JP3310818B2 - Evaluation method for remaining life of Ni-base heat-resistant alloy - Google Patents
Evaluation method for remaining life of Ni-base heat-resistant alloyInfo
- Publication number
- JP3310818B2 JP3310818B2 JP12557295A JP12557295A JP3310818B2 JP 3310818 B2 JP3310818 B2 JP 3310818B2 JP 12557295 A JP12557295 A JP 12557295A JP 12557295 A JP12557295 A JP 12557295A JP 3310818 B2 JP3310818 B2 JP 3310818B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- phase
- resistant alloy
- stress
- ratio
- base heat
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)
- Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、ガスタービン動翼等に
使用されるNi基耐熱合金の余寿命を評価する方法に関
する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the remaining life of a Ni-base heat-resistant alloy used for a gas turbine blade or the like.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】従来のNi基耐熱合金のメタル使用温度
を推定する方法は、予め用意した加熱温度、時間が既知
の材料のγ’相標準写真と、メタル温度を推定しようと
する材料のγ’相写真を対比して、熟練者が金属組織変
化(γ’相の粗大化等)を半定量的に判断するものであ
るが、γ’相からのクリープ破断寿命比の推定法に関し
ては未だ確立していない。2. Description of the Related Art Conventional methods for estimating the metal use temperature of a Ni-base heat-resistant alloy include a γ ′ phase standard photograph of a material having a known heating temperature and time, and a γ of a material whose metal temperature is to be estimated. 'Compared with a phase photograph, a skilled person semi-quantitatively judges changes in the metal structure (such as coarsening of the γ' phase), but there is still no method for estimating the creep rupture life ratio from the γ 'phase. Not established.
【0003】[0003]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】従来法は、熟練者のみ
が判断できる技術であり、利用範囲が限られていた。ま
た、客観性に乏しく定量的精度の表現が難しいという問
題があった。そこで、本発明は、上記の問題点を解消
し、メタル使用温度又はクリープ破断を未然に防ぐこと
のできるNi基耐熱合金の余寿命評価法を提供しようと
するものである。The conventional method is a technique which can be judged only by a skilled person, and its use is limited. In addition, there is a problem that it is difficult to express quantitative accuracy due to poor objectivity. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to solve the above-mentioned problems and to provide a method for evaluating the remaining life of a Ni-based heat-resistant alloy that can prevent a metal operating temperature or a creep rupture before it occurs.
【0004】[0004]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、下記構成を採
用することにより、上記の課題の解決を可能にしたもの
である。 (1) Ni基耐熱合金における金属組織のγ’相のラフト
化比率を検知してクリープ破断寿命比を推定することを
特徴とするNi基耐熱合金の余寿命評価法。The present invention makes it possible to solve the above-mentioned problems by employing the following constitution. (1) A method for evaluating the remaining life of a Ni-base heat-resistant alloy, which comprises estimating a creep rupture life ratio by detecting a rafting ratio of a γ ′ phase of a metal structure in the Ni-base heat-resistant alloy.
【0005】(2) 温度時間履歴が既知のNi基耐熱合金
試料について、γ’相の円相当直径を求め、ラーソン・
ミラー・パラメータ〔LMP=(T+273)(C+l
ogt)〕と円相当直径との間の校正曲線を予め求めて
おき、評価対象のNi基耐熱合金のγ’相の円相当直径
から、メタル温度Tを求めることを特徴とする上記(1)
記載のNi基耐熱合金の余寿命評価法。(2) For a Ni-base heat-resistant alloy sample whose temperature and time history is known, the equivalent circle diameter of the γ '
Mirror parameter [LMP = (T + 273) (C + 1)
ogt)] and a circle-equivalent diameter are determined in advance, and the metal temperature T is determined from the circle-equivalent diameter of the γ 'phase of the Ni-base heat-resistant alloy to be evaluated.
The remaining life evaluation method of the described Ni-base heat-resistant alloy.
【0006】(3) 評価対象のNi基耐熱合金試料に応力
を負荷し、負荷方向に平行面(応力負荷面)と直角面
(応力負荷無し面)におけるγ’相の長径と短径を測定
し、それぞれの面におけるアスペクト比(長径/短径)
を求め、さらに、ラフト化比率Φ(応力負荷面のアスペ
クト比/応力負荷無し面のアスペクト比)を求めて、ラ
フト化比率Φとラーソンミラーパラメータ(LMP)の
関係図から、クリープ破断寿命比(履歴時間t/クリー
プ破断寿命tr)を求めることを特徴とする上記(2) 記
載のNi基耐熱合金の余寿命評価法。(3) A stress is applied to the Ni-base heat-resistant alloy sample to be evaluated, and the major axis and minor axis of the γ 'phase are measured on a plane parallel to the loading direction (stress-loaded plane) and a plane perpendicular to the loading direction (stress-free plane). And the aspect ratio of each surface (major axis / minor axis)
And the raft ratio Φ (aspect ratio of the stress-loaded surface / aspect ratio of the surface without stress) is determined, and the creep rupture life ratio ( (2) The method for evaluating the remaining life of a Ni-base heat-resistant alloy according to the above (2), wherein a hysteresis time t / creep rupture life tr) is obtained.
【0007】[0007]
【作用】本発明者等は、Ni基耐熱合金を高温で長時間
使用するときに応力負荷があると、γ’相が細長く変化
(ラフト化)することに着目し、走査型電子顕微鏡(S
EM)を用いて5000倍程度の高倍率でこれを測定
し、ラーソン・ミラー・パラメータ〔LMP=(T+2
73)×(C+logt)〕を用いることにより、クリ
ープ破断寿命比を迅速かつ客観的に定量評価することに
成功した。The present inventors have noticed that the γ 'phase is elongated (rafted) when a Ni-based heat-resistant alloy is used at a high temperature for a long time at a high temperature under a stress load.
This was measured at a high magnification of about 5000 times using EM), and the Larson-Miller parameter [LMP = (T + 2)
73) × (C + logt)], a rapid and objective quantitative evaluation of the creep rupture life ratio was successfully achieved.
【0008】即ち、温度・時間履歴が既知の材料につい
て、予めγ’相の変化をSEMで測定して円相当直径の
平均値dとLMPについての校正曲線を作成しておき、
評価対象のγ’相を当てはめてメタル使用温度を推定す
る。また、γ’相の応力負荷方向に直角面と平行面につ
いても、γ’相の円相当直径の平均値dを求め、その変
化をLMP〔=(T+273)×(C+logt)〕で
整理してメタル温度Tを推定する。That is, for a material having a known temperature / time history, the change of the γ ′ phase is measured by an SEM in advance to prepare a calibration curve for the average value d of the circle equivalent diameter and the LMP,
The metal use temperature is estimated by applying the γ 'phase to be evaluated. The average value d of the circle-equivalent diameter of the γ ′ phase is also determined for the plane parallel to the plane perpendicular to the stress load direction of the γ ′ phase, and the change is arranged by LMP [= (T + 273) × (C + logt)]. Estimate the metal temperature T.
【0009】次に、画像処理装置でγ’相の長径aに対
する短径bの比α(アスペクト比=a/b)を求め、応
力負荷を受ける方向のアスペクト比ασ(a’/b’)
と無負荷のアスペクト比α0 (a/b)の比をラフト化
比率Φとして求めた。 Φ=ασ/α0 =(a’/b’)/(a/b) そして、温度・時間毎のΦとLMPの関係を推定し、Φ
とLMPが合致するtrを、前記Φ−LMPの関係から
推定し、クリープ破断寿命比t/trを推定するもので
ある。Next, the ratio α (aspect ratio = a / b) of the minor axis b to the major axis a of the γ ′ phase is determined by an image processing apparatus, and the aspect ratio ασ (a ′ / b ′) in the direction of receiving a stress load is obtained.
And the no-load aspect ratio α 0 (a / b) was determined as the raft ratio Φ. Φ = ασ / α 0 = (a ′ / b ′) / (a / b) Then, the relationship between Φ and LMP for each temperature and time is estimated, and Φ
And LMP that agree with each other is estimated from the relationship of Φ-LMP, and the creep rupture life ratio t / tr is estimated.
【0010】[0010]
【実施例】図1〜3は、Ni基耐熱合金のγ’相の変化
の状況を示したもので、図1は素材の角張ったγ’相を
示している。この素材をラーソン・ミラー・パラメータ
(LMP)が29.26×103 の温度・時間履歴を経
ることにより、図2のように、丸みを帯びて粗大化す
る。さらに、前記の温度・時間履歴を付与し、かつ5.
2kgf/mm2 の応力を作用させると、図3のよう
に、γ’相が一層粗大化するとともに、細長く変化する
(ラフト化する)。1 to 3 show the change in the γ 'phase of a Ni-base heat-resistant alloy. FIG. 1 shows the angular γ' phase of a material. This material undergoes a temperature and time history with a Larson-Miller parameter (LMP) of 29.26 × 10 3 to be rounded and coarse as shown in FIG. Further, the temperature / time history is added, and
When a stress of 2 kgf / mm 2 is applied, the γ ′ phase is further coarsened and elongate (raft) as shown in FIG.
【0011】図4は、γ’相の円相当直径の平均値dの
変化(粗大化)の校正曲線の例を示した、d−LMP線
図である。応力の影響はなく、式(1)で表現すること
ができる。 LMP=8.03・logd+29.18 ・・・(1) 式中、LMP=(T+273)(20+logt)×1
0-3 T:履歴時の温度(℃) t:履歴時間(hr)d :γ’相の円相当直径の平均値(μm) (但し、定数Cは合金毎に変更する場合があるが、上式
では20とした)FIG. 4 is a d- LMP diagram showing an example of a calibration curve of the change (coarsening) of the average value d of the circle equivalent diameter of the γ ′ phase. There is no influence of stress, and it can be expressed by equation (1). LMP = 8.03 · log d +29.18 (1) where LMP = (T + 273) (20 + logt) × 1
0 -3 T: Temperature during history (° C.) t: History time (hr) d : Average value of equivalent circle diameter of γ ′ phase (μm) (However, constant C may be changed for each alloy, In the above formula, it was 20)
【0012】図5は、γ’相のアスペクト比(長径/短
径)の変化に対する履歴時間tとクリープ破断時間tr
の比のクリープ破断寿命比(t/tr)に対する、下記
Φ(ασ/α0 )の関係を例示したものである。図から
明らかなように、クリープ破断寿命比の増加に伴い、
γ’相のアスペクト比が変化する。応力負荷の場合のア
スペクト比(ασ)は増加(ラフト化)するが、無負荷
の場合のアスペクト比(α0 )は減少する。応力負荷有
のアスペクト比と応力負荷無のアスペクト比との比であ
るクラフト化比率Φ(ασ/α0 )は、図中、黒丸印の
ように、片対数グラフ上で直線となる。FIG. 5 shows the history time t and the creep rupture time tr with respect to the change in the aspect ratio (major axis / minor axis) of the γ ′ phase.
Is an example of the relationship of the following Φ (ασ / α 0 ) to the creep rupture life ratio (t / tr) of the ratio. As is clear from the figure, as the creep rupture life ratio increases,
The aspect ratio of the γ 'phase changes. The aspect ratio (ασ) in the case of a stress load increases (raft), but the aspect ratio (α 0 ) in the case of no load decreases. The crafting ratio Φ (ασ / α 0 ), which is the ratio between the aspect ratio with stress load and the aspect ratio without stress load, is a straight line on a semilogarithmic graph as indicated by a black circle in the figure.
【0013】この直線は、式(2)で表現することがで
きる。 Pt/tr=Ptr+log(t/tr)(T+273) 及び、Φ=Ct/tr ・・・(2) 式中、Pt/tr:クリープ破断寿命比(t/tr)のとき
のLMP Ptr:t/tr=1のときのLMP LMP=(20+logtr)(T+273)×10-3 T:履歴温度(℃) Φ:γ’相のアスペクト比の(応力負荷有)/(応力負
荷無)の比 C:応力(LMP)に依存するΦの最大値(t/tr=
1のとき)This straight line can be expressed by equation (2). Pt / tr = Ptr + log (t / tr) (T + 273) and Φ = Ct / tr (2) where Pt / tr : creep rupture life ratio (t / tr) LMP P tr : LMP when t / tr = 1 LMP = (20 + logtr) (T + 273) × 10 −3 T: hysteresis temperature (° C.) Φ: aspect ratio of the γ ′ phase (with stress load) / (stress load) Ratio C: maximum value of Φ depending on stress (LMP) (t / tr =
1)
【0014】以上の実験データを踏まえてγ’相変化に
基づく高温長期使用材のメタル温度Tとクリープ破断寿
命比t/trの推定の手順を図6及び図7により説明す
る。高温長期使用材のメタル温度Tを推定する手順は、
次のとおりである。まず、 走査型電子顕微鏡(SEM)で応力方向に直角面及び
平行面のγ’相を5000倍程度の高倍率で観察して応
力方向に直角(応力負荷無)面のγ’相の長径aと短径
b、及び、応力方向に平行(応力負荷有)面のγ’相の
長径a’と短径b’を測定する。A procedure for estimating the metal temperature T and the creep rupture life ratio t / tr of a high-temperature long-term material based on the γ 'phase change based on the above experimental data will be described with reference to FIGS. The procedure for estimating the metal temperature T of high-temperature long-term materials is as follows:
It is as follows. First, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used to observe the γ 'phase in a plane perpendicular to the stress direction and a plane parallel to the stress direction at a high magnification of about 5000 times, and observe the major axis a of the γ' phase in a plane perpendicular to the stress direction (no stress applied). And the minor axis b, and the major axis a ′ and minor axis b ′ of the γ ′ phase on the plane parallel to the stress direction (with stress applied).
【0015】γ’相の画像処理では、γ’相の円相
当直径の平均値d、及び、γ’相のアスペクト比の応
力負荷有/無のラフト化比率Φを求める。γ’相の円
相当直径の平均値dは、で測定したγ’相の長径と短
径から円相当直径の平均値dを求める。In the image processing of the γ ′ phase, the average value d of the circle equivalent diameter of the γ ′ phase and the raft ratio Φ with / without the stress load of the aspect ratio of the γ ′ phase are obtained. gamma 'an average value of equivalent-circle diameters of phase d is in the measured gamma' an average value d of the circle equivalent diameter of major axis and minor axis of the phase.
【0016】メタル温度Tの推定は、前記で求めた
γ’相の円相当直径の平均値dを用い、評価対象の実験
データである図6のd−LMP線図から、図4の試料に
ついては次式を得た。ここで、上記のd−LMP線図と
式(1)は、温度・時間履歴の既知試料から予め求めた
校正曲線である。メタル温度Tの推定には、使用時間t
は既知であることが必要となる。なお、γ’相のd変化
に応力依存はないので、メタル温度Tの推定には、応力
方向に直角面及び平行面のいずれか一方のSEM観察で
よい。The metal temperature T is estimated by using the average value d of the equivalent circle diameter of the γ ′ phase obtained as described above, and from the d- LMP diagram of FIG. 6 which is the experimental data to be evaluated, for the sample of FIG. Obtained the following equation. Here, the above d- LMP diagram and equation (1) are calibration curves obtained in advance from known samples of the temperature / time history. To estimate the metal temperature T, use time t
Needs to be known. Since the d change of the γ 'phase does not depend on the stress, the metal temperature T may be estimated by SEM observation of one of a plane perpendicular to and parallel to the stress direction.
【0017】LMP=8.03・logd+29.18 一方、LMPは、LMP=(T+273)(20+lo
gt)×10-3 であるから、両式から、次式によりメ
タル温度Tを求めることができる。 T=〔(8.03・logd+29.18)/(20+
logt)×10-3〕−273LMP = 8.03 · log d +29.18 On the other hand, LMP is LMP = (T + 273) (20 + lo
gt) × 10 −3 , the metal temperature T can be determined from both equations by the following equation. T = [(8.03 · logd + 29.18) / (20+
logt) × 10 -3 ] -273
【0018】γ’相のアスペクト比の応力負荷有/無
のラフト化比率Φは、γ’相の応力負荷のアスペクト比
σα(a’/b’)と、応力負荷無のアスペクト比σ0
(a/b)から両者の比率Φ(=σα/σ0 )として求
める。 温度・時間毎のΦ−LMP関係の推定では、で求め
たγ’相の円相当直径の平均値dと、で求めたメタル
温度Tと、で求めたγ’相のΦから予め求め、Φ−L
MPの関係を式(2)より求め、図6のΦ−LMP線図
のように作図してΦとLMPの交点を求める。The raft ratio Φ with / without a stress load of the aspect ratio of the γ ′ phase is represented by an aspect ratio σα (a ′ / b ′) of a γ ′ phase stress load and an aspect ratio σ 0 without a stress load.
From (a / b), the ratio Φ (= σα / σ 0 ) is obtained. In the estimation of the Φ-LMP relationship for each temperature and time, the average value d of the equivalent circle diameter of the γ ′ phase obtained in the above, the metal temperature T obtained in the above, and the Φ of the γ ′ phase obtained in the above are obtained in advance. -L
The relationship between MPs is obtained from equation (2), and the intersection of Φ and LMP is obtained by plotting as shown in the Φ-LMP diagram of FIG.
【0019】クリープ破断寿命比t/trは、このよ
うにして求めた、Φ−LMP関係の推定値のうち、t/
tr=1のΦがその最大値となり、これから Φ=C
t/trの関係を示す図6のΦ−t/tr線図を作図し、こ
れに再びγ’相観察からのΦを当てはめて、クリープ破
断寿命比t/trを推定することができる。The creep rupture life ratio t / tr is t / tr of the estimated value of the Φ-LMP relation thus obtained.
Φ at tr = 1 becomes its maximum value, from which Φ = C
Draw the Φ-t / tr diagram of Figure 6 showing the relationship of t / tr, by applying the [Phi from this re-gamma 'phase observation, it is possible to estimate the creep rupture life ratio t / tr.
【0020】別法として、メタル温度毎のΦ−LMP
関係、t/tr=1において、図7のΦ−LMP線図の
ように、次式を求め、t/tr<1を推定することも可
能である。 Φ1 =1+4.14×10-13 ・100.4412P1 P =P1 +log(t/tr)・〔(T+273)/
1000〕 Φ =1+(Φ1 −1)(t/tr)Alternatively, Φ-LMP for each metal temperature
In the relation, t / tr = 1, it is also possible to obtain the following equation and estimate t / tr <1 as shown in the Φ-LMP diagram of FIG. Φ 1 = 1 + 4.14 × 10 −13 · 10 0.4412 P1 P = P 1 + log (t / tr) · [(T + 273) /
1000] Φ = 1 + (Φ 1 −1) (t / tr)
【0021】[0021]
【発明の効果】本発明は、上記の構成を採用することに
より、高温長時間使用によるγ’相の変化を画像処理装
置を用いて予め作成した校正曲線を用い、Ni基耐熱合
金のメタル使用温度推定とクリープ破断寿命比を迅速に
かつ定量的に推定することができるようになった。その
結果、例えば、ガスタービン動翼のメタル使用温度やク
リープ破断を未然に防止するための対策を講ずることに
より、製品の信頼性を確保できるようになった。According to the present invention, by adopting the above-described structure, the change of the γ ′ phase due to long-time use at high temperature can be measured by using a calibration curve prepared in advance using an image processing apparatus and using a metal of a Ni-base heat-resistant alloy. Temperature estimation and creep rupture life ratio can be quickly and quantitatively estimated. As a result, for example, the reliability of the product can be ensured by taking measures to prevent the metal operating temperature and creep rupture of the gas turbine blade beforehand.
【図1】実施例で用いたNi基耐熱合金が、高温使用前
の角張ったγ’相を示した顕微鏡写真である。FIG. 1 is a photomicrograph showing that the Ni-base heat-resistant alloy used in Examples shows a sharp γ ′ phase before use at a high temperature.
【図2】図1のγ’相にLMP=29.26×103 の
温度・時間履歴を付与したことにより、丸みを帯びて粗
大化したγ’相の状態を示した顕微鏡写真である。FIG. 2 is a photomicrograph showing a rounded and coarse γ ′ phase obtained by adding a temperature / time history of LMP = 29.26 × 10 3 to the γ ′ phase of FIG. 1;
【図3】図1のγ’相がLMP=29.26×103 の
温度・時間履歴を付与し、かつ、5.2kgf/mm2
の応力が作用したときのγ’相の状態を示した顕微鏡写
真である。FIG. 3 shows that the γ ′ phase of FIG. 1 gives a temperature / time history of LMP = 29.26 × 10 3 and 5.2 kgf / mm 2
5 is a photomicrograph showing the state of the γ ′ phase when the stress of FIG.
【図4】γ’相の円相当直径の平均値dとLMPの関係
を示した図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the relationship between the average value d of the equivalent circle diameter of the γ ′ phase and LMP.
【図5】アクセプト比α及びラフト化比率Φ(=ασ/
α0 )とクリープ破断寿命比(t/tr)の関係を示し
た図である。FIG. 5 shows an accept ratio α and a raft ratio Φ (= ασ /
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a relationship between α 0 ) and a creep rupture life ratio (t / tr).
【図6】γ’相変化からメタル温度及びクリープ破断寿
命比を推定する手順を説明するための図であり、γ’相
SEM観察のデータに基づいてγ’相画像処理を行うま
での手順を説明するための図である。FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining a procedure for estimating a metal temperature and a creep rupture life ratio from a γ ′ phase change, and illustrates a procedure until γ ′ phase image processing is performed based on γ ′ phase SEM observation data. It is a figure for explaining.
【図7】γ’相変化からメタル温度及びクリープ破断寿
命比を推定する手順を説明するための図であり、図6に
続いて、メタル温度T及びクリープ破断寿命比t/tr
を推定する手順を説明するための図である。FIG. 7 is a diagram for explaining a procedure for estimating a metal temperature and a creep rupture life ratio from a γ ′ phase change. FIG.
FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining a procedure for estimating.
フロントページの続き (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) G01N 17/00 G01M 19/00 G01N 3/32 G01N 33/20 JICSTファイル(JOIS)Continuation of the front page (58) Field surveyed (Int. Cl. 7 , DB name) G01N 17/00 G01M 19/00 G01N 3/32 G01N 33/20 JICST file (JOIS)
Claims (3)
相のラフト化比率を検知してクリープ破断寿命比を推定
することを特徴とするNi基耐熱合金の余寿命評価法。1. The γ ′ of the metal structure in a Ni-base heat-resistant alloy
A method for evaluating a remaining life of a Ni-based heat-resistant alloy, comprising estimating a creep rupture life ratio by detecting a raft ratio of a phase.
試料に応力を負荷し、γ’相の長径と短径を測定して円
相当直径を求め、ラーソン・ミラー・パラメータ〔LM
P=(T+273)(C+logt)〕と前記円相当直
径との間の校正曲線を予め求めておき、評価対象のNi
基耐熱合金のγ’相の円相当直径から、メタル温度Tを
求めることを特徴とする請求項1記載のNi基耐熱合金
の余寿命評価法。2. A stress is applied to a Ni-base heat-resistant alloy sample whose temperature and time history is known, and the major axis and minor axis of the γ ′ phase are measured to obtain a circle-equivalent diameter, and the Larson-Miller parameter [LM]
A calibration curve between P = (T + 273) (C + logt)] and the circle equivalent diameter is obtained in advance, and the Ni to be evaluated is evaluated.
2. The method for evaluating the remaining life of a Ni-base heat-resistant alloy according to claim 1, wherein the metal temperature T is determined from the equivalent circle diameter of the γ 'phase of the base heat-resistant alloy.
負荷し、負荷方向に平行面(応力負荷面)と直角面(応
力負荷無し面)におけるγ’相の長径と短径を測定し、
それぞれの面におけるアスペクト比(長径/短径)を求
め、さらに、ラフト化比率Φ(応力負荷面のアスペクト
比/応力負荷無し面のアスペクト比)を求めて、ラフト
化比率Φとラーソン・ミラー・パラメータ(LMP)の
関係図から、クリープ破断寿命比(履歴時間t/クリー
プ破断寿命tr)を求めることを特徴とする請求項2記
載のNi基耐熱合金の余寿命評価法。3. A stress is applied to the Ni-base heat-resistant alloy sample to be evaluated, and the major axis and minor axis of the γ ′ phase are measured on a plane parallel to the load direction (stress-loaded plane) and a plane perpendicular to the loading direction (stress-free plane). ,
The aspect ratio (major axis / minor axis) of each surface is determined, and the raft ratio Φ (aspect ratio of the stress-loaded surface / aspect ratio of the surface without stress) is determined. 3. The method for evaluating the remaining life of a Ni-base heat-resistant alloy according to claim 2, wherein a creep rupture life ratio (history time t / creep rupture life tr) is determined from a relationship diagram of the parameter (LMP).
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP12557295A JP3310818B2 (en) | 1995-04-27 | 1995-04-27 | Evaluation method for remaining life of Ni-base heat-resistant alloy |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP12557295A JP3310818B2 (en) | 1995-04-27 | 1995-04-27 | Evaluation method for remaining life of Ni-base heat-resistant alloy |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH08297079A JPH08297079A (en) | 1996-11-12 |
JP3310818B2 true JP3310818B2 (en) | 2002-08-05 |
Family
ID=14913512
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP12557295A Expired - Lifetime JP3310818B2 (en) | 1995-04-27 | 1995-04-27 | Evaluation method for remaining life of Ni-base heat-resistant alloy |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP3310818B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6448724B1 (en) * | 2017-08-10 | 2019-01-09 | 九州電力株式会社 | Remaining life evaluation method |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109799146B (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2021-07-02 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Casing evaluation method for fireflooding heavy oil well |
-
1995
- 1995-04-27 JP JP12557295A patent/JP3310818B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6448724B1 (en) * | 2017-08-10 | 2019-01-09 | 九州電力株式会社 | Remaining life evaluation method |
JP2019035597A (en) * | 2017-08-10 | 2019-03-07 | 九州電力株式会社 | Residual lifetime evaluation method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPH08297079A (en) | 1996-11-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Manson | Fatigue-a complex subject-some simple approximations | |
Northwood et al. | Characterization of neutron irradiation damage in zirconium alloys—an international “round-robin” experiment | |
Noecker et al. | Metallurgical investigation into ductility dip cracking in Ni-based alloys: Part II | |
Paul et al. | Shear band microtexture formation in twinned face centred cubic single crystals | |
Mueller et al. | In-situ strength of individual silicon particles within an aluminium casting alloy | |
US6512982B2 (en) | Methods and systems for evaluating defects in metals | |
JP3310818B2 (en) | Evaluation method for remaining life of Ni-base heat-resistant alloy | |
US4953973A (en) | Detection of compressive residual stresses using the method of caustics | |
CN112415029A (en) | Method for directly testing volume fraction of precipitated phase in alloy | |
US8691105B2 (en) | Method of detecting contamination of titanium alloys of two-phase type having an alpha and a beta phase | |
Doig et al. | The use of stretch zone width measurements in the determination of fracture toughness of low strength steels | |
JP3064107B2 (en) | High-temperature damage evaluation method for austenitic heat-resistant steel | |
Kruml et al. | Dislocation density in ni3 (al, hf) | |
JP2007057240A (en) | Estimation apparatus of destruction cause and estimation method of destruction cause | |
JP3794943B2 (en) | Method for estimating metal temperature and material properties of Ni-based alloy parts | |
JPH05223809A (en) | Remaining service life estimating method for gamma' phase precipitation reinforcement type alloy | |
Venkatraman et al. | Stiffness based technique to probe cyclic damage accumulation in micro-structurally graded bond coats via micro-beam bending tests | |
Kraemer et al. | Toward a Better Understanding of Crack Growth in Nickel-Cast Alloys Under Creep-Fatigue and Thermo-Mechanical Fatigue Conditions | |
Schwalbe et al. | Validation of the fracture mechanics test method egf p1–87d (esis p1–90/esis p1–92): analysis of an experimental round robin | |
JPH10197515A (en) | Estimating method of working temperature of cobalt group heat resistant alloy | |
JP3224053B2 (en) | Non-destructive test method and apparatus for heat-resistant metal | |
JP3519703B2 (en) | Temperature estimation method for high temperature parts | |
JP2020159850A (en) | Method, device and system for diagnosing degradation of nickel-based superalloy | |
JP2009074868A (en) | Lifetime estimation method of nickel-based alloy component | |
Varvani Farahani | Biaxial fatigue crack growth and crack closure under constant amplitude and periodic compressive overload histories in 1045 steel |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20020430 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090524 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090524 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100524 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110524 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120524 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130524 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140524 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |