JP2017525012A5 - - Google Patents
Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2017525012A5 JP2017525012A5 JP2016570866A JP2016570866A JP2017525012A5 JP 2017525012 A5 JP2017525012 A5 JP 2017525012A5 JP 2016570866 A JP2016570866 A JP 2016570866A JP 2016570866 A JP2016570866 A JP 2016570866A JP 2017525012 A5 JP2017525012 A5 JP 2017525012A5
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- ies
- user
- uie
- ast
- computer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims 4
- 230000002452 interceptive Effects 0.000 claims 3
- 230000001360 synchronised Effects 0.000 description 1
Description
IESのUIEは、それぞれ分離され、同調して用いられるコンフィグ/リアルタイムモードにおいて、UIE.Y,Y=1,2,...,から構成される。各UIE.Yは、知識表現「KR−UIE.Y」、人的相互作用「HI−UIE.Y」、相互作用制御「IC−UIE.Y」エンティティを有する。
The IES UIE is separated and used in a synchronized configuration / real time mode. Y, Y = 1, 2,. . . , Is composed. Each UIE. Y has a knowledge representation “KR-UIE.Y”, a human interaction “HI-UIE.Y”, and an interaction control “IC-UIE.Y” entity.
IES又はそのユーザは、それらの間で「相互作用」を起動する。
The IES or its user initiates an “interaction” between them.
Claims (30)
少なくともプロセッサ、プロセッサで実行可能な方法のコードを格納するメモリ、IES(Innovation Expert System)ユーザとのIESの対話を行うための少なくとも1つのI/O装置、IESの動作に関するデータが格納されるメモリ、及び、「ユーザインターフェイスエンティティ、UIE(User Interface Entity)」を有し、前記UIEは、UIE::={<KR−UIE、HI−UIE、IC−UIE>.Y|Y∈YUIE}を含む、「イノベーションエキスパートシステム、IES(Innovation Expert System)」を実行し、
前記メモリに格納されたFSTPFFOLLIN‐テストによって決定された所定の「PTRデータ構造、PTRFFOLLIN‐DS(PTR Data Structure)」と、「論証可能サブテスト、前記メモリに格納されたAST(Arguable Subtest)」∈FSTPFFOLLIN‐テスト(将来の「FFOLLIN」を除く)と、に対して、「法的文法項連鎖、LAC(legal argument chain)の集合を生成かつカスタマイズするコンフィグモードにおいて、
但し、{LAC}::={LACAST.Z|LACAST.ZはTT.0がAST∀Z∈ZASTを通過することを論証する}であり、よって、∀Z∈ZAST⊂YUIEは、ASTを有するKR−UIE.Z、ユーザにより入力されるHI−UIE.Z及びユーザにより決定されるIC−UIE.Zを保持し、
リアルタイムモードでは、起動及び/又はカスタマイズされたLACAST.Z、Z∈ZASTを提起し、
前記IESによって実行された場合、前記IESがコンフィグモードの場合には動作A)を、前記IESがリアルタイムモードの場合には動作B)を、繰り返し連続して、完全に、かつ任意のIESユーザに対して実行し、
前記IESの動作A)及びB)は、下記の通りであり、
A)
i.前記IESは、既に存在するLACAST又はLACに変換されるAST∈FSTP‐テスト(PTR)に対するZ∈ZASTを自動的に認識し、
ii.前記認識したKR‐UIE.Zに前記ASTを入力し、このASTがどのI/O装置上のものであるかを表現するものをそのHI‐UIE.Zに入力し、前記ASTの前記表現においてユーザがどの対話制御を有するかをそのIC‐UIEに入力するように、自動的にユーザに促し、
iii.少なくとも1つの他のIESユーザのI/O装置と通信する少なくとも1つのIESユーザからの情報を自動的に受け付け、
iv.IESユーザの要求に応じて、前記IESユーザのIESモードを前記リアルタイムモードに切り替え、
B)
i.LAC∈{LACAST}を自動的に認識し、
ii.自動的にASTを認識し、そして自動的にLAC∈{LACAST}を認識し、
iii.前記LACを決定するにあたり、A)のii.において定義されるように又は前もって定義されるようにLACを表現し、
iv.少なくとも1つの他のIESユーザのI/O装置と通信する少なくとも1つのIESユーザからの情報を自動的に受け付け、
v.IESユーザの要求に応じて、前記IESユーザのIESモードを前記コンフィグモードに切り替える、
コンピュータ実装方法。 By running
At least a processor, a memory for storing code of a method executable by the processor, at least one I / O device for performing an IES interaction with an IES (Innovation Expert System) user, a memory for storing data relating to the operation of the IES , And “User Interface Entity (UIE)”, the UIE is a UIE :: = {<KR-UIE, HI-UIE, IC-UIE>. Execute “Innovation Expert System (IES)” including Y | Y∈Y UIE }
Predetermined “PTR data structure, PTR FFOLLIN- DS (PTR Data Structure)” determined by FSTP FFOLLIN -test stored in the memory , “demonstable subtest , AST (Arguable Subtest) stored in the memory ” ”∈FSTP FFOLLIN -for tests (except for future “ FFOLLIN ” ), and“ in config mode to generate and customize a set of legal grammar term chains, LAC (legal argument chains),
However, {LAC} :: = {LAC AST . Z | LAC AST . Z is TT. 0 proves that it passes through AST∀ZεZ AST }, so that ∀ZεZ AST ⊂Y UIE is the KR-UIE. Z, HI-UIE. Z and user-determined IC-UIE. Holding Z,
In real-time mode, the activated and / or customized LAC AST . Z, Z ∈ Z AST ,
When executed by the IES, the operation A) is repeated when the IES is in the configuration mode, and the operation B) is repeated when the IES is in the real-time mode. Run against
The operations A) and B) of the IES are as follows:
A)
i. The IES automatically recognizes ZεZ AST for existing LAC AST or ASTεFSTP-test (PTR) converted to LAC,
ii. The recognized KR-UIE. The AST is input to Z, and what expresses which I / O device the AST is on is expressed as its HI-UIE. Automatically prompting the user to enter in the IC-UIE what interaction control the user has in the representation of the AST
iii. Automatically accepts information from at least one IES user communicating with at least one other IES user's I / O device;
iv. In response to a request from an IES user, the IES user's IES mode is switched to the real-time mode,
B)
i. Automatically recognize LACε {LAC AST },
ii. Automatically recognizes AST, and automatically recognizes LACε {LAC AST },
iii. In determining the LAC, ii. Of A). Represent the LAC as Ru is or predefined as defined in,
iv. Automatically accepts information from at least one IES user communicating with at least one other IES user's I / O device;
v. In response to a request from an IES user, the IES user's IES mode is switched to the configuration mode.
Computer mounting method.
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 Either by selecting the expression from a predetermined set of IES of the expression described above, or by describing the expression in a predetermined IES notation, the user input expression requested by the IES is recognized by the user. ,
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 An IES that is output for use by at least one IES user, either by selecting the representation from a predetermined set of IES of the representation described above, or by describing the representation in a predetermined IES notation. Is recognized by the user,
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 User input is at least KR-UIE. Y, HI-UIE. Y or IC-UIE. Switch the function of the IES to automatically generate or modify part of Y interactively with the user,
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
UIE.Yを更に分割又は除去する動作は、ユーザ又はIESユーザに制御された前記IESによって決定され、A)及びB)で定義された任意の動作がステップに適用される、
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 The IES is a UIE. For Y, UIE. Y or UIE. Providing the user with the ability to further divide Y steps into steps and eliminate such subdivisions;
UIE. The action of further dividing or removing Y is determined by the IES controlled by the user or IES user, and any action defined in A) and B) is applied to the step.
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 The at least one AST is completely entered by the IES user or is derived by the IES from at least one PTR-DS recognized by the IES user, interactively or automatically with the IES user,
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
もし不十分である場合には、前記PTR−DSは、IESユーザとの間で対話的な前記IESによって完成される、
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 The PTR-DS is partially entered, modified or verified by an IES user,
If insufficient, the PTR-DS is completed by the IES interactive with IES users.
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 The FFOLLIN is provided by the PTR-DS, or the FFOLN is selected from a predetermined IES set of the FFROLLN, and the TT. Input by the user either by completing the selected FFOLN as FFOLLIN with 0 inC, and by describing the FFOLLIN or FFROLLN in a predetermined IES description method.
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
前記IESは、制限の結果の集合がFFOLの性質が保たれることをチェックする、
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 The IES user restricts SPL by document, and TT. The additional restriction to 0 is described by the notation given by the IES,
The IES checks that the result set of restrictions retains the FFOL property.
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
その使用に関するログファイルに書き出し、
その使用を瞬間的に、又は、IESユーザが構築可能な所定のIESイベントが生じたかを、IESユーザに通知する、
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 The IES user follows the predetermined procedure of the IES and the PTR-DS and the associated TT. Can be authenticated to mark up at least one part of the UIE used by the zero test and to allow the IES to monitor its use as well as to recognize and authenticate any such part Sign in a
Write a log file about its use,
Informs the IES user of its use instantaneously or whether a certain IES event that can be constructed by the IES user has occurred,
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 Both states expressed as configured by the IES user in the notation provided by the IES by the IES user recognizing the actual state of the IES and switching between different recognized states Obtaining a description of the difference from the IES;
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 The IES user cancels the most recent interaction with the IES that changes its I / EM,
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 An IES user enables / disables at least one other IES user for at least one interaction with the IES user;
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 An IES user can select at least a portion of the representation of the IES that is selectable from a set of parts provided by the IES or described by the IES user in a notation provided by the IES. Synchronize to two IES users,
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
請求項1に記載のコンピュータ実装方法。 An IES user can select an IES user from a set of parts provided by the IES, or described by the IES user in a notation provided by the IES. Request a part of the log file of the IES execution period for 0,
The computer-implemented method of claim 1.
少なくともプロセッサ、プロセッサで実行可能な方法のコードを格納するメモリ、IES(Innovation Expert System)ユーザとのIESの対話を行うための少なくとも1つのI/O装置、IESの動作に関するデータが格納されるメモリ、及び、「ユーザインターフェイスエンティティ、UIE(User Interface Entity)」を有し、前記UIEは、UIE::={<KR−UIE、HI−UIE、IC−UIE>.Y|Y∈YUIE}を含む、「イノベーションエキスパートシステム、IES(Innovation Expert System)」を実行し、
前記メモリに格納されたFSTPFFOLLIN‐テストによって決定された所定の「PTRデータ構造、PTRFFOLLIN‐DS(PTR Data Structure)」と、前記メモリに格納された「論証可能サブテスト、AST(Arguable Subtest)」∈FSTPFFOLLIN‐テスト(将来の「FFOLLIN」を除く)と、に対して、「法的文法項連鎖、LAC(legal argument chain)の集合を生成かつカスタマイズするコンフィグモードにおいて、
但し、{LAC}::={LACAST.Z|LACAST.ZはTT.0がAST∀Z∈ZASTを通過することを論証する}であり、よって、∀Z∈ZAST⊂YUIEは、ASTを有するKR−UIE.Z、ユーザにより入力されるHI−UIE.Z及びユーザにより決定されるIC−UIE.Zを保持し、
リアルタイムモードでは、起動及び/又はカスタマイズされたLACAST.Z、Z∈ZASTを提起し、
前記IESによって実行された場合、前記IESがコンフィグモードの場合には動作A)を、前記IESがリアルタイムモードの場合には動作B)を、繰り返し連続して、完全に、かつ任意のIESユーザに対して実行し、
前記IESの動作A)及びB)は、下記の通りであり、
A)
i.前記IESは、既に存在するLACAST又はLACに変換されるAST∈FSTP‐テスト(PTR)に対するZ∈ZASTを自動的に認識し、
ii.前記認識したKR‐−UIE.Zに前記ASTを入力し、このASTがどのI/O装置上のものであるかを表現するものをそのHI‐UIE.Zに入力し、前記ASTの前記表現においてユーザがどの対話制御を有するかをそのIC−UIEに入力するように、自動的にユーザに促し、
iii.少なくとも1つの他のIESユーザのI/O装置と通信する少なくとも1つのIESユーザからの情報を自動的に受け付け、
iv.IESユーザの要求に応じて、前記IESユーザのIESモードを前記リアルタイムモードに切り替え、
B)
i.LAC∈{LACAST}を自動的に認識し、
ii.自動的にASTを認識し、そして自動的にLAC∈{LACAST}を認識し、
iii.前記LACを決定するにあたり、A)のii.において定義されるように又は前もって定義されるようにLACを表現し、
iv.少なくとも1つの他のIESユーザのI/O装置と通信する少なくとも1つのIESユーザからの情報を自動的に受け付け、
v.IESユーザの要求に応じて、前記IESユーザのIESモードを前記コンフィグモードに切り替える、
コンピュータ実装システム。 By running
At least a processor, a memory for storing code of a method executable by the processor, at least one I / O device for performing an IES interaction with an IES (Innovation Expert System) user, a memory for storing data relating to the operation of the IES , And “User Interface Entity (UIE)”, the UIE is a UIE :: = {<KR-UIE, HI-UIE, IC-UIE>. Execute “Innovation Expert System (IES)” including Y | Y∈Y UIE }
FSTP FFOLLIN stored in the memory - predetermined determined by the test "PTR data structures, PTR FFOLLIN -DS (PTR Data Structure ) " and stored in the memory has been "demonstrable subtest, AST (Arguable Subtest) ”∈FSTP FFOLLIN -for tests (except for future “ FFOLLIN ” ), and“ in config mode to generate and customize a set of legal grammar term chains, LAC (legal argument chains),
However, {LAC} :: = {LAC AST . Z | LAC AST . Z is TT. 0 proves that it passes through AST∀ZεZ AST }, so that ∀ZεZ AST ⊂Y UIE is the KR-UIE. Z, HI-UIE. Z and user-determined IC-UIE. Holding Z,
In real-time mode, the activated and / or customized LAC AST . Z, Z ∈ Z AST ,
When executed by the IES, the operation A) is repeated when the IES is in the configuration mode, and the operation B) is repeated when the IES is in the real-time mode. Run against
The operations A) and B) of the IES are as follows:
A)
i. The IES automatically recognizes ZεZ AST for existing LAC AST or ASTεFSTP-test (PTR) converted to LAC,
ii. The recognized KR--UIE. The AST is input to Z, and what expresses which I / O device the AST is on is expressed as its HI-UIE. Automatically prompts the user to enter into the IC-UI what interactive control the user has in the representation of the AST,
iii. Automatically accepts information from at least one IES user communicating with at least one other IES user's I / O device;
iv. In response to a request from an IES user, the IES user's IES mode is switched to the real-time mode,
B)
i. Automatically recognize LACε {LAC AST },
ii. Automatically recognizes AST, and automatically recognizes LACε {LAC AST },
iii. In determining the LAC, ii. Of A). Represent the LAC as Ru is or predefined as defined in,
iv. Automatically accepts information from at least one IES user communicating with at least one other IES user's I / O device;
v. In response to a request from an IES user, the IES user's IES mode is switched to the configuration mode.
Computer mounted system.
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 Either by selecting the expression from a predetermined set of IES of the expression described above, or by describing the expression in a predetermined IES notation, the user input expression requested by the IES is recognized by the user. ,
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 An IES that is output for use by at least one IES user, either by selecting the representation from a predetermined set of IES of the representation described above, or by describing the representation in a predetermined IES notation. Is recognized by the user,
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 User input is at least KR-UIE. Y, HI-UIE. Y or IC-UIE. Switch the function of the IES to automatically generate or modify part of Y interactively with the user,
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
UIE.Yを更に分割又は除去する動作は、ユーザ又はIESユーザに制御された前記IESによって決定され、A)及びB)で定義された任意の動作がステップに適用される、
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 The IES is a UIE. For Y, UIE. Y or UIE. Providing the user with the ability to further divide Y steps into steps and eliminate such subdivisions;
UIE. The action of further dividing or removing Y is determined by the IES controlled by the user or IES user, and any action defined in A) and B) is applied to the step.
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 The at least one AST is completely entered by the IES user or is derived by the IES from at least one PTR-DS recognized by the IES user, interactively or automatically with the IES user,
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
もし不十分である場合には、前記PTR−DSは、IESユーザとの間で対話的な前記IESによって完成される、
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 The PTR-DS is partially entered, modified or verified by an IES user,
If insufficient, the PTR-DS is completed by the IES interactive with IES users.
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 The FFOLLIN is provided by the PTR-DS, or the FFOLN is selected from a predetermined IES set of the FFROLLN, and the TT. Input by the user either by completing the selected FFOLN as FFOLLIN with 0 inC, and by describing the FFOLLIN or FFROLLN in a predetermined IES description method.
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
前記IESは、制限の結果の集合がFFOLの性質が保たれることをチェックする、
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 The IES user restricts SPL by document, and TT. The additional restriction to 0 is described by the notation given by the IES,
The IES checks that the result set of restrictions retains the FFOL property.
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
その使用に関するログファイルに書き出し、
その使用を瞬間的に、又は、IESユーザが構築可能な所定のIESイベントが生じたかを、IESユーザに通知する、
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 The IES user follows the predetermined procedure of the IES and the PTR-DS and the associated TT. Can be authenticated to mark up at least one part of the UIE used by the zero test and to allow the IES to monitor its use as well as to recognize and authenticate any such part Sign in a
Write a log file about its use,
Informs the IES user of its use instantaneously or whether a certain IES event that can be constructed by the IES user has occurred,
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 Both states expressed as configured by the IES user in the notation provided by the IES by the IES user recognizing the actual state of the IES and switching between different recognized states Obtaining a description of the difference from the IES;
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 The IES user cancels the most recent interaction with the IES that changes its I / EM,
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 An IES user enables / disables at least one other IES user for at least one interaction with the IES user;
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 An IES user can select at least a portion of the representation of the IES that is selectable from a set of parts provided by the IES or described by the IES user in a notation provided by the IES. Synchronize to two IES users,
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
請求項16に記載のコンピュータ実装システム。 An IES user can select an IES user from a set of parts provided by the IES, or described by the IES user in a notation provided by the IES. Request a part of the log file of the IES execution period for 0,
The computer-implemented system of claim 16.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2019020435A JP6891200B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2019-02-07 | Computer implementation methods, innovation expert systems and programs |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/294,825 US20140365385A1 (en) | 2009-04-09 | 2014-06-03 | Ies capable of semi-automatically generating/ invoking all legal argument chains (lacs) in the spl test of a claimed invention (ci), as enabled by its inventive concepts (incs) |
US14/294,825 | 2014-06-03 | ||
PCT/IB2015/000828 WO2015185980A1 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2015-06-03 | Innovation expert system capable of semi-automatically generating and invoking all legal argument chains in a claimed invention |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2019020435A Division JP6891200B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2019-02-07 | Computer implementation methods, innovation expert systems and programs |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2017525012A JP2017525012A (en) | 2017-08-31 |
JP2017525012A5 true JP2017525012A5 (en) | 2018-08-30 |
JP6480473B2 JP6480473B2 (en) | 2019-03-13 |
Family
ID=53674216
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2016570866A Active JP6480473B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2015-06-03 | An innovation expert system capable of semi-automatic generation and activation of legal grammar term chains in the claimed invention |
JP2019020435A Active JP6891200B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2019-02-07 | Computer implementation methods, innovation expert systems and programs |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2019020435A Active JP6891200B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2019-02-07 | Computer implementation methods, innovation expert systems and programs |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3152709A1 (en) |
JP (2) | JP6480473B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN106489160A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015185980A1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0929884B1 (en) | 1996-10-07 | 1999-10-27 | Teles AG Informationstechnologien | Method for transmitting data in a telecommunications network and switch for implementing said method |
JP2009501974A (en) * | 2005-07-13 | 2009-01-22 | トムソン グローバル リソーシーズ | User interface for legal case history |
US20080086507A1 (en) * | 2006-10-06 | 2008-04-10 | Intelligent Process Expert Systems, Llc | Automated Letters Patent Analysis Support System and Method |
US20140012766A1 (en) * | 2009-04-09 | 2014-01-09 | Sigram Schindler | Inventive concepts enabled semi-automatic tests of patents |
US20130179386A1 (en) * | 2009-04-09 | 2013-07-11 | Sigram Schindler | Innovation expert system, ies, and its ptr data structure, ptr-ds |
EP2441033A1 (en) * | 2010-08-17 | 2012-04-18 | Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH | The fstp expert system |
CN110263931A (en) * | 2010-08-17 | 2019-09-20 | 西格拉姆申德勒有限公司 | FSTP expert system |
-
2015
- 2015-06-03 WO PCT/IB2015/000828 patent/WO2015185980A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-06-03 EP EP15738968.5A patent/EP3152709A1/en active Pending
- 2015-06-03 JP JP2016570866A patent/JP6480473B2/en active Active
- 2015-06-03 CN CN201580037875.1A patent/CN106489160A/en active Pending
-
2019
- 2019-02-07 JP JP2019020435A patent/JP6891200B2/en active Active
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Evangelidis et al. | Performance modelling and verification of cloud-based auto-scaling policies | |
JP6773901B2 (en) | Service control and user identification authentication based on virtual reality | |
US9588786B2 (en) | Dynamic multi-user computer configuration settings | |
RU2015155633A (en) | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING AND IMPLEMENTING AN AGENT OR SYSTEM WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | |
US10438118B2 (en) | Verification by metamorphic testing of applications that utilize artificial intelligence | |
CN105574000B (en) | Extend the method and device of APK file application | |
JP2017518588A5 (en) | ||
WO2010151732A4 (en) | Method and system for rating device security and automatically assessing security compliance | |
WO2006115937A2 (en) | System review toolset and method | |
KR102074909B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for classifying software vulnerability | |
US10824752B2 (en) | Utilizing heuristic and machine learning models to generate a mandatory access control policy for an application | |
KR20160135239A (en) | Method and system for generating verification codes | |
JP6839123B2 (en) | Information processing equipment, information processing methods, and programs | |
WO2016161704A1 (en) | Usage control method and system for medical detection device and medical detection device | |
CA3071060A1 (en) | Updating a speech generation setting based on user speech | |
CN111630510B (en) | Echo pattern user authentication | |
US20160321069A1 (en) | Effective feature location in large legacy systems | |
Foukarakis et al. | Applying a multimodal user interface development framework on a domestic service robot | |
JP2014160457A (en) | Interactive variable selection device, interactive variable selection method and interactive variable selection program | |
US20210150358A1 (en) | System and method for controlling confidential information | |
KR102070991B1 (en) | Method for generating choreography of avatar and apparatus for executing the method | |
US9652717B2 (en) | Avoidance of supporting evidence processing based on key attribute predictors | |
JP2017525012A5 (en) | ||
US20200090282A1 (en) | Methods for automatically determining injury treatment relation to a motor vehicle accident and devices thereof | |
CN105701373A (en) | ADB interface opening method and apparatus |