JP4283650B2 - Method for designing wire length of electric wire for wire harness and method for determining quality - Google Patents

Method for designing wire length of electric wire for wire harness and method for determining quality Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4283650B2
JP4283650B2 JP2003396556A JP2003396556A JP4283650B2 JP 4283650 B2 JP4283650 B2 JP 4283650B2 JP 2003396556 A JP2003396556 A JP 2003396556A JP 2003396556 A JP2003396556 A JP 2003396556A JP 4283650 B2 JP4283650 B2 JP 4283650B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
wire
length
tension
maximum
range
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2003396556A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2005158547A (en
Inventor
建青 呉
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yazaki Corp
Original Assignee
Yazaki Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yazaki Corp filed Critical Yazaki Corp
Priority to JP2003396556A priority Critical patent/JP4283650B2/en
Publication of JP2005158547A publication Critical patent/JP2005158547A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4283650B2 publication Critical patent/JP4283650B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Installation Of Indoor Wiring (AREA)

Description

本発明は、ワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法及びその良否判定方法に関し、特に、張力を考慮して電線の線長設計を行うようにして、より設計精度を高めたワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法及びこの線長設計方法を応用したワイヤハーネス用電線の良否判定方法に関する。   TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a wire harness wire length design method and a quality determination method thereof, and more particularly to a wire harness wire having a higher design accuracy by designing the wire length in consideration of tension. The present invention relates to a long design method and a quality determination method for a wire harness wire to which the wire length design method is applied.

車両や屋内には、複数の電線が束ねられて構成され、電子機器、電子部品等を電気的に接続する、いわゆる、ワイヤハーネスが配策されている。このようなワイヤハーネスを製造する際には、通常、カーメーカ等からの保護部材の取付位置や各部寸法等が付されたワイヤハーネス設計図に基づいて、ワイヤハーネスメーカが、ワイヤハーネスを構成する各電線の切断寸法を決定した後、これら電線端末にコネクタ等を取り付ける。そして、このような電線群が、作業者によって、治具板上で布線されて、テープ部材等で結束されてワイヤハーネスが完成する。従来、このようなワイヤーハーネス製造工程において、各電線の切断寸法は、上記設計図に付された寸法情報を参照して、例えば、中心線寸法とよばれる手法により設計されていた。   A so-called wire harness is arranged in a vehicle or indoors, which is configured by bundling a plurality of electric wires and electrically connecting electronic devices, electronic components, and the like. When manufacturing such a wire harness, the wire harness manufacturer usually configures the wire harness based on the wire harness design drawing to which the mounting position of each protective member and the dimensions of each part are attached from a car manufacturer or the like. After determining the cut dimensions of the wires, a connector or the like is attached to these wire ends. And such an electric wire group is wired on a jig | tool board by an operator, and is bound by a tape member etc., and a wire harness is completed. Conventionally, in such a wire harness manufacturing process, the cutting dimension of each electric wire has been designed by, for example, a method called a center line dimension with reference to the dimension information attached to the design drawing.

ところが、図9に示すように、治具板上に取り付けらたフォークFをガイドにして、ワイヤハーネスW/Hを製造する際に、上記設計した寸法通りの各電線を真っ直ぐに束ねて、コネクタC側からテープ部材Pを巻きつけていった場合、例えば、図9のW1で示すように、ワイヤハーネスW/Hを構成する電線群Wのいずれかの電線にたるみが発生する場合がある。このようなたるみは電線余長として現れ、図10(A)のW1′に示すように、折り曲げたり、或いは、図10(B)のW1″に示すように、巻いた状態にして吸収し、他の電線群と共にテープ巻きせざるを得ない状況になる。そうすると、ワイヤハーネスW/Hが肥大化したり、電気的にも好ましくない状況が発生する。   However, as shown in FIG. 9, when manufacturing the wire harness W / H using the fork F attached on the jig plate as a guide, the electric wires according to the above designed dimensions are bundled straight, and the connector When the tape member P is wound from the C side, for example, as indicated by W1 in FIG. 9, sagging may occur in any one of the wires in the wire group W constituting the wire harness W / H. Such a sag appears as an extra wire length, and is bent or absorbed as shown by W1 ′ in FIG. 10 (A) or wound as shown by W1 ″ in FIG. 10 (B), When the tape is wound together with other wire groups, the wire harness W / H becomes enlarged or electrically unfavorable.

そこで、このような電線余長を補正するために、以下のような手法が提案されている。例えば、上記のように中心線寸法により設計した電線を、実際に治具板上で調べて、その電線余長を修正する手法がある(第1従来手法)。また、例えば、ワイヤハーネスの直径に基づいて、フォークサイズと治具レイアウトに合わせて線長補正を行う手法がある(第2従来手法)。更に、下記特許文献1に示されるように、電線の最小屈曲半径に基づいて線長補正を行う手法もある(第3従来手法)。
特開2000−11778号
Therefore, in order to correct such a wire surplus length, the following method has been proposed. For example, there is a method in which an electric wire designed with a center line dimension as described above is actually examined on a jig plate and its extra wire length is corrected (first conventional method). Further, for example, there is a method of correcting the line length in accordance with the fork size and the jig layout based on the diameter of the wire harness (second conventional method). Furthermore, as shown in the following Patent Document 1, there is also a method of performing wire length correction based on the minimum bending radius of the electric wire (third conventional method).
JP 2000-11778

ところが、上記第1従来手法によると、繰り返し試作が必要であるという問題があった。また、上記第2従来手法によると、補正用経路は実際の電線経路との相違が大きいので、線長再修正のための試作が必要であるという問題があった。更に、上記第3従来手法によると、実際の作業で余長の発生原因のひとつとなる張力を考慮していないので、過剰な張力が発生しやすく、現実とはやや異なる補正結果になることが考えられる。   However, according to the first conventional method, there is a problem that repeated trial manufacture is necessary. Further, according to the second conventional method, since the correction path is largely different from the actual wire path, there is a problem that a prototype for recorrecting the line length is necessary. Furthermore, according to the third conventional method, since tension that is one of the causes of excess length in actual work is not taken into account, excessive tension is likely to occur, and the correction result may be slightly different from the actual one. Conceivable.

よって本発明は、上述した現状に鑑み、張力を考慮して電線の線長設計を行うようにして、より設計精度を高め、試作品作成や試行錯誤による時間浪費も軽減するワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法を提供することを課題としている。また、本発明は、この線長設計方法を応用した、好適なワイヤハーネス用電線の良否判定方法を提供することを課題としている。   Therefore, in view of the present situation described above, the present invention is designed for a wire harness wire that increases the design accuracy and reduces time waste due to trial creation and trial and error by designing the wire length in consideration of tension. It is an object to provide a line length design method. Moreover, this invention makes it the subject to provide the quality determination method of the suitable electric wire for wire harnesses which applied this wire length design method.

上記課題を解決するためになされた請求項1記載のワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法は、ワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法において、ワイヤハーネス用コネクタの最大許容張力と端子圧着強度と電線伸長強度との中で、最小値を呈するものを張力参照基準値とし、この値の4分の1を最大許容電線張力とした場合の、前記被設計電線の両端に対する前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力下における、3つのフォークの配置による3点拘束に基づいて計算される被設計電線の近似曲線を補正基準経路とし、前記補正基準経路は、前記3点拘束下で前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力を受けて曲げられた前記被設計電線の曲率円を、前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力と前記3つのフォークの相対的な位置関係とにより変動する半径を有する補正基準円として求め、前記3つのフォークの配置に基づくフォーク中心線に平行し、且つ、前記補正基準円と正接する2本の延長線をひくことにより、前記2本の延長線と、前記2本の延長線と正接する2点間の前記補正基準円の一部とで作成され、前記被設計電線の両端に対する最大許容電線張力下での前記補正基準経路の電線長である最大張力線長を求める最大張力線長計算ステップと、前記最大張力線長に、吸収可能な線長として、ワイヤハーネスの製造工程におけるテープ巻き工程で螺旋状に巻くことにより吸収できる余長吸収量を加えた前記補正基準経路の電線長である最大余長線長を求める最大余長線長計算ステップと、前記最大余長線長と前記最大張力線長との間の範囲である電線長最大可能範囲を求める電線長最大可能範囲計算ステップと、を含み、前記電線長最大可能範囲に基づいて、前記被設計電線の設計目標線長を決定する、ことを特徴とする。 The wire length design method for a wire harness wire according to claim 1, which has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems, is a wire length design method for a wire harness wire. Among the tensile strengths, the one that exhibits the minimum value is the tension reference standard value, and a quarter of this value is the maximum allowable wire tension, which is smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension for both ends of the designed wire. An approximate curve of the designed wire calculated based on the three-point constraint by the arrangement of three forks under tension is used as a correction reference path, and the correction reference path is smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension under the three-point constraint. The radius of curvature of the designed wire bent under tension varies depending on the tension smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension and the relative positional relationship of the three forks. The two extension lines by drawing two extension lines parallel to the fork center line based on the arrangement of the three forks and tangent to the correction reference circle, The maximum tension which is created by a part of the correction reference circle between two points tangent to the two extended lines and is the wire length of the correction reference path under the maximum allowable wire tension with respect to both ends of the designed wire The maximum tension line length calculation step for obtaining the line length, and the extra tension absorption that can be absorbed by winding in a spiral manner in the tape winding process in the manufacturing process of the wire harness is added to the maximum tension line length as an absorbable line length. The maximum extra length line length calculating step for obtaining the maximum extra length line length that is the electric length of the correction reference path, and the electric wire for obtaining the maximum possible length of the electric wire length that is a range between the maximum extra length line length and the maximum tension line length. Longest Can include ranges and calculation steps, and on the basis of the electrical wire length maximum range, to determine the design target line length of the object to be designed wire, characterized in that.

請求項1記載の発明によれば、適切な張力下における3点拘束に基づいて計算される被設計電線の近似曲線を補正基準経路とし、被設計電線の両端に対する最大許容電線張力下での補正基準経路の電線長である最大張力線長と最大張力線長に吸収可能な長さとして余長吸収量を加えた補正基準経路の電線長である最大余長線長との間の範囲である電線長最大可能範囲が求められ、電線長最大可能範囲に基づいて、被設計電線の設計目標線長が決定される。 According to the first aspect of the present invention, the approximate curve of the designed wire calculated based on the three-point constraint under an appropriate tension is used as the correction reference path, and the correction is performed under the maximum allowable wire tension for both ends of the designed wire. Electric wire that is in the range between the maximum tension line length that is the wire length of the reference path and the maximum surplus length line length that is the length of the corrected reference path with the extra length absorption added to the maximum tension line length The longest possible range is obtained, and the design target wire length of the designed wire is determined based on the maximum possible wire length range.

上記課題を解決するためになされた請求項2記載のワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法は、請求項1記載の線長設計方法において、前記被設計電線の許容公差の上限と下限との間の範囲である公差範囲と、前記電線長最大可能範囲とを比較し、前記公差範囲が前記電線長最大可能範囲内に収まるように、前記被設計電線の設計目標線長を決定する電線長決定ステップ、を更に含むことを特徴とする。   The wire length design method for a wire harness for a wire harness according to claim 2, which has been made to solve the above-mentioned problem, is the wire length design method according to claim 1, wherein an upper limit and a lower limit of an allowable tolerance of the designed wire are set. The tolerance range that is the range of the wire length is compared with the maximum possible wire length range, and the design target wire length of the designed wire is determined so that the tolerance range is within the maximum possible wire length range The method further includes a step.

請求項2記載の発明によれば、被設計電線の許容公差の上限と下限との間の範囲である公差範囲と、電線長最大可能範囲とが比較され、公差範囲が電線長最大可能範囲内に収まるように、被設計電線の設計目標線長が決定される。   According to the second aspect of the present invention, the tolerance range which is the range between the upper limit and the lower limit of the allowable tolerance of the designed wire is compared with the maximum possible cable length range, and the tolerance range is within the maximum possible cable length range. The design target wire length of the to-be-designed electric wire is determined so as to be within the range.

上記課題を解決するためになされた請求項3記載のワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法は、請求項2記載の線長設計方法において、前記電線長決定ステップでは、前記被設計電線の余長量をできるだけ抑えると同時にできるだけ前記張力を抑えるようにし、且つ、前記公差範囲が前記電線長最大可能範囲内に収まるように、前記被設計電線の設計目標線長を決定する、ことを特徴とする。 The wire length design method for a wire harness for a wire harness according to claim 3, wherein the wire length design method according to claim 2 is an extra length of the designed wire in the wire length determination step. The design target line length of the to-be-designed electric wire is determined so as to suppress the tension as much as possible and to suppress the tension as much as possible and to keep the tolerance range within the maximum possible range of the electric wire length. .

請求項3記載の発明によれば、被設計電線の余長量をできるだけ抑えると同時にできるだけ被設計電線の両端に対する張力を抑えるようにし、且つ、公差範囲が電線長最大可能範囲内に収まるように、被設計電線の設計目標線長が決定される。   According to the third aspect of the present invention, it is possible to suppress the extra length of the designed wire as much as possible, and to suppress the tension on both ends of the designed wire as much as possible, and to keep the tolerance range within the maximum possible range of the wire length. The design target line length of the designed wire is determined.

上記課題を解決するためになされた請求項記載のワイヤハーネス用電線の良否判定方法は、ワイヤハーネス用コネクタの最大許容張力と端子圧着強度と電線伸長強度との中で、最小値を呈するものを張力参照基準値とし、この値の4分の1を最大許容電線張力とした場合の、前記被設計電線の両端に対する前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力下における、3つのフォークの配置による3点拘束に基づいて計算される被設計電線の近似曲線を補正基準経路とし、前記補正基準経路は、前記3点拘束下で前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力を受けて曲げられた前記被設計電線の曲率円を、前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力と前記3つのフォークの相対的な位置関係とにより変動する半径を有する補正基準円として求め、前記3つのフォークの配置に基づくフォーク中心線に平行し、且つ、前記補正基準円と正接する2本の延長線をひくことにより、前記2本の延長線と、前記2本の延長線と正接する2点間の前記補正基準円の一部とで作成され、前記被設計電線の両端に対する最大許容電線張力下での前記補正基準経路の電線長である最大張力線長を求める最大張力線長計算ステップと、前記最大張力線長に、吸収可能な線長として、ワイヤハーネスの製造工程におけるテープ巻き工程で螺旋状に巻くことにより吸収できる余長吸収量を加えた前記補正基準経路の電線長である最大余長線長を求める最大余長線長計算ステップと、前記最大余長線長と前記最大張力線長との間の範囲である電線長最大可能範囲を求める電線長最大可能範囲計算ステップと、前記被試験電線の公差の上限と下限との間の範囲である公差範囲と、前記電線長最大可能範囲とを比較し、この比較結果に基づき前記被試験電線の良否を判定する良否判定ステップと、を含むことを特徴とする。 The wire harness wire quality determination method according to claim 4, which has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems, exhibits a minimum value among the maximum allowable tension, terminal crimping strength, and wire extension strength of the wire harness connector. 3 points due to the arrangement of three forks under tension smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension with respect to both ends of the designed wire, where is the tension reference standard value and ¼ of this value is the maximum allowable wire tension An approximate curve of the designed wire calculated based on the constraint is used as a correction reference path, and the correction reference path is a curve of the designed wire bent by receiving a tension smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension under the three-point constraint. A curvature circle is obtained as a correction reference circle having a radius that varies depending on the tension smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension and the relative positional relationship of the three forks. 2 tangents to the two extension lines and the two extension lines by drawing two extension lines parallel to the fork center line based on the arrangement of the mark and tangent to the correction reference circle A maximum tension line length calculation step for obtaining a maximum tension line length that is a wire length of the correction reference path under a maximum allowable wire tension with respect to both ends of the designed wire , and a portion of the correction reference circle between points; And the maximum tension wire length, the wire length of the correction reference path as an absorbable wire length plus a surplus absorption amount that can be absorbed by spirally winding in the tape winding step in the wire harness manufacturing process. A maximum extra-length line length calculating step for obtaining a maximum extra-length line length; an electric wire length maximum possible range calculating step for obtaining an electric wire length maximum possible range that is a range between the maximum extra-length line length and the maximum tension line length; Public test wire Including a tolerance range which is a range between the upper limit and the lower limit of the above and a maximum possible range of the wire length, and a pass / fail judgment step for judging pass / fail of the wire under test based on the comparison result. And

請求項記載の発明によれば、適切な張力下における3点拘束に基づいて計算される被試験電線の近似曲線を補正基準経路とし、被試験電線の両端に対する最大許容電線張力下での補正基準経路の電線長である最大張力線長と最大張力線長に吸収可能な長さとして余長吸収量を加えた補正基準経路の電線長である最大余長線長との間の範囲である電線長最大可能範囲が求められ、被試験電線の公差範囲と電線長最大可能範囲との比較結果に基づき、被試験電線の良否が判定される。 According to the invention described in claim 4 , the correction under the maximum allowable wire tension with respect to both ends of the wire under test is made the approximate curve of the wire under test calculated based on the three-point constraint under an appropriate tension as the correction reference path. Electric wire that is in the range between the maximum tension line length that is the wire length of the reference path and the maximum surplus length line length that is the length of the corrected reference path with the extra length absorption added to the maximum tension line length The longest possible range is determined, and the quality of the wire under test is determined based on the comparison result between the tolerance range of the wire under test and the maximum possible range of the wire length.

請求項1記載の発明によれば、適切な張力下における3点拘束に基づいて計算される被設計電線の近似曲線を補正基準経路とし、被設計電線の両端に対する最大許容電線張力下での補正基準経路の電線長である最大張力線長と最大張力線長に吸収可能な長さとして余長吸収量を加えた補正基準経路の電線長である最大余長線長との間の範囲である電線長最大可能範囲が求められ、電線長最大可能範囲に基づいて、被設計電線の設計目標線長が決定される。これにより、従来なされていなかった、張力を考慮した電線の線長設計が可能になる。すなわち、電線端部に取り付けられるコネクタ等に過剰な張力がかかることがなく、余長量も許容される範囲に抑えられた線長設計が可能になる。また、従来手法のような試作品作成や試行錯誤による時間浪費も軽減可能になる。また、テープ巻き工程で想定される、被設計電線を螺旋状に巻くことにより吸収できる電線余長量、すなわち、上記電線長最大可能範囲が設定される。したがって、電線長最大可能範囲は非常に現実的であり、より現実に即したワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計が可能になる。 According to the first aspect of the present invention, the approximate curve of the designed wire calculated based on the three-point constraint under an appropriate tension is used as the correction reference path, and the correction is performed under the maximum allowable wire tension for both ends of the designed wire. Electric wire that is in the range between the maximum tension line length that is the wire length of the reference path and the maximum surplus length line length that is the length of the corrected reference path with the extra length absorption added to the maximum tension line length The longest possible range is obtained, and the design target wire length of the designed wire is determined based on the maximum possible wire length range. This makes it possible to design the wire length in consideration of the tension, which has not been made conventionally. That is, excessive tension is not applied to the connector or the like attached to the end portion of the electric wire, and a wire length design is possible in which the extra length is limited to an allowable range. In addition, time waste due to trial production and trial and error as in the conventional method can be reduced. Moreover, the amount of extra wire length that can be absorbed by spirally winding the to-be-designed electric wire, which is assumed in the tape winding step, that is, the above-described maximum possible electric wire length is set. Therefore, the maximum possible range of the wire length is very realistic, and the wire length of the wire harness wire can be designed more realistically.

請求項2記載の発明によれば、被設計電線の許容公差の上限と下限との間の範囲である公差範囲と、電線長最大可能範囲とが比較され、公差範囲が電線長最大可能範囲内に収まるように、被設計電線の設計目標線長が決定される。これにより、被設計電線の許容公差も考慮した電線の線長設計が可能になる。   According to the second aspect of the present invention, the tolerance range which is the range between the upper limit and the lower limit of the allowable tolerance of the designed wire is compared with the maximum possible cable length range, and the tolerance range is within the maximum possible cable length range. The design target wire length of the to-be-designed electric wire is determined so as to be within the range. As a result, it is possible to design the wire length in consideration of the allowable tolerance of the designed wire.

