JP3756674B2 - Magnetic steel sheet for laminated adhesive cores with stable adhesive strength - Google Patents

Magnetic steel sheet for laminated adhesive cores with stable adhesive strength Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP3756674B2
JP3756674B2 JP19716298A JP19716298A JP3756674B2 JP 3756674 B2 JP3756674 B2 JP 3756674B2 JP 19716298 A JP19716298 A JP 19716298A JP 19716298 A JP19716298 A JP 19716298A JP 3756674 B2 JP3756674 B2 JP 3756674B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
steel sheet
adhesive strength
film
iron core
strength
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP19716298A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2000030923A (en
Inventor
浩康 藤井
和年 竹田
聖一 妹尾
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP19716298A priority Critical patent/JP3756674B2/en
Publication of JP2000030923A publication Critical patent/JP2000030923A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3756674B2 publication Critical patent/JP3756674B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、打ち抜きまたは剪断加工後、加圧及び加熱により鋼板同士を接着することで鉄心を作製できる積層接着鉄心用電磁鋼板に関するものである。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
電磁鋼板から電気機器、特にモーターのステーター、ローターなどの鉄心を製作する場合、鋼板を所定の形状に打ち抜きまたは剪断加工後、積層し、端面を溶接や、かしめ等の方法によって固着させて鉄心とする方法が一般的である。
これに対して、特公昭55−9815号公報あるいは特開平2−208034号公報などにおいて、前記の溶接法や、かしめ法によらない鉄心固着法が提案されている。前記公報に開示された技術は接着性を有する絶縁皮膜をあらかじめ鋼板表面に形成しておき、打ち抜きまたは剪断加工によって所定の形状にした後、これらを積層した上で加圧、加熱することによって鋼板同士を固着させ鉄心とするものである。
【0003】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
固着された鉄心はこの時、鋼板同士の接着強度が不足すると鉄心が回転している時に剥離を起こす場合がある。そのため、積層接着鉄心用電磁鋼板における鋼板同士の固着度合い、いわゆる接着強度は非常に重要である。この接着強度は皮膜材質の他、皮膜量、乾燥温度、鉄心製作時の加熱温度と印加圧力などに影響される。そのため工業的には、これらを精密に調整するという方法で製造されてきた。ところが、同じ皮膜量でかつ同じ乾燥温度で乾燥しても、なお接着強度にばらつきが生じるという問題があった。
【0004】
本発明はこのような接着強度のばらつきを低減させる技術を提案するものである。
【0005】
【課題を解決するための手段】
本発明は、打ち抜きまたは剪断加工によって所定の形状にした後、これらを積層した上で加圧、加熱することによって鋼板同士を固着させ鉄心とするための、鋼板表面に接着機能を有する絶縁皮膜を形成した積層接着鉄心用電磁鋼板であって、前記皮膜がエポキシ樹脂を質量百分率で20〜75%およびフェノール樹脂を10〜60%含み、かつ、前記皮膜の接着前の硬度が鉛筆硬度2H以上5H以下であることを特徴とする安定した接着強度をもつ積層接着鉄心用電磁鋼板である。
【0006】
【発明の実施の形態】
本発明者らは、前記の接着強度にばらつきが生じるという問題を解決するため鋭意検討を重ねた結果、接着作用を有する絶縁皮膜の接着前の硬度が接着強度に影響しているのではないかと考えるに至った。以下、そうした考えに至った経緯を述べる。
【0007】
積層接着鉄心用電磁鋼板を用いた鉄心の製造方法は、所定の形状と寸法をもつ鉄心用素材を剪断あるいは打ち抜き等の手段で切り出し、積層し、加圧状態で加熱することによる。
このような方法で製造される積層接着鉄心用電磁鋼板について、発明者らはその接着強度に影響を及ぼす因子について吟味し直した。前述したように、接着強度に影響を及ぼすものとして皮膜材質、皮膜厚さ、鉄心製作時の加熱温度と印加圧力などがあげられる。発明者らはこれらの他に、界面の接触面積が大きく影響しているのではないかと考えた。
【0008】
一般に、2相の接合界面の強度はその界面の面積に依存し、面積が大きいほどその接合強度は高い。そのため、接合前の表面凹凸が激しい場合は、界面同士の接触面積が小さいため、十分な接合強度が得られない。接着鋼板においても、皮膜が相互に接触できれば十分な接触面積を確保でき、高い接着強度をもつ鉄心が製作できる。そしてそのためには、皮膜がある程度変形できるもの、すなわち、或る程度の柔らかさを持っていれば、圧着により変形して接触面積が増大し、高い接着強度をもつ皮膜になる。
【0009】
発明者らは以上のような考えに基づき、積層接着鉄心用電磁鋼板として接着強度が最も安定する接着前の皮膜硬度を求めるため、種々の硬度をもつ皮膜を形成させ、それらの接着強度を調べた。
まず、板厚0.5mmの電磁鋼板に、樹脂組成が、アクリル樹脂:エポキシ樹脂:フェノール樹脂=20:60:20(量%)で固形分量分率20量%の水エマルジョン型コーティング液をロールコーターを用いて皮膜量が片面当たり8g/m2 になるよう塗布した。次に、これらの乾燥温度と乾燥時間を調整して種々の皮膜硬度になるようにした。接着前の皮膜硬度は鉛筆によって皮膜に疵がはいるかどうかで判定する、いわゆる鉛筆硬度法により判定した。
【0010】
こうして作製した試料から試験片を切り出し、2枚の試験片を重ね10kgf/cm2 で加圧した状態で200℃まで加熱し、60秒間保持することで接着強度測定用の試験片を調製した。
この試験片を引張り試験機を用いその接着強度を測定した。また、皮膜の受ける損傷度合いについては作製した試料を工場ラインの鋼板支持ロールに押し付けて擦りあわせ、その時に皮膜の受ける損傷度合いを目視で判定した。結果を表1に示す。
【0011】
【表1】

Figure 0003756674
【0012】
表1から接着前の皮膜の鉛筆硬度がHB、Hと低い場合(実験番号(1)(2))接着強度の平均値はそれぞれ172kg/cm2 ,171kg/cm2 ,と高く、また接着強度のばらつきも小さいが、皮膜損傷を受けやすかった。一方、鉛筆硬度が6H、7Hと高い場合(実験番号(7)(8))皮膜損傷度は良好であるが、接着強度の平均値が126kg/cm2 、118kg/cm2 と低く、また接着強度がそれぞれ113kg/cm2 から145kg/cm2 、105kg/cm2 から139kg/cm2 とばらついた。これらに対し、鉛筆硬度が2H以上5H以下の範囲(実験番号(3)(4)(5)(6))では接着強度の平均値が概ね170kg/cm2 以上と高く、ばらつきも小さく安定していた。また、皮膜損傷度も良好であった。
【0013】
これらの結果から、積層接着鉄心用電磁鋼板として安定した接着強度を得るためには接着前の皮膜の鉛筆硬度を2H以上5H以下にすれば良いことがわかった。
次に、本発明の接着皮膜の製造方法について説明する。
本発明に用いる鋼板は通常の圧延・焼鈍により製造された電磁鋼板であれば一方向性電磁鋼板、無方向性電磁鋼板など種類を問わず適用できる。特に無方向性電磁鋼板を用いるモーター鉄心に適用する場合、その効果が最も発揮できる。
【0014】
また、絶縁皮膜についても、接着機能を発揮する絶縁皮膜形成用のコーティング液であれば、本発明を適用できる。例えば、フェノール樹脂やエポキシ樹脂のような加圧・加熱により鋼板同士を接着させる際、硬化反応を起こす熱硬化性樹脂に適用できるのは勿論のこと、アクリル樹脂やメタクリル樹脂のような加熱しても硬化反応の起こらない熱可塑性樹脂にも適用できる。一例として、樹脂組成が、アクリル樹脂:エポキシ樹脂:フェノール樹脂=20:20:60(重量%)で固形分重量分率20重量%の水エマルジョン型コーティング液がある。
【0015】
また、鋼板にコーティング液を付着させる方法についても特に限定されない。例えば、正回転ロールコーターや逆回転ロールコーターやあるいはバーコーターでも良い。また、スプレー法でもかまわない。
塗布量は片面当たり1g/m2 以上20g/m2 以下が望ましい。塗布量が1g/m2 未満だと鋼板上表面全体を十分に被覆しにくいため十分な接着強度が得られず、一方20g/m2 より多いと加圧・加熱した際、端面から樹脂がにじみ出やすいという問題が生じたり、また、占積率も低下してしまう。そのため、塗布量は1g/m2 以上から20g/m2 以下が良い。
【0016】
乾燥温度および時間は絶縁皮膜の接着前の硬度を調整する重要な工程である。最適な条件は使用する有機樹脂や溶媒によって異なるが、一般的には鋼帯温度で80〜300℃に10〜30秒加熱される。
接着前の皮膜硬度は主に乾燥温度を調整することにより、鉛筆硬度で2Hから5Hになるように調整する。接着前の硬度が5Hより高い場合、接着させたときの接着強度は低下する。逆に、接着前の硬度が2Hより低い場合、接着強度は高いものの、鋼板の製造時やその後の取り扱いの際に疵がつく場合や、圧着加熱しなくても融着する場合などがあるため好ましくない。
【0017】
乾燥後の冷却は、空冷法でも良いし水冷あるいは気水冷却法なども適用できる。
【0018】
【実施例】
<実施例1>
板厚0.35mmの電磁鋼板に、樹脂組成が、アクリル樹脂:エポキシ樹脂:フェノール樹脂=15:75:10(量%)で固形分量分率20量%の水エマルジョン型のコーティング液をロールコーターを用いて皮膜量が片面当たり6g/m2 になるよう塗布した。これらを乾燥温度110℃、150℃、190℃で乾燥し、冷却した。こうして作製した試料から試験片を切り出した。ついで、2枚の試験片を重ね10kgf/cm2 で加圧した状態で200℃まで加熱し、60秒間保持することで接着強度測定用の試験片を調製した。この試験片を引張り試験機を用い接着強度を測定した。結果を表2に示す。
【0019】
【表2】
Figure 0003756674
【0020】
表2から鉛筆硬度がHである比較例では接着強度の平均値が173kg/cm2 と高く、またばらつきも小さいが、皮膜損傷度が大きい。また、鉛筆硬度が7Hである比較例では皮膜損傷度は良好であるが、接着強度の平均値が114kg/cm2 と低く、また、ばらつきも大きい。これらに対し、鉛筆硬度が4Hである実施例では接着強度の平均値が173kg/cm2 と高く、またばらつきも小さく、また、皮膜損傷度も良好で優れている。
<実施例2>
板厚0.6mmの電磁鋼板に、樹脂組成が、アクリル樹脂:エポキシ樹脂:フェノール樹脂=15:70:15(量%)で固形分量分率20量%のコーティング液をロールコーターを用いて皮膜量が片面当たり9g/m2 になるよう塗布した。これらを乾燥温度100℃、160℃、180℃で乾燥し、冷却した。こうして作製した試料から試験片を切り出した。ついで、2枚の試験片を重ね10kgf/cm2 で加圧した状態で200℃まで加熱し、60秒間保持することで接着強度測定用の試験片を調製した。この試験片を引張り試験機を用い接着強度を測定した。結果を表3に示す。
【0021】
【表3】
Figure 0003756674
【0022】
表3から、鉛筆硬度がHBである比較例では接着強度の平均値が173kg/cm2 と高く、またばらつきも小さいが、皮膜損傷度が大きい。また、鉛筆硬度が6Hである比較例では皮膜損傷度は良好であるが、接着強度の平均値が122kg/cm2 と低く、また、ばらつきも大きい。これらに対し、鉛筆硬度が5Hである実施例では接着強度の平均値が172kg/cm2 と高く、またばらつきも小さく、また、皮膜損傷度も良好で優れている。
【0023】
【発明の効果】
以上述べたように、本発明によれば安定した接着強度をもつ積層接着鉄心用電磁鋼板を得られる。[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an electromagnetic steel sheet for a laminated adhesive iron core that can produce an iron core by bonding steel sheets by pressurization and heating after punching or shearing.
[0002]
[Prior art]
When producing iron cores such as stators and rotors for electrical equipment from electromagnetic steel sheets, the steel sheets are punched or sheared into a predetermined shape, laminated, and the end surfaces are fixed by welding, caulking, or other methods. The method to do is common.
On the other hand, Japanese Patent Publication No. 55-9815 or Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2-208034 proposes an iron core fixing method that does not depend on the welding method or the caulking method. In the technique disclosed in the above publication, an insulating film having adhesiveness is formed in advance on the surface of the steel sheet, and after forming a predetermined shape by punching or shearing, these are laminated and then pressed and heated. They are fixed together to form an iron core.
[0003]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
