JP5146395B2 - Stretch flange crack estimation method considering strain gradient and stretch flange crack judgment system of press forming simulation - Google Patents

Stretch flange crack estimation method considering strain gradient and stretch flange crack judgment system of press forming simulation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5146395B2
JP5146395B2 JP2009099260A JP2009099260A JP5146395B2 JP 5146395 B2 JP5146395 B2 JP 5146395B2 JP 2009099260 A JP2009099260 A JP 2009099260A JP 2009099260 A JP2009099260 A JP 2009099260A JP 5146395 B2 JP5146395 B2 JP 5146395B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
strain
stretch flange
crack
face
gradient
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2009099260A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2010069533A (en
Inventor
崇 松野
淳 新田
浩一 佐藤
亨 吉田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2009099260A priority Critical patent/JP5146395B2/en
Publication of JP2010069533A publication Critical patent/JP2010069533A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5146395B2 publication Critical patent/JP5146395B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Description

本発明は、主に金属板をプレス成形加工することにより自動車用部品を設計・製造するにあたり、伸びフランジ割れを回避する部品形状を事前評価するため、シミュレーションを用いて伸びフランジ割れの予測を可能にする技術に関するものである。   In the present invention, when designing and manufacturing automotive parts, mainly by press forming metal plates, it is possible to predict stretch flange cracks using simulation in order to pre-evaluate the part shape to avoid stretch flange cracks. It is about the technology to make.

自動車、家電製品、建築構造物等の被加工材には、図1のようにパンチ2とダイ3による打ち抜き加工が施されることが多い。図2に示すように、打ち抜き加工面は、被加工材1(図1参照)がパンチ2(図1参照)により全体的に押し込まれて形成されるだれ4、パンチ2とダイ3(図1参照)のクリアランス内(以下、特に記載がなく“クリアランス”と表記した場合は、パンチとダイのクリアランスを指すこととする)に被加工材1が引き込まれ局所的に引き伸ばされて形成される剪断面5、パンチ2とダイ3のクリアランス内に引き込まれた被加工材1が破断して形成される破断面6、および被加工材1裏面に生じるばり7によって構成される。打ち抜き加工は切削やレーザー加工などに比べると低コストであるメリットがあるが、一方で、非特許文献1で例が示されるように、打ち抜き面に引張変形が加わる伸びフランジ加工時の割れが他の加工方法よりも起こりやすい。   Work materials such as automobiles, home appliances, and building structures are often punched with a punch 2 and a die 3 as shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 2, the punched surface is formed by a workpiece 4 (see FIG. 1) being entirely pushed by a punch 2 (see FIG. 1) 4, a punch 2 and a die 3 (see FIG. 1). Shear) formed by the work material 1 being drawn and locally stretched within the clearance (see below), where there is no particular description, and “clearance” refers to the clearance between the punch and the die) The surface 5 is constituted by a fracture surface 6 formed by breaking the workpiece 1 drawn into the clearance between the punch 2 and the die 3 and a flash 7 generated on the back surface of the workpiece 1. Punching has the advantage of lower costs compared to cutting and laser processing, but on the other hand, as shown in Non-Patent Document 1, there are other cracks during stretch flange processing where tensile deformation is applied to the punched surface. It is easier to happen than the processing method.

このような問題の対策として、打ち抜き面の伸びフランジ割れ予測を行うことが有効となる。予め割れが起こらないような伸びフランジ成形条件・打ち抜き条件の見積もりを、実際の金型試作の試行錯誤無しに行えるためである。   As a countermeasure for such a problem, it is effective to predict the stretch flange crack of the punched surface. This is because it is possible to estimate the stretch flange forming conditions and punching conditions so that cracks do not occur in advance without trial and error in actual mold production.

絞り加工やフォーム加工のような板面内で割れが発生する問題に対しては、有限要素法等によるシミュレーションを利用して割れを予測することは定常的に行われている。具体的には、板厚限界線や成形限界線図(FLDともいう)等の限界ひずみを実験的あるいは理論的に導出しておき、その限界ひずみ状態とシミュレーションより計算上得られるひずみ状態とを比較することにより、割れ発生の有無を判定することが実施されている。従って、上記のような加工に対しては、割れ発生箇所・発生時点の予測にはある程度定量性が得られている。   For problems such as drawing and foaming that cause cracks in the plate surface, predicting cracks using simulations such as the finite element method is routinely performed. Specifically, limit strains such as plate thickness limit lines and forming limit diagrams (also referred to as FLD) are derived experimentally or theoretically, and the limit strain state and the strain state obtained by simulation are calculated. By comparing, it has been carried out to determine the presence or absence of cracks. Therefore, for the above-described processing, a certain degree of quantification is obtained in the prediction of the crack occurrence location and the occurrence time.

例えば、特許文献1に、成形限界線図を用いてプレス成形の際の破断を防止するコンピュータシミュレーションに関するプレス成形システムが開示されている。   For example, Patent Literature 1 discloses a press molding system related to computer simulation that uses a molding limit diagram to prevent breakage during press molding.

伸びフランジ割れは、歪勾配が大きく影響することが良く知られており、非特許文献2によれば、伸びフランジ割れでは、割れ部近傍の歪勾配の影響により、くびれの進展抑制および割れ進展遅延の影響があることが指摘されている。非特許文献2の結果を踏まえて、非特許文献3には、打ち抜き穴の穴広げ加工を対象に有限要素シミュレーションを行い、各要素で局所分岐理論を用いて不安定指数を導出し、歪勾配の影響を考慮するために不安定指数の空間積分値が負となる穴端部の塑性歪値を伸びフランジ割れが起こる限界歪値として導出する方法が開示されている。   It is well known that stretch flange cracks are greatly affected by strain gradient. According to Non-Patent Document 2, in stretch flange cracks, constriction progress suppression and crack progress delay are caused by the effect of strain gradient in the vicinity of the crack. Has been pointed out. Based on the results of Non-Patent Document 2, Non-Patent Document 3 includes a finite element simulation for punching holes, and derives an instability index using local bifurcation theory for each element. In order to consider the influence of the above, there is disclosed a method for deriving the plastic strain value at the hole end where the spatial integral value of the instability index is negative as the limit strain value at which stretch flange cracking occurs.

さらに、非特許文献4では、簡易的に伸びフランジ割れを予測する手法として、穴広げ試験の結果より得られた破断限界歪を、穴広げ以外の打ち抜き稜線形状における伸びフランジ成形シミュレーションに適用して伸びフランジ割れが起こるか否かを予測する手法が記載されている。   Furthermore, in Non-Patent Document 4, as a simple method for predicting stretch flange cracking, the fracture limit strain obtained from the results of the hole expansion test is applied to a stretch flange forming simulation in a punched ridge shape other than hole expansion. A technique for predicting whether stretch flange cracking will occur is described.

特開2006−167766号公報JP 2006-167766 A

「プレス絞り加工」、(社)日本金属プレス工業協会編、日刊工業新聞社刊、中村・桑原著、91〜94頁"Press Drawing", Japan Metal Press Industry Association, Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, Nakamura, Kuwahara, 91-94 第45回塑性加工連合講演会講演論文集 pp.437-440Proceedings of the 45th Plastic Working Joint Lecture pp.437-440 第57回塑性加工連合講演会講演論文集 pp.175-176Proceedings of the 57th Japan Plastic Working Conference pp.175-176 CP778 Volume A、Numisheet2005、 edited by L.M.Smith、 F.Pourboghrat、 J.W.Yoon、 and T.B.Stoughton、 American Institute of Physics 0-7354-0265-5-/05CP778 Volume A, Numisheet2005, edited by L.M.Smith, F.Pourboghrat, J.W.Yoon, and T.B.Stoughton, American Institute of Physics 0-7354-0265-5- / 05

上記に紹介した方法にはいくつかの課題が存在する。伸びフランジ割れは薄板の縁部が伸ばされて割れが発生する破断現象であるが、特許文献1に記載された発明も含め、従来割れ評価に利用されてきた球頭パンチ張出成形や円筒パンチ張出成形により得られる成形限界線図は板面上の破断現象を取り扱う理論であるため、板端部が破壊を起こす伸びフランジ割れの評価を行うことは原理的に不可能である。   There are several problems with the method introduced above. Stretch flange cracking is a rupture phenomenon in which the edge of a thin plate is stretched to cause cracking. However, including the invention described in Patent Document 1, ball head punch overhang molding and cylindrical punch that have been used for conventional crack evaluation Since the forming limit diagram obtained by overhang forming is a theory that deals with the breaking phenomenon on the plate surface, it is impossible in principle to evaluate the stretch flange crack that causes the plate end portion to break.

また、非特許文献3に開示される方法は、伸びフランジ割れに対して局所分岐理論を用いた予測を試みているが、特殊な材料モデルを用いる必要があるために、一般に流通する商用の有限要素コードに適用することが困難であり、非特許文献4に開示される方法は歪勾配の影響を考慮しておらず、穴広げ変形以外の問題を取り扱う際にはかなり安全側の予測をしてしまう。   In addition, the method disclosed in Non-Patent Document 3 attempts to make predictions using local branching theory for stretch flange cracks, but since it is necessary to use a special material model, a commercially available finite number is generally available. It is difficult to apply to element codes, and the method disclosed in Non-Patent Document 4 does not consider the effect of strain gradient, and makes a considerable safety prediction when dealing with problems other than hole expansion deformation. End up.

本発明は、商用の有限要素コードを用いて、歪勾配の影響を考慮して簡易的に打ち抜き部の伸びフランジ割れを事前予測するシミュレーション方法を提供することを目的とする。   SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to provide a simulation method that simply uses a commercial finite element code to preliminarily predict stretch flange cracks in a punched portion in consideration of the effect of strain gradient.

本発明は、以下をその要旨とする。   The gist of the present invention is as follows.

(1)打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ割れを予測する方法であって、予め、予測対象となる形状とは異なる形状または工具条件による打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験を行い、その際に材料の打ち抜き時の剪断面比率γと、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrのいずれか一方又は両方と、打ち抜き端面の引張試験における端面に割れが生じる限界相当塑性歪εcrとの関係を数式として近似して求め、前記予測対象となる打ち抜きを行った材料の剪断面比率γpartを測定すると共に、有限要素法で前記予測対象の打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ成形解析を行い、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrの何れか一方又は両方を算出し、前記剪断面比率γpartと前記歪勾配Δεθ及びΔεrの何れか一方又は両方を前記数式に代入して前記予測対象となる打ち抜き端面に割れが生じる限界歪εcr partを求め、その次に前記成形解析で求めた要素毎におけるフランジ部の相当塑性歪εpと、前記実部品の限界歪εcr partを比較して伸びフランジ割れを推定することを特徴とする伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。
(2)打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ割れを予測する方法であって、予め、予測対象となる形状とは異なる形状または工具条件による打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験を行い、その際の材料の打ち抜き時の剪断面比率γと、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrのいずれか一方又は両方と、打ち抜き端面の引張試験における端面に割れが生じる限界相当塑性歪εcrとの関係を数式として求めた後、前記予測対象の打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジの剪断面比率γpartを測定すると共に、有限要素法で前記予測対象の打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ成形解析を行い、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrの何れか一方又は両方を算出し、前記剪断面比率γpartと前記歪勾配Δεθ及びΔεrの何れか一方又は両方を前記数式に代入して前記予測対象となる打ち抜き端面に割れが生じる限界歪εcr partを求め、その次に理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の単軸引張歪が前記実部品の限界歪εcr partと一致するように前記理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の補正を行った後、前記成形解析で求めた要素毎におけるフランジ部の相当塑性歪εpと、前記補正後の理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の単軸引張での限界歪εcr partを比較して伸びフランジ割れを推定することを特徴とする伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。
(3)打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ割れを予測する方法であって、予め、予測の対象となる形状とは異なる形状または工具条件による打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験を行い、その際の材料の打ち抜き時のクリアランスCと、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrのいずれか一方又は両方と、打ち抜き端面の引張試験における端面に割れが生じる限界相当塑性歪εcrとの関係を数式として近似して求め、有限要素法で前記予測対象の打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ成形解析を行い、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrの何れか一方又は両方を算出し、前記予測対象となる打ち抜きのクリアランスCpartと前記歪勾配Δεθ及びΔεrの何れか一方又は両方を前記数式に代入して前記予測対象となる打ち抜き端面に割れが生じる限界歪εcr partを求め、その次に前記成形解析で求めた要素毎におけるフランジ部の相当塑性歪εpと、前記実部品の限界歪εcr partを比較して伸びフランジ割れを推定することを特徴とする伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。
(4)打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ割れを予測する方法であって、予め、予測の対象となる形状とは異なる形状または工具条件による打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験を行い、その際の材料の打ち抜き時のクリアランスCと、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrのいずれか一方又は両方と、打ち抜き端面の引張試験における端面に割れが生じる限界相当塑性歪εcrとの関係を数式として求めた後、有限要素法で前記予測対象の打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ成形解析を行い、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrの何れか一方又は両方を算出し、前記予測対象となる打ち抜きのクリアランスCpartと前記歪勾配Δεθ及びΔεrの何れか一方又は両方を前記数式に代入して前記予測対象となる打ち抜き端面に割れが生じる限界歪εcr partを求め、その次に理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の単軸引張歪が前記実部品の限界歪εcr partと一致するように前記理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の補正を行った後、前記成形解析で求めた要素毎におけるフランジ部の相当塑性歪εpと、前記補正後の理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の単軸引張での限界歪εcr partを比較して伸びフランジ割れを推定することを特徴とする伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。
(5)前記打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験が、丸穴の打ち抜きと丸穴に対する穴広げ加工試験であることを特徴とする(1)〜(4)の何れか一つに記載の伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。
(6)前記打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験が、打ち抜きと打ち抜きにより作成した切欠き試験片に対する曲げ試験であることを特徴とする(1)〜(4)の何れかに記載の伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。
(7)端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθの代わりに端部稜線方向の応力勾配Δσθを用い、端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrの代わりに端部稜線垂直方向の応力勾配Δσrを用いることを特徴とする(1)〜(6)の何れかに記載の伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。
(8)有限要素法によるプレス成形解析結果の読み込み部を有し、前記読み込み部に読み込まれた解析結果からエッジ部の要素を抽出する機能と、前記エッジ部の要素に対して請求項1〜6のいずれかの伸びフランジ割れの推定方法により割れ判定を行う機能を有することを特徴とするプレス成形シミュレーションの伸びフランジ割れ判定システム。
(9)有限要素法によるプレス成形解析結果の読み込み部を有し、前記読み込み部に読み込まれた解析結果からエッジ部の要素を抽出する機能と、前記エッジ部の要素に対して請求項1〜6のいずれかの伸びフランジ割れの推定方法により割れ判定を行う機能と、前記エッジ部以外の要素に対しては成形限界線または板厚減少率による割れ判定を行う機能と、前記割れ判定を行う機能により割れと判定された要素を3次元変形図上に同時に表示する機能を有することを特徴とするプレス成形シミュレーションの伸びフランジ割れ判定システム。
(1) A method for predicting stretched flange cracks on a punched end face, in which a test different from the predicted shape or a tool condition is performed in advance and a test for applying tensile deformation to the punched end face is performed. One or both of shear surface ratio γ during punching, strain gradient Δεθ in the edge ridge line direction and strain gradient Δεr in the edge ridge line vertical direction, and limit equivalent plastic strain that causes cracks in the end surface in the tensile test of the punched end surface Approximating the relationship with εcr as an equation, measuring the shear plane ratio γpart of the material subjected to punching as the prediction target, and performing stretch flange forming analysis of the punched end surface of the prediction target by a finite element method, Calculate one or both of the strain gradient Δεθ in the edge ridge line direction and the strain gradient Δεr in the edge ridge line vertical direction, and either the shear plane ratio γpart and the strain gradients Δεθ or Δεr Substituting either or both into the above formula to determine the critical strain εcr part that causes cracks in the punched end face to be predicted, and then the equivalent plastic strain εp of the flange portion for each element determined by the molding analysis, A method for estimating stretch flange cracks, wherein stretch flange cracks are estimated by comparing critical strains εcr part of actual parts.
(2) A method for predicting stretched flange cracks on the punched end face, in which a test different from the predicted shape or a tool condition and a test for applying tensile deformation to the punched end face are performed in advance. One or both of shear surface ratio γ during punching, strain gradient Δεθ in the edge ridge line direction and strain gradient Δεr in the edge ridge line vertical direction, and limit equivalent plastic strain that causes cracks in the end surface in the tensile test of the punched end surface After obtaining the relationship with εcr as a mathematical expression, the shear surface ratio γpart of the stretch flange of the punched end surface of the prediction target is measured, and the stretch flange forming analysis of the punched end surface of the prediction target is performed by a finite element method. One or both of the strain gradient Δεθ in the ridge line direction and the strain gradient Δεr in the edge ridge line vertical direction is calculated, and one of the shear surface ratio γpart and the strain gradients Δεθ and Δεr. Or, by substituting both into the mathematical formula, the critical strain εcr part that causes cracks in the punched end face to be predicted is obtained, and then the uniaxial tensile strain in the theoretical molding limit diagram or experimental molding limit diagram is the actual part. After the correction of the theoretical forming limit diagram or the experimental forming limit diagram so as to match the limit strain εcr part of the flange, the equivalent plastic strain εp of the flange portion for each element obtained by the forming analysis, A method for estimating stretch flange cracks, wherein stretch flange cracks are estimated by comparing the limit strain εcr part in uniaxial tension in the theoretical forming limit diagram or the experimental forming limit diagram.
(3) A method for predicting stretched flange cracks on the punched end face, in which a test is performed in advance to perform punching according to a shape or tool condition different from the shape to be predicted and tensile deformation to the punched end face. The clearance C at the time of punching, the strain gradient Δεθ in the end ridge line direction, the strain gradient Δεr in the vertical direction of the end ridge line, or both, and the limit equivalent plastic strain εcr that causes cracks in the end face in the tensile test of the punched end face The finite element method is used to calculate the stretch flange formation analysis of the target end face to be predicted, and either the strain gradient Δεθ in the edge ridge line direction or the strain gradient Δεr in the edge ridge line vertical direction is selected. One or both are calculated, and one or both of the punching clearance Cpart and the strain gradients Δεθ and Δεr to be predicted are substituted into the formula, and the prediction is performed. The critical strain εcr part that causes cracks on the punched end face is obtained, and then the equivalent plastic strain εp of the flange portion for each element obtained by the molding analysis is compared with the critical strain εcr part of the actual part. A method for estimating an elongated flange crack, wherein the flange crack is estimated.
(4) A method for predicting stretched flange cracks on the punched end face, in which a test is performed in advance by punching with a shape or tool condition different from the shape to be predicted and applying tensile deformation to the punched end face. The clearance C at the time of punching, the strain gradient Δεθ in the end ridge line direction, the strain gradient Δεr in the vertical direction of the end ridge line, or both, and the limit equivalent plastic strain εcr that causes cracks in the end face in the tensile test of the punched end face After calculating the relationship with the equation as a mathematical expression, a stretched flange forming analysis of the punched end face to be predicted is performed by the finite element method, and either one of the strain gradient Δεθ in the end ridge line direction and the strain gradient Δεr in the end ridge line vertical direction is performed. Or both are calculated, and one or both of the punching clearance Cpart and the strain gradients Δεθ and Δεr to be predicted are substituted into the formula. The critical strain εcr part that causes cracks in the punched end surface is obtained, and then the theoretical molding is performed so that the uniaxial tensile strain in the theoretical molding limit diagram or the experimental molding limit diagram matches the critical strain εcr part of the actual part. After correcting the limit diagram or the experimental molding limit diagram, the equivalent plastic strain εp of the flange portion for each element obtained by the molding analysis, and the corrected theoretical molding limit diagram or experimental molding limit diagram A method for estimating stretch flange cracks, wherein stretch flange cracks are estimated by comparing critical strains εcr part in uniaxial tension.
(5) The test according to any one of (1) to (4), wherein the test for applying a tensile deformation to the punching and punching end surface is a punching test for a round hole and a hole expanding process for the round hole. Estimating method of stretch flange crack.
(6) The elongation according to any one of (1) to (4), wherein the test for applying tensile deformation to the punching and punching end face is a bending test for a notched specimen prepared by punching and punching. Method for estimating flange cracks.
(7) The stress gradient Δσθ in the end ridge line direction is used instead of the strain gradient Δεθ in the end ridge line direction, and the stress gradient Δσr in the end ridge line vertical direction is used instead of the strain gradient Δεr in the end ridge line vertical direction. The stretch flange crack estimation method according to any one of (1) to (6), which is characterized.
(8) It has a reading part of a press forming analysis result by a finite element method, and has a function of extracting an element of an edge part from an analysis result read into the reading part, and the elements of the edge part. 6. A stretch flange crack determination system for press forming simulation, which has a function of performing crack determination by the stretch flange crack estimation method of any one of 6.
(9) It has a reading unit for a press molding analysis result by a finite element method, and has a function of extracting an element of an edge portion from an analysis result read into the reading unit, and the element of the edge portion. A function for performing crack determination by an estimation method of any one of the flange flange cracks, a function for performing crack determination based on a forming limit line or a plate thickness reduction rate for elements other than the edge portion, and performing the crack determination A stretch flange crack determination system for press forming simulation, which has a function of simultaneously displaying elements determined to be cracks by function on a three-dimensional deformation diagram.

本発明によれば、金属板のプレス成形加工における伸びフランジ割れ予測に、事前評価試験より得た板端面加工条件の影響と、割れ部近傍の端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrの何れか一方又は両方の相関関係式を用いることで、従来の割れ限界予測では簡易的な評価が困難であった伸びフランジ割れの事前予測を行うことが可能になる。   According to the present invention, the influence of the plate end face processing conditions obtained from the preliminary evaluation test, the strain gradient Δεθ in the direction of the edge ridge line in the vicinity of the crack portion, and the edge ridge line perpendicular to the stretch flange crack prediction in the press forming of the metal plate By using one or both of the correlation equations of the strain gradient Δεr in the direction, it is possible to perform advance prediction of the stretch flange crack, which was difficult to evaluate simply by conventional crack limit prediction.

打ち抜き加工を模式的に示す断面図である。It is sectional drawing which shows a punching process typically. 被加工材の打ち抜き端面の形状を模式的に示す断面図である。It is sectional drawing which shows typically the shape of the punching end surface of a workpiece. 打ち抜き稜線に対する座標系を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the coordinate system with respect to a punching ridgeline. FLDを補正する方法の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the method of correct | amending FLD. 図4を使用して伸びフランジ割れを判定する方法の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the method of determining a stretch flange crack using FIG. サイドベンド試験を模式的に示す断面図である。It is sectional drawing which shows a side bend test typically. 本発明の割れ判定システムの構成を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the crack determination system of this invention. 実施例1〜6における伸びフランジ割れ予測を行うブランク板の図であり、(a)は斜視図、(b)は平面図である。It is a figure of the blank board which performs the stretch flange crack prediction in Examples 1-6, (a) is a perspective view, (b) is a top view. 実施例1〜6における伸びフランジ割れ予測を行う伸びフランジ成形用の金型構成を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows the metal mold | die structure for stretch flange molding which performs stretch flange crack prediction in Examples 1-6. 実施例1〜4、6における穴広げ試験を模式的に示す斜視図であり、(a)は穴広げ試験時の状態、(b)は穴広げ試験後の試験片の状態である。It is a perspective view which shows typically the hole expansion test in Examples 1-4, 6, (a) is the state at the time of a hole expansion test, (b) is the state of the test piece after a hole expansion test. 実施例1で測定した打ち抜き面の剪断面比率γと歪勾配Δεr、および、限界相当塑性歪εcrの関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the shear surface ratio (gamma) of the punching surface measured in Example 1, strain gradient (DELTA) epsilon, and limit equivalent plastic strain (epsilon) cr. 実施例2における実測のFLDおよび本発明(2)にしたがって補正したFLDを示す図である。It is a figure which shows measured FLD in Example 2, and FLD correct | amended according to this invention (2). 実施例4における実測のFLDおよび本発明(4)にしたがって補正したFLDを示す図である。It is a figure which shows the measured FLD in Example 4, and the FLD corrected according to the present invention (4). 実施例5で使用したサイドベンド用の試験片形状を示す平面図である。6 is a plan view showing the shape of a test piece for side bend used in Example 5. FIG. 実施例7における伸びフランジ割れを含む割れ予測を行う、内穴付き円形ブランクおよび加工後の円筒深絞り成形品を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows the circular blank with an inner hole and the cylindrical deep drawing molded product after a process which perform crack prediction including the stretch flange crack in Example 7. FIG. 実施例7において自動抽出されたエッジ要素の領域を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows the area | region of the edge element automatically extracted in Example 7. FIG. 本発明の割れ判定システムによる割れ判定の例をひずみ平面図上で示した説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which showed the example of the crack determination by the crack determination system of this invention on the distortion | strain top view. 本発明の割れ判定システムにより割れ判定された要素の位置を表示した例を示す斜視図である。It is a perspective view which shows the example which displayed the position of the element by which the crack determination was carried out by the crack determination system of this invention.

本発明者らは、従来の板厚限界やFLDを利用した割れ予測を、シミュレーションを利用して実施・検討したところ、ブランク縁部での材料破断現象である伸びフランジ割れの予測精度は低く、特に延性の低い高強度材において予測困難なことを確認した。   The inventors of the present invention have conducted and studied crack prediction using a conventional plate thickness limit and FLD using simulation, and the prediction accuracy of stretch flange cracking, which is a material fracture phenomenon at the blank edge, is low, In particular, it was confirmed that it was difficult to predict in a high-strength material having low ductility.

続いて、この予測精度低下を克服するため、既に開示済みの伸びフランジ割れ予測手法の適用を試みたが、特殊な材料モデルが必要であったために、本発明者等が使用可能な予測装置、ソフトの範囲内では実施ができない場合があった。そこで、本発明者らは試行錯誤の結果、予め評価モデルとなる打ち抜き形状、伸びフランジ成形条件を定め、該打ち抜き・伸びフランジ成形試験より得られた歪勾配と伸びフランジ割れ、または、打ち抜きクリアランスと伸びフランジ割れの相関関係式を、異なる条件の打ち抜き、伸びフランジ成形条件へ適用することで、簡易的に伸びフランジ割れ予測が可能であることを見出した。   Subsequently, in order to overcome this decrease in prediction accuracy, an attempt was made to apply the already disclosed stretch flange crack prediction method, but since a special material model was required, a prediction device that the present inventors can use, There were cases where it could not be implemented within the scope of the software. Therefore, as a result of trial and error, the inventors previously determined the punching shape and stretch flange molding conditions as an evaluation model, and obtained the strain gradient and stretch flange cracking obtained from the punching / stretch flange molding test, or the punching clearance and It was found that stretch flange cracks can be easily predicted by applying the correlation formula of stretch flange cracks to stamping under different conditions and stretch flange forming conditions.

本発明は以下を要件とする。   The present invention requires the following.

本発明(1)における推定方法は、評価対象部品に使用する素材について、剪断面比率γと、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrのいずれか一方又は両方と、限界相当塑性歪εcrとの関係を事前に実験により求めておき、下記(1)式の関数関係を同定した後に該関係式を別の伸びフランジ成形の伸びフランジ割れ予測に適用する方法である。   In the estimation method in the present invention (1), the shear plane ratio γ and one or both of the strain gradient Δεθ in the edge ridge line direction and the strain gradient Δεr in the edge ridge line vertical direction are used for the material used for the evaluation target component. In this method, the relationship with the critical equivalent plastic strain εcr is obtained in advance by experiments, and after the functional relationship of the following equation (1) is identified, the relationship is applied to the prediction of stretch flange cracking in another stretch flange molding. .

ここで、剪断面比率γとは、図2に示す剪断面5の板厚方向の長さts(mm)/板厚t(mm)×100%である。   Here, the shear surface ratio γ is the length ts (mm) in the thickness direction of the shear surface 5 shown in FIG. 2 / the thickness t (mm) × 100%.

限界相当塑性歪εcr、および歪勾配Δεr、Δεθの定義について、以下に説明する。   The definitions of the critical equivalent plastic strain εcr and strain gradients Δεr, Δεθ will be described below.

図3のごとく、被加工材1の板面内の打ち抜き部稜線8に対して垂直方向をr、稜線8方向をθ、板厚方向(紙面垂直方向)をzとした場合に、r方向歪の板厚全体の平均値とθ方向歪の板厚全体の平均値、z方向歪の板厚全体の平均値を、それぞれεr(r、θ)、εθ(r、θ)、εz(r、θ)とすれば、相当塑性歪εpは、r、θの関数、(2)式として表される。相当塑性歪の定義(≒関数g)については、広く弾塑性力学の教科書にも記載されている。   As shown in FIG. 3, when the vertical direction with respect to the punched portion ridgeline 8 in the plate surface of the workpiece 1 is r, the ridgeline 8 direction is θ, and the plate thickness direction (perpendicular to the paper surface) is z, the r-direction distortion is obtained. The average value of the whole plate thickness, the average value of the whole plate thickness of the θ direction strain, and the average value of the whole plate thickness of the z direction strain are respectively expressed as εr (r, θ), εθ (r, θ), εz (r, Assuming that θ), the equivalent plastic strain εp is expressed as a function of r and θ, (2). The definition of equivalent plastic strain (≈function g) is widely described in textbooks of elastoplastic mechanics.

(1)式における限界相当塑性歪εcrは、伸びフランジ割れが起こった際の相当塑性歪であり、伸びフランジ割れが発生した際の各方向の歪相当塑性歪εr、εθ、εzを測定、または算出し、さらにこれらの値を(2)式に代入して導出される。また、Δεr、Δεθは、以下の(3)式、(4)式のように定義される。   The critical equivalent plastic strain εcr in the equation (1) is equivalent plastic strain when stretch flange cracking occurs, and the strain equivalent plastic strain εr, εθ, εz in each direction when stretch flange cracking occurs, or It is derived by substituting these values into equation (2). Δεr and Δεθ are defined as in the following equations (3) and (4).

実際の評価試験では、座標値r、θが異なるいくつかの点でεr、εθ、εzを測定、または、シミュレーションにより算出し、これらの値の差分を取ることによって歪勾配の値を求めるのが簡便である。rの単位はmm、um、m等任意に設定しても構わないが、事前評価試験と伸びフランジ割れ予測で用いる単位系を揃えなければならない。θに関しても同様である。また、ある範囲、例えば10mm程度の範囲で測定した歪分布を関数近似して(3)式、(4)式へ代入して求めてもよい。後者の算出方法に依れば、実験上の測定誤差を低減できる利点がある。   In an actual evaluation test, εr, εθ, and εz are measured or calculated by simulation at several points with different coordinate values r and θ, and the value of the strain gradient is obtained by taking the difference between these values. Convenient. The unit of r may be arbitrarily set such as mm, um, m, etc., but the unit system used in the preliminary evaluation test and the prediction of the stretch flange crack must be aligned. The same applies to θ. Alternatively, the strain distribution measured in a certain range, for example, a range of about 10 mm, may be approximated by function and substituted into the equations (3) and (4). The latter calculation method has an advantage that experimental measurement errors can be reduced.

(1)式同定のための評価試験には、打ち抜き切り欠き材の引張試験、打ち抜き切り欠き材の曲げ試験、打ち抜き穴あき材の引張試験、打ち抜き穴の穴広げ試験等が挙げられる。これらは形状が単純であるために同定が行い易い。例えば切り欠き材の引張試験であれば、異なる切欠き半径と打ち抜きクリアランスの試験片で引張試験を行い、各試験片の形状と打ち抜き条件におけるせん断面率γと端部に破断が起こった際の限界相当塑性歪εcrと歪勾配Δεr、Δεθのデータを測定、または計算により取得することで、(1)式を同定することができる。   Examples of the evaluation test for identifying the formula (1) include a punched notched material tensile test, a punched notched material bending test, a punched holed material tensile test, and a punched hole expansion test. These are easy to identify because of their simple shape. For example, in the case of a tensile test of a notched material, a tensile test is performed with test pieces having different notch radii and punching clearances. By obtaining data of the limit equivalent plastic strain εcr and strain gradients Δεr, Δεθ by measurement or calculation, the equation (1) can be identified.

次に、評価対象部品の打ち抜きブランクにおける伸びフランジ割れ予測対象部位の打ち抜き端面観察を成形加工前に実施し、この部位の剪断面比率γpartを求める。   Next, the punched end face of the stretch flange crack prediction target portion in the punched blank of the evaluation target part is observed before forming, and the shear surface ratio γpart of this portion is obtained.

続いて、評価対象部品の伸びフランジ成形シミュレーション(打ち抜きは含まない)を有限要素法により実施して、シミュレーション結果より端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθと端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrを算出し、これらのいずれか一方または両方と、上記で求めたγpartを(1)式へ代入することにより、伸びフランジ割れ予測対象部位の限界歪εcr partを求める。その次に、解析結果から得られている予測対象部位の相当塑性歪εpを前記限界歪εcr partと比較し、
εp<εcr part ならば、伸びフランジ割れ発生せず、
εp=εcr part またはεp>εcr partならば、伸びフランジ割れ発生あり、
というように伸びフランジ割れを推定する。
Subsequently, a stretch flange forming simulation (not including punching) of the evaluation target part is performed by the finite element method, and a strain gradient Δεθ in the end ridge line direction and a strain gradient Δεr in the end ridge line vertical direction are calculated from the simulation result. By substituting one or both of these and γpart obtained above into the equation (1), the critical strain εcr part of the stretch flange crack prediction target part is obtained. Next, the equivalent plastic strain εp of the prediction target part obtained from the analysis result is compared with the limit strain εcr part,
If εp <εcr part, no stretch flange cracks occur,
If εp = εcr part or εp> εcr part, stretch flange cracking occurs,
Thus, stretch flange cracks are estimated.

なお、通常は要素毎の歪値を評価する場合が多いが、有限要素法の各要素に複数の積分点が配置されている場合は、各積分点毎にフランジ部の相当塑性歪εpと前記実部品の限界歪εcr partを比較して伸びフランジ割れ判定を実施してもよい。   Usually, the strain value for each element is often evaluated, but when a plurality of integration points are arranged in each element of the finite element method, the equivalent plastic strain εp of the flange portion and the above-mentioned each integration point The stretch flange crack determination may be performed by comparing the limit strain εcr part of the actual part.

本発明(2)における推定方法は、対象材料における(1)式の関数関係の同定、またそれを利用した限界歪εcr partを同定する手順までは、本発明(1)と同様である。   The estimation method in the present invention (2) is the same as that in the present invention (1) until the identification of the functional relationship of the expression (1) in the target material and the procedure for identifying the critical strain εcr part using it.

本発明(2)では、従来利用されてきた理論FLDまたは実験FLDを流用し、図4に示すように、FLD線と(εθ=−2εr)軸の交点がεcr partに一致するように実験FLDまたは理論FLDを補正する。このようなことを行うことにより、(1)式導出のための評価試験と伸びフランジ割れ評価対象となる部材のεrとεθの比率が大きく異なっていても、より精度良く伸びフランジ割れが予測可能となる。この補正の際には、元になるFLDを各歪比毎に定率αを掛けることが望ましい。すなわち補正前のFLD上の点(εr、εθ)に対して、(α×εr、α×εθ)を新たなFLD上の点として利用する。ここにα=εcr part/{FLD線と(εθ=−2εr)軸の交点のεθ}である。この方法に依れば、FLD表示機能を有した商用のソフトウェア上にて、本発明によるFLDの補正を容易に実施可能である。   In the present invention (2), a theoretical FLD or an experimental FLD that has been conventionally used is used, and as shown in FIG. 4, the experimental FLD is made so that the intersection of the FLD line and the (εθ = −2εr) axis coincides with εcr part. Alternatively, the theoretical FLD is corrected. By doing this, even if the ratio of εr and εθ of the evaluation test for deriving equation (1) and the stretch flange crack evaluation target material is significantly different, stretch flange cracks can be predicted more accurately. It becomes. At the time of this correction, it is desirable to multiply the original FLD by a constant rate α for each distortion ratio. That is, (α × εr, α × εθ) is used as a new point on the FLD with respect to the point (εr, εθ) on the FLD before correction. Here, α = εcr part / {εθ at the intersection of the FLD line and the (εθ = −2εr) axis}. According to this method, the correction of the FLD according to the present invention can be easily performed on commercial software having an FLD display function.

上記のように補正されたFLDを導出した後は、成形シミュレーションで算出される各要素のεrとεθが、図5に示すように補正後のFLDの線よりも外側であれば伸びフランジ割れが起こると推定する。   After deriving the FLD corrected as described above, if the εr and εθ of each element calculated in the molding simulation are outside the corrected FLD line as shown in FIG. Presumed to happen.

本発明(3)における推定方法は、(1)式の代わりに、打ち抜き時のクリアランスと限界相当塑性歪εcrとの関係を(5)式より求め、伸びフランジ割れ評価対象となる部材の打ち抜きクリアランスCpartから、限界相当塑性歪εcr partを求める方法である。打ち抜き時のクリアランスCは設計事項であるため通常は既知であるから、特に測定のような作業は必要無い。仮にクリアランス量が不明である場合は、例えばクリアランス内に粘土を流し込んで型を取り、型の大きさを測るような作業を行って測定すればよい。(5)式を同定するための試験水準は、端面の形状測定の要否以外は(1)式の場合と同様である。   In the estimation method in the present invention (3), instead of the equation (1), the relationship between the clearance at the time of punching and the limit equivalent plastic strain εcr is obtained from the equation (5), and the punching clearance of the member to be evaluated for stretch flange cracking is obtained. This is a method for obtaining a critical equivalent plastic strain εcr part from Cpart. Since the clearance C at the time of punching is a design matter and is usually known, no particular work such as measurement is required. If the amount of clearance is unknown, for example, it may be measured by pouring clay into the clearance to take a mold and measuring the size of the mold. The test level for identifying the formula (5) is the same as the formula (1) except for the necessity of measuring the shape of the end face.

本発明(1)と同様の作業を行って導出したεcr partを用いて、本発明(2)と同様にFLDを補正すれば、本発明(2)のように、(5)式同定のための評価試験と伸びフランジ割れ評価対象の部材のΔεr、Δεθの比率が大きく異なる場合であっても、より精度の高い伸びフランジ割れ予測が可能である(前記本発明(4))。   If the FLD is corrected in the same manner as in the present invention (2) using the εcr part derived by performing the same work as in the present invention (1), as in the present invention (2), Even when the ratio of Δεr and Δεθ of the evaluation flange test member and the stretch flange crack evaluation target member are greatly different, it is possible to predict stretch flange crack with higher accuracy (the present invention (4)).

以上の方法は、クリアランスと穴径を変えた打ち抜きにより作成した丸穴試験片を用いて穴広げ試験を行うと、(1)式、または(5)式の同定が簡便、かつ、高精度な伸びフランジ割れ予測が行える(前記本発明(5))。穴広げ試験は、通常行われる伸びフランジ加工と端面の変形状態が近く、かつ、穴広げ率λ%から、εcrを(6)式により求めることができるので、(1)式、(5)式を同定するためのデータ処理を簡便に行える(スクライブドサークルやグリッドを計測することで求めても良い)。穴広げ試験における穴径を変化させれば、複数のεcrとΔεrの組み合わせを得ることができる。円錐穴広げ試験と円筒穴広げ試験でもεcrとΔεrの組み合わせが異なるため、これらの試験を併用すればより高精度に(1)式、または(5)式の同定を行える。ただし、穴広げ試験は打ち抜き穴の稜線方向(周方向)で歪の分布が一様であるため、Δεθ=0となることを注意しなければならない。(1)式または(5)式は、Δεθの項を持つことができず、もし、伸びフランジ割れ予測で誤差が大きい場合は、Δεθが0とならない切欠き引張試験片の引張や伸びフランジ加工そのものを再現するようなモデル金型によるフランジアップ試験、後述のサイドベンド試験を行う必要がある。   In the above method, when a hole expansion test is performed using a round hole test piece created by punching with different clearances and hole diameters, the identification of formula (1) or (5) is simple and highly accurate. The stretch flange crack can be predicted (the present invention (5)). In the hole expansion test, the deformation state of the end face is close to that of the normal stretch flange processing, and εcr can be obtained from equation (6) from the hole expansion rate λ%, so equations (1) and (5) Data processing for identifying can be performed simply (may be obtained by measuring a scribed circle or grid). If the hole diameter in the hole expansion test is changed, a plurality of combinations of εcr and Δεr can be obtained. Since the combination of εcr and Δεr is different between the conical hole expansion test and the cylindrical hole expansion test, it is possible to identify the expression (1) or (5) with higher accuracy by using these tests together. However, in the hole expansion test, it should be noted that Δεθ = 0 because the strain distribution is uniform in the ridgeline direction (circumferential direction) of the punched hole. Equation (1) or (5) cannot have a Δεθ term, and if the error in stretch flange crack prediction is large, Δεθ will not be zero. It is necessary to perform a flange-up test with a model mold that reproduces the same and a side bend test described later.

Δεθの影響を再現できる評価試験方法として、穴広げ試験とは別に、打ち抜き切欠き材に対する図6に示すような曲げ試験が挙げられる(前記本発明(6))。以下、この試験をサイドベンド試験と称する。サイドベンド試験では、試験片9の打ち抜き部稜線8は半円状であることが多く、この半円の径を変えることにより、Δεθ、Δεrの値を変化させることができる。伸びフランジ変形と打ち抜き面の変形状態が近いことから、より精度良く(1)式または(5)式の同定が可能である。   As an evaluation test method capable of reproducing the influence of Δεθ, a bending test as shown in FIG. 6 for a punched-out notched material can be cited in addition to the hole expansion test (the present invention (6)). Hereinafter, this test is referred to as a side bend test. In the side bend test, the punched portion ridgeline 8 of the test piece 9 is often semicircular, and the values of Δεθ and Δεr can be changed by changing the diameter of the semicircle. Since the stretch flange deformation and the punched surface deformation state are close, it is possible to identify the expression (1) or (5) with higher accuracy.

また、歪勾配値の代わりに応力勾配値を用いれば、より高精度な伸びフランジ割れ予測が可能である(前記本発明(7))。相当塑性歪εpは変形の履歴に応じて値が異なるため、変形の履歴が(1)式または(5)式を同定するための試験と伸びフランジ割れ評価対象のものとで大きく異なる場合は、大きな誤差が生じる可能性がある。一方、相当応力σpは変形履歴の影響を受けないため、このような問題は起きない。   Further, if the stress gradient value is used instead of the strain gradient value, the stretch flange crack can be predicted with higher accuracy (the present invention (7)). Since the value of the equivalent plastic strain εp varies depending on the deformation history, the deformation history is greatly different between the test for identifying the equation (1) or (5) and the subject of the stretch flange crack evaluation target. Large errors can occur. On the other hand, since the equivalent stress σp is not affected by the deformation history, such a problem does not occur.

相当応力σpは測定することができないので、実測して求める場合は、相当塑性歪値より、(7)式のように求めれば良い。   Since the equivalent stress σp cannot be measured, when it is obtained by actual measurement, it can be obtained from the equivalent plastic strain value as shown in equation (7).

ここで、関数pは、加工硬化則と呼ばれるものである。応力勾配値は、以下の(8)式、(9)式のように定義される。   Here, the function p is called a work hardening rule. The stress gradient value is defined as the following equations (8) and (9).

歪勾配値を応力勾配値で置き換えた(1)式、(5)式は、(10)式、(11)式のようになる。   Equations (1) and (5), in which the strain gradient value is replaced with the stress gradient value, are as shown in equations (10) and (11).

ここで、(12)式を用いて、(10)’式、(11)’式としてもよい。   Here, the expression (10) ′ and the expression (11) ′ may be used by using the expression (12).

本発明(2)、(4)に対しても、歪勾配の代わりに応力勾配を用いることができ、その場合は図4の歪値εを応力値σに置き換えた応力FLDを用いる。   For the present inventions (2) and (4), a stress gradient can be used instead of the strain gradient. In this case, a stress FLD in which the strain value ε in FIG. 4 is replaced with the stress value σ is used.

また、伸びフランジ割れが発生するエッジ部の歪状態は単軸引張状態となり、塑性力学的に単軸引張変形における相当塑性歪は単軸引張方向の歪または最大主歪と同義であることは言うまでもない。すなわち、ここで述べた限界相当塑性歪εcr、限界歪εcr part、予測対象部位の相当塑性歪εp等に使われる相当塑性歪は単軸引張方向の歪または最大主歪と言い換えることができる。   In addition, the strain state of the edge portion where stretch flange cracking occurs is a uniaxial tensile state, and it goes without saying that the equivalent plastic strain in the uniaxial tensile deformation is synonymous with the strain in the uniaxial tensile direction or the maximum principal strain. Yes. That is, the equivalent plastic strain used for the limit equivalent plastic strain εcr, the limit strain εcr part, the equivalent plastic strain εp of the prediction target portion, etc. described here can be rephrased as the strain in the uniaxial tensile direction or the maximum principal strain.

さらに、本発明における割れ判定システムでは、有限要素法によるプレス成形シミュレーション結果を用いて、伸びフランジ割れが発生する部位をコンピュータで自動的に判定することが可能である。   Furthermore, in the crack determination system according to the present invention, it is possible to automatically determine the part where the stretch flange crack is generated by a computer using the press molding simulation result by the finite element method.

図7は、本発明による割れ判定システムの構成を示す。図7を参照して、割れ判定システムの処理の流れを説明する。本発明の割れ判定システムは、有限要素法による成形解析結果の読み込み部31を有し、この読み込み部31により、有限要素法の汎用的なソフトウェアで解析された結果を取り込むことが可能である。そして、取り込んだ全ての要素から、エッジ部の要素を自動的に抽出する自動抽出機能32を有している。エッジ部の要素の自動抽出は、各要素を構成している節点番号の共有状況から判断することができる。例えば四角形の要素であれば2要素のみで共有されている節点が外周部にある節点と認識できるため、その節点が有する要素がエッジ要素と識別することができる。または各要素を構成している辺の共有状況から判断する方法もある。エッジ部以外の要素の辺は必ず他の要素と共有されているため、他の要素と共有されていない辺を有する要素はエッジ要素と認識することが可能である。   FIG. 7 shows the configuration of a crack determination system according to the present invention. With reference to FIG. 7, the flow of processing of the crack determination system will be described. The crack determination system of the present invention has a reading section 31 for forming analysis results by the finite element method, and the reading section 31 can take in the results analyzed by general-purpose software for the finite element method. And it has the automatic extraction function 32 which extracts the element of an edge part automatically from all the taken in elements. The automatic extraction of the elements of the edge part can be determined from the sharing situation of the node numbers constituting each element. For example, in the case of a quadrilateral element, a node shared by only two elements can be recognized as a node on the outer periphery, so that the element possessed by the node can be identified as an edge element. Alternatively, there is a method of judging from the sharing situation of the sides constituting each element. Since the sides of the elements other than the edge portions are always shared with other elements, elements having sides that are not shared with other elements can be recognized as edge elements.

