JP2642084B2 - Multi-protocol network monitoring and diagnostic system - Google Patents

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a multiprotocol network monitoring / diagnosing system, and more particularly to a monitoring / diagnosing method for a plurality of computers connected to a local area network in a multiprotocol environment.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, a monitoring and diagnosing method of a station connected to a local area network of this kind has been disclosed in, for example, a station diagnostic system disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 4-150120. Is used to provide a system that improves the processing speed of the system by reliably grasping the station, improving the accuracy of the diagnosis of the station, and quickly executing the diagnosis of the station. As a basic means of diagnosis, a certain loopback test is performed on each station to realize the diagnosis.

Next, a loopback test used as a basic means of diagnosis will be described with reference to FIG.

A local area network (hereinafter referred to as “LA”)
N), the diagnostic station 32 transmits a diagnostic frame to the station to be diagnosed 33 via the LAN 31. The transmitted diagnostic frame is transmitted to the diagnostic station 32 by returning to the diagnostic station 33. The diagnostic station 32 determines the diagnostic station 33 and the LAN 31 by comparing the diagnostic frame transmitted to the diagnostic station 33 with the diagnostic frame looped back from the diagnostic station 33 and transmitted. Note that a response frame may be used instead of returning a diagnostic frame.

[0005]

The conventional station diagnosis system in a local area network can be generally used as a computer monitoring / diagnosis system, but it cannot judge the quality unless a diagnostic frame is transmitted and received. As a result, unnecessary traffic is generated. In addition, there is a problem that when the diagnostic frame is destroyed due to a cause other than the failure of the partner device, an erroneous diagnosis is performed.

In addition, since the procedure of generating and executing a diagnostic frame is left to the communication user, a burden is imposed on the user. In addition, there is a problem that all stations using the local area network cannot be centrally managed because they cannot be applied between different types of protocols.

[0007]

According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a transmitting / receiving section for receiving data propagating through a local area network and transmitting test data; A data analysis unit that analyzes data addresses and analyzes the type of communication protocol for each address; and a timer that monitors the data reception interval for each address and compares it with a monitoring time set in advance for each computer. A monitoring unit, a memory unit that stores analyzed information and a monitoring time as a monitoring table, a magnetic storage unit that stores the monitoring table and the history of alarm occurrence, and a computer that has not sent data for a certain period of time is detected. The test data is sent to a primary alarm generator that generates a primary alarm and to a computer where the primary alarm is detected. A diagnosing unit, a secondary alarm generating unit for generating a secondary alarm when there is no response due to the transmission of the test data, displaying the occurrence of the primary alarm and the secondary alarm, and monitoring each computer It is provided with an input / output / display unit for confirming the time setting and the history of alarm occurrence.

In a second aspect of the present invention, the memory means includes a monitoring interval for performing timer monitoring on an address recorded as unique information of the computer, and a monitoring and monitoring method when a primary alarm occurs. When the condition of the primary alarm that determines the diagnostic operation, and when the secondary alarm occurs, the condition of the secondary alarm that determines the monitoring and diagnostic operation, and when the diagnostic unit sends test data,
It is configured to store a protocol defining a diagnostic frame.

[0009]

Next, the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing one embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 1, a local area network 1 is a local area network shared by a plurality of computers 11A to 11N. The transmission / reception unit 2 monitors the local area network 1 and transmits a test frame. The data analysis unit 3 analyzes the address of the received data, and analyzes the type of the communication protocol for each address. The timer monitoring unit 4 monitors the data reception interval for each address, and performs a comparison with a monitoring interval set in advance for each computer. Then, the result of the comparison determination is maintained as the status of each computer.

When the monitoring interval is exceeded,
It has a function of activating the primary alarm generator 7 or the secondary alarm generator 9. The memory unit 5 stores the monitoring table of FIG. The magnetic storage unit 6 is an auxiliary storage unit that records a monitoring table and an alarm occurrence history. The primary alarm generator 7 and the secondary alarm generator 9 are started by the timer monitoring unit 4, and the operation at that time is also instructed by the timer monitoring unit 4. The diagnostic unit 8 is activated by the primary alarm generating unit 7 and sends out a diagnostic frame to the computer detected by the timer monitoring unit 4. At this time, the monitoring interval of the timer monitoring unit 4 is reset, and the content of the response frame is set. The diagnostic frame has a data format for each protocol in advance. The input / output / display unit 10 includes a keyboard, a display, and the like, and displays and changes the monitoring table in FIG. 2 and displays occurrence of a primary alarm or a secondary alarm. Further, it has a function of checking the history of alarm occurrences recorded in the magnetic storage unit 6.

FIG. 2 shows a configuration diagram of the monitoring table stored in the memory unit 5. The address 21 is unique information (address) of each of the computers 11A to 11N. The protocol 22 is a protocol used for each computer. The above two items are the results of monitoring the local area network 1 and analyzing the data by the data analysis unit 3. The monitoring interval 23 is a reference value for performing a primary determination, and means a data inter-frame interval.

The primary alarm occurrence 24 and the secondary alarm occurrence 25 are data instructing an operation when an abnormality is detected by the timer monitoring unit 4. For the above three items (the monitoring interval 23, the primary alarm occurrence 24, and the secondary alarm occurrence 25), when data is registered for the first time, predetermined values are set. Any change from 10 is possible.

Next, the operation will be described with reference to the flow charts of FIGS. 3, 4, and 5.

When the system is started, first, monitoring data is loaded from the magnetic storage unit 6 to the memory unit 5 (S
1). When the loading is completed, the transmission / reception unit 2 and the timer monitoring unit 4 are activated and enter a monitoring state (S2). The received data is analyzed by the data analysis unit 3 for the computer address and the protocol type and sent to the timer monitoring unit 4 (S
3). The timer monitoring unit 4 refers to the monitoring table and determines whether a new address, which is unique information of each computer, is registered (S4). As a result of the determination, if the information does not exist, it is added to the monitoring table (S5).
At this time, the address and the protocol use data obtained from the data analysis unit 3, and other data use predetermined data. When the addition to the monitoring table is completed, the status of the address is changed to ALIV
Set to E and set the timer. When the timer is set, monitoring of the address is also started (S5
S6). On the other hand, if the address exists in the monitoring table, the current status is determined (S9 to S1).
2).

At this time, the operation in each status is as follows. If the status is DEAD (S9), the status is changed to ALIVE and the timer is reset (S10, S11). Status is A
If the status is LIVE (S10), the status is not changed, and only the timer is reset (S11). If the status is DIAG, it is determined whether the frame content matches the response of the diagnostic frame. If they do not match, the status is changed to ALIVE (S13 / S1)
4), reset the timer (S11). If they do not match, nothing is performed. Through the above operation, S7
Return to monitoring state.

Next, the operation when an alarm occurs will be described. In S7, when an address whose timer has elapsed is generated, an alarm is generated. When an alarm occurs, the timer monitoring unit 4 notifies the memory unit 5 that the alarm has occurred. If the status at the time of alarm occurrence is ALIVE, the memory unit 5 determines that a primary alarm has occurred, and if the status is DIAG, determines that the alarm is a secondary alarm. The determination result is sent to the timer monitoring unit together with the contents of the primary alarm occurrence 24 or the secondary alarm occurrence 25 in the monitoring table for instructing the operation at the time of alarm occurrence. Further, when the log of the instruction of the primary alarm occurrence 24 or the secondary alarm occurrence 25 in the monitoring table is collected, the occurrence time and the address are recorded in the magnetic storage unit 6. Assuming that the generated alarm is a primary alarm, the timer monitoring unit activates the primary alarm generation unit 7.

At the time of activation, the contents of the primary alarm occurrence 24 in the monitoring table for instructing the operation of the primary alarm generator 7 are also notified. The operation instructed by the primary alarm generator 7 includes displaying an alarm and starting diagnosis. When the alarm display is instructed,
The display unit 10 is activated, and a display indicating that a primary alarm has occurred is displayed on the display unit. When the start of the diagnosis is instructed, the diagnosis unit 8 is started. When activated, the diagnostic unit 8 prepares a diagnostic frame corresponding to the protocol type of the address, sets the response content of the diagnostic frame and the monitoring interval in the timer monitoring unit 6, and sets the diagnostic frame via the transmitting / receiving unit 2. Is sent. During the diagnosis, the status is changed to DIAG. When these actions are completed,
The timer is reset (S11), and the process returns to the monitoring state of S7 (S21 to S26). Further, if the generated alarm is a secondary alarm, the timer monitoring unit operates as a secondary alarm generating unit 9.
Is started (S31). In addition, the operation of the secondary alarm generating unit 9 is instructed at the time of activation, as in the case of the primary alarm. The contents of the secondary alarm occurrence 25 in the monitoring table are also notified. The operation instructed by the secondary alarm generating unit 9 is an alarm display. If the display of the alarm is instructed, the input / output / display unit 10 is activated, and the display unit displays that the secondary alarm has occurred. Next, the status is changed to DEAD, and the monitoring interval is changed to ∞. When these operations are completed, the timer is reset (S
11) Then, the process returns to the monitoring state of S7 (S31 to S35).

[0019]

As described above, the multi-protocol network monitoring / diagnosing system according to the present invention monitors and monitors data propagating on the local area network, thereby providing a computer connected to the local area network. Because it does not depend on the protocol and does not send unnecessary data for monitoring compared to the polling method, no extra traffic is generated and the network efficiency is not reduced. It has the effect of being able to monitor.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing one embodiment of a multiprotocol network monitoring / diagnosis system according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a configuration diagram of a monitoring table stored in a memory unit of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating the operation of one embodiment according to the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart connected to FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 is a flowchart connected to FIG. 3;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing an example of a conventional station diagnosis system.

[Explanation of symbols]

 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Local area network 2 Transmission / reception part 3 Data analysis part 4 Timer monitoring part 5 Memory part 6 Magnetic storage part 7 Primary alarm generation part 8 Diagnosis part 9 Secondary alarm generation part 10 I / O / display part 11A-11N Computer 21 Address 22 Protocol 23 Monitoring interval 24 Primary alarm occurrence 25 Secondary alarm occurrence 31 Local area network 32 Diagnostic station 33 Diagnostic station

Claims (2)

(57) [Claims] A transmitting / receiving unit for receiving data propagating through a local area network and transmitting test data; a data analyzing unit for analyzing an address of the received data and analyzing a type of a communication protocol for each address; A timer monitoring unit that monitors a data reception interval for each of the addresses and performs a comparison with a monitoring time set in advance for each computer; a memory unit that stores analyzed information and the monitoring time as a monitoring table; A magnetic storage unit that stores a table and a history of alarm occurrence, and a primary alarm generation unit that generates a primary alarm when a computer that has not sent data for a certain period of time is detected. When there is no response due to the diagnostic unit transmitting the test data and the transmission of the test data ,
A secondary alarm generating unit for generating a secondary alarm, an input / output / display unit for displaying the occurrence of the primary alarm and the secondary alarm, setting a monitoring time for each computer, and confirming a history of the occurrence of the alarm. A multi-protocol network monitoring / diagnosis system characterized by comprising: 2. A monitoring interval for performing timer monitoring on an address recorded as computer-specific information by the memory means, and the primary determining means for determining a monitoring / diagnosing operation when a primary alarm occurs. Alarm conditions, and when the secondary alarm occurs, the secondary alarm conditions that determine the monitoring and diagnostic operation, and when the diagnostic unit sends test data, stores a protocol that defines a diagnostic frame. The multi-protocol network monitoring / diagnosis system according to claim 1, wherein