At this time, if the bonded iron core has insufficient adhesion strength between steel plates, peeling may occur when the iron core is rotating. For this reason, the degree of adhesion between the steel sheets in the laminated bonded iron core electromagnetic steel sheet, so-called adhesive strength, is very important. This adhesive strength is influenced by the film material, the film amount, the drying temperature, the heating temperature and the applied pressure during the manufacture of the iron core. Therefore, industrially, it has been manufactured by a method of precisely adjusting them. However, there is a problem that even if the film is dried at the same coating amount and at the same drying temperature, the adhesive strength varies.
[0004]
The present invention proposes a technique for reducing such variations in adhesive strength.
[0005]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
The present invention provides an insulating film having an adhesive function on the surface of a steel sheet for forming a predetermined shape by punching or shearing and then laminating them and then pressing and heating to fix the steel sheets to form an iron core. A laminated magnetic steel sheet for laminated adhesive iron core, wherein the coating contains 20 to 75% by weight of epoxy resin and 10 to 60% of phenolic resin, and the hardness before bonding of the coating is 2H or more of pencil hardness of 5H An electromagnetic steel sheet for laminated adhesive iron cores having stable adhesive strength, characterized in that:
[0006]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
As a result of intensive studies in order to solve the above-mentioned problem that the adhesive strength varies, the present inventors have found that the hardness before bonding of the insulating film having the bonding effect may affect the bonding strength. I came to think. The following is the background that led to such an idea.
[0007]
The manufacturing method of an iron core using a laminated bonded iron core electromagnetic steel sheet is obtained by cutting out an iron core material having a predetermined shape and size by means such as shearing or punching, laminating, and heating in a pressurized state.
The inventors reexamined the factors affecting the adhesive strength of the laminated steel core magnetic steel sheet produced by such a method. As described above, the film material, the film thickness, the heating temperature and the applied pressure at the time of manufacturing the iron core, and the like can affect the adhesive strength. In addition to these, the inventors considered that the contact area of the interface may have a great influence.
[0008]
In general, the strength of the two-phase bonding interface depends on the area of the interface, and the larger the area, the higher the bonding strength. Therefore, when the surface unevenness before joining is severe, the contact area between the interfaces is small, so that sufficient joining strength cannot be obtained. Even in a bonded steel sheet, if the coatings can contact each other, a sufficient contact area can be secured, and an iron core having high adhesive strength can be manufactured. For this purpose, if the film can be deformed to some extent, that is, if it has a certain degree of softness, the film is deformed by pressure bonding to increase the contact area, resulting in a film having high adhesive strength.
[0009]
Based on the above-mentioned idea, the inventors have determined the film hardness before bonding that provides the most stable adhesion strength as a laminated bonded iron core electrical steel sheet. It was.
First, the electromagnetic steel sheet having a thickness of 0.5 mm, the resin composition, acrylic resin: epoxy resin: phenol resin = 20: 60: 20 solids in (mass%) Weight fraction 20 mass% of water emulsion type The coating solution was applied using a roll coater so that the coating amount was 8 g / m 2 per side. Next, the drying temperature and drying time were adjusted so that various film hardnesses were obtained. The film hardness before bonding was determined by the so-called pencil hardness method, which is determined by whether or not the film is wrinkled with a pencil.
[0010]
A test piece was cut out from the sample thus prepared, heated to 200 ° C. in a state where two test pieces were stacked and pressurized at 10 kgf / cm 2 , and held for 60 seconds to prepare a test piece for measuring adhesive strength.
The test piece was measured for tensile strength using a tensile tester. Further, the degree of damage received by the film was determined by visually observing the degree of damage received by the prepared sample by pressing it against a steel sheet support roll in a factory line and rubbing it. The results are shown in Table 1.
[0011]
[Table 1]
Figure 0003756674
[0012]
The pencil hardness of the coating before the adhesive from Table 1 HB, H and lower case (Experiment No. (1) (2)) respectively mean adhesion strength 172kg / cm 2, 171kg / cm 2, a high, and adhesion strength Although the variation of the film was small, the film was easily damaged. On the other hand, when the pencil hardness is as high as 6H and 7H (experiment number (7) (8) ), the film damage degree is good, but the average value of the adhesive strength is low as 126 kg / cm 2 and 118 kg / cm 2 The strength varied from 113 kg / cm 2 to 145 kg / cm 2 and 105 kg / cm 2 to 139 kg / cm 2 , respectively. On the other hand, when the pencil hardness is in the range of 2H to 5H (Experiment No. (3) (4) (5) (6) ), the average value of the adhesive strength is as high as 170 kg / cm 2 or more, and the variation is stable and stable. It was. Also, the degree of film damage was good.
[0013]
From these results, it was found that the pencil hardness of the film before bonding should be 2H or more and 5H or less in order to obtain a stable bonding strength as a laminated bonded iron core electromagnetic steel sheet.
Next, the manufacturing method of the adhesive film of this invention is demonstrated.
The steel plate used in the present invention can be applied regardless of the type such as a unidirectional electrical steel plate and a non-oriented electrical steel plate as long as it is an electrical steel plate manufactured by ordinary rolling and annealing. In particular, when applied to a motor iron core using a non-oriented electrical steel sheet, the effect can be exhibited most.
[0014]
Further, the present invention can be applied to any insulating film as long as it is a coating liquid for forming an insulating film that exhibits an adhesive function. For example, when bonding steel plates by pressure and heating such as phenol resin and epoxy resin, it can be applied to thermosetting resins that cause a curing reaction, as well as heating such as acrylic resins and methacrylic resins. Also, it can be applied to a thermoplastic resin that does not cause a curing reaction. As an example, there is a water emulsion type coating liquid having a resin composition of acrylic resin: epoxy resin: phenol resin = 20: 20: 60 (wt%) and a solid content weight fraction of 20 wt%.
[0015]
Moreover, it is not specifically limited about the method of making a coating liquid adhere to a steel plate. For example, a forward rotating roll coater, a reverse rotating roll coater, or a bar coater may be used. The spray method may also be used.
The coating amount is desirably 1 g / m 2 or more and 20 g / m 2 or less per side. If the coating amount is less than 1 g / m 2, it is difficult to sufficiently cover the entire surface of the steel sheet, so that sufficient adhesive strength cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if it exceeds 20 g / m 2 , the resin oozes out from the end face when pressed and heated. The problem that it is easy to occur arises, and the space factor also decreases. Therefore, the coating amount is preferably 1 g / m 2 or more and 20 g / m 2 or less.
[0016]
The drying temperature and time are important steps for adjusting the hardness before bonding of the insulating film. Optimum conditions vary depending on the organic resin and solvent used, but generally the steel strip is heated to 80 to 300 ° C. for 10 to 30 seconds.
The film hardness before bonding is adjusted so that the pencil hardness is 2H to 5H mainly by adjusting the drying temperature. When the hardness before bonding is higher than 5H, the bonding strength when bonded is lowered. On the contrary, when the hardness before bonding is lower than 2H, although the bonding strength is high, there are cases where wrinkles occur during the manufacture of the steel sheet and the subsequent handling, and there are cases where it is fused without heating by pressure bonding. It is not preferable.
[0017]
The cooling after drying may be an air cooling method, a water cooling method or an air-water cooling method.
[0018]
【Example】
<Example 1>
The electromagnetic steel sheet having a thickness of 0.35 mm, the resin composition, acrylic resin: epoxy resin: phenol resin = 15: 75: 10 (mass%) in the solids mass fraction 20 mass% of water emulsion type coating The liquid was applied using a roll coater so that the coating amount was 6 g / m 2 per side. These were dried at a drying temperature of 110 ° C., 150 ° C., and 190 ° C. and cooled. A test piece was cut out from the sample thus prepared. Next, two test pieces were stacked and heated to 200 ° C. in a state of being pressurized at 10 kgf / cm 2 and held for 60 seconds to prepare a test piece for measuring adhesive strength. The test piece was measured for tensile strength using a tensile tester. The results are shown in Table 2.
[0019]
[Table 2]
Figure 0003756674
[0020]
From Table 2, in the comparative example where the pencil hardness is H, the average value of the adhesive strength is as high as 173 kg / cm 2 and the variation is small, but the degree of film damage is large. Further, in the comparative example in which the pencil hardness is 7H, the film damage degree is good, but the average value of the adhesive strength is as low as 114 kg / cm 2 and the variation is large. On the other hand, in the example where the pencil hardness is 4H, the average value of the adhesive strength is as high as 173 kg / cm 2 , the variation is small, and the degree of film damage is good and excellent.
<Example 2>
The electromagnetic steel sheet having a thickness of 0.6 mm, the resin composition, acrylic resin: epoxy resin: phenol resin = 15: 70: 15 rolls (mass%) in the solids mass fraction 20 mass% of the coating liquid coater Was applied so that the coating amount was 9 g / m 2 per side. These were dried at a drying temperature of 100 ° C., 160 ° C., and 180 ° C. and cooled. A test piece was cut out from the sample thus prepared. Next, two test pieces were stacked and heated to 200 ° C. in a state of being pressurized at 10 kgf / cm 2 and held for 60 seconds to prepare a test piece for measuring adhesive strength. The test piece was measured for tensile strength using a tensile tester. The results are shown in Table 3.
[0021]
[Table 3]
Figure 0003756674
[0022]
From Table 3, in the comparative example where the pencil hardness is HB, the average value of the adhesive strength is as high as 173 kg / cm 2 and the variation is small, but the degree of film damage is large. Further, in the comparative example having a pencil hardness of 6H, the film damage degree is good, but the average value of the adhesive strength is as low as 122 kg / cm 2 and the variation is large. On the other hand, in the example where the pencil hardness is 5H, the average value of the adhesive strength is as high as 172 kg / cm 2 , the variation is small, and the degree of film damage is good and excellent.
[0023]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to obtain an electromagnetic steel sheet for a laminated adhesive iron core having stable adhesive strength.

Claims (1)

打ち抜きまたは剪断加工によって所定の形状にした後、これらを積層した上で加圧、加熱することによって鋼板同士を固着させ鉄心とするための、鋼板表面に接着機能を有する絶縁皮膜を形成した積層接着鉄心用電磁鋼板であって、前記皮膜がエポキシ樹脂を質量百分率で20〜75%およびフェノール樹脂を10〜60%含み、かつ、前記皮膜の接着前の硬度が鉛筆硬度2H以上5H以下であることを特徴とする安定した接着強度をもつ積層接着鉄心用電磁鋼板。Laminate bonding in which an insulating film having an adhesive function is formed on the surface of a steel sheet to form a predetermined core by punching or shearing, and then laminating them and then pressing and heating to fix the steel sheets together to form an iron core An electrical steel sheet for iron core, wherein the coating contains 20 to 75% by mass of epoxy resin and 10 to 60% of phenolic resin, and the hardness before adhesion of the coating is 2H or more and 5H or less of pencil hardness. An electrical steel sheet for laminated bonded iron cores with stable adhesive strength.
JP19716298A 1998-07-13 1998-07-13 Magnetic steel sheet for laminated adhesive cores with stable adhesive strength Expired - Lifetime JP3756674B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19716298A JP3756674B2 (en) 1998-07-13 1998-07-13 Magnetic steel sheet for laminated adhesive cores with stable adhesive strength

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19716298A JP3756674B2 (en) 1998-07-13 1998-07-13 Magnetic steel sheet for laminated adhesive cores with stable adhesive strength

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2000030923A JP2000030923A (en) 2000-01-28
JP3756674B2 true JP3756674B2 (en) 2006-03-15

Family

ID=16369817

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP19716298A Expired - Lifetime JP3756674B2 (en) 1998-07-13 1998-07-13 Magnetic steel sheet for laminated adhesive cores with stable adhesive strength

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3756674B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016017132A1 (en) * 2014-07-29 2016-02-04 Jfeスチール株式会社 Electromagnetic steel sheet for lamination, laminate electromagnetic steel sheet, production method for laminate electromagnetic steel sheet, and iron core for vehicle motor
WO2018117670A2 (en) 2016-12-23 2018-06-28 주식회사 포스코 Electrical steel sheet adhesive coating composition, electrical steel sheet product, and manufacturing method therefor
KR102156189B1 (en) * 2018-11-30 2020-09-16 주식회사 포스코 Electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method of the same
CA3165608A1 (en) * 2020-06-17 2021-12-23 Ichiro Tanaka Electrical steel sheet, laminated core, and laminated core manufacturing method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2000030923A (en) 2000-01-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101967690B1 (en) Electrical steel sheet for stacking, stacked electrical steel sheet, method of manufacturing stacked electrical steel sheet, and iron core for automotive motor
KR102176342B1 (en) Method for manufacturing the electrical steel sheet product
JP6086098B2 (en) Laminated electrical steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof
CN110382223B (en) Composite material for stator and rotor laminations
CN113165332A (en) Electrical steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same
KR101540373B1 (en) Adhesive coating composition for non-oriented electrical steel, non-oriented electrical steel product, and method for manufacturing the product
KR20210021365A (en) Method for producing lacquer-coated electrical strips, and lacquer-coated electrical strip
JP3756674B2 (en) Magnetic steel sheet for laminated adhesive cores with stable adhesive strength
BE1002450A3 (en) COMPOUND MATERIAL COMPRISING ALUMINIUM AND FIBER MATS AND METHOD FOR THEIR Manufacturing.
JPH0243704A (en) Laminated magnetic core and manufacture thereof
JP4987224B2 (en) Manufacturing method of laminated core
JP3527413B2 (en) Electromagnetic steel sheets for laminated adhesive cores with stable adhesive strength and excellent rust resistance
JP3634155B2 (en) Manufacturing method of electrical steel sheet for laminated adhesive core with excellent adhesive strength stability
JP5750275B2 (en) Insulated steel sheet and laminated iron core
JP3542909B2 (en) Manufacturing method of magnetic steel sheet for laminated bonded iron core
CN110621496A (en) Composite material for transformer
JP4792756B2 (en) Manufacturing method of laminated core with excellent dimensional accuracy
JP2001310344A (en) Method for manufacturing laminated sheet
CN116918224A (en) Laminated iron core and method for manufacturing the same
JPS6253833A (en) Manufacture of cut-board sandwich type laminated metallic plate
CN116422560A (en) Electrical steel core and preparation method thereof
JPS6237995A (en) Metal based substrate and manufacture thereof
JPS60109836A (en) Manufacture of lainated board
JP3527414B2 (en) Electromagnetic steel sheet for laminated adhesive core with extremely excellent adhesive strength stability
CN110205074A (en) Product obtained after a kind of thermosetting resin adhesive and its application method and application

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20040203

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20040402

A911 Transfer to examiner for re-examination before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20040511

A912 Re-examination (zenchi) completed and case transferred to appeal board

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A912

Effective date: 20040910

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20051107

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20051222

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100106

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110106

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120106

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130106

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130106

Year of fee payment: 7

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130106

Year of fee payment: 7

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130106

Year of fee payment: 7

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130106

Year of fee payment: 7

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140106

Year of fee payment: 8

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term