抽出されたエッジ部の各要素に対して、上記に示した伸びフランジ割れの推定方法による割れ判定機能33を有することにより、コンピュータで自動的に伸びフランジ割れ判定を行うことができる。エッジ部以外の要素に対しては通常の割れ判定、すなわち成形限界線図や板厚減少率による割れ判定を併せて行う割れ判定機能34を有する。ここでいう成形限界線図による判定とは、ひずみ平面図上に実験や理論による成形限界線を読み込んでおき、各要素のひずみ値が限界線を超えているかどうかを比較して判定するものである。また、ひずみの代わりに応力平面図上の応力限界線を用い、各要素の応力値と比較しても良い。また、板厚減少率による割れ判定とは、あらかじめ被加工材の限界板厚歪を実験や理論で決定しておき、各要素の板厚減少率が限界値を超えているかどうかを比較するものである。これらの方法と同時に割れ判定することで、伸びフランジ割れと通常割れのどちらの割れが早く起こるかを評価することが可能である。さらに、エッジ要素の伸びフランジ割れ判定結果とエッジ以外の要素の通常割れ判定結果を同時に3次元変形図上に表示する表示機能35を有することで、各割れ形態に応じた割れ危険位置を視覚的に把握することができる。   By having the crack judging function 33 based on the method for estimating the stretch flange crack described above for each element of the extracted edge portion, the stretch flange crack can be automatically judged by a computer. For elements other than the edge portion, there is a crack determination function 34 for performing normal crack determination, that is, crack determination based on a forming limit diagram and a plate thickness reduction rate. The judgment based on the forming limit diagram here refers to determining whether the strain value of each element exceeds the limit line by reading the forming limit line by experiment or theory on the strain plan. is there. Further, instead of strain, a stress limit line on the stress plan view may be used to compare with the stress value of each element. In addition, crack judgment based on the plate thickness reduction rate is to determine whether the plate thickness reduction rate of each element exceeds the limit value by preliminarily determining the limit plate thickness strain of the workpiece by experiment and theory. It is. By determining cracks simultaneously with these methods, it is possible to evaluate whether cracks of stretch flange cracks or normal cracks occur earlier. Furthermore, it has a display function 35 for simultaneously displaying on the three-dimensional deformation diagram the result of determining the edge flange crack of the edge element and the result of determining the normal crack of the elements other than the edge, so that the crack risk position corresponding to each crack form can be visualized. Can grasp.

このように、コンピュータによるプレス成形シミュレーションにおいて通常割れだけでなく伸びフランジ割れを精度良く予測できるようになれば、事前に対策を講じることができ、金型製作時または金型修正時におけるトライアンドエラーを減らし工数削減を図ることができる。   In this way, if it becomes possible to accurately predict not only normal cracks but also stretch flange cracks in computer-based press molding simulations, measures can be taken in advance, and trial and error during mold manufacturing or mold correction Can be reduced and man-hours can be reduced.

本発明の実施例1として、図8に示す形状のブランク板11を打ち抜き加工して作成し、このブランク板11を図9に示す伸びフランジ成形用金型17にて成形する際の伸びフランジ割れ予測を実施した。   As Example 1 of the present invention, a blank plate 11 having the shape shown in FIG. 8 is formed by punching, and the flange plate is cracked when the blank plate 11 is formed with the mold 17 for forming an extended flange shown in FIG. The prediction was carried out.

伸びフランジ成形用金型17によるブランク板11の伸びフランジ部形状は、ブランク板11のコーナー曲率半径Rと直線部開き角θから構成される。本実施例では、ブランク板11は、R=60mm、θ=120°の形状とした。また、伸びフランジ成形には、打ち抜き形状に対応するダイ22およびパンチ21を用いた。ブランク板11には、板厚1.6mm、引張強さ780MPa級冷延鋼板を用いた。ブランク板11の幅Wは140mmで一定とした。また、打ち抜きにはパッド23(板逆押さえ)を用い、パッド背圧5トンの条件で打ち抜き加工を施した。打ち抜き時のクリアランスは、板厚に対して11%である。フランジ高さHは、10、15、20、25、30mmの5水準として伸びフランジ試験を行った。フランジ高さHは、図8に示すブランク板11の中央部の全長Htotalから、パンチ21とパッド23に挟まれるブランク板11平坦部の中央部高さHflatを引いた距離(Htotal−Hflat)である。なお、図8中のLpは、パンチ21の縁部の形状を示す。成形試験の結果、各フランジ高さに対する成形可否は表1のようになり、伸びフランジ割れは、フランジ高さHが25mmのときに生じた。   The shape of the stretch flange portion of the blank plate 11 by the stretch flange molding die 17 is composed of the corner curvature radius R of the blank plate 11 and the straight portion opening angle θ. In this embodiment, the blank plate 11 has a shape of R = 60 mm and θ = 120 °. Further, the die 22 and the punch 21 corresponding to the punched shape were used for the stretch flange molding. The blank plate 11 was a cold-rolled steel plate having a plate thickness of 1.6 mm and a tensile strength of 780 MPa. The width W of the blank plate 11 was constant at 140 mm. Moreover, the pad 23 (plate reverse pressing) was used for punching, and punching was performed under the condition of a pad back pressure of 5 tons. The clearance at the time of punching is 11% with respect to the plate thickness. The flange height test was conducted by setting the flange height H to five levels of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 mm. The flange height H is a distance (Htotal-Hflat) obtained by subtracting the central height Hflat of the flat portion of the blank plate 11 sandwiched between the punch 21 and the pad 23 from the total length Htotal of the central portion of the blank plate 11 shown in FIG. is there. Note that Lp in FIG. 8 indicates the shape of the edge of the punch 21. As a result of the molding test, molding feasibility for each flange height is as shown in Table 1, and stretch flange cracking occurred when the flange height H was 25 mm.

続いて、(1)式を同定するため、図10(a)に示すような、対頂角60度の円錐状のパンチ15を用いた穴広げ試験を実施した。試験片12の形状は120mm×120mmの矩形で、その中央部に、打ち抜き加工により穴加工を施した。試験片12の初期の穴径d0を5mm、10mm、15mmの3水準、打ち抜きクリアランスを5%、10%、15%の3水準として、総計9水準の実験を各5回ずつ行った。打ち抜き面のせん断面率γは各水準で端面観察用の図10(b)に示すような打ち抜きサンプルも採取し、光学顕微鏡観察により求めた。また、穴縁の限界引張歪は、穴広げ試験後の穴径d1による穴広げ率から対数歪に換算した値を用いた。5回の実験結果値を平均した結果を図11に示す。この実験により得られた打ち抜き面の剪断面比率γ、歪勾配Δεr、及び限界相当塑性歪εcrの結果値より、各パラメータとεcrが線形関係にあることを仮定して最小2乗法を用いると(1)式は、(13)式として導出された。   Subsequently, in order to identify the equation (1), a hole expansion test using a conical punch 15 having a vertical angle of 60 degrees as shown in FIG. The shape of the test piece 12 was a rectangle of 120 mm × 120 mm, and a hole was formed in the center by punching. Experiments with a total of 9 levels were performed 5 times each, with the initial hole diameter d0 of the test piece 12 being 3 levels of 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm, and the punching clearance being 3 levels of 5%, 10%, and 15%. The shearing surface ratio γ of the punched surface was obtained by taking a punched sample as shown in FIG. 10B for end face observation at each level and observing with an optical microscope. Further, as the critical tensile strain at the hole edge, a value converted into a logarithmic strain from a hole expansion ratio based on the hole diameter d1 after the hole expansion test was used. The result of averaging the five experimental results is shown in FIG. From the results of the shear plane ratio γ, strain gradient Δεr, and critical equivalent plastic strain εcr obtained from this experiment, it is assumed that each parameter and εcr are in a linear relationship and the least square method is used ( Equation (1) was derived as Equation (13).

なお、歪勾配の測定は、2mmグリッドのスクライブパターンをエッチングにより転写しておき、割れ発生時点でのクリアランス方向の歪分布を測定した。この歪分布を5次多項式で近似した後、導関数を求めて穴縁の歪勾配を求めた。これは端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrに相当する。   The strain gradient was measured by transferring a 2 mm grid scribe pattern by etching and measuring the strain distribution in the clearance direction at the time when the crack occurred. After approximating this strain distribution with a fifth-order polynomial, the derivative was determined to determine the strain gradient of the hole edge. This corresponds to the strain gradient Δεr in the direction perpendicular to the end ridge line.

続いて、上記の伸びフランジ成形試験のシミュレーションを有限要素法により実施した。有限要素法のソルバーには、市販のFEMコードであるABAQUS/Standardを使用した。フランジ高さHは、実成形品と同じH=10、15、20、25、30mmの5水準を実施し、要素タイプとして、ABAQUS/Standardの要素ライブラリーにおける低減ひずみシェル要素を用いた。初期要素サイズは2mmとした。   Subsequently, the above-described stretch flange forming test was simulated by the finite element method. ABAQUS / Standard, a commercially available FEM code, was used as the finite element method solver. For the flange height H, five levels of H = 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 mm, which are the same as the actual molded product, were implemented, and the reduced strain shell element in the ABAQUS / Standard element library was used as the element type. The initial element size was 2 mm.

(13)式に必要な値である、伸びフランジ成形試験で測定された打ち抜き面の剪断面比率γpartは、28%であった。Δεrはシミュレーション上で各要素中心の歪分布を5次多項式で近似した後に導関数を求めて算出した。これらの値を用い、(14)式を満たす要素が成形シミュレーション終了後に存在した場合に、伸びフランジ割れが発生したと判定した。   The shear surface ratio γpart of the punched surface measured in the stretch flange molding test, which is a value necessary for the expression (13), was 28%. Δεr was calculated by obtaining a derivative after approximating the strain distribution at the center of each element with a fifth-order polynomial in the simulation. Using these values, it was determined that stretch flange cracking occurred when an element satisfying equation (14) was present after the end of the molding simulation.

結果、図8のブランク板11に示したコーナー中央部10に歪集中する解析結果が得られ、実際の割れ位置と場所が一致するとともに、(14)式により伸びフランジ割れ可否を判定したところ、30mmで割れが生じ、それ以外のフランジ高さのシミュレーションでは割れが生じない結果となった。   As a result, an analysis result is obtained in which the strain concentrates on the corner central portion 10 shown in the blank plate 11 of FIG. 8, and the actual crack position and the place coincide with each other. Cracks occurred at 30 mm, and the other flange height simulations resulted in no cracks.

この結果は、大きめの見積もりではあるものの、限界フランジ高さの予測値は表1の成形試験結果と近い値を示しており、本発明の効果が確認された。   Although this result is a large estimate, the predicted value of the critical flange height is close to the molding test result shown in Table 1, confirming the effect of the present invention.

実施例1と同じ試験を行った後に、実施例1と同じ素材に対して、中島法と呼ばれる張り出し試験を行い、図12に示すFLD(成形限界線図)を得た。図12に示すFLDは、歪状態が原点を挟んで限界線の外側にプロットされるような場合に割れが生じるという、板材の破断が起こる歪状態を示すグラフである。   After performing the same test as in Example 1, an overhang test called the Nakajima method was performed on the same material as in Example 1 to obtain an FLD (molding limit diagram) shown in FIG. The FLD shown in FIG. 12 is a graph showing a strain state in which a fracture of the plate material occurs such that a crack occurs when the strain state is plotted outside the limit line across the origin.

端面測定により得られるγpartと伸びフランジ成形シミュレーションより得られるΔεrより、εcr partを算出し、この値を用いて、さらに図12に示すようにFLDを補正する。補正された図12のFLDより伸びフランジ割れを判定したところ、フランジ高さが30mmの際に割れが生じ、それ以下では割れが生じないという結果を得た。表1に示す実際の伸びフランジ割れ結果より大きめではあるが、本発明による予測値は概ね実験結果と一致しており、本発明の効果が確認された。   Εcr part is calculated from γpart obtained by end face measurement and Δεr obtained from stretch flange forming simulation, and FLD is further corrected as shown in FIG. 12 using this value. When stretched flange cracks were determined from the corrected FLD in FIG. 12, cracks occurred when the flange height was 30 mm, and cracks did not occur below that. Although it is larger than the actual stretch flange cracking results shown in Table 1, the predicted values according to the present invention are generally consistent with the experimental results, and the effects of the present invention were confirmed.

実施例1と同じ試験を行い、穴広げ試験結果からクリアランスCと歪勾配Δεr、限界相当塑性歪εcrの関係を2次多項式で近似する関係式(15)式を得た。   The same test as in Example 1 was performed, and the relational expression (15) that approximated the relation between the clearance C, the strain gradient Δεr, and the limit equivalent plastic strain εcr by a quadratic polynomial was obtained from the hole expansion test result.

続いて、実施例1と同じ伸びフランジ成形試験のシミュレーションを実施した。伸びフランジ試験におけるクリアランスは板厚に対して11%であるから、C/t=11であるので、割れ判定の条件式は(16)式となり、(16)式を満たす要素が成型シミュレーション終了後に存在した場合に伸びフランジ割れが発生したと判定する。   Subsequently, the same stretch flange forming test as in Example 1 was simulated. Since the clearance in the stretch flange test is 11% with respect to the plate thickness, C / t = 11. Therefore, the conditional expression for crack determination is the expression (16), and the element satisfying the expression (16) is If it exists, it is determined that a stretch flange crack has occurred.

結果として、図8のブランク板11に示したコーナー中央部10に歪集中する解析結果が得られ、実際の割れ位置と場所が一致するとともに、(16)式を用いて伸びフランジ割れ可否を判定したところ、20mmで割れが生じ、それ以下のフランジ高さのシミュレーションでは割れが生じない結果となった。   As a result, an analysis result in which the strain concentrates on the corner central portion 10 shown in the blank plate 11 of FIG. 8 is obtained, and the actual cracking position and the location coincide with each other, and whether or not the stretch flange crack is possible is determined using the equation (16). As a result, cracking occurred at 20 mm, and the simulation of the flange height below that resulted in no cracking.

この結果は、表1に示す実際の伸びフランジ割れ結果より小さめの見積もりではあるものの、限界フランジ高さの予測値は表1の成形試験結果と近い値を示しており、本発明の効果が確認された。   Although this result is a smaller estimate than the actual stretch flange cracking result shown in Table 1, the predicted value of the limit flange height is close to the molding test result of Table 1, confirming the effect of the present invention. It was done.

実施例2と同じ試験を行い、得られたFLDに対して、クリアランスCpartと伸びフランジ成形シミュレーションより得られるΔεrを(15)式に代入することにより得られたεcr partを用いて図13のごとくFLDを修正し、修正された図13のFLDより伸びフランジ割れを判定したところ、フランジ高さが20mmの際に割れが生じ、それ以下では割れが生じないという結果を得た。表1に示す実際の伸びフランジ割れ結果より低めではあるが、本発明による予測値は概ね実験結果と一致しており、本発明の効果が確認された。   The same test as in Example 2 was performed, and εcr part obtained by substituting Δεr obtained from the clearance Cpart and stretch flange forming simulation into the equation (15) for the obtained FLD as shown in FIG. When the FLD was corrected and the stretched flange crack was judged from the corrected FLD of FIG. 13, a crack was generated when the flange height was 20 mm, and no crack was generated below that. Although it is lower than the actual stretch flange cracking results shown in Table 1, the predicted values according to the present invention are generally consistent with the experimental results, confirming the effects of the present invention.

(1)式の同定にサイドベンド試験を行うこと以外が全て実施例1と同じである試験を行った。   The same test as in Example 1 was performed except that a side bend test was performed for identification of the formula (1).

サイドベンド試験には、図14に示す試験片9を用いた。図14に示す試験片9は、打ち抜き加工により半円状の切欠き16が設けられている。切欠き16の径d2を5mm、10mm、15mm、20mm、25mm、30mmの6水準、打ち抜きクリアランスを5%、10%、15%の3水準として、総計18水準の実験を各5回ずつ行った。打ち抜き面の剪断面比率γは各水準で端面観察用の打ち抜きサンプルも採取し、光学顕微鏡観察により求めた。5回の実験結果値を平均した結果を表2に示す。この実験により得られた打ち抜き面のせん断面比率γ、歪勾配Δεr、及び限界相当塑性歪εcrの結果値より、各パラメータの2次までの項を考慮して最小2乗法を用いると、(1)式は(17)式と同定された。   For the side bend test, a test piece 9 shown in FIG. 14 was used. The test piece 9 shown in FIG. 14 is provided with a semicircular cutout 16 by punching. A total of 18 experiments were performed 5 times each, with the notch 16 having a diameter d2 of 6 levels of 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 20 mm, 25 mm and 30 mm and a punching clearance of 3 levels of 5%, 10% and 15%. . The punching surface shear surface ratio γ was obtained by taking a punched sample for end face observation at each level and observing with an optical microscope. Table 2 shows the results of averaging the five experimental results. From the result values of the shear plane ratio γ, strain gradient Δεr, and critical equivalent plastic strain εcr of the punched surface obtained by this experiment, when the least square method is used in consideration of terms up to the second order of each parameter, (1 ) Was identified as (17).

なお、歪と歪勾配の測定は、実施例1と同様に実施した。   The measurement of strain and strain gradient was performed in the same manner as in Example 1.

続いて、実施例1と同じ伸びフランジ成形試験のシミュレーションを有限要素法により実施した。γpart=28%であるので、割れ判定の条件式は(18)式となり、(18)式を満たす要素が成形シミュレーション終了後に存在した場合に、伸びフランジ割れが発生したと判定する。   Subsequently, the same stretch flange forming test as in Example 1 was simulated by the finite element method. Since γpart = 28%, the conditional expression for crack determination is expression (18), and it is determined that an elongated flange crack has occurred when an element satisfying expression (18) exists after the end of the molding simulation.

結果として、図8のブランク板11に示したコーナー中央部10に歪集中する解析結果が得られ、実際の割れ位置と場所が一致するとともに、(18)式を用いて伸びフランジ割れ可否を判定したところ、フランジ高さ25mmの水準で割れが生じ、それ以外のフランジ高さのシミュレーションでは割れが生じない結果となった。限界フランジ高さの予測値は表1の成形試験結果と一致しており、本発明の効果が確認された。   As a result, an analysis result in which the strain concentrates on the central portion 10 of the corner shown in the blank plate 11 of FIG. 8 is obtained, and the actual crack position and the location coincide with each other, and whether or not the stretch flange crack is determined using the formula (18). As a result, cracks occurred at a flange height level of 25 mm, and the other flange height simulations showed no cracks. The predicted value of the critical flange height is consistent with the molding test results shown in Table 1, confirming the effects of the present invention.

歪値の代わりに応力値を用いること以外は実施例1と同じである伸びフランジ割れ予測試験を行った。   The stretch flange crack prediction test, which is the same as in Example 1, except that the stress value is used instead of the strain value, was performed.

応力値の測定は、2mmグリッドのスクライブパターンをエッチングにより転写しておき、割れ発生時点でのクリアランス方向の歪値を測定して加工硬化関数pに代入することによって行った。得られた応力値の分布を5次多項式で近似した後、導関数を求めて穴縁の応力勾配を求めた。これは端部稜線垂直方向の応力勾配Δσrに相当する。   The stress value was measured by transferring a scribe pattern of a 2 mm grid by etching, measuring the strain value in the clearance direction at the time of crack occurrence, and substituting it into the work hardening function p. After the obtained stress value distribution was approximated by a fifth-order polynomial, the derivative was obtained to obtain the stress gradient of the hole edge. This corresponds to the stress gradient Δσr in the direction perpendicular to the end ridge line.

加工硬化関数はJIS5号引張り試験を行うことにより測定し、(19)式を得た。   The work hardening function was measured by performing a JIS No. 5 tensile test, and the equation (19) was obtained.

以上の手法により、(20)式が同定され、γpart=28%より伸びフランジ割れの判定条件は、(21)式となる。なお、Δσrはシミュレーション上で各要素中心の相当応力分布を5次多項式で近似した後に導関数を求めて算出する。   By the above method, the equation (20) is identified, and the determination condition of the stretched flange crack from γpart = 28% is the equation (21). Δσr is calculated by obtaining a derivative after approximating the equivalent stress distribution at the center of each element with a fifth-order polynomial in the simulation.

結果として、図8のブランク板11に示したコーナー中央部10に歪集中する解析結果が得られ、実際の割れ位置と場所が一致するとともに、(21)式を用いて伸びフランジ割れ可否を判定したところ、フランジ高さ30mmの水準で割れが生じ、それ以下のフランジ高さのシミュレーションでは割れが生じない結果となった。限界フランジ高さの予測値は表1の成形試験結果と一致しており、本発明の効果が確認された。   As a result, an analysis result is obtained in which the strain concentrates on the corner central portion 10 shown in the blank plate 11 of FIG. 8, and the actual crack position and the place coincide with each other, and whether or not stretch flange cracks can be determined using the formula (21). As a result, cracking occurred at the flange height of 30 mm, and no cracking occurred in the simulation of the flange height below that. The predicted value of the critical flange height is consistent with the molding test results shown in Table 1, confirming the effects of the present invention.

本発明の実施例7として、図15左上に示す直径110mmの円板状の板の中心に直径10mmの内穴24aを打ち抜き加工した円形ブランク24を作成し、この円形ブランク24を直径50mmの深絞り用パンチで図15右下に示すような円筒深絞り成形品25に加工する際の伸びフランジ割れ予測を実施した。材料特性としては一般鋼板SPCCのデータを入力し、しわ押さえ力を2ton、摩擦係数を0.15として有限要素法ソフトLS−DYNAによるプレス成形解析を実施した。   As Example 7 of the present invention, a circular blank 24 is formed by punching an inner hole 24a having a diameter of 10 mm at the center of a disk-shaped plate having a diameter of 110 mm shown in the upper left of FIG. Stretch flange crack prediction was performed when processing into a cylindrical deep-drawn molded product 25 as shown in the lower right of FIG. 15 with a drawing punch. As the material properties, data on general steel plate SPCC was input, and the press forming analysis was performed by the finite element method software LS-DYNA with a wrinkle holding force of 2 ton and a friction coefficient of 0.15.

成形高さ18mmのときの成形解析結果を本発明の割れ判定システムに取り込み、自動的にエッジ要素を抽出した。ここでは、要素を構成するエッジの共有情報からエッジ要素を抽出した。その結果を図16に示す。円形ブランク24の外周及び内穴24aに接する要素のみがエッジ要素として抽出された。その他の要素はエッジ以外の要素として識別された。本発明の割れ判定システムによる割れ判定の例を図17に示す。図17は各要素のひずみ状態をひずみ平面図上にプロットしたものである。ここで三角形のマークはエッジ要素のひずみ状態を示しており、白ぬきのマークは割れ判定とされなかった要素である。黒塗りのマークは割れ判定とされた要素を示す。割れ判定の歪限界εcr partは、ここで用いた素材を実施例1と同条件の穴広げ限界から決定した値を用いた。また、丸のマークはエッジ以外の要素のひずみ状態を示しており、白ぬきのマークは割れ判定とされなかった要素である。黒塗りのマークは割れ判定とされた要素を示す。割れ判定の成形限界線は、球頭張出し工具を用いた中島法による成形限界歪測定方法により測定した。この割れ判定とされた要素の位置を3次元変形図上に示したのが図18である。内穴端部に伸びフランジ割れと判定された要素、パンチ肩部付近に通常割れと判定された要素が示され、破断危険性の高い部位を判りやすく表示できる。実際に同条件での円筒深絞り試験を行ったところ、成形高さ18mmのときに穴縁で割れが発生した。また、パンチ肩近傍ではネッキングが起こっており、十分な精度で割れの位置を予測可能なことがわかった。   The molding analysis result at the molding height of 18 mm was taken into the crack determination system of the present invention, and the edge elements were automatically extracted. Here, edge elements are extracted from shared information of edges constituting the elements. The result is shown in FIG. Only elements in contact with the outer periphery of the circular blank 24 and the inner hole 24a were extracted as edge elements. Other elements were identified as non-edge elements. An example of crack determination by the crack determination system of the present invention is shown in FIG. FIG. 17 is a plot of the strain state of each element on a strain plan view. Here, the triangular mark indicates the strain state of the edge element, and the white mark is an element that is not determined to be cracked. A black mark indicates an element that is determined to be cracked. As the strain limit εcr part for crack determination, the material used here was determined from the hole expansion limit under the same conditions as in Example 1. Further, the circle mark indicates the strain state of the elements other than the edge, and the white mark is an element that is not determined as a crack. A black mark indicates an element that is determined to be cracked. The forming limit line for crack determination was measured by the forming limit strain measurement method by the Nakajima method using a ball head overhanging tool. FIG. 18 shows the positions of the elements determined to be cracks on a three-dimensional deformation diagram. Elements that are determined to be elongated flange cracks at the end of the inner hole, and elements that are determined to be normal cracks are shown near the punch shoulder, so that a portion having a high risk of fracture can be easily displayed. When a cylindrical deep drawing test was actually performed under the same conditions, cracks occurred at the hole edge when the molding height was 18 mm. It was also found that necking occurred near the punch shoulder and the position of the crack could be predicted with sufficient accuracy.

本発明は、板材の伸びフランジ割れの予測に適用できる。   The present invention can be applied to the prediction of stretch flange cracks in plate materials.

1 被加工材
2 パンチ
3 ダイ
4 だれ
5 剪断面
6 破断面
7 ばり
8 打ち抜き部稜線
9 試験片
10 コーナー中央部
11 ブランク板
12 試験片
15 パンチ
16 切欠き
17 伸びフランジ用成型金型
21 パンチ
22 ダイ
23 パッド
24 円形ブランク
24a 内穴
25 円筒深絞り成形品
31 読み込み部
32 自動抽出機能
33、34 割れ判定機能
35 表示機能
Lp パンチ縁部の形状曲線
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Work material 2 Punch 3 Die 4 Droop 5 Shear surface 6 Fracture surface 7 Burr 8 Punching part ridge 9 Test piece 10 Corner center part 11 Blank plate 12 Test piece 15 Punch 16 Notch 17 Mold 21 for stretch flange 21 Punch 22 Die 23 Pad 24 Circular blank 24a Inner hole 25 Cylindrical deep-drawn product 31 Reading section 32 Automatic extraction function 33, 34 Crack determination function 35 Display function
Lp Punch edge shape curve

Claims (9)

打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ割れを予測する方法であって、
予め、予測対象となる形状とは異なる形状または工具条件による打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験を行い、その際に、材料の打ち抜き時の剪断面比率γと、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrのいずれか一方又は両方と、打ち抜き端面の引張試験における端面に割れが生じる限界相当塑性歪εcrとの関係を数式として近似して求め、前記予測対象となる打ち抜きを行った材料の剪断面比率γpartを測定すると共に、有限要素法で前記予測対象の打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ成形解析を行い、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrの何れか一方又は両方を算出し、前記剪断面比率γpartと前記歪勾配Δεθ及びΔεrの何れか一方又は両方を前記数式に代入して前記予測対象となる打ち抜き端面に割れが生じる限界歪εcr partを求め、その次に前記成形解析で求めた要素毎におけるフランジ部の相当塑性歪εpと、前記実部品の限界歪εcr partを比較して伸びフランジ割れを推定することを特徴とする歪勾配を考慮した伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。
A method of predicting stretch flange cracks on the punched end face,
Preliminary tests are performed in which a shape different from the shape to be predicted or a tool condition is punched and a tensile deformation is applied to the punched end surface. At that time, the shear surface ratio γ during material punching and the strain gradient in the edge ridgeline direction Approximating the relationship between one or both of Δεθ and the strain gradient Δεr in the direction perpendicular to the edge ridge line and the limit equivalent plastic strain εcr at which the end face in the tensile test of the punched end face is approximated as an equation, In addition to measuring the shear surface ratio γpart of the punched material, the elongation flange forming analysis of the punched end face to be predicted is performed by the finite element method, and the strain gradient Δεθ in the end ridge line direction and the strain in the vertical direction of the end ridge line are analyzed. Either one or both of the gradient Δεr is calculated, and one or both of the shear surface ratio γpart and the strain gradients Δεθ and Δεr are substituted into the mathematical formula, and the punching target as the prediction target is calculated. Obtain the critical strain εcr part that causes cracks on the surface, and then compare the equivalent plastic strain εp of the flange part for each element obtained in the molding analysis with the critical strain εcr part of the actual part to estimate the stretch flange crack A method for estimating a stretch flange crack in consideration of a strain gradient.
打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ割れを予測する方法であって、
予め、予測対象となる形状とは異なる形状または工具条件による打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験を行い、その際の材料の打ち抜き時の剪断面比率γと、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrのいずれか一方又は両方と、打ち抜き端面の引張試験における端面に割れが生じる限界相当塑性歪εcrとの関係を数式として求めた後、前記予測対象の打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジの剪断面比率γpartを測定すると共に、有限要素法で前記予測対象の打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ成形解析を行い、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrの何れか一方又は両方を算出し、前記剪断面比率γpartと前記歪勾配Δεθ及びΔεrの何れか一方又は両方を前記数式に代入して前記予測対象となる打ち抜き端面に割れが生じる限界歪εcr partを求め、その次に理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の単軸引張歪が前記実部品の限界歪εcr partと一致するように前記理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の補正を行った後、前記成形解析で求めた要素毎におけるフランジ部の相当塑性歪εpと、前記補正後の理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の単軸引張での限界歪εcr partを比較して伸びフランジ割れを推定することを特徴とする歪勾配を考慮した伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。
A method of predicting stretch flange cracks on the punched end face,
In advance, a test is performed in which a shape different from the shape to be predicted or a tool condition is punched and a tensile deformation is applied to the punched end surface, and the shear surface ratio γ at the time of punching the material and the strain gradient Δεθ in the edge ridge line direction. And the edge end ridge line perpendicular strain gradient Δεr or both and the limit equivalent plastic strain εcr at which the end face in the tensile test of the punched end face cracks as a mathematical formula, In addition to measuring the shear surface ratio γpart of the stretch flange of the above, and performing the stretch flange forming analysis of the punched end surface to be predicted by the finite element method, the strain gradient Δεθ in the end ridge line direction and the strain gradient Δεr in the end ridge line vertical direction Either one or both are calculated, and either one or both of the shear surface ratio γpart and the strain gradient Δεθ and Δεr are substituted into the formula, and the punched end surface is the prediction target The critical strain εcr part at which cracking occurs is obtained, and then the theoretical molding limit diagram or the theoretical molding limit diagram or the experimental molding limit diagram so that the uniaxial tensile strain matches the critical strain εcr part of the actual part. After correcting the experimental forming limit diagram, the equivalent plastic strain εp of the flange portion for each element obtained by the forming analysis and the corrected theoretical forming limit diagram or the experimental forming limit diagram by uniaxial tension A method for estimating stretch flange cracks considering a strain gradient, characterized in that stretch flange cracks are estimated by comparing the critical strains εcr part of the two.
打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ割れを予測する方法であって、
予め、予測対象となる形状とは異なる形状または工具条件による打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験を行い、その際の材料の打ち抜き時のクリアランスCと、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrのいずれか一方又は両方と、打ち抜き端面の引張試験における端面に割れが生じる限界相当塑性歪εcrとの関係を数式として近似して求め、有限要素法で前記予測対象の打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ成形解析を行い、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrの何れか一方又は両方を算出し、前記予測対象となる打ち抜きのクリアランスCpartと前記歪勾配Δεθ及びΔεrの何れか一方又は両方を前記数式に代入して前記予測対象となる打ち抜き端面に割れが生じる限界歪εcr partを求め、その次に前記成形解析で求めた要素毎におけるフランジ部の相当塑性歪εpと、前記実部品の限界歪εcr partを比較して伸びフランジ割れを推定することを特徴とする歪勾配を考慮した伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。
A method of predicting stretch flange cracks on the punched end face,
Preliminary tests for punching with a shape or tool condition different from the shape to be predicted and applying a tensile deformation to the punched end face, clearance C at the time of punching the material, strain gradient Δεθ in the edge ridge line direction and end Approximate the relationship between one or both of the strain gradient Δεr in the vertical direction of the ridge line and the limit equivalent plastic strain εcr at which the end face is cracked in the tensile test of the punched end face, and calculate it using the finite element method. Is subjected to stretch flange forming analysis of the punched end face, and one or both of the strain gradient Δεθ in the end ridge line direction and the strain gradient Δεr in the vertical direction of the end ridge line are calculated, and the punching clearance Cpart to be predicted and the Substituting either or both of the strain gradients Δεθ and Δεr into the mathematical formula to obtain a critical strain εcr part at which the punched end face to be predicted is cracked, and then By comparing the equivalent plastic strain εp of the flange portion for each element obtained by the forming analysis and the limit strain εcr part of the actual part to estimate the stretch flange crack, the stretch flange crack considering the strain gradient is characterized. Estimation method.
打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ割れを予測する方法であって、
予め、予測対象となる形状とは異なる形状または工具条件による打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験を行い、その際の材料の打ち抜き時のクリアランスCと、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrのいずれか一方又は両方と、打ち抜き端面の引張試験における端面に割れが生じる限界相当塑性歪εcrとの関係を数式として求めた後、有限要素法で前記予測対象の打ち抜き端面の伸びフランジ成形解析を行い、端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθ及び端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrの何れか一方又は両方を算出し、前記予測対象となる打ち抜きのクリアランスCpartと前記歪勾配Δεθ及びΔεrの何れか一方又は両方を前記数式に代入して前記予測対象となる打ち抜き端面に割れが生じる限界歪εcr partを求め、その次に理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の単軸引張歪が前記実部品の限界歪εcr partと一致するように前記理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の補正を行った後、前記成形解析で求めた要素毎におけるフランジ部の相当塑性歪εpと、前記補正後の理論成形限界線図又は実験成形限界線図の単軸引張での限界歪εcr partを比較して伸びフランジ割れを推定することを特徴とする歪勾配を考慮した伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。
A method of predicting stretch flange cracks on the punched end face,
Preliminary tests for punching with a shape or tool condition different from the shape to be predicted and applying a tensile deformation to the punched end face, clearance C at the time of punching the material, strain gradient Δεθ in the edge ridge line direction and end After determining the relationship between one or both of the strain gradient Δεr in the vertical direction of the ridge line and the limit equivalent plastic strain εcr at which the end face in the tensile test of the punched end face is cracked, the finite element method Stretch flange forming analysis of the punched end face is performed, and one or both of the strain gradient Δεθ in the end ridge line direction and the strain gradient Δεr in the end ridge line vertical direction are calculated, and the punching clearance Cpart and the strain to be predicted are calculated. By substituting one or both of the gradients Δεθ and Δεr into the above formula, a critical strain εcr part at which the punched end surface to be predicted is cracked is obtained, and then After correcting the theoretical molding limit diagram or the experimental molding limit diagram so that the uniaxial tensile strain of the molding limit diagram or the experimental molding limit diagram matches the critical strain εcr part of the actual part, the molding Estimate the stretch flange crack by comparing the equivalent plastic strain εp of the flange part for each element found in the analysis with the limit strain εcr part in the uniaxial tension of the theoretical forming limit diagram or the experimental forming limit diagram after the correction. A method for estimating a stretch flange crack in consideration of a strain gradient.
前記打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験が、丸穴の打ち抜きと丸穴に対する穴広げ加工試験であることを特徴とする請求項1〜4の何れか1項に記載の歪勾配を考慮した伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。   5. The strain gradient according to claim 1, wherein the punching and the test for applying tensile deformation to the punched end face are a punching process of a round hole and a hole expanding process test for the round hole. Estimating method of stretch flange crack. 前記打ち抜きと打ち抜き端面に引張変形を加える試験が、打ち抜きと打ち抜きにより作成した切欠き試験片に対する曲げ試験であることを特徴とする請求項1〜4の何れか1項に記載の歪勾配を考慮した伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。   The strain test according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the test for applying tensile deformation to the punching and punching end face is a bending test for a notch specimen prepared by punching and punching. Method for estimating stretch flange cracks. 端部稜線方向の歪勾配Δεθの代わりに端部稜線方向の応力勾配Δσθを用い、端部稜線垂直方向の歪勾配Δεrの代わりに端部稜線垂直方向の応力勾配Δσrを用いることを特徴とする請求項1〜6の何れか1項に記載の歪勾配を考慮した伸びフランジ割れの推定方法。   The stress gradient Δσθ in the edge ridge line direction is used instead of the strain gradient Δεθ in the edge ridge line direction, and the stress gradient Δσr in the edge ridge line vertical direction is used in place of the strain gradient Δεr in the edge ridge line vertical direction. The estimation method of the stretch flange crack which considered the strain gradient of any one of Claims 1-6. 有限要素法によるプレス成形解析結果の読み込み部を有し、前記読み込み部に読み込まれた解析結果からエッジ部の要素を抽出する機能と、前記エッジ部の要素に対して請求項1〜6のいずれかの伸びフランジ割れの推定方法により割れ判定を行う機能を有することを特徴とするプレス成形シミュレーションの伸びフランジ割れ判定システム。   It has a reading part of the press molding analysis result by a finite element method, The function which extracts the element of an edge part from the analysis result read into the reading part, and any of Claims 1-6 to the element of the edge part A stretch flange crack determination system for press forming simulation, which has a function of performing crack determination by an estimation method of the stretch flange crack. 有限要素法によるプレス成形解析結果の読み込み部を有し、前記読み込み部に読み込まれた解析結果からエッジ部の要素を抽出する機能と、前記エッジ部の要素に対して請求項1〜6のいずれかの伸びフランジ割れの推定方法により割れ判定を行う機能と、前記エッジ部以外の要素に対しては成形限界線または板厚減少率による割れ判定を行う機能と、前記割れ判定を行う機能により割れと判定された要素を3次元変形図上に同時に表示する機能を有することを特徴とするプレス成形シミュレーションの伸びフランジ割れ判定システム。   It has a reading part of the press molding analysis result by a finite element method, The function which extracts the element of an edge part from the analysis result read into the reading part, and any of Claims 1-6 to the element of the edge part The crack is determined by the function of performing crack determination by the method of estimating the stretch flange crack, the function of performing crack determination by the forming limit line or the plate thickness reduction rate for the elements other than the edge part, and the function of performing the crack determination. A stretch molding crack determination system for press forming simulation, which has a function of simultaneously displaying the elements determined to be on a three-dimensional deformation diagram.
JP2009099260A 2008-08-20 2009-04-15 Stretch flange crack estimation method considering strain gradient and stretch flange crack judgment system of press forming simulation Active JP5146395B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009099260A JP5146395B2 (en) 2008-08-20 2009-04-15 Stretch flange crack estimation method considering strain gradient and stretch flange crack judgment system of press forming simulation

