JP4800449B1 - Evaluation apparatus, evaluation method and evaluation program for corporate activities - Google Patents

Abstract

Provided is a technique for appropriately evaluating a company activity based on a YK value indicated by a combination of a target value of corporate performance and a target value of a KAITEKI index.
A method for evaluating a corporate activity, which receives an input of a performance target value and a performance value for a target value of a KAITEKI index, and is represented by a combination of the performance value of the performance and the performance value of the KAITEKI index. An evaluation value for the target value of the YK value is obtained according to the achievement level of the actual value of the company, the target value of the corporate performance, the actual value of the target value of the corporate performance, the target value of the KAITEKI index, and the KAITEKI Based on the actual value with respect to the target value of the index, the predicted value of the performance after a predetermined period, the predicted value of the KAITEKI index, or the predicted value of the YK value is obtained.
[Selection] Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to a technique for evaluating corporate activities.

  Conventionally, corporate activities have been evaluated based on whether or not the corporate value indicated by the financial index has increased.

  For example, as a result of corporate activities, if the profit, asset, share, etc. have increased, the evaluation is good, and if it has not increased, the evaluation is bad.

JP 2000-20588 A JP 2001-167194 A JP 2005-182451 A

  However, when business activities are conducted in pursuit of profits only, the expansion of production directly linked to the profit increase will be promoted, and activities such as resource recycling and waste disposal that are contrary to the profit increase will be suppressed. As a result, bankruptcies such as depletion of natural resources and environmental pollution will be caused, making it difficult to continue corporate activities.

  For this reason, it has become necessary to carry out sustainable corporate activities without limiting the environmental burden caused by corporate activities and without causing bankruptcies. For example, when wood is used as a raw material, the use of recycled raw materials or afforestation keeps the amount of resources by antagonizing the amount of felled wood and the amount of afforestation, enabling sustainable use.

  On the other hand, in order to reduce the burden on the environment, it is not a little expensive to establish a recycling system or introduce a waste treatment facility. Even if the cost for this environment makes it impossible for the company to continue its business activities without profits, it may not be a sustainable corporate activity.

  In addition to environmental considerations, companies need to have a social responsibility to provide health and comfort to all stakeholders (stakeholders: consumers, investors, etc., and society as a whole). .

  Therefore, the applicant proposes to carry out sustainable corporate activities while maintaining a balance between corporate performance and social responsibility.

  And in order to achieve this, the target value of the company's performance and the target value on social responsibility different from the target value of this performance (hereinafter referred to as KAITEKI index. Synonymous with MOS (Management of Sustainability).) A technology for appropriately evaluating corporate activities based on the corporate value (YK value) indicated by the combination of

In order to solve the above problems, the evaluation apparatus of the present invention provides:
An evaluation device for corporate activities,
A storage unit for storing a target value of a corporate value (YK value) indicated by a combination of a target value of a corporate performance and a target value of a KAITEKI index that is a target value for social responsibility different from the target value of the business performance;
An input receiving unit that receives input of the actual value of the achievement and the actual value of the KAITEKI index, or the actual value of the YK value;
An evaluation value is calculated according to the achievement level of the actual value with respect to the target value of the YK value, or the achievement level of the actual value of the YK value indicated by a combination of the actual value of the achievement and the actual value of the KAITEKI index is reached with respect to the target value. An evaluation unit that obtains an evaluation value in response,
Based on the target value of the corporate performance, the actual value with respect to the target value of the corporate performance, the target value of the KAITEKI index, and the actual value with respect to the target value of the KAITEKI index, A prediction unit for obtaining a predicted value of the KAITEKI index or a predicted value of the YK value;
An output unit for outputting the evaluation value,
The target value of the KAITEKI index is the target value for sustainability of corporate activities, the target value to suppress the environmental impact of corporate activities to a sustainable level, and the corporate activities are comfortable as the target value of comfort Including values that include targets that contribute to sex,
The sustainability target value includes an environmental load reduction target value and a resource consumption suppression target value,
The target value for comfort includes a target value for sales of products that contribute to comfort, a target value for satisfaction with stakeholders, and a target value for safety,
The input receiving unit receives an input of an expected arrival time of the target value of the YK value,
The evaluation unit obtains an evaluation value related to the YK value at the scheduled arrival time,
When the actual value of the received YK value deviates from the target value of the YK value,
The prediction unit obtains a combination of a performance value of a performance that is a performance value of a YK value after a predetermined period and a performance value of a KAITEKI index, and calculates a target value of the YK value after the predetermined period and a YK value after the predetermined period. Each of the target value of the performance after a predetermined period and the target value of the KAITEKI index are changed so that the deviation from the actual value is small.

Moreover, in order to solve the said subject, the evaluation method of this invention is the following.
YK from the storage unit storing the target value of the corporate value (YK value) indicated by the combination of the target value of the corporate performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index which is a target value for social responsibility different from the target value of the business performance Reading the value;
Receiving the actual value for the target value of the achievement and the target value of the KAITEKI index or the target value of the YK value;
Obtaining an evaluation value according to the degree of achievement of the actual value of the YK value with respect to the target value of the YK value, or the degree of achievement of the actual value of the YK value indicated by a combination of the actual value of the achievement and the actual value of the KAITEKI index And obtaining an evaluation value for the target value of the YK value according to
Based on the target value of the corporate performance, the actual value with respect to the target value of the corporate performance, the target value of the KAITEKI index, and the actual value with respect to the target value of the KAITEKI index, a predicted value of the business performance after a predetermined period, KAITEKI Obtaining a predicted value of the index or a predicted value of the YK value;
Outputting the evaluation value;
The computer runs,
The target value of the KAITEKI index is the target value for sustainability of corporate activities, the target value to suppress the environmental impact of corporate activities to a sustainable level, and the corporate activities are comfortable as the target value of comfort Including values that include targets that contribute to sex,
The sustainability target value includes an environmental load reduction target value and a resource consumption suppression target value,
The target value for comfort includes a target value for sales of products that contribute to comfort, a target value for satisfaction with stakeholders, and a target value for safety,
In the step of receiving the input, an input of an expected arrival time of the target value of the YK value is received,
In the step of obtaining the evaluation value, the evaluation value related to the YK value is obtained at the scheduled arrival time,
When the actual value of the received YK value deviates from the target value of the YK value,
In the step of obtaining the predicted value, a combination of the actual value of the result that is the actual value of the YK value after the predetermined period and the actual value of the KAITEKI index is obtained, and the target value of the YK value after the predetermined period and the predetermined value Each of the target value of the performance after a predetermined period and the target value of the KAITEKI index are changed so that the difference between the actual value of the YK value and the actual value is small.

  Further, the present invention may be an evaluation program that causes a computer to execute the evaluation method. Furthermore, the present invention may be one in which this evaluation program is recorded on a computer-readable recording medium. The function can be provided by causing the computer to read and execute the program of the recording medium.

  Here, the computer-readable recording medium refers to a recording medium that accumulates information such as data and programs by electrical, magnetic, optical, mechanical, or chemical action and can be read from the computer. . Examples of such a recording medium that can be removed from the computer include a flexible disk, a magneto-optical disk, a CD-ROM, a CD-R / W, a DVD, a DAT, an 8 mm tape, and a memory card.

  Further, there are a hard disk, a ROM (read only memory), and the like as a recording medium fixed to the computer.

  The present invention provides a technique for appropriately evaluating a company activity based on a YK value indicated by a combination of a target value of business performance of a company and a target value of a KAITEKI index.

Schematic diagram of corporate activity evaluation equipment Illustration of the evaluation method The figure which shows the example of score distribution of KAITEKI index The figure which shows the example of calculation of the score according to the achievement level A diagram showing the relationship between the estimated time of arrival and the target value Explanatory diagram of target reduction processing Explanatory diagram of evaluation at affiliated companies Explanatory diagram of weighting by affiliated company Diagram showing the predicted achievement rate of sustainability indicators, health indicators, and comfort indicators Figure showing transition of forecast achievement rate of FIG. Flowchart of processing method in correction processing 4 Flow chart of processing for selecting an index to be improved according to selection conditions Flowchart of processing method in correction processing 5 FIG. 13 is a flowchart of index selection processing to be corrected. Explanatory diagram of probability density function The figure which shows an example of an increment rate table Explanatory drawing of a modified example of the probability density function Flowchart of processing method in correction processing 1 Diagram showing correlation between stock price and KAITEKI index

  The best mode for carrying out the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. The configuration of the following embodiment is an exemplification, and the present invention is not limited to the configuration of the embodiment.

<Embodiment 1>
FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of a corporate activity evaluation apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, the evaluation apparatus 1 includes an arithmetic processing unit 12 including a central processing unit (CPU) and a main memory in a main body, a storage unit (hard disk) 13 that stores data and software for arithmetic processing, It is a general computer provided with an input / output port 14, a communication control unit (CCU: Communication Control Unit) 15, and the like.

  An input device such as a keyboard, a mouse, a CD-ROM drive, and an output device such as a display device or a printer are appropriately connected to the input / output port 14.

  The CCU 15 communicates with other computers via a network.

  An operating system (OS) and application software (evaluation program, etc.) are installed in the storage unit 13. In addition, the storage unit 13 has a corporate value indicated by a combination of a target value of a corporate performance (hereinafter referred to as a corporate performance) and a target value of a KAITEKI index that is a target value for social responsibility different from the target value of the corporate performance. The target value of (YK value) is stored.

  The arithmetic processing unit 12 includes a CPU, a memory, and the like, and appropriately reads out and executes the OS and application programs from the storage unit 13 and receives information input from the input / output port 14 and the CCU 15 and information read from the storage unit 13. By performing arithmetic processing, it also functions as an input reception unit, an evaluation unit, and an output unit.

  As this input reception unit, the target value of the corporate performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index or the actual value of the target value of the YK value are input from another computer via the input device connected to the input / output port 14 or the CCU 15. Receive input.

  The target value of the KAITEKI index is a target value for sustainability of corporate activities to suppress the environmental impact of corporate activities to a sustainable level, and a corporate activity value for comfort. May include a value that includes a goal that contributes to comfort, and may further include a value that indicates a goal of the degree of contribution to the health of corporate activities as a health target value.

  In addition, the target value of sustainability usually includes at least one of the target value of the environmental load reduction amount and the target value of the resource consumption suppression amount. It is preferable to include a target value related to CSR.

  Furthermore, the target value of comfort usually includes a target value of the reliability of the company, and further includes at least one of a target value of sales of a product that contributes comfortably and a target value of satisfaction of stakeholders. Is preferred. It is also preferable to include a sales target value, a stakeholder satisfaction target value, and a safety target value that the comfort target value contributes comfortably to.

  The health target value preferably includes at least one of a target value of contribution to disease healing and a target value related to prevention / early detection, and further includes a target value of medical cost reduction.

The evaluation unit obtains an evaluation value according to the degree of achievement of the actual value of the YK value with respect to the target value of the YK value, or the YK value indicated by a combination of the actual value of the company performance and the actual value of the KAITEKI index The evaluation value for the target value of the YK value is obtained according to the achievement level of the actual value.

  In addition, when the arrival schedule time of YK value is input, an evaluation part calculates | requires an evaluation value in this arrival schedule time. Further, the evaluation unit may perform evaluation on a specific day such as the end of the month or the end of the fiscal year, or on a regular basis, in addition to the scheduled arrival time.

  The forecasting unit includes a target value for the corporate performance, a performance value for the target value of the corporate performance, a target value for the KAITEKI index, and a performance value for the target value of the KAITEKI index. Predicted value, predicted value of KAITEKI index, or predicted value of YK value. The actual value used by the prediction unit may be an evaluation result (evaluation value, score) by the evaluation unit in addition to the actual value (input value) received by the input reception unit.

  The output unit controls the evaluation value obtained by the evaluation unit, the actual value predicted by the prediction unit, and the like to be displayed on the display device, printed from the printer, and transmitted to another computer.

<Evaluation methods>
FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of an evaluation method executed by the evaluation apparatus 1 that is a computer according to an evaluation program.

  When the evaluation device 1 receives an activation instruction by a user operation or the like, the arithmetic processing unit 12 reads out and executes the evaluation program from the storage unit 13 and starts the processing of FIG.

  First, the input receiving unit receives the actual value of the company performance and the actual value of the KAITEKI index, the actual value of the YK value, and the date when these actual values are obtained, and stores them in the storage unit 13 or the memory (step S1). ). The actual value and date may be input by the user by operating an input device such as a keyboard, or may receive data input from another system. For example, corporate performance receives financial statement data from an ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system. Note that the input receiving unit is not limited to receiving data sent from another device, but may be one that accesses a database or the like of another system and reads and acquires the data.

  Note that the input accepting unit, for the first time of startup or initial setting, etc., starts the evaluation period, the target value of the company performance, the target value of the KAITEKI index, the target value of the YK value, the expected arrival time of these target values, etc. Is stored in the storage unit 13. Here, the target value of the YK value may be directly input, but may be obtained based on the target value of the company performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index.

  Next, the arithmetic processing unit 12 determines whether or not the current date and time has reached a predetermined time limit (date for evaluation) (step S2). If the predetermined time limit has not been reached, the process ends (step S2, No), and if the current date has reached the predetermined time limit (step S2, Yes), the process proceeds to step S3.

  The evaluation unit reads the target value of the YK value from the storage unit 13, and obtains an evaluation value according to the achievement level of the actual value with respect to the target value of the YK value (step S3). For example, when the actual value of the YK value is input in step S1, the achievement is obtained by dividing the actual value of the YK value by the target value. If the achievement is 20% or less, 1 point, if it is 40% or less Evaluation is performed according to a predetermined table such as two points.

When the actual value of the company performance and the actual value of the KAITEKI index are input in step S1, the evaluation unit obtains the actual value of the YK value indicated by the combination of the actual value of the company performance and the actual value of the KAITEKI index. . For example, each achievement value is divided by the target value to obtain the achievement level. If the achievement level is 20% or less, 1 point is scored, and if it is 40% or less, the score is given according to a predetermined table. And the score of the KAITEKI index are totaled to obtain the actual value of the YK value. Then, the achievement value is obtained by dividing the actual value of the YK value by the target value, and the evaluation is performed according to a predetermined table in the same manner as described above.

  Here, the evaluation unit may correct the evaluation of the YK value according to the balance between the actual value of the company performance and the actual value of the KAITEKI index.

For example, the ratio between the actual value of the company performance and the actual value of the KAITEKI index is a predetermined ratio (8:
2,7: 3 etc.), the coefficient is multiplied so that the evaluation becomes lower.

  In addition, the coefficient is multiplied so that the evaluation becomes lower as the increase rate of the actual value of the company performance is farther from the increase rate of the actual value of the KAITEKI index.

  Also, multiply the coefficient so that the evaluation increases as the rate of increase in the actual value of the corporate performance and the increase in the actual value of the KAITEKI index is higher than the average value, and the coefficient so that the evaluation decreases as the average value decreases. . As the average value, an average value in the same industry and an average value in related companies are input via the input receiving unit. As a result, the evaluation can be made in consideration of economic trends.

  Next, the prediction unit reads the target value and actual value of the company performance, and the target value and actual value of the KAITEKI index from the storage unit 13 and the memory, and based on these target value and actual value, the YK value after a predetermined period is read. The actual value is predicted (step S4).

  Further, the prediction unit changes the target value of the corporate performance after the predetermined period and the target value of the KAITEKI index so that the target value of the YK value after the predetermined period matches the actual value of the YK value after the predetermined period. (Step S5).

  And the evaluation value calculated | required by the evaluation part, the predicted performance value, the changed target value, etc. are output (step S6).

<Evaluation process>
Next, the KAITEKI index evaluation process in step S3 will be specifically described. In addition, since a well-known technique can be utilized about the evaluation process of a company performance, concrete description is abbreviate | omitted.

  In this embodiment, the KAITEKI index is a target value (hereinafter abbreviated as “sustainability index”) as a target value for sustainability of corporate activities in order to suppress the environmental impact of corporate activities to a sustainable level. A value indicating the goal of the contribution of corporate activities to health (hereinafter abbreviated as a health index) as a target value for health, and a value that includes targets for the extent to which corporate activities contribute to comfort as a target value for comfort (hereinafter referred to as a health target value) , Abbreviated as comfort index). Each index has a plurality of items, and when this item is satisfied, points are added, and this score is totaled to obtain an index.

Sustainability indicators are indicators that aim to contribute to the maintenance of the global environment.
(S-1) related to our production activities,
(S-2) Products related,
(S-3) Examples include materials related to procurement of raw materials.

  Here, (S-1) Relevant to our own production activities are to switch to environmentally conscious raw fuel, to increase the efficiency of resources and energy by improving the efficiency of the production process, recycling Suppressing the generation of environmentally hazardous substances such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, dust, etc. (S-2) Examples include reducing energy consumption at customers by manufacturing and selling products, and reducing resource consumption by reducing replacement demand by extending the life of products. (S-3) Raw materials, etc. In relation to the procurement of raw materials, the usage rate of raw fuel with a low carbon footprint is increased, the usage rate of raw fuel manufactured from renewable materials is increased, Eco Mark products are used, To raise friendly raw materials, and the like.

  One of these indicators can be adopted as a sustainability indicator, or multiple indicators can be adopted in a balanced manner to form a sustainability indicator as a whole. It is preferable to suppress the generation amount, improve energy use efficiency, promote recycling, and more preferably employ two or more of these. Rather than limiting to a single indicator, it is preferable to combine multiple indicators in a balanced manner. In this case, if the type of business is the manufacturing industry, there will be one each related to production activities and one related to products. It is preferable to use the above, and it is more preferable to add a thing related to procurement.

  Some CSR activities are called CSR (corporate social responsibility) activities. These include not only the contents related to the global environment but also elements such as human rights. It may be added inside.

  Examples of combinations of these include, for example, sustainability indicators, reduction of environmentally hazardous substances, suppression of carbon dioxide emissions at customers through products, improvement in the use of raw fuel made from renewable materials, production It is possible to use high process efficiency. Each of these indicators separately sets a target value to be achieved and a plan for achieving the target value.

As a specific target value setting, for example, for the sustainability index item S-1, a reduction target value is set as follows.
1. Greenhouse gas 2 million tons 2. NOx (nitrogen oxide) 2,000 tons SOx (sulfur oxide) 5 tons 4. Dust 50 tons 5. PRTR survey target substances 200 tons Points are calculated according to the proportion of these conditions.

  Health index is an index for the purpose of contributing to the ability of people to have a healthy life. Specifically, it contributes to the improvement of fertility rate, promotes development and public health, promotes health maintenance, Promote preventive activities, promote centralization of physical information, promote early detection of diseases, improve the cure rate of intractable diseases, contribute to reduction of medical expenses, improve medical environment, support medical education , Contribute to the recovery of physical function, promote anti-aging, and contribute to the provision of safe food.

  One of these indicators can be adopted as a health indicator, or a plurality of indicators can be adopted in a balanced manner and used as a health indicator as a whole. Rather than limiting to a single indicator, it is preferable to combine multiple indicators in a balanced manner. If the business form of the business is a pharmaceutical business, promote health maintenance, promote preventive activities, and improve the cure rate for intractable diseases. It is preferable to use at least one of improving and contributing to the reduction of medical expenses.

As a more specific example, for example, the condition H-1 of the health index is set as follows.
1. Increase in the number of treatment dissatisfaction times the number of patients on medication (treatment dissatisfaction level = 1-treatment satisfaction)
2. Increase the number of patients with designated intractable diseases who receive medication. Scores are calculated according to the proportion of these conditions.

  The comfort index is an index that aims to contribute to providing a more comfortable life for people. Add.

  Specific examples of comfort indicators include products and services with improved convenience, products and services with improved durability and stability, and functions that are directly related to products and services. Offering more fulfilling products and services, offering products and services that meet diverse requirements, offering products and services that feel more comfortable with the five senses, such as those with good touch, providing clean or clean products, and peace of mind In addition to providing products / services that can be felt, there are measures to reduce the time required to provide these products / services, such as an increase in the percentage of new products.

  In addition, indicators related to the improvement of satisfaction and elimination of dissatisfaction with companies affected by companies are examples of comfort indicators. For example, in order to increase shareholder satisfaction, stock prices, market capitalization, dividend rates, etc. are improved. In order to increase customer satisfaction, reduce the incidence of complaints, increase the speed of response to complaints, increase the consumption rate of paid leave, increase the rate of taking childcare leave to increase employee satisfaction And improve indicators related to the work environment. There is a ranking by private research organizations regarding the degree of satisfaction of companies involved. For example, “NICES” by Nikkei Research Inc. can be raised, but improving this ranking can also be cited as an example of an index.

  In addition, examples of indicators include reducing the incidence of environmental accidents such as personal injury, accidents that stop operations, and leakage, confirming product safety, and publicizing the results.

  One of these indicators can be adopted as a comfort indicator, or multiple indicators can be adopted in a well-balanced manner and used as a comfort indicator as a whole. It is preferable to improve the ranking and reduce the accident rate. It is preferable to combine multiple indicators in a balanced manner rather than limiting to one indicator. In that case, indicators directly related to products and services, indicators related to improvement of satisfaction of affected parties affected by companies, and resolution of dissatisfaction It is preferable to use. An example of a combination of these is, for example, a combination of an improvement in the ratio of new products to the whole, an improvement in rankings during the private research period, and a reduction in the incidence of accidents. Each of these indicators separately sets a target value to be achieved and a plan for achieving the target value.

As a more specific example, the condition for the comfort index item C-2 is set as follows.
1. Shareholder satisfaction Increase the ratio of your stock price to the average stock price. (20% of the standard time (for example, September 2010))
2. Stakeholder satisfaction Improve survey company lineking 20th.
3. Employee Satisfaction Manage the male / female ratio of management posts closer to 1: 1.
Increase the percentage of foreign employees to a specified value or higher.
Overtime hours shall be less than the prescribed value.
The score is calculated according to the ratio satisfying these conditions.

  FIG. 3 shows the score distribution of each index. In FIG. 3, the final target value of each index is 100 points, and 33 or 34 points are allocated to each item. That is, the KAITEKI index is evaluated with a maximum score of 300 points.

