JP3068088U - Personnel appraisal report - Google Patents

Abstract

(57) [Summary] [Problem] A form for personnel appraisal that can be evaluated quickly and accurately and with objectivity. Provide a form for personnel appraisal that can be facilitated. SOLUTION: This is a personnel evaluation evaluation form for entering evaluations in a predetermined period of an evaluation object in accordance with contents to be evaluated, and belongs to a common attribute with close relation to each other. An attribute display column for displaying a plurality of evaluation items as one attribute group and displaying attribute contents of each attribute group; an evaluation content explanation column provided for each item belonging to the attribute group and displaying contents to be evaluated; An evaluation form for personnel evaluation, which is provided with a provided evaluation entry column.

Description

[Detailed description of the invention]

[0001]

[Technical field to which the invention belongs]

 The present invention relates to an evaluation form for filling in personnel evaluations, an evaluation standard form, a list of evaluation results of a plurality of evaluation targets, a list showing changes over time of evaluations, and the like.

[0002] In this specification, documents for entering and displaying personnel evaluations, such as evaluation sheets, reference sheets, and lists, are referred to as personnel evaluation forms.

[0003]

[Prior art]

 The so-called personnel evaluation, which evaluates and evaluates the ability and performance of the target person, plays an important role in determining salaries and bonuses and the work in charge at organizations such as companies and government offices. When the number of target persons is small or the work content is simple, personnel appraisal can be easily and quickly performed by the appraiser's own judgment or consultation. However, when the number of target persons is large or the content of work is complicated, it takes a lot of time and effort to properly perform personnel evaluation, and it is difficult to make objective judgments.

Conventionally, in the evaluation of personnel for a large number of people or complex tasks, a method of analyzing and evaluating such aspects as evaluation of work attitudes, motivation to work, etc., evaluation of work performance, and evaluation of work ability has been adopted. However, the specific methods vary depending on the company and the evaluator, and there are no specific indicators or worksheets, which requires a lot of time for the evaluation work, and lacks the objectivity of the evaluation. Was.

[0005]

[Problems to be solved by the invention]

 The present invention solves such problems in the past, and can be used for quick and accurate evaluation with a high degree of objectivity. The purpose of the present invention is to provide a form for personnel appraisal that can facilitate accurate grasp of appraisal results.

[0006]

[Means for Solving the Problems]

 The present invention provides the following form for personnel appraisal to achieve the above object. In addition, the figure numbers in the embodiments described later are also described in association with the following forms. (1) An evaluation sheet for personnel evaluation, in which evaluations to be evaluated are divided into items according to the content to be evaluated, and a plurality of evaluation items that are closely related to each other are defined as one attribute group. An attribute display column for displaying the attribute content of the attribute group, an evaluation content explanation column provided for each item belonging to the attribute group for displaying the content to be evaluated, and an evaluation entry column provided for each item are provided. An evaluation vote for personnel evaluation (FIGS. 5, 6, and 7). (2) The evaluation form for personnel evaluation described in (1) above (FIGS. 5, 6, and 7), wherein the evaluation entry column is provided with a plurality of columns for each level of evaluation. (3) An evaluation criteria table for personnel evaluation, in which the evaluation criteria to be evaluated are classified according to the content to be evaluated, and are a plurality of evaluations that are closely related to each other and belong to a common attribute. An attribute display column for displaying an attribute content of each attribute group with an item as one attribute group; an evaluation content explanation column provided for each item belonging to the attribute group and displaying the content to be evaluated; Personnel appraisal, characterized by having a plus criteria description column indicating the content corresponding to the positive evaluation of the item, and a minus criteria description column provided for each item and indicating the content corresponding to the negative evaluation of the item. Evaluation criteria table (Fig. 8). (4) A business performance evaluation standard table that displays the business performance evaluation standards to be evaluated in accordance with the content to be evaluated, and describes the evaluation content that is provided for each of the divided items and displays the content to be evaluated. Column and a stage display column in which the level of business capability evaluation is classified by a predetermined number of stages, and the evaluation content explanation column and the stage display column are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other, and are surrounded by these columns. A business capability evaluation criteria table (FIG. 9), in which the evaluation criteria corresponding to each stage in the stage display column are described for each of the evaluation content explanation columns using the divided areas. (5) A business performance evaluation sheet for entering the business performance to be evaluated into items according to the content to be evaluated, which is provided for each item and displays the content to be evaluated. And a performance evaluation entry column provided for each item, and a weight display column provided for each item and indicating a weight for all items of each item (see FIGS. 10 and 11). ). (6) A business performance evaluation form for entering the business performance to be evaluated into items according to the content to be evaluated, which is provided for each item and displays the content to be evaluated. And a high / low display column provided for each item and displaying the content of the business performance evaluation in a plurality of stages, and a score display column adjacent to the high / low display column and displaying a score corresponding to each stage. A business performance evaluation form characterized by having it (Fig. 12). (7) A business ability evaluation list for displaying the business ability to be evaluated in terms of items according to the contents of the evaluation, and an evaluation content explanation column provided for each divided item and displaying the contents of the evaluation. A step display column in which the level of the business ability evaluation is divided by a predetermined number of steps is provided, and the evaluation content explanation column and the stage display column are arranged so as to be orthogonal to each other to form a vertical axis and a horizontal axis. A business capability evaluation list (FIG. 13), characterized in that the display in the step display column for each evaluation content description column is shown as a bar graph using the area enclosed by the horizontal axis. (8) Each of the evaluation content explanation columns is divided in the axial direction of the column, and the business capability in a predetermined period and the business capability in the previous evaluation are described in parallel. The business ability evaluation form described in Item 5 (FIG. 14). (9) A business ability distribution list that displays a plurality of business skills to be evaluated by itemized skills, an evaluation content description column that displays the content to be evaluated provided for each item, Provide a stage display column that divides the level of ability evaluation by a predetermined number of stages, arrange the evaluation content explanation column and the stage display column so as to be orthogonal to each other, and use the area enclosed by these columns A business capability distribution list (FIG. 15), wherein the number of persons corresponding to each stage display column is indicated in each evaluation content explanation column. (10) A list of business abilities that displays a plurality of evaluation targets by itemized abilities. An evaluation content explanation column is provided for each item and displays the details of the evaluation. A work ability list (16) characterized by comprising a stage display column for displaying the high and low stages, and a corresponding person display column for displaying a person corresponding to the evaluation stage displayed for each item. . (11) A personnel evaluation time-lapse table that displays a total of affective evaluations such as work attitudes and willingness to work, work performance evaluations, and work ability evaluations. An evaluation content display column is provided for each item to display the content of the evaluation, and an evaluation time display column indicating the time at which the evaluation was performed is provided. The evaluation content display column and the evaluation time display column are orthogonal to each other. A list of personnel appraisals over time (Fig. 17), characterized in that areas arranged in these columns are used to indicate the evaluation of each evaluation item at each evaluation time. (12) Personnel appraisal total list that displays the evaluation results of work attitude and work motivation, work performance evaluation, and work ability evaluation of a plurality of appraisals. Column, and an evaluation display column that displays emotion evaluation, business performance evaluation, business capability evaluation, and their overall evaluation.The subject display column and the evaluation display column are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other. A total list of personnel evaluations (FIG. 18), characterized in that each evaluation result is shown for each target person using the area surrounded by the column of FIG.

[0007]

[Embodiment of the invention]

 Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. Although the personnel evaluation form according to the present invention can be used for manually compiling the evaluation results, it is particularly suitable for use as an input form and an output form for a personal evaluation system using a computer. Are suitable. Therefore, first, a personnel evaluation system which is an example of using the personnel evaluation form according to the present invention will be described.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of a personnel evaluation system. The personnel evaluation system includes a central processing unit (CPU) 100, a storage device 200, an input device 300, a display device 400, a file device 500, a printing device 600, and connection lines for connecting these. 700.

The central processing unit 100 controls the entire system, processes files, and the like according to a program stored in the storage device 200. The storage device 200 includes a main memory 210, a program 220, and the like, and cooperates with the central processing unit.

The input device 300 includes a keyboard, a mouse, and the like for inputting instructions and data to the CPU. In this system, the personnel evaluation of a person to be evaluated is performed based on the evaluation of a plurality of evaluation items. The input device 300 receives the evaluation results of the evaluation items for each individual. Various evaluation sheets according to the present invention are used for this input. The evaluation criteria table according to the present invention is used as a criterion for the evaluation.

The display unit 400 includes a CRT for displaying input data and processing results, a liquid crystal display screen, and the like. The file device 500 is configured by an auxiliary storage device such as a hard disk, and stores files described below. The printing device 600 includes a printer or the like, and outputs a processing result, data on a display screen, and the like by printing. The printed output is in the form of various lists according to the present invention.

The storage device 200 stores a program 220 for a preliminary processing unit and an evaluation unit. The preliminary processing unit collates the evaluation result (for example, A, B, C, or the symbol of ○, △, ×) input from the input unit with the individual evaluation criterion by numerical display set in the individual evaluation criterion file, The relevant evaluation in the standard is used as the individual score for the evaluation item. Then, the individual scores are totaled to obtain a total score. In this tabulation process and the tabulation process described below, weighting (coefficient assignment) according to importance or the like can be included for each evaluation item or each evaluation attribute. The individual evaluation criterion can be a criterion table for associating marks such as A, B, C or ○, Δ, × with one point, three points, five points, etc.

The file device 500 stores the total evaluation for each individual in a data storage file. Further, the individual scores and the attribute scores, which are the intermediate data, may be stored in the file device 500 as necessary.

The printing device 600 can be a printer of various forms, and can store the total evaluation (individual score, attribute score, and total score, if necessary) stored in the file device 500 in accordance with a printing program. Print in a table format.

FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 show the procedure of the evaluation process by the system configured as described above. FIG. 2 shows an example in which a plurality of evaluation items are classified into evaluation attributes, and FIG. 3 shows an example in which such evaluation items are not classified.

In the example of FIG. 2, first, an evaluation result D 1 performed by the appraiser on the subject is evaluated by the input device 300 such as a keyboard (step S 1). Evaluation result D is the result of the appraiser performing the appraisal in accordance with the evaluation contents to be incorporated as personnel evaluations, such as emotion evaluation, business performance evaluation, and business ability evaluation. At this time, the specification and the information on the subject to be evaluated may be performed from the keyboard, or may be read from the personal information file F1 in which the name, affiliation, age, years of service, and the like are input in advance. The CPU 100 performs the following processing according to the instruction of the program 220. The input evaluation result is collated with the evaluation result read from the individual evaluation criterion file F2 in the preliminary processing unit, and an individual score is determined (step S2). Further, individual scores are totaled for each evaluation attribute, and an attribute total score is obtained (step S3). The obtained attribute total score is compared with the attribute evaluation criterion read from the attribute evaluation criterion file F3, and the attribute score is determined (step S4). Then, all attribute scores are totaled and a total score is calculated (step S5). Next, in the evaluation section, the total points are collated with the total evaluation criterion read from the total evaluation criterion file F4, and the total evaluation is determined (step S6). This total evaluation is the intended emotion evaluation. The total evaluation is stored in the personnel evaluation master file F5, and is printed by the printer P as needed (step S7).

In the case where there are a plurality of appraisers for one appraisal subject, the preliminary processing unit determines in advance in step S5 for each of the plurality of total points by the plurality of appraisers. The total points can be calculated by multiplying by the weight coefficient according to the appraiser and summing up. This composite total point corresponds to the aforementioned total point. The evaluation unit compares the composite total point with a total evaluation criterion that is set in advance by numerical display, and determines a corresponding evaluation in the criterion as a total evaluation.

The example of FIG. 3 is the same as the example of FIG. 2 except that there is no classification of the evaluation attribute. The input of the evaluation result (step S 1 ′) and the determination of the individual score (step S 2 ′) This is performed in the same manner as in the example of FIG. In the example of FIG. 3, next, the total of the individual scores is totaled to obtain a total score (step S3 '). The subsequent determination of the total evaluation (step S4 ') and storage and printing of the total evaluation (step S5') are the same as in the example of FIG.

In the example of the comprehensive evaluation shown in FIG. 4, processing by the CPU 100, the program 220, and the like is performed as follows. The emotion total point, the work performance total point, and the ability total point that have already been stored are read from the personnel evaluation master file Fm (step S1d). The read total points are totaled and set as a total score (step S2d). If the preliminary processing unit is provided with an evaluation type weighting means, the total points of the emotions, business performance, and abilities for each evaluation type are weighted according to the weighting standard stored in the weight standard file F1d. Then, the total is obtained and a total score is obtained (step S2d '). This total score is compared with a comprehensive evaluation criterion in numerical value display set in the comprehensive evaluation criterion file F2d, and the corresponding evaluation in the criterion is regarded as a total evaluation (step S3d). The total evaluation obtained in step S3d is stored in the personnel evaluation master file Fm and printed by the printer P as necessary.

The present invention can be used for quick and accurate execution of personnel evaluations in various types of business and business forms, using the above-described application to a personnel evaluation system as an example.

FIG. 5 shows an example of a personnel evaluation evaluation form used when performing an evaluation of work attitude, work motivation, and the like during a predetermined period to be evaluated. This evaluation form has a structure in which the contents to be evaluated are classified and entered. For this purpose, a plurality of evaluation items that have a close relationship with each other and belong to a common attribute are defined as one attribute group. An attribute display column 1 for displaying the attribute content of each attribute group is provided. Further, for each item belonging to the attribute group, an evaluation content description column 2 for displaying the content to be evaluated is provided, and an evaluation entry column 3 follows the column. Further, an attribute total column 4 is provided for each attribute group in which the total evaluation of items belonging to the attribute group is entered.

When using this evaluation form, the evaluator reads the evaluation item 2 for each attribute display column 1 and writes the evaluation result of the subject to be evaluated in the evaluation entry column 3. The entry is made in such a way that the evaluation is plus, medium, or negative according to the "+/-" described above entry column 3, and a check mark is entered in the corresponding column. . In the attribute total column (subtotal), enter the number of checks for "+ .-" for one attribute.

As described above, in the evaluation form, since the evaluation items are subdivided, it is possible to perform an accurate and objective evaluation by evaluating each item. In addition, since the evaluation items are grouped for each attribute that is important for the evaluation of affection, evaluation can be performed for each attribute at the time of evaluation, and accurate evaluation can be easily performed. Furthermore, if an attribute total column is provided so that a subtotal is calculated for each attribute, accurate evaluation of each attribute can be obtained.

Further, in this evaluation form, three columns of evaluation entry columns are provided vertically, and columns of a plus evaluation, a middle evaluation, and a minus evaluation are provided from the left. The following advantages can be obtained by providing entry columns for each level of evaluation in this way. In other words, not only the appraiser but also the appraiser take the self-evaluation method and compare the results of both evaluations. Then, as shown in FIG. 6, when the evaluation of the appraiser matches the evaluation of the subject to be evaluated, a symbol (for example, ◎) is displayed in the evaluation column where the evaluations match. If the appraiser and the subject have different evaluations, the respective symbols (for example, ● for the appraiser and ○ for the subject) are displayed in the respective evaluation columns. In FIG. 6, the appraisal of the appraiser and the appraisal subject are the same in the positive evaluation at the top and in the middle evaluation in the second from the top. In the third row, the appraiser evaluates himself positively, and the appraiser performs an intermediate evaluation. Also, in the fourth row, the appraiser has a negative evaluation, but the appraiser has a positive evaluation. In this way, by providing an entry column for each level of evaluation, it is possible to clearly indicate whether the appraiser and the appraiser agree or disagree with the appraisal. It can be used to view evaluation trends and to discuss points of inconsistency, and to promote accurate evaluation and communication through evaluation. The evaluation of the appraiser and the appraisal target can be collated manually or by computer processing. FIG. 6 is a printout of the result of the computer processing.

FIG. 7 shows an example of a personnel evaluation evaluation form used when performing a business ability evaluation of an evaluation target. Similar to the example shown in FIG. 5, this evaluation form has a configuration in which contents to be evaluated are classified and entered. Further, an attribute display column 1, an evaluation content explanation column 2, and an evaluation entry column 3 are provided.

When this evaluation form is used, similarly to the example of FIG. 5, the evaluator reads evaluation item 2 for each attribute display column 1 and writes the evaluation result of the evaluation target person in evaluation entry column 3. Fill out.

In this evaluation form, since evaluation items are subdivided, accurate and objective evaluation can be performed by evaluating each item. In addition, since the evaluation items are summarized for each attribute that is important in the evaluation of business ability, it is possible to accurately grasp the evaluation of each attribute.

FIG. 8 shows an example of an evaluation criteria table for personnel evaluation in which emotion evaluation criteria such as the work attitude and the willingness to work during a predetermined period of the evaluation subject are classified and displayed according to the content to be evaluated. This reference table also has a plurality of evaluation items that are closely related to each other and belong to a common attribute as one attribute group, and include an attribute display column 5 for displaying the attribute content of each attribute group. In addition, an evaluation content explanation column 6 for displaying the content to be evaluated for each item belonging to the attribute group is provided. In response to this, for each item, a plus reference explanation column 7 showing the content corresponding to the plus evaluation, and a minus evaluation description column 7 And a negative reference explanation column 8 indicating the content corresponding to.

For example, in the item belonging to the attribute of discipline, the evaluation content description column describes the evaluation content that “internal company commitments, submitted documents, business rules, etc. were always followed”, In the explanation column, `` I will take the initiative to comply with the rules and deadlines, '' and in the minus standard explanation column, `` If anything, it is the same as Tadawari, and it matches with the behavior of others Often, both positive and negative trends are clearly described.

As described above, since the evaluation items are subdivided in the reference table, it is possible to accurately and objectively evaluate each item. In addition, since evaluation items are grouped for each attribute that is important for the evaluation of emotions, a comprehensive evaluation of each attribute is possible. In addition, an evaluation description column is provided for each item, and correspondingly, a plus reference description column and a minus reference description column are provided. And enable accurate evaluation.

FIG. 9 shows an example of a business ability evaluation criterion table in which the business ability evaluation criteria to be evaluated are classified and displayed according to the contents to be evaluated. This reference table is also provided with an attribute display column 5 in which a plurality of evaluation items having a close relationship with each other and belonging to a common attribute are set as one attribute group, and the attribute content of each attribute group is displayed. An evaluation content explanation column 6 is provided for displaying the content to be evaluated for each item belonging to the attribute group. In this reference table, the attribute display column 5 and the evaluation content description column 6 are arranged vertically, and the stage display column 7 ′ in which the level of business performance evaluation is divided by a predetermined number of stages is arranged horizontally, and mutually orthogonal. Are arranged so that Using the area surrounded by these columns, the evaluation criteria 8 'corresponding to each stage in the stage display column 7' are described for each evaluation content explanation column 6.

As described above, in the reference table, since the evaluation items are subdivided, it is possible to accurately and objectively evaluate each item. In addition, since evaluation items are grouped for each attribute that is important for the evaluation of business ability, it is possible to make a comprehensive evaluation for each attribute. Moreover, the evaluation content explanation column 6 and the stage display column 7 'are arranged so as to be orthogonal to each other, and the evaluation criteria 8' corresponding to each stage in the stage display column 7 'are described for each evaluation content explanation column 6. As a result, the required level is clearly evident for each evaluation of operational capability. Therefore, the appraiser can set the target level appropriately by looking at the standard table. In addition, the appraiser not only can easily and appropriately evaluate the business ability based on the standard table, but also can give appropriate advice to the evaluated person using the standard table as a guide.

FIG. 10 and FIG. 11 show examples of business performance evaluation sheets for entering business performances in a predetermined period in accordance with the contents to be evaluated. This evaluation form includes an evaluation content explanation column 9 provided for each divided item and displaying the content to be evaluated, a performance evaluation entry column 10 provided for each item, and a total evaluation item entry column provided for each item. There is provided a weight display column 11 indicating the weight for the item.

There is a high or low importance among a plurality of tasks performed by one subject. Since the evaluation form has a weight display column 11, by displaying weighting according to the importance of the work in advance in the evaluation form, the appraiser can know the importance of the evaluation item. And enable accurate evaluation according to its importance. In addition, since the weights are displayed in advance, calculations and checks are easy when counting by hand.

FIG. 12 shows an example of a business result evaluation form for entering business results in a predetermined period in accordance with the contents to be evaluated. The evaluation form includes an evaluation content explanation column 12 provided for each item and displaying the content to be evaluated, and a high / low display column provided for each item and indicating the level of the business performance evaluation in a plurality of stages. 13a, and a score display column 13b adjacent to the height display column and displaying a score according to each step. The score display column for each stage displays a score corresponding to each stage for each item.

As described above, this evaluation form is provided with a graded score display column for each evaluation item indicated in the explanation column 12, so that it is determined according to the importance of a plurality of tasks performed by one subject. Can be set. In this way, evaluations that take into account the importance of work, such as giving a particularly high evaluation score to high performance in important work and conversely lowering the evaluation score particularly when performance is poor in important work. Can be easily and accurately performed.

FIG. 13 shows an example of a business ability evaluation list for displaying the business ability to be evaluated in terms of items according to the content of the evaluation. In this list, evaluation items closely related to each other are defined as one attribute group, and an attribute display column 14 for displaying the attribute content of each attribute group is provided. Further, an evaluation content explanation column 15 for displaying the content of the evaluation is provided for each item belonging to the attribute group. Further, there is provided a stage display column 16 in which the level of the business ability evaluation is classified by a predetermined number of stages. The evaluation content explanation column 15 and the stage display column 16 are arranged so as to be orthogonal to each other to form a vertical axis and a horizontal axis. Then, using the area enclosed by the vertical and horizontal axes, the display of the grade display column for each evaluation content description column is shown in a bar graph form.

This list and the various forms described below are different from the evaluation form up to FIG. 12, and in the case of a computer-based evaluation system, the input data (for example, based on the evaluation form in FIG. 6) is used. It is used as a form to output the evaluation result through the step of evaluating based on the evaluation. However, when performing manual tallying and displaying the results, it is used as a form for filling in the results.

As described above, in this list, the evaluation content description column 15 and the stage display column 16 are arranged so as to be orthogonal to each other to form a vertical axis and a horizontal axis, and each evaluation is performed using an area surrounded by these. Since the level display for price items is shown in a bar graph, the level of business capability for each item can be seen at a glance. Therefore, it is possible to easily and accurately grasp the business capability for each evaluation item for a wide range of operations and complicated operations.

[0040] Even if other evaluation factors are added, clear display is maintained, so that analysis from various directions can be easily performed. That is, in this example, the evaluations by the three evaluators are displayed, and the evaluations of the three evaluators are indicated by ●, ○, and ◎ for each evaluation item. According to this list, even when the evaluations by a plurality of appraisers are displayed at the same time, a clear display is maintained without complicating the evaluation. Therefore, it is possible to easily perform a multifaceted analysis, such as viewing the evaluations of three evaluations for one evaluation item or viewing the evaluation distribution by one evaluator for all evaluation items.

The business performance evaluation list shown in FIG. 14 shows both the current evaluation and the previous evaluation. That is, for each evaluation item, the current evaluation is represented by ●, and the previous evaluation is represented by ○. In this way, even if the two evaluations before and after are displayed simultaneously, the display can be kept clear without complicating it. A multifaceted analysis, such as viewing the current evaluation distribution, can be easily performed.

FIG. 15 shows an example of a business ability distribution list in which a plurality of business ability to be evaluated are classified according to the contents of the evaluation and displayed according to the ability. In this list, evaluation items that are closely related to each other are defined as one attribute group, and an attribute display column 17 for displaying the attribute content of each attribute group is provided. Further, an evaluation content explanation column 18 provided for each item belonging to the attribute group and displaying the content of the evaluation, and a stage display column 19 in which the level of the business ability evaluation is classified by a predetermined number of levels are provided. Are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to the stage display column. Then, the area enclosed by these columns is used to indicate the number of relevant persons in each stage display column in each evaluation content description column.

As described above, in this business capability distribution list, the evaluation content explanation column 18 and the stage display column 19 are arranged so as to be orthogonal to each other, and the area surrounded by these columns is used. Each evaluation content description column is configured to indicate the number of relevant persons in each stage display column, so it is clear at a glance how many people are at each level for each evaluation item in the organization being evaluated. . Therefore, based on this, it is possible to accurately determine the division of duties, transfer personnel, supply personnel, and the like.

FIG. 16 shows an example of a business ability list that displays a plurality of business abilities to be evaluated according to itemized abilities. In this list, evaluation items that are closely related to each other are defined as one attribute group, and an attribute display column 20 for displaying the attribute content of each attribute group is provided. In addition, an evaluation content explanation column 21 provided for each item belonging to the attribute group and displaying the content of the evaluation, a stage display column 22 for displaying the level of the business capability evaluation for each item, and a stage display column 22 are displayed for each item. A corresponding person display column 23 for displaying a name of a person corresponding to the evaluation stage is provided.

According to the work ability list, a grade display column 22 and a corresponding person display column 23 are provided for each evaluation item, so that for each evaluation item, a person of a desired level can be easily found. Can be. In the example of FIG. 16, since each of the evaluation items shows the corresponding person of the third grade, it is possible to quickly find the person having the third grade work ability for many items required for the specific work. it can.

FIG. 17 shows an example of a personnel evaluation time-lapse list that displays a total of emotion evaluation, business performance evaluation, and business ability evaluation. The list includes a column 24 for emotion evaluation, business performance evaluation, and business capability evaluation, an evaluation content display column 25 provided for each item in each classification, and displaying the content of the evaluation, and a time when the evaluation was performed. And an evaluation time display field 26 shown in FIG. The evaluation content display column and the evaluation time display column are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other, and use the area enclosed by these columns to indicate the evaluation for each evaluation item for each evaluation item. Has become. In this example, the evaluation content display column of the affective evaluation is described with a large item corresponding to the attribute described in the affective evaluation form, and the same applies to the work performance evaluation and the work ability evaluation. Also, the evaluation results by three appraisers, A, B, and Hei are described. In this list, the sentiment evaluation is blank every other month, and the ability evaluations are listed only in April.These evaluations are not made on a monthly basis, but on a 2-month and 6-month basis. Because.

As described above, in this personnel evaluation time-lapse list, the evaluation content display column 25 for the emotion evaluation, the business performance evaluation, and the business capability evaluation and the evaluation time display column 26 are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other. The area enclosed by these columns is used to indicate the evaluation for each evaluation period for each evaluation item. Therefore, if you look along the evaluation content display column, you can list the comprehensive evaluation of all items, and if you look at the evaluation time display column, you can see the change over time of the evaluation of each item. When these are taken into account, it is clear at a glance how comprehensive the changes of the subject are with time.

FIG. 18 shows an example of a personnel evaluation totaling list that displays the evaluation results of the emotion evaluation, business performance evaluation, and business ability evaluation of a plurality of evaluation targets. This list is provided with a subject display column 27 for displaying a subject to be evaluated, and an evaluation display column 28 for displaying an affective evaluation, a business performance evaluation, a business ability evaluation, and a comprehensive evaluation thereof. The subject display column and the evaluation display column are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other, and each evaluation result is shown for each subject using the area enclosed by these columns. .

As described above, in the personnel evaluation time-lapse list, the subject display column 27 and the evaluation display column 28 for displaying the emotion evaluation, the business performance evaluation, the business ability evaluation, and the comprehensive evaluation thereof are orthogonal to each other. The evaluation results for each subject are shown using the area enclosed by these columns. Therefore, the distribution of each evaluation of each subject in one organization or group is clear, and the position of the subject in the organization can be clearly understood accordingly. In addition, referring to the position, it is possible to add an overall evaluation that is impossible only from individual evaluations. That is, the column on the right in this example is a column for comprehensive evaluation. In this column, a score column is used to calculate and fill in the score of the subject to be evaluated based on the evaluation results of the three people for affection evaluation, business performance evaluation, and business ability evaluation, and ranking within the group based on the score. There is a ranking column to fill in, and an evaluation column to be determined based on the score, and a finalization column to enter the final decision result with reference to the ranking column and the evaluation column. Thus, according to this list, it is possible to conduct an evaluation that includes the positions of members in the entire organization, and to conduct an appropriate personnel evaluation based on the evaluation.

[0050]

[Effect of the invention]

 As is clear from the above, according to the present invention, a form for personnel appraisal that can be evaluated quickly and accurately and objectively, and in cases where the number of appraisers is large or where the work content is complicated, In addition, it is possible to provide a personnel evaluation form that can facilitate accurate grasp of the evaluation result.

[Submission date] December 28, 1999 (December 28, 1999)

[Procedure amendment 8]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0001

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[0001]

[Technical field to which the invention belongs]

This invention is complete for evaluation vote for employee evaluation, evaluation criteria form, list display form of a plurality of evaluation target considered Division results relates list display form or the like showing the change over time in the evaluation.

[Procedure amendment 9]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0002

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[0002] In this specification, documents for filling in and displaying personnel evaluations, such as evaluation sheets, reference sheets, and list display sheets, are referred to as personnel evaluation forms.

[Procedure amendment 10]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0006

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[0006]

[Means for Solving the Problems]

The present invention provides the following form for personnel appraisal to achieve the above object. In addition, the figure numbers in the embodiments described later are also described in association with the following forms. (1) An evaluation sheet for personnel evaluation, in which evaluations to be evaluated are divided into items according to the content to be evaluated, and a plurality of evaluation items that are closely related to each other are defined as one attribute group. An attribute display column for displaying the attribute content of the attribute group, an evaluation content explanation column provided for each item belonging to the attribute group for displaying the content to be evaluated, and an evaluation entry column provided for each item are provided. An evaluation vote for personnel evaluation (FIGS. 5, 6, and 7). (2) The evaluation form for personnel evaluation described in (1) above (FIGS. 5, 6, and 7), wherein the evaluation entry column is provided with a plurality of columns for each level of evaluation. (3) An evaluation criteria table display form for personnel evaluation, in which the evaluation criteria to be evaluated are classified and displayed according to the content to be evaluated, and have a plurality of attributes closely related to each other and belonging to a common attribute. An attribute display column for setting the evaluation item as one attribute group and displaying the attribute content of each attribute group; an evaluation content description column provided for each item belonging to the attribute group and displaying the content to be evaluated; Personnel affairs characterized by having a plus reference explanation column indicating the content corresponding to the positive evaluation of the item and a minus reference explanation column provided for each item and indicating the content corresponding to the negative evaluation of the item. Evaluation evaluation table display form (Fig. 8). (4) A business performance evaluation standard table display form that displays the business performance evaluation criteria to be evaluated in accordance with the content to be evaluated, and displays the content to be evaluated that is provided for each divided item. A content description column and a stage display column in which the level of business capability evaluation is classified by a predetermined number of levels are provided, and the evaluation content description column and the stage display column are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other. A business ability evaluation standard table display form (FIG. 9), wherein an evaluation criterion corresponding to each stage in the stage display column is described for each of the evaluation content explanation columns using an enclosed area. (5) A business performance evaluation sheet for entering the business performance to be evaluated into items according to the content to be evaluated, which is provided for each item and displays the content to be evaluated. And a performance evaluation entry column provided for each item, and a weight display column provided for each item and indicating a weight for all items of each item (see FIGS. 10 and 11). ). (6) A business performance evaluation form for entering the business performance to be evaluated into items according to the content to be evaluated, which is provided for each item and displays the content to be evaluated. And a high / low display column provided for each item and displaying the content of the business performance evaluation in a plurality of stages, and a score display column adjacent to the high / low display column and displaying a score corresponding to each stage. A business performance evaluation form characterized by having it (Fig. 12). (7) A business performance evaluation list display sheet for displaying the business performance to be evaluated in terms of items according to the content of the evaluation, and a description of the evaluation content that is provided for each divided item and displays the content of the evaluation Column, and a stage display column in which the level of business capability evaluation is divided by a predetermined number of stages is provided, and the evaluation content explanation column and the stage display column are arranged so as to be orthogonal to each other to form a vertical axis and a horizontal axis, Using the area enclosed by the vertical and horizontal axes, the display of the stage display column for each evaluation content description column is shown as a bar graph, and the business capability evaluation list display form (Fig. 13). (8) Each of the evaluation content explanation columns is divided in the axial direction of the column, and the business capability in a predetermined period and the business capability in the previous evaluation are described in parallel. The business ability evaluation form described in Item 5 (FIG. 14). (9) A business ability distribution list display sheet for displaying a plurality of business ability to be evaluated by itemized ability, and an evaluation content explanation column for displaying the content to be evaluated provided for each item; Provide a stage display column in which the level of business capability evaluation is divided by a predetermined number of stages, arrange the evaluation content explanation column and the stage display column so as to be orthogonal to each other, and set the area enclosed by these columns. A business form distribution list display sheet (FIG. 15), wherein the number of persons corresponding to each stage display section is indicated in each evaluation content explanation section. (10) A list of business ability persons displaying a plurality of items to be evaluated according to their respective abilities, which is a table display form, and an evaluation content explanation column provided for each item and displaying the content of the evaluation; Business ability person list display sheet characterized by having a stage display column for displaying the high and low grades of the evaluation and a relevant person display column for displaying the person corresponding to the evaluation stage displayed for each item. (16). (11) A personnel evaluation time-lapse list display sheet that displays the evaluation of work attitude, work motivation, etc., the evaluation of work performance, and the evaluation of work performance. An evaluation content display column that is provided for each item of ability evaluation and displays the content of the evaluation is provided, and an evaluation time display column that indicates the time at which the evaluation was performed is provided, and the evaluation content display column and the evaluation time display column are mutually side by side orthogonally disposed, performance evaluations over time list display form, characterized in that in the manner shown the evaluation of each evaluation period for each evaluation item using these enclosed or regions in the column (Fig. 17 ). (12) Personnel appraisal summary list display sheet that displays the evaluation results of work attitudes and willingness to work for multiple appraisals, work performance evaluations, and work ability evaluations, where the appraisal target is displayed. A column for subject display and an evaluation display column for displaying affective evaluation, business performance evaluation, business capability evaluation and their overall evaluation are provided, and the subject display column and the evaluation display column are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other. In addition, the evaluation results of the personnel evaluation summary list display form (Fig. 18) are characterized in that each evaluation result is shown for each subject using the area surrounded by these columns.

[Procedure amendment 11]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0010

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

The input device 300 includes a keyboard, a mouse, and the like for inputting instructions and data to the CPU. In this system, the personnel evaluation of a person to be evaluated is performed based on the evaluation of a plurality of evaluation items. The input device 300 receives the evaluation results of the evaluation items for each individual. Various evaluation sheets according to the present invention are used for this input. In addition, the evaluation standard table display form according to the present invention is used as a criterion for the evaluation.

[Procedure amendment 12]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0011

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

The display unit 400 includes a CRT for displaying input data and processing results, a liquid crystal display screen, and the like. The file device 500 is configured by an auxiliary storage device such as a hard disk, and stores files described below. The printing device 600 includes a printer or the like, and outputs a processing result, data on a display screen, and the like by printing. This printout is in the form of a vote displaying various lists according to the present invention .

[Procedure amendment 13]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0028

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

FIG. 8 is an example of a vote displaying an evaluation criteria table for personnel evaluation in which the evaluation criteria such as the work attitude and the willingness to work during the predetermined period of the subject to be evaluated are classified according to the content to be evaluated. Is shown. This reference table display form is also provided with an attribute display column 5 for displaying a plurality of evaluation items which are closely related to each other and belong to a common attribute as one attribute group, and display the attribute contents of each attribute group. I have. In addition, an evaluation content description column 6 is provided for displaying the content to be evaluated for each item belonging to the attribute group. In response to this, for each item, a plus reference description column 7 showing the content corresponding to the positive evaluation, and a minus A negative reference explanation column 8 indicating the content corresponding to the evaluation is provided.

[Procedure amendment 14]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0030

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

As described above, since the evaluation items are subdivided in the reference table display form, it is possible to accurately and objectively evaluate each item. In addition, since the evaluation items are grouped for each attribute that is important for the evaluation of emotions, it is possible to evaluate each attribute collectively. In addition, an evaluation content explanation column is provided for each item, and correspondingly, a plus standard explanation column and a negative standard explanation column are provided. And enable accurate evaluation.

[Procedure amendment 15]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0031

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

FIG. 9 shows an example of a vote displaying a business ability evaluation criteria table in which the business ability evaluation criteria to be evaluated are classified and displayed according to the content to be evaluated. Again reference table display form, and includes an attribute display column 5 the plurality of evaluation items belonging to a common attribute with a closely related to each other as one attribute group view attributes contents of each attribute group. Further, an evaluation content explanation column 6 for displaying the content to be evaluated for each item belonging to the attribute group is provided. In this reference table display form , the attribute display column 5 and the evaluation content explanation column 6 are arranged vertically, and the stage display column 7 ′ in which the level of business capability evaluation is divided by a predetermined number of stages is arranged horizontally, and mutually. They are arranged orthogonally. Using the area surrounded by these columns, the evaluation criteria 8 'corresponding to each stage in the stage display column 7' is described for each evaluation content description column 6.

[Procedure amendment 16]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0032

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

As described above, since the evaluation items are subdivided in the reference table display form, it is possible to accurately and objectively evaluate each item. In addition, since the evaluation items are grouped for each attribute that is important for the evaluation of business ability, it is possible to make a comprehensive evaluation for each attribute. In addition, the evaluation content description column 6 and the stage display column 7 'are arranged so as to be orthogonal to each other, and the evaluation criteria 8' corresponding to each stage in the stage display column 7 'are described for each evaluation content description column 6. As a result, the required level is clear at a glance for each evaluation of business capability. Therefore, the appraiser can set the target level appropriately by looking at this standard table. In addition, the appraiser not only can easily and appropriately evaluate the business ability based on this standard table, but also can give appropriate advice to the subject to be evaluated using the standard table as a guideline.

[Procedure amendment 17]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0037

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

FIG. 13 shows an example of a vote on which a business ability evaluation list for displaying the business ability to be evaluated is divided into items according to the contents of the evaluation. The list display form includes an attribute item having an attribute closely related to each other as one attribute group, and an attribute display column 14 for displaying the attribute content of each attribute group. Further, an evaluation content explanation column 15 for displaying the content of the evaluation is provided for each item belonging to the attribute group. Further, there is provided a stage display column 16 in which the level of the business ability evaluation is classified by a predetermined number of stages. The evaluation content explanation column 15 and the stage display column 16 are arranged so as to be orthogonal to each other to form a vertical axis and a horizontal axis. Using the area enclosed by the vertical and horizontal axes, the display of the grade display column for each evaluation content description column is shown in a bar graph form.

[Procedure amendment 18]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0038

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

The list display form and the various forms described below are different from the evaluation forms up to FIG. 12, and in the case of a computer-based evaluation system, the input data (for example, according to the evaluation form in FIG. 6) is used. It is used as a form when outputting the evaluation result based on the evaluation step based on the evaluation result. However, when performing manual tallying and displaying the results, it is used as a form for entering the results.

[Procedure amendment 19]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0039

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

As described above, in this list display form , the evaluation content explanation column 15 and the stage display column 16 are arranged so as to be orthogonal to each other to form the vertical axis and the horizontal axis, and use the area enclosed by these. Since the level display for each evaluation item is shown in a bar graph form, the level of business capability for each item can be seen at a glance. Therefore, it is possible to easily and accurately grasp the business capability for each evaluation item for a wide range of tasks and complex tasks.

[Procedure amendment 20]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0040

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[0040] Even if other evaluation factors are added, clear display is maintained, so that analysis from various directions can be easily performed. That is, in this example, the evaluations by the three evaluators are displayed, and the evaluations of the three evaluators are indicated by ●, ○, and ◎ for each evaluation item. According to this list display form, even when the evaluations by a plurality of appraisers are displayed at the same time, the display is kept clear without complication. Therefore, it is possible to easily perform a multifaceted analysis, such as viewing the evaluations of three evaluations for one evaluation item, or viewing the evaluation distribution of one evaluation person for all evaluation items.

[Procedure amendment 21]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0041

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

In addition, the business ability evaluation list display form shown in FIG. 14 describes both the current evaluation and the previous evaluation. That is, for each evaluation item, the current evaluation is represented by ●, and the previous evaluation is represented by ○. In this way, even if the two evaluations before and after are displayed simultaneously, the display can be kept clear without complicating it. Multifaceted analysis such as viewing the current evaluation distribution can be easily performed.

[Procedure amendment 22]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0042

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[0042] FIG. 15 shows an example of a business capacity distribution list display form for displaying a plurality of evaluation object of business ability, in capacity by then itemized in accordance with the contents of the evaluation. The list display form has an evaluation item having a close relationship with each other as one attribute group, and an attribute display column 17 for displaying the attribute content of each attribute group is provided. In addition, an evaluation content explanation column 18 provided for each item belonging to the attribute group and displaying the content of the evaluation, and a stage display column 19 in which the level of the business capability evaluation is classified by a predetermined number of levels are provided. Are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to the step display column. The area enclosed by these columns is used to indicate the number of relevant persons in each stage display column in each evaluation content description column.

[Procedure amendment 23]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0043

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

As described above, in this business ability distribution list display form , the evaluation content description column 18 and the stage display column 19 are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other, and the area surrounded by these columns is used. In each of the evaluation content explanation columns, the number of relevant persons in each stage display column is indicated, so it is clear at a glance how many people are at each level for each evaluation item in the organization to be evaluated. It is. Therefore, based on this, it is possible to appropriately determine the division of duties, transfer personnel, supply personnel, etc.

[Procedure amendment 24]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0044

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

FIG. 16 shows an example of a job skill list display slip that displays a plurality of job skills to be evaluated by itemized skills. In this list display form, evaluation items closely related to each other are defined as one attribute group, and an attribute display column 20 for displaying the attribute content of each attribute group is provided. In addition, an evaluation content description column 21 provided for each item belonging to the attribute group and displaying the content of the evaluation, a stage display column 22 displaying the high and low stages of the business capability evaluation for each item, and an evaluation displayed for each item A corresponding person display column 23 for displaying the name of the person corresponding to the stage is provided.

[Procedure amendment 25]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0045

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

According to the work ability list display form , a grade display column 22 and a corresponding person display column 23 are provided for each evaluation item, so that for each evaluation item, a person of a desired level can be easily found. be able to. In the example of FIG. 16, each of the evaluation items displays the corresponding person of the third grade, so that a person having the third grade work ability can be quickly found for many items required for the specific work. .

[Procedure amendment 26]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0046

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

FIG. 17 shows an example of a vote displaying a personnel evaluation time-lapse list that displays a total of emotion evaluation, business performance evaluation, and business ability evaluation. This list display form was evaluated by a classification column 24 for affective evaluation, business performance evaluation, and business capability evaluation, and an evaluation content display column 25 provided for each item in each classification and displaying the content of the evaluation. An evaluation time display field 26 indicating the time is provided. The evaluation content display column and the evaluation time display column are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other, and use the area enclosed by these columns to indicate the evaluation of each evaluation item at each evaluation time. It has become. In this example, the evaluation content display column of the emotion evaluation is described with a large item corresponding to the attribute described in the emotion evaluation form, and the same applies to the business performance evaluation and the business ability evaluation. Also, the evaluation results by three appraisers, A, B, and Hei are described. In this list, the sentiment evaluation is blank every other month, and the ability evaluation is listed only in April because these evaluations are not made on a monthly basis but on a two-month and six-month basis. It is.

[Procedure amendment 27]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0047

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

In this manner, the personnel evaluation time-lapse list display form is formed by arranging the evaluation content display column 25 for the emotion evaluation, the business performance evaluation, and the business ability evaluation, and the evaluation time display column 26 so as to be orthogonal to each other. They are arranged, and the evaluations at each evaluation time are shown for each evaluation item using the area enclosed by these columns. Therefore, if you look along the evaluation content display column, you can list the comprehensive evaluation of all items, and if you look at the evaluation time display column, you can list the change over time of the evaluation of each item. When these are taken into account, it is clear at a glance that the overall change of the subject is over time.

[Procedure amendment 28]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0048

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

FIG. 18 shows an example of a vote displaying a personnel evaluation totaling list displaying the evaluation results of emotion evaluation, business performance evaluation, and business ability evaluation of a plurality of evaluation targets. This list display form includes a subject display column 27 for displaying a subject to be evaluated, and an evaluation display column 28 for displaying an affective evaluation, a business performance evaluation, a business ability evaluation, and a comprehensive evaluation thereof. The subject display column and the evaluation display column are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other, and each evaluation result is shown for each subject using an area surrounded by these columns.

[Procedure amendment 29]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] 0049

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

As described above, this personnel evaluation time-lapse list display form includes the subject person display column 27 and the evaluation display column 28 for displaying affection evaluation, business performance evaluation, business ability evaluation, and their comprehensive evaluation. They are arranged so as to be orthogonal to each other, and each evaluation result is shown for each subject using the area enclosed by these columns. Therefore, the distribution of each evaluation of each subject in one organization or group is clear, and the position of the subject in the organization can be clearly understood. Also, referring to the position, it is possible to add an overall evaluation that is impossible only from individual evaluations. In other words, the column on the right in this example is a column for comprehensive evaluation. In this column, a score column is used to calculate and fill in the score of the subject to be evaluated based on the evaluation results of the three people: emotion evaluation, business performance evaluation, and business ability evaluation. There is a ranking column for ranking and filling in the column, an evaluation column for determination based on the points owned, and a confirmation column for entering the final decision result with reference to the ranking column and evaluation column. Thus, according to this list display form, it is possible to perform an evaluation including the positions of the members in the entire organization and perform an appropriate personnel evaluation based on the evaluation.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of a personnel evaluation system using a personnel evaluation form according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a procedure of an example of an evaluation process by a personnel evaluation system shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a procedure of another example of the evaluation process by the personnel evaluation system shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of comprehensive evaluation of an evaluation process by the personnel evaluation system shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of an evaluation sheet for personnel appraisal according to the present invention, which is used when performing emotion evaluation.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of use of an example of an evaluation sheet for personnel appraisal according to the present invention, which is used when performing emotion evaluation.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of an evaluation sheet for personnel appraisal according to the present invention, which is used when performing business performance evaluation.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of an evaluation criteria table for personnel evaluation according to the present invention, which is used when performing an emotion evaluation.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of an evaluation criteria table for personnel evaluation according to the present invention, which is used when performing business ability evaluation.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a business performance evaluation slip according to the present invention.

FIG. 11 is a diagram showing another example of the business performance evaluation slip according to the present invention.

FIG. 12 is a diagram showing still another example of the work performance evaluation slip according to the present invention.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a business ability evaluation form according to the present invention.

FIG. 14 is a diagram showing another example of the business ability evaluation list according to the present invention.

FIG. 15 is a diagram showing an example of a business capability distribution list according to the present invention.

FIG. 16 is a diagram showing an example of a business ability list according to the present invention.

FIG. 17 is a diagram showing an example of a personnel evaluation time-lapse list according to the present invention.

FIG. 18 is a diagram showing an example of a personnel evaluation totaling list according to the present invention.

[Explanation of symbols]

 1 Attribute display field 2 Evaluation content description field 3 Evaluation entry field 4 Attribute total field 5 Attribute display field 6 Evaluation content description field 7 Plus criteria description field 7 'Step display field 8 Negative criteria description field 8' Evaluation criteria 9 Evaluation content description field 10 Performance evaluation entry column 11 Weight display column 12 Evaluation content description column 13 Grade score display column 14 Attribute display column 15 Evaluation content description column 16 Stage display column 17 Attribute display column 18 Evaluation content description column 19 Stage display column 20 Attribute display column 21 Evaluation content description field 22 Stage display field 23 Applicable person display field 24 Classification field 25 Evaluation content display field 26 Evaluation time display field 27 Target person display field 28 Evaluation display field

────────────────────────────────────────────────── ───

[Procedure amendment]

[Submission date] December 28, 1999 (1999.12.
28)

[Procedure amendment 1]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] Claim 3

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[Procedure amendment 2]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] Claim 4

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[Procedure amendment 3]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] Claim 7

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[Procedure amendment 4]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] Claim 9

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[Procedure amendment 5]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] Claim 10

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[Procedure amendment 6]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] Claim 11

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[Procedure amendment 7]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] Claim 12

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

12. Affective evaluation of such work attitude and work ethic of the plurality of evaluation target, a personnel evaluation summary list display form to display the results of evaluation of business performance evaluation and business performance evaluation, to display the evaluation subjects A target person display column and an evaluation display column for displaying affection evaluation, business performance evaluation, business capability evaluation, and a comprehensive evaluation thereof are provided, and the target person display column and the evaluation display column are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other. and, appraisal summary list display, characterized in that it has to indicate the evaluation results for each subject using a space surrounded by these fields
Votes .

[Procedure amendment]

[Submission date] December 28, 1999 (1999.12.
28)

[Procedure amendment 30]

[Document name to be amended] Statement

[Correction target item name] Brief description of drawings

[Correction method] Change

[Correction contents]

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of a personnel evaluation system using a personnel evaluation form according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a procedure of an example of an evaluation process by a personnel evaluation system shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a procedure of another example of the evaluation process by the personnel evaluation system shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of comprehensive evaluation of an evaluation process by the personnel evaluation system shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of an evaluation sheet for personnel appraisal according to the present invention, which is used when performing emotion evaluation.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of use of an example of an evaluation sheet for personnel appraisal according to the present invention, which is used when performing emotion evaluation.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of an evaluation sheet for personnel appraisal according to the present invention, which is used when performing business performance evaluation.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of a personnel evaluation evaluation standard table display form according to the present invention, which is used when performing an emotion evaluation.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of a personnel evaluation evaluation standard table display form according to the present invention, which is used when performing business ability evaluation.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of a business performance evaluation slip according to the present invention.

FIG. 11 is a diagram showing another example of the business performance evaluation slip according to the present invention.

FIG. 12 is a diagram showing still another example of the work performance evaluation slip according to the present invention.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a business ability evaluation form according to the present invention.

FIG. 14 is a diagram showing another example of the business ability evaluation list display slip according to the present invention.

FIG. 15 shows one of the business ability distribution list display votes according to the present invention.
It is a figure showing an example.

FIG. 16 is a diagram showing an example of a business ability person list display slip according to the present invention.

FIG. 17 is a diagram showing a list of votes for a list of personnel appraisal time according to the present invention.
It is a figure showing an example.

FIG. 18 is a view showing a list of personnel evaluation appraisal tabulations according to the present invention.
It is a figure showing an example.

[Explanation of symbols] 1 Attribute display field 2 Evaluation content description field 3 Evaluation entry field 4 Attribute total field 5 Attribute display field 6 Evaluation content description field 7 Plus criteria description field 7 'Step display field 8 Negative criteria description field 8' Evaluation criteria 9 Evaluation description column 10 Performance evaluation entry column 11 Weight display column 12 Evaluation description column 13 Score display column for each stage 14 Attribute display column 15 Evaluation description column 16 Stage display column 17 Attribute display column 18 Evaluation description column 19 Display Field 20 Attribute display field 21 Evaluation content description field 22 Stage display field 23 Applicant display field 24 Classification field 25 Evaluation content display field 26 Evaluation time display field 27 Target person display field 28 Evaluation display field

Claims (12)

[Utility model registration claims] 1. An evaluation sheet for personnel evaluation in which items to be evaluated are classified according to the contents to be evaluated and are filled in, and a plurality of evaluation items closely related to each other are included in one evaluation item.
An attribute display column for displaying the attribute content of each attribute group as an attribute group; an evaluation content explanation column provided for each item belonging to the attribute group for displaying the content to be evaluated; and an evaluation entry column provided for each item An evaluation vote for personnel evaluation, comprising: 2. The evaluation entry column is provided with a plurality of columns for each level of evaluation.
Evaluation sheet for personnel evaluation described in. 3. A personnel evaluation evaluation criteria table in which evaluation criteria to be evaluated are classified and displayed according to the content to be evaluated, wherein a plurality of evaluation criteria are closely related to each other and belong to a common attribute. An attribute display column for displaying the attribute content of each attribute group with an evaluation item as one attribute group; an evaluation content description column provided for each item belonging to the attribute group for displaying the content to be evaluated; Personnel affairs characterized by having a plus-criteria explanation column indicating the content corresponding to a positive evaluation for the item and a minus-criteria explanation column provided for each item and indicating the content corresponding to a negative evaluation for the item. Evaluation criteria table for evaluation. 4. A business ability evaluation criterion table in which the business ability evaluation criteria to be evaluated are classified according to the content to be evaluated and displayed, wherein the evaluation is provided for each of the divided items and displays the content to be evaluated. A content description column and a stage display column in which the level of business performance evaluation is divided by a predetermined number of levels are provided, and the evaluation content description column and the stage display column are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other, and are surrounded by these columns. A business capability evaluation criterion table wherein, for each of the evaluation content explanation columns, an evaluation criterion corresponding to each stage in the stage display column is described using a designated area. 5. A business performance evaluation form for entering and evaluating the business performance to be evaluated according to the content to be evaluated, wherein the evaluation content is provided for each of the divided items and displays the content to be evaluated. A business performance evaluation form comprising: an explanation column, a performance evaluation entry column provided for each item, and a weight display column provided for each item and indicating a weight for all items of each item. 6. A business performance evaluation form for filling in the business performance to be evaluated in accordance with the content to be evaluated, which is provided for each of the divided items and displays the content to be evaluated. A description field, a high / low display field provided for each item to indicate the level of the business performance evaluation in a plurality of stages, and a score display field adjacent to the high / low display field and displaying a score corresponding to each level. A business performance evaluation form characterized by having: 7. A business ability evaluation list for displaying the business ability to be evaluated in terms of items according to the contents of the evaluation, and a description of the evaluation contents provided for each of the divided items and displaying the contents of the evaluation. Column, and a stage display column in which the level of the business ability evaluation is divided by a predetermined number of stages is provided, and the evaluation content explanation column and the stage display column are arranged so as to be orthogonal to each other to form a vertical axis and a horizontal axis. A business capability evaluation list, wherein a display of a step display column for each evaluation content description column is shown in a bar graph shape using an area enclosed by a vertical axis and a horizontal axis. 8. Each of the evaluation content description columns is divided in the axial direction of the column, and the business capability in a predetermined period and the business capability in the previous evaluation are described in parallel. The business ability evaluation form according to claim 5. 9. A business ability distribution list for displaying a plurality of business ability to be evaluated by itemized ability,
An evaluation content explanation column provided for each item and displaying the content to be evaluated, and a stage display column in which the level of business capability evaluation is divided by a predetermined number of stages are provided, and the evaluation content explanation column and the stage display column are mutually Business capability distribution list characterized by being arranged so as to be orthogonal and using the area enclosed by these columns to indicate the number of relevant persons in each stage display column for each evaluation content description column table. 10. A business ability list for displaying a plurality of evaluation targets by itemized abilities, an evaluation content explanation column provided for each item and displaying the content of the evaluation, and a business capability for each item. A stage display column for displaying the high and low rating stages,
A work ability list, comprising: a corresponding person display column for displaying a person corresponding to the evaluation stage displayed for each item. 11. A personnel evaluation time-lapse table for displaying an evaluation of work attitude, work motivation, etc., an evaluation of work performance, and an evaluation of work ability, which are subject to evaluation. An evaluation content display column is provided for each of the items to display the content of the evaluation, and an evaluation time display column indicating the time at which the evaluation was performed is provided, and the evaluation content display column and the evaluation time display column are orthogonal to each other. A list of personnel evaluations over time, wherein the evaluations at each evaluation time are shown for each evaluation item using an area surrounded by these columns. 12. A personnel evaluation totaling table for displaying the evaluation results of a plurality of evaluation targets, such as work attitudes and work motivations, work performance evaluations, and business ability evaluations, and a target person displaying the evaluation targets. Display columns, emotion evaluation, business performance evaluation,
An evaluation display column for displaying the business ability evaluation and the overall evaluation of these is provided, and the subject display column and the evaluation display column are arranged side by side so as to be orthogonal to each other, and the area surrounded by these columns is used. A summary list of personnel evaluations, wherein each evaluation result is shown for each subject.