JP3184962B2 - Laser welding detection method - Google Patents

Laser welding detection method

Info

Publication number
JP3184962B2
JP3184962B2 JP23372198A JP23372198A JP3184962B2 JP 3184962 B2 JP3184962 B2 JP 3184962B2 JP 23372198 A JP23372198 A JP 23372198A JP 23372198 A JP23372198 A JP 23372198A JP 3184962 B2 JP3184962 B2 JP 3184962B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
welding
light
laser
intensity
reflected light
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP23372198A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2000061672A (en
Inventor
英敏 月原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority to JP23372198A priority Critical patent/JP3184962B2/en
Publication of JP2000061672A publication Critical patent/JP2000061672A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3184962B2 publication Critical patent/JP3184962B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、レーザ光をワーク
に照射して溶接を行うレーザ溶接方法に適用され、ワー
クにおける欠陥有無等の溶接状態を検出するレーザ溶接
の溶接状態検出方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a laser welding method for applying a laser beam to a workpiece to perform welding and detecting a welding state such as the presence or absence of a defect in the workpiece.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】レーザ溶接は、レーザ発振器から出力さ
れたパルス状のレーザ光を対象ワークに照射して溶接を
行うものである。レーザ溶接における溶接状態、特に溶
接欠陥の検査は、検査がオフラインにて目視や検査機器
の使用により行うことが多い。この場合、自動車製造の
ような大量生産ラインでは多量箇所の検査が必要とな
り、検査員の負担は大きい。また、生産ラインの生産性
の観点から検査時間は短い必要があり、溶接と並行して
欠陥検査を行うことが最も望ましい。
2. Description of the Related Art In laser welding, welding is performed by irradiating a target workpiece with pulsed laser light output from a laser oscillator. Inspection of welding conditions, particularly welding defects in laser welding, is often carried out off-line visually or by using inspection equipment. In this case, mass production lines such as automobile manufacturing require inspection of a large number of places, and the burden on inspectors is large. Further, the inspection time needs to be short from the viewpoint of the productivity of the production line, and it is most desirable to perform the defect inspection in parallel with the welding.

【0003】一般に、レーザ溶接における溶接状態のオ
ンライン計測技術としては、溶接時に溶接部分にて発生
するプラズマを利用したもの、溶接時に発生する音(溶
接音)を利用したもの、あるいはYAGレーザを用いた
レーザ溶接時に溶接部から発生する散乱光(以後、反射
光と呼ぶ)を利用したものが有る。具体的には、プラズ
マ光強度、プラズマ電位、溶接音レベル、あるいは反射
光強度を測定し、その測定値に基づいて溶接欠陥を検出
するものが、提案、開示、もしくは実施されている。反
射光強度を測定し、その測定値に基づいて溶接欠陥を検
出する技術は、特願平9−213223号として提案さ
れている。
[0003] In general, as an on-line measurement technique of a welding state in laser welding, a technique utilizing plasma generated at a welded portion during welding, a technique utilizing sound generated during welding (welding sound), or a YAG laser is used. Some use scattered light (hereinafter referred to as reflected light) generated from a welded portion during laser welding. Specifically, an apparatus that measures a plasma light intensity, a plasma potential, a welding sound level, or a reflected light intensity and detects a welding defect based on the measured value has been proposed, disclosed, or implemented. A technique of measuring the intensity of reflected light and detecting a welding defect based on the measured value is proposed in Japanese Patent Application No. 9-213223.

【0004】上述したオンライン計測技術を応用して溶
接欠陥の自動検出を行うようにした実例は少いが、例え
ば、「溶接学会論文集(1996年)、第14巻、第4
号、第689〜693頁」にて、プラズマ光の強度変化
から欠陥を自動検出する方法が開示されている。
Although there are few actual examples in which the above-described online measurement technology is applied to automatically detect a welding defect, for example, “Welding Society Transactions (1996), Vol. 14, No. 4
No., pages 689 to 693 ", a method for automatically detecting a defect from a change in the intensity of plasma light is disclosed.

【0005】[0005]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】ところで、反射光は、
ワークへの照射されるレーザ光(照射光)がワークによ
って全て吸収されることはなく、その吸収されないレー
ザ光が様々な方向へ向かって反射する作用に基づいてい
る。よって、反射光といえども、レーザ光全般にみられ
る指向性の強さという性質を有している。このため、反
射光を測定する技術においては、反射光の全てを受光セ
ンサによって受光することは実際上不可能であるし、何
時も決まった量の反射光を受光できるとは限らない。つ
まり、計測に必要な反射光を確実に得られない場合もあ
り得る。したがって、反射光を測定する技術は、測定の
安定性が十分である技術と言い切ることはできない。
By the way, the reflected light is
The laser light (irradiation light) applied to the work is not entirely absorbed by the work, and the laser light not absorbed is reflected in various directions. Therefore, even the reflected light has the property of the directivity seen in the entire laser light. For this reason, in the technique of measuring the reflected light, it is practically impossible to receive all of the reflected light by the light receiving sensor, and a fixed amount of reflected light cannot always be received. That is, the reflected light required for the measurement may not be reliably obtained. Therefore, the technique of measuring the reflected light cannot be said to be a technique with sufficient measurement stability.

【0006】また、プラズマ光を測定する技術は、得ら
れるプラズマ光の特性とその際の溶接状態との関係を未
だ一義的に定められていないため、各特性の識別や詳細
な分析が難しいという実状にある。
In the technique of measuring plasma light, the relationship between the characteristics of the obtained plasma light and the welding state at that time has not yet been uniquely determined, so that it is difficult to identify and analyze each characteristic in detail. In fact.

【0007】本発明の課題は、溶接箇所の欠陥を高精度
かつ詳細に検出できるレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法を
提供することである。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to provide a method for detecting a welding state of laser welding, which can detect a defect at a welding portion with high accuracy and detail.

【0008】[0008]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明によれば、レーザ
光をワークに照射して溶接を行うレーザ溶接方法に適用
され、ワークにおける溶接状態を検出するレーザ溶接の
溶接状態検出方法において、レーザ溶接時にワークから
放出されるプラズマ光および反射光両光の強度を、溶接
状態情報とし、前記プラズマ光の強度を、予め設定した
溶接良好時のプラズマ光の強度範囲と比較する共に、前
記反射光の強度を、予め設定した溶接良好時の反射光の
強度範囲と比較し、両比較結果と、比較結果と溶接状態
とを予め対応づけたテーブルにより、溶接の良好/不良
ならびに少くとも不良時での不良の種類を溶接状態とし
て検出することを特徴とするレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出
方法が得られる。
According to the present invention, there is provided a laser welding method for detecting a welding state in a work, which is applied to a laser welding method for irradiating a work with laser light to perform welding. The intensity of both the plasma light and the reflected light emitted from the workpiece at the time of welding is used as welding state information, and the intensity of the plasma light is compared with a preset intensity range of the plasma light at the time of good welding. Is compared with the preset intensity range of the reflected light when welding is good, and the comparison result and the table in which the comparison result and the welding state are associated in advance show whether welding is good / bad and at least bad. A method for detecting the welding state of laser welding, characterized by detecting the type of failure as a welding state.

【0009】[0009]

【0010】[0010]

【0011】また、本発明によれば、前記プラズマ光お
よび前記反射光両光の強度に加え、レーザ光のソース強
度にも基づいて溶接状態を検出する前記レーザ溶接の溶
接状態検出方法が得られる。
Further, according to the present invention, there is provided the welding state detecting method for laser welding, wherein the welding state is detected based on the source intensity of the laser light in addition to the intensity of both the plasma light and the reflected light. .

【0012】[0012]

【0013】[0013]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、図面を参照して、本発明の
実施の形態によるレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法を説明
する。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Hereinafter, a method for detecting a welding state of laser welding according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

【0014】図1を参照して、本発明による溶接状態検
出方法を実現するためのレーザ溶接システムは、パルス
状のレーザ光を発生するYAGレーザ発振器301と、
発生したレーザ光を伝搬する光ファイバ302と、図示
しない走査機構が接続され、伝搬されたレーザ光が入力
されるレーザトーチ303とを有している。レーザトー
チ303から出射されるレーザ光は、照射光Lwとして
図示しない走査テーブル上に載置されたワーク500に
照射され、レーザ溶接が行われる。溶接時には、ワーク
500の溶接部から、反射光Lrおよびプラズマ光Lp
が発生する。
Referring to FIG. 1, a laser welding system for realizing a welding state detecting method according to the present invention includes a YAG laser oscillator 301 for generating pulsed laser light,
An optical fiber 302 that propagates the generated laser light, and a laser torch 303 to which a scanning mechanism (not shown) is connected and to which the propagated laser light is input, are provided. The laser light emitted from the laser torch 303 is irradiated as irradiation light Lw on the work 500 placed on a scanning table (not shown), and laser welding is performed. During welding, reflected light Lr and plasma light Lp
Occurs.

【0015】レーザトーチ303は、トーチ本体303
aおよびトーチ上部303cからなる筐体を備えてい
る。トーチ本体303a内には、光ファイバ302を通
して伝搬されたレーザ光を反射する一方、反射光Lrお
よびプラズマ光Lpを透過するYAGレーザ反射ミラー
303bと、YAGレーザ反射ミラー303bで反射さ
れたレーザ光を照射光Lwとして集光する図示しない集
光レンズと、YAGレーザ反射ミラー303bを透過し
た反射光Lrおよびプラズマ光Lpを集光する図示しな
い集光レンズと、YAGレーザ反射ミラー303bを透
過した反射光Lrおよびプラズマ光Lpのうちお概ねプ
ラズマ光Lpを透過する一方、お概ね反射光Lrを反射
するYAG光反射ミラー303dと、YAG光反射ミラ
ー303dを透過したプラズマ光Lpを含む光のうちか
らプラズマ光Lpのみを抽出する図示しないフィルタ
と、YAG光反射ミラー303dを反射した反射光Lr
を含む光のうちから反射光Lrのみを抽出する図示しな
いフィルタとが備えられている。
The laser torch 303 includes a torch main body 303.
a and a torch upper portion 303c. Inside the torch body 303a, while reflecting the laser light propagated through the optical fiber 302, the YAG laser reflecting mirror 303b transmitting the reflected light Lr and the plasma light Lp, and the laser light reflected by the YAG laser reflecting mirror 303b. A not-shown condensing lens that condenses as irradiation light Lw, a not-shown condensing lens that condenses reflected light Lr and plasma light Lp transmitted through YAG laser reflecting mirror 303b, and reflected light transmitted through YAG laser reflecting mirror 303b Among the Lr and the plasma light Lp, a plasma is selected from among a YAG light reflecting mirror 303d that transmits the plasma light Lp substantially while reflecting the reflected light Lr and a light that includes the plasma light Lp transmitted through the YAG light reflecting mirror 303d. A filter (not shown) for extracting only light Lp and a YAG light reflecting mirror Reflected light Lr reflected by the 03d
And a filter (not shown) that extracts only the reflected light Lr from the light including

【0016】さらに、本レーザ溶接システムは、ワーク
500における溶接状態を検出するレーザ溶接状態検出
装置100を有している。レーザ溶接状態検出装置10
0は、トーチ上部303cに取り付けられ、YAG光反
射ミラー303dを透過後にフィルタによってろ過され
たプラズマ光Lpを受光してその光強度に応じた電気信
号Spを出力するプラズマ光用センサ102と、トーチ
上部303cに取り付けられ、YAG光反射ミラー30
3dを反射後にフィルタによってろ過された反射光Lr
を受光してその光強度に応じた電気信号Srを出力する
反射光用センサ103と、プラズマ光用センサ102お
よび反射光用センサ103からの電気信号Spおよび電
気信号Srを用いてプラズマ光Lpおよび反射光Lr両
光の状態情報としての両光強度に基づいて溶接状態を検
出する溶接状態判定処理部101と、検出した溶接状態
をディスプレイ等に表示するための表示部104と、検
出した溶接状態を記憶するための記憶部105とを備え
ている。
Further, the laser welding system has a laser welding state detecting device 100 for detecting a welding state of the work 500. Laser welding state detection device 10
A plasma light sensor 102 attached to the torch upper part 303c, receives the plasma light Lp filtered by the filter after passing through the YAG light reflecting mirror 303d, and outputs an electric signal Sp according to the light intensity; The YAG light reflecting mirror 30 is attached to the upper part 303c.
Reflected light Lr filtered by a filter after reflecting 3d
And a reflected light sensor 103 that outputs an electric signal Sr corresponding to the light intensity thereof, and the plasma light Lp using the electric signal Sp and the electric signal Sr from the plasma light sensor 102 and the reflected light sensor 103. A welding state determination processing unit 101 that detects a welding state based on both light intensities as state information of both the reflected light Lr, a display unit 104 for displaying the detected welding state on a display or the like, and a detected welding state And a storage unit 105 for storing.

【0017】溶接状態判定処理部101は、アナログの
電気信号Spおよび電気信号Srをデジタル信号に変換
するA/D変換器と、そのデジタル信号を処理するCP
Uと、処理の際に用いるデータ等を例えば予め記憶した
メモリとを備えている。
The welding state determination processing unit 101 includes an A / D converter that converts an analog electric signal Sp and an electric signal Sr into a digital signal, and a CP that processes the digital signal.
U and a memory in which data and the like used in the processing are stored in advance, for example.

【0018】図2(a)は、溶接状態判定処理部101
に入力される電気信号Sp、即ち、プラズマ光用センサ
102によって検出されたプラズマ光Lpの光強度の一
例を、時系列的に示している。また、図2(b)は、溶
接状態判定処理部101に入力される電気信号Sr、即
ち、反射光用センサ103によって検出された反射光L
rの光強度の一例を、時系列的に示している。溶接状態
判定処理部101のCPUは、図2(a)および図2
(b)のような電気信号を、A/D変換器を通して、実
際にはデジタル信号の形態で得る。
FIG. 2A shows a welding state determination processing unit 101.
, An example of the light intensity of the plasma light Lp detected by the plasma light sensor 102 is shown in chronological order. 2B shows the electric signal Sr input to the welding state determination processing unit 101, that is, the reflected light L detected by the reflected light sensor 103.
An example of the light intensity of r is shown in time series. The CPU of the welding state determination processing unit 101 performs the operations shown in FIGS.
An electric signal as shown in (b) is actually obtained in the form of a digital signal through an A / D converter.

【0019】図2(a)を参照して、PThHおよびP
ThLはそれぞれ、予め設定されたプラズマ光Lpの光
強度について溶接状態の良好/不良のしきい値であり、
溶接状態判定処理部101のメモリに記憶されている。
Referring to FIG. 2 (a), PTh H and P
Th L is a threshold value of good / bad welding condition for a preset light intensity of plasma light Lp,
It is stored in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101.

【0020】CPUは、基本的には、プラズマ光Lpの
光強度が上限しきい値PThHを超過した場合には溶接
欠陥以外の不良、下限しきい値PThL未満の場合には
溶接欠陥不良、また、下限しきい値PThL以上上限し
きい値PThH以下の範囲内であれば溶接が良好である
と判定する。ただし、本発明においては、CPUは、以
下に示す反射光強度の判定をも併せ考慮して、最終的な
判定を行う。
[0020] CPU is basically when the light intensity of the plasma light Lp exceeds the high threshold PTh H is other than welding defect defect, weld defects in the case of less than the lower threshold PTh L poor and determines that the welding be within the scope of the following lower threshold PTh L or more upper threshold PTh H is good. However, in the present invention, the CPU makes a final determination in consideration of the following determination of the reflected light intensity.

【0021】図2(b)を参照して、RThHおよびR
ThLはそれぞれ、予め設定された反射光Lrの光強度
について溶接状態の良好/不良のしきい値であり、溶接
状態判定処理部101のメモリに記憶されている。
Referring to FIG. 2B, RTh H and R
Th L is a threshold value of good / bad of the welding state with respect to the preset light intensity of the reflected light Lr, and is stored in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101.

【0022】CPUは、基本的には、反射光Lrの光強
度が上限しきい値RThHを超過した場合には溶接欠陥
不良、下限しきい値RThL未満の場合には溶接欠陥以
外の不良、また、下限しきい値RThL以上上限しきい
値RThH以下の範囲内であれば溶接が良好であると判
定する。ただし、本発明においては、CPUは、上述し
たプラズマ光強度の判定をも併せ考慮して、最終的な判
定を行う。
The CPU is basically when the light intensity of the reflected light Lr has exceeded the high threshold RTh H welding defect defect, in the case of less than the lower threshold RTh L is other than welding defect failure and determines that the welding be within the range of less than the lower limit threshold value RTh L or more upper threshold RTh H is good. However, in the present invention, the CPU makes a final determination in consideration of the above-described determination of the plasma light intensity.

【0023】尚、本発明においては、溶接状態判定処理
部内のA/D変換器とCPUとの間にローパスフィルタ
を設けてもよい。この場合には、図3(a)および
(b)に示すような高周波成分が除去された信号を処理
することになる。高周波成分が除去された信号を処理す
る方が、検出精度に優れることが多い。
In the present invention, a low-pass filter may be provided between the A / D converter and the CPU in the welding state determination processing section. In this case, a signal from which high-frequency components are removed as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B is processed. Processing a signal from which high frequency components have been removed is often superior in detection accuracy.

【0024】図3(a)は、デジタル化された電気信号
Spをさらにローパスフィルタでろ過した信号、即ち、
高周波成分が除去されたプラズマ光Lpの光強度の一例
を、時系列的に示している。また、図3(b)は、デジ
タル化された電気信号Srをさらにローパスフィルタで
ろ過した信号、即ち、反射光Lrの光強度の一例を、時
系列的に示している。
FIG. 3A shows a signal obtained by further filtering the digitized electric signal Sp with a low-pass filter, that is,
An example of the light intensity of the plasma light Lp from which the high-frequency component has been removed is shown in chronological order. FIG. 3B shows, in a time-series manner, an example of a signal obtained by further filtering the digitized electric signal Sr with a low-pass filter, that is, the light intensity of the reflected light Lr.

【0025】図3(a)を参照して、FPThHおよびFP
ThLはそれぞれ、予め設定されたプラズマ光Lpの光
強度について溶接状態の良好/不良のしきい値であり、
溶接状態判定処理部101のメモリに記憶されている。
CPUは、基本的には、プラズマ光Lpの光強度が上限
しきい値FPThHを超過した場合には溶接欠陥以外の不
良、下限しきい値FPThL未満の場合には溶接欠陥不
良、また、下限しきい値FPThL以上上限しきい値FPT
H以下の範囲内であれば溶接が良好であると判定す
る。ただし、本発明においては、CPUは、以下に示す
反射光強度の判定をも併せ考慮して、最終的な判定を行
う。
Referring to FIG. 3 (a), FPTh H and FP
Th L is a threshold value of good / bad welding condition for a preset light intensity of plasma light Lp,
It is stored in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101.
CPU is basically when the light intensity of the plasma light Lp exceeds the high threshold FPTh H is other than welding defect defect, in the case of less than the lower threshold FPTh L welding defects failure, also, Lower threshold FPT L or higher Upper threshold FPT
It is determined that the welding is good if it is within the range of hH or less. However, in the present invention, the CPU makes a final determination in consideration of the following determination of the reflected light intensity.

【0026】図3(b)を参照して、FRThHおよびFR
ThLはそれぞれ、予め設定された反射光Lrの光強度
について溶接状態の良好/不良のしきい値であり、溶接
状態判定処理部101のメモリに記憶されている。CP
Uは、基本的には、反射光Lrの光強度が上限しきい値
FRThHを超過した場合には溶接欠陥不良、下限しきい
値FRThL未満の場合には溶接欠陥以外の不良、また、
下限しきい値FRThL以上上限しきい値FRThH以下の範
囲内であれば溶接が良好であると判定する。ただし、本
発明においては、CPUは、上述したプラズマ光強度の
判定をも併せ考慮して、最終的な判定を行う。
Referring to FIG. 3B, FRTh H and FR
Th L is a threshold value of good / bad of the welding state with respect to the preset light intensity of the reflected light Lr, and is stored in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101. CP
U basically means that the light intensity of the reflected light Lr is the upper threshold value
Weld defects failure when exceeded FRTh H, in the case of less than the lower threshold FRTh L is other than welding defects failure, also,
It determines that the weld if the lower threshold FRTh L or more upper threshold FRTh H following range is good. However, in the present invention, the CPU makes a final determination in consideration of the above-described determination of the plasma light intensity.

【0027】さて、上記したように、溶接状態判定処理
部101のメモリに予め記憶した各しきい値を参照し
て、プラズマ光Lpの強度を溶接良好時のプラズマ光L
pの強度範囲と比較する共に、反射光Lrの強度を予め
設定した溶接良好時の反射光Lrの強度範囲と比較し、
両比較結果に応じて、溶接の良好/不良ならびに不良時
での不良の種類および不良の原因を溶接状態として検出
する。具体的には、比較結果と溶接状態とを対応づけた
テーブルを、溶接状態判定処理部101のメモリ内に予
め記憶している。このテーブルの一例を図4に示す。
As described above, the intensity of the plasma light Lp is determined by referring to the respective threshold values stored in advance in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101 when the welding is good.
While comparing with the intensity range of p, the intensity of the reflected light Lr is compared with a preset intensity range of the reflected light Lr when welding is good,
In accordance with the comparison results, the good / bad state of the welding and the type and cause of the failure at the time of the failure are detected as the welding state. Specifically, a table in which the comparison result is associated with the welding state is stored in the memory of the welding state determination processing unit 101 in advance. FIG. 4 shows an example of this table.

【0028】図4を参照して、本テーブルは、プラズマ
光Lpの強度と反射光Lrの強度それぞれのしきい値と
の比較結果を複合的に判定することを可能にする。例え
ば、プラズマ光Lpが下限しきい値PThL(または、F
RThL)未満であり、かつ反射光Lrが上限しきい値R
ThH(または、FRThH)超過である場合には、溶接欠
陥であると判定する。
Referring to FIG. 4, this table makes it possible to compositely determine the result of comparison between the intensity of plasma light Lp and the threshold of the intensity of reflected light Lr. For example, when the plasma light Lp reaches the lower threshold PTh L (or F
RTh L ) and the reflected light Lr is higher than the upper threshold R
If Th H (or FRTh H ) is exceeded, it is determined that the defect is a welding defect.

【0029】さらに、本テーブルでは、溶接欠陥の有無
だけではなく、欠陥以外の不良の判定、さらに、欠陥の
場合にはその種類を推定できる。例えば、プラズマ光L
pが下限しきい値PThL(または、FRThL)未満であ
り、かつ反射光Lrが上限しきい値RThH(または、F
RThH)超過である場合には、「溶け込みが悪い」とい
う欠陥種類であると推定する。
Further, in this table, it is possible to determine not only the presence or absence of a welding defect but also a defect other than a defect, and further, in the case of a defect, its type. For example, the plasma light L
p is less than the lower threshold PTh L (or FRTh L ), and the reflected light Lr is the upper threshold RTh H (or F
If RTh H ) is exceeded, it is estimated that the defect type is “poor penetration”.

【0030】さらに、本テーブルによれば、例えば、上
記比較結果の場合、「溶け込みが悪い」という欠陥種類
を推定するだけではなく、その欠陥要因が「ワーク50
0の溶接箇所に対して照射光Lwがデフォーカスであ
る」、「カバーガラスの汚れ」、「レーザ用光学系の劣
化」、もしくはこのいずれか複数の組み合わせが考えら
れ得る旨をも推定できる。
Further, according to this table, for example, in the case of the above comparison result, not only the defect type “poor penetration” is estimated, but the defect factor is “work 50
It can also be estimated that the irradiation light Lw is defocused for the welding position of 0, "contamination of the cover glass", "deterioration of the laser optical system", or a combination of any one of these.

【0031】尚、図4に示したテーブル例では、説明の
煩雑さを避けるために、*印を付した各セルの判定、欠
陥種類、欠陥要因等は省略しているが、実施の際には、
各セル毎に、判定、欠陥種類、欠陥要因等を設定してお
く。
In the table example shown in FIG. 4, for simplicity of explanation, the judgment of each cell marked with *, the defect type, the defect factor, etc. are omitted. Is
For each cell, a judgment, a defect type, a defect factor, and the like are set.

【0032】溶接状態判定処理部101による判定およ
び推定結果(溶接の良好/不良、欠陥種類、欠陥要因)
は、表示部104によって表示され、また、記憶部10
5によって記憶される。表示方法としては、ディスプレ
イ表示だけではなく、プリントアウトしてもよい。ま
た、記憶部105で記憶するだけではなく、レーザ溶接
システムの主制御装置に直結するデータベース記憶手段
に記憶してもよい。また、ネットワークを介してレーザ
溶接システムの主制御装置に送出し、レーザ溶接システ
ムの制御をフィードバック制御としてもよい。
Determination and estimation results by welding state determination processing section 101 (good / bad welding, defect type, defect factor)
Is displayed by the display unit 104, and the storage unit 10
5 is stored. As a display method, not only display but also printout may be performed. Further, the information may be stored not only in the storage unit 105 but also in a database storage unit directly connected to the main controller of the laser welding system. Further, the information may be transmitted to a main controller of the laser welding system via a network, and the control of the laser welding system may be performed as feedback control.

【0033】本発明において、上述のごとく、プラズマ
光強度と反射光強度それぞれのしきい値との比較結果を
複合的に判定することで、溶接状態の良好/不良(欠陥
をも含む)の高精度な判定に加えて、欠陥種類および欠
陥要因等を推定できるのは、プラズマ光および反射光の
特性の違いに基づいている。即ち、プラズマ光は、レー
ザ溶接の際の溶融現象で発生する光の成分を総合的に評
価するのに用いられるので、この結果、様々な現象変化
を捕えることが可能になる。一方、反射光は、ワークへ
の吸収性を有する照射光をオリジナルとするために、反
射光強度はワークに対する吸収度に応じるので、レーザ
溶接の状態の観点からすれば、溶け込み現象と強い相関
関係にある。よって、溶け込み深さの管理に用いられ
る。
In the present invention, as described above, the results of comparison between the threshold values of the plasma light intensity and the reflected light intensity are determined in a complex manner, so that the good / bad (including defects) in the welding state can be increased. The fact that the defect type and the defect factor can be estimated in addition to the accurate determination is based on the difference between the characteristics of the plasma light and the reflected light. That is, the plasma light is used to comprehensively evaluate the light component generated by the melting phenomenon at the time of laser welding. As a result, it is possible to capture various changes in the phenomenon. On the other hand, the reflected light has a strong correlation with the penetration phenomenon from the viewpoint of the state of laser welding because the reflected light intensity depends on the degree of absorption to the work, because the reflected light is the original irradiation light that has absorptivity to the work. It is in. Therefore, it is used for controlling the penetration depth.

【0034】以上説明した実施の形態の変形例として、
プラズマ光および反射光両光の強度に加え、照射光Lw
の光強度をも、判定のパラメータとしてもよい。具体的
には、YAGレーザ発振器301からパワーモニタ信号
を取得するようにする。
As a modification of the embodiment described above,
In addition to the intensity of both the plasma light and the reflected light, the irradiation light Lw
May be used as a parameter for determination. Specifically, a power monitor signal is obtained from the YAG laser oscillator 301.

【0035】さらに、プラズマ光および反射光両光のバ
ッチ的な強度に加え、両光のトレンド的な強度に基づい
て、経時的なパラメータによって生じる欠陥要因等を推
定するようにしてもよい。具体的には、グラフ上の検出
信号として、その横軸をワーク毎(製品番号)とし、縦
軸を製品毎の信号レベルの平均値とする。
Further, in addition to the batch-like intensity of both the plasma light and the reflected light, a defect factor or the like caused by a parameter over time may be estimated based on the trend intensity of the two lights. Specifically, as a detection signal on the graph, the horizontal axis is set for each work (product number), and the vertical axis is set to an average value of signal levels for each product.

【0036】尚、上記の説明では、レーザ発振器として
YAGレーザ発振器を用いているが、これに限らず、他
の例えばCO2 レーザ発振器、エキシマレーザ発振器を
用いても良い。この場合、照射レーザ光の反射光の検出
が可能なように、光学系の構成や光電変換素子の選定を
行う。
In the above description, a YAG laser oscillator is used as the laser oscillator. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and a CO2 laser oscillator or an excimer laser oscillator may be used. In this case, the configuration of the optical system and the selection of the photoelectric conversion element are performed so that the reflected light of the irradiation laser light can be detected.

【0037】また、溶接状態判定処理部101の構成自
体は信号処理装置として一般的であり、パソコンを利用
して容易に実現できる。
The configuration itself of the welding state determination processing unit 101 is generally used as a signal processing device, and can be easily realized using a personal computer.

【0038】[0038]

【発明の効果】本発明によるレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出
方法は、レーザ光をワークに照射して溶接を行うレーザ
溶接方法に適用され、ワークにおける溶接状態を検出す
るレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法において、レーザ溶接
時にワークから放出されるプラズマ光および反射光両光
の状態情報に基づいて溶接状態を検出するため、溶接箇
所の欠陥を高精度かつ詳細に検出できる。また、プラズ
マ光と照射レーザ光の反射光とを利用することで多角的
に溶接状態が判定できる。さらに、検査員の省人・省力
化を実現でき、オンライン計測による検査時間短縮化を
図れるので、欠陥検出自動化による生産ライン自動化
(無人化)へ大きく寄与する。
The welding state detecting method for laser welding according to the present invention is applied to a laser welding method for performing welding by irradiating a laser beam to a work. Since the welding state is detected based on the state information of both the plasma light and the reflected light emitted from the workpiece at the time of laser welding, it is possible to detect a defect at a welding location with high accuracy and in detail. Further, the welding state can be determined from various angles by using the plasma light and the reflected light of the irradiation laser light. Furthermore, labor saving and labor saving of the inspector can be realized, and the inspection time can be shortened by the online measurement, which greatly contributes to the automation (unmanned) of the production line by the automatic defect detection.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の実施の形態によるレーザ溶接の溶接状
態検出方法を実現するためのレーザ溶接システムの構成
を示す図である。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a laser welding system for realizing a welding state detection method of laser welding according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】本発明の実施の形態によるレーザ溶接の溶接状
態検出方法を説明するための図であり、(a)はプラズ
マ光の光強度を時系列的に示し、(b)は反射光の光強
度を時系列的に示す。
2A and 2B are diagrams for explaining a welding state detection method of laser welding according to an embodiment of the present invention, wherein FIG. 2A shows the light intensity of plasma light in time series, and FIG. The light intensity is shown in chronological order.

【図3】本発明の実施の形態によるレーザ溶接の溶接状
態検出方法を説明するための図であり、(a)は高周波
除去されたプラズマ光の光強度を時系列的に示し、
(b)は高周波除去された反射光の光強度を時系列的に
示す。
3A and 3B are diagrams for explaining a welding state detection method of laser welding according to an embodiment of the present invention, wherein FIG. 3A shows the light intensity of plasma light from which high-frequency waves have been removed in time series;
(B) shows in chronological order the light intensity of the reflected light from which the high frequency has been removed.

【図4】本発明の実施の形態によるレーザ溶接の溶接状
態検出方法を説明するための図であり、を示す図であ
り、プラズマ光および反射光両光の状態情報と溶接状態
(良好/不良、欠陥種類、欠陥要因)との対応テーブル
を示す。
FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining a method for detecting a welding state of laser welding according to an embodiment of the present invention, and is a view showing the state information of both plasma light and reflected light and the welding state (good / bad). , A defect type, and a defect factor) are shown.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

100 レーザ溶接状態検出装置 101 溶接状態判定処理部 102 プラズマ光用センサ 103 反射光用センサ 104 表示部 105 記憶部 301 YAGレーザ発振器 302 光ファイバ 303 レーザトーチ 303a トーチ本体 303b YAGレーザ反射ミラー 303c トーチ上部 303d YAG光反射ミラー 500 ワーク REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 100 laser welding state detection device 101 welding state determination processing unit 102 plasma light sensor 103 reflected light sensor 104 display unit 105 storage unit 301 YAG laser oscillator 302 optical fiber 303 laser torch 303a torch main body 303b YAG laser reflection mirror 303c torch upper part 303d YAG Light reflection mirror 500 work

Claims (2)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 レーザ光をワークに照射して溶接を行う
レーザ溶接方法に適用され、ワークにおける溶接状態を
検出するレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法において、レーザ溶接時にワークから放出されるプラズマ光および
反射光両光の強度を、溶接状態情報とし、 前記プラズマ光の強度を、予め設定した溶接良好時のプ
ラズマ光の強度範囲と比較する共に、前記反射光の強度
を、予め設定した溶接良好時の反射光の強度範囲と比較
し、両比較結果と、比較結果と溶接状態とを予め対応づ
けたテーブルにより、溶接の良好/不良ならびに少くと
も不良時での不良の種類を溶接状態として 検出すること
を特徴とするレーザ溶接の溶接状態検出方法。
The present invention is applied to a laser welding method of irradiating a laser beam to a work to perform welding, and in a laser welding welding state detecting method of detecting a welding state of the work, a plasma light emitted from the work at the time of laser welding;
The intensity of the reflected light and the intensity of the plasma light are used as welding state information, and the intensity of the plasma light is set to a preset value when welding is good.
The intensity of the reflected light is compared with the intensity range of the plasma light.
Is compared with the preset range of reflected light intensity when welding is good.
The comparison result, the comparison result, and the welding state are associated in advance.
Good and bad welding and minimal
A method for detecting a welding state of laser welding, wherein the type of the defect at the time of the defect is also detected as a welding state.
【請求項2】 前記プラズマ光および前記反射光両光の
強度に加え、レーザ光のソース強度にも基づいて溶接状
態を検出する請求項1に記載のレーザ溶接の溶接状態検
出方法。
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said plasma light and said reflected light are both
Welding condition based on laser light source intensity in addition to intensity
The welding state detection of the laser welding according to claim 1, wherein the state is detected.
How to get out.
JP23372198A 1998-08-20 1998-08-20 Laser welding detection method Expired - Fee Related JP3184962B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP23372198A JP3184962B2 (en) 1998-08-20 1998-08-20 Laser welding detection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP23372198A JP3184962B2 (en) 1998-08-20 1998-08-20 Laser welding detection method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2000061672A JP2000061672A (en) 2000-02-29
JP3184962B2 true JP3184962B2 (en) 2001-07-09

Family

ID=16959531

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP23372198A Expired - Fee Related JP3184962B2 (en) 1998-08-20 1998-08-20 Laser welding detection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3184962B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3560135B2 (en) * 1999-03-23 2004-09-02 日産自動車株式会社 Quality monitoring method for YAG laser welds
JP4441129B2 (en) * 2001-01-18 2010-03-31 新日本製鐵株式会社 Method and apparatus for determining welding state in laser spot lap welding
US6670574B1 (en) * 2002-07-31 2003-12-30 Unitek Miyachi Corporation Laser weld monitor
JP4617324B2 (en) * 2007-01-31 2011-01-26 東急車輛製造株式会社 Laser weld formation method
JP5205926B2 (en) * 2007-11-09 2013-06-05 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Welding quality inspection device and welding quality inspection method
JP2012024781A (en) * 2010-07-20 2012-02-09 Amada Co Ltd Fiber laser machining device and method of controlling the same
JP6470600B2 (en) * 2015-03-12 2019-02-13 株式会社ワイテック Weld inspection equipment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2000061672A (en) 2000-02-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Sun et al. Sensor systems for real-time monitoring of laser weld quality
US6399915B1 (en) Method and apparatus for determining quality of welding at weld between working material pieces
JP3603843B2 (en) Laser welding quality monitoring method and apparatus
JP5043881B2 (en) Laser welding monitoring apparatus and laser welding monitoring method
KR101240980B1 (en) Method for checking quality of laser welding and equipment thereof
JP2005508759A (en) Method and apparatus for evaluating workpiece joints
JP2005216294A (en) Method for controlling quality of industrial process, particularly laser welding process
JP2005285113A (en) Method for controlling quality of industrial processes and system therefrom
JP3184962B2 (en) Laser welding detection method
JPH0249194B2 (en)
JP2021058927A (en) Laser welding quality detecting method and laser welding quality detecting device
JP3154177B2 (en) Laser welding state determination method and laser state determination apparatus
Wiesemann 2.8 Process monitoring and closed-loop control: 2 Production engineering
KR20180091480A (en) System and Method for detecting weld defects by type
JP5187121B2 (en) Laser processing apparatus and laser processing method
JP3385502B2 (en) Laser welding defect detection apparatus and detection method
JP4026404B2 (en) Laser welding quality monitoring method and apparatus
JP2861649B2 (en) Steel plate weld inspection method
JP2010052009A (en) Abnormality sensing method of laser beam welding system
JP2967671B2 (en) Monitoring device for welding status
Park et al. Development of a weld quality monitoring system in CO 2 laser welding by using photodiodes
JP4441129B2 (en) Method and apparatus for determining welding state in laser spot lap welding
JP3136556B2 (en) Laser welding machine
WO2022181060A1 (en) Determination method and determination device for laser processing state
KR100558773B1 (en) The method of laser weld monitoring using time variation of frequency components

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20010328

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080511

Year of fee payment: 7

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080511

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090511

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100511

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110511

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120511

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120511

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130511

Year of fee payment: 12

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130511

Year of fee payment: 12

S802 Written request for registration of partial abandonment of right

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R311802

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees