JP2020201291A - Specimen analyzer and specimen analysis method - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide a specimen analyzer and a specimen analysis method with which it is possible to execute an accuracy managed measurement at an appropriate frequency in accordance with specimen measurement execution frequency and reagent information.SOLUTION: A specimen analyzer 30 includes a control unit for setting accuracy management for each measurement item from an accuracy management group that includes first accuracy management for executing an accuracy managed measurement at a prescribed time, second accuracy management for executing an accuracy managed measurement each time a specimen measurement is performed a prescribed number of times and third accuracy management for executing an accuracy managed measurement at each prescribed time interval, and controlling a measurement unit 32 in accordance with the set accuracy management. Both of the first accuracy management and the second or third accuracy management can be set, and either of the second and third accuracy managements can be selectively set. When the first accuracy management is executed while the first accuracy management and the second or third accuracy management are set, the control unit resets the number of times a measurement is performed after the first accuracy management is set or an elapsed time after the third accuracy management is executed.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

The present invention relates to a sample analyzer and a sample analysis method.

A sample analyzer that controls the accuracy of a reagent by measuring a measurement sample prepared by mixing a reagent with a quality control substance whose components are known is known. Patent Document 1 describes a quality control method to be executed for a reagent in a new reagent container when the remaining amount of reagent in the reagent container is low, and an accuracy to be executed for a reagent in a reagent container in use at regular time intervals. The management method is described.

JP-A-2010-190641

In the above-mentioned sample analyzer, the quality control measurement is limited to being performed at regular time intervals other than the timing when the reagent container is replaced, and the frequency of performing the quality control measurement cannot be flexibly set. However, in facilities and the like that analyze samples using a sample analyzer, it is desired to execute quality control measurement at an appropriate frequency according to the execution frequency of sample measurement, reagent information, and the like.

A first aspect of the present invention relates to a sample analyzer that analyzes a sample for a plurality of measurement items. The sample analyzer (30) according to this embodiment continuously performs sample measurement for measuring a measurement sample prepared by mixing a sample and a reagent according to the measurement item, and responds to the quality control substance and the measurement item. A measurement unit (32) that performs quality control measurement to measure a measurement sample prepared by mixing a reagent, a first quality control that executes quality control measurement at a predetermined time, and sample measurement are performed a predetermined number of times. Quality control is set for each measurement item from the quality control group including the second quality control that executes the quality control measurement and the third quality control that executes the quality control measurement at predetermined time intervals. A control unit (331) that controls the measurement unit (32) according to the above is provided. Both the first quality control and the second quality control or the third quality control can be set, and either one of the second quality control and the third quality control can be set alternately. When the first quality control and the second quality control or the third quality control are set in the control unit (331), when the first quality control is executed, the second quality control is executed after the second quality control is executed. The number of measurements or the elapsed time since the third quality control is executed is reset.

According to the sample analyzer according to this aspect, the quality control can be set from a plurality of quality controls having different frequencies of performing the quality control measurement. In this way, if the quality control can be set from the quality control group including a plurality of quality control, the quality control measurement can be executed at an appropriate frequency according to the execution frequency of the sample measurement, the reagent information, and the like. When the first quality control is set, for example, when the stability of the reagent is high, it is possible to suppress the execution of unnecessary quality control measurement. When the second quality control is set, for example, when the sample measurement is executed frequently, the quality control measurement can be surely executed. When the third quality control is set, for example, when the execution frequency of the sample measurement is low, it is possible to suppress the execution of unnecessary quality control measurement.

A second aspect of the present invention relates to a sample analysis method for analyzing a sample for a plurality of measurement items. The sample analysis method according to this aspect corresponds to a sample measurement step of continuously performing sample measurement for measuring a measurement sample prepared by mixing a sample and a reagent according to a measurement item, and a quality control substance and a measurement item. Quality control measurement step of performing quality control measurement to measure a measurement sample prepared by mixing with the above reagents, first quality control to execute quality control measurement at a predetermined time, and sample measurement are performed a predetermined number of times. From the quality control group including the second quality control that executes the quality control measurement for each measurement and the third quality control that executes the quality control measurement at predetermined time intervals, the setting process for setting the quality control for each measurement item. Including. Both the first quality control and the second quality control or the third quality control can be set, and either one of the second quality control and the third quality control can be set alternately. When the first quality control and the second quality control or the third quality control are set, when the first quality control is executed, the number of measurements since the second quality control is executed, or the third quality control is performed. Resets the elapsed time since quality control was performed.

According to the sample analysis method according to this aspect, the same effect as that of the first aspect is obtained.

According to the present invention, quality control measurement can be executed at an appropriate frequency according to the execution frequency of sample measurement, reagent information, and the like.

FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing the configuration of the sample analyzer according to the first embodiment. FIG. 2 is a plan view schematically showing a configuration when the transport unit and the measurement unit according to the first embodiment are viewed from above. FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram for explaining an operation of dispensing the reagent in the reagent container according to the first embodiment into the reaction container. FIG. 3B is a diagram schematically showing the configuration of the detection unit according to the first embodiment. FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a measuring unit according to the first embodiment. FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the sample analyzer according to the first embodiment. 6 (a) to 6 (c) are schematic views for explaining quality control measurement in the time QC, the time interval QC, and the number of tests QC according to the first embodiment, respectively. 7 (a) to 7 (c) are schematic views for explaining the vial QC according to the first embodiment. 8 (a) to 8 (c) are schematic views for explaining the vial QC according to the comparative example. FIG. 9A is a conceptual diagram showing the elapsed time of the time interval QC stored in the storage unit according to the first embodiment and the number of tests of the number of tests QC. FIG. 9B is a conceptual diagram showing the history information stored in the storage unit according to the first embodiment. FIG. 9C is a conceptual diagram showing the number of times of sample measurement in each time zone of each day of the week generated based on the history information according to the first embodiment. FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram showing the configuration of the management measurement item selection screen displayed on the display unit according to the first embodiment. FIG. 11 is a schematic view showing the configuration of the edit measurement item selection screen displayed on the display unit according to the first embodiment. FIG. 12 is a schematic view showing the configuration of the reception screen displayed on the display unit according to the first embodiment. FIG. 13 is a schematic view showing the configuration of the reception screen displayed on the display unit according to the first embodiment. FIG. 14 is a flowchart showing a process of displaying the reception screen according to the first embodiment. FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing a process of selecting either the time interval QC or the number of tests QC on the reception screen according to the first embodiment. FIG. 16A is a flowchart showing the processing of the sample measurement instruction according to the first embodiment. FIG. 16B is a flowchart showing a sample measurement process according to the first embodiment. FIG. 16C is a flowchart showing the processing of the reagent exchange instruction according to the first embodiment. FIG. 17A is a flowchart showing the time QC process according to the first embodiment. FIG. 17B is a flowchart showing a process of quality control measurement according to the first embodiment. FIG. 18A is a flowchart showing the processing of the time interval QC according to the first embodiment. FIG. 18B is a flowchart showing the processing of the number of tests QC according to the first embodiment. FIG. 19 is a flowchart showing the processing of the vial QC according to the first embodiment. FIG. 20 is a schematic view showing the configuration of the reception screen displayed on the display unit according to the second embodiment. FIG. 21 (a) is a diagram showing quality control determined based on the number of tests and the stability of the reagent according to the second embodiment. FIG. 21B is a diagram showing quality control determined based on the properties of the reagent according to the second embodiment. FIG. 22 is a flowchart showing a display process of recommended information in the comment area according to the second embodiment. FIG. 23 is a flowchart showing a display process of recommended information in the comment area according to the second embodiment. FIG. 24 is a flowchart showing a process of selecting the quality control of the execution target candidate according to the third embodiment. FIG. 25 is a flowchart showing a process of selecting the quality control of the execution target candidate according to the third embodiment.

<Embodiment 1>
FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing the configuration of the sample analyzer 30. The sample analyzer 30 analyzes the sample. The sample analyzer 30 includes a transport unit 31, a measurement unit 32 detailed with reference to FIGS. 2 to 4, and an analysis unit 33 detailed with reference to FIG. 5 inside the housing 30a. .. In FIG. 1, the XYZ axes are orthogonal to each other, and the X-axis direction and the Y-axis direction correspond to directions parallel to the horizontal plane. The X-axis positive direction corresponds to the left direction, the Y-axis positive direction corresponds to the rear direction, and the Z-axis positive direction corresponds to the vertical downward direction.

The measuring unit 32 mixes the sample and the reagent to prepare a measurement sample based on the sample. Then, the measurement unit 32 continuously performs the sample measurement for measuring the measurement sample based on the sample, and transmits the measurement result of the sample measurement to the analysis unit 33. Further, the measuring unit 32 mixes the quality control substance and the reagent to prepare a measurement sample based on the quality control substance. Then, the measurement unit 32 performs the quality control measurement for measuring the measurement sample based on the quality control substance at a predetermined timing, and transmits the measurement result of the quality control measurement to the analysis unit 33.

The quality control substance is also called a control sample and is a sample having a known composition. Therefore, if the measurement conditions are the same, the measurement results based on the quality control substance will be the same. The quality control substance broadly includes artificially generated substances such as substances prepared by extracting a predetermined component from a sample collected from an animal and latex particles imitating particles contained in the sample.

The analysis unit 33 analyzes the sample based on the measurement result of the sample measurement, and analyzes whether or not the reagent is appropriate based on the measurement result of the quality control measurement.

Here, in the sample analyzer 30 of the first embodiment, a plurality of quality controls having different start conditions for quality control measurement are performed. Hereinafter, a plurality of quality controls performed by the sample analyzer 30 will be referred to as a “precision control group”. The quality control group includes a first quality control that executes quality control measurement at a predetermined time, a second quality control that executes quality control measurement every time a sample measurement is performed a predetermined number of times, and an accuracy at a predetermined time interval. Includes at least two types of quality control selected from the third quality control that performs the control measurement. The analysis unit 33 sets the quality control for each measurement item from the quality control group, and controls the measurement unit 32 according to the set quality control.

As described above, according to the first embodiment, at least one quality control can be set from the quality control group including a plurality of quality controls having different frequencies of performing the quality control measurement. In this way, if the quality control can be set from the quality control group including a plurality of quality control, the quality control measurement can be executed at an appropriate frequency according to the execution frequency of the sample measurement, the reagent information, and the like.

The control by the analysis unit 33 is performed by the control unit 331 of the analysis unit 33, which will be described later with reference to FIG. 5, but may be performed by another control unit.

FIG. 2 is a plan view schematically showing a configuration when the transport unit 31 and the measurement unit 32 are viewed from above. The measuring unit 32 is arranged behind the conveying unit 31. The measuring unit 32 makes measurements related to the blood coagulation test. Therefore, in the first embodiment, the sample contained in the sample container 11 is plasma.

The liquid contained as a sample in the sample container 11 is not limited to plasma. That is, the sample contained in the sample container 11 is not limited to plasma, but may be whole blood, serum, urine, lymph, body cavity fluid, or the like. For example, when a measurement related to a blood cell test is performed on a sample by the measuring unit 32, the sample may be whole blood. For example, if the measurement unit 32 performs a blood coagulation test, an immunological test, or a biochemical test on the sample, the sample may be plasma. For example, when a sample is measured by the measuring unit 32 for an immunological test or a biochemical test, the sample can be serum.

The transport unit 31 includes a rack storage unit 111, a rack transport unit 112, and a rack recovery unit 113. The rack storage unit 111 and the rack collection unit 113 are connected to the right end and the left end of the rack transport unit 112, respectively. The rack storage unit 111 pushes the front surface of the sample rack 13 by a feeding member that can move in the front-rear direction to transfer the sample rack 13 to the rear. The rack transfer unit 112 transfers the sample rack 13 to the left by a belt that can move in the left-right direction and engages with the lower surface of the sample rack 13. The rack collecting unit 113 pushes the rear surface of the sample rack 13 by the feeding member that can move in the front-rear direction to transfer the sample rack 13 forward.

The operator sets the sample rack 13 in which the sample container 11 is set in the rack storage unit 111. The transport unit 31 feeds the sample rack 13 set in the rack storage section 111 to the right end of the rack transport section 112 by the feeding member of the rack storage section 111. Subsequently, the transport unit 31 transports the sample rack 13 to the left by the belt of the rack transport unit 112, and sequentially positions the sample container 11 at the suction position 112a or the suction position 112b. The suction position 112a is a position for the sample dispensing unit 210 described later to suck the sample, and the suction position 112b is a position for the sample dispensing unit 220 described later to suck the sample. When the suction of the sample to all the sample containers 11 held in the sample rack 13 is completed, the transport unit 31 uses the belt of the rack transport unit 112 and the feeding member of the rack collection unit 113 to transfer the sample rack 13 to the rack collection unit 113. Transport to.

The measuring unit 32 includes a sample dispensing unit 210, 220, a reaction vessel table 230, a transfer unit 240, a heating table 250, a reagent table 260, two reagent dispensing units 270, and a transfer unit 280. It includes a detection unit 290.

The sample dispensing unit 210 includes a suction unit 211, an arm 212, and a mechanical unit 213. The suction unit 211 is installed at the tip of the arm 212. The suction unit 211 is a nozzle. The mechanism unit 213 is configured to rotate the arm 212 in the circumferential direction and move it in the vertical direction. As a result, the suction unit 211 can move in the circumferential direction and the vertical direction. The sample dispensing unit 210 lowers the suction unit 211 from above with respect to the sample container 11 positioned at the suction position 112a, and penetrates the stopper body that seals the sample container 11. Then, the sample dispensing unit 210 sucks the sample from the sample container 11 via the suction unit 211, and discharges the sucked sample into the new reaction container 12 held in the holding hole 231 of the reaction container table 230.

The sample dispensing unit 220 includes a suction unit 221, an arm 222, and a mechanical unit 223, similarly to the sample dispensing unit 210. The suction unit 221 is installed at the tip of the arm 222. The suction unit 221 is a nozzle. The mechanism unit 223 is configured to rotate the arm 222 in the circumferential direction and move it in the vertical direction. As a result, the suction unit 221 can move in the circumferential direction and the vertical direction. The sample dispensing section 220 sucks the sample from the sample container 11 located at the suction position 112b or the reaction vessel 12 held on the reaction vessel table 230, and the sucked sample is held in the transfer section 240 as a new reaction vessel 12 Discharge to. Further, the sample dispensing unit 220 sucks the quality control substance from the container 22 installed on the reagent table 260, and discharges the sucked quality control substance into the new reaction container 12 held in the transfer unit 240.

The reaction vessel table 230 has a ring shape in a plan view and is arranged outside the reagent table 260. The reaction vessel table 230 is configured to be rotatable in the circumferential direction. The reaction vessel table 230 includes a plurality of holding holes 231 for holding the reaction vessel 12.

The transfer unit 240 includes a holding hole 241 for holding the reaction vessel 12 and a configuration for transferring the holding hole 241 in the front-rear direction. The transfer unit 240 holds the new reaction vessel 12 in the holding hole 241 and positions the reaction vessel 12 at the discharge position 242. The sample dispensing unit 220 discharges the sample into the reaction vessel 12 located at the discharge position 242. Here, one or more measurement items are set for one sample, and the sample sucked from one sample container 11 is placed in a new reaction container 12 sequentially positioned at the discharge position 242 for each measurement item. It is discharged. The transfer unit 240 transfers the reaction vessel 12 from which the sample has been discharged to the rear and positions it near the left side of the heating table 250.

The heating table 250 includes a transfer unit 251 for transferring the reaction vessel 12 and a plurality of holding holes 252 for holding the reaction vessel 12. The transfer unit 251 of the heating table 250 transfers the reaction vessel 12 positioned near the left side of the heating table 250 by the transfer unit 240 to the holding hole 252 of the heating table 250. The heating table 250 has a circular contour in a plan view and is configured to be rotatable in the circumferential direction. The heating table 250 heats the reaction vessel 12 set in the holding hole 252 to 37 ° C.

The reagent table 260 is configured so that a reagent container 21 containing a reagent used for measurement related to a blood coagulation test can be installed. The reagent table 260 is configured to be rotatable in the circumferential direction. A plurality of reagent containers 21 containing reagents used for measuring measurement items are installed on the reagent table 260. That is, the reagents used for each measurement item are determined, and a plurality of reagent containers 21 corresponding to each measurement item are installed in the reagent table 260. Further, a container 22 containing a quality control substance is installed on the reagent table 260.

The reagent dispensing unit 270 includes a suction unit 271 and a mechanism unit 272. The suction unit 271 is provided with the liquid level sensor 271a shown in FIG. The liquid level sensor 271a detects that the tip of the suction unit 271 has come into contact with the liquid surface of the reagent in the reagent container 21 when the suction unit 271 is lowered. The mechanism unit 272 includes stepping motors 272a and 272b shown in FIG. The stepping motor 272a horizontally moves the suction unit 271 so as to cross the reagent table 260. The stepping motor 272b moves the suction unit 271 in the vertical direction. The two reagent dispensing units 270 are installed below the upper surface of the housing 30a.

The reagent dispensing unit 270 dispenses the reagent into the reaction vessel 12 heated by the heating table 250. At the time of dispensing the reagent, the transfer unit 251 or the transfer unit 280 takes out the reaction vessel 12 from the holding hole 252 of the heating table 250. Then, the reagent dispensing unit 270 sucks the reagent from the reagent container 21 through the suction unit 271, and discharges the sucked reagent into the reaction container 12 taken out from the holding hole 252. As a result, when the sample is contained in the reaction vessel 12, the reagent is mixed with the sample to prepare a measurement sample based on the sample, and when the quality control substance is contained in the reaction vessel 12, the quality control substance is used. The reagents are mixed to prepare a measurement sample based on the quality control substance.

FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram for explaining an operation of dispensing the reagent in the reagent container 21 into the reaction container 12.

The reagent container 21 includes a body portion 21a for accommodating reagents and an opening 21b for opening the upper end of the body portion 21a to the outside. When the unopened reagent container 21 is installed on the reagent table 260, the operator removes the lid of the reagent container 21 provided in the opening 21b so that the inside of the body portion 21a is opened upward through the opening 21b. The reagent container 21 is placed on the reagent table 260. After that, as shown in the leftmost figure of FIG. 3A, the lid portion 261 provided on the reagent table 260 is superposed on the upper end of the reagent container 21 so as to cover the opening 21b of the reagent container 21. The reagent table 260 includes an opening / closing mechanism 262 shown in FIG. The opening / closing mechanism 262 moves the lid portion 261 to open / close the opening 21b of the reagent container 21.

When the reagent is sucked from the reagent container 21, the lid portion 261 is retracted from the opening 21b by the opening / closing mechanism 262, and the upper part of the opening 21b is opened. Then, as shown in the central figure of FIG. 3A, the suction unit 271 is inserted into the body portion 21a by the stepping motors 272a and 272b of the reagent dispensing unit 270, and the reagent is sucked by the suction unit 271. Then, as shown in the rightmost figure of FIG. 3A, the suction unit 271 is inserted into the reaction vessel 12 by the stepping motors 272a and 272b, and the reagent sucked by the suction unit 271 is discharged to the reaction vessel 12. To. When the suction of the reagent from the reagent container 21 is completed, the lid portion 261 is superposed on the upper end of the reagent container 21 so as to cover the opening 21b by the opening / closing mechanism 262.

When the lid portion 261 that covers the opening 21b of the reagent container 21 is opened each time the measurement sample is prepared in this way, the deterioration of the reagent contained in the reagent container 21 can progress according to the number of times the lid portion 261 is opened and closed. On the other hand, according to the first embodiment, for example, by setting the second quality control described later, the quality control measurement is executed according to the number of times of sample measurement, so that the deterioration of the reagent can be quickly grasped.

Returning to FIG. 2, when the reagent is discharged into the reaction vessel 12 and the measurement sample is prepared, the transfer unit 280 sets the reaction vessel 12 in the holding hole 291 of the detection unit 290. At this time, the two reagent dispensing units 270 are properly used so as to enable smooth measurement.

The measurement principle of the detection unit 290 is, for example, a coagulation method, a synthetic substrate method, an immunoturbidimetric method, an agglutination method, or the like. The detection unit 290 includes a plurality of holding holes 291. The detection unit 290 irradiates the reaction vessel 12 set in the holding hole 291 with light, receives the light transmitted through the measurement sample or the scattered light generated from the measurement sample, and outputs a signal according to the light reception intensity. ..

FIG. 3B is a diagram schematically showing the configuration of the detection unit 290.

The detection unit 290 that performs measurements related to the blood coagulation test includes a light source unit 292 and a light receiving unit 293. FIG. 3B shows the periphery of one holding hole 291.

The light source unit 292 includes a semiconductor laser light source and emits light having different wavelengths. The light source unit 292 irradiates the reaction vessel 12 set in each holding hole 291 with light. When the measurement sample in the reaction vessel 12 is irradiated with light, the light transmitted through the measurement sample or the light scattered by the measurement sample is incident on the light receiving unit 293. The light receiving unit 293 is composed of a photodetector provided for each holding hole 291. Specifically, the light receiving unit 293 is composed of a phototube, a photodiode, and the like. The light receiving unit 293 receives the transmitted light or the scattered light and outputs an electric signal according to the amount of received light. The control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32 shown in FIG. 4 generates the measurement result used in the analysis related to the blood coagulation test based on the electric signal output from the light receiving unit 293.

The measuring unit 32 may perform measurements related to the biochemical test. In this case, the measuring unit 32 has the same configuration as that in the case of performing the measurement related to the biochemical test and performing the measurement related to the blood coagulation test. That is, the measurement unit 32 in this case also irradiates the measurement sample with light by the light source unit 292, and receives the transmitted light or scattered light generated from the measurement sample by the light receiving unit 293. Then, the control unit 321 generates a measurement result used in the analysis related to the biochemical test based on the electric signal output from the light receiving unit 293.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the measuring unit 32.

The measuring unit 32 includes a control unit 321, a storage unit 322, a communication unit 323, and various mechanical units shown in FIGS. 2 to 3B.

The control unit 321 is, for example, a CPU. The storage unit 322 is, for example, a ROM, a RAM, or a hard disk. The control unit 321 communicates with the transport unit 31 and the analysis unit 33 via the communication unit 323. The communication unit 323 is, for example, an interface board for communication. The control unit 321 controls each unit in the measurement unit 32 and the transport unit 31 according to the programs and data stored in the storage unit 322. The control unit 321 performs sample measurement and quality control measurement related to the blood coagulation test. The control unit 321 stores the signal output from the detection unit 290 in the storage unit 322 as a measurement result, and transmits the measurement result to the analysis unit 33.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the sample analyzer 30. The sample analyzer 30 includes a transport unit 31, a measurement unit 32, and an analysis unit 33. In FIG. 5, the configuration of the measurement unit 32 is omitted for convenience, except for the control unit 321 and the storage unit 322 and the communication unit 323.

The analysis unit 33 is composed of, for example, a personal computer. The analysis unit 33 includes a control unit 331, a storage unit 332, a display unit 333, an input unit 334, and a communication unit 335. The control unit 331 is, for example, a CPU. The storage unit 332 is, for example, a ROM, a RAM, or a hard disk. The storage unit 332 stores a program 332a for causing the analysis unit 33 to execute a predetermined process. The control unit 331 communicates with the measurement unit 32 via the communication unit 335. The communication unit 335 is, for example, an interface board for communication. The control unit 331 controls each unit in the analysis unit 33 and the measurement unit 32 according to the program 332a and data stored in the storage unit 332.

The display unit 333 is, for example, a liquid crystal display. The input unit 334 is used when the operator inputs an instruction. The input unit 334 is, for example, a mouse or a keyboard. The display unit 333 and the input unit 334 may be integrally configured by a touch panel type display or the like.

The control unit 331 analyzes the sample regarding the blood coagulation test based on the measurement result of the sample measurement received from the measurement unit 32. Specifically, the control unit 331 includes PT, APTT, Fbg, extrinsic coagulation factor, intrinsic coagulation factor, coagulation factor XIII, HpT, TTO, FDP, D-dimer, PIC, FM, ATIII, Plg, APL, Measurement items such as PC, VWF: Ag, VWF: RCo, ADP, collagen, and epinephrine are analyzed.

The types of reagents used in these measurement items are predetermined. The reagent container 21 containing each of the reagents used in these measurement items is set in the reagent table 260. Further, even when the reagents stored in the reagent container 21 are exhausted, an unused reagent container 21 containing the same type of reagent in advance is also set in the reagent table 260 in order to continue the measurement without interruption. ..

The control unit 331 analyzes the quality control based on the measurement result of the quality control measurement received from the measurement unit 32. Specifically, the control unit 331 transmits an instruction for quality control measurement to the measurement unit 32. The control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32 prepares a measurement sample by mixing the quality control substance and the reagent corresponding to the measurement item, measures the prepared measurement sample, and transmits the measurement result to the analysis unit 33. The control unit 321 analyzes the measurement items based on the measurement results, and determines whether or not the analysis value is within a desired range. If the analytical value is not within the desired range, the control unit 331 determines that the accuracy of the reagent used in the measurement of the measurement item is low, and stops the measurement of the measurement item.

In the first embodiment, the measurement unit 32 and the analysis unit 33 are separate bodies, but the measurement unit 32 and the analysis unit 33 may be configured by one device. In this case, one device may include the control unit 321 and the control unit 331 separately, or the control unit 331 may perform all the processing of the control unit 321 and the control unit 321 may be omitted.

The accuracy control group of the first embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. 6 (a) to 7 (c).

The quality control group of the first embodiment includes the first to fourth quality control. The first to fourth quality control is quality control in which quality control measurement is executed at timings based on different first to fourth rules. The first quality control is a quality control in which the quality control measurement is executed at a predetermined time. The second quality control is a quality control in which the quality control measurement is executed every time the sample measurement is performed a predetermined number of times. The third quality control is a quality control in which the quality control measurement is executed at predetermined time intervals. The fourth quality control is a quality control in which a quality control measurement is executed based on a reagent in a second reagent container containing the same type of reagent when the remaining amount of reagent in the first reagent container becomes less than a predetermined amount. is there. Hereinafter, the first quality control is referred to as "time QC", the second quality control is referred to as "test number QC", the third quality control is referred to as "time interval QC", and the fourth quality control is referred to as "vial QC". Refer to.

In the first embodiment, the operator inputs information on quality control for each measurement item via the input unit 334 of the analysis unit 33. The control unit 331 of the analysis unit 33 sets the accuracy control for each measurement item based on the received information. In the following description, a case where quality control of a predetermined measurement item is performed will be described.

FIG. 6A is a schematic diagram for explaining quality control measurement at time QC.

When the current time reaches the time determined at the time of setting the time QC, the control unit 331 executes the quality control measurement for the current reagent. Here, the current reagent is not a reagent housed in an unused reagent container 21, but a reagent housed in a reagent container 21 currently in use. In the example shown in FIG. 6A, the times T1, T2, and T3 are determined when the time QC is set, and the quality control measurement is performed at the times T1, T2, and T3. As described above, when the quality control measurement is executed at a predetermined time, it is possible to suppress the execution of unnecessary quality control measurement, for example, when the stability of the reagent is high.

FIG. 6B is a schematic diagram for explaining the quality control measurement at the time interval QC.

The control unit 331 starts counting the elapsed time of the time interval QC, and executes quality control measurement for the current reagent every time the elapsed time reaches a predetermined time interval. In the example shown in FIG. 6B, ΔT is set as the time interval when the time interval QC is set, and every time the elapsed time count reaches ΔT, quality control measurement is performed on the current reagent. In this way, when the quality control measurement is executed at predetermined time intervals, it is possible to suppress the execution of unnecessary quality control measurement, for example, when the execution frequency of the sample measurement is low.

FIG. 6C is a schematic diagram for explaining the quality control measurement in the test number QC.

The control unit 331 starts counting the number of sample measurements of the target measurement item, that is, the number of tests, and executes quality control measurement for the current reagent every time the number of tests reaches a predetermined number of times Nt. In the example shown in FIG. 6C, 3 is set as the number of tests Nt when the number of tests QC is set, and each time the number of sample measurements for the target measurement item, that is, the count of the number of tests reaches Nt. , Quality control measurements are being made on the current reagents. In this way, if the quality control measurement is executed every time the sample measurement is performed a predetermined number of times, the quality control measurement can be reliably executed, for example, when the sample measurement is executed frequently.

7 (a) to 7 (c) are schematic views for explaining the quality control measurement in the vial QC.

As shown in FIG. 7A, the control unit 331 estimates the number of times the sample can be measured within the time Tc required for the quality control measurement. Specifically, the control unit 331 estimates the number of sample measurements that can be performed based on the history information regarding the past execution history of the sample measurement performed by the measurement unit 32. The history information is stored in the storage unit 332. In this way, when the estimated number of times Nc is estimated based on the history information, the estimated number of times Nc can be estimated accurately. In the example shown in FIG. 7A, 3 is estimated as the estimated number of sample measurements Nc that can be performed within the time Tc required for the quality control measurement.

Subsequently, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the remaining amount of the current reagent is less than the amount of the reagent required for the sample measurement of the estimated number of times Nc. When the remaining amount of the current reagent becomes less than the amount of the reagent required for the sample measurement of the estimated number of times Nc, the control unit 331 executes the quality control measurement based on the reagent of the reagent container 21 containing the new reagent. Here, the new reagent is a reagent of the same type as the current reagent contained in the unused reagent container 21. For example, at the present time in FIG. 7A, when it is determined that the remaining amount of the current reagent is less than the amount of the reagent required for the sample measurement of the estimated number of times Nc, the quality control measurement based on the new reagent is started.

After the quality control measurement based on the new reagent is completed, the control unit 331 analyzes the quality control of the new reagent. When the control unit 331 determines that the new reagent is normal in the analysis related to quality control, the control unit 331 performs subsequent sample measurement using the new reagent. On the other hand, when the control unit 331 determines that the new reagent is abnormal in the analysis related to quality control, the control unit 331 stops the sample measurement based on the new reagent.

As shown in FIG. 7B, assuming that the sample measurement of the number of times Nc is actually performed within the time Tc required for the quality control measurement, the remaining amount of the current reagent is exhausted and the quality control measurement of the new reagent is performed. Is completed, so sample measurement based on the new reagent can be started. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 7C, if there is a subsequent sample, the sample measurement can be performed immediately.

In this way, if the accuracy control based on the current reagent is started when the remaining amount of the current reagent becomes less than the amount of reagent required for the estimated number of sample measurements, the sample measurement based on the new reagent can be started quickly. At the same time, the waiting time from the end of quality control based on the new reagent to the start of use of the new reagent can be shortened.

In the vial QC, the control unit 331 of the sample measurement scheduled to be performed by the current reagent when calculating the estimated number of sample measurements Nc that can be performed within the time Tc required for the quality control measurement. The number of times may be considered. In addition, the control unit 331 may consider the reagent amount of the current reagent reserved for use when calculating the reagent amount used in the sample measurement that can be performed within the time Tc required for the quality control measurement.

8 (a) to 8 (c) are schematic views for explaining the vial QC according to the comparative example.

As shown in FIG. 8A, in the comparative example, the quality control measurement is started when the number of times the sample can be measured with the remaining reagents of the current reagent, that is, the number of remaining tests becomes less than a predetermined number of times. In the examples shown in FIGS. 8A to 8C, the predetermined number of times is 3. As shown in FIG. 8A, since the number of remaining tests has reached 3 at the present time, quality control measurement based on the new reagent is started.

As shown in FIG. 8B, when the sample measurement is performed frequently after the quality control is started, the target three sample measurements are started before the quality control of the new reagent is completed. In this case, since the sample measurement based on the new reagent can be performed only after the result of the quality control based on the new reagent is determined, the sample measurement of the current reagent is started until the sample measurement of the new reagent is started. There will be a waiting time in between.

On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 8C, when the sample measurement is performed infrequently after the quality control is started, the sample measurement is performed in the reagent container 21 of the current reagent even after the quality control of the new reagent is completed. Since the available reagents remain, the sample measurement of the current reagent will be delayed. In this case, there is a waiting time between the end of the quality control measurement of the new reagent and the start of the sample measurement of the new reagent. When the start of sample measurement based on the new reagent is delayed in this way, the result of quality control based on the quality control of the new reagent does not necessarily reflect the accuracy of sample measurement of the new reagent.

On the other hand, according to the first embodiment, the number of sample measurements that can be performed within the time Tc required for the quality control measurement is estimated, and the reagent residue of the current reagent is calculated from the reagent amount required for the estimated number of sample measurements. When the volume is low, quality control measurements are performed based on the same type of new reagent. By doing so, as shown in FIG. 7B, the sample measurement using the current reagent performed within the time Tc can be executed while the quality control measurement using the new reagent is being executed. As a result, as in the comparative example of FIG. 8B, it becomes easy to avoid a situation in which the sample measurement using the new reagent is kept waiting until the quality control measurement is completed. Therefore, according to the first embodiment, the sample measurement using the new reagent can be started quickly after the sample measurement using the current reagent. Further, as in the comparative example of FIG. 8C, it becomes easy to avoid the situation where the sample measurement using the new reagent is waited until the current reagent runs out after the quality control measurement is completed. Therefore, according to the first embodiment, the accuracy of the new reagent can be guaranteed based on the result of the quality control of the new reagent.

FIG. 9A is a conceptual diagram showing the elapsed time of the time interval QC stored in the storage unit 332 and the number of tests of the number of tests QC.

The storage unit 332 of the analysis unit 33 stores the elapsed time of the time interval QC and the number of tests of the number of tests QC for each measurement item. When the quality control measurement based on the time interval QC is performed, the control unit 331 resets the elapsed time stored in the storage unit 332, starts counting the elapsed time, and updates the elapsed time stored in the storage unit 332. To do. When the quality control measurement based on the number of tests QC is performed, the control unit 331 resets the number of tests stored in the storage unit 332 and increases the number of tests by 1 each time the sample is measured, and the storage unit 332 Update the number of tests stored in.

When the time interval QC is executed, the control unit 331 performs quality control measurement when the elapsed time reaches the time interval ΔT shown in FIG. 6 (b). As a result, quality control is performed for each time interval ΔT in the time interval QC. Further, when the number of tests QC is executed, the control unit 331 performs quality control measurement when the number of tests reaches the number of tests Nt shown in FIG. 6 (c). As a result, quality control measurement is performed for each test number Nt in the test number QC.

FIG. 9B is a conceptual diagram showing the history information stored in the storage unit 332. FIG. 9C is a conceptual diagram showing the number of times of sample measurement in each time zone of each day of the week generated based on the history information.

As shown in FIG. 9B, the storage unit 332 of the analysis unit 33 includes a sample number, a measurement start date, a measurement start time, a measurement end time, and a measurement item for each sample. The history information is stored. The history information includes, for example, information on the sample for the past 50 weeks. The history information is information regarding the past execution history of the sample measurement performed by the measurement unit 32.

As described above, the control unit 331 estimates the number of sample measurements Nc that can be performed within the time Tc based on the history information regarding the past execution history of the sample measurement performed by the measurement unit 32 in the vial QC. .. At this time, from the history information as shown in FIG. 9B, the control unit 331 determines the number of times of sample measurement in each time zone of each day of the week for each measurement item, for example, as shown in FIG. 9C. Calculate the average. Then, the control unit 331 estimates the number of sample measurements that can be performed within the time Tc required for the quality control measurement, based on the aggregation result as shown in FIG. 9C. Specifically, the control unit 331 calculates the average number of sample measurements Na in the time zone to which the current time belongs with reference to FIG. 9C, and executes the calculated average number of times Na within the time Tc. It is acquired as the estimated number of times Nc of sample measurement predicted to be performed. Then, the control unit 331 calculates the predicted usage amount required for the sample measurement of the estimated number of times Nc, and executes the quality control measurement when the remaining amount of the current reagent becomes less than the predicted usage amount.

When the number of sample measurements predicted to be performed on the day and time zone to which the current time belongs is acquired based on the historical information in this way, the reagents required for the sample measurement performed within the time required for quality control measurement. The amount can be estimated accurately.

In the first embodiment, as shown in FIG. 9C, the control unit 331 does not calculate all the averages in each time zone of each day of the week, but measures the sample in the day of the week and the time zone to which the current time belongs. Only the average Na of times is calculated.

Next, the screen used when setting the quality control will be described with reference to FIGS. 10 to 13. The operator displays the screens shown in FIGS. 10 to 13 on the display unit 333 and sets the quality control when the sample analyzer 30 is installed or when the operation of the quality control is reviewed.

As shown in FIG. 10, the control measurement item selection screen 401 has a measurement item list 401a, a control measurement item list 401b, an insert button 401c, an add button 401d, a delete button 401e, an OK button 401f, and a cancel button. It is provided with 401 g. The operator operates the input unit 334 to display the management measurement item selection screen 401.

The measurement item list 401a shows a list of measurement items that are not managed among all the measurement items. The management measurement item list 401b shows a list of measurement items to be managed. When the insert button 401c is operated, the control unit 331 inserts the measurement item selected in the measurement item list 401a under the measurement item selected in the control measurement item list 401b. When the add button 401d is operated, the control unit 331 adds the measurement item selected in the measurement item list 401a to the bottom of the control measurement item list 401b. When the delete button 401e is operated, the control unit 331 deletes the measurement item selected in the control measurement item list 401b, and adds the deleted measurement item to the measurement item list 401a.

When the OK button 401f is operated, the control unit 331 stores the measurement items in the management measurement item list 401b in the storage unit 332 and closes the management measurement item selection screen 401. When the cancel button 401g is operated, the control unit 331 discards the information set in the management measurement item list 401b and closes the management measurement item selection screen 401.

As shown in FIG. 11, the edit measurement item selection screen 402 includes a measurement item list 402a and an item edit button 402b. The operator operates the input unit 334 to display the edit measurement item selection screen 402.

The measurement item list 402a displays a list of measurement items to be managed, which are set in advance via the management measurement item selection screen 401 of FIG. 10 and stored in the storage unit 332. In the measurement item list 402a, a part of the settings related to quality control is displayed for each measurement item. When the item edit button 402b is operated, the control unit 331 reads the quality control setting information related to the measurement item selected in the measurement item list 402a, and displays the reception screen 410 in a state of reflecting the read setting information. Displayed on 333. The accuracy control setting information related to the measurement item is stored in the storage unit 332 as an initial value in advance, and is also stored in the storage unit 332 via the reception screens 410 and 420.

As shown in FIG. 12, the reception screen 410 includes a measurement item display area 411, a check box 412, a setting button 413, a check box 414, a registration button 415, and a cancel button 416.

The measurement item display area 411 indicates a measurement item selected on the edit measurement item selection screen 402 and set by the reception screen 410. The check box 412 is an operation unit for setting whether or not to carry out periodic automatic QC. The periodic automatic QC includes a time QC, a time interval QC, and a number of tests QC. By operating the check box 412, the operator can set whether or not to collectively execute the periodic automatic QC set on the reception screen 420 described later. The setting button 413 is a button for setting the periodic automatic QC in more detail. When the setting button 413 is operated, the control unit 331 causes the display unit 333 to display the reception screen 420 described later. The check box 414 is an operation unit for setting whether or not to carry out the vial QC.

When the registration button 415 is operated, the control unit 331 stores the setting information set in the reception screen 410 and the reception screen 420 described later in the storage unit 332, and closes the reception screen 410. When the cancel button 416 is operated, the control unit 331 discards the setting information set on the reception screens 410 and 420 and closes the reception screen 410.

As shown in FIG. 13, the reception screen 420 includes a check box 421, a plurality of setting areas 422, a check box 423, and setting areas 424 and 425.

The check box 421 is an operation unit for setting whether or not to execute the time QC. When the check box 421 is in the checked state, the setting of the setting area 422 in which the check box 422a is in the checked state becomes effective. The setting area 422 is an area for setting a time for performing quality control in the time QC. When the button 422c is operated, the time in the time input area 422b is changed. When the check box 422a is in the check state, the time in the setting area 422 becomes valid when the check box 421 is in the check state. In the example shown in FIG. 13, the time in the uppermost setting area 422 is valid among the five setting areas.

The check box 423 is an operation unit for setting whether or not to carry out the time interval QC or the test number QC. When the check box 423 is checked, the setting of the setting area 424 or the setting area 425 becomes effective. The setting area 424 is an area for setting a time interval for executing quality control in the time interval QC. When the button 424c is operated, the time in the time interval input area 424b is changed. When the radio button 424a is selected, the time interval QC is enabled when the check box 423 is checked. The setting area 425 is an area for setting the number of tests for executing quality control in the number of tests QC. When the button 425c is operated, the number of tests in the test number input area 425b is changed. When the radio button 425a is in the selected state, the test number QC becomes effective when the check box 423 is in the checked state.

The radio buttons 424a and 425a are interlocked with each other, and when one of them is in the selected state, the other is in the non-selected state. As a result, only one of the time interval QC and the number of tests QC can be set as the execution target.

When the OK button 426 is operated, the control unit 331 temporarily stores the setting contents of the reception screen 420 in the storage unit 332 and closes the reception screen 420. When the cancel button 427 is operated, the control unit 331 discards the setting contents of the reception screen 420 and closes the reception screen 420.

The process of displaying the reception screens 410 and 420 on the display unit 333 will be described with reference to the flowcharts of FIGS. 14 and 15. The processes shown in FIGS. 14 and 15 are executed for each measurement item.

When the operator operates the input unit 334 to select the measurement item on the edit measurement item selection screen 402 and operate the item edit button 402b, the control unit 331 starts the process of FIG.

In step S11, the control unit 331 reads the setting information stored in the storage unit 332, and displays the reception screen 410 on the display unit 333 in a state of reflecting the read setting information. The operator operates the reception screen 410 shown in FIG. 12 via the input unit 334 to input the settings related to quality control. Further, the operator operates the setting button 413 of the reception screen 410 shown in FIG. 12 to display the reception screen 420 shown in FIG. 13 via the input unit 334, and operates the reception screen 420 to relate to quality control. Enter the settings.

FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing processing related to the operation of the radio buttons 424a and 425a of the reception screen 420. The control unit 331 determines whether or not the radio button 424a of the time interval QC has been operated in step S21, and determines whether or not the radio button 425a of the test number QC has been operated in step S22.

When the radio button 424a of the time interval QC is operated, in step S23, the control unit 331 selects the time interval QC and makes it possible to input the time interval. Specifically, the control unit 331 selects the radio button 424a and sets the time interval input area 424b and the button 424c into an operable state. Further, in step S24, the control unit 331 cancels the selection state of the test number QC and makes the test number non-input state. Specifically, the control unit 331 sets the radio button 425a in a non-selected state, and sets the test number input area 425b and the button 425c in an inoperable state.

On the other hand, when the radio button 425a of the test number QC is operated, in step S25, the control unit 331 selects the test number QC and makes it possible to input the test number. Specifically, the control unit 331 selects the radio button 425a and sets the test number input area 425b and the button 425c into an operable state. Further, in step S26, the control unit 331 cancels the selection state of the time interval QC so that the time interval cannot be input. Specifically, the control unit 331 deselects the radio button 424a and disables the time interval input area 424b and the button 424c.

When the process of step S24 or step S26 is completed, the control unit 331 returns the process to step S21 and repeats the process of FIG. When the OK button 426 or the cancel button 427 of the reception screen 420 is operated, the control unit 331 ends the process of FIG.

As described above, since only one of the radio buttons 424a and 425a can be selected, in the first embodiment, either the time interval QC or the number of tests QC can be selectively set. As described with reference to FIGS. 6 (b) and 6 (c), the time interval QC and the number of tests QC are both executed at substantially constant intervals, and therefore, if either one is executed, the required accuracy is required. Can be managed. According to the first embodiment, either the time interval QC or the number of tests QC can be selectively set, so that unnecessary quality control is suppressed and the consumption of the quality control substance and the reagent is consumed. Can be suppressed. Moreover, since unnecessary accuracy control settings can be avoided, the operation for setting by the operator can be simplified.

Returning to FIG. 14, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the registration button 415 of the reception screen 410 has been operated in step S12, and determines whether or not the cancel button 416 of the reception screen 410 has been operated in step S13. When the registration button 415 is operated, the control unit 331 advances the process to step S14. On the other hand, when the cancel button 416 is operated, the control unit 331 discards the set contents set via the reception screens 410 and 420, and ends the process of FIG.

In step S14, the control unit 331 stores the setting contents set via the reception screens 410 and 420 in the storage unit 332. As described above, in the first embodiment, the control unit 331 causes the display units 333 to display the reception screens 410 and 420 for receiving the settings of each quality control included in the quality control group, and the reception screens 410 and 420 are used. Set the received quality control as the quality control of the execution target. As a result, the operator can easily set each quality control included in the quality control group via the reception screens 410 and 420.

Further, as described above, when the operator selects the measurement item on the edit measurement item selection screen 402 and then operates the item edit button 402b, the control unit 331 determines the measurement item received from the operator via the input unit 334. The reception screen 410 for setting the quality control is displayed. As a result, appropriate accuracy control can be set for each measurement item.

In step S15, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the time interval QC is set. When the check box 412 is in the check state on the reception screen 410, the check box 423 is in the check state, and the radio button 424a is in the selected state on the reception screen 420, the time interval QC is set in the control unit 331. Judged as When the time interval QC is set, in step S16, the control unit 331 resets the elapsed time of the time interval QC for the measurement item. As described with reference to FIG. 9A, the elapsed time of the time interval QC is stored in the storage unit 332 for each measurement item, and is updated in real time according to the passage of time. In step S16, the elapsed time of the time interval QC for the target measurement item is set to 0.

In step S17, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the test number QC is set. When the check box 412 is in the check state on the reception screen 410, the check box 423 is in the check state, and the radio button 425a is in the selected state on the reception screen 420, the control unit 331 is set to the test number QC. Judged as When the test number QC is set, in step S18, the control unit 331 resets the test number of the test number QC for the measurement item. Number of tests The number of tests of QC is stored in the storage unit 332 for each measurement item as described with reference to FIG. 9A, and is stored in real time each time the sample of the target measurement item is measured. It will be counted up. In step S18, the number of tests of the number of tests QC for the target measurement item is set to 0.

FIG. 16A is a flowchart showing the processing of the sample measurement instruction.

In step S31, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the operator has received the sample measurement start instruction via the input unit 334. Upon receiving the instruction to start the sample measurement, in step S32, the control unit 331 transmits an instruction to execute the sample measurement to the control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32, and causes the measurement unit 32 to execute the sample measurement. In step S33, the control unit 331 determines whether or not there is a subsequent sample based on the signal from the measurement unit 32. When there is a subsequent sample, the control unit 331 returns the process to step S32 and transmits a sample measurement instruction for the subsequent sample. On the other hand, if there is no subsequent sample, the control unit 331 ends the process of FIG. 16A. The process of the sample measurement instruction shown in FIG. 16A is repeated.

FIG. 16B is a flowchart showing a sample measurement process.

In step S41, the control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32 determines whether or not the sample measurement instruction transmitted from the analysis unit 33 in step S32 of FIG. 16A is received. Upon receiving the sample measurement instruction, in step S42, the control unit 321 drives each unit in the measurement unit 32 to perform the sample measurement. That is, the control unit 321 prepares a measurement sample by mixing the sample and the reagent corresponding to the measurement item for the measurement item included in the sample measurement instruction, and measures the prepared measurement sample. The sample measurement process shown in FIG. 16B is repeated.

FIG. 16C is a flowchart showing the processing of the reagent exchange instruction.

In step S51, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the remaining amount of the current reagent is less than the volume used for one sample measurement for the measurement item corresponding to this reagent.

Here, as described above, the reagent dispensing unit 270 includes a liquid level sensor 271a for detecting the liquid level at the time of suction by the suction unit 271, and a stepping motor 272b for moving the suction unit 271 in the vertical direction. To be equipped. Each time the suction unit 271 sucks the reagent, the control unit 331 determines the remaining amount of the reagent in the reagent container 21 based on the number of pulses input to the stepping motor 272b and the liquid level detection by the liquid level sensor 271a. get.

That is, when the initial position of the tip of the suction unit 271 is H, the number of pulses input to the stepping motor 272b from the initial position to the detection of the liquid level is P, and a unit pulse is input to the stepping motor 272b. Assuming that the amount of descent of the suction unit 271 is D and the inner area of the reagent container 21 is S, the remaining amount T of the reagent contained in the reagent container 21 is calculated by the following formula (1).

T = (HP × D) × S… (1)

The control unit 331 acquires the remaining amount of the reagent before suction based on the above formula (1) when the suction unit 271 is lowered in the dispensing of the current reagent. Further, the control unit 331 acquires the remaining amount of the current reagent by subtracting the amount of the reagent to be sucked in one dispensing from the remaining amount of the reagent before suction. The control unit 331 stores the remaining amount of the current reagent thus acquired in the storage unit 332. In step S51, it is determined whether or not the remaining amount of the current reagent, which is updated each time the reagent is dispensed, is less than one dose at the time of execution of step S51.

When the remaining amount of the current reagent is less than one dose, in step S52, the control unit 331 transmits an instruction to switch the reagent to be dispensed from the current reagent to the new reagent to the control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32. .. That is, the control unit 331 ends the use of the reagent container 21 containing the current reagent, and causes the subsequent sample measurement to be performed using a new reagent of the same type as the current reagent. The processing of the reagent exchange instruction shown in FIG. 16C is repeated.

Next, processing of time QC, time interval QC, test number QC, and vial QC will be described with reference to FIGS. 17A to 19. The processes of FIGS. 17 (a), 18 (a), 18 (b), and 19 are repeatedly executed for each measurement item. Further, the processes of FIGS. 17 (a), 18 (a), 18 (b), and 19 are started when the sample measurement is started in FIG. 16 (a), and are repeatedly executed until the sample measurement is completed. Will be done. That is, these processes are repeatedly executed from the determination of YES in step S31 to the determination of NO in step S33. The processes of FIGS. 17 (a), 18 (a), 18 (b), and 19 are started at the same time when the execution of the time QC, the time interval QC, the number of tests QC, and the vial QC is set, respectively. It may be repeatedly executed until the sample analyzer 30 is terminated.

As shown in FIG. 17A, in step S101, the control unit 331 refers to the setting information stored in the storage unit 332, and the current time set in the time input area 422b of the reception screen 420 is the time QC. Judge whether or not the set time of is reached. When the current time reaches the set time, in step S102, the control unit 331 transmits an instruction to execute the quality control measurement to the control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32, and causes the measurement unit 32 to execute the quality control measurement.

FIG. 17B is a flowchart showing the processing of quality control measurement.

In step S61, the control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32 determines whether or not the instruction for quality control measurement transmitted from the analysis unit 33 in step S102 of FIG. 17A has been received. Upon receiving the quality control measurement instruction, in step S62, the control unit 321 drives each unit in the measurement unit 32 to perform the quality control measurement. That is, the control unit 321 prepares a measurement sample by mixing the quality control substance and the reagent corresponding to the measurement item for the measurement item included in the instruction of the quality control measurement, and measures the prepared measurement sample. The reagent exchange process shown in FIG. 17B is repeated. Further, when the accuracy control measurement instruction is transmitted in step S112 of FIG. 18A, step S122 of FIG. 18B, and step S134 of FIG. 19, the control unit 321 is shown in FIG. 17B. Quality control measurement is performed according to the processing shown.

In this way, the quality control substance and the reagent corresponding to the measurement item are mixed to prepare the measurement sample, and when the prepared measurement sample is measured, the measurement item is measured even if there are a plurality of reagents for each measurement item. It is possible to reliably perform quality control measurement based on the reagent corresponding to.

Returning to FIG. 17A, in step S103, the control unit 331 resets the elapsed time of the time interval QC and the number of tests of the number of tests QC.

Since the accuracy control measurement is performed at intervals of time to ensure the accuracy of the sample measurement, it is less necessary to execute a plurality of quality control measurements at close timings. According to the first embodiment, when the quality control measurement based on the time QC is executed in step S102, the time lapse count of the time interval QC and the test number count of the test number QC are reset in step S103. As a result, it is possible to prevent the time interval QC and the number of tests QC from being executed at close timings after the quality control measurement is executed at a predetermined time. In addition, since unnecessary quality control is suppressed, consumption of quality control substances and reagents can be suppressed.

Subsequently, in step S104, the control unit 331 waits for processing until the result of the quality control measurement executed in step S102 is obtained. When the result of the quality control measurement is obtained, in step S105, the control unit 331 analyzes the quality control based on the result of the quality control measurement and determines whether or not there is an abnormality in the reagent. If it is determined that there is an abnormality in the reagent, in step S106, the control unit 331 drives the measurement unit 32 to stop the sample measurement started in step S31 of FIG. 16A. On the other hand, if it is determined that there is no abnormality in the reagent, step S106 is skipped and the process of FIG. 17A ends.

As shown in FIG. 18A, in step S111, the control unit 331 refers to the elapsed time stored in the storage unit 332 as shown in FIG. 9A, and counts the elapsed time of the time interval QC. Judge whether the set value has been reached. When the elapsed time count reaches the set value, in step S112, the control unit 331 transmits an instruction to execute the quality control measurement to the control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32, and causes the measurement unit 32 to execute the quality control measurement. Then, in step S113, the control unit 331 resets the elapsed time of the time interval QC.

Subsequently, in step S114, the control unit 331 waits for processing until the result of the quality control measurement executed in step S112 is obtained. When the result of the quality control measurement is obtained, in step S115, the control unit 331 analyzes the quality control based on the result of the quality control measurement and determines whether or not there is an abnormality in the reagent. If it is determined that there is an abnormality in the reagent, in step S116, the control unit 331 drives the measurement unit 32 to stop the sample measurement started in step S31 of FIG. 16A. On the other hand, if it is determined that there is no abnormality in the reagent, step S116 is skipped and the process of FIG. 18A ends.

As shown in FIG. 18B, in step S121, the control unit 331 refers to the number of tests stored in the storage unit 332 as shown in FIG. 9A, and counts the number of tests in the test number QC. Judge whether the set value has been reached. When the count of the number of tests reaches the set value, in step S122, the control unit 331 transmits an instruction to execute the quality control measurement to the control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32, and causes the measurement unit 32 to execute the quality control measurement. Then, in step S123, the control unit 331 resets the number of tests of the number of tests QC.

Subsequently, in step S124, the control unit 331 waits for processing until the result of the quality control measurement executed in step S122 is obtained. When the result of the quality control measurement is obtained, in step S125, the control unit 331 analyzes the quality control based on the result of the quality control measurement and determines whether or not there is an abnormality in the reagent. If it is determined that there is an abnormality in the reagent, in step S126, the control unit 331 drives the measurement unit 32 to stop the sample measurement started in step S31 of FIG. 16A. On the other hand, if it is determined that there is no abnormality in the reagent, step S126 is skipped and the process of FIG. 18B ends.

As shown in FIG. 19, in step S131, the control unit 331 acquires the predicted usage amount of the required reagent within the time Tc required for one quality control measurement. Specifically, as described with reference to FIGS. 9 (b) and 9 (c), the control unit 331 belongs to the current time for the measurement item based on the history information stored in the storage unit 332. Calculate the average Na of the number of sample measurements on the day of the week and the time of day. The control unit 331 acquires the estimated number Nc of sample measurement that can be performed within the time Tc required for one quality control measurement based on the multiplication of the time Tc and the average number of times Na. Then, the control unit 331 obtains the predicted usage amount of the reagent by multiplying the reagent amount required for one sample measurement by the estimated number of times Nc.

Subsequently, in step S132, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the remaining amount of the current reagent is equal to or less than the predicted usage amount acquired in step S131. As described above, the remaining amount of the current reagent is stored in the storage unit 332 and is updated every time the reagent is dispensed. When the remaining amount of the current reagent is equal to or less than the predicted usage amount, in step S134, the control unit 331 transmits an instruction to execute the quality control measurement based on the new reagent to the control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32, and the measurement unit 32 To perform quality control measurements. In this case, the control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32 executes the quality control measurement based on the new reagent instead of the current reagent in step S62 of FIG. 17B.

When the remaining amount of the current reagent is larger than the predicted usage amount, in step S133, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the remaining amount of the current reagent is equal to or less than the reagent amount used in one sample measurement. When the remaining amount of the current reagent is less than or equal to the amount of the reagent used for one sample measurement, that is, when the sample cannot be measured using the current reagent because the remaining amount of the current reagent is small, the control unit 331 Advances the process to step S134 to perform quality control measurements based on the new reagent. On the other hand, when the remaining amount of the current reagent is larger than the amount of the reagent used in one sample measurement, it is not necessary to immediately start the quality control measurement based on the new reagent, so that the control unit 331 returns the process to step S131. ..

Subsequently, in step S135, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the result of the quality control measurement based on the new reagent executed in step S134 has been obtained. If the result of the quality control measurement based on the new reagent is not obtained, in step S136, the control unit 331 makes the sample measurement based on the new reagent wait. That is, if the result of quality control of the new reagent is not obtained, it cannot be determined whether or not the new reagent is in an appropriate state. Therefore, the control unit 331 waits for the sample measurement using the new reagent in the control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32 so that the sample measurement using the new reagent is not started until the result of the quality control measurement based on the new reagent is obtained. Send instructions to let you. As a result, the control unit 321 makes the sample measurement using the new reagent wait for the target measurement item in step S42 of FIG. 16B.

When the result of the quality control measurement based on the new reagent is obtained, in step S137, the control unit 331 analyzes the quality control based on the result of the quality control measurement and determines whether or not there is an abnormality in the new reagent. .. If it is determined that there is an abnormality in the new reagent, in step S138, the control unit 331 stops the sample measurement based on the new reagent. As a result, the sample measurement based on the new reagent is not started, and when the current reagent runs out, the sample measurement of the measurement item is stopped. On the other hand, when it is determined that there is no abnormality in the new reagent, in step S139, the control unit 331 tells the control unit 321 of the measurement unit 32 to release the standby for sample measurement using the new reagent. Send an instruction to cancel the measurement. As a result, when the control unit 321 receives the sample measurement instruction for the target measurement item, the control unit 321 performs the sample measurement using the new reagent in step S42 of FIG. 16B. In this way, the process of FIG. 19 is completed.

According to the process of FIG. 19, quality control measurement based on the new reagent is executed according to the predicted usage amount, so that the waiting time for sample measurement using the new reagent as shown in FIG. 8 (b) is usually long. Does not occur. However, depending on the frequency with which the sample is actually measured, a waiting time for sample measurement using the new reagent may occur as shown in FIG. 8 (b). Even in such a case, according to the first embodiment, if it is determined that there is no abnormality in the new reagent, the standby state is promptly released in step S139, so that the sample measurement using the new reagent can be started quickly. ..

<Embodiment 2>
In the second embodiment, recommended information suggesting which quality control is preferable in the quality control group is displayed on the reception screen 410 for each measurement item. In the second embodiment, only the configurations and processes of FIGS. 20 to 23 described below are different from those in the first embodiment. Other configurations of the second embodiment are the same as those of the first embodiment.

As shown in FIG. 20, the reception screen 410 of the second embodiment further has a reagent property display area 431, a reagent stability display area 432, and a comment, as compared with the reception screen 410 of the first embodiment shown in FIG. Regions 433 and 434 are provided. The display contents of the reagent property display area 431, the reagent stability display area 432, and the comment area 433, 434 are recommended information suggesting preferable accuracy control.

The reagent property display area 431 displays the properties of the reagent. In the second embodiment, the properties of the reagent are lyophilized products or liquid products. The reagent stability display area 432 displays the stability of the reagent. In the second embodiment, the stability of the reagent is information indicating how long the good quality of the reagent lasts, and is represented by a time such as 5 hours or 10 hours. The stability of the reagent may be represented by "good" or "bad".

The storage unit 332 of the analysis unit 33 stores the reagent information of each reagent contained in all the reagent containers 21 installed on the reagent table 260. The reagent information includes information indicating whether the reagent is a freeze-dried product or a liquid product, and information indicating the stability of the reagent. When the reception screen 410 is displayed on the display unit 333, the control unit 331 reads the reagent information used for the measurement item from the storage unit 332, and based on the read reagent information, displays the reagent properties in the reagent property display area 431. It is displayed and the stability of the reagent is displayed in the reagent stability display area 432.

The comment area 433 displays a guideline for determining which quality control is preferable in the quality control group. The comment area 434 specifically displays the quality control that is preferably set in practice.

Here, what kind of quality control is preferable in what case in the quality control group is determined in advance as shown in FIGS. 21 (a) and 21 (b).

As shown in FIG. 21A, the preferred quality control among the time QC, the time interval QC, and the test number QC is determined based on the number of tests of the target measurement item and the stability of the reagent. In FIG. 21 (a), the number of tests is the frequency of sample measurement performed for a target measurement item. When the stability of the reagent is good, time QC is preferable regardless of the number of tests. When the stability of the reagent is poor, the number of tests QC is preferable when the number of tests is large, and the time interval QC is preferable when the number of tests is small. Further, as shown in FIG. 21B, it is determined whether it is preferable to set the vial QC based on the properties of the reagent of the target measurement item. When the properties of the reagent are lyophilized, it is preferable to set the vial QC.

Returning to FIG. 20, the comment area 433 displays the contents shown in the tables of FIGS. 21A and 21B as a message. Based on the historical information as shown in FIG. 9B, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the number of tests of the measurement item is large, that is, whether or not the sample measurement of the measurement item is performed frequently. judge. Further, the control unit 331 reads out the stability of the reagent used in the measurement item from the storage unit 332, and determines the stability of the read reagent. The control unit 331 determines the preferable accuracy control based on the determination result and the rules shown in FIGS. 21A and 21B. Then, the control unit 331 displays the determined quality control in the comment area 434.

As described above, when the recommended information suggesting the preferable quality control is displayed in the reagent property display area 431, the reagent stability display area 432, and the comment area 433, 434, the operator refers to the recommended information. As a result, it is possible to visually grasp which of the quality control groups is preferable to execute the quality control. According to the properties of the reagent displayed in the reagent property display area 431, the stability of the reagent displayed in the reagent stability display area 432, and the comment displayed in the comment area 434, it is possible to make a judgment of preferable accuracy control. Become. Therefore, by displaying this information as recommended information, the operator can determine the preferred quality control in the quality control group.

The preferable quality control is not limited to being displayed in the comment area 434, and a mark such as an icon or a message may be displayed in the vicinity of the operation unit for setting the quality control determined to be preferable. For example, if vial QC is preferred, a marker is displayed near check box 414 in FIG. 20, if time QC is preferred, marker is displayed near check box 421 in FIG. 13, and time interval QC is preferred. If a mark is displayed in the vicinity of the radio button 424a of 13 and the number of tests QC is preferable, the mark may be displayed in the vicinity of the radio button 425a in FIG.

The display processing of the recommended information in the comment area 434 will be described with reference to FIGS. 22 and 23. When the operator operates the input unit 334 to select the measurement item on the edit measurement item selection screen 402 and operate the item edit button 402b, the control unit 331 starts the processes of FIGS. 22 and 23.

As shown in FIG. 22, in step S201, the control unit 331 predicts the execution frequency of the sample measurement of the measurement item. Specifically, the control unit 331 acquires the number of times of sample measurement of the measurement item per predetermined time in a predetermined period as a predicted value of the execution frequency based on the history information. In this case, the predetermined period is, for example, 50 weeks, and the predetermined time is, for example, 1 hour. The control unit 331 may acquire the number of times of sample measurement of the measurement item in a predetermined period as a predicted value of the execution frequency.

In step S202, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the execution frequency acquired in step S201 is less than a predetermined threshold value. The predetermined threshold value used in step S202 is a threshold value related to the execution frequency that can determine whether or not the frequency of sample measurement is high, and is a threshold value that can determine which of the time interval QC and the number of tests QC is preferable. ..

In this way, when the execution frequency is predicted based on the history information, it is possible to appropriately determine which is preferable, the time interval QC or the number of tests QC, as described later, according to the magnitude of the execution frequency. Therefore, preferable quality control can be properly displayed as recommended information.

When the execution frequency is less than a predetermined threshold value, in step S203, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the reagent information of the reagent used in the measurement item includes the predetermined information. As described above, the reagent information is stored in the storage unit 332, and usually includes the properties of the reagent and the stability of the reagent. In step S203, the control unit 331 reads the reagent information from the storage unit 332, and determines whether or not the read reagent information includes the properties of the reagent and the stability of the reagent.

If the reagent information does not include reagent properties and reagent stability, in step S204, control unit 331 indicates in the comment area 434 of the reception screen 410 that time QC, time interval QC and vial QC are preferred. .. If the reagent information includes the properties of the reagent and the stability of the reagent, the control unit 331 proceeds to step S205.

In step S205, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the reagent of the measurement item is a liquid product based on the properties of the reagent contained in the reagent information. When the reagent is a lyophilized product, in step S206, the control unit 331 indicates that the vial QC is preferable in the comment area 434 of the reception screen 410. When the reagent is a liquid product, the control unit 331 advances the process to step S207.

In step S207, the control unit 331 determines whether or not the stability of the reagent of the measurement item is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold value based on the stability of the reagent contained in the reagent information. The predetermined threshold value used in step S207 is a threshold value capable of determining whether the stability of the reagent is high or low, and is a threshold value capable of determining which of the time QC and the time interval QC is preferable. If the stability of the reagent is defined as the time during which the quality of the reagent remains in good condition, the predetermined threshold used in step S207 is set to a time, such as 5 hours.

When the stability of the reagent is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold value, in step S208, the control unit 331 indicates that the time QC is preferable in the comment area 434 of the reception screen 410. On the other hand, when the stability of the reagent is less than a predetermined threshold value, in step S209, the control unit 331 displays in the comment area 434 of the reception screen 410 that the time interval QC is preferable.

When it is determined in step S202 that the execution frequency is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold value, the control unit 331 advances the process to step S211 in FIG.

In steps S211 to S217 of FIG. 23, steps S204 and S209 are changed to steps S212 and S217, respectively, as compared with steps S203 to S209 of FIG. Steps S211 and S213 to S216 are the same as steps S203 and S205 to S208. Hereinafter, steps S212 and S217 will be described.

When it is determined in step S211 that the reagent information does not include the properties of the reagent and the stability of the reagent, in step S212, the control unit 331 indicates that the time QC, the number of tests QC, and the vial QC are preferable. It is displayed in the comment area 434 of. When it is determined in step S215 that the stability of the reagent is less than a predetermined threshold value, in step S217, the control unit 331 displays in the comment area 434 of the reception screen 410 that the number of tests QC is preferable.

When it is determined in steps S207 and S215 that the stability of the reagent is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold value, it is displayed in the comment area 434 of the reception screen 410 that the time QC is preferable. This allows the operator to visually perceive that time QC is preferred when the reagent is highly stable. When it is determined in steps S205 and S213 that the properties of the reagent are lyophilized products, it is displayed in the comment area 434 of the reception screen 410 that the vial QC is preferable. This allows the operator to visually understand that the vial QC is preferred when the reagent is lyophilized.

<Embodiment 3>
In the third embodiment, the quality control of the execution target candidate is selected from the quality control included in the quality control group for each measurement item. In the third embodiment, only the processes of FIGS. 24 and 25 described below are different from those of the first embodiment. Other configurations of the third embodiment are the same as those of the first embodiment.

The process of selecting the quality control of the execution target candidate will be described with reference to FIGS. 24 and 25. When the reagent container 21 is installed on the reagent table 260 and the installed reagent container 21 is registered via the screen for registering the reagent, the control unit 331 uses the reagent contained in the reagent container 21. The processing of FIGS. 24 and 25 is started for the measurement items. The start timing of the treatments in FIGS. 24 and 25 is not limited to the timing when the reagent container 21 is registered. For example, the control unit 331 may start the processing of FIGS. 24 and 25 for each measurement item at predetermined time intervals.

The processing of steps S301 to S303, S305, and S307 of FIG. 24 is the same as the processing of steps S201 to S203, S205, and S207 of FIG. Therefore, in the following description of FIG. 24, the processing of steps S304, S306, S308, and S309 will be described for convenience.

When it is determined in step S303 that the reagent information does not include the reagent properties and the reagent stability, in step S304, the control unit 331 sets the time QC, the time interval QC, and the vial QC as execution target candidates. When it is determined in step S305 that the reagent is a lyophilized product, in step S306, the control unit 331 sets the vial QC as an execution target candidate. When it is determined in step S307 that the stability of the reagent is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold value, the control unit 331 sets the time QC as an execution target candidate in step S308. When it is determined in step S307 that the stability of the reagent is less than a predetermined threshold value, in step S309, the control unit 331 sets the time interval QC as an execution target candidate. When steps S308 and S309 are completed, the control unit 331 advances the process to step S318 of FIG.

When it is determined in step S302 that the execution frequency is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold value, the control unit 331 advances the process to step S311 of FIG.

The processing of steps S311 and S313 to S316 of FIG. 25 is the same as the processing of steps S303 and S305 to S308 of FIG. 24. Therefore, in the following description of FIG. 25, the processing of steps S312, S317, and S318 will be described for convenience.

When it is determined in step S311 that the reagent information does not include the reagent properties and the reagent stability, in step S312, the control unit 331 sets the time QC, the number of tests QC, and the vial QC as execution target candidates. When it is determined in step S315 that the stability of the reagent is less than a predetermined threshold value, in step S317, the control unit 331 sets the test number QC as an execution target candidate.

In step S318, the control unit 331 displays the reception screens 410 and 420 on the display unit 333 with the execution set for the execution target candidates set in the previous step, that is, the processes of steps S301 to S309 and S311 to S317. Let me.

Specifically, when the vial QC is set as an execution target candidate, the control unit 331 displays the reception screen 410 with the check box 414 of FIG. 12 checked. When the time QC, the time interval QC, and the number of tests QC are set as execution target candidates, the control unit 331 displays the reception screen 410 with the check box 412 in FIG. 12 checked. When the time QC is set as the execution target candidate, the control unit 331 displays the reception screen 420 with the check box 421 of FIG. 13 checked. When the time interval QC or the number of tests QC is set as the execution target candidate, the control unit 331 displays the reception screen 420 with the check box 423 of FIG. 13 checked. When the time interval QC is set as the execution target candidate, the control unit 331 displays the reception screen 420 with the radio button 424a of FIG. 13 selected. When the test number QC is set as the execution target candidate, the control unit 331 displays the reception screen 420 with the radio button 425a of FIG. 13 selected.

In step S318, after the reception screens 410 and 420 are displayed with the execution target candidates set, the operator refers to the reception screens 410 and 420 to confirm the quality control of the execution target candidates. Then, by operating each part of the reception screens 410 and 420, the operator corrects the accuracy control of the execution target candidate, the setting value of each quality control, and the like as necessary, and operates the registration button 415 of the reception screen 410. To determine the quality control of the execution target.

As described above, according to the third embodiment, when the quality control of the execution target candidate is selected, the operator can save the trouble of determining which quality control should be executed. Further, when the execution frequency is predicted based on the history information in step S301, at least one of the time interval QC and the number of tests QC is selected as the execution target candidate according to the magnitude of the execution frequency. As a result, the operator can save the trouble of selecting the quality control after determining the execution frequency.

Further, when it is determined in steps S307 and S315 that the stability of the reagent is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold value, time QC is selected as an execution target candidate. As a result, the operator can save the trouble of selecting the time QC after judging that the stability of the reagent is high. Further, when it is determined in steps S305 and S313 that the properties of the reagent are lyophilized products, the vial QC is selected as an execution target candidate. As a result, the operator can save the trouble of selecting the vial QC after determining that the reagent is a lyophilized product.

Further, after the processing of steps S301 to S309 of FIG. 24 and steps S311 to S317 of FIG. 25 is completed, in step S318, the control unit 331 sets the quality control of the execution target based on the selected execution target candidate. The reception screens 410 and 420 for reception are displayed on the display unit 333. As a result, the operator can smoothly input settings such as presence / absence of execution and detailed parameters for the quality control selected as the execution target candidate by the control unit 331.

In step S318 of FIG. 25, the control unit 331 may set the quality control of the selected execution target candidate as the quality control of the execution target without displaying the reception screens 410 and 420. By doing so, the operator confirms the quality control of the execution target candidate, and the quality control of the execution target candidate can be executed without inputting settings such as whether or not the quality control is executed and detailed parameters. When the quality control of the execution target is automatically set in this way, it is possible to omit the trouble of the operator setting the quality control of the execution target based on the quality control of the execution target candidate.

21 Reagent container (1st reagent container, 2nd reagent container)
21b Aperture 30 Specimen analyzer 32 Measuring unit 261 Lid unit 270 Reagent dispensing unit 292 Light source unit 293 Light receiving unit 331 Control unit 332 Storage unit 332a Program 333 Display unit 410, 420 Reception screen

Claims (14)

A sample analyzer that analyzes samples for multiple measurement items.
Specimen measurement is continuously performed to measure the measurement sample prepared by mixing the sample and the reagent according to the measurement item, and the measurement sample prepared by mixing the quality control substance and the reagent according to the measurement item. Quality control to measure the measurement unit that performs measurement and
The first quality control that executes the quality control measurement at a predetermined time, the second quality control that executes the quality control measurement every time the sample measurement is performed a predetermined number of times, and the quality control measurement that executes the quality control measurement at a predetermined time interval. From the quality control group including the third quality control that executes the above, the control unit that sets the quality control for each measurement item and controls the measurement unit according to the set quality control is provided.
Both the first quality control and the second quality control or the third quality control can be set.
Either one of the second quality control and the third quality control can be selectively set.
When the first accuracy control and the second accuracy control or the third accuracy control are set in the control unit, when the first accuracy control is executed, the second accuracy control is executed. A sample analyzer that resets the number of measurements since then or the elapsed time since the third quality control was executed. The first aspect of claim 1, wherein the control unit receives the set execution presence / absence of the quality control for each measurement item, and controls the measurement unit according to the set quality control for the measurement item for which the execution is accepted. Specimen analyzer. The sample according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the control unit receives the predetermined time and the predetermined number of measurements or the predetermined time interval on the same screen, and sets quality control for each measurement item. Analysis equipment. The sample analyzer according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the predetermined time in the first quality control can be set a plurality of times on the same day. The sample analyzer according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the control unit accepts selection of a measurement item subject to the quality control setting from a plurality of measurement items. In the quality control group, when the remaining amount of reagent in the first reagent container becomes less than the amount of reagent required for the estimated number of sample measurements that can be performed within the time required for the quality control measurement, the same type of reagent is used. The sample analyzer according to any one of claims 1 to 5, further comprising a fourth quality control that executes the quality control measurement based on the reagent in the second reagent container containing the above. The measuring unit includes a light source unit for irradiating the measurement sample with light and a light receiving unit for receiving the light generated from the measurement sample.
The sample analyzer according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the sample measurement and the quality control measurement are measurements related to blood coagulation. This is a sample analysis method that analyzes samples for multiple measurement items.
A sample measurement step of continuously performing sample measurement for measuring a measurement sample prepared by mixing the sample and a reagent corresponding to a measurement item, and
A quality control measurement process that performs quality control measurement to measure a measurement sample prepared by mixing a quality control substance and a reagent according to the measurement item, and
The first quality control that executes the quality control measurement at a predetermined time, the second quality control that executes the quality control measurement every time the sample measurement is performed a predetermined number of times, and the quality control measurement that executes the quality control measurement at a predetermined time interval. From the quality control group including the third quality control to execute, including the setting process of setting the quality control for each measurement item.
Both the first quality control and the second quality control or the third quality control can be set.
Either one of the second quality control and the third quality control can be selectively set.
When the first quality control and the second quality control or the third quality control are set, when the first quality control is executed, the number of measurements since the second quality control is executed. Or, a sample analysis method for resetting the elapsed time since the third quality control is executed. According to claim 8, the presence or absence of execution of the quality control set by the setting process is accepted for each measurement item, and the quality control measurement step is executed according to the set quality control for the measurement items for which execution is accepted. The sample analysis method described. The sample according to claim 8 or 9, wherein in the setting step, the predetermined time and the predetermined number of measurements or the predetermined time interval are received on the same screen, and the accuracy control is set for each measurement item. Analysis method. The sample analysis method according to any one of claims 8 to 10, wherein the predetermined time in the first quality control can be set a plurality of times on the same day. The sample analysis method according to any one of claims 8 to 11, further comprising a step of accepting selection of a measurement item to be subject to the quality control setting from a plurality of measurement items. In the quality control group, when the remaining amount of reagent in the first reagent container becomes less than the amount of reagent required for the estimated number of sample measurements that can be performed within the time required for the quality control measurement, the same type of reagent is used. The sample analyzer according to any one of claims 8 to 12, further comprising a fourth quality control that performs the quality control measurement based on the reagent in the second reagent container containing the above. The sample measurement unit step and the quality control measurement step include a step of irradiating the measurement sample with light and receiving the light generated from the measurement sample.
The sample analysis method according to any one of claims 8 to 13, wherein the sample measurement and the quality control measurement are measurements related to blood coagulation.

Images