JP2002099682A - Method and device for evaluating employee - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an evaluating method which can smoothly evaluate an employee while maintaining high-level secrecy on WEB. SOLUTION: An employee who has been identified by comparing biometrics data evaluates oneself. The result of the self-evaluation is called self-evaluation points. A section chief having been identified similarly to the employee while referring to self-evaluation points evaluates the employee and primary evaluation points are calculated. A department chief having been identified similarly to the employee, etc., while referring to self-evaluation points and primary evaluation points evaluate the employee secondarily. The number of evaluating persons can be set to various values at need. Thus, after the evaluated person (employee) and evaluating persons (section chief, department chief) are identified, the evaluation is performed to secure secrecy and safety. Further, while the secrecy, etc., is secured, the section chief and department chief evaluate the employee in order while referring the self-evaluation points of the employee, so the evaluation can smoothly be carried out.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for evaluating employees of a company and a system used for executing the method.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art In a company, the evaluation of its employees is an important matter. In particular, in recent years, the ability evaluation based on the meritocracy has been regarded as important, and thus the importance of evaluating the ability of employees has been increasing.

[0003]

However, conventionally,
There is no established method for evaluating employees, and the evaluation work has often been complicated. In addition, employees tend to have to report their work results for their own evaluation and set their own goals for their own evaluation. In addition, the burden of reporting the achievement rate of the target by oneself increases, and the original work may be hindered.

[0004] The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide an evaluation method capable of smoothly evaluating an employee and a system used for executing the method.

[0005]

In order to solve the above problems, the present invention is based on a question step of asking one or more questions to an employee to be evaluated,
A self-evaluation score calculating step of calculating the employee's self-evaluation score.

According to such a configuration, evaluation can be performed based on the employee's answer to the question.

In the present invention, the term "employee" is not limited to a regular employee of a company or the like, but refers to all employees generally evaluated, such as part-timers and part-time workers. Also,
The “employee” is a concept including, for example, staff of various organizations and public servants of public organizations.

[0008] In the present invention, the primary evaluator answers the above-mentioned question by referring to the employee's answer and the self-evaluation score calculated based on the answer.
An employee evaluation method, comprising: a next evaluation step; and a first evaluation calculation step of calculating a first evaluation score of the employee based on a response of the first evaluator in the first evaluation step. It is.

According to such a configuration, the primary evaluator is:
An employee evaluation can be performed while referring to the employee's answer.

Further, in the present invention, the secondary evaluator calculates the answer based on the employee's answer, the self-evaluation score calculated based on the answer, the primary evaluator's answer, and the answer. A secondary evaluation step for answering the question made while referring to the primary evaluation score, and a secondary evaluation score of the employee based on the answer of the secondary evaluator in the secondary evaluation step. And a secondary evaluation calculation step of calculating.

According to such a configuration, the secondary evaluator is:
The evaluation of the employee can be executed with reference to the answer of the employee and the answer / evaluation of the primary evaluator.

[0012] The present invention also includes an employee authentication step of receiving biometrics data from the employee and determining whether or not the employee is an individual based on the biometrics data. The step is a method for evaluating an employee, wherein a question is asked when the person is determined to be the person in the employee authentication step.

[0013] According to such a configuration, since the personal authentication is performed by using the biometric data, only the employee himself / herself can execute the self-evaluation.

Further, the present invention provides a primary evaluator authentication step of receiving biometrics data from the primary evaluator and determining whether or not the primary evaluator is an individual based on the biometrics data. Wherein the primary evaluation step includes allowing the primary evaluator to answer a question when the primary evaluator authentication step determines that the user is the principal. It is.

According to such a configuration, since the personal authentication is performed by using the biometric data, only the primary evaluator can execute the primary evaluation.

Further, the present invention provides a secondary evaluator authentication step of receiving biometrics data from the secondary evaluator and determining whether or not the secondary evaluator is an individual based on the biometrics data. Wherein the secondary evaluation step includes the step of permitting the secondary evaluator to answer a question when it is determined in the secondary evaluator authentication step that the user is the principal. It is.

According to such a configuration, the personal authentication is performed using the biometric data, so that only the secondary evaluator can execute the secondary evaluation.

Further, the present invention is the employee evaluation method, wherein in the questioning step, one or more questions are selected based on the qualification or function of the employee.

According to such a configuration, it is possible to generate a group of questions according to the contents of the work of each employee.

In the present invention, in the question step, the one or more questions are displayed on a web page,
On the other hand, an employee evaluation method is characterized in that the employee executes an answer on a web page.

According to such a configuration, the employee can answer the question via the browser software.

Further, in order to solve the upper problem, the present invention stores an employee identifier and the qualification and function of the employee indicated by the identifier in an evaluation device used for employee evaluation. The first storage means is stored based on the first storage means, the qualifications and functions of the employee, and a group of questions to be asked based on the qualifications and functions, and the first storage means is searched based on the identifier of the employee. Question means for reading the qualifications and functions of the employee, searching the second storage means based on the read qualifications and functions, and generating a group of questions to be performed based on the qualifications and functions; And a presenting means for presenting to the employee.

According to such a configuration, the qualification of the employee
Questions can be generated based on profession and the questions can be presented to employees.

Further, the present invention includes third storage means for storing an employee answer of the employee with respect to the question group and a score based on the employee answer, wherein the question means comprises: An evaluation apparatus, wherein a self-evaluation score is calculated based on an employee response, and the self-evaluation score and the employee response are stored in the third storage means.

According to such a configuration, the self-evaluation score can be calculated based on the answer of the employee, and the score can be held.

Further, in the present invention, the presenting means presents the employee answer to the question group and a self-evaluation score based on the employee answer to a primary evaluator, and the question means comprises: Calculating a primary evaluation score based on the primary evaluator's response to the primary evaluator, and storing the primary evaluation score and the primary evaluator response in the third storage means. Device.

According to such a configuration, the primary evaluator is:
The primary evaluation can be executed while referring to the employee's answer and the self-evaluation score.

Also, in the present invention, the presenting means includes the employee answer to the question group, a self-evaluation score based on the employee answer, the primary evaluator answer to the question group, and the primary evaluator. Primary evaluation score based on the answer,
Is presented to the secondary evaluator, and the question means calculates a secondary evaluation score based on the secondary evaluator's answer to the question group.

According to such a configuration, the secondary evaluator is:
The secondary evaluation can be executed while referring to the employee answer, the self-evaluation score, the primary evaluator answer, and the primary evaluation score.

Further, the present invention receives biometrics data, checks whether the employee indicated by the biometrics data is the same as the employee indicated by the identifier, and determines whether the employee is the same as the employee indicated by the identifier. An evaluation device, comprising: an authentication unit that determines that the user is a principal; and a presentation unit that presents the group of questions to the employee when the authentication unit determines that the user is a principal.

According to such a configuration, since the authentication of the person is performed by the biometric data, it is possible to prevent the third person from executing the self-evaluation on behalf of the employee.

Further, according to the present invention, the authentication means may be configured so that:
Based on the biometrics data received from the next evaluator, it is determined whether the primary evaluator is the principal. If the authentication unit is determined to be the principal, the presentation unit replaces the question group with the first evaluator. An evaluation device characterized by presenting to a next evaluator.

According to such a configuration, since the authentication of the user by the biometrics data is executed, the third party is required
Executing the primary evaluation on behalf of the next evaluator can be prevented.

Also, in the present invention, the authentication means may be configured to execute
Based on the biometrics data received from the next evaluator, it is determined whether or not the secondary evaluator is the principal. If the authentication means is determined to be the principal, the presentation means substitutes the question group into the 2nd evaluator. An evaluation device characterized by presenting to a next evaluator.

According to such a configuration, since the authentication of the user by the biometrics data is executed, the third party is required
Executing the secondary evaluation on behalf of the next evaluator can be prevented.

Also, in the present invention, the authentication means transmits the biometric data to an external authentication device that performs identity verification based on the biometric data, and indicates whether or not the user is an identity from the authentication device. An evaluation device that receives an authentication result.

According to such a configuration, personal authentication based on biometrics data can be entrusted to an external authentication device, so that a general-purpose authentication device can be used.

[0038]

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

Embodiment 1 1. Network Configuration In the first embodiment, a network 10 such as a corporate LAN
An example will be described in which an employee is evaluated by using.

FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing the form of such a network 10. Network 10
Is, for example, a corporate LAN. The network includes a terminal 12 of an employee who is an evaluator and a terminal 14 of a primary evaluator (for example, a section manager) who is a supervisor of the employee.
And are connected. In the text, the evaluator closest to the evaluated person is referred to as a primary evaluator.

Further, a terminal 16 of a secondary evaluator (for example, a manager) as a supervisor is connected to the network 10. In the text, the evaluators of the evaluator are referred to as a primary evaluator, a secondary evaluator,... In ascending order of the evaluator.

A server 18 used for executing employee evaluation is connected to the network 10. The network may include the so-called Internet. Further, it may be a virtual network such as a so-called VPN. Further, an authentication server 3 for authenticating whether or not the user is an identity based on the signature data
0 is connected to the network 10.

2. Overall Flow of Evaluation Operation The employee evaluation method according to the first embodiment is performed according to the flow shown in the flowchart of FIG. The detailed operation of each step will be described in Section 4.

(1) The employee (evaluated person) executes his / her own evaluation (step S2-1 in FIG. 2). The result of the employee's own evaluation is referred to as “self-evaluation score”. This self-evaluation score is transmitted via the network 10 to the manager (primary evaluator) who is the supervisor. In the first embodiment, transmission is performed particularly through the server 18.

(2) The primary evaluator (section manager) evaluates the employee (refers to “1”
(Referred to as “next evaluation point”) (Step S2 in FIG. 2)
-2). The primary evaluation score and the self-evaluation score are further transmitted via the network 10 to the secondary evaluator (manager) who is the supervisor.

(3) The secondary evaluator (manager) evaluates the employee (referred to as “secondary evaluation”) while referring to the self-evaluation score and the primary evaluation score (FIG. 2). Step S2-3).

(4) This secondary evaluation is the final evaluation for the employee.

As described above, since the primary evaluator (section manager) and the secondary evaluator (manager) are sequentially evaluated for the employee, including the self-evaluation score of the person, the employee is evaluated. The evaluation can be performed smoothly.

In the first embodiment, an example of two stages in which only section managers / managers evaluate employees is shown. However, in more stages, such as headquarters, managing director, managing director,... An evaluation may be performed.

[0050] 3. 1. Server that executes service of evaluation operation The service related to the evaluation operation in the operation described in the evaluation flow is provided by the server 18. This server 18 corresponds to an example of the evaluation device of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the server 18. As shown in FIG.
Has a web service means 20, an authentication means 22, an inquiry means 24, and a storage means 26.

The web service means 20 is a means for providing a web page to each of the terminals 12, 14, 16 connected to the network 10. In the first embodiment, this WE
Employees and evaluators (section manager, manager) perform the evaluation operation via page B. The WEB service means 20 corresponds to an example of the presenting means of the present invention.

The authentication means 22 uses an external authentication server 30 to check whether the person accessing the WEB page is the employee or the evaluator (section manager, manager). are doing. This prevents another person from executing the employee's self-evaluation score or seeing the evaluation result of the employee. Embodiment 1
Then, the authentication unit 22 transmits the signature data to the external authentication server 30 and requests that the signature data is the signature data of the user. The authentication server 30 determines whether or not the signature data belongs to the user, and sends the determination result to the authentication unit 22.
To return. Based on the result of this determination, the authentication means 22
It is determined whether or not the person accessing the page is the person himself / herself.

In the first embodiment, the authentication unit 22
Uses the external authentication server 30 to perform identity verification, but by incorporating the same function as the authentication server 30 into the authentication means 22, it is possible to perform identity verification without using the external authentication server 30. Is also preferred.

On the other hand, if an external authentication server 30 is used, other systems using the authentication server 30 cannot see inside the server 18 in the first embodiment, so that the security is considered to be improved. Can be

Also, signature data serving as a reference for signature verification and comparison software for authentication are provided on the server 1.
Since the data can be stored in the external server 30 instead of in the server 8, there is an advantage that the amount of data to be stored in the server 18 can be prevented from increasing.

The inquiry means 24 generates a group of questions for evaluating the employee based on the qualification and function of the employee. In the first embodiment, the evaluation of the employee is executed by answering a question. In addition, question means 2
4 receives the answer to the question via the web service means 20 and stores it in the storage means 26. In addition, the evaluation is totalized based on the answers. These operations will be described later in detail.

The storage means 26 is a storage means for storing various data. The above-mentioned question group, its answer, the total result of the evaluation, and the like are also stored in the storage means 26.

The web service means 20 is composed of a group of software for providing an interface with a network and a web page. Authentication means 2
2. The inquiry means 24 is also composed of software operating on a computer. It is preferable that the storage means is configured using a hard disk or various optical disks (so-called MO, DVD, etc.).

[0060] 4. Details of Evaluation Operation FIGS. 4 to 6 show flowcharts showing detailed operations of the self-evaluation using the server 18.

4-1. Self-evaluation operation FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a detailed operation of the self-evaluation in step S2-1.

First, in step S4-1, the employee logs in to the server 18 from the terminal 12. This login is performed by an employee inputting his / her employee number on a web page provided by the server 18. As described above, so-called browser software is installed in the employee terminal, and the employee accesses the server 18 using the browser software.

Further, in the first embodiment, the employee inputs signature data at the time of login. This signature data is used for so-called identity verification. In other words, it is prevented that another person impersonates himself and inputs his / her own evaluation without permission.

In the first embodiment, the signature data is used, but any data such as a fingerprint, a voiceprint, and a retinal pattern may be used as long as the data is biometric data.

The employee number and the signature data thus input are sent from the web service means 20 to the authentication means 2.
2 and interrogation means 24. The authentication unit 22 determines whether or not the user is the person using the signature data, and presents the determination result to the web service unit 20. When the authentication unit 22 determines that the user is the user, the WEB service unit 20 displays a message indicating that the user is the user on the terminal 12 of the employee.

Next, in step S4-2, a WEB page for executing self-evaluation for the employee is displayed. This WEB page is a WEB page in which one or more question groups for the employee are shown together with their options. This web page is stored in web service means 2
0 and presented to the employee. That is, W
The EB service unit 20 corresponds to an example of a presentation unit according to the present invention. The employee can refer to this web page via the browser software and answer questions as described above.

On the other hand, one or more question groups included in the web page are created by the question means 24.
The inquiry means 24 searches the employee database in the storage means 26 based on the employee number of the employee. And
Find out the qualifications and functions of the employee. Further, the question means 24 reads out a group of questions to be presented to the employee from the storage means 26 based on the qualification and function. In this way, the question means 24 generates a group of questions based on the qualifications and functions of the employee.

As described above, the storage means 26 stores an employee database storing the qualifications and functions of the employees, and a group of questions prepared for each qualification and function.
That is, the storage unit 26 is an example of the first storage unit and the second storage unit of the present invention.

The question is, for example, "whether a customer can respond to a telephone call" or "whether a product can be ordered". On the other hand, options such as “I can do better”, “I can do a little”, “Normal”, “I can't do much”, “I can hardly do it” are shown, and the employee selects an option that applies to herself.
Note that these options as answers to the question group are displayed on the WEB page by radio buttons or the like.

In step S4-3, the employee clicks any radio button to select an answer to the question from options. In the first embodiment,
I used radio buttons, but displayed a checkbox,
The employee may check the check box as appropriate.

In step S4-4, the answer of the employee is stored in a predetermined storage means. This storage is temporary and at this stage the employee can change its contents.

In step S4-5, a score is calculated for the answer of the employee. A score is attached to each of the above options, and the score for the employee's answer is calculated by totaling the scores. This score is the self-evaluation score for the employee. It is not shown to the employee what kind of score is given to which option. Also, the self-evaluation score, which is the result of the tallying, is not shown to the employee himself.

The employee's answer is the WEB service means 20
Is passed to the inquiry means 24 via The question means 24 calculates a score for each question based on the received answer.
The score of each option for each question is stored in the storage unit 26 in the form of a table. Of course, the point distribution may be held internally by the interrogating means 24 itself.

In step S4-6, the employee inputs signature data. The input of the signature data indicates that the response may be transmitted to the evaluator. In other words, the answer can be changed until the signature data is input.

In step S4-7, the self-evaluation score and answer data are transmitted to the evaluator.

In step S 4-8, the self-evaluation score is stored in the storage means 26. At this time, in addition to the self-evaluation score (final score), the employee's answer to the question is also stored. As described later, the self-evaluation score and the answer are disclosed to the primary evaluator and the secondary evaluator,
These evaluators can evaluate the employee while also considering the self-evaluation score and the employee's concept.

This storing operation is executed by the interrogating means 24. Further, in parallel with the storing operation, the inquiry means 24 sends a flag indicating that the evaluation has been completed to the evaluator list of the evaluator. The evaluator list is a list provided for each evaluator, and is a list indicating evaluators to be evaluated by each evaluator. This list shows whether or not each evaluator has completed the self-evaluation. Such display is performed by reflecting the contents of the flag in the list. In the first embodiment, the evaluator list is stored in the storage unit 2
6, but may be stored anywhere. Note that the storage unit 26 is an example of a third storage unit in the present invention.

As described above, according to the first embodiment,
An employee can perform self-evaluation only by answering a question on the web page, and a highly convenient system can be realized. In particular, since the employee can answer only by selecting an option, the employee can execute the self-evaluation in a short time, and the influence on the normal work can be reduced.

4.2.1 Evaluation Operation of Primary Evaluator One of the primary evaluator (section manager) in step S2-2 described above.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the detailed operation of the next evaluation.

First, in step S5-1, the primary evaluator logs in to the server 18 from the terminal 14. This login operation is performed by the server 18 as in the case of the employee.
Is executed by the primary evaluator inputting his / her employee number on the WEB page provided by the company. Further, the execution of the identity verification using the signature data is almost the same as that of the employee.

If the authentication means 22 determines that the user is the principal, the WEB service means 20 displays a message to the effect that the user is confirmed to be the principal on the terminal 14 of the primary evaluator.

Next, in step S5-2, a WEB page for executing the primary evaluation of the employee whose primary evaluator must evaluate is displayed to the primary evaluator (section manager). You. This WEB page is a WEB page showing a group of questions identical to the group of questions for the employee. The primary evaluator selects an option for each question in the same manner as the employee to evaluate the employee. Execute. 1
Browser software is also installed on the terminal 14 of the next evaluator, and the primary evaluator can execute evaluation using this browser software.

The characteristic feature of the first embodiment is that
The point is that the employee's answer is shown on this web page. The WEB page also shows points (self-evaluation points) based on the answers of the employees. With such a configuration, the primary evaluator (section manager) can execute the primary evaluation of the employee while considering the self-evaluation score of the employee.

W shown to such a primary evaluator
A schematic diagram of the EB page is shown in FIG. As shown in this figure, the answer and the score of the employee A to be evaluated by the primary evaluator are shown, and the primary evaluator can execute the evaluation on the employee A while considering the contents thereof. it can.

It is desirable that the evaluation value obtained by summing up the scores for the answers to the respective questions is normalized and displayed so that the full score is 100 points. In other words, there is no limit on the number of questions. The score is calculated by weighting. In other words, a total of 100
You don't have to worry about it. This point is also a characteristic matter in the first embodiment.

In step S5-3, the primary evaluator performs a primary evaluation by selecting an answer to each question from the options similarly to the employee.

In step S5-4, the answer is stored in a predetermined storage means. The stored answer can be changed at this stage.

In step S5-5, a score is calculated for the answer of the primary evaluator. In this case, what score is given to each option is presented to the primary evaluator. In addition, the result of the final primary evaluation (referred to as primary evaluation score) in which scores for each question are totaled is also shown to the primary evaluator.

In step S5-6, the primary evaluator inputs the signature data again. The input of the signature data means an intention that the answer and the score can be finally determined.

In step S5-7, the answer and the score are transmitted to the secondary evaluator.

In step S5-8, the primary evaluation score is stored in the storage means 26. At this time, in addition to the primary evaluation score, each response of the primary evaluator to the question is also stored. As will be described later, the primary evaluation score and each response of the primary evaluator are disclosed to the secondary evaluator. As a result, 2
The secondary evaluator is the employee's self-evaluation score and 1
It is possible to evaluate the employee while considering the next evaluation score.

In parallel with the storage of the evaluation points, a flag indicating the end of the evaluation is sent to the evaluator list of the evaluator. In this case, the evaluator is a secondary evaluator positioned higher than the primary evaluator. Each secondary evaluator is provided with an evaluator list in which, as with the primary evaluator, evaluators to be evaluated by the user are described. This list shows whether each evaluator has completed the self-evaluation and also displays whether the primary evaluator has completed the evaluation. This display is made based on the flag.

Note that this storage means 26 is provided in the third embodiment of the present invention.
This corresponds to an example of a storage unit.

As described above, according to the first embodiment,
The primary evaluator refers to the employee's self-
Since the next evaluation can be performed, a more objective evaluation can be performed.

4-3. Evaluation Operation of Secondary Evaluator 2 of the secondary evaluator (manager) in step S2-3.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the detailed operation of the next evaluation.

First, in step S7-1, the secondary evaluator logs in to the server 18 from the terminal 16. This login operation is the same as that of the employee or the primary evaluator.

Next, in step S7-2, a WEB page for executing the secondary evaluation of the employee whose secondary evaluator must evaluate the secondary evaluator (section manager) is displayed. You. This WEB page is a WEB page showing the same question group as the question group for the employee, like the WEB page shown to the primary evaluator (section manager). Then, the secondary evaluator executes the secondary evaluation by selecting options for each question in the same manner as the employee or the primary evaluator. The so-called browser software is also mounted on the terminal 16 of the secondary evaluator, and the secondary evaluator can execute the secondary evaluation using this browser software.

The characteristic features of the first embodiment are as follows.
This web page shows the employee's answer, the self-evaluation score based thereon, the primary evaluator's answer, and the primary evaluation score based thereon. With such a configuration,
The secondary evaluator (manager) can execute the secondary evaluation of the employee while considering the self-evaluation score and the primary evaluation score of the employee.

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a WEB page shown to the secondary evaluator. As shown in this figure,
On the WEB page, the answer of employee A to be evaluated by the secondary evaluator and the score thereof (self-evaluation score) are shown. Further, the WEB page shows the answer of the primary evaluator and the score (primary evaluation score). Therefore, the secondary evaluator can execute the secondary evaluation for the employee A while considering these contents.

It is desirable that the evaluation value obtained by summing up the scores for the answers to the respective questions is normalized and displayed so that the full score is 100 points.

In step S7-3, the secondary evaluator performs secondary evaluation by selecting an answer to each question from options.

In step S7-4, this answer is stored in a predetermined storage means. At this point, the answer can be changed.

In step S7-5, a score is calculated for the answer of the secondary evaluator. In this case, as in the case of the primary evaluator, what kind of score is assigned to each option, the final secondary evaluation result (referred to as secondary evaluation score) in which the scores for each question are totaled are also 2 points. It is shown to the next evaluator (see FIG. 8).

In short, the employees to be evaluated are:
Although the score attached to each option for each question and the value of the final score, which is the final total value, are not disclosed, the primary evaluator and the secondary evaluator who are the evaluators will not disclose these scores and evaluation scores. Is shown.

In step S7-6, the secondary evaluator inputs the signature data. The input of this signature data is 2
This means that the user is willing to finalize the next evaluation.

In step S7-7, if there is a higher evaluator, the answer and the secondary evaluation are transmitted to the higher evaluator.

In step S 7-8, the secondary evaluation score is stored in the storage means 26. At this time, in addition to the secondary evaluation score, each answer of the secondary evaluator to the question is also stored.

When there is a higher evaluator, a flag indicating the end of evaluation is sent to the evaluator list in parallel with this storing operation. This evaluator list is a list provided for higher-level evaluators, and includes a display indicating whether or not the evaluation of the evaluator in each stage has been completed.
This display is made based on the flag.

As described above, according to the first embodiment,
The secondary evaluator is the employee's self-evaluation score and the primary evaluator is 1
Since secondary evaluation can be performed while referring to the next evaluation score,
It is possible to perform a more objective evaluation.

As described above, according to the first embodiment, the self-evaluation of the employee, the primary evaluation of the primary evaluator, and the secondary evaluation of the secondary evaluator are sequentially executed centering on the server 18. Therefore, the evaluation can be performed smoothly.

Further, as shown in FIG. 8, on the WEB page referred to by the secondary evaluator, the evaluation of the lower rank is shown. For example, if the evaluation of the primary evaluator has not been completed, the result of the evaluation of the primary evaluator is not shown. This means that the secondary evaluator can be informed to what stage the evaluation work has progressed. As a result, the secondary evaluator can prompt self-evaluation of the employee. Similarly, it is possible to prompt the primary evaluator to evaluate.

The evaluation data obtained according to the first embodiment can be imported into spreadsheet software or the like by copying it from a web page. As a result, salary review materials for the entire company can be easily created.

In the first embodiment, the evaluation of the employees of the company has been described. However, the "employee" in the present invention is not limited to a regular employee of a company or the like, but means all personnel generally evaluated, such as part-timers and part-time workers. The “employee” is a concept including, for example, staff of various organizations and public servants of public organizations.

Embodiment 2 1. Evaluator (1-1) As described in the first embodiment, the present invention intends to evaluate employees in multiple stages. Here, an evaluator at a certain intermediate stage is an evaluator from the viewpoint of a lower employee, but is an evaluator to be evaluated from a higher evaluator.

Therefore, when an evaluator at a certain intermediate stage logs in to the server 18, the evaluator selects one of two types of evaluation screens.

As described in the first embodiment, one evaluation screen is for evaluation of a person lower than the self. When this evaluation screen is selected, a list of subordinates (evaluates) to be evaluated by the user is displayed. This list is the evaluator list described in the first embodiment. As described above, this evaluator list indicates whether or not all evaluations of persons lower than the self have been completed. Based on this display, the evaluation is performed from those who have completed the evaluation.

The other evaluation screen is the self-evaluation, which corresponds to the employee's self-evaluation described in the first embodiment.

(1-2) The number of evaluators for the evaluator is arbitrary. For example, there are those who report directly to the director and complete the evaluation only by the primary evaluation. Further, there may be a case where the tree structure of the organization is deep and the processing is executed up to the fourth evaluation.

[0119] 2. In the first embodiment described above, only the evaluator and the evaluator (some people play both roles) have been described.

However, it is also preferable that there is an administrator who simply checks the evaluation operation separately from the evaluator / evaluated person. Here, the administrator is a person who has been given authority in advance. The authority here refers to the authority to see data in a predetermined range. For example, the person in charge of evaluation may check the status of the evaluation, or the president may view the employee's answer. These managers can access the server 18 and browse the evaluation results in a predetermined range, the answers of each person, and the like. Such authority is specified by signature verification.

It is preferable that the data is not rewritten even by the administrator.

[0122] 3. Security and Mobility As described in the first embodiment, it is necessary to input signature data not only when logging in to the server 18 but also when transmitting data such as an answer. Such a configuration means that a so-called double check is performed. With such a configuration, it is possible to protect the privacy of the individual and to clarify the intention of the individual to perform and transmit.

It is not necessary to prepare a dedicated terminal for use by the evaluator / evaluated person. That is, the operation described in the first embodiment does not depend on the client machine. As long as the client is connected to the server 18, when the employee goes on a business trip, the client installed at the branch office where the employee travels can execute the operation in the first embodiment. Of course, even in this case, the identity verification using the signature data is executed.

Further, a configuration in which a handwritten character recognition function is provided in a so-called mobile phone or the like is also conceivable. It is possible to execute identity verification using signature data using a mobile phone or the like having such a configuration. Therefore, if such a mobile phone or the like is used, the evaluation operation can be performed safely from anywhere within the radio wave range of the mobile phone.

It is considered that such a mobile phone can be realized by using a means for recognizing a character drawn with a finger on a display portion.

It is technically possible for a predetermined server to provide a web page and perform an evaluation operation using the provided web page. A password is known as a means for confirming the identity of the user, but the security of the password may not always be sufficient.

Further, once transmitted data described in the first embodiment cannot be altered later, and thus cannot be tampered with.

[0128] 4. Others In the above embodiment, each person is evaluated based on the question and the answer. For example, by displaying the answer (evaluation) of a person lower than the user, the evaluated person can be evaluated while referring to the evaluation of the lower person.

However, there are various other data as reference data. For example, the current annual salary, the next year's salary that the employee (evaluate) considers appropriate, and the employee (evaluate)
If the evaluation annual salary etc. are also displayed, it will be helpful for evaluation.
An evaluation salary is obtained from the employee and displayed.

Therefore, it is desirable to configure such that these various data can be displayed and obtained. In each terminal, display is performed by so-called browser software, so that various data can be displayed if various data can be converted into WEB data by HTML.

It is preferable that the WEB page displaying such various data be specially designed so that the data does not remain on the WEB. The fact that it does not remain on the WEB means that after inputting some data as described above while displaying a certain page, displaying another page,
The purpose is to prevent the input data from being displayed when the page on which data has been previously input is displayed again.
The special device is a device on the server 18 side.

[0132]

As described above, according to the present invention, since an employee is asked a question and the evaluation score of the employee is calculated based on the answer, the evaluation of the employee can be performed simply. is there.

Further, according to the present invention, when a question similar to a question for an employee is made a primary evaluator and a secondary evaluator, the answer / evaluation score of a lower order person is presented together with the question.
As a result, the higher rank person can execute the evaluation of the employee while referring to the lower rank person's evaluation.

Further, according to the present invention, identity verification is performed using biometrics data. Therefore, there is little possibility that the third person answers the question by impersonating the employee. Furthermore, there is little possibility that the third party will impersonate the evaluator and execute the evaluation.

Further, according to the present invention, since a question is generated based on the qualifications and functions of the employee, it is possible to generate a question in accordance with the job contents of the employee, and it is possible to perform an accurate evaluation. It is.

According to the present invention, the answers and evaluation scores of employees and primary evaluators are stored in the storage means.
The secondary evaluator and the secondary evaluator can refer to the answers and evaluation scores of the lower evaluators at the time of evaluation.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing a form of a network according to a preferred embodiment 1 of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a flow of an operation of the employee evaluation method according to the present embodiment.

FIG. 3 is a configuration block diagram of a server. FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a second timing generation unit.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a detailed operation of step S2-1 in FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a detailed operation of step S2-2 in FIG. 2;

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a web page shown to a primary evaluator.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a detailed operation of step S2-3 in FIG. 2;

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a web page shown to a secondary evaluator.

[Explanation of symbols]

 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Network 12 Employee terminal 14 Primary evaluator's terminal 16 Secondary evaluator's terminal 18 Server 20 Web service means 22 Authentication means 24 Inquiry means 26 Storage means 30 Authentication server

Claims (16)

[Claims] 1. A question step of asking one or more questions to an employee to be evaluated, and a self-evaluation score calculation step of calculating a self-evaluation score of the employee based on an answer to the question. An employee evaluation method characterized by the following. 2. The employee evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the primary evaluator performs the question by referring to the employee's answer and the self-evaluation score calculated based on the answer. And a primary evaluation calculation step of calculating a primary evaluation score of the employee based on a response of the primary evaluator in the primary evaluation step. How to evaluate employees. 3. The employee evaluation method according to claim 2, wherein the secondary evaluator answers the employee, the self-evaluation score calculated based on the answer, and the response of the primary evaluator. ,
A secondary evaluation step for answering the question asked with reference to the primary evaluation score calculated based on the answer; and A secondary evaluation calculation step of calculating a secondary evaluation score of the employee. 4. The employee evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the employee receives biometrics data from the employee, and determines whether or not the employee is himself / herself based on the biometrics data. An authentication step, wherein the questioning step asks a question when it is determined in the employee authentication step that the user is an individual. 5. The method for evaluating an employee according to claim 2, wherein the biometrics data is received from the primary evaluator,
A primary evaluator authentication step of determining whether or not the primary evaluator is the principal based on the biometric data, wherein the primary evaluation step is the principal in the primary evaluator authentication step An employee evaluation method, wherein the primary evaluator is permitted to answer a question when it is determined that the primary evaluator has an answer. 6. The method for evaluating an employee according to claim 3, wherein biometrics data is received from the secondary evaluator,
A secondary evaluator authentication step of determining whether or not the secondary evaluator is an individual based on the biometric data, wherein the secondary evaluator is an individual in the secondary evaluator authentication step An employee evaluation method characterized by permitting the secondary evaluator to answer a question when it is determined that the second evaluator has the answer. 7. The employee evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein in said questioning step, one or more questions are selected based on a qualification or a function of said employee. How members are evaluated. 8. The employee evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein in said questioning step, said one or more questions are displayed on a web page, and said employee answers on the web page. Employee evaluation method characterized by performing. 9. An evaluation device used for evaluating an employee, wherein: a first storage means for storing an identifier of the employee and a qualification / function of the employee indicated by the identifier; and a qualification / function of the employee And a second storage unit storing a group of questions to be performed based on the qualification and function, and searching the first storage unit based on the identifier of the employee.
Read out the qualifications and functions of the employee,
The second storage means is searched based on the function, and the qualification
An evaluation device, comprising: a question unit that generates a group of questions to be performed based on a job function; and a presentation unit that presents the generated group of questions to the employee. 10. The evaluation device according to claim 9, further comprising: third storage means for storing an employee answer of the employee with respect to the question group and a score based on the employee answer. An evaluation device, wherein a self-evaluation score is calculated based on the employee answer to a question group, and the self-evaluation score and the employee answer are stored in the third storage means. 11. The evaluation device according to claim 10, wherein the presenting means presents the employee answer to the question group and a self-evaluation score based on the employee answer to a primary evaluator. Calculating a primary evaluation score based on the primary evaluator's answer to the question group and storing the primary evaluation score and the primary evaluator answer in the third storage means An evaluation device characterized by the above-mentioned. 12. The evaluation device according to claim 11, wherein the presentation unit is configured to provide the employee answer to the question group, a self-evaluation score based on the employee answer, and the primary evaluator answer to the question group. A primary evaluation score based on this primary evaluator answer and a secondary evaluator are presented to the secondary evaluator, and the question means is based on the secondary evaluator's response to the question group and the secondary evaluation score An evaluation device that calculates 13. The evaluation device according to claim 9, wherein the biometrics data is received, and it is checked whether an employee indicated by the biometrics data is the same as an employee indicated by the identifier. An authentication unit that determines that the user is the principal when they are the same, and a presentation unit that presents the group of questions to the employee when the authentication unit determines that the user is the principal. apparatus. 14. The evaluation device according to claim 11, wherein the authentication unit determines, based on biometrics data received from the primary evaluator, whether or not the primary evaluator is an individual. The evaluation device, wherein when the means is determined to be the person, the presenting means presents the question group to the primary evaluator. 15. The evaluation device according to claim 12, wherein the authentication unit determines whether or not the secondary evaluator is an individual based on biometrics data received from the secondary evaluator. The evaluation device, wherein when the means is determined to be the person, the presenting means presents the question group to the secondary evaluator. 16. The evaluation device according to claim 13, wherein the authentication unit transmits the biometrics data to an external authentication device that performs identity verification based on the biometrics data. An evaluation device for receiving an authentication result indicating whether or not the user is the principal.