JP6891200B2 - Computer implementation methods, innovation expert systems and programs - Google Patents

Description

Glossary The following underlined terms and phrases used herein have the following meanings:

a) "In response to a request for direct or contact by an IES user " means that the IES user himself activates the function (directly requests its execution), or the IES prompts the activation of the function (in response to the request). (Indirectly request its execution).

b) " Several different LACs for any AST in CI / TT.O " means that the presence of some LACs requires the definition of several different multimedia representations for LACs by IES users. Not only does it indicate that it is caused by the AST itself containing different arguments, for example having different disclosures to inC handled by the AST and / or having one or more legal justifications for the disclosure.

c) The answer provided by IES (with respect to at least one aspect of at least one of the pending CIs inC) to the query set by the IES user is that the answer is all relevant legal and technical. For these two purposes only if the information is addressed and possessed and the CI expresses this information to present all of the respective requirements specified in the SPL. It is referred to as "complete and concise ," unlike the information provided by the inconsistent classical claim structure.

d) " Question consciously or unconsciously posed by an IES user " means that the user asks this question specifically intentionally, i.e., aiming or accidentally, in the expression of the grammatical term. ..

e) Different " logics " of ASTs refer to different types of ASTs expressing issues, eg, explaining whether inCs are disclosed herein or subordinate to inCs in a set. To do.

f) " All ASTs for a given CI and its FFOLLIN " means ^{that any part of the FSTP FOOLLIN} -test of this CI is covered by the AST. ^{That is, CI's complete FSTP FFOLLIN} test, which is interpreted as a logical combination of basic logical statements, is divided into the above set of BASTs (see γ).

g) If the ASTs represented by the two LACs do not share the BAT, the two LACs are " non-redundant ".

"LAC"
Any of the LACs, if invoked in response to a direct or indirect request by the IES user (and the LAC is generated by the IES for a partial presence during the execution of the UIEY that defines the LAC). Instantiation is potentially, momentarily, accurately, and complete for one of a finite number of questions (expected in config mode), depending on the answer in the multimedia representation (determined in config mode). And responds briefly to some user controllable by the IES user regarding the representation and / or logic of this answer. The occurrence of this question, intentionally or unintentionally raised by the IES user, is the reason for this instantiation launch. The problem addressed by this question is one of the finite aspects of testing a given CI against the requirements sufficiency presented by each given instantiation of a given FFOLLIN. The set of all LACs defined for a given FFOLLIN and its CI in config mode defines the overall usefulness of the CI provided by the IES so configured in this FFOLLIN.

"AST"
FSTP-test by instantiating AST. Access to specific parts of FSTP-DS that are potentially better than specific parts of o, and / or some FSTP-tests. It is possible to connect a part of o. Thereby, for a given CI and its FFOLLIN, all ASTs as a whole cover ^{the FSTP FFOLLIN-DS of this CI. Thus, the usefulness of AST instantiation lies} in providing access to a portion of the FSTP FFOLLIN-test represented by AST instantiation in a CI test to satisfy a given FFOLLIN.

"IC-UIE"
Instantiation of any IC-UIE makes it possible to construct and control the representation of any part of any LAC.

"HI-UIE"
Any HI-UIE instantiation can determine any multimedia aspect and didactic representation of any LAC.

"KR-UIE"
By instantiating any KR-UIE, any LAC representation can be supported by a suitable choice of AST logic.

Chapter 1 Introduction This patent application for the Substantive Patent Law (SPL, Note 1) is a partial continuation application of US Patent Application No. 14 / 165,225.

The Mayo decision in the US Supreme Court (References 1, 18, 19) states that if the invention (CI) is a new technical subject and is based on a model, the claims are made by "invention concept, inC". (Claimed Invention: CI) is required to be described. Inspired by this, Advanced IT studied decision-making in the aforementioned CI test under SPL, which is valid even when the CI does not require a model (references 11, 18, 19, 25, 36, 45, 71, 78).

Models are standardized and implicitly used by SPL precedents, such as the "ISO / OSI" model in communications, the "molecular binding force" model in nanotechnology, and the "RNA / DNA" model in genetics. Is something that can be done.

The humanistic synonym of the model phrase is "paradigm", and the scientific synonym is "reference system" such as "coordinate system".

Implemented by mathematical "axioms, theories, proofs", physics "laws of nature", and by SPL's "claims" herein, even if the CI itself is not accurately understood. As is done, the use of the model often allows an accurate description of the invention in the claims.

The inventions claimed herein are applicable to all model-based CIs.

(References 10, 18, 19, 25, 46, 47) show that CI meets SPL only if it passes the "FSTP-test".

Thus, the FSTP-test results in (semi) automatically all Legal Argument Chains (LACs) where the CI satisfies the SPL.

This greatly facilitates the decision-making of patent practitioners regarding the testing of CI under SPL, especially if the CI is model-based.

SPL reasoning is always finite first order logic (FFOL).

Only if all (legally non-redundant) LACs have a "User Interface Entity (UIE)" that allows the user to access a CI that meets the SPL, is the CI's SPL-related functionality? , CI alias TT., Which stores all of its non-functional properties. A system based on 0 PTR ^SPL- DS (References 6 and 7) is called an "Innovation Expert System (IES)".

IES utilizes its own PTR-DS, which embodies all "arguable subtests (AST)" with all the results of its CI's FSTP-test. AST is the blueprint for all LACs in this CI.

The automatic LAC generation according to the present invention is not limited to the test of CI under SPL, as described in Chapter 2.

The UIEs of IES are separated and used in synchronization with each other in the config / real-time mode. Y, Y = 1, 2, ... .. .. , Consists of. Each UIE. Y has a knowledge representation "KR-UIE.Y", a human interaction "HI-UIE.Y", and an interaction control "IC-UIE.Y" entity.

IES or its users activate "interactions" between them.

In config mode, the interaction is by the user with the UIE. It results in the creation or modification of at least one of the three components cited in Y.

In real-time mode, the interaction is IC-UIE. Controlled by Y, HI-UIE. Brings the activation of the expression of Y.

In both modes, this interaction is described by KR-UIE. Use Y. KR-UIE. Y uses the knowledge stored in PTR-DS (references 11 and 25) in order.

UIE. Y may be further subdivided into (potentially nested) "UIE.Y steps". UIE. By invoking Y, at least one of these steps is partially performed.

LAC. Z, Z = 1, 2, ... .. .. , Are at least one partial UIE. It is represented by executing Y.

AST. X, X = 1, 2, ... .. .. , Are at least one KR-UIE. Accessed by Y, each at least one LAC. Converted to Z.

AST. In X, the user can use these IC-UIE. In the config mode that can be switched by calling Y, the IC-UIE. At least one HI-UIE. Used in at least one "logical representation" associated with Y.

That is, in the IES config mode, any AST (semi) automatically has one or more LAC. It can be converted to Zs. At the request of judges, examiners, lawyers, inventors, etc., AST's LAC in various logical expressions is described in UIE. Converted to multimedia representation by Ys.

In real-time mode, the user can use AST. LAC. Converted from X. In order to emphasize the side surface by Z, AST. These UIEs of X. Switch between Y.

FIG. 1 shows a 1/2/3 continuous UIE. Generated / customized semi-automatically in a config mode defined by the IES user. 1a (references 1) / 1b (references 1, 2) / 1c (references 1, 2, 3) Step UIE. AST converted into three LACa / b / c by 1a / 1b / 1c. 1 and their 6 <HI-UIE. Y, KR-UIE. Y, IC-UIE. Y> is shown.

FIG. 2 shows AST. 1 again based on the overall 6 steps (lines), those UIE. Three more powerful LACs by 1d / 1e / 1f. It is shown that it has two logical expressions that lead to d / e / f.

The second part of Chapter 2 provides further information on Figure 1/2.

Chapter 2 Generation of all LACs for CI testing under any FFOLLIN (Notes 1 and 2)

The patent application utilizes the scientific insights of the FSTP project, for which a list of references is presented in the form of citations of publications in the Appendix.

These are CI / TT. How to make all 0 ACTs (all non-identical) equivalent to being automatically activated in real-time mode of IES, using IES in config mode, as described in Chapter 1. Indicates whether it is converted semi-automatically.

The role of FFOLIN is shown in α) to ζ) below.

To convey the role of IES in config mode, the following bullet points identify the technical features of IES that allow the user to configure alias calibration in which aliases customize IES.

Thus, one or some users may use IES simultaneously in config mode and / or real-time mode, thus communicating directly or indirectly with each other.

An understanding of the behavior of IES in real-time mode arises directly from an understanding of config mode.

The features mentioned above are often redundantly added, as already described above and / or as described in these references.

Chapter 3 defines the meaning of CI inC and the claims as a whole when it is not clear in advance from the definition of inC, and the explanation of Chapter 2 is provided to provide a basis for interpreting these meanings. Use.

These bullet points also disclose the scope of this CI.

• According to reference 25, the CI satisfies the SPL only if it passes the FSTP-test. And the FSTP-test (in each subset S, on a finite set of all BED-inCs of the subset S of TT.0 of the subset S). CIs passing m, 2 ≤ m ≤ 10 are all FSTP-tests on this set. It passes through n, 1 ≦ n ≦ m. The reverse of this relationship clearly requires no retention.

The complete FSTP-test is about the CI under the SPL test, through the mirror predicate of this CI's BED-inC, 11 concerns embodied by the SPL in Volume 35 of the United States Code and between them. A program that evaluates the entire FFOL representation that models logic (see below). The coupling of BED-inC mirror predicates models the properties of the elements of CI. These equivalents in the prior art TT may or may not be present, as defined by the FSTP-test user (and confirmed by one of ordinary skill in the art).

-Any AST is a lexically and syntactically correct "sentence" alias FFOL term within the scope of this entire FFOL expression. Thus, there are at most a finite number of ASTs for any CI, and the user / person skilled in the art will generate an AST for which the meaning of the CI is clear (assumed to be correct herein). (Excluding the above-mentioned characteristics and relationships between characteristics that are input to the DS).

-There are at most a finite number (usually hundreds) of ASTs that are PTR dependent. All these ASTs can be performed on a finite number of PTR-dependent BED-in-C subsets. All these ASTs, their own BASTA (see below), are blueprints for all LACs. There are no other (legally non-redundant) LACs, even if there are different representations of any AST for IES users, such as different LACs.

-Any AST (converted to LAC.Z). Any UIE for X. Y is the initial UIE. An existing defined UIE for checking or changing the result of Y or preceding input. The boot parameter, LAC. Some UIE of Z. Interactions between activations of the representation of Y, or other LAC. Depending on the interaction with the representation of Z, in config mode, the "UIE-stub" provided by the introduction of any IES is activated and this UIE-stub is added to the "UIE-stub". Generated by the IES user by passing Y. Therefore, any UIE. Y may be composed of one or several series of "UIE steps, UIES" by the user, whereby any UIES may also be composed of one or several series of the above-mentioned steps by the user. It may be configured (“Nested UIEY”). Therefore, any UIE. Y may be composed of one or several series of "UIE steps, UIES" by the user, whereby any UIES may also be composed of one or several series of the above-mentioned steps by the user. It may be configured (“Nested UIEY”). Depending on the introduction and / or configuration of a particular IES, except for automatic ones, KR- / HI- / IC-UIE. Y or KR- / HI- / IC-UIES. Arbitrary UIE. Y and UIES. Y is specified by the user.

The three components of UIE mentioned are not detailed in this patent application, but are largely generated automatically by IES or interactively generated by a user guided by IES and are essentially the same or similar. Things, that is, things that are commonplace in principle.

Thus, the object of the claimed inventions set forth herein is all LACs that merely explain the structure of the classical claims for a given CI. Not limited to providing Z (the LAC.Z described above only indicates that the CI has the opportunity to meet the SPL), but all LACs that meet the SPL. Z is provided.

• In config mode, all PTR-DS are automatically or semi-automatically / interactively split into all ASTs so that they are considered reasonable by the IES user, and a large amount of AST logic potential any one. In real-time mode, these ASTs or LACs (eg, eg,) after the multimedia representation of equivalent LACs and user dialogue functions (shown in FIG. 1/2 and α) to ζ) are also divided. , (By the IES Acoustic Word Spotter) and / or (semi) automatically by the IES user (see steps α) to ζ) below). Thus, the execution has a particular item that communicates with the user, eg, for any kind of problem being managed. With relevant conventional techniques, for example, from IVR systems and their audio pattern spotting and matching capabilities, how the dialog just executed is instantly launched in a real-time LAC to produce the appropriate pattern. In principle, it is possible to know whether it is recognized (semily) automatically. Here, the LAC recognition and activation processes in the real-time mode described above, for example, these processes utilize graphical and / or acoustic patterns embodied by the relevant multimedia thesaurus structure based on the "AST pattern". It may be substantially supported by IES calibration, which gives hints to each of these processes.

A complete FSTP-test for CI that satisfies the SPL of Volume 35 of the United States Code is the 10 FSTP-tests in Figure 3. It has o, 1 ≦ o ≦ 10. This test was selected in (b) / (c), the CI "set of all claims interpretations, SoI", i.e. all TTs of this CI. Executed for 0. If disclosed by the specification of a patent (application), CI allows several interpretations (references 71, 78). The term / idea of "technical teaching 0, TT.0" (references 6, 7, 11) represents one of them (references 71, 78). That is, TT. 0 is an element of CI's "set of interpretations, SoI".

However, these TT. There are various execution sequences of FSTP-tests for each of the 0s. 10 FSTP-tests. While the initialization sequence of o must be that of their natural index, they may be performed thoroughly or in duplicate. That is, in the latter case, any FSTP-test. Only CI with inC already confirmed by m, ∀m <n, any FSTP-test of this CI. The check of n is maintained.

Advanced IT, like the output to the IES user in the latter case, the inputs and commands given to the IES by the IES user are here defined by the IES in a pre-defined alphabet so that they can be understood by both parties. Before a vocabulary), syntax, semantics and pragmatics are given, they must have some, and these are under the rules pre-given by the IES and controlled by the IES user. Under, it must be defined during the execution of the FSTP-test of the claimed invention by IES.

The term / idea "legal grammar term chain, LAC" represents what is generally understood by any person skilled in the art of SPL knowledge. Its broad sense is not limited in any other way. The index "Z" is a specific LAC. Identify Z, and more specifically, identify an instantiation of Z of "type LAC" (from a programming language perspective). Type / instantiation "AST" / "AST.X", "UIE" / "UIE.Y". .. .. The same applies to such as.

The CI TT. Tested to satisfy the SPL, given by the IES. The above UIE-stub on the PTR-DS representing 0 is always available to the IES user (unless locked by the user). As described above, IES users use UIE stubs to define a wide range of UIE instantiations that make up the UIE between IES and IES users for customizing CI SPL tests for IES users. You may. This includes facilitating the use of features provided by IES for this test.

・ UIE. Whether Y should be generated / integrated / modified or executed is determined by UIE. It is determined by the mode of IES at the time of starting Y. Thus, this mode may be set by the user (eg, the one performing this activation or something else) or the IES, and / or the UIE. Y may exist and be set at any time of the executive function to be activated. Therefore, conflicts may occur, and IES must be introduced to resolve the conflict automatically or interactively with the IES user.

-Any launch may refer to only one step in the instantiation of UIE.

• The significance of human dialogue, or its semantics, is currently transparent to IES and potentially for very simple ASTs, unless it is automatically derived from the pending AST by IES. Occurs.

The usefulness of the described CIs disclosed herein (ie, each IES in the method of controlling CIs) is described in some respects of the PTR-DS or in each of these points. Depending on the most recent launch of the FSTP test representing 0, for example the TT of CI in the SPL test for IES users. It should be understood under the ability of HI-UIE for automatic instant information representation by 1 or several different LACs for any AST of 0.

In particular, the claimed invention has been invented to allow the LAC to be represented automatically or interactively in response to a given problem, and the response is as if it were SPL tested. TT. It seems to be given by a human who has all the knowledge about 0.

For this purpose, this response is all used by IES (by having humans speak and present what is used graphically to support the expression, either in reality or on the screen, somehow synchronously. Must be represented by the media (by what would be normal when using the real-time mode of the IES, represented without the support of the IES). To achieve this, IES first inputs fragments of grammatical terms that the user intends to express later in a proprietary way, acoustically and / or graphically, and then the complete method of these fragments. It is possible to combine it with what is considered a grammatical term chain and finally automatically regenerate this grammatical term. Such a response to a viewer of this LAC (to a question or to others who have previously entered the claimed invention as a query) is a personal and potential multimedia response as a smart IMR (interactive multimedia response). Appears as media announcement / information. The "user anthropomorphism" of the IMR subsystem behavior of the invention according to this claim is complicated by the cooperation of the IES user and the IES by selectively mentioning or reacting by answering the interrupted question immediately. Such a swift reaction, under the control of the IES user, comprises representing the LAC, thereby the IC-UIE. Y is also configured to be an intervening and / or attached description. Various such dialogues are described in Chapters 3 and 4.

To achieve this result, IES performs many steps of all such processes automatically or interactively, as described in α) to ζ) below. For example, when invoked directly or indirectly by an IES user (ie, by an IES request), the IES is essentially

α) At most a finite number of the above-mentioned user dialogues are required by the IES user. Due to the nature of FFOL in question, it recognizes which "high level user dialogues" to occur by activation / for activation.

β) From FSTP-DS, derive which technical and / or legal matters are needed for this dialogue.

γ) Depending on which "basic AST argument" covers the problem, i.e. the FFOL characteristic of the FSTP-test, any TT. There are a finite number of BATs for 0, and each TT. The 0-independent BATA is given by IES and is TT. The 0-dependent BATA is entered into the IES by the IES user under the most recent guidance controlled by the PTR-DS prior to the use of the IES, as described in α) to ζ).

δ) Due to the nature of the FFOL of the question, where any sequence is correct and rethinking is useful, some "BATAs" are a single complete sequence of "low-level answers" to these questions from these instances. Compile "Sequence, SoBATA" and let KR-UIE instantiation express this SoBATA.

ε) Multimedia to future (in config mode) or real (real-time) I / O devices with one or some specific but logically equivalent to SoBATA this low-level SoBATA. Convert to a sequence of outputs and let the same number of HI-UIE entities represent these future / real outputs. This is potentially supported by the KR-UIE alias SoBATA. Each of these materializations provides a specific basis for one or several of the high-level user dialogue sequences that are invoked and ζ) performed above.

ζ) For any ε) HI-UIE instantiation, in the future (in config mode) or in reality (in real-time mode), for which event, on which I / O device, part of the HI-UIE instantiation Or determine how to output the other one of the HI-UIE instantiations of these ε), and for the instantiation of this HI-UIE, these to that particular IC-UIE. It expresses future / current dialogue control, thereby connecting IES user commands with not only part of the HI-UIE instantiation of ε), but also any trailing part needed to execute from KR-UIE.

Steps α) to ζ), and in particular some comments on this CI logic, are informative.

-Any step requires some interactive input from the IES user or control by the IES user, or is performed fully automatically.

• These steps include, for example, i) preliminary / calibration / config mode, ii) response test mode, iii) "one-way" response mode, iv) bidirectional, alias "interactive" response mode, v) some. "Integrated" response mode ,. .. .. If it is started in a different mode such as, it will be different.

BASTA (= basic AST grammar term) in step γ represents a set of completely (usually neither unique nor non-redundant) finite, basic construction blocks in which the FSTP-test is decomposed. In any BASTA, the term "basic" refers to a single actual alias "technique" and / or 10 FSTP-tests. Represents a legal issue of one of o (eg, a finite number of the aforementioned details, evaluations, several relationships of inC, or pending FSTP test. O). Also, the term "grammar term" indicates that BASTA is transformed into the basic building blocks of LAC.

• While the CI embodiments of this patent application dealing with steps α) to ζ) use the functions specified for CI in a very sophisticated manner, nonetheless, this introduction for those skilled in the art It is easily feasible. This can always be achieved by retaining more for simpler CI embodiments and appropriately limiting the I / O flexibility of the aforementioned embodiments.

-In addition to steps α) to ζ), the embodiment of the claimed invention may provide a "prototype" of all user dialogues and the modes they provide. This can be paraphrased, repeating some sentences, or repeating some sentences particularly slowly, momentarily skipping insignificant details, encouraging the user to continue, or just mentioned. Ask for confirmation of understanding ,. .. .. It is similar to the macro for the routine repeating part when they are started.

• The LAC may also be represented by a default configuration with user dialogue specific to the model of the application area. These prototype dialogues input / define / construct specific UIE instantiations by the user for personalization of the LAC to adapt to the specificity of the actual PTR-DS under IES and / or testing. However, the functionalization of these prototypes is usually not yet ideally used by IES users.

-This patent application does not use the special features of SPL (Note 1) or its FSTP-test anywhere. That is, the SPL is too narrow to identify this. The following paragraph clarifies this and determines the scope of CI for this patent application.

From a programming language point of view, SPL, "substantial copyright law, SCL", ... are considered to be the scope of "instructive" type declarations whose common definition is "finite FOL legal norms, FFOLLN". May be done. Thus, any declaration of the above type is referred to as FFOLLN and is defined by a finite set to be satisfied by any instantiation of this directed type, i.e. by any subject that satisfies it.

Here, any instantiation of FFOLLN occurs according to the subject of CI of FFOL, for example, by ^{a finite set of BED SCL-} inC generated for this CI (Reference 71). Therefore, this instantiation, which is the subject defined by the CI of this FFOLLN, is referred to as the "Finite FOL Legal Code of Invention, FFOLLIN".

With this in mind, the scope of the patent application is ^deemed to actually include any IES FOOLLIN determined by careful analysis of the claims claiming this CI. Therefore, from the above discussion of programming languages (generalized in the discussion of References 10, 18, 19, 25, mathematically reexamined in Reference 73, linguistically independent of programming languages and legal terms. The definition is as follows. Test scope CI of the present patent application, which generates the necessity and sufficiency to meet the requirements given strong "to the same extent, TC.NaS.MR (t est of a c reation n ecessary a nd s including the ufficient for its m eeting a given r equirement) ".

Being "as powerful" means that any FFOLLIN by this CI can be customized / built, and its representation is controlled by the IES user (as described above) by one or some accurate and complete LACs. It makes it possible to build ^{an IES FOOLLIN} that is knowledgeable enough to respond immediately.

This generalization also has a clear impact on ^{the FSTP SPL} -test that determines the ^{PTR SPL-} DS, meaning that ^{the FSTP TCNaSMR} -test ^{determines the PTR TCNaSMR-DS. The terms} "FSTP FFOLLN-test" and "PTR ^FFOLLN- DS" are less specific, but mean the same thing. This generalization may extend to FFOLLN's dependence on infinite parameters such as time. That is, the CI of this patent application is much broader than the typical purpose, that is, the one repeatedly and clearly described for the SPL of Volume 35 of the United States Code, as already articulated in Chapter 1. It has an application area, i.e. the total FFOLxN area. x means not only "law" but also any private "instruction".

A CI with elemental properties that can be described in detail by combining the mirror predicates of this TT.0 BED ^FOOLLIN- inC, as defined by some FFOLLIN-generated aliases "Technical Teaching .0, TT.0 ^{FFOLLIN". IES FFOLLIN (} defined as) is this TT. 0 ^FFOLLIN is omniscient about FFOLLIN sufficiency and is included in claim 16. For ^{example, BED} SPL -inc and ^{FSTP SPL} of ^{CI SPL} - ^{IES SPL} defined by the test is the omniscient respect SPL sufficiency of the ^{CI SPL.}

• Without treating this reasoning scientifically, some very interesting conclusions are possible that show the overall irrationality of attempts to demonstrate model-based CI. That is,

^{○ To introduce IES FFOOLN} (as claimed in claims 16-30), the SPL of Volume 35 of the United States Code is exactly FFOOLN, both the concrete FFOOLN and the FSTP ^FFOOLN -test (ie, it is FFOLN). Not necessary (sufficient to know that) and there is no CI ^FOOLN . The "abstract" IES ^FOOLLN so introduced by the PTR ^{FFOLLIN- DS of CI FOOLLIN} (specific FFOLLN, specific CI ^FOOLLIN and specific FSTP ^{required for the construction of PTR FOOLLIN-DS).} Calibration (based on the ^{FFOLLN- test) results in an omniscient IES FOOLLIN} with respect to the FFOLLN sufficiency of ^{CI FOOLLIN.}

○ As one of the application areas of CI disclosed by this patent application (one of them is "the area of SPL in Volume 35 of the United States Code") (all are "FFOLN areas"), the FSTP ^FFOLLN -test is FFOL. It cannot be defined without being based on CI. That is, any FFOL CI from FFOLLN ^{will generate a particular composite metric for any precedent by its FSTP FFOLLIN} -test, as is the empirical technique by those skilled in the art in this FFOLLN region.

○ It was not really necessary in classical CI technology for any CI to recognize the generation of its own metric. So, intuition always implies (although no one understands it before FSTP technology). There is no intuition for the latest model-based CI technology, and therefore scientific research of tests to meet FFOLLN is essential in any way (Reference 79).

The underlined phrases quoted below, as used herein, have the following meanings:

a) "In response to a request for direct or contact by an IES user " means that the IES user himself activates the function (directly requests its execution), or the IES prompts the activation of the function (in response to the request). (Indirectly request its execution).

b) " Several different LACs for any AST in CI / TT.O " means that the presence of some LACs requires the definition of several different multimedia representations for LACs by IES users. Not only does it indicate that it is caused by the AST itself, including different inference methods, for example having different disclosures to inC handled by the AST and / or having one or more legal justifications for the disclosure.

c) The answer provided by IES (with respect to at least one aspect of at least one of the pending CIs inC) to the query set by the IES user is that the answer is all relevant legal and technical. For these two purposes only if the information is addressed and possessed and the CI expresses this information to present all of the respective requirements specified in the SPL. It is referred to as "complete and concise ," unlike the information provided by the inconsistent classical claim structure.

d) " Question consciously or unconsciously posed by an IES user " means that the user asks this question specifically intentionally, i.e., aiming or accidentally, in the expression of the grammatical term. ..

e) Different " logics " of ASTs refer to different types of ASTs expressing issues, eg, explaining whether inCs are disclosed herein or subordinate to inCs in a set. To do.

f) " All ASTs for a given CI and its FFOLLIN " means ^{that any part of the FSTP FOOLLIN} -test of this CI is covered by the AST. ^{That is, the complete FSTP FFOLLIN} test of CI, which is interpreted as a logical combination of basic logical statements, is divided into the set of BAST (see γ) above.

g) If the ASTs represented by the two LACs do not share the BAT, the two LACs are " non-redundant ".

Chapter 3 Significance of terms in C and claims of CI Independent claims (invention according to independent claims) and CI (for simplification, the plural form is ignored without losing generality) are five (for simplicity). It consists of instantiations of BED-) inC, ie "KR-UIE", "HI-UIE", "IC-UIE", "AST" and "LAC". Their significance is primarily explained in Chapter 1, illustrated throughout the specification of the patent application, which describes their usefulness in a glossary style.

Five inCs refer to information that IES (semi) automatically generates and uses (sometimes treated to include information), as defined in detail herein. Therefore, the claims contribute to the disclosure / description of the invention concept of this CI, in particular the incremental contribution to the usefulness of each CI. Some of the dependent CIs are based on further disclosure of inC, which is not detailed herein.

All of the incremental usefulness of the five inCs (references 18 and 19) and their association with the SPL of the United States Code Volume 35 must be demonstrated instantaneously in real-time mode alone, and in config mode they. Additions and potentially more detailed examinations of usefulness are acknowledged. The incremental usefulness of these five inCs (in real-time mode) is not the way they control it and allow similar definitions, but the overall insubstantial / invisible way of the five inCs. It is defined as follows, as specified by the IES, which contains at least one instantiation or can generate it as if it were launched instantaneously.

・ LAC is as follows.
Any of the LACs, if invoked in response to a direct or indirect request by the IES user (and the LAC is generated by the IES for a partial presence during the execution of the UIEY that defines the LAC). Instantiation is potentially, momentarily, accurately, and complete for one of a finite number of questions (expected in config mode), depending on the answer in the multimedia representation (determined in config mode). And responds briefly to some user controllable by the IES user regarding the representation and / or logic of this answer. The occurrence of this question, intentionally or unintentionally raised by the IES user, is the reason for this instantiation launch. The problem addressed by this question is
It is one of a finite number of aspects that test a given CI for the sufficiency of the requirements presented by each given instantiation of a given FFOLLIN.
The set of all LACs defined for a given FFOLLIN and its CI in config mode defines the overall usefulness of the CI provided by the IES so configured in this FFOLLIN.

・ AST is as follows.
FSTP-test by instantiating AST. Access to specific parts of FSTP-DS that are potentially better than specific parts of o, and / or some FSTP-tests. It is possible to connect a part of o. Thereby, for a given CI and its FFOLLIN, all ASTs as a whole cover ^{the FSTP FFOLLIN-DS of this CI. Thus, the usefulness of AST instantiation lies} in providing access to a portion of the FSTP FFOLLIN-test represented by AST instantiation in a CI test to satisfy a given FFOLLIN.

・ IC-UIE is as follows.
Instantiation of any IC-UIE makes it possible to construct and control the representation of any part of any LAC.

・ HI-UIE is as follows.
Any HI-UIE instantiation can determine any multimedia aspect and didactic representation of any LAC.

・ KR-UIE is as follows.
By instantiating any KR-UIE, any LAC representation can be supported by a suitable choice of AST logic.

The (non-) functional meaning of the claims to recognize how one of ordinary skill in the art conforms to CI remains unexplained. Those skilled in the art are experienced IT system designers who are also familiar with the SPL and Supreme Court KSR / Billski / Mayo / Myrid decisions discussed in References 71 and 78. The claims of the method of paragraph 15 also apply to the subsequent system claims.

Finally, some definitions / explanations / comments regarding the claims are needed and useful.

Claim 1
The bold italic acronym stands for set. In the definition of LAC, the term "prove" should sometimes be replaced by the term "infer" or "assert". Without loss of generality, the PTR-DS given this description is a single TT. It may be assumed that it has only 0.

The term "automatically recognizes" means that IES always first checks if a user's request is unresolved when attempting to invoke another user dialogue. If so, it processes this request, otherwise it checks if it wants to urge the user to request a user dialogue, and if so, does this.

Claim 7
From the underlying patent application, a method of completing a partial PTR-DS is known. From footnote 2, this also applies to each FFOLLN, FFOLLIN.

Claim 9
To allow this check to be performed, this CI limits the writing capabilities accordingly.

Chapter 4 The CI of the Patent Application meets the SPL of Volume 35 of the United States Code.
According to References 11 and 25, the claimed invention of the present specification is the 10 FSTP tests shown in FIG. Satisfy Articles 101/102/103/112 of Volume 35 of the United States Code so that it passes through all of o. That is, it passes through:

FSTP test 1
Technically, the invention according to all claims, like claims 1 and 16 and their dependent claims, is composed of at least 5 or more BED-crCs cited at the beginning of Chapter 3 and BED-. Each of the crCs contributes to increasing the usefulness of the IES in generating / customizing / invoking LACs. It is trivial to separate them into components, that is, the execution of FSTP test 1 is self-evident.

FSTP test 2
These five BED-crCs are legally disclosed by Chapters 1-4. That is, BED-inC. And the FSTP-test of a single invention described in the claims uses a set of these five inCs.

FSTP test 3
Neither claim has a "means plus function" representation.

FSTP test 4
It is possible to disclose the five BED-crCs and therefore the CIs in Chapters 1-4.

FSTP test 5
The five BED-inCs are clearly independent.

FSTP test 6
The five BED-inCs are non-equivalent to those skilled in the art so that there are no prior art and those skilled in the art for them.

FSTP test 7
The claimed invention is shown in its overall usefulness in Chapter 1 and explained in detail in Chapters 2-4 by its five inCs (as recognized at the beginning of Chapter 3). As such, if the NAIO test is passed and one of these five inCs is abandoned, the claimed invention no longer has any particular utility. Therefore, the invention according to any claim is not only an abstract idea.

FSTP test 8
The claimed invention is clearly not just a natural phenomenon. The opposite is true, and none of the five Incs describe natural phenomena.

FSTP test 9
The claimed invention is clearly novel, light and non-trivial (Note 4).

FSTP test 10
Since none of the five Incs is trivial, the claimed invention is not idempotent.

Thus, as mentioned above, the claimed invention satisfies the SPL of Volume 35 of the United States Code.

Finally, by passing all 10 FSTP tests, it is worth noting that this CI has also passed 16 tests, as shown in FIG. In the classical claim structure, only six tests are performed, as described in reference 25. To introduce this idea into the context of the Mayo case, if the classical claim structure is considered to be a useful invention in determining whether the claimed invention meets the US SPL. , As in the Billski / Mayo case, it is merely an "abstract idea" of the structure of the claims. The structure of the classical claims, strangely enough, is never useful. In fact, it is more misleading than leading to a complete, United States Code, volume 35, and claim structure required by the Mayo case (Notes 2, 3).

Other aspects, objectives, effects and features of the invention will be further clarified by the detailed description of the preferred embodiments below. This description is given without limitation of the examples and with reference to the drawings attached separately from FIGS. 1 and 2 described above.
A 1/2/3 continuous UIE. Generated / customized semi-automatically in a config mode defined by the IES user. 1a / 1b / 1c step UIE. AST converted into three LACa / b / c by 1a / 1b / 1c. 1 and their 6 <HI-UIE. Y, KR-UIE. Y, IC-UIE. Y> is shown. AST. 1 again based on the overall 6 steps (lines), those UIE. Three more powerful LACs by 1d / 1e / 1f. It is shown that it has two logical expressions that lead to d / e / f. 10 FSTP-tests. The FSTP-test composed of o is shown. Shows the complex US Code SPL expressed in the basic FSTP test.

Package insert bibliography list

[Reference 1]
S. Schindler: "US Highest Courts' Patent Precedents in Mayo / Myriad / CLS / Ultramercial / LBC:'Inventive Concepts' Accepted-Abstract Ideas' Next Patenting Emerging Tech. Inventions Now without Intricacies" *
[Reference 2]
"Advanced IT" includes, for example, AI, semantics, KR, DL, NL ,. .. It shows the research area of IT such as.
[Reference 3]
R. Brachmann, H. Levesque "Knowledge Representation &Reasoning", Elsevier, 2004
[Reference 4]
"The Description Logic Handbook", Cambridge UP, 2010
[Reference 5]
S. Schindler: "Math. Model. Substantive Patent Law (SPL) Top-Down vs. BottomUp", Yokohama, JURISIN 2013 *
[Reference 6]
SSBG pat. Appl .: "THE FSTP EXPERT SYSTEM" , International Publication No. 2012/022612
[Reference 7]
SSBG pat. Appl .: "AN INNOVATION EXPERT SYS., IES, & ITS DATA STRUC., PTR-DS" , International Publication No. 2013/135814
[Reference 8]
J. Schulze: "TECHNICAL REPORT # 1.V1 ON THE '882 PTR AND THE UI OF THE IES PROTO-TYPE", in prep.
[Reference 9]
S. Schindler: "Patent Business-Before Shake-up", 2013 *
[Reference 10]
SSBG's AB to CAFC in LBC, 2013 *
[Reference 11]
SSBG pat. Appl .: "INV. CONC. ENABL. SEMI-AUTOM. PATENT TESTS" *
[Reference 12]
C. Correa: "Res. Handbook on Protection of IP under WTO Rules", EE, 2010.
[Reference 13]
N. Klunker: "Harmonisierungsbestr. Im mat. Patentrecht", MPI, Muchen, 2010.
[Reference 14]
US Patent Office / MPEP: "2111 Claim Interpretation; Broadest Reason. Interpr. [Eighth Ed., Rev. 1]," *
US Patent Office / MPEP: "2111 Claim Interpretation; Broadest Reason. Interpr. [Eighth Ed., Rev. 2]," *
US Patent Office / MPEP: "2111 Claim Interpretation; Broadest Reason. Interpr. [Eighth Ed., Rev. 3]," *)
US Patent Office / MPEP: "2111 Claim Interpretation; Broadest Reason. Interpr. [Eighth Ed., Rev. 4]," *
US Patent Office / MPEP: "2111 Claim Interpretation; Broadest Reason. Interpr. [Eighth Ed., Rev. 5]," *
US Patent Office / MPEP: "2111 Claim Interpretation; Broadest Reason. Interpr. [Eighth Ed., Rev. 6]," *
US Patent Office / MPEP: "2111 Claim Interpretation; Broadest Reason. Interpr. [Eighth Ed., Rev. 7]," *
US Patent Office / MPEP: "2111 Claim Interpretation; Broadest Reason. Interpr. [Eighth Ed., Rev. 8]," *
US Patent Office / MPEP: "2111 Claim Interpretation; Broadest Reason. Interpr. [Eighth Ed., Rev. 9]," *
[Reference 15]
S. Schindler: "KR Support for SPL Precedents", Barcelona, eKNOW-2014 *.
[Reference 16]
J. Daily, S. Kieff: "Anything under the Sun Made by Humans SPL Doctrine as Endogenous Institutions for Commercial Innovation", Stanford and GWU *
[Reference 17]
United States Court of Appeals for the Circuit, En ban Hearing in LBC, 12.9.13.
[Reference 18]
SSBG AB to the Supreme Court in CLS, 07.10.2013 *
[Reference 19]
SSBG AB to the Supreme Court in WildTangent, 23.09.2013 *
[Reference 20]
US Patent Office, "Intell. Prop. And the US Economy: INDUSTR. IN FOCUS", 2012 *
[Reference 21]
K. O'Malley: Keynote Address, IPO, 2013 *
[Reference 22]
S. Schindler, "The View of an Inventor at the Grace Period", Kiev, 2013 *
[Reference 23]
S. Schindler, "The IES and its In-C Enabled SPL Tests", Munich, 2013 *
[Reference 24]
S. Schindler, "Two Fundamental Theorems of'Math. Innovation Science'", Hong Kong, ECM-2013 *
[Reference 25]
S. Schindler, A. Paschke, S. Ramakrishna, "Form. Legal Reason. That an Invention Sat. SPL", Bologna, JURIX-2013 *
[Reference 26]
SSBG AB to the Supreme Court in Bilski, 6.8.2009 *
[Reference 27]
T. Bench-Capon, F. Coenen: "Isomorphism. And Legal Knowl. Based Systems", AI & Law, 1992 *
[Reference 28]
N. Fuchs, R. Schwitter. "Attempt to Controlled English", 1996.
[Reference 29]
A. Paschke: "Rules and Logic Programming in the Web". 7. ISS, Galway, 2011.
[Reference 30]
K. Ashley, V. Walker, "From Information Retrieval to Arg. Retrieval for Legal Cases:… ..", Bologna, JURIX-2013 *
[Reference 31]
Hearing in Oracle vs. Google, "As to Copyrightability of the Java® Platform", US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, 6.12.2013.
[Reference 32]
S. Schindler, "A KR Based Innovation Expert System (IES) for US SPL Precedents", Phuket, ICIM-2014 *
[Reference 33]
S. Schindler, "Status Report about the FSTP Prototype", Hyderabat, GIPC-2014.
[Reference 34]
S. Schindler, "Status Report about the FSTP Prototype", Moscow, LESI, 2014.
[Reference 35]
S. Schindler, "Substantive Trademark Law STL), Substantive Copyright Law (SCL), and SPL -STL Tests Are True SCL Subtests, and SCL Tests Are True SPL Subtests", in prep.
[Reference 36]
S. Schindler, "Boon and Bane of Inventive Concepts and Refined Claim Construction in the Supreme Court's New Patent Precedents", Hawaii, IAM-2014 *)
[Reference 37]
D.-M. Bey, C. Cotropia, "The Unreasonableness of the BRI Standard", AIPLA, 2009 *)
[Reference 38]
Transcript of the Hearing in TELES vs. CISCO / US Patent Office, US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, 8.1.2014 *)
[Reference 39]
Transcript of the en banc Hearing in CLS vs. ALICE, United States Court of Appeals for the Circuit, 8.2.2013 *)
[Reference 40]
SSBG's Brief to the CAFC in case '453 *
[Reference 41]
SSBG's Brief to the CAFC in case '902 *
[Reference 42]
SSBG Amikas Brief to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the CLS case, 06.12.2012 *
[Reference 43]
SSBG pat. Appl. "An IES Capable of Semi-Autom. Generating / Invoking All Legal Argument Chains (LACs) in the SPL Test of a Claimed Invention (CI), as Enabled by Its Inventive Concepts (inCs)", *
[Reference 44]
R. Rader, Panel Discussion "Patent on Life Sciences", Berlin, 28.11.2012
[Reference 45]
SSBG's AB to the Supreme Court as to the CII Question, Jan. 28, 2014 *
[Reference 46]
S. Schindler: "Autom. Deriv. Of Leg. Arg. Chains (LACs) from Arguable Subtests (ASTs) of a Claimed Invention's Test for Satisfying. SPL", University of Warsaw, 24.05.2014 *
[Reference 47]
S. Schindler: "Auto. Gen. of All ASTs for an Inv.'S SPL Test", subm. For public. *
[Reference 48]
US Patent Office / MPEP, "2012 ... Proc. For Subj. Matter Eligibility ... of Process Claims Involving Laws of Nature", 2012 *
[Reference 49]
USPTO / MPEP, Guidelines 35 USC 112 (2), Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 27; MPEP 2171, Rev. 9, Aug. 2012 *
[Reference 50]
NAUTILUS v. BIOSIG, PFC, 2013 *
[Reference 51]
BIOSIG, Respondent, 2013 *
[Reference 52]
Public Knowledge et al., AB, 2014 *
[Reference 53]
Amazon et al., AB, 2014 *
[Reference 54]
White House, FACT SHEET --... the President's Call to Strength. Our Patent System and Foster Innovation, 2014 *
[Reference 55]
See US Patent Office homepage
[Reference 56]
See the homepage of the American Association of Intellectual Property Owners
[Reference 57]
M. Adelman, R. Rader, J. Thomas: "Cases and Materials on Patent Law", West AP, 2009.
[Reference 58]
SSBG's Amicus Brief to the Supreme Court as to its (In) Definiteness Questions, March 3, 2014 *
[Reference 59]
SSBG pat. Appl. "A Patent Interpretations and inCs Minded UI of an IES"
[Reference 60]
S. Schindler: "A Patent Interpretation (s) and an inCs Minded UI of an IES", in preparation, 2014.
[Reference 61]
H. Wegner: "Indefiniteness, the Sleeping Giant in Patent Law", www.laipla.net/ hal-wegners-top-ten-patent-cases /
[Reference 62]
Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Case Numbers 12-1513, Reexamination Number 95,001,001 in US Patent Application 7,145,902, February 21, 2014 *
Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Case Numbers 12-1297, Reexamination Numbers 90 / 010,017 in US Patent Application 6,954,453, April 4, 2014 *
[Reference 63]
[63] B. Wegner, S. Schindler: "A Mathematical Structure for Modeling Inventions", Coimbra, CICM-2014 *
[Reference 64]
SSBG's Petition to the CAFC for Rehearing En Banc in the '902 case, 18.04.2014 *.
[Reference 65]
United States Court of Appeals for the Circuit: VEDERI vs. GOOGLE decision; March 14, 2014
[Reference 66]
United States Court of Appeals for the Circuit: THERASENSE vs. BECTON & BAYER decision, 25.05.2011
[Reference 67]
B. Fiacco: VERSATA v. Amicus Briefs to the US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of SAP & US Patent Office
[Reference 68]
Official transcript of oral argument at the US Supreme Court in Alice Corp v. CLS Case 13-298 Subject to final Review, March 31, 2014, Alderson Reporting Company *
[Reference 69]
R. Rader, Keynote Speech: "Patent Law and Litigation Abuse", ED Tex Bench and Bar Conf., November 1, 2013 *
[Reference 70]
S. Schindler, Keynote Speech: "eKnowledge About Substantive Patent Law (SPL)-Trail Blazer into the Innovation Age", Barcelona, eKNOW-2014 *
[Reference 71]
S. Schindler: "The Supreme Court's'SPL Initiative': Scientizing Its SPL Interpretation Clarifies Three Initially Evergreen SPL Obscurities", submitted for publ., 2014 *
[Reference 72]
USPTO / MPEP: "2014 Procedure For Subject Matter Eligibility Analysis Of Claims Reciting Or Involving Laws Of Nature / Natural Principles, Natural Phenomena, And / Or Natural Products" *
[Reference 73]
B. Wegner, S. Schindler: "The Mathematical Structure for Modeling the Refined Claim Construction", in prep.
[Reference 74]
Tbd
[Reference 75]
D. Crouch: "En Banc Federal Circuit Panel Changes the Law of Claim Construction", 13.07.2005.
[Reference 76]
Video of the Hearing on 09.05.2014 organized by the PTO *
[Reference 77]
R. Rader, Keynote Speeches at GTIF, Geneva, 2014 and LESI, Moscow, 2014
[Reference 78]
S. Schindler: "On the BRI-Schism in the US National Patent System (NPS), A Challenge for the US Highest Courts", May 22, 2014, subm. For publ. *
[Reference 79]
SSBG's Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court in the '902 case, in preparation.

*) See www.fstp-expert-system.com.

Footnote / Endnote Note 1
While there are currently differences between the US "Substantive Patent Law, SPL" and other territories / nations, such as the EU with the EPC SPL, there are internationally understood SPLs. Harmonization is completely less controversial in the United States, much more in the EU and in many industrialized countries, and as evidenced in the "Supreme Court", and economically for all parties. This difference should be resolved sooner or later, as it is also very beneficial. For example, a similar process was once carried out, such as the domestic accounting of public companies, and today it is in harmony with the global IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards). Here, patent highway programs in several large patent offices play an important role.

Note 2
By performing the NANO test on this CI, there is no prior art or pragmatics to determine the creative height that should be 5 or more by one of ordinary skill in the art and make this happen. According to references 5 and 6, the creativity of this CI is
Greater than 1, thereby guaranteeing its novelty (there is no prior art document that anticipates one of the above five BID-inCs, especially at least, as those skilled in the art).
• 5 or more, which guarantees its non-obviousness for the same reason.

Note 3
Due to the novelty in this part of the specification, many details (obvious) are briefly described in Chapter 2. The above-mentioned non-important thing is superfluous in the patent specification, and the specification has this part. If a future patent application is supported by its PTR-DS or by the IES disclosed herein, the above description, whether self-evident, to the user in real-time requirements. Potentially represented by a multimedia representation that is maximally controllable.

Claims (24)

Innovation Expert A computer implementation method that is executed in at least one of config and real-time modes using data about the operation of the system.
The data is
A predetermined "claimed invention", the technical teaching TT of the CI. 0 and all SPL-related functional corresponding or equivalent previous line art documents to the CI, given that stores non-functional properties as "data structure DS (data structure)",
Includes the fragmented "Arguable Subtest" logically constructed by the DS.
The fragmented AST comprises the result of the FSTP test of the invention according to the claim.
The FSTP test includes a set of tests for evaluating CI under the "Substantive patent Law (SPL)".
Instantiation of the fragmented AST provides access to parts of the FSTP test results.
The computer mounting method is
Interact with the user in at least one of config mode and real-time mode
The first to third processes are executed by the processor provided in the computer, and the first to third processes are executed.
The first process is
A "user interface" to allow a user to enter or access a "legal argument chain" of a given CI to indicate that the CI satisfies the SPL. Provides "user interface entity (UIE)"
The LAC is derived from one or more ASTs and contains one or more AST representations.
Decision whether the CI meets the SPL is performed by an instance of the LAC,
Each of the plurality of the UIE, include access available components,
Before Kia access available components,
Both of those are instantiated, can be constructed and controlled expression of any of the LAC by the logic of selection of the AST, the "knowledge representation of the user interface entity KR-UIE (knowledge representation user interface entity) ",
Both of what is instantiated, it is possible to determine the media aspects及beauty representation of any of the LAC, "human dialogue user interface multi entity HI-UIE (human interaction user interface entity) ",
Each of the instantiated ones includes an "interaction control user interface entity (IC-UIE)", which can construct and control the representation of any part of the LAC.
The second process is
In the configuration mode, one or more of the KR-UIE selected, the sets of the HI-UIE and the IC-UIE, and allows the user to create or modify a pre Kia access available components,
Based on the user's input, the UIE to be selected from the plurality of UIEs is automatically derived.
For the user
In the KR-UIE of the selected UIE, a representation of one or more fragmented ASTs logically configured by the predetermined DS derived from the predetermined CI, and
How the KR-UIE is expressed as a LAC in the HI-UIE of the selected UIE via an input / output device.
The IC-UIE of the selected UIE is automatically prompted to enter what dialogue control the user has for the representation of the LAC.
In the third process , in the real-time mode, based on the fragmented AST, the selected UIE is executed in real time, and the fragmented AST is combined to form the LAC. Then, the LAC is automatically expressed.
Computer implementation method. The plurality of UIEs are divided into user interface entity steps.
By activating one of the plurality of UIEs, at least one corresponding UIE step is executed.
Any step defined in both the config mode and the real-time mode applies.
The computer mounting method according to claim 1. Innovation expert system (IES) users define different multimedia representations for the LAC and generate "different LACs for any AST of CI / TT.0".
The computer mounting method according to claim 1. For the predetermined CI and the FFOLLIN of the predetermined CI, all ASTs cover the FSTPFFOLLIN-DS of this CI.
The computer mounting method according to claim 1. The FSTPFOOLLIN-test of the CI covered by the AST, the complete FSTPFOLLIN-test of the CI, is understood as the logical product of the basic logical statements decomposed into a set of "basic arguable subsets". Ru,
The computer mounting method according to claim 1. Details of PTR-DS by the IES user or this TT. Depending on its FSTP-test, which represents 0 and each of this detail, the HI-UIE will have the TT of the CI under the SPL applied to the user. Automatic or semi-automatic instant information representation is possible by one or more different LACs for any AST of 0.
The computer mounting method according to claim 1. The LAC identification and activation process in said real-time mode utilizes one or both of the graphical and acoustic patterns embodied by the relevant multimedia thesaurus structure based on the "AST pattern" for each of these processes. Substantially supported by IES calibration that gives hints,
The computer mounting method according to claim 1. The IES completes these fragments by user anthropomorphization with fragments of grammatical terms initially input acoustically, graphically, or acoustically and graphically that are intended to be expressed later in a unique way. This grammatical term can be automatically regenerated and finally expressed as a personal or potential multimedia announcement or information in a smart IMR (interactive multimedia response) system.
The computer mounting method according to claim 1. An innovation expert system that operates in at least one of config and real-time modes.
With the processor
It is provided with a memory in which data related to the operation of the innovation expert system is stored.
The stored data is
A predetermined "claimed invention", the technical teaching TT of the CI. 0 and all SPL-related functional corresponding or equivalent previous line art documents to the CI, given that stores non-functional properties as "data structure DS (data structure)",
Includes the fragmented "Arguable Subtest" logically constructed by the DS.
The fragmented AST comprises the result of the FSTP test of the invention according to the claim.
The FSTP test includes a set of tests for evaluating CI under the "Substantive patent Law (SPL)".
Instantiation of the fragmented AST provides access to parts of the FSTP test results.
In addition, it comprises one or more input / output devices that interact with the user in at least one of the config mode and the real-time mode.
The first to third processes are executed by the processor provided in the computer, and the first to third processes are executed.
The first process is
A "user interface" to allow a user to enter or access a "legal argument chain" of a given CI to indicate that the CI satisfies the SPL. Provides "user interface entity (UIE)"
The LAC is derived from one or more ASTs and contains one or more AST representations.
Decision whether the CI meets the SPL is performed by an instance of the LAC,
Each of the plurality of the UIE, include access available components,
Before Kia access available components,
Both of those are instantiated, can be constructed and controlled expression of any of the LAC by the logic of selection of the AST, the "knowledge representation of the user interface entity KR-UIE (knowledge representation user interface entity) ",
Both of what is instantiated, it is possible to determine the media aspects及beauty representation of any of the LAC, "human dialogue user interface multi entity HI-UIE (human interaction user interface entity) ",
Each of the instantiated ones includes an "interaction control user interface entity (IC-UIE)", which can construct and control the representation of any part of the LAC.
The second process is
In the configuration mode, one or more of the KR-UIE selected, the sets of the HI-UIE and the IC-UIE, and allows the user to create or modify a pre Kia access available components,
Based on the user's input, the UIE to be selected from the plurality of UIEs is automatically derived.
For the user
In the KR-UIE of the selected UIE, a representation of one or more fragmented ASTs logically configured by the predetermined DS derived from the predetermined CI, and
How the KR-UIE is expressed as a LAC in the HI-UIE of the selected UIE via an input / output device.
The IC-UIE of the selected UIE is automatically prompted to enter what dialogue control the user has for the representation of the LAC.
In the third process , in the real-time mode, based on the fragmented AST, the selected UIE is executed in real time, and the fragmented AST is combined to form the LAC. Then, the LAC is automatically expressed.
Innovation expert system. The plurality of UIEs are divided into user interface entity steps.
By activating one of the plurality of UIEs, at least one corresponding UIE step is executed.
Any step defined in both the config mode and the real-time mode applies.
The innovation expert system according to claim 9. Innovation expert system (IES) users define different multimedia representations for the LAC and generate "different LACs for any AST of CI / TT.0".
The innovation expert system according to claim 9. For the predetermined CI and the FFOLLIN of the predetermined CI, all ASTs cover the FSTPFFOLLIN-DS of this CI.
The innovation expert system according to claim 9. The FSTPFOOLLIN-test of the CI covered by the AST, the complete FSTPFOLLIN-test of the CI, is understood as the logical product of the basic logical statements decomposed into a set of "basic arguable subsets". Ru,
The innovation expert system according to claim 9. Details of PTR-DS by the IES user or this TT. Depending on its FSTP-test, which represents 0 and each of this detail, the HI-UIE will have the TT of the CI under the SPL applied to the user. Automatic or semi-automatic instant information representation is possible by one or more different LACs for any AST of 0.
The innovation expert system according to claim 9. The LAC identification and activation process in said real-time mode utilizes one or both of the graphical and acoustic patterns embodied by the relevant multimedia thesaurus structure based on the "AST pattern" for each of these processes. Substantially supported by IES calibration that gives hints,
The innovation expert system according to claim 9. The IES completes these fragments by user anthropomorphization with fragments of grammatical terms initially input acoustically, graphically, or acoustically and graphically that are intended to be expressed later in a unique way. This grammatical term can be automatically regenerated and finally expressed as a personal or potential multimedia announcement or information in a smart IMR (interactive multimedia response) system.
The innovation expert system according to claim 9. A program that causes a computer to perform processing related to the operation of the Innovation Expert System in at least one of config mode and real-time mode using data related to the operation of the Innovation Expert System.
The data is
A predetermined "claimed invention", the technical teaching TT of the CI. 0 and all SPL-related functional corresponding or equivalent previous line art documents to the CI, given that stores non-functional properties as "data structure DS (data structure)",
Includes the fragmented "Arguable Subtest" logically constructed by the DS.
The fragmented AST comprises the result of the FSTP test of the invention according to the claim.
The FSTP test includes a set of tests for evaluating CI under the "Substantive patent Law (SPL)".
Instantiation of the fragmented AST provides access to parts of the FSTP test results.
The program
Interact with the user in at least one of config mode and real-time mode
A processor provided in the computer, to execute the first to third processing,
The first process is
A "user interface" to allow a user to enter or access a "legal argument chain" of a given CI to indicate that the CI satisfies the SPL. Provides "user interface entity (UIE)"
The LAC is derived from one or more ASTs and contains one or more AST representations.
Decision whether the CI meets the SPL is performed by an instance of the LAC,
Each of the plurality of the UIE, include access available components,
Before Kia access available components,
Both of those are instantiated, can be constructed and controlled expression of any of the LAC by the logic of selection of the AST, the "knowledge representation of the user interface entity KR-UIE (knowledge representation user interface entity) ",
Both of what is instantiated, it is possible to determine the media aspects及beauty representation of any of the LAC, "human dialogue user interface multi entity HI-UIE (human interaction user interface entity) ",
Each of the instantiated ones includes an "interaction control user interface entity (IC-UIE)", which can construct and control the representation of any part of the LAC.
The second process is
In the configuration mode, one or more of the KR-UIE selected, the sets of the HI-UIE and the IC-UIE, and allows the user to create or modify a pre Kia access available components,
Based on the user's input, the UIE to be selected from the plurality of UIEs is automatically derived.
For the user
In the KR-UIE of the selected UIE, a representation of one or more fragmented ASTs logically configured by the predetermined DS derived from the predetermined CI, and
How the KR-UIE is expressed as a LAC in the HI-UIE of the selected UIE via an input / output device.
The IC-UIE of the selected UIE is automatically prompted to enter what dialogue control the user has for the representation of the LAC.
In the third process , in the real-time mode, based on the fragmented AST, the selected UIE is executed in real time, and the fragmented AST is combined to form the LAC. Then, the LAC is automatically expressed.
program. The plurality of UIEs are divided into user interface entity steps.
By activating one of the plurality of UIEs, at least one corresponding UIE step is executed.
Any step defined in both the config mode and the real-time mode applies.
The program according to claim 17. Innovation expert system (IES) users define different multimedia representations for the LAC and generate "different LACs for any AST of CI / TT.0".
The program according to claim 17. For the predetermined CI and the FFOLLIN of the predetermined CI, all ASTs cover the FSTPFFOLLIN-DS of this CI.
The program according to claim 17. The FSTPFOOLLIN-test of the CI covered by the AST, the complete FSTPFOLLIN-test of the CI, is understood as the logical product of the basic logical statements decomposed into a set of "basic arguable subsets". Ru,
The program according to claim 17. Details of PTR-DS by the IES user or this TT. Depending on its FSTP-test, which represents 0 and each of this detail, the HI-UIE will have the TT of the CI under the SPL applied to the user. Automatic or semi-automatic instant information representation is possible by one or more different LACs for any AST of 0.
The program according to claim 17. The LAC identification and activation process in said real-time mode utilizes one or both of the graphical and acoustic patterns embodied by the relevant multimedia thesaurus structure based on the "AST pattern" for each of these processes. Substantially supported by IES calibration that gives hints,
The program according to claim 17. The IES completes these fragments by user anthropomorphization with fragments of grammatical terms initially input acoustically, graphically, or acoustically and graphically that are intended to be expressed later in a unique way. This grammatical term can be automatically regenerated and finally expressed as a personal or potential multimedia announcement or information in a smart IMR (interactive multimedia response) system.
The program according to claim 17.

Images