JP4583268B2 - Incident management program - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to an incident management program for causing a computer to function as an incident management device.

  As is well known, in recent years, organizations that have help desks (for-profit corporations, public interest corporations, special corporations, government agencies, etc.) are increasing. The help desk is a contact point for a user (a member of a group or a customer) to solve problems and questions encountered when using the IT [Information Technology] infrastructure possessed by the group. In a small company, IT infrastructure engineers often engage in help desk work in parallel with their own work, but as a large company, help as a department in the IT infrastructure operations management department. There are often departments specializing in desks.

  Recently, an increasing number of companies are working on improving IT services (a general term for IT infrastructure and its operation management) in accordance with ITIL [Information Technology Infrastructure Library]. ITIL is a guideline that defines activities necessary to provide high-quality IT services to users (service support) and activities necessary to improve the efficiency of IT services (service delivery). The model case of is systematically described.

  In many help desks that have been improved based on ITIL as described above, when a user inquires about the IT infrastructure, troubles and questions about the IT infrastructure that the user asks about should be solved. It is managed as one issue until it is resolved. According to ITIL, this problem to be solved is called an incident. In incident management at the help desk, each incident is given a priority indicating the degree to which it is processed in preference to other incidents, and the help desk staff (staff) assigns each incident to its priority. Processing is done one by one in descending order.

“What is ITIL”, [online], IT Service Management Forum Japan, [searched July 15, 2005], Internet <http://www.itsmf-japan.org/itil/index.html>

  By the way, the above-mentioned priority is usually judged by the help desk staff based on the urgency level heard together with the incident from the user who made the inquiry and the contents of other incidents that have been accepted at that time. .

  However, since the urgency level is subjectively determined by the user who made the inquiry, for example, the urgency level may differ depending on the user even if the incidents have exactly the same content. In some cases, the degree of urgency is not appropriate. In such a case, for example, when the incidents with the same contents occur at a later time, it cannot be said that the help desk staff determines the same priority for the incidents. However, there was a problem that there was a risk that the value could not be determined accurately. Such a problem also goes against ITIL's philosophy of providing high-quality IT services to users.

  The present invention has been made in view of the problems of the prior art as described above, and an object thereof is to make it possible to determine the priority of an incident as accurately as possible in a help desk.

  The incident management program invented in order to solve the above problems stores, for each user information of a user who uses the IT infrastructure, a degree of trust indicating the degree of trust of the user in a storage device. Credit rating storage means, user evaluation accepting means for accepting good or bad evaluation about the user from the input device, and increasing or decreasing the credit rating of the user in the storage device based on the user's evaluation received by the user evaluation accepting means Credibility update means, the content of the incident about the IT infrastructure encountered by the user, the urgency indicating the urgency of the resolution of the incident, the user information of the user who has inquired the incident, and the IT in which the incident occurs IT infrastructure that receives IT infrastructure identification information for identifying the infrastructure from the input device Receiving an importance level corresponding to the IT infrastructure identification information received by the incident reception means from a storage device storing importance level definition information defining the importance level of the IT infrastructure for each IT infrastructure identification information Importance acquired by the incident receiving means and the importance acquired by the importance acquiring means from a storage device storing priority definition information that defines priority for each combination of importance and urgency. Priority acquisition means for acquiring the priority corresponding to the degree, the credit degree acquisition means for acquiring the user's credit level indicated by the user information received by the incident reception means from the storage device, and the credit level acquisition means The credit is added to the priority acquired by the priority acquisition means, and the priority with which the credit is added and the incident reception means The incident registration means for storing the contents of the attached incident in the storage device as an incident record, and when receiving an instruction from the operator via the input device, the order of the incident records stored in the storage device by the incident registration means is given priority. It is characterized by functioning as rearrangement means for rearranging in descending order, and presentation means for presenting incident records in the storage device through the output device in the order rearranged by the rearrangement means.

  According to the incident management program configured as described above, the computer specifies the importance level based on the IT infrastructure identification information obtained by the operator (help desk staff) from the user who made the inquiry, and the operator Incident heard from the user by identifying the priority corresponding to the combination of the urgency heard from the user along with the incident and the above importance, and adding the user's creditworthiness to the priority The priority after the addition is registered together with the contents of. At this time, the credit added to the priority is increased or decreased by the evaluation by the staff or specialists who processed the previous incident. Therefore, if the credit is high, the priority after the credit is added also increases. If the credit is low, the priority after the credit is added is also low. For this reason, even if the priority of incidents with exactly the same content changes due to the urgency being subjectively determined by the user who made the inquiry, the creditworthiness of the user Since the priority is corrected by, the priority becomes more accurate.

  Therefore, according to the present invention, the priority of incidents can be determined as accurately as possible in the help desk, and as a result, the quality of IT services can be improved.

  Hereinafter, one embodiment for carrying out the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

  First, the configuration of the incident management apparatus of this embodiment will be described.

  FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a schematic configuration of an incident management apparatus 10 according to the present embodiment. Briefly describing the incident management apparatus 10, the incident management apparatus 10 is configured to function as an incident management apparatus by installing incident management software 16 described later on a personal computer that is generally marketed. is there.

  As is well known, the personal computer constituting the incident management apparatus 10 is composed of a display device 10a such as a liquid crystal display, an input device 10b such as a keyboard and a mouse, and a main body 10c connected to these devices. Yes. The main body 10c incorporates known hardware such as a CPU [Central Processing Unit] 11, a DRAM [Dynamic Random Access Memory] 12, an MDD [Multi Disk Drive] 13, and an HDD [Hard Disk Drive] 14. Among them, the HDD 14 controls input / output in the display device 10a and the input device 10b, and storage areas of the DRAM 12, the MDD 13 and the HDD 14 (storage elements, CD [Compact Disk], DVD [Digital Versatile Disk], HD [ The basic software 15 for providing basic functions such as read / write control to the storage area of the Hard Disk] to many application software is stored.

  As described above, incident management software 16 is installed in the HDD 14 of the incident management apparatus 10 according to the present embodiment. This incident management software 16 solves the problems and questions about IT infrastructure that the contact person (staff) has asked from the user who has inquired to the help desk as a problem to be solved. Until then, it is a set of programs and data for management. According to ITIL, this problem to be solved is referred to as an incident, and hence the problem solved by the staff from the user is hereinafter referred to as an incident.

  The incident management software 16 includes an importance definition table 16a, a priority definition table 16b, a credit management table 16c, an incident queue table 16d, an incident registration program 16e, a user evaluation registration program 16f, and an incident order management program. 16g is included.

  The importance level definition table 16a is the in-house importance level (down) of IT [Information Technology] infrastructure held by organizations (profit corporations, public interest corporations, special corporations, government agencies, etc.) that use this incident management apparatus 10 It is a table for defining the degree of the influence of time). FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the importance level definition table 16a. As shown in FIG. 2, the importance level definition table 16a has the same number of records as the IT infrastructure possessed by the organization. Each record has fields of “business name” and “importance”. The “business name” field is a field in which the name of the IT infrastructure is recorded, and the “importance” field is a field in which the importance of the IT infrastructure is recorded. Here, in the present embodiment, the importance is in four stages of 5, 3, 2, and 1. The priority of 5 is the highest and the priority of 1 is the lowest.

  The priority definition table 16b is based on the urgency level uniquely determined by the user (member of the above organization or customer) who has made an inquiry to the help desk regarding problems or questions encountered in the use of the IT infrastructure, and the above-mentioned importance levels. A table used to determine the priority of an incident. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the priority definition table 16b. As shown in FIG. 3, the priority definition table 16b has cells in a two-dimensional matrix. Each cell is associated with one urgency level and one importance level, and the combination of the urgency level and the importance level is different for each cell. In each cell, the priority defined as corresponding to the combination of the urgency level and the importance level is recorded. Here, in this embodiment, the urgency level is in four stages of 5, 3, 2, and 1. The urgency level of 5 is the highest and the urgency level of 1 is the lowest. Moreover, the priority is also in four stages of 5, 3, 2, and 1. The priority of 5 is the highest and the priority of 1 is the lowest.

  The reliability management table 16c is a table for managing the above-mentioned user's reliability. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the credit management table 16c. As shown in FIG. 4, the credit management table 16c has the same number of records as the users belonging to the above-mentioned organization. Each record has fields of “user identification information” and “credibility”. The “user identification information” field is a field in which identification information assigned to each user so that the above-mentioned organization can individually identify each user among all users is recorded. The “credit” field is a field in which the credit of the user is recorded. Here, the degree of trust is a value with 0.1 as a minimum unit. When the value is positive, it indicates that the user has trust, and when the value is negative, the user has no trust. It is shown that. The incident management apparatus 10 that stores the credit management table 16c in the HDD 14 corresponds to the above-described credit storage.

