JP3048891B2 - Transport vehicle operation planning device - Google Patents

Transport vehicle operation planning device

Info

Publication number
JP3048891B2
JP3048891B2 JP20312095A JP20312095A JP3048891B2 JP 3048891 B2 JP3048891 B2 JP 3048891B2 JP 20312095 A JP20312095 A JP 20312095A JP 20312095 A JP20312095 A JP 20312095A JP 3048891 B2 JP3048891 B2 JP 3048891B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
transport
assignment
vehicle
goods
transport vehicle
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP20312095A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH0950599A (en
Inventor
真佐子 野村
昌弘 田村
雄二 藤山
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority to JP20312095A priority Critical patent/JP3048891B2/en
Publication of JPH0950599A publication Critical patent/JPH0950599A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3048891B2 publication Critical patent/JP3048891B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は,運搬車両の運行計
画立案装置に係り,詳しくは複数の運搬車両により複数
の運搬物を積載又は牽引して予め設定された発着地点間
を運搬する作業に対し,各運搬車両及び運搬物を割り当
ててそれぞれの運行計画を立案する装置に関するもので
ある。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an operation planning device for a transportation vehicle, and more particularly to an operation for loading or towing a plurality of transportation objects by a plurality of transportation vehicles and transporting the transportation between predetermined departure and arrival points. On the other hand, the present invention relates to an apparatus for allocating each transport vehicle and a transported article to formulate an operation plan.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】図10は,従来の運搬車両の運行計画立
案装置A′の一例における概略構成を示すブロック図で
ある。ここでは,台車・機動車諸元情報記憶部56と,
台車・機動車使用予定情報記憶部57と,運搬作業情報
記憶部54と,積地・卸地情報記憶部55と,運搬作業
に対する台車51,51,…,機動車52,52,…の
割り当ての優先順位及び台車,機動車の運用目標に関連
する運用規則情報を記憶する運用規則情報記憶部53と
のそれぞれから,台車・機動車運行計画決定部58に,
前記台車・機動諸元情報,使用予定情報,運搬作業情
報,積地・卸地情報及び運用規則情報が与えられる。台
車・機動車運行計画決定部58では,これらの情報に基
づき,多重ツリー探索法を用いて運搬作業のそれぞれに
対し,使用する台車と機動車とを各別に割り当て,台車
及び機動車の運行計画を作成する。具体的には,図11
に示すように,先ず台車・機動車の利用可能時間帯を算
出し(S51),運搬作業を時間帯によって複数のグル
ープに分けた後(S52),まだ割り当ての済んでいな
いグループの中で最も時刻の早いグループについて,グ
ループ内の作業を優先順位に従って並べ変えて運搬作業
列のデータを作成し(S53,S54),上記ステップ
S51で計画対象とした台車列を作成する(S55)。
そして,運搬作業情報,積地・卸地情報,台車・機動車
諸元情報及び運用規則情報に基づき,運搬作業列のデー
タ及び台車列のデータについて,多重ツリー探索法を用
いて運搬作業−台車の割り当てを行う(S56)。この
後,機動車についても同様の割り当てを行い(S57〜
S61),作業を終了する。ここで,多重ツリー探索法
とは,ツリー探索を行うための分枝限定法を応用したも
のであり,探索のためのツリーを部分問題に分解してツ
リーを多重化し,それぞれのツリー毎に解の探索を行う
ものである。
2. Description of the Related Art FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of an example of a conventional operation planning device A 'for a transport vehicle. Here, the bogie / mobile vehicle specification information storage unit 56,
.., Trolleys 51,..., Motor vehicles 52, 52,. From the operation rule information storage unit 53 that stores the operation rule information related to the operation priority information and the operation targets of the bogie and the mobile vehicle, and to the bogie / mobile vehicle operation plan determination unit 58,
The bogie / mobility specification information, scheduled use information, transport work information, loading / unloading land information, and operation rule information are provided. Based on the information, the bogie / mobile vehicle operation plan deciding section 58 assigns a bogie and a mobile vehicle to be used to each of the transport work by using a multiple tree search method, and executes the operation plan of the bogie and the mobile vehicle. Create Specifically, FIG.
As shown in (1), first, the available time zone of the bogie / mobile car is calculated (S51), and the transport work is divided into a plurality of groups according to the time zone (S52). For the group with the earlier time, the work in the group is rearranged according to the priority order to create the data of the transport work sequence (S53, S54), and the bogie sequence to be planned in step S51 is created (S55).
Then, based on the transport work information, the loading / unloading place information, the bogie / mobile vehicle specification information, and the operation rule information, the transport work-carriage is performed using the multiple tree search method for the data of the transport work row and the data of the bogie row. Is assigned (S56). Thereafter, the same assignment is performed for the mobile vehicle (S57 to S57).
S61), end the operation. Here, the multiple tree search method is an application of a branch-and-bound method for performing a tree search. The search tree is decomposed into subproblems, the trees are multiplexed, and a solution is obtained for each tree. The search is performed.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】上記したような従来の
運搬車両の運行計画立案装置A′では,計画立案に多重
ツリー探索法を用いているので,分解された各ツリー内
での最適解を得ることはできるものの,全体ツリーでの
最適解は必ずしも得ることができない。このため,全運
搬作業対全運搬車両の最適な割り当てが得られるとは限
らない。本発明は,このような従来の技術における課題
を解決するために,運搬車両の運行計画立案装置を改良
し,全運搬作業対全運搬車両の最適な割り当てを得るこ
とのできる運搬車両の運行計画立案装置を提供すること
を目的とするものである。
In the conventional operation planning apparatus A 'for a transport vehicle as described above, since the multiple tree search method is used for the planning, the optimal solution in each decomposed tree is determined. Although it can be obtained, the optimal solution in the whole tree cannot always be obtained. For this reason, it is not always possible to obtain an optimal assignment of all transport operations to all transport vehicles. In order to solve such problems in the prior art, the present invention is an improvement of an operation planning device for a transport vehicle, and an operation plan of the transport vehicle capable of obtaining an optimal assignment of all transport operations to all transport vehicles. It is an object to provide a planning device.

【0004】[0004]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記目的を達成するため
に本発明は,複数の運搬車両により複数の運搬物を積載
又は牽引して予め設定された発着地点間を運搬する作業
に対し,各運搬車両及び運搬物を割り当ててそれぞれの
運行計画を立案する装置において,少なくとも上記運行
計画の対象となる運搬車両,運搬物,運搬作業及び発着
地点に関する各情報を記憶する計画情報記憶手段と,上
記運行計画の条件を記憶する計画条件記憶手段と,上記
各情報に基づいて運搬作業に対する運搬車両及び運搬物
の割り当ての良否を評価する割り当て評価手段と,上記
運行計画の条件と,上記運搬作業に対する運搬車両及び
運搬物の割り当ての評価結果とに基づいて,該運搬作業
に対する運搬車両及び運搬物の割り当てを,分枝限定法
により決定する割り当て決定手段とを具備し,上記割り
当て決定手段が,運搬作業に対する運搬車両及び運搬物
の割り当てを分枝限定法により決定するに当り,割り当
て不可能な運搬作業と運搬車両及び運搬物とからなる割
り当て候補を線形計画法を用いて除去してなることを特
徴とする運搬車両の運行計画立案装置として構成されて
いる。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In order to achieve the above object, the present invention is directed to an operation for loading or towing a plurality of articles by a plurality of transport vehicles and transporting them between predetermined landing points. A device for allocating transport vehicles and transported goods and drafting respective operation plans, wherein plan information storage means for storing at least information on transported vehicles, transported goods, transport work, and departure / arrival points which are the targets of the operation plan; Plan condition storage means for storing the conditions of the operation plan, assignment evaluation means for evaluating whether or not the assignment of the transport vehicles and the goods to the transport operation is good based on the above information, conditions for the operation plan, Based on the results of the evaluation of the allocation of the transport vehicles and the goods, the allocation of the transport vehicles and the goods to the transport work is determined by the branch and bound method. ; And a hit determination means, above split
The guessing means is the transport vehicle and the transported goods for the transport operation
In deciding the assignment of branches by the branch and bound method
Of transport operations that cannot be carried out
It is important to note that allocation candidates are removed using linear programming.
It is configured as an operation planning device for hauling vehicles
I have.

【0005】或いは,上記割り当て決定手段,運搬作
業に対する運搬車両及び運搬物の割り当てを分枝限定法
により決定するに当り,割り当て不可能な運搬作業と運
搬車両及び運搬物とからなる割り当て候補を目標計画法
を用いて除去するように構成してもよい。 或いは,上記
割り当て決定手段,運搬作業に対する運搬車両及び運
搬物の割り当てを分枝限定法により決定するに当り,割
り当て不可能な運搬作業と運搬車両及び運搬物とからな
る割り当て候補をファジィ線形計画法を用いて除去する
ように構成してもよい。さらには,上記割り当て評価手
段が,運搬作業に対する運搬車両及び運搬物の割り当て
数が多くなるに従って,単調増加又は単調減少する評価
値を演算し,運搬車両及び運搬物の未割り当て作業に対
する割り当てによる上記評価値の増加又は減少分の最小
限を求め,かつ,上記割り当て決定手段が,上記評価値
と該評価値の増加又は減少分の最小限とに基づいて上記
運搬作業に対する運搬車両及び運搬物の割り当てを決定
する運搬車両の運行計画立案装置である。さらには,上
記割り当て評価手段が,上記評価値の増加又は減少分の
最小限を求めるに当り,最適割り当て問題の解法を用い
る運搬車両の運行計画立案装置である。
[0005] Alternatively, the allocation determining means, hit the allocation decisions transport vehicle and the transported articles against carrying works by branch and bound method, the allocation candidate consisting of the allocation impossible carrying works and transportation vehicles and transported article You may comprise so that it may remove using goal programming . Alternatively, the allocation determining means, per the assignment of transport vehicle and the transported articles against transport work is determined by branch and bound method, consisting of the allocation impossible carrying works and transportation vehicles and transported article allocation candidate fuzzy linear programming Removal using the method
It may be configured as follows. Further, the allocation evaluation means calculates an evaluation value that monotonically increases or monotonically decreases as the number of allocations of the transport vehicles and the goods to the transport work increases, and calculates the above-mentioned evaluation value by the allocation to the unallocated works of the transport vehicles and the goods. The minimum of the increase or decrease of the evaluation value is determined, and the assignment determining means determines the minimum of the increase or decrease of the evaluation value and the minimum of the increase or decrease of the evaluation value. It is an operation plan planning device for a transport vehicle that determines an assignment. Further, the present invention is an operation planning device for a transporting vehicle, wherein the allocation evaluation means uses a solution to an optimum allocation problem when obtaining a minimum increase or decrease in the evaluation value.

【0006】さらには,上記運搬物が混銑車であり,か
つ,上記運搬車両が機関車である運搬車両の運行計画立
案装置である。さらには,上記運搬物が台車であり,か
つ,上記運搬車両が機関車である運搬車両の運行計画立
案装置である。ここに,分枝限定法は,全ての割り当て
可能性について検討する手法であるので,本発明によれ
ば,問題を分解する多重ツリー検索法を用いた従来例と
は異なり,全体を通した最適解を得ることができる。ま
た,分枝限定法では,効率的に探索の打切りを行うこと
によって,高速な探索を行うことができるが,本発明に
よれば,線形計画法または,目標計画法または,ファジ
ィ線形計画法といった容易な手段によって,割り当て可
能な運搬作業と運搬車両及び運搬物との組合せを見いだ
して除去することが可能である。さらに,評価値を単調
増加または単調減少となるように定めて,車両未割り当
て作業に全ての車両を割り当てた場合の評価値増加分ま
たは減少分の最小限を,実際に全ての割り当ての組合せ
を調べることなく求められるため,現在分かっている最
良の割り当ての評価値よりも,これから割り当てを進め
ていくと評価値が悪化することが分かると探索を容易に
打ち切ることができ,その結果高速な探索が可能とな
る。
Further, there is provided an operation plan planning device for a transport vehicle in which the transported object is a mixed iron car and the transported vehicle is a locomotive. Further, the present invention is an operation plan planning device for a transport vehicle in which the transported object is a trolley and the transported vehicle is a locomotive. Here, since the branch and bound method is a method for examining all possible assignments, according to the present invention, unlike the conventional example using the multiple tree search method for decomposing a problem, the optimal A solution can be obtained. In the branch-and-bound method, a high-speed search can be performed by efficiently terminating the search. However, according to the present invention, a linear programming, a target programming, or a fuzzy linear programming is used. By means of easy means, it is possible to find and remove combinations of assignable transport operations and transport vehicles and goods. Furthermore, the evaluation value is determined so as to be monotonically increasing or decreasing, and the minimum increase or decrease in the evaluation value when all vehicles are allocated to the unallocated work is reduced to the actual combination of all allocations. The search can be performed without checking, so the search can be easily terminated if it is found that the evaluation value deteriorates as the allocation proceeds in the future, compared to the currently known best allocation evaluation value. Becomes possible.

【0007】[0007]

【発明の実施の形態】及びDETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION AND

【実施例】以下添付図面を参照して,本発明の実施の形
態及び実施例につき説明し,本発明の理解に供する。
尚,以下の実施の形態及び実施例は,本発明を具体化し
た一例であって,本発明の技術的範囲を限定する性格の
ものではない。ここに,図1は本発明の実施例の形態及
び実施例に係る運搬車両の運行計画立案装置Aの概略構
成を示すブロック図,図2は運搬車両情報記憶部の記憶
内容の一例を示す図表,図3は運搬作業・運搬物情報記
憶部の記憶内容の一例を示す図表,図4は発着地点情報
記憶部の記憶内容の一例を示す図表,図5は着地点,発
地点を結ぶ2部グラフの一例を示す図,図6はファジィ
メンバシップ関数の一例を示す図,図7は割り当てツリ
ーの一例を示す図,図8は装置Aの動作手順を示すフロ
ー図,図9は装置Aの出力例を示す図である。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Embodiments and examples of the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings to provide an understanding of the present invention.
The following embodiments and examples are mere examples embodying the present invention, and do not limit the technical scope of the present invention. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of an operation planning device A for a transport vehicle according to an embodiment and an example of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a table showing an example of storage contents of a transport vehicle information storage unit. , FIG. 3 is a table showing an example of the storage contents of the transport work / transportation information storage section, FIG. 4 is a table showing an example of the storage contents of the landing point information storage section, and FIG. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a fuzzy membership function, FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of an assignment tree, FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating an operation procedure of the device A, and FIG. It is a figure showing an example of an output.

【0008】図1に示す如く,本発明の実施の形態及び
実施例に係る運搬車両の運行計画立案装置Aは,複数の
運搬車両により複数の運搬物を積載又は牽引して予め設
定された発着地点間を運搬する作業に対し,各運搬車両
及び運搬物を割り当ててそれぞれの運行計画を立案する
点で従来例と同様である。しかし,本実施の形態及び実
施例では,少なくとも上記運行計画の対象となる運搬車
両,運搬物,運搬作業及び発着地点に関する各情報を記
憶する運搬車両情報記憶部1,運搬作業・運搬物情報記
憶部2,発着地点情報記憶部3,運用規則記憶部4(1
〜4が計画情報記憶手段に相当)と,上記運行計画の条
件を記憶する計画条件記憶部5(計画条件記憶手段に相
当)と,上記各情報に基づいて運搬作業に対する運搬車
両及び運搬物の割り当ての良否を評価する評価値計算部
6,評価値増加分予測部7(6及び7が評価手段に相
当)と,上記運行計画の条件と上記運搬作業に対する運
搬車両及び運搬物の割り当ての評価結果とに基づいて,
該運搬作業に対する運搬車両及び運搬物の割り当てを分
枝限定法により決定する割り当て不可能割当候補除去部
8,運搬作業・運搬車両・運搬物割当部9,暫定解記憶
部10,最適解出力部11(8〜11が割り当て決定手
段に相当)とを具備してなる点で従来例と異なる。
As shown in FIG. 1, an operation planning apparatus A for a transport vehicle according to an embodiment and an embodiment of the present invention loads or pulls a plurality of loads by a plurality of transport vehicles, and sets a predetermined arrival and departure time. This is the same as the conventional example in that each transport vehicle and the transported goods are assigned to the operation of transporting between points and each operation plan is made. However, in the present embodiment and examples, the transport vehicle information storage unit 1, which stores at least information on the transport vehicle, the transported object, the transporting operation, and the departure / arrival point, which is the target of the operation plan, the transporting operation / transported object information storage Unit 2, departure / arrival point information storage unit 3, operation rule storage unit 4 (1
4 to 4 correspond to plan information storage means), a plan condition storage unit 5 for storing the conditions of the operation plan (corresponding to plan condition storage means), Evaluation value calculation unit 6 for evaluating the quality of the allocation, evaluation value increase prediction unit 7 (6 and 7 correspond to evaluation means), and evaluation of the conditions of the operation plan and the allocation of transport vehicles and goods to the transport operation Based on the results
Unassignable allocation candidate removing unit 8 for deciding the allocation of transport vehicles and goods to the transport work by the branch and bound method, transport work / transport vehicle / goods allocation unit 9, provisional solution storage unit 10, optimal solution output unit 11 (8 to 11 correspond to allocation determining means).

【0009】以下,本装置Aをさらに具体化すると共
に,その作動原理について詳述する。尚,ここでは運搬
物として混銑車を,運搬車両として機関車を用いるもの
とするが,運搬物として台車を用いることとしても何ら
支障はない。また,ここでは次のような記号を用いるも
のとする。 .機関車の数をI,機関車割当対象の輸送作業(運搬作
業)の数をJとする。 .第j輸送作業の発地点をps (j),着地点をp
f (j)とする。 .第j輸送作業の発要求時刻をts (j),着要求時刻
をtf (j)とする。 .第j輸送作業の発時刻をx(j),着時刻をy(j)
とする(これらは定数ではなく変数である)。 .地点p1 ,p2 間の単走時間(混銑車を接続しないで
機関車単体で移動するのに要する時間)をT0 (p1
2 ),輸送時間(混銑車を機関車に接続して移動する
のに要する時間)をT1 (p1 ,p2 )とする。 .機関車iの初期位置pi 0 ,稼働開始時刻をti 0
稼働終了時刻をti 1とする。 .現在割当完了している最終の輸送作業番号をj0 とす
る。 .現在機関車iに割り当てられている輸送作業数をK
(i)とする。 .現在機関車iに割り当てられている輸送作業番号をj
i 1 ,ji 2 ,…,j i k(i)とする。
Hereinafter, the present apparatus A will be further embodied.
Next, the operating principle will be described in detail. The transportation here
Using mixed iron cars as goods and locomotives as transport vehicles
However, even if a trolley is used as the cargo,
No problem. The following symbols are used here.
And . When the number of locomotives is I,
J) is the number of (work). . P is the starting point of the jth transport operations(J), the landing point is p
f(J). . The request time of the jth transportation work is ts(J), arrival request time
To tf(J). . The departure time of the j-th transportation work is x (j) and the arrival time is y (j)
(These are variables, not constants). . Point p1, PTwoSingle running time between
The time required to travel by a locomotive alone) is T0(P1,
pTwo), Transportation time
The time it takes to1(P1, PTwo). . Initial position p of locomotive ii 0, The operation start time is ti 0,
Set the operation end time to ti 1And . J is the final transport operation number that has been assigned0Toss
You. . The number of transport operations currently assigned to locomotive i is K
(I). . The transport work number currently assigned to the locomotive i is j
i 1, Ji Two, ..., j i k (i)And

【0010】運搬車両情報記憶部1には,図2に示すよ
うに,機関車の車番と,それぞれの初期位置及び稼働可
能な時間帯とが記憶されている。運搬作業・運搬物情報
記憶部2には,図3に示すように各輸送作業の作業番
号,発地点名,着地点名,発要求時刻,着要求時刻,輸
送作業の対象となる混銑車番号,混銑車による輸送内容
物からなる運搬作業・運搬物情報が記憶されている。作
業は発要求時刻の早い順に並べられている。発着地点情
報記憶部3には,図4に示すように,発着地点間の標準
移動時間が記憶されている。標準移動時間には,輸送時
間と単走時間の両方が記憶されている。運用規則記憶部
4には,割り当ての目標として機関車の単走時間合計の
最小化という目標が記憶されている。
As shown in FIG. 2, the vehicle information storage unit 1 stores the vehicle numbers of the locomotives, their respective initial positions, and the operable time zones. As shown in FIG. 3, the transport work / transported goods information storage unit 2 stores the work number, departure point name, destination point name, departure request time, departure request time, and the number of the pig iron truck to be transported. In addition, transport work / transported goods information composed of transport contents by the pig iron truck is stored. The tasks are arranged in order of earliest request time. The departure / arrival point information storage unit 3 stores a standard travel time between departure and arrival points, as shown in FIG. In the standard travel time, both the transport time and the single run time are stored. The operation rule storage unit 4 stores a goal of minimizing the total running time of the locomotive as a target of allocation.

【0011】評価値計算部6では,機関車の単走時間合
計を求めて評価値とする。評価値増加分予測部7では,
次のようにして今後の割り当てにより増加する評価値の
増加分の最小値(最小限)を求める。即ち,図5に示す
ように,着地点,発地点の2組の節点集合を作り,1対
1に結んだ2部グラフを作成する。枝の重みとして,地
点間の単走時間を付与する。但し,終点につながる枝の
重みは0とする。すると,I台の機関車の運行経路は必
ずこの2組の節点の1対1対応(割当)として表すこと
ができる。その割り当てでの枝の重みの合計は,単走時
間の合計となる。運行経路の集合は割り当ての集合の部
分集合であるから,割り当ての最小値はその部分集合の
最小と比較して常に等しいかまたは小さい。従って,枝
の重み合計が最小となる割り当て(最小割当)を求めれ
ば,運行経路の中で単走時間が最小のものの単走時間の
合計よりも必ず小さく,今後どのような割り当てをした
としても最低限これ以上の単走時間がかかるということ
が分かる。このような最小割当が短時間で求められるこ
とは,例えば人見勝人著「生産管理光学」,コロナ社出
版,1978年,PP94−96により知られている。
そこで,上記のような最小割当を求めることによって,
評価値増加分の最小値を予測することができる。
The evaluation value calculator 6 calculates the total single running time of the locomotive and uses it as an evaluation value. In the evaluation value increase prediction unit 7,
The minimum value (minimum value) of the increase in the evaluation value that increases due to future allocation is determined as follows. That is, as shown in FIG. 5, two sets of nodes, a landing point and a departure point, are created, and a bipartite graph connected one-to-one is created. The single running time between points is given as the weight of the branch. However, the weight of the branch connected to the end point is set to 0. Then, the operation route of the I locomotives can always be represented as a one-to-one correspondence (allocation) of these two sets of nodes. The sum of the branch weights in that assignment is the sum of the single running times. Since the set of service routes is a subset of the set of assignments, the minimum value of the assignment is always equal to or smaller than the minimum of that subset. Therefore, if the assignment that minimizes the total weight of the branches (minimum assignment) is found, it will always be smaller than the sum of the single trip times of the running routes with the shortest running time, and no matter what allocation is made in the future, It can be seen that it takes at least a single run time. The fact that such a minimum assignment is required in a short time is known, for example, from Katsuhito Hitomi, "Production Management Optics", Corona Publishing, 1978, PP94-96.
Therefore, by finding the minimum allocation as described above,
The minimum value of the evaluation value increase can be predicted.

【0012】割り当て不可能割当候補除去部8では,次
のようにして割り当て不可能な割当候補の除去を行う。
このための条件が計画条件記憶部5に記憶されている。
その内容は以下のとおりである。 1.地点pf (j)への着時刻y(j)は,地点p
s (j)での発時刻x(j)に地点ps (j),p
f (j)間の輸送時間を足した時刻でなければならな
い。 y(j)=x(j)+T1 (ps (j),pf (J)) (j=1,2,…,J) …(1) 2.第ji K 輸送作業の発地点から発車する時刻x(j
i K )は,同じ機関車の前回輸送作業ji K-1 の着地点
f (ji K-1 )へ着いた時刻と,前回輸送作業ji
K-1 の着地点pf (ji K-1 )から今回輸送作業ji K
の発地点ps (j i K )までの単走時間T0 (pf (j
i K-1 ),ps (ji K ))の合計より後でなければな
らない。 x(ji K )≧y(ji K-1 )+T0 (pf (ji K-1 ),ps (ji K )) (i=1,2,…,I,K=2,3,…,K(i)) …(2)
The unassignable assignment candidate removing unit 8
The assignment candidate that cannot be assigned is removed as described above.
Conditions for this are stored in the plan condition storage unit 5.
The contents are as follows. 1. Point pfThe arrival time y (j) at (j) is the point p
sPoint p at departure time x (j) at (j)s(J), p
fThe time must be the sum of the transportation time between (j)
No. y (j) = x (j) + T1(Ps(J), pf(J)) (j = 1, 2,..., J) (1) Jthi KTime x (j) to depart from the departure point of transportation work
i K) Is the previous transportation work j of the same locomotive.i K-1Landing point
pf(Ji K-1) And the last transportation work ji
K-1Landing point pf(Ji K-1) From this time transport worki K
Departure point ps(J i KSingle running time T)0(Pf(J
i K-1), Ps(Ji K)) Must be later than the sum
No. x (ji K) ≧ y (ji K-1) + T0(Pf(Ji K-1), Ps(Ji K)) (I = 1, 2,..., I, K = 2, 3,..., K (i)) (2)

【0013】3.機関車iの行う最初の輸送作業である
第ji 1 輸送作業の発地点から発車する時刻x
(ji 1 )は,稼働開始時刻ti 0 に,初期位置pi 0
から第ji 1輸送作業の発地点までの単走時間T0 (p
i 0 ,ps (ji 1 ))より後でなければならない。 x(ji 1 )≧ti 0 +T0 (pi 0 ,ps (ji 1 )) (i=1,2,…,I) …(3) 4.機関車iの行う最終の輸送作業である第ji K(i)
送作業の着地点に到着する時刻y(ji K(i))は,稼働
最終時刻ti 1 より前でなければならない。 y(ji K(i))≦ti 1 (i=1,2,…,I) …(4) 上記条件(1)〜(4)は,分枝限定法における一般的
な制約条件であるが,本発明では,次のような条件をさ
らに追加し,割当候補の除去を行う。 5.線形計画法を用いる場合:この場合は次のような条
件を追加する。 (a)発時刻は発要求時刻に一致しなければならない。 x(j)=ts (j) (j=1,2,…,J) …(5) (b)着時刻は着要求時刻に一致しなければならない。 y(j)=tf (j) (j=1,2,…,J) …(6) 上記条件(1)〜(6)のもとで,目的関数を次のよう
に定義し,これを最小化する。
3. Time x at which the train departs from the departure point of the j i 1 transport work, which is the first transport work performed by locomotive i
(J i 1) is, in the operational start time t i 0, the initial position p i 0
From the first j i 1 single run time of up to departure point of the transport work T 0 (p
i 0 , p s (j i 1 )). x (j i 1) ≧ t i 0 + T 0 (p i 0, p s (j i 1)) (i = 1,2, ..., I) ... (3) 4. Is the last of the transport work performed by the locomotive i first j i K (i) time to arrive at the landing point of the transport work y (j i K (i) ) must be before the operation the last time t i 1 . y (j i K (i) ) ≦ t i 1 (i = 1, 2,..., I) (4) The above conditions (1) to (4) are general constraints in the branch and bound method. However, in the present invention, the following conditions are further added to remove the allocation candidates. 5. When using linear programming: In this case, the following conditions are added. (A) The departure time must match the departure request time. x (j) = t s ( j) (j = 1,2, ..., J) ... (5) (b) arrival time must match the wearing request time. y (j) = t f (j) (j = 1, 2,..., J) (6) Under the above conditions (1) to (6), the objective function is defined as follows. Is minimized.

【0014】[0014]

【数1】 ここで,周知のシンプレックス法を用いて以上の線形計
画問題を解くと,条件(5),(6)を満たす解が存在
しなければ,条件(5),(6)の範囲内ではこの割り
当てが不可能であることがわかり,割当候補を除去する
ことができる。
(Equation 1) Here, when the above-mentioned linear programming problem is solved using the well-known simplex method, if there is no solution satisfying the conditions (5) and (6), this assignment is made within the range of the conditions (5) and (6). Is impossible, and the allocation candidate can be removed.

【0015】6.目標計画法を用いる場合:次のような
条件を追加する。 (a)発時刻の発要求時刻からの超過分をdj + ,不足
分をdj - とすると次式が成立する。 x(j)−dj + +dj - =ts (j) (j=1,2,…,J) …(8) (b)着時刻の着要求時刻からの超過分をdJ+j + ,不
足分をdJ+j - とすると次式が成立する。 y(j)−dJ+j + +dJ+j - =tf (j) (j=1,2,…,J) …(9)
6. When using goal programming: Add the following conditions. The excess from the calling request time of (a) onset time d j +, the shortage d j - and the following equation is established when. x (j) -d j + + d j - = t s (j) (j = 1,2, ..., J) ... (8) (b) the excess from the destination request time of arrival time d J + j +, the shortage d J + j - following equation is established when the. y (j) −d J + j + + d J + j = t f (j) (j = 1, 2,..., J) (9)

【0016】上記条件(1)〜(4),(8),(9)
のもとで,次の目的関数を最小化する。
The above conditions (1) to (4), (8), (9)
, The following objective function is minimized.

【数2】 目的関数の最小値は,発時刻・着時刻をどれだけ目標に
近づけてもこれ以上は近づけられないという限界を示し
ている。従って,予め閾値を設けておき,これよりも値
が大きければ割り当て不可能とみなすことができ,割当
候補を除去することができる。
(Equation 2) The minimum value of the objective function indicates a limit that no matter how close the departure time and the arrival time are to the target, they cannot be further approached. Therefore, a threshold value is set in advance, and if the value is larger than the threshold value, it can be determined that the assignment is impossible, and the assignment candidate can be removed.

【0017】7.ファジィ計画法を用いる場合:第j輸
送作業の発時刻x(j),着時刻y(j)について,発
要求時刻ts (j),着要求時刻tf (j)からのずれ
の好ましさを表現するメンバシップ関数を,図6に示す
ように定義する。即ち, (a)発時刻の発要求時刻からのずれの好ましさλ
s (j)は次式で表現する。
[7] When fuzzy programming is used: For the departure request time t s (j) and the departure request time t f (j) for the departure time x (j) and arrival time y (j) of the j-th transportation work, it is preferable. The membership function expressing the value is defined as shown in FIG. (A) The preference λ of the deviation of the departure time from the departure request time
s (j) is expressed by the following equation.

【数3】 (Equation 3)

【0018】(b)着時刻の着要求時刻からのずれの好
ましさλf (j)は次式で表現する。
(B) The preference λ f (j) of the deviation of the arrival time from the arrival request time is expressed by the following equation.

【数4】 (Equation 4)

【0019】上記条件(1)〜(4),(11),(1
2)のもとで,次の目的関数を最小化する。
The above conditions (1) to (4), (11), (1)
Under 2), the following objective function is minimized.

【数5】 シンプレックス法を用いて以上のファジィ線形計画問題
を解くと,メンバシップ関数(11),(12)の範囲
内で解が存在しなければ,この割り当てが不可能である
ことがわかり,割当候補を除去することができる。
(Equation 5) When the above fuzzy linear programming problem is solved using the simplex method, it can be understood that this assignment is impossible if no solution exists within the range of the membership functions (11) and (12). Can be removed.

【0020】運搬作業・運搬車両・運搬物割当部9で
は,図7に示すような割り当てツリーを作り,同ツリー
の向かって左上から順に縦型検索を行うものとする。探
索は具体的には図8に示すような手順により分枝限定法
を用いて行う。 ステップS1:暫定解記憶部10を初期化し,暫定値と
して非常に大きな数値を格納する。 ステップS2:ツリー左上に近い方から,未探索の節点
を1つ選択する。 ステップS3:現在選択されている節点までの割り当て
に基づき,割り当て不可能割当候補除去部8により割り
当て可能性をチェックする。そして,割り当て可能なら
ば次ステップへ,割り当て不可能ならば後述するステッ
プS9へ移行する。 ステップS4:評価値計算部6により,現在選択されて
いる節点までの割り当てによる評価値を計算する。
The transport work / transportation vehicle / transportation allocating unit 9 creates an allocation tree as shown in FIG. 7 and performs a vertical search in order from the upper left of the tree. The search is specifically performed using a branch and bound method according to a procedure as shown in FIG. Step S1: The provisional solution storage unit 10 is initialized, and a very large numerical value is stored as a provisional value. Step S2: One unsearched node is selected from the one closer to the upper left of the tree. Step S3: The assignment possibility is checked by the unassignable assignment candidate removing unit 8 based on the assignment up to the currently selected node. If the assignment is possible, the process proceeds to the next step. If the assignment is not possible, the process proceeds to step S9 described later. Step S4: The evaluation value calculation unit 6 calculates an evaluation value by assignment to the currently selected node.

【0021】ステップS5:評価値増加分予測部7によ
り,現在選択されている節点以下の割り当てによる評価
値増加分の最小限を求める。 ステップS6:上記ステップS4で求めた評価値と上記
ステップS5で求めた評価値増加分の最小限とを合計し
た値と,暫定解記憶部10に記憶されている暫定値とを
比較する。そして,前者の方が小さければ次ステップ
へ,前者の方が大きければ後述するステップS9へ移行
する。 ステップS7:現在選択されている節点が,ツリーの下
端でなければ上記ステップS2へ戻る。 ステップS8:現在選択されている節点における割り当
てと評価値とを,暫定解記憶部10に記憶されているも
のと入れ換えて記憶し,次のステップS9へ移行する。
Step S5: The evaluation value increase predicting section 7 obtains the minimum increase in the evaluation value due to the assignment below the currently selected node. Step S6: The value obtained by summing the evaluation value obtained in step S4 and the minimum increase in the evaluation value obtained in step S5 is compared with the provisional value stored in the provisional solution storage unit 10. If the former is smaller, the process proceeds to the next step. If the former is larger, the process proceeds to step S9 described later. Step S7: If the currently selected node is not the lower end of the tree, the process returns to step S2. Step S8: The assignment and the evaluation value at the currently selected node are replaced with those stored in the provisional solution storage unit 10, and the process proceeds to the next step S9.

【0022】ステップS9:節点を終端(この節点以下
のサブツリーの節点をすべて探索済みとする)とし,後
戻り(バックトラック)操作により未探索の節点を選択
する。未探索の節点があれば上記ステップS3へ戻る。 ステップS10:暫定解記憶部10に記憶されている暫
定解があれば,その解を最適解出力部11により最適解
として出力する。記憶されている暫定解がなければ,こ
の機関車台数での割り当ては不可能と結論でき,最適解
出力部11により解なしとの結論を出力する。本装置A
を用いて得られる機関車の運行計画の一例を図9に示し
た。このとき約1時間の運行計画を求めるのに要した計
算時間は35秒であった。従って,ツリーの分割を行わ
ずに全体を通した最適解を,ここでは実用的にかつ十分
短時間に得ることができることがわかった。
Step S9: The node is set to the end (all nodes of the subtree below this node have been searched), and an unsearched node is selected by a backtracking operation. If there is an unsearched node, the process returns to step S3. Step S10: If there is a provisional solution stored in the provisional solution storage unit 10, the solution is output as the optimal solution by the optimal solution output unit 11. If there is no stored provisional solution, it can be concluded that allocation with this number of locomotives is impossible, and the optimal solution output unit 11 outputs a conclusion that there is no solution. This device A
FIG. 9 shows an example of an operation plan of a locomotive obtained by using the method shown in FIG. At this time, the calculation time required for obtaining the operation plan of about one hour was 35 seconds. Therefore, it has been found that the optimal solution can be obtained practically and in a sufficiently short time here without dividing the tree.

【0023】尚,上記実施形態及び実施例では,運搬物
を予め運搬作業と1対1に対応づけておいた後,これと
運搬車両との最適な組合せを考えたが,実使用に際して
は,同様の手順で運搬物と運搬作業との最適な組合せを
考えた後に,これらと運搬車両との最適な組合せを考え
ることとしてもよい。この場合も分枝限定法によるた
め,多重ツリー検索法を用いた従来例とは異なり,全体
を通した最適解を得ることができる。
In the above-described embodiments and examples, the most suitable combination of the conveyed object and the conveyed vehicle is considered after preliminarily associating the conveyed material with the conveyed work. It is also possible to consider the optimal combination of a transported object and a transport operation in the same procedure, and then consider the optimal combination of these and a transport vehicle. Also in this case, since the branch and bound method is used, unlike the conventional example using the multiple tree search method, an optimal solution can be obtained throughout.

【0024】[0024]

【発明の効果】本発明に係る運搬車両の運行計画立案装
置は,上記したように構成されているため,全運搬作業
対全運搬車両の最適な割り当てを得ることができる。即
ち,分枝限定法は全ての割り当て可能性について検討す
る手法であるので,本発明によれば問題を分解する多重
ツリー検索法を用いた従来例とは異なり,全体を通した
最適解を得ることができる。また,分枝限定法では,効
率的に探索の打切りを行うことによって高速な探索を行
うことができるが,本発明によれば,線形計画法又は目
標計画法又はファジィ線形計画法といった容易に手段に
より,割り当て不可能な運搬作業と運搬車両及び運搬物
との組合せを見いだして除去することが可能である。さ
らに,評価値を単調増加又は単調減少となるように定
め,未車両割り当て作業に全ての車両を割り当てた場合
の評価値増加分又は減少分の最小限を,実際に全ての割
り当ての組合せを調べることなく求められるため,現在
分かっている最良の割り当ての評価値よりも,これから
割り当てを進めていくと評価値が悪化することが分かる
と,探索を容易に打ち切ることができ,結果として高速
な探索が可能となる。
As described above, the operation planning system for a transport vehicle according to the present invention is configured as described above, so that an optimal assignment of all transport operations to all transport vehicles can be obtained. That is, since the branch and bound method is a method for examining all possible assignments, according to the present invention, unlike the conventional example using a multiple tree search method for decomposing a problem, an optimal solution is obtained throughout. be able to. In the branch and bound method, high-speed search can be performed by efficiently terminating the search. However, according to the present invention, it is easy to use a linear programming method, a target programming method, or a fuzzy linear programming method. As a result, it is possible to find and remove the unassignable combination of the transport operation and the transport vehicle and the transported object. Furthermore, the evaluation value is determined to be monotonically increasing or decreasing, and the minimum increase or decrease in the evaluation value when all vehicles are allocated to the unallocated vehicle work is checked for all combinations of actual allocations. The search can be easily terminated if it is found that the evaluation value will worsen as the allocation proceeds in the future, compared to the currently known best allocation evaluation value. Becomes possible.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】 本発明の実施例の形態及び実施例に係る運搬
車両の運行計画立案装置Aの概略構成を示すブロック
図。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a schematic configuration of an operation planning device A for a transport vehicle according to an embodiment and an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】 運搬車両情報記憶部の記憶内容の一例を示す
図表。
FIG. 2 is a table showing an example of contents stored in a transport vehicle information storage unit.

【図3】 運搬作業・運搬物情報記憶部の記憶内容の一
例を示す図表。
FIG. 3 is a table showing an example of contents stored in a transport work / transported goods information storage unit.

【図4】 発着地点情報記憶部の記憶内容の一例を示す
図表。
FIG. 4 is a table showing an example of contents stored in a departure / arrival point information storage unit.

【図5】 着地点,発地点を結ぶ2部グラフの一例を示
す図。
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a bipartite graph connecting a landing point and a departure point.

【図6】 ファジィメンバシップ関数の一例を示す図。FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a fuzzy membership function.

【図7】 割り当てツリーの一例を示す図。FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of an assignment tree.

【図8】 装置Aの動作手順を示すフロー図。FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing an operation procedure of the device A;

【図9】 装置Aの出力例を示す図。FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an output example of the device A.

【図10】 従来の運搬車両の運行計画立案装置A′の
一例における概略構成を示すブロック図。
FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of an example of a conventional transportation vehicle operation planning device A ′.

【図11】 従来装置A′の動作手順を示すフロー図。FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an operation procedure of the conventional device A ′.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

A…運搬車両の運行計画立案装置 1…運搬車両情報記憶部(計画情報記憶手段に相当) 2…運搬作業・運搬物情報記憶部(計画情報記憶手段に
相当) 3…発着地点情報記憶部(計画情報記憶手段に相当) 4…運用規則記憶部(計画情報記憶手段に相当) 5…計画条件記憶部(計画条件記憶手段に相当) 6…評価値計算部(評価手段に相当) 7…評価値増加分予測部(評価手段に相当) 8…割り当て不可能割当候補除去部(割り当て決定手段
に相当) 9…運搬作業・運搬車両・運搬物割当部(割り当て決定
手段に相当) 10…暫定解記憶部(割り当て決定手段に相当) 11…最適解出力部(割り当て決定手段に相当)
A: Transport vehicle operation plan planning device 1 ... Transport vehicle information storage unit (corresponding to plan information storage unit) 2 ... Transport work / transported goods information storage unit (corresponding to plan information storage unit) 3 ... Departure / arrival point information storage unit ( 4 ... Operation rule storage unit (corresponding to plan information storage unit) 5 ... Plan condition storage unit (corresponding to plan condition storage unit) 6 ... Evaluation value calculation unit (corresponding to evaluation unit) 7 ... Evaluation Value increase predicting unit (corresponding to evaluation means) 8: Unassignable allocation candidate removing unit (corresponding to allocation determining means) 9 ... Transportation work / transportation vehicle / transported goods allocating unit (corresponding to allocation determining means) 10: Provisional solution Storage unit (corresponding to allocation determining means) 11 ... Optimal solution output unit (corresponding to allocation determining means)

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 藤山 雄二 兵庫県加古川市金沢町1番地 株式会社 神戸製鋼所 加古川製鉄所内 (56)参考文献 特開 平7−175504(JP,A) 特開 平1−23120(JP,A) 特開 平2−112100(JP,A) (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) G08G 1/123 G05B 13/02 G06F 17/60 ────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of front page (72) Inventor Yuji Fujiyama 1 Kanazawacho, Kakogawa City, Hyogo Prefecture Kobe Steel, Ltd. Kakogawa Works (56) References JP-A-7-175504 (JP, A) JP-A-1 -23120 (JP, A) JP-A-2-112100 (JP, A) (58) Fields investigated (Int. Cl. 7 , DB name) G08G 1/123 G05B 13/02 G06F 17/60

Claims (7)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 複数の運搬車両により複数の運搬物を積
載又は牽引して予め設定された発着地点間を運搬する作
業に対し,各運搬車両及び運搬物を割り当ててそれぞれ
の運行計画を立案する装置において, 少なくとも上記運行計画の対象となる運搬車両,運搬
物,運搬作業及び発着地点に関する各情報を記憶する計
画情報記憶手段と, 上記運行計画の条件を記憶する計画条件記憶手段と, 上記各情報に基づいて運搬作業に対する運搬車両及び運
搬物の割り当ての良否を評価する割り当て評価手段と, 上記運行計画の条件と,上記運搬作業に対する運搬車両
及び運搬物の割り当ての評価結果とに基づいて,該運搬
作業に対する運搬車両及び運搬物の割り当てを,分枝限
定法により決定する割り当て決定手段とを具備し 上記割り当て決定手段が,運搬作業に対する運搬車両及
び運搬物の割り当てを分枝限定法により決定するに当
り,割り当て不可能な運搬作業と運搬車両及び運搬物と
からなる割り当て候補を線形計画法を用いて除去してな
ことを特徴とする運搬車両の運行計画立案装置。
1. For a task of loading or towing a plurality of cargoes by a plurality of transport vehicles and transporting the cargo between predetermined departure and arrival points, each transport vehicle and the cargo are assigned and an operation plan is prepared. In the apparatus, plan information storage means for storing at least information on a transport vehicle, a transported object, a transport operation, and a departure / arrival point which are the targets of the operation plan; plan condition storage means for storing the conditions of the operation plan; Based on the information, the assignment evaluation means for evaluating the quality of the assignment of the transport vehicles and the goods to the transport work, the conditions of the operation plan, and the evaluation results of the assignment of the transport vehicles and the goods to the transport work. the assignment of the transport vehicle and the transported articles against the carrying works, comprising a assignment determining means for determining the branch and bound method, the allocation determining means , Transport vehicle及for transportation work
And the assignment of goods by the branch and bound method.
Transport work that cannot be assigned
By using the linear programming method.
Travel planning apparatus of the transport vehicle, characterized in that that.
【請求項2】 複数の運搬車両により複数の運搬物を積
載又は牽引して予め設定された発着地点間を運搬する作
業に対し,各運搬車両及び運搬物を割り当ててそれぞれ
の運行計画を立案する装置において, 少なくとも上記運行計画の対象となる運搬車両,運搬
物,運搬作業及び発着地点に関する各情報を記憶する計
画情報記憶手段と, 上記運行計画の条件を記憶する計画条件記憶手段と, 上記各情報に基づいて運搬作業に対する運搬車両及び運
搬物の割り当ての良否を評価する割り当て評価手段と, 上記運行計画の条件と,上記運搬作業に対する運搬車両
及び運搬物の割り当ての評価結果とに基づいて,該運搬
作業に対する運搬車両及び運搬物の割り当てを,分枝限
定法により決定する割り当て決定手段とを具備し, 上記割り当て決定手段が,運搬作業に対する運搬車両及
び運搬物の割り当てを分枝限定法により決定するに当
り,割り当て不可能な運搬作業と運搬車両及び運 搬物と
からなる割り当て候補を目標計画法を用いて除去してな
ることを特徴とする 運搬車両の運行計画立案装置。
2. A method for loading a plurality of articles by a plurality of transport vehicles.
Work to transport between preset departure and arrival points by loading or towing
Allotment of each transport vehicle and goods to the industry
Equipment for planning an operation plan of a vehicle, at least
A total that stores information on items, transport operations, and departure and arrival points.
Image information storage means, plan condition storage means for storing the conditions of the operation plan, and a transportation vehicle and an operation for transportation operation based on each of the information.
Allocation evaluation means for evaluating the quality of the allocation of the conveyed goods, conditions of the operation plan, and a transport vehicle for the transport operation
And the results of the assessment of the
Assignment of transport vehicles and goods to work shall be
; And a assignment determining means for determining according to a conventional method, the allocation determining means, transport vehicle及for carrying works
And the assignment of goods by the branch and bound method.
Ri, and assignment non-transportation work and the transportation vehicle and luck 搬物
Of candidate assignments consisting of
An operation planning device for a transport vehicle, comprising:
【請求項3】 複数の運搬車両により複数の運搬物を積
載又は牽引して予め設定された発着地点間を運搬する作
業に対し,各運搬車両及び運搬物を割り当ててそれぞれ
の運行計画を立案する装置において, 少なくとも上記運行計画の対象となる運搬車両,運搬
物,運搬作業及び発着地点に関する各情報を記憶する計
画情報記憶手段と, 上記運行計画の条件を記憶する計画条件記憶手段と, 上記各情報に基づいて運搬作業に対する運搬車両及び運
搬物の割り当ての良否を評価する割り当て評価手段と, 上記運行計画の条件と,上記運搬作業に対する運搬車両
及び運搬物の割り当ての評価結果とに基づいて,該運搬
作業に対する運搬車両及び運搬物の割り当てを,分枝限
定法により決定する割り当て決定手段とを具備し, 上記割り当て決定手段が,運搬作業に対する運搬車両及
び運搬物の割り当てを分枝限定法により決定するに当
り,割り当て不可能な運搬作業と運搬車両及び運搬物と
からなる割り当て候補をファジィ線形計画法を用いて除
去してなることを特徴とする 運搬車両の運行計画立案装
置。
3. A method for loading a plurality of articles by a plurality of transport vehicles.
Work to transport between preset departure and arrival points by loading or towing
Allotment of each transport vehicle and goods to the industry
Equipment for planning an operation plan of a vehicle, at least
A total that stores information on items, transport operations, and departure and arrival points.
Image information storage means, plan condition storage means for storing the conditions of the operation plan, and a transportation vehicle and an operation for transportation operation based on each of the information.
Allocation evaluation means for evaluating the quality of the allocation of the conveyed goods, conditions of the operation plan, and a transport vehicle for the transport operation
And the results of the assessment of the
Assignment of transport vehicles and goods to work shall be
; And a assignment determining means for determining according to a conventional method, the allocation determining means, transport vehicle及for carrying works
And the assignment of goods by the branch and bound method.
Transport work that cannot be assigned
By using fuzzy linear programming
An operation planning device for a transport vehicle, wherein the operation plan is prepared.
【請求項4】 上記割り当て評価手段が,運搬作業に対
する運搬車両及び運搬物の割り当て数が多くなるに従っ
て,単調増加又は単調減少する評価値を演算し,運搬車
両及び運搬物の未割り当て作業に対する割り当てによる
上記評価値の増加又は減少分の最小限を求め,かつ,上
記割り当て決定手段が,上記評価値と該評価値の増加又
は減少分の最小限とに基づいて上記運搬作業に対する運
搬車両及び運搬物の割り当てを決定する請求項1〜3の
いずれかに記載の運搬車両の運行計画立案装置。
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein said assignment evaluating means is adapted for carrying work.
As the number of transport vehicles and goods to be allocated increases,
Calculate the monotonically increasing or monotonically decreasing evaluation value.
By assignment for both unassigned operations of both vehicles and goods
Find the minimum increase or decrease in the above evaluation value and
The assignment determining means may include the evaluation value and an increase or an increase in the evaluation value.
Is based on the minimum amount of reduction.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the assignment of the transported vehicle and the load is determined.
An operation planning device for a transport vehicle according to any one of the above .
【請求項5】 上記割り当て評価手段が,上記評価値の
増加又は減少分の最小限を求めるに当り,最適割り当て
問題の解法を用いる請求項4記載の運搬車両の運行計画
立案装置。
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein said assigning and evaluating means comprises :
Optimal allocation for finding the minimum increase or decrease
5. The operation planning device for a transport vehicle according to claim 4, wherein a solution to the problem is used .
【請求項6】 上記運搬物が混銑車であり,かつ,上記
運搬車両が機関車である請求項1〜5のいずれかに記載
運搬車両の運行計画立案装置。
6. The conveyed article is a mixed iron wheel, and
The transport vehicle is a locomotive, and the vehicle according to any one of claims 1 to 5.
Operation planning equipment for transport vehicles.
【請求項7】 上記運搬物が台車であり,かつ,上記運
搬車両が機関車である請求項1〜5のいずれかに記載の
運搬車両の運行計画立案装置。
7. The vehicle according to claim 7, wherein the conveyed object is a trolley,
The operation planning device for a transport vehicle according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the transport vehicle is a locomotive .
JP20312095A 1995-08-09 1995-08-09 Transport vehicle operation planning device Expired - Fee Related JP3048891B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP20312095A JP3048891B2 (en) 1995-08-09 1995-08-09 Transport vehicle operation planning device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP20312095A JP3048891B2 (en) 1995-08-09 1995-08-09 Transport vehicle operation planning device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0950599A JPH0950599A (en) 1997-02-18
JP3048891B2 true JP3048891B2 (en) 2000-06-05

Family

ID=16468740

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP20312095A Expired - Fee Related JP3048891B2 (en) 1995-08-09 1995-08-09 Transport vehicle operation planning device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3048891B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7124059B2 (en) 2000-10-17 2006-10-17 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Managing maintenance for an item of equipment
US7461008B2 (en) * 2001-09-04 2008-12-02 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Planning and scheduling modification of a configuration
US7457762B2 (en) 2001-09-04 2008-11-25 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Optimization of management of maintenance, repair and overhaul of equipment in a specified time window
US7457763B1 (en) 2001-09-04 2008-11-25 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Predictive maintenance system
US7440906B1 (en) 2001-09-04 2008-10-21 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Identification, categorization, and integration of unplanned maintenance, repair and overhaul work on mechanical equipment
JP5080553B2 (en) * 2009-12-28 2012-11-21 新日鉄ソリューションズ株式会社 Operation allocation apparatus, operation allocation method, and program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0950599A (en) 1997-02-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Dejax et al. Survey paper—a review of empty flows and fleet management models in freight transportation
Alicke Modeling and optimization of the intermodal terminal Mega Hub
Burinskiene et al. A simulation study for the sustainability and reduction of waste in warehouse logistics
CN109726863A (en) A kind of material-flow method and system of multiple-objection optimization
Feo et al. The intermodal trailer assignment problem
Rave et al. Drone location and vehicle fleet planning with trucks and aerial drones
CN114023094A (en) Wharf vehicle scheduling system, method, equipment and medium
CN108038625A (en) Intelligence is sent a car system
JP3048891B2 (en) Transport vehicle operation planning device
Butko et al. Organization of railway freight short-haul transportation on the basis of logistic approaches
Kronmueller et al. On-demand grocery delivery from multiple local stores with autonomous robots
Kunnapapdeelert et al. Capacitated vehicle routing problem for Thailand’s steel industry via saving algorithms
KR100613858B1 (en) Method of vehicle assignment for logistic workflow
Giménez-Palacios et al. First-mile logistics parcel pickup: Vehicle routing with packing constraints under disruption
Li et al. Shunting strategy for placing-in and taking-out wagons on branch-shaped freight operation network with simulation method
Zak et al. Multiple criteria optimization method for the vehicle assignment problem in a bus transportation company
Rizkya et al. Design of Distribution Routes Using Saving Matrix Method to Minimize Transportation Cost
Borodin et al. Methods of substantiation of specialization of railway lines
JP5811694B2 (en) Warehouse work plan creation system and warehouse work plan creation method
JP2003026335A (en) Method for scheduling allocation of vehicle, setting program therefor, and storage medium storing the same
CN113379102B (en) Multi-network trunk transport optimization method, computer equipment and storage medium
CN115907374A (en) Intelligent dispatching method, device and equipment for vehicle of distribution center and storage medium
JPH08153085A (en) Method and device for searching optimal solution of allocation and despatching scheduling program problem
Al Theeb et al. Optimization of the heterogeneous vehicle routing problem with cross docking logistic system
Lutter Optimized load planning for motorail transportation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees