JP4433173B2 - Iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater, production method thereof, purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, production method thereof, and purification treatment method of soil and groundwater - Google Patents

Iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater, production method thereof, purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, production method thereof, and purification treatment method of soil and groundwater Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4433173B2
JP4433173B2 JP2004148348A JP2004148348A JP4433173B2 JP 4433173 B2 JP4433173 B2 JP 4433173B2 JP 2004148348 A JP2004148348 A JP 2004148348A JP 2004148348 A JP2004148348 A JP 2004148348A JP 4433173 B2 JP4433173 B2 JP 4433173B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
particle powder
soil
groundwater
iron composite
iron
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2004148348A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2005021882A (en
Inventor
雅之 上神
潤一 河野
浩司 角屋
朋子 沖田
健二 沖中
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toda Kogyo Corp
Original Assignee
Toda Kogyo Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toda Kogyo Corp filed Critical Toda Kogyo Corp
Priority to JP2004148348A priority Critical patent/JP4433173B2/en
Publication of JP2005021882A publication Critical patent/JP2005021882A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4433173B2 publication Critical patent/JP4433173B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Description

本発明は、土壌又は地下水中に含まれるジクロロメタン、四塩化炭素、1、2−ジクロロエタン、1、1−ジクロロエチレン、シス−1、2−ジクロロエチレン、1、1、1−トリクロロエタン、1、1、2−トリクロロエタン、トリクロロエチレン、テトラクロロエチレン及び1、3−ジクロロプロペン等の脂肪族有機ハロゲン化合物、ダイオキシン類、PCB等の芳香族有機ハロゲン化合物、カドミウム、鉛、クロム、砒素、セレン、シアン等の重金属等を効率よく、持続的に、しかも経済的に分解・不溶化できる浄化剤を提供するものである。   The present invention relates to dichloromethane, carbon tetrachloride, 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-dichloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,1,2, contained in soil or groundwater. -Efficient use of aliphatic organic halogen compounds such as trichloroethane, trichlorethylene, tetrachloroethylene and 1,3-dichloropropene, aromatic organic halogen compounds such as dioxins and PCB, heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, chromium, arsenic, selenium and cyanide It provides a cleansing agent that can be decomposed and insolubilized well, economically and economically.

トリクロロエチレン、テトラクロロエチレン等の脂肪族有機ハロゲン化合物は、半導体工場での洗浄用や金属加工金属の脱脂用として幅広く用いられている。   Aliphatic organic halogen compounds such as trichlorethylene and tetrachloroethylene are widely used for cleaning in semiconductor factories and for degreasing metalworking metals.

また、都市ごみや産業廃棄物を焼却するごみ焼却炉から発生する排ガスや飛灰、主灰中には、微量ではあるが人体に対して極めて強い毒性を持つ芳香族有機ハロゲン化合物であるダイオキシン類が含まれている。ダイオキシン類は、ジベンゾ−p−ジオキシン、ジベンゾフラン等の水素が塩素で置換された化合物の総称である。排ガスや飛灰はごみ焼却炉周辺に滞留し周辺地域の土壌中にダイオキシン類が残存することとなる。   Dioxins, which are aromatic organic halogen compounds that are extremely toxic to the human body, even in trace amounts, are contained in exhaust gas, fly ash, and main ash generated from incinerators that incinerate municipal waste and industrial waste. It is included. Dioxins are a general term for compounds in which hydrogen is substituted with chlorine, such as dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran. Exhaust gas and fly ash stay around the waste incinerator and dioxins remain in the surrounding soil.

更に、PCB(ポリ塩化ビフェニル)は化学的、熱的に安定であり、電気絶縁性にも優れており、トランス、コンデンサーの絶縁油、可塑剤、熱媒体として多用されていたが、有害であることから製造及び使用が禁止されている。しかしながら、過去において使用されていたPCBの有効な処理方法は確立されておらず、大部分が処理されずにそのまま保存されている。   In addition, PCB (polychlorinated biphenyl) is chemically and thermally stable, has excellent electrical insulation properties, and has been frequently used as an insulating oil, plasticizer, and heat medium for transformers and capacitors, but is harmful. Therefore, production and use are prohibited. However, an effective processing method for PCBs used in the past has not been established, and most of them are stored without being processed.

脂肪族有機ハロゲン化合物及び芳香族有機ハロゲン化合物等の有機ハロゲン化合物類は難分解性である上に発癌性物質又は強い毒性を有する物質であるため、土壌・地下水の有機ハロゲン化合物類による汚染が深刻な環境問題になっている。   Organic halogen compounds such as aliphatic organic halogen compounds and aromatic organic halogen compounds are difficult to decompose and are carcinogenic or highly toxic. Therefore, contamination by organic halogen compounds in soil and groundwater is serious. Has become a serious environmental problem.

即ち、前記有機ハロゲン化合物類が排出された場合、有機ハロゲン化合物類は難分解性であるため、排出された土壌中に蓄積され有機ハロゲン化合物類で汚染された状態となり、また、地下水も有機ハロゲン化合物類によって汚染されることとなる。更に、地下水は汚染土壌以外の周辺地域についても広がるため、広範な領域で有機ハロゲン化合物類による汚染が問題となる。   That is, when the organic halogen compounds are discharged, since the organic halogen compounds are hardly decomposable, the organic halogen compounds are accumulated in the discharged soil and contaminated with the organic halogen compounds. It will be contaminated by compounds. Furthermore, since groundwater spreads in surrounding areas other than contaminated soil, contamination with organic halogen compounds becomes a problem in a wide range.

有機ハロゲン化合物類によって汚染された土壌では土地の再利用・再開発を行うことができないため、有機ハロゲン化合物類によって汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化処理方法として様々な技術手段の提案がなされているが、有機ハロゲン化合物類は難分解性であり、しかも、多量の土壌・地下水が処理対象となるため、効率的、且つ、経済的な浄化技術は未だ十分に確立されていない。   Since soil cannot be reused or redeveloped in soil contaminated with organohalogen compounds, various technical means have been proposed as a purification method for soil and groundwater contaminated with organohalogen compounds. However, since organic halogen compounds are hardly decomposable and a large amount of soil and groundwater are treated, an efficient and economical purification technology has not yet been established.

有機ハロゲン化合物類によって汚染された土壌の浄化方法として、各種触媒を用いて浄化処理する方法、有機ハロゲン化合物類の揮発性を利用して吸引除去する方法、土壌を掘削して加熱処理によって無害化する熱分解法、微生物を利用する方法等が知られている。また、有機ハロゲン化合物類によって汚染された地下水の浄化方法として、汚染地下水を土壌外に抽出して無害化する方法、地下水を揚水することによって有機ハロゲン化合物類を除去する方法等が知られている。   As a purification method for soil contaminated with organic halogen compounds, a method of purification using various catalysts, a method of removing by suction using the volatility of organic halogen compounds, excavation of soil and detoxification by heat treatment There are known thermal decomposition methods and methods utilizing microorganisms. In addition, as a method for purifying groundwater contaminated with organic halogen compounds, a method of extracting contaminated groundwater from the soil to render it harmless, a method of removing organic halogen compounds by pumping groundwater, and the like are known. .

有機ハロゲン化合物類で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化方法として提案されている技術手段のうち、有機ハロゲン化合物類で汚染された土壌・地下水と鉄系粒子を用いた浄化剤とを混合接触させて無害化する技術手段が提案されている(特許文献1〜8)。   Among the technical means proposed as a purification method for soil and groundwater contaminated with organohalogen compounds, soil and groundwater contaminated with organohalogen compounds and a cleaning agent using iron-based particles are mixed and contacted. Technical means for detoxification have been proposed (Patent Documents 1 to 8).

一方、近年の環境意識の向上から、重金属による土壌・地下水の汚染が注目されている。特に、カドミウム、鉛、クロム、砒素、セレン、シアン等の重金属等からなる有害物質による汚染は人体又は生態系に対して有害であるため、前記有害物質の浄化・除去処理が急務とされている。   On the other hand, soil and groundwater contamination by heavy metals has attracted attention due to recent environmental awareness improvements. In particular, since contamination with toxic substances such as cadmium, lead, chromium, arsenic, selenium, cyanide and other heavy metals is harmful to the human body or ecosystem, there is an urgent need to clean and remove the toxic substances. .

周知のとおり、重金属等の有害物質で汚染された土壌又は地下水の対策技術は「浄化技術」と「封じ込め」に分類され、浄化技術は「原位置浄化」と対象地から汚染土壌を掘削する「掘削除去」とに分類される。「原位置浄化」は更に、汚染土壌・地下水に含まれる重金属等を地下(原位置)で分解する「原位置分解」と汚染土壌・地下水を抽出または掘削した中の重金属等を取り除く「原位置抽出」に分けられる。   As is well known, countermeasures for soil or groundwater contaminated with toxic substances such as heavy metals are categorized as “purification technology” and “containment”. “Excavation removal”. “In-situ purification” further includes “in-situ decomposition” in which heavy metals contained in contaminated soil and groundwater are decomposed underground (in-situ), and “in-situ removal” that removes heavy metals from extracted or excavated contaminated soil and groundwater. It is divided into “extraction”.

「原位置抽出」は、重金属等に分類される対象物質のうち、シアン、農薬などの化合物を熱化学的に分解する「分解」と物理的な分離によって濃縮された重金属等を土壌・地下水から分離する「分離」とがある。   “In-situ extraction” refers to “decomposition” that decomposes compounds such as cyanide and pesticides among the target substances classified as heavy metals, etc., and heavy metals concentrated by physical separation from soil and groundwater. There is "separation" to separate.

一方、「封じ込め」は「原位置封じ込め」と「掘削除去後封じ込め」に分類される。原位置封じ込めは、汚染土壌に固化剤を混合して固型化し、その後現場の土壌を移動させずに原位置で汚染土壌を封じ込める技術である。また、掘削除去後封じ込めは、前処理として汚染土壌に不溶化剤を混合し、難溶化させ、その後一度掘削してから、改めて汚染土壌を封じ込める技術である。   On the other hand, “containment” is classified into “in-situ containment” and “containment after excavation and removal”. In-situ containment is a technique in which a contaminated soil is mixed with a solidifying agent and solidified, and then the contaminated soil is contained in-situ without moving on-site soil. Containment after excavation and removal is a technique in which an insolubilizing agent is mixed in the contaminated soil as a pretreatment to make it insoluble, and after excavation is performed once, the contaminated soil is contained again.

「浄化技術」に係る施工法としては、土壌洗浄法、熱脱着法などが挙げられ、例えば、薬品を添加し、重金属等を溶解して分離する化学溶解法、水で土壌を洗浄・分級し、重金属等を多く含んだ微粒子を分離する水洗浄法、土壌粒子の表面に付着した汚染物質を洗浄剤で洗浄し、更に粒子の大きさと比重によって清浄な大粒子と汚染物の微粒子に分級する土壌湿式洗浄法などが挙げられる。   Construction methods related to “Purification Technology” include soil washing method, thermal desorption method, etc., for example, chemical dissolution method that adds chemicals and dissolves and separates heavy metals, etc., washing and classifying soil with water , Water washing method for separating fine particles containing a lot of heavy metals, etc., cleaning contaminants adhering to the surface of soil particles with a cleaning agent, and classifying them into clean large particles and contaminant fine particles according to the size and specific gravity of the particles Examples include soil wet cleaning.

また、「封じ込め」に係る施工法は、「原位置封じ込め」では汚染土壌にセメント等の固化剤を混合して不透水層と鋼矢板等によって封じ込める方法があり、「掘削除去後封じ込め」では、汚染土壌に対して薬剤によって不溶化処理して汚染土壌を溶出しにくい形態に変化させた後に遮断工、遮水工で封じ込める方法がある。   In addition, the construction method related to “containment” is “in-situ containment”, in which there is a method of mixing a contaminated soil with a solidifying agent such as cement and containing it with an impermeable layer and a steel sheet pile, etc. There is a method in which the contaminated soil is insolubilized with a chemical to change the contaminated soil into a form in which it is difficult to elute, and is then contained by a barrier or water barrier.

しかしながら、前記各処理技術は、処理コストが高く、長期間を要するものであり、重金属等の有害物質を効率よく、かつ、持続的に、低減する技術とは言い難いものである。   However, each processing technique is expensive and requires a long period of time, and it is difficult to say that it is a technique that efficiently and continuously reduces harmful substances such as heavy metals.

最近では、主に鉄粉の還元作用を利用し重金属類の価数を低減し無害化、安定化する低コストの処理技術が開発されている。例えば、クロムに対して鉄粉の還元作用(金属の価数低減)を利用した技術が記載されている(特許文献5)。また、特許文献9には、重金属イオンを含む溶液をpH5〜6程度に調整し、鉄粉を加えて攪拌すると、鉄粉の一部が溶解して、水酸化第2鉄が沈殿し、pHの上昇とともにゲーサイト、レピッドクロサイトが生成し、この際重金属の一部は共沈して大部分は鉄粉へ吸着することが記載されており、また、低いpHでは鉄粉の溶出が増大し、吸着除去効果は劣化することが記載されている。   Recently, a low-cost processing technique has been developed that mainly uses the reducing action of iron powder to reduce the valence of heavy metals and render them harmless and stable. For example, a technique using a reduction action of iron powder (reduction of metal valence) against chromium is described (Patent Document 5). Further, in Patent Document 9, when a solution containing heavy metal ions is adjusted to about pH 5-6, and iron powder is added and stirred, part of the iron powder is dissolved and ferric hydroxide precipitates, and pH It is described that goethite and rapid crosite are formed with the rise in the temperature, and in this case, a part of heavy metals are co-precipitated and most of them are adsorbed to the iron powder. It is described that it increases and the adsorption removal effect deteriorates.

特開平11−235577号公報Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 11-235577 特開2000−5740号公報JP 2000-5740 A 特開2000−334063号公報JP 2000-334063 A 特開2001−38341号公報JP 2001-38341 A 特開2001−198567号公報JP 2001-198567 A 特開2002−161263号公報JP 2002-161263 A 特開2002−210452号公報JP 2002-210452 A 特開2002−317202号公報JP 2002-317202 A 特公昭52−45665号公報Japanese Patent Publication No. 52-45665

前出特許文献1には0.1重量%以上の炭素を含有する鉄粉を土壌に添加・混合して土壌中の有機ハロゲン化合物を無害化する技術が開示されているが、鉄粉の比表面積及び粒度は記載されているものの粒子サイズが大きいため、有機ハロゲン化合物を十分に低減できるとは言い難いものである。   Patent Document 1 discloses a technique for detoxifying organic halogen compounds in soil by adding and mixing iron powder containing 0.1% by weight or more of carbon to the soil. Although the surface area and particle size are described, it is difficult to say that the organic halogen compound can be sufficiently reduced because the particle size is large.

また、前出特許文献2には銅を含有した鉄粉を用いて土壌中の有機ハロゲン化合物を無害化する技術が開示されているが、有機ハロゲン化合物の分解に長時間を必要とするため効率よく有機ハロゲン化合物を無害化できるとは言い難いものである。   In addition, Patent Document 2 discloses a technique for detoxifying organic halogen compounds in soil using iron powder containing copper. However, since it requires a long time to decompose the organic halogen compounds, efficiency is improved. It is difficult to say that organic halogen compounds can be rendered harmless.

また、前出特許文献3にはダイオキシン類と製鉄所における熱間圧延鋼板の製造工程から生じるミルスケールを含む塩酸酸性水溶液とを100℃より低温で接触させてダイオキシン類を無害化する技術が開示されているが、無害化を促進させる塩酸酸性水溶液が必須であり、ミルスケール自体の分解反応が十分とは言い難いものである。   Patent Document 3 discloses a technique for detoxifying dioxins by bringing dioxins into contact with an acidic aqueous hydrochloric acid solution containing mill scale generated from a hot-rolled steel sheet manufacturing process at a steel mill at a temperature lower than 100 ° C. However, an aqueous hydrochloric acid solution that promotes detoxification is essential, and it is difficult to say that the decomposition reaction of the mill scale itself is sufficient.

また、前出特許文献4には平均粒子径1〜500μmの鉄粒子を含む水懸濁液からなる土壌浄化剤が開示されているが、粒子サイズが大きく、有機ハロゲン化合物を十分に分解することが困難となる。   Moreover, although the above-mentioned patent document 4 discloses a soil purifier comprising an aqueous suspension containing iron particles having an average particle diameter of 1 to 500 μm, the particle size is large and the organic halogen compound is sufficiently decomposed. It becomes difficult.

また、前出特許文献5には平均粒子径が10μm未満の球状鉄粒子を含有する水懸濁液を用いる技術が開示されているが、該球状鉄粒子を含有する水懸濁液は製鋼用の酸素吹転炉から精錬中に発生する排ガスを集塵し、ガスを除去して得られる水懸濁液であり、有機ハロゲン化合物を十分に低減できるとは言い難いものである。   In addition, Patent Document 5 discloses a technique using an aqueous suspension containing spherical iron particles having an average particle diameter of less than 10 μm. The aqueous suspension containing spherical iron particles is used for steelmaking. It is a water suspension obtained by collecting exhaust gas generated during refining from an oxygen blowing converter and removing the gas, and it is difficult to say that organic halogen compounds can be sufficiently reduced.

また、前出特許文献6には、ニッケル、銅、コバルト及びモリブデンから選ばれる金属が表面に付着し、付着金属以外の表面が鉄酸化被膜で覆われている有機ハロゲン化合物分解用鉄粉が記載されているが、ミルスケールで得られた鉄粉や溶鋼を水アトマイズした鉄粉を用いており、記載されている鉄粉の比表面積から、鉄粉の粒子サイズが大きいと思われ、有機ハロゲン化合物を十分に低減できるとは言い難いものである。   In addition, the aforementioned Patent Document 6 describes an iron powder for decomposing an organic halogen compound in which a metal selected from nickel, copper, cobalt, and molybdenum is attached to the surface, and the surface other than the attached metal is covered with an iron oxide film. However, the iron powder obtained by mill scale and the iron powder obtained by water atomization of the molten steel are used. From the specific surface area of the iron powder described, the particle size of the iron powder seems to be large. It is difficult to say that the compound can be sufficiently reduced.

