JP2019106613A - Work management device, work management method, and work management program - Google Patents

Abstract

To inhibit communication via a network from being made to be unstable by performing work on the network even when a state of the network changes until the work is started after the work is registered.SOLUTION: A work management device 4 comprises: a registration unit 41 for accepting registration of work that may affect performance of a network 3; a first information acquisition unit 42 for acquiring first information showing a state of the network 3 at the time of registering the work; a second information acquisition unit 43 for acquiring, at least once, second information including a result obtained by simulating an influence to be given to the performance until the work is started after the work is registered; and a warning unit 45 for outputting warning information when the second information acquired finally differs from the first information and the work is to affect the performance.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 3

Description

  The present invention relates to a work management apparatus, a work management method, and a work management program.

  At present, because the use of networks is widespread, it is important to have a technology for simulating the extent to which the network is affected by failures of components and connection cables in consideration of the status of the components and connection cables of the network. . For example, according to Patent Document 1, in a network system in which a plurality of component devices are connected by a connection cable to form a network, all route patterns of the network configuration are extracted as "tables" and then the component devices and connections used in the route are extracted. A network system failure simulation method is disclosed, which simulates a range affected by a system function from normality / abnormality of a route pattern according to the state of a cable.

JP, 2004-312224, A

  By the way, it is necessary to carry out the work on the constituent devices of the network and the connection cable on a daily basis. The failure occurrence simulation method of the network system described above is effective when planning work for the network components and connection cables.

  However, such work requires a certain period from being planned to being started. On the other hand, the state of the network can be improved by, for example, distribution of an operating system (OS: Operating System) accompanying the start of sales of a new portable terminal and start of a video distribution service even after work is planned and started. It changes from moment to moment. For this reason, when work is performed in a situation where the state of the network changes between the time when the work is planned and the time when it is started, communication by the network may become unstable.

  Therefore, according to the present invention, there is a possibility that communication by the network may become unstable if the work is performed in a state where the state of the network is changing after the work for the network is registered and started. An object of the present invention is to provide a work management apparatus, a work management method, and a work management program that can warn of a certain thing.

  A work management apparatus according to an aspect of the present invention is a computer, and a registration unit that receives registration of a work that may affect the performance of the network, and indicates the state of the network at the time of registration of the work. First information acquisition unit for acquiring information, and second information acquisition for acquiring at least once second information including simulation results on the influence on the performance between the time when the work is registered and the time when the work is started And a warning unit that outputs warning information if the first information and the second information acquired at the end are different and the work affects the performance.

  A work management method according to an aspect of the present invention includes a registration step of receiving registration of work that may affect network performance in a computer, and first information indicating a state of the network at the time of registration of the work. A first information acquisition step of acquiring the second information acquisition step of acquiring at least once second information including a result of simulation about the influence on the performance between the registration of the work and the start of the work; And an output step of outputting warning information when the first information and the second information acquired at last are different and the work affects the performance.

  A work management program according to an aspect of the present invention includes a registration unit that receives a registration of a work that may affect the performance of a network, and a first information indicating a state of the network at the time of registration of the work. A first information acquisition unit for acquiring the second information acquisition unit for acquiring at least once the second information including a result of simulation about the influence on the performance between the registration of the work and the start of the work; And a warning unit that outputs warning information when the first information and the second information acquired at the end are different from each other and the work affects the performance.

  According to the present invention, there is a possibility that communication by the network may become unstable if the work is performed in a state where the state of the network is changing after the work for the network is registered and started. It can warn that there is.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a simulation apparatus, a monitoring apparatus, a network, and a work management apparatus according to the embodiment, and their connection relationship. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a network backbone, an area network, and nodes according to the embodiment and their connection relationship. FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating an example of processing performed by the work management apparatus according to the embodiment.

  Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In addition, what attached the same code | symbol in each figure has the same or same structure.

[Embodiment]
First, the configuration and operation of a simulation apparatus according to an embodiment will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a connection relationship between a simulation apparatus 1, a monitoring apparatus 2, a network 3, and a work management apparatus 4 according to an embodiment.

  The simulation apparatus 1 simulates the state of the network 3 assuming various cases in a state in which work is being performed in a node of the network 3 and a state in which a failure occurs in the network 3. Here, in various cases, for example, when a failure occurs due to a natural disaster or the like in a node of the network 3, distribution of a new OS, new video distribution is performed when change, addition or removal of devices related to the node is performed. When events such as start of service occur. The failure is, for example, an event generated by a node that can not communicate and an event in which the traffic on the circuit of the network 3 is tight, for example, an event in which the traffic exceeds a predetermined value. The state of the network 3 means, for example, the traffic of each line constituting the network 3, the traffic flow of each line, and the possibility of communication between the nodes of the network 3. A node is a data terminal device such as a router.

  The simulation apparatus 1 includes, for example, time zone, design value of each line, traffic and bandwidth occupancy rate, number and type of clients subordinate to each node, presence / absence of dark fiber in each line, performance of network 3, physical configuration and logic of network 3 Simulation is performed in consideration of the information, MAC address (Media Access Control Address) of data link layer included in network 3, IP address (Internet Protocol Address) of network layer included in network 3, and information on faults collected from nodes. Can.

  Here, the design value is a parameter assigned to each line. For example, when the network 3 adopts Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) as a protocol, the larger the parameter, the more difficult the data flow. The design value means the cost or weight in the Dijkstra method. The MAC address is a physical address assigned to hardware configuring the network 3 to identify each node on the network 3. The IP address is a logical address for determining hardware that transmits and receives a packet.

  The simulation apparatus 1 uses, for example, at least one of a MAC address and an IP address when simulating the traffic of each line of the network 3. In addition, the simulation apparatus 1 can also perform simulation on the influence that a logical fault caused by a physical fault generated in the network 3 has on the network 3. Furthermore, the simulation apparatus 1 can simulate the state of the network at the time of planning of the work and at the time of registration of the work, and at least once simulation of the state of the network from when the work is registered until it is started. It can be carried out.

  The monitoring device 2 appropriately collects information on failures from nodes of the network 3, for example, a router interface or a switch connected to the router, and detects the occurrence of a failure. The information related to the failure is, for example, a signal output when the router switches the engine, or a signal output from a bus connected to an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) included in the router.

  The network 3 is, for example, a network including at least one of the physical layer, the data link layer, and the network layer of the OSI 7 hierarchical reference model. Also, the network 3 may be a network of another hierarchy, including physical networks and logical networks.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a network backbone, an area network, and nodes according to the embodiment and their connection relationship. As shown in FIG. 2, the network 3 includes, for example, a backbone 31 and an area network 32. The backbone 31 is a trunk which forms the core of the network 3. The area network 32 is a communication network extending from the backbone 31 to each client, and includes, for example, a node 32a, a node 32b, a node 32c, a node 32d, a node 32e, and a node 32f.

  The task management device 4 appropriately collects simulation results from the simulation device 1 and collects information on failures from the monitoring device 2. Further, as shown in FIG. 1, the work management apparatus 4 includes a registration unit 41, a first information acquisition unit 42, a second information acquisition unit 43, a determination unit 44, a warning unit 45, and a storage unit 46. , Change unit 47.

  The registration unit 41 receives registration of work that may affect the performance of the network 3. For example, the registration unit 41 receives, as a result of simulation at the time of planning an operation, registration of the operation determined to be executable by the worker. The registration unit 41 can also register the work for which the registration has been received in association with the failure detected by the monitoring device 2.

  The first information acquisition unit 42 acquires, from the simulation apparatus 1, first information indicating the state of the network 3 at the time of registration of work. The first information is generated by simulation of the state of the network at the time of registration of work.

  The second information acquisition unit 43 acquires at least once the second information including the simulation result of the influence on the performance from the time when the work is registered until the time when the work is started. The second information is generated by simulating the state of the network at a specific point in time between work registration and start.

  The determination unit 44 determines whether or not a time that is earlier than a time at which the registration unit 41 receives the registration is started a predetermined time. The predetermined time length is, for example, one hour before the time when the work is started.

  In addition, the determination unit 44 determines whether or not the first information and the second information acquired at the end are different. For example, when at least one of the traffic, the traffic flow, the configuration of the network 3, the design value of the network 3, and the state of the node of the network 3 differs in the first information and the second information, the determination unit 44 2 Determine that the information is different.

  Furthermore, the determination unit 44 determines whether the work for which the registration unit 41 has received registration affects the performance.

  For example, when there is a node that can not communicate, the determination unit 44 can determine that the work for which the registration unit 41 has received registration affects the performance of the network 3. Specifically, when a task involving blocking of communication is being performed in the node 32a shown in FIG. 2, if a failure occurs that blocks communication in the node 32f, the node 32b, the node 32c, the node 32d and the node 32e becomes a node which can not communicate. Therefore, in this case, the determination unit 44 determines that the work at the node 32 a affects the performance of the network 3. In addition, the failure said here may be a failure matched with the operation | work which the registration part 41 registered.

  Alternatively, when the traffic on the line of the network 3 is tight, for example, when the traffic exceeds the predetermined value, the determination unit 44 determines that the work for which the registration unit 41 receives registration affects the performance of the network 3. can do. Specifically, when the bandwidth occupancy rate of the line connecting the backbone 31 and the node 32a shown in FIG. 2 is 70% and the bandwidth occupancy rate of the line connecting the backbone 31 and the node 32f is 50%. In addition, when work involving blocking of communication is performed in the node 32a, the band occupancy of the line connecting the backbone 31 and the node 32f will be 120%. As a result, communication using the line connecting the backbone 31 and the node 32 f becomes unstable. That is, communication using the node 32 f, the node 32 e, the node 32 d, the node 32 c, and the node 32 b becomes unstable. Therefore, in this case, the determination unit 44 determines that the work at the node 32 a affects the performance of the network 3.

  Alternatively, if the time when the failure is restored is later than the time when the work is started based on the time required for the recovery stored in the storage unit 46, the judgment unit 44 determines that the work is the performance of the network 3. It may be determined that it has an influence. In addition, based on the time required for the recovery stored in the storage unit 46, the determination unit 44 performs the operation when the time to recover from the failure is later than the time determined by the worker performing the operation. It may be determined that it can not be done.

  Alternatively, the determination unit 44 determines that the work affects the performance of the network 3 if the work execution accuracy calculated based on the type and content of the work and the time required for recovery is less than a predetermined threshold. Good. Here, the task implementation accuracy is the degree to which the task can be implemented without affecting the performance of the network 3.

  The warning unit 45 passes a predetermined time before the time when the registration unit 41 receives the registration, and the first information and the second information acquired last are different, and Output warning information when work affects performance. The warning information is information indicating that the performance of the network 3 is affected when the registration unit 41 receives the registration, and may include the result determined by the determination unit 44. The warning unit 45 also outputs warning information to, for example, a portable terminal carried by a worker or a terminal used by a network manager.

  The storage unit 46 is a memory that stores the time required for recovery for each failure. The time required for the recovery is, for example, the average or the maximum value of the time required for the recovery work of the failure performed in the past.

  The change unit 47 has passed the time that is a predetermined time before the time when the registration unit 41 receives the registration, and the first information is different from the second information acquired last, and When the work affects the performance, the registration unit 41 changes the plan of the work for which the registration has been received, and outputs the plan after the change. For example, the change unit 47 outputs information indicating that the work should be canceled and information indicating a preferable schedule for performing the work.

  An example of processing performed by the task management device 4 according to the embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating an example of processing performed by the work management apparatus according to the embodiment.

  In step S <b> 1, the registration unit 41 receives registration of work that may affect the performance of the network 3.

  In step S2, the first information acquisition unit 42 acquires first information indicating the state of the network at the time of registration of the work acquired in step S1.

  In step S3, the second information acquisition unit 43 acquires, at least once, the second information including the simulation result on the influence on the performance from the time when the work registered in step S1 is registered to the time when it is started. .

  In step S4, the determination unit 44 determines whether or not a predetermined time has passed before the time when the work registered in step S1 is performed. If the determination unit 44 determines that the time has passed (step S4: Yes), the process proceeds to step S5, and if it is determined that the time has not passed (step S4; No), the process waits.

  In step S5, the determination unit 44 determines whether the first information and the second information acquired last are different. If the determination section 44 determines that both are different (step S5: Yes), the process proceeds to step S5, and if it is determined that both are equal (step S5: No), the process is ended.

  In step S6, the determination unit 44 determines whether the work registered in step S1 affects the performance of the network 3. If the determination unit 44 determines that the work affects the performance of the network 3 (step S6: Yes), the process proceeds to step S6, and it is determined that the work does not affect the performance of the network 3 (Step S6: No), the process is ended.

  In step S7, the warning unit 45 outputs warning information.

  In step S8, the change unit 47 changes the work plan registered in step S1 and ends the process.

  The embodiment which is an example of the present invention has been described above. The work management apparatus 4 receives a registration of a work that may affect the performance of the network 3, and a first information acquisition unit that acquires first information indicating the state of the network 3 at the time of work registration. 42, a second information acquiring unit 43 for acquiring at least once the second information including the simulation result on the influence on the performance between the time when the work is registered and the time when the work is started, and the first information and the last information And a warning unit 45 for outputting warning information if the second information is different from the second information and if the work affects the performance.

  For this reason, in the work management apparatus 4, specifically, the state of the network 3 changes between the time when the work is registered and the time when it is started, and communication becomes impossible due to the work and the newly generated failure. When there is a possibility that a node will occur, it is possible to prompt the worker to change the plan of the work, and to suppress the occurrence of a node that can not communicate.

  Similarly, when the work management apparatus 4 changes the state of the network 3 between the time when the work is registered and the time when the work is started, and the traffic of the line of the network 3 becomes tight due to the work, for example, If the traffic exceeds a predetermined value, the worker can be prompted to change the plan of the work, and the occurrence of a line exceeding the predetermined traffic can be suppressed.

  In addition, the work management apparatus 4 determines that the work can not be performed based on the time required for the recovery, when the time to recover from the failure is later than the time when the work is started. For this reason, the work management apparatus 4 can suppress the occurrence of a node that can not communicate and the occurrence of a line that exceeds predetermined traffic due to a fault that has not been recovered and the work.

  In addition, the work management apparatus 4 determines that the work can not be performed based on the time required for the recovery, when the time to recover from the failure is later than the time determined by the worker performing the work. For this reason, the work management apparatus 4 effectively utilizes the labor of the worker in order to suppress the fact that the work can not be performed because the failure recovery work is not in time after the worker who performs the work is determined. Can be made possible.

  The embodiments described above are for the purpose of facilitating the understanding of the present invention, and are not for the purpose of limiting the present invention. The elements included in the embodiment and the arrangement, the material, the conditions, the shape, the size, and the like of the elements are not limited to those illustrated, and can be changed as appropriate. In addition, configurations shown in different embodiments can be partially substituted or combined with each other.

  DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... simulation apparatus, 2 ... monitoring apparatus, 3 ... network, 31 ... backbone, 32 ... area network, 32a, 32b, 32c, 32d, 32e, 32f ... node, 4 ... work management apparatus, 41 ... registration unit, 42 ... First information acquisition unit 43: second information acquisition unit 44: determination unit 45: warning unit 46: storage unit 47: change unit

Service management apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention, carried out a registration unit which accepts the registration of the work that may affect the network performance, the work in the first state of the network at the time of registration of the work A first information acquisition unit for acquiring first information which is a simulation result of the influence on the performance of the network in the event of a failure, and of the network at a specific time between the registration of the work and the start of the work A second information acquisition unit for acquiring at least once the second information which is a result of simulating the influence on the performance of the network when the work is performed in the second state , and the first information and the last acquired the working effect on the performance in the case and said second information difference exists And a determination unit for determining whether or not to grant.

The work management method according to an aspect of the present invention is the work management method according to the first aspect, wherein the computer receives a registration of a work that may affect the performance of the network, and the work in the first state of the network at the time of the work registration. The first information acquisition step of acquiring first information which is a result of simulation about the influence on the performance of the network when performing the above, and the specific information between the time when the work is registered and the time when the work is started. A second information acquisition step of acquiring at least once the second information which is a result of simulating the influence on the performance when the work is performed in the second state of the network, and the first information and the last acquired the work on the case and the second information difference exists And a determination step of determining whether or not affect the performance.

Work management program according to one embodiment of the present invention causes a computer to function as the service management apparatus.

Claims (7)

A computer,
A registration unit that accepts registration of tasks that may affect network performance;
A first information acquisition unit that acquires first information indicating a state of the network at the time of registration of the work;
A second information acquiring unit acquiring at least once second information including a result of simulation about an influence on the performance from the time when the work is registered until the time when the work is started;
A warning unit that outputs warning information if the first information and the second information acquired at the end are different and the work affects the performance;
Work management apparatus comprising:   The warning unit is configured to transmit the first information and the second information when at least one of traffic, traffic flow, configuration of the network, design value of the network, and state of a node of the network is different between the first information and the second information. The work management apparatus according to claim 1, which determines that the second information is different from the second information.   The work management apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the network is a network including at least one of a network layer and a data link layer of an OSI 7 hierarchical reference model. The information processing apparatus further includes a determination unit that determines whether the work can be performed based on the second information.
The determination unit determines that the operation can not be performed in at least one of a case where a node where communication can not be performed and a case where traffic on a line of the network is tight. The work management apparatus according to any one of the above. It further comprises a storage unit that stores the time required for recovery for each failure,
The determination unit determines the work based on the time required for the recovery if the time at which the failure is recovered is later than the time at which the worker performing the work determines or the time at which the work is started. The work management apparatus according to claim 4, which is determined to be impossible to implement. At the computer
A registration step that accepts registration of tasks that may affect network performance;
A first information acquisition step of acquiring first information indicating a state of the network at the time of registration of the work;
A second information acquisition step of acquiring at least once second information including a result of simulation about an influence on the performance between the time when the work is registered and the time when the work is started;
An output step of outputting warning information if the first information and the second information acquired last are different and the work affects the performance;
Work management method including:   A work management program for causing a computer to function as the work management apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 5.