  The incident queue table 16d is a table for managing incidents (troubles and questions) about the IT infrastructure that the staff has heard from users who have made inquiries to the help desk. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of a data structure of the incident queue table 16d. As shown in FIG. 5, the incident queue table 16d has the same number of records as the unresolved incidents that have been accepted at the help desk. Each record has fields of “reception number”, “incident content”, “reception date / time”, “processing time”, “user identification information”, “priority”, and “processing state”. Among these, the “reception number” field is a field in which a reception number assigned to each incident is recorded as identification information for individually identifying each incident among all incidents. The “incident content” field is a field in which text data indicating a summary by the help desk staff about the content of the incident is recorded. The “acceptance date and time” field is a field in which the date and time when the staff hears an incident from the user at the help desk and decides to start the resolution of the incident is recorded. The “processing time” field is a field in which the time already spent on the work in the process of solving the incident is recorded as the processing time. Note that the processing time recorded in the “processing time” field is the time spent when the help desk staff or a specialist who received a resolution request (escalation) from the staff worked on the incident, Through a predetermined input means (for example, a function of displaying the contents of the incident queue table 16d on the screen and receiving an update of information in the field and overwriting the table 16d) by a staff member or a specialist who has performed the work Updated. However, this processing time may be a time during which information related to this incident is displayed on the display device 10a of the incident management device 10 in order for a help desk staff or a specialist to process this incident. The “user identification information” field is a field in which identification information of a user who has made an inquiry is recorded. The “priority” field is a field in which the priority of the incident is recorded. The “processing state” field is a field in which processing state information indicating how far the work has progressed in the process of solving the incident is recorded. Note that the processing status includes accepted, survey requested, and surveying. Accepted means that the help desk staff has heard the incident from the user, and investigation requested means that if the staff is unable to respond to the user about the incident, resolution to other specialists This means that the request (escalation) has been completed. During the investigation, it means that the specialist who has received the solution request is conducting the investigation. Further, a record relating to an incident for which a response to the user has been completed is deleted from the incident queue table 16d by a help desk staff or a specialist, and the deleted record is stored in the incident management software 16 Are stored in a database (not shown) in the incident management apparatus 10 and used as an analysis target for customer service and product development.

  The incident registration program 16e is a program that realizes a function for registering an incident heard from a user at the help desk in the incident queue table 16d. The contents of the processing executed by the CPU 11 in accordance with the incident registration program 16e will be described later with reference to FIG.

  The user evaluation registration program 16f is a program that realizes a function for updating the credit rating in the credit rating management table 16c. The contents of processing executed by the CPU 11 in accordance with the user evaluation registration program 16f will be described later with reference to FIG.

  The incident order management program 16g is a program for rearranging records in the incident queue table 16d. The contents of processing executed by the CPU 11 in accordance with the incident order management program 16g will be described later with reference to FIGS.

  Next, the process performed in the incident management apparatus 10 of this embodiment is demonstrated.

  First, the help desk staff of an organization that uses the incident management apparatus 10 accepts inquiries from users by telephone or e-mail regarding troubles or questions encountered in using the IT infrastructure of the organization. . When there is such an inquiry, the staff operates the input device 10b of the incident management device 10 to start the incident registration program 16e. Then, the CPU 11 of the incident management apparatus 10 starts executing the incident registration process according to the incident registration program 16e. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the flow of this incident registration process.

  After the start of the incident registration process, the CPU 11 performs a process of displaying an input screen (not shown) for inputting information related to the incident on the display device 10a (step S101). Here, the information that can be input on the input screen (not shown) includes the identification information of the user who made the inquiry, the summary of the contents of the incident heard from the user, the reception time, the business name, and the urgency. The operator (help desk staff) displays the input screen (not shown) on the display device 10a, and then asks the content of the incident, the business name, and the degree of urgency from the user who made the inquiry. Enter various information on the input screen.

  Subsequently, the CPU 11 waits until the OK button is clicked in a state where each information is input on the input screen (not shown) (step S102; NO). When the OK button is clicked (step S102; YES), the CPU 11 temporarily stores each information except for the business name among the information input on the input screen (not shown) at the time of the click in the DRAM 12. (Step S103). The CPU 11 that executes steps S101 and S102 corresponds to the above-described incident receiving means.

  Thereafter, the CPU 11 refers to the importance level definition table 16a as shown in FIG. 2 to identify the importance level corresponding to the business name input on the input screen (not shown) (step S104). The data is temporarily stored in the DRAM 12 (step S105). The CPU 11 that executes steps S104 and S105 corresponds to the importance level acquisition unit described above.

  Subsequently, the CPU 11 refers to the priority definition table 16b as shown in FIG. 3 and specifies the priority corresponding to the combination of the urgency level and the importance level stored in the DRAM 12 (step S106). The priority is temporarily stored in the DRAM 12 (step S107). The CPU 11 that executes steps S106 and S107 corresponds to the above-described priority acquisition unit.

  Thereafter, the CPU 11 refers to the credit management table 16c as shown in FIG. 4 and specifies the credit corresponding to the user identification information stored in the DRAM 12 (step S108). Note that the CPU 11 that executes this step S108 corresponds to the above-described credit level acquisition means.

  Then, CPU11 discriminate | determines whether the specified reliability is zero or more (step S109).

  Then, when the credit level is zero or more (step S109; YES), the CPU 11 adds the credit level to the priority stored in the DRAM 12 (step S110), and when the credit level is less than zero (step S109). NO), the priority stored in the DRAM 12 is left as it is.

  Thereafter, the CPU 11 generates a new reception number (step S111), and adds a record including each information stored in the DRAM 12 and the new reception number to the end of the incident queue table 16d, thereby creating a new incident. Is registered in the table 16d (step S112). At this time, records recorded in the incident queue table 16d include a summary of incident contents, reception date and time, user identification information, and priority in addition to the newly generated reception number. However, since the processing time is not accumulated at the stage of incident registration, zero time is recorded in the “processing time” field. In the “processing state” field, “accepted” is recorded. The CPU 11 that executes steps S109 to S112 corresponds to the above-described incident registration means.

  And CPU11 complete | finishes the process which concerns on FIG. 6 after registration of an incident.

  By the incident registration process described above, the help desk staff can register the contents of the incident heard from the user who has inquired about the IT infrastructure in the incident queue table 16d.

  In addition, as described above, when the help desk staff or the professional staff who has received an escalation from this staff finishes answering the user about the incident, the process of deleting the record related to the incident from the incident queue table 16d. Along with this process, a process for evaluating the user must also be performed. At this time, the staff or the professional staff operates the input device 10b of the incident management device 10 to start the user evaluation registration program 16f. Then, the CPU 11 of the incident management apparatus 10 starts executing the user evaluation registration process according to the user evaluation registration program 16f. FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the flow of the user evaluation registration process.

  After the start of the user evaluation registration process, the CPU 11 performs a process of displaying an input screen (not shown) for inputting the user identification information and the reliability of the user on the display device 10a (step S201). . The input screen (not shown) includes a text box or a drop-down list box for inputting user identification information and a radio button for inputting whether the user is reliable. .

  Subsequently, the CPU 11 waits until the OK button is clicked in a state where each information is input on the input screen (not shown) (step S202; NO). When the OK button is clicked (step S202; YES), the CPU 11 determines whether or not the reliability of the user input on the input screen (not shown) at the time of the click is “Yes”. It discriminate | determines (step S203).

  When the reliability of the user input on the input screen (not shown) is “Yes” (step S203; YES), the CPU 11 performs the input in the reliability management table 16c as shown in FIG. A process of increasing the value of the “credibility” field of the record including the same information as the user identification information input on the screen by 0.1 is performed (step S204), and the user evaluation registration process according to FIG.

  On the other hand, when the reliability of the user input on the input screen (not shown) is “none” (step S203; NO), the CPU 11 determines the user input on the input screen in the credit management table 16c. A process of reducing the value of the “credibility” field of the record including the same information as the identification information by 0.1 is performed (step S205), and the user evaluation registration process according to FIG. 7 is terminated.

  The CPU 11 that executes steps S201 and S202 corresponds to the above-described user evaluation accepting unit, and the CPU 11 that executes steps S203 to S205 corresponds to the above-described reliability update unit.

  Through the user evaluation registration process described above, the help desk staff or specialists have determined that the user is reliable because the urgency level heard from the user together with the content of the incident is appropriate. Sometimes, the good evaluation can be reflected in the credit management table 16c, and when it is determined that the user is not reliable because the urgency level heard from the user is not appropriate, the bad evaluation is regarded as the credit rating. This can be reflected in the management table 16c.

  In this user evaluation registration process, one evaluator (staff or specialist) is assigned 0.1 points as the points (minimum unit of credit) that should be given to the user in one evaluation. ing. As described in steps S109 and S110 in FIG. 6, when the trustworthiness is a positive value, this trustworthiness is added to the priority, but the point of one evaluator is 1.0. If this is the case, the priority level of the incident received from the user will fluctuate greatly in one evaluation, which may be severe for the user. For this reason, the points given to the user in one evaluation (the evaluator's share per evaluation) are set to 0.1 so that the evaluations of a plurality of evaluators are averaged. Therefore, if the number of good evaluations exceeds the number of bad evaluations by ten, the user can receive a priority one higher than usual. However, even if the number of bad evaluations exceeds, the priority does not decrease (see steps S109 and S110 in FIG. 6).

  By the way, when a staff member of a help desk or a specialist who escalates from the staff tries to process an incident that he / she should share, first, the contents of the incident queue table 16d are displayed on the display device 10a, and the incident is selected. After that, it starts to process.

  Therefore, the incident management software 16 (see FIG. 1) described above is shown in addition to the incident registration program 16e and the user evaluation registration program 16f described with reference to FIGS. A program that realizes a function for displaying a list of incidents registered in the incident queue table 16d is included. Note that the CPU 11 that implements the program (not shown) corresponds to the presentation means described above.

  However, since the records in the incident queue table 16d are added at the end of registration as described in step S112 in FIG. 6, they may not be arranged in order of priority. Therefore, this program (not shown) includes an incident order management program 16g as a program for rearranging the records in the incident queue table 16d before displaying the contents of the incident queue table 16d as a list. When the incident sequence management program 16g is activated, the CPU 11 reads the incident sequence management program 16g and starts executing the incident sequence management process. 8 and 9 are diagrams showing the flow of the incident order management process.

  After the start of the incident order management process, the CPU 11 sorts the incident queue table 16d in order of priority (step S301), and executes the individual process loop L1. In the individual processing loop L1, the CPU 11 specifies incidents (records) one by one from the beginning to the end of the incident queue table 16d as a processing target, thereby performing step S311 for each of all incidents in the table 16d. ˜S344 is executed.

  After specifying one incident as a processing target, the CPU 11 first determines whether or not the priority of the processing target incident is 5 (step S311).

  If the priority of the incident to be processed is 5 (step S311; YES), the CPU 11 has passed 30 minutes or more from the reception date / time in the “acceptance date / time” field of the incident to be processed. It is determined whether or not the processing time in the “processing time” field is 3 hours or more (steps S312 and S313).

  If the time at this point has passed 30 minutes or more from the reception date / time in the “acceptance date / time” field of the incident to be processed (step S312; YES), or the processing time in the “processing time” field is 3 hours When it is above (step S313; YES), CPU11 performs the process which rearranges the record of a process target incident on the head of an incident queue table (step S314).

  On the other hand, if the priority of the incident to be processed is not 5 (step S311; NO), or 30 minutes have not elapsed since the reception date / time in the “acceptance date / time” field of the incident to be processed. In addition, when the processing time in the “processing time” field is less than 3 hours (step S312; NO, S313; NO), the CPU 11 does not perform the process of rearranging the records in the incident queue table 16d. .

  Subsequently, the CPU 11 determines whether or not the priority of the incident to be processed is 3 (step S321).

  If the priority of the incident to be processed is 3 (step S321; YES), the CPU 11 has passed one hour or more from the reception date and time in the “acceptance date and time” field of the incident to be processed. Whether or not the processing time in the “processing time” field is 6 hours or more is determined (steps S322 and S323).

  Then, when the time at this point has passed one hour or more from the reception date / time in the “acceptance date / time” field of the incident to be processed (step S322; YES), or the processing time in the “processing time” field is 6 hours When it is above (step S323; YES), CPU11 performs the process which rearranges the record of a process target incident on the head of an incident queue table (step S324).

  On the other hand, if the priority of the incident to be processed is not 3 (step S321; NO), or 1 hour has not elapsed since the reception date / time in the “acceptance date / time” field of the incident to be processed. In addition, when the processing time in the “processing time” field is less than 6 hours (step S322; NO, S323; NO), the CPU 11 does not perform the process of rearranging the records in the incident queue table 16d. .

  Subsequently, the CPU 11 determines whether or not the priority of the process target incident is 2 (step S331).

  If the priority of the incident to be processed is 2 (step S331; YES), the CPU 11 has passed at least 8 hours from the reception date and time in the “acceptance date and time” field of the incident to be processed. Whether or not the processing time in the “processing time” field is 24 hours or more is determined (steps S332 and S333).

  Then, when the time at this point has passed 8 hours or more from the reception date and time in the “acceptance date and time” field of the incident to be processed (step S332; YES), or the processing time in the “processing time” field is 24 hours When it is above (step S333; YES), the CPU 11 performs a process of rearranging the records of the incidents to be processed at the head of the incident queue table (step S334).

  On the other hand, when the priority of the incident to be processed is not 2 (step S331; NO), or the time at this point has not elapsed from the reception date and time in the “acceptance date and time” field of the incident to be processed, and When the processing time in the “processing time” field is less than 24 hours (step S332; NO, S333; NO), the CPU 11 does not perform the process of rearranging the records in the incident queue table 16d.

  Subsequently, the CPU 11 determines whether or not the priority of the process target incident is 1 (step S341).

  If the priority of the incident to be processed is 1 (step S341; YES), the CPU 11 has passed 24 hours or more from the reception date / time in the “acceptance date / time” field of the incident to be processed. Whether or not the processing time in the “processing time” field is 72 hours or more is determined (steps S342 and S343).

  If the time at this point has passed 24 hours or more from the reception date / time in the “acceptance date / time” field of the incident to be processed (step S342; YES), or the processing time in the “processing time” field is 72 hours. When it is above (step S343; YES), CPU11 performs the process which rearranges the record of a process target incident to the head of an incident queue table (step S344).

  On the other hand, when the priority of the incident to be processed is not 1 (step S341; NO), or 24 hours have not elapsed since the reception date / time in the “acceptance date / time” field of the incident to be processed. In addition, when the processing time in the “processing time” field is less than 72 hours (step S342; NO, S343; NO), the CPU 11 does not perform the process of rearranging the records in the incident queue table 16d. .

  Thereafter, the CPU 11 determines whether or not an unprocessed record exists in the incident queue table 16d. If there is an unprocessed record, the CPU 11 identifies the incident of the record as the next process target incident and identifies the identified process. Steps S311 to S344 described above are executed for the target incident. After completing steps S311 to S344 for all the records in the incident queue table 16d, the CPU 11 leaves the individual processing loop L1 and ends the incident order management process according to FIGS.

  The CPU 11 that executes the individual processing loop L1 corresponds to the rearranging means described above.

  By the incident order management process described above, in the incident queue table 16d, an incident with a high priority and an incident that has been received for a certain period of time even if the priority is low are processed quickly. Will be rearranged.

  Next, the operation and effect of the incident management apparatus 10 of this embodiment will be described.

  As described above, the help desk staff operates the incident management apparatus 10 to start the incident registration program 16e, and inputs information related to the incident on an input screen (not shown) (S101, S102). Then, the incident management apparatus 10 receives the input from the help desk staff, specifies the importance from the business name (IT infrastructure) related to the inquiry from the user (S104), and the staff receives from the user. The priority corresponding to the combination of the urgency level and the importance level is specified (S106), and if the user's credit rating is zero or more, the credit rating is added to the priority (S109; YES, (S110), the contents of the incident about the IT infrastructure heard from the user and the priority after the addition are registered in the incident queue table 16d (S112).

  The credit added to the priority at this time is increased or decreased by the evaluation by the staff or specialist who processed the previous incident (S201 to S205). For this reason, if creditworthiness is high, the priority after creditworthiness is added will also become high. However, in the case of this embodiment, even if the creditworthiness is low, the priority after the creditworthiness is added is not lowered.

  Therefore, even if the priority of incidents with exactly the same content changes because the urgency is subjectively determined by the user who made the inquiry, it depends on the user's credit rating. Since the priority is corrected, the priority becomes more accurate. As a result, the quality of the IT service provided to the user by the above group is improved.

  By the way, although the incident management apparatus 10 of this embodiment mentioned above adds a reliability to a priority, when a reliability is zero or more, it is not limited to this. For example, the credit may be added to the priority even when the credit is a negative value.

  Moreover, although the incident management apparatus 10 of this embodiment demonstrated as what has the function (not shown) for displaying the content of the incident queue table 16d on the display apparatus 10a, it is not limited to this, For example, incident queue It may have a function (not shown) for printing out the contents of the table 16d onto printing paper.

(Appendix 1)
Computer
A credit storage means for storing, in a storage device, a trustworthiness indicating a trustworthiness of the user for each user information of a user who uses the IT infrastructure;
User evaluation acceptance means for accepting good / bad evaluation of the user from the input device;
Credit update means for increasing or decreasing the credit of the user in the storage device based on the user's evaluation received by the user evaluation accepting means;
To identify the content of an incident about the IT infrastructure encountered by the user, the urgency level indicating the urgency of resolution of the incident, the user information of the user who has inquired the incident, and the IT infrastructure where the incident occurs Incident reception means for receiving the IT infrastructure identification information from the input device,
Importance level acquisition means for acquiring the importance level corresponding to the IT infrastructure identification information received by the incident reception means from a storage device storing importance level definition information defining the importance level of the IT infrastructure for each IT infrastructure identification information ,
Corresponds to the urgency received by the incident receiving means and the importance acquired by the importance acquiring means from the storage device storing priority definition information that defines priority for each combination of importance and urgency Priority acquisition means for acquiring priority,
A credit level acquisition unit for acquiring the credit level of the user indicated by the user information received by the incident reception unit from the storage device;
The credit level acquired by the credit level acquisition unit is added to the priority level acquired by the priority level acquisition unit, and the priority level with the added credit level and the contents of the incident received by the incident reception unit are stored in the storage device as an incident record. Incident registration means,
When receiving an instruction from the operator via the input device, the incident registration means rearranges the order of the incident records stored in the storage device in order of priority, and
An incident management program for causing an incident record in the storage device to be presented through an output device in an order rearranged by the rearranging unit.

(Appendix 2)
When the incident registration means stores the contents of the incident in a storage device, the time when the incident reception means receives the contents of the incident is also stored in the storage device,
The rearranging means rearranges the order of incident records stored in the storage device by the incident registration means in descending order of priority, and then rearranges incident records that have passed a predetermined time from the reception time to the top. The incident management program according to supplementary note 1, characterized by:

(Appendix 3)
Said computer further
The incident registration means functions as a processing time storage means for storing in the storage device the time taken to resolve the incident stored in the storage device as a processing time,
When the incident registration unit stores the contents of the incident in the storage device, the time when the incident reception unit receives the incident is also stored in the storage device,
After the rearrangement means rearranges the order of each incident record stored in the storage device by the incident registration means in descending order of priority, a predetermined time has elapsed from the reception time, or the processing time storage means The incident management program according to supplementary note 1, wherein incident records whose processing time stored in a table exceeds a predetermined value are rearranged at the head.

(Appendix 4)
Importance definition information stored in the storage device by the importance storage means defines the minimum unit of importance as 1,
The incident management program according to appendix 1, 2, or 3, wherein the reliability update means increases or decreases a user's reliability in the storage device by 0.1 per evaluation.

(Appendix 5)
The incident management program according to appendix 4, wherein the incident registration means adds the reliability to the priority when the reliability is a predetermined value or more.

(Appendix 6)
Computer
A credit storage means for storing, in a storage device, a trustworthiness indicating a trustworthiness of the user for each user information of a user who uses the IT infrastructure;
User evaluation acceptance means for accepting good / bad evaluation of the user from the input device;
Credit update means for increasing or decreasing the credit of the user in the storage device based on the user's evaluation received by the user evaluation accepting means;
To identify the content of an incident about the IT infrastructure encountered by the user, the urgency level indicating the urgency of resolution of the incident, the user information of the user who has inquired the incident, and the IT infrastructure where the incident occurs Incident reception means for receiving the IT infrastructure identification information from the input device,
Importance level acquisition means for acquiring the importance level corresponding to the IT infrastructure identification information received by the incident reception means from a storage device storing importance level definition information defining the importance level of the IT infrastructure for each IT infrastructure identification information ,
Corresponds to the urgency received by the incident receiving means and the importance acquired by the importance acquiring means from the storage device storing priority definition information that defines priority for each combination of importance and urgency Priority acquisition means for acquiring priority,
A credit level acquisition unit for acquiring the credit level of the user indicated by the user information received by the incident reception unit from the storage device;
The credit level acquired by the credit level acquisition unit is added to the priority level acquired by the priority level acquisition unit, and the priority level with the added credit level and the contents of the incident received by the incident reception unit are stored in the storage device as an incident record. Incident registration means,
When receiving an instruction from the operator via the input device, the incident registration means rearranges the order of the incident records stored in the storage device in order of priority, and
A computer-readable medium storing an incident management program for functioning as a presentation unit for presenting incident records in the storage device through an output device in the order in which the rearranging unit rearranges.

(Appendix 7)
User evaluation acceptance procedure for accepting good / bad evaluation of users from the input device,
For each user information of a user who uses the IT infrastructure, out of a storage device that stores a degree of trust indicating the trustworthiness of the user, the trustworthiness of the user who has received an evaluation in the user evaluation acceptance procedure is Credit update procedure to increase or decrease based on evaluation,
To identify the content of an incident about the IT infrastructure encountered by the user, the urgency level indicating the urgency of resolution of the incident, the user information of the user who has inquired the incident, and the IT infrastructure where the incident occurs Incident reception procedure for receiving IT infrastructure identification information from the input device,
Importance acquisition procedure for acquiring the importance corresponding to the IT infrastructure identification information received in the incident reception procedure from the storage device storing the importance definition information that defines the importance of the IT infrastructure for each IT infrastructure identification information ,
Corresponds to the emergency level received in the incident reception procedure and the importance level acquired in the importance level acquisition procedure from the storage device storing the priority definition information that defines the priority for each combination of the importance level and the emergency level Priority acquisition procedure for acquiring priority,
A credit acquisition procedure for acquiring the credit of the user indicated by the user information received in the incident reception procedure from the storage device;
The credit acquired in the credit acquisition procedure is added to the priority acquired in the priority acquisition procedure, and the priority with the credit added and the contents of the incident received in the incident reception procedure are stored in the storage device as an incident record. Incident registration procedure,
When receiving an instruction from the operator via the input device, a rearrangement procedure for rearranging the order of incident records stored in the storage device in the incident registration procedure in descending order of priority, and
An incident management method, wherein a computer executes a presentation procedure for presenting incident records in the storage device through an output device in the order rearranged in the rearrangement procedure.

The figure which shows schematic structure of the incident management apparatus of this embodiment Diagram showing an example of the data structure of the importance level definition table The figure which shows an example of the data structure of a priority definition table The figure which shows an example of the data structure of a credit management table Diagram showing an example of the data structure of the incident queue table Diagram showing the flow of incident registration processing Diagram showing the flow of user evaluation registration process Diagram showing the flow of incident sequence management processing Diagram showing the flow of incident sequence management processing

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Incident management apparatus 10a Display apparatus 10b Input apparatus 10c Main body 11 CPU
12 DRAM
14 HDD
16 Incident Management Software 16a Importance Definition Table 16b Priority Definition Table 16c Reliability Management Table 16d Incident Queue Table 16e Incident Registration Program 16f User Evaluation Registration Program 16g Incident Order Management Program

Claims (5)

Computer
A credit storage means for storing, in a storage device, a trustworthiness indicating a trustworthiness of the user for each user information of a user who uses the IT infrastructure;
User evaluation acceptance means for accepting good / bad evaluation of the user from the input device;
Credit update means for increasing or decreasing the credit of the user in the storage device based on the user's evaluation received by the user evaluation accepting means;
To identify the content of an incident about the IT infrastructure encountered by the user, the urgency level indicating the urgency of resolution of the incident, the user information of the user who has inquired the incident, and the IT infrastructure where the incident occurs Incident reception means for receiving the IT infrastructure identification information from the input device,
Importance level acquisition means for acquiring the importance level corresponding to the IT infrastructure identification information received by the incident reception means from a storage device storing importance level definition information defining the importance level of the IT infrastructure for each IT infrastructure identification information ,
Corresponds to the urgency received by the incident receiving means and the importance acquired by the importance acquiring means from the storage device storing priority definition information that defines priority for each combination of importance and urgency Priority acquisition means for acquiring priority,
A credit level acquisition unit for acquiring the credit level of the user indicated by the user information received by the incident reception unit from the storage device;
The credit level acquired by the credit level acquisition unit is added to the priority level acquired by the priority level acquisition unit, and the priority level with the added credit level and the contents of the incident received by the incident reception unit are stored in the storage device as an incident record. Incident registration means,
When receiving an instruction from the operator via the input device, the incident registration means rearranges the order of the incident records stored in the storage device in order of priority, and
An incident management program for causing an incident record in the storage device to be presented through an output device in an order rearranged by the rearranging unit. When the incident registration means stores the contents of the incident in a storage device, the time when the incident reception means receives the contents of the incident is also stored in the storage device,
The rearranging means rearranges the order of incident records stored in the storage device by the incident registration means in descending order of priority, and then rearranges incident records that have passed a predetermined time from the reception time to the top. The incident management program according to claim 1. Said computer further
The incident registration means functions as a processing time storage means for storing in the storage device the time taken to resolve the incident stored in the storage device as a processing time,
When the incident registration unit stores the contents of the incident in the storage device, the time when the incident reception unit receives the incident is also stored in the storage device,
After the rearrangement means rearranges the order of each incident record stored in the storage device by the incident registration means in descending order of priority, a predetermined time has elapsed from the reception time, or the processing time storage means 2. The incident management program according to claim 1, wherein incident records whose processing time exceeds a predetermined value are rearranged at the head. Importance definition information stored in the storage device by the importance storage means defines the minimum unit of importance as 1,
The incident management program according to claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the reliability update means increases or decreases a user's reliability in the storage device by 0.1 per evaluation. 5. The incident management program according to claim 4, wherein the incident registration means adds the reliability to the priority when the reliability is a predetermined value or more.