また、前出特許文献7には、Sを含有する鉄粉を有機ハロゲン化合物で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化処理に用いることが記載されているが、粒子サイズが大きく、有機ハロゲン化合物を十分に低減できるとは言い難い。   Further, in the above-mentioned Patent Document 7, it is described that iron powder containing S is used for purification treatment of soil / groundwater contaminated with an organic halogen compound, but the particle size is large and the organic halogen compound is sufficient. It is hard to say that it can be reduced.

また、前出特許文献8には、マグネタイトを含有する鉄複合粒子粉末を有機ハロゲン化合物で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化処理に用いることが記載されているが、Sを含有しておらず、有機ハロゲン化合物を十分に低減できるとは言い難い。   In addition, in the aforementioned Patent Document 8, it is described that the iron composite particle powder containing magnetite is used for the purification treatment of soil / groundwater contaminated with an organic halogen compound, but does not contain S, It is difficult to say that organic halogen compounds can be sufficiently reduced.

また、前出特許文献5には、鉄粉の還元作用(価数低減)を利用した無害化、安定化処理方法が記載されているが、年数が経つと鉄粉の還元作用の持続性に問題を生じ、重金属が無害で安定な価数になっていても再度価数が上がり有害な金属に変わる可能性がり、恒久的な対策とは言い難いものである。   In addition, the above-mentioned Patent Document 5 describes a detoxification and stabilization treatment method using the reduction action (valence reduction) of iron powder. However, over the years, the sustainability of the reduction action of iron powder is improved. Even if the heavy metal is harmless and has a stable valence, the valence may rise again and turn into a harmful metal, which is not a permanent measure.

また、前出特許文献9記載の技術は、鉄粉の作用は還元もしくは吸着が主である。一部溶解による作用もあるが、全て酸性領域での鉄粉の溶出を経由して、ゲーサイト、レピッドクロサイト、マグネタイトが生成し取り込まれるメカニズムであり、鉄粉を利用した処理技術においてFe2+もしくはFe3+の溶解により重金属を取り込みながらスピネルフェライト化する現象を積極的に利用した技術ではない。 In the technique described in Patent Document 9, the action of iron powder is mainly reduction or adsorption. Although there is an effect due to partial dissolution, it is a mechanism in which goethite, rapid crosite and magnetite are generated and taken in via the elution of iron powder in the acidic region, and in the processing technology using iron powder, Fe It is not a technique that actively utilizes the phenomenon of spinel ferrite formation while taking in heavy metals by dissolution of 2+ or Fe 3+ .

そこで、本発明は、土壌・地下水中に含まれる有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類を効率よく持続的に、且つ経済的に処理できる鉄複合粒子を用いた浄化方法を提供することを技術的課題とする。   Therefore, the present invention is technically intended to provide a purification method using iron composite particles that can efficiently and continuously and economically treat organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals contained in soil and groundwater. Let it be an issue.

前記技術的課題は以下の通りの本発明により達成できる。   The technical problem can be achieved by the present invention as follows.

即ち、本発明は、有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化処理に用いるα−Feとマグネタイトとからなる鉄複合粒子粉末であって、鉄複合粒子粉末のX線回折スペクトルにおいてα−Feの(110)面の回折強度D110とマグネタイトの(311)面の回折強度D311との強度比(D110/(D311+D110))が0.30〜0.95であり、Al含有量が0.10〜1.50重量%であり、S含有量が3500〜7000ppmであることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末である(本発明1)。 That is, the present invention is an iron composite particle powder comprising α-Fe and magnetite used for purification treatment of soil and groundwater contaminated with organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals, and the X-ray of the iron composite particle powder In the diffraction spectrum, the intensity ratio (D 110 / (D 311 + D 110 )) between the diffraction intensity D 110 of the (110) plane of α-Fe and the diffraction intensity D 311 of the (311) plane of magnetite is 0.30-0. It is an iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater, characterized in that it has an Al content of 0.10 to 1.50 wt% and an S content of 3500 to 7000 ppm (this invention) 1).

また、本発明は、飽和磁化値が85〜155Am/kgであり、BET比表面積が5〜60m/gであり、α−Feの(110)面の結晶子サイズが200〜400Åであり、平均粒子径が0.05〜0.50μmであることを特徴とする本発明1の土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末である(本発明2)。 In the present invention, the saturation magnetization value is 85 to 155 Am 2 / kg, the BET specific surface area is 5 to 60 m 2 / g, and the crystallite size of the (110) plane of α-Fe is 200 to 400 mm. The iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater of the present invention 1 according to the present invention 1 having an average particle diameter of 0.05 to 0.50 μm (present invention 2).

また、本発明は、本発明1又は2の土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末を有効成分として含有する水懸濁液からなる土壌・地下水の浄化剤である(本発明3)。   Further, the present invention is a soil / groundwater purification agent comprising a water suspension containing the iron / composite powder for soil / groundwater purification treatment of the present invention 1 or 2 as an active ingredient (invention 3).

また、本発明は、平均長軸径が0.05〜0.50μmであってAl含有量が0.06〜1.00重量%であるゲータイト粒子粉末又は平均長軸径が0.05〜0.50μmであってAl含有量が0.07〜1.13重量%であるヘマタイト粒子粉末を、350〜600℃の温度範囲で加熱還元して鉄粒子粉末とし、冷却後、該鉄粒子粉末を気相中で表面酸化被膜を形成することなく水中に取り出し、次いで、水中で当該鉄粒子粉末の粒子表面に表面酸化被膜を形成した後に乾燥することを特徴とする本発明1又は2の土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の製造法である(本発明4)。   The present invention also provides a goethite particle powder having an average major axis diameter of 0.05 to 0.50 μm and an Al content of 0.06 to 1.00% by weight or an average major axis diameter of 0.05 to 0. A hematite particle powder having an Al content of 0.07 to 1.13% by weight is heat-reduced in a temperature range of 350 to 600 ° C. to obtain an iron particle powder. After cooling, the iron particle powder is It is taken out in water without forming a surface oxide film in the gas phase, and then dried after forming a surface oxide film on the particle surface of the iron particle powder in water. This is a method for producing iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of groundwater (present invention 4).

また、本発明は、平均長軸径が0.05〜0.50μmであってAl含有量が0.06〜1.00重量%であり、S含有量が2200〜4500ppmであるゲータイト粒子粉末又は平均長軸径が0.05〜0.50μmであってAl含有量が0.07〜1.13重量%であり、S含有量が2400〜5000ppmのヘマタイト粒子粉末を、350〜600℃の温度範囲で加熱還元して鉄粒子粉末とし、冷却後、該鉄粒子粉末を気相中で表面酸化被膜を形成することなく水中に取り出し、水中で当該鉄粒子粉末の粒子表面に表面酸化被膜を形成して鉄複合粒子粉末を含有する水懸濁液を得ることを特徴とする本発明3の土壌・地下水の浄化剤の製造法である(本発明5)。   The present invention also provides a goethite particle powder having an average major axis diameter of 0.05 to 0.50 μm, an Al content of 0.06 to 1.00% by weight, and an S content of 2200 to 4500 ppm. A hematite particle powder having an average major axis diameter of 0.05 to 0.50 μm, an Al content of 0.07 to 1.13 wt%, and an S content of 2400 to 5000 ppm is obtained at a temperature of 350 to 600 ° C. Heat reduction in the range to make iron particle powder, after cooling, the iron particle powder is taken out in water without forming a surface oxide film in the gas phase, and a surface oxide film is formed on the particle surface of the iron particle powder in water Thus, the method for producing a soil / groundwater purifier of the present invention 3 is characterized in that an aqueous suspension containing iron composite particle powder is obtained (invention 5).

また、本発明は、本発明3のα−Feとマグネタイトとからなる鉄複合粒子粉末を有効成分として含有する水懸濁液からなる浄化剤を長期間保存して得られた浄化剤であって、該浄化剤中に粒子径が0.1〜5.0μmの粗大粒子を含み、かつ、該鉄複合粒子粉末全体のX線回折スペクトルにおいてα−Feの(110)面の回折強度D110とマグネタイトの(311)面の回折強度D311との強度比(D110/(D110+D311))が0.20〜0.80であることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化剤である(本発明6)。 Further, the present invention is a purifier obtained by preserving a purifier comprising an aqueous suspension containing the iron composite particle powder comprising α-Fe and magnetite of the present invention 3 as an active ingredient for a long period of time. The purification agent contains coarse particles having a particle size of 0.1 to 5.0 μm, and the diffraction intensity D 110 of the (110) plane of α-Fe in the X-ray diffraction spectrum of the entire iron composite particle powder; A soil / groundwater purifier having an intensity ratio (D 110 / (D 110 + D 311 )) of the diffraction intensity D 311 of the (311) plane of magnetite between 0.20 and 0.80 ( Invention 6).

また、本発明は、本発明6の土壌・地下水の浄化剤において、前記浄化剤中の鉄複合粒子粉末は、飽和磁化値が70〜140Am/kgであり、α−Feの(110)面の結晶子サイズが200〜400Åであることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化剤である(本発明7)。 Further, the present invention provides the soil / groundwater purification agent of the invention 6, wherein the iron composite particle powder in the purification agent has a saturation magnetization value of 70 to 140 Am 2 / kg, and the (110) plane of α-Fe. This is a soil / groundwater purifier having a crystallite size of 200 to 400 mm (Invention 7).

また、本発明は、本発明6又は7の土壌・地下水の浄化剤において、前記浄化剤中の鉄複合粒子粉末はFeの含有量が全粒子粉末に対して65〜80重量%であることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化剤である(本発明8)。   Further, the present invention is the soil or groundwater purification agent of the present invention 6 or 7, wherein the iron composite particle powder in the purification agent has an Fe content of 65 to 80% by weight based on the total particle powder. It is a soil / groundwater purification agent characterized (present invention 8).

また、本発明は、本発明1又は2の土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末と有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類で汚染された土壌又は有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類で汚染された地下水とを混合接触させることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化処理方法である(本発明9)。   In addition, the present invention is contaminated with the soil or organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals contaminated with the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil / groundwater of the present invention 1 or 2 and the organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals. It is a method for purifying soil and groundwater, wherein the groundwater is mixed and contacted (present invention 9).

また、本発明は、本発明3、6、7及び8のいずれかの土壌・地下水の浄化剤と有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類で汚染された土壌又は有機ハロゲン化合物及び/又は重金属で汚染された地下水とを混合接触させることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化処理方法である(本発明10)。   In addition, the present invention is contaminated with soil or organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals contaminated with the soil / groundwater purification agent of any of the present inventions 3, 6, 7 and 8 and organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals. A method for purifying soil and groundwater, wherein the groundwater is mixed and contacted (present invention 10).

本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末は、有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類を効率よく分解・不溶化できるので、有機ハロゲン化合物及び/又は重金属類によって汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化剤として好適である。   Since the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention can efficiently decompose and insolubilize organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals, it can be used as a purification agent for soil and groundwater contaminated with organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals. Is preferred.

本発明の構成を詳しく説明すれば、次の通りである。   The configuration of the present invention will be described in detail as follows.

まず、本発明1又は2に係る土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末(以下、「浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末」という)について述べる。   First, an iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater according to the present invention 1 or 2 (hereinafter referred to as “iron composite particle powder for purification treatment”) will be described.

浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の構成相はα−Fe相とともに、Fe相を含有する。Feの含有量は該鉄複合粒子粉末のX線回折スペクトルにおいて、α−Feの(110)面の回折強度D110とFeの(311)面の回折強度D311との強度比(D110/(D311+D110))が0.30〜0.95である。製造直後の強度比が0.30未満の場合、α−Fe相の存在比率が低いため有機ハロゲン化合物類の浄化性能が十分ではなく、本発明の目的とする効果を容易に得ることが困難となる。強度比が0.95を超える場合には、α−Fe相の存在比率は十分であるが本発明で生成されたFe相の存在比率が低くなり、触媒活性の早期劣化、持続性の低下を招く為、本発明の目的とする効果が得られない。好ましくは0.32〜0.95である。また、Feは浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の粒子表面に存在することが好ましい。 The constituent phase of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment contains an Fe 3 O 4 phase together with the α-Fe phase. In the X-ray diffraction spectrum of the iron composite particle powder, the content of Fe 3 O 4 is the diffraction intensity D 110 of the (110) plane of α-Fe and the diffraction intensity D 311 of the (311) plane of Fe 3 O 4 . The intensity ratio (D 110 / (D 311 + D 110 )) is 0.30 to 0.95. When the strength ratio immediately after production is less than 0.30, the abundance ratio of the α-Fe phase is low, so the purification performance of the organic halogen compounds is not sufficient, and it is difficult to easily obtain the intended effect of the present invention. Become. When the strength ratio exceeds 0.95, the abundance ratio of the α-Fe phase is sufficient, but the abundance ratio of the Fe 3 O 4 phase produced in the present invention is lowered, and the catalyst activity is prematurely deteriorated and sustained. Therefore, the intended effect of the present invention cannot be obtained. Preferably it is 0.32-0.95. Fe 3 O 4 is preferably present on the particle surface of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment.

本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末のS含有量は3500〜7000ppmである。S含有量が3500ppm未満の場合には、有機ハロゲン化合物類の浄化性能が十分ではなく本発明の目的とする効果が得られない。7000ppmを越える場合には、有機ハロゲン化合物類の浄化性能はあるが、多量に含有しても効果が飽和し経済的ではない。好ましくは3800〜7000ppmであり、より好ましくは3800〜6500ppmである。   The S content of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention is 3500 to 7000 ppm. When the S content is less than 3500 ppm, the purification performance of the organic halogen compounds is not sufficient, and the intended effect of the present invention cannot be obtained. When it exceeds 7000 ppm, there is a purification performance of organic halogen compounds, but even if it is contained in a large amount, the effect is saturated and it is not economical. Preferably it is 3800-7000 ppm, More preferably, it is 3800-6500 ppm.

本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末のAl含有量は0.10〜1.50重量%である。Al含有量が0.10重量%未満の場合には、造粒物の体積収縮により硬い造粒物になり易い為、湿式粉砕を行う場合に労力を要する。1.50重量%を越える場合には、還元反応の進行が遅く、還元反応に長時間を要する。また結晶成長を十分に行うことができず、α−Fe相が不安定となり粒子表面に酸化皮膜が厚く形成されたり、また加熱還元時におけるFe相からα−Fe相への相変化が不十分のため、α−Fe相の存在比率を高くすることが困難となり、本発明の目的とする効果を得ることができない。好ましくは0.20〜1.20重量%である。 The Al content of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention is 0.10 to 1.50% by weight. When the Al content is less than 0.10% by weight, it tends to be a hard granulated product due to volume shrinkage of the granulated product, and therefore labor is required when performing wet grinding. When the amount exceeds 1.50% by weight, the reduction reaction proceeds slowly and requires a long time for the reduction reaction. Also, the crystal growth cannot be sufficiently performed, the α-Fe phase becomes unstable, and a thick oxide film is formed on the particle surface, or the phase change from the Fe 3 O 4 phase to the α-Fe phase during the heating reduction Is insufficient, it becomes difficult to increase the abundance ratio of the α-Fe phase, and the intended effect of the present invention cannot be obtained. Preferably it is 0.20 to 1.20% by weight.

本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の粒子形状は粒状が好ましい。本発明では紡錘状又は針状のゲータイト粒子粉末又はヘマタイト粒子をそのまま加熱還元処理するので、α−Fe相へ結晶変態する際、粒子形状が崩れ、等方的に成長する過程を経るので粒状形状となる。一方、球状では粒子サイズが同じであれば、BET比表面積が小さくなり触媒活性が低くなるため、球状粒子が存在しないことが好ましい。   The particle shape of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention is preferably granular. In the present invention, the spindle-shaped or needle-shaped goethite particle powder or hematite particles are subjected to heat reduction treatment as they are, so that when undergoing crystal transformation to the α-Fe phase, the particle shape collapses and undergoes an isotropic growth process, so that the granular shape It becomes. On the other hand, if the particle size is the same in the spherical shape, the BET specific surface area is decreased and the catalytic activity is decreased.

本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の平均粒子径は0.05〜0.50μmが好ましい。平均粒子径が0.05μm未満の場合にはα−Fe相が不安定であるため表面に厚い酸化被膜が形成され、α−Fe相の存在比率を高くすることが困難となり、本発明の目的とする効果が得られない。製造直後に0.50μmを越える場合にはα−Fe相の存在比率は高くできるが、相対的にFe相の存在比率が低くなり、触媒活性の早期劣化、維持性の低下を招く為、本発明の目的とする課題を容易に解決することができない。より好ましくは0.05〜0.30μmである。 The average particle diameter of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention is preferably 0.05 to 0.50 μm. When the average particle size is less than 0.05 μm, the α-Fe phase is unstable, so that a thick oxide film is formed on the surface, making it difficult to increase the abundance ratio of the α-Fe phase. The effect is not obtained. If it exceeds 0.50 μm immediately after production, the abundance ratio of the α-Fe phase can be increased, but the abundance ratio of the Fe 3 O 4 phase is relatively lowered, leading to early deterioration of catalytic activity and deterioration of maintainability. For this reason, the object of the present invention cannot be easily solved. More preferably, it is 0.05-0.30 micrometer.

本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の結晶子サイズ(α−Feの(110)面)は200〜400Åが好ましい。200Å未満の場合にはα−Fe相の存在比率を高くすることが困難となり、本発明の目的とする効果を得ることが困難となる。400Åを越える場合には、α−Fe相の存在比率は高くできるが、本発明で生成したFe相の存在比率を本発明の目的とする効果が得られる程度に保持することが困難となる。より好ましくは200〜350Åである。 The crystallite size (α-Fe (110) plane) of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention is preferably 200 to 400 mm. If it is less than 200%, it is difficult to increase the abundance ratio of the α-Fe phase, and it becomes difficult to obtain the intended effect of the present invention. If it exceeds 400%, the abundance ratio of the α-Fe phase can be increased, but it is difficult to maintain the abundance ratio of the Fe 3 O 4 phase produced in the present invention to such an extent that the intended effect of the present invention can be obtained. It becomes. More preferably, it is 200-350cm.

本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末のBET比表面積値は5〜60m/gが好ましい。5m/g未満の場合には、接触面積が小さくなり触媒活性が発現しにくい。60m/gを越える場合には、α−Fe相の存在比率を高くすることが困難となり、本発明の目的とする効果を得ることが困難となる。より好ましくは7〜55m/gである。 The BET specific surface area value of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention is preferably 5 to 60 m 2 / g. When it is less than 5 m 2 / g, the contact area is small, and the catalytic activity is hardly exhibited. When it exceeds 60 m 2 / g, it is difficult to increase the abundance ratio of the α-Fe phase, and it becomes difficult to obtain the intended effect of the present invention. More preferably, it is 7-55 m < 2 > / g.

本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の飽和磁化値は85〜155Am/kg(85〜155emu/g)が好ましい。製造直後の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の飽和磁化値が85Am/kg未満の場合には、α−Fe相の存在比率が低いものであり、本発明の目的とする課題を容易に解決することができない。155Am/kgを越える場合にはα−Fe相の存在比率は高くできるが、本発明で得られるFe相の存在比率を本発明の目的とする効果が得られる程度に保持することが困難となる。結果相対的にFe相の存在比率が低くなり、触媒活性の早期劣化、維持性の低下を招く為、本発明の目的とする課題を容易に解決することができない。より好ましくは90〜155Am/kg(90〜155emu/g)である。 The saturation magnetization value of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention is preferably 85 to 155 Am 2 / kg (85 to 155 emu / g). When the saturation magnetization value of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment immediately after production is less than 85 Am 2 / kg, the abundance ratio of the α-Fe phase is low, and the object of the present invention is easily solved. I can't. When it exceeds 155 Am 2 / kg, the abundance ratio of the α-Fe phase can be increased, but the abundance ratio of the Fe 3 O 4 phase obtained by the present invention should be maintained to such an extent that the intended effect of the present invention can be obtained. It becomes difficult. As a result, the abundance ratio of the Fe 3 O 4 phase is relatively low, leading to early deterioration of catalyst activity and a decrease in maintainability. Therefore, the object of the present invention cannot be easily solved. More preferably, it is 90-155 Am < 2 > / kg (90-155 emu / g).

本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末のFeの含有量は全粒子粉末に対して75重量%以上が好ましい。製造直後のFeの含有量が75重量%未満の場合には触媒活性が低下するため、本発明の目的とする効果を容易に得ることが困難となる。より好ましくは75〜98重量%であり、更により好ましくは75〜90重量%である。   The Fe content of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention is preferably 75% by weight or more based on the total particle powder. When the Fe content immediately after the production is less than 75% by weight, the catalytic activity is lowered, so that it is difficult to easily obtain the intended effect of the present invention. More preferably, it is 75 to 98% by weight, and still more preferably 75 to 90% by weight.

本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末は、Pb、Cd、As、Hg、Sn、Sb、Ba、Zn、Cr、Nb、Co、Bi等のFe以外の金属元素は毒性のある金属であるため極力含有しないことが好ましい。殊に、高純度化及び触媒性能を考慮した場合、浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末について、後述する方法で各金属の溶出量を測定した場合、カドミウムの溶出量が0.01mg/l以下、全シアンは溶出が検出されず、鉛の溶出量が0.01mg/l以下、クロム溶出量が0.05mg/l以下、砒素の溶出量が0.01mg/l以下、総水銀の溶出量が0.0005mg/l以下、セレンの溶出量が0.01mg/l以下、フッ素の溶出量が0.8mg/l以下、ホウ素の溶出量が1mg/l以下であることが好ましい。   In the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention, metallic elements other than Fe, such as Pb, Cd, As, Hg, Sn, Sb, Ba, Zn, Cr, Nb, Co, and Bi, are toxic metals. Therefore, it is preferable not to contain as much as possible. In particular, when high purity and catalytic performance are taken into consideration, when the elution amount of each metal is measured by the method described later for the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment, the elution amount of cadmium is 0.01 mg / l or less, No elution was detected in cyan, lead elution amount was 0.01 mg / l or less, chromium elution amount was 0.05 mg / l or less, arsenic elution amount was 0.01 mg / l or less, and total mercury elution amount was 0. It is preferable that the elution amount of selenium is 0.01 mg / l or less, the elution amount of fluorine is 0.8 mg / l or less, and the elution amount of boron is 1 mg / l or less.

また、浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末について、後述する方法で各金属の含有量を測定した場合、カドミウム及びその化合物の含有量が150mg/kg以下、シアン化合物の含有量が50mg/kg以下、鉛及びその化合物の含有量がの含有量が150mg/kg以下、六価クロム化合物含有量が250mg/kg以下、砒素及びその化合物の含有量が150mg/kg以下、水銀及びその化合物の含有量が15mg/kg以下、セレン及びその化合物の含有量が150mg/kg以下、フッ素及びその化合物の含有量が4000mg/kg以下、ホウ素及びその化合物の含有量が4000mg/kg以下であることが好ましい。   Further, regarding the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment, when the content of each metal is measured by the method described later, the content of cadmium and its compound is 150 mg / kg or less, the content of cyanide compound is 50 mg / kg or less, lead And its compound content is 150 mg / kg or less, hexavalent chromium compound content is 250 mg / kg or less, arsenic and its compound content is 150 mg / kg or less, mercury and its compound content is 15 mg It is preferable that the content of selenium and its compound is 150 mg / kg or less, the content of fluorine and its compound is 4000 mg / kg or less, and the content of boron and its compound is 4000 mg / kg or less.

なお、浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末は、造粒物の形態であってもよい。   The iron composite particle powder for purification treatment may be in the form of a granulated product.

次に、本発明3に係る有機ハロゲン化合物類で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化剤(以下、「浄化剤」という)について述べる。   Next, the soil / groundwater purification agent (hereinafter referred to as “purification agent”) contaminated with the organic halogen compounds according to the third aspect of the present invention will be described.

本発明3に係る浄化剤は、本発明1又は2に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末を有効成分として含有する水懸濁液であり、浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の水懸濁液中の含有量は0.5〜50重量部の範囲内で適宜選択することができ、より好ましくは1〜30重量部である。   The purification agent according to the present invention 3 is a water suspension containing, as an active ingredient, the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the first or second aspect of the present invention, in the aqueous suspension of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment. Content can be suitably selected within the range of 0.5-50 weight part, More preferably, it is 1-30 weight part.

本発明に係る浄化剤を構成する鉄複合粒子について、レーザー回折装置を用いて粒度分布を測定した場合、鉄複合粒子の二次粒子の粒度分布は単一ピークであることが好ましい。複数のピークを有する場合、汚染土壌中への浸透速度が均一でなく浄化に長時間を要し本発明の目的とする効果を得ることが困難となる。   When the particle size distribution of the iron composite particles constituting the purifier according to the present invention is measured using a laser diffractometer, the particle size distribution of secondary particles of the iron composite particles is preferably a single peak. When it has a plurality of peaks, the penetration rate into the contaminated soil is not uniform, and it takes a long time for purification, and it becomes difficult to obtain the intended effect of the present invention.

本発明に係る浄化剤を構成する鉄複合粒子の二次粒子のメジアン径(D50:鉄複合粒子の全体積を100%として粒子径に対する累積割合を求めたときの累積割合が50%となる粒子径)は0.5〜5.0μmが好ましい。二次粒子のメジアン径(D50)はより微細であることが好適であるが、一次粒子が微粒子でありα−Feを含有するため、磁気凝集を起こし易く、また、0.5μm未満とすることは工業的には困難である。5.0μmを超える場合は、汚染土壌への浸透が遅くなり短時間で浄化し難く、本発明の目的とする効果を得ることが困難となる。より好ましくは0.5〜3.5μmである。 The median diameter of secondary particles of the iron composite particles constituting the purifying agent according to the present invention (D 50 : the cumulative ratio when the cumulative ratio with respect to the particle diameter is calculated with the total volume of the iron composite particles being 100% is 50%. The particle diameter is preferably 0.5 to 5.0 μm. The median diameter (D 50 ) of the secondary particles is preferably finer, but since the primary particles are fine particles and contain α-Fe, they tend to cause magnetic aggregation and are less than 0.5 μm. This is difficult industrially. When it exceeds 5.0 μm, the penetration into the contaminated soil is delayed and it is difficult to purify in a short time, and it becomes difficult to obtain the intended effect of the present invention. More preferably, it is 0.5 to 3.5 μm.

本発明に係る浄化剤中の鉄複合粒子の二次粒子のD90(鉄複合粒子の全体積を100%として粒子径に対する累積割合を求めたときの累積割合が90%となる粒子径)とD10(鉄複合粒子の全体積を100%として粒子径に対する累積割合を求めたときの累積割合が10%となる粒子径)との比D90/D10は1.5〜5.0が好ましい。分布幅はより小さいほど汚染土壌への浸透速度が均一化され浄化速度も均一化されるため好ましいが、工業的には1.0が限界である。5.0を超える場合は汚染土壌への浸透速度が不均一となり浄化に遅れが生じ、浄化に長時間かかるため、本発明の目的とする効果を得ることが困難となる。より好ましくは1.0〜3.5である。 D 90 of the secondary particles of the iron composite particles in the purifier according to the present invention (particle diameter when the cumulative ratio to the particle diameter is 90% when the total volume of the iron composite particles is 100%) The ratio D 90 / D 10 with D 10 (particle diameter at which the cumulative ratio with respect to the particle diameter when the total volume of the iron composite particles is 100% is 10%) is 1.5 to 5.0 preferable. The smaller the distribution width, the more uniform the permeation rate into the contaminated soil and the uniform purification rate, but 1.0 is the limit industrially. If it exceeds 5.0, the rate of permeation into the contaminated soil will be uneven and purification will be delayed, and it will take a long time for purification, making it difficult to obtain the intended effect of the present invention. More preferably, it is 1.0-3.5.

本発明に係る浄化剤中の鉄複合粒子の二次粒子の分布幅(D84−D16)(D84:鉄複合粒子の全体積を100%として粒子径に対する累積割合を求めたときの累積割合が84%となる粒子径、D16:鉄複合粒子の全体積を100%として粒子径に対する累積割合を求めたときの累積割合が16%となる粒子径)は0.5〜5.0μmが好ましい。分布幅はより小さいほど汚染土壌への浸透速度が均一化され浄化速度も均一化されるため好ましいが、工業的には0.5μmが限界である。5.0μmを超える場合は汚染土壌への浸透速度が不均一となり浄化に遅れが生じ、浄化に長時間かかる為、本発明の目的とする効果が得られない。より好ましくは0.5〜3.5μmである。 Distribution width (D 84 -D 16 ) of secondary particles of iron composite particles in the purifier according to the present invention (D 84 : Cumulative amount when the cumulative ratio with respect to the particle diameter is determined with the total volume of iron composite particles being 100%. Particle diameter at which the ratio is 84%, D 16 : Particle diameter at which the cumulative ratio to the particle diameter when the total volume of the iron composite particles is 100% is 16%) is 0.5 to 5.0 μm. Is preferred. The smaller the distribution width, the more uniform the permeation rate into the contaminated soil and the uniform purification rate, but 0.5 μm is the limit industrially. If it exceeds 5.0 μm, the penetration rate into the contaminated soil becomes non-uniform, resulting in a delay in purification, and it takes a long time for purification, so the intended effect of the present invention cannot be obtained. More preferably, it is 0.5 to 3.5 μm.

本発明に係る浄化剤の比重は1.2〜1.4が好ましい。1.2未満では浄化剤の輸送、土壌等への添加量を考えると固形分が少なく経済的でなく、1.4を超える場合は本発明の一次粒子径、二次粒子径を考慮すると浄化剤が増粘し、工業的に製造するのは困難である。   The specific gravity of the purifier according to the present invention is preferably 1.2 to 1.4. If less than 1.2, considering the transport amount of the cleaning agent and the amount added to the soil, etc., the solid content is low and not economical, and if it exceeds 1.4, the purification is performed considering the primary particle size and the secondary particle size of the present invention. The agent thickens and is difficult to manufacture industrially.

次に、本発明4に係る有機ハロゲン化合物類で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の製造法について述べる。   Next, a method for producing iron composite particle powder for the purification treatment of soil and groundwater contaminated with the organic halogen compounds according to the present invention 4 will be described.

ゲータイト粒子粉末は、常法に従って、例えば、第一鉄塩を含有する水溶液と、水酸化アルカリ、炭酸アルカリ又はアンモニアから選ばれる1種又は2種以上とを反応させて得られる鉄の水酸化物や炭酸鉄等の第一鉄含有沈殿物を含む懸濁液中に空気等の酸素含有ガスを通気することにより得ることができる。   The goethite particle powder is obtained by reacting, for example, an aqueous solution containing a ferrous salt with one or more selected from alkali hydroxide, alkali carbonate or ammonia according to a conventional method. It can be obtained by ventilating an oxygen-containing gas such as air through a suspension containing a ferrous iron-containing precipitate such as iron carbonate.

なお、不純物含有量の少ない浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末を得るためには、前記第一鉄塩を含有する水溶液として、重金属等の不純物を低減し、純度の高いものを使用することが好ましい。   In addition, in order to obtain the iron composite particle powder for purification processing with a small impurity content, it is preferable to use a high-purity one that reduces impurities such as heavy metals as the aqueous solution containing the ferrous salt.

第一鉄塩を含有する水溶液の不純物量を低減するためには、例えば、鋼板を硫酸で酸洗し、鋼板の表層に析出している不純物、防錆の油分等を溶解除去した後の不純物の少ない鋼板を溶解して得られた第一鉄塩水溶液を用いる方法がある。鉄以外の金属不純物の多い屑鉄やスクラップ鉄、耐蝕性を向上させる為に行なわれるめっき処理、リン酸塩処理及びクロム酸処理等を行った鋼板並びに防錆の油分を塗布した鋼板等の酸洗液を用いた場合には、鉄複合粒子粉末中に不純物が残存し、浄化する土壌・地下水に溶出する恐れがあり好ましくない。また、酸化チタン製造工程等から副生する硫酸第一鉄溶液に水酸化アルカリ等のアルカリを添加し、pH調整によりチタン、その他の不純物を水酸化物として不溶化して沈殿除去、限外ろ過除去等を行い使用する方法がある。不純物の少ない鋼板を硫酸溶解して使用するのが好ましく、引き続きpH調整による不純物除去を行うのが更に好ましい。何れの方法も工業的に問題が無く、経済的にも有利である。   In order to reduce the amount of impurities in the aqueous solution containing the ferrous salt, for example, the steel sheet is pickled with sulfuric acid, and impurities that have precipitated on the surface layer of the steel sheet and dissolved and removed rust preventive oil are removed. There is a method using an aqueous ferrous salt solution obtained by dissolving a steel sheet with a small amount of iron. Pickling of scrap iron and scrap iron with a lot of metal impurities other than iron, steel plates with plating treatment, phosphate treatment and chromic acid treatment to improve corrosion resistance, and steel plates with anti-rust oil applied When the liquid is used, impurities remain in the iron composite particle powder, and there is a possibility that it may elute into the soil or groundwater to be purified. Also, alkali such as alkali hydroxide is added to the ferrous sulfate solution by-produced from the titanium oxide production process, etc., and titanium and other impurities are insolubilized as hydroxides by pH adjustment to remove precipitates and ultrafiltration There is a method to use it. It is preferable to use a steel plate with few impurities dissolved in sulfuric acid, and it is further preferable to remove impurities by pH adjustment. Either method has no industrial problems and is economically advantageous.

ゲータイト粒子粉末の平均長軸径は0.05〜0.50μmであり、S含有量が2200〜4500ppmである。粒子形状は紡錘状又は針状のどちらでも良い。軸比は4〜30が好ましく、より好ましくは5〜25であり、BET比表面積は20〜200m/gが好ましく、より好ましくは25〜180m/gである。 The average major axis diameter of the goethite particle powder is 0.05 to 0.50 μm, and the S content is 2200 to 4500 ppm. The particle shape may be either spindle-shaped or needle-shaped. Axial ratio is preferably from 4 to 30, more preferably from 5 to 25, BET specific surface area is preferably 20 to 200 m 2 / g, more preferably 25~180m 2 / g.

本発明においては、前記ゲータイト粒子中にAlを含有させるか、又は、ゲータイト粒子にAl被覆することが重要である。Alを含有または被覆することによって造粒物の体積収縮を抑制することより造粒物の硬さを制御することができる。したがって湿式粉砕を行う場合の労力も小さくすることができる。また相対的に一次粒子の大きさを小さくすることができ、比表面積も相対的に大きくなり、性能が向上する。   In the present invention, it is important that the goethite particles contain Al or the goethite particles are coated with Al. The hardness of the granulated product can be controlled by suppressing the volume shrinkage of the granulated product by containing or coating Al. Therefore, the labor for wet pulverization can be reduced. Further, the size of the primary particles can be relatively reduced, the specific surface area is also relatively increased, and the performance is improved.

ゲータイト粒子粉末のAl含有量又はAl被覆量は0.06〜1.00重量%が好ましい。   The Al content or the Al coating amount of the goethite particle powder is preferably 0.06 to 1.00% by weight.

なお、ゲータイト粒子粉末は、常法に従って、造粒しておくことが好ましい。造粒することによって、固定層方式の還元炉を使用できるほか、鉄複合粒子とした場合でも還元条件によってはそのまま造粒物の形態を保つことが可能となり、カラム等に充填して使用する場合には好ましい。   The goethite particle powder is preferably granulated according to a conventional method. By granulating, a fixed bed type reduction furnace can be used, and even when iron composite particles are used, it is possible to maintain the shape of the granulated product as it is depending on the reducing conditions. Is preferred.

得られたゲータイト粒子粉末は250〜350℃の温度範囲で加熱脱水したヘマタイト粒子粉末にすることが好ましい。   The obtained goethite particle powder is preferably a hematite particle powder that has been heat-dehydrated in a temperature range of 250 to 350 ° C.

本発明におけるヘマタイト粒子粉末は、あらかじめS含有量が高いゲータイト粒子を用いるか、又は、S含有量が低いゲータイト粒子の場合には、ヘマタイト粒子粉末の水懸濁液に硫酸を添加することで、ヘマタイト粒子粉末のS含有量を制御する。   The hematite particle powder in the present invention uses goethite particles having a high S content in advance, or in the case of goethite particles having a low S content, by adding sulfuric acid to an aqueous suspension of the hematite particle powder, The S content of the hematite particle powder is controlled.

ヘマタイト粒子粉末の平均長軸径は0.05〜0.50μmであり、S含有量が2400〜5000ppmである。ヘマタイト粒子粉末のAl含有量又はAl被覆量は0.07〜1.13重量%が好ましい。   The average major axis diameter of the hematite particle powder is 0.05 to 0.50 μm, and the S content is 2400 to 5000 ppm. The Al content or the Al coating amount of the hematite particle powder is preferably 0.07 to 1.13% by weight.

前記ゲータイト粒子粉末又は前記ヘマタイト粒子粉末を350〜600℃の温度範囲で加熱還元することによって鉄粒子(α−Fe)粉末とする。   The goethite particle powder or the hematite particle powder is heated and reduced in a temperature range of 350 to 600 ° C. to obtain iron particle (α-Fe) powder.

加熱還元温度が350℃未満である場合には、還元反応の進行が遅く、還元反応に長時間を要する。また、BET比表面積を大きくすることができるが、結晶成長を十分に行うことができず、α−Fe相が不安定となり粒子表面に酸化被膜が厚く形成されたり、またFe相からα−Fe相への相変化が不十分のため、α−Fe相の存在比率を高くすることができない。600℃を超える場合には、還元反応が急激に進行して粒子及び粒子相互間の焼結が過度に促進され粒子径が大きくなり、BET比表面積も小さくなるため好ましくない。 When the heating reduction temperature is less than 350 ° C., the reduction reaction proceeds slowly and takes a long time for the reduction reaction. Moreover, although the BET specific surface area can be increased, crystal growth cannot be sufficiently performed, the α-Fe phase becomes unstable, and a thick oxide film is formed on the particle surface, or from the Fe 3 O 4 phase. Since the phase change to the α-Fe phase is insufficient, the abundance ratio of the α-Fe phase cannot be increased. When the temperature exceeds 600 ° C., the reduction reaction proceeds rapidly, the sintering between the particles and the particles is excessively promoted, the particle diameter is increased, and the BET specific surface area is also decreased.

なお、還元反応の昇温時の雰囲気は水素ガス、窒素ガス等が利用できるが、工業的には水素ガスが好ましい。   In addition, although hydrogen gas, nitrogen gas, etc. can utilize the atmosphere at the time of temperature increase of a reductive reaction, hydrogen gas is preferable industrially.

加熱還元後の鉄粒子粉末は冷却した後、該鉄粒子粉末を気相中で表面酸化被膜を形成することなく水中に取り出し、水中で当該鉄粒子粉末の粒子表面に表面酸化被膜を形成し、次いで、乾燥する。   After cooling the iron particle powder after heat reduction, the iron particle powder is taken out in water without forming a surface oxide film in the gas phase, and a surface oxide film is formed on the particle surface of the iron particle powder in water, Then it is dried.

冷却時の雰囲気は窒素又は水素のいずれでもよいが、最終的には窒素に切り替えることが好ましい。また、水中に取り出す時には100℃以下まで冷却されていることが好ましい。   The atmosphere during cooling may be either nitrogen or hydrogen, but is preferably switched to nitrogen finally. Moreover, when taking out in water, it is preferable to be cooled to 100 degrees C or less.

乾燥雰囲気は、窒素、空気中、真空中等適宜選択できるが、温度は100℃以下が好ましい。   The drying atmosphere can be selected as appropriate, such as nitrogen, air, or vacuum, but the temperature is preferably 100 ° C. or lower.

以上の加熱還元処理によって、粒子全体はα−Fe相からなる鉄粒子となり、水中に取り出すことによって、α−Feの触媒活性により水を分解し、水素と酸素に分離し、発生した酸素によりα−Feが酸化され、粒子表面にFeからなる酸化被膜が形成されるものと推定している。 Through the above heat reduction treatment, the entire particles become iron particles composed of an α-Fe phase, and when taken out into water, the water is decomposed by the catalytic activity of α-Fe, separated into hydrogen and oxygen, and the generated oxygen produces α It is presumed that -Fe is oxidized and an oxide film composed of Fe 3 O 4 is formed on the particle surface.

次に、本発明5に係る有機ハロゲン化合物で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化剤の製造法は、本発明4における加熱還元後の鉄粒子粉末を冷却後、水中に取り出し、そのまま鉄複合粒子粉末を含有する水懸濁液からなる浄化剤とするものである。   Next, the method for producing a soil / groundwater purification agent contaminated with an organic halogen compound according to the fifth aspect of the present invention is as follows. A purifier comprising an aqueous suspension containing

本発明の浄化剤においては鉄複合粒子粉末の二次凝集体を粉砕して分散させておくことが好ましい。   In the cleaning agent of the present invention, it is preferable to pulverize and disperse the secondary aggregates of the iron composite particle powder.

加熱還元後の鉄粒子粉末を冷却後、水中に取り出し、水中で当該鉄粒子粉末の粒子表面に表面酸化被膜を形成した後、鉄複合粒子を湿式粉砕する。   The iron particle powder after heat reduction is cooled and then taken out into water. After forming a surface oxide film on the particle surface of the iron particle powder in water, the iron composite particles are wet-pulverized.

鉄複合粒子の凝集状態、性質(高活性)、大きさ、粉砕装置の能力(製品の粒度、粉砕量)及び最終形態を考慮すると、粉砕は湿式粉砕することが好ましい。   In consideration of the agglomeration state, properties (high activity), size, ability of the pulverizer (product particle size, pulverization amount) and final form of the iron composite particles, the pulverization is preferably wet pulverization.

本発明に用いる粉砕装置としては、メディアを用いる場合、転動ミル(ポットミル、チューブミル、コニカルミル)や振動ミル(ファイン・バイブレーションミル)等の容器駆動式、塔型(タワーミル)、攪拌槽型(アトライター)、流通管型(サンドグラインドミル)及びアニュラー型(アニュラーミル)等の媒体攪拌式を用いることができる。メディアを用いない場合、容器回転型(オングミル)、湿式高速回転型(コロイドミル、ホモミキサー、ラインミキサー)等のせん断・摩擦式を用いることができる。   As a pulverizer used in the present invention, in the case of using a medium, a container-driven type such as a rolling mill (pot mill, tube mill, conical mill) or vibration mill (fine vibration mill), tower type (tower mill), stirring tank type ( Medium stirring types such as an attritor), a distribution pipe type (sand grind mill), and an annular type (annular mill) can be used. When the medium is not used, a shear / friction type such as a container rotation type (Ang mill) or a wet high-speed rotation type (colloid mill, homomixer, line mixer) can be used.

一般的に粉砕は25mm以下の原料を粉状に砕く事で、大別して粗粉砕、細粉砕、微粉砕の工程に分けられる。粗粉砕は5mm〜20メッシュまでの粉砕で、細粉砕は200メッシュ以下の粒子が90%程度、微粉砕は325メッシュ以下の粒子が90%程度となるように粉砕することと一般的に言われており、さらに数ミクロンまで粉砕できる超微粉砕機もある。本発明においては、鉄複合粒子を粗粉砕、細粉砕及び微粉砕の3つの粉砕状態を経ることが好ましい。   In general, the pulverization is performed by roughly pulverizing a raw material of 25 mm or less into powder and roughly divided into coarse pulverization, fine pulverization, and fine pulverization processes. It is generally said that coarse pulverization is pulverization from 5 mm to 20 mesh, fine pulverization is such that particles of 200 mesh or less are about 90%, and fine pulverization is such that particles of 325 mesh or less are about 90%. There are also ultra-fine pulverizers that can pulverize to a few microns. In the present invention, the iron composite particles are preferably subjected to three pulverization states of coarse pulverization, fine pulverization, and fine pulverization.

粗粉砕にはバッフルを取り付けた攪拌槽内に挿入して攪拌する低速回転型、中速回転型、高速回転せん断型、高低速回転組み合わせ攪拌機等が使用できるが、本発明の鉄複合粒子の凝集体を考慮すると1000〜6000rpmの中速〜高速回転型攪拌機が好ましい。攪拌機の羽根形状はディスクタービン、ファンタービン、矢羽根タービン、プロペラ型等が挙げられるが、エッジ付きのディスクタービンが好ましく、例えば、特殊機化工業製のホモディスパーである。   For coarse pulverization, a low-speed rotation type, medium-speed rotation type, high-speed rotation shear type, high-low-speed rotation combination stirrer, etc., which is inserted into a stirring tank equipped with a baffle and stirred can be used. Considering the collection, a medium to high-speed rotating stirrer at 1000 to 6000 rpm is preferable. The blade shape of the stirrer includes a disk turbine, a fan turbine, an arrow blade turbine, a propeller type, and the like, but a disk turbine with an edge is preferable, for example, a homodisper manufactured by Tokushu Kika Kogyo.

細粉砕又は微粉砕には、バッチ式装置又は連続式装置が使用できるが、工業的には連続式が好ましい。メディアを用いる場合はボールミル、タワーミル、サンドグラインドミル、アトライター等が使用でき、メディアを用いない場合は、ホモミキサー、ラインミキサー等が使用できる。   A batch type apparatus or a continuous type apparatus can be used for fine pulverization or fine pulverization, but a continuous type is preferred industrially. When using media, a ball mill, tower mill, sand grind mill, attritor or the like can be used, and when no media is used, a homomixer, a line mixer or the like can be used.

細粉砕には、複数のスリットを外周に入れて軸固定面部にカッター歯を設けた回転子と固定子を多段式に組み合わせた装置を使用することができ、回転子の周速が30m/s以上のメディアレスであるラインミキサー等の連続せん断分散機、例えば、特殊機化工業製のホモミックラインミルが特に好ましい。   For fine pulverization, it is possible to use a multi-stage combination of a rotor and a stator in which a plurality of slits are provided on the outer periphery and the shaft fixing surface portion is provided with cutter teeth, and the peripheral speed of the rotor is 30 m / s. A continuous shearing disperser such as the above-mentioned medialess line mixer, for example, a homomic line mill manufactured by Tokushu Kika Kogyo is particularly preferable.

微粉砕(仕上げ粉砕)には、円筒形のベッセル内にφ1〜φ3のメディアを充填率70〜80%で挿入し、ベッセル中心部に設置された回転軸に複数個の円板を取り付けて回転させることにより、メディアに急速旋回作用が起こり、その中を処理物が下から上に通過するサンドグラインドミル等のメディア式分散機を使用することができ、例えば、アイメックス社製のサンドグラインダーが特に好ましい。   For fine crushing (finish crushing), φ1 to φ3 media are inserted into a cylindrical vessel at a filling rate of 70 to 80%, and a plurality of discs are attached to a rotating shaft installed at the center of the vessel and rotated. It is possible to use a media-type disperser such as a sand grind mill in which a rapid swirling action occurs in the media and the processed material passes from the bottom to the top, for example, a sand grinder manufactured by IMEX preferable.

本発明の湿式粉砕においては、粒子のクラック生長を助け再結合を抑制するため、又は粒子が凝集して粒状となり粉砕され難くなったりボールやミルに付着して粉砕力が弱められたりすることを抑制するために、粉砕助剤を適宜添加しても良い。粉砕助剤には固体、液体があり固体としては、ステアリン酸塩類、コロイド状シリカ、コロイド状カーボン等、液体ではトリエタノールアミン、スルホン酸アルキル等が使用できる。   In the wet pulverization of the present invention, the crack growth of particles is prevented and recombination is suppressed, or the particles are aggregated to become granular and difficult to be pulverized, or the pulverization force is weakened by adhering to a ball or mill. In order to suppress, a grinding aid may be added as appropriate. Grinding aids include solids and liquids. Examples of solids include stearates, colloidal silica, colloidal carbon, etc., and liquids include triethanolamine and alkyl sulfonate.

湿式粉砕時の懸濁液の濃度は鉄複合粒子が20〜40重量%が好ましい。20重量%未満の場合は、粉砕時にせん断等の応力が掛かり難く所定の粉砕粒度が得られないか長時間を要し、また粉砕に必要なメディアが著しく摩耗する為好ましくない。40重量%を超える場合には、水懸濁液が増粘し、機械的な負荷が大きく工業的に製造するのは困難である。   The concentration of the suspension during wet pulverization is preferably 20 to 40% by weight of iron composite particles. When the amount is less than 20% by weight, stress such as shearing is hardly applied during pulverization, and a predetermined pulverized particle size cannot be obtained or it takes a long time, and the media necessary for pulverization is significantly worn. If it exceeds 40% by weight, the aqueous suspension will thicken, and the mechanical load is large, making it difficult to produce industrially.

次に、本発明6乃至8に係る浄化剤について述べる。   Next, the purifier according to the present invention 6 to 8 will be described.

本発明3に係る浄化剤をそのまま保存した場合、粗大粒子が生成するものである(以下、「保存後の浄化剤」という)。粗大粒子が存在しても、有機ハロゲン化合物類・重金属等の浄化性能は維持されている。   When the cleaning agent according to the third aspect of the present invention is stored as it is, coarse particles are generated (hereinafter referred to as “cleaning agent after storage”). Even if coarse particles are present, the purification performance of organic halogen compounds and heavy metals is maintained.

本発明における粗大粒子とは、後述するとおり、走査型電子顕微鏡写真にて確認できる鉄複合粒子の最大粒子の粒子径を測定したものである。粒子径が5.0μmを越える粗大粒子を含有する場合には、汚染土壌への浸透が極端に遅くなり短時間で浄化し難く、本発明の目的とする効果を得ることが困難となる。好ましくは4.0μm以下であり、より好ましくは3.5μm以下である。   As will be described later, the coarse particles in the present invention are those obtained by measuring the particle diameter of the largest particles of iron composite particles that can be confirmed by a scanning electron micrograph. When coarse particles having a particle diameter exceeding 5.0 μm are contained, the penetration into the contaminated soil becomes extremely slow and it is difficult to purify in a short time, and it becomes difficult to obtain the intended effect of the present invention. Preferably it is 4.0 micrometers or less, More preferably, it is 3.5 micrometers or less.

本発明に係る保存後の浄化剤は、例えば、製造後約1ヶ月後において、請求項2記載の粒子に加え、粒子径0.10〜0.30μmの粗大粒子を含有しても良く、製造後約3ヶ月後では、粒子径0.30〜0.60μmの粗大粒子を含有しても良く、製造後約1年後では、粒子径1.00〜5.00μmの粗大粒子を含有しても良い。   The storage agent after storage according to the present invention may contain, for example, coarse particles having a particle size of 0.10 to 0.30 μm in addition to the particles according to claim 2 after about one month after the production. After about 3 months, coarse particles having a particle size of 0.30 to 0.60 μm may be contained, and after about one year after production, coarse particles having a particle size of 1.00 to 5.00 μm are contained. Also good.

本発明に係る保存後の浄化剤は、製造後約1ヶ月後において、該鉄複合粒子粉末全体のX線回折スペクトルにおいてα−Feの(110)面の回折強度D110とマグネタイトの(311)面の回折強度D311との強度比(D110/(D110+D311))が0.50〜0.80でも良く、製造後約3ヶ月後では、前記強度比が0.30〜0.50でも良く、製造後約1年後では、前記強度比が0.20〜0.30でも良い。 Cleaning agent after storage according to the present invention, in about 1 month later after production, the iron composite particles of the entire powder alpha-Fe in the X-ray diffraction spectrum (110) plane of the diffraction intensity D 110 and magnetite (311) The intensity ratio (D 110 / (D 110 + D 311 )) with the diffraction intensity D 311 of the surface may be 0.50 to 0.80, and after about 3 months after manufacture, the intensity ratio is 0.30 to 0.00. The strength ratio may be 0.20 to 0.30 after about one year after manufacture.

本発明に係る保存後の浄化剤中の鉄複合粒子粉末のBET比表面積値は、前記範囲内において変化するものである。   The BET specific surface area value of the iron composite particle powder in the cleaning agent after storage according to the present invention varies within the above range.

本発明に係る保存後の浄化剤は、製造後約1ヶ月後において、浄化剤中に含有される鉄複合粒子粉末の飽和磁化値は100〜140Am/kgでも良く、製造後約3ヶ月後では、飽和磁化値は90〜100Am/kgでも良く、製造後約1年後では、飽和磁化値は70〜90Am/kgでも良い。 In the purifier after storage according to the present invention, the saturation magnetization value of the iron composite particle powder contained in the purifier may be 100 to 140 Am 2 / kg after about one month after production, and about three months after production. in a saturation magnetization value may even 90~100Am 2 / kg, in after about one year after manufacture, the saturation magnetization values may be 70~90Am 2 / kg.

本発明に係る保存後の浄化剤は、製造後約1ヶ月後において、浄化剤中に含有される鉄複合粒子粉末のα−Feの(110)面の結晶子サイズは、250〜400Åでも良く、製造後約3ヶ月後では250〜400Åでも良く、製造後約1年後では200〜300Åでも良い。   In the cleaning agent after storage according to the present invention, the crystallite size of the (110) plane of α-Fe of the iron composite particle powder contained in the cleaning agent may be 250 to 400 mm after about one month after production. After about 3 months after production, it may be 250 to 400 mm, and after about 1 year after production, it may be 200 to 300 mm.

本発明に係る保存後の浄化剤は、製造後約1〜6ヶ月後において、浄化剤中に含有される鉄複合粒子粉末のFe含有量は70〜80重量%でも良く、製造後約1年後では、Fe含有量は65〜75重量%でも良い。   In the cleaning agent after storage according to the present invention, the Fe content of the iron composite particle powder contained in the cleaning agent may be 70 to 80% by weight after about 1 to 6 months after manufacture, and about 1 year after manufacture. Later, the Fe content may be 65-75% by weight.

次に、本発明9又は本発明10に係る有機ハロゲン化合物類で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化処理方法ついて述べる。   Next, a method for purifying soil and groundwater contaminated with the organic halogen compounds according to the present invention 9 or the present invention 10 will be described.

有機ハロゲン化合物類で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化処理は、一般的に、含有される汚染物質を直接地下で分解する原位置分解法と掘削又は抽出した土壌・地下水中の汚染物質を分解する原位置抽出法とがあり、本発明においてはいずれの方法でも行うことができる。   In general, soil and groundwater purification treatment contaminated with organic halogen compounds decomposes pollutants in soil and groundwater that have been excavated or extracted, and in-situ decomposition methods that directly decompose the contained pollutants directly underground. There is an in-situ extraction method, and any method can be used in the present invention.

原位置分解法においては、浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末又は浄化剤を高圧の空気、窒素等のガスあるいは水を媒体にしてそのまま浸透もしくはボーリング孔から地下に導入する方法が取られる。特に本発明の浄化剤は水懸濁液であるのでそのまま使用するか必要に応じて希釈すれば良い。   In the in-situ decomposition method, a method is adopted in which the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment or the purification agent is directly permeated or introduced into the basement through a borehole using a gas such as high-pressure air, nitrogen, or water as a medium. In particular, since the purification agent of the present invention is an aqueous suspension, it can be used as it is or diluted as necessary.

原位置抽出法においては、掘削した土壌と浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末又は浄化剤を、サンドミル、ヘンシェルミキサー、コンクリートミキサー、ナウターミキサー、一軸又は二軸式のニーダー型混合器等を用いて混合攪拌すれば良い。また、揚水した地下水においては浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末が充填されたカラム等に通水することができる。   In the in-situ extraction method, the excavated soil and the iron composite particle powder or cleaning agent for purification treatment are mixed using a sand mill, Henschel mixer, concrete mixer, Nauta mixer, uniaxial or biaxial kneader mixer, etc. What is necessary is just to stir. Further, the pumped ground water can be passed through a column or the like filled with the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment.

浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末あるいは浄化剤(固形分換算)の添加量は、土壌・地下水の有機ハロゲン化合物類の汚染の程度に応じて適宜選択することができるが、汚染土壌を対象とする場合には、通常土壌100重量部に対して0.01〜20重量部が好ましく、より好ましくは0.05〜10重量部である。0.01重量部未満の場合には、本発明の目的とする効果が充分得られない。20重量部を超える場合には、浄化効果は向上するが経済的ではない。また、汚染地下水を対象とする場合には、地下水100重量部に対して0.01〜20重量部添加することが好ましく、より好ましくは0.05〜10重量部である。   The amount of iron composite particle powder for purification treatment or the amount of purification agent (solid content conversion) can be selected as appropriate according to the degree of contamination of organic halogen compounds in the soil and groundwater. Usually, 0.01-20 weight part is preferable with respect to 100 weight part of soil, More preferably, it is 0.05-10 weight part. When the amount is less than 0.01 parts by weight, the intended effect of the present invention cannot be obtained sufficiently. If it exceeds 20 parts by weight, the purification effect is improved, but it is not economical. When contaminated groundwater is targeted, it is preferably added in an amount of 0.01 to 20 parts by weight, more preferably 0.05 to 10 parts by weight with respect to 100 parts by weight of the groundwater.

本発明に係る鉄複合粒子粉末又は浄化剤を用いて有機ハロゲン化合物類を浄化した場合には、後述する評価法において、見掛けの反応速度定数を0.005h−1以上にすることができる。 When the organohalogen compounds are purified using the iron composite particle powder or the purifying agent according to the present invention, the apparent reaction rate constant can be set to 0.005 h −1 or more in the evaluation method described later.

次に、本発明9又は本発明10に係る重金属類の有害物質で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化処理方法ついて述べる。   Next, the purification method for soil and groundwater contaminated with heavy metal harmful substances according to the present invention 9 or the present invention 10 will be described.

本発明に係る重金属類の有害物質で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化処理方法は、「封じ込め」による方法であり、「原位置封じ込め」又は「掘削後封じ込め」のいずれにも適用できる。   The method for purifying soil / groundwater contaminated with hazardous substances of heavy metals according to the present invention is a method of “containment”, and can be applied to either “in-situ containment” or “containment after excavation”.

「原位置封じ込め」においては、浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末と水との混合物又は浄化剤を高圧の空気、窒素等のガスを媒体にしてそのまま浸透もしくはボーリング孔から地下に導入する方法である。浄化剤を用いる場合には、水懸濁液であるのでそのまま使用するか必要に応じて希釈すれば良い。   “In-situ containment” is a method in which a mixture or a purification agent of iron composite particle powder for purification treatment and water or a gas such as nitrogen or the like is permeated or introduced into a basement through a borehole as it is. When using a cleaning agent, since it is a water suspension, it may be used as it is or may be diluted as necessary.

「掘削後封じ込め」においては、浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末と水との混合物又は浄化剤を、サンドミル、ヘンシェルミキサー、コンクリートミキサー、ナウターミキサー、一軸又は二軸式のニーダー型混合器等を用いて汚染土壌と混合攪拌して、土壌中の重金属等をフェライト化した後、封じ込める方法である。なお、必要に応じて、重金属等を取り込んだフェライトを磁気分離することもできる。   In "containment after excavation", use a sand mill, Henschel mixer, concrete mixer, nauter mixer, uniaxial or biaxial kneader type mixer, etc., for the mixture or detergent of iron composite particle powder for purification treatment and water This is a method of mixing and agitation with contaminated soil to ferritize heavy metals in the soil and then contain them. In addition, if necessary, it is possible to magnetically separate ferrite incorporating heavy metal or the like.

浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末あるいは浄化剤(固形分換算)の添加量は、土壌・地下水中における重金属等の有害物質の汚染の程度に応じて適宜選択することができるが、汚染土壌を対象とする場合には、通常土壌100重量部に対して0.01〜20重量部が好ましく、より好ましくは0.05〜10重量部である。0.01重量部未満の場合には、本発明の目的とする効果が充分得られない。20重量部を超える場合には、浄化効果は向上するが経済的ではない。また、汚染地下水を対象とする場合には、地下水100重量部に対して0.01〜20重量部添加することが好ましく、より好ましくは0.05〜10重量部である。   The amount of iron composite particles for purification treatment or the amount of purification agent (solid content conversion) can be selected as appropriate according to the degree of contamination of hazardous substances such as heavy metals in the soil and groundwater. When doing, 0.01-20 weight part is normally preferable with respect to 100 weight part of soil, More preferably, it is 0.05-10 weight part. When the amount is less than 0.01 parts by weight, the intended effect of the present invention cannot be obtained sufficiently. If it exceeds 20 parts by weight, the purification effect is improved, but it is not economical. When contaminated groundwater is targeted, it is preferably added in an amount of 0.01 to 20 parts by weight, more preferably 0.05 to 10 parts by weight with respect to 100 parts by weight of the groundwater.

本発明に係る鉄複合粒子粉末又は浄化剤を用いて重金属類を浄化・不溶化した場合には、後述する評価法において見掛けの反応速度定数を、砒素の場合0.01h−1以上、クロムの場合0.01h−1以上、鉛の場合0.05h−1以上にすることができる。 When heavy metals are purified and insolubilized using the iron composite particle powder or the purifying agent according to the present invention, the apparent reaction rate constant in the evaluation method described later is 0.01 h −1 or more in the case of arsenic, and in the case of chromium. 0.01 h −1 or more, and in the case of lead, 0.05 h −1 or more can be set.

<作用>
本発明において重要な点は、本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末あるいは浄化剤を用いることによって、土壌・地下水の有機ハロゲン化合物類を効率よく、経済的に分解処理できるという点である。
<Action>
An important point in the present invention is that organic halogen compounds of soil and groundwater can be decomposed efficiently and economically by using the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment or the purification agent according to the present invention.

本発明者は、土壌・地下水中の有機ハロゲン化合物類を効果的に分解できる理由は未だ明らかではないが、下記のように推定している。   The present inventor has not yet clarified the reason why organic halogen compounds in soil and groundwater can be effectively decomposed, but estimates as follows.

即ち、本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末は、α−Fe相(0価)とFe相とが特定の割合で存在するとともに、一部の硫黄が加熱還元工程を経て0価の状態で存在することによって、鉄複合粒子として高い還元作用を有することができ、有機ハロゲン化合物類の分解反応に寄与するものと推定している。 That is, in the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention, the α-Fe phase (zero valence) and the Fe 3 O 4 phase are present in a specific ratio, and part of sulfur is 0 after the heat reduction step. It is presumed that, when present in a valence state, the iron composite particles can have a high reducing action and contribute to the decomposition reaction of organic halogen compounds.

本発明においては、浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末にAl化合物を特定量添加することによって、有機ハロゲン化合物類の分解性能を向上させることができた。この理由は未だ明らかではないが、Alを含有することによって、一次粒子をより微細化することができ、しかも、鉄複合粒子粉末の凝集体の強度を従来に比較して小さくなるので、湿式粉砕に労力を要さず、同様に粉砕した場合より微細に粉砕することが可能となる。その結果、土壌中又は地下水中で容易に浸透・分散することができるので、鉄複合粒子が本来有する有機ハロゲン化合物類に対する分解活性を十分に発揮できたことによるものと本発明者は推定している。   In the present invention, the decomposition performance of organic halogen compounds could be improved by adding a specific amount of Al compound to the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment. The reason for this is not yet clear, but by containing Al, the primary particles can be made finer, and the strength of the aggregates of the iron composite particle powder becomes smaller than before, so wet grinding. Therefore, it is possible to pulverize more finely than when pulverizing in the same manner. As a result, the present inventor presumed that the iron composite particles were able to sufficiently exhibit the decomposition activity on the organic halogen compounds inherently possessed because they can easily penetrate and disperse in soil or groundwater. Yes.

以上のように、触媒活性効果が高いため、効率的に短期間で浄化処理を行うことが可能となり、特に高濃度の有機ハロゲン化合物類で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化に好適である。   As described above, since the catalytic activity effect is high, it is possible to efficiently perform purification treatment in a short period of time, and it is particularly suitable for purification of soil and groundwater contaminated with high-concentration organic halogen compounds.

更に、本発明に係る浄化剤は、長期間の保存後、粗大粒子を含有することとなるが、後出実施例に示すとおり、高い浄化活性を維持している。   Furthermore, the purifying agent according to the present invention contains coarse particles after long-term storage, but maintains a high purifying activity as shown in the Examples below.

また、本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子は、粒子サイズが微細であり高い活性を保持しているため、加熱することなく常温でα−Feが溶解しやすく、更に、土壌中に含有されている水又は地下水を効率よく分解して水素又は水酸基を生じさせ局所的に常にアルカリ性領域となるため、α−Feの溶解反応が徐々に進行する。次いで、溶解したα−Feと重金属等の有害物質とが鉄複合粒子の界面で、水の分解による水酸基、酸素又は溶存酸素等を取り込みスピネルフェライト化が持続的に進行し重金属等の有害物質を不溶化するものと本発明者は推定している。また、鉄複合粒子中に含有するSも局所的にα−Feの溶解に寄与しているものと推定される。   Moreover, since the iron composite particles for purification treatment according to the present invention have a fine particle size and retain high activity, α-Fe is easily dissolved at room temperature without heating, and is further contained in soil. The water or groundwater is efficiently decomposed to generate hydrogen or a hydroxyl group so that it always becomes an alkaline region locally, so that the dissolution reaction of α-Fe proceeds gradually. Next, dissolved α-Fe and heavy metals and other harmful substances are taken at the interface of the iron composite particles, and hydroxyl groups, oxygen or dissolved oxygen, etc. due to decomposition of water are taken in and spinel ferrite formation proceeds continuously, and harmful substances such as heavy metals are removed. The inventor presumes that it is insolubilized. It is also presumed that S contained in the iron composite particles also contributes to the dissolution of α-Fe locally.

また、溶解したα−Feと重金属等の有害物質とのフェライト化反応が、スピネル構造である表層マグネタイトをシードとし、エピタキシャルに粒子が成長するため、効率よく重金属等の有害物質を不溶化できるものと本発明者は推定している。   In addition, the ferritization reaction between dissolved α-Fe and toxic substances such as heavy metals can be used to efficiently insolubilize toxic substances such as heavy metals because the grains grow epitaxially with the surface layer magnetite having a spinel structure as a seed. The inventor estimates.

本発明においては、酸又はアルカリを添加してpHを調整する処理、加熱処理及び空気吹き込みなどによる強制的な酸化処理も不要であることからも、効率よく重金属等の有害物質を不溶化できるものである。   In the present invention, the process of adjusting the pH by adding an acid or alkali, the heat treatment, and the forced oxidation treatment by air blowing, etc. are also unnecessary, so that harmful substances such as heavy metals can be efficiently insolubilized. is there.

更に、本発明においては、後出実施例に示すとおり、不溶化した重金属等の再溶出を抑制できるものであり、長期間にわたる不溶化に優れている。   Furthermore, in this invention, as shown in an Example mentioned later, it can suppress re-elution of the insolubilized heavy metal etc., and is excellent in insolubilization over a long period of time.

本発明の代表的な実施の形態は次の通りである。   A typical embodiment of the present invention is as follows.

ゲータイト粒子粉末の平均長軸径及び軸比は透過型電子顕微鏡写真(倍率30000倍)で測定した。ヘマタイト粒子粉末及び鉄複合粒子粉末の平均粒子径は走査型電子顕微鏡写真(倍率30000倍)を用いて測定した。   The average major axis diameter and the axial ratio of the goethite particle powder were measured with a transmission electron micrograph (magnification 30000 times). The average particle diameter of the hematite particle powder and the iron composite particle powder was measured using a scanning electron micrograph (magnification 30000 times).

鉄複合粒子粉末のFe量、Al量及び重金属類不溶化後の固液分離後の濾液中のAs、Cr、Pb量は、「誘導結合プラズマ発光分光分析装置SPS4000」(セイコー電子工業(株)製)を使用して測定した。   The amount of Fe, Al, and the amount of As, Cr, and Pb in the filtrate after solid-liquid separation after insolubilization of heavy metals was determined by “inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer SPS4000” (manufactured by Seiko Electronics Co., Ltd.). ).

各粒子粉末のS含有量は、「カーボン・サルファーアナライザー:EMIA−2200」(HORIBA製)を使用して測定した。   The S content of each particle powder was measured using “Carbon Sulfur Analyzer: EMIA-2200” (manufactured by HORIBA).

各粒子粉末の結晶相はX線回折によって10〜90°の範囲で測定して同定した。   The crystalline phase of each particle powder was identified by measuring in the range of 10 to 90 ° by X-ray diffraction.

鉄複合粒子粉末のピーク強度比は、前記の通りX線回折の結果から、α−Feの(110)面の回折強度D110及びマグネタイトの(311)面の回折強度D311を測定し、D110/(D311+D110)として強度比を求めた。 As described above, the peak intensity ratio of the iron composite particle powder was determined by measuring the diffraction intensity D 110 of the (110) plane of α-Fe and the diffraction intensity D 311 of the (311) plane of magnetite from the result of X-ray diffraction. The intensity ratio was determined as 110 / (D 311 + D 110 ).

鉄複合粒子粉末の結晶子サイズ(α−Feの(110)面)は、X線回折法で測定される結晶粒子の大きさを、各粒子の結晶面のそれぞれに垂直な方向における結晶粒子の厚さを表したものであり、各結晶面についての回折ピーク曲線から、下記シェラーの式を用いて計算した値で示したものである。   The crystallite size (α-Fe (110) plane) of the iron composite particle powder is the size of the crystal particle measured by the X-ray diffraction method, and the crystal particle size in the direction perpendicular to the crystal plane of each particle. The thickness is expressed by a value calculated from the diffraction peak curve for each crystal plane using the following Scherrer equation.

結晶子サイズ=Kλ/βcosθ
但し、β=装置に起因する機械幅を補正した真の回折ピークの半値幅(ラジアン単位)。
K=シェラー定数(=0.9)。
λ=X線の波長(Cu Kα線 0.1542nm)。
θ=回折角(各結晶面の回折ピークに対応)。
Crystallite size = Kλ / βcosθ
Where β = half-value width (in radians) of the true diffraction peak corrected for machine width due to the device.
K = Scherrer constant (= 0.9).
λ = wavelength of X-ray (Cu Kα ray 0.1542 nm).
θ = Diffraction angle (corresponding to the diffraction peak of each crystal plane).

各粒子粉末の比表面積は、「モノソーブMS−11」(カンタクロム(株)製)を使用し、BET法により測定した値で示した。   The specific surface area of each particle powder was represented by a value measured by BET method using “Monosorb MS-11” (manufactured by Kantachrome Co., Ltd.).

鉄複合粒子粉末の飽和磁化値は、「振動試料磁力計VSM−3S−15」(東英工業(株)製)を使用し、外部磁場795.8kA/m(10kOe)で測定した。   The saturation magnetization value of the iron composite particle powder was measured using an “vibrating sample magnetometer VSM-3S-15” (manufactured by Toei Industry Co., Ltd.) with an external magnetic field of 795.8 kA / m (10 kOe).

浄化剤中の鉄複合粒子粉末の粒度分布は、レーザー散乱・回折方式「NIKKISO MICROTRAC HRA MODEL 9320−X100」(日機装社製)を用いて測定した。なお、分散溶媒をエタノールとし、分散剤をオルガノシランとし、分散を超音波分散機で1分間とした。   The particle size distribution of the iron composite particle powder in the cleaning agent was measured using a laser scattering / diffraction method “NIKKISO MICROTRAC HRA MODEL 9320-X100” (manufactured by Nikkiso Co., Ltd.). The dispersion solvent was ethanol, the dispersant was organosilane, and the dispersion was performed for 1 minute with an ultrasonic disperser.

鉄複合粒子粉末中に存在する鉄以外のカドミウム、鉛、クロム、砒素、総水銀、セレン、全シアン、フッ素及びホウ素の各溶出量は、平成3年 環境庁告示第46号 「土壌の汚染に係る環境基準について」に基づいて測定した。   Each leaching amount of cadmium, lead, chromium, arsenic, total mercury, selenium, total cyanide, fluorine and boron other than iron present in the iron composite particle powder is 1992 Environment Agency Notification No. 46 “Soil Contamination Measured based on the environmental standards.

鉄複合粒子粉末中に存在する鉄以外のカドミウム、鉛、クロム、砒素、総水銀、セレン、全シアン、フッ素及びホウ素の各含有量は、環境省告示第19号に基づいて測定した。   The contents of cadmium, lead, chromium, arsenic, total mercury, selenium, total cyanide, fluorine and boron other than iron present in the iron composite particle powder were measured based on Ministry of the Environment Notification No. 19.

<検量線の作製:有機ハロゲン化合物の定量>
有機ハロゲン化合物の濃度は下記手順に従ってあらかじめ検量線を作成し、得られた検量線に基づいて濃度を算出した。
トリクロロエチレン(TCE:CHCl):分子量131.39
試薬特級(99.5%)、密度(20℃)1.461〜1.469g/ml
<Preparation of calibration curve: Determination of organohalogen compounds>
The concentration of the organic halogen compound was prepared in advance according to the following procedure, and the concentration was calculated based on the obtained calibration curve.
Trichlorethylene (TCE: C 2 HCl 3 ): molecular weight 131.39
Reagent grade (99.5%), density (20 ° C.) 1.461 to 1.469 g / ml

トリクロロエチレンを0.05μl、0.1μl及び1.0μlの3水準とし、褐色バイアル瓶50ml(実容積68ml)にイオン交換水30mlを添加し、次いで、トリクロロエチレンを各水準量注入し、直ちにフッ素樹脂ライナー付きゴム栓で蓋をし、その上からアルミシールで強固に締め付ける。バイアル瓶を20℃、20分静置した後、ヘッドスペースのガスをシリンジで50μl分取し、「GC−MS−QP5050」(島津製製作所製)を用いてトリクロロエチレンを測定する。トリクロロエチレンは全く分解されないものとして、添加量とピーク面積との関係を求める。このときのカラムはキャピラリーカラム(DB−1:J&W Scientific社製、液相:ジメチルポリシロキサン)とし、キャリアガスにはHeガス(143l/min)を使用し、40℃、2分間保持した後、10℃/minの速度で250℃まで昇温してガスを分析する。   Trichlorethylene is made into three levels of 0.05 μl, 0.1 μl and 1.0 μl, 30 ml of ion-exchanged water is added to 50 ml of a brown vial (actual volume 68 ml), then each amount of trichlorethylene is injected, and immediately a fluororesin liner Cover with a rubber stopper and tighten it with an aluminum seal. After leaving the vial at 20 ° C. for 20 minutes, 50 μl of the headspace gas is taken with a syringe, and trichlorethylene is measured using “GC-MS-QP5050” (manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation). Assuming that trichlorethylene is not decomposed at all, the relationship between the amount added and the peak area is determined. The column at this time is a capillary column (DB-1: manufactured by J & W Scientific, liquid phase: dimethylpolysiloxane), He gas (143 l / min) is used as a carrier gas, and the temperature is maintained at 40 ° C. for 2 minutes. The gas is analyzed by raising the temperature to 250 ° C at a rate of ° C / min.

<有機ハロゲン化合物測定用試料調整>
褐色バイアル瓶50ml(実容積68ml)に浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末0.1gとイオン交換水30mlを注入し、次いで、トリクロロエチレン1μlを注入し、直ぐにフッ素樹脂ライナー付きゴム栓で蓋をし、その上からアルミシールで強固に締め付ける。
<Sample preparation for organohalogen compound measurement>
Pour 0.1 g of iron composite particle powder for purification treatment and 30 ml of ion-exchanged water into 50 ml of brown vial (actual volume 68 ml), then inject 1 μl of trichlorethylene, and immediately cover with a rubber stopper with a fluororesin liner. Tighten with aluminum seal from above.

<有機ハロゲン化合物の分解反応における評価方法(見掛けの反応速度定数の測定)>
前記バイアル瓶を24℃で静置する。トリクロロエチレン残存量を、前記バイアル瓶を20℃、20分静置した後、ヘッドスペースからシリンジで50μlのガスを分取した。なお、ガスの分取は最大500時間まで、回分法によって所定時間におけるトリクロロエチレンの残存濃度を、前記「GC−MS−QP5050」(島津製作所社製)を用いて測定した。
<Evaluation method in decomposition reaction of organic halogen compound (measurement of apparent reaction rate constant)>
The vial is left at 24 ° C. The remaining amount of trichlorethylene was allowed to stand at 20 ° C. for 20 minutes, and then 50 μl of gas was collected from the headspace with a syringe. The residual concentration of trichlorethylene in a predetermined time was measured by a batch method up to a maximum of 500 hours using the “GC-MS-QP5050” (manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation).

得られた残存濃度から、下記式に基づいて見掛けの反応速度定数kobsを算出した。
ln(C/Co)=−k・t
Co:トリクロロエチレンの初期濃度
C:トリクロロエチレンの残存濃度
k:見掛けの反応速度定数(h−1
t:時間(h)
From the obtained residual concentration, an apparent reaction rate constant kobs was calculated based on the following formula.
ln (C / Co) = − k · t
Co: Initial concentration of trichlorethylene C: Residual concentration of trichlorethylene k: Apparent reaction rate constant (h −1 )
t: Time (h)

<重金属測定用試料調整及び不溶化反応における評価方法(見掛けの反応速度定数の測定)>
クロム、鉛、砒素溶液が各25ppmとなるように、1000mlメスフラスコに1000ppm標準液(関東化学(株)製)を25ml採取し全量が1000mlとなるようにイオン交換水を添加して重金属溶液の調製を行った。褐色バイアル瓶50ml(実容積68ml)に浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末0.06gと前記調製した重金属溶液30mlを注入し、直ちにゴム栓で蓋をし、24℃で静置する。
重金属残存量測定用溶液は、前記バイアル瓶の溶液と鉄複合粒子粉末を分離するため、0.45μmメンブランフィルターにより吸引ろ過し溶液を得る。なお、溶液の分取は最大336時間まで所定時間における残存濃度を回分法で測定した。
<Evaluation method in sample preparation and insolubilization reaction for heavy metal measurement (measurement of apparent reaction rate constant)>
Extract 25 ml of 1000 ppm standard solution (manufactured by Kanto Chemical Co., Ltd.) into a 1000 ml volumetric flask so that the chromium, lead, and arsenic solutions are 25 ppm each, and add ion-exchanged water so that the total amount becomes 1000 ml. Prepared. Pour 0.06 g of iron composite particle powder for purification treatment and 30 ml of the prepared heavy metal solution into 50 ml of brown vial (actual volume 68 ml), immediately cover with a rubber stopper and leave at 24 ° C.
The solution for measuring the amount of heavy metal remaining is suction filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filter to obtain a solution in order to separate the solution in the vial and the iron composite particle powder. In addition, the fractionation of the solution measured the residual density | concentration in predetermined time to a maximum of 336 hours by the batch method.

<重金属の評価方法>
得られた溶液について前記「誘導結合プラズマ発光分光分析装置SPS4000」(セイコー電子工業(株)製)を用いて各重金属の残存濃度を測定する。なお、測定は検量線法により行い、濃度4水準以上で検量線を作成し、その検量線が0.9999以上の相関係数において測定を行う。
<Evaluation method for heavy metals>
About the obtained solution, the residual density | concentration of each heavy metal is measured using the said "inductively coupled plasma emission-spectral-analysis apparatus SPS4000" (made by Seiko Electronics Co., Ltd.). The measurement is performed by the calibration curve method, a calibration curve is created at a concentration of 4 levels or higher, and the calibration curve is measured at a correlation coefficient of 0.9999 or higher.

得られた重金属の残存濃度から、不溶化時間と残存重金属濃度/初期重金属濃度の対数とが一次式で近似できると仮定して、下記式に基づいて見掛けの反応速度定数kobsを算出した。
ln(C/Co)=−k・t
Co:重金属の初期濃度
C:重金属の残存濃度
k:見掛けの反応速度定数(h−1
t:時間(h)
Assuming that the insolubilization time and the logarithm of residual heavy metal concentration / initial heavy metal concentration can be approximated by a linear expression from the obtained heavy metal residual concentration, an apparent reaction rate constant kobs was calculated based on the following equation.
ln (C / Co) = − k · t
Co: Initial concentration of heavy metal C: Residual concentration of heavy metal k: Apparent reaction rate constant (h −1 )
t: Time (h)

<不溶化後の酸・アルカリによる重金属溶出試験>
社団法人土壌環境センターから提案された、「重金属等不溶化処理土壌の安定性に関する検討部会報告− 酸添加溶出試験法、アルカリ添加溶出試験法 −」に従い、酸添加、アルカリ添加溶出試験を行った。
<Elution test of heavy metals with acid / alkali after insolubilization>
Acid addition and alkali addition dissolution tests were conducted in accordance with “Study Group Report on Stability of Insolubilized Soils Treated with Heavy Metals-Acid Addition Dissolution Test Method, Alkaline Addition Dissolution Test Method” proposed by the Soil Environment Center.

(提案内容抜粋)
不溶化処理土壌が酸性あるいはアルカリ性の水に曝された場合の安定性を評価する場合、環境庁告示第46号溶出試験に加えて、硫酸添加溶出試験Iと消石灰添加溶出試験Iを実施することを提案する。
これらの試験で重金属等が溶出してこないような不溶化処理技術であれば、実際に安定した不溶化処理が可能と考えられ、また、不溶化処理した土壌を埋め戻した場合、その後に多少の酸あるいはアルカリに曝されるとしても重金属等の溶出はおこらないと考えられる。
(Excerpt of proposal)
In order to evaluate the stability when insolubilized soil is exposed to acidic or alkaline water, in addition to the Environment Agency Notification No. 46 dissolution test, a sulfuric acid addition dissolution test I and a slaked lime addition dissolution test I should be conducted. suggest.
If the insolubilization technology that does not elute heavy metals in these tests, it is considered possible to actually achieve a stable insolubilization process.When the insolubilized soil is backfilled, some acid or Even if exposed to alkali, it is considered that elution of heavy metals does not occur.

<不溶化後の重金属の溶出試験用の試料調整>
(1)砒素
褐色バイアル瓶50ml(実容積68ml)に前記浄化剤を鉄複合粒子粉末として8g/l、砒素20mg/l(関東化学(株)製)、イオン交換水で30mlになるように注入した。その後直ぐにフッ素樹脂ライナー付きゴム栓で蓋をし、その上からアルミシールで強固に締め付けた。前記バイアル瓶を24℃で静置し、回分的に0.45μmメンブランフィルターを使用して固液分離し、濾液を「誘導結合プラズマ発光分光分析装置SPS4000」(セイコー電子工業(株)製)で分析し、pHを測定し、固液分離後の固体については21日後のみについて、社団法人土壌環境センター提案の酸・アルカリ溶出試験Iに従って行った。
(2)六価クロム
前記浄化剤を鉄複合粒子粉末として12g/l、六価クロムを50mg/l(関東化学(株)製)とした以外は前記と同様に行った。
(3)鉛
前記浄化剤を鉄複合粒子粉末として1g/l、鉛を20mg/l(関東化学(株)製)とした以外は前記と同様に行った。
<Sample preparation for elution test of heavy metals after insolubilization>
(1) Arsenic In a 50 ml brown vial (actual volume 68 ml), the purifier is injected as iron composite particle powder at 8 g / l, arsenic 20 mg / l (manufactured by Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.), and ion-exchanged water to 30 ml. did. Immediately after that, the cap was covered with a rubber plug with a fluororesin liner, and the top was firmly tightened with an aluminum seal. The vial was left at 24 ° C. and separated into solid and liquid using a 0.45 μm membrane filter batchwise, and the filtrate was obtained using an “inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer SPS4000” (manufactured by Seiko Denshi Kogyo Co., Ltd.). Analysis, pH was measured, and the solid after solid-liquid separation was conducted only after 21 days according to the acid / alkali elution test I proposed by the Soil Environment Center.
(2) Hexavalent chromium It was carried out in the same manner as above except that the purification agent was 12 g / l as an iron composite particle powder and hexavalent chromium was 50 mg / l (manufactured by Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.).
(3) Lead It was carried out in the same manner as above except that the purifying agent was 1 g / l as an iron composite particle powder and lead was 20 mg / l (manufactured by Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.).

<脂肪族有機ハロゲン化合物測定用試料調整>
褐色バイアル瓶50ml(実容積68ml)に浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末1gとイオン交換水30mlを注入し、次いで、トリクロロエチレン1μlを注入し、直ぐにフッ素樹脂ライナー付きゴム栓で蓋をし、その上からアルミシールで強固に締め付ける。前記バイアル瓶をペイントコンディショナー(レッドデビル社製)で3時間振とうする。
<Sample preparation for measuring aliphatic organic halogen compounds>
Inject 50 g of a brown vial (actual volume: 68 ml) with 1 g of iron composite particle powder for purification treatment and 30 ml of ion-exchanged water, then inject 1 μl of trichlorethylene, and immediately cover with a rubber stopper with a fluororesin liner. Tighten firmly with an aluminum seal. The vial is shaken with a paint conditioner (Red Devil) for 3 hours.

<脂肪族有機ハロゲン化合物の評価方法>
トリクロロエチレン残存量は、前記バイアル瓶のヘッドスペースのガスをシリンジで50μl分取し、前記「GC−MS−QP5050」(島津製作所社製)を用いて測定する。
<Evaluation method of aliphatic organic halogen compound>
The residual amount of trichlorethylene is measured using the above-mentioned “GC-MS-QP5050” (manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation) by taking 50 μl of the headspace gas of the vial bottle with a syringe.

<浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末及び浄化剤の製造>
毎秒3.4cmの割合でNガスを流すことによって非酸化性雰囲気に保持された反応容器中に、1.16mol/lのNaCO水溶液704lを添加した後、Fe2+1.35mol/lを含む硫酸第一鉄水溶液296lを添加、混合(NaCO量は、Feに対し2.0倍当量に該当する。)し、温度47℃においてFeCOを生成させた。
<Manufacture of iron composite particle powder and purification agent for purification treatment>
Into a reaction vessel maintained in a non-oxidizing atmosphere by flowing N 2 gas at a rate of 3.4 cm per second, 704 l of a 1.16 mol / l Na 2 CO 3 aqueous solution was added, and then Fe 2+ 1.35 mol / l. 296 l of ferrous sulfate aqueous solution containing l was added and mixed (the amount of Na 2 CO 3 corresponds to 2.0 times equivalent to Fe), and FeCO 3 was produced at a temperature of 47 ° C.

ここに得たFeCOを含む水溶液中に、引き続き、Nガスを毎秒3.4cmの割合で吹き込みながら、温度47℃で70分間保持した後、当該FeCOを含む水溶液中に、温度47℃において毎秒2.8cmの空気を5.0時間通気してゲータイト粒子を生成させた。なお、空気通気中におけるpHは8.5〜9.5であった。 In an aqueous solution containing FeCO 3 obtained here, subsequently, while blowing N 2 gas at a rate per second 3.4cm, it was held 70 minutes at temperature 47 ° C., in an aqueous solution containing the FeCO 3, temperature 47 ° C. At 2.8 cm, air of 2.8 cm / second was aerated for 5.0 hours to generate goethite particles. The pH during air ventilation was 8.5 to 9.5.

ここに得たゲータイト粒子を含有する懸濁液に、Al3+0.3mol/lを含む硫酸Al水溶液20lを添加、十分撹拌した後フィルタープレスで水洗し、得られたプレスケーキを圧縮成型機を用いて孔径4mmの成型板で押し出し成型して120℃で乾燥してゲータイト粒子粉末の造粒物とした。 To the suspension containing the goethite particles obtained here, 20 l of an aqueous solution of Al sulfate containing Al 3+ 0.3 mol / l was added, stirred well, then washed with a filter press, and the resulting press cake was compressed with a compression molding machine. It was extruded using a molding plate having a pore diameter of 4 mm and dried at 120 ° C. to obtain a granulated product of goethite particles.

ここに得た造粒物を構成する含有するゲータイト粒子粉末は、平均長軸径0.30μm、軸比(長軸径/短軸径)12.5の紡錘状を呈した粒子であった。BET比表面積は85m/g、Al含有量は0.40重量%、S含有量は400ppmであった。 The goethite particles contained in the granulated product thus obtained were particles having a spindle shape with an average major axis diameter of 0.30 μm and an axial ratio (major axis diameter / minor axis diameter) of 12.5. The BET specific surface area was 85 m 2 / g, the Al content was 0.40% by weight, and the S content was 400 ppm.

前記造粒物を330℃で加熱しヘマタイト粒子とし乾式粉砕する。その後水に邂逅し70%硫酸を10ml/kgの割合で添加し攪拌する。その後、脱水しプレスケーキとし、圧縮成型機を用いて孔径3mmの成型板で押し出し成型して120℃で乾燥してヘマタイト粒子粉末の造粒物とした。   The granulated product is heated at 330 ° C. to form hematite particles and dry pulverized. Then, it is poured into water and 70% sulfuric acid is added at a rate of 10 ml / kg and stirred. Thereafter, it was dehydrated to form a press cake, extruded using a molding plate having a pore diameter of 3 mm using a compression molding machine, and dried at 120 ° C. to obtain a granulated product of hematite particles.

ここに得た造粒物を構成するヘマタイト粒子粉末は、平均長軸径0.24μm、軸比(長軸径/短軸径)10.7の紡錘形を呈した粒子であった。S含有量は3300ppmであった。   The hematite particle powder constituting the granulated product obtained here was a spindle-shaped particle having an average major axis diameter of 0.24 μm and an axial ratio (major axis diameter / minor axis diameter) of 10.7. The S content was 3300 ppm.

前記ゲータイト粒子粉末の造粒物100gを固定層還元装置に導入し、Hガスを通気させながら、450℃で180分間、完全にα−Feとなるまで還元した。次に、Nガスに切替え室温まで冷却させた後、イオン交換水300mlを直接還元炉に導入し、そのまま約20重量%の鉄粒子粉末を含有する水懸濁液として取り出した。 100 g of the granulated product of the goethite particle powder was introduced into a fixed bed reducing apparatus, and reduced to complete α-Fe at 450 ° C. for 180 minutes while allowing H 2 gas to flow. Next, after switching to N 2 gas and allowing it to cool to room temperature, 300 ml of ion-exchanged water was directly introduced into the reduction furnace, and was directly taken out as a water suspension containing about 20 wt% iron particle powder.

その水懸濁液をバッフルを取り付けたステンレスビーカーに移し、中速回転型攪拌機として動力0.2kWのT.Kホモディスパー2.5型(直径40mmφのエッジタービン翼、特殊機化工業(株)製)を挿入し、回転数3600rpmで30分間攪拌した。   The aqueous suspension was transferred to a stainless beaker equipped with a baffle, and a T.W. K homodisper type 2.5 (edge turbine blade with a diameter of 40 mmφ, manufactured by Tokushu Kika Kogyo Co., Ltd.) was inserted and stirred at a rotational speed of 3600 rpm for 30 minutes.

次いで、連続せん断式分散機として、動力0.55kWのT.Kホモミックラインミル(PL−SL型、特殊機化工業(株)製)で、回転数4000rpmで分散処理した。   Next, as a continuous shearing type disperser, a T.I. Dispersion treatment was carried out at a rotation speed of 4000 rpm using a K homomic line mill (PL-SL type, manufactured by Tokushu Kika Kogyo Co., Ltd.).

その後、メディア式分散機として、動力1.5kWの四筒式サンドグラインダー(4TSG−(1/8G)型、特殊機化工業(株)製)に、直径2mmのガラスビーズを0.25l充填し、回転数500rpmで分散処理し浄化剤とした。   After that, as a media-type disperser, 0.25 l of glass beads with a diameter of 2 mm were filled into a four-cylinder sand grinder (4TSG- (1 / 8G) type, manufactured by Special Machine Industries Co., Ltd.) with a power of 1.5 kW. Then, dispersion treatment was performed at a rotation speed of 500 rpm to obtain a purifying agent.

得られた浄化剤の比重は1.25、固形分濃度は30重量%であり、レーザー回折・散乱法による浄化剤(水懸濁液)の粒度分布は単一ピークであり、メジアン径(D50)が1.90μm、D90/D10比が1.81、分布幅(D84−D16)が1.10μmであった。 The specific gravity of the resulting cleaning agent is 1.25, the solid content concentration is 30% by weight, the particle size distribution of the cleaning agent (water suspension) by laser diffraction / scattering method is a single peak, and the median diameter (D 50 ) was 1.90 μm, the D 90 / D 10 ratio was 1.81, and the distribution width (D 84 -D 16 ) was 1.10 μm.

得られた浄化剤中に含有する鉄複合粒子は、走査型電子顕微鏡(30000倍)で観察した結果、一次粒子の粒子形状は米粒状であって平均長軸径が0.09μmであって軸比が1.4であった。   The iron composite particles contained in the obtained cleaning agent were observed with a scanning electron microscope (30000 times). As a result, the primary particles had a rice grain shape and an average major axis diameter of 0.09 μm. The ratio was 1.4.

次いで、濾過し、40℃で3時間、大気中で乾燥し、浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末を得た(浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末とする)。   Subsequently, it filtered, and it dried in air | atmosphere for 3 hours at 40 degreeC, and obtained the iron composite particle powder for a purification process (it is set as the iron composite particle powder for a purification process).

ここに得た鉄複合粒子は、α−Feを主体としており、飽和磁化値135Am/kg(135emu/g)、BET比表面積27m/g、結晶子サイズ295Å、Fe含有量は83.0重量%、S含有量は4000ppmであった。X線回折の結果、α−FeとFeとが存在することが確認された。そのD110(α−Fe)とD311(Fe)との強度比D110/(D110+D311)は0.84であった。 The iron composite particles obtained here are mainly composed of α-Fe, a saturation magnetization value of 135 Am 2 / kg (135 emu / g), a BET specific surface area of 27 m 2 / g, a crystallite size of 295Å, and an Fe content of 83.0. % By weight and S content were 4000 ppm. As a result of X-ray diffraction, it was confirmed that α-Fe and Fe 3 O 4 were present. The intensity ratio D 110 / (D 110 + D 311 ) between D 110 (α-Fe) and D 311 (Fe 3 O 4 ) was 0.84.

<浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の溶出試験結果>
前記評価法によれば、得られた鉄複合粒子粉末の溶出試験結果は、カドミウムの溶出量が0.001mg/l未満、全シアンの溶出量が検出されない、鉛の溶出量が0.001mg/l未満、クロム溶出量が0.01mg/l未満、砒素の溶出量が0.001mg/l未満、総水銀の溶出量が0.0005mg/l未満、セレンの溶出量が0.001mg/l未満、フッ素の溶出量が0.5mg/l未満、ホウ素の溶出量が0.1mg/l未満であり、いずれも測定装置の検出限界を下回る値であり、全て前記環境基準の基準値を下回るものであった。
<Results of dissolution test of iron composite particle powder for purification treatment>
According to the evaluation method, the dissolution results of the obtained iron composite particle powder were as follows: the cadmium elution amount was less than 0.001 mg / l, the total cyan elution amount was not detected, and the lead elution amount was 0.001 mg / l. Less than l, chromium elution amount less than 0.01 mg / l, arsenic elution amount less than 0.001 mg / l, total mercury elution amount less than 0.0005 mg / l, selenium elution amount less than 0.001 mg / l The elution amount of fluorine is less than 0.5 mg / l and the elution amount of boron is less than 0.1 mg / l, both of which are below the detection limit of the measuring device, and all are below the standard value of the environmental standard. Met.

<浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の含有量の測定結果>
また、得られた鉄複合粒子粉末の含有試験結果を表1に示す。表1に示すとおり、カドミウム及びその化合物の含有量が2mg/kg未満、シアン化合物の含有量が5mg/kg未満、鉛及びその化合物の含有量が5mg/kg未満、六価クロム化合物含有量が5mg/kg未満、砒素及びその化合物の含有量が1mg/kg未満、水銀及びその化合物の含有量が1mg/kg未満、セレン及びその化合物の含有量が1mg/kg未満、フッ素及びその化合物の含有量が20mg/kg未満、ホウ素及びその化合物の含有量が20mg/kg未満であり、いずれも測定装置の検出限界を下回る値であり、全て前記環境基準の基準値を下回るものであった。
<Measurement result of content of iron composite particle powder for purification treatment>
In addition, Table 1 shows the content test results of the obtained iron composite particle powder. As shown in Table 1, the content of cadmium and its compound is less than 2 mg / kg, the content of cyanide is less than 5 mg / kg, the content of lead and its compound is less than 5 mg / kg, and the content of hexavalent chromium compound is Less than 5 mg / kg, arsenic and its compound content less than 1 mg / kg, mercury and its compound content less than 1 mg / kg, selenium and its compound content less than 1 mg / kg, fluorine and its compound content The amount was less than 20 mg / kg, and the content of boron and its compounds was less than 20 mg / kg. All of these values were below the detection limit of the measuring device, and all were below the standard value of the environmental standard.

<有機ハロゲン化合物の浄化処理結果(見掛けの反応速度定数)>
重金属不溶化反応における評価結果(見掛けの反応速度定数)について、反応時間に対する砒素、クロム、鉛の濃度のグラフを図1及び図2に示す。
<Results of organic halogen compound purification treatment (apparent reaction rate constant)>
Regarding the evaluation results (apparent reaction rate constant) in the heavy metal insolubilization reaction, graphs of the concentrations of arsenic, chromium and lead against the reaction time are shown in FIGS.

前記評価方法によれば、前記浄化剤を用いた場合のトリクロロエチレン浄化における見掛けの反応速度定数は0.034h−1であった。 According to the evaluation method, the apparent reaction rate constant in the purification of trichlorethylene when the purification agent was used was 0.034 h −1 .

<重金属不溶化反応における評価結果(見掛けの反応速度定数)>
前記評価方法によれば、前記浄化剤を用いた場合の重金属における見掛けの反応速度定数は、砒素が0.0195h−1、クロムが0.0138h−1、鉛は0.0630h−1であった。
<Evaluation results in the heavy metal insolubilization reaction (apparent reaction rate constant)>
According to the evaluation method, the apparent reaction rate constant in the heavy metals in the case of using the cleaning agent, arsenic 0.0195H -1, chromium 0.0138H -1, lead was 0.0630H -1 .

重金属不溶化反応における評価結果(見掛けの反応速度定数)について、反応時間に対する砒素、クロム、鉛の濃度のグラフを図3〜図5に示す。   Regarding the evaluation results (apparent reaction rate constant) in the heavy metal insolubilization reaction, graphs of the concentrations of arsenic, chromium, and lead with respect to the reaction time are shown in FIGS.

即ち、図3は、発明の実施の形態で得られた鉄複合粒子粉末を用いて、前記<重金属測定用試料調整及び不溶化反応における評価方法(見掛けの反応速度定数の測定)>を行った場合の、反応時間に対する砒素、クロム、鉛の濃度のグラフである。   That is, FIG. 3 shows the case where <the evaluation method (measurement of apparent reaction rate constant) in the sample preparation for heavy metal measurement and insolubilization reaction> is performed using the iron composite particle powder obtained in the embodiment of the invention. It is a graph of the density | concentration of arsenic, chromium, and lead with respect to reaction time.

また、図4は、発明の実施の形態で得られた鉄複合粒子粉末を用いて、前記<重金属測定用試料調整及び不溶化反応における評価方法(見掛けの反応速度定数の測定)>を行った場合の、反応時間に対する砒素、クロム、鉛の濃度の対数値のグラフである。   Moreover, FIG. 4 shows the case where <the evaluation method (measurement of apparent reaction rate constant) in the sample preparation for heavy metal measurement and insolubilization reaction> is performed using the iron composite particle powder obtained in the embodiment of the invention. It is a graph of the logarithm value of the density | concentration of arsenic, chromium, and lead with respect to reaction time.

また、図5は、発明の実施の形態で得られた鉄複合粒子粉末を用いて、前記<重金属測定用試料調整及び不溶化反応における評価方法(見掛けの反応速度定数の測定)>を行った場合の、反応時間に対する砒素、クロム、鉛の溶液pHのグラフである。   Further, FIG. 5 shows the case where the above-described <Method for evaluating heavy metal measurement and evaluation method for insolubilization reaction (measurement of apparent reaction rate constant)> is performed using the iron composite particle powder obtained in the embodiment of the invention. It is a graph of solution pH of arsenic, chromium, and lead with respect to reaction time.

このときの重金属残存量測定用溶液は、クロム、鉛添加共にpH10前後であり、分離した鉄複合粒子粉末は黒色のままで変化無く、重金属類とのフェライト化合物になったと推定している。   The solution for measuring the amount of heavy metal remaining at this time was about pH 10 for both chromium and lead addition, and it was estimated that the separated iron composite particle powder remained black and did not change and became a ferrite compound with heavy metals.

後述する比較例の還元鉄粉、電解鉄粉の場合、重金属残存量測定用溶液は、クロムはpH4前後、鉛はpH6前後であり、また鉛を添加した後に分離した鉄粉末は赤色沈殿を生じており、鉛との水酸化鉄化合物になったと推定している。   In the case of reduced iron powder and electrolytic iron powder of Comparative Examples, which will be described later, the solution for measuring the amount of heavy metal remaining is about pH 4 for chromium and about pH 6 for lead, and the iron powder separated after adding lead produces a red precipitate. It is estimated that it became an iron hydroxide compound with lead.

<不溶化後の重金属の再溶出試験評価結果>
不溶化後の重金属の溶出試験の結果を表2に示す。表2に示すとおり、アルカリ溶出試験I結果では、砒素、クロム、鉛の溶出量が環境基準以下であり、また酸溶出試験I結果では、砒素、クロムの溶出量が環境基準以下であった。これらの試験で重金属等が溶出してこない不溶化処理技術であれば、重金属等不溶化については非常に強固であり、実際にも安定した不溶化処理が可能と考えられる。また、不溶化処理した土壌を埋め戻した場合、その後に多少の酸あるいはアルカリに曝されるとしても重金属等の溶出はおこらないと考えられる。従って、原位置浄化における重金属等の不溶化処理でも優れた効果を発揮することが期待できる。
なお、酸溶出試験I結果で鉛のみ溶出が認められ、その原因は明らかとなっていないが、砒素、クロム不溶化試験における鉄複合粒子粉末の添加濃度がそれぞれ8g/l、12g/lであることに比較して、鉛の場合は1g/lと低添加濃度であり、その場合でも汚染水の浄化が完了したのは、鉛の一部が水酸化物として不溶化後の鉄複合粒子粉末に吸着した為で、不溶化後の粉体からの再溶出を考えた場合は、添加濃度として不適切であった可能性が高いと発明者は推測している。
<Evaluation results of heavy metal re-elution test after insolubilization>
The results of the heavy metal dissolution test after insolubilization are shown in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, the leaching amounts of arsenic, chromium, and lead were below the environmental standard in the alkaline dissolution test I results, and the leaching amounts of arsenic and chromium were below the environmental standard in the acid dissolution test I results. If the insolubilization treatment technology in which heavy metals and the like are not eluted in these tests, insolubilization of heavy metals and the like is very strong, and it is considered that a stable insolubilization treatment can actually be performed. In addition, when the insolubilized soil is backfilled, it is considered that elution of heavy metals and the like does not occur even if the soil is exposed to some acid or alkali thereafter. Therefore, it can be expected that an excellent effect is exhibited even in the insolubilization treatment of heavy metals or the like in the in-situ purification.
In the acid elution test I, only lead was eluted, and the cause is not clear. However, the additive concentration of the iron composite particle powder in the arsenic and chromium insolubilization tests is 8 g / l and 12 g / l, respectively. In contrast, the concentration of lead is as low as 1 g / l. Even in this case, the purification of contaminated water was completed because part of the lead was adsorbed on the iron composite particle powder after insolubilization as a hydroxide. Therefore, when considering re-elution from the powder after insolubilization, the inventor presumes that there is a high possibility that the addition concentration is inappropriate.

次に、本発明の実施例及び比較例を挙げる。   Next, examples and comparative examples of the present invention will be given.

<ゲータイト粒子>
ゲータイト粒子として表3に示すゲータイト粒子を用意した。
<Goethite particles>
The goethite particles shown in Table 3 were prepared as goethite particles.

ゲータイト粒子1、2、5
添加する硫酸Al水溶液の量を種々変化させた以外は前記発明の実施の形態と同様にしてゲータイト粒子粉末の造粒物を得た。
Goethite particles 1, 2, 5
A granulated product of goethite particles was obtained in the same manner as in the above-described embodiment except that the amount of the Al sulfate aqueous solution to be added was variously changed.

ゲータイト粒子3
Fe2+1.50mol/lを含む硫酸第一鉄水溶液12.8lと0.44−NのNaOH水溶液30.2l(硫酸第一鉄水溶液中のFe2+に対し0.35当量に該当する。)とを混合し、pH6.7、温度38℃においてFe(OH)を含む硫酸第一鉄水溶液の生成を行なった。次いで、Fe(OH)を含む硫酸第一鉄水溶液に温度40℃において毎分130lの空気を3.0時間通気してゲータイト核粒子を生成させた。
Goethite particles 3
12.8 l of ferrous sulfate aqueous solution containing Fe 2+ 1.50 mol / l and 30.2 l of 0.44-N NaOH aqueous solution (corresponding to 0.35 equivalent to Fe 2+ in ferrous sulfate aqueous solution) And a ferrous sulfate aqueous solution containing Fe (OH) 2 at a pH of 6.7 and a temperature of 38 ° C. was produced. Next, 130 l of air per minute was passed through a ferrous sulfate aqueous solution containing Fe (OH) 2 at a temperature of 40 ° C. for 3.0 hours to generate goethite core particles.

前記ゲータイト核粒子を含む硫酸第一鉄水溶液(ゲータイト核粒子の存在量は生成ゲータイト粒子に対し35mol%に該当する。)に、5.4NのNaCO水溶液7.0l(残存硫酸第一鉄水溶液中のFe2+に対し1.5当量に該当する。)を加え、pH9.4、温度42℃において毎分130lの空気を4時間通気してゲータイト粒子粉末を生成させた。ここに得たゲータイト粒子を含有する懸濁液にAl3+0.3mol/lを含む硫酸Al水溶液を0.96lを添加、十分撹拌した後をフィルタープレスで水洗し、得られたプレスケーキを圧縮成型機を用いて孔径4mmの成型板で押し出し成型して120℃で乾燥してゲータイト粒子粉末の造粒物とした。 The ferrous sulfate aqueous solution containing the goethite core particles (the amount of the goethite core particles corresponds to 35 mol% with respect to the produced goethite particles) was added to 7.0 l of 5.4N Na 2 CO 3 aqueous solution (residual ferrous sulfate 1.5 equivalents of Fe 2+ in the aqueous iron solution) was added, and 130 liters of air was aerated for 4 hours at a pH of 9.4 and a temperature of 42 ° C. to produce goethite particle powder. 0.96 l of an aqueous solution of Al sulfate containing Al 3+ 0.3 mol / l was added to the suspension containing the goethite particles obtained here, and after sufficient stirring, the mixture was washed with a filter press and the resulting press cake was compressed. Extrusion molding was performed with a molding plate having a hole diameter of 4 mm using a molding machine and dried at 120 ° C. to obtain a granulated product of goethite particles.

ここに得た造粒物を構成する含有するゲータイト粒子粉末は、平均長軸径0.33μm、軸比(長軸径/短軸径)25.0の針状を呈した粒子であった。BET比表面積は70m/g、Al含有量は0.42重量%、S含有量は4000ppmであった。 The goethite particle powder contained in the granulated product thus obtained was a needle-like particle having an average major axis diameter of 0.33 μm and an axial ratio (major axis diameter / minor axis diameter) of 25.0. The BET specific surface area was 70 m 2 / g, the Al content was 0.42% by weight, and the S content was 4000 ppm.

ゲータイト粒子4
添加する硫酸Al水溶液の量を変化させた以外は前記ゲータイト粒子3と同様にしてゲータイト粒子粉末の造粒物を得た。
Goethite particles 4
A granulated product of goethite particle powder was obtained in the same manner as the goethite particles 3 except that the amount of the Al sulfate aqueous solution to be added was changed.

浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末及び浄化剤:実施例1〜6、比較例1〜7;
ゲータイト粒子の種類、加熱脱水の温度、ヘマタイト粒子を含有する懸濁液への硫酸の添加の有無及び添加量、加熱還元の温度を種々変化させた以外は前記発明の実施の形態と同様にして浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末及び浄化剤を得た。
Iron composite particle powder and purification agent for purification treatment: Examples 1 to 6, Comparative Examples 1 to 7;
Except for various changes in the type of goethite particles, the temperature of heat dehydration, the presence or absence of addition of sulfuric acid to the suspension containing hematite particles, and the temperature of heat reduction, the same as in the embodiment of the invention. An iron composite particle powder and a purification agent for purification treatment were obtained.

このときの製造条件を表4に、得られた浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末及び浄化剤の諸特性を表5に示す。   The production conditions at this time are shown in Table 4, and the properties of the obtained iron composite particle powder for purification treatment and the purification agent are shown in Table 5.

比較例2は、前記ゲータイト粒子粉末1の造粒物100gを転動還元装置に導入し、Hガスを通気させながら、300℃で180分間、完全にFeとなるまで還元した、α−Feを全く含まないマグネタイト粒子粉末である。比較例3は還元鉄粉、比較例4は電解鉄粉である。また比較例5、6はカルボニル鉄粉、比較例7はスポンジ鉄粉である。 In Comparative Example 2, 100 g of the granulated product of the goethite particle powder 1 was introduced into a rolling reduction device, and reduced to completely Fe 3 O 4 at 300 ° C. for 180 minutes while allowing H 2 gas to flow. It is a magnetite particle powder containing no α-Fe. Comparative Example 3 is reduced iron powder, and Comparative Example 4 is electrolytic iron powder. Comparative Examples 5 and 6 are carbonyl iron powder, and Comparative Example 7 is sponge iron powder.

<見掛けの反応速度定数の測定>
実施例7〜12、比較例8〜14;
浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の種類及び浄化剤の種類を種々変化させ、見掛けの反応速度定数を測定した。
<Measurement of apparent reaction rate constant>
Examples 7-12, Comparative Examples 8-14;
The apparent reaction rate constant was measured by changing the type of the iron composite particle powder for the purification treatment and the type of the purification agent.

このときの処理条件及び測定結果を表6に示す。   Table 6 shows the processing conditions and measurement results at this time.

なお、比較例12〜14では、トリクロロエチレンの分解が殆ど起こらないため、見掛けの反応速度定数を求めることができなかった。   In Comparative Examples 12 to 14, since the decomposition of trichlorethylene hardly occurred, the apparent reaction rate constant could not be obtained.

<重金属不溶化における見掛けの反応速度定数の測定>
比較例15〜18;
浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の種類、不溶化する重金属の種類、添加濃度を種々変化させ、見掛けの反応速度定数を測定した。
<Measurement of apparent reaction rate constant in heavy metal insolubilization>
Comparative Examples 15-18;
The apparent reaction rate constant was measured by varying the type of iron composite particle powder for purification treatment, the type of heavy metal to be insolubilized, and the addition concentration.

このときの処理条件及び測定結果を表7に示す。   Table 7 shows the processing conditions and measurement results at this time.

実施例13〜16
保存後の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末及び浄化剤の諸特性を表8に示す。実施例13〜16は、実施例1の鉄複合粒子を含有する浄化剤(固形分濃度30%)の浄化剤を開放系で1、3、6、12ヶ月保存したものである。
Examples 13-16
Table 8 shows the characteristics of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment after storage and the purification agent. In Examples 13 to 16, the cleaning agent (solid content concentration 30%) containing the iron composite particles of Example 1 was stored in an open system for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

<脂肪族有機ハロゲン化合物の浄化処理結果>
実施例17〜21、比較例19〜20;
浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の種類を種々変化させ、前記<脂肪族有機ハロゲン化合物測定用試料調整>及び<脂肪族有機ハロゲン化合物の評価方法>に従って、浄化処理を行った。測定した結果を表9に示す。
<Results of purification of aliphatic organic halogen compounds>
Examples 17-21, comparative examples 19-20;
Various types of the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment were changed, and purification treatment was performed according to the above <Preparation of Aliphatic Organic Halogen Compound Measurement Sample> and <Method for Evaluation of Aliphatic Organic Halogen Compound>. Table 9 shows the measurement results.

本発明に係る浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末は、有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類を効率よく分解・不溶化できるので、有機ハロゲン化合物及び/又は重金属類によって汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化剤として好適である。
Since the iron composite particle powder for purification treatment according to the present invention can efficiently decompose and insolubilize organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals, it can be used as a purification agent for soil and groundwater contaminated with organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals. Is preferred.

発明の実施の形態で得られた鉄複合粒子粉末を用いてトリクロロエチレンの浄化処理を行った場合の、反応時間とトリクロロエチレン残存率のグラフである(●:実施の形態の鉄複合粒子粉末)。It is a graph of reaction time and trichlorethylene residual rate when the purification treatment of trichlorethylene is performed using the iron composite particle powder obtained in the embodiment of the present invention (●: iron composite particle powder of the embodiment). 発明の実施の形態で得られた鉄複合粒子粉末を用いてトリクロロエチレンの浄化処理を行った場合の、反応時間に対する、トリクロロエチレンの残存濃度/初期濃度の対数値のグラフである(●:実施の形態の鉄複合粒子粉末)。FIG. 3 is a graph of logarithm of residual concentration / initial concentration of trichlorethylene with respect to reaction time when trichloroethylene purification treatment is performed using the iron composite particle powder obtained in the embodiment of the present invention (●: embodiment) Iron composite particle powder). 発明の実施の形態で得られた鉄複合粒子粉末を用いて、前記<重金属測定用試料調整及び不溶化反応における評価方法(見掛けの反応速度定数の測定)>を行った場合の、反応時間に対する砒素(◇)、クロム(□)、鉛(△)の濃度のグラフである。Arsenic with respect to the reaction time when the above <preparation method for heavy metal measurement and evaluation method in insolubilization reaction (measurement of apparent reaction rate constant)> is performed using the iron composite particle powder obtained in the embodiment of the invention It is a graph of the concentration of (◇), chromium (□), and lead (△). 発明の実施の形態で得られた鉄複合粒子粉末を用いて、前記<重金属測定用試料調整及び不溶化反応における評価方法(見掛けの反応速度定数の測定)>を行った場合の、反応時間に対する砒素(◇)、クロム(□)、鉛(△)の濃度の対数値のグラフである。Arsenic with respect to the reaction time when the above <preparation method for heavy metal measurement and evaluation method in insolubilization reaction (measurement of apparent reaction rate constant)> is performed using the iron composite particle powder obtained in the embodiment of the invention It is a graph of logarithmic values of the concentration of (◇), chromium (□), and lead (△). 発明の実施の形態で得られた鉄複合粒子粉末を用いて、前記<重金属測定用試料調整及び不溶化反応における評価方法(見掛けの反応速度定数の測定)>を行った場合の、反応時間に対する砒素(◇)、クロム(□)、鉛(△)の溶液pHのグラフである。Arsenic with respect to reaction time when the above <preparation method for heavy metal measurement and evaluation method in insolubilization reaction (measurement of apparent reaction rate constant)> is performed using the iron composite particle powder obtained in the embodiment of the invention It is a graph of solution pH of (◇), chromium (□), and lead (Δ). 保存後の浄化剤にて生成した粗大粒子の走査型電子顕微鏡写真(倍率30000倍)である。It is a scanning electron micrograph (magnification 30000 times) of the coarse particle produced | generated with the cleaning agent after a preservation | save.

Claims (10)

有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類で汚染された土壌・地下水の浄化処理に用いるα−Feとマグネタイトとからなる鉄複合粒子粉末であって、鉄複合粒子粉末のX線回折スペクトルにおいてα−Feの(110)面の回折強度D110とマグネタイトの(311)面の回折強度D311との強度比(D110/(D311+D110))が0.30〜0.95であり、Al含有量が0.10〜1.50重量%であり、S含有量が3500〜7000ppmであることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末。 An iron composite particle powder composed of α-Fe and magnetite used for purification treatment of soil and groundwater contaminated with organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals, and in the X-ray diffraction spectrum of the iron composite particle powder, α-Fe The intensity ratio (D 110 / (D 311 + D 110 )) of the (110) plane diffraction intensity D 110 and the magnetite (311) plane diffraction intensity D 311 is 0.30 to 0.95, and contains Al. An iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater, having an amount of 0.10 to 1.50% by weight and an S content of 3500 to 7000 ppm. 飽和磁化値が85〜155Am/kgであり、BET比表面積が5〜60m/gであり、α−Feの(110)面の結晶子サイズが200〜400Åであり、平均粒子径が0.05〜0.50μmであることを特徴とする請求項1記載の土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末。 The saturation magnetization value is 85 to 155 Am 2 / kg, the BET specific surface area is 5 to 60 m 2 / g, the crystallite size of the (110) plane of α-Fe is 200 to 400 mm, and the average particle size is 0 The iron composite particle powder for soil / groundwater purification treatment according to claim 1, wherein the powder is 0.05 to 0.50 μm. 請求項1又は請求項2記載の土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末を有効成分として含有する水懸濁液からなる土壌・地下水の浄化剤。 A soil / groundwater purification agent comprising a water suspension containing the iron / particle composite powder for soil / groundwater purification treatment according to claim 1 or 2 as an active ingredient. 平均長軸径が0.05〜0.50μmであってAl含有量が0.06〜1.00重量%であり、S含有量が2200〜4500ppmであるゲータイト粒子粉末又は平均長軸径が0.05〜0.50μmであってAl含有量が0.07〜1.13重量%であり、S含有量が2400〜5000ppmであるヘマタイト粒子粉末を、350〜600℃の温度範囲で加熱還元して鉄粒子粉末とし、冷却後、該鉄粒子粉末を気相中で表面酸化被膜を形成することなく水中に取り出し、次いで、水中で当該鉄粒子粉末の粒子表面に表面酸化被膜を形成した後に乾燥することを特徴とする請求項1又は請求項2記載の土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末の製造法。
A goethite particle powder having an average major axis diameter of 0.05 to 0.50 μm, an Al content of 0.06 to 1.00% by weight , and an S content of 2200 to 4500 ppm , or an average major axis diameter of 0. A hematite particle powder having a 0.05 to 0.50 μm Al content of 0.07 to 1.13 wt% and an S content of 2400 to 5000 ppm is heated and reduced in a temperature range of 350 to 600 ° C. After cooling, the iron particle powder is taken out in water without forming a surface oxide film in the gas phase, and then dried after forming a surface oxide film on the particle surface of the iron particle powder in water. A method for producing an iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater according to claim 1 or 2.
平均長軸径が0.05〜0.50μmであってAl含有量が0.06〜1.00重量%であり、S含有量が2200〜4500ppmであるゲータイト粒子粉末又は平均長軸径が0.05〜0.50μmであってAl含有量が0.07〜1.13重量%であり、S含有量が2400〜5000ppmのヘマタイト粒子粉末を、350〜600℃の温度範囲で加熱還元して鉄粒子粉末とし、冷却後、該鉄粒子粉末を気相中で表面酸化被膜を形成することなく水中に取り出し、水中で当該鉄粒子粉末の粒子表面に表面酸化被膜を形成して鉄複合粒子粉末を含有する水懸濁液を得ることを特徴とする請求項3記載の土壌・地下水の浄化剤の製造法。 A goethite particle powder having an average major axis diameter of 0.05 to 0.50 μm, an Al content of 0.06 to 1.00 wt%, and an S content of 2200 to 4500 ppm, or an average major axis diameter of 0 A hematite particle powder having an Al content of 0.07 to 1.13 wt% and an S content of 2400 to 5000 ppm is heated and reduced in a temperature range of 350 to 600 ° C. After cooling to iron particle powder, the iron particle powder is taken out in water without forming a surface oxide film in the gas phase, and a surface oxide film is formed on the particle surface of the iron particle powder in water to form an iron composite particle powder. 4. A method for producing a soil / groundwater purifier according to claim 3, wherein a water suspension containing water is obtained. 請求項3記載のα−Feとマグネタイトとからなる鉄複合粒子粉末を有効成分として含有する水懸濁液からなる浄化剤を長期間保存して得られた浄化剤であって、該浄化剤中に粒子径が0.1〜5.0μmの粗大粒子を含み、かつ、該鉄複合粒子粉末全体のX線回折スペクトルにおいてα−Feの(110)面の回折強度D110とマグネタイトの(311)面の回折強度D311との強度比(D110/(D110+D311))が0.20〜0.80であることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化剤。 A purification agent obtained by preserving for a long time a purification agent comprising an aqueous suspension containing the iron composite particle powder comprising α-Fe and magnetite according to claim 3 as an active ingredient, comprises coarse particles having a particle diameter of 0.1~5.0μm to, and iron composite particles of the entire powder alpha-Fe in the X-ray diffraction spectrum (110) plane of the diffraction intensity D 110 and magnetite (311) A soil / groundwater purifier having an intensity ratio (D 110 / (D 110 + D 311 )) to the diffraction intensity D 311 of the surface of 0.20 to 0.80. 請求項6記載の土壌・地下水の浄化剤において、前記浄化剤中の鉄複合粒子粉末は、飽和磁化値が70〜140Am/kgであり、α−Feの(110)面の結晶子サイズが200〜400Åであることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化剤。 The soil / groundwater purification agent according to claim 6, wherein the iron composite particle powder in the purification agent has a saturation magnetization value of 70 to 140 Am 2 / kg and a crystallite size of (110) plane of α-Fe. A soil and groundwater purification agent characterized by being 200 to 400 mm. 請求項6又は7記載の土壌・地下水の浄化剤において、前記浄化剤中の鉄複合粒子粉末はFeの含有量が全粒子粉末に対して65〜80重量%であることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化剤。 The soil / groundwater purification agent according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the iron composite particle powder in the purification agent has a Fe content of 65 to 80 wt% with respect to the total particle powder. Groundwater purification agent. 請求項1又は請求項2記載の土壌・地下水の浄化処理用鉄複合粒子粉末と有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類で汚染された土壌又は有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類で汚染された地下水とを混合接触させることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化処理方法。 The iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater according to claim 1 or claim 2 and soil contaminated with organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals or ground water contaminated with organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals A method for purifying soil and groundwater, wherein the soil and groundwater are in contact with each other. 請求項3、6、7及び8のいずれかに記載の土壌・地下水の浄化剤と有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類で汚染された土壌又は有機ハロゲン化合物類及び/又は重金属類で汚染された地下水とを混合接触させることを特徴とする土壌・地下水の浄化処理方法。
The soil or groundwater purification agent according to any one of claims 3, 6, 7, and 8 and soil contaminated with organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals or contaminated with organic halogen compounds and / or heavy metals. A method for purifying soil and groundwater, characterized by mixing and contacting with groundwater.
JP2004148348A 2003-06-10 2004-05-18 Iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater, production method thereof, purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, production method thereof, and purification treatment method of soil and groundwater Active JP4433173B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004148348A JP4433173B2 (en) 2003-06-10 2004-05-18 Iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater, production method thereof, purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, production method thereof, and purification treatment method of soil and groundwater

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003165812 2003-06-10
JP2004148348A JP4433173B2 (en) 2003-06-10 2004-05-18 Iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater, production method thereof, purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, production method thereof, and purification treatment method of soil and groundwater

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005021882A JP2005021882A (en) 2005-01-27
JP4433173B2 true JP4433173B2 (en) 2010-03-17

Family

ID=34196953

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004148348A Active JP4433173B2 (en) 2003-06-10 2004-05-18 Iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater, production method thereof, purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, production method thereof, and purification treatment method of soil and groundwater

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4433173B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006116477A (en) * 2004-10-22 2006-05-11 Miura Co Ltd Arsenic removing agent and arsenic removing method
JP4676898B2 (en) * 2005-04-07 2011-04-27 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Arsenic removal method and arsenic removal treatment agent in contaminated water
JP4848293B2 (en) * 2006-02-07 2011-12-28 日鐵セメント株式会社 Ultra-fine particle injection material composition
JP5144033B2 (en) * 2006-05-22 2013-02-13 石原産業株式会社 Organic compound decomposition material and method for treating soil or water using the same
JP5700651B2 (en) * 2010-04-21 2015-04-15 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Treatment agent and treatment method for contaminated water containing heavy metals
JP2014033988A (en) * 2012-08-08 2014-02-24 Takenaka Doboku Co Ltd Method for reducing heavy metal content in heavy metal polluted soil, using ferritization treatment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2005021882A (en) 2005-01-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR100921261B1 (en) Iron Particles for Purifying Contaminated Soil or Ground Water, Process for Producing the Iron Particles, Purifying Agent Comprising the Iron Particles, Process for Producing the Purifying Agent and Method of Purifying Contaminated Soil or Ground Water
JP4600258B2 (en) Purification agent for purification treatment of soil and groundwater, its production method and purification treatment method of soil and groundwater
US20080314839A1 (en) Iron composite particles for purifying soil or ground water, process for producing the same, purifying agent containing the same, process for producing the purifying agent and method for purifying soil or ground water
JP4258622B2 (en) Purification agent for soil and groundwater contaminated with organic halogen compounds, its production method, and purification method for soil and groundwater contaminated with organic halogen compounds
JP4479899B2 (en) Purification agent for soil and groundwater purification, its production method, and soil and groundwater purification method
JP4433173B2 (en) Iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater, production method thereof, purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, production method thereof, and purification treatment method of soil and groundwater
JP2012210559A (en) Clarifying agent for clarification treatment of soil/ground water, method for producing the same, method for transporting the same and method for clarification treatment of soil/ground water
JP4352215B2 (en) Iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater containing aromatic halogen compounds, its production method, purification agent containing said iron composite particle powder, its production method, and purification treatment of soil and groundwater containing aromatic halogen compounds Method
JP4479890B2 (en) Purification agent for soil and groundwater purification, its production method, and soil and groundwater purification method
JP4626762B2 (en) Noble metal-carrying iron complex for soil and groundwater purification treatment, purification agent containing noble metal-carrying iron complex, and soil and groundwater purification method
JP4639029B2 (en) Soil contaminated with toxic substances such as heavy metals, iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater, its manufacturing method, purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, its manufacturing method and soil contaminated with toxic substances such as heavy metals Groundwater purification method
JP4479902B2 (en) Iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of waste water, its production method, purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, its production method and waste water purification treatment method
JP2013208527A (en) Iron composite particle powder for purifying soil, ground water, and waste water, purifying agent including the iron composite particle powder, and method for purifying soil, ground water, and waste water contaminated by organic halogen compound
JP2007296408A (en) Metal iron-magnetite mixed particle powder for purifying soil/groundwater, purification agent containing metal iron-magnetite mixed particle powder, and method for cleaning soil/groundwater
JP5479006B2 (en) Soil and groundwater purification methods
JP4557126B2 (en) Iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater contaminated with organic halogen compounds, its production method, purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, its production method and purification treatment of soil and groundwater contaminated with organic halogen compounds Method
JP4106545B2 (en) Iron composite particle powder for the purification treatment of soil and groundwater containing an organic halogen compound, its production method, a purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, its production method and a purification method for soil and groundwater containing an organic halogen compound
JP4258623B2 (en) Iron composite particle powder for purification treatment of soil and groundwater contaminated with organic halogen compounds, its production method, purification agent containing the iron composite particle powder, its production method and purification treatment of soil and groundwater contaminated with organic halogen compounds Method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20070319

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20090616

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20090618

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20090807

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20091202

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20091215

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4433173

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130108

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130108

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130108

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140108

Year of fee payment: 4

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350