JP4684210B2 - Risk management evaluation system and risk management evaluation sheet - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention provides a risk management evaluation system and a risk management evaluation for allowing each of a plurality of constituent members in an organization to evaluate each of a plurality of risk-related items in the organization and collecting the evaluation results. Regarding the sheet.

The establishment of internal controls (systems for ensuring the appropriateness of operations) in companies is one of the important management issues. The new company law, which came into effect on May 1, 2006, states that The "system construction" duty has come to be imposed.
In order to build the internal control system, the heads of each basic organization such as each business unit and each affiliated company that constitutes the company manage risk (crisis) (hereinafter referred to as “risk management”). It is necessary to check the effectiveness regularly. In such risk management, it is important for each basic organization to continue the PDCA cycle consisting of Plan (plan)-Do (implementation)-Check (evaluation)-Action (improvement and review). .

In order to perform the risk management evaluation as described above, each of the members in the organization will be evaluated for each of the risk-related items in the organization, and the evaluation results will be collected. A risk management evaluation system for doing this is known (see, for example, Patent Document 1).
And the risk management evaluation system of the said patent document 1 is a risk management evaluation sheet | seat (in which the said evaluation result (item value) can be input into the terminal of the evaluator (operator) who evaluates among several constituent members (operator). Display the checklist), receive the evaluation result received from the terminal, store the received evaluation result in the evaluation result database (storage device) in association with, for example, the department (system) constituting the organization, For example, the evaluation result extracted from the evaluation result database by specifying a department is used to perform aggregation such as calculating an evaluation score for each risk status stage in each of the risk-related items.

  On the other hand, although it is different from the above risk management evaluation system, as an electronic payment system, it accepts applications for application cases such as travel expenses billing from the application processor's terminal, and sequentially approves the application cases in accordance with their responsibilities. There is known an electronic settlement system configured to execute an approval process from a user terminal (see, for example, Patent Document 2).

JP 2001-31572 A Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2003-233531

  In a conventional risk management evaluation system, for example, in an organization such as a large company where a large number of members exist, a large number of evaluation results are collected randomly from each of the large number of members. The tabulation of evaluation results becomes very complicated. On the other hand, in order to simplify such tabulation work, the collection of evaluation results is limited to the head of each basic organization such as each business division or each affiliated company in the organization or a person delegated by that person In this case, the evaluation result is far from the reality, and the reliability of the total result is lowered.

  In addition, the conventional risk management evaluation system is configured to collect data after all evaluation results have been collected, and the results are used to follow up each department in addition to feedback to management. Is done. However, the heads and members of each department are aware of the specific contents of the risk-related items when inputting the evaluation results for each of the risk-related items. When we did this, we would see the results of the aggregation, so we could not fully motivate the improvement of awareness about the importance of risk management and the improvement of basic skills.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and its purpose is to allow each of a plurality of constituent members in an organization to evaluate each of a plurality of risk-related items in the organization, In collecting the evaluation results, evaluation was performed so as to motivate each constituent member to raise awareness of the importance of risk management and to improve basic skills while simplifying the aggregation work and improving reliability. The point is to provide a risk management evaluation system and a risk management evaluation sheet that can collect the results.

The risk management evaluation system according to the present invention for achieving the above object causes each of a plurality of constituent members in an organization to evaluate each of a plurality of risk-related items in the organization, and the evaluation result The first feature configuration is configured to be capable of data communication via a predetermined communication network with respect to the respective terminals of the plurality of constituent members,
An evaluator setting means for setting the accessed constituent on the terminal side as an evaluator performing the evaluation;
Evaluation sheet display means for displaying an evaluation sheet on which the evaluation result can be input on the terminal of the evaluator,
From the evaluator's terminal, the evaluation result input unit is received, the evaluation result collecting means for storing the received evaluation result in the evaluation result database in association with the evaluator,
The evaluation sheet display means recognizes a member having an evaluation processing order lower than that of the evaluator as a lower constituent by referring to an evaluation processing order table that defines an evaluation processing order for each of the plurality of constituent members. Then, the evaluation result collected from the lower constituent member is extracted from the evaluation result database, and the extracted evaluation result of the lower constituent member is added to the evaluation sheet displayed on the evaluator's terminal. In the point.
In the present application, the lower evaluation processing order indicates the evaluation processing order in which the risk-related items should be evaluated before the evaluator, and conversely, the upper evaluation processing order is the same as that after the evaluator. Indicates the evaluation processing order to be evaluated.

  According to the first feature configuration, the evaluation process in which the evaluation sheet display means defines the evaluation process order based on the responsibility order of each of the plurality of constituent members on the evaluation sheet displayed on the evaluator's terminal. The evaluation result of the subordinate constituent recognized by referring to the ranking table can be extracted from the evaluation result database and added. Therefore, the evaluator collects the evaluation results of the displayed lower constituent members and re-evaluates the evaluation results for each of a plurality of risk-related items while referring to the evaluation results of the lower constituent members. Can be entered in the evaluation sheet.

Therefore, the evaluation results collected from the evaluator, such as the head of the organization or the head of each department within the organization, can be handled as a summary of the organization or each department. The results can be easily aggregated to obtain a highly reliable aggregation result.
Furthermore, the evaluator, such as the head of the organization or the head of each department, is urged to input the evaluation results for each of the plurality of risk-related items so that the evaluator is aware of the specific contents of the risk-related items. By presenting the evaluation results of subordinates such as subordinates, it is possible to improve the awareness of the importance of risk management and motivate the improvement of basic skills.

  In the second feature configuration of the risk management evaluation system according to the present invention, in addition to the first feature configuration, the evaluation processing order table hierarchically defines evaluation processing orders for each of the plurality of constituent members. It is in the point.

  According to the second feature configuration, for example, even for an organization in which responsibility rankings are hierarchically configured, such as a large company, the hierarchical responsibility ranking is defined as an evaluation processing ranking in the evaluation processing ranking table. Can do. Therefore, on the evaluation sheet displayed on the evaluator's terminal such as the head of the organization or the head of each department in the organization, a plurality of evaluations collected from a plurality of subordinate members whose evaluation processing rank is lower than that of the evaluator. Since the result is added, the evaluator can grasp the evaluation result for each of the risk-related items of the entire organization or the entire department.

  The third feature configuration of the risk management evaluation system according to the present invention is configured to be able to update the evaluation process order in the evaluation process order table in addition to any of the first to second feature structures. It is in.

  According to the third characteristic configuration, the evaluation processing order defined in the evaluation processing order table can be changed as appropriate in accordance with the change of the responsibility order in the organization or the application to another organization.

  The fourth feature configuration of the risk management evaluation system according to the present invention is configured such that, in addition to any one of the first to third feature configurations, the risk-related items in the evaluation sheet can be updated. is there.

  According to the fourth feature configuration, the risk-related items in the evaluation sheet can be changed as appropriate in accordance with changes in the content and response status of the organization risk due to the implementation of the PDCA cycle in risk management. In addition, for example, the risk-related items in the evaluation sheet are composed of basic risk-related items that cannot be changed and complementary risk-related items that can be changed, and those that apply to the entire organization are listed as the above basic risk-related items. Items specific to each department can be listed as supplementary risk-related items.

  In the fifth feature configuration of the risk management evaluation system according to the present invention, in addition to any one of the first to fourth feature configurations, the evaluation sheet display means may evaluate the past evaluation results of the evaluator. It is the point which is comprised so that it may extract from a result database and the said past evaluation result extracted may be added to the evaluation sheet | seat displayed on the said evaluator's terminal.

  According to the fifth feature configuration, the evaluator refers to the evaluation results evaluated in the past by the evaluator in addition to the evaluation results of the lower-level components described so far. Evaluation results for each of a plurality of risk-related items can be input to the evaluation sheet while confirming the effect of risk management for each.

  The sixth characteristic configuration of the risk management evaluation system according to the present invention is a total that can be output by totaling the evaluation results accumulated in the evaluation result database in addition to any of the first to fifth characteristic configurations. The output means is provided.

  According to the sixth characteristic configuration, it is possible to effectively use the aggregated results of the evaluation results for each of the plurality of risk-related items output by the aggregated output means for feedback to the manager, follow-up on the spot, and the like. In addition, the aggregation method can be changed as appropriate, and an aggregation result suitable for the situation can be obtained.

The risk management evaluation sheet according to the present invention, which is used in the risk management evaluation system according to the present invention that has been described so far, and achieves the above-mentioned object, is provided for each of a plurality of constituent members in the organization. A risk management evaluation sheet for allowing each of a plurality of risk-related items to be evaluated and collecting the evaluation results, wherein the characteristic configuration is determined by an evaluator who performs the evaluation among the plurality of constituent members. , An evaluation result input unit capable of inputting the evaluation result;
And a lower evaluation result section for adding an evaluation result collected from a lower constituent member having an evaluation processing order lower than that of the evaluator among the plurality of constituent members.

In other words, by collecting the evaluation results from each of a plurality of constituent members in a form in which the evaluation results are entered in the evaluation result input section of this evaluation sheet, the evaluator who fills in the evaluation results can subordinate the evaluation sheet. In the form of collecting and re-evaluating the evaluation results of the lower constituent members displayed in the result section, it is possible to evaluate each of the risk-related items while referring to the evaluation results of the lower constituent members.
Therefore, similar to the risk management evaluation system described so far, the evaluation results collected from evaluators such as the head of the organization or the head of each department within the organization can be easily tabulated to obtain a highly reliable count result. However, it is possible to motivate evaluators such as the head of the organization or the head of each department to raise awareness about the importance of risk management and improve basic skills.

Embodiments of a risk management evaluation system (hereinafter abbreviated as “evaluation system”) and a risk management evaluation sheet (hereinafter abbreviated as “evaluation sheet”) according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
An evaluation system 1 shown in FIG. 1 is provided in, for example, an organization of an entire company or an entire company group, and each of a plurality of employees and officers (an example of a constituent member, hereinafter simply referred to as “employee”) in the organization. The system is configured to allow each of a plurality of risk-related items related to the risk in the organization to be evaluated and to collect the evaluation results.

Specifically, the evaluation system 1 includes a plurality of terminals (hereinafter referred to as “employee PCs”) 20 used by each of the plurality of employees and an audit department terminal (hereinafter referred to as “audit”) that performs risk management audits and the like. 8) is configured to be capable of data communication via a predetermined communication network 10.
The evaluation system 1 includes an evaluator setting unit 2, an evaluation sheet display unit 3, an evaluation result collection unit 4, a totalization output unit 5, and other known input / output devices and peripheral devices. Further, an evaluation result database (hereinafter referred to as “evaluation result DB”) 6 and a personnel information database (hereinafter referred to as “personnel information DB”) 7 described later are accessible.

  The employee PC 20 is a normal personal computer and includes a main body, a display screen, and input devices such as a keyboard and a mouse. Further, the employee PC 20 is provided with software such as a browser so as to be able to access various WEB sites on the Internet, send and receive data in a predetermined format, etc., and display page screens of the various WEB sites. It is configured to be displayed on the screen. The communication network 10 is realized by, for example, an intranet configured by a known wired or wireless data communication unit, an in-house LAN (local area network), the Internet, or the like.

The evaluation result DB 6 is assigned to one or more nonvolatile storage devices provided in a computer system provided on the auditing department side, for example, and evaluates each of a plurality of risk related items such as risk items and risk response status check items. It is constructed as a result stored for each employee.
The risk-related items can be changed as appropriate according to changes in time, changes in the scale of the organization, and the like.

On the other hand, the personnel information DB 7 is assigned to one or more nonvolatile storage devices provided in a computer system provided on the personnel department side or the like, and stores employee personnel information and the like. As personnel information, an employee ID and password of each employee for the evaluation system 1, an evaluation processing order table 7a, and the like are stored.
The evaluation processing order table 7a defines an evaluation processing order that is an order of evaluating risk-related items for each of a plurality of employees. The evaluation processing order is based on the responsibility order of each employee. Can be set. For example, as shown in FIG. 8, in the ascending order of the evaluation processing order, in the business department, the ascending order of the evaluation processing order is defined in the order of manager, department manager, and business department manager. Ascending order is defined.

Moreover, each means 2-5 of the evaluation system 1 is implement | achieved by software processing, utilizing the hardware resource of the computer system which comprises the evaluation system 1. FIG.
Specifically, the evaluation system 1 executes a predetermined computer program on the computer of the computer system while using hardware resources of the computer system, so that the evaluator setting unit 2, the evaluation sheet display unit 3, the evaluation result The collection means 4 and the total output means 5 are realized. The computer program is installed in a recording device accessible by a computer constituting the evaluation system 1 in hardware via a computer-readable recording medium such as a CD-ROM or a data transmission medium such as the Internet. And put to practical use.

  Furthermore, the evaluation system 1 has a function as a WEB server that manages a WEB site that provides various processing screens for risk management evaluation in WEB format via the communication network 10. In other words, the evaluation system 1 sends display data that can be displayed on the display screen of the employee PC 20 to the employee PC 20 in response to the access from the employee PC 20. The browser software processes the display data and displays the corresponding screen on the display screen. Thereby, the evaluation system 1 can display various screens on the display screen of the employee PC 20, and can receive data input on the display screen from the employee PC 20.

  By transmitting and receiving data between the evaluation system 1 and the employee PC 20 in this way, it is possible to display predetermined screen information from the evaluation system 1 on the display screen of the employee PC 20 simply by providing the employee PC 20 with general-purpose software. Conversely, data input on the display screen from the employee PC 20 can be easily received. In the following description, data transmission / reception between the evaluation system 1 and the employee PC 20 is performed by transmission / reception using a known data exchange protocol on the Internet.

Hereinafter, the detailed structure of each means 2-5 of the evaluation system 1 is demonstrated along the flow of the evaluation process flow performed by the evaluation system shown in FIG.
When an employee accesses the WEB site managed by the evaluation system from the employee PC 20 (step # 01), the evaluator setting means 2 of the evaluation system 1 first inputs an employee ID and a password for setting the employee as an evaluator. Login screen display data to be sent to the employee PC 20 (step # 02), and a login screen is displayed on the display screen of the employee PC 20.

Next, when the login screen is displayed on the employee PC 20, the accessing employee inputs his / her employee ID and password and clicks the login button on the login screen. And the password are transmitted to the evaluation system 1 (step # 03).
Then, the evaluator setting means 2 refers to the personnel information stored in the personnel information DB, and sets the employee as an evaluator in the form of identifying the accessed employee from the received employee ID and password ( Step # 04).

Next, after setting the evaluator by the evaluator setting means 2, the evaluation system 1 transmits the menu screen display data to the evaluator's employee PC 20 (step # 05), and the display screen of the employee PC 20 is displayed. A menu screen as shown in FIG. 3 is displayed on the top (step # 06).
In addition to the selection part for displaying an evaluation sheet such as a risk item evaluation sheet and a risk response status check item evaluation sheet, which will be described in detail later, this evaluator will also explain the risk items and response status check items. A selection unit for inputting a general comment, a selection unit for referring to an evaluation result or a general comment input by the user, and the like are shown.
Then, when the employee PC 20 clicks a selection unit for displaying an evaluation sheet on the menu screen, an evaluation sheet display request is transmitted to the evaluation system 1 (step # 07).

  The evaluation sheet display means 3 of the evaluation system 1 that has received the evaluation sheet display request displays an evaluation sheet on the evaluator's employee PC 20 for displaying an evaluation sheet in which the evaluation results for each of the plurality of risk-related items can be input. The display data is transmitted (step # 10), and an evaluation sheet as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 is displayed on the display screen of the employee PC 20 (step # 11).

Here, as the evaluation sheet, a risk item evaluation sheet as shown in FIG. 4 and a risk response status check item evaluation sheet as shown in FIG. 5 are used.
The above-mentioned risk item evaluation sheet shown in FIG. 4 is for evaluating the risk item that is the risk itself. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 4, each risk field such as business risk and financial / accounting risk is shown. As an evaluation result indicating the evaluation of each of the plurality of risk items shown in FIG. 1, the influence degree X indicating the degree of loss due to the occurrence of the risk item, for example, by a score of 0 to 4, and the occurrence frequency of the risk item, for example, 0 It has an evaluation result input unit capable of inputting a probability of occurrence Y indicated by a score of ˜4 and a risk evaluation value Z that is a product of the degree of influence X and the probability of occurrence Y. As for the risk evaluation value Z, the product of the degree of influence X and the possibility of occurrence Y can be automatically calculated and input.

  On the other hand, the risk response status check item evaluation sheet shown in FIG. 5 is for evaluating the risk response status check items that express the matters to be controlled for each risk item at a specific action level. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 5, as an evaluation for each of a plurality of risk response status check items shown for each corresponding risk item, the implementation level of the risk response status check item is indicated by a score of 0 to 4, for example. An evaluation result input unit capable of inputting the corresponding evaluation value W is provided.

  Furthermore, the risk-related evaluation sheets of the risk item evaluation sheet and the risk response status check item evaluation sheet have a lower evaluation processing rank than the evaluator who inputs the evaluation result in addition to the evaluation result input unit. It has a lower evaluation result section that displays the evaluation result of the risk evaluation value Z and the corresponding evaluation value W collected from the subordinate employees who are employees, and further, the risk evaluation value Z collected from the evaluator last year (past) and the response A past evaluation result section for displaying a past evaluation result of the evaluation value W is provided.

  That is, the evaluation sheet display means 3 refers to the evaluation processing order table 7a stored in the personnel information DB 7 and recognizes an employee having an evaluation processing order lower than the evaluator who is the accessing employee as a subordinate employee. Then, the evaluation result of the subordinate employee is extracted from the evaluation result DB 6 (step # 08), and the evaluation sheet is generated in such a form that the extracted evaluation result of the subordinate employee is added to the above-described subordinate evaluation result section (step # 09). Then, the evaluation sheet display data for displaying the generated evaluation sheet is transmitted to the employee PC 20 of the evaluator (step # 10), and the evaluation sheet is displayed on the display screen of the employee PC 20 (step #). 11).

  Specifically, assuming that the evaluator is a business manager in a business department as shown in FIG. 8, the employee PC 20 of the business department manager has the responsibility ranking of the business department as shown in FIGS. The evaluation results collected from the respective managers (A, B, and Tsubaki) who are lower than the manager are displayed in the lower evaluation result section on the evaluation sheet.

  Therefore, the evaluator such as the general manager of the business unit refers to the evaluation results collected from the subordinate employees in the form of collecting and reassessing the evaluation results collected from the subordinate employees such as the respective general managers (Ex. However, the evaluation result for each of the plurality of risk-related items can be input to the evaluation sheet.

Further, the evaluation sheet display means 3 extracts the evaluation result of the evaluator last year from the evaluation result DB 6 (step # 09), and in step # 10, the extracted evaluation result of the last year is displayed in the past evaluation result section described above. An evaluation sheet is generated in a form to be added.
Therefore, in addition to the evaluation results of the subordinate employees such as the respective general managers (A, B, and A) described above, the evaluators such as the business managers refer to the evaluation results that they evaluated last year, While confirming the effect of risk management for each of the plurality of risk-related items, the evaluation result for each of the plurality of risk-related items can be input to the evaluation sheet.

  As described above, the evaluator on the employee PC 20 side on which the evaluation sheet is displayed inputs the evaluation result to the evaluation result input part of the evaluation sheet and clicks the confirm button, so that the input evaluation result is evaluated. It is transmitted to the system 1 (step # 12).

  The evaluation result collection means 4 of the evaluation system 1 receives the evaluation result from the evaluator's employee PC 20 and stores the received evaluation result in the evaluation result DB 6 in association with the evaluator's employee ID or the like (step #). 13).

Furthermore, the evaluation system 1 collects the evaluation results from a certain evaluator along the above-described evaluation processing flow, and then refers to the evaluation processing order table 7a stored in the personnel information DB 7 to make the evaluation system more than the evaluator. Recognize an employee who has a higher evaluation processing order as a higher employee and send a collection completion report such as e-mail to report the completion of collection of evaluation results from the evaluator to the PC terminal 20 of the higher employee. Transmit in the form (step # 14).
Accordingly, the upper-level employee who has received the collection completion report accesses the evaluation system 1 from his / her employee PC 20 when the collection of evaluation results from all employees such as subordinates in the department he / she manages is completed, and the above-mentioned An evaluation result for each of a plurality of risk-related items can be input along the evaluation processing flow.
Note that the e-mail of the collection completion report may be transmitted from the evaluator's employee PC 20 to the upper employee's employee PC 20. In addition, when the evaluation result is collected from the evaluator, the collection completion report by e-mail is omitted, and the upper employee can confirm whether the collection of the evaluation result from the lower employee is completed through the PC terminal 20. You may comprise.

  Then, the evaluation process flow as described above is executed for each of a plurality of employees in a form in which evaluators are sequentially set, for example, in ascending order of hierarchical evaluation process order. In the result DB 6, the evaluation results collected from the employees in the respective positions in the evaluation processing order are stored in association with the employees.

The aggregation output means 5 of the evaluation system 1 can aggregate and output the evaluation results accumulated in the evaluation result DB.
Specifically, the tabulation output means 5 extracts the evaluation results accumulated in the evaluation result DB 6 by, for example, each risk item by accessing the employee PC 20 or the audit department PC 8 of the business manager having a specific authority, for example. The tabulation is performed in a predetermined format and output to a display screen, a printer, or the like. The tabulation results thus output can be effectively used for feedback to the manager, follow-up on the site, or the like.

For example, the tabulation output means 5 can tabulate and output the evaluation results in a tabulation format as shown in FIG. 6 or FIG.
That is, in the tabulation format shown in FIG. 6, for each risk item, the distribution of the impact degree X and the probability of occurrence Y collected using the risk item evaluation sheet is graphed. It is possible to recognize a risk item in an area where the evaluation value Z is high (an area close to the upper right corner in FIG. 6).
Moreover, in the total form shown in FIG. 7, for each risk item, the distribution of the risk evaluation value collected using the risk item evaluation sheet and the correspondence evaluation value W collected using the risk response status check item evaluation sheet is a graph. The output in this format recognizes risk items in areas where risk avoidance is insufficient even though the risk evaluation value is high (the area near the lower right corner in FIG. 7) be able to.
In addition, these tabulation formats may be set arbitrarily. For example, the tabulation format is used instead of the graph, and the risk assessment values for each risk item and the changes over time of the corresponding assessment values are graphed and displayed. Etc. can be adopted.

  In addition, although the example which applied the risk management evaluation system and risk management evaluation sheet | seat of this invention to the organization of a company or a company group was demonstrated in the said embodiment, you may apply to another organizations other than a company.

  The risk management evaluation system and the risk management evaluation sheet according to the present invention provide an aggregation work for collecting and collecting evaluation results for each of a plurality of risk-related items in an organization for each of a plurality of constituent members in the organization. Effectively used as a means to collect evaluation results so as to motivate each constituent to raise awareness of the importance of risk management and improve basic skills. Is possible.

Schematic configuration diagram of risk management evaluation system Flow chart showing the evaluation process flow Figure showing an example of a menu screen Diagram showing an example of a risk item evaluation sheet Figure showing an example of a check sheet evaluation sheet Figure showing an example of the summary output of evaluation results Figure showing an example of the summary output of evaluation results Diagram explaining the status of hierarchical responsibility ranking in an organization

Explanation of symbols

1: Risk management evaluation system 2: Evaluator setting means 3: Evaluation sheet display means 4: Evaluation result collection means 5: Total output means 6: Evaluation result database 7a: Evaluation processing order table 10: Communication network 20: Employee PC (Configuration Terminal)

Claims (7)

A risk management evaluation system for allowing each of a plurality of constituent members in an organization to evaluate each of a plurality of risk-related items in the organization and collecting the evaluation results,
It is configured to be capable of data communication via a predetermined communication network with respect to each of the plurality of constituent terminals,
An evaluator setting means for setting the accessed constituent on the terminal side as an evaluator performing the evaluation;
Evaluation sheet display means for displaying an evaluation sheet on which the evaluation result can be input on the terminal of the evaluator,
From the evaluator's terminal, the evaluation result input unit is received, the evaluation result collecting means for storing the received evaluation result in the evaluation result database in association with the evaluator,
The evaluation sheet display means recognizes a member having an evaluation processing order lower than that of the evaluator as a lower constituent by referring to an evaluation processing order table that defines an evaluation processing order for each of the plurality of constituent members. Then, the evaluation result collected from the lower constituent member is extracted from the evaluation result database, and the extracted evaluation result of the lower constituent member is added to the evaluation sheet displayed on the evaluator's terminal. Risk management evaluation system.   The risk management evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation processing order table hierarchically defines evaluation processing orders for each of the plurality of constituent members.   The risk management evaluation system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the evaluation processing order in the evaluation processing order table is configured to be updatable.   The risk management evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the risk-related item in the evaluation sheet is configured to be updatable.   The evaluation sheet display means is configured to extract a past evaluation result of the evaluator from the evaluation result database and add the extracted past evaluation result to an evaluation sheet to be displayed on the evaluator's terminal. The risk management evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 4.   The risk management evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 5, further comprising a totalization output unit capable of totaling and outputting the evaluation results accumulated in the evaluation result database. A risk management evaluation sheet for allowing each of a plurality of constituent members in an organization to evaluate each of a plurality of risk-related items in the organization and collecting the evaluation results,
An evaluator performing the evaluation among the plurality of constituent members, an evaluation result input unit capable of inputting the evaluation result;
A risk management evaluation sheet comprising: a lower evaluation result section for adding an evaluation result collected from a lower constituent member having an evaluation processing order lower than that of the evaluator among the plurality of constituent members.

Images