FIG. 4 shows a calculation example of the score according to the achievement level.
For example, since the achievement level of the item S-1 is 40%, it is set to 14 points, which is 40% of the 34 distribution points. Moreover, since the achievement level of the item H-2 is 50%, it is set to 16.5 points, which is 50% of the 33 distribution points. In this way, the score of each item is obtained and integrated. In the example of FIG. 4, the sustainability index is 40 points, the health index is 50 points, the comfort index is 30 points, and the total KAITEKI index is 120 points.

<Prediction process>
Next, the prediction process of step S4 will be described.
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the relationship between the scheduled arrival time and the target value. In FIG. 5, a bar graph S indicates a sustainability index, a bar graph H indicates a health index, a bar graph C indicates a comfort index, and these are all shown as a line graph. In FIG. 5, the horizontal axis represents the year, the left vertical axis represents the sustainability index, health index, and comfort index, and the right vertical axis represents the overall score. In FIG. 5, fiscal 2010 is set as the evaluation start time, and fiscal 2015 is set as the scheduled arrival time, that is, the time for achieving the target value of 300 points. For example, in FIG. 5, it is assumed that the KAITEKI index increases linearly from the evaluation start time to the scheduled arrival time, and when it is 50 points at the start of evaluation, it increases every year by 20% of the difference from the target value of 300 points. Thus, the intermediate target value of the KAITEKI index is set.

  In addition, in FIG. 5, although the intermediate target is shown for every year, you may show for every arbitrary periods, such as a half year, a quarter, a month, and a week. At this time, the time when the intermediate target is set is the predetermined period determined in step S2.

  When the intermediate target is set in this way and the operator operates the input device connected to the input / output port 14 to input the value (target value) and time of the intermediate target, the input receiving unit of the evaluation apparatus 1 The input is received and stored in the storage unit 13.

  Then, when the KAITEKI index is calculated at each time when the intermediate target is set in step S3 in FIG. 2, the predicting unit is based on the KAITEKI index and the target value read from the storage unit 13 after a predetermined period. Predict actual values.

  For example, the amount of change from the previous year is obtained for the KAITEKI index for a certain year, and the actual value after a predetermined period is calculated by multiplying this amount of change by the period. Thereby, for example, the actual value after the next fiscal year can be predicted. Note that the present invention is not limited to the prediction that changes in a linear function, and may be predicted so as to change based on a predetermined function by taking a change amount in a plurality of periods.

  In addition, when the actual value of the corporate performance exceeds the target, the predetermined value is predicted so that the predicted value of the KAITEKI index is added, and when the actual value of the corporate performance is lower than the target, the predicted value of the KAITEKI index is decreased. The KAITEKI index may be predicted together with the actual value of the company performance such as multiplying the value.

<Target correction processing>
[Correction process 1]
FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram of the target correction process. In FIG. 6, the target value of the KAITEKI index is set at every predetermined time and is the same as that shown in FIG. 5, and the target value of the company performance is set at every predetermined time.

When the actual value of the received YK value deviates from the target value of the YK value,
The prediction unit obtains a combination of a result value of a result that is a result value of a YK value after a predetermined period and a result value of a KAITEKI index,
Whether to change each of the target value of the performance after the predetermined period and the target value of the KAITEKI index so that the difference between the target value of the YK value after the predetermined period and the actual value of the YK value after the predetermined period becomes small Or the target value of the YK value is changed.

  Although the KAITEKI index and the corporate performance target value do not necessarily have the same score distribution, in this embodiment, the target value for 2015 is set so that the balance between the KAITEKI index and the corporate performance can be intuitively grasped. The same 300 points are set. That is, the target value of the corporate performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index are set to 50 points, 100 points, 150 points, 200 points, 250 points, and 300 points from the 2010 to 2015, respectively.

  On the other hand, it is assumed that the actual value of the KAITEKI index has achieved the target from FY2010 to FY2011, but the actual value of the corporate performance is 90 points, which is below the target value of 100 points.

  If this situation continues, the actual value of the company performance will be below the target value in the next fiscal year, and the actual value of the YK value will deviate from the target value. The warning is issued so that the divergence is reduced, that is, the execution plan is revised, or after a predetermined period, for example, the divergence between the actual value of the YK value in the next year and the target value is reduced, that is, The target value of the company performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index are changed so that the YK value reaches the target value.

  For example, as described above, the actual value of 2012 is predicted based on the actual value of 2010 to 2011, and if the difference between the predicted actual value and the target value is less than a predetermined value (threshold), the target value is If it is not changed and if it is equal to or greater than the predetermined value, a warning is issued or the target value of the corporate performance, the target value of the KAITEKI index, and the target value of the YK value are changed. Alternatively, both the target value change and the warning are performed.

  As a result of issuing the warning, the execution plan is reviewed, and if it is determined that the target value does not need to be changed, the target value does not need to be changed. As a method for changing the target value when it is determined that it is difficult to achieve the target value even if the execution plan is reviewed, for example, a method as shown in FIG. 18 is conceivable.

  First, the prediction unit compares the actual value of the YK value obtained by the evaluation unit with the target value of the YK value, the actual value is below the target value, and whether or not this difference (absolute value) is equal to or greater than the threshold value L1. (S11), and if the difference between the actual value of the YK value and the target value is greater than or equal to the threshold L1 (S11, Yes), the prediction unit proceeds to the next step S12 and continues the correction process, and this difference Is less than the threshold value L1, the process is terminated.

  In step S12, the prediction unit predicts a combination of a corporate performance value (hereinafter also referred to as a predicted value) that becomes a YK value after a predetermined period and a predicted value of the KAITEKI index (S12).

  In the case of FIG. 6, the forecasting unit obtains an increase (change amount) of corporate performance for one year from 2010 to 2011 (40 points), and after a predetermined period, for example, one year later, The amount of change is added to the business performance (90 points) in 2011 for a predetermined period (1 year in this example), and the predicted value Pa of the business performance in 2012 is calculated as 130 points.

  Similarly, for the KAITEKI index, the prediction unit calculates an increase (change amount) of the KAITEKI index for one year from 2010 to 2011 (50 points), and after a predetermined period, for example, KAITEKI for 2012, which is one year later. The amount of change of the index is calculated by adding the amount of change for the predetermined period (one year in this example) to the KAITEKI index (100 points) in 2011, and the predicted value Pb of the KAITEKI index in 2012 is calculated as 150 points.

Next, the forecasting unit compares the predicted value of the corporate performance after the predetermined period and the predicted value of the KAITEKI index obtained in the previous stage with the target value of the corporate performance after the predetermined period and the target value of the KAITEKI index, respectively. A difference obtained by subtracting the predicted value is obtained, and it is determined whether either the difference in the company performance or the difference in the KAITEKI index is equal to or greater than a predetermined value (threshold value) L2 (S13).

  In the example of FIG. 6, the difference (20 points) between the predicted value Pa of the company performance and the target value Ga is obtained, and the difference of 20 points is compared with a predetermined value L2. In this example, the predetermined value L2 is 15 points, and it is determined that it is difficult to achieve the initial target value of 150 points by making the difference of 20 points equal to or greater than the predetermined value, that is, recovering the difference of 20 points.

  Similarly, the difference (0 point) between the predicted value Pb of the KAITEKI index and the target value Gb is obtained, and this difference 0 point is compared with a predetermined value L2. In this example, the difference 0 point is less than the predetermined value, and it is determined that no correction process is necessary. As a result, if any of the difference in company performance and the difference in the KAITEKI index is equal to or greater than a predetermined value (S13, Yes), the process proceeds to S14.

  In S14, the prediction unit changes the target value of the corporate performance after a predetermined period and the target value of the KAITEKI index based on the difference of the corporate performance and the difference of the KAITEKI index. And an output part outputs the target value of the corporate performance after a change, the target value of a KAITEKI parameter | index, and the target value of the YK value based on these (S15). On the other hand, when the difference is less than the threshold value L2 in step S13 (S13, No), the output unit reads: “At the current pace, the business performance and the KAITEKI index after a predetermined period become the predicted values Pa and Pb, and the target Ga, A warning that the target cannot be achieved is output, such as “Gb cannot be achieved” (S16).

  Note that the target correction process by the prediction unit is performed by the input / output port 14 or the like according to a program developed in an executable state on the main memory by the evaluation apparatus (computer) 1 having the hardware configuration illustrated in FIG. This is realized by computing information input from the CCU 15 and information read from the storage unit 13.

  Next, the target changing process in step S14 will be specifically exemplified. The target change process is not particularly limited as long as the difference between the target value and the predicted value is small, and any method may be used. In this example, one of the company performance and the KAITEKI index whose difference is equal to or greater than L2 is lowered, and the other target is raised, thereby changing the target value to be easily achieved. For example, if the difference in corporate performance is 20 points as described above, a value obtained by multiplying this difference by a predetermined coefficient, for example, 0.5 (10 points) is added to the target value Gb of the KAITEKI index to obtain the target of corporate performance. This value is subtracted from the value Ga. That is, the target value Gc of the corporate performance after the change in 2012 is 140 points, and the target value Gd of the KAITEKI index is 160 points. Thereby, the feasible target value based on the results of 2011 is reset, and the YK value of 2012 is able to achieve the target value of 300 points by carrying out corporate activities aiming at this.

On the other hand, when the difference of the KAITEKI index is not less than L2 (not shown), a value obtained by multiplying this difference by a predetermined coefficient, for example, 0.5 is added to the target value Ga of the company performance, and the target value Gb of the KAITEKI index is Decrease the value. As a result, even when the KAITEKI index does not reach the target, the target Gd of the KAITEKI index can be lowered, the target value Gc of the company performance can be changed higher, and the target value of the YK value can be easily achieved.

  In the above example, the coefficient to be multiplied by the difference is set to 0.5. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the coefficient may be another value, or may be dynamically changed based on other factors. For example, the coefficient may be changed based on an economic trend index.

  Specifically, when the business performance does not reach the target and the target value of the KAITEKI index is changed to a high value, the above-mentioned predetermined coefficient is corrected and the target value of the KAITEKI index is corrected when the economy is worsening based on the economic trend index. The value to be added to is increased, and the value to be added to the target value of the KAITEKI index is reduced in the phase where the economy is expanding. The business trend index is input via the input receiving unit every predetermined period and stored in the storage unit 13, and the prediction unit reads the business trend index from the storage unit 13 and uses it.

As the economic trend index, a diffusion index (DI) or a composite index may be used. Also, each leading index may be used or a matching index may be used.

  For example, when the company performance does not reach the target, the predetermined coefficient k multiplied by this difference is k = 1−DI. That is, the predetermined coefficient k is 0.5 when DI is 50%, the predetermined coefficient k is 0.3 when DI is 70%, and the predetermined coefficient k is 0.6 when DI is 40%. .

  On the other hand, when the KAITEKI index does not reach the target and the target value of the corporate performance is changed to a high value, when the economy is expanding based on the economic trend index, the above-mentioned predetermined coefficient is corrected and added to the target value of the corporate performance When the economy is worsening, increase the value to be added to the target value of corporate performance.

  For example, the predetermined coefficient k multiplied by the difference of the KAITEKI index is k = DI. In other words, if the DI is 70%, the difference between the KAITEKI index is multiplied by 0.7 to the corporate performance. If the DI is 30%, the difference between the KAITEKI index is multiplied by 0.3 to the corporate performance. Add.

  Thus, the possibility of achieving the target can be increased by dynamically changing the value of the predetermined coefficient k in accordance with the business trend index. For example, if DI exceeds 50%, it is an expansion phase of the economy, so growth in corporate performance can be expected. Therefore, increasing the ratio of corporate performance when changing the target increases the possibility of achieving the target. Can be increased. Also, if the DI is less than 50%, it is an economic downturn, so you can't expect much growth in corporate performance. Decrease the ratio of corporate performance when changing the target. Can be increased. Thereby, a target value can be set with high accuracy, and the accuracy as an evaluation apparatus for corporate activities is increased.

  The target value may be changed in conjunction with the stock price. For example, when the correlation between the KAITEKI index and the stock price, and the correlation between the company performance and the stock price are defined in advance, and the target value of the KAITEKI index is changed, the fluctuation amount of the stock price corresponding to the difference in the company performance is obtained. The target value of the KAITEKI index is changed so that the stock price fluctuation amount is obtained. The stock price is input via the input receiving unit every predetermined period and stored in the storage unit 13. The prediction unit reads the stock price from the storage unit 13 and uses it.

For example, every time the actual value of the KAITEKI index is announced, the actual value of the KAITEKI index and the stock price after the announcement are accumulated. FIG. 19 is a diagram showing the correlation between the KAITEKI index and the stock price. Generally, there is a positive correlation between the KAITEKI index and the stock price. When the KAITEKI index increases, the stock price increases. When the KAITEKI index decreases, the stock price also decreases. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 9, the actual value of the KAITEKI index and the stock price after the announcement are accumulated, and the correlation is defined based on the fluctuation amount ΔKa of the KAITEKI index and the fluctuation amount ΔSq of the stock price.

For example,
Stock price fluctuation amount ΔSq = KAITEKI index fluctuation amount ΔKa × coefficient f + constant α
The relational expression is defined as follows.

  Similarly, stock prices are also related to corporate performance. For example, if corporate performance increases, stock prices may increase. If corporate performance decreases, stock prices may decrease. Therefore, the relationship between the stock price and the company performance is also defined in advance and stored in the storage unit 13.

  Then, for example, when the company performance does not reach the target, the prediction unit refers to the storage unit 13 to determine the stock price fluctuation amount ΔSq corresponding to this difference from the relationship between the company performance and the stock price, that is, the company performance by this difference. When the price increases, the stock price increases.

  Further, the prediction unit obtains a fluctuation amount ΔKa of the KAITEKI index corresponding to the fluctuation amount ΔSq of the stock price based on the relational expression, and changes the fluctuation amount ΔKa to a high value in addition to the target value of the KAITEKI index. Further, the target value of the company performance may be changed to be lower by the amount of increase in the target value of the KAITEKI index. In this way, when the company performance does not reach the target, the target value of the KAITEKI index is changed to a higher value based on this difference to increase the actual value higher than the original target, and the increase in the stock price is promoted. An environment where it is easy to increase can be created, and the difference between the target value of the YK value and the predicted value can be reduced.

  On the other hand, when the KAITEKI index does not reach the target, the prediction unit refers to the storage unit 13 and from the relationship between the KAITEKI index and the stock price, the stock price fluctuation amount ΔSq corresponding to this difference, that is, the KAITEKI index increases by this difference. If the price of the stock increases.

  Further, the prediction unit obtains a fluctuation amount of the corporate performance corresponding to the fluctuation amount ΔSq of the stock price based on the correlation between the stock price and the corporate performance, and adds this fluctuation amount to the target value of the corporate performance. Further, the target value of the KAITEKI index may be changed to a lower level by increasing the target value of the company performance. In this way, when the KAITEKI index does not reach the target, the target value of the corporate performance is changed to a higher value based on this difference to increase the actual value higher than the initial target, and the decrease in the KAITEKI index is compensated for. The deviation between the target value and the predicted value can be reduced.

  In this way, by associating the KAITEKI index and corporate performance via the stock price and determining the amount of change in the target value in a complementary manner, the divergence between the target value and the predicted value of the YK value can be reduced. The accuracy as an evaluation device increases.

  Note that the change of the target value so that the difference between the actual value of the YK value and the target value becomes small is usually made based on the past results of each index. Specifically, based on past performance, the target values of the sustainability index, health index, and comfort index are taken into account by taking into account the cost fluctuation, load fluctuation, and the contribution to the YK value due to the change in the target value. As a result, the change is made so that the difference between the actual value of the KAITEKI index and the target value becomes small. Similarly, with respect to the corporate performance index, the target value is changed based on the past performance so that the difference between the actual value of each index and the target value is small. Considering these results comprehensively, the target value of the YK value indicated by the combination of the target value of the corporate performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index should be reduced from the actual value based on the past results. Is set.

  In the change of the target value, the distribution of the target value of the corporate performance and the target of the KAITEKI index is changed without changing the target value of the YK value. However, there may be an option to change the target value of the YK value. .

  For example, if the difference between the company performance and the KAITEKI index is less than the threshold value L2 in step S13, it is determined that it is not necessary to change the target value of the company performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index, and the target value of the YK value is changed. In this case, the predicted value Pc of the YK value is obtained from the predicted value Pa of the company performance and the predicted value Pb of the KAITEKI index, and the target value Ge of the YK value after a predetermined period is changed to the predicted value Pc.

  In addition, if any of the difference between the company performance and the KAITEKI index is greater than or equal to a predetermined value (threshold L3, where L3> L2) in step S13, the target value of the company performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index are also displayed. change.

  For example, when the threshold L3 is 30 points, the predicted value Pa of the corporate performance in 2012 is 110 points, and the predicted value Pb of the KAITEKI index is 150 points, the difference in corporate performance is 40 points, which exceeds the threshold L3. Therefore, the target value of the corporate performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index to be changed are obtained by setting the threshold L3 as the upper limit and regarding the difference in corporate performance as 30 points. That is, a value (15 points) obtained by multiplying the difference of 30 points in the company performance by the predetermined coefficient 0.5 is added to the target value Gb ′ of the KAITEKI index, and this value is subtracted from the target value Ga ′ of the company performance. Here, the target values Ga ′ and Gb ′ are values obtained by subtracting the value exceeding the difference threshold L3 from the initial target values Ga and Gb.

Target value Ga ′ = original target value Ga− (difference−threshold L3)
= 150- (40-30)
Target value Gb ′ = original target value Gb− (difference−threshold value L3)
However, when the difference does not exceed the threshold value, the target values Ga ′ and Gb ′ are set to the same values as the initial target values Ga and Gb.

  Accordingly, the target value Gc of the corporate performance in 2012 is changed to 125 points, and the target value Gd of the KAITEKI index is changed to 165 points. And YK value Ge290 point is calculated | required from these target values Gc and Gd, and it changes.

  Then, the prediction unit outputs the target value GC of the corporate performance after the change, the target value Gd of the KAITEKI index, and the YK value Ge (S15).

[Correction process 2]
The forecasting unit predicts the growth of the corporate performance target and the KAITEKI index from the transition of the actual value of the corporate performance in the past predetermined period and the transition of the performance of the KAITEKI index in the past predetermined period. The company performance target and the target of KAITEKI index (distribution) are set so that the YK value after a predetermined period of time matches the target value.

  In the example of FIG. 6, the increase in corporate performance from 2010 to 2011 is 40 points, the increase in the KAITEKI index is 50 points, and the KAITEKI index is larger. In other words, since the KAITEKI index can be expected to grow, when the correction is made, a predicted value of the actual value of the KAITEKI index in 2012 is obtained, and this predicted value is multiplied by a predetermined coefficient to obtain a new target value.

  For example, the actual value in 2012 is predicted to be 150 points, and this is multiplied by a predetermined coefficient, and the target value of the KAITEKI index is corrected by setting the new target value to 160 points. Then, when the corrected target value of the KAITEKI index is 160 points, the target value of the corporate performance for achieving the target value of 300 YK values is obtained as 140 points and corrected.

[Correction process 3]
The prediction unit may reset the target in consideration of practical ease of achievement of each item. For example, if the CO2 reduction target cannot be achieved with regard to the greenhouse gas of the sustainability index, the reduction target can be achieved by making capital investment, but there is a problem that it takes a lot of cost, and it is difficult to achieve.

  On the other hand, regarding the comfort index, bringing the ratio of management posts, which is employee satisfaction, close to 1: 1 is low in cost and easy to achieve if there are appropriate personnel.

  Therefore, the target value is corrected by preliminarily digitizing the achievability of each item and holding it in a table or the like, selecting an item with high achievability and achieving it ahead of schedule (next year).

For example, if the CO2 reduction target cannot be achieved, the goal is to bring the male / female ratio of management posts closer to 1: 1 instead. For example, if the reduction of CO2 is achieved,
The ratio between the profit recorded in the previous fiscal year and the required capital investment is input, and if this ratio is equal to or greater than a predetermined value, it is determined that the item can be achieved, and if it is less than the predetermined value, it is determined that the item cannot be achieved. Also, if it is an item that brings the management post to a male / female ratio close to 1: 1, the number of people that can be promoted to the management post from the personnel database is read by gender, and whether or not the male / female ratio can be made close to 1: 1. judge.

When selecting an achievable item, the item to be selected may be determined according to the score allocated to each item. For example, 20 points are achieved when CO2 reduction is achieved, 10 points when the gender ratio approaches 1: 1, and 10 points when the average overtime is reduced. If CO2 reduction cannot be achieved, the gender ratio is 1: 1. The goal is modified to compensate by achieving items that are closer and items that reduce average overtime hours.

  Thus, by changing the target value of the next year, the actual value of the next year can be easily matched with the target value.

[Correction process 4]
As a result of calculating the KAITEKI index as described above, if the target value has not been reached, further investment can be performed to increase the achievement rate of the KAITEKI index in the next fiscal year and make corrections.

  FIG. 9 is a diagram showing the predicted achievement rate of the sustainability index, health index, and comfort index, and FIG. 10 is a graph showing the transition of the predicted achievement rate of FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 9, for each detailed item of each index, score distribution, expected achievement rate, correction cost, and certainty of improvement are set, and the operator inputs these as target values to the evaluation device 1, and the evaluation device 1 Is stored in the storage unit 13 as a data table in which the detailed items of each index are associated with parameters such as achievement rate, correction cost, reliability of improvement, and the like. That is, the storage unit 13 of this example also serves as a parameter storage unit.

  In this example, as shown in FIG. 9, the target value (expected achievement rate or score), correction cost, and certainty of improvement are set for each detailed item of each indicator, but the sustainability indicator, health indicator, comfort indicator You may set for every arbitrary unit of each parameter | index, such as for each parameter | index, or each item S-1 to S-3, H-1 to H-3, and C-1 to C-3 of each parameter | index.

  In this example, S-1-1 of the detailed items in the sustainability index is a reduction in the emission of environmentally hazardous substances, S-1-2 is a reduction in CO2 through the product, and S-2-1 is a renewable raw fuel. S2-2 is reduction of the use of rare metals, S-2-3 is resource saving and energy saving, S-3 is strengthening CSR activities through procurement of raw materials and materials.

  In addition, H-1 which is a detailed item in the health index is a contribution to disease healing (reciprocal of treatment satisfaction x number of patients), and H-2 is a contribution to improvement of QOL (a disease with low treatment satisfaction (cancer is difficult to cure). Increase in the range of products covered by drugs (expansion of new drugs, indication expansion, addition of dosage forms, etc.)), H-3-1 contributes to prevention (number of vaccine administration), H-3-2 Contributes to early detection (number of tests, number of diagnoses).

  Furthermore, C-1-1 of detailed items in the comfort index is sales of comfort products (products that provide comfort), C-1-2 is the rate of new product (ratio of new products), and C-2-1 is external. Ranking improvement in company ranking survey, C-2-2 is improvement of employee satisfaction (paid leave acquisition rate, female manager ratio, etc.), and C-3 is suppression of accident occurrence rate.

  When the evaluation unit calculates the KAITEKI index as described above and the target value shown in FIGS. 9 and 10 has not been reached, the prediction unit adds to improve the KAITEKI index as shown in FIG. Ask for an investment proposal.

  First, the prediction unit reads the amount of profit from the actual value of the company performance stored in the storage unit 13, and determines the total amount of this profit or a predetermined ratio as the investment amount (S20).

  Next, the prediction unit selects a detailed item of an index to be improved according to a predetermined selection condition (S22). Here, the predetermined selection conditions include, for example, a low correction cost, a small variation in improvement certainty, and an expected improvement result not exceeding a predetermined value of the target value.

  The prediction unit obtains an amount of money necessary to improve the achievement rate or score of the selected item of the selected index by a predetermined unit, and subtracts this from the investment amount (S23). The predetermined unit can be arbitrarily set, for example, 0.5%, 1%, 3%, etc. for the achievement rate, 0.5 points, 1, 5 points, etc. for the score. For example, when the index S-1-1 is 16 points (80%), to improve by 1 point as a predetermined unit and to 17 points, the distribution is 20 points, so it is necessary to achieve an achievement rate of 85% is there. Therefore, the cost of 5 billion yen to improve the achievement rate of 5% is subtracted from the investment amount. In addition, if it improves 0.5% as a predetermined unit, 500 million yen will be subtracted from the investment amount if it will improve 3%.

  Then, the prediction unit determines whether or not the investment amount has been eliminated by the subtraction. If the investment amount remains (S24, No), the prediction unit determines whether or not the KAITEKI index has reached the target value (S25). ).

  If the KAITEKI index does not reach the target value even if the achievement rate or score in a predetermined unit is added to the detailed item of the index selected in step S22 (S25, No), the process returns to step S22, and steps S22 and S23 are repeated. When the KAITEKI index reaches the target value by repeating this process (S25, Yes), the prediction unit outputs a list of the detailed items of the index selected in step S22 and the investment amount of the detailed items as a report (S26). ), The process is terminated. Here, the output includes display on a display device, printing on a paper medium by a printer, transmission by another computer, and the like.

  FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram of processing for selecting an index to be improved according to the selection condition in step S22.

First, each index set, that is, a sustainability index set Si = {S-1-1, S-1-2, S-2-1, S-2-2, S-2-3, S-3}. , A set of health indices Hi = {H−
1, H-2, H-3-1, H-3-2}, a set of comfort indices Ci = C-1-1, C-1-2, C-2-1, C-2-2, C -3} exclude those that are not to be improved (S201). For example, an object that reaches a predetermined number of times such as 1.2 times or 1.4 times the target value is excluded. Further, when the investment amount of each of the sustainability index, the health index, and the comfort index reaches a predetermined number of times the investment amount of other indexes, this index is excluded.

  Of the remaining indices not excluded in S201, the index with the lowest correction cost is selected (S202). In order to distribute the investment amount in a balanced manner among the sustainability index, health index, and comfort index, as shown in FIG. 11, when the index selection (S22) and the investment amount subtraction (S23) are repeated. , Change the set of indicators to be selected. For example, if the indicator with the lowest correction cost is selected from the set of sustainability indicators, the next indicator to be repeated will select the indicator with the lowest correction cost from the set of health indicators, and the next time it will be repeated, The index with the lowest correction cost is selected from the set.

If a plurality of indicators with the same correction cost are selected in step S202, the one with the smallest deviation in improvement certainty is selected (S203).
As a result, each index can be selected in a well-balanced manner, and additional investment can be appropriately allocated.

  In order to improve the KAITEKI index so that it approaches the target value in this way, by providing a report that shows how much additional investment should be made for which index, support to determine the management policy for the next fiscal year Can do.

  Further, by repeating the allocation of the additional investment for each predetermined unit according to the predetermined selection condition, the additional investment can be optimally allocated within the profit range.

  In this example, the report is output only when the target can be achieved within the investment amount (S25, Yes). However, when the investment amount disappears (S24, Yes), the process proceeds to step S26, and A report may be output. Thereby, support for efficiently allocating a small investment amount can be performed.

[Correction process 5]
In this example, compared with the correction process 4 described above, a process in which an operator inputs a desired reliability and determines an investment distribution based on the cost when correction is performed with the reliability is different.

  FIG. 13 is an explanatory diagram of the correction process 5, and FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram of the index selection process to be corrected in FIG.

  First, the prediction unit reads the amount of profit from the actual value of the company performance stored in the storage unit 13, and determines the total amount of this profit or a predetermined ratio as the investment amount (S20).

  The prediction unit displays the investment amount on a display device and displays a message prompting the input of the reliability (P). When the operator operates the input device to input the reliability (P), the prediction unit receives this and stores it in the storage unit 13 (S21).

  Next, the prediction unit selects a detailed item of an index to be improved according to a predetermined selection condition (S22). Here, the predetermined selection condition is to obtain the cost of each index according to the reliability (P) input as described later, and to select the one with the low cost.

  Further, the prediction unit obtains an amount of money required to improve the achievement rate or score of the index by a predetermined unit using the cost of the selected index, and subtracts this from the investment amount (S23).

  Then, the prediction unit determines whether or not the investment amount has been eliminated by the subtraction. If the investment amount remains (S24, No), the prediction unit determines whether or not the KAITEKI index has reached the target value (S25). ).

  If the KAITEKI index does not reach the target value even if the achievement rate or score in a predetermined unit is added to the detailed item of the index selected in step S22 (S25, No), the process returns to step S22, and steps S22 and S23 are repeated. When the KAITEKI index reaches the target value by repeating this process (S25, Yes), the prediction unit outputs a list of the detailed items of the index selected in step S22 and the investment amount of the detailed items as a report (S26). ), The process is terminated. Here, the output includes display on a display device, printing on a paper medium by a printer, transmission by another computer, and the like.

  FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram of the process of selecting an index to be improved according to the selection condition in step S22.

  First, each index set, that is, a sustainability index set Si = {S-1-1, S-1-2, S-2-1, S-2-2, S-2-3, S-3}. , Health index set Hi = {H-1, H-2, H-3-1, H-3-2}, comfort index set Ci = C-1-1, C-1-2, C-2 -1, C-2-2, C-3} are excluded from those not to be improved (S211). For example, an object that reaches a predetermined number of times such as 1.2 times or 1.4 times the target value is excluded. Further, when the investment amount of each of the sustainability index, the health index, and the comfort index reaches a predetermined number of times the investment amount of other indexes, this index is excluded.

For the remaining indices not excluded in S211, the correction cost Co (FIG. 9) is read from the database in the storage unit 13 (S212). For example, in the example of FIG. 9, the correction cost Co of the index S-1-1 is 1 billion yen per 1%.
Further, an increment rate Fi corresponding to the input reliability (P) is determined for the correction cost Co of each index (S213).

At this time, the increment rate Fi can be obtained by a probability density function as shown in FIG. In FIG. 15, the horizontal axis represents the increment rate Fi, and the value obtained by integrating the area of the graph indicates the reliability (P). That is, the probability of an increment rate of 1.0 is the lowest, and the reliability increases as the increment rate increases. In the example of FIG. 15, the increment rate Fi of 68% reliability is 1.2 times, and the reliability of 80% reliability is 1.4 times.
The increment rate Fi at the reliability (P) can be defined as follows.

  If f (x) is given by an empirical formula, the integral calculation may be performed according to Σf (xi) Δxi. If distribution data is stored in a table in the form of a histogram, the same calculation may be performed with the width of the horizontal axis of the histogram being Δxi and the number of samples being f (xi).

FIG. 15 shows each index, for example, sustainability index S-1-1, S-1-2, S-2-1, S-2-2, S-2-3, S-3, health index H-. 1, H-2, H-3-1, H-3-2, Comfort index C-1-1, C-1-2, C-2-1, C-2-2, C-3
For example, the horizontal axis represents the rate of change between the estimated cost that is predicted to improve the predetermined unit and the cost that was actually required to improve the predetermined unit, that is, the incremental rate of the correction cost, and the number of samples is the vertical axis. It is a collected example. For example, the rate of change of the cost actually required with respect to the predicted cost in increments of 0.1, such as the horizontal axis 1 to 1.1, 1.1 to 1.2, 1.2 to 1.3. It is better to collect a sample number of the number of investment times and create a histogram. Then, a distribution function as shown in FIG. 15 may be obtained as a curve approximating the histogram.

  The distribution function may be obtained by an empirical formula (for example, a polynomial), or the histogram may be stored in the form of a table as it is.

  Further, data as shown in FIG. 15 can be obtained from the budget amount for achieving the target index in various projects in the company and the actual calculation amount necessary for achieving the target index.

  Further, for indices similar to the respective indices, a distribution function as shown in FIG. 15 can be obtained by accumulating empirical values of the budget amount and actual calculation amount for achieving the target.

  The prediction unit may define this probability density function for each index in advance and calculate the increment rate Fi using this probability density function, or the increment rate corresponding to the reliability (P) as shown in FIG. A configuration in which Fi is obtained in advance for each index, stored in the storage unit 13 as an increment rate table, and the increment rate Fi corresponding to the input reliability (P) may be read. When an intermediate value of the reliability stored in the increment rate table in FIG. 16 is input, values before and after that may be read from the increment rate table and calculated by linear interpolation.

  Next, the prediction unit obtains a combined cost coefficient Cth for each index by multiplying the correction cost Co by the increment rate Fi (S214).

  Then, the prediction unit selects the index with the lowest combined cost coefficient Cth among the indices (S215). In order to distribute the investment amount in a balanced manner between the sustainability index, the health index, and the comfort index, as shown in FIG. 13, when the index selection (S22) and the investment amount subtraction (S23) are repeated. , Change the set of indicators to be selected. For example, when the index with the lowest combined cost coefficient Cth is selected from the set of sustainability indices, the next index to be repeated is to select the index with the lowest combined cost coefficient Cth from the set of health indices, and The index with the lowest combined cost coefficient Cth is selected from the set of comfort indices.

  Thereby, it is possible to accurately obtain an additional investment plan for achieving the target with a predetermined reliability.

  In the correction process 5, the probability density function is created for the distribution of sample values in the case of 1 times or more and the increment rate Fi is obtained. However, the increment rate calculation method is not limited to this, and other calculation methods are available. Also good. For example, as shown in FIG. 17, the distribution of the variation value of the correction cost Co is accumulated from when it is less than 1 time (decrease) to when it exceeds 1 time (increase) to obtain a distribution function. Then, from 1 / infinity to infinity, the distribution function is divided by the area obtained by integrating the distribution function to normalize to obtain the probability density function.

When the user specifies a desired reliability, for example, 80% reliability, the area of the range that increases from the decreasing range centered on the average value (median or 1 point) is The position of the horizontal axis that provides the reliability (for example, 0.8) is obtained. In the example of FIG. 17, the shaded range is 0.8.
And the boundary of the integration range is the correction cost increment rate Fi on the horizontal axis (for example, 0.4 to 1..
It is located in 3).

  Then, a value on the increasing side of the value (0.4) on the cost decrease side and the value (1.3) on the cost increase side of the incremental rate Fi of the correction cost is determined as the increment rate Fi. That is, the largest value (right value) of the fluctuation range is determined as the increment rate.

  Thus, the increment rate Fi may be calculated based on the distribution function, or the increment rate Fi of the correction cost with respect to the reliability is calculated in advance, and the reliability and the increment rate Fi are associated as shown in FIG. May be registered in the increment rate table.

  In FIG. 17, the variation ratio (1 / infinity to infinity) with respect to the cost is used as the increment rate on the horizontal axis. However, instead of FIG. 17, the horizontal axis may be expressed as −100% to infinity% as the ratio of the fluctuation amount to the cost. For example, -20% is reduced by 20%, and + 300% is tripled. That is, in the sustainability index of FIG. 9, the correction cost is 800 million yen if it is -20%, and 3 billion yen if it is + 300%.

<Conversion by affiliated company>
When the company includes a plurality of related companies, a weight for each related company may be set, and an evaluation value for each related company may be converted into an evaluation value for the entire company according to the weight.

  FIG. 7 shows a concept when the KAITEKI index is used for evaluation of related companies constituting the entire company, separately from the evaluation of the entire company.

  For the entire company, the sustainability index, health index, and comfort index are assigned the same weight, but the related companies that make up the entire company should have different weights for each index depending on the characteristics of the business. It should be noted that the composition ratio between the target value of the corporate performance in the YK value and the target value of the KAITEKI index may be different for the entire company and the related companies constituting the target value, but it is usually preferable to make them uniform.

  Accordingly, as shown in FIG. 7, although the total points of the entire company and the related companies constituting the same company are 300 points, the weight of each index is, for example, the related company A having a small health-related business weight, Affiliate company B, which has a health index of 150 points, a health index of 20 points, and a comfort index of 130 points, and the weight of the health-related business is large, the sustainability index is 50 points, the health index is 250 points, and the comfort index is 0 points The related company C and related company D, which do not have health-related businesses, have a sustainability index of 150 points, a health index of 0 points, and a comfort index of 150 points, and the value of the KAITEKI index as a related company according to these weights Will be calculated.

  Apart from this, in order to clarify the contribution degree of each related company in the KAITEKI index of the entire company, a weight for each related company may be determined. In this case, for example, in the sustainability index, affiliate company A has 50 points, affiliate company B has 10 points, affiliate company C and affiliate company D have 20 points, and a total of 100 points. It will be assigned in consideration of the business scale. An example is shown in FIG.

  In addition, it is possible to add the index values of affiliated companies to make an index for the entire company. However, the KAITEKI index is correctly performed by integrating the results calculated for each index as shown in FIG. It is not preferable to add the combined KAITEKI index values.

As described above, according to the embodiment, the corporate activity can be appropriately evaluated based on the YK value indicated by the combination of the target value of the corporate performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index, thereby enabling a permanent corporate activity.

<Others>
The present invention is not limited to the illustrated examples described above, and various modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.

  For example, the same effects as those of the above-described embodiment can be obtained even with the configurations described below. These components can be combined as much as possible.

(Appendix 1)
An evaluation device for corporate activities,
A storage unit for storing a target value of a corporate value (YK value) indicated by a combination of a target value of a corporate performance and a target value of a KAITEKI index that is a target value for social responsibility different from the target value of the business performance;
An input receiving unit that receives input of the actual value of the achievement and the actual value of the KAITEKI index, or the actual value of the YK value;
An evaluation value is calculated according to the achievement level of the actual value with respect to the target value of the YK value, or the achievement level of the actual value of the YK value indicated by a combination of the actual value of the achievement and the actual value of the KAITEKI index is reached with respect to the target value. An evaluation unit that obtains an evaluation value in response,
Based on the target value of the corporate performance, the actual value with respect to the target value of the corporate performance, the target value of the KAITEKI index, and the actual value with respect to the target value of the KAITEKI index, A prediction unit for obtaining a predicted value of the KAITEKI index or a predicted value of the YK value;
An output unit for outputting the evaluation value,
The target value of the KAITEKI index is the target value for sustainability of corporate activities, the target value to suppress the environmental impact of corporate activities to a sustainable level, and the corporate activities are comfortable as the target value of comfort Including values that include targets that contribute to sex,
The sustainability target value includes an environmental load reduction target value and a resource consumption suppression target value,
The target value for comfort includes a target value for sales of products that contribute to comfort, a target value for satisfaction with stakeholders, and a target value for safety,
The input receiving unit receives an input of an expected arrival time of the target value of the YK value,
The evaluation unit obtains an evaluation value related to the YK value at the scheduled arrival time,
When the actual value of the received YK value deviates from the target value of the YK value,
The prediction unit obtains a combination of a performance value of a performance that is a performance value of a YK value after a predetermined period and a performance value of a KAITEKI index, and calculates a target value of the YK value after the predetermined period and a YK value after the predetermined period. An apparatus for evaluating corporate activities, characterized in that each of a target value of a performance after a predetermined period and a target value of a KAITEKI index are changed so that a deviation from an actual value is small.

(Appendix 2)
The evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the sustainability target value includes at least one of target values for suppressing the amount of carbon dioxide generated, improving energy use efficiency, and promoting recycling.

(Appendix 3)
The evaluation apparatus according to appendix 1 or 2, wherein the comfort target value includes a target value for improvement in ranking and / or reduction in accident occurrence rate during a private survey period.

(Appendix 4)
The evaluation apparatus according to any one of appendices 1 to 3, wherein the comfort target value includes an index directly related to a product or service, an improvement related to satisfaction of a party affected by a company, and an index related to elimination of dissatisfaction. .

(Appendix 5)
The evaluation apparatus according to any one of appendices 1 to 4, wherein the target value of the KAITEKI index further includes a value indicating a target of contribution to health of corporate activities as a target value of health.

(Appendix 6)
The evaluation apparatus according to appendix 5, wherein the health target value includes at least one of a target value of contribution to disease healing and a target value related to prevention / early detection.

(Appendix 7)
The evaluation apparatus according to appendix 6, wherein the health target value includes a target value for medical cost reduction.

(Appendix 8)
The target value of health includes at least one of target values that promote health maintenance, promote preventive activities, improve the cure rate of intractable diseases and contribute to reduce medical costs, Evaluation device.

(Appendix 9)
The evaluation device according to any one of appendices 1 to 8, wherein the sustainability target value further includes a target value related to CSR in procurement.

(Appendix 10)
The actual value of the KAITEKI index is a value obtained by aggregating the actual values of a plurality of items,
A parameter storage unit that stores an improvement cost that is an amount required to increase the actual value of each item related to the KAITEKI index by a predetermined unit, and an allocation condition that defines a condition for investment in each item;
Determine the investment amount based on the amount of profit extracted from the actual value of the achievement, select one item from the plurality of items according to the distribution condition, increase the actual value of the item by a predetermined unit and the investment amount The KAITEKI index has reached the target value by reducing the improvement cost for the predetermined unit, repeatedly selecting the item, increasing the actual value, and subtracting the investment amount, and increasing the actual value, or the improvement Any one of appendices 1 to 9 including a distribution unit that outputs a cumulative total of the selected item and the improvement cost obtained by increasing the actual value of the item when the investment amount is eliminated by reducing the cost. The evaluation device described.

(Appendix 11)
The company includes a plurality of related companies, further comprising a weight storage unit that stores the weight of each related company,
The input receiving unit receives the actual value of each related company,
The evaluation unit obtains an evaluation value based on the actual value of each related company, and converts the evaluation value for each related company into the evaluation value of the entire company according to the weight. The evaluation apparatus as described in.

(Appendix 12)
A method for evaluating corporate activities,
YK from the storage unit storing the target value of the corporate value (YK value) indicated by the combination of the target value of the corporate performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index which is a target value for social responsibility different from the target value of the business performance Reading the value;
Receiving the actual value for the target value of the achievement and the target value of the KAITEKI index or the target value of the YK value;
Obtaining an evaluation value according to the degree of achievement of the actual value of the YK value with respect to the target value of the YK value, or the degree of achievement of the actual value of the YK value indicated by a combination of the actual value of the achievement and the actual value of the KAITEKI index And obtaining an evaluation value for the target value of the YK value according to
Based on the target value of the corporate performance, the actual value with respect to the target value of the corporate performance, the target value of the KAITEKI index, and the actual value with respect to the target value of the KAITEKI index, a predicted value of the business performance after a predetermined period, KAITEKI Obtaining a predicted value of the index or a predicted value of the YK value;
Outputting the evaluation value;
The computer runs,
The target value of the KAITEKI index is the target value for sustainability of corporate activities, the target value to suppress the environmental impact of corporate activities to a sustainable level, and the corporate activities are comfortable as the target value of comfort Including values that include targets that contribute to sex,
The sustainability target value includes an environmental load reduction target value and a resource consumption suppression target value,
The target value for comfort includes a target value for sales of products that contribute to comfort, a target value for satisfaction with stakeholders, and a target value for safety,
In the step of receiving the input, an input of an expected arrival time of the target value of the YK value is received,
In the step of obtaining the evaluation value, the evaluation value related to the YK value is obtained at the scheduled arrival time,
When the actual value of the received YK value deviates from the target value of the YK value,
In the step of obtaining the predicted value, a combination of the actual value of the result that is the actual value of the YK value after the predetermined period and the actual value of the KAITEKI index is obtained, and the target value of the YK value after the predetermined period and the predetermined value A method for evaluating corporate activity, characterized in that each of a target value of a performance after a predetermined period and a target value of a KAITEKI index are changed so that a difference between the YK value and the actual value is small.

(Appendix 13)
The evaluation method according to appendix 12, wherein the sustainability target value includes at least one of a target value for suppressing carbon dioxide generation, improving energy use efficiency, and promoting recycling.

(Appendix 14)
14. The evaluation method according to appendix 12 or 13, wherein the comfort target value includes a target value for improvement in ranking and / or reduction in accident rate during a private survey period.

(Appendix 15)
The evaluation method according to any one of appendices 12 to 14, wherein the target value of comfort includes an index directly related to a product or service, an improvement related to satisfaction of a party affected by a company, and an index related to elimination of dissatisfaction. .

(Appendix 16)
16. The evaluation method according to any one of appendices 12 to 15, wherein the target value of the KAITEKI index further includes a value indicating a target of contribution to health of corporate activities as a target value of health.

(Appendix 17)
The evaluation method according to appendix 16, wherein the target value of health includes at least one of a target value of contribution to disease healing and a target value related to prevention / early detection.

(Appendix 18)
18. The evaluation method according to appendix 17, wherein the health target value includes a target value for medical cost reduction.

(Appendix 19)
The target value of health includes at least one of target values that promote health maintenance, promote preventive activities, improve the cure rate of intractable diseases, and contribute to a reduction in medical costs. Evaluation methods.

(Appendix 20)
The evaluation method according to any one of appendices 12 to 19, wherein the sustainability target value further includes a target value related to CSR in procurement.

(Appendix 21)
The actual value of the KAITEKI index is a value obtained by aggregating the actual values of a plurality of items,
A parameter storage unit that stores an improvement cost that is an amount required to increase the actual value of each item related to the KAITEKI index by a predetermined unit, and an allocation condition that defines a condition for investment in each item;
Determine the investment amount based on the amount of profit extracted from the actual value of the achievement, select one item from the plurality of items according to the distribution condition, increase the actual value of the item by a predetermined unit and the investment amount The KAITEKI index has reached the target value by reducing the improvement cost for the predetermined unit, repeatedly selecting the item, increasing the actual value, and subtracting the investment amount, and increasing the actual value, or the improvement Any one of Additional Items 12 to 20 including a distribution unit that outputs a cumulative total of the selected item and the improvement cost obtained by increasing the actual value of the item when the investment amount is eliminated by reducing the cost. The evaluation method described.

(Appendix 22)
The company includes a plurality of related companies, further comprising a weight storage unit that stores the weight of each related company,
The input receiving unit receives the actual value of each related company,
The evaluation unit obtains an evaluation value based on the actual value of each related company, and converts the evaluation value for each related company into the evaluation value of the entire company according to the weight. Evaluation method described in 1.

(Appendix 23)
An evaluation program for corporate activities,
YK from the storage unit storing the target value of the corporate value (YK value) indicated by the combination of the target value of the corporate performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index which is a target value for social responsibility different from the target value of the business performance Reading the value;
Receiving the actual value for the target value of the achievement and the target value of the KAITEKI index or the target value of the YK value;
Obtaining an evaluation value according to the degree of achievement of the actual value of the YK value with respect to the target value of the YK value, or the degree of achievement of the actual value of the YK value indicated by a combination of the actual value of the achievement and the actual value of the KAITEKI index And obtaining an evaluation value for the target value of the YK value according to
Based on the target value of the corporate performance, the actual value with respect to the target value of the corporate performance, the target value of the KAITEKI index, and the actual value with respect to the target value of the KAITEKI index, a predicted value of the business performance after a predetermined period, KAITEKI Obtaining a predicted value of the index or a predicted value of the YK value;
Outputting the evaluation value;
To the computer,
The target value of the KAITEKI index is the target value for sustainability of corporate activities, the target value to suppress the environmental impact of corporate activities to a sustainable level, and the corporate activities are comfortable as the target value of comfort Including values that include targets that contribute to sex,
The sustainability target value includes an environmental load reduction target value and a resource consumption suppression target value,
The target value for comfort includes a target value for sales of products that contribute to comfort, a target value for satisfaction with stakeholders, and a target value for safety,
In the step of receiving the input, an input of an expected arrival time of the target value of the YK value is received,
In the step of obtaining the evaluation value, the evaluation value related to the YK value is obtained at the scheduled arrival time,
When the actual value of the received YK value deviates from the target value of the YK value,
In the step of obtaining the predicted value, a combination of the actual value of the result that is the actual value of the YK value after the predetermined period and the actual value of the KAITEKI index is obtained, and the target value of the YK value after the predetermined period and the predetermined value An evaluation program characterized by changing each of the target value of the performance after a predetermined period and the target value of the KAITEKI index so that the difference between the actual value of the YK value and the actual value is small.

(Appendix 24)
24. The evaluation program according to appendix 23, wherein the sustainability target value includes at least one of target values for suppressing the amount of carbon dioxide generated, improving energy use efficiency, and promoting recycling.

(Appendix 25)
25. The evaluation program according to appendix 23 or 24, wherein the comfort target value includes a target value for improvement in ranking and / or reduction in accident rate during a private survey period.

(Appendix 26)
The evaluation program according to any one of appendices 23 to 25, wherein the comfort target value includes an index directly related to a product or a service, an improvement of satisfaction of a party affected by a company, and an index related to elimination of dissatisfaction. .

(Appendix 27)
27. The evaluation program according to any one of appendices 23 to 26, wherein the target value of the KAITEKI index further includes a value indicating a target of contribution to health of corporate activities as a target value of health.

(Appendix 28)
28. The evaluation program according to appendix 27, wherein the health target value includes at least one of a target value of contribution to disease healing and a target value related to prevention / early detection.

(Appendix 29)
29. The evaluation program according to appendix 28, wherein the health target value includes a target value for medical cost reduction.

(Appendix 30)
30. The supplementary note 28 or 29, wherein the health target value includes at least one of a target value that promotes health maintenance, promotes preventive activities, improves the cure rate of incurable diseases, and contributes to a reduction in medical costs Evaluation program.

(Appendix 31)
31. The evaluation program according to any one of appendices 23 to 30, wherein the sustainability target value further includes a target value related to CSR in procurement.

(Appendix 32)
The actual value of the KAITEKI index is a value obtained by aggregating the actual values of a plurality of items,
A parameter storage unit that stores an improvement cost that is an amount required to increase the actual value of each item related to the KAITEKI index by a predetermined unit, and an allocation condition that defines a condition for investment in each item;
Determine the investment amount based on the amount of profit extracted from the actual value of the achievement, select one item from the plurality of items according to the distribution condition, increase the actual value of the item by a predetermined unit and the investment amount The KAITEKI index has reached the target value by reducing the improvement cost for the predetermined unit, repeatedly selecting the item, increasing the actual value, and subtracting the investment amount, and increasing the actual value, or the improvement 31. Any one of appendices 23 to 31, further comprising: a distribution unit that outputs the total of the selected item and the improvement cost obtained by increasing the actual value of the item when the investment amount is eliminated by reducing the cost. The described evaluation program.

(Appendix 33)
The company includes a plurality of related companies, further comprising a weight storage unit that stores the weight of each related company,
The input receiving unit receives the actual value of each related company,
The evaluation unit obtains an evaluation value based on the actual value of each related company, and converts the evaluation value for each related company into the evaluation value of the entire company according to the weight. Evaluation program described in.

1 Evaluation Device 12 Arithmetic Processing Unit 13 Storage Unit (Hard Disk)
14 I / O port 15 Communication control unit (CCU: Communication Control Unit)

Claims (21)

An evaluation device for corporate activities,
A storage unit for storing a target value of a corporate value (YK value) indicated by a combination of a target value of a corporate performance and a target value of a KAITEKI index that is a target value for social responsibility different from the target value of the business performance;
An input receiving unit that receives input of the actual value of the achievement and the actual value of the KAITEKI index, or the actual value of the YK value;
An evaluation value is calculated according to the achievement level of the actual value with respect to the target value of the YK value, or the achievement level of the actual value of the YK value indicated by a combination of the actual value of the achievement and the actual value of the KAITEKI index is reached with respect to the target value. An evaluation unit that obtains an evaluation value in response,
Based on the target value of the corporate performance, the actual value with respect to the target value of the corporate performance, the target value of the KAITEKI index, and the actual value with respect to the target value of the KAITEKI index, obtains the predicted value of the predicted value or YK value KAITEKI indicator, a prediction unit to change the target value based on the predicted value,
An output unit that outputs the evaluation value , the predicted value, or the changed target value ;
The target value of KAITEKI indicator, the target value of sustainability including corporate activities at least one reduction of the target value and the target value of the consumption inhibiting amount of resources environmental impact and comfortably contributes predetermined product a sales target value, a target value of including comfort at least one stakeholder satisfaction target value and safety of the target value based on the incidence of certain accident,
Wherein the input receiving unit receives input of a target value of the YK value at multiple time points at predetermined intervals,
In the predetermined period, when the actual value of the YK value at the time when the first period has elapsed deviates from the target value of the YK value by a threshold value or more ,
The prediction unit is
By comparing the actual value of the achievement at the start of the first period and the actual value of the achievement at the time when the first period has passed,
Comparing the actual value of the KAITEKI index at the start of the first period with the actual value of the KAITEKI index at the time when the first period has elapsed, to determine the amount of change in the KAITEKI index during the first period;
Based on the amount of change in the performance of the first period, the value of the performance that changes from the start of the second period, which is the time when the first period has elapsed, to the time of the second period, is predicted. As sought
Based on the amount of change of the KAITEKI index in the first period, the value of the KAITEKI index that changes from the start time of the second period, which is the time point when the first period has elapsed, to the elapse time of the second period. As a predicted value,
Subtract the forecast value of the performance from the target value of the performance at the time of the second period,
Subtracting the predicted value of the KAITEKI index from the target value of the KAITEKI index at the time of the second period to obtain a difference;
If one of the difference in the achievements or the difference in the KAITEKI index is greater than or equal to a threshold value, the value obtained by multiplying the target value of the achievement or KAITEKI index in which the difference is greater than or equal to the threshold value by a predetermined coefficient is subtracted. Add the value to the other target value, so that the difference between the target value of the YK value when the second period has elapsed and the predicted value of the YK value when the second period has elapsed is reduced. And KAITEKI index target values are changed, and a corporate activity evaluation device.   The evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the sustainability target value includes at least one of a target value for suppressing the generation amount of carbon dioxide, improving energy use efficiency, and promoting recycling.   The evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the comfort target value includes a target value for improving ranking and / or reducing an accident occurrence rate during a private survey period.   The evaluation according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the target value of comfort includes an index directly related to a product or service, an improvement related to satisfaction of a party affected by a company, and an index related to elimination of dissatisfaction. apparatus.   The evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the target value of the KAITEKI index further includes a value indicating a target of contribution to health of corporate activities as a target value of health.   The evaluation apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the health target value includes at least one of a target value of a contribution degree of disease healing and a target value related to prevention / early detection.   The evaluation apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the health target value includes a target value of a medical cost reduction amount.   The health target value includes at least one of a target value that promotes health maintenance, promotes preventive activities, improves the cure rate of incurable diseases, and contributes to a reduction in medical costs. Evaluation device. The evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the sustainability target value further includes a target value related to CSR in procurement. The actual value of the KAITEKI index is a value obtained by aggregating the actual values of a plurality of items,
A parameter storage unit that stores a correction cost that is an amount necessary to increase the actual value of each item related to the KAITEKI index by a predetermined unit, and a selection condition that defines a condition for investment in each item;
The prediction unit determines an investment amount based on the amount of profit extracted from the actual value of the achievement, selects one item from the plurality of items according to the selection condition, and increases the actual value of the item by a predetermined unit And reducing the correction cost for the predetermined unit from the investment amount, repeatedly selecting the item, increasing the actual value, and subtracting the investment amount, and increasing the actual value of the item, so that the KAITEKI index is the target value. If reached, or if there is no more investment by subtracting the modified cost, you output the cumulative of the selected item and modify cost of increasing the actual value of the item 請 Motomeko 1-9 The evaluation apparatus according to any one of the above. The company includes a plurality of related companies, further comprising a weight storage unit that stores the weight of each related company,
The input receiving unit receives the actual value of each related company,
The said evaluation part calculates | requires an evaluation value based on the said performance value of each said related company, and converts the evaluation value for every said related company into the evaluation value of the said whole company according to the said weight. The evaluation apparatus according to item.   The predetermined coefficient is k, the economic trend index is DI,
  When a value obtained by multiplying the difference by the predetermined coefficient is added to the target value of the KAITEKI index,
  The predetermined coefficient k is k = 1−DI, or
  When adding the value obtained by multiplying the difference by the predetermined coefficient to the target value of the achievement,
  The evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined coefficient k is k = DI.   A storage unit storing the correlation between the fluctuation amount of the KAITEKI index and the fluctuation amount of the stock price, and the correlation between the fluctuation amount of the business performance and the fluctuation amount of the stock price;
  The prediction unit
  When the actual value of the performance does not reach the target value, the storage unit is referred to obtain a stock price fluctuation amount when the performance fluctuates by the difference between the actual value of the business performance and the target value. The amount of variation of the KAITEKI index corresponding to the amount is obtained and the amount of variation of the KAITEKI index is added to the target value of the KAITEKI index to change the target value of the KAITEKI index, or
  When the actual value of the KAITEKI index does not reach the target value, the storage unit is referred to determine the stock price fluctuation amount when the KAITEKI index fluctuates by the difference between the actual value of the KAITEKI index and the target value. The change amount of the achievement corresponding to the change amount of the performance is obtained, and the change amount of the achievement is added to the target value of the achievement, and the target value of the achievement is changed. Evaluation device. A method for evaluating corporate activities,
YK from the storage unit storing the target value of the corporate value (YK value) indicated by the combination of the target value of the corporate performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index which is a target value for social responsibility different from the target value of the business performance Reading the value;
Receiving the actual value for the target value of the achievement and the target value of the KAITEKI index or the target value of the YK value;
Obtaining an evaluation value according to the degree of achievement of the actual value of the YK value with respect to the target value of the YK value, or the degree of achievement of the actual value of the YK value indicated by a combination of the actual value of the achievement and the actual value of the KAITEKI index And obtaining an evaluation value for the target value of the YK value according to
Based on the target value of the corporate performance, the actual value with respect to the target value of the corporate performance, the target value of the KAITEKI index, and the actual value with respect to the target value of the KAITEKI index, a predicted value of the business performance after a predetermined period, KAITEKI a step to change the target value based on the predicted value calculated predicted value of the predicted value or YK value of the index,
Outputting the evaluation value , the predicted value, or the changed target value ;
The computer runs,
Target value of the KAITEKI indicator, and the target value of sustainability at least one including business activities of the target value of the consumption inhibiting amount of the target value and the resources of reduction of environmental impact, comfort contributes predetermined product sales target value, at least one of the stakeholder satisfaction target value and <br/> safety target value based on the incidence of certain accident and a target value of including comfort,
In the step of receiving the input, receiving the target value of the YK value at a plurality of time points for each predetermined period ,
In the predetermined period, when the actual value of the YK value at the time when the first period has elapsed deviates from the target value of the YK value by a threshold value or more ,
In the step of obtaining the predicted value,
Of the predetermined period, the actual value of the achievement at the start of the first period is compared with the actual value of the achievement at the time when the first period has passed to determine the amount of change in the achievement during the first period. ,
Comparing the actual value of the KAITEKI index at the start of the first period with the actual value of the KAITEKI index at the time when the first period has elapsed, to determine the amount of change in the KAITEKI index during the first period;
Based on the amount of change in the performance of the first period, the value of the performance that changes from the start of the second period, which is the time when the first period has elapsed, to the time of the second period, is predicted. As sought
Based on the amount of change of the KAITEKI index in the first period, the value of the KAITEKI index that changes from the start time of the second period, which is the time point when the first period has elapsed, to the elapse time of the second period. As a predicted value,
Subtract the forecast value of the performance from the target value of the performance at the time of the second period,
Subtracting the predicted value of the KAITEKI index from the target value of the KAITEKI index at the time of the second period to obtain a difference;
If one of the difference in the achievements or the difference in the KAITEKI index is greater than or equal to a threshold value, the value obtained by multiplying the target value of the achievement or KAITEKI index in which the difference is greater than or equal to the threshold value by a predetermined coefficient is subtracted. Add the value to the other target value, so that the difference between the target value of the YK value when the second period has elapsed and the predicted value of the YK value when the second period has elapsed is reduced. And KAITEKI index target values are changed, and a corporate activity evaluation method. The actual value of the KAITEKI index is a value obtained by aggregating the actual values of a plurality of items,
  With reference to a parameter storage unit that stores a correction cost that is an amount necessary to increase the actual value of each item related to the KAITEKI index by a predetermined unit and a selection condition that defines a condition for investment in each item,
  The investment amount is determined based on the amount of profit extracted from the actual value of the achievement, and one item is selected from the plurality of items according to the selection condition, and the actual value of the item is increased by a predetermined unit and the investment amount When the KAITEKI index reaches the target value by reducing the correction cost for the predetermined unit, repeating the selection of the item, increasing the actual value, and subtracting the investment amount, and increasing the actual value of the item, The evaluation method according to claim 14, wherein when the investment amount disappears due to the reduction of the correction cost, an accumulated total of the correction cost obtained by increasing the selected item and the actual value of the item is output.   The predetermined coefficient is k, the economic trend index is DI,
  When a value obtained by multiplying the difference by the predetermined coefficient is added to the target value of the KAITEKI index,
  The predetermined coefficient k is k = 1−DI, or
  When adding the value obtained by multiplying the difference by the predetermined coefficient to the target value of the achievement,
  The evaluation method according to claim 14, wherein the predetermined coefficient k is k = DI.   Storing the correlation between the fluctuation amount of the KAITEKI index and the fluctuation amount of the stock price, and the correlation between the fluctuation amount of the performance and the fluctuation amount of the stock price in a storage unit;
  When the actual value of the performance does not reach the target value, the storage unit is referred to obtain a stock price fluctuation amount when the performance fluctuates by the difference between the actual value of the business performance and the target value. To quantity
Obtain the amount of change of the corresponding KAITEKI index, add the amount of change of the KAITEKI index to the target value of the KAITEKI index, or change the target value of the KAITEKI index, or
  When the actual value of the KAITEKI index does not reach the target value, the storage unit is referred to determine the stock price fluctuation amount when the KAITEKI index fluctuates by the difference between the actual value of the KAITEKI index and the target value. The evaluation method according to claim 14, wherein a fluctuation amount of the performance corresponding to the fluctuation amount of the performance is obtained, and the fluctuation amount of the performance is added to the target value of the performance to change the target value of the performance. An evaluation program for corporate activities,
YK from the storage unit storing the target value of the corporate value (YK value) indicated by the combination of the target value of the corporate performance and the target value of the KAITEKI index which is a target value for social responsibility different from the target value of the business performance Reading the value;
Receiving the actual value for the target value of the achievement and the target value of the KAITEKI index or the target value of the YK value;
Obtaining an evaluation value according to the degree of achievement of the actual value of the YK value with respect to the target value of the YK value, or the degree of achievement of the actual value of the YK value indicated by a combination of the actual value of the achievement and the actual value of the KAITEKI index And obtaining an evaluation value for the target value of the YK value according to
Based on the target value of the corporate performance, the actual value with respect to the target value of the corporate performance, the target value of the KAITEKI index, and the actual value with respect to the target value of the KAITEKI index, a predicted value of the business performance after a predetermined period, KAITEKI obtains the predicted value of the predicted value or YK value of the index, a step to change the target value based on the predicted value,
Outputting the evaluation value , the predicted value, or the changed target value ;
To the computer,
Target value of the KAITEKI indicator, and the target value of sustainability at least one including business activities of the target value of the consumption inhibiting amount of the target value and the resources of reduction of environmental impact, comfort contributes predetermined product sales of the target value, the target value of the stakeholder satisfaction and at least one safety target value based on the incidence of certain accident and a target value of including comfort,
In the step of receiving the input, receiving the target value of the YK value at a plurality of time points for each predetermined period ,
In the predetermined period, when the actual value of the YK value at the time when the first period has elapsed deviates from the target value of the YK value by a threshold value or more ,
In the step of obtaining the predicted value,
Of the predetermined period, the actual value of the achievement at the start of the first period is compared with the actual value of the achievement at the time when the first period has passed to determine the amount of change in the achievement during the first period. ,
Comparing the actual value of the KAITEKI index at the start of the first period with the actual value of the KAITEKI index at the time when the first period has elapsed, to determine the amount of change in the KAITEKI index during the first period;
Based on the amount of change in the performance of the first period, the value of the performance that changes from the start of the second period, which is the time when the first period has elapsed, to the time of the second period, is predicted. As sought
Based on the amount of change of the KAITEKI index in the first period, the value of the KAITEKI index that changes from the start time of the second period, which is the time point when the first period has elapsed, to the elapse time of the second period. As a predicted value,
Subtract the forecast value of the performance from the target value of the performance at the time of the second period,
Subtracting the predicted value of the KAITEKI index from the target value of the KAITEKI index at the time of the second period to obtain a difference;
If one of the difference in the achievements or the difference in the KAITEKI index is greater than or equal to a threshold value, the value obtained by multiplying the target value of the achievement or KAITEKI index in which the difference is greater than or equal to the threshold value by a predetermined coefficient is subtracted. The value is added to the other target value, and Y at the time when the second period has elapsed
Deviation between the predicted value of the target value and the YK value of the second time period elapse of the K value to decrease, evaluation and changing the respective target values of the KAITEKI indicators operating results program. The actual value of the KAITEKI index is a value obtained by aggregating the actual values of a plurality of items,
  With reference to a parameter storage unit that stores a correction cost that is an amount necessary to increase the actual value of each item related to the KAITEKI index by a predetermined unit and a selection condition that defines a condition for investment in each item,
  The investment amount is determined based on the amount of profit extracted from the actual value of the achievement, and one item is selected from the plurality of items according to the selection condition, and the actual value of the item is increased by a predetermined unit and the investment amount When the KAITEKI index reaches the target value by reducing the correction cost for the predetermined unit, repeating the selection of the item, increasing the actual value, and subtracting the investment amount, and increasing the actual value of the item, 19. The evaluation program according to claim 18, wherein when the investment amount disappears due to the reduction of the correction cost, the total of the selected item and the correction cost obtained by increasing the actual value of the item is output.   The predetermined coefficient is k, the economic trend index is DI,
  When a value obtained by multiplying the difference by the predetermined coefficient is added to the target value of the KAITEKI index,
  The predetermined coefficient k is k = 1−DI, or
  When adding the value obtained by multiplying the difference by the predetermined coefficient to the target value of the achievement,
  20. The evaluation program according to claim 18, wherein the predetermined coefficient k is k = DI.   Storing the correlation between the fluctuation amount of the KAITEKI index and the fluctuation amount of the stock price, and the correlation between the fluctuation amount of the performance and the fluctuation amount of the stock price in a storage unit;
  When the actual value of the performance does not reach the target value, the storage unit is referred to obtain a stock price fluctuation amount when the performance fluctuates by the difference between the actual value of the business performance and the target value. The amount of variation of the KAITEKI index corresponding to the amount is obtained and the amount of variation of the KAITEKI index is added to the target value of the KAITEKI index to change the target value of the KAITEKI index, or
  When the actual value of the KAITEKI index does not reach the target value, the storage unit is referred to determine the stock price fluctuation amount when the KAITEKI index fluctuates by the difference between the actual value of the KAITEKI index and the target value. The evaluation program according to claim 18 or 19, wherein a fluctuation amount of the performance corresponding to the fluctuation amount is calculated, the fluctuation amount of the performance is added to the target value of the performance, and the target value of the performance is changed.

Images