請求項3記載の発明によれば、被設計電線の余長量をできるだけ抑えると同時にできるだけ被設計電線の両端に対する張力を抑えるようにし、且つ、公差範囲が電線長最大可能範囲内に収まるように、被設計電線の設計目標線長が決定される。これにより、コネクタ等に過剰な張力がかかることがなく、且つ、余長量も最低限に抑えた線長設計が可能になる。すなわち、より精度の高いワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計が可能になる。   According to the third aspect of the present invention, it is possible to suppress the extra length of the designed wire as much as possible, and to suppress the tension on both ends of the designed wire as much as possible, and to keep the tolerance range within the maximum possible range of the wire length. The design target line length of the designed wire is determined. As a result, it is possible to design a wire length that does not apply excessive tension to the connector or the like and also minimizes the amount of extra length. That is, the wire length of the wire harness wire with higher accuracy can be designed.

請求項記載の発明によれば、適切な張力下における3点拘束に基づいて計算される被試験電線の近似曲線を補正基準経路とし、被試験電線の両端に対する最大許容電線張力下での補正基準経路の電線長である最大張力線長と最大張力線長に吸収可能な長さとして余長吸収量を加えた補正基準経路の電線長である最大余長線長との間の範囲である電線長最大可能範囲が求められ、被試験電線の公差範囲と電線長最大可能範囲との比較結果に基づき、被試験電線の良否が判定される。これにより、電線長最大可能範囲を利用して、被試験電線の公差範囲適正か否かを判定することが可能になる。したがって、被試験電線の良否や実用性が正確に判定可能になる。 According to the invention described in claim 4 , the correction under the maximum allowable wire tension with respect to both ends of the wire under test is made the approximate curve of the wire under test calculated based on the three-point constraint under an appropriate tension as the correction reference path. Electric wire that is in the range between the maximum tension line length that is the wire length of the reference path and the maximum surplus length line length that is the length of the corrected reference path with the extra length absorption added to the maximum tension line length The longest possible range is determined, and the quality of the wire under test is determined based on the comparison result between the tolerance range of the wire under test and the maximum possible range of the wire length. As a result, it is possible to determine whether the tolerance range of the wire under test is appropriate using the maximum possible range of the wire length. Therefore, it is possible to accurately determine the quality and practicality of the wire under test.

以下、本発明の実施の形態を図面に基づいて説明する。まず、本発明をより明確に理解するために、以下のような必要な用語の定義を行う。図1は、3点拘束曲線等を説明するための図である。図2は、余長電線長及び余長吸収量等を説明するための図である。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. First, in order to understand the present invention more clearly, the following necessary terms are defined. FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining a three-point constraint curve and the like. FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining the extra length electric wire length, the extra length absorption amount, and the like.

3点拘束曲線:図1のW1に示すように、任意の3箇所b1、b2、b3の拘束の下で曲げた電線形状を3点拘束曲線という。図中、電線W1の一部は、3又フォークF1にて拘束されているが、これは3又フォークF1に限定されることはない。図中、CL1及びCL2はフォーク中心線を示す。   Three-point constraint curve: As shown by W1 in FIG. 1, the shape of the electric wire bent under the constraint of arbitrary three locations b1, b2, and b3 is referred to as a three-point constraint curve. In the drawing, a part of the electric wire W1 is restrained by the three-fork F1, but this is not limited to the three-fork F1. In the figure, CL1 and CL2 indicate fork centerlines.

電線余長:図2に示すように、余長電線長(ワイヤハーネスW/Hにおける余長電線w2の長さ)と直線状電線長(ワイヤハーネスW/Hにおける直線状電線w1の長さ)との線長差を電線余長という。直線状電線長は、ワイヤハーネスW/Hのワイヤ中心長に一致する。   Wire surplus length: As shown in FIG. 2, the surplus wire length (the length of the surplus wire w2 in the wire harness W / H) and the straight wire length (the length of the straight wire w1 in the wire harness W / H). The difference in wire length is called the extra wire length. The straight wire length matches the wire center length of the wire harness W / H.

余長吸収量:図2に示すように、テープ巻き工程で螺旋状に巻くことができる螺旋電線長(ワイヤハーネスW/Hにおける螺旋状電線w3の長さ)と上記直線状電線長との線長差を余長吸収量という。   2. Surplus length absorption amount: As shown in FIG. 2, a line between the length of the helical electric wire (the length of the helical electric wire w3 in the wire harness W / H) that can be helically wound in the tape winding process and the linear electric wire length. The length difference is called the extra length absorption.

最大許容電線張力:ワイヤハーネス用コネクタの最大許容張力と端子圧着強度と電線伸長強度との中で、最小値を呈するものを張力参照基準値とし、この値の4分の1を最大許容電線張力という。 The maximum allowable wire tension: in the maximum allowable load and terminal crimping strength and wire elongation strength of the connector wire harness, those exhibiting the minimum value as the tension reference standard value, the maximum allowable wire tension quarter of the value That's it.

電線長許容公差:ワイヤハーネスの製造工程における諸許容公差上限値の総和を電線長許容公差上限とし、その諸許容公差下限値の総和を電線長許容公差下限とする。電線長許容公差上限と電線長許容公差下限との間の範囲を電線長許容公差(図6参照)という。   Wire length tolerance: The sum of the allowable tolerance upper limits in the wire harness manufacturing process is the wire length allowable tolerance upper limit, and the sum of the allowable tolerance lower limits is the wire length allowable tolerance lower limit. A range between the upper limit of the allowable wire length tolerance and the lower limit of the allowable allowable wire length is referred to as an allowable allowable wire length (see FIG. 6).

また、図3及び図4を用いて、本発明で用いられる補正基準経路について説明する。図3は、補正基準経路等を説明するための図である。図4は、最大許容張力経路、最小許容張力経路及び適切な張力経路との関係を説明するための図である。   The correction reference path used in the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining a correction reference path and the like. FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining the relationship between the maximum allowable tension path, the minimum allowable tension path, and an appropriate tension path.

補正基準経路は、適切な張力を受けた3点拘束曲線に基づく近似曲線である。補正基準経路は、以下のようにして作成する。   The correction reference path is an approximate curve based on a three-point constraint curve subjected to appropriate tension. The correction reference path is created as follows.

例えば、上記図1のW1で示すように、3点拘束下で適切な張力f2、f3を受けて曲げられた電線の曲率円を求める。このような曲率円を、図3で示すように、補正基準円RCという。なお、補正基準円RCの半径rは、張力f2、f3の大きさ、フォークF1、F2、F3の相対的な位置関係、すなわち、張力f2、f3の方向により変動し得る。   For example, as indicated by W1 in FIG. 1, the curvature circle of the electric wire bent under appropriate tensions f2 and f3 under the three-point constraint is obtained. Such a curvature circle is referred to as a correction reference circle RC as shown in FIG. The radius r of the correction reference circle RC can vary depending on the magnitudes of the tensions f2 and f3 and the relative positional relationship between the forks F1, F2 and F3, that is, the directions of the tensions f2 and f3.

次に、図3に示すように、フォークF1、F2、F3の配置に基づくフォーク中心線CL1、CL2に平行し、且つ、上記補正基準円RCと正接するような、2本の直線1−2及び3−4をひく。これらの直線を延長線1−2及び3−4という。そして、上記補正基準円RCの一部2−3と延長線1−2及び3−4とを合成した、補正基準経路を求める。 Next, as shown in FIG. 3, two straight lines P 1-1 parallel to the fork center lines CL1 and CL2 based on the arrangement of the forks F1, F2 and F3 and tangent to the correction reference circle RC are shown. catching P 2 and P 3- P 4. These straight lines are referred to as extension lines P 1 -P 2 and P 3 -P 4. Then, a correction reference path is obtained by combining a part P 2- P 3 of the correction reference circle RC with the extension lines P 1 -P 2 and P 3- P 4.

上記適切な張力は、
最小許容張力<適切な張力<最大許容電線張力
の関係を満たさなければならない。ここで、最小許容張力とは、上記最大許容余長量を呈する経路の張力をいう。
The appropriate tension is
The relationship of minimum allowable tension <appropriate tension <maximum allowable wire tension must be satisfied. Here, the minimum allowable tension refers to the tension of the path exhibiting the maximum allowable extra length.

また、最大許容張力経路(最大許容電線張力に対応する経路)と、最小許容張力経路(最小許容張力に対応する経路)と、適切な張力経路(適切な張力に対応する経路)との関係は、図4に示すような関係になる。 In addition, the relationship between the maximum allowable tension path (path corresponding to the maximum allowable wire tension), the minimum allowable tension path (path corresponding to the minimum allowable tension), and the appropriate tension path (path corresponding to the appropriate tension) is The relationship is as shown in FIG.

次に、図5及び図6を用いて、本発明のワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法の一実施形態について説明する。図5は、本発明のワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法の一実施形態を示すフローチャートである。図6は、ワイヤ中心線長、最大余長線長、許容上限線長、設計目標線長、許容下限線長及び最大張力線長の関係を示す図である。   Next, an embodiment of a wire length design method for a wire harness wire according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. 5 and 6. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an embodiment of a wire length design method for a wire harness wire according to the present invention. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the relationship among the wire center line length, the maximum extra length line length, the allowable upper limit line length, the design target line length, the allowable lower limit line length, and the maximum tension line length.

この線長設計方法では、まず、図5のステップS101、ステップS102及びステップS103において、被設計電線の最大張力線長、最大余長線長及び電線長最大可能範囲を求める。最大張力線長は、図4に示した最大許容張力経路の長さに対応し、最大許容電線張力下での補正基準経路の電線長である(図6のLf)。また、最大余長線長は、図4に示した最小許容張力経路の長さに対応し、上記最大張力線長に吸収可能な線長として余長吸収量を加えた補正基準経路の電線長である(図6のLs)。そして、電線長最大可能範囲は、最大余長線長と最大張力線長との間の範囲である(図6ではdlfとdlsとの間の範囲)。なお、ステップS101、ステップS102及びステップS103はそれぞれ、請求項1中の最大張力線長計算ステップ、最大余長線長計算ステップ及び電線長最大可能範囲計算ステップに対応する。 In this wire length design method, first, in steps S101, S102, and S103 in FIG. The maximum tension line length corresponds to the length of the maximum allowable tension path shown in FIG. 4, and is the wire length of the correction reference path under the maximum allowable cable tension (Lf in FIG. 6). Further, the maximum extra length line length corresponds to the length of the minimum allowable tension path shown in FIG. 4 and is the wire length of the correction reference path obtained by adding the extra length absorption amount to the maximum tension line length that can be absorbed. Yes (Ls in FIG. 6). The maximum possible wire length range is a range between the maximum extra length line length and the maximum tension line length (in FIG. 6, a range between dlf and dls). Note that step S101, step S102, and step S103 correspond to the maximum tension line length calculation step, the maximum extra length line length calculation step, and the wire length maximum possible range calculation step in claim 1, respectively.

次に、ステップS104及びステップS105において、被設計電線の許容公差下限データ及び許容公差上限データを取得し、ステップS106において、公差範囲を求める。許容公差下限データ及び許容公差上限データは、切断結果、圧着結果、フォーク間距離等に基づいて、予め求められているデータであり、これらがステップS104及びステップS105で取得される。   Next, in step S104 and step S105, allowable tolerance lower limit data and allowable tolerance upper limit data of the designed wire are acquired, and in step S106, a tolerance range is obtained. The allowable tolerance lower limit data and the allowable tolerance upper limit data are data obtained in advance based on the cutting result, the crimping result, the distance between the forks, and the like, and these are acquired in step S104 and step S105.

なお、許容公差下限に対応する電線長は図6において許容公差下限長Llで示し、許容公差上限に対応する電線長さは図6において許容公差上限長Luで示している。公差範囲は、これら許容公差上限と許容公差下限との間の範囲である(図6ではdllとdluとの間の範囲a+b)。なお、図6において、上記dlf、dll、dld、dlu及びdlsに対応する張力をそれぞれ、Fmax、Fdu、Fd、Fdl及びFminで示している。また、Lcはワイヤ中心線長を示している。   The wire length corresponding to the allowable tolerance lower limit is indicated by the allowable tolerance lower limit length L1 in FIG. 6, and the wire length corresponding to the allowable tolerance upper limit is indicated by the allowable tolerance upper limit length Lu in FIG. The tolerance range is a range between the allowable tolerance upper limit and the allowable tolerance lower limit (range a + b between dll and dlu in FIG. 6). In FIG. 6, tensions corresponding to the above-mentioned dlf, dll, dld, dlu, and dls are indicated by Fmax, Fdu, Fd, Fdl, and Fmin, respectively. Lc represents the wire center line length.

そして、ステップS107及びステップS108において、上記公差範囲(図6のdllとdluとの間の範囲)が、電線長最大可能範囲(図6ではdlfとdlsとの間の範囲)内に収まるように(ステップS107のY)、被設計電線の設計目標線長(図6のLd)を決定する。なお、ステップS107及びステップS108はそれぞれ、請求項1中の電線長決定ステップに対応する。   In step S107 and step S108, the tolerance range (the range between dll and dlu in FIG. 6) falls within the maximum possible wire length range (the range between dlf and dls in FIG. 6). (Y of step S107), the design target wire length (Ld of FIG. 6) of the to-be-designed electric wire is determined. Step S107 and step S108 each correspond to the wire length determination step in claim 1.

この実施形態によると、被設計電線の公差範囲が電線長最大可能範囲内に収まるように、被設計電線の設計目標線長が決定される。これにより、従来なされていなかった、張力を考慮した電線の線長設計が可能になる。すなわち、電線端部に取り付けられるコネクタ等に過剰な張力がかかることがなく、余長量も許容される範囲に抑えられた線長設計が可能になる。また、従来手法のような試作品作成や試行錯誤による時間浪費も軽減可能になる。   According to this embodiment, the design target wire length of the designed wire is determined so that the tolerance range of the designed wire is within the maximum possible length of the wire. This makes it possible to design the wire length in consideration of the tension, which has not been made conventionally. That is, excessive tension is not applied to the connector or the like attached to the end portion of the electric wire, and a wire length design is possible in which the extra length is limited to an allowable range. In addition, time waste due to trial production and trial and error as in the conventional method can be reduced.

次に、図7を加えて、本発明のワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法の他の実施形態について説明する。図7は、本発明のワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法の他の実施形態を示すフローチャートである。   Next, with reference to FIG. 7, another embodiment of the wire length designing method for a wire harness wire according to the present invention will be described. FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing another embodiment of the wire length designing method for a wire harness wire according to the present invention.

この線長設計方法では、まず、図7のステップS201、ステップS202及びステップS203において、第1実施形態のステップS101、ステップS102及びステップS103と同様、被設計電線の最大張力線長、最大余長線長及び電線長最大可能範囲(図6のdlfとdlsとの間の範囲)を求める。   In this wire length design method, first, in step S201, step S202, and step S203 of FIG. 7, as in steps S101, S102, and S103 of the first embodiment, the maximum tension line length and the maximum extra length line of the designed wire. The maximum possible range of length and wire length (range between dlf and dls in FIG. 6) is obtained.

次に、ステップS204及びステップS205において、第1実施形態のステップS104及びステップS105と同様、被設計電線の許容公差下限データ及び許容公差上限データを取得し、ステップS206において、第1実施形態のステップS106と同様、公差範囲(図6のdllとdluとの間の範囲)を求める。   Next, in step S204 and step S205, as in steps S104 and S105 of the first embodiment, the allowable tolerance lower limit data and the allowable tolerance upper limit data of the designed wire are acquired, and in step S206, the steps of the first embodiment are obtained. Similar to S106, a tolerance range (range between dll and dlu in FIG. 6) is obtained.

そして、ステップS207〜ステップS209において、上記公差範囲が、電線長最大可能範囲内に収まるように(ステップS207のY)、更に、電線余長量をできるだけ抑え、且つ、できるだけ電線張力を抑えるように、被設計電線の設計目標線長(図6のLd)を決定する。なお、実施例2は、請求項3に対応する。   In step S207 to step S209, the tolerance range is within the maximum possible range of the wire length (Y in step S207), and further, the amount of extra wire length is suppressed as much as possible, and the wire tension is suppressed as much as possible. Then, the design target wire length (Ld in FIG. 6) of the designed wire is determined. The second embodiment corresponds to the third aspect.

この実施形態によると、被設計電線の余長量をできるだけ抑えると同時にできるだけ被設計電線の両端に対する張力を抑えるようにし、且つ、公差範囲が電線長最大可能範囲内に収まるように、被設計電線の設計目標線長が決定される。これにより、コネクタ等に過剰な張力がかかることがなく、且つ、余長量も最低限に抑えた線長設計が可能になる。すなわち、より精度の高いワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計が可能になる。   According to this embodiment, it is possible to suppress the remaining length of the designed wire as much as possible, and to suppress the tension on both ends of the designed wire as much as possible, and to keep the tolerance range within the maximum possible range of the wire length. The design target line length is determined. As a result, it is possible to design a wire length that does not apply excessive tension to the connector or the like and also minimizes the amount of extra length. That is, the wire length of the wire harness wire with higher accuracy can be designed.

更に、図8を加えて、上記線長設計方法を応用したワイヤハーネス用電線の良否判定方法について説明する。図8は、本発明のワイヤハーネス用電線の良否判定方法の一実施形態を示すフローチャートである。   Furthermore, FIG. 8 is added and the quality determination method of the electric wire for wire harnesses which applied the said wire length design method is demonstrated. FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing an embodiment of a method for determining the quality of a wire harness wire according to the present invention.

この判定方法では、まず、図8のステップS301、ステップS302及びステップS303において、上記第1実施形態のステップS101、ステップS102及びステップS103と同様、被試験電線の最大張力線長、最大余長線長及び電線長最大可能範囲(図6のdlfとdlsとの間の範囲)を求める。なお、ステップS301、ステップS302及びステップS303はそれぞれ、請求項中の最大張力線長計算ステップ、最大余長線長計算ステップ及び電線長最大可能範囲計算ステップに対応する。 In this determination method, first, in step S301, step S302, and step S303 of FIG. 8, the maximum tension line length and the maximum extra length line length of the wire under test are the same as in steps S101, S102, and S103 of the first embodiment. The maximum possible wire length range (range between dlf and dls in FIG. 6) is obtained. Note that step S301, step S302, and step S303 respectively correspond to the maximum tension line length calculation step, the maximum extra length line length calculation step, and the wire length maximum possible range calculation step in claim 4 .

次に、ステップS304及びステップS305において、第1実施形態のステップS104及びステップS105と同様、被試験電線の許容公差下限データ及び許容公差上限データを取得し、ステップS306において、第1実施形態のステップS106と同様、公差範囲(図6のdllとdluとの間の範囲)を求める。   Next, in step S304 and step S305, as in step S104 and step S105 of the first embodiment, the allowable tolerance lower limit data and the allowable tolerance upper limit data of the wire under test are acquired, and in step S306, the steps of the first embodiment are obtained. Similar to S106, a tolerance range (range between dll and dlu in FIG. 6) is obtained.

そして、ステップS307において、上記公差範囲が、上記電線長最大可能範囲よりも狭いか否か、すなわち、公差範囲が電線長最大可能範囲内に収まりきるか否かが判定される。上記公差範囲が、上記電線長最大可能範囲よりも狭い、すなわち、公差範囲が電線長最大可能範囲内に収まりきると判定されると(ステップS307のY)、この被試験電線は良品とみなすことができ、ステップS308において、この被試験電線を良品と判定し、さもなければ、すなわち、公差範囲が電線長最大可能範囲内に収まりきらないと判定されると(ステップS307のN)、この被試験電線は不良品とみなすことができ、ステップS309において、この被試験電線を不良品と判定する。ステップS307は、請求項の良否判定ステップに対応する。 In step S307, it is determined whether or not the tolerance range is narrower than the maximum wire length possible range, that is, whether or not the tolerance range is within the maximum wire length possible range. If it is determined that the tolerance range is narrower than the maximum possible wire length range, that is, the tolerance range is within the maximum possible wire length range (Y in step S307), the wire under test may be regarded as a non-defective product. In step S308, it is determined that the electric wire under test is a non-defective product. Otherwise, if it is determined that the tolerance range does not fall within the maximum possible length of the electric wire (N in step S307), the electric wire under test is determined. The electric wire can be regarded as a defective product, and in step S309, the electric wire under test is determined as a defective product. Step S307 corresponds to the quality determination step of claim 4 .

この実施形態によると、上記ワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法を応用して、被試験電線の公差範囲適正か否かを判定することが可能になる。したがって、被試験電線の良否や実用性が正確に判定可能になる。   According to this embodiment, it is possible to determine whether or not the tolerance range of the wire under test is appropriate by applying the wire length design method for the wire harness wire. Therefore, it is possible to accurately determine the quality and practicality of the wire under test.

以上のように、本発明の実施形態によると、張力を考慮して電線の線長設計を行うようにして、より設計精度を高め、試作品作成や試行錯誤による時間浪費も軽減するワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法を提供することができる。また、この線長設計方法を応用して、好適なワイヤハーネス用電線の良否判定方法を提供することができる。   As described above, according to the embodiment of the present invention, the wire length design of the electric wires is performed in consideration of the tension, the design accuracy is further improved, and time waste due to trial production and trial and error is reduced. It is possible to provide a wire length design method for electric wires. Further, by applying this wire length design method, it is possible to provide a suitable method for determining the quality of a wire harness wire.

なお、上記実施形態では、本発明は、3点拘束された電線のみの設計方法を限定するものでなく、少なくとも3点拘束された電線の設計方法を意図するものである。したがって、本発明は、3点以上拘束された電線の設計にも適用可能である。   In the above-described embodiment, the present invention does not limit the design method of an electric wire constrained by three points, but intends the design method of an electric wire constrained by at least three points. Therefore, the present invention can also be applied to the design of electric wires constrained by three or more points.

3点拘束曲線等を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating a 3 point | piece constraint curve. 余長電線長及び余長吸収量等を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating a surplus length electric wire length, a surplus length absorption amount, etc. FIG. 補正基準経路等を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating a correction | amendment reference | standard path | route. 最大許容張力経路、最小許容張力経路及び適切な張力経路との関係を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the relationship with the maximum allowable tension | tensile_strength path | route, the minimum allowable tension | tensile_strength path | route, and an appropriate tension | tensile_strength path | route. 本発明のワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法の一実施形態を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows one Embodiment of the wire length design method of the electric wire for wire harnesses of this invention. ワイヤ中心線長、最大余長線長、許容上限線長、設計目標線長、許容下限線長及び最大張力線長の関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between wire center line length, maximum extra length line length, allowable upper limit line length, design target line length, allowable lower limit line length, and maximum tension line length. 本発明のワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法の他の実施形態を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows other embodiment of the wire length design method of the electric wire for wire harnesses of this invention. 本発明のワイヤハーネス用電線の良否判定方法の一実施形態を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows one Embodiment of the quality determination method of the electric wire for wire harnesses of this invention. 電線にたるみが発生した状態を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the state which the sagging generate | occur | produced in the electric wire. 図10(A)及び図10(B)は、たるみが発生した電線をともなってテープ巻きした状態を示す図である。FIG. 10A and FIG. 10B are diagrams showing a state where tape winding is performed with an electric wire in which sagging has occurred.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

W/H ワイヤハーネス
W、W1 電線
C コネクタ
F 、F1 フォーク
CL1、CL2 フォーク中心線
W / H Wire harness W, W1 Electric wire C Connector F, F1 Fork CL1, CL2 Fork center line

Claims (4)

ワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法において、
ワイヤハーネス用コネクタの最大許容張力と端子圧着強度と電線伸長強度との中で、最小値を呈するものを張力参照基準値とし、この値の4分の1を最大許容電線張力とした場合の、前記被設計電線の両端に対する前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力下における、3つのフォークの配置による3点拘束に基づいて計算される被設計電線の近似曲線を補正基準経路とし、
前記補正基準経路は、前記3点拘束下で前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力を受けて曲げられた前記被設計電線の曲率円を、前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力と前記3つのフォークの相対的な位置関係とにより変動する半径を有する補正基準円として求め、前記3つのフォークの配置に基づくフォーク中心線に平行し、且つ、前記補正基準円と正接する2本の延長線をひくことにより、前記2本の延長線と、前記2本の延長線と正接する2点間の前記補正基準円の一部とで作成され、
前記被設計電線の両端に対する最大許容電線張力下での前記補正基準経路の電線長である最大張力線長を求める最大張力線長計算ステップと、
前記最大張力線長に、吸収可能な線長として、ワイヤハーネスの製造工程におけるテープ巻き工程で螺旋状に巻くことにより吸収できる余長吸収量を加えた前記補正基準経路の電線長である最大余長線長を求める最大余長線長計算ステップと、
前記最大余長線長と前記最大張力線長との間の範囲である電線長最大可能範囲を求める電線長最大可能範囲計算ステップと、を含み、
前記電線長最大可能範囲に基づいて、前記被設計電線の設計目標線長を決定する、
ことを特徴とするワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法。
In the wire length design method of the wire harness wire,
Among the maximum allowable tension, terminal crimping strength, and wire extension strength of the connector for wire harness, the one that exhibits the minimum value is the tension reference value, and a quarter of this value is the maximum allowable wire tension. Under the tension smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension with respect to both ends of the designed wire, an approximated curve of the designed wire calculated based on the three-point constraint by the arrangement of three forks is used as a correction reference path,
In the correction reference path, a curvature circle of the designed electric wire bent under a tension smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension under the three-point constraint, a relative tension between the tension smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension and the three forks. By calculating two correction lines that are parallel to the fork center line based on the arrangement of the three forks and are tangent to the correction reference circle. The two extension lines and a part of the correction reference circle between two points tangent to the two extension lines,
A maximum tension line length calculating step for obtaining a maximum tension line length that is a wire length of the correction reference path under a maximum allowable wire tension with respect to both ends of the designed wire; and
The maximum excess wire length of the correction reference path, which is the maximum tension wire length plus the absorption length that can be absorbed by winding in a spiral manner in the tape winding process in the manufacturing process of the wire harness. A maximum extra line length calculation step for obtaining a long line length;
A wire length maximum possible range calculation step for obtaining a wire length maximum possible range that is a range between the maximum extra length line length and the maximum tension line length, and
Based on the maximum possible length of the wire length, determine a design target wire length of the designed wire,
A method for designing the length of a wire harness wire.
請求項1記載のワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法において、
前記被設計電線の許容公差の上限と下限との間の範囲である公差範囲と、前記電線長最大可能範囲とを比較し、前記公差範囲が前記電線長最大可能範囲内に収まるように、前記被設計電線の設計目標線長を決定する電線長決定ステップ、
を更に含むことを特徴とするワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法。
In the wire length design method of the electric wire for wire harnesses according to claim 1,
Compare the tolerance range which is the range between the upper limit and the lower limit of the allowable tolerance of the designed wire, and the maximum possible length of the wire, so that the tolerance range is within the maximum possible length of the wire, Wire length determination step for determining the design target wire length of the designed wire,
A wire length design method for a wire harness wire, further comprising:
請求項2記載のワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法において、
前記電線長決定ステップでは、
前記被設計電線の余長量をできるだけ抑えると同時にできるだけ前記張力を抑えるようにし、且つ、前記公差範囲が前記電線長最大可能範囲内に収まるように、前記被設計電線の設計目標線長を決定する、
ことを特徴とするワイヤハーネス用電線の線長設計方法。
In the wire length design method of the wire for a wire harness according to claim 2 ,
In the wire length determination step,
The design target wire length of the wire to be designed is determined so as to suppress the remaining amount of the wire to be designed as much as possible and at the same time suppress the tension as much as possible, and the tolerance range is within the maximum possible range of the wire length. To
A method for designing the length of a wire harness wire.
ワイヤハーネス用電線の良否判定方法において、In the method for determining the quality of the wire harness wire,
ワイヤハーネス用コネクタの最大許容張力と端子圧着強度と電線伸長強度との中で、最小値を呈するものを張力参照基準値とし、この値の4分の1を最大許容電線張力とした場合の、前記被設計電線の両端に対する前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力下における、3つのフォークの配置による3点拘束に基づいて計算される被設計電線の近似曲線を補正基準経路とし、Among the maximum allowable tension, terminal crimping strength, and wire extension strength of the connector for wire harness, the one that exhibits the minimum value is the tension reference value, and a quarter of this value is the maximum allowable wire tension. The approximate curve of the designed wire calculated based on the three-point constraint by the arrangement of the three forks under a tension smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension with respect to both ends of the designed wire is a correction reference path,
前記補正基準経路は、前記3点拘束下で前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力を受けて曲げられた前記被設計電線の曲率円を、前記最大許容電線張力より小さい張力と前記3つのフォークの相対的な位置関係とにより変動する半径を有する補正基準円として求め、前記3つのフォークの配置に基づくフォーク中心線に平行し、且つ、前記補正基準円と正接する2本の延長線をひくことにより、前記2本の延長線と、前記2本の延長線と正接する2点間の前記補正基準円の一部とで作成され、The correction reference path includes a curvature circle of the designed wire bent under a tension smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension under the three-point constraint, and a relative tension between the tension smaller than the maximum allowable wire tension and the three forks. By calculating two correction lines that are parallel to the fork center line based on the arrangement of the three forks and are tangent to the correction reference circle. The two extension lines and a part of the correction reference circle between two points tangent to the two extension lines,
前記被設計電線の両端に対する最大許容電線張力下での前記補正基準経路の電線長である最大張力線長を求める最大張力線長計算ステップと、A maximum tension line length calculating step for obtaining a maximum tension line length that is a wire length of the correction reference path under a maximum allowable wire tension with respect to both ends of the designed wire; and
前記最大張力線長に、吸収可能な線長として、ワイヤハーネスの製造工程におけるテープ巻き工程で螺旋状に巻くことにより吸収できる余長吸収量を加えた前記補正基準経路の電線長である最大余長線長を求める最大余長線長計算ステップと、The maximum excess wire length of the correction reference path, which is the maximum tension wire length plus the absorption length that can be absorbed by winding in a spiral manner in the tape winding process in the manufacturing process of the wire harness. A maximum extra line length calculation step for obtaining a long line length;
前記最大余長線長と前記最大張力線長との間の範囲である電線長最大可能範囲を求める電線長最大可能範囲計算ステップと、Wire length maximum possible range calculation step for obtaining the maximum possible wire length range that is the range between the maximum extra length wire length and the maximum tension wire length;
前記被試験電線の公差の上限と下限との間の範囲である公差範囲と、前記電線長最大可能範囲とを比較し、この比較結果に基づき前記被試験電線の良否を判定する良否判定ステップと、A pass / fail judgment step that compares a tolerance range that is a range between an upper limit and a lower limit of the tolerance of the wire under test, and the maximum possible range of the wire length, and judges pass / fail of the wire under test based on the comparison result; ,
を含むことを特徴とするワイヤハーネス用電線の良否判定方法。The quality determination method of the electric wire for wire harnesses characterized by including.
JP2003396556A 2003-11-27 2003-11-27 Method for designing wire length of electric wire for wire harness and method for determining quality Expired - Fee Related JP4283650B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003396556A JP4283650B2 (en) 2003-11-27 2003-11-27 Method for designing wire length of electric wire for wire harness and method for determining quality

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003396556A JP4283650B2 (en) 2003-11-27 2003-11-27 Method for designing wire length of electric wire for wire harness and method for determining quality

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005158547A JP2005158547A (en) 2005-06-16
JP4283650B2 true JP4283650B2 (en) 2009-06-24

Family

ID=34721965

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003396556A Expired - Fee Related JP4283650B2 (en) 2003-11-27 2003-11-27 Method for designing wire length of electric wire for wire harness and method for determining quality

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4283650B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5095981B2 (en) * 2006-11-14 2012-12-12 矢崎総業株式会社 Holding jig arrangement design apparatus and holding jig arrangement design method
JP4815457B2 (en) * 2008-01-22 2011-11-16 関東自動車工業株式会社 Automatic examination system for wire harness connection work
JP4815456B2 (en) * 2008-01-22 2011-11-16 関東自動車工業株式会社 Wire harness length evaluation system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2005158547A (en) 2005-06-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8653372B2 (en) Wire harness
US6330746B1 (en) Method of determining the length of electric wires for use in constructing a wire harness, and method of constructing a wire harness
JP6106517B2 (en) Round terminal fixing structure
JP3843984B2 (en) Multi-core cable with connector
US20200098489A1 (en) Wire harness
US20090266575A1 (en) Electric Wire for Automobile
US7624503B2 (en) Method for manufacturing wire harness branching portion
JP4199096B2 (en) Wire harness design support device, support method, support program, and storage medium storing the support program
JP4283650B2 (en) Method for designing wire length of electric wire for wire harness and method for determining quality
US7008274B2 (en) Crimp contact which can easily be reduced in size
CN113168939A (en) Wire harness
US20140115876A1 (en) Manufacturing method of segment coil
KR20150009610A (en) Method for manufacturing a winding coil of electric machine
JP4886477B2 (en) Wiring layout design support device, wiring layout design support method, and wiring layout design support program
JP7097280B2 (en) Liner
US20220311318A1 (en) Stator and method of manufacturing stator
JP5303385B2 (en) Branch layout design support device, branch layout design support method, and branch layout design support program
JP2007299562A (en) Bending resistant cable, cable for automobile, and cable for robot
Rawlins Analytical elements of overhead conductor fabrication
JP5690162B2 (en) Wire harness and method of manufacturing wire harness
JP6376093B2 (en) Electrical wire
JP5295660B2 (en) Wire harness manufacturing jig and method of manufacturing wire harness
JP5095981B2 (en) Holding jig arrangement design apparatus and holding jig arrangement design method
JP4899463B2 (en) Type breakage prevention type electric wire and overhead wiring method
JP2024069800A (en) Linear sleeve

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20060221

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20081014

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20081021

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20081219

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20090310

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20090319

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4283650

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120327

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120327

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130327

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140327

Year of fee payment: 5

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees