JP2020156186A - System stabilizing device - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide a system stabilizing device capable of selecting a suitable electric control machine according to the variation even when an electric power state varies with a cycle shorter than the cycle of transient stability degree calculation.SOLUTION: A system stabilizing device has a collection section, a system model creation section, a calculation section, a first selection section, a stability degree evaluation model creation section, and a second selection section. The stability degree evaluation model creation section creates a stability degree evaluation model for evaluating a stability degree in a generator installed in the electric power system on the basis of system information collected by the collection section, a calculation result by the calculation section, and variables used in the processing by the first selection section. The stability degree evaluation model creation section operates in a first cycle. The second selection section evaluates the stability degree of the generator when the electric control by a first electric control machine is performed using the stability degree evaluation model and the system information collected in a second cycle shorter than the first cycle.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

Embodiments of the present invention relate to system stabilizers.

In the system stabilizer for the purpose of stabilizing the power system, in case of an accident in the system, the transient stability calculation in the case of an accident is repeated based on the state of the electric power before the accident. A method of executing and selecting a generator (hereinafter, also referred to as an electric control device) to be disconnected (hereinafter, also referred to as a cutoff or an electric control) according to an accident is performed (for example, a non-patent document). 1). However, it may be difficult to deal with renewable energy or the like in which the state of electric power can change in a cycle shorter than the cycle of transient stability calculation.

"Appendix 2 Case Study of Relay System to Prevent Step-out", Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan Technical Report No. 801. 153-154, Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, October 2000

The problem to be solved by the present invention is a system in which an appropriate electric controller can be selected according to the change even when the power state changes in a cycle shorter than the cycle of transient stability calculation. It is to provide a stabilizer.

The system stabilizer of the embodiment includes an acquisition unit, a system model creation unit, a calculation unit, a first selection unit, a stability evaluation model creation unit, and a second selection unit. The collection unit collects system information about the power system. The system model creation unit creates a system model based on the system information collected by the collection unit. The calculation unit uses the system model that reflects the power flow value flowing through the power system to calculate the transient stability when an assumed accident occurs in the power system. The first selection unit selects the first electronic control machine to be subject to electronic control for each assumed accident based on the calculation result obtained by the calculation unit. The stability evaluation model creation unit is provided in the power system based on the system information collected by the collection unit, the calculation result by the calculation unit, and the variables used in the process of processing by the first selection unit. Create a stability evaluation model that evaluates the degree of stability of the generated generator. The collection unit, the system model creation unit, the calculation unit, the first selection unit, and the stability evaluation model creation unit operate in the first cycle. The second selection unit uses the stability evaluation model and the system information collected in the second cycle shorter than the first cycle to perform the electronic control by the first electronic control machine. The degree of stability of the generator is determined from the operation time of the system model creation unit, the calculation unit, the first selection unit, and the stability evaluation model creation unit that led to the selection of the first electronic controller. Evaluation is performed before one cycle elapses, and a second electronic control machine to be additionally controlled is selected based on the evaluation result.

The block diagram which shows the structure of the power supply system to which the system stabilizer 20 of an embodiment is applied. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a flow of processing performed by the additional electronic control execution unit 50 of the embodiment. The figure explaining the process performed by the additional electronic control execution unit 50 of an embodiment.

Hereinafter, the system stabilizer of the embodiment will be described with reference to the drawings. In the following description, a plurality of the same components are distinguished by adding numerical values such as "1" and "2" to the end of the reference numerals via "-" (hyphen). When a plurality of the same configurations are not distinguished from each other, it is omitted to add numerical values such as "1" and "2" to the end of the code via "-" (hyphen).

(First Embodiment)
The first embodiment will be described. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a power supply system to which the system stabilizer 20 of the first embodiment is applied. The power supply system includes, for example, a power system 1, a transmission system 10, and a system stabilizer 20.

The power system 1 includes a bus 2 (bus 2-1 to 2-5), a transmission line 3 (transmission lines 3-1 to 3-4), and a transformer 4 (transformers 4-1 to 4-4). , Generator 5 (generators 5-1 to 5-4), circuit breaker 6 (circuit breaker 6-1 to 6-4), information terminal 11 (information terminal 11-1 to 11-5), and control A terminal 12 (control terminals 12-1, 12-2) is provided.

The transformer 4 transforms the voltage of the electric power generated by the generator 5 into a predetermined voltage. For example, the transformer 4-1 transforms the voltage of the electric power generated by the generator 5-1 into a predetermined voltage. The generator 5 indicates a device that generates electric power by a power source using renewable energy such as solar power and wind power, or by depleting energy such as fossil fuel such as a synchronous machine such as a thermal power machine, a nuclear power machine, and a hydraulic machine. The circuit breaker 6 cuts off the supply of the electric power generated by the generator 5 to the consumer. For example, the circuit breaker 6-1 cuts off the supply of electric power generated by the generator 5-1. The transmission system 10 is composed of a dedicated communication line or a communication network such as the Internet, and transmits various information such as system information described later between the information terminal 11 and the system stabilizer 20.

The information terminal 11 measures information (hereinafter, referred to as system information) regarding electric power supplied from the generator 5 to the consumer via the bus 2.

The system information includes power information regarding the supply and demand state of power in each component of the power system 1 (bus 2, transmission line 3, transformer 4, generator 5, circuit breaker 6, information terminal 11, and control terminal 12). Contains connection information about the connection status of. The electrical information included in the system information includes the active power and the ineffective power of the transmission line 3 and the transformer 4, the bus voltage applied to the bus 2, and the like. Further, the connection information included in the system information includes the connection state of the transmission line 3 and the transformer 4. The system information includes, for example, information such as the voltage and phase angle of each bus 2 in the power system 1, the active power flow and reactive power flow of the transmission line 3, and the start / stop information of the generator 5. For example, the information terminal 11-1 provides power information regarding the power supplied by the transmission lines 3-1, 3-2, 3-5 connected to the bus 2-1 and connection information of the transmission line 3-1 and the like. Measure the system information including.

The control terminal 12 controls the circuit breaker 6 in response to the control signal from the system stabilizer 20 to control the interruption of the power supply from the generator 5. For example, the control terminal 12-1 controls the circuit breakers 6-1 and 6-2 in response to the control signal from the system stabilizer 20 to control the interruption of the power supply via the bus 2-4. ..

The system stabilizer 20 acquires system information via the transmission system 10, calculates transient stability based on the acquired system information, and maintains the stability of the power system 1 in the event of an assumed accident. Select the electronic control machine to be electronically controlled. Here, the electric control machine is a generator 5 that cuts off the supply of electric power.

In the present embodiment, in addition to the transient stability calculation described above, the system stabilizer 20 provides additional electrical control when the state of the power system 1 changes in a cycle earlier than the cycle in which the transient stability calculation is performed. It is determined whether or not it is necessary, and if additional electronic control is required, an electronic control device that performs additional electronic control is selected.

The system stabilization device 20 includes an electronic control execution unit 30, a stability evaluation model generation unit 40, and an additional electronic control execution unit 50. The electronic control execution unit 30 is a functional unit that performs processing related to electronic control by conventional transient stability calculation. The stability evaluation model generation unit 40 and the additional electronic control execution unit 50 are functional units that perform processing related to the additional electronic control. Here, the stability evaluation model generation unit 40 is an example of the “stability evaluation model creation unit”. The additional electronic control execution unit 50 is an example of the “second selection unit”.

The electronic control execution unit 30 includes a system information collection unit 31, a basic system storage unit 32, a system model creation unit 33, a stability calculation unit 34, an electronic control machine selection unit 35, and a first-stage electronic control unit 36. And a calculation result storage unit 37. Here, the system information collecting unit 31 is an example of the “collecting unit”. The stability calculation unit 34 is an example of a “calculation unit”. The electronic control machine selection unit 35 is an example of the “first selection unit”.

The system information collecting unit 31 acquires system information from the information terminal 11 via the transmission system 10 at preset cycles (for example, 1 minute). The system information collecting unit 31 outputs the acquired system information to the system model creating unit 33.

The system model creation unit 33 is a simulation model (hereinafter, system model) that represents the power flow state of the power system 1 based on the system information acquired by the information terminal 11 and the configuration information stored in the basic system storage unit 32. ) Is created. The basic system storage unit 32 stores the configuration information.

The configuration information is information regarding the configuration of each component of the power system 1. The configuration information is, for example, information indicating the impedance and inductance of the transmission line 3 possessed by the power system 1, interconnection information between the bus 2 and the transmission line 3, the scale, number, and arrangement of each component of the power system 1.

The stability calculation unit 34 performs a system analysis simulation by transient stability calculation using the system model. The stability calculation unit 34 executes the transient stability calculation when various preset accidents occur, and whether the generator does not step out or step out, that is, the power system is stable or unstable. To determine. The stability calculation unit 34 outputs the determination result to the electronic control machine selection unit 35. When the determination result by the stability calculation unit 34 is unstable, the electronic controller selection unit 35 selects one of the generators to be detuned as the electronic controller and adds it. The stability calculation unit 34 executes the transient stability calculation under the condition of shutting off the electric controller selected by the electronic controller selection unit 35, determines again whether it is stable or unstable, and determines whether the determination result is the electronic controller. Output to the selection unit 35. By repeating the exchange between the stability calculation unit 34 and the electric control machine selection unit 35 until the determination result becomes stable, the electric control machine capable of maintaining the stability of the power system in the assumed accident is determined (selected). To.

The electronic control machine selection unit 35 outputs information on the electronic control machine selected for stabilizing the power system 1 to the first stage electronic control unit 36 in the event of an assumed accident. Further, the stability calculation unit 34 stores the calculation result storage unit 37 with various conditions including the system model used for the transient stability calculation and the selection result of the electronic controller and the calculation result.

The first-stage electronic control unit 36 senses the occurrence of an accident in the power system 1 and the accident conditions via the transmission system 10, and shuts off to the control terminal 12 of the electronic control device selected in advance in the assumed accident corresponding to the accident conditions. Send a command. As a result, the corresponding generator 5 is disconnected from the power system 1. The calculation result storage unit 37 stores the system model used for the transient stability calculation, various conditions including the selection result of the electronic controller, and the calculation result.

The stability evaluation model generation unit 40 electrifies the electric control machine (first electric control machine) selected by the electronic control execution unit 30 when the power state changes before the timing of the next transient stability calculation. Formulate (create) a function and parameters for determining whether or not the power system 1 stabilizes after being controlled, that is, whether or not additional power control is performed. The stability evaluation model generation unit 40 always executes processing (that is, regardless of whether or not an accident has occurred) in the same cycle as the transient stability calculation cycle by the electronic control execution unit 30.

The stability evaluation model generation unit 40 includes an unstable side system model formulation unit 41, a stable side system model formulation unit 42, a determination standard formulation unit 43, and an output change model formulation unit 44.

The unstable side system model formulation unit 41 calculates various constants for calculating the state quantity of the unstable generator group model under the accident conditions of each assumed accident. The unstable generator group model is a model in which a plurality of generators 5 (unstable generator group) belonging to the unstable side system are put together into one generator equivalent to the plurality of generators. The generator 5 belonging to the unstable side system is a generator 5 that does not maintain stability against the occurrence of a assumed accident, that is, can become unstable, and is a generator 5 that is subject to electronic control in the assumed accident. ..

The unstable side system model formulation unit 41 examines (calculates) the internal voltage phase angle difference of each generator 5 with reference to the phase angle center of gravity of all the generators 5, and the calculated phase angle difference is predetermined. The generator that exceeds the specified value is defined as the generator 5 that belongs to the unstable side system.

Further, the unstable side system model formulation unit 41 calculates the inertial constant M ₁ of the unstable generator group model as various constants (parameters) for calculating the state quantity of the unstable generator group model. Inertial constant M ₁ stable generator group model, as shown in (Equation 1), is calculated as the sum of the inertia constants M _i of a generator belonging to the unstable side system.

In (Equation 1), M ₁ is the inertia constant of the unstable generator group model, the M _i indicates the inertia constant of the generator 5 of the identification number i belonging unstable side system. The identification number i (i = 0 to n) is a number that uniquely identifies an unstable generator (generator 5 belonging to the unstable side system). n is an arbitrary natural number.

The stable side system model formulation unit 42 formulates a function for estimating the active power of the stable generator group model under each accident condition by using the calculation result stored in the calculation result storage unit 37. In addition, the stable side system model formulation unit 42 calculates various constants (parameters) for calculating the state quantity of the stable generator group model under the accident conditions of each assumed accident.

The stable generator group model is a model in which a plurality of generators 5 (stable generator group) belonging to the stable side system are put together into one generator equivalent to the plurality of generators 5. The stable side system is a system that is presumed to maintain stability against an assumed accident, and is, for example, a set of generators or the like located at a location away from the location where the assumed accident occurred from the viewpoint of electrical connection. is there. This is because the generator 5 provided at a location away from the location where the assumed accident is expected to occur is not easily affected by the assumed accident and is considered to maintain stability against the assumed accident.

For example, the stable side system model formulation unit 42 examines (calculates) the internal voltage phase angle difference of each generator based on the phase angle center of gravity of all the generators 5, and the calculated phase angle difference is a predetermined specified value. The generator 5 that does not exceed the above is the generator 5 that belongs to the stable side system.

Here, since it is considered that the stable side system is often provided at a place away from the place where the assumed accident occurred, the information terminal 11 cannot directly measure the system information in the stable side system. It can be considered that most of the cases. Therefore, it is difficult to measure the system information of the stable side system immediately after the accident actually occurs in real time.

As a countermeasure, in the present embodiment, the stable side system model formulation unit 42 performs a regression model showing the relationship between the total load of the stable side system and the bus voltage as a function for estimating the active power of the stable generator group model ( Function) is created. As a result, the system information of the stable side system immediately after the accident occurs is estimated using the regression model.

Further, stability-side system model development unit 42, as various constants for calculating a state quantity of stable generator group model (parameters), calculates the inertia constant M ₂ stable generator group model. As shown in (Equation 2), the inertial constant M ₂ of the stable generator group model is calculated as the sum of the inertial constants M _j of the generators belonging to the stable side system.

In (Equation 2), M ₂ indicates the inertial constant of the stable generator group model, and M _j indicates the inertial constant of the generator 5 having the identification number j belonging to the stable side system. The identification number j (j = 0 to m) is a number that uniquely identifies a stable generator (generator 5 belonging to the stable side system). m is an arbitrary natural number.

The judgment standard development unit 43 formulates the criteria for judging whether the integrated generator model is stable or unstable. The integrated generator model is a model in which a stable generator group model and an unstable generator group model are combined into one generator.

The determination standard development unit 43 calculates, for example, the threshold value of the phase angle deviation of the integrated generator model (hereinafter, the phase angle deviation threshold value Δδ _th ). The phase angle deviation will be described in detail later. The phase angle deviation threshold value Δδ _th of the integrated generator model is used as a threshold value for determining the stability degree of the integrated generator model after an accident occurs by the stability determination unit 57 of the additional electronic control execution unit 50 described later.
Further, in the process of obtaining the phase angle deviation threshold Δδ _th , the judgment standard formulation unit 43 determines the maximum value of the active power output and the maximum active power output from the relationship between the phase angle of the integrated generator model and the active power output. Find the phase angle when Specifically, the phase angle and active power output of the integrated generator model are obtained from the time-series transient stability calculation results, the maximum value of the active power output is searched from among them, and the phase angle at the same time is saved.

The output change model formulation unit 44 uses the calculation result stored in the calculation result storage unit 37 to estimate the change in the active power of the generator 5 that is not subject to the electronic control when the electronic control is performed. Calculate the coefficient of. The generator 5 that is not subject to the electronic control is a generator 5 that belongs to the stable side system.

The output change model formulation unit 44 derives, for example, the first electric control machine and the total electric control pattern in which the first electric control machine is combined with the additional electric control machine candidate. The output change model formulation unit 44 has the short-circuit impedance to the generator 5 of the other unstable side system and the generator of the stable side system as seen from the terminal bus of the added electric control machine in the derived all-electric control pattern. Find the short-circuit impedance up to 5. The output change model formulation unit 44 calculates the ratio of each short-circuit impedance to the total value of the two obtained short-circuit impedances. The output change model formulation unit 44 uses the calculated ratio as a coefficient for estimating the change in the active power of the generator 5 which is not subject to the electronic control.

Here, there are two types of changes in active power, the first is a stepwise change immediately after the electric control is implemented, and the second is a gradual change after the electric control is implemented. The output change model formulation unit 44 calculates the coefficient for estimating the change of these two active powers by calculating the above-mentioned ratio according to the elapsed time from the time when the electric control is executed.

The additional electronic control execution unit 50 is a functional unit that operates after an accident occurs in the power system. When an accident occurs in the power system, the additional electronic control execution unit 50 generates, by the stability evaluation model generation unit 40, whether or not to perform additional electric control after executing the electric control by the first electric control machine. Judgment is made using the given function, etc., and if additional electronic control is required, the target electronic control machine is selected.

The additional electronic control execution unit 50 includes a high-speed information collection unit 51, a generator state calculation unit 500, an output change estimation unit 55, a stability determination unit 57, and an additional electronic control unit selection unit 58. The high-speed information collecting unit 51 acquires system information via the transmission system 10 at a sampling cycle faster than the cycle for acquiring system information by the electronic control execution unit 30. The system information here includes various information such as generator active power and transmission line active power.

The high-speed information collecting unit 51 constantly collects system information at a high-speed sampling cycle and holds the system information in a fixed time interval. Then, when the high-speed information collecting unit 51 determines that an accident has occurred, the high-speed information collecting unit 51 waits until a predetermined time elapses from a predetermined time before the accident occurs (hereinafter, referred to as an information collection start time) (hereinafter, when the information collection ends). ) Extract the system information collected in a certain time interval. The high-speed information collecting unit 51 outputs the extracted system information for a certain time section to the generator state calculation unit 500.

Whether or not an accident has occurred can be determined by acquiring the operation signal of the protection relay. For example, one of the protection relays measures the currents at both ends of the transmission line and determines whether the difference is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold value. In this case, if the difference in current is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold value, it is determined that an accident has occurred.

The generator state calculation unit 500 calculates the state of the generator 5 after the accident using the system information acquired from the high-speed information collection unit 51. The state of the generator 5 is, for example, the active power deviation and the phase angle deviation of the generator 5. The active power deviation is a time-series change in active power from the start of information collection to the end of information collection, based on the active power before the accident. The phase angle deviation is a time-series change in the phase angle from the start of information collection to the end of information collection, based on the phase angle before the occurrence of the accident.

The output change estimation unit 55 estimates the time-series change of the active power deviation of the integrated generator model when the electric control is implemented by using the calculation result by the generator state calculation unit 500. The stability determination unit 57 estimates whether or not the power system 1 is stable when the electric control is implemented by using the calculation result by the generator state calculation unit 500. When the stability determination unit 57 determines that the power system 1 is not stable even if the stability determination unit 57 performs the electric control, the additional electric control machine selection unit 58 selects the electric control machine to be subjected to the additional electric control. .. The processes performed by the output change estimation unit 55, the stability determination unit 57, and the additional electronic control machine selection unit 58 will be described in detail later.

The generator state calculation unit 500 includes an unstable side system calculation unit 52, a stable side system calculation unit 53, a phase angle deviation prediction unit 54, and a phase angle deviation recalculation unit 56.

Unstable side line calculation unit 52, a state of unstable generator group model, the active power deviation [Delta] P _G1 unstable generator group _model, and calculates a phase angle deviation .DELTA..delta ₁ unstable generator group model.

Specifically, as shown in (Equation 3), the unstable side system calculation unit 52 adds the active power P _Gi at time t of the generator 5 belonging to the unstable side system collected by the high-speed information collection unit 51. By doing so, the active power _PG1 (t) at time t of the unstable generator group model is calculated.

In (Equation 3), P _{G1 (t)} is the effective power of the unstable generator cloud model at the time when the predetermined time t from the time information collection start has elapsed, P _{Gi (t)} is a predetermined time from the time information collection start The active power of the generator 5 of the identification number i belonging to the unstable side system at the time when t has elapsed is shown. The identification number i (i = 0 to n) is a number that uniquely identifies the unstable generator. Further, n is an arbitrary natural number.

As shown in (Equation 4), the unstable side system calculation unit 52 is unable to reduce the active power of the unstable generator group model before the accident from the active power of the unstable generator group model at each time t. Calculate the active power deviation of the stable generator group model.

In (Equation 4), ΔP _G1 is the active power deviation of the unstable generator group model, and P _G1 (t) is the active power of the unstable generator group model at a predetermined time t from the start of information collection. _PG1 (0) indicates the active power of the unstable generator group model at the start of information collection (that is, before the accident occurs).

Further, the unstable side system calculation unit 52 calculates the phase angle deviation of the unstable generator group model by using (Equation 5).

In (Equation 5), Δδ ₁ indicates the phase angle deviation of the unstable generator group model, ΔP _G1 indicates the active power deviation of the unstable generator group model, and M ₁ indicates the inertial constant of the unstable generator group model. The inertial constant M ₁ of the unstable generator group model is calculated by the unstable side system model formulation unit 41. Note that (Equation 5) is calculated based on the equation of motion of the generator shown in (Equation 6).

In (Equation 6), M is the inertia constant of the generator, D is the damping coefficient, [delta] is the phase angle, P _m is the machine input, P _G indicates the active power of the generator. (Equation 5), be calculated by a zero damping coefficient D in Equation (6) (zero), the mechanical input P _m, the effective power P _{G (0)} of stable generator cloud model before the accident Can be done.

Stable side line calculation unit 53, stable as a state of the generator group model, the active power deviation ΔP of stable generator group model _G2, and calculates the phase angle deviation .DELTA..delta ₂ stable generator group model.

Specifically, the stable side system calculation unit 53 causes the regression model created by the stable side system model formulation unit 42 to input the bus voltage collected by the high-speed information collection unit 51, thereby causing the total load in the stable side system. To estimate. The stable side system calculation unit 53 divides the difference obtained by subtracting the active power _PG2 flowing to the stable side system at time t from the estimated total load in the stable side system, which is collected by the high-speed information collection unit 51, into the stable generator group. Let the active power of the model be _PG2 (t).

Stable side line calculation unit 53, as shown in (Equation 7), the stabilized generator group model in the calculated time t active power P _{G2 (t)} is available from the stable generator cloud model before the accident power P _G2 By reducing (0), the active power deviation ΔP _G2 of the stable generator group model is calculated.

In (Equation 7), ΔP _G2 is the active power deviation of the stable generator group model, and P _G2 (t) is the active power of the stable generator group model at a predetermined time t from the start of information collection, _PG2. (0) indicates the active power of the stable generator group model at the start of information collection (that is, before the accident occurs).

Further, the stable side system calculation unit 53 calculates the phase angle deviation Δδ ₂ of the stable generator group model by using (Equation 8).

In (Equation 8), Δδ ₂ indicates the phase angle deviation of the stable generator group model, ΔP _G2 indicates the active power deviation of the stable generator group model, and M ₂ indicates the inertial constant of the stable generator group model. The inertial constant M ₂ of the stable generator group model is calculated by the stable side system model formulation unit 42.

Phase angle difference predicting unit 54, as the state of the integrated generator model, the active power deviation [Delta] P G integrated generator _model, and calculates a phase angle deviation Δδ integrated generator model.

As shown in (Equation 9), the phase angle deviation prediction unit 54 is stable from the phase angle deviation Δδ ₁ (t) of the unstable generator group model at time t calculated by the unstable side system calculation unit 52. The phase angle deviation Δδ (t) of the integrated generator model at time t is calculated by reducing the phase angle deviation Δδ ₂ (t) of the stable generator group model at time t calculated by the side system calculation unit 53. ..

In (Equation 9), Δδ (t) is the phase angle deviation of the integrated generator model at time t, Δδ ₁ (t) is the phase angle deviation of the unstable generator group model at time t, and Δδ ₂ (t) is the time. The phase angle deviation of the stable generator group model at t is shown.

Further, the phase angle deviation prediction unit 54 approximates the time transition of the calculated phase angle deviation Δδ (t) of the integrated generator model with a quadratic function or the like to allow an arbitrary time from the end of information collection to an arbitrary time. Predict the predicted phase angle deviation Δδ'(t) {t = t3 ~} of the integrated generator model. Here, the time t3 is the time at the end of information collection.

The phase angle difference predicting unit 54, a high-speed information collection unit 51 information collection at the end of the (time t3) until the active power deviation ΔP of stable generator cloud model _{G2 (t),} the active power deviation of unstable generator group model by substituting [Delta] P _G1 (t) to (equation 10), is converted to the active power deviation [Delta] P _G integrated generator model.

Shown in (Equation 10), the active power deviation integrated generator model in [Delta] P _G (t) is time _{t (t = 0~t3), M} 1 is an inertia constant of the unstable generator group model. M ₂ indicates the inertial constant of the stable generator group model. Further, ΔP _G1 (t) is the active power deviation of the unstable generator group model at time t (t = 0 to t3), and ΔP _G2 (t) is the stable generator group model at time t (t = 0 to t3). Shows the active power deviation of.

Moreover, the phase angle deviation estimation unit 54, integrated generator model predictive phase angle deviation Δδ 'and from equation (11), definitive arbitrary time t after time t3, the predicted integrated generator model active power deviation [Delta] P _G' (T) is calculated.

In (Equation _{11), ΔP G '(t} ) time t predict the active power deviation integrated generator model in (t = t3 to), M is the inertia constant of integration generator model, .DELTA..delta' time t (t = The predicted phase angle deviation of the integrated generator model in t3 to) is shown. The inertial constant M of the integrated generator model is obtained by (Equation 12).

Output change estimation unit 55 estimates the reflecting active power deviation [Delta] P G _"integrated generator model reflecting the electronically controlled. Where the electronically controlled, the electric by the first electronically controlled machine system, and additional electronically controlled execution unit The electric control by the additional electric control machine selected by 50 is included. That is, the output change estimation unit 55 is not only after the electric control by the first electric control machine but also after the additional electric control is performed. it may be estimated active power deviation [Delta] P G _"integrated generator model. In will be described how to estimate the active power deviation [Delta] P G _"integrated generator model reflecting the electronically controlled by the first electronically controlled machine, be estimated in a similar manner may reflect the addition of the electronically controlled below Can be done.

Specifically, the output change estimation unit 55 sets the ratio of the short-circuit impedance of the stable side system generator calculated by the output change model formulation unit 44 to the active power before the accident occurs in the first electric control machine belonging to the stable side system. The value multiplied by is taken as the increase in active power of the unstable generator group model due to electronic control. The stable side system generator here refers to a generator belonging to the stable side system and corresponding to the first electric control machine.

The output change estimation unit 55 adds the amount of increase in the active power of the unstable generator group model due to the electronic control to the active power deviation ΔP _G1 of the unstable generator group model before reflecting the electronic control, thereby performing the electronic control. The reflected active power deviation ΔP _G1 ”(t) (t = t4 to t5) of the unstable generator group model reflecting the above is estimated. Here, at time t4, the electric control by the first electric controller was executed. Time. Time t5 is the time when the additional electronic control was executed.

In addition, in (Equation 3), the output change estimation unit 55 first, among the generators 5 belonging to the unstable side system, the active power deviation of the generator 5 excluding the generator 5 corresponding to the first electric control machine. By adding ΔP _Gi , the active power deviation ΔP _G1 # of the stable generator group model reflecting the electric control is calculated. Then, the output change estimation unit 55 adds the amount of increase in the active power of the unstable generator group model due to the electric control to the active power deviation ΔP _G1 # of the stable generator group model reflecting the electric control, thereby causing the electric control. The reflected active power deviation ΔP _G1 ”(t) (t = t4 to t5) of the unstable generator group model reflecting the above is estimated.

Further, the output change estimation unit 55 sets the ratio of the short-circuit impedance of the unstable side system generator calculated by the output change model formulation unit 44 to the active power before the accident occurs in the first electric control machine belonging to the unstable side system. The value multiplied by is taken as the increase in active power of the stable generator group model due to the electric control. The unstable side system generator here indicates a generator belonging to the unstable side system and corresponding to the first electric control machine.

The output change estimation unit 55 reflects the electric control by adding the increase in the active power of the stable generator group model due to the electric control to the active power deviation ΔP _G2 of the stable generator group model before reflecting the electric control. Estimate the reflected active power deviation ΔP _G2 ”(t) (t = t4 to t5) of the stable generator group model.

Then, the output change estimation unit 55 uses the inertial constant M ₁ ”of the unstable generator group model reflecting the electric control by the first electric controller, the inertial constant M ₂ of the stable generator group model, and the unstable generator group. Reflected active power deviation ΔP _G1 "(t) of the model, reflected active power deviation ΔP _G2 " (t) of the stable generator group model and (Equation 13), integrated power generation reflecting the electric control by the first electric controller calculating a reflection of the machine model active power deviation _{ΔP G "(t) (t} = t4~t5).

In (Equation 13), ΔP _G1 "(t) is the reflected active power deviation of the integrated generator model at time t, and M ₁ " is the inertial constant of the unstable generator group model reflecting the electric control by the first electric controller. , M ₂ is the inertial constant of the stable generator group model, ΔP _G1 "(t) is the reflected active power deviation of the unstable generator group model, and ΔP _G2 " (t) is the reflected active power deviation of the stable generator group model. Shown. The inertial constant M ₁ "of the unstable generator group model reflecting the electric control by the first electric control machine is, for example, in (Equation 1), among the generators 5 belonging to the unstable side system, the first electric control machine. It is calculated by adding the inertial constants of the generator 5 excluding the generator 5 corresponding to.

The phase angle deviation recalculation unit 56 estimates the reflected phase angle deviation Δδ ”of the integrated generator model that reflects the electronic control. The phase angle deviation recalculation unit 56 estimates the integrated generator calculated by the output change estimation unit 55. model reflection of the active power deviation [Delta] P _G to "a (t) (t = t4 to t5), because the equation (14), reflecting the phase angle deviation Δδ integrated generator model" (t) (t = t4 to t5) calculate.

In (Equation 14), Δδ "(t) is the phase angle deviation reflecting the integrated generator model at time t, M" is inertia constant of integration generator model reflecting the electronically controlled by the first electrical control unit, [Delta] P _G " (T) indicates the estimated active power deviation of the integrated generator model at time t. Here, the inertial constant M "of the integrated generator model is unstable, which is reduced by the amount of the generator selected for the first electric control. It can be obtained from the inertial constants M ₁ "of the generator group model and (Equation 12).

From the above, when separated by time, the phase angle deviation Δδ and the phase angle deviation prediction unit 54 calculated by the phase angle deviation prediction unit 54 from the start of information collection (time t0) to the end of information collection (time t3) are predicted. Predicted phase angle deviation Δδ'from the end of information collection (time t3) to the execution of electronic control by the first electronic control machine (time t4), the first electric control machine calculated by the phase angle deviation recalculation unit 56 The reflected phase angle deviation Δδ ”after the execution of the electronic control according to (time t4 to) is obtained, and the time transition of the phase angle deviation of the integrated generator model is obtained by arranging these in the order of passage of time (see the lower part of FIG. 3).

The stability determination unit 57 includes the reflected phase angle deviation Δδ of the integrated generator model calculated by the phase angle deviation recalculation unit 56 and the phase angle deviation threshold Δδ of the integrated generator model calculated by the determination standard formulation unit 43. _The stability determination unit 57 determines that the maximum value of the reflected phase angle deviation Δδ ”is stable if it is below the phase angle deviation threshold Δδ _th, and unstable if it is above it.

The additional electric control machine selection unit 58 is based on the coefficient (impedance ratio) calculated by the output change model formulation unit 44, and is selected from the generators 5 that are candidates for additional electric control at the time of electric control. The one with the largest change in active power is selected as the target electric controller for additional electronic control.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a flow of processing performed by the additional electronic control execution unit 50 of the embodiment.
In step S1, the high-speed information collecting unit 51 acquires system information at a designated time. The designated time is a predetermined time interval including the time when an accident occurs, and is a time interval from the start of information collection (time t0) to the end of information collection (time t3). The high-speed information collecting unit 51 outputs the acquired system information at the designated time to the generator state calculation unit 500.

In step S2, the unstable side system calculation unit 52 calculates the phase angle deviation Δδ ₁ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the unstable generator group model. The unstable side system calculation unit 52 sets the active power deviation ΔP _G1 (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the unstable generator group model calculated from the system information and the inertial constant M ₁ of the unstable generator group model. Based on this, the phase angle deviation Δδ ₁ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the unstable generator group model is calculated, and the calculation result is output to the phase angle deviation prediction unit 54.

First, the stable side system calculation unit 53 calculates the phase angle deviation Δδ ₂ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the stable generator group model. Then, the stable side system calculation unit 53 is based on the active power deviation ΔP _G2 (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the stable generator group model estimated from the regression model and the inertial constant M ₂ of the stable generator group model. Then, the phase angle deviation Δδ ₂ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the stable generator group model is calculated, and the calculation result is output to the phase angle deviation prediction unit 54.

In step S3, the phase angle deviation prediction unit 54 determines the phase angle deviation Δδ ₁ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the unstable generator group model and the phase angle deviation Δδ ₂ (t) of the stable generator group model. Using (t = t0 to t3), the phase angle deviation Δδ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the integrated generator model is calculated.

In step S4, the phase angle deviation estimation unit 54, thereby calculating the effective power difference [Delta] P _G integrated generator model (t) (t = t0~t3) , the predicted active power deviation [Delta] P _G integrated generator model '( t) (t = t3 ~) is predicted.

First, the phase angle deviation prediction unit 54 determines the active power deviation ΔP _G1 (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the unstable generator group model and the active power deviation ΔP _G2 (t) (t) of the stable generator group model. = T0 to t3) is used to calculate the active power deviation ΔP (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the integrated generator model. Next, the phase angle deviation prediction unit 54 uses the phase angle deviation Δδ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the integrated generator model calculated in step S3, and uses an approximate curve by a function such as a quadratic function. By doing so, the predicted phase angle deviation Δδ'(t) (t = t3 ~) of the integrated generator model is predicted. Then, the phase angle deviation estimation unit 54, 'with (t) (t = t3 to), the predicted active power deviation [Delta] P _G integrated generator models' prediction phase angle deviation Δδ integrated generator model (t) ( t = t3 ~) is calculated.

In step S5, the output change estimation unit 55 calculates reflect active power deviation [Delta] P G integrated generator model that reflects the electrically controlled by the first electrically-controlled machine _{"to (t) (t = t4~)} . Time t4 Is the time when the electric control by the first electric control machine is executed.

First, the output change estimation unit 55 adds the amount of increase in the active power of the unstable generator group model due to the electric control, so that the reflected active power deviation of the unstable generator group model ΔP _G1 ”(t) (t = t4). ~ T5) is calculated. Next, the output change estimation unit 55 adds the amount of increase in the active power of the stable generator group model due to the electric control to reflect the effective power deviation ΔP _G2 of the stable generator group model ”(. t) (t = t4 to t5) is calculated. Then, the output change estimation unit 55 uses the reflected active power deviation ΔP _G1 ”(t) (t = t4 to t5) of the unstable generator group model and the reflected active power deviation ΔP _G2 ” (t) of the stable generator group model. (t = t4 to t5) is used to calculate the reflection of integrated generator model active power deviation _{ΔP G "(t) (t} = t4~t5).

In step S6, the phase angle deviation recalculating unit 56 uses the reflected active power deviation [Delta] P _G of the calculated integrated generator model in step S5 "(t) (t = t4~t5), the first electrically controlled machine The reflected phase angle deviation Δδ ”(t) (t = t4 to t5) of the integrated generator model reflecting the electric power control according to the above is recalculated.

In step S7, the stability determination unit 57 compares the reflected phase angle deviation Δδ ”(t) (t = t4 to t5) of the integrated generator model recalculated in step S6 with the phase angle deviation threshold Δδ _th . Thereby, it is determined whether or not the power system 1 is stabilized by the electric control. In the stability determination unit 57, the reflected phase angle deviation Δδ ”(t) (t = t4 to t5) of the integrated generator model is the phase angle. It is determined that the power system 1 is stable when the deviation threshold is below Δδ _th, and it is determined that the power system 1 is not stable when the deviation threshold is exceeded. If it is determined in step S7 that the electronic control is stable, the process proceeds to step S10, and if it is determined that the electronic control is not stable, the process proceeds to step S8.

In step S8, the additional electronic control machine selection unit 58 selects the additional electronic control machine. The additional electric control machine selection unit 58 selects the generator 5 having the largest change in active power during electric control as the additional electric control machine from the generators 5 that are candidates for the additional electric control machine. Candidates for the additional electric control machine are, for example, a generator 5 belonging to the unstable side system and not corresponding to the first electric control machine.

In step S9, the output change estimation unit 55, reflecting the active power deviation [Delta] P G integrated generator models that reflect by electronically controlled selected additional electronically controlled press in Step _{S8 "(t) (t =} t5~) calculating the. time t5 is the time when the additional electrically controlled is executed. output change estimation unit 55 uses the processing by the same method as shown in step S5, reflecting the integrated generator model active power deviation [Delta] P G _"( t) (t = t5) is calculated.

In step S10, the stability determination unit 57 sends a cutoff command to the control terminal 12 of the generator 5 corresponding to the electric control machine determined to be stable by the electric control. Here, the generator 5 subject to electronic control is the first electric control machine or the first electric control machine and the additional electric control machine when an additional electric control machine is selected. As a result, the corresponding generator 5 is disconnected from the power system 1. When the first electronic control unit is disconnected from the power system 1, the stability determination unit 57 sends a cutoff command to the control terminal 12 of the first electronic control unit via the first stage electronic control unit 36.

In the flowchart shown in FIG. 2, the order of processing in step S1 and step S2 may be changed.

Moreover, the phase angle deviation estimation unit 54, the effective power difference [Delta] P _G of the calculated integrated electric generator model (t) (t = t0~t3) , and the predicted active power deviation [Delta] P _G integrated generator model '(t) ( Scale adjustment may be performed for t = t3 to).

For example, a combination of the active power deviation [Delta] P _G integrated generator model (t) (t = t0~t3) to the phase angle deviation Δδ integrated generator model corresponding (t) (t = t0~t3), the phase When the angular deviation Δδ rearranges such that ascending, active power deviation [Delta] P _G is the parabolic trajectory. The phase angle difference predicting unit 54, so that the maximum value of active power deviation [Delta] P _G in the parabolic trajectory is larger than the maximum value of active power deviations created by criterion established unit 43 only, the same value Adjust the scale.

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a process performed by the additional electronic control execution unit 50 of the embodiment. FIG. 3 shows the time-series changes in the active power deviation and the phase angle deviation of the generator 5. Time t0 is the time when information collection is started, time t1 is the time when an accident occurs (accident occurs), and time t2 is when the accident is eliminated (accident). (Removal), time t3 is when information collection is completed (measurement is completed), time t4 is when electronic control is executed by the first electric control machine (first electric control), and time t5 is when additional electric control is executed (additional electric control). Is shown.

In the upper part of FIG. 3, the active power deviation ΔP _G2 (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the stable generator group model is a solid line, and the predicted active power deviation ΔP _G2 '(t) (t =) of the stable generator group model. t3 ~) is shown by a broken line, and the reflected active power deviation ΔP _G2 ”(t) (t = t4 to t5) of the stable generator group model is shown by a single point broken line. In this example, stable power generation occurs when an accident occurs. In the machine group model, the active power decreases slightly, recovers to the state before the accident occurred by eliminating the accident, and the active power increases slightly after the accident is eliminated. Also, the active power increased after the accident is eliminated gradually decreases. As expected, the active power is expected to increase slightly each time the electric control is performed.

The second stage from the top in FIG. 3, the effective power difference [Delta] P of unstable generator group model _{G1 (t) (t = t0~t3} ) is solid, the prediction of the unstable generator group model active power deviation [Delta] P _G1 ' (T) (t = t3 ~) is shown by a broken line, and the reflected active power deviation ΔP _G1 ”(t) (t = t4 to t5) of the unstable generator group model is shown by a single point broken line. In this example, an accident. In the event of an unstable generator group model, the active power drops significantly, recovers to a level that is slightly lower than the state before the accident due to accident elimination, and after the accident is eliminated, the active power starts to increase. It is expected that the active power will gradually decrease every time the electric control is performed after the accident is eliminated, and then gradually decrease.

The third stage from the top in FIG. 3, the effective power difference [Delta] P _G integrated generator model (t) (t = t0~t3) is solid, the predicted active power deviation [Delta] P _G integrated generator model '(t) ( t = t3 to) by the broken line, reflect the active power deviation [Delta] P _G integrated generator model "(t) (t = t4~t5 ) is shown by dashed line. in this example, if an accident occurs, integration In the generator model, the active power drops significantly, recovers to the extent that it drops slightly from the state before the accident by removing the accident, increases the active power after removing the accident, and then gradually drops after being maintained for a certain period of time. In addition, it is predicted that the active power will increase every time the electric control is performed after the accident is eliminated, and then gradually decrease.

In the lower part of FIG. 3, the phase angle deviation Δδ ₂ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the stable generator group model is shown by a solid line. In addition, the phase angle deviation Δδ ₁ of the unstable generator group model is shown by a solid line. The phase angle deviation Δδ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the integrated generator model is a solid line, the predicted phase angle deviation Δδ'(t) (t = t3 ~) of the integrated generator model is a broken line, and the integrated generator. The reflected phase angle deviation Δδ ”(t) (t = t4 to t5) of the model is indicated by a single point dashed line. In this example, when an accident occurs, the phase angle deviation increases slightly in the stable generator group model. Although it decreases due to accident elimination, the degree of change is small and the phase angle deviation is stable without expansion. On the other hand, in the unstable generator group model, the phase angle immediately after the accident occurs. Although the deviation increases sharply and the degree of increase decreases slightly due to accident elimination, the phase angle deviation remains large. In the integrated generator model, it is predicted that the phase angle deviation will continue to increase after the information collection is completed. However, it is predicted that the degree of increase in the phase angle deviation will decrease each time the electric control is applied, and the phase angle deviation will decrease after the additional electric control is executed.

As described above, the system stabilizer 20 of the embodiment includes a stability evaluation model generation unit 40 and an additional electronic control execution unit 50 (second selection unit) in addition to the conventional electronic control execution unit 30. .. The stability evaluation model generation unit 40 evaluates the degree of stability in the generator 5 provided in the power system 1 by using the variables used in the process (first process) in the electronic control execution unit 30. Generate an evaluation model. The additional electronic control execution unit 50 uses the system information acquired in a cycle (second cycle) earlier than the cycle (first cycle) in which the processing in the electronic control execution unit 30 is performed, and the stability evaluation model to be next. Evaluate the degree of stability of the generator when the electric control by the first electric control machine is executed before the processing timing (next first cycle) by the electric control execution unit 30 of the above is reached, and based on the evaluation result. Select the electronic control machine (second electronic control machine) that is the target of the additional electronic control. As a result, the system stabilizer 20 of the embodiment responds to the sudden change in the power state of the power system 1 in a cycle earlier than the cycle in which the processing in the electronic control execution unit 30 is performed. It is possible to select an appropriate electric control machine, and to stabilize the power system 1 by performing additional electric control.

Further, in the system stabilization device 20 of the embodiment, the additional electronic control execution unit 50 includes a high-speed information collection unit 51, a generator state calculation unit 500, an output change estimation unit 55, and a stability determination unit 57. It has an electronic control machine selection unit 58. The high-speed information collecting unit 51 collects system information in a predetermined time interval (time t0 to time t3) in a cycle earlier than the cycle in which processing is performed by the electronic control execution unit 30. The generator state calculation unit 500 calculates the phase angle deviation Δδ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the integrated generator model, and the predicted phase angle deviation Δδ'(t) (t = t3) of the integrated generator model. ~) Is predicted. Output change estimation unit 55 uses the calculation result of the power generator state calculating section 500, due to the electrical control is performed, reflecting the integrated generator model active power deviation [Delta] P G a _{(t) (t} = _t4~) presume. The stability determination unit 57 executes the electric control using the reflected phase angle deviation Δδ ”(t) (t = t4 to) of the integrated generator model calculated based on the estimation result by the output change estimation unit 55. By doing so, it is determined whether or not the power system 1 is stable. When the stability determination unit 57 determines that the power system 1 is not stable, the additional electric control device selection unit 58 determines whether or not the power system 1 is stable. As a result, in the system stabilizer 20 of the embodiment, whether or not the power system 1 is stabilized by executing the electric control is determined by using the calculation result of calculating the time-series change of the generator 5. It is possible to judge.

Further, in the system stabilization device 20 of the embodiment, the generator state calculation unit 500 includes the unstable side system calculation unit 52, the stable side system calculation unit 53, the phase angle deviation prediction unit 54, and the phase angle deviation recalculation. It has a part 56. The unstable side system calculation unit 52 calculates the phase angle deviation Δδ ₁ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the unstable generator group model based on the system information collected by the high-speed information collection unit 51. The stable side system calculation unit 53 calculates the phase angle deviation Δδ ₂ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the stable generator group model based on the system information collected by the high-speed information collection unit 51. The phase angle deviation prediction unit 54 uses the phase angle deviation Δδ ₁ (t) (t = t0 to t3) of the unstable generator group model and the phase angle deviation Δδ ₂ (t) (t = t0 to 0) of the stable generator group model. Using t3), the predicted phase angle deviation Δδ'(t) (t = t3 to) of the integrated generator model is predicted. The phase angle deviation recalculation unit 56 uses the predicted phase angle deviation Δδ'(t) (t = t3 to) of the integrated generator model to reflect the reflected phase angle deviation of the integrated generator model when the electronic control is executed. Δδ ”(t) (t = t4 ~) is calculated. As a result, in the system stabilizer 20 of the embodiment, the reflected phase angle deviation Δδ” (t) of the integrated generator model when the electronic control is executed. It is possible to quantitatively determine whether or not the power system 1 is stable by using (t = t4 to).

Further, in the system stabilizer 20 of the embodiment, the stability evaluation model generation unit 40 includes the unstable side system model formulation unit 41, the stable side system model formulation unit 42, the determination standard formulation unit 43, and the output change model. It has a formulation department 44. The unstable side system model formulation unit 41 creates an unstable generator group model by using the calculation result obtained by the processing in the electronic control execution unit 30. The stable side system model formulation unit 42 creates a stable generator group model by using the calculation result obtained by the processing in the electronic control execution unit 30. The determination standard development unit 43 creates a phase angle deviation threshold value Δδ _th for determining whether or not the power system is stabilized by executing the electric control. The output change model formulation unit 44 creates a coefficient representing the time-series change of the information regarding the active power of the generator 5. As a result, the system stabilizer 20 of the embodiment can calculate the time-series change in the power state of each model using the unstable side system model, the stable side system model, and the coefficient. Further, using the phase angle deviation threshold value Δδ _th , it is possible to determine whether or not the power system is stabilized by executing the electric control.

Further, in the system stabilizer 20 of the embodiment, the stable side system model formulation unit 42 uses the calculation result obtained by the processing in the electronic control execution unit 30 to obtain information on the active power in the regression model (stable generator group model). Create a function that represents a series change). As a result, the system stabilizer 20 of the embodiment can calculate the time-series change of the active power of the stable generator group model even when the system information of the stable side system cannot be directly acquired.

Further, in the system stabilizer 20 of the embodiment, the stable side system model formulation unit 42 changes the time-series change of the active power of the generator 5 due to the execution of the electric control when the electric control is executed. A coefficient is created to represent each of the stepwise change (first change) and the gradual change (second change) after the electric control is executed. As a result, in the system stabilizer 20 of the embodiment, it is possible to accurately calculate the time-series change of the active power of the generator 5 when the electric control is executed.

According to at least one embodiment described above, the additional electronic control execution unit 50 uses the stability evaluation model created by the stability evaluation model generation unit 40 to generate the generator 5 when the electric control is executed. Evaluate the degree of stability, and select the target electric control machine for additional electric control based on the evaluation result. As a result, the system stabilizer 20 of the embodiment responds to the sudden change in the power state of the power system 1 in a cycle earlier than the cycle in which the processing in the electronic control execution unit 30 is performed. You can select the appropriate electric control machine.

In the above-described embodiment, an example of determining whether or not the power system 1 is stabilized by electric control using the phase angle deviation Δδ of the integrated generator model has been shown, but the present invention is not limited to this. Whether or not it is stable may be determined by using the phase angle (δ0 + Δδ) obtained by adding the initial phase angle δ0 before the accident to the phase angle deviation Δδ. In that case, the phase angle deviation threshold value Δδ _th of the integrated generator model obtained by the determination standard formulation unit 43 is obtained by adding the initial phase angle value δ0.

Further, in the above, an example is shown in which the high-speed information collecting unit 51 ends the collection of information before the execution of the electronic control by the first electronic control machine, but the present invention is not limited to this. Information may be collected by the high-speed information collecting unit 51 until after the execution of the electronic control by the first electronic control machine. In that case, the active power deviation ΔP _G1 (t) (t = t14 to) of the unstable generator group model due to the execution of the electric control by the first electric control machine is calculated based on the information of the high-speed information collecting unit 51. .. Here, the time t14 is the time when the electronic control by the first electronic control machine is executed, and the information collection time is the time after the time t14.

Further, in the above, with respect to a certain value (threshold value), the terms "when the threshold value is not exceeded" and "when the threshold value is not exceeded" include a case where the value is less than the threshold value and a case where the value is below the threshold value. You can. It may be arbitrarily determined in the power transmission system whether the case where the threshold value is not exceeded or the case where the threshold value is below the threshold value is below the threshold value or below the threshold value. The same applies to the words "when the threshold is exceeded" and "when the threshold is exceeded".

Although some embodiments of the present invention have been described, these embodiments are presented as examples and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. These embodiments can be implemented in various other forms, and various omissions, replacements, and changes can be made without departing from the gist of the invention. These embodiments and modifications thereof are included in the scope and gist of the invention as well as the invention described in the claims and the equivalent scope thereof.

1 ... Power system, 2 ... Bus line, 3 ... Transmission line, 4 ... Transformer, 5 ... Generator, 6 ... Circuit breaker, 10 ... Transmission system, 20 ... System stabilizer, 11 ... Information terminal, 12 ... Control terminal , 30 ... Electronic control execution unit, 40 ... Stability evaluation model generation unit, 50 ... Additional electronic control execution unit

Claims (6)

A collection unit that collects system information about the power system,
A system model creation unit that creates a system model based on the system information collected by the collection unit,
A calculation unit that calculates transient stability in the event of an assumed accident in the power system using the system model that reflects the power flow value flowing through the power system.
Based on the calculation result obtained by the calculation unit, the first selection unit that selects the first electronic control machine to be electronically controlled for each assumed accident, and
Based on the system information collected by the collecting unit, the calculation result by the calculation unit, and the variables used in the process of processing by the first selection unit, the degree of stability in the generator provided in the power system is determined. Stability evaluation model creation unit that creates a stability evaluation model to be evaluated,
With
The collection unit, the system model creation unit, the calculation unit, the first selection unit, and the stability evaluation model creation unit operate in the first cycle.
Using the stability evaluation model and the system information collected in the second cycle shorter than the first cycle, the stability degree of the generator when the electric control by the first electric control machine is executed is determined. Before the first cycle elapses from the operation time of the system model creation unit, the calculation unit, the first selection unit, and the stability evaluation model creation unit that led to the selection of the first electronic controller. The second selection unit, which evaluates to and selects the second electronic control machine to be additionally controlled based on the evaluation result.
Further prepare
System stabilizer. The second selection unit is
A high-speed information collecting unit that collects the system information in a predetermined time section in the second cycle, and
Information on the phase angle of the integrated generator model using the integrated generator model that integrates the generators, which was created as the stability evaluation model based on the system information collected by the high-speed information collecting unit. The generator state calculation unit that calculates the time-series change of the time interval in the above and predicts the time-series change after the time interval in the information on the phase angle of the integrated generator model based on the calculation result.
An output change estimation unit that estimates the time-series change of information on the active power of the integrated generator model due to the execution of electric control using the calculation result by the generator state calculation unit.
Whether or not the power system is stabilized by executing electronic control using the time-series change of the information on the phase angle of the integrated generator model calculated based on the estimation result by the output change estimation unit. Stability determination unit for determination and
The system stabilizing device according to claim 1, further comprising an additional electric control device selection unit that selects the second electric control device when the stability determination unit determines that the power system is not stable. The generator state calculation unit
Unstable power generation, which is a set of the generators that can be unstable with respect to the assumed accident, created as the stability evaluation model based on the system information collected by the high-speed information collecting unit. An unstable side system calculation unit that calculates the time-series change of information on the phase angle of the unstable generator group model using the unstable generator group model in which the machine group is converted into one generator.
Stable power generation, which is a set of the generators that can maintain stability against the assumed accident, created as the stability evaluation model based on the system information collected by the high-speed information collecting unit. Using the stable generator group model in which the machine group is converted into one generator, the stable side system calculation unit that calculates the time-series change of the information on the phase angle of the stable generator group model, and
Using the time-series change of the information about the phase angle of the stable generator group model and the time-series change of the information about the phase angle of the unstable generator group model, the time-series change of the information about the phase angle of the integrated generator model. Phase angle deviation prediction unit that predicts
Electric control using the time-series change of the information about the active power of the integrated generator model calculated by using the estimation result by the output change estimation unit and the time-series change of the information about the phase angle of the integrated generator model. The phase angle deviation recalculation unit that calculates the time series change of the information about the phase angle of the integrated generator model when
The system stabilizer according to claim 2. The stability evaluation model creation unit
As the stability evaluation model, an unstable generator group model in which an unstable generator group, which is a set of the generators that can be unstable with respect to the assumed accident among the generators, is converted into one generator is used. The unstable side system model development department to be created and
As the stability evaluation model, a stable generator group model is created by converting a stable generator group, which is a set of the generators capable of maintaining stability against the assumed accident among the generators, into one generator. Stable side system model development department and
A judgment standard formulation department that creates a threshold value for judging whether or not the power system is stabilized by executing electronic control, and
The output change model development department that creates a coefficient representing the time-series change of the information on the active power of the generator, and
The system stabilizer according to claim 1. The stable side system model development unit creates a function representing the time-series change of the system information and the information on the active power in the stable generator group model as the stability evaluation model.
The system stabilizer according to claim 4. The output change model formulation department describes the change in the active power of the generator due to the execution of the electric control, the first change which is the change when the electric control is executed, and the change after the electric control is executed. Create a function indicating each of the second changes, which are changes in which the amount of change per unit time is smaller than that of the first change.
The system stabilizer according to claim 4 or 5.

Images