JP2021172229A - Operation arrangement support device, operation arrangement support system, method, and program - Google Patents

Abstract

To support operation arrangement by presenting information for conducting more preferable operation arrangement while reducing a burden on a commander without requiring skill.SOLUTION: An operation arrangement support device includes: a plan generation unit for generating a plurality of operation arrangement plans based on past operation management result information; an index value calculation unit for calculating a service evaluation index value for each of the plurality of operation arrangement plans; and an information presentation unit for presenting an operation arrangement plan together with a service evaluation index value corresponding thereto.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

Embodiments of the present invention relate to an operation control support device, an operation control support system, a method and a program.

Conventionally, when managing train operations, in normal times, the order of the course configuration is determined according to the operating position of each train based on the arrival and departure times of the trains specified in the control timetable, and switching machines are changed. It controls the course such as the display of traffic lights.

In addition, when a delay occurs, it is necessary to control the course in the same way as in normal times, taking into consideration the overall operation, local delays, transportation volume, etc., or the commander considers the train operation order, operation time, etc. I was making changes according to.

These changes include those that change the control timetable and those that manually intervene in the control based on the control timetable, but these are generally called operation control.
Scenes for rearranging operations include operation adjustments such as during the morning rush hour, execution of track blockades such as when an accident occurs, and subsequent resumption of operations.

Japanese Patent No. 4874204 Japanese Patent No. 6038693

By the way, at present, the commander is reorganizing the operation, but the operation schedule has become complicated due to the new establishment of mutual direct operation and paid operation types such as liner flights, and the burden on the commander has increased. ing.
In order to reduce the burden on the commanders, it is possible to increase the number of commanders, but it is difficult to pass on the technology and there is a shortage of personnel due to the decrease in the working population. Automation is desired.

The present invention has been made in view of the above, and it is possible to provide information for performing more suitable operation arrangement without requiring skill while reducing the burden on the commander to provide operation arrangement support. The purpose is to provide operation control support devices, operation control support systems, methods and programs.

The operation reorganization support device of the embodiment includes a plan generation unit that generates a plurality of operation reorganization plans based on past operation management record information, and an index value calculation unit that calculates an operation evaluation index value for each of the plurality of operation reorganization plans. , It is equipped with an information presentation unit that presents the operation adjustment plan together with the corresponding operation evaluation index value.

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of the operation control system of the embodiment. FIG. 2 is a functional configuration block diagram of the operation rearranging support device. FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of a wiring example of the first embodiment. FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of the relationship between the type of operation and the course in the wiring example shown in FIG. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram of an example of a definition table of competing paths. FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram of a specific process. FIG. 7 is a processing flowchart of the operation rearranging support device of the embodiment. FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram of a specific example of the course competition determination. FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram of the operation evaluation index value. FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram of the operation rearranging plan. FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram of a screen for presenting operation rearrangement support information. FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram of another presentation screen of the operation rearranging support information. FIG. 13 is an explanatory diagram of wiring according to the second embodiment. FIG. 14 is a processing flowchart of the second embodiment. FIG. 15 is an explanatory diagram of an example of determination of the withdrawal notification.

Next, the embodiment will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
[1] System Configuration FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration block diagram of the operation control system of the embodiment.
The operation adjustment support system 10 can be roughly divided into an operation management system 11, an operation monitoring screen display device 12, an operation adjustment control device 13, a course configuration control device 14, an operation adjustment support device 15, and a performance timetable acquisition device. A 16 and an alarm device 17 are provided.

The operation management system 11 monitors the operation of each train TR, collects and generates crew response information, collects and generates station response information, supports contact with facilities outside the range of the operation management device such as a garage, and communicates regarding vehicle operation. Support, contact support to the crew ward office, etc.
The operation monitoring screen display device 12 displays an operation monitoring screen for monitoring the operation status of the train TR, and displays the current status of the train TR and the actual timetable in association with the train TR so that the commander can monitor them.

Based on the instructions of the commander, the operation control device 13 provides processing support for presenting the control timetable to the train TR or the like, operating a traffic light accompanying the operation control, and responding to a question from the train TR or the station. conduct.
The course configuration control device 14 performs course configuration control such as signal display under the control of the operation rearranging control device 13.

The operation reorganization support device 15 generates a plurality of operation reorganization patterns based on past operation management record information, calculates an operation evaluation index value for each of the plurality of operation reorganization patterns, and corresponds to the operation reorganization pattern. Along with the value, it is presented to the commander via the operation management system 11.

Next, the functional configuration of the operation control support device will be described.
FIG. 2 is a functional configuration block diagram of the operation rearranging support device.
The operation adjustment support device 15 can be roughly divided into an operation prediction unit 21, a course competition judgment unit 22, an operation condition extraction unit 23, an operation order candidate formulation unit 24, an operation index value creation unit 25, and an operation adjustment plan. It has a creation unit 26 and an operation index value / operation arrangement plan presentation unit 27.

The operation prediction unit 21 predicts the train operation based on the train performance timetable, and outputs the prediction result to the course competition determination unit 22 and the operation order candidate formulation unit 24.
The route competition determination unit 22 determines whether or not a plurality of trains have route competition based on the operation prediction result of the operation prediction unit 21, and outputs the determination result to the operation order candidate formulation unit 24.

The operation condition extraction unit 23 extracts the operation conditions of the target train based on the past operation results and the past operation arrangement results, and outputs the operation conditions to the operation order candidate formulation unit 24.
Here, the operation condition extraction unit 23 also has a function of integrating the manually set operation condition into the extracted operation condition when the operation condition is manually set.

The operation sequence candidate formulation unit 24 formulates one or more operation sequence candidates based on the input train operation prediction result, course competition judgment result, and extracted operation conditions, and operates the operation index value creation unit 25 and operation arrangement. Output to the plan creation unit 26.
The operation index value creation unit 25 creates an operation index value for each operation order candidate and outputs the operation index value / operation arrangement plan presentation unit 27.

The operation reorganization plan creation unit 26 creates an operation reorganization plan for realizing those operation sequences based on the operation order candidates, and outputs the operation index value / operation reorganization plan presentation unit 27.
Here, in the operation adjustment plan, information such as operation adjustment input (change of operation order, connection designation with other trains, etc.), signal deterrence control proposal, inquiry response, manual course control, etc. possessed by the operation management device is provided. include.

The operation index value / operation reorganization plan presentation unit 27 presents the input operation index value and the operation reorganization plan corresponding to the operation index value as the operation reorganization support information.
[2] First Embodiment FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of a wiring example of the first embodiment.
In FIG. 3, reference numerals A to G, ZA, and ZB represent train course sections, respectively.
Further, reference numerals A to G are route sections of the main line, and reference numerals B and F are set at positions corresponding to the platforms of the P station.

Further, the reference numeral ZA is a route section of the lead-in line for the down line provided at the vehicle station, and ZB is a path section of the lead-in line for the up line provided at the vehicle station.
That is, in FIG. 3, the down line includes a course AB and a course BC.
Further, the up line includes a course DE, a course EF, and a course FG.

Further, the track from the down line to the lead-in line is provided with a course BZA.
Furthermore, the track from the up line to the lead-in line is provided with a course DZB.
Further, the line from the drop line to the up line includes a course ZAF and a course ZBF.

FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of the relationship between the type of operation and the course in the wiring example shown in FIG.
In the case of the example of FIG. 4, there are the following nine cases of the relationship between the type of operation and the course.
(1) When arriving at P station on the down line, the route is route AB.
(2) The course when departing from the down line P station is the course BC.
(3) The course when entering the vehicle from the down line is the course BZA.
(4) The course when entering the course section E on the up line is the course DE.
(5) When arriving at P station from the course section E on the up line, the course is the course EF.
(6) The course when departing from P station on the up line is the course FG.
(7) The course when entering the vehicle from the up line is the course DZB.
(8) The course when leaving from the course section ZA and heading for the up line is the course ZAF.
(9) The course when leaving the garage from the course section ZB and heading for the up line is the course ZBF.

Next, the competing course will be described.
In actual wiring, course competition occurs between multiple trains.
Therefore, for example, in the wiring shown in FIG. 3, when the course shown in FIG. 4 is set, it is necessary to avoid the conflict of the course and perform the course control.

In the shape of the wiring shown in FIG. 3, for example, the following states occur in normal operation.
・ Take the down line, end at P station, and enter the service line ZA inside the train station.
-A train leaving from the drop-in line ZA or drop-in line ZB of the rolling stock station will be installed at P station and will start as an up train from P station.
・ Trains that do not stop at P station on the down line (for example, limited express trains) pass through.
・ The train that has been running on the up line stops and departs at P station.

FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram of an example of a definition table of competing paths.
For example, when the down line train ends at P station and tries to travel on the course BZA for warehousing (in the case of Fig. 5 No. 3), the course BZA, the course BC, the course ZAF, the course ZBF, and the course EF. There is a course conflict when there is a train trying to travel.

Therefore, when the operation is disturbed in the above state, the competing course shown in FIG. 5 exists, so that the following state may occur, for example.
・ The train that runs on the down line and ends at P station tries to enter the train station from P station, but the train running on the up line is coming, so wait.

・ When a train running on the down line stops at P station and then tries to enter the train station, the train running on the up line is approaching, and on the down line, it does not stop at P station as a succeeding train. The passing train is approaching.
-When the train is traveling on the up line course DE, it competes with the train leaving the vehicle station and waits in the course section E.

By the way, in general, an operation reorganization plan is determined and executed based on a rule (condition) such as "priority is given to main line running in warehousing and main line running".

However, for example, in the state where the above-mentioned operation disturbance occurs, the delay spread to a train (for example, a limited express train) passing through without stopping at P station as a succeeding train causes an operation disturbance on the downstream side. Therefore, even if the course of the train running on the up line is temporarily restrained, the train arriving at P station will be warehousing from the down line, and it will be an obstacle to the train passing through without stopping at P station, which is the following train. There is also the idea of operation control that minimizes.

Therefore, in the present embodiment, in such a case, the following information is simultaneously presented as the operation reorganization support information when presenting the operation reorganization plan.

(1) Operation evaluation index value by temporarily deterring the course of the train traveling on the up line, for example, the delay prediction value at the end point of the up line (2) Traveling on the down line as a succeeding train and not stopping at P station Operation evaluation index value due to delay of trains passing through, for example, predicted value of waiting time for connection to other lines on the downstream side

As a result, the commander can easily grasp the good and bad of the plurality of operation reorganization plans, and can decide the content of the operation reorganization to be performed at that time.

Hereinafter, specific processing will be described.
FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram of a specific process.
As described above, the disturbance of the operation may cause an obstacle in the course control, and it may be necessary to reorganize the operation.

For example, as shown in FIG. 6, it is assumed that the train T1 is on the down line, the trains T0 and T4 are on the up line, and the train T2 is on the rolling stock at a certain time.

In this case, in the normal timetable, operation management is performed according to the following procedure.
(1) The up line train T0 departs from P station.
(2) The down line train T1 departs from P station and heads for the service line ZA in the train station.
(3) In the meantime, the installation of the train T2 on the service line ZB in the vehicle station to the P station is started, and the train T2 arrives at the up line platform of the P station.
(4) Further, after the train T1 crosses the up main line toward the service line ZA of the rolling stock station, the train T4 arrives at the up line platform of P station.

FIG. 7 is a processing flowchart of the operation rearranging support device of the embodiment.
By the way, the operation reorganization support device 15 performs the operation reorganization support to some extent in advance, whether it gives an instruction to the course configuration control device 14 or conveys the contents of the operation reorganization plan to the driver or the station staff. There is a need.

Therefore, the operation reorganization support device 15 first functions as the operation prediction unit 21 and predicts the train operation prior to generating the operation reorganization information (step S11).
Specifically, for example, the inter-station travel time and the station stop time are extracted from the planned timetable, and each time the train runs and the actual timetable is updated, the inter-station travel time or the station stop time corresponding to the actual value is extracted. By adding, the arrival time at the next station and the departure time at the station will be calculated.

Next, the operation rearranging support device functions as a course competition determination unit 22, and determines whether or not there is a competing course based on the train operation prediction result.

FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram of a specific example of the course competition determination.
In FIG. 8, the results of operation prediction for the trains T0, T1, T2, and T4 shown in FIG. 6 are described as predicted times.
Then, the operation rearranging support device 15 registers the time in which the conflict can occur as a set value in advance based on these predicted times, and sets the conflict determination time range.

Further, the operation rearranging support device 15 refers to the definition table of the competing route shown in FIG. 5, and sets the trains in which the route competition occurs in this competition determination time range into one set.
In the example of FIG. 6, as shown in FIG. 5, since the course BZA and the course EF are in competition, T1 and T2 having overlapping competition time zones are regarded as one set b.

Specifically, when determining the course competition, the operation rearranging support device 15 departs from the train arriving at P station and the train arriving at P station within a fixed time set for each train in the premises of P station. Search for trains to be loaded, trains to be warehousing (pulled up) from the P station to the train station, and trains to be warehousing (installed) from the train station to the train station (step S12).
Subsequently, the operation rearranging support device 15 sets a train whose course competes with the train (step S13).

Next, the operation rearranging support device 15 determines whether or not the train is a train in which there are no other trains competing in the course (step S14).
In the determination of step S14, if the train is a train in which there are no other trains competing for the course (step S14; Yes), the operation reorganization support device 15 ends the process.

In the determination of step S14, if there is another train that competes with the train (step S14; No), the operation reorganization support device 15 resolves the conflict for the set of trains that compete with the train. In addition, the train operation order is determined (step S15).
In this case, within the same group, the operation evaluation index value is calculated, the operation order candidate is formulated according to the separately determined conditions (rules), and the order is set within the group.

FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram of the operation evaluation index value.
The operation rearranging support device 15 calculates an operation evaluation index value for each operation order of the trains determined in step S15.
Specifically, in the case of the example of FIG. 9, when there is a course conflict between the warehousing of the train T1 and the warehousing of the train T2, the train T1 and the train T2 depart from the P station of the train T2. Operation evaluation index value V1 for delay amount, operation evaluation index value V2 for arrival delay amount at the terminal station of train T2, operation evaluation index value V3 for departure delay amount at P station of the following train of train T1, and P for return train of train T1 The operation evaluation index value V4 of the station departure delay amount is calculated.

FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram of the operation rearranging plan.
The operation reorganization support device 15 generates an operation reorganization plan for each train operation order determined in step S15.

Specifically, in the case of the example of FIG. 10, in the case where there is a course conflict between the warehousing of the train T1 and the warehousing of the train T2, in the combination of the train T1 and the train T2, the train after the warehousing of the train T2. A plurality of operation reorganization plans, specifically, an operation reorganization plan PL1 and an operation reorganization plan PL2, are generated for each of the case of warehousing of T1 and the case of warehousing of train T2 after warehousing of train T1. ..

Subsequently, the operation reorganization support device 15 creates deterrence information of the traffic light necessary for executing the determined operation order for each operation reorganization plan generated to give an instruction to the course configuration control device 14 (step S16). ).

Then, the operation control support device 15 presents the deterrence information of the traffic light to the operation management system 11 (step S17).
Subsequently, the operation reorganization support device 15 determines whether or not the processing for all the train sets has been completed (step S18).

In the determination of step S18, if the processing for all train sets has not been completed yet (step S18; No), the processing proceeds to step S15 again, and the above-described processing is repeated below.
In the determination of step S18, when the processing for all train sets is completed (step S18; Yes), the processing is completed.

As a result, the operation reorganization support device 15 presents a plurality of operation reorganization plans as operation reorganization support information to the commander via the operation management system 11 in correspondence with the operation evaluation index value.

FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram of a screen for presenting operation rearrangement support information.
FIG. 11 shows a case where the operation arrangement support information is presented using the premises timetable diagram.
As shown in FIG. 11, a yard timetable is shown for each set of trains in which course competition occurs.
Furthermore, since the operation arrangement plan is highlighted in descending order of the operation evaluation index value (in the example of FIG. 11, it is displayed by a thicker line), the commander can easily assume that the selection priority is high. You can grasp the arrangement plan.

FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram of another presentation screen of the operation rearranging support information.
FIG. 12 shows a case where the operation rearranging support information is presented using the home / route occupancy status display diagram.

As shown in FIG. 12, the home / route occupancy status is shown for the train set in which the route competition occurs, and the operation reorganization plan is highlighted in the order of the operation evaluation index value among the home / route occupancy status. (In the example of FIG. 12, it is displayed in bolder), so that the commander can easily grasp the operation reorganization plan that is assumed to have a high selection priority.

As a result, the commander refers to the operation evaluation index value and instructs one of the operation reorganization measures as the operation reorganization plan to be executed.

As a result, the deterrence information of the traffic light corresponding to the instructed operation reorganization plan is transmitted to the course configuration control device 14 via the operation reorganization control unit, the corresponding signal is displayed, and the operation reorganization is executed.
Therefore, even an inexperienced commander can easily realize a more suitable operation arrangement.

[3] Second Embodiment Next, the second embodiment will be described.
In the second embodiment, in a line having a plurality of operating sections, when the train is transferred to another line (for example, the main line) at the end point of a train in a certain operating section such as a branch line, the operation is arranged in consideration of train connection. It is an embodiment for.
In this case, it is necessary to organize the operation in consideration of the following points.
(1) Train connection (for example, connection from BD line to AC line)
(2) Train turnaround (for example, turnaround at station B in operation between station A and station B)
Is an issue to consider.
FIG. 13 is an explanatory diagram of wiring according to the second embodiment.
In FIG. 13, a case where processing is performed for station B will be described.
Here, it is assumed that there are the following preconditions (1) to (5) when providing operation control support.
(1) The AC line is the main line, and many passengers head for station A.
(2) Transfer from D station to B station and head for A station.
(3) There are many people at B station, and there are many turn-back operations between A station and B station.
(4) Most of the return trains between A station and B station are connected to the trains on the BD line.
(5) At station B, the BD line, AC line, and the wiring of the turnaround facility intersect.

In this case, in order to reduce the operation delay of the AC route, which is a high-priority route, within the range of ensuring the required transportation capacity and transfer convenience of the AC route, the following (1) to (3) Perform processing.
(1) When the train on the BD line, which is a low-priority line, is delayed, the train on the BD line (connecting source train), which is a low-priority line, and the AC line, which is a high-priority line. It presents the necessity of canceling the connection relationship from the delay relationship of the train (connection destination train).
(2) Determine the operation order of the return train between A station and B station, which is a high-priority train, and the BD line train, which is a low-priority train.
(3) The operation support information of the operation management device for performing the operation corresponding to the operation order determined in (2) above is presented.

FIG. 14 is a processing flowchart of the second embodiment.
First, the operation reorganization support device 15 monitors the operation status (step S21).
As for monitoring the operation status, the current operation status (current value) is taken in, the operation is predicted, and the operation status is grasped.
Next, the operation reorganization support device 15 determines whether or not the predicted value of the delay amount of the return train between A station and B station of the main line, which is a high-priority train, departs from B station is larger than a predetermined threshold value. (Step S22).
In the judgment of step S22, when the predicted value of the delay amount of the return train between A station and B station departing from B station is larger than the predetermined threshold value (step S22; large), the priority of the connection target is low. The connection with the train on the BD line, which is a train, is released, and the process ends (step S23).
In the determination of step S22, when the predicted value of the delay amount of the return train between A station and B station departing from B station is not large with respect to the predetermined threshold (when it is less than or equal to the predetermined threshold) (step S22; not large). ), It is determined whether the predicted arrival delay amount of the branch line train of the orphan (the train on the BD line, which is a low priority train) is large, medium, or small (step S24).

In the determination of step S24, if the predicted arrival delay amount of the branch line train (train on the BD line which is a low priority train) at the time of changing the operation order is large (step S24; large), the operation reorganization support device 15 Changes the operation order in the premises (step S25), changes the route configuration order correspondingly, and ends the process (step S26).

In the judgment of step S24, if the predicted arrival delay amount of the branch line train (the train on the BD line, which is a low priority train) at the time of changing the operation order is medium (step S24; medium), the operation is rearranged. Since the support device 15 wants to change the operation order on the premises if it can be changed (step S27), it is determined whether or not it is possible to advance the installation of the return train between A station and B station, which is a high-priority train, at B station. (Step S28).

In the judgment of step S28, if there is no problem with the train on the BD line, which is a low-priority train, even if the return train between A station and B station is installed ahead of schedule at B station, that is, between A station and B station. If it is possible to advance the installation of the return train at station B (step S28; no problem), the control timetable is changed, the course configuration order is changed, and the process is completed (step S29).

In the judgment of step S28, if the installation of the return train between A station and B station at B station is advanced, there is a problem with the train on the BD line, which is a low priority train, that is, the return train between A station and B station. If the installation at station B cannot be advanced (step S28; there is a problem), change or do not change the operation purity on the premises depending on the time zone, line number, etc. (step S30), and change the operation order on the premises. In the meantime, the control timetable is changed (advanced) to change the course configuration order (step S31).

In the determination of step S24, if the predicted arrival delay amount of the branch line train (the train on the BD line which is a low priority train) at the time of changing the operation order is small, the operation adjustment support device 15 performs the operation order in the premises. Ends the process without changing.

As described above, according to the second embodiment, when a line having a plurality of operating sections is transferred to another line (for example, the main line) at the end point of a train in a certain operating section such as a branch line. , Even when targeting operation adjustment considering train connection, it is possible to present a more suitable operation arrangement plan, and even an inexperienced commander does not require complicated judgment. It is possible to easily realize a more suitable operation arrangement.

[4] Modifications of the Embodiment In the above, the operation arrangement plan mainly related to the course competition has been mainly described, but it is not limited to the one related to the course competition, and whether or not to stop the plan to evacuate is considered. It is also possible to present it as an operation control plan.

FIG. 15 is an explanatory diagram of an example of determination of the withdrawal notification.
FIG. 15 shows a case where a determination is made to cancel the evacuation at a main station as an operation reorganization plan.
In the example of FIG. 15, there are the following two operation control plans.
(1) Evacuate as planned.
(2) Cancel the evacuation.

There are the following three evaluation indexes.
(1) Evaluation index V1: End point delay amount (2) Evaluation index V2: Delay duration (3) Evaluation index V3: Connection waiting time

Therefore, for example, when the evaluation index V2 is emphasized, if the delay duration is 30 minutes, the operation reorganization plan is proposed to "evacuate as planned", and if the delay duration is 10 minutes, "evacuate". To discontinue "is proposed.

According to this modification, not only those related to the course competition but also whether or not to stop the plan to evacuate can be presented as an operation reorganization plan, and the operation reorganization can be performed more easily.

Further, the operation rearranging support device of the present embodiment includes a control device such as a CPU, a storage device such as a ROM (Read Only Memory) or RAM, an external storage device such as an HDD or a CD drive device, and a display device. It is equipped with a device and input devices such as a keyboard and mouse, and has a hardware configuration using a normal computer.

The program executed by the operation control support of the present embodiment is a file in an installable format or an executable format that can be read by a computer such as a DVD (Digital Versaille Disk), or a USB memory or SSD (Solid). It is recorded and provided in a semiconductor memory device such as a State Disk).

Further, the program executed by the operation control support device of the present embodiment may be stored on a computer connected to a network such as the Internet and provided by downloading via the network. Further, the program executed by the operation control support device of the present embodiment may be configured to be provided or distributed via a network such as the Internet.
Further, the program of the operation rearranging support device of the present embodiment may be configured to be provided by incorporating it into a ROM or the like in advance.

Although some embodiments of the present invention have been described, these embodiments are presented as examples and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. These novel embodiments can be implemented in various other embodiments, and various omissions, replacements, and changes can be made without departing from the gist of the invention. These embodiments and modifications thereof are included in the scope and gist of the invention, and are also included in the scope of the invention described in the claims and the equivalent scope thereof.

10 Operation reorganization support system 11 Operation management system 12 Operation monitoring screen display device 13 Operation reorganization control device 14 Course configuration control device 15 Operation reorganization support device 16 Achievement timetable acquisition device 17 Alarm device 21 Operation prediction unit 22 Career competition judgment unit 23 Operation conditions Extraction unit 24 Operation sequence candidate formulation department 25 Operation index value creation department 26 Operation reorganization plan creation department 27 Operation index value / operation reorganization plan presentation department

Claims (12)

A plan generation unit that generates multiple operation reorganization plans based on past operation management performance information,
An index value calculation unit that calculates an operation evaluation index value for each of the plurality of operation reorganization plans,
An information presentation unit that presents the operation reorganization plan together with the corresponding operation evaluation index value,
Operation control support device equipped with. The plan generation unit includes an operation prediction unit that predicts train operation based on the train performance timetable.
A competition judgment unit that determines whether or not there is competition for multiple trains based on the predicted train operation,
The operation condition extraction unit that extracts the operation conditions of the target train based on the past operation results and the past operation arrangement results,
The operation order candidate formulation department that formulates operation order candidates based on the predicted train operation, the presence or absence of course competition, and the extracted operation conditions,
Based on the operation order candidates, the operation reorganization plan creation department that creates the operation reorganization plan to realize those operation sequences, and
To prepare
The operation rearranging support device according to claim 1. The index value calculation unit includes an operation index value creation unit that creates an operation index value for each operation order candidate.
The operation control support device according to claim 1 or 2. The operation reorganization plan includes information such as operation reorganization input such as operation order change, connection designation with other trains, signal deterrence control proposal, question response, manual course control, etc.
The operation rearranging support device according to any one of claims 1 to 3. A status monitoring unit that monitors the train connection and train turnaround operation status at a predetermined station,
A plan generation unit that generates and presents an operation reorganization plan based on the delay prediction value of the train to be connected and the train that makes the return.
Operation control support device equipped with. When the predicted delay amount of the train to be turned back is a value that does not hinder the connection of the train, the plan generation unit at the station based on the predicted arrival delay amount of the train to be connected. Generate the above-mentioned operation reorganization plan for changing the operation order and the route composition order in the premises.
The operation rearranging support device according to claim 5. The plan generation unit generates the operation reorganization plan based on the possibility that the train to be turned back is installed ahead of schedule at the station.
The operation rearranging support device according to claim 6. An operation management system that monitors the operation of each train and outputs operation commands,
The operation control support device according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
An operation reorganization control device that performs operation reorganization control based on the operation reorganization plan generated by the operation reorganization support device, and an operation reorganization control device.
A course configuration control device that controls the course configuration under the control of the operation control control device,
Operation control support system equipped with. It is a method executed by an operation reorganization support device that presents an operation reorganization plan and provides operation reorganization support.
The process of generating multiple operation reorganization plans based on past operation management performance information,
The process of calculating the operation evaluation index value for each of the plurality of operation reorganization plans and
The process of presenting the operation reorganization plan together with the corresponding operation evaluation index value, and
Method with. It is a method executed by an operation reorganization support device that presents an operation reorganization plan and provides operation reorganization support.
The process of monitoring train connections and train turnaround operations at designated stations, and
The process of generating and presenting an operation reorganization plan based on the delay prediction value of the train to be connected and the train to be turned back, and
Method with. It is a program for controlling the operation control support device that presents the operation control plan and provides the operation control support by the computer.
The computer
A means to generate multiple operation control plans based on past operation management performance information,
A means for calculating an operation evaluation index value for each of the plurality of operation reorganization plans, and
Means for presenting the operation reorganization plan together with the corresponding operation evaluation index value,
A program that works. It is a program for controlling the operation control support device that presents the operation control plan and provides the operation control support by the computer.
The computer
Means for monitoring train connections and train turnaround operations at designated stations,
A means for generating and presenting an operation reorganization plan based on a delay prediction value of the train to be connected and the train to be turned back.
A program that works.

Images