JP5377186B2 - Method for calculating the abundance ratio for each type of solid waste - Google Patents

Method for calculating the abundance ratio for each type of solid waste Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5377186B2
JP5377186B2 JP2009214510A JP2009214510A JP5377186B2 JP 5377186 B2 JP5377186 B2 JP 5377186B2 JP 2009214510 A JP2009214510 A JP 2009214510A JP 2009214510 A JP2009214510 A JP 2009214510A JP 5377186 B2 JP5377186 B2 JP 5377186B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
waste
area
type
ratio
combustible
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2009214510A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2011064538A (en
Inventor
博之 大野
智明 八村
哲也 宮原
Original Assignee
一般財団法人日本環境衛生センター
株式会社環境地質
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 一般財団法人日本環境衛生センター, 株式会社環境地質 filed Critical 一般財団法人日本環境衛生センター
Priority to JP2009214510A priority Critical patent/JP5377186B2/en
Publication of JP2011064538A publication Critical patent/JP2011064538A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5377186B2 publication Critical patent/JP5377186B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

本発明は、廃棄物処理・処分施設に搬入される固体状廃棄物の集合物を、細かなエリアに分けて、赤外分光センサによるリモートセンシング技術を利用してエリア毎に廃棄物の種類を特定し、種類毎の全体量に対する存在割合を定量的に算出する方法に関するものである。この技術は,特に廃棄物処理・処分施設の運用効率向上に有用である。   The present invention divides a collection of solid waste carried into a waste treatment / disposal facility into fine areas and uses the remote sensing technology by infrared spectroscopy sensor to select the type of waste for each area. The present invention relates to a method for specifying and quantitatively calculating the existence ratio with respect to the total amount for each type. This technology is particularly useful for improving the operational efficiency of waste treatment and disposal facilities.

一般に固体状廃棄物(一般廃棄物・産業廃棄物)の取り扱いには、中間処理としての焼却処理や再資源化(リサイクル)処理、及び最終処分としての埋め立てなどがある。かつては、こうした処理と処分を分離して取り扱うことが多かったが、近年、廃棄物の処理・処分を総合的に取り扱える施設が増えつつある。例えば、「エコパークいずもざき」のように、焼却・破砕施設と最終処分場(主に埋め立て)と浸出水処理施設などを一体にした複合処理施設、あるいは「エコパーク寒川」や「エコパークあぼし」のように、焼却施設に熱回収施設と再資源化施設を併設した複合処理施設などが整備されつつある。   In general, handling of solid waste (general waste / industrial waste) includes incineration processing as intermediate processing, recycling (recycling) processing, and landfilling as final disposal. In the past, these treatments and disposals were often handled separately, but in recent years there are an increasing number of facilities that can handle waste treatment and disposal comprehensively. For example, like “Eco Park Izumozaki”, a combined treatment facility that combines an incineration / crushing facility with a final disposal site (mainly landfill) and a leachate treatment facility, or “Eco Park Samukawa” or “Eco Park Abo” As in the case of “Shi”, incineration facilities and other facilities that are equipped with heat recovery and recycling facilities are being developed.

このような廃棄物の焼却処理、再資源化処理、最終処分などを一箇所で一貫して行おうとする傾向は、循環型社会を形成するという観点に沿ったものとして、今後も増加するものと予想される。その場合、複合処理施設トータルとしての運営効率の向上が極めて重要となる。   The tendency to consistently conduct such waste incineration, recycling, and final disposal in one place will increase in the future in line with the viewpoint of creating a recycling society. is expected. In that case, it is extremely important to improve the operational efficiency of the combined treatment facility.

固体状廃棄物は、通常、トラックなどの運搬手段によって施設に搬入される。搬入される廃棄物の種類は様々であり、可燃ごみ(紙くず、木くず、繊維くずなどが含まれる)、廃プラスチック類、金属ごみ、不燃ごみ(ガラスくず、コンクリートくず、がれき類などが含まれる)などがある。これらの廃棄物は、必ずしも単一種類に分類されて1台のトラックで運搬されてくるわけではなく、複数種類の廃棄物が混在した状態で搬入されてくるのが実情である。そこで、施設内に搬入された廃棄物は、展開調査と呼ばれる方法によって種類と量が管理される。我が国においては、多くの場合、可燃性廃棄物は焼却処理されることから、この展開調査では、搬入廃棄物を作業者が直接目視観察(あるいはカメラ画像の観察)して可燃性廃棄物の量をおおまかに判断し、それにより処理の方法や手順を決定している。但し、焼却炉の形式等によっては、可燃性廃棄物の範囲に違いがあり、可燃ごみのみならず廃プラスチック類が可燃性廃棄物の範疇に含まれる場合もある。展開調査では、それらの事情も考慮して廃棄物の種類と量を見積もることになる。   Solid waste is usually carried into a facility by a transportation means such as a truck. There are various types of waste to be brought in, combustible waste (including paper waste, wood waste, fiber waste, etc.), waste plastics, metal waste, non-burnable waste (including glass waste, concrete waste, debris, etc.) and so on. These wastes are not necessarily classified into a single type and are transported by a single truck, but the actual situation is that a plurality of types of waste are carried in a mixed state. Therefore, the type and amount of the waste carried into the facility is managed by a method called development survey. In Japan, combustible waste is often incinerated. In this development survey, the amount of combustible waste is checked by an operator's direct visual observation (or camera image observation). Is roughly determined, thereby determining the processing method and procedure. However, depending on the type of incinerator, etc., there is a difference in the range of combustible waste, and not only combustible waste but also waste plastics may be included in the category of combustible waste. In the deployment survey, the type and amount of waste will be estimated in consideration of these circumstances.

上記のような展開調査により見積もった可燃性廃棄物の量は、作業者が目視で経験的に判断しているので、実際の量と大きく異なる場合が生じることもある。そこで、可燃性廃棄物とそれ以外の不燃性廃棄物を適切に区別し、ある程度の確度で可燃性廃棄物量を定量的に見積もることができれば、燃焼効率の改善、焼却によるエネルギーコストの低減、展開調査の省力化、施設内での横待ち等の時間の短縮などが期待でき、それらは処理施設の運用効率の向上に繋がる。こうした可燃ごみの定量的な見積もりは、逐次の燃焼効率をコントロール可能となることを意味し、その時々のCO2 排出量の制御にも結びつく。 The amount of combustible waste estimated by the above-described development survey is empirically determined visually by the operator, and may differ greatly from the actual amount. Therefore, if the combustible waste and other non-combustible waste can be properly distinguished and the amount of combustible waste can be quantitatively estimated with a certain degree of accuracy, improvement of combustion efficiency, reduction of energy costs through incineration, and deployment It can be expected to save labor and shorten the time required for waiting in the facility, which leads to the improvement of the operation efficiency of the treatment facility. Such quantitative estimation of combustible waste means that sequential combustion efficiency can be controlled, and it also leads to control of CO 2 emissions at that time.

また、廃プラスチック類は、焼却炉の形式などによって、前述のように可燃性廃棄物の範疇に含まれる場合もあるが、含まれない場合には再資源化処理される。その他、金属ごみも再資源化処理される。金属以外の不燃ごみ(ガラスくず、コンクリートくず、がれき類など)は埋め立て処分される。このような処理処分を適切に行うためには、施設に搬入された廃棄物の集合物について、種類別の存在割合を効率よく定量的に把握できるようにすることが肝要である。これは、処理施設のストックヤードなどに搬入された廃棄物を、再資源化施設などに搬出する際の判断基準としても有用である。例えば、再資源化可能廃棄物であっても、それがある決められた割合以下であれば直接埋め立てに回し、その割合以上であれば再資源化施設に搬入するなどの判断が可能となる。このことは、再資源化施設などにおける処理効率の向上にも繋がり、無駄の少ない循環型社会の確立に寄与できることになる。   In addition, waste plastics may be included in the category of combustible waste as described above depending on the type of the incinerator or the like, but if not included, they are recycled. In addition, metal waste is also recycled. Non-burning waste other than metal (glass scrap, concrete scrap, debris, etc.) is disposed of in landfills. In order to appropriately perform such disposal, it is important to make it possible to efficiently and quantitatively grasp the existence ratio of each type of waste collected in the facility. This is also useful as a judgment criterion when the waste carried into the stock yard of the treatment facility is carried out to the recycling facility or the like. For example, even if it is a recyclable waste, if it is less than a certain ratio, it can be sent directly to landfill, and if it is more than that ratio, it can be judged to be carried into a recycling facility. This leads to an improvement in processing efficiency in recycling facilities and the like, and can contribute to the establishment of a recycling-oriented society with little waste.

ところで、固体状廃棄物を種類毎に分類する技術は、一部で既に実用化されている。例えば、風力を利用して包装食品を包装材と生ごみとに分ける技術、遠心力・浮力・磁力を順に使って廃棄物を分別する技術などがある。また、赤外分光センサによるリモートセンシング技術を利用して、処分場の廃棄物、覆土状況などを管理・監視する方法もある(特許文献1)。ここでは、異なる波長帯の反射率の組み合わせによる正規化差分指標を用いて廃棄物や覆土状況などを評価し、覆土後の処分場の管理と閉鎖の判断・決定を行っている。   By the way, some technologies for classifying solid waste by type have already been put into practical use. For example, there are technologies that use wind power to separate packaged foods into packaging materials and garbage, and technologies that sort waste using centrifugal force, buoyancy, and magnetic force in this order. In addition, there is a method for managing and monitoring waste in a disposal site, soil covering conditions, and the like using remote sensing technology using an infrared spectroscopic sensor (Patent Document 1). Here, waste and soil covering conditions are evaluated using a normalized difference index based on a combination of reflectivities in different wavelength bands, and the disposal site after soil covering is judged and determined for closure.

しかし、これらの文献には、トラックの荷台などに積載されて施設に搬入されてくる固体状廃棄物の集合物について、種類別の存在割合を定量的に把握する手法は開示されていない。   However, these documents do not disclose a method for quantitatively grasping the existence ratio of each type of solid waste aggregate loaded on a truck bed or the like and carried into a facility.

特開2005−199154号公報JP 2005-199154 A

本発明が解決しようとする課題は、固体状廃棄物の集合物について、種類別の存在割合を定量的に把握可能とし、それによって処理・処分施設の適切な運用、及び運用効率の向上を図ることである。   The problem to be solved by the present invention is to make it possible to quantitatively grasp the existence ratio of each type of solid waste aggregate, thereby improving the proper operation of the treatment / disposal facility and the improvement of the operation efficiency. That is.

本発明は、固体状廃棄物の集合物に白色光を照射し、該廃棄物からの反射光スペクトルについて、赤色域から短波長赤外域までの複数の波長帯での反射率を、廃棄物の集合物に対応する測定領域内を平面的に走査しながら順次赤外分光センサを用いて遠隔測定し、走査間隔と測定間隔によって決まるエリア毎に、異なる波長帯の反射率の組み合わせを用いた正規化差分指標を計算し、正規化差分指標を予め設定した判定式に従って判定することで各エリア毎に廃棄物の種類を分類し、廃棄物種類毎に相当するエリアを抽出し、廃棄物種類毎のエリアの面積を合算し、全エリアの総面積に対する比率を算出することで廃棄物の集合物全体における廃棄物種類毎の存在割合を算出することを特徴とする固体状廃棄物の種類毎の存在割合算出方法である。   The present invention irradiates a solid waste aggregate with white light, and reflects the reflectance in a plurality of wavelength bands from the red region to the short wavelength infrared region with respect to the reflected light spectrum from the waste. Normal measurement using a combination of reflectances in different wavelength bands for each area determined by the scanning interval and the measurement interval, while remotely measuring using an infrared spectroscopic sensor while scanning the measurement area corresponding to the aggregate in a planar manner Classify the waste types for each area by calculating the normalized difference index and determining the normalized difference index according to the preset judgment formula, extract the area corresponding to each waste type, and for each waste type The ratio of the total area of all areas is calculated, and the ratio of the total area to the total area is calculated to calculate the existence ratio of each type of waste in the total waste collection. In the existence ratio calculation method That.

具体的には、例えば細分されたエリア毎に、廃棄物の種類を、正規化差分指標に基づき予め設定した判定式に従って、廃プラスチック類、可燃ごみ、金属ごみ、不燃ごみに分類し、それら廃棄物の種類毎の存在割合を求める。   Specifically, for example, for each subdivided area, the types of waste are classified into waste plastics, combustible waste, metal waste, and non-burnable waste according to a judgment formula set in advance based on the normalized difference index. The existence ratio for each type of object is obtained.

更に、エリア毎に、反射光スペクトルの1次微分値及び2次微分値を用いて1次と2次の正規化微分指標を計算し、予め設定した判定式に従って更に細かい分類を行うこともできる。例えば、可燃ごみを更に乾湿性状別に易燃性ごみと難燃性ごみとに細分し、可燃ごみを更にそれぞれ該当するエリア面積の総和により易燃性ごみ量と難燃性ごみ量の見積もりを行うこともできる。   Further, for each area, the primary and secondary normalized differential indices can be calculated using the primary differential value and the secondary differential value of the reflected light spectrum, and finer classification can be performed according to a predetermined determination formula. . For example, combustible waste is further subdivided into flammable waste and flame retardant waste according to dry and wet conditions, and the amount of flammable waste and flame retardant waste is estimated based on the sum of the corresponding area areas. You can also.

このような固体状廃棄物の種類毎の存在割合算出方法を実施するための装置としては、固体状廃棄物の集合物の上方に位置し、廃棄物の集合物に白色光を照射するハロゲン光源と、廃棄物の集合物を撮影するカメラと、廃棄物からの反射光スペクトルを遠隔測定する赤外分光センサと、該赤外分光センサを縦横平面的に移動するセンサ駆動機構と、赤外分光センサの位置データと測定データとで計算処理を行うコンピュータとを具備し、カメラ画像にエリア毎の正規化差分指標を重ね合わせて表示すると共に、前記コンピュータで各エリア毎に廃棄物の種類を分類し、廃棄物種類毎に相当するエリアを抽出し、廃棄物種類毎のエリアの面積を合算し、全エリアの総面積に対する比率を算出することで固体状廃棄物の集合物全体における廃棄物種類毎の存在割合を算出するような構成が望ましい。   As a device for carrying out such a method for calculating the abundance ratio for each type of solid waste, a halogen light source that is positioned above the solid waste aggregate and emits white light to the waste aggregate. A camera for photographing a collection of waste, an infrared spectroscopic sensor for remotely measuring a reflected light spectrum from the waste, a sensor driving mechanism for moving the infrared spectroscopic sensor in vertical and horizontal planes, and infrared spectroscopy A computer that performs calculation processing based on sensor position data and measurement data, and displays the normalized difference index for each area superimposed on the camera image, and classifies the type of waste for each area by the computer. Then, the area corresponding to each waste type is extracted, and the area of each waste type is summed, and the ratio of the total area of all areas is calculated to calculate the ratio of the total solid waste. Configured so as to calculate the abundance ratio of each kind is desirable.

本発明に係る方法は、赤外分光センサを用いて固体状廃棄物からの反射光スペクトルを遠隔測定し、細分したエリア毎の廃棄物の種類を正規化差分指標を用いて決定し、それぞれの存在割合を算出する方法であるから、固体状廃棄物の集合物について、廃棄物の種類毎の量を定量的に且つ迅速・容易に見積もることができる。これによって、可燃ごみのみならず廃プラスチック類が可燃性廃棄物の範疇に含まれる場合でも、可燃性廃棄物の量をおおまかに判断し、処理の方法や手順を決定できる。また、本発明方法により、可燃性廃棄物とそれ以外の不燃性廃棄物を適切に区別し、ある程度の確度で可燃性廃棄物の量を定量的に見積もることができるので、燃焼効率の改善、焼却によるエネルギーコストの低減、展開調査の省力化、施設内での横待ち等の時間の短縮などが期待でき、それらは処理施設の運用効率の向上に繋がる。こうした可燃ごみの定量化は、逐次の燃焼効率をコントロール可能となることを意味し、その時々のCO2 排出量の制御にも結びつく。 The method according to the present invention remotely measures the reflected light spectrum from solid waste using an infrared spectroscopic sensor, determines the type of waste for each subdivided area using a normalized difference index, Since it is a method of calculating the abundance ratio, it is possible to quantitatively and quickly and easily estimate the amount of each type of waste for the aggregate of solid waste. As a result, even when not only combustible waste but also waste plastics are included in the category of combustible waste, it is possible to roughly determine the amount of combustible waste and determine the processing method and procedure. In addition, according to the method of the present invention, combustible waste and other non-combustible waste can be appropriately distinguished, and the amount of combustible waste can be quantitatively estimated with a certain degree of accuracy. Reductions in energy costs due to incineration, labor savings in deployment surveys, shortening of waiting time in the facility, etc. can be expected, which leads to improvement in operation efficiency of the treatment facility. Such quantification of combustible waste means that sequential combustion efficiency can be controlled, and it also leads to control of CO 2 emissions at that time.

更に本発明によって廃棄物の種類毎の量が見積もれるため、廃プラスチック類が可燃性廃棄物の範疇に含まれない場合には、その量に応じて再資源化できるし、金属ごみも量や質に応じて再資源化処理できる。金属以外の不燃ごみが多い場合は埋め立て処分を選択できる。このような処理処分を適切に行うことができるので、再資源化施設などにおける処理効率の向上にも繋がり、本発明は、無駄の少ない循環型社会の確立に寄与できることになる。   Furthermore, since the amount of each type of waste can be estimated according to the present invention, if waste plastics are not included in the category of flammable waste, they can be recycled according to the amount, and the amount of metal waste can also be increased. Can be recycled according to quality. If there is a lot of non-burnable garbage other than metal, landfill disposal can be selected. Since such processing disposal can be performed appropriately, it leads to improvement of processing efficiency in a recycling facility or the like, and the present invention can contribute to the establishment of a recycling society with little waste.

本発明方法を実施するシステムとその動作の一例を示す概略図。The schematic which shows an example of the system which implements the method of this invention, and its operation | movement. 反射光スペクトルの測定例を示すグラフ。The graph which shows the example of a measurement of a reflected light spectrum. 廃棄物の種類と正規化差分指標(NDTI)の関係を示すグラフ。The graph which shows the relationship between the kind of waste, and a normalization difference parameter | index (NDTI). 正規化差分指標(NDTI)による廃棄物種類の分類手順の一例を示すフロー図。The flowchart which shows an example of the classification | category procedure of the waste kind by a normalization difference parameter | index (NDTI). 廃棄物の種類と1次の正規化微分指標(NDDI)の関係を示すグラフ。The graph which shows the relationship between the kind of waste material, and a 1st-order normalization differential indicator (NDDI). 廃棄物の種類と2次の正規化微分指標(NDDI)の関係を示すグラフ。The graph which shows the relationship between the kind of waste material, and a 2nd-order normalization differential indicator (NDDI). 正規化微分指標(NDDI)による可燃ごみの分類手順の一例を示すフロー図。The flowchart which shows an example of the classification procedure of the combustible waste by a normalization differential parameter | index (NDDI). 正規化微分指標(NDDI)による不燃ごみの分類手順の一例を示すフロー図。The flow figure which shows an example of the classification procedure of the noncombustible waste by a normalization differential index (NDDI). 廃棄物の処理・処分の手順の一例を示すフロー図。The flowchart which shows an example of the procedure of a waste treatment / disposal.

本発明では、固体状廃棄物の集合物に白色光を照射し、該廃棄物からの反射光スペクトルについて、赤色域から短波長赤外域までの複数の波長帯での反射率を、廃棄物の集合物に対応する測定領域内を平面的に走査しながら順次赤外分光センサを用いて遠隔測定する。走査間隔と測定間隔によって決まるエリア毎に、異なる波長帯の反射率の組み合わせを用いた正規化差分指標を計算し、正規化差分指標を予め設定した判定式に従って判定することで各エリア毎に廃棄物の種類を分類する。そして、廃棄物種類毎に相当するエリアを抽出し、廃棄物種類毎のエリアの面積を合算し、全エリアの総面積に対する比率を算出することで固体状廃棄物の集合物全体における廃棄物種類毎の存在割合を算出する。   In the present invention, the aggregate of solid waste is irradiated with white light, and the reflectance in a plurality of wavelength bands from the red region to the short wavelength infrared region is measured for the reflected light spectrum from the waste. Remote measurement is performed sequentially using an infrared spectroscopic sensor while scanning the measurement area corresponding to the aggregate in a planar manner. For each area determined by the scan interval and the measurement interval, calculate a normalized difference index using a combination of reflectances in different wavelength bands, and discard the normalized difference index according to a predetermined determination formula. Classify the type of object. Then, the area corresponding to each waste type is extracted, the area of each waste type is added together, and the ratio to the total area of all areas is calculated to calculate the waste type in the entire solid waste aggregate. The existence ratio for each is calculated.

図1は、本発明方法を実施するシステムとその動作の一例を示す概略図である。廃棄物10は、トラック12のオープンな荷台に積まれて、処理・処分施設に搬入される。本発明で対象とする廃棄物は固体状のものであって、通常は複数種類の廃棄物が混在した集合状態となって積載されているものである。トラック荷台の上方には、荷台上の廃棄物の集合物全体に白色光を照射するハロゲン光源14、及び荷台上の廃棄物の集合物全体を撮影するカメラ16が設置される。また、廃棄物からの反射光スペクトルを鉛直上方から遠隔測定する赤外分光センサ18と、該赤外分光センサ18をトラックの荷台の範囲(測定領域)で縦横平面的に移動するセンサ駆動機構20が設けられる。更に、赤外分光センサの位置データと測定データとで計算処理を行うコンピュータ22を設ける。なお、ここで用いる赤外分光センサ18は、測定波長が630〜2500nm程度のものである。   FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a system for implementing the method of the present invention and its operation. The waste 10 is loaded on an open loading platform of the truck 12 and carried into a treatment / disposal facility. The waste targeted by the present invention is solid, and is usually loaded in a collective state in which a plurality of types of waste are mixed. Above the truck bed, a halogen light source 14 for irradiating the entire collection of waste on the bed with white light and a camera 16 for photographing the entire collection of waste on the carriage are installed. In addition, an infrared spectroscopic sensor 18 that remotely measures a reflected light spectrum from waste vertically from above, and a sensor driving mechanism 20 that moves the infrared spectroscopic sensor 18 in a vertical and horizontal plane within the range (measurement region) of a truck bed. Is provided. Furthermore, a computer 22 that performs calculation processing using the position data and measurement data of the infrared spectroscopic sensor is provided. The infrared spectroscopic sensor 18 used here has a measurement wavelength of about 630 to 2500 nm.

上記の例は、処理・処分施設のストックヤード内などを想定したものであるが、その他にも、本発明は、ダンピングボックス内で廃棄物の種類と量を把握する場合などにも利用できることは言うまでもない。   The above example assumes the stockyard of a treatment / disposal facility, but in addition, the present invention can also be used when grasping the type and amount of waste in a dumping box. Needless to say.

処理・処分施設における現地調査において、搬入された廃棄物の反射光スペクトルを測定した結果の一例を図2に示す。このように、廃棄物の種類に応じて反射光スペクトルは変化する。このことは従来公知であるが、本発明は、基本的にこのような現象を利用するものである。   FIG. 2 shows an example of the result of measuring the reflected light spectrum of the imported waste in the field survey at the treatment / disposal facility. Thus, the reflected light spectrum changes according to the type of waste. This is conventionally known, but the present invention basically utilizes such a phenomenon.

