JP3194730U - Indicator - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention provides a display body capable of clearly displaying a distribution of a contamination state in a cleaning target at a glance. A planar object having a polygonal, circular, or elliptical surface shape, and an evaluation result display diagram 21 formed on the entire surface or a part of the surface of the planar object, the evaluation result display diagram. 21 is provided with a shape imitating the planar shape of the cleaning target, the evaluation result display diagram 21 displays the evaluation result of the cleaning target area into which the cleaning target is divided. Evaluation columns 22a to 22i, and the evaluation columns 22a to 22i are arranged so that the positional relationship between the evaluation columns 22a to 22i and the positional relationship between the cleaning target areas correspond to each other. Display body. [Selection] Figure 2

Description

  The present invention relates to a display body, and more particularly, to a display body that can clearly display a distribution of a contamination state in an object to be cleaned.

  Conventionally, the contamination state on the surface to be cleaned may be evaluated. In particular, when the object to be cleaned is a floor surface of an indoor facility such as a building, the contamination state on the surface of the object to be cleaned determines whether to clean the floor surface, repair the floor material, or maintain the floor material. It is important as a judgment material.

  In the object to be cleaned, the degree and distribution of contamination is not uniform. The degree and distribution of the contamination state to be cleaned differ depending on the number of people and the type of equipment installed. For example, if the object to be cleaned is a corridor, the “area A to be cleaned”, which is the corridor in front of the elevator where people frequently enter and exit, is easy to get dirty. The “cleaning target area B”, which is a passage portion close to the wall surface, is often difficult to get dirty. Therefore, when this corridor is used as a cleaning target and the contamination state is evaluated, it can be determined that “cleaning target area A” is in a clean state, and “cleaning target area B” is determined as being in a state of severe contamination. be able to.

  Conventionally, even if an evaluation result regarding the contamination state of each cleaning target area is obtained, there is a problem that the relationship between the contamination state in the cleaning target area and the position of the cleaning target area cannot be easily recognized. In the above example, the area A to be cleaned in front of the elevator is heavily contaminated, and even if it is determined that careful daily cleaning work is required, the area to be cleaned in front of the elevator is the actual object to be cleaned. It is difficult for the cleaner to easily recognize where it is located, how big it is, and what shape it is.

  The problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a display body that can clearly display the distribution of the contamination state in the object to be cleaned.

Means for solving the problems are as follows:
(1) A plane object and an evaluation result display diagram formed on the surface of the plane object are provided, and the evaluation result display diagram displays an evaluation result of the area to be cleaned in which the object to be cleaned is divided. The result display diagram includes a plurality of evaluation columns, and is a display body characterized in that the evaluation columns are arranged so that the positional relationship between the evaluation columns and the positional relationship between the cleaning target areas correspond to each other,
(2) The evaluation field is formed so as to be color-coded into any one selected from blue, yellow, and red from the top to the bottom of the evaluation result. Is a display of
(3) The display unit according to (1) or (2), wherein the evaluation result is obtained using two types of evaluation criteria,
(4) Among the two types of evaluation criteria, one type is an evaluation criterion for ranking the measurement results obtained by the measuring device, and the other type is an evaluation criterion for ranking the observer's impressions. 3) The display body according to
(5) The display object according to any one of (1) to (4), wherein the object to be cleaned is a floor surface of an indoor facility.

  According to the present invention, since the positional relationship between the evaluation columns and the positional relationship between the cleaning target areas correspond to each other, it is possible to recognize the contamination state of each cleaning target area by observing the evaluation result in each evaluation column and The positional relationship between the cleaning target areas whose states are recognized can be recognized at a glance. Therefore, the user can recognize the distribution of the contamination state in the entire cleaning object at a glance.

  Moreover, according to this invention, the contamination state of cleaning object can be evaluated accurately by using two types of evaluation criteria.

FIG. 1 is a longitudinal sectional view of a display body which is an example of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a plan view showing an example of an evaluation result display diagram in the present invention. FIG. 3 is a floor view showing the position of each area to be cleaned in the object to be cleaned. FIG. 4 is a plan view showing another example of the evaluation result display diagram in the present invention. FIG. 5 is a plan view showing an example of a reference image in the present invention.

  As shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, a display body 1 as an example of the present invention includes a flat object 2 and an evaluation result display diagram 21 formed on a surface 3 of the flat object 2.

The flat object 2 is not particularly limited as long as it is an object having a surface capable of forming the evaluation result display diagram 21, and examples thereof include paper, a plastic sheet, a display, and a projection object.
In the planar object 2, the aspect in which the evaluation result display diagram 21 is formed is not particularly limited. In the example in which the flat object 2 is a sheet made of paper or plastic, it is only necessary that the evaluation result display diagram 21 is printed on the surface of the sheet made of paper or plastic so that it can be visually recognized. Moreover, in the example in which the planar object 2 is a display, the evaluation result display diagram 21 may be displayed on the surface of the display. Furthermore, in the example in which the planar object 2 is the projection object, the evaluation result display diagram 21 may be projected onto the surface of the projection object by a projection device such as a projector.
The type of paper is not particularly limited, and preferred examples include coated paper, matte coated paper, high-quality paper, and white paperboard. The plastic is preferably transparent or translucent. Preferable examples of the plastic material include polyacrylate, polycarbonate, polystyrene, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyvinylidene chloride, and polycarbonate.
The display includes a light source and has a function of displaying an image by emitting light from the surface. The type of the display is not particularly limited, and for example, a commercially available display such as a liquid crystal display and a plasma display can be used. Preferable examples of the electronic device provided with the display include a personal computer and a mobile phone. The type of personal computer is not particularly limited, but it is particularly preferable to use a tablet-type personal computer having a display in which a cover device and an input device are integrated.
The projection target is not particularly limited as long as it is a device having a surface capable of displaying the evaluation result display diagram 21 projected by a projection device such as a projector. More specifically, the evaluation result display diagram 21 can be displayed on the surface of the projection object by projecting light by a projection device such as a projector. Preferable examples of the projection target include a screen and a plain wall.

  The flat object 2 is preferably formed in a thin plate shape, a sheet shape, or a film shape so as to have a plane having a larger area than the area of the end face, and this flat surface corresponds to the surface 3 of the flat object. In the example in which the flat object 2 is a sheet of paper or plastic, the thickness of the flat object 2 is preferably about 0.1 to 0.3 mm. When the thickness of the flat object 2 is within the above numerical range, the flat object 2 can be easily used by being attached to the surface of various objects. The shape of the surface 3 of the flat object is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include a polygon, a circle, and an ellipse, and a square or a rectangle is particularly preferable. The size of the surface 3 of the flat object is not particularly limited, but in an example where the shape of the surface 3 of the flat object is a square or a rectangle, if the length of one side is 30 mm or more and 100 mm or less, the operability is excellent. This is preferable because the user can easily observe the display.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the flat object 2 is preferably provided with an adhesive layer 4 on the surface opposite to the surface 3 of the flat object. By providing the adhesive layer 4, for example, the flat object 2 can be attached to a position that is easy for the user to observe, such as a wall or a desk surface. The adhesive layer 4 can be formed by applying a known adhesive to the flat object 2. The type of the adhesive used for forming the adhesive layer 4 is not particularly limited as long as it has a certain adhesive strength. For example, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, vinyl resin, styrene resin, epoxy resin And cyanoacrylate-based adhesives.

  A release layer 5 is preferably provided on the surface of the adhesive layer 4 opposite to the surface in contact with the planar object 2. When the flat object 2 is attached to another substance, the release layer 5 may be removed and the adhesive layer 4 may be exposed. The release layer 5 has a function of protecting the adhesive layer 4 and preventing the adhesive strength of the adhesive from deteriorating.

  The adhesive layer 4 may be provided on the entire surface of the surface opposite to the surface 3 of the flat object, or may be provided on a part of the surface. Further, the shape, thickness, etc. of the release layer 5 are not particularly limited as long as the surface of the adhesive layer 4 can be covered. In addition, the material of the release layer 5 is not particularly limited as long as the release layer 5 can be bonded to the adhesive layer 4 with appropriate strength, but is preferably paper or plastic.

  As shown in FIG. 2, an evaluation result display diagram 21 is formed on the surface 3 of the flat object. The evaluation result display diagram 21 may be formed on the entire surface 3 of the flat object, or may be formed on a part of the surface 3 of the flat object. The ratio of the area occupied by the plurality of evaluation result display diagrams 21 on the surface 3 of the flat object is particularly preferably 60% or more and 90% or less. Within this numerical range, the operability is excellent and the user can easily observe the display.

  The cleaning target may be a target on which daily cleaning work is performed in an indoor facility, for example. Indoor facilities include, for example, elevator halls, entrances, conference rooms, office rooms, toilets, stairs, hot water supply rooms, corridors, and the like. The object to be cleaned is an object having a surface in an indoor facility, and examples thereof include a floor, a ceiling, a wall, a shelf, glass, a desk, a mirror, a wash basin, a sink, and a toilet toilet. It is particularly preferable that the object to be cleaned is a floor surface of an indoor facility. Preferable examples of the floor include, for example, carpet floors, chemical floors, stone floors, wooden floors, and floor surfaces of other floors such as linoleum.

The object to be cleaned is divided into two or more areas to be cleaned according to the distribution of the contamination state. For example, it is preferable to classify so that a location with a remarkable contamination state becomes an area of a small area, and a location with a light contamination state becomes an area of a large area. The area of the area to be cleaned is preferably ² m ² or more and 50 m ² or less. For each area to be cleaned, an evaluation result related to the contamination state is obtained using an evaluation criterion described later.

  The floor plan of FIG. 3 shows the positional relationship, shape, area ratio, etc. of the cleaning target areas 32a to 32i actually divided in the cleaning target 31 in the plan view. In the evaluation result display diagram 21 of FIG. 2, a plurality of evaluation columns 22a to 22i are provided. The positional relationship between the areas to be cleaned 32a to 32i shown in FIG. 3 corresponds to the positional relationship between the evaluation columns 22a to 22i shown in FIG. More specifically, the floor diagram shown in FIG. 3 and the evaluation result display image 21 shown in FIG. 2 have substantially the same shape, and the areas to be cleaned 32a to 32i in FIG. 3 and the evaluation columns 22a to 22 in FIG. Since 22i has substantially the same shape, the positions and exclusive areas of the cleaning target areas 32a to 32i in the entire cleaning object 31 are substantially the same as the positions and exclusive areas of the evaluation columns 22a to 22i in the entire evaluation result display image 21. Are the same.

  The evaluation columns 22a to 22i are preferably formed so as to be color-coded according to the ranking of the evaluation results in the cleaning target areas 32a to 32i corresponding to the evaluation columns 22a to 22i. More preferably, the evaluation columns 22a to 22i are formed so as to be color-coded into any one selected from blue, yellow, and red from the top to the bottom of the evaluation result. Since such color coding is the same configuration as the color coding of traffic lights, the blue evaluation column is good, the red evaluation column is bad, and the yellow evaluation column is an evaluation between good and bad. A person can make an intuitive judgment at a glance. The blue color in the present application may be, for example, light blue, dark blue, group blue, indigo, blue-green as used for a blue signal, or green.

  In the example in FIG. 2, the evaluation columns 22a and 22f are color-coded red, the evaluation columns 22b, 22d, 22h, and 22i are color-coded yellow, and the evaluation columns 22c, 22e, and 22g are color-coded blue.

Although not illustrated in FIG. 2, numbers may be described in the evaluation columns 22 a to 22 i according to the evaluation, in other words, numbers indicating superiority or inferiority of the evaluation may be described. When numbers are described in the evaluation columns 22a to 22i, the superiority and inferiority of the evaluation columns 22a to 22i can be compared according to the size relationship of the numbers described in the evaluation columns 22a to 22i, and the user can easily evaluate the numbers. The superiority or inferiority between the columns 22a to 22i can be determined.
In order to allow the evaluation result display image 21 to display the evaluation results of the cleaning target areas 32a to 32i, the evaluation columns 22a to 22i may be only color-coded to indicate the ranking of the evaluations. Only numbers may be described, and color coding indicating ranking of evaluations and numerical values according to the evaluation may be described.

The shape of the evaluation columns 22a to 22i may not be substantially the same as the shape of the cleaning target areas 32a to 32i in the floor plan. The shape of the evaluation columns 22a to 22i allows the user to easily associate the positional relationship of the evaluation columns 22a to 22i in the entire evaluation result display image 21 with the positional relationship of the cleaning target areas 32a to 32i in the entire cleaning target 31. As long as it can be understood, the design can be changed as appropriate. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 4, the shapes of the evaluation columns 42 a to 42 i may be simplified as compared to the shapes of the cleaning target areas 32 a to 32 i.

The evaluation standard is used to evaluate the contamination state of the object to be cleaned. Evaluation criteria include subjective evaluation criteria and objective evaluation criteria. The subjective evaluation standard is an evaluation standard based on an impression obtained by using any of the five senses of a person. Of the five senses, an impression obtained by sight or smell is preferable.
An objective evaluation criterion is an evaluation criterion based on a measurement value obtained using a measuring device. Examples of the measuring device include a dust meter, a color difference meter, an ATP measuring device, and a gloss meter. As a measuring device such as a dust meter, a color difference meter, an ATP measuring device, and a gloss meter, a conventionally known device that is commercially available can be used.
For example, in an example where the object to be cleaned is a stone floor or a chemical floor, a floor resin finish is often formed on the floor surface. It is possible to evaluate the degree of damage of the coating and accumulation of dirt. The carpet floor, which is an example of the object to be cleaned, may be discolored or faded due to deterioration over time, and by measuring the value of the color difference, the degree of discoloration, fading, dirt adhesion, etc. of the carpet floor can be evaluated. it can.
Also, in cases where the object to be cleaned is a toilet floor, hot water room floor, kitchen floor, kitchen floor, etc., the hygienic condition of the floor surface is evaluated by measuring the amount of ATP using an ATP measuring device. can do. Furthermore, by measuring the amount of dust, dust, and the like on the surface of the object to be cleaned using a dust meter, it is possible to evaluate whether or not the dust suction operation is properly performed on the object to be cleaned.

  The number of evaluation criteria used in the present invention is not particularly limited, but it is particularly preferable that one or two types of evaluation criteria be used. When one kind of evaluation standard is used, a subjective evaluation standard may be used or an objective evaluation standard may be used. When two types of evaluation criteria are used, only subjective evaluation criteria or objective evaluation criteria may be used, but subjective evaluation criteria and objective evaluation criteria may be used. preferable. By using the subjective evaluation standard and the objective evaluation standard, it is possible to accurately evaluate the contamination state of the cleaning target. In addition, when using an objective evaluation standard, a plurality of measurements are performed in one cleaning target area, and an average value of the obtained measurement values is evaluated based on an objective evaluation standard in the cleaning target area. A result is preferred. More specifically, when an objective evaluation criterion is used, it is preferable to perform measurement using a measuring device at a plurality of different locations in one cleaning target area.

  In an example in which two types of evaluation criteria are used, for example, a reference image 51 shown in FIG. 5 can be used to obtain an evaluation result in the area to be cleaned. The reference image 51 includes a plurality of reference columns 52 arranged in an m × n matrix, and evaluation criteria corresponding to the two types of evaluation criteria, arranged in the row direction and the column direction outside the reference column 52. A column 53 is formed. In the example in FIG. 5, the square reference columns 52 are arranged in a 4 × 4 matrix. Outside the reference column 52, one column of the vertical evaluation criterion column 53a is provided, and one row of the horizontal evaluation criterion column 53b is provided. In the example in FIG. 5, the reference column 52 has the same square shape as the evaluation criterion column 53. In the vertical evaluation standard column 53a, letters 1 to 4 for ranking the evaluations and the numerical range of the measured values in parentheses are displayed, and in the horizontal evaluation standard column 53b, A to rank the evaluations. The letter D and the character string indicating the evaluation result based on the viewer's impression are displayed in parentheses. Further, the reference fields 52a of the first row A column, the first row B column, and the second row A column are color-coded in blue, and the first row C column, the second row B column, the second row C column, the third row A column, and the third row. The B column reference field 52b is color-coded in yellow, and the 1st row D column, 2nd row D column, 3rd row C column, 3rd row D column, and 4th row A column to D column reference column 52c are colored in red. It becomes.

  The evaluation criteria column 53 has a function of ranking evaluation results regarding the contamination state of the area to be cleaned. In other words, the letters, numbers, symbols, etc. displayed in the evaluation criteria column 53 have a correspondence relationship with the rank of the evaluation result regarding the contamination state of the area to be cleaned. Specifically, in FIG. 5, the user of the reference image 51 refers to the evaluation criteria column 53 a in the vertical direction and the evaluation result obtained using one of the evaluation criteria corresponds to the reference column 52 of which row. Are used, and the evaluation result obtained using the other evaluation criterion with reference to the horizontal evaluation criterion column 53b is determined to correspond to the reference column 52 of which column, and then the two evaluation criteria are used. It is determined to which reference column 52 the evaluation result obtained in this way corresponds.

  Further, the colors assigned to the evaluation columns 22a to 22i by color coding are the same as the colors attached to the reference column 52 corresponding to the evaluation results obtained in the cleaning target areas 32a to 32i corresponding to the respective evaluation columns 22a to 22i. It is preferable that they are the same.

  Next, the operation of the display body 1 according to the present invention will be described.

  Consider an example in which a cleaning company confirms the distribution of the contamination state with the floor surface of one floor of the office building shown in the floor diagram of FIG. 3 as a cleaning target.

  The cleaning company first divides the floor to be cleaned into nine cleaning target areas 32a to 32i. Next, in each area to be cleaned, the glossiness is measured using a gloss meter, and the visual impression of the observer is recorded. The observer's visual evaluation is performed once for each area to be cleaned. For the gloss meter measurement, a total of five measurements were made by setting five different locations in each area to be cleaned and measuring once at each location, and the average of the five measurements obtained. The value is taken as the measurement result. The measurement result by the gloss meter is obtained as a numerical value of 0 or more and 100 or less. Further, the viewer's visual impression is obtained in four stages: “good”, “slightly good”, “slightly bad”, and “bad”. The results are shown in Table 1 below.

Furthermore, it is determined to which reference column 52 the evaluation results obtained using the two evaluation criteria correspond to the reference image 51 shown in FIG. In the reference image 51, the mark “A” in the horizontal direction indicates the impression by the evaluator that the appearance of the floor is good, “B” indicates the impression by the evaluator that the appearance of the floor is slightly good, “C” is set to indicate an impression by the evaluator that the appearance of the floor surface is slightly poor, and “D” is set to indicate an impression by the evaluator that the appearance of the floor surface is poor. Further, “1” in the vertical direction indicates that the glossiness of the floor surface is 75 or more and 100 or less, “2” indicates that the glossiness of the floor surface is 50 or more and less than 75, and “3” indicates that the floor surface is glossy. The glossiness of the surface is 25 or more and less than 50, and “4” is set to indicate that the glossiness of the floor surface is 0 or more and less than 25.
For example, in the example of the area to be cleaned 32a, the measurement result of the glossiness is “28”, and the viewer's visual impression is “somewhat poor”. Since “28” is “25 or more and less than 50”, it is determined from the measurement result of the glossiness that the measurement result of the cleaning target area 32a corresponds to the evaluation column in the third row. Further, from the result that the visual impression is “slightly bad”, it is determined that the measurement result of the measurement target area 32a corresponds to the evaluation column in the C column. As described above, by using two evaluation criteria, it is determined that the measurement result of the cleaning target area 32a corresponds to 3 rows and C columns.

Next, the display body 1 is prepared. On the surface 3 of the flat object in the display body 1, an image having the same shape as the evaluation result display FIG. 21 shown in FIG. 2 and the evaluation columns 22 a to 22 i are not color-coded (hereinafter referred to as “color-coded evaluation result display”). May be referred to as a figure "). The evaluation result display diagram that is not color-coded is similar in shape to the floor diagram 31 shown in FIG.
The cleaning company color-codes the evaluation columns 22a to 22i in the evaluation result display diagram that is not color-coded according to the colors indicating the evaluation results of the corresponding cleaning target areas 32a to 32i. In particular,
The evaluation columns 22a to 22i are color-coded by the same color as the color applied to the reference column 52 corresponding to the evaluation result of each cleaning target area. For example, in the example of the cleaning target area 32a, the evaluation column 22a is color-coded by the red color applied to the reference column 52 in the C column and the third row in FIG.
In order to color-code the evaluation columns 22a to 22i in the example in which the flat object 2 is a sheet made of paper or plastic, each evaluation column may be painted with a color pencil or the like. In order to color-code the evaluation columns 22a to 22i in the example in which the flat object 2 is a display, the colors corresponding to the respective evaluation columns 22a to 22i may be displayed by operating the display.

When the evaluation result display FIG. 21 after the evaluation columns 22a to 22i are color-coded, the evaluation column 22a corresponding to the cleaning target area 32a including the passage near the elevator hall with many people and the toilet with many people Since the evaluation column 22f corresponding to the cleaning target area 32f including the passage is painted red, the user can determine at a glance that these cleaning target areas are extremely contaminated.
Moreover, since the evaluation columns 22c, 22e, and 22g corresponding to the cleaning target areas 32c, 32e, and 32g, which are passages with little traffic, are painted blue, these cleaning target areas are in a clean state. The user can judge at a glance.

As a result of evaluation using two different evaluation criteria, the cleaning target areas 32a and 32f corresponding to the red evaluation fields 22a and 22f need to be carefully cleaned, while the blue evaluation field 22c, In the areas to be cleaned 32c, 32e, and 32g corresponding to 22e and 22g, the cleaning contractor can easily determine that the cleaning work should be simply performed.
Further, since the positional relationship between the evaluation columns 22a to 22i and the positional relationship between the cleaning target areas 32a to 32i correspond to each other, the user takes the evaluation result display diagram 21 color-coded like a map. By walking on the one floor, which is the cleaning target 31, while referring to it, the position, size, contamination state, shape, etc. of each of the cleaning target areas 32a to 32i can be easily grasped.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Display body 2 Plane thing 3 Surface of flat thing 4 Adhesive layer 5 Release layer 21 Evaluation result display image 22a-22i Evaluation column 31 Cleaning object 32a-32i Cleaning object area 41 Evaluation result display image 42a-42i Evaluation column 51 Reference image 52 , 52a, 52b, 52c Reference column 53 Evaluation criterion column 53a Vertical evaluation criterion column 53b Horizontal evaluation criterion column

Means for solving the problems are as follows:
(1) A planar object whose surface shape is polygonal, circular, or elliptical , and an evaluation result display diagram formed on the entire surface or a part of the surface of the planar object, the evaluation result display diagram, comprising a shape imitating a planar shape of the cleaned, the evaluation result display view is made by displaying the evaluation result of the cleaned area was divided the cleaned, the evaluation result display view includes a plurality of evaluation column a display body, characterized in that a positional relationship between the evaluation column and the positional relationship of the cleaned area to each other formed by the evaluation column are arranged so as to correspond,
(2) The evaluation field is formed so as to be color-coded into any one selected from blue, yellow, and red from the top to the bottom of the evaluation result. Is a display of
(3) The display unit according to (1) or (2), wherein the evaluation result is obtained using two types of evaluation criteria,
(4) Among the two types of evaluation criteria, one type is an evaluation criterion for ranking the measurement results obtained by the measuring device, and the other type is an evaluation criterion for ranking the observer's impressions. 3) The display body according to
(5) The display object according to any one of (1) to (4), wherein the object to be cleaned is a floor surface of an indoor facility.

Claims (5)

A plane object, and an evaluation result display diagram formed on the surface of the plane object,
The evaluation result display diagram displays the evaluation result of the area to be cleaned that categorizes the object to be cleaned,
The evaluation result display diagram includes a plurality of evaluation columns, and the evaluation columns are arranged so that the positional relationship between the evaluation columns corresponds to the positional relationship between the areas to be cleaned.   The display body according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation column is formed so as to be color-coded into any one selected from blue, yellow, and red from the top to the bottom of the evaluation result.   The display body according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation result is obtained using two kinds of evaluation criteria.   4. The evaluation criterion according to claim 3, wherein one of the two types of evaluation criteria is an evaluation criterion for ranking the measurement results obtained by the measuring device, and the other one is an evaluation criterion for ranking the observer's impressions. The display body.   The display object according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the object to be cleaned is a floor surface of an indoor facility.

Images