative control drug was added sample)) and μ (D (control)). Specifically, μ (D (ratio)) = μ (D (sample)) / μ (D (control)) × 100 is calculated and the value of μ (D (ratio)) is evaluated. If μ (D (ratio))> 100 (%), the sample group was able to induce cell death of cancer cells more strongly than the control group. On the other hand, average values μ (CD (sample)) and μ of cell death induction rates of the normal cell group (sample group) to which the test drug was added and the normal cell group (control group) to which the negative control drug was added Compare (CD (control)). Specifically, μ (CD (ratio)) = μ (CD (sample)) / μ (CD (control)) × 100 is calculated and the value of μ (CD (ratio)) is evaluated. However, if the value of μ (CD (control)) is 0 or a value close to it, it is impossible to calculate μ (CD (ratio)) accurately, so evaluation is made with the value of μ (CD (sample)). . The closer the value of μ (CD (ratio)) is to 100% (μ (CD (ratio)) ≒ 100%) (eg 50% <μ (CD (ratio)) <200%) or μ (CD (sample) ) Is closer to 0% (μ (CD (sample)) ≒ 0%) (for example, μ (CD (sample)) <1%), the anticancer agent does not affect the cell death of normal cells, and the side effect of the drug It is evaluated that it is less useful and highly useful.
In the case of evaluation or screening of an auxiliary drug that enhances the anticancer drug action of a known anticancer drug, a cancer cell group (sample group) treated with a known anticancer drug and a test auxiliary drug in combination and a cancer cell group treated with only the known anticancer drug (control group) The average values μ (D (sample)) and μ (D (control)) of cell death induction rates are compared. Specifically, μ (D (ratio)) = μ (D (sample)) / μ (D (control)) × 100 is calculated, and the value of μ (D (ratio)) is evaluated. If μ (D (ratio))> 100 (%), the sample group was able to induce cell death of cancer cells more strongly than the control group, and the auxiliary drug exhibited the anticancer action of a known anticancer drug. Indicates that it has been enhanced. On the other hand, average values μ (CD (sample)) and μ of cell growth rates of the cancer cell group (sample group) treated with the test auxiliary drug and the cancer cell group (control group) when the test auxiliary drug is not given. Compare (CD (control)). Specifically, μ (CD (ratio)) = μ (CD (sample)) / μ (CD (control)) × 100 is calculated and the value of μ (CD (ratio)) is evaluated. However, if the value of μ (CD (control)) is 0 or a value close to it, it is impossible to calculate μ (CD (ratio)) accurately, so evaluation is made with the value of μ (CD (sample)). . For example, the value of μ (CD (ratio)) is closer to 100% (μ (CD (ratio)) ≈100%) (for example, 50% <μ (CD (ratio)) <200%) or μ (CD ( The value of sample)) is closer to 0% (μ (CD (sample)) ≒ 0%) (for example, μ (CD (sample)) <1%). It is highly useful as an auxiliary drug.

(3) Inhibition of partial cell death (Fractional Killing) Cell growth rate of the entire cell population of the cell group to which the drug was added (sample group) and the cell group to which the negative control drug was added (control group) The coefficient of variation (CV (L)) and the coefficient of variation of cell death induction rate (CV (D)) are compared. Specifically, CV (L (ratio)) = CV (L (sample)) / CV (L (control)) x 100
And CV (D (ratio)) = CV (D (sample)) / CV (D (control)) × 100 is calculated, and the values of CV (L (ratio)) and CV (D (ratio)) are evaluated. If CV (L (ratio)) <100 (%) and CV (D (ratio) <100 (%), in the cell growth rate and cell death induction rate, partial cells of the sample group with respect to the control group It means that death (Fractional Killing) can be suppressed.

(4) Temporal changes in each of the above indicators Furthermore, the time of drug action is analyzed by analyzing the time course of the effect on cell proliferation, the effect on cell death, and the ability to suppress partial cell death (Fractional Killing). Dependencies can be evaluated.

(5) Evaluation example using control cells (normal cells in anticancer drug screening system, anticancer drug (−) cancer cells in auxiliary drug screening system) In addition to the above evaluation items, the ratio of the average value of cell proliferation rate μ (CL (ratio)), the ratio of mean cell death rate μ (CD (ratio)), the rate of variation coefficient CV (CL (ratio)) of cell growth rate, and the rate CV of variation factor of cell induction rate ( More detailed evaluation is preferable for CD (ratio). Specifically, it is as follows.
As an evaluation example for a test drug, for example, a drug (sample) and a negative control drug (control) are added to a patient cancer tissue-derived cell and a normal cell, and each μ (CL (sample)) and μ (CL (control)) ) From the negative control group, the ratio μ (CL (ratio)) of the average cell growth rate of the sample group is calculated. Similarly, the ratio μ (CD (ratio)) of the average cell death induction rate of the sample group is calculated from μ (CD (sample)) and μ (CD (control)). In normal cells, μ (CL (ratio)) ≈100% and μ (CD (sample)) ≈0 (%) or μ (CL (ratio)) ≈100% and μ Most preferably, (CD (ratio)) ≈100%. At least 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and μ (CD (sample)) <1%, or 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200%, And 50% <μ (CD (ratio)) <200% needs to be satisfied. At the same time, if μ (L (ratio)) <100 (%) and μ (D (ratio))> 100 (%) in cells derived from patient cancer tissue, it can be evaluated that the usefulness of the drug is high. Preferably μ (L (ratio)) <50 (%), μ (D (ratio))> 1000 (%), more preferably μ (L (ratio)) <10 (%), μ (D ( ratio))> 10000 (%).
In addition, for example, in the above-mentioned drugs, the ratio CV (CL (ratio)) of the coefficient of variation of the cell growth rate relative to the control group and the ratio CV (CD (ratio)) of the coefficient of variation of the cell death induction rate relative to the control group are small. In the case of (<100%), it is considered that there is a low possibility that a subpopulation with high malignancy (low effect of the drug) is included in the cell population, and it can be evaluated that the drug is highly useful.
Values evaluated as having high efficacy of anticancer drugs are (a) μ (L (ratio)) <100 (%), μ (D (ratio))> 100 (%), CV (L (ratio)) <100 (%), CV (D (ratio)) <100 (%), preferably μ (L (ratio)) <50 (%), μ (D (ratio))> 1000 ( %), More preferably μ (L (ratio)) <10 (%), μ (D (ratio))> 10000 (%) (b) at least 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and μ (CD (sample)) <1%, or 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and 50% <μ (CD ( ratio)) <200%, and μ (CL (ratio)) ≈100 (%), μ (CD (ratio)) ≈100 (%) or μ (CL (ratio)) ≈100 (%), μ ( CD (sample)) ≈0 (%) is preferable.
In order to be an effective anticancer agent, at least one of μ (L (ratio)), μ (D (ratio)), CV (L (ratio)) and CV (D (ratio)) for cancer cells. Preferably satisfies the above index. In general, it is preferable to satisfy two or more indices, and it is most preferable to satisfy all of the indices. However, even if the index for cancer cells is satisfied, μ (CL (ratio)) and μ (CD (ratio)) satisfy the above index in normal cells, or μ (CL (ratio)) and μ (D (sample If)) does not satisfy the above index, serious side effects are feared, and it cannot be said that it is an effective anticancer agent.
The value that the effectiveness of an auxiliary drug is evaluated to be high is as follows: (a) In the combined administration of a known anticancer drug and an auxiliary drug, μ (L (ratio)) <100 (%), μ (D (ratio))> 100 ( %), CV (L (ratio)) <100 (%), CV (D (ratio)) <100 (%), preferably μ (L (ratio)) <50 (%), μ (D ( ratio))> 1000 (%), more preferably μ (L (ratio)) <10 (%), μ (D (ratio))> 10000 (%), Generally, 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and μ (CD (sample)) <1%, or 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% And 50% <μ (CD (ratio)) <200% and μ (CL (ratio)) ≈100 (%), μ (CD (ratio)) ≈100 (%) or μ (CL ( ratio)) ≈100 (%) and μ (CD (sample)) ≈0 (%). In order to be an effective adjuvant, it is necessary to satisfy at least one of the above evaluation indices for the target cancer cells in the combined administration of the known anticancer agent and the adjuvant. In general, it is preferable to satisfy two or more indices, and it is most preferable to satisfy all of the indices. However, even if each index for anti-cancer drug combination administration is satisfied, μ (CL (ratio)) and μ (CD (ratio)) or μ (CL (ratio)) and μ (CD ( If the observation result by any combination of sample)) does not satisfy the above-mentioned index, it means that there is a strong cell death inducing action and / or cell growth inhibitory action that exceeds the role of an anticancer drug as an auxiliary drug. Since there is a high risk of damaging normal cells, there are concerns about serious side effects. That is, it cannot be said that it is an effective adjuvant as an adjuvant for a specific anticancer agent.

8). Characterization of the test cell population 6. The test cell population is evaluated according to the following indices according to the numerical values obtained in (1). For test cell populations (eg, patient-derived cells), using known anticancer agents, monoclonal antibodies that recognize specific cancer markers, siRNA and gene expression vectors, and the behavior of individual cells in the test cell population By observing, a profile of the test cell population can be created. Further, by comparing other behavior data, it is possible to evaluate the effectiveness of each drug on the test cell population. The process is the same as 6 above, and examination of the drug concentration at the time of administration, the number of times of administration, the timing of administration, the combination with other drugs, compounds, etc. used in combination, the timing (time) of administration and the combination thereof is shown in 6 above. Based on the indicators (1) to (4) ”.

For example, a drug and a negative control drug are added to a cancer cell group (sample) whose characteristics are unknown and a control (control) cell group such as a normal cell or a known cancer cell, and μ (L (sample)) and μ (L (control)), the ratio μ (L (ratio)) of the average cell growth rate of the sample group to the negative control group is calculated. Similarly, the ratio μ (D (ratio)) of the average cell death induction rate of the sample group is calculated from μ (D (sample)) and μ (D (control)).
In the cancer cell group (sample) whose characteristics are unknown, μ (L (ratio)) <100 (%), μ (D (ratio))> 100 (%), and μ ( If the value is lower than the value of L (ratio) and exceeds the value of μ (D (ratio)), it can be evaluated that the effect of the drug on the unknown cancer cell group is high. In this case, in normal cells, at least 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and μ (CD (sample)) <1%, or 50% <μ (CL (ratio) ) <200% and 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200%, μ (CL (ratio)) ≈100 (%) and μ (CD (sample)) ≈0 It is desirable that (%) or μ (CL (ratio)) ≈100 (%) and μ (CD (ratio)) ≈100 (%).
In addition, in the unknown cancer cell group (sample), if the CV (L (ratio)) and CV (D (ratio)) values are small compared to the cancer cell group used as a control, malignancy in the unknown cancer cell group occurs. It is unlikely that a subpopulation with a high degree (less effective drug) is included.

  Values for which the unknown malignancy of an unknown cancer cell group is low and drug administration is evaluated to be effective are (a) μ (L (ratio)) <100 (%), μ (D (ratio) )> 100 (%), CV (L (ratio)) <100 (%), CV (D (ratio)) <100 (%), preferably μ (L (ratio)) <50 (%), μ (D (ratio))> 1000 (%), (b) 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% with respect to normal cells and μ (CD (sample)) <1%, or 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and 50% <μ (CD (ratio)) <200%, preferably μ (CL (ratio)) ≈100 (%), μ (CD (ratio)) ≈100 (%) or μ (CL (ratio)) ≈100 (%), μ (CD (sample)) ≈0 (%), (c) μ (L ( ratio)) and μ (D (ratio)) values are below the μ (L (ratio)) value of the cancer cell group used as a control and above the μ (D (ratio)) value. It is preferable to satisfy all of the above evaluation indexes, but it is not necessary to satisfy all of them.

9. Embodiments of the Present Invention When the present invention is typically applied, it can be broadly classified as follows. 6. “Evaluation of test drug” described in 7. There are two types of “determining the characteristics of the test cell population” described in the above.
The following four examples are given as examples of the former. (A) The test drug (anticancer drug) can induce cell death uniformly and / or uniformly suppress cell proliferation of individual cancer cells constituting the target cancer cell population It is a case where it is judged whether it is a medicine which is easy to make a drug resistant strain by evaluating whether it can do. In addition, (b) screening for an unknown anticancer agent that uniformly induces cell death and / or uniformly suppresses cell proliferation of individual cancer cells constituting the target cancer cell population, or (c) ) An unknown auxiliary drug having an action of enhancing or uniformly acting on the individual cancer cells constituting the target cancer cell population, the cell death-inducing action and / or cell growth-inhibiting action of a known anticancer agent When used in the screening of the above, or (d) to recover (reinstate again) the cell death-inducing action and / or cell growth-inhibiting action of the anticancer drug on cancer cells that have acquired resistance to known anticancer drugs, or to act uniformly A typical example of the present invention is also used for screening an unknown auxiliary drug having an action.
The following example is given as an example of the latter. (E) Individual cells in a test cell population against a test cell population (for example, patient-derived cells) using a known anticancer agent, a monoclonal antibody that recognizes a specific cancer marker, siRNA or a gene expression vector By observing the behavior, it is possible to create a profile of the test cell population.
As an embodiment of the present invention, (d) recovering the cell death-inducing action and / or cell growth-inhibiting action of an anticancer agent against cancer cells that have acquired resistance to a known anticancer agent (anticancer agent-resistant strain is treated with anticancer agent sensitivity) The method of “screening for an unknown auxiliary drug having the action of returning to (1)” or acting uniformly is described. The emergence of resistant strains against powerful anticancer agents is a serious problem, not a method of screening for drugs that have the effect of amplifying their cell death in combination with known cancer cell-specific anticancer agents. In view of the above, a screening for a drug capable of recovering the cell death-inducing action and / or cell growth-inhibiting action of the anticancer drug (returning the anticancer drug-resistant strain to the anticancer drug sensitivity) was carried out. Of course, the present invention is not limited to such a technique.
As an embodiment of the present invention, TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand), which is attracting attention as an anticancer agent that specifically induces cell death in cancer cells, is used as a well-known powerful anticancer agent, The following procedure is performed using cultured HeLa cells used as model cancer cells.
(1) Preliminary selection of candidate siRNAs having activity to inhibit TRAIL cell death induction by conventional screening methods (2) Evaluation of TRAIL resistance for each colony and definition of TRAIL resistant Hela cell line (Fig. 3)
Evaluate the TRAIL resistance of the HeLa cell population. In addition, TRAIL is added to the HeLa cell population, the TRAIL resistance of the surviving cell population is evaluated, and compared with the original HeLa cell population. Define a HeLa cell population that is resistant to TRAIL.
(3) Evaluation of siRNA involved in sensitization of TRAIL-resistant HeLa cells By applying the evaluation method of the present invention, TRAIL recovers the cell death-inducing action and / or the cell growth-inhibiting action (the TRAIL-resistant HeLa cells have TRAIL resistance An unknown auxiliary drug having the effect of returning the sensitivity again) and / or the effect of causing the cell death-inducing action and / or the cytostatic action of TRAIL to uniformly act on individual Hela cell colonies is evaluated.

Hereinafter, in order to deepen the understanding of the present invention, the present invention will be specifically described with reference to examples, but the present invention is not limited thereto.
In addition, the description content of the patent document or the non-patent document cited in this specification shall be incorporated as the description of this specification.

  In this example, TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand), which is attracting attention as a well-known cancer cell-specific anticancer agent, is used, and the target cancer cell is a cultured HeLa used as a human model cancer cell. Using TRAIL-resistant HeLa cells acquired from cells, recovering TRAIL's cell death-inducing action and / or cell growth-inhibiting action (the effect of returning TRAIL resistance of TRAIL-resistant Heal cells to sensitivity again), and / or TRAIL It is a model experiment for screening an unknown auxiliary drug having an effect of uniformly acting on the cell death inducing action and / or cell growth suppressing action on individual Hela cell colonies. At that time, TRAIL was administered using various siRNAs as candidates for auxiliary agents that amplify the effects of TRAIL (ie, cell death-inducing action and / or cell growth-inhibiting action and / or homogenizing action by TRAIL). Each cancer cell colony was allowed to act. Each of these siRNAs is a drug that uniformly acts on each cancer cell colony, or a drug that recovers and / or amplifies the cell death-inducing action or cell growth-inhibiting action of lost TRAIL, that is, an anticancer drug In order to evaluate whether the effect as an auxiliary drug is achieved, a time series analysis of a cancer cell population in which each siRNA was allowed to act was performed.

In addition, the materials used in the cell culture, gene manipulation, etc. used in this example and the preparation methods thereof are all general materials and adjustment methods used in ordinary laboratories. Street. In addition, these are all typical examples, and are not limited thereto.
(1) Cell culture related materials
The following materials were used as a basic medium and additional components when culturing Hela cells.
・ DMEM (4.5g / l Glucose) with L-Glutamin, without Sodium Pyrurate (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan)
・ FBS: CEL Lect GOLD FETAL BOVINE SERUM ICN (ICN Pharmaceuticals, Costa Mesa, CA)
・ Penicillin / Streptomycin Mix (Penicillin5000u / ml, Streptomycin5000ug / ml, Nacalai Tesque)
・ Kanamycin (10mg / ml, 0.85% saline), (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA)
In addition, PBS (-) without Calcium, Magnecium (Nacalai Tesque) is used as PBS for washing cells and wells. When the cells were temporarily stored, Cell Banker 2 (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) was used.

(2) Materials required for observation over time by TRAIL exposure
As the TRAIL drug, Recombinant Human TRAIL / Apo2L (50 μg / tube) (PeproTech Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ) was used. ).

(3) Reverse transfection-related materials The methods used for sterilization are as follows.
When autoclaving, 0.1% Gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO) is dissolved in MilliQ water (0.1% Gelatin / MilliQ) or 0.5% Polyvinyl Alcohol / MilliQ is used, and filter sterilization is a 0.22 μm filter. Was dissolved in 45 mg / ml dextran4000 (Wako) / MilliQ.
Reverse transfection was performed in 70% Ethanol / MilliQ.
As a control of the test siRNA, the following commercially available siRNA was also used (in addition, each storage method was in accordance with the method described in each company's catalog).
・ Silencer Cy3 Labeled Negative Control siRNA # 1 (Ambion, Austin, TX)
・ AllStars Negative Control siRNA (Qiagen, Valencia, CA)
・ AllStars Hs Cell Death siRNA (QIAGEN)
・ Lipofectamin RNAiMAX Reagent (Invitrogen)

(4) Preparation of cultured cancer cells Hela cells were used as typical cultured cancer cells, and DMEM (4.5 g / l Glucose, FBS 10%, Penicillin 10 u / ml, Streptomycin 10 ug / ml, Kanamycin 100 ug / ml, L-Glutamin) The cells were cultured in a medium, and passage was performed when the cell density reached about 70%. The cells used in this study were expanded in advance, frozen at −80 ° C. in a deep freezer using Cell Banker 2, and stored in liquid nitrogen. After the cells were thawed, the experiment was always conducted after 2 passages.

(5) Adjustment of TRAIL
Human TRAIL Apo-II
Ligand was dissolved in 100 μl of DEPC-treated water and adjusted to 500 ng / ml. 10 μl aliquots were stored at −30 ° C. and used up for use.

(Example 1) Preliminary selection of candidate siRNA having activity of inhibiting TRAIL cell death induction by conventional screening method In Example 1, a HeLa cell wild type strain was used to respond to TRAIL from an apoptosis-related 240 gene. 8 genes that inhibit apoptosis were identified. In this case, the conventional drug evaluation system is applied, and the individual cells of the HeLa cancer cells are not focused. The entire cell population is combined with TRAIL treatment, siRNA introduction treatment is performed, and viable HeLa cells are Eleven types of siRNA represented by SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 11 shown below were selected. There were eight types of apoptosis inhibitor genes targeted by these siRNAs. In this experiment, only siRNA drug candidates to be used in Example 3 are selected in advance according to Example 1 because the effect of reducing the number of viable cells after the combined treatment is larger than the single treatment with the anticancer drug TRAIL. It is also positioned as a preliminary selection experiment. In other words, each siRNA that inhibits the expression of these eight genes has been evaluated in the cell population, and the response of the cells to the drug is averaged, and the drug resistance of each cell has been evaluated. Absent. In this experiment, since the number of living cells is evaluated, it is not distinguished whether the number of cells is a result of “growth inhibition” or “cell death”. Moreover, since it is not an experiment using a TRAIL resistant strain, it is a result showing only “an effect of amplifying the effect of TRAIL” and not a result showing an “effect of resensitizing TRAIL resistance”.
The siRNAs narrowed down by Example 1 are siRNAs for the following 8 target genes. In Example 3 of the present invention described below, siRNAs for the following eight target genes were used. In addition, when using 2 types of siRNA, it used as a liquid mixture.

(1) CASP2 (Gene Accession Number: NM_001224)
Anti-CASP2-siRNA (QIAGEN) targeting "AAC ATC TTC TGG AGA AGG ACA (SEQ ID NO: 1)"
(2) MDM2 (Gene Accession Number: NM_002392)
Anti-MDM2-siRNA (QIAGEN) targeting "CAG GCA AAT GTG CAA TAC CAA (SEQ ID NO: 2)"
(3) NFKBIA (Gene Accession Number: NM_020529)
Anti-NFKBIA -siRNA (QIAGEN) targeting "CTG GGC CAG CTG ACA CTA GAA (SEQ ID NO: 3)"
Anti-NFKBIA -siRNA (QIAGEN) targeting "AAG GGT GTA CTT ATA TCC ACA (SEQ ID NO: 4)"
(4) RAC1 (Gene Accession Number: NM_006908)
Anti-RAC1-siRNA (QIAGEN) targeting "ATG CAT TTC CTG GAG AAT ATA (SEQ ID NO: 5)"
(5) MCL1 (Gene Accession Number: NM_021960)
Anti-MCL1-siRNA (QIAGEN) targeting “CCC GCC GAA TTC ATT AAT TTA (SEQ ID NO: 6)”
(6) GNB2L (Gene Accession Number: NM_006098)
“Anti-GNB2L-siRNA (QIAGEN) targeting TTG GCA CAC GCT AGA AGT TTA (SEQ ID NO: 7)”
"Anti-GNB2L-siRNA (QIAGEN) targeting ACC AGG GAT GAG ACC AAC TAT (SEQ ID NO: 8)"
(7) SFN (Gene Accession Number: NM_006142)
Anti- SFN -siRNA (QIAGEN) targeting "CCG GGA GAA GGT GGA GAC TGA" (SEQ ID NO: 9)
(8) POU2F (Gene Accession Number: NM_002697)
Anti-POU2F-siRNA targeting “CAG GAT CTT CAA CAA CTG CAA (SEQ ID NO: 10)” (QIAGEN)
Anti-POU2F-siRNA targeting "TTG GAG AAC TTT CTA ACC AAA (SEQ ID NO: 11)" (QIAGEN)
As a positive control, anti-CASP8-siRNA (manufactured by QIAGEN) targeting CASP8 (Gene Accession Number: NM — 001080124) “AAG AGT CTG TGC CCA AAT CAA (SEQ ID NO: 12)” was used.

(Example 2) Evaluation of TRAIL resistance for each colony and definition of TRAIL resistant Hela cell line (FIG. 3)
Using a cancer cell line (HeLa cell) that is considered to be a uniform cell population, the resistance to TRAIL was evaluated for each colony, and the phenomenon that the cancer cells were only partially killed (Fractional Killing) was evaluated. TRAIL was exposed to a HeLa wild-type strain sensitive to TRAIL, and cells were observed in time series. Furthermore, in order to evaluate whether TRAIL resistance of a group of TRAIL resistant cancer cells that did not die was maintained, TRAIL was exposed again to Hela cells that survived TRAIL exposure, and the cells were observed in time series.

(2-1) Evaluation of HeLa wild type strain by time-lapse observation
HeLa wild strain was seeded at 1 × 10 ⁴ cells / well in 24-well EZview, and the medium was changed the next day. Cultivate in a 37 ° C 5% CO ₂ incubator for 48 hours, replace the medium with 200 ng / ml TRAIL and medium without TRAIL as a control, and expose to TRAIL for 60 hours. Time series images were acquired.

(2-2) Recovery of cell lines that survived TRAIL exposure
The medium was removed for each well and washed with 1 ml of PBS (−). PBS (−) was removed and 200 μl of 0.025% Trypsin / EDTA was added and immediately removed. The mixture was reacted at 37 ° C. for 2 minutes, 500 μl of the medium was added, and the viable cells were collected and transferred to a 10 cm petri dish containing 10 ml medium. After culturing in a 37 ° C. 5% CO ₂ incubator for 3 hours, the medium was changed after confirming adhesion to the bottom surface of the cells, and normal culture was performed.

(2-3) Evaluation by chronological observation of surviving cell lines after exposure to TRAIL Subcultured twice, recovered, seeded again at 1 x 10 ⁴ cells / well in 24 well EZview, and cultured in a 37 ° C 5% CO ₂ incubator for 48 hours did. After 48 hours, the medium was changed to a medium supplemented with 200 ng / ml of TRAIL, and time-series images were acquired for 60 hours with a time-series cell image acquisition microscope.

(2-4) Time-series cell image acquisition and image analysis 120-cycle phase difference images were simultaneously acquired at 30-minute intervals while culturing at 37 ° C. and 5% CO _{2 with a} time-series cell image acquisition apparatus. From the acquired images, the cell counter analysis software (ImageJ; http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) plug-in software “Cell Counter” shows the number of live and dead cells in each cell population every 4 hours. It measured using. The survival rate was calculated by dividing the number of living cells by the total number of cells (the sum of the number of dead cells and the number of living cells). The procedure flow of the second embodiment is as shown in FIG.

(2-5) Results and Discussion The experimental results in Example 2 showed that the number of dead cells in Hela cells was different for each cell population (colony), and the sensitivity to TRAIL was different for each cell population. Many of the cell populations that do not have TRAIL resistance (a population in which 70% or more of the cells died 40 hours after addition of TRAIL) showed the phenotype (cell death) within 5 hours after addition of TRAIL. On the other hand, there was a 65% resistant population (a population in which 70% or more cells survived 40 hours after addition of TRAIL) (FIG. 6A).
Therefore, in order to confirm whether or not the surviving cell population has acquired continuous resistance, the surviving cell population was collected by TRAIL exposure, subcultured twice in medium without TRAIL, and then again TRAIL Exposed to. As a result, 96% or more of the cell population showed TRAIL resistance (70% or more of the cells survived 40 hours after addition of TRAIL) (FIG. 6B). Moreover, only one cell population was observed for the rapid decrease in viability observed in the wild type.
The above results strongly suggest that Hela cells are mixed with cell populations that are resistant and sensitive to TRAIL, and that TRAIL resistant strains have selectively proliferated under TRAIL exposure.
The TRAIL resistance (FIG. 6B) of the cells surviving after the addition of TRAIL is not likely to be a newly acquired cell characteristic due to the addition of TRAIL, but is likely to be a characteristic originally retained by the wild cell population. It is also suggested that wild-type Hela may be a heterogeneous population in TRAIL resistance as a cell population. The results also show the importance of searching for drugs that perceive resistance in TRAIL resistant strains rather than searching for drugs that induce cell death in response to TRAIL (such as siRNA). .
More than 96% of the cell population that survived TRAIL exposure has continuously acquired TRAIL resistance and is defined below as a TRAIL resistant HeLa cell line. The TRAIL resistant HeLa cell line obtained by the above method is used in Example 3.

(Example 3) Evaluation of siRNA involved in sensitization of TRAIL resistant HeLa cells In Example 3, the candidate auxiliary drugs obtained in Example 1 (siRNA targeting 8 genes) were evaluated.
Since the importance of searching for a drug that sensitizes resistance to a TRAIL resistant strain was demonstrated in Example 2, the candidate auxiliary drug (siRNA) obtained in Example 1 was obtained in Example 2. TRAIL resistance of TRAIL-resistant HeLa cells is re-sensitized by introducing (reverse transfection) into TRAIL-resistant HeLa cells derived from the obtained HeLa cells, followed by addition of TRAIL (cell death-inducing action and / or cells of TRAIL) Time-series analysis of the cell state evaluated the effect of TRAIL on cell death induction by TRAIL on TRAIL-resistant HeLa cells and the effect of evenly suppressing cell growth on individual HeLa cell colonies. .
As candidate adjuvants (siRNAs) at that time, in Example 1, using the HeLa cell wild strain, the expression of 8 types of genes that are candidates for apoptosis-inhibiting activity genes selected from the apoptosis-related 240 genes is inhibited. Eleven types of siRNA.

(3-1) Creation of reverse transfection wells
Regarding siRNA immobilization method (5 plate) to 24well EZview (Non-patent Documents 6 and 7):
0.1% Gelatin 500 μl / well was applied to 24-well EZview, and after standing at room temperature in a clean bench for 1 hour, it was aspirated. Subsequently, equal amounts of 45 mg / ml dextran and 70% EtOH were mixed, 40 μl per well was applied, and air-dried in a bench.
The three reagents shown in Table 1 were mixed to prepare a siRNA mixture, and then allowed to stand at room temperature for 20 minutes, and 184 μl of a 0.5% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) solution was added. The mixed solution was applied to air-dried 24-well EZview at a rate of 22 μl per well, completely air-dried in a bench, stored in a vacuum at 4 ° C, and returned to room temperature before use (molar number of siRNA). Is 3.8 pmol per well).

(3-2) Preparation of TRAIL resistant HeLa cell line
HeLa wild strains are seeded at 1 × 10 ⁴ cells / well in a reverse transfection well (24 well EZview) on which control siRNA (Non Target siRNA: siRNA that does not show knockdown efficiency for any gene) is immobilized. On the next day, the medium was changed. The cells were cultured for 48 hours in a 37 ° C. 5% CO ₂ incubator, and the medium was exchanged between a medium supplemented with TRAIL 200 ng / ml and a medium without TRAIL added as a control, and further exposed to TRAIL for 60 hours.

(3-3) Recovery of TRAIL-resistant HeLa cell line The medium was removed, the medium was removed from 1 well, and washed with 1 ml of PBS (-). PBS (−) was removed and 200 μl of 0.025% Trypsin / EDTA was added and immediately removed. The mixture was reacted at 37 ° C. for 2 minutes, 500 μl of the medium was added, and the viable cells were collected and transferred to a 10 cm petri dish containing 10 ml medium. After culturing in a 37 ° C 5% CO2 incubator for 3 hours, the medium was changed after confirming adhesion to the bottom surface of the cells, and normal culture was performed.

(3-4) Knockdown analysis of TRAIL resistant HeLa cell line
HeLa TRAIL resistant strains (2 passages after recovery) were seeded at 1 × 10 ⁴ cells / well in 24 well EZview with siRNA immobilized, and the medium was changed the next day. 48 hours after seeding, cell images were obtained for confirmation of knockdown (FIG. 4), and the medium was replaced with a medium with TRAIL added at 200 ng / ml and a medium without TRAIL as a control. Time-series images were acquired with a time-series cell image acquisition apparatus for 40 hours. Image analysis was performed on the acquired image in the same manner as in Example 2 (2-4). (Figure 5)

(3-5) Introduction of siRNA into cells and confirmation of knockdown by reverse transfection method
Cy3-labeled control siRNA (Cy3 Labeled Negative Control siRNA: siRNA not showing knockdown efficiency for any gene) was immobilized on a 24-well EZview plate, followed by cell seeding, and after 48 hours of culture, Cell images were acquired (FIGS. 4A-D). From the fluorescence images (FIGS. 4A-D) of the cells into which siRNA was incorporated, siRNA introduction into the cytoplasm was observed (FIG. 4D). This result indicates that siRNA can be introduced into the cytoplasm by solid phase transfection.
Next, using siRNA mix (Cell Death siRNA) (Fig. 4F) and control siRNA (Fig. 4E) to induce cell death, check whether siRNA functions in the cell (can knockdown gene) It was. As a result, siRNA that induces cell death induced cell death with high efficiency to cells, whereas control siRNA did not give toxicity to cells. This indicates that the induction of gene knockdown by siRNA was successful by solid phase transfection. In addition, these results are expected to be knocked down correctly in other wells on the plate, and the subsequent analysis was advanced.

(3-6) Analysis for evaluation of auxiliary drug used in combination with TRAIL in TRAIL resistant HeLa cells Number of living cells at each time of each cell population (colony) calculated according to (3-4) above, [0017] Using the calculation procedure shown in [0017], the average value of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population [μ (L)] (the evaluation of the sample when TRAIL was added was μ (L (Sample)), the value when TRAIL was added The evaluation of the control is μ (L (Contorl)), the standard deviation of the cell growth rate of the whole cell population [σ (L)] (The evaluation of the sample when TRAIL is added is σ (L (Sample)), when TRAIL is added Σ (L (Contorl)), the coefficient of variation of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population [CV (L)] (Evaluation of the sample when TRAIL is added is CV (L (Sample)), TRAIL is added The evaluation of the control was CV (L (Contorl)), the average value of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population relative to the control group (without TRAIL) [μ (CL)] (TRAIL addition Μ (CL (Sample)) for the evaluation of the sample without evaluation, μ (CL (Contorl)) for the control without TRAIL, and the standard deviation [σ (CL)] of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population (without TRAIL addition) The evaluation of the sample is σ (CL (Sample)), the evaluation of the control without TRAIL addition is σ (CL (Contorl)), the coefficient of variation of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population [CV (CL)] (without TRAIL addition The evaluation of the sample was CV (CL (Sample)), and the evaluation of the control without addition of TRAIL was CV (CL (Contorl)) (Table 2A, B).
The number of dead cells at each time of each cell population (colony) calculated according to the above (3-4) and the average value of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population using the calculation procedure shown in [0017] [μ (D)] (The evaluation of the sample when TRAIL was added was μ (D (Sample)), the evaluation of the control when TRAIL was added was μ (D (Contorl)), and the standard deviation of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population [ σ (D)] (Evaluation of sample when TRAIL is added is σ (D (Sample)), evaluation of control when TRAIL is added is σ (D (Contorl)), and fluctuation of cell growth rate of entire cell population Coefficient [CV (D)] (CV (D (Sample)) for sample evaluation when TRAIL was added, CV (D (Contorl)) for control when TRAIL was added, cells for control group (without TRAIL)) Average cell growth rate [μ (CD)] for the entire population (μ (CD (Sample)) for samples without TRAIL addition, μ (CD (Contorl)) for controls without TRAIL), cells Standard deviation of cell growth rate of the whole group [σ (CD)] (σ (CD (Sample)) for the evaluation of the sample without TRAIL addition, σ (CD (Contorl)) for the control without the addition of TRAIL), cell population Coefficient of variation of overall cell growth rate [CV (CD)] (CV (CD (Sample)) was evaluated for samples without TRAIL, and CV (CD (Contorl)) was calculated for controls without TRAIL) (Table 3A, B).

TRAIL添加有のμ(L(ratio)) ＜ 100(%)、C.V.(L(ratio))＜100(%)の場合、○印を記載。
TRAIL添加無のμ(CL(ratio)) ≦ 50(%)の又はμ(CL(ratio)) ≧ 200(%)場合、×印を記載。 <Table 2> Evaluation of cell growth rate of auxiliary drugs used in combination with TRAIL using TRAIL resistant HeLa cells

When μ (L (ratio)) <100 (%) and CV (L (ratio)) <100 (%) with TRAIL added, ○ mark.
When μ (CL (ratio)) ≦ 50 (%) or μ (CL (ratio)) ≧ 200 (%) without TRAIL addition, x mark is entered.

TRAIL添加有のμ(D(ratio)) ＞ 1000(%)、C.V.(D(ratio))＜100(%)の場合、○印を記載。
TRAIL添加無のμ(CD(sample)) ≧ 1(%)場合、×印を記載。 <Table 3> Evaluation of cell death induction rate of auxiliary drugs used in combination with TRAIL using TRAIL resistant HeLa cells

When μ (D (ratio))> 1000 (%) and CV (D (ratio)) <100 (%) with TRAIL added, ○ mark.
When μ (CD (sample)) ≧ 1 (%) without TRAIL addition, x mark is shown.

(3-7) Results and Discussion The knockdown evaluation of each gene is as follows.

(A) MDM2 knockdown: ○
Upon addition of TRAIL, knockdown of MDM2 inhibited cell proliferation (μ (L (ratio)) = 69.3%) and induced cell death (μ (D (ratio)) = 3020%). When TRAIL is not added, cell death is not induced (μ (CD (sample)) = 0.02%), which is an excellent TRAIL adjuvant. MDM2 is a gene known to be involved in apoptosis. When MDM2 is knocked down, p53 is activated and cell cycle arrest and cell death induction are enhanced. On the other hand, both CV (L (ratio)) and CV (D (ratio)) exceeded 100%, and the effect of acting uniformly on individual HeLa cell colonies was low.
Even when TRAIL is not added, knockdown of MDM2 inhibits cell proliferation (μ (CL (ratio)) = 58.1%), and the effect of inhibiting cell proliferation is considered to be independent of TRAIL.
From the above, although the effect of uniformly acting on cell colonies is low, MDM2 knockdown that assists TRAIL in inducing cell death and suppresses cell proliferation may be effective as a target.

(I) NFKBIA knockdown: ×
Upon addition of TRAIL, NFKBIA knockdown strongly induced cell proliferation and cell death (μ (L (ratio)) = 6.00%) and cell death (μ (D (ratio)) = 21000%). However, since it strongly induces cell proliferation and cell death even when TRAIL is not added, it is not suitable as an auxiliary drug for TRAIL. Since NFKBIA knockdown causes cell growth inhibition and cell death induction in a TRAIL-independent manner, it may be highly toxic to normal cells.

(C) About knockdown of RAC1: △
Upon addition of TRAIL, RAC1 knockdown inhibited cell proliferation (μ (L (ratio)) = 75.7%) and induced cell death (μ (D (ratio)) = 377.4%). However, μ (D (ratio)) = 377.4% induces cell death about 4 times that of the control, and the effect is low. When TRAIL is not added, (μ (CL (ratio)) = 64.7% ), (Μ (CD (sample)) = 0.28%), and the effect of assisting the effect of TRAIL is also low.

(D) About knockdown of MCL1: ○
When TRAIL was added, knockdown of MCL1 strongly induced cell death (μ (D (ratio)) = 5400%), while cell growth was hardly suppressed (μ (L (ratio)) = 119.7% ). When TRAIL is not added, cell death is not induced (μ (CD (sample)) = 0.03%), which is an excellent TRAIL adjuvant. In addition, MCL1 is known as a member of the BCL family, and the effect of acting specifically on cell death indicates that this technique is functioning correctly. CV (L (ratio)) and CV (D (ratio)) were both below 100%, and the effect of acting uniformly on individual HeLa cell colonies was strong.
Although there is no inhibition of cell growth, knockdown of MCL1, which has a strong effect of assisting TRAIL action and causing cell death to act uniformly on cell colonies, can be expected to be effective as a target.

(E) About knockdown of GNB2L1: △
When TRAIL is added, knockdown of GNB2L1 hardly inhibits cell proliferation (μ (L (ratio)) = 93.1%) but induces cell death (μ (D (ratio)) = 2530%). However, CV (L (ratio)) and CV (D (ratio)) are both greater than 100% and are not particularly excellent targets.

(F) About knockdown of SFN: ×
When TRAIL is added (μ (L (ratio)) = 37.8%), (μ (D (ratio)) = 3820%), not added (μ (CL (ratio)) = 34.5%), (μ (CD (sample Regardless of)) = 3.25%), SFN knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell death, making it unsuitable as an adjunct to TRAIL.

(Gi) About CASP2 knockdown: ×
CASP2 knockdown inhibits cell growth regardless of TRAIL addition (μ (L (ratio)) = 9.58%) or non-addition (μ (L (ratio)) = 28.0%). μ (D (ratio)) = 683% induces cell death about 7 times that of the control, and the effect is not particularly strong.

(K) About knockdown of POU2F1: ○
Upon addition of TRAIL, knockdown of POU2F1 strongly induces cell death (μ (D (ratio)) = 4700 (%), and also slightly suppresses cell proliferation (μ (L (ratio)) = 87.4%). This effect is not TRAIL-dependent because inhibition of proliferation is also seen when TRAIL is not added (μ (L (ratio)) = 57.6%), because there is little induction of cell death when TRAIL is not added (μ (CD ( sample)) = 0.96%), excellent as a TRAIL adjuvant, CV (L (ratio)) is less than 100%, and the effect of uniformly acting on the growth inhibition of individual HeLa cell colonies is strong. On the other hand, CV (D (ratio)) exceeded 100%, and the effect of uniformly acting on cell death was low.Because the relationship between POU2F1 and apoptosis is not known in detail, POU2F1 is a target for new auxiliary drugs. May be very effective.

(K) Summary From the above considerations, MDM2, MCL1, and POU2F1 can be expected as effective target genes for sensitizing TRAIL-resistant cancer cells and enhancing TRAIL's cell death-inducing effect. Since the target gene candidate was determined, it became possible to increase the sensitivity of the resistant cancer cell population and enhance the drug efficacy of TRAIL by adjusting or combining the corresponding positions of siRNA to the target gene.

SEQ ID NO: 1 (anti-CASP2-siRNA): AAC ATC TTC TGG AGA AGG ACA
SEQ ID NO: 2 (anti-MDM2-siRNA): CAG GCA AAT GTG CAA TAC CAA
SEQ ID NO: 3 (anti-NFKBIA-siRNA): CTG GGC CAG CTG ACA CTA GAA
SEQ ID NO: 4 (anti-NFKBIA-siRNA): AAG GGT GTA CTT ATA TCC ACA
SEQ ID NO: 5 (anti-RAC1-siRNA): ATG CAT TTC CTG GAG AAT ATA
Sequence number 6 (anti-MCL1-siRNA): CCC GCC GAA TTC ATT AAT TTA
Sequence number 7 (anti-GNB2L-siRNA): TTG GCA CAC GCT AGA AGT TTA
Sequence number 8 (anti-GNB2L-siRNA): ACC AGG GAT GAG ACC AAC TAT
Sequence number 9 (anti- SFN-siRNA): CCG GGA GAA GGT GGA GAC TGA
SEQ ID NO: 10 (anti-POU2F-siRNA): CAG GAT CTT CAA CAA CTG CAA
SEQ ID NO: 11 (anti-POU2F-siRNA): TTG GAG AAC TTT CTA ACC AAA
SEQ ID NO: 12 (anti-CASP8-siRNA): AAG AGT CTG TGC CCA AAT CAA

Claims (12)

A method for evaluating or screening a drug that has a high cell growth inhibitory effect on a target cancer cell, or a drug that also has a high cell death-inducing effect, and that suppresses the appearance of drug-resistant cancer cells. A method comprising steps (1) to (4);
(1) A step of seeding cancer cells on a culture plate or cell chip at a low density, culturing them and growing them for each individual cell to form colonies,
(2) After processing a part of the colony group with the test drug, the cell images are recorded over time while culturing, and the number of viable cells and dead cells are counted for each colony every unit time. Cell proliferation rate L (sample) and cell death induction rate D (sample) of each colony
Record the cell images over time while culturing without treating the other part of the colony group with the test drug, and count the number of living and dead cells for each colony per unit time. Calculating the cell growth rate L (control) and cell death induction rate D (control) of each colony
(3) The cell growth rate average value μ (L (sample)) and cell death induction rate average value μ (D (sample)) of the entire cell population treated with the test drug in step (2) are used as the cell growth of each colony. Calculated as an arithmetic mean value of the rate L (sample) and the cell death induction rate D (sample),
The cell growth rate average value μ (L (control)) and cell death induction rate average value μ (D (control)) of the entire cell population not subjected to the test drug treatment in step (2) are used as the cell growth rate of each colony. Calculating each of the arithmetic mean values of L (control) and cell death induction rate D (control),
(4) The calculated μ (L (sample)) and μ (L (control)) are compared, and μ (L (ratio)) = μ (L (sample)) / μ (L (control)) When x100 (%) is less than 100 (%), the test drug is evaluated as a drug having a high cytostatic effect,
The calculated μ (D (sample)) and μ (D (control)) are compared, and μ (D (ratio)) = μ (D (sample)) / μ (D (control)) × 100 ( %) Is greater than 100 (%), the test drug is evaluated as a drug with a high cell death-inducing effect,
A step of selecting a test drug evaluated as having a high cell growth inhibitory effect or a test drug evaluated as having a high cell death inducing effect. In addition to the steps (1) to (4), the following steps (5) and (6) are further provided as a control experiment for screening a drug with few side effects. Method;
(5) Using the test drug selected in step (4) as the test drug, applying the same technique as in steps (1) and (2) to normal cells, In the case where the test drug treatment is not performed together with the cell growth rate CL (sample) and the cell death induction rate CD (sample) for each colony when the test drug treatment is performed to grow each time to form a colony Calculate the cell growth rate CL (control) and cell death induction rate CD (control) for each colony,
As the respective arithmetic mean values, the cell proliferation rate average value μ (CL (sample)) and cell death induction rate average value μ (CD (sample)) of the entire cell population treated with the test drug, and the test drug treatment Cell proliferation rate average value μ (CL (control)) and cell death induction rate average value μ (CD (control)) of the whole cell population not subjected to the calculation are calculated, and μ (CL (sample)) and μ (CL (control) )) And μ (CL (ratio)), and μ (CD (ratio)), which is the ratio of μ (CD (sample)) and μ (CD (control)),
(6) μ (CL (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200%, and μ (CD (sample)) is μ (CD (sample)) <1% Or μ (CL (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and μ (CD (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CD (ratio)) <200% A step of evaluating and selecting that the test drug has few side effects and is highly useful. In addition to the case where the steps (1) to (4) or the steps (5) to (6) are provided, the following step (7) for screening a drug that acts uniformly on individual cancer cells ) To (9) are provided, The method according to claim 1 or 2,
(7) The standard deviation σ (L (sample)) of the cell growth rate of the whole cell population treated with the test drug is expressed as the cell growth rate L (sample) for each colony and the average value μ of the cell growth rate of the whole cell population ( L (sample)), and the coefficient of variation of the proliferation rate of the entire cell population treated with the test drug “CV (L (sample)) = σ (L (sample)) / μ (L (sample)) "
The standard deviation σ (L (control)) of the cell growth rate of the entire cell population not subjected to the test drug treatment is calculated as the cell growth rate L (control) for each colony and the average value μ (L (control)), and the coefficient of variation of the proliferation rate of the entire cell population treated with the test drug “C.V. (L (control)) = σ (L (control)) / μ ( L (control)) ",
(8) The standard deviation σ (D (sample)) of the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population treated with the test drug is the average of the cell death induction rate D (sample) for each colony and the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population After calculation using the difference from the value μ (D (sample)), the coefficient of variation of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population treated with the test drug “C.V. (D (sample)) = σ (D ( sample)) / μ (D (sample)) ”
The standard deviation σ (D (control)) of the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population not subjected to the test drug treatment is the average value of the cell death induction rate L (control) for each colony and the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population. After calculating using the difference from μ (D (control)), the coefficient of variation of the cell death induction rate of the whole cell population treated with the test drug “C.V. (D (control)) = σ (D (control) )) / Μ (D (control)) ”,
(9) CV (L (ratio)) = CV (L (sample)) / CV (L), which is the ratio of the coefficient of variation of both cell growth rates obtained in the step (7). (control)) × 100 and / or the ratio of the coefficient of variation of both cell death induction rates determined in the above step (8) CV (D (ratio)) = CV (D ( sample)) / C.V. (D (control)) × 100 is less than 100%, the test drug has partial cell growth inhibition and / or cell growth rate and / or cell death induction rate. Or the process of selecting and evaluating that it is a chemical | medical agent which can suppress partial cell death (Fractional Killing). Amplifying the cell proliferation suppression effect of known anti-cancer agents, or even an auxiliary agent for even amplified cell death-inducing effect, and an evaluation method or screening method of inhibiting coagent the emergence of drug-resistant cancer cells, A method comprising the following steps (1) to (4);
(1) A step of seeding cancer cells on a culture plate or cell chip at a low density and culturing to form colonies for each individual cell,
(2) After part of the colony group is treated with the known anticancer agent and the test auxiliary agent in combination, the cell images are recorded over time while culturing, and the number of viable cells and dead cells are determined for each colony per unit time. Count, and calculate the cell growth rate L (sample) and cell death induction rate D (sample) of each colony per unit time,
After the other part of the colony group was treated with the known anticancer agent alone, the cell images were recorded over time while culturing, and the number of living and dead cells was counted for each colony per unit time. Calculate the cell growth rate L (control) and cell death induction rate D (control) of each colony per hour,
(3) Average cell proliferation rate μ (L (sample)) and average cell death induction rate μ (D (sample)) of the entire cell population treated in combination with the known anticancer agent and test auxiliary agent in step (2) Calculating the arithmetic mean values of the cell growth rate L (sample) and cell death induction rate D (sample) of each colony,
The average cell growth rate μ (L (control)) and the average cell death induction rate μ (D (control)) of the entire cell population treated with only the known anticancer agent in the step (2) are expressed as the cell growth rate L of each colony. (control) and a step of calculating as an arithmetic mean value of cell death induction rate D (control),
(4) The calculated μ (L (sample)) and μ (L (control)) are compared, and μ (L (ratio)) = μ (L (sample)) / μ (L (control)) When the x100 (%) is less than 100 (%), the test auxiliary drug is evaluated as a drug having a high amplification effect of cell growth suppression,
The calculated μ (D (sample)) and μ (D (control)) are compared, and μ (D (ratio)) = μ (D (sample)) / μ (D (control)) × 100 ( %) Is greater than 100 (%), the test auxiliary drug is evaluated as a drug with a high cell death-inducing effect,
A step of selecting a test auxiliary drug evaluated as having a high amplification effect of cell growth inhibition or a test auxiliary drug evaluated as having a high cell death inducing effect. In addition to the steps (1) to (4) according to claim 4, the following steps (5) and (6) for screening an auxiliary drug with fewer side effects as a control experiment in a system not using a known anticancer agent. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that:
(5) The same technique as in steps (1) and (2) above, using only the test auxiliary drug selected in step (4) without adding a known anticancer agent to the colony group of cancer cells Each colony when the test auxiliary drug is not applied, together with the cell growth rate CL (sample) and cell death induction rate CD (sample) for each colony when the test auxiliary drug alone is applied. Calculate cell growth rate CL (control) and cell death induction rate CD (control) for each,
As the respective arithmetic mean values, the cell proliferation rate average value μ (CL (sample)) and the cell death induction rate average value μ (CD (sample)) of the entire cancer cell population when treated with the test auxiliary drug, and Calculating the average cell growth rate μ (CL (control)) and cell death induction rate average μ (CD (control)) of the entire cancer cell population not subjected to the test auxiliary drug treatment;
(6) μ (CL (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200%, and μ (CD (sample)) is μ (CD (sample)) <1% Or μ (CL (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and μ (CD (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CD (ratio)) <200% In this case, the step of evaluating and selecting that the test auxiliary drug has few side effects and is highly useful. In addition to the steps (1) to (4) according to claim 4 or when the steps (5) to (6) according to claim 5 are further provided, an anticancer agent is further added to each cancer cell. The method according to claim 4 or 5, wherein the following steps (7) to (9) are provided for selecting an auxiliary drug that acts uniformly:
(7) The standard deviation σ (L (sample)) of the cell growth rate of the whole cell population treated with the test auxiliary drug in combination is the average of the cell growth rate L (sample) for each colony and the cell growth rate of the whole cell population. After calculating using the difference from the value μ (L (sample)), the coefficient of variation of the proliferation rate of the entire cell population treated with the test auxiliary drug in combination “C.V. (L (sample)) = σ (L (sample)) / μ (L (sample)) ”
The standard deviation σ (L (control)) of the cell growth rate of the whole cell population treated only with the known anticancer agent is calculated as the cell growth rate L (control) for each colony and the average value μ (L ( control)), and the coefficient of variation of the proliferation rate of the entire cell population treated with only the known anticancer agent “C.V. (L (control)) = σ (L (control)) / μ ( L (control)) ",
(8) The standard deviation σ (D (sample)) of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population treated with the test auxiliary agent is used, and the cell death induction rate D (sample) for each colony and the cell death induction of the entire cell population After calculating using the difference from the average value μ (D (sample)) of the rate, the coefficient of variation of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population treated with the test auxiliary drug in combination “C.V. (D (sample)) ) = Σ (D (sample)) / μ (D (sample)) ”
The standard deviation σ (D (control)) of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population treated only with the known anticancer agent is the cell death induction rate L (control) for each colony and the average value μ of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population μ After calculating using the difference from (D (control)), the coefficient of variation of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population treated only with the known anticancer agent “C.V. (D (control)) = σ (D (control) )) / Μ (D (control)) ”,
(9) CV (L (ratio)) = CV (L (sample)) / CV (L (control)) × 100 and / or the ratio of the coefficient of variation of both cell death induction rates determined in the above step (8) CV (D (ratio)) = CV sample)) / C.V. (D (control)) × 100 is less than 100%, the test auxiliary drug partially inhibits cell growth in cell growth rate and / or cell death induction rate And / or evaluating and selecting a drug capable of amplifying the suppression of fractional killing.   The method according to any one of claims 4 to 6, wherein cancer cells that have been treated with a known anticancer agent in advance and become resistant to the anticancer agent are selected and used as target cancer cells.   The method according to claim 7, wherein the test auxiliary drug to be evaluated or screened is an auxiliary drug for restoring the sensitivity of cancer cells that have become known to be resistant to an anticancer drug.   The method according to claim 7 or 8, wherein the known anticancer agent is TRAIL, and the test auxiliary agent is an agent that inhibits expression of a siRNA preparation or a gene containing a sequence targeted by the siRNA. A method for evaluating the effectiveness of administration of a desired drug to a test cancer cell group, comprising at least the following steps (1) to (4);
(1) A step of seeding each of a test cancer cell group and a known cancer cell group on a culture plate or a cell chip at a low density, culturing and growing each individual cell to form a colony,
(2) In each cancer cell group, after treating a part of the colony group with the drug, cell images are recorded over time while culturing, and the number of viable cells and dead cells for each colony per unit time And calculating the cell growth rate L (sample) and cell death induction rate D (sample) of each colony per unit time,
In each of each cancer cell group, a cell image was recorded over time while culturing without treating the other part of the colony group with the drug, and the number of living and dead cells for each colony per unit time Counting the cell growth rate L (control) and cell death induction rate D (control) of each colony per unit time,
(3) In each cancer cell group, the average cell growth rate μ (L (sample)) and the average cell death induction rate μ (D (sample)) of the whole cell population treated with the drug in step (2) Are calculated as arithmetic mean values of the cell growth rate L (sample) and cell death induction rate D (sample) of each colony,
In each cancer cell group, the average cell growth rate μ (L (control)) and the average cell death induction rate μ (D (control)) of the whole cell population not subjected to the drug treatment in step (2) A step of calculating as an arithmetic mean value of the cell growth rate L (control) and the cell death induction rate D (control) of each colony,
(4) In the test cancer cell group, the calculated μ (L (sample)) and μ (L (control)) are compared, and μ (L (ratio)) <100 (%), Comparing the calculated μ (D (sample)) and μ (D (control)), μ (D (ratio))> 100 (%) and a known cancer cell group used as a control A step of evaluating that the effectiveness of administration of the drug to the test cancer cell group is high if the value is below the value of μ (L (ratio)) and exceeds the value of μ (D (ratio)). The drug is a drug that has been confirmed to have few side effects by the following steps (5) and (6) provided at the same time or in advance of the steps (1) to (4). Item 10. The method according to Item 10;
(5) Applying the same method as in steps (1) and (2) to normal cells, growing normal cells for each cell to form colonies, and applying the drug treatment Calculate the cell growth rate CL (control) and cell death induction rate CD (control) for each colony when the drug treatment is not performed together with the cell growth rate CL (sample) and cell death induction rate CD (sample) for each colony. ,
As the respective arithmetic mean values, the cell proliferation rate average value μ (CL (sample)) and the cell death induction rate average value μ (CD (sample)) of the whole cell group treated with the drug, and cells not subjected to the drug treatment Calculate the average cell growth rate μ (CL (control)) and cell death induction rate μ (CD (control)) of the entire population, and calculate the difference between μ (CL (sample)) and μ (CL (control)). A step of calculating μ (CL (ratio)) which is a ratio and μ (CD (ratio)) which is a ratio of μ (CD (sample)) and μ (CD (control));
(6) μ (CL (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200%, and μ (CD (sample)) is μ (CD (sample)) <1% Or μ (CL (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CL (ratio)) <200% and μ (CD (ratio)) is 50% <μ (CD (ratio)) <200% A step of evaluating that there are few side effects due to the drug in some cases. The following steps (7) to (9) are further provided for the test cancer cell group evaluated as having high efficacy in administration of the drug by the steps (1) to (4). 12. A method according to claim 10 or 11;
(7) For each of the test cancer cell group and the known cancer cell group, the standard deviation σ (L (sample)) of the cell growth rate of the whole cell group treated with the drug is expressed as the cell growth rate L ( sample) and the average value μ (L (sample)) of the cell growth rate of the whole cell population, and then the coefficient of variation of the growth rate of the whole cell population treated with the drug “C.V. (L (sample)) = σ (L (sample)) / μ (L (sample)) ”
For each cancer cell group, the standard deviation σ (L (control)) of the cell growth rate of the whole cell population not subjected to the drug treatment, the cell growth rate L (control) for each colony and the cell growth rate of the whole cell population The coefficient of variation of the proliferation rate of the whole cell group treated with the drug “C.V. (L (control)) = σ (L (control) )) / Μ (L (control)) ”,
(8) For each cancer cell group, the standard deviation σ (D (sample)) of the cell death induction rate of the entire drug-treated cell population is expressed as the cell death induction rate D (sample) for each colony and the entire cell population. After calculating using the difference from the mean value μ (D (sample)) of the cell death induction rate, the variation coefficient “C.V. (D (sample)) ) = Σ (D (sample)) / μ (D (sample)) ”
For each cancer cell group, the standard deviation σ (D (control)) of the cell death induction rate of the entire cell population not subjected to drug treatment, the cell death induction rate L (control) for each colony and the cells of the entire cell population After calculating using the difference from the average value μ (D (control)) of the death induction rate, the coefficient of variation of the cell death induction rate of the whole cell group treated with the drug “CV (D (control)) = calculating σ (D (control)) / μ (D (control)) ”,
(9) In the test cancer cell group, CV (L (ratio)) = CV (L (sample)), which is the ratio of the coefficient of variation of both cell proliferation rates determined in the step (7). /C.V.(L(control))×100 is C.V. (L (ratio)) <100 (%),
CV (D (ratio)) = CV (D (sample)) / CV (D (control), which is the ratio of the coefficient of variation of both cell death induction rates obtained in the step (8). )) X 100 is C.V. (D (ratio)) <100% and the values of C.V. (L (ratio)) and C.V. (D (ratio)) are If the number is lower than the known cancer cell group used as a control, the test cancer cell group is likely to contain a subpopulation with high malignancy, and the drug administration is highly effective. Process.

Images