JP2018088059A - Regional policy evaluation method and regional policy evaluation system - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To associate an evaluation item of a local government with information on efforts for the evaluation item.SOLUTION: A regional policy evaluation method by a regional policy evaluation system having a regional evaluation device in which evaluation information obtained by evaluating local characteristics of a local government is stored for each local government and a regional policy evaluation device communicating with the regional evaluation device, in which the regional policy evaluation device acquires evaluation information corresponding to the designated local government from the regional evaluation device, acquires policy information indicating content of efforts of the designated local government corresponding to an evaluation item specified in the evaluation information from an external device, and outputs the evaluation item and the policy information in association with each other.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to a regional measure evaluation method and a regional measure evaluation system.

  Conventionally, a regional evaluation tool for the purpose of discovering regional characteristics using open data is known. With this regional assessment tool, it is possible to compare regional characteristics nationwide by using open data. For local government staff and companies responsible for urban development, etc. Is provided.

JP 2002-288391 A JP 2002-334185 A JP 2007-328532 A

  By the way, many local governments are taking measures on various matters based on national guidelines. However, the above-mentioned regional evaluation tool does not take into account measures taken by local governments, but can provide information on evaluations for each local government, but cannot provide information on measures taken for each evaluation item. .

  For this reason, in the past, when local governments wanted to obtain information about their efforts on matters that were subject to evaluation, they were able to trace the target information from a vast amount of information by accessing each local government's website. It was necessary to take a lot of time and effort.

  An object of the present invention is to provide a regional measure evaluation method and a regional measure evaluation system capable of associating an evaluation item of a local government with information on an approach to the evaluation item.

  In one aspect, regional policy evaluation by a regional policy evaluation system having a regional policy evaluation device in which evaluation information evaluating the regional characteristics of the local government is stored for each municipality and a regional policy evaluation device that communicates with the regional evaluation device. In the method, the regional measure evaluation device acquires evaluation information corresponding to a designated local government from the regional evaluation device, and corresponds to the evaluation item specified in the evaluation information. The measure information indicating the contents of the information is acquired from an external device, and the evaluation item and the measure information are output in association with each other.

  Each procedure described above can be a functional unit that realizes each procedure described above, a method that is executed by a computer as each procedure described above, and a computer-readable storage medium that stores a program.

  As one aspect, the evaluation item of the local government can be associated with the information regarding the approach to the evaluation item.

It is a figure which shows an example of the regional measure evaluation system of 1st embodiment. It is a figure explaining the hardware constitutions of the regional measure evaluation apparatus of 1st embodiment. It is a figure explaining the function of the regional measure evaluation device of a first embodiment. It is a figure explaining the process of the regional measure evaluation apparatus of 1st embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the input screen of the evaluation item of the local government in 1st embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of a measure database. It is a figure which shows an example of a cost-effectiveness database. It is a figure which shows the example of a display by the regional measure evaluation apparatus of 1st embodiment. It is a figure explaining the function of the regional measure evaluation apparatus of 2nd embodiment. It is a figure explaining the process of the regional measure evaluation apparatus of 2nd embodiment. It is a figure explaining extraction of the evaluation item in a second embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the regional measure evaluation system of 3rd embodiment.

(First embodiment)
The first embodiment will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a regional measure evaluation system according to the first embodiment.

  The regional measure evaluation system 100 of this embodiment includes a regional measure evaluation device 200 and a regional evaluation device 300, and the regional measure evaluation device 200 and the regional evaluation device 300 are connected via a network N.

  The regional measure evaluation apparatus 200 according to the present embodiment includes a regional measure evaluation processing unit 210, a measure database 220, and a cost effectiveness database 230.

  The regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 according to the present embodiment associates an evaluation item, which is an evaluation target in the regional evaluation device 300 for each local government, with information on an approach to the evaluation item, and uses the user of the regional measure evaluation device 200. To present. In the following description, an approach for an evaluation item by a local government is referred to as a measure, and information relating to an approach to the evaluation item is referred to as measure information.

  The area evaluation device 300 according to the present embodiment includes an area evaluation processing unit 310 and an area evaluation database 320. The area evaluation processing unit 310 is realized by, for example, an area evaluation tool for the purpose of discovering area characteristics using open data. The regional evaluation processing unit 310 stores the result of evaluating the regional characteristics for each local government in the regional evaluation database 320 as evaluation information for each local government. This evaluation information is, for example, information in which a predetermined evaluation item is associated with an evaluation value for each evaluation item.

  In the regional measure evaluation system 100 of the present embodiment, when the local government is designated, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 of the regional measure evaluation apparatus 200 requests the local evaluation apparatus 300 to display the evaluation information of the designated local government. Do.

  Upon receiving this display request, the regional evaluation device 300 refers to the regional evaluation database 320 and transmits evaluation information of the designated local government to the regional measure evaluation device 200.

  Upon receiving the evaluation information of the designated local government, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 displays the evaluation information. Then, upon receiving the designation of the evaluation item in the evaluation information of the local government, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 transmits a request for acquiring the measure information for the specified evaluation item to the local government server 400 held by the specified local government. To do.

  When the local government server 400 accepts this acquisition request, the local government server 400 searches the local government database 410 held by the local government with the designated evaluation item, extracts measure information for the designated evaluation item, and transmits it to the regional measure evaluation device 200. .

  Note that the local government server 400 is a server that is provided for each local government such as a municipality, and the local government database 410 is a database that stores open data for each local government.

  Upon receiving the measure information from the local government server 400, the regional measure evaluation device 200 displays the designated evaluation item and the measure information in association with each other. The regional measure evaluation apparatus 200 stores the acquired measure information in the measure database 220 in association with the designated evaluation item. Details of the measure database 220 will be described later.

  Furthermore, the regional measure evaluation apparatus 200 of the present embodiment extracts budget information related to the budget for each measure from the measure information, generates cost-effectiveness information indicating the cost-effectiveness for each measure, and generates a cost-effectiveness database. 230. Details of the cost-effectiveness database 230 will be described later.

  As described above, the regional measure evaluation device 200 according to the present embodiment has the evaluation items acquired from the designated evaluation items and the local government server 400 possessed by the local government in the evaluation information of the local government acquired from the regional evaluation device 300. Corresponds with the measure information for the item. Therefore, according to the present embodiment, the user can obtain evaluation information of the local government and measure information for the evaluation item simply by specifying the local government and the evaluation item included in the evaluation information of the local government. .

  Below, the regional measure evaluation apparatus 200 of this embodiment is demonstrated. FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining the hardware configuration of the regional measure evaluation apparatus according to the first embodiment.

  The regional measure evaluation device 200 of the present embodiment includes an input device 21, an output device 22, a drive device 23, an auxiliary storage device 24, a memory device 25, an arithmetic processing device 26, and an interface device 27 that are connected to each other via a bus B. including.

  The input device 21 is for inputting various types of information, and is realized by, for example, a keyboard or a mouse. The output device 22 is for outputting various types of information, and is realized by, for example, a display. The interface device 27 includes a modem, a LAN card, and the like, and is used for connecting to a network.

  The regional measure evaluation program is at least a part of various programs that control the regional measure evaluation apparatus 200. The regional measure evaluation program is provided, for example, by distributing the storage medium 28 or downloading it from the network. The storage medium 28 in which the regional measure evaluation program is recorded is a CD-ROM, a flexible disk, a magneto-optical disk, or the like, a storage medium that records information optically, electrically, or magnetically, a ROM, a flash memory, or the like. Various types of storage media such as a semiconductor memory that electrically records information can be used.

  The regional measure evaluation program is installed from the storage medium 28 to the auxiliary storage device 24 via the drive device 23 when the storage medium 28 storing the regional measure evaluation program is set in the drive device 23. The regional measure evaluation program downloaded from the network is installed in the auxiliary storage device 24 via the interface device 27.

  The auxiliary storage device 24 stores the installed regional measure evaluation program and also stores necessary files, data, and the like. The memory device 25 reads and stores the regional measure evaluation program from the auxiliary storage device 24 when the computer is activated. The arithmetic processing unit 26 implements various processes as described later in accordance with the regional measure evaluation program stored in the memory device 25.

  Note that the hardware configuration of the regional evaluation apparatus 300 according to the present embodiment is the same as that of the regional measure evaluation apparatus 200, and thus description thereof is omitted.

  Next, with reference to FIG. 3, the function of the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 of the regional measure evaluation apparatus 200 of the present embodiment will be described.

  FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining functions of the regional measure evaluation apparatus according to the first embodiment. The regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 of the present embodiment is realized by the arithmetic processing device 26 of the regional measure evaluation device 200 reading and executing the regional measure evaluation program stored in the auxiliary storage device 24 or the like.

  The regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 of the present embodiment includes an input receiving unit 211, an evaluation information acquisition unit 212, a measure information acquisition unit 213, a measure success / failure determination unit 214, a budget information extraction unit 215, a function generation unit 216, and a storage control unit 217. And a display control unit 218.

  The input receiving unit 211 of this embodiment receives various inputs to the regional measure evaluation device 200. Specifically, the input reception unit 211 receives input including local government designation and evaluation item designation.

  When the input reception unit 211 receives the designation of the local government in the input reception unit 211, the evaluation information acquisition unit 212 of the present embodiment makes an acquisition request for the specified local government evaluation information to the regional evaluation device 300, and receives the evaluation information of the specified local government. get.

  When the input receiving unit 211 receives the designation of the evaluation item, the measure information acquisition unit 213 of the present embodiment makes a search request for the designated evaluation item to the local government server 400 of the designated local government, and the local government database 410 To obtain measure information corresponding to evaluation items. Specifically, the measure information acquisition unit 213 of the present embodiment transmits “designated evaluation item” and “measure” to the local government server 400 as search keywords. And the measure information acquisition part 213 acquires the information extracted as a result of searching the local government database 410 as measure information.

  Here, measure information acquired from the local government database 410 in the present embodiment will be described.

  The municipality server 400 is a server provided for each municipality such as a municipality, and the municipality database 410 stores information for each municipality. The information for each local government includes, for example, various information such as information on living in the local government, information on child-raising, information on various procedures, information on welfare, and information on politics as a local government.

  Information related to politics as a local government includes, for example, information on measures and projects corresponding to the evaluation items, outcome indicators that indicate the effects and outcomes (outcomes) generated by the implementation of the measures and projects, the degree of achievement of the outcome indicators, and measures And the budget amount and settlement amount for business.

  In the local government database 410, these various pieces of information are stored in accordance with the design of the local government database 410 for each local government.

  In the present embodiment, information associated with the keyword “measure” among the information stored in the local government database 410 may be acquired as measure information. The information included in the measure information of the present embodiment may be different for each local government, but at least the name of the evaluation item, the outcome index, the target achievement level of the outcome index, the budget amount and the settlement amount are included. It is preferable.

  The measure success / failure determination unit 214 determines whether the measure is successful based on the measure information acquired by the measure information acquisition unit 213. Specifically, the measure success / failure determination unit 214 of the present embodiment determines the success or failure of the measure based on the outcome index acquired as the measure information, and assigns measure determination information indicating the determination result to the measure information.

  The budget information extraction unit 215 extracts budget information related to the budget of the measure from the measure information acquired by the measure information acquisition unit 213, and generates cost-effectiveness information from the budget information. Specifically, the budget information extraction unit 215 extracts the budget amount for the measure and the settlement amount indicating the settlement result from the measure information as the budget information, associates the budget information with the measure and the outcome index, Use counter-effect information.

  When the input receiving unit 211 receives the selection of the measure, the function generating unit 216 generates a function that is a result of multivariate analysis of the “measure” and the “outcome index”. Details of the processing of the function generation unit 216 will be described later.

  The storage control unit 217 stores the measure information acquired by the measure information acquisition unit 213 in the measure database 220 together with measure determination information. Further, the storage control unit 217 stores the cost effectiveness information generated from the budget information extracted by the budget information extraction unit 215 in the cost effectiveness database 230.

  The display control unit 218 displays the information stored in the measure database 220 and the cost-effectiveness database 230 and the function generated by the function generation unit 216.

  Below, with reference to FIG. 4, the process of the regional measure evaluation process part 210 of this embodiment is demonstrated. FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining processing of the regional measure evaluation apparatus according to the first embodiment.

  The regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 of the regional measure evaluation device 200 of the present embodiment determines whether or not the designation of the local government has been received by the input receiving unit 211 (step S401). In step S401, when the designation is not accepted, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 waits until the designation of the local government is accepted.

  In step S <b> 401, when the designation of the local government is received, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 requests the evaluation information acquisition unit 212 to obtain the evaluation information of the designated local government from the regional evaluation apparatus 300. And the evaluation information acquisition part 212 acquires the evaluation information of the designated local government from the evaluation information stored in the area evaluation database 320 from the area evaluation apparatus 300, and displays it by the display control part 218 (step S402). .

  Subsequently, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 determines whether or not the input receiving unit 211 has received designation of an evaluation item included in the evaluation information (step S403). In step S403, when the designation of the evaluation item is not accepted, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 waits until the designation of the evaluation item is accepted. At this time, if the designation of the evaluation item is not accepted even after the predetermined time has elapsed, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 may end the process.

  In step S403, when the designation of the evaluation item is accepted, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 causes the measure information acquisition unit 213 to search the local government server 400 of the designated local government with the search keyword “designated evaluation item”. A search request with “measure” is made. Specifically, for example, when the designated evaluation item is “child care support”, the measure information acquisition unit 213 makes a search request to the local government server 400 with the search keyword “child care support measure” (step S404). ).

  Subsequently, the measure information acquisition unit 213 acquires measure information extracted from the local government database 410 by the search according to the search request in the local government server 400 (step S405). Here, the acquired measure information is information in which an evaluation item is associated with information related to a measure indicating the content of the local government's approach to the evaluation item.

  Next, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 determines the success or failure of the measure indicated by the measure information stored in the measure database 220 by the measure success / failure determination unit 214, and assigns the measure determination information according to the determination result to the measure information ( Step S406).

  Specifically, the measure success / failure determination unit 214 of the present embodiment refers to the target achievement level of the outcome index included in the measure information, and determines the success or failure of the measure. In the present embodiment, for example, a target achievement threshold for determining success may be set in the measure success / failure determination unit 214 in advance. For example, the measure success / failure determination unit 214 may determine that the measure is successful when the target achievement level is 70% or more.

  Next, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 causes the budget information extraction unit 215 to extract budget information from the measure information (step S407). Specifically, the budget information extraction unit 215 extracts a budget amount and a settlement amount included in the measure information as budget information.

  Next, the storage control unit 217 generates cost effectiveness information from the budget information and stores it in the cost effectiveness database 230 (step S408). Specifically, the storage control unit 217 generates cost-effectiveness information in which budget information (budget amount and settlement amount), a measure, and an outcome index are associated with each other, and stores them in the cost-effectiveness database 230.

  Next, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 causes the storage control unit 217 to store the acquired measure information and measure determination information in the measure database 220 (step S409). Here, the measure information stored in the measure database 220 may be a part of measure information not including the budget information after the budget information is extracted.

  Subsequently, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 causes the display control unit 218 to display a list of measure information and measure determination information for the specified local government and evaluation items in the display order determined based on the measure determination information. It is displayed on the output device 22 of 200 (step S410).

  Specifically, the display control unit 218 causes the measure determination information to be displayed in order from measure information in which the value of the measure determination information is “success”. In other words, the display control unit 218 preferentially displays the measure information determined to have succeeded.

  At this time, the display control unit 218 may also display a list of cost-effectiveness information stored in the cost-effectiveness database 230 together with a list of measure information.

  Subsequently, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 determines whether or not the selection of a measure has been received from the displayed measure information by the input receiving unit 211 (step S411). In step S411, when the selection of the measure is not accepted, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 stands by until the measure selection is accepted. In step S411, when the selection of the measure is not accepted even after the predetermined time has elapsed, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 may end the process.

  In step S411, when the selection of the measure is accepted, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 generates a function as a result of multivariate analysis of the “measure” and the “outcome index” by the function generation unit 216. A list and a list of cost-effectiveness information are displayed (step S412), and the process ends.

  Below, with reference to FIG. 5 thru | or FIG. 8, the process of the regional measure evaluation apparatus 200 of this embodiment is demonstrated concretely.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of an input screen for local government evaluation items in the first embodiment. In the regional measure evaluation device 200 of the present embodiment, when a local government is designated, evaluation information of the designated local government is displayed.

  A screen 51 illustrated in FIG. 5 illustrates an example of evaluation information displayed on the output device (display) 22 of the regional measure evaluation device 200.

  In the screen 51, “A city” is designated as the local government. Therefore, in the regional measure evaluation apparatus 200 according to the present embodiment, a map 50 for indicating the position of A city and evaluation information 52 of A city are displayed on the screen 51.

  In the example of FIG. 5, an icon 53 indicating the designated local government (A city) may be displayed on the map 50. Further, in the example of FIG. 5, a radar chart indicating a plurality of evaluation items and evaluation values for each evaluation item is displayed as the evaluation information 52 of the present embodiment. In the present embodiment, for example, designation of an evaluation item may be received on this radar chart.

  For example, it is assumed that a button 54 indicating “citizen participation”, which is one of the evaluation items, is selected in the evaluation information 52. In this case, the regional measure evaluation apparatus 200 transmits the search keyword “citizen participation measure” and the search request to the local government server 400 in the A city by the measure information acquisition unit 213.

  Next, the measure database 220 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a measure database.

  In the regional measure evaluation device 200 of this embodiment, when the measure information acquisition unit 213 transmits the search keyword and the search request to the local government server 400, the measure information 61 is acquired from the local government server 400 and stored in the measure database 220.

  In the measure database 220 shown in FIG. 6, the measure information 61 includes, as information items, a local government, an evaluation item, a basic measure, a measure, an index, and a target achievement level. In the measure database 220, the item “local government” is associated with other items, and information including the value of the item “locality” and the values of other items is referred to as measure information.

  The value of the item “local government” indicates the name of a local government such as a designated municipality. The value of the item “evaluation item” indicates the name of the designated evaluation item. The value of the item “basic measure” indicates the name of the measure. The value of the item “measure” indicates a measure included in the basic measure. In other words, the value of the item “measure” is a measure obtained by subdividing the basic measure indicated by the value of the item “basic measure”.

  The value of the item “outcome index” indicates an index representing the effect / result generated by the implementation of the measure. The value of the item “target achievement level” indicates the target achievement level of the outcome index.

  Further, in the measure database 220, measure determination information 62 indicating the success / failure determination result for each measure is given. The measure determination information 62 has “success / failure determination” as an information item. The value of the item “success / failure determination” indicates a determination result by the measure success / failure determination unit 214.

  In the example of FIG. 6, measure information 61 and measure determination information 62 when the local government “A city” is specified and the evaluation item “citizen participation” is specified are shown. In other words, in the example of FIG. 6, as a result of searching the local government database 410 of “A city” by “citizen participation measures”, measure information 61 extracted and measure determination information 62 indicating the result of determining success or failure for each measure. It shows.

  In this case, it is understood that the basic measure “promotion of civic participation” and the measure “activation of local activities / civic public interest activities” are extracted from the municipality database 410 of City A. In addition, in Fig. 6, “Ratio of the number of members of civil society groups in the population” is extracted as an outcome index of the measure “Activation of community activities / civic public interest activities”, and the target achievement level is “80%”. It can be seen that the determination result of the measure by the measure success / failure determination unit 214 is “success”.

  Furthermore, in FIG. 6, “specific contract number of collaborative projects” is extracted as an outcome index of the measure “revitalization of community activities / citizen public interest activities” and the target achievement level is “20%”. It can be seen that the determination result by the measure success / failure determination unit 214 is “delay”.

  As described above, in the present embodiment, in the measure database 220, the measure information related to the measure corresponding to the evaluation item corresponding to the designated evaluation item of the designated local government can be associated.

  In the example of FIG. 6, the measure information acquired from the local government database 410 designed by the A city when the local government “A city” is designated.

  When the designated local government is, for example, B city, measure information is acquired from the local government database 410 designed by the B city. Therefore, in that case, items included in the measure information of the measure database 220 may be different from the example of FIG.

  Next, the cost effectiveness database 230 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of a cost-effectiveness database.

  In the example of FIG. 7, cost-effectiveness information generated based on budget information extracted from measure information when the local government “A city” is designated and the evaluation item “citizen participation” is designated is shown.

  The cost-effectiveness database 230 includes information items such as measures, outcome indicators, budget amounts, and settlement amounts, and the item “measures” is associated with other items.

  The value of the item “budget amount” indicates the budget amount allocated to the corresponding measure. The value of the item “financial value” indicates the financial value of the corresponding measure.

  In the example of Fig. 7, the budget amount to achieve the target of the outcome measure "proportion of civic action group members in the population" of the measure "revitalization of local activities and civic public interest activities" is 1 million yen, It can be seen that the amount is 800,000 yen.

  In the example of Fig. 7, the budget amount to achieve the target of the outcome indicator "number of specific contracts for collaborative projects" for the measure "revitalization of local activities / citizen public interest activities" is 1 million yen, Is 1.2 million yen.

  Thus, in this embodiment, the measure, the budget amount and the settlement amount in the measure are associated in the cost-effectiveness database 230.

  Next, with reference to FIG. 8, the policy information displayed on the display of the regional policy evaluation device 200, the policy determination information, and the cost effectiveness information will be described.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a display example by the regional measure evaluation device of the first embodiment. The screen 81 shown in FIG. 8 shows an example in which measure information, measure determination information, and cost-effectiveness information are displayed when the local government “A city” is designated and the evaluation item “citizen participation” is designated. ing.

  On the screen 81, measure information 61 stored in the measure database 220, measure determination information 62, and budget information 83 which is a part of cost effectiveness information are displayed in association with each other.

  At this time, on the screen 81, the measure information is displayed in order from the measure information associated with the measure determination information determined to be “success”.

  In the example of the screen 81, among the measures “activation of local activities / civic public interest activities”, a measure that uses “the ratio of the number of members of the civic activity group in the population” as an outcome index is determined as “success”. In addition, among the measures “Activation of Community Activities / Citizens' Public Interest Activities,” measures that use “specific contract number of collaborative projects” as an outcome measure are determined to be “delayed”. Therefore, in this embodiment, it displays from the former measure.

  Thus, in this embodiment, since the measure information regarding the successful measure is displayed in order, the user of the regional measure evaluation system 100 can easily grasp what measure is effective for the evaluation item. Can be made.

  In the present embodiment, the display order is determined based on the measure determination information, but the present invention is not limited to this. The display order of the measure information may be, for example, the order in which the goal achievement level is high.

  In this embodiment, by displaying the budget information 83 for each measure, the cost effectiveness of the measure for the evaluation item can be presented to the user of the regional measure evaluation system 100. Therefore, the user of the regional measure evaluation system 100 can refer to, for example, an estimate of the budget for the measure based on this information.

  In this embodiment, for example, when a certain measure is selected on the screen 81, a function indicating the relationship between the target achievement level of the selected measure and the target achievement level of the outcome index is generated and displayed.

  The example of FIG. 8 shows a case where the measure “activation of local activities / civic public interest activities” is selected. In this case, a function 84 indicating the relationship between the target achievement level of the measure “activation of local activities / citizen public interest activities” and the target achievement levels of the two outcome indicators associated with this measure is displayed. In the function 84, A and B are coefficients, and C is a constant.

  In the present embodiment, for example, when a measure is selected on the screen 81, the function generation unit 216 causes the measure information including the selected measure in the measure information of the local government corresponding to the selected measure in the measure database 220. To extract.

  Then, the function 84 can be generated by performing multivariate analysis of the measure in the measure information and the outcome index corresponding to the measure.

  In the present embodiment, by displaying this function 84, for example, how the change in the achievement level of the two outcome indicators is achieved with respect to the achievement level of the measure “activation of community activities / citizen public interest activities”. It can be shown to the user of the regional measure evaluation system 100 whether it is affected.

  For example, if the degree of achievement of the goal of the outcome indicator “Percentage of citizen activity group members in the population” has a greater effect on the goal achievement level of the overall measure, It can be seen that it is only necessary to focus on improving the target achievement ratio of “number ratio”.

  Further, in the present embodiment, for example, measure information of the measure “activation of local activities / citizen public interest activities” may be accumulated in the measure database 220 every year or the like. In this case, as the number of times of accumulation increases, the accuracy of multivariate analysis can be improved.

  As described above, in the present embodiment, the evaluation items in the evaluation information for the local government and the measure information for each evaluation item can be associated with each other and presented. In addition, according to the present embodiment, the user of the regional measure evaluation system 100 can refer to information in which evaluation items and measures are associated with each other only by specifying the local government and the evaluation item. It is possible to reduce the trouble of searching for the target information by accessing

  Specifically, for example, it is assumed that a user of the regional measure evaluation system 100 is interested in the regional characteristics of a certain local government, and the local measure evaluation apparatus 200 designates the local government and displays the evaluation information. At that time, it is assumed that this user is interested in what kind of efforts the local government is taking for each evaluation item.

  In that case, this user simply specifies the evaluation item that he / she is interested in in the displayed evaluation information, and what kind of efforts the local government is doing for the specified evaluation item, Can know.

(Second embodiment)
The second embodiment will be described below with reference to the drawings. The second embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that an evaluation item that is a subject is extracted from evaluation information of a local government, and measure information for the extracted evaluation item is displayed. Therefore, in the following description of the second embodiment, differences from the first embodiment will be described, and those requiring the same functional configuration as the first embodiment will be described in the description of the first embodiment. The same reference numerals as those used are assigned, and the description thereof is omitted.

  FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining functions of the regional measure evaluation apparatus according to the second embodiment. The regional measure evaluation processing unit 210A of the present embodiment includes a task item extraction unit 219 in addition to the units included in the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 of the first embodiment.

  The task item extraction unit 219 extracts the evaluation item as a task in the evaluation information acquired by the evaluation information acquisition unit 212 and passes it to the measure information acquisition unit 213.

  Specifically, for example, when a certain local government and a local government to be compared are designated, the task item extraction unit 219 compares the evaluation information of the two, and selects the evaluation item having the largest evaluation value difference. It is an evaluation item that is regarded as an issue.

  Further, for example, when a local government is designated, the assignment item extraction unit 219 may set the item having the lowest evaluation value as the evaluation item as the assignment in the evaluation information of the designated local government.

  The measure information acquisition unit 213 of the present embodiment makes a search request to the local government server 400 of the specified local government using the evaluation item passed from the task item extraction unit 219 as a search keyword.

  FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining processing of the regional measure evaluation apparatus according to the second embodiment.

  In FIG. 10, the local government that is the display target of the measure information and the comparative local government that is compared with the local government are selected, and the comparison result of the evaluation information of the two local governments is used to display the measure information in the local government that is the display target of the measure information. The process in case the evaluation item made into a subject is extracted is shown.

  The regional measure evaluation processing unit 210A of the present embodiment determines whether or not the designation of the local government has been received by the input receiving unit 211 (step S1001). Here, in this embodiment, the input of both the local government that is the display target of the measure information and the local government that is the comparison target is accepted.

  If the corresponding input is not accepted in step S1001, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210A waits until the input is accepted.

  In step S <b> 1001, upon receiving a corresponding input, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 </ b> A makes an acquisition request for the evaluation information of the two local governments designated to the regional evaluation device 300 by the evaluation information acquisition unit 212. And the evaluation information acquisition part 212 acquires the evaluation information of two designated local governments among the evaluation information stored in the area evaluation database 320 from the area evaluation apparatus 300, and displays it by the display control part 218 (step). S1002).

  Next, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210A compares the evaluation information of the two local governments with the task item extraction unit 219 (step S1003). Specifically, the task item extraction unit 219 may perform a process of extracting a difference between evaluation values for each evaluation item of two evaluation information as a comparison of evaluation information of each local government.

  Subsequently, the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210A extracts an evaluation item to be a task by the task item extraction unit 219 and passes it to the measure information acquisition unit 213 (step S1004). Specifically, the task item extraction unit 219 has an evaluation value smaller than the evaluation value of the evaluation item of the comparison target local government among the evaluation items of the local government that are the display targets of the measure information, and the difference is You may extract the largest evaluation item as an evaluation item made into a subject.

  The processing from step S1005 to step S1013 in FIG. 10 is the same as the processing from step S404 to step S412 in FIG.

  Below, with reference to FIG. 11, extraction of the evaluation item by the task item extraction part 219 is demonstrated. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating extraction of evaluation items in the second embodiment.

  FIG. 11 shows a case where A city is designated as the local government for which the measure information is displayed, and Y city is designated as the comparative local government.

  On the screen 111 shown in FIG. 11, a radar chart 112 for city A and a radar chart 113 for city Y are displayed.

  In the present embodiment, the evaluation values of the evaluation items of the radar charts 112 and 113 are compared, and the evaluation item having the largest difference between the evaluation value of the radar chart 112 and the evaluation value of the radar chart 113 is defined as a problem. To be extracted. In the example of FIG. 11, it can be seen that the evaluation item “citizen participation” is extracted as the evaluation item to be the subject.

  The extraction of evaluation items by the assignment item extraction unit 219 is not limited to the method described above. For example, the task item extraction unit 219 may extract a plurality of items whose evaluation values are lower than those of the local governments to be compared.

  Moreover, in this embodiment, the local government for comparison is designated in addition to the local government for which the measure information is displayed, but the present invention is not limited to this. In the present embodiment, for example, when only the local government that is the display target of the measure information is specified, the evaluation item with the lowest evaluation value may be extracted as an issue, or a plurality of evaluation items in order from the lowest evaluation value. The evaluation items may be extracted as a problem.

  As described above, in this embodiment, it is possible to extract the evaluation items that are the issues of the local government from the evaluation information of the local government, and associate the extracted evaluation items with the measure information corresponding to the evaluation items.

  Therefore, according to this embodiment, the problem which the local government has can be extracted, the problem and the countermeasure (measure) against the problem can be displayed in association with each other, and verification of the countermeasure against the problem can be supported.

(Third embodiment)
The third embodiment will be described below with reference to the drawings. The third embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that the regional measure evaluation device 200 and the regional evaluation device 300 are realized by one device. Therefore, in the following description of the third embodiment, only differences from the first embodiment will be described, and those having the same functional configuration as the first embodiment will be described for the first embodiment. The same reference numerals as those used in FIG.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of a regional measure evaluation system according to the third embodiment. The regional measure evaluation system 100A of this embodiment includes a regional measure evaluation device 200A and a terminal device 500.

  The regional measure evaluation apparatus 200 </ b> A according to the present embodiment includes a regional evaluation processing unit 310, a regional measure evaluation processing unit 210, a regional evaluation database 320, a measure database 220, and a cost effectiveness database 230.

  The regional measure evaluation device 200A of the present embodiment displays an input screen for designating a local government on the terminal device 500, and when the local government is designated in the terminal device 500, the corresponding evaluation information from the regional evaluation database 320 is displayed on the terminal device. 500.

  In addition, when an evaluation item is specified in the terminal device 500, the regional measure evaluation apparatus 200A acquires corresponding measure information from the local government server 400 by the local measure evaluation processing unit 210 and displays it on the terminal device 500. Store in the measure database 220.

  The terminal device 500 of this embodiment may be, for example, a general computer, a tablet computer, a smartphone, or the like.

  As described above, in the present embodiment, by providing the regional measure evaluation unit 310 and the regional measure evaluation processing unit 210 in the regional measure evaluation apparatus 200A, it is not necessary to introduce a special application or the like to the terminal device 500. , Can increase versatility. In addition, the processing load on the terminal device 500 can be reduced.

In the disclosed technology, forms such as the following supplementary notes are conceivable.
(Appendix 1)
A regional measure evaluation method by a regional measure evaluation system having a regional measure evaluation device in which evaluation information for evaluating local characteristics of a local government is stored for each local government, and a regional measure evaluation device that communicates with the regional evaluation device,
The regional measure evaluation device
Obtain evaluation information corresponding to the specified local government from the regional evaluation device,
The measure information indicating the content of the designated municipality's efforts corresponding to the assessment item designated in the assessment information is acquired from an external device,
A regional measure evaluation method for outputting the evaluation item and the measure information in association with each other.
(Appendix 2)
The regional measure evaluation device
The success or failure of the initiative is determined based on an index that represents the result generated by the effort included in the measure information.
The regional measure evaluation method according to appendix 1, which is output in order from the efforts determined to be successful.
(Appendix 3)
The regional measure evaluation device
The regional measure evaluation method according to appendix 1 or 2, wherein budget information including a budget amount and a settlement amount for the approach is extracted from the measure information, and is output together with the measure information.
(Appendix 4)
The regional measure evaluation device
Generate a function indicating the degree of achievement of the goal for the approach, the degree of goal achievement of the index representing the outcome generated by the effort,
The regional measure evaluation method according to appendix 2 or 3, wherein the generated function is output together with the measure information.
(Appendix 5)
The regional measure evaluation method according to any one of appendices 1 to 4, wherein the evaluation item having the lowest evaluation among the evaluation items included in the evaluation information is the designated evaluation item.
(Appendix 6)
The regional measure evaluation device
According to the result of comparing the first evaluation information of the first local government designated as the acquisition target of the measure information and the second evaluation information of the second local government designated as the comparison target of the first local government To extract evaluation items,
The regional measure evaluation method according to any one of appendices 1 to 4, wherein the extracted evaluation item is the designated evaluation item.
(Appendix 7)
The regional measure evaluation method according to any one of appendices 1 to 6, wherein the external device is a server device provided for each designated local government.
(Appendix 8)
The measure information is
At least the name of the evaluation item, the name of the approach, an index representing the outcome generated by the approach, the target achievement level of the index, and budget information including a budget amount and a settlement amount for the approach The regional measure evaluation method according to any one of appendices 1 to 7.
(Appendix 9)
A regional measure evaluation system having a regional evaluation device in which evaluation information for evaluating a regional characteristic of a local government is stored for each local government, and a regional measure evaluation device that communicates with the regional evaluation device,
The regional measure evaluation device
An evaluation information acquisition unit for acquiring evaluation information corresponding to the designated local government from the regional evaluation device;
A measure information acquisition unit for acquiring measure information indicating the content of the designated local government's efforts corresponding to the evaluation item specified in the evaluation information;
A regional measure evaluation system comprising: an output unit that outputs the evaluation item and the measure information in association with each other.
(Appendix 10)
A regional measure evaluation system having a terminal device and a regional measure evaluation device in which evaluation information for evaluating local characteristics of a local government is stored for each local government,
The regional measure evaluation device
An evaluation information storage unit in which the evaluation information is stored for each municipality;
An evaluation information acquisition unit for acquiring evaluation information corresponding to the designated local government from the regional evaluation device;
A measure information acquisition unit for acquiring measure information indicating the content of the designated local government's efforts corresponding to the evaluation item specified in the evaluation information;
A regional measure evaluation system comprising: an output unit that outputs the evaluation item and the measure information in association with each other.
(Appendix 11)
An evaluation information acquisition unit that acquires evaluation information corresponding to a designated local government from a regional evaluation device in which evaluation information obtained by evaluating the local characteristics of the local government is stored for each local government;
A measure information acquisition unit for acquiring measure information indicating the content of the designated local government's efforts corresponding to the evaluation item specified in the evaluation information;
A regional measure evaluation apparatus comprising: an output unit that outputs the evaluation item and the measure information in association with each other.
(Appendix 12)
An evaluation information storage unit in which evaluation information for evaluating local characteristics of local governments is stored for each local government,
An evaluation information acquisition unit that acquires evaluation information corresponding to the designated local government from the evaluation information storage unit;
A measure information acquisition unit for acquiring measure information indicating the content of the designated local government's efforts corresponding to the evaluation item specified in the evaluation information;
A regional measure evaluation apparatus comprising: an output unit that outputs the evaluation item and the measure information in association with each other.
(Appendix 13)
On the computer,
Processing for obtaining evaluation information corresponding to a designated local government from a regional evaluation device in which evaluation information for evaluating local characteristics of the local government is stored for each local government;
Processing for acquiring measure information indicating the content of the designated local government's efforts corresponding to the evaluation item specified in the evaluation information from an external device;
The regional measure evaluation program which performs the process which matches and outputs the said evaluation item and the said measure information.

  The present invention is not limited to the specifically disclosed embodiments, and various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the claims.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 100 Regional measure evaluation system 200 Regional measure evaluation apparatus 210 Local measure evaluation processing part 211 Input reception part 212 Evaluation information acquisition part 213 Measure information acquisition part 214 Measure success / failure determination part 215 Budget information extraction part 216 Function generation part 220 Measure database 230 Cost Effect database 300 Regional evaluation device 310 Regional evaluation database 320 Regional evaluation processing unit 400 Local government server 410 Local government database

Claims (5)

A regional measure evaluation method by a regional measure evaluation system having a regional measure evaluation device in which evaluation information for evaluating local characteristics of a local government is stored for each local government, and a regional measure evaluation device that communicates with the regional evaluation device,
The regional measure evaluation device
Obtain evaluation information corresponding to the specified local government from the regional evaluation device,
The measure information indicating the content of the designated municipality's efforts corresponding to the assessment item designated in the assessment information is acquired from an external device,
A regional measure evaluation method for outputting the evaluation item and the measure information in association with each other. The regional measure evaluation device
The success or failure of the initiative is determined based on an index that represents the result generated by the effort included in the measure information.
The regional measure evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the regional measure is output in order from the approach determined to be successful. The regional measure evaluation device
The regional measure evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein budget information including a budget amount and a settlement amount for the approach is extracted from the measure information and output together with the measure information. The regional measure evaluation device
Generate a function indicating the degree of achievement of the goal for the approach, the degree of goal achievement of the index representing the outcome generated by the effort,
The regional measure evaluation method according to claim 2 or 3, wherein the generated function is output together with the measure information. A regional measure evaluation system having a regional evaluation device in which evaluation information for evaluating a regional characteristic of a local government is stored for each local government, and a regional measure evaluation device that communicates with the regional evaluation device,
The regional measure evaluation device
An evaluation information acquisition unit for acquiring evaluation information corresponding to the designated local government from the regional evaluation device;
A measure information acquisition unit for acquiring measure information indicating the content of the designated local government's efforts corresponding to the evaluation item specified in the evaluation information;
A regional measure evaluation system comprising: an output unit that outputs the evaluation item and the measure information in association with each other.

Images