JP5038665B2 - Gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity judgment method and airtightness / leakage inspection report - Google Patents

Gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity judgment method and airtightness / leakage inspection report Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP5038665B2
JP5038665B2 JP2006232694A JP2006232694A JP5038665B2 JP 5038665 B2 JP5038665 B2 JP 5038665B2 JP 2006232694 A JP2006232694 A JP 2006232694A JP 2006232694 A JP2006232694 A JP 2006232694A JP 5038665 B2 JP5038665 B2 JP 5038665B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
data
airtightness
leakage inspection
volume
pipe
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2006232694A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2008058037A (en
Inventor
健 安部
泰秀 土田
基彦 上原
慎一郎 有馬
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
AIM TECH CO.,LTD.
Tokyo Gas Engineering Co Ltd
Original Assignee
AIM TECH CO.,LTD.
Tokyo Gas Engineering Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by AIM TECH CO.,LTD., Tokyo Gas Engineering Co Ltd filed Critical AIM TECH CO.,LTD.
Priority to JP2006232694A priority Critical patent/JP5038665B2/en
Publication of JP2008058037A publication Critical patent/JP2008058037A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5038665B2 publication Critical patent/JP5038665B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

本発明はガス配管気密・漏洩検査データ真贋判定方法及び気密・漏洩検査報告書に関するものであり、特に、各住戸固有のガス配管の容積をガス漏洩量と関連付けて、ガス配管の気密・漏洩検査における測定値データの真正性を検証できるようにしたガス配管気密・漏洩検査データ真贋判定方法及び気密・漏洩検査報告書に関するものである。   TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity determination method and an airtightness / leakage inspection report, and in particular, relates to the gas piping volume specific to each dwelling unit with the amount of gas leakage, and the airtightness / leakage inspection of the gas piping. The present invention relates to a gas pipe airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity judgment method and an airtightness / leakage inspection report which enable verification of the authenticity of measured value data in Japan

従来、新築の住戸等においてガス配管の工事を行った後は、該ガス配管の気密・漏洩検査が実施され、ガス漏洩などの異常が無いことを確認している。そして、前記ガス配管の気密・漏洩検査は法令により定期的又は自主的に実施されるが、一般にガス事業者は、ガス配管の気密・漏洩検査の業務を外部のガス工事会社などの企業に委託することが多い。受託した企業は、現場でガス配管の気密・漏洩検査を実施し、その測定値データを気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載してガス事業者に報告する。この場合、報告された測定値データが、受託企業の検査員によって当該住戸にて実際に測定された真正のデータであるという確たる保証はなく、そのことを証明する手立てもなかった。   Conventionally, after construction of a gas pipe in a newly-built dwelling unit or the like, an airtightness / leakage inspection of the gas pipe is performed to confirm that there is no abnormality such as a gas leak. The gas pipe airtightness / leakage inspection is carried out regularly or voluntarily according to the law. In general, gas companies entrust the gas pipe airtightness / leakage inspection work to companies such as external gas construction companies. Often to do. The contracted company conducts gas pipe airtightness / leakage inspection at the site and reports the measured value data in the airtightness / leakage inspection report to the gas company. In this case, there was no reliable guarantee that the reported measurement data was genuine data actually measured at the dwelling unit by an inspector of the contracted company, and there was no way to prove it.

前記気密・漏洩検査のデータの信頼性を証明するためには、実際にガス配管の気密・漏洩検査を行った住戸の固有情報を得て、該固有情報を気密・漏洩検査のデータと関連付けて認証することが考えられる。例えば、図3に示すように、GPS(Global Positioning System)1による位置情報と配管気密・漏洩検査器2による漏洩検査機能とを組み合わせた認証方式が考えられる。   In order to prove the reliability of the data of the airtightness / leakage inspection, obtain the specific information of the dwelling unit that actually performed the airtightness / leakage inspection of the gas pipe, and associate the specific information with the data of the airtightness / leakage inspection. It is possible to authenticate. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, an authentication method is conceivable in which position information by GPS (Global Positioning System) 1 and a leak inspection function by pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device 2 are combined.

このGPS認証方式は、GPS1により各住戸の位置情報を計測すると共に、配管気密・漏洩検査器(ガス漏洩検査器)2により各住戸のガス配管の気密・漏洩検査(ガス漏洩試験)を行う。そして、配管気密・漏洩検査器2により得られたガス漏洩量データと、前記GPS1により得られた位置情報データとをプリンター3にて印刷する。次に、この印刷物を気密・漏洩検査報告書4としてガス事業者に提出し、データの偽造・改ざんがないことを照合確認したうえで、データの真正性を認証する(例えば、類似した関連技術の一例として特許文献1参照)。
特開2004−85239号公報。
In this GPS authentication method, the position information of each dwelling unit is measured by the GPS 1 and the gas tightness / leakage inspection (gas leakage test) of the gas piping of each dwelling unit is performed by the pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device (gas leakage inspection device) 2. Then, the printer 3 prints the gas leakage amount data obtained by the pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device 2 and the position information data obtained by the GPS 1. Next, submit this printed matter to the gas company as an airtight / leakage inspection report 4 and verify that the data is not counterfeited or falsified, and authenticate the authenticity of the data (for example, similar related technology). As an example, refer to Patent Document 1).
JP 2004-85239 A.