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008211763 2008-08-20
JP2008211763 2008-08-20
JP2009099260A JP5146395B2 (en) 2008-08-20 2009-04-15 Stretch flange crack estimation method considering strain gradient and stretch flange crack judgment system of press forming simulation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2010069533A JP2010069533A (en) 2010-04-02
JP5146395B2 true JP5146395B2 (en) 2013-02-20

Family

ID=42201798

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2009099260A Active JP5146395B2 (en) 2008-08-20 2009-04-15 Stretch flange crack estimation method considering strain gradient and stretch flange crack judgment system of press forming simulation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5146395B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105866122A (en) * 2016-06-21 2016-08-17 湖南大学 Method of establishing sheet metal high-speed forming limit diagram
CN110997172A (en) * 2017-08-23 2020-04-10 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Method for evaluating deformation limit on sheared surface of metal plate, method for predicting crack, and method for designing press die

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5561203B2 (en) * 2011-02-23 2014-07-30 Jfeスチール株式会社 Stretch flange crack judgment method
JP5375941B2 (en) * 2011-12-21 2013-12-25 Jfeスチール株式会社 Press molding tool design method, press molding tool
CN104220185B (en) * 2012-04-16 2017-09-26 杰富意钢铁株式会社 The manufacture method of the method for making of stamping forming limit line chart, fracturing shape method and punching parts
JP5472518B1 (en) * 2012-11-19 2014-04-16 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for determining limit strain of stretch flange and method for determining press forming possibility
JP6314626B2 (en) * 2014-04-21 2018-04-25 新日鐵住金株式会社 Press formability evaluation method, apparatus, program, and computer-readable storage medium
JP6350224B2 (en) * 2014-11-04 2018-07-04 新日鐵住金株式会社 Metal thin plate shearing mold, design method thereof, and shearing apparatus including the processing mold
JP6098664B2 (en) * 2015-05-08 2017-03-22 Jfeスチール株式会社 Shear edge molding availability evaluation method
JP6828476B2 (en) * 2016-02-05 2021-02-10 日本製鉄株式会社 Edge fracture prediction method, program and recording medium
KR102271009B1 (en) * 2017-07-20 2021-06-29 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 Evaluation method of deformation limit in shearing surface of metal plate, crack prediction method, and design method of press mold
JP6886178B2 (en) * 2017-08-24 2021-06-16 株式会社キーレックス Preliminary prediction method for the presence or absence of cracks during molding of a press-molded product
MX2020003456A (en) 2017-09-26 2020-08-03 Jfe Steel Corp Method for evaluating deformation limit, crack prediction method, and method for designing press die.
JP7110976B2 (en) * 2017-12-27 2022-08-02 日本製鉄株式会社 Formability evaluation method, program and recording medium
JP7206902B2 (en) * 2017-12-27 2023-01-18 日本製鉄株式会社 Formability evaluation method, program and recording medium
KR102482506B1 (en) 2019-02-26 2022-12-28 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 Bending crack evaluation method, bending crack evaluation system, and manufacturing method of press-formed parts
MX2021011063A (en) * 2019-03-14 2021-12-15 Jfe Steel Corp Stretch flange crack evaluation method, metal sheet selection method, press die design method, component shape design method, and pressed component manufacturing method.
JP2020159834A (en) * 2019-03-26 2020-10-01 日本製鉄株式会社 Rupture criteria analysis method, rupture criteria analysis program, and rupture criteria analysis system
JP7092107B2 (en) * 2019-12-26 2022-06-28 Jfeスチール株式会社 Extension flange property evaluation method, press die design method, and press part manufacturing method
JP7418008B2 (en) * 2020-06-04 2024-01-19 学校法人東海大学 method and punch
MX2023006450A (en) * 2020-12-03 2023-06-15 Jfe Steel Corp Delayed fracture characteristic evaluation method and program.
WO2022118497A1 (en) * 2020-12-03 2022-06-09 Jfeスチール株式会社 Delayed fracture characteristic evaluation method and program
JPWO2022185883A1 (en) * 2021-03-03 2022-09-09
CN113552003B (en) * 2021-06-17 2023-12-12 首钢集团有限公司 Prediction method for edge forming limit of high-strength steel plate stamping part

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4621217B2 (en) * 2006-02-01 2011-01-26 新日本製鐵株式会社 Fracture prediction method and apparatus, program, and recording medium
JP4935713B2 (en) * 2008-02-27 2012-05-23 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for determining whether molding is possible at the shear edge of a pressed product

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105866122A (en) * 2016-06-21 2016-08-17 湖南大学 Method of establishing sheet metal high-speed forming limit diagram
CN110997172A (en) * 2017-08-23 2020-04-10 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Method for evaluating deformation limit on sheared surface of metal plate, method for predicting crack, and method for designing press die
CN110997172B (en) * 2017-08-23 2021-09-07 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Method for evaluating deformation limit on sheared surface of metal plate, method for predicting crack, and method for designing press die
US11609166B2 (en) 2017-08-23 2023-03-21 Jfe Steel Corporation Deformation limit evaluation method for sheared surface of metal sheet, crack prediction method, and press die designing method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2010069533A (en) 2010-04-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5146395B2 (en) Stretch flange crack estimation method considering strain gradient and stretch flange crack judgment system of press forming simulation
US9953115B2 (en) Method for specifying stretch flange limit strain and method for determining feasibility of press forming
JP4814851B2 (en) Estimation method of stretch flange crack in thin plate press forming simulation
JP6769561B2 (en) Deformation limit evaluation method, crack prediction method and press die design method
US9925578B2 (en) Method for reducing springback and apparatus for analyzing springback of press formed parts
JP6828476B2 (en) Edge fracture prediction method, program and recording medium
JP4935713B2 (en) Method for determining whether molding is possible at the shear edge of a pressed product
JP6314626B2 (en) Press formability evaluation method, apparatus, program, and computer-readable storage medium
JP4621217B2 (en) Fracture prediction method and apparatus, program, and recording medium
JP4621216B2 (en) Fracture limit acquisition method and apparatus, program, and recording medium
JP6852426B2 (en) Formability evaluation method, program and recording medium
KR101886556B1 (en) Stretch-flange crack prediction method, stretch-flange crack prediction device, computer program, and recording medium
JP7110976B2 (en) Formability evaluation method, program and recording medium
JP6897413B2 (en) Formability evaluation method, program and recording medium
KR101951587B1 (en) Fracture prediction method, program, recording medium, and arithmetic processing device
WO2020184712A1 (en) Stretch flange crack evaluation method, metal sheet selection method, press die design method, component shape design method, and pressed component manufacturing method
JP2020040111A (en) Deformation limit evaluation method, crack prediction method and press metal mold design method
Ingarao et al. A new progressive design methodology for complex sheet metal stamping operations: Coupling spatially differentiated restraining forces approach and multi-objective optimization
JP7206902B2 (en) Formability evaluation method, program and recording medium
JP5900751B2 (en) Evaluation method and prediction method of bending inner crack
Tsoupis et al. Prediction of damage in small curvature bending processes of high strength steels using continuum damage mechanics model in 3D simulation
Yao et al. Rapid design of corner restraining force in deep drawn rectangular parts
JP2020159834A (en) Rupture criteria analysis method, rupture criteria analysis program, and rupture criteria analysis system
US11971390B2 (en) Stretch flange crack evaluation method, metal sheet selection method, press die design method, component shape design method, and pressed component manufacturing method
JP6303815B2 (en) Forging crack prediction method, forging crack prediction program, and recording medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110816

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20121030

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20121031

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20121112

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 5146395

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20151207

Year of fee payment: 3

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350