JP2019212315A - Method, program, device, and system for evaluating legal sentence - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide a technique for accurately and rapidly evaluating a legal document while clarifying the point.SOLUTION: The method for evaluating a legal sentence equipped in a computer includes: an input step (SQ101) in which a server terminal receives an input of a legal sentence from a user terminal; a reading step SQ102 in which evaluation range information related to the evaluation range of the legal sentence and the evaluation rule of the legal sentence are read; an evaluation step SQ104 in which the range of the legal sentence which corresponds to at least the evaluation range information is evaluated on the basis of the evaluation rule; a step SQ108 in which a modification plan is generated on the basis of the evaluation; and an output step S110 in which the result is output.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 6

Description

  The present invention relates to a legal text evaluation method, a legal text evaluation program, a legal text evaluation device, and a legal text evaluation system.

  Legal documents that stipulate legal relationships between multiple parties, including contracts and terms of use, are determined based on various factors such as the type of legal relationship, as well as the power balance between the parties and the purpose of contract conclusion. It is done. On the other hand, legal documents are stipulated in the background of the existence of various rules such as government ordinances, various guidelines, and business customs as well as laws, and if you do not fully understand their specialized knowledge, It is very difficult to judge whether the content is advantageous or disadvantageous.

  Therefore, as described above, the judgment (review) of whether or not the content of a legal document with a high degree of expertise is advantageous to oneself is usually made based on the judgment of experts such as lawyers. It was very difficult to ask such an expert to review all legal documents in terms of time and financial costs. Furthermore, since these reviews depend on the human resources and expertise of legal professionals, it was difficult to stably obtain homogeneous review results.

  Various attempts have been made so far to solve such problems. Specifically, as described below, a legal document is digitized, read by a computer, scored by clause, and the result is output to the user. A technique for easily grasping the risk is known (see Patent Document 1).

US Published Patent Publication No. 2016/0232630

  On the other hand, for those who have a certain degree of legal knowledge, or want to evaluate legal documents in a short time, and want to receive an evaluation in consideration of the priority of the evaluation target after clearly understanding and understanding the issues Needs also exist.

  Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a technique that can be performed speedily and accurately while clarifying the issues regarding the evaluation of legal documents.

According to the present invention, there is provided a legal text evaluation method for evaluating legal text implemented by a computer,
An input step for receiving input of the legal text;
A step of reading out the evaluation range information on the evaluation range of the legal text and the evaluation rule of the legal text;
An evaluation step for evaluating a range corresponding to at least the evaluation range information of the legal text based on the evaluation rule;
An output step for outputting the evaluation;
A legal text evaluation method is obtained.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to improve the efficiency of business by picking up the evaluation object in advance and clarifying the points to be evaluated and the clauses to be evaluated.

It is a figure which shows the structural example of the legal text evaluation system by embodiment of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the server terminal of FIG. It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the user terminal of FIG. It is a figure which shows the function structure of the server terminal of FIG. It is a figure which shows the function structure of the user terminal of FIG. It is a flowchart which shows the rough flow of a process of the legal text evaluation system of FIG. It is an example of a screen displayed on the user terminal side of the legal text evaluation system according to the embodiment of the present invention. It is the other example of a screen displayed on the user terminal side of the legal text evaluation system by embodiment of this invention. It is the other example of a screen displayed on the user terminal side of the legal text evaluation system by embodiment of this invention. It is the other example of a screen displayed on the user terminal side of the legal text evaluation system by embodiment of this invention. It is the other example of a screen displayed on the user terminal side of the legal text evaluation system by embodiment of this invention. It is the other example of a screen displayed on the user terminal side of the legal text evaluation system by embodiment of this invention.

The contents of the embodiment of the present invention will be listed and described. A legal text evaluation method, a legal text evaluation program, a legal text evaluation device, and a legal text evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention have the following configurations.
[Item 1]
A legal text evaluation method for evaluating legal text implemented by a computer,
An input step for receiving input of the legal text;
A step of reading out the evaluation range information on the evaluation range of the legal text and the evaluation rule of the legal text;
An evaluation step for evaluating a range corresponding to at least the evaluation range information of the legal text based on the evaluation rule;
An output step for outputting the evaluation;
Including legal text evaluation methods.
[Item 2]
A method for evaluating legal text as described in item 1,
A registration step of accepting registration of the evaluation range information;
Legal text evaluation method.
[Item 3]
The method of evaluating legal texts according to item 2,
In the registration step, the evaluation range information is registered in terms of clauses that can be included in the legal text.
Legal text evaluation method.
[Item 4]
The legal text evaluation method according to any one of Items 1 to 3,
In the evaluation step, when there is no range corresponding to the evaluation range information in the input legal text, an evaluation to that effect is performed.
Legal text evaluation method.
[Item 5]
The legal text evaluation method according to any one of Items 1 to 4,
A correction step of proposing a correction proposal based on the evaluation;
Legal text evaluation method.
[Item 6]
The legal text evaluation method according to any one of Items 1 to 5,
The evaluation rule includes a rule for determining whether or not the content is advantageous for a user of the legal text using a score.
Legal text evaluation method.
[Item 7]
The method of evaluating legal texts according to item 6,
Receiving superiority information regarding at least parties of the legal text;
A correction step of correcting the score based on the superiority information;
Legal text evaluation method including
[Item 8]
The legal text evaluation method according to any one of Items 1 to 7,
The output step displays and outputs the evaluation in association with a range corresponding to the evaluation range information together with display content using at least one element of color, size, and shape [Item 9]
A legal text evaluation program for causing a computer to execute the method according to any one of Items 1 to 8.
[Item 10]
A legal text evaluation server that evaluates legal text,
A storage unit that holds evaluation range information regarding an evaluation range of the legal text; and an evaluation rule for the legal text;
An input unit for receiving input of the legal text;
A reading unit for reading out the evaluation range information and the evaluation rule;
An evaluation unit that evaluates at least a range corresponding to the evaluation range information of the legal text based on the evaluation rule;
An output unit for outputting the evaluation;
A legal text evaluation device.
[Item 11]
A legal text evaluation system for evaluating legal text, including a user terminal and a server terminal,
The server terminal is:
A storage unit that holds evaluation range information regarding the evaluation range of the legal text and an evaluation rule for the legal text;
Accepting input of the legal text from the user terminal;
Reading the evaluation range information and the evaluation rule;
Evaluating a range corresponding to the evaluation range information based on the evaluation rule;
Outputting the evaluation,
Legal text evaluation system.

<Details of the embodiment>
Hereinafter, a legal text evaluation method, a legal text evaluation program, a legal text evaluation apparatus, and a legal text evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings, taking a legal text evaluation system (hereinafter referred to as “the present system”) as an example. While explaining. In the accompanying drawings, the same or similar elements are denoted by the same or similar reference numerals, and redundant description of the same or similar elements may be omitted in the description of each embodiment. Further, the features shown in each embodiment can be applied to other embodiments as long as they do not contradict each other.

<Overview>
This system is a system for evaluating document files including legal texts such as contracts, and in particular, sets an evaluation range (hereinafter also referred to as “review points”) to be reviewed in advance. Thus, the present invention relates to a technology that can shorten the time required for confirming a contract or the like. For example, in the evaluation of contracts and the like, each person in charge or an external expert performs evaluation based on the company's own evaluation policy (the provisions here can be concessioned / cannot concession, etc.). In this case, the evaluation policy is often different depending on the company. As in the present embodiment, by picking up an evaluation target, it is possible to automatically perform an evaluation that matches the evaluation policy of the company's legal text. Further, in the case of a contract including a large number of clauses, it becomes possible to improve the efficiency of operations by narrowing down and clarifying clauses (issues) that need to be considered more carefully.

  The evaluation targets of the present invention include contracts, terms of use, notices, etc., and all documents including laws and other legal texts, as well as other documents submitted to other administrative agencies. . Furthermore, it can be applied to any document that sells, including the advantages / disadvantages / advantages / advantages / rights / obligations of the parties.

  In this embodiment, the direct object of evaluation is defined as “legal text”, but the input to the system can be the entire legal document (document file etc.) including the legal text. .

  FIG. 1 is an overall schematic diagram of the present system. The system 1 includes a server terminal 100 and a user terminal 200. Server terminal 100 is connected to user terminal 200 via network 50. In order to simplify the description, only one user terminal is shown in FIG. 1, but the present invention is not limited to this, and two or more user terminals may be used.

  In this system, when a document file including legal text is transmitted from the user terminal 200 to the server terminal 100, the server terminal 100 performs a legal evaluation, and the evaluation result is transmitted to the user terminal 200.

  With reference to FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, the outline | summary of the hardware constitutions of the server terminal 100 and the user terminal 200 is demonstrated. A server terminal 100 shown in FIG. 2 is an information processing apparatus for providing a service through an application, and may be a general-purpose computer such as a workstation or a personal computer, or may be logically realized by cloud computing. May be. The server terminal 100 includes a processor 10, a memory 11, a storage 12, a communication interface (IF) 13, an input / output unit 14, and the like, which are electrically connected to each other through a bus 15.

  The processor 10 is an arithmetic device that controls the operation of the entire server terminal 100, performs control of data transmission / reception between elements, and performs information processing necessary for execution of an application. For example, the processor 10 is a CPU (Central Processing Unit), and executes information processing by executing a program or the like stored in the storage 12 and expanded in the memory 11.

  The memory 11 includes a main memory composed of a volatile storage device such as a DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory) and an auxiliary memory composed of a nonvolatile storage device such as a flash memory or an HDD (Hard Disc Drive). . The memory 11 is used as a work area of the processor 10 and stores a basic input / output system (BIOS) executed when the server terminal 100 is activated, various setting information, and the like. The storage 12 stores various programs such as an application program and a user authentication program. A database that stores data used for each process of the application may be constructed in the storage 12.

  The communication interface 13 connects the server terminal 100 to the network 400 and communicates with the user terminal 200. The input / output unit 14 is an information input device such as a mouse or a keyboard, and an output device such as a display. The bus 15 is connected in common to each of the above elements and transmits, for example, an address signal, a data signal, and various control signals.

  The user terminal 200 shown in FIG. 3 also includes a processor 20, a memory 21, a storage 22, a communication interface (IF) 23, an input / output unit 14, and the like, which are electrically connected to each other through a bus 15. . Since the function of each element can be configured similarly to the server terminal 100 described above, detailed description of each element is omitted.

  The functional configuration of the system 1 will be described with reference to FIGS. 4 and 5.

  FIG. 4 is an exemplary block diagram mainly showing functions implemented in the server terminal 100. The server terminal 100 includes a communication unit 110, a determination unit 130, a registration unit 150, an application unit 170, and a storage unit 190, and interacts with each other. The determination unit 130 further includes an input unit 132, a reading unit 134, an evaluation unit 136, and a correction unit 138. The registration unit 150 further includes an evaluation range information registration unit 152 and a superiority information registration 154. The storage unit 190 further includes evaluation range information 192, evaluation rules 194, superiority information 196, and clause sentence example information 196.

  The communication unit 110 communicates with the user terminal 200. The determination unit 130 evaluates legal text. The input unit 132 extracts legal texts to be evaluated from the legal document file. The reading unit reads evaluation range information related to the evaluation range of legal texts and legal text evaluation rules. The evaluation unit 136 evaluates at least a range corresponding to the evaluation range information of the legal text based on the evaluation rule. The evaluation rule in the present embodiment includes a rule for determining whether or not the content is advantageous for the user of the legal text using the score. The correction unit 138 corrects the score with reference to the clause sentence example information 198 based on the superiority information regarding at least the parties of the legal text. According to this configuration, it is possible to perform an evaluation that is optimal for the party.

  The evaluation range information is, for example, a clause that can be included in legal text. That is, the evaluation range can be set as the presence or absence of one or a plurality of clauses that prescribe the specified content, or a specific range within the clause. The evaluation range information can be registered in advance from the user by the evaluation range information registration 152. This allows the user to check for omissions regarding important clauses or to receive only feedback on the specified clauses. Similarly, the superiority information can be registered in advance from the user by the superiority information registration unit 154.

  The evaluation range that can be set in units of clauses described above may have a plurality of evaluation elements. That is, if you register a certain clause (for example, “Compensation clause”), whether or not it contains elements (subjective requirements, objective requirements, expense items, etc.) Whether the contents are advantageous or unfavorable is also set as an evaluation target. Thereby, it becomes possible to evaluate more detailed contents.

  In the present embodiment, the evaluation unit can also propose a clause amendment plan with reference to the clause sentence example information 198. As the amendment proposal, for example, it is possible to propose a plurality of patterns according to the stage of superiority of the parties based on the superiority information.

  As an example of the above-described evaluation and evaluation rule, for example, the following method can be employed. The evaluation rules are determined according to the legal nature of the legal text. As an example of the contents of the evaluation rule, for example, a table used for scoring used in the evaluation unit may be adopted.

  Specifically, the importance, title, presence / absence of essential words, expression strength, numerical magnitude, duration of the period, and other factors in the legal text are included as items for judgment. It is conceivable to use a table that performs scoring based on whether or not the item is satisfied. By adopting this configuration, it is possible to evaluate and score character content created with various expressions from various perspectives.

  FIG. 5 is an exemplary block diagram mainly showing functions implemented in the user terminal 200. The user terminal 200 includes a communication unit 210, a storage unit 220, an input unit 240, an output unit 250, and an application unit 270, and interacts with each other. The storage unit 220 stores a legal document file to be evaluated, and cooperates with the communication unit 110 and the application unit 170 of the server terminal 100 via the communication unit 210.

  The elements in the hardware configurations of the server terminal 100 and the user terminal 200 shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, the functional blocks shown in FIG. 4, and the information shown in FIG. 5 are merely examples, It is not limited to these. In particular, each functional block shown in FIG. 4 may be implemented as part of hardware and / or as part of software.

  Moreover, you may comprise so that the user terminal 200 may have at least one part of each function block of the server terminal 100 shown in FIG. You may comprise so that the server terminal 100 may also have at least one part of each function of the user terminal 200. FIG.

  That is, the method according to the embodiment can be executed by an information processing apparatus arbitrarily selected from the server terminal 100 and the user terminal 200. In addition, the information stored in the storage unit 190 illustrated in FIG. 4 is not limited to the illustrated configuration, data type, and data item.

  With reference to FIG. 6 thru | or FIG. 12, the process of the user terminal 200 and the server terminal 100 is demonstrated using the example of a screen displayed on a user terminal.

  As shown in FIG. 7, the user accesses a screen for setting / registering an evaluation range (review point). As shown in FIG. 8, the user can set a review point for each contract type, for example. In the illustrated screen example, a non-disclosure agreement (NDA), personnel introduction, SaaS terms of service, a dealer / agent / agency store, an advertising operation consignment / advertisement agent, and an investment contract are illustrated. Is not limited to this. Hereinafter, a confidentiality agreement (NDA) will be described as an example.

  As shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, the review points according to the present embodiment can set the evaluation range in terms of clauses. In the screen example shown in the figure, as part of the “Terms for the definition of confidential information (contents of information)”, “Terms for the definition of confidential information (method of disclosure)”, “Exceptions to disclosure to third parties” ( "Disclosure scope"), "Obligations to be disclosed to third parties (responsibility scope)", "Audit provisions", "Rules regarding the handling of rights regarding deliverables, etc." It is not limited to this.

  As shown in Fig. 10, by displaying review points in terms of clauses in this way, users can pick up and evaluate clauses that are important to their company and clauses that can be the issue of this agreement. Become. The set review points are registered in the evaluation range information 192 of the storage unit 190 by the evaluation range information registration unit 152. By registering review points once set in the evaluation range information in this way, efficient evaluation output is possible without the need for special selections from the next time onwards. Efficient evaluation can be achieved when you want to check a large number of documents.

  Returning to FIG. 6, after setting review points in advance, the user transmits a legal document (SQ101). At this time, superiority information is received from the user. The server terminal 100 reads the information in the storage unit 190 and the registration unit 150 (SQ102), and evaluates the legal text in the legal document based on the evaluation range information and the evaluation rule (SQ104). At the same time, for a clause with a low evaluation (that is, disadvantageous to self), a revised proposal is generated and output to the user terminal 200 (SQ110).

  The result of the evaluation can be displayed as a summary in a format as shown in FIG. For example, it is possible to grasp the total number of cases to be improved / corrected by displaying “There are 14 improvement points in this contract”. The breakdown of 14 cases includes, for example, “There are 10 disadvantageous clauses”, “There are 3 somewhat disadvantageous clauses”, and “1 item that is normally included” is missing. In addition to the advantages and disadvantages of the above, it is possible to evaluate the existence of provisions (missing, etc.).

  As shown in FIG. 12, the evaluation result can be displayed for each of the “article”, “item”, “article content”, and “risk evaluation” items of the article. As shown in the figure, the evaluation of the advantage / disadvantage is displayed in five stages of “disadvantage”, “somewhat disadvantage”, “appropriate”, “somewhat advantageous”, and “advantage”, and is intuitively easy to understand.

  In addition, the contents of the risk assessment include, for example, a statement that states that “the purpose of disclosure of confidential information is defined, and it is meaningful to define the scope of prohibition of unauthorized use.” This is a provision that is defined and is somewhat advantageous for the disclosing person. ”

  As an evaluation result display method (UI) in the present embodiment, for example, whether or not the evaluation result is advantageous to the user is displayed and output together with display content using at least one element of color, size, and shape. You may do it. The color may be expressed using a color system such as RGB or Lab for each evaluation result, and may be expressed as a name representing a specific color such as “red”, “blue”, and “green”. The color information may be composed of only one color or may be composed of only a plurality of colors. A configuration is also conceivable in which output is performed such that the lightness of the color changes with gradation in accordance with the change in evaluation. When such a configuration is adopted, it becomes possible to grasp the level of evaluation with more visibility.

  Regarding the size, it is conceivable to display a predetermined display content according to the evaluation level. Specifically, it is conceivable that the display is small when the evaluation is advantageous to itself, and the display is large when the evaluation is disadvantageous. By adopting this configuration, it becomes possible for the user to intuitively understand the determination of the advantage and disadvantage of the text content.

  As for the shape, in addition to the shape of a circle, square, rectangle, sphere, or other geometric figure, when using pictograms such as characters, symbolic shapes such as “〇”, “×”, “△”, etc. The case where it uses is considered.

  Note that the display content output from the UI output unit may be generated by combining the display content having the configuration described so far. In other words, display content can be generated by combining colors and sizes or combining colors and shapes according to the evaluation results. By adopting this configuration, it is possible to flexibly output display contents for various evaluation results, so that the visibility of a wide range of evaluation results can be improved.

  The above-described embodiments are merely examples for facilitating understanding of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the present invention. The present invention can be changed and improved without departing from the gist thereof, and it is needless to say that the present invention includes equivalents thereof.

1 legal text evaluation system 10, 20 processor 50 network 100 server terminal 200 user terminal

Claims (11)

A legal text evaluation method for evaluating legal text implemented by a computer,
An input step for receiving input of the legal text;
A step of reading out the evaluation range information on the evaluation range of the legal text and the evaluation rule of the legal text;
An evaluation step for evaluating a range corresponding to at least the evaluation range information of the legal text based on the evaluation rule;
An output step for outputting the evaluation;
Including legal text evaluation methods. The legal text evaluation method according to claim 1,
A registration step of accepting registration of the evaluation range information;
Legal text evaluation method. The legal text evaluation method according to claim 2,
In the registration step, the evaluation range information is registered in terms of clauses that can be included in the legal text.
Legal text evaluation method. A legal text evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
In the evaluation step, when there is no range corresponding to the evaluation range information in the input legal text, an evaluation to that effect is performed.
Legal text evaluation method. A legal text evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 4,
A correction step of proposing a correction proposal based on the evaluation;
Legal text evaluation method. A legal text evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 5,
The evaluation rule includes a rule for determining whether or not the content is advantageous for a user of the legal text using a score.
Legal text evaluation method. The legal text evaluation method according to claim 6,
Receiving superiority information regarding at least parties of the legal text;
A correction step of correcting the score based on the superiority information;
Legal text evaluation method including A legal text evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 7,
The output step displays and outputs the evaluation in association with a range corresponding to the evaluation range information together with display content using at least one element of color, size, and shape.
Legal text evaluation method.   A legal text evaluation program for causing a computer to execute the method according to claim 1. A legal text evaluation server that evaluates legal text,
A storage unit that holds evaluation range information regarding an evaluation range of the legal text; and an evaluation rule for the legal text;
An input unit for receiving input of the legal text;
A reading unit for reading out the evaluation range information and the evaluation rule;
An evaluation unit that evaluates at least a range corresponding to the evaluation range information of the legal text based on the evaluation rule;
An output unit for outputting the evaluation;
A legal text evaluation device. A legal text evaluation system for evaluating legal text, including a user terminal and a server terminal,
The server terminal is:
A storage unit that holds evaluation range information regarding the evaluation range of the legal text and an evaluation rule for the legal text;
Accepting input of the legal text from the user terminal;
Reading the evaluation range information and the evaluation rule;
Evaluating a range corresponding to the evaluation range information based on the evaluation rule;
Outputting the evaluation,
Legal text evaluation system.