上記GPS認証方式は、アパートなどの集合住戸では各住戸が相互に近接しているので、GPSによる各住戸の位置判別精度では、個々の住戸を正確に判別することが困難になる。又、住宅内ではGPSの電波が十分に届かないために、GPSによって各住戸の固有情報を正確に得ることはできない。従って、前記気密・漏洩検査データの信頼性証明の手段として、GPS認証方式を実用化することには多くの困難が伴う。   In the GPS authentication method, each dwelling unit is close to each other in an apartment unit such as an apartment. Therefore, it is difficult to accurately discriminate each dwelling unit with the position determination accuracy of each dwelling unit using GPS. In addition, since the GPS radio wave does not reach sufficiently in the house, the unique information of each dwelling unit cannot be obtained accurately by GPS. Therefore, many difficulties are involved in putting the GPS authentication method into practical use as a means for certifying the reliability of the airtight / leakage inspection data.

又、各住戸に固有なバーコードなどの情報を用いた認証方式も考えられる。図4に示すように、個々の住戸の固有情報、例えば各住戸において、ガスメータ5に貼付されたバーコードの情報をバーコードリーダ6でスキャンすると共に、配管気密・漏洩検査器2によりガス配管の気密・漏洩検査を実施し、このとき得られたガス漏洩量データと固有のバーコードデータとをプリンター7にて印刷し、前記同様に、これを気密・漏洩検査報告書8としてガス事業者に提出してデータの真正性を認証する。   An authentication method using information such as a barcode unique to each dwelling unit is also conceivable. As shown in FIG. 4, the unique information of each dwelling unit, for example, the bar code information affixed to the gas meter 5 in each dwelling unit is scanned with the bar code reader 6, and the gas tightness / leakage inspection device 2 Airtightness / leakage inspection is carried out, and the gas leakage amount data and the unique barcode data obtained at this time are printed by the printer 7 and, similarly to the above, this is reported to the gas company as an airtightness / leakage inspection report 8. Submit and authenticate the authenticity of the data.

このバーコード認証方式によれば、アパート等の建物の築造時、例えば、各住戸にガスメータが設置される前などでは、バーコード自体が各住戸に配置されているか否かが確定されていないため、各住戸における測定値データの認証手段としてバーコードを使用することはできない。この場合、実際に各住戸に行かなくてもバーコードを読み込むことも可能になるため、悪意者によって測定値データが偽造・改ざんされる恐れがある。従って、バーコード認証方式は、データ不正行為を未然に防止できず、配管気密・漏洩検査の測定値データの信頼性が低下する。   According to this barcode authentication method, when building a building such as an apartment, for example, before a gas meter is installed in each dwelling unit, it is not determined whether or not the barcode itself is arranged in each dwelling unit. The bar code cannot be used as a means for authenticating the measured value data in each dwelling unit. In this case, since it is possible to read a barcode without actually going to each dwelling unit, there is a risk that the measured value data may be forged or falsified by a Service-to-Self. Therefore, the bar code authentication method cannot prevent data fraud, and the reliability of the measured value data of the pipe airtightness / leakage inspection is lowered.

そこで、各住戸のガス配管における気密・漏洩検査データの真贋を確実に検証できると共に、気密・漏洩検査データ(測定値データ)の偽造・改ざんを未然に防止して該データの信頼性を高めるために解決すべき技術的課題が生じてくるのであり、本発明はこの課題を解決することを目的とする。   Therefore, the authenticity of the airtightness / leakage inspection data in the gas piping of each dwelling unit can be reliably verified, and the reliability of the data can be improved by preventing forgery / falsification of the airtightness / leakage inspection data (measurement value data). Therefore, a technical problem to be solved arises, and the present invention aims to solve this problem.

請求項1記載の発明は、住戸のガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を配管気密・漏洩検査器で測定し、該測定値データを気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載して真贋を判定する方法において、前記測定値データの真贋を判定する際に比較基準となる固有の識別データとして、前記住戸のガス配管の容積を採用し、前記ガス配管の容積をアルファベット等の符号データに暗号化するステップと、該暗号化された符号データを、前記測定値データとともに前記気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載するステップと、データ真贋判定の際に前記住戸のガス配管の容積を配管気密・漏洩検査器で再度計測するステップと、該容積計測値データと、前記気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載された容積測定値データを比較照合して、双方のデータの整合性が確認されたときのみ、前記測定値データの真正性を証明するステップと、を備えることを特徴とするガス配管気密・漏洩検査データ真贋判定方法を提供する。 The invention according to claim 1 is a method for measuring the volume and gas leakage amount of a gas pipe of a dwelling unit with a pipe airtightness / leakage inspection instrument, and determining the authenticity by describing the measured value data in an airtightness / leakage inspection report. Adopting the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit as unique identification data that becomes a comparison reference when determining the authenticity of the measured value data, and encrypting the volume of the gas pipe into code data such as alphabets; The encrypted code data is described in the airtightness / leakage inspection report together with the measured value data, and the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit is again determined by the airtightness / leakage inspection device at the time of data authenticity determination. a step of measuring a container product measured value data, and compares and collates the volumetric value data described in the hermetic-leakage inspection report, when the integrity of both the data is confirmed only, before Providing a step to verify the authenticity of the measurement value data, a gas pipe airtight spilled inspection data authenticity determination method, characterized in that it comprises a.

この構成によれば、住戸のガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を配管気密・漏洩検査器で測定し、この測定値データの真贋を判定する時に、比較基準となる固有の識別データとして、住戸のガス配管の容積を採用する。まず、受託企業の検査員が現場に赴いて各住戸のガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を配管気密・漏洩検査器で測定すると共に、該ガス配管の容積を配管固有情報としてアルファベット等の符号に暗号化する。この暗号化された符号データは、前記ガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を示す測定値データと共に気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載する。 According to this configuration, the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit and the amount of gas leakage are measured with a pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device, and when determining the authenticity of this measured value data, Adopt the volume of gas piping. First, an inspector of the contracted company visits the site and measures the volume of gas piping and the amount of gas leakage in each dwelling unit with a pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device. Encrypt. The encrypted code data is described in the airtightness / leakage inspection report together with the measured value data indicating the volume of the gas pipe and the gas leakage amount.

然る後、再び前記住戸のガス配管の容積を配管気密・漏洩検査器で計測し、該容積計測値データを、前記気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載された容積測定値デーと比較照合する。その結果、所定の整合性が確認されたときのみ、該測定値データの真正性を証明し、所定の整合性が確認されないときは、該測定値データの真正性証明を拒否する。 Thereafter, the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit is again measured with a pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device, and the volumetric measurement value data is compared with the volumetric measurement value data described in the airtightness / leakage inspection report . As a result, only when the predetermined consistency is confirmed, the authenticity of the measured value data is proved. When the predetermined consistency is not confirmed, the authenticity certification of the measured value data is rejected.

請求項記載の発明は、住戸のガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を配管気密・漏洩検査器で測定して得られた測定値データが記載される気密・漏洩検査報告書において、該気密・漏洩検査報告書は、請求項1記載のガス配管気密・漏洩検査データ真贋判定方法に用いられるものであって、測定値データ及び配管識別データが記載されるエリアを有し、前記測定値データの記載エリアには、住戸のガス配管気密・漏洩検査時に測定されたガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を示す数値が記載され、且つ、前記配管識別データの記載エリアには、前記ガス配管の容積を暗号化したアルファベット等の符号データが記載されるように構成し、前記測定値データの真贋判定の際に配管気密・漏洩検査器で再度計測して得られる住戸のガス配管の容積の計測値データと、前記記載エリアに記載された容積測定値データを比較照合して、双方のデータの整合性の成否を確認できるようにしたことを特徴とする気密・漏洩検査報告書を提供する。 The invention described in claim 2 is a gas tightness / leakage inspection report in which measurement data obtained by measuring the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit and the amount of gas leakage with a pipe airtightness / leakage tester is described. The leakage inspection report is used for the gas pipe airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity determination method according to claim 1 , and has an area where measurement value data and pipe identification data are described. the described area is described numerical value indicating the volume and the gas leakage amount of the measured gas pipe during gas pipe hermetically-leakage inspection of dwelling is and the the description area of the pipe identification data, the volume of the gas pipe configured such that the code data of alphabetic or the like encryption is described, the measurement value measured value of the volume of the gas piping of dwelling units obtained by re-measured by a pipe hermetically-leak tester during authentication judgment data Providing a chromatography data, and compares and collates the volumetric value data described in the described areas, a hermetic-leakage inspection report to feature that it has to be able to confirm the success or failure of integrity of both data .

この構成によれば、気密・漏洩検査報告書には、受託検査員等によって測定された住戸のガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を示す数値と、該ガス配管の容積を暗号化したアルファベット等の符号とが記載される。そして、測定値データの真贋判定の際に配管気密・漏洩検査器で再度計測した住戸のガス配管の容積の計測値データと、前記記載エリアに記載された容積測定値データとを比較照合して、双方のデータの整合性の成否が確認される。このガス配管の容積は各住戸に固有な配管識別データであり、この配管識別データに測定値データが関連付けられる。従って、悪意による測定値データの偽造・改ざんが事実上不可能になる。 According to this configuration, the airtightness / leakage inspection report includes a numerical value indicating the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit and the amount of gas leakage measured by a contracted inspector, and an alphabet or the like that encrypts the volume of the gas pipe. The code is described. Then, the measured value data of the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit measured again by the pipe airtightness / leakage detector at the time of authenticity determination of the measured value data is compared with the volume measured value data described in the above described area. The success or failure of the consistency of both data is confirmed. The volume of the gas pipe is pipe identification data unique to each dwelling unit, and measurement value data is associated with the pipe identification data. Therefore, it is virtually impossible to forge or falsify the measured value data due to malicious intent.

請求項1記載の発明は、受託企業の検査員等が実際に当該住戸に赴いて気密・漏洩検査を行わなければ、各住戸の配管容積のデータを得ることができないので、例えば、当該住戸以外の現場で収集した検査データを捏造して使用することは事実上できず、従来に比べて高い認証機能を確保することができる。 In the invention described in claim 1, since the inspector of the contracted company does not actually go to the dwelling unit and perform the airtightness / leakage inspection, it is not possible to obtain the data of the piping volume of each dwelling unit. It is virtually impossible to forge and use the inspection data collected at the site, and it is possible to secure a higher authentication function than in the past.

請求項記載の発明は、測定値データの真贋を判定する時に、比較基準となる固有の識別データとして、住戸のガス配管の容積を採用し、暗号化された符号データは、前記ガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を示す測定値データと共に気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載し、然る後、再び前記住戸のガス配管の容積を配管気密・漏洩検査器で計測し、該容積計測値データと前記容積測定値データを比較照合した結果、所定の整合性が確認されたときのみ、前記測定値データの真正性を証明する。依って、ガス配管を配管識別データとして暗号化して、之を測定値データと関連付けて該測定値データの真正性を認証するので、悪意者によるデータ捏造などの不正行為を未然に防止でき、加えて、配管識別データたるガス配管の容積は暗号化されて、特定の関係者以外にはその内容が判らないので、該配管の容積データそのものが偽造・改ざんされる恐れも殆どない。 The invention according to claim 1 adopts the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit as the unique identification data as a comparison reference when determining the authenticity of the measured value data, and the encrypted code data is the data of the gas pipe. It is described in the airtightness / leakage inspection report together with the measurement value data indicating the volume and the amount of gas leakage, and after that, the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit is again measured with a pipe airtightness / leakage inspection instrument, The authenticity of the measured value data is proved only when a predetermined consistency is confirmed as a result of comparing and comparing the volume measured value data. Therefore, since the gas pipe is encrypted as pipe identification data, the authenticity of the measured value data is authenticated by associating it with the measured value data, so that fraudulent acts such as data fabrication by the Service-to-Self can be prevented in advance. Thus, the volume of the gas pipe, which is the pipe identification data, is encrypted and cannot be understood by anyone other than a specific party, so there is almost no risk that the volume data of the pipe itself is forged or altered.

請求項記載の発明は、気密・漏洩検査報告書には、該ガス配管の容積又は該ガス配管の容積を暗号化したアルファベット等の符号と測定値データとが記載される。そして、配管気密・漏洩検査器で再度計測した住戸のガス配管の容積の計測値データと、前記記載エリアに記載された容積測定値データとを比較照合して、双方のデータの整合性の成否を確認でき、通常どおり気密・漏洩検査の報告手続きを行うだけで、データ不正行為を防止でき、この場合、高価なバーコードの入力装置又は読取装置等は不要であり、簡単かつ安価に実用化できるメリットを有する。 In the second aspect of the invention, the gas tightness / leakage inspection report describes the volume of the gas pipe or a code such as an alphabet in which the volume of the gas pipe is encrypted and the measured value data. The measured value data of the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit measured again by the pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device is compared with the volume measurement value data described in the above described area, and the success or failure of the consistency of both data is confirmed. can see, only to report procedure normally airtight, loss inspection, the data can be prevented fraud, in this case, the input device or the reading device such as an expensive bar code is not required, simple and inexpensive commercialization It has a merit that can be.

本発明は、住戸のガス配管における検査員による気密・漏洩検査の測定値データの真贋を容易かつ確実に判定すると共に、測定値データの偽造・改ざん等を未然防止して、測定値データの信頼性を高めるという目的を、住戸のガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を配管気密・漏洩検査器で測定し、該測定値データを気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載して真贋を判定する方法において、前記測定値データの真贋を判定する際に比較基準となる固有の識別データとして、前記住戸のガス配管の容積を採用し、前記ガス配管の容積をアルファベット等の符号データに暗号化するステップと、該暗号化された符号データを、前記測定値データとともに前記気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載するステップと、データ真贋判定の際に前記住戸のガス配管の容積を配管気密・漏洩検査器で再度計測するステップと、該容積計測値データと、前記気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載された容積測定値データを比較照合して、双方のデータの整合性が確認されたときのみ、前記測定値データの真正性を証明するステップと、を備えることを特徴とするガス配管気密・漏洩検査データ真贋判定方法によって実現した。 The present invention makes it possible to easily and reliably determine the authenticity of the measured value data of the airtightness / leakage inspection by the inspector in the gas piping of the dwelling unit, and to prevent the counterfeiting / tampering of the measured value data, thereby ensuring the reliability of the measured value data. In the method of determining the authenticity by measuring the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit and the amount of gas leakage with a pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device, and describing the measured value data in the airtightness / leakage inspection report, Adopting the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit as unique identification data that becomes a comparison reference when determining the authenticity of the measurement value data, and encrypting the volume of the gas pipe into code data such as alphabets; the dark Goka code data, the steps described in the hermetic-leakage inspection report together with the measurement data, piping gas volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling during the data authentication judgment - a step of re-measured by the leakage tester, a container product measured value data, and compares and collates the volumetric value data described in the hermetic-leakage inspection report, when the integrity of both the data is confirmed And a step of proving authenticity of the measured value data, and realizing the authenticity determination method for gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection data.

以下、本発明の好適な一実施例を説明する。本実施例は、ポンプ、圧力計等を内蔵して成る配管気密・漏洩検査器を用いることにより、公知の検査手順にて各住戸のガス配管の容積(以下、配管容積という。)及び圧力低下値を計測することができる。   Hereinafter, a preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described. In the present embodiment, by using a pipe airtightness / leakage tester having a built-in pump, pressure gauge, etc., the gas pipe volume of each dwelling unit (hereinafter referred to as the pipe volume) and pressure drop in a known inspection procedure. The value can be measured.

通常、前記配管容積は、ガス漏洩量を計算する目的で使用されるが、各住戸における配管容積は、間取りが同じであっても異なることから、この配管容積を各住戸固有の識別データたる「指紋」として利用できる。即ち、ガス漏洩量の検査データに配管容積を関連付けることによって、悪意者によるデータの偽造・改ざんを防止できる。   Usually, the pipe volume is used for the purpose of calculating the amount of gas leakage, but the pipe volume in each dwelling unit is different even if the floor plan is the same, so this pipe volume is used as identification data unique to each dwelling unit. It can be used as a “fingerprint”. That is, by associating the pipe volume with the inspection data of the gas leakage amount, it is possible to prevent forgery / falsification of data by the Service-to-Self.

前記配管容積は、配管気密・漏洩検査器によって測定されるデータ値である。そのため、データ測定に伴う誤差の混入が避け難いが、十分に再現性が見込まれる程度の有効数字の範囲内に止めることにより、該配管容積のデータを再現性のある情報値として有効に活用できる。   The pipe volume is a data value measured by a pipe airtightness / leakage tester. For this reason, it is difficult to avoid mixing errors due to data measurement, but the pipe volume data can be effectively used as reproducible information values by stopping within the range of significant figures that are sufficiently reproducible. .

図1は本実施例に係るデータ真贋判定システムを示す。同図において、11はプロパンガス用の配管気密・漏洩検査器(例えば、商品名「セーバプロ」、株式会社エイムテック販売。)であって、配管気密・漏洩検査器11にはポンプ、圧力計等が内蔵されている。該ポンプ、圧力計等を利用することにより、例えば、新築の住戸のガス配管工事後に気密・漏洩検査を行う際に、住戸のガスメータよりも下流側の配管容積及び圧力低下値(ガス漏洩量データ)を精度良く計測できる。   FIG. 1 shows a data authenticity determination system according to this embodiment. In the figure, 11 is a pipe gas tightness / leakage tester for propane gas (for example, trade name “Saberpro”, sold by AIMTEC Co., Ltd.). The pipe airtightness / leakage tester 11 includes a pump, a pressure gauge, etc. Is built-in. By using the pump, pressure gauge, etc., for example, when performing gas tightness / leakage inspection after gas piping work for a newly built unit, the piping volume and pressure drop value (gas leakage amount data) on the downstream side of the gas meter of the unit ) Can be measured with high accuracy.

本発明のデータ真贋判定システムは、各住戸に固有な配管識別データを実際の検査データに関連付けて、検査データの真贋をチェックするものである。本実施例では、先ず、受託企業の検査員が各住戸に赴いて、配管気密・漏洩検査器11により、個々の住戸の配管容積及び圧力低下値を測定する。そして、該測定値及び検査日は、所定の変換ルールに従ってアルファベット等の符号に暗号化する。ついで、該暗号化された符号データと、前記配管容積及び圧力低下値の測定値データとを住戸用の気密・漏洩検査報告書13にプリンター12にて印刷する。   The data authenticity determination system of the present invention checks the authenticity of inspection data by associating pipe identification data unique to each dwelling unit with actual inspection data. In this embodiment, first, an inspector of the contracted company goes to each dwelling unit and measures the pipe volume and the pressure drop value of each dwelling unit using the pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device 11. Then, the measurement value and the inspection date are encrypted into codes such as alphabets according to a predetermined conversion rule. Next, the encrypted code data and the measured data of the pipe volume and the pressure drop value are printed on the airtight / leakage inspection report 13 for the dwelling unit by the printer 12.

この場合、気密・漏洩検査報告書13には、各住戸のガス配管の容積及び圧力低下値(ガス漏洩量)を示す数字が記載される測定値データ記載エリアと、前記配管容積、圧力低下値及び検査日を暗号化したアルファベットが記載される配管識別データ記載エリアとが設けられているため、配管容積及び圧力低下値の測定値データ、並びに前記暗号化された符号データはそれぞれ前述した各記載エリアに表示する。   In this case, the airtightness / leakage inspection report 13 includes the measured value data description area in which numbers indicating the volume and pressure drop value (gas leak amount) of the gas pipes of each dwelling unit, and the pipe volume and pressure drop value are described. And the pipe identification data description area in which the alphabet that encrypted the inspection date is described, the measured value data of the pipe volume and the pressure drop value, and the encrypted code data are respectively described above. Display in the area.

その後、前記測定値データの真贋を判定する必要が生じた時に、再度、当該住戸のガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を正確に計測する。次に、この計測値データと最初の測定値データとを相互に比較することにより、該測定値データの真贋を判定する   Then, when it becomes necessary to determine the authenticity of the measured value data, the volume of the gas pipe and the amount of gas leakage of the dwelling unit are accurately measured again. Next, the authenticity of the measured value data is determined by comparing the measured value data with the first measured value data.

図2は具体的な測定値データを暗号化する際の手順を示す。まず、各住戸にて気密・漏洩検査を実施して、配管容積と圧力低下値を測定する。同図中の検査関連情報表14に例示するように、例えば、2005年1月29日に配管容積12.76リットル、圧力低下0.04kPaと計測されたとする。このとき、年月日は7桁の数字「2005129」をそのまま利用するが、測定値についてはその上位3桁を有効数字として利用する。即ち、配管容積の値は「127」を利用し、圧力低下の値は「004」を利用する。本実施例では、使用者が日付情報を変更できないように構成することにより、使用者によって気密・漏洩検査報告書の改ざんを防止することができる。   FIG. 2 shows a procedure for encrypting specific measurement value data. First, airtightness / leakage inspection is performed at each dwelling unit, and the pipe volume and pressure drop value are measured. As illustrated in the inspection-related information table 14 in the figure, it is assumed that, for example, a pipe volume of 12.76 liters and a pressure drop of 0.04 kPa are measured on January 29, 2005. At this time, the seven-digit number “2005129” is used as it is for the date, but the upper three digits of the measured value are used as significant figures. That is, the value of the pipe volume uses “127”, and the value of the pressure drop uses “004”. In this embodiment, it is possible to prevent the user from falsifying the airtightness / leakage inspection report by configuring so that the user cannot change the date information.

次に、年月日、配管容積及び圧力低下値の有効数字を、この順に組み合わせて「2005129127004」の13桁の数字を得る。而して、該13桁の数字をアルファベットに変換して暗号化処理を行うが、この場合、図示例の換字変換テーブル15の変換規則に従って暗号化処理を行う。この換字変換テーブル15の変換規則では、図示の如く、数字「0」〜「9」がアルファベット「Z」〜「V」に対応する。従って、数字「2005129127004」はアルファベット「SZZCTTSVTEZZQ」に暗号化される。   Next, significant digits of date, pipe volume and pressure drop value are combined in this order to obtain a 13-digit number “2005129127004”. Thus, the 13-digit number is converted into alphabets for encryption processing. In this case, the encryption processing is performed according to the conversion rules of the substitution conversion table 15 in the illustrated example. In the conversion rule of the substitution conversion table 15, numbers “0” to “9” correspond to alphabets “Z” to “V” as shown in the figure. Therefore, the number “2005129127004” is encrypted to the alphabet “SZZCTSVTEZZQ”.

前記暗号化処理されたアルファベットは、図2に示すように、データ出力帳票(気密・漏洩検査報告書)16の下側余白部に印字される。従って、このデータ出力帳票16に記入された測定値データと、暗号化されたアルファベットデータとの整合性を検討することで、測定値データが正規のデータであるか否かが容易に判断される。   The encrypted alphabet is printed in a lower margin of the data output form (airtight / leakage inspection report) 16 as shown in FIG. Accordingly, by examining the consistency between the measured value data entered in the data output form 16 and the encrypted alphabet data, it is easily determined whether or not the measured value data is regular data. .

なお、図示例で用いた暗号処理方式は、単純な換字変換方式であるが、更に高度な他の暗号処理方式を用いることもできる。   Note that the encryption processing method used in the illustrated example is a simple substitution conversion method, but other more advanced encryption processing methods can also be used.

本実施例によれば、受託企業の検査員が現場に赴いて、各住戸の配管容積及び圧力低下値を測定すると共に、該測定値及び検査日の数字13桁をアルファベットの符号に暗号化する。この暗号化された符号と前記13桁の数字は、気密・漏洩検査報告書の所定箇所に記載する。   According to the present embodiment, the inspector of the contract company visits the site to measure the piping volume and pressure drop value of each dwelling unit, and encrypts the measured value and the 13-digit number of the inspection date into alphabetic codes. . This encrypted code and the 13-digit number are written in a predetermined location of the airtightness / leakage inspection report.

そして、前記測定値データの真贋を判定する必要が生じた場合のみ、再び当該住戸の配管容積を計測し、当該容積計測値データと前記容積測定値データを比較照合する。その結果、所定の整合性が確認されたときだけ、該測定値データが「本物」であると判定する。   Then, only when it is necessary to determine the authenticity of the measurement value data, the pipe volume of the dwelling unit is measured again, and the volume measurement value data and the volume measurement value data are compared and collated. As a result, it is determined that the measured value data is “genuine” only when predetermined consistency is confirmed.

以上の如く本発明は、配管容積を配管識別データとして暗号化して、実際の測定値データと関連付けて認証するので、悪意者によるデータの偽造・改ざんを確実に未然防止できる。   As described above, according to the present invention, the pipe volume is encrypted as pipe identification data and authenticated in association with actual measurement value data. Therefore, it is possible to reliably prevent forgery and falsification of data by a Service-to-Self.

加えて、配管容積はアルファベットに暗号化されているので、秘密保持義務者のみしかそのデータ内容を把握できない。従って、配管容積のデータ自体が悪意により捏造される恐れはない。   In addition, since the pipe volume is encrypted in alphabets, only the person who is obliged to keep secret can grasp the data contents. Therefore, there is no fear that the pipe volume data itself is forged.

さらに、各住戸の配管容積のデータは、検査員が実際に現場に行って検査しなければ取得できない。従って、他所の現場で収集した検査データを捏造して代用することは事実上不可能であり、常に高い認証機能が確保される。   Furthermore, the piping volume data of each dwelling unit cannot be acquired unless the inspector actually goes to the site and inspects. Therefore, it is virtually impossible to forge and substitute inspection data collected at other sites, and a high authentication function is always secured.

さらに又、気密・漏洩検査報告書には、暗号化データと測定値データのみを記載して、従来の気密・漏洩検査の報告手続きに従うだけで自動的に認証できる。よって、高価なバーコードの入力装置及び読取装置などの特別な手段を何ら必要とせず、簡易かつ低コストで実用化できる。   Furthermore, only the encrypted data and the measured value data are described in the airtightness / leakage inspection report, and authentication can be automatically performed simply by following the conventional airtightness / leakage inspection report procedure. Therefore, no special means such as an expensive bar code input device and reading device is required, and it can be put into practical use simply and at low cost.

尚、本発明の暗号化の手法に代えて、配管容積とガス漏洩量を同時に印字するだけで、気密試験の真贋確認を求めることもできる。   In addition, it can replace with the encryption method of this invention and can also ask | require the authenticity check of an airtight test only by printing a piping volume and the amount of gas leaks simultaneously.

本発明は、本発明の精神を逸脱しない限り種々の改変をなすことができ、そして、本発明が該改変されたものにも及ぶことは当然である。   The present invention can be variously modified without departing from the spirit of the present invention, and the present invention naturally extends to the modified ones.

本発明の一実施例に係るガス配管気密・漏洩検査データ真贋判定システムの説明図。Explanatory drawing of the gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity determination system which concerns on one Example of this invention. 一実施例に係るガス配管気密・漏洩検査データ真贋判定システムにおけるデータ暗号化処理を示す説明図。Explanatory drawing which shows the data encryption process in the gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity determination system which concerns on one Example. 想定される従来技術の一例を示す説明図。Explanatory drawing which shows an example of the assumed prior art. 想定される従来技術の他の例を示す説明図。Explanatory drawing which shows the other example of the prior art assumed.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

11 配管気密・漏洩検査器
12 プリンター
13 気密・漏洩検査報告書
14 検査関連情報表
15 換字変換テーブル
16 データ出力帳票
11 Pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device 12 Printer 13 Airtightness / leakage inspection report 14 Inspection related information table 15 Substitution conversion table 16 Data output form

Claims (2)

住戸のガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を配管気密・漏洩検査器で測定し、該測定値データを気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載して真贋を判定する方法において、
前記測定値データの真贋を判定する際に比較基準となる固有の識別データとして、前記住戸のガス配管の容積を採用し、
前記ガス配管の容積をアルファベット等の符号データに暗号化するステップと、
該暗号化された符号データを、前記測定値データとともに前記気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載するステップと、
データ真贋判定の際に前記住戸のガス配管の容積を配管気密・漏洩検査器で再度計測するステップと、
該容積計測値データと、前記気密・漏洩検査報告書に記載された容積測定値データを比較照合して、双方のデータの整合性が確認されたときのみ、前記測定値データの真正性を証明するステップと、
を備えることを特徴とするガス配管気密・漏洩検査データ真贋判定方法。
In the method of measuring the volume of the gas piping of the dwelling unit and the amount of gas leakage with a pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device, and determining the authenticity by describing the measured value data in the airtightness / leakage inspection report,
Adopting the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit as unique identification data that becomes a comparison reference when determining the authenticity of the measurement value data,
Encrypting the volume of the gas pipe into code data such as alphabets;
Describing the encrypted code data in the airtightness / leakage inspection report together with the measurement value data;
A step of measuring the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit again with a pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device at the time of data authenticity judgment ;
The volume measurement value data is compared with the volume measurement value data described in the airtightness / leakage inspection report, and only when the consistency of both data is confirmed, the authenticity of the measurement value data is proved. And steps to
A gas pipe airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity judgment method characterized by comprising:
住戸のガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を配管気密・漏洩検査器で測定して得られた測定値データが記載される気密・漏洩検査報告書において、In the airtightness / leakage inspection report that describes the measured value data obtained by measuring the volume of the gas piping of the dwelling unit and the amount of gas leakage with a pipe airtightness / leakage inspection device,
該気密・漏洩検査報告書は、請求項1記載のガス配管気密・漏洩検査データ真贋判定方法に用いられるものであって、前記測定値データ及び配管識別データが記載されるエリアを有し、The airtightness / leakage inspection report is used in the gas pipe airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity determination method according to claim 1 and has an area where the measurement value data and the pipe identification data are described,
前記測定値データの記載エリアには、住戸のガス配管気密・漏洩検査時に測定されたガス配管の容積及びガス漏洩量を示す数値が記載され、In the description area of the measurement data, numerical values indicating the volume of gas piping and the amount of gas leakage measured at the time of the gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection of the dwelling unit are described,
且つ、前記配管識別データの記載エリアには、前記ガス配管の容積を暗号化したアルファベット等の符号データが記載されるように構成し、And, in the description area of the pipe identification data, it is configured so that code data such as an alphabet that encrypts the volume of the gas pipe is described,
前記測定値データの真贋判定の際に配管気密・漏洩検査器で再度計測して得られる住戸のガス配管の容積の計測値データと、前記記載エリアに記載された容積測定値データとを比較照合して、双方のデータの整合性の成否を確認できるようにしたことを特徴とする気密・漏洩検査報告書。Comparing the measured value data of the volume of the gas pipe of the dwelling unit obtained by measuring again with the pipe airtightness / leakage tester when determining the authenticity of the measured value data, and the volume measured value data described in the described area An airtightness / leakage inspection report characterized by being able to confirm the success or failure of the consistency of both data.
JP2006232694A 2006-08-29 2006-08-29 Gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity judgment method and airtightness / leakage inspection report Active JP5038665B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006232694A JP5038665B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2006-08-29 Gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity judgment method and airtightness / leakage inspection report

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006232694A JP5038665B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2006-08-29 Gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity judgment method and airtightness / leakage inspection report

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008058037A JP2008058037A (en) 2008-03-13
JP5038665B2 true JP5038665B2 (en) 2012-10-03

Family

ID=39240960

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006232694A Active JP5038665B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2006-08-29 Gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity judgment method and airtightness / leakage inspection report

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5038665B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102818680A (en) * 2012-08-20 2012-12-12 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Pressure testing device
JP7156291B2 (en) * 2017-09-21 2022-10-19 コニカミノルタ株式会社 Gas inspection report creation support device, gas inspection report creation support method, and gas inspection report creation support program
US11252377B2 (en) 2018-05-16 2022-02-15 Konica Minolta, Inc. Camera device, gas leakage check system, gas leakage check method, and gas leakage check program

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09288031A (en) * 1996-04-23 1997-11-04 Seibu Gas Kk Measuring apparatus for leakage amount of gas
JP2001108569A (en) * 1999-10-13 2001-04-20 Ito Koki Kk Method for measuring content volume of gas supply line and leak volume, and device therefor
JP2005100317A (en) * 2003-08-28 2005-04-14 F Wiseman Consulting Japan:Kk Method for inspecting information, method for processing vehicle information, vehicle information management device, and method for recording information

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2008058037A (en) 2008-03-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108922012B (en) Invoice checking method without leakage of original information based on block chain technology
CN106934630B (en) Measuring instrument quantity value tracing method
RU2007145709A (en) AUTHORIZATION CHECK BY OPTICAL SCATTERING
US20100262385A1 (en) Safety pulser for fuel dispenser and method for judging fraud activity
JP5038665B2 (en) Gas piping airtightness / leakage inspection data authenticity judgment method and airtightness / leakage inspection report
CN109034848A (en) A kind of Distributed Detection authentication platform
CN101600944B (en) Verification of process variable transmitter
JP2013025571A (en) Card issue system and card issue method
CN112861101A (en) High-reliability inspection detection data processing method and device
JP7399328B2 (en) Authentication system and authentication server
US20160247387A1 (en) Calibration system for equipment
CN116359833A (en) Centralized verification method, device and equipment for electric energy meter and storage medium
WO2018180163A1 (en) Fuel supply station system
TWI509460B (en) Electronic verification system and its method
KR101417825B1 (en) Method of verification of electronic filing document and apparatuse for using the same
JP2007147471A (en) Airtightness test management system, mobile device for airtightness test, computer for airtightness test management, and airtightness test management method
Kiayias et al. An Authentication and Ballot Layout Attack Against an Optical Scan Voting Terminal.
CN112434609B (en) Test reagent use track tracing method based on block chain
US20220349769A1 (en) Cryptographic transducer calibration system for hose assembly test benches
CN116629903B (en) Commodity anti-counterfeiting Internet of things traceability recognition system based on blockchain data
Orman Online voting: we can do it!(we have to)
CN116362688A (en) Digital verification method and system for metering appliance
Vollan Observing electronic voting
WO2023095832A1 (en) Inspection method for exhaust gas analysis device, inspection device, and inspection system
KR102162764B1 (en) Resource trading system based on blockchain data

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20090630

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20110812

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110823

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20111012

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20120313

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120510

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120605

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120706

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150713

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5038665

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R371 Transfer withdrawn

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R371

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313115

S803 Written request for registration of cancellation of provisional registration

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313803

RD99 Written request for registration of restore

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313D99

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

RD05 Notification of revocation of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R3D05

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250