ハロゲン光源14から照射された白色光は廃棄物10の集合物で反射される。反射光スペクトルを赤外分光センサ18で検出し、赤色域から短波長赤外域までの複数の波長帯での反射率を測定する。この測定は、廃棄物の集合物の1点のみではなく、廃棄物の集合物全体に対応する測定領域内を平面的に走査しながら順次行う。図1のBは、トラック荷台の廃棄物の集合物を上方から見た図であり、矢印で示すように、平面的に走査して間欠的に測定する。これによって、走査間隔と測定間隔によって決まるエリア毎に測定データを得る。コンピュータ22によって、各エリア毎に異なる波長帯の反射率の組み合わせを用いた正規化差分指標(NDTI:Normalized Differential Type Index)を計算する。正規化差分指標NDTIは、次式で定義される。
NDTIij=(Ri −Rj )/(Ri +Rj
ここで、Ri :i波長帯の反射率、Rj :j波長帯の反射率である。
得られた正規化差分指標を、予め設定した判定式に従って判定することで各エリア毎に廃棄物の種類を分類する。カメラで撮影した廃棄物の集合物の画像に、各エリア毎の廃棄物種類を重ね合わせて図1のCに示すように表示することができる。そして、廃棄物種類毎に相当するエリアを抽出し、廃棄物種類毎のエリアの面積を合算し、全エリアの総面積に対する比率を算出することで廃棄物の集合物全体における廃棄物種類毎の存在割合を算出することができる。例えば、クロスハッチングの部分が可燃ごみであるとすると、そのエリアを抽出し、全面積に対する割合を求めることで、可燃ごみの割合が算出される。
White light emitted from the halogen light source 14 is reflected by the aggregate of the waste 10. The reflected light spectrum is detected by the infrared spectroscopic sensor 18, and the reflectance in a plurality of wavelength bands from the red region to the short wavelength infrared region is measured. This measurement is performed sequentially while scanning in a planar manner not only at one point of the waste aggregate but also within the measurement region corresponding to the entire waste aggregate. FIG. 1B is a view of the aggregate of waste on the truck bed from above, and is measured intermittently by scanning in a plane as indicated by arrows. Thus, measurement data is obtained for each area determined by the scanning interval and the measurement interval. The computer 22 calculates a normalized differential index (NDTI) using a combination of reflectances in different wavelength bands for each area. The normalized difference index NDTI is defined by the following equation.
NDTI ij = (R i -R j ) / (R i + R j)
Here, R i is the reflectance in the i wavelength band, and R j is the reflectance in the j wavelength band.
The type of waste is classified for each area by determining the obtained normalized difference index according to a predetermined determination formula. The waste type for each area can be superimposed and displayed on the image of the collection of wastes taken by the camera as shown in FIG. Then, the area corresponding to each waste type is extracted, the area of each waste type is added up, and the ratio to the total area of all the areas is calculated to calculate the ratio of each waste type in the entire collection of wastes. The existence ratio can be calculated. For example, if the cross-hatched portion is combustible waste, the area is extracted and the proportion of the combustible waste is calculated by calculating the proportion of the total area.

廃棄物の種類を特定後、乾湿状態など更なる細分化が必要な場合は、各廃棄物の反射光スペクトル(波長と反射率の関係)を1次微分、あるいは2次微分し、それらの微分値から得られる正規化微分指標(NDDI:Normalized Differential type Derivative Index )を用いる。具体的には、階差計算法を用いて次のように計算する。
反射光スペクトルデータを、A1 ,A2 ,A3 ,・・・,Ai ,・・・,An (1≦i≦n)としたとき、微分を計算するためのデータ間の差をmで表すと、
1次微分は、Δ1 m,j=Aj −Am+j (1≦j≦n−m)
2次微分は、Δ2 m,j=Δ1 m,j−Δ1 m,m+j=Aj −2Am+j +A2m+j(1≦j≦n−m)
となる。このような方法で求めた微分値を用いて、次式で表される正規化微分指標(NDDI)を計算する。
NDDIn ij =(Δn i−Δn j)/(Δn i+Δn j
After specifying the type of waste, if further subdivision is required, such as dry and wet conditions, the reflected light spectrum (relationship between wavelength and reflectance) of each waste is first or second order differentiated A normalized differential index (NDDI) obtained from the value is used. Specifically, the calculation is performed as follows using the difference calculation method.
When the reflected light spectrum data is A 1 , A 2 , A 3 ,..., A i ,..., A n (1 ≦ i ≦ n), the difference between the data for calculating the derivative is In terms of m,
The first derivative is Δ 1 m, j = A j −A m + j (1 ≦ j ≦ n−m)
The second derivative is Δ 2 m, j = Δ 1 m, j −Δ 1 m, m + j = A j −2A m + j + A 2m + j (1 ≦ j ≦ n−m)
It becomes. Using the differential value obtained by such a method, a normalized differential index (NDDI) represented by the following equation is calculated.
NDDI n ij = (Δ n i −Δ n j ) / (Δ n i + Δ n j )

赤外分光センサにより測定する赤色域から短波長赤外域までの複数の波長帯は、次の通りである。波長帯の分類は、通常、赤外分光センサで行われている分類に従っている。
R:赤色波長域(630nm〜690nm)
NIR:近赤外波長域(760nm〜860nm)
SWIR1:短波長赤外波長域(1600nm〜1700nm)
SWIR2:短波長赤外波長域(2145nm〜2185nm)
SWIR3:短波長赤外波長域(2185nm〜2225nm)
SWIR4:短波長赤外波長域(2235nm〜2285nm)
SWIR5:短波長赤外波長域(2295nm〜2365nm)
SWIR6:短波長赤外波長域(2360nm〜2430nm)
A plurality of wavelength bands from the red region to the short wavelength infrared region measured by the infrared spectroscopic sensor are as follows. The classification of the wavelength band usually follows the classification performed by the infrared spectroscopic sensor.
R: Red wavelength range (630 nm to 690 nm)
NIR: Near-infrared wavelength region (760 nm to 860 nm)
SWIR1: Short wavelength infrared wavelength range (1600nm-1700nm)
SWIR2: Short wavelength infrared wavelength region (2145 nm to 2185 nm)
SWIR3: Short wavelength infrared wavelength region (2185 nm to 2225 nm)
SWIR4: Short wavelength infrared wavelength region (2235 nm to 2285 nm)
SWIR5: Short wavelength infrared wavelength region (2295 nm to 2365 nm)
SWIR6: Short wavelength infrared wavelength region (2360 nm to 2430 nm)

正規化差分指標による廃棄物の種類の分類は、例えばSWIR1−NIR、SWIR5−SWIR1、R−SWIR1、SWIR6−SWIR2を用いて実施する。廃棄物の種類特定の基礎となる各種の廃棄物の正規化差分指標の例を図3に示す。この数値を用いることで、図4に示すフローに従って廃棄物種類を特定する。
(1)第1判定式:NDTI62<0.2を満たさないものについては廃プラスチック類と判定する。
(2)第2判定式:NDTI1N>−0.2を満たさないものについては紙くず・繊維くず(可燃ごみ)と判定する。
(3)第3判定式:NDTIR1<−0.1を満たさないものについては不燃混合ごみ・金属くず(不燃ごみ)と判定する。
(4)第4判定式:NDTI51<−0.1を満たさないものについては土壌・コンクリート・アスファルト等(不燃ごみ)と判定する。
(5)第4判定式:NDTI51<−0.1を満たすものについては木くず・可燃混合ごみ(可燃ごみ)と判定する。
このようにして、測定エリア毎に、廃棄物を廃プラスチック類、可燃ごみ、不燃ごみ(金属くずを含むものと含まないもの)に分類できる。
The classification of waste types based on the normalized difference index is performed using, for example, SWIR1-NIR, SWIR5-SWIR1, R-SWIR1, SWIR6-SWIR2. FIG. 3 shows an example of a normalized difference index for various types of wastes that serve as a basis for specifying the type of waste. By using this numerical value, the waste type is specified according to the flow shown in FIG.
(1) First judgment formula: Those not satisfying NDTI 62 <0.2 are judged as waste plastics.
(2) Second judgment formula: Those not satisfying NDTI 1N > −0.2 are judged as paper waste / fiber waste (combustible waste).
(3) Third judgment formula: Those that do not satisfy NDTI R1 <−0.1 are judged as non-combustible mixed waste / metal scrap (non-combustible waste).
(4) Fourth judgment formula: Those that do not satisfy NDTI 51 <−0.1 are judged as soil, concrete, asphalt, etc. (non-combustible waste).
(5) Fourth judgment formula: Those satisfying NDTI 51 <−0.1 are judged as wood waste / combustible mixed waste (combustible waste).
In this way, waste can be classified into waste plastics, combustible waste, and non-combustible waste (including and not including metal scrap) for each measurement area.

更に細かい分類は、1次正規化微分指標と2次正規化微分指標を計算することで実施可能である。廃棄物種類の細分化の基礎となる各種の廃棄物の1次正規化微分指標の例を図5に、2次正規化微分指標の例を図6に、それぞれ示す。   Further fine classification can be performed by calculating a primary normalized differential index and a secondary normalized differential index. FIG. 5 shows an example of a primary normalized differential index for various types of waste that is a basis for subdividing waste types, and FIG. 6 shows an example of a secondary normalized differential index.

可燃ごみの細分化のフローを図7に示す。
(a)紙くず・繊維くずは、第5判定式:NDDI2 63 <1.5を満たさないものについては湿潤した紙くず・繊維くず(燃焼効率:小)、満たすものについては乾燥した紙くず・繊維くず(燃焼効率:大)と判定する。
(d)木くず・可燃混合ごみは、まず第6判定式:NDDI1 1N >−5.0を満たさないものについては湿潤した可燃混合ごみ(燃焼効率:小)と判定する。次に、第7判定式:NDDI2 63 >0.0を満たさないものについては乾燥した木くず(燃焼効率:大)と判定する。更に、NDDI2 63 <2.0を満たさないものについては乾燥した可燃混合ごみ(燃焼効率:大)、満たすものについては湿潤したあるいは異物が付着した木くず(燃焼効率:小)と判定する。このように、湿潤状態に応じて細かな分類ができる。
Fig. 7 shows the flow of combustible waste fragmentation.
(A) Waste paper / fiber waste is wet paper waste / fiber waste (combustion efficiency: small) for those that do not satisfy the fifth judgment formula: NDDI 2 63 <1.5, and dry waste / fiber waste for those that satisfy (5) Combustion efficiency: Large).
(D) First, wood scrap / combustible mixed waste is judged to be wet combustible mixed waste (combustion efficiency: small) if it does not satisfy the sixth judgment formula: NDDI 1 1N > −5.0. Next, what does not satisfy the seventh judgment formula: NDDI 2 63 > 0.0 is judged as dry wood waste (combustion efficiency: high). Further, those that do not satisfy NDDI 2 63 <2.0 are determined to be dry combustible mixed waste (combustion efficiency: high), and those that satisfy NDDI 2 63 <2.0 are determined to be wet or debris (burning efficiency: low). Thus, a fine classification can be performed according to the wet state.

不燃ごみの再分類のフローを図8に示す。
(b)不燃混合ごみ・金属くずは、第8判定式:NDDI1 51 <−15を満たさないものについては水や土が付着した金属くずまたは不燃混合ごみと判定し、満たすものについては洗浄不要の金属くずと判定する。
(c)土壌・コンクリート・アスファルトくずなどは、まず第9判定式:NDDI1 63 <10を満たさないものについてはアスファルトくずと判定する。次に、第10判定式:NDDI2 63 >0.5を満たさないものについては土壌と判定し、満たすものについてはコンクリートくずと判定する。このように、不燃ごみについても、細分化が可能である。
Fig. 8 shows the flow of non-combustible waste reclassification.
(B) Non-combustible mixed waste / metal waste is judged as metal waste or non-combustible mixed waste with water or earth attached to those that do not satisfy the eighth judgment formula: NDDI 1 51 <-15, and cleaning is not required for those that satisfy Judge as scrap metal.
(C) Soil, concrete, asphalt waste, etc. are first judged as asphalt waste if they do not satisfy the ninth judgment formula: NDDI 1 63 <10. Next, the thing which does not satisfy the 10th judgment formula: NDDI 2 63 > 0.5 is judged as soil, and the thing which satisfies is judged as concrete waste. In this way, non-combustible waste can be subdivided.

このように赤外分光センサの走査間隔と測定間隔によって決まるエリア毎に測定データを取得し、細分化されたエリア毎に、コンピュータで計算処理することで、そのエリアの廃棄物の種類が特定される。このようにして、全てのエリアについて、エリア毎の廃棄物の種類が求まる。そこで、全てのエリアの総面積に対する特定の廃棄物(例えば廃プラスチック類など)に相当するエリアの面積の合算の比率を求め、廃棄物の種類毎(例えば廃プラスチック類など)の割合を算出することができる。これを利用することによって、廃棄物の処理・処分施設の効率的な運用が可能となる。   In this way, the measurement data is acquired for each area determined by the scanning interval and the measurement interval of the infrared spectroscopic sensor, and the type of waste in that area is specified by performing computer calculation processing for each subdivided area. The In this way, the type of waste for each area is obtained for all areas. Therefore, the ratio of the total area of the area corresponding to the specific waste (for example, waste plastics) to the total area of all the areas is obtained, and the ratio for each type of waste (for example, waste plastics) is calculated. be able to. By using this, it becomes possible to operate the waste treatment / disposal facility efficiently.

廃棄物の集合物の処理・処分のプロセスの一例を図9に示す。焼却炉の構造によって廃プラスチック類を焼却処理する場合と再資源化処理する場合とがあり、それによって処理・処分のフローが異なる。
(1)まず、廃プラスチック類を焼却しない場合は、廃プラスチック類の割合が規定値以上であれば、再資源化処理の工程を決定し、再資源化処理を行う。
(2)次に、廃プラスチック類を焼却する場合は、可燃ごみと廃プラスチック類を合わせた可燃性廃棄物の割合を合算する。そして、可燃性廃棄物の割合が規定値以上であれば焼却処分する。湿潤状況の割合を算出して燃焼効率の大小を求め、焼却処理の優先順位を決定し、それに応じて焼却処理する。
(3)金属くずの割合が規定値以上であれば、洗浄不要な金属くずの割合を算出し、再資源化処理の工程を決定し、再資源化処理を行う。
(4)コンクリート・アスファルトくずの割合が規定値以上であれば、選別破砕を行う。
(5)それら以外のものは、そのまま埋め立て処分とする。
なお、上記の各既定値は、例えば60%程度が一応の目安となるが、施設の構造、処理・処分の状況などによって適切な値を設定することになる。
An example of a process for disposal / disposal of a collection of wastes is shown in FIG. Depending on the structure of the incinerator, waste plastics may be incinerated or recycled, and the processing / disposal flow will differ.
(1) First, when waste plastics are not incinerated, if the proportion of waste plastics is equal to or greater than a specified value, the process of recycling process is determined and the recycling process is performed.
(2) Next, when incinerating waste plastics, add up the proportion of combustible waste, including combustible waste and waste plastics. And if the ratio of combustible waste is more than the specified value, it will be incinerated. The ratio of the wet condition is calculated to determine the magnitude of the combustion efficiency, the priority of the incineration process is determined, and the incineration process is performed accordingly.
(3) If the ratio of scrap metal is equal to or higher than the specified value, the ratio of scrap metal that does not need to be cleaned is calculated, the process of the recycling process is determined, and the recycling process is performed.
(4) If the ratio of concrete and asphalt scrap is above the specified value, sorting and crushing is performed.
(5) All other items will be disposed of in landfills.
For each of the predetermined values, for example, about 60% is a rough standard, but an appropriate value is set according to the structure of the facility, the state of treatment / disposal, and the like.

このように本発明では、廃棄物の種類毎の存在割合を定量的に見積もることができるため、処理・処分を一貫して適切に且つ効率よく実施することが可能となり、再資源化も可能となるため、循環型社会の形成に大きく貢献できる。   As described above, in the present invention, since the existence ratio for each type of waste can be estimated quantitatively, it becomes possible to carry out treatment and disposal consistently, appropriately and efficiently, and also enables recycling. Therefore, it can greatly contribute to the formation of a recycling society.

10 廃棄物
12 トラック
14 ハロゲン光源
16 カメラ
18 赤外分光センサ
20 センサ駆動機構
22 コンピュータ
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Waste 12 Track 14 Halogen light source 16 Camera 18 Infrared spectroscopic sensor 20 Sensor drive mechanism 22 Computer

Claims (4)

固体状廃棄物の集合物に白色光を照射し、該廃棄物からの反射光スペクトルについて、赤色域から短波長赤外域までの複数の波長帯での反射率を、廃棄物の集合物に対応する測定領域内を平面的に走査しながら順次赤外分光センサを用いて遠隔測定し、走査間隔と測定間隔によって決まるエリア毎に、異なる波長帯の反射率の組み合わせを用いた正規化差分指標を計算し、正規化差分指標を予め設定した判定式に従って判定することで各エリア毎に廃棄物の種類を分類し、廃棄物種類毎に相当するエリアを抽出し、廃棄物種類毎のエリアの面積を合算し、全エリアの総面積に対する比率を算出することで廃棄物の集合物全体における廃棄物種類毎の存在割合を算出することを特徴とする固体状廃棄物の種類毎の存在割合算出方法。   Irradiate white light to a collection of solid waste, and reflect the reflectance of the reflected light spectrum in multiple wavelengths from the red range to the short-wavelength infrared range to the collection of waste. Remote measurement is performed sequentially using an infrared spectroscopic sensor while scanning the measurement area in a plane, and a normalized difference index using a combination of reflectivities in different wavelength bands is determined for each area determined by the scan interval and the measurement interval. Calculate and classify the waste type for each area by determining the normalized difference index according to the preset judgment formula, extract the area corresponding to each waste type, and the area of the area for each waste type And calculating the ratio of total waste to the total area by calculating the ratio of total waste to each type of waste by calculating the ratio of the total area to the total area. . 細分されたエリア毎に、廃棄物の種類を、正規化差分指標に基づき予め設定した判定式に従って、廃プラスチック類、可燃ごみ、金属ごみ、不燃ごみに分類し、それら廃棄物の種類毎の存在割合を求める請求項1記載の固体状廃棄物の種類毎の存在割合算出方法。   For each subdivided area, the types of waste are classified into waste plastics, combustible waste, metal waste, and non-burnable waste according to a preset judgment formula based on the normalized difference index. The existence ratio calculation method for each type of solid waste according to claim 1, wherein the ratio is obtained. エリア毎に、反射光スペクトルの1次微分値及び2次微分値を用いて1次と2次の正規化微分指標を計算し、予め設定した判定式に従って、可燃ごみを更に乾湿性状別に易燃性ごみと難燃性ごみとに細分し、可燃ごみを更にそれぞれ該当するエリア面積の総和により易燃性ごみ量と難燃性ごみ量の見積もりを行う請求項2記載の固体状廃棄物の種類毎の存在割合算出方法。   For each area, the primary and secondary normalized differential indices are calculated using the primary differential value and secondary differential value of the reflected light spectrum, and the combustible waste is further flammable according to the wet and dry conditions according to a preset judgment formula. 3. The type of solid waste according to claim 2, wherein the amount of flammable waste and the amount of flame retardant waste is estimated by subdividing into combustible waste and flame retardant waste, and further combustible waste is further calculated based on the sum of the corresponding area areas. Method for calculating the existence ratio for each. 請求項1乃至3のいずれかに記載の固体状廃棄物の種類毎の存在割合算出方法を実施するための装置であって、
固体状廃棄物の集合物の上方に位置し、廃棄物の集合物に白色光を照射するハロゲン光源と、廃棄物の集合物を撮影するカメラと、廃棄物からの反射光スペクトルを遠隔測定する赤外分光センサと、該赤外分光センサを縦横平面的に移動するセンサ駆動機構と、赤外分光センサの位置データと測定データとで計算処理を行うコンピュータとを具備し、カメラ画像にエリア毎の正規化差分指標を重ね合わせて表示すると共に、前記コンピュータで各エリア毎に廃棄物の種類を分類し、廃棄物種類毎に相当するエリアを抽出し、廃棄物種類毎のエリアの面積を合算し、全エリアの総面積に対する比率を算出することで廃棄物の集合物全体における廃棄物種類毎の存在割合を算出するようにした固体状廃棄物の種類毎の存在割合算出システム。
An apparatus for carrying out the abundance ratio calculation method for each type of solid waste according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
Located above the solid waste collection, the halogen light source that irradiates the waste collection with white light, a camera that captures the waste collection, and the reflected light spectrum from the waste is remotely measured. An infrared spectroscopic sensor, a sensor driving mechanism for moving the infrared spectroscopic sensor in vertical and horizontal planes, and a computer that performs calculation processing based on the position data and measurement data of the infrared spectroscopic sensor. In addition to displaying the normalized difference index for each area, the computer classifies the type of waste for each area, extracts the area corresponding to each type of waste, and adds up the area of the area for each type of waste. An existence ratio calculation system for each type of solid waste that calculates an existence ratio for each type of waste in the entire aggregate of waste by calculating a ratio of the total area to the total area.
JP2009214510A 2009-09-16 2009-09-16 Method for calculating the abundance ratio for each type of solid waste Expired - Fee Related JP5377186B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009214510A JP5377186B2 (en) 2009-09-16 2009-09-16 Method for calculating the abundance ratio for each type of solid waste

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009214510A JP5377186B2 (en) 2009-09-16 2009-09-16 Method for calculating the abundance ratio for each type of solid waste

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2011064538A JP2011064538A (en) 2011-03-31
JP5377186B2 true JP5377186B2 (en) 2013-12-25

Family

ID=43950956

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2009214510A Expired - Fee Related JP5377186B2 (en) 2009-09-16 2009-09-16 Method for calculating the abundance ratio for each type of solid waste

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5377186B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103868881A (en) * 2012-12-13 2014-06-18 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for test of wax content in asphalt
KR101981031B1 (en) * 2018-05-18 2019-05-23 제이에이치데이터시스템 주식회사 Platform for scrapping metal based on artificial intelligence
CN110001875B (en) * 2019-03-22 2024-04-12 中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院 Water surface robot for cleaning and classifying water surface garbage and classified salvaging method
JP7213741B2 (en) * 2019-04-17 2023-01-27 株式会社メタルワン Iron scrap inspection method and iron scrap inspection system
JP7387465B2 (en) 2020-01-29 2023-11-28 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Waste agitation state evaluation device and method
CN116519624B (en) * 2023-07-03 2023-08-25 生态环境部华南环境科学研究所(生态环境部生态环境应急研究所) Solid waste harmful ingredient detection system based on image data analysis

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0343022A (en) * 1989-07-11 1991-02-25 Kubota Corp Method for spraying agricultural required substance to be sprayed
JPH04204354A (en) * 1990-11-30 1992-07-24 Meiwa Seishi Genryo Kk Paper sheet sorter
JPH05263411A (en) * 1992-03-19 1993-10-12 Hitachi Ltd Object observation method and device
JP2000214084A (en) * 1999-01-25 2000-08-04 Asahi Chem Ind Co Ltd Method and apparatus for decision of test substance
JP2002267599A (en) * 2001-03-07 2002-09-18 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Quality of material identification system for plastic and quality of material identification/assortment system for plastic
JP2003279415A (en) * 2002-03-20 2003-10-02 Oyo Corp Remote examination method for types and distribution of wastes
JP4397024B2 (en) * 2004-01-14 2010-01-13 応用地質株式会社 Waste disposal site management and monitoring methods
JP4452793B2 (en) * 2004-04-26 2010-04-21 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・データ Illegal dumping point detection device, method, and program
JP2006250827A (en) * 2005-03-11 2006-09-21 Pasuko:Kk Analytical method for growth condition of crop
JP5210586B2 (en) * 2007-10-01 2013-06-12 Idec株式会社 Plastic discrimination device and plastic discrimination method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2011064538A (en) 2011-03-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5377186B2 (en) Method for calculating the abundance ratio for each type of solid waste
Deshpande et al. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of end-of-life alternatives for waste plastics: A case study of Norway
Vrancken et al. Critical review of real-time methods for solid waste characterisation: Informing material recovery and fuel production
Bilitewski et al. Waste management
TWI797402B (en) Information processing device, information processing program, and information processing method
Bonifazi et al. Asbestos containing materials detection and classification by the use of hyperspectral imaging
JP2016528462A (en) Diagnosis and control of incineration facilities and solid fuel boilers through thermal settlement and design program and driver&#39;s operation form analysis and equipment life cycle management system and method
WO2021179037A1 (en) Methods and systems for dynamically processing waste
Raj et al. AN IoT based waste segreggator for recycling biodegradable and non-biodegradable waste
Jiang et al. From prospecting to mining: A review of enabling technologies, LCAs, and LCCAs for improved construction and demolition waste management
KR102382947B1 (en) Recyclable waste sorting system and method
Cesetti et al. Waste processing: new near infrared technologies for material identification and selection
Reza AI-Driven Solutions for Enhanced Waste Management and Recycling in Urban Areas
CN101855021A (en) Automatic waste treatment process
Fufa GHG emission calculation from construction phase of Lia barnehage
Chang et al. A multi-criteria evaluation of the methods for recycling scrap tires
JP6879899B2 (en) Stirring state detection device, stirring control device, and stirring state detection method
Bonifazi et al. Gravity packaging final waste recovery based on gravity separation and chemical imaging control
Parbhakar-Fox Reinventing the wheel: the environmental geometallurgy matrix and its supporting tools
O'Brien et al. Incineration of waste at casey station, australian antarctic territory
JP2005164431A (en) Method and apparatus for identifying plastics
Koinig Sensor-Based Sorting and Waste Management Analysis and Treatment of Plastic Waste With Special Consideration of Multilayer Films
Jeetah et al. Adoption of Machine Learning for Sustainable Solid Waste Management
Bonifazi et al. Hyperspectral imaging approach for the identification of construction and demolition waste from earthquake sites
Olaniyan et al. Modeling the environmental impacts of landlfiling and incineration waste management scenarios with Gabi6 tool

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20120905

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20130719

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20130918

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20130924

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees