JP4592921B2 - Fingerprint verification device - Google Patents

Fingerprint verification device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4592921B2
JP4592921B2 JP2000329200A JP2000329200A JP4592921B2 JP 4592921 B2 JP4592921 B2 JP 4592921B2 JP 2000329200 A JP2000329200 A JP 2000329200A JP 2000329200 A JP2000329200 A JP 2000329200A JP 4592921 B2 JP4592921 B2 JP 4592921B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
frequency
feature data
collation
matching
fingerprint
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2000329200A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2002133417A (en
Inventor
睦彦 堀江
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority to JP2000329200A priority Critical patent/JP4592921B2/en
Publication of JP2002133417A publication Critical patent/JP2002133417A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4592921B2 publication Critical patent/JP4592921B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V40/00Recognition of biometric, human-related or animal-related patterns in image or video data
    • G06V40/10Human or animal bodies, e.g. vehicle occupants or pedestrians; Body parts, e.g. hands
    • G06V40/12Fingerprints or palmprints
    • G06V40/1365Matching; Classification

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
  • Collating Specific Patterns (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
この発明は、入力された指紋と登録された指紋とを照合して本人か否かを判定する指紋照合装置に関するものである。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
図9は従来の指紋照合装置を示す機能構成図である。画像取込み手段1で指紋画像データを読み取り、特徴抽出手段2で指紋の照合特徴データ3を作成する。この照合特徴データ3と登録特徴データ4とは照合手段5で照合され、照合率が算出される。照合率がしきい値以上であればOKとなり、しきい値よりも低ければ、再度照合し、規定回数照合しても照合率がしきい値よりも低ければNGとなる。
【0003】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
上記のような従来の指紋照合装置では、照合率をしきい値と比較して合否を判定しているため、指紋が薄い等で照合しにくい人がいる場合ではしきい値(OKの判定基準)を低く設定する必要がある。しかし、この場合、他人を受け入れる確率(他人詐称率)が高くなり、本人識別率が低くなるという問題点がある。
【0004】
この発明は上記問題点を解消するためになされたもので、本人照合率が低い場合でも、他人詐称率を一定としながら、本人識別率を向上できるようにした指紋照合装置を提供することを目的とする。
【0005】
【課題を解決するための手段】
この発明の第1発明に係る指紋照合装置は、照合率がしきい値よりも低い場合に規定回数の照合を実施し、それらの照合特徴データから各特徴点の出現頻度を算出して頻度付照合特徴データを作成し、この頻度付照合特徴データとあらかじめ作成された頻度付登録特徴データとを照合し、頻度ごとの特徴点の一致数を算出し、最大頻度ごとの特徴点の一致数及び照合率を用いて判別関数を計算しこの判別関数値により、入力された指紋の合否を判定するようにしたものである。
【0007】
また、第発明に係る指紋照合装置は、第発明のものにおいて、指紋が否と判定されると判別関数値が保留範囲にあるかを判定し、保留範囲にあると判定されると、再度頻度付照合特徴データと頻度付登録特徴データとを照合し、その結果により指紋の合否を再判定するようにしたものである。
【0008】
また、第発明に係る指紋照合装置は、第発明のものにおいて、指紋が否と再判定されると、頻度付照合特徴データと頻度付登録特徴データとの照合回数が指定数を越えるまで、照合の繰返しを許可するようにしたものである。
【0009】
【発明の実施の形態】
実施の形態1.
図1〜図5はこの発明の第1及び第2発明の一実施の形態を示す図で、図1は機能構成図、図2及び図3は照合動作フローチャート、図4は頻度算出手段の動作説明図、図5は頻度付特徴データ作成例の説明図であり、同一符号は同一部分を示す。(以下の実施の形態も同じ)
【0010】
図1において、1は所定位置に置かれた指の指紋画像データを読み取る画像取込み手段、2は画像取込み手段1で読み取られた指紋画像データから指紋の特徴データ3(端点、分岐点など)を抽出する特徴抽出手段、4はあらかじめ登録されている頻度付登録特徴データ、5は特徴データ3と登録特徴データ4を照合する照合手段、6は上記照合のOK/NGの結果を表示する照合結果表示器、7は上記照合による特徴点の出現頻度を算出する頻度算出手段、8は頻度算出手段7により算出された頻度付特徴データである。
【0011】
次に、この実施の形態の照合動作を図2〜図5を参照して説明する。なお、この実施の形態では、利用者の操作は適当な表示器(図示しない)によって指示されるものとし、頻度算出に用いる指紋データの数、すなわち規定値Nmax=3としている。
ステップS1でまずカウンタNを零に初期化し、ステップS2で画像取込み手段1で指紋画像データを読み取り、特徴抽出手段2で指紋の特徴データ3を作成する。
【0012】
次に、ステップS3で照合手段5により、登録特徴データ4と照合データである特徴データ3とを照合し、照合率Fを算出する。ステップS4でこの照合率Fがしきい値Th以上であるかを判定する。しきい値Th以上であれば本人と認識し、ステップS5でOK処理して照合結果表示器6に照合結果を表示する。照合率Fがしきい値Thよりも小さければ、ステップS6でカウンタNを1だけ増加してステップS7へ進む。
【0013】
ステップS7でカウンタNが規定値Nmax(=3)に達したかを判定する。規定値Nmaxに達していなければステップS2へ戻る。カウンタNが規定値Nmaxに達するとステップS8へ進む。ステップS8で今回を含め、今までの照合データ3セットから、各特徴点の出現頻度を算出し、頻度付照合特徴データを作成する。
次に、頻度付照合特徴データの作成について、図4及び図5を参照して説明する。
【0014】
図4で頻度算出手段7は1回目〜3回目の特徴データ3−1〜3−3の3回分の照合データに基づいて、頻度付特徴データ8を作成する。
図5には具体例を示し、特徴データ3−3を基準にすると、特徴A1,A2は特徴データ3−1〜3−3において互いに一致しているため頻度3であり、特徴A3は特徴データ3−1,3−3で一致しているため頻度2であり、その他の特徴A4,A5は特徴データ3−3だけに出現しているため頻度1とする。上記のようにして頻度は計算されるが、登録特徴データ作成時も、数回照合が実施され、同様に頻度を計算して、頻度付登録特徴データ4として記憶されている。
【0015】
ステップS9では上記のように作成された頻度付照合特徴データと、頻度付登録特徴データとを照合し、頻度ごとの特徴点の一致数を算出し、最大頻度ごとの特徴点の一致数及び照合率を用いて判別関数Sを計算する。
次に、この場合の最大頻度である登録データの頻度3と照合データの頻度3の一致数をM33として説明する。
判別関数S=f(照合率F、頻度3ごとの一致数M33)
ただし、(f:関数)
【0016】
具体的判別関数Sを下記に示す。
S=p1×F+p2(M33/特徴点数)−p3|(a3/a)−(b3/b)|+p4
ここで、a,bはそれぞれ登録データ及び照合データの特徴点数、a3,b3はそれぞれ登録データ及び照合データの重み3の特徴点数の個数を表す。また、係数p1〜p4はあらかじめ統計的に算出された係数であり、本人・他人を分別する係数である。この判別係数Sの値が大きいほど本人の確率が増え、値が小さいと他人の確率が増える。
【0017】
ステップS10で判別関数Sが一定値Sh以上であるかを判定し、一定値Sh以上であれば本人と判定してステップS11でOK処理し、一定値Shよりも小さければ他人と判定してステップS12でNG処理する。
ここで、S4,S6〜S8は頻度算出手段、S9は判別関数計算手段、S10は合否判定手段を構成している。
【0018】
このようにして、照合時に照合率の低い人の場合でも、再入力で得られる複数の特徴データを利用し、かつ安定した特徴点の情報に基づく高精度の判別関数を併用することにより、しきい値を下げることなく照合をしやすくしたため、他人詐称率を保持しながら(誤認識の多発を防ぎ)、本人に対する照合精度を向上することが可能となる。また、新たな外部装置を付加しないため、安価で確実な装置を実現することが可能となる。
【0019】
実施の形態2.
図6及び図7はこの発明の第3発明の一実施の形態を示す照合動作フローチャートである。なお、図1、図2、図4及び図5は実施の形態2にも共用する。
次に、この実施の形態の動作を説明する。
ステップS1〜S11は実施の形態1と同様である。
ステップS10で判別関数Sが一定値Shよりも小さければステップS15へ進み、判別関数Sが保留範囲(S1〜Sh)にあるかを判定する。保留範囲外であればステップS16でNG処理する。
【0020】
保留範囲であれば、本人の可能性があるので、ステップS17へ進んで再度画像データを取込み及び特徴データを抽出し、ステップS18〜S20で再度図3のステップS8〜S10と同様に、判別関数Sを評価する。そして、その結果によりステップS21又はステップS22で、OK処理又はNG処理をする。
ここで、ステップS15は保留判定手段を、ステップS17〜S20は合否再判定手段を構成している。
【0021】
このようにして、指紋照合が不合格となっても、その指紋データが保留範囲にあれば、再照合によって合否を再判定するようにしているため、指紋の状態が悪い人でも、再判定の機会が与えられ、利便性を向上することが可能となる。
【0022】
実施の形態3.
図8はこの発明の第4発明の一実施の形態を示す照合動作フローチャートである。なお、図1、図2、図4〜図6は実施の形態3にも共用する。
図8は図7にステップS23を付加したものである。
ステップS1〜S11,S15〜S21は実施の形態2と同様である。
ステップS20で判別関数Sが一定値Shよりも小さければステップS23へ進み、繰返し回数が指定数を越えたかを判定する。指定数を越えていなければステップS15へ進み、指定数を越えれば、ステップS22でNG処理をする。
【0023】
ここで、ステップS23は照合繰返し許可手段を構成している。
このようにして、2回目の判定でNGの場合は、指定回数まで再照合の繰返しを許可するようにしたため、指紋の状態が悪い人に救済の機会を与え、更に利便性を向上することが可能となる。
【0024】
【発明の効果】
以上説明したとおりこの発明の第1発明では、照合率がしきい値よりも低い場合に規定回数の照合を実施し、それらの照合特徴データから各特徴点の出現頻度を算出し頻度付照合特徴データを作成し、この頻度付照合特徴データと頻度付登録特徴データとを照合し、頻度ごとの一致数を算出し、最大頻度ごとの特徴点の一致数及び照合率を用いて判別関数を計算し、この判別関数値により、指紋の合否を判定するようにしたので、しきい値を下げることなく照合をしやすくし、他人詐称率を一定としながら、本人識別率を向上することができる。
【0025】
また、第発明では、指紋が否と判定されると判別関数値が保留範囲にあるかを判定し、保留範囲にあると判定されると、再度頻度付照合特徴データと頻度付登録特徴データとを照合し、その結果により指紋の合否を再判定するようにしたので、指紋の状態が悪い人でも、再判定の機会が与えられ、利便性を向上することができる。
【0026】
また、第発明では、指紋が否と再判定されると、頻度付照合特徴データと頻度付登録特徴データとの照合回数が指定数を越えるまで、照合の繰返しを許可するようにしたので、指紋の状態が悪い人に救済の機会を与え、更に利便性を向上することができる。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】この発明の実施の形態1を示す機能構成図。
【図2】この発明の実施の形態1を示す照合動作フローチャート。
【図3】図2の続きを示す照合動作フローチャート。
【図4】この発明の実施の形態1を示す頻度算出手段の動作説明図。
【図5】この発明の実施の形態1を示す頻度付特徴データ作成例の説明図。
【図6】この発明の実施の形態2を示す照合動作フローチャート。
【図7】図6の続きを示す照合動作フローチャート。
【図8】この発明の実施の形態3を示す照合動作フローチャート(図6の続き)。
【図9】従来の指紋照合装置を示す機能構成図。
【符号の説明】
1 画像取込み手段、2 特徴抽出手段、3 特徴データ、3−1〜3−3 1〜3回目の特徴データ、4 頻度付登録特徴データ、5 照合手段、6 照合結果表示器、7 頻度算出手段、8 頻度付特徴データ。
S4,S6〜S8 頻度算出手段、S9 判別関数計算手段、S10 合否判定手段、S15 保留判定手段、S17〜S20 合否再判定手段、S23 照合繰返し許可手段。
[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a fingerprint collation apparatus that collates an input fingerprint with a registered fingerprint and determines whether or not the person is the person himself / herself.
[0002]
[Prior art]
FIG. 9 is a functional block diagram showing a conventional fingerprint collation apparatus. Fingerprint image data is read by the image capturing means 1 and fingerprint collation feature data 3 is created by the feature extraction means 2. The collation feature data 3 and the registered feature data 4 are collated by the collating means 5 to calculate a collation rate. If the collation rate is equal to or greater than the threshold value, the result is OK. If the collation rate is lower than the threshold value, the collation is performed again.
[0003]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
In the conventional fingerprint collation apparatus as described above, the pass / fail is determined by comparing the collation rate with a threshold value. Therefore, when there is a person who is difficult to collate due to a thin fingerprint, the threshold value (OK criterion) ) Must be set low. However, in this case, there is a problem that the probability of accepting another person (other person's spoofing rate) is high and the identification rate is low.
[0004]
The present invention was made to solve the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a fingerprint collation apparatus that can improve the identification rate while keeping the other person's spoofing rate constant even when the identification rate is low. And
[0005]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
The fingerprint collation device according to the first aspect of the present invention performs collation a prescribed number of times when the collation rate is lower than the threshold value, calculates the appearance frequency of each feature point from the collation feature data, and assigns the frequency. Create matching feature data, compare this frequency-matched matching feature data with pre-created frequency-registered feature data, calculate the number of matching feature points for each frequency, calculate the determine specific function using the collation rate, this discriminant function value, is obtained so as to determine the acceptability of the input fingerprint.
[0007]
The fingerprint collation device according to the second invention is the one according to the first invention, wherein if the fingerprint is determined to be negative, it is determined whether the discriminant function value is in the holding range, and if it is determined that the fingerprint function is in the holding range, The frequency-matching feature data and the frequency-registered feature data are collated again, and the pass / fail of the fingerprint is determined again based on the result.
[0008]
The fingerprint collation device according to the third invention is the one according to the second invention, wherein when the fingerprint is re-determined, the number of collations between the frequency-matched feature data and the frequency-registered feature data exceeds the specified number. , The repetition of verification is permitted.
[0009]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Embodiment 1 FIG.
1 to 5 are diagrams showing an embodiment of the first and second inventions of the present invention. FIG. 1 is a functional configuration diagram, FIGS. 2 and 3 are verification operation flowcharts, and FIG. 4 is an operation of frequency calculation means. FIG. 5 and FIG. 5 are explanatory diagrams of an example of creating feature data with frequency. (The following embodiments are also the same)
[0010]
In FIG. 1, 1 is an image capturing means for reading fingerprint image data of a finger placed at a predetermined position, and 2 is a fingerprint feature data 3 (end point, branch point, etc.) from the fingerprint image data read by the image capturing means 1. Feature extraction means to extract, 4 is registered feature data with frequency registered in advance, 5 is collation means for collating feature data 3 and registered feature data 4, and 6 is a collation result for displaying the result of the above-mentioned collation OK / NG A display 7 is a frequency calculation means for calculating the appearance frequency of feature points by the above collation, and 8 is frequency-equipped feature data calculated by the frequency calculation means 7.
[0011]
Next, the collating operation of this embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. In this embodiment, the user's operation is instructed by an appropriate display (not shown), and the number of fingerprint data used for frequency calculation, that is, the specified value Nmax = 3.
In step S1, first, the counter N is initialized to zero. In step S2, the fingerprint image data is read by the image capture means 1, and the fingerprint feature data 3 is created by the feature extraction means 2.
[0012]
Next, in step S3, the collation unit 5 collates the registered feature data 4 with the feature data 3 that is collation data, and calculates a collation rate F. In step S4, it is determined whether the verification rate F is equal to or greater than a threshold value Th. If it is equal to or greater than the threshold value Th, the person is recognized, and in step S5, OK processing is performed and the collation result display unit 6 displays the collation result. If the verification rate F is smaller than the threshold value Th, the counter N is incremented by 1 in step S6, and the process proceeds to step S7.
[0013]
In step S7, it is determined whether the counter N has reached a specified value Nmax (= 3). If the specified value Nmax has not been reached, the process returns to step S2. When the counter N reaches the specified value Nmax, the process proceeds to step S8. In step S8, the appearance frequency of each feature point is calculated from the three sets of collation data so far including this time, and collation feature data with frequency is created.
Next, creation of frequency matching feature data will be described with reference to FIGS.
[0014]
In FIG. 4, the frequency calculation means 7 creates frequency-equipped feature data 8 based on the three-time collation data of the first to third feature data 3-1 to 3-3.
FIG. 5 shows a specific example. Based on the feature data 3-3, the features A1 and A2 are frequency 3 because they match each other in the feature data 3-1 to 3-3, and the feature A3 is feature data. Since the frequency 3-1 and 3-3 match, the frequency is 2, and the other features A4 and A5 appear only in the feature data 3-3. Although the frequency is calculated as described above, collation is performed several times when the registered feature data is created, and the frequency is calculated in the same manner and stored as the frequency-added registered feature data 4.
[0015]
In step S9, the collated feature data with frequency created as described above and the registered feature data with frequency are collated, the number of feature points matched for each frequency is calculated, and the number of feature points matched and collated for each maximum frequency. The discriminant function S is calculated using the rate.
Next, the number of matches between the frequency 3 of registered data and the frequency 3 of collation data, which is the maximum frequency in this case, will be described as M33.
Discriminant function S = f (matching rate F, number of matches M33 for each frequency 3)
However, (f: function)
[0016]
A specific discriminant function S is shown below.
S = p1 × F + p2 (M33 / number of feature points) −p3 | (a3 / a) − (b3 / b) | + p4
Here, a and b represent the number of feature points of registration data and collation data, respectively, and a3 and b3 represent the number of feature points of weight 3 of registration data and collation data, respectively. The coefficients p1 to p4 are coefficients that are statistically calculated in advance, and are coefficients that discriminate between the person and others. The probability of the person increases as the discriminant coefficient S increases, and the probability of the other person increases as the value decreases.
[0017]
In step S10, it is determined whether the discriminant function S is greater than or equal to a certain value Sh. If it is greater than or equal to the certain value Sh, it is determined that the person is the person, and OK processing is performed in step S11. NG processing is performed at S12.
Here, S4, S6 to S8 constitute frequency calculation means, S9 constitutes discriminant function calculation means, and S10 constitutes pass / fail judgment means.
[0018]
In this way, even in the case of a person with a low matching rate at the time of matching, by using a plurality of feature data obtained by re-input and using a high-precision discriminant function based on stable feature point information, Since the collation is facilitated without lowering the threshold value, it is possible to improve the collation accuracy for the person while maintaining the misrepresentation rate of others (preventing frequent misrecognition). In addition, since a new external device is not added, an inexpensive and reliable device can be realized.
[0019]
Embodiment 2. FIG.
FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 are collation operation flowcharts showing one embodiment of the third invention of the present invention. 1, 2, 4, and 5 are shared by the second embodiment.
Next, the operation of this embodiment will be described.
Steps S1 to S11 are the same as those in the first embodiment.
If the discriminant function S is smaller than the fixed value Sh in step S10, the process proceeds to step S15, and it is determined whether the discriminant function S is in the holding range (S1 to Sh). If it is outside the holding range, NG processing is performed in step S16.
[0020]
If it is within the reserved range, there is a possibility of the person, so the process proceeds to step S17, and the image data is taken in again and the feature data is extracted. Evaluate S. Then, depending on the result, in step S21 or step S22, OK processing or NG processing is performed.
Here, step S15 constitutes a hold determination means, and steps S17 to S20 constitute pass / fail redetermination means.
[0021]
In this way, even if the fingerprint verification fails, if the fingerprint data is in the holding range, the pass / fail is re-determined by re-verification. Opportunities are given and convenience can be improved.
[0022]
Embodiment 3 FIG.
FIG. 8 is a collation operation flowchart showing one embodiment of the fourth invention of the present invention. 1, 2, and 4 to 6 are shared by the third embodiment.
FIG. 8 is obtained by adding step S23 to FIG.
Steps S1 to S11 and S15 to S21 are the same as those in the second embodiment.
If the discriminant function S is smaller than the fixed value Sh in step S20, the process proceeds to step S23, and it is determined whether the number of repetitions exceeds the specified number. If the specified number is not exceeded, the process proceeds to step S15. If the specified number is exceeded, NG processing is performed in step S22.
[0023]
Here, step S23 constitutes a collation repetition permission means.
In this way, in the case of NG in the second determination, since re-matching is permitted up to the specified number of times, it is possible to provide a rescue opportunity for a person with a bad fingerprint state and further improve convenience. It becomes possible.
[0024]
【The invention's effect】
Or as described in the first aspect of the invention, the collation rate is carried out matching the prescribed number is lower than the threshold value, matching with the frequency and calculates the appearance frequency of each feature point from their matching feature data Create feature data, compare this frequency matching feature data with frequency registered feature data, calculate the number of matches for each frequency, and use the number of feature points for each maximum frequency and the matching rate to determine the discriminant function. Since it is calculated and the pass / fail of the fingerprint is determined based on the discriminant function value, it is easy to perform collation without lowering the threshold value, and the identity identification rate can be improved while keeping the other person's spoof rate constant. .
[0025]
In the second invention, if it is determined that the fingerprint is negative, it is determined whether the discriminant function value is in the holding range, and if it is determined that it is in the holding range, the frequency-matching feature data and the frequency-registered feature data are again displayed. Since the result of the fingerprint is re-determined based on the result, even a person with a poor fingerprint status can be given a re-determination opportunity to improve convenience.
[0026]
Further, in the third invention, when the fingerprint is re-determined to be negative, the collation is allowed to be repeated until the number of collations between the frequency-matched feature data and the frequency-registered feature data exceeds the specified number. A person who has a bad fingerprint status can be given relief, and convenience can be further improved.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a functional configuration diagram showing a first embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a collation operation flowchart showing the first embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a collation operation flowchart showing the continuation of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is an operation explanatory diagram of frequency calculation means showing Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram of an example of creating frequency feature data according to the first embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a collation operation flowchart showing Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a collation operation flowchart showing the continuation of FIG. 6;
FIG. 8 is a collation operation flowchart showing the third embodiment of the present invention (continuation of FIG. 6).
FIG. 9 is a functional configuration diagram showing a conventional fingerprint collation apparatus.
[Explanation of symbols]
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Image capture means, 2 Feature extraction means, 3 Feature data, 3-1 to 3-3 1st-3rd feature data, 4 Frequency registration feature data, 5 Matching means, 6 Matching result display, 7 Frequency calculation means 8 Feature data with frequency.
S4, S6 to S8 Frequency calculation means, S9 discriminant function calculation means, S10 pass / fail determination means, S15 hold determination means, S17 to S20 pass / fail re-determination means, S23 collation repeat permission means.

Claims (3)

入力された指紋画像データから抽出された照合特徴データと、あらかじめ登録された特徴データとを照合し、この照合の度合いを示す照合率がしきい値以上であれば上記照合結果を一致と判定する装置において、
上記照合率が上記しきい値よりも低い場合に規定回数の上記照合を実施し、それらの照合特徴データから各特徴点の出現頻度を算出して頻度付照合特徴データを作成する頻度算出手段と、
上記頻度付照合特徴データとあらかじめ作成された頻度付登録特徴データとを照合し、上記頻度ごとの特徴点の一致数を算出し、最大頻度ごとの特徴点の一致数及び上記照合率を用いて判別関数を計算する判別関数計算手段と、
上記判別関数値により上記入力された指紋の合否を判定する合否判定手段と
を備えたことを特徴とする指紋照合装置。
The collation feature data extracted from the input fingerprint image data is collated with the pre-registered feature data, and if the collation rate indicating the degree of collation is equal to or greater than a threshold value, the collation result is determined to be coincident. In the device
A frequency calculation means for performing the matching a predetermined number of times when the matching rate is lower than the threshold value, calculating the appearance frequency of each feature point from the matching feature data, and creating frequency matching feature data; ,
The matching feature data with frequency and the registered feature data with frequency created in advance are collated, the number of matching feature points for each frequency is calculated, and the number of matching feature points for each maximum frequency and the matching rate are used. A discriminant function calculating means for calculating a discriminant function;
A fingerprint collation apparatus comprising: pass / fail judgment means for judging pass / fail of the inputted fingerprint based on the discriminant function value.
合否判定手段により否と判定されると判別関数値が保留範囲にあるかを判定する保留判定手段と、
上記保留範囲にあると判定されると再度頻度付照合特徴データと頻度付登録特徴データとを照合し、その結果により指紋の合否を判定する合否再判定手段と
を設けたことを特徴とする請求項記載の指紋照合装置。
A hold determination unit that determines whether the discriminant function value is in the hold range when it is determined as NO by the pass / fail determination unit;
Claims characterized in that there is provided pass / fail re-determination means for collating frequency-matching feature data with frequency-registered feature data again when it is determined that the position is within the holding range, and judging pass / fail of the fingerprint based on the result. Item 2. The fingerprint collation device according to Item 1 .
合否再判定手段により否と判定されると頻度付照合特徴データと頻度付登録特徴データとの照合回数が指定数を越えるまで上記照合の繰返しを許可する照合繰返し許可手段
を設けたことを特徴とする請求項記載の指紋照合装置。
A verification repetition permission unit is provided that permits the verification to be repeated until the number of verifications between the frequency-matched feature data and the frequency-registered feature data exceeds a specified number when the pass / fail re-determination unit determines NO. The fingerprint collation apparatus according to claim 2 .
JP2000329200A 2000-10-27 2000-10-27 Fingerprint verification device Expired - Fee Related JP4592921B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2000329200A JP4592921B2 (en) 2000-10-27 2000-10-27 Fingerprint verification device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2000329200A JP4592921B2 (en) 2000-10-27 2000-10-27 Fingerprint verification device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2002133417A JP2002133417A (en) 2002-05-10
JP4592921B2 true JP4592921B2 (en) 2010-12-08

Family

ID=18805920

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2000329200A Expired - Fee Related JP4592921B2 (en) 2000-10-27 2000-10-27 Fingerprint verification device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4592921B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004021884A1 (en) * 2002-09-03 2004-03-18 Fujitsu Limited Individual identification device
US8190239B2 (en) 2002-09-03 2012-05-29 Fujitsu Limited Individual identification device
JP3846582B2 (en) 2002-09-27 2006-11-15 日本電気株式会社 Fingerprint authentication method / program / device

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01131978A (en) * 1987-08-26 1989-05-24 Komatsu Ltd Method and device for deciding identity of fingerprint

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01131978A (en) * 1987-08-26 1989-05-24 Komatsu Ltd Method and device for deciding identity of fingerprint

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2002133417A (en) 2002-05-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
TWI260557B (en) Computer readable medium recording handwritten signature authentication program, and handwritten signature authentication method and apparatus
JPH0424889A (en) Ic card provided with personal identification function
JP5492274B2 (en) Authentication apparatus, authentication method, and authentication program
JP4992517B2 (en) Face matching device
JP3990907B2 (en) Composite authentication system
JP4592921B2 (en) Fingerprint verification device
KR20100041562A (en) Method and system for performing user authentication by face recognizing and fingerprint recognizing of user needing an authentication
Sujithra et al. Next generation biometric security system: An approach for mobile device security
JP2013239125A (en) Portable terminal
CN116453196B (en) Face recognition method and system
JP2008158627A (en) Personal identification device and personal identification method
Srivastava et al. Continuous multi-biometric user authentication fusion of face recognition and keystoke dynamics
JP4603675B2 (en) Pen input personal recognition method
JP2011076289A (en) Biometric authentication device
JP2003044858A (en) Device and method for personal identification
JPH10134191A (en) Person discrimination system by face shape
JP2964199B2 (en) Fingerprint matching method
Kawamata et al. Face authentication for e-Learning using time series information
JP4529418B2 (en) Image recognition device
JP4307606B2 (en) Pen input personal authentication method
JP4270886B2 (en) Data verification device
JP2002014695A (en) Method and device for interactive personal identification
WO2021157686A1 (en) Authentication device, authentication method, and recording medium
JP2006059242A (en) Biological authentication device and passage control system
JP2877547B2 (en) Portable storage media

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20070926

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100622

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100712

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100803

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100827

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20100914

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20100915

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130924

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4592921

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees