JP2021127647A - Selection method of sample preparation method, and sample preparation method - Google Patents

Selection method of sample preparation method, and sample preparation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2021127647A
JP2021127647A JP2020023994A JP2020023994A JP2021127647A JP 2021127647 A JP2021127647 A JP 2021127647A JP 2020023994 A JP2020023994 A JP 2020023994A JP 2020023994 A JP2020023994 A JP 2020023994A JP 2021127647 A JP2021127647 A JP 2021127647A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
soil
specimen
flow
value
solidified
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2020023994A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
正人 清田
Masato Kiyota
正人 清田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Materials Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Materials Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Materials Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Materials Corp
Priority to JP2020023994A priority Critical patent/JP2021127647A/en
Publication of JP2021127647A publication Critical patent/JP2021127647A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Consolidation Of Soil By Introduction Of Solidifying Substances Into Soil (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)

Abstract

To provide a selection method of sample preparation method capable of facilitating the determination of which method, tapping method or rammer method, should be used to prepare the sample according to the characteristics of the soil, and a sample preparation method.SOLUTION: The selection method of sample preparation is a selection method which of the tapping method or the rammer method should be selected as the sample preparation method. The method includes the steps of: supplying solidified soil which is a mixture of sample soil and cement-based solidifying material into a cylindrical body placed on a flow table; pulling up the cylindrical body in the vertical direction and removing the same to leave only the solidified soil on the flow table; measuring the flow value of the solidified soil using the flow test according to JIS R 5201: 2015 "Physical test method for cement"; and determining whether the flow value is greater than or equal to the specified value, whether or not. When the flow value is greater than or equal to the specified value, the tapping method is selected; and when the flow value is less than the specified value, the Rammer method is selected.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

本発明は、土とセメント系固化材とが混合された供試体作製方法の選定方法及び供試体作製方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for selecting a method for producing a specimen in which soil and a cement-based solidifying material are mixed, and a method for producing a specimen.

近年、セメント系固化材を使用した地盤改良工事が増加し、様々な土質の改良がなされている。このような土質を改良する方法として、特許文献1〜3に記載の方法が知られている。
特許文献1に記載の湿式地盤改良土の製造方法では、土と、固化材と、水または泥水と、を配合して湿式地盤改良土を製造するに際し、土の砂分及び含水比を測定する工程と、地盤改良土における水に対する固化材の比率と一軸圧縮強度との相関により、所望の一軸圧縮強度に対応する水に対する固化材の比率を求める工程と、地盤改良土のブリージング率の値と、水に対する土と固化材の混合物の比率との相関により、所望のブリージング率に対応する水に対する混合物の比率を求める工程と、地盤改良土の湿潤密度を求める工程と、上記各工程の結果に基づき、土、固化材及び水または泥水の配合比を決定する工程と、を備えている。
In recent years, ground improvement works using cement-based solidifying materials have increased, and various soil quality improvements have been made. As a method for improving such soil quality, the methods described in Patent Documents 1 to 3 are known.
In the method for producing wet ground-improved soil described in Patent Document 1, when soil, a solidifying material, and water or muddy water are mixed to produce wet soil-improved soil, the sand content and water content of the soil are measured. The process of obtaining the ratio of the solidifying material to water corresponding to the desired uniaxial compressive strength by the correlation between the ratio of the solidifying material to water in the ground-improved soil and the uniaxial compressive strength, and the value of the breathing rate of the ground-improved soil. , The step of obtaining the ratio of the mixture to water corresponding to the desired breathing rate by the correlation with the ratio of the mixture of soil and the solidifying material to water, the step of obtaining the wet density of the ground-improved soil, and the results of each of the above steps. Based on this, it includes a step of determining the mixing ratio of soil, solidifying material and water or muddy water.

また、特許文献2に記載の地盤改良方法は、現位置土を掘削しながら固化材と混合撹拌して現位置土の強度増加を図る地盤改良工法であり、バックホウのアーム先端に装着した混合撹拌ヘッドを地中に貫入して改良処理を施している。この際、混合撹拌ヘッドの負荷抵抗率の値が50%以下となるように、改良処理深度に応じて改良処理直後における処理土の流動性を積極的に変化させて改良処理を行い、この流動性の指標はテーブルフロー値とし、予め定めた改良処理深度−流動性特性(フロー値)に基づき改良処理深度別のフロー値を決定している。 Further, the ground improvement method described in Patent Document 2 is a ground improvement method for increasing the strength of the current position soil by mixing and stirring with the solidifying material while excavating the current position soil, and is a mixing and stirring method attached to the tip of the arm of the backhoe. The head is penetrated into the ground for improvement. At this time, the fluidity of the treated soil immediately after the improvement treatment is positively changed according to the improvement treatment depth so that the value of the load resistivity of the mixing / stirring head is 50% or less, and the improvement treatment is performed. The index of the property is a table flow value, and the flow value for each improved processing depth is determined based on the predetermined improved processing depth-fluidity characteristic (flow value).

さらに、特許文献3に記載の流動化処理土の品質管理方法は、建設発生土を泥状土とし、これに固化材を加えて混合した流動化処理土の品質管理方法であり、固化材を加える前の泥状土の一部、あるいは固化材を加えた後の流動化処理土の一部を採取し、この土のフロー値を、フロー試験(JHS 313−1992 シリンダ法)により測定する。フロー管理の許容範囲を目標フロー値に対して±30mm以内、より好ましくは±20mm以内とし、変動率を30%以内に抑えている。 Further, the quality control method for fluidized soil described in Patent Document 3 is a quality control method for fluidized soil in which construction-generated soil is used as muddy soil and a solidifying material is added thereto, and the solidifying material is used. A part of the muddy soil before addition or a part of the fluidized soil after adding the solidifying material is collected, and the flow value of this soil is measured by a flow test (JHS 313-1992 cylinder method). The permissible range of flow management is within ± 30 mm, more preferably within ± 20 mm with respect to the target flow value, and the volatility is suppressed within 30%.

特開2002−180449号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2002-180449 特開2005−98072号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2005-98072 特開2009−148698号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2009-148689

ところで、セメント系固化材を使用しても土質の種類によって、改良した土の強度が異なるため、地盤改良工事の度に、セメント系固化材と土とを混合した供試体を用いた室内配合試験を実施し、その土質の強度発現性を確認する必要がある。この室内配合試験の供試体作製には、地盤工学会基準「安定処理土の締固めをしない供試体作製方法」(JGS0821−2009)、又は、セメント協会標準試験方法「セメント系固化材による改良体の強さ試験方法」(JCAS L−01:2006)が用いられる。前者はタッピング法とも呼ばれ、固化処理土をモールドに詰めて、床などにモールドを打ちつけて気泡除去の操作を行うものである。固化処理土の状態は比較的柔らかく、団子状又はひも状になるものに適している。後者はランマー法とも呼ばれ、ランマーの落下によるエネルギーにより固化処理土を突き固めて、供試体を作製する方法である。固化処理土の状態は比較的硬く、タッピング法では供試体の作製が難しい場合に適用される。 By the way, even if a cement-based solidifying material is used, the strength of the improved soil differs depending on the type of soil. It is necessary to confirm the strength development of the soil. For the preparation of specimens for this indoor compounding test, the Japanese Geotechnical Society standard "Method for preparing specimens without compaction of stable treated soil" (JGS0821-2009) or the Cement Association standard test method "Improved products using cement-based solidifying material". (JCAS L-01: 2006) is used. The former is also called the tapping method, in which solidified soil is packed in a mold and the mold is struck on the floor or the like to remove air bubbles. The state of the solidified soil is relatively soft and suitable for dumplings or strings. The latter is also called the Rammer method, which is a method of preparing a specimen by compacting the solidified soil by the energy generated by the fall of the Rammer. The solidified soil is relatively hard and is applied when it is difficult to prepare a specimen by the tapping method.

しかしながら、タッピング法又はランマー法で供試体を作製する際に、どちらの方法で供試体を製造するのかを選定するのが難しい場合がある。例えば、熟練の技術者であっても、タッピング法による作製が好ましいと判断して供試体を作製したところ、供試体の出来上がりにばらつきが大きく、均一な供試体作製が困難となり、ランマー法で実施すれば均一な供試体が作製できたケースがある。また、その逆のケースも然りである。通常、水を加えない乾式添加(W/C=0%)では固化処理土の状態は硬いため、ランマー法による供試体作製が一般的であるものの、試料土の性状によりタッピング法が好ましい場合もあり、熟練の技術者であっても判断に困ることも多い。このため、土質の特性に合わせてタッピング法及びランマー法のいずれの方法で供試体を作製すればよいのかの判断を容易にできる供試体作製方法の選定方法が望まれている。 However, when producing a specimen by the tapping method or the Rammer method, it may be difficult to select which method is used to produce the specimen. For example, even a skilled technician decided that the tapping method was preferable and prepared the specimen, but the finished specimen varied widely, making it difficult to produce a uniform specimen, and the Rammer method was used. In some cases, a uniform specimen could be produced. And vice versa. Normally, dry addition without water (W / C = 0%) makes the solidified soil hard, so specimens are generally prepared by the Rammer method, but the tapping method may be preferable depending on the properties of the sample soil. There are many cases where even a skilled engineer has trouble making a decision. Therefore, there is a demand for a method for selecting a specimen preparation method that makes it easy to determine which method, the tapping method or the Rammer method, should be used to prepare the specimen according to the characteristics of the soil.

本発明は、このような事情に鑑みてなされたもので、土質の特性に合わせてタッピング法及びランマー法のいずれの方法で供試体を作製すればよいのかの判断を容易にできる供試体作製方法の選定方法及び供試体作製方法を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and is a method for producing a specimen, which makes it easy to determine which method, the tapping method or the Rammer method, should be used to prepare the specimen according to the characteristics of the soil. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for selecting a sample and a method for preparing a specimen.

本発明の供試体作製方法の選定方法は、供試体作製方法としてタッピング法又はランマー法のいずれかを選定する供試体作製方法の選定方法であって、試料土とセメント系固化材とが混合された固化処理土をフローテーブル上に載置された筒体に投入し、前記筒体を垂直方向に引き上げて取り去ることにより、前記固化処理土のみを前記フローテーブル上に残し、前記固化処理土のフロー値をJIS R 5201:2015「セメントの物理試験方法」に準じたフロー試験により測定し、前記フロー値が所定値以上であるか否かを判定し、前記フロー値が前記所定値以上である場合にタッピング法を選定し、前記フロー値が前記所定値未満である場合にランマー法を選定する。 The method for selecting the specimen preparation method of the present invention is a method for selecting a specimen preparation method for selecting either the tapping method or the rammer method as the specimen preparation method, in which the sample soil and the cement-based solidifying material are mixed. The solidified soil was put into a cylinder placed on a flow table, and the cylinder was pulled up vertically to be removed, so that only the solidified soil was left on the flow table and the solidified soil was removed. The flow value is measured by a flow test according to JIS R 5201: 2015 "Physical test method for cement", it is determined whether or not the flow value is equal to or higher than a predetermined value, and the flow value is equal to or higher than the predetermined value. In this case, the tapping method is selected, and when the flow value is less than the predetermined value, the rammer method is selected.

本発明では、フロー試験における固化処理土のフロー値が所定値以上であるか否かを判定するだけで供試体作製方法を選定できるので、熟練の技術者でなくとも、供試体作製方法を容易に設定できる。具体的には、固化処理土のフロー値が所定値以上である場合、振動により固化処理土が幅広く広がっていることから固化処理土が緩いことがわかるため、この場合、供試体作製方法は、タッピング法に設定する。一方、固化処理土のフロー値が所定値未満である場合、振動により固化処理土の広がりが小さいことから固化処理土が固いことがわかるため、この場合、供試体作製方法は、ランマー法に設定する。 In the present invention, since the specimen preparation method can be selected only by determining whether or not the flow value of the solidified soil in the flow test is equal to or higher than a predetermined value, the specimen preparation method can be easily performed even by a non-skilled engineer. Can be set to. Specifically, when the flow value of the solidified soil is equal to or higher than a predetermined value, it can be seen that the solidified soil is loose because the solidified soil spreads widely due to vibration. Set to the tapping method. On the other hand, when the flow value of the solidified soil is less than a predetermined value, it can be seen that the solidified soil is hard because the spread of the solidified soil is small due to vibration. In this case, the specimen preparation method is set to the Rammer method. do.

本発明の供試体作製方法の選定方法の好ましい態様としては、JIS R 5201:2015「セメントの物理試験方法」の前記フローテーブルの振動数に代えて、1秒に1回の割合で5回以上30回以下の中で設定可能であり、前記所定値は、前記振動数に応じて設定されるとよい。
JIS R 5201:2015「セメントの物理試験方法」では、上記振動数は1秒に1回の割合で15回に設定されている。上記態様では、振動数を1秒に1回の割合で5〜30回の中で自在に設定でき、振動数に応じて所定値が設定されるので、例えば、対象となる固化処理土が明らかに固い場合には、15回もの振動を与えなくても、固化処理土が広がる可能性が低いため、振動数を少なくすることで供試体作製方法を迅速に選定できる。一方、対象となる固化処理土が明らかに緩い場合には、30回の振動を与えることでより確実に固化処理土を広げることができるため、供試体作製方法の選定を容易にできるようになる。
As a preferred embodiment of the method for selecting the method for producing the specimen of the present invention, the frequency of the flow table in JIS R 5201: 2015 “Physical test method for cement” is replaced with 5 times or more at a rate of once per second. It can be set within 30 times or less, and the predetermined value may be set according to the frequency.
In JIS R 5201: 2015 "Physical test method for cement", the frequency is set to 15 times at a rate of once per second. In the above aspect, the frequency can be freely set within 5 to 30 times at a rate of once per second, and a predetermined value is set according to the frequency. Therefore, for example, the target solidified soil is clear. If it is hard, it is unlikely that the solidified soil will spread even if it is not vibrated 15 times. Therefore, the method for preparing the specimen can be quickly selected by reducing the frequency. On the other hand, when the target solidified soil is clearly loose, the solidified soil can be spread more reliably by applying vibration 30 times, so that the method for preparing the specimen can be easily selected. ..

本発明の供試体作製方法の選定方法の好ましい態様としては、前記フロー試験をJIS R 5201:2015「セメントの物理試験方法」に基づいて実行する場合、前記所定値が110mmであるとよい。 As a preferred embodiment of the method for selecting the method for producing a specimen of the present invention, when the flow test is carried out based on JIS R 5201: 2015 “Physical test method for cement”, the predetermined value is preferably 110 mm.

本発明の供試体作製方法は、上記供試体作製方法の選定方法により選定された作製方法により前記供試体を作製する。
本発明では、供試体作製方法として、ランマー法及びタッピング法のうち、より適した作製方法により供試体を作製できる。
In the method for producing a specimen of the present invention, the specimen is produced by the production method selected by the method for selecting the method for producing a specimen.
In the present invention, as a method for producing a specimen, a specimen can be produced by a more suitable production method among the Rammer method and the tapping method.

本発明によれば、土質の特性に合わせてタッピング法及びランマー法のいずれの方法で供試体を作製すればよいのかの判断を容易にでき、適切な方法で供試体を作製できる。 According to the present invention, it is possible to easily determine which method, the tapping method or the Rammer method, should be used to prepare the specimen according to the characteristics of the soil, and the specimen can be prepared by an appropriate method.

本発明の一実施形態に係る供試体作製方法の選定方法の手順を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the procedure of the selection method of the specimen manufacturing method which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 上記実施形態の選定方法における筒体に固化処理土を投入する工程を示す模式図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows the process of putting solidification treated soil into a cylinder in the selection method of the said embodiment. 上記実施形態の選定方法における筒体を垂直方向に除去する工程を示す模式図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows the process of removing a cylinder in the vertical direction in the selection method of the said embodiment. 上記実施形態の選定方法における固化処理土に振動を付与する工程を示す模式図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows the process of giving vibration to solidified treated soil in the selection method of the said embodiment. 上記実施形態の選定方法における振動後の固化処理土の広がりを計測する工程を示す模式図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows the process of measuring the spread of solidified soil after vibration in the selection method of the said embodiment. 上記実施形態の選定方法により選択されたタッピング法による供試体作製方法を示す模式図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows the specimen manufacturing method by the tapping method selected by the selection method of the said embodiment. 上記実施形態の選定方法により選択されたランマー法による供試体作製方法を示す模式図である。It is a schematic diagram which shows the specimen manufacturing method by the Rammer method selected by the selection method of the said embodiment.

以下、本発明の一実施形態について、図面を参照しながら説明する。 Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

本実施形態の供試体作製方法の選定方法(以下、選定方法という。)は、図1に示すフローチャートに示す手順により実行される。供試体は、室内配合試験に用いられるものであり、供試体作製には、地盤工学会基準「安定処理土の締固めをしない供試体作製方法」(JGS0821−2009)によるタッピング法、又は、セメント協会標準試験方法「セメント系固化材による改良体の強さ試験方法」(JCAS L−01:2006)によるランマー法のいずれかが用いられる。本実施形態の供試体作製方法の選定方法は、試料土にセメント系固化材を混合した固化処理土をタッピング法又はランマー法のいずれを用いて供試体とするかの判断を容易にするために実行される。以下、供試体作製方法の選定方法について、詳しく説明する。 The method for selecting the specimen manufacturing method of the present embodiment (hereinafter referred to as the selection method) is executed by the procedure shown in the flowchart shown in FIG. The specimen is used for an indoor compounding test, and the specimen can be prepared by the tapping method according to the Japanese Geotechnical Society standard "Method for producing specimen without compaction of stable treated soil" (JGS0821-2009) or cement. One of the Rammer methods according to the association standard test method "Strength test method of improved body using cement-based solidifying material" (JCAS L-01: 2006) is used. The method for selecting the sample preparation method of the present embodiment is to facilitate the determination of whether to use the tapping method or the Rammer method for the solidified treated soil in which the cement-based solidifying material is mixed with the sample soil. Will be executed. Hereinafter, the method for selecting the method for producing the specimen will be described in detail.

まず、試料土にセメント系固化材を混合して固化処理土10を作製する(ステップS11)。試料土は、室内配合試験の対象となる土地の土であり、その土質は、粘質土や砂質土からなるのが一般的である。また、セメント系固化材としては、例えば、ユースラビラー50(三菱マテリアル株式会社岩手工場製)が用いられる。このステップS11の処理では、試料土1mに対して200〜400kg/mのセメント系固化材を添加するとともに、必要に応じて水を加えて混合することにより、水固化材比(セメント系固化材に対する水の比率:W/C)が0%以上100%以下の固化処理土とする。 First, the cement-based solidifying material is mixed with the sample soil to prepare the solidified soil 10 (step S11). The sample soil is the soil of the land to be subjected to the indoor compounding test, and the soil quality is generally composed of viscous soil or sandy soil. Further, as the cement-based solidifying material, for example, Youth Labyrinth 50 (manufactured by Mitsubishi Materials Corporation, Iwate Factory) is used. In the treatment of step S11, a cement-based solidifying material of 200 to 400 kg / m 3 is added to 1 m 3 of the sample soil, and water is added and mixed as necessary to mix the water-solidified material ratio (cement-based). The solidified soil has a ratio of water to solidifying material (W / C) of 0% or more and 100% or less.

ステップS11の処理により固化処理土10を作製した後、図2に示すように、固化処理土10を筒体20に投入する(ステップS12)。具体的には、JIS R 5201:2015「セメントの物理試験方法」に記載のフロー試験の手順に合わせて、フローテーブル30の上面31における中央に置いた筒体20に固化処理土10を2層に詰め、各層を直径20±1mm、質量500±3gの突き棒の先端が各層の約1/2の深さまで入るように全面にわたって各々15回突き、最後に必要に応じて不足分を補い、表面をならすことにより実行される。この筒体20は、上部内径70.0±0.5mm、下部内径100±0.5mm、高さ60.0±0.5mmに設定される円錐台状に形成されている。 After the solidified soil 10 is prepared by the treatment in step S11, the solidified soil 10 is put into the cylinder 20 as shown in FIG. 2 (step S12). Specifically, two layers of solidified soil 10 are placed on the cylinder 20 placed in the center on the upper surface 31 of the flow table 30 in accordance with the flow test procedure described in JIS R 5201: 2015 “Physical test method for cement”. Each layer is pierced 15 times over the entire surface so that the tip of the thrust rod with a diameter of 20 ± 1 mm and a mass of 500 ± 3 g enters to a depth of about 1/2 of each layer, and finally the shortage is supplemented as necessary. It is performed by smoothing the surface. The tubular body 20 is formed in a truncated cone shape having an upper inner diameter of 70.0 ± 0.5 mm, a lower inner diameter of 100 ± 0.5 mm, and a height of 60.0 ± 0.5 mm.

そして、ステップS12の処理により固化処理土10が筒体20に充填されると、この筒体20を図3に示すように、垂直方向に移動させて取り外す(ステップS13)。これにより、図4に示すように、円錐台状に形成された固化処理土10がフローテーブル30の上面31における中央に配置される。 Then, when the solidified soil 10 is filled in the tubular body 20 by the process of step S12, the tubular body 20 is moved in the vertical direction and removed as shown in FIG. 3 (step S13). As a result, as shown in FIG. 4, the solidified soil 10 formed in a truncated cone shape is arranged at the center of the upper surface 31 of the flow table 30.

ステップS13の処理により、円錐台状の固化処理土10が上面31の中央に載置されると、フロー装置(図示略)を駆動させて、円錐台状の固化処理土10に所定数の振動を付与する(ステップS14)。この振動付与は、フローテーブル30に15秒間に15回の割合で落下運動を与えることにより実行される。
このステップS14の処理が実行されると、円錐台状の固化処理土10が振動により上面31側の部位が徐々に崩れて円周方向外側に広がり、例えば、固化処理土10の外径が図5の二点鎖線に示す状態から、図5の実線で示した状態に拡大する。
When the truncated cone-shaped solidified soil 10 is placed in the center of the upper surface 31 by the process of step S13, a flow device (not shown) is driven to cause a predetermined number of vibrations on the truncated cone-shaped solidified soil 10. (Step S14). This vibration imparting is performed by giving the flow table 30 a falling motion at a rate of 15 times in 15 seconds.
When the process of step S14 is executed, the portion of the truncated cone-shaped solidified soil 10 gradually collapses on the upper surface 31 side due to vibration and spreads outward in the circumferential direction. For example, the outer diameter of the solidified soil 10 is shown in FIG. The state shown by the alternate long and short dash line in FIG. 5 is expanded to the state shown by the solid line in FIG.

ステップS14の処理後、上面31に広がった固化処理土10の外径を測定してフロー値を算出する(ステップS15)。具体的には、図5に示すように、固化処理土10が広がった後の径を最大と認める方向の幅w1と、これに直交する方向の幅w2とで1mm単位まで測定し、その平均値を、ミリメートル(mm)を単位とする無名数の整数で表す。この試験は2回行い、その平均値をフロー値とする。
そして、フロー値が所定値以上であるか否かを判定する(ステップS16)。本実施形態では、例えば、15秒間で15回の割合で振動が付与されているため、所定値を110mmに設定している。
After the treatment in step S14, the outer diameter of the solidified treated soil 10 spread on the upper surface 31 is measured to calculate the flow value (step S15). Specifically, as shown in FIG. 5, the width w1 in the direction in which the diameter after the solidified soil 10 spreads is recognized as the maximum and the width w2 in the direction orthogonal to the width w1 are measured up to 1 mm units, and the average thereof is measured. The value is represented by an anonymous integer in millimeters (mm). This test is performed twice, and the average value is used as the flow value.
Then, it is determined whether or not the flow value is equal to or greater than a predetermined value (step S16). In the present embodiment, for example, since vibration is applied at a rate of 15 times in 15 seconds, a predetermined value is set to 110 mm.

この判定ステップS16により、フロー値が所定値以上であると判定された場合(S16でYES)、供試体作製方法としてタッピング法が望ましいと判定する(ステップS17)。具体的には、固化処理土10の広がり(フロー値)が所定値以上である場合、振動により固化処理土10が幅広く広がっていることから固化処理土10が緩いことがわかる。このため、供試体作製方法としてタッピング法が望ましいと選定する。
一方、フロー値が所定値未満であると判定された場合(S16でNO)、供試体作製方法としてランマー法が望ましいと選定する(ステップS18)。具体的には、振動により固化処理土10の広がりが小さいことから固化処理土10が固いことがわかる。このため、供試体作製方法として、ランマー法が望ましいと選定する。
つまり、本実施形態では、フロー試験における固化処理土10の広がり(フロー値)が所定値以上であるか否かを判定するだけで供試体作製方法を選定可能となっており、この選定後、処理を終了する。
When it is determined in the determination step S16 that the flow value is equal to or greater than a predetermined value (YES in S16), it is determined that the tapping method is desirable as the specimen preparation method (step S17). Specifically, when the spread (flow value) of the solidified soil 10 is equal to or greater than a predetermined value, it can be seen that the solidified soil 10 is loose because the solidified soil 10 spreads widely due to vibration. Therefore, the tapping method is selected as the method for preparing the specimen.
On the other hand, when it is determined that the flow value is less than a predetermined value (NO in S16), the Rammer method is selected as the method for producing the specimen (step S18). Specifically, it can be seen that the solidified soil 10 is hard because the spread of the solidified soil 10 is small due to vibration. Therefore, the Rammer method is selected as the method for preparing the specimen.
That is, in the present embodiment, the specimen preparation method can be selected only by determining whether or not the spread (flow value) of the solidified treated soil 10 in the flow test is equal to or higher than a predetermined value. End the process.

(供試体作製方法)
本実施形態では、上記供試体作製方法の選定方法により選定された作製方法により、供試体を作製する。例えば、タッピング法が選定された場合、地盤工学会基準「安定処理土の締固めをしない供試体作製方法」(JGS0821−2009)に基づいて供試体を作製する。具体的には、図6に示すように、固化処理土10を有底筒状の容器40に固化処理土10を3層に分けて投入し、各層毎に容器40をコンクリート床50等に打ち付け、気泡の除去を行って作製する。
(Method for making specimens)
In the present embodiment, the specimen is produced by the production method selected by the selection method of the specimen production method described above. For example, when the tapping method is selected, the specimen is prepared based on the Japanese Geotechnical Society standard "Method for producing specimen without compaction of stable treated soil" (JGS0821-2009). Specifically, as shown in FIG. 6, the solidified soil 10 is put into the bottomed tubular container 40 in three layers, and the container 40 is driven into the concrete floor 50 or the like for each layer. , Prepared by removing air bubbles.

一方、ランマー法が選定された場合、セメント協会標準試験方法「セメント系固化材による改良体の強さ試験方法」(JCAS L−01:2006)に基づいて供試体を作製する。具体的には、図7に示すように、コンクリート床50等に載置された容器40に固化処理土10を3層に分けて投入し、ランマー装置60の把持部63を把持し、支軸61を容器40の中央に配置した状態で、1.5kgのランマー62を落下高さ20cmで各層毎に12回突き固めることにより作製する。 On the other hand, when the Rammer method is selected, a specimen is prepared based on the Cement Association standard test method "Strength test method of improved body using cement-based solidifying material" (JCAS L-01: 2006). Specifically, as shown in FIG. 7, the solidified soil 10 is divided into three layers and put into the container 40 placed on the concrete floor 50 or the like, the grip portion 63 of the rammer device 60 is gripped, and the support shaft is supported. With 61 placed in the center of the container 40, a 1.5 kg rammer 62 is tamped 12 times for each layer at a drop height of 20 cm.

本実施形態では、フロー試験における固化処理土10のフロー値が所定値以上であるか否かを判定するだけで供試体作製方法を選定できるので、熟練の技術者でなくとも、供試体作製方法を容易に設定できる。具体的には、固化処理土10のフロー値が所定値以上である場合、振動により固化処理土10が幅広く広がっていることから固化処理土10が緩いことがわかるため、この場合、供試体作製方法は、タッピング法に設定する。一方、固化処理土10のフロー値が所定値未満である場合、振動により固化処理土10の広がりが小さいことから固化処理土10が固いことがわかるため、この場合、供試体作製方法は、ランマー法に設定する。 In the present embodiment, the specimen preparation method can be selected only by determining whether or not the flow value of the solidified treated soil 10 in the flow test is equal to or higher than a predetermined value. Can be easily set. Specifically, when the flow value of the solidified soil 10 is equal to or higher than a predetermined value, it can be seen that the solidified soil 10 is loose because the solidified soil 10 is widely spread by vibration. The method is set to the tapping method. On the other hand, when the flow value of the solidified soil 10 is less than a predetermined value, it can be seen that the solidified soil 10 is hard because the spread of the solidified soil 10 is small due to vibration. Set to law.

また、本実施形態の供試体作製方法の選定方法により供試体作製方法として、ランマー法及びタッピング法のうちより適した作製方法が選定されるので、この選定方法により選定された供試体作製方法により供試体を作製できる。これにより、供試体を適切に作製できる。 Further, since a more suitable production method is selected from the Rammer method and the tapping method as the specimen production method according to the method for selecting the specimen production method of the present embodiment, the specimen production method selected by this selection method is used. Specimens can be prepared. Thereby, the specimen can be appropriately produced.

その他、細部構成は実施形態の構成のものに限定されるものではなく、本発明の趣旨を逸脱しない範囲において種々の変更を加えることが可能である。
例えば、上記実施形態では、ステップS14の処理において、フローテーブル30に振動を付与する回数(振動数)は、1秒に1回の割合で15回としたが、これに限らない。例えば、ステップS14の処理において、JIS R 5201:2015「セメントの物理試験方法」の振動数に代えて、1秒に1回の割合で5回以上30回以下の中で設定可能としてもよい。この場合、所定値は、振動数に応じて設定されるとよい。つまり、所定値は、振動数に依存し、例えば、5秒間で5回振動が付与されている場合には、所定値を105mmに設定し、30秒間で30回振動が付与されている場合には、所定値を120mmに設定するとよい。
In addition, the detailed configuration is not limited to the configuration of the embodiment, and various changes can be made without departing from the gist of the present invention.
For example, in the above embodiment, in the process of step S14, the number of times (frequency) to apply vibration to the flow table 30 is set to 15 times at a rate of once per second, but the number is not limited to this. For example, in the process of step S14, instead of the frequency of JIS R 5201: 2015 “Physical test method for cement”, it may be possible to set the frequency at a rate of once per second from 5 times to 30 times. In this case, the predetermined value may be set according to the frequency. That is, the predetermined value depends on the frequency. For example, when the vibration is applied 5 times in 5 seconds, the predetermined value is set to 105 mm, and when the vibration is applied 30 times in 30 seconds. It is preferable to set a predetermined value to 120 mm.

この変形例では、ステップS14の処理における振動数を1秒に1回の割合で5〜30回の中で自在に設定でき、振動数に応じて所定値が設定されるので、例えば、対象となる固化処理土10が明らかに固い場合には、15回もの振動を与えなくても、固化処理土10が広がる可能性が低いため、振動数を5回と少なくすることで供試体作製方法を迅速に選定できる。一方、対象となる固化処理土10が明らかに緩い場合には、30回の振動を与えることでより確実に固化処理土10を広げることができるため、供試体作製方法の選定を容易にできるようになる。 In this modification, the frequency in the process of step S14 can be freely set within 5 to 30 times at a rate of once per second, and a predetermined value is set according to the frequency. When the solidified soil 10 is clearly hard, it is unlikely that the solidified soil 10 will spread even if it is not vibrated 15 times. Can be selected quickly. On the other hand, when the target solidified soil 10 is clearly loose, the solidified soil 10 can be expanded more reliably by applying vibration 30 times, so that the method for preparing the specimen can be easily selected. become.

粘性土(宮城県仙台市採取,湿潤密度1.65g/cm,含水比46.1質量%)、砂質土(宮城県大崎市,湿潤密度1.97g/cm,含水比18.8質量%)のそれぞれを試料土とし、これら各試料土に対して、三菱マテリアル株式会社岩手工場製のセメント系固化材ユースラビラー50(US50)を用いて固化処理を行った。固化処理土の固化材添加量は、湿潤土1mに対し300kg/mとし、表1に示す水固化材比(W/C)を0〜100質量%に変化させて試料No.1〜No.20の固化処理土とした。なお、これら試料No.1〜No.20は、それぞれ3本ずつ作製した。 Cohesive soil (Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, wet density 1.65 g / cm 3 , moisture content 46.1% by mass), sandy soil (Osaki City, Miyagi Prefecture, wet density 1.97 g / cm 3 , moisture content 18.8) Each of these sample soils (% by mass) was used as sample soil, and each of these sample soils was solidified using a cement-based solidifying material Youth Labyrinth 50 (US50) manufactured by Mitsubishi Materials Corporation Iwate Factory. Solidifying material amount of solidification soil, to wet soil 1 m 3 and 300 kg / m 3, by changing the water solidifying material ratios shown in Table 1 (W / C) 0 to 100% by weight Sample No. 1-No. It was used as 20 solidified soils. In addition, these sample Nos. 1-No. No. 20 was prepared by 3 pieces each.

これら試料No.1〜No.12の固化処理土については、規格(JIS R 5201:2015「セメントの物理試験方法」の「12フロー試験」)に従って、1秒1回の割合で15回の落下振動を加えて、固化処理土のフロー試験を実施した。また、試料No.13〜No.16については、1秒1回の割合で5回の落下振動を加えて、固化処理土のフロー試験を実施した。さらに、試料No.17〜No.20については、1秒1回の割合で30回の落下振動を加えて固化処理土のフロー試験を実施し、フロー値を算出した。このフロー値は、3つの試料のそれぞれのフロー値の平均値とし、表1に示した。
これらフロー試験の後、セメント協会標準試験方法「セメント系固化材による改良体の強さ試験方法」(JCAS L−01:2006)による供試体作製方法であるランマー法、及び、地盤工学会基準「安定処理土の締固めをしない供試体作製方法」(JGS0821−2009)による供試体作製方法であるタッピング法のそれぞれの方法で供試体を作製した。
These sample Nos. 1-No. For the solidified soil of 12, according to the standard (JIS R 5201: 2015 "Physical test method of cement", "12 flow test"), the solidified soil is subjected to 15 drop vibrations at a rate of once per second. Flow test was carried out. In addition, sample No. 13-No. For No. 16, a flow test of the solidified soil was carried out by applying falling vibrations 5 times at a rate of once per second. Furthermore, the sample No. 17-No. For 20, a flow test of the solidified soil was carried out by applying 30 times of drop vibration at a rate of once per second, and the flow value was calculated. This flow value is the average value of the flow values of each of the three samples and is shown in Table 1.
After these flow tests, the Rammer method, which is a method for preparing specimens according to the Cement Association standard test method "Strength test method for improved bodies using cement-based solidified materials" (JCAS L-01: 2006), and the Japanese Geotechnical Society standard " Specimens were prepared by each method of the tapping method, which is a method for preparing specimens according to "Method for preparing specimens without compaction of stabilized soil" (JGS0821-2009).

[供試体の評価]
そして、材齢7日において型枠を脱型し、供試体のつまり状況を目視観察した。目視観察の判定は、均一な供試体である場合を良好「A」と判定し、一部において空洞が目立つ場合を可「B」と判定し、多くの箇所で空洞が目立つ場合を不可「C」と判定した。
また、各試料No.1〜No.20の変動係数(%)を算出した。この変動係数は、3つの供試体の各フロー値の変動係数であり、この値が小さいほど3つの供試体のフロー値のばらつきが小さいことを示している。これら供試体の評価を表1に示した。
[Evaluation of specimen]
Then, the mold was removed from the mold at the age of 7 days, and the clogging of the specimen was visually observed. In the visual observation judgment, a uniform specimen is judged to be good "A", a case where cavities are conspicuous in a part is judged as "B", and a case where cavities are conspicuous in many places is not possible "C". It was judged.
In addition, each sample No. 1-No. The coefficient of variation (%) of 20 was calculated. This coefficient of variation is the coefficient of variation of each flow value of the three specimens, and the smaller this value is, the smaller the variation of the flow values of the three specimens is. The evaluation of these specimens is shown in Table 1.

Figure 2021127647
Figure 2021127647

落下振動数が1秒1回の割合で15回の場合、試料No.1〜No.6から、フロー値が110mm未満では、供試体の状態は、タッピング法に比べてランマー法が良好で、ばらつきの指標である変動係数が小さいことがわかる。これは試料No.7〜No.12からも明らかなように、土質の種類が異なっても、フロー値が110mm未満ではランマー法の方が良好である。なお、試料No.11については、ランマー法においても供試体の状態が「B」であるが、変動係数が22%とばらつきが大きい。試料No.12をみると供試体の状態が「A」であるため、タッピング法を用いたほうがよいことがわかる。
一方、落下振動数が1秒1回の割合で5回の場合、試料No.13〜No.16では、フロー値105mm未満では、供試体の状態は、ランマー法の方が良好で、フロー値105mm以上ではタッピング法が良好であることがわかる。また、落下振動数が1秒1回の割合で30回の場合、試料No.17〜No.20では、フロー値120mm未満ではランマー法の方が良好で、フロー値120mm以上ではタッピング法が良好であることがわかる。
When the drop frequency is 15 times at a rate of once per second, the sample No. 1-No. From 6, it can be seen that when the flow value is less than 110 mm, the state of the specimen is better in the Rammer method than in the tapping method, and the coefficient of variation, which is an index of variation, is small. This is sample No. 7 to No. As is clear from No. 12, the Rammer method is better when the flow value is less than 110 mm, even if the type of soil is different. In addition, sample No. Regarding No. 11, the state of the specimen is “B” also in the Rammer method, but the coefficient of variation is 22%, which is a large variation. Sample No. Looking at No. 12, since the state of the specimen is “A”, it can be seen that it is better to use the tapping method.
On the other hand, when the drop frequency is 5 times at a rate of once per second, the sample No. 13-No. In No. 16, it can be seen that when the flow value is less than 105 mm, the state of the specimen is better in the Rammer method, and when the flow value is 105 mm or more, the tapping method is better. Further, when the drop frequency is 30 times at a rate of once per second, the sample No. 17-No. At 20, it can be seen that the Rammer method is better when the flow value is less than 120 mm, and the tapping method is better when the flow value is 120 mm or more.

これらのことから、JIS R 5201:2015「セメントの物理試験方法」の落下振動数の15回とは異なる場合でも、落下振動数を定めて事前にテーブルフローと供試体の状態を調査しておき、上記実施例では、落下振動数が5回の場合の所定値を105mmに設定し、落下振動数が30回の場合の所定値を120mmに設定することで、供試体作製方法を選定することが可能となることが示された。 Based on these facts, even if the drop frequency is different from the 15 times of the JIS R 5201: 2015 "Physical test method for cement", the drop frequency is determined and the table flow and the condition of the specimen are investigated in advance. In the above embodiment, the specimen manufacturing method is selected by setting the predetermined value when the falling frequency is 5 times to 105 mm and setting the predetermined value when the falling frequency is 30 times to 120 mm. Was shown to be possible.

10…固化処理土
20…筒体
30…フローテーブル
31…上面
40…容器
50…コンクリート床
60…ランマー装置
61…支軸
62…ランマー
63…把持部
10 ... Solidified soil 20 ... Cylinder 30 ... Flow table 31 ... Top surface 40 ... Container 50 ... Concrete floor 60 ... Rammer device 61 ... Support shaft 62 ... Rammer 63 ... Grip

Claims (4)

供試体作製方法としてタッピング法又はランマー法のいずれかを選定する供試体作製方法の選定方法であって、試料土とセメント系固化材とが混合された固化処理土をフローテーブル上に載置された筒体に投入し、前記筒体を垂直方向に引き上げて取り去ることにより、前記固化処理土のみを前記フローテーブル上に残し、前記固化処理土のフロー値をJIS R 5201:2015「セメントの物理試験方法」に準じたフロー試験により測定し、前記フロー値が所定値以上であるか否かを判定し、前記フロー値が前記所定値以上である場合にタッピング法を選定し、前記フロー値が前記所定値未満である場合にランマー法を選定することを特徴とする供試体作製方法の選定方法。 This is a method for selecting a specimen preparation method for selecting either the tapping method or the rammer method as the specimen preparation method. The solidified treated soil in which the sample soil and the cement-based solidifying material are mixed is placed on the flow table. By throwing it into the cylinder and pulling it up vertically to remove it, only the solidified soil is left on the flow table, and the flow value of the solidified soil is set to JIS R 5201: 2015 "Physics of cement". It is measured by a flow test according to the "test method", it is determined whether or not the flow value is equal to or higher than a predetermined value, and when the flow value is equal to or higher than the predetermined value, a tapping method is selected and the flow value is the predetermined value or more. A method for selecting a specimen manufacturing method, which comprises selecting the Rammer method when the value is less than the predetermined value. JIS R 5201:2015「セメントの物理試験方法」の前記フローテーブルの振動数に代えて、1秒に1回の割合で5回以上30回以下の中で設定可能であり、前記所定値は、前記振動数に応じて設定されることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の供試体作製方法の選定方法。 Instead of the frequency of the flow table of JIS R 5201: 2015 "Physical test method of cement", it can be set at a rate of once per second from 5 times to 30 times, and the predetermined value is set. The method for selecting a specimen manufacturing method according to claim 1, wherein the sample is set according to the frequency. 前記所定値が110mmであることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の供試体作製方法の選定方法。 The method for selecting a specimen manufacturing method according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined value is 110 mm. 請求項1から3のいずれか一項に記載の供試体作製方法の選定方法により選定された作製方法により前記供試体を作製することを特徴とする供試体作製方法。 A method for producing a specimen, which comprises producing the specimen by the production method selected by the method for selecting the specimen production method according to any one of claims 1 to 3.
JP2020023994A 2020-02-17 2020-02-17 Selection method of sample preparation method, and sample preparation method Pending JP2021127647A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020023994A JP2021127647A (en) 2020-02-17 2020-02-17 Selection method of sample preparation method, and sample preparation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2020023994A JP2021127647A (en) 2020-02-17 2020-02-17 Selection method of sample preparation method, and sample preparation method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2021127647A true JP2021127647A (en) 2021-09-02

Family

ID=77488195

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2020023994A Pending JP2021127647A (en) 2020-02-17 2020-02-17 Selection method of sample preparation method, and sample preparation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2021127647A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114034839A (en) * 2021-11-03 2022-02-11 广东中煤江南工程勘测设计有限公司 Soil bonding curing agent and soil detection method

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07318467A (en) * 1994-05-24 1995-12-08 Ube Ind Ltd Manufacture of earthen molding specimen
JP2005113392A (en) * 2003-10-03 2005-04-28 Kato Construction Co Ltd Foundation improvement method
JP2009209283A (en) * 2008-03-05 2009-09-17 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd Solidification material for soil improvement
JP2019059886A (en) * 2017-09-28 2019-04-18 太平洋セメント株式会社 Solidification material

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07318467A (en) * 1994-05-24 1995-12-08 Ube Ind Ltd Manufacture of earthen molding specimen
JP2005113392A (en) * 2003-10-03 2005-04-28 Kato Construction Co Ltd Foundation improvement method
JP2009209283A (en) * 2008-03-05 2009-09-17 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd Solidification material for soil improvement
JP2019059886A (en) * 2017-09-28 2019-04-18 太平洋セメント株式会社 Solidification material

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114034839A (en) * 2021-11-03 2022-02-11 广东中煤江南工程勘测设计有限公司 Soil bonding curing agent and soil detection method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5010936B2 (en) Concrete fluidity evaluation test method and apparatus
JP2021127647A (en) Selection method of sample preparation method, and sample preparation method
JP5053901B2 (en) Method for preparing specimen for ground improvement method test
JP2016065417A (en) Quality management method of cast-in-place porous concrete
JP2000009616A (en) Indoor mixing test method for deep-layer mixing processing construction of sandy soil
CN107422106B (en) A kind of method of the anti-isolation characteristic of in situ quantitation assessment fresh concrete material
Larsson Shear box apparatus for modelling chemical stabilised soil–introductory tests
CN106257267A (en) A kind of optimum moisture content using static pressure method and the determination method of maximum dry density
Brandon et al. Fabrication of silty sand specimens for large-and small-scale tests
JP7286568B2 (en) Specimen preparation device
Shooshpasha et al. Effect of silica fume on the ultrasonic pulse velocity of cemented sand
CN106442051A (en) Method for artificially preparing structured soil
Muhammad et al. Difficulties in the sample preparation and testing of modified soils
JP6949549B2 (en) Method of estimating the strength of the root compaction
DE4130339A1 (en) Improving foundation soil by constructing pillars - with volume of added gravel, etc. regulated relative to vibrator drawing process and compacting intervals
Maryoto Proposed concrete compaction method using an electrical internal vibrator: a review of compaction standard for concrete in laboratory according to SNI 2493: 2011
Arshad et al. Cement stabilized soil subgrade: Design and construction
JP5248195B2 (en) Concrete fluidity evaluation test method and apparatus
JP2021127648A (en) Sample preparation method
JP6601830B1 (en) Method for early determination of strength of sabo soil cement and method for manufacturing sabo soil cement
Kitazume et al. Centrifuge model tests on failure pattern of group column type deep mixing improved ground
Hegarty et al. Combined effects of moisture content prior to compaction, compactive effort and rainfall quantity on soil crust strength
JP2021156158A (en) Method of constructing concrete floor surface
Gaus et al. Experimental Study on the use of Pumice on the Rigid Pavement
JP4633825B2 (en) Soil cement column and method for manufacturing soil cement column

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A712

Effective date: 20220624

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20220624

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20220720

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220804

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20230322

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20230404

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20230512

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20230822