JP2016170165A - Evaluation device and evaluation method for bending resistance of metal plate - Google Patents

Evaluation device and evaluation method for bending resistance of metal plate Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2016170165A
JP2016170165A JP2016019111A JP2016019111A JP2016170165A JP 2016170165 A JP2016170165 A JP 2016170165A JP 2016019111 A JP2016019111 A JP 2016019111A JP 2016019111 A JP2016019111 A JP 2016019111A JP 2016170165 A JP2016170165 A JP 2016170165A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
bending
metal plate
bending radius
limit
punch
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2016019111A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP6766365B2 (en
Inventor
研一郎 大塚
Kenichiro Otsuka
研一郎 大塚
富安 健
Takeshi Tomiyasu
健 富安
嘉明 中澤
Yoshiaki Nakazawa
嘉明 中澤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp
Publication of JP2016170165A publication Critical patent/JP2016170165A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6766365B2 publication Critical patent/JP6766365B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To evaluate a critical bending radius of a steel plate by V-shape bending with drastic suppression of increase of the man-hour and cost for an evaluation test in comparison to conventional evaluation methods.SOLUTION: An evaluation device 10 includes a punch 11 and a die 12, and performs a V-shape bending work to a steel-plate 13 in one direction to evaluate a critical bending radius. A bending radius R1 at a tip 11a of the punch 11 and a bending radius R2 at a bottom 12a of the die 12 continuously and gradually change in a direction intersecting the one direction, respectively.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

本発明は、金属板の耐曲げ性の評価装置および評価方法に関する。   The present invention relates to an evaluation apparatus and an evaluation method for bending resistance of a metal plate.

合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板のめっき層は、Zn−Fe金属間化合物により構成されるため、硬く脆いという性質があり、プレス成形時の変形によって表面の亜鉛めっき層が粉末状に剥離する「パウダリング」を生じることがある。   The plating layer of the alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet is composed of a Zn-Fe intermetallic compound, so it has the property of being hard and brittle, and the surface galvanized layer is peeled off in powder form by deformation during press molding. May occur.

パウダリングによって剥離しためっき粉が成形品に付着することによって、押し込み痕や金型への損傷、塗装時の外観劣化といった様々な問題が発生する。パウダリングは、曲げ変形の場合には曲げ部の曲げ半径、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき層の合金化度や合金化処理温度等に影響されるとされている。このため、例えばパウダリングを生じない限界曲げ半径を事前に求め、めっき鋼板のパウダリング特性(例えばパウダリングを生じない限界曲げ半径(限界曲げパンチR))を、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき層の合金化度や合金化処理温度毎に、事前に評価する必要がある。   When the plating powder peeled off by powdering adheres to the molded product, various problems such as indentation marks, damage to the mold, and deterioration of the appearance during painting occur. In the case of bending deformation, powdering is said to be affected by the bending radius of the bent portion, the alloying degree of the alloyed hot-dip galvanized layer, the alloying treatment temperature, and the like. Therefore, for example, the limit bending radius that does not cause powdering is obtained in advance, and the powdering characteristics of the plated steel sheet (for example, the limit bending radius that does not cause powdering (limit bending punch R)) It is necessary to evaluate in advance for each degree of conversion and alloying treatment temperature.

特許文献1〜3には、めっき鋼板のパウダリング特性の評価に関する発明が開示されている。パウダリング特性の評価方法としては様々なものがあるが、最も一般的には、特許文献1〜3に記載されるように、V形型曲げ曲げ戻しにより評価される。   Patent Documents 1 to 3 disclose inventions relating to the evaluation of powdering characteristics of plated steel sheets. There are various methods for evaluating powdering characteristics, but most generally, evaluation is performed by V-shaped bending and bending back as described in Patent Documents 1 to 3.

また、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板に限らず、曲げにより剥離するおそれのある靭性に乏しい表層を有する金属板に対して、表層が剥離しない限界曲げ半径を評価する必要がある。ここで、「靭性に乏しい表層を有する」とは、金属板の内部の金属より靭性に乏しい層が前記金属と金属板の表面の間に形成されていることを意味し、例えば合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板の他に合金電気めっき鋼板、Al−Zn溶融めっき鋼板、Zn−Al−Mg溶融めっき鋼板、クロムフリー被膜鋼板等の化成被膜鋼板等が挙げられる。   Moreover, it is necessary to evaluate the limit bend radius at which the surface layer does not peel, not only for the alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet but also for a metal plate having a surface layer with poor toughness that may be peeled off by bending. Here, “having a surface layer with poor toughness” means that a layer with less toughness than the metal inside the metal plate is formed between the metal and the surface of the metal plate, for example, alloyed molten zinc In addition to the plated steel sheet, alloy electroplated steel sheet, Al—Zn hot dipped steel sheet, Zn—Al—Mg hot dipped steel sheet, chemical coated steel sheet such as chromium-free coated steel sheet, and the like can be mentioned.

一方、鋼板の高強度化に伴って、鋼板の延性は低下するため、プレス成形された鋼板には割れ(以下、本明細書では「曲げ割れ」という)が生じ易くなる。曲げ割れが発生すると、プレス成形品の歩留まりが低下する。このため、曲げ割れを生じない限界曲げ半径を事前に求め、鋼板の曲げ割れ性(例えば曲げ割れを生じない限界曲げ半径(限界曲げパンチR))を、鋼板の引張強度毎に事前に評価する必要がある。   On the other hand, since the ductility of a steel sheet decreases as the strength of the steel sheet increases, cracks (hereinafter referred to as “bending cracks” in this specification) tend to occur in the press-formed steel sheet. When bending cracks occur, the yield of press-formed products decreases. For this reason, the limit bending radius which does not produce a bending crack is calculated | required in advance, and the bending cracking property (for example, the limit bending radius which does not produce a bending crack (limit bending punch R)) is evaluated beforehand for every tensile strength of a steel plate. There is a need.

鋼板の曲げ割れ性を評価する方法として、一般にV曲げ試験方法が知られる。V曲げ試験方法は、先端に複数の異なる曲げRを有する断面V型の複数のパンチとこれに対向するダイを準備し、これら複数のパンチおよびダイで鋼板をそれぞれ挟み込んでプレス成形を多数回行うことにより、鋼板に曲げ割れが生じない最小曲げ半径を求める方法である。   As a method for evaluating the bending cracking property of a steel sheet, a V-bending test method is generally known. In the V bending test method, a plurality of punches having a V-shaped cross section having a plurality of different bends R at the tip and a die facing the punch are prepared, and a steel sheet is sandwiched between the plurality of punches and dies, and press forming is performed many times. This is a method for obtaining a minimum bending radius at which a bending crack does not occur in the steel sheet.

しかし、V曲げ試験方法を行うには、先端に多数の曲げRを有するパンチおよびダイを準備し、多数の実験を行う必要があり、試験に要するコストおよび工数が嵩む。   However, in order to perform the V-bending test method, it is necessary to prepare punches and dies having a large number of bends R at the tip and perform a large number of experiments, which increases the cost and man-hours required for the test.

特許文献4には、V曲げ試験において鋼板の曲げ限界値をパンチの曲げRとV形ダイスのスパンWの関数として決定する方法が開示され、特許文献5には、金属板の曲げ変形後の曲げ戻し変形時に曲げ内側に発生する曲げ内ワレ評価方法が開示されている。   Patent Document 4 discloses a method of determining a bending limit value of a steel sheet as a function of a punch bending R and a V-shaped die span W in a V-bending test, and Patent Document 5 discloses a method after bending deformation of a metal plate. An evaluation method for cracking in bending that occurs inside the bending at the time of bending back deformation is disclosed.

特開2014−201818号公報JP 2014-201818 A 特開2014−238282号公報JP 2014-238282 A 特開平11−6827号公報JP-A-11-6827 特開2011−173136号公報JP 2011-173136 A 特開2015−47605号公報JP2015-47605A

図8は、従来のV形型曲げ曲げ戻しによるめっき鋼板のパウダリング特性の評価方法を模式的に示す説明図である。   FIG. 8 is an explanatory view schematically showing a method for evaluating the powdering characteristics of a plated steel sheet by conventional V-shaped bending bending back.

図8に示すように、V形型曲げ曲げ戻しによる評価方法は、所定のパンチ先端半径を有するパンチ1と所定のダイ底半径を有するダイ2とを用いて試験片(合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板)3にV形型曲げを行い、その後にフラットパンチ4およびフラットダイ5を用いて曲げ戻しを行った後に、試験片3の曲げ内面へのテープ6の貼付および剥離を行い、テープ6の濃淡によりパウダリングの有無を評価する。これを、パンチ先端半径,ダイ底半径が異なる多数の他のパンチ,ダイを用いて試験片3に対して行う。このようにして、パウダリングを生じない限界曲げ半径を求めていた。   As shown in FIG. 8, the evaluation method by V-shaped bending and bending back uses a punch 1 having a predetermined punch tip radius and a die 2 having a predetermined die bottom radius as a test piece (alloyed galvanized steel sheet). 3) V-shaped bending was performed on 3 and then bent back using the flat punch 4 and the flat die 5, and then the tape 6 was applied to and peeled from the bending inner surface of the test piece 3. To evaluate the presence or absence of powdering. This is performed on the test piece 3 using a number of other punches and dies having different punch tip radii and die bottom radii. In this way, the limit bending radius that does not cause powdering has been obtained.

このため、試験を行う試験片3の合金化度および合金化処理温度が1条件である場合であっても、複数固の金型を用いる必要であるとともに複数回のV形型曲げ曲げ戻しを行う必要がある。このため、評価試験に要する工数およびコストの増加が避けられなかった。他の曲げにより剥離するおそれのある表層を有する金属板に対して、表層が剥離しない許容される限界曲げ半径を評価する場合も事情は同じである。   For this reason, even when the degree of alloying of the test piece 3 to be tested and the alloying treatment temperature are one condition, it is necessary to use a plurality of solid molds and perform a plurality of V-shaped bending and unbending operations. There is a need to do. For this reason, the increase in the man-hour and cost which an evaluation test requires cannot be avoided. The situation is the same when evaluating an allowable limit bending radius at which the surface layer does not peel against a metal plate having a surface layer that may be peeled off by other bending.

また、特許文献4,5により開示された発明においても多数の金型を準備し、多数回の実験を行う必要があり、試験に要するコストおよび工数が嵩む。   In the inventions disclosed in Patent Documents 4 and 5, it is necessary to prepare a large number of molds and perform a large number of experiments, which increases the cost and man-hour required for the test.

本発明は、V形型曲げ曲げ戻しによる例えばめっき金属板のパウダリング性の従来の評価方法や、V形型曲げ試験方法による鋼板の曲げ割れの従来の評価方法が有するこのような課題に鑑みてなされたものであり、従来の評価方法よりも評価試験に要する工数およびコストの増加を大幅に抑制できる、例えば合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板のパウダリング特性といった、曲げにより剥離するおそれのある表層を有する金属板や、曲げ割れを生じおそれがある金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置および評価方法を提供することである。   The present invention has been made in view of such problems that the conventional evaluation method for the powdering property of, for example, a plated metal plate by V-shaped bending bending back and the conventional evaluation method for the bending crack of a steel sheet by the V-shaped bending test method have. The surface layer that can be peeled off by bending, such as the powdering characteristics of galvannealed steel sheets, which can greatly suppress the increase in man-hours and costs required for evaluation tests as compared to conventional evaluation methods. It is to provide an evaluation device and an evaluation method for a metal plate having a limit bending radius of a metal plate or a metal plate that may cause a bending crack.

本発明者らは、上記課題を解決するために鋭意検討を重ねた結果、
(A)パンチ先端半径,ダイ底半径がいずれも連続的に変化するパンチおよびダイを用いて金属板に曲げ半径を連続的に変化させたV形型曲げ曲げ戻しを行い、金属板の表面に圧縮ひずみを付与して表層の剥離を発生させれば、曲げ半径Rの連続変化に伴う表層剥離の発生から金属板の耐曲げ性を、一回の曲げ成形により適正に評価できること、および
(B)パンチ先端半径,ダイ底半径がいずれも連続的に変化するパンチおよびダイを用いて金属板に曲げ半径を連続的に変化させたV形型曲げを行い、曲げ加工された金属板の稜線の方向へひずみを断続的に変化させれば、曲げ半径Rの連続変化に伴う金属板の曲げ割れを、一回の曲げ成形により適正に評価できることを知見し、さらに検討を重ねて本発明を完成した。本発明は以下に列記の通りである。
As a result of intensive studies to solve the above problems, the present inventors have
(A) Using a punch and die in which both the punch tip radius and the die bottom radius are continuously changed, V-shaped bending and bending back with a bending radius continuously changed on the metal plate is performed on the surface of the metal plate. If compressive strain is applied to cause peeling of the surface layer, the bending resistance of the metal plate can be properly evaluated by a single bending process from the occurrence of peeling of the surface layer accompanying the continuous change of the bending radius R, and (B ) Using a punch and die whose punch tip radius and die bottom radius both change continuously, V-shaped bending with a continuously changing bending radius was performed on the metal plate, and the ridgeline of the bent metal plate Knowing that if the strain is intermittently changed in the direction, the bending cracks of the metal plate accompanying the continuous change of the bending radius R can be properly evaluated by a single bending, and the present invention is completed through further studies. did. The present invention is listed below.

(1)パンチおよびダイを備え、金属板に一の方向へのV形型曲げ加工を行うことにより前記金属板の限界曲げ半径を評価する装置であって、
前記パンチの先端の曲げ半径、および前記ダイの底の曲げ半径が、いずれも、前記一の方向と交差する方向へ連続的かつ徐々に変化する、金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。
(1) An apparatus that includes a punch and a die and evaluates a limit bending radius of the metal plate by performing a V-shaped bending process in one direction on the metal plate,
An apparatus for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate, wherein the bending radius at the tip of the punch and the bending radius at the bottom of the die both continuously and gradually change in a direction intersecting the one direction.

(2)前記金属板は靭性に乏しい表層を有する金属板であるとともに、前記限界曲げ半径は表層剥離を生じない限界曲げ半径である、1項に記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   (2) The evaluation apparatus for the limit bending radius of the metal plate according to item 1, wherein the metal plate is a metal plate having a surface layer with poor toughness, and the limit bending radius is a limit bending radius that does not cause surface layer peeling.

(3)前記パンチの先端の曲げ半径には、前記金属板の板厚の10倍の箇所がある、2項に記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   (3) The evaluation apparatus for the limit bending radius of the metal plate according to item 2, wherein the bending radius at the tip of the punch has a location 10 times the thickness of the metal plate.

(4)前記パンチの先端の曲げ半径には、3〜26mmの範囲内の箇所がある、2項に記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   (4) The apparatus for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate according to item 2, wherein the bending radius at the tip of the punch has a portion within a range of 3 to 26 mm.

(5)前記パンチの先端の曲げ半径には、3mm未満の箇所と26mm超の箇所がある、2項に記載された金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   (5) The apparatus for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate according to item 2, wherein the bending radius at the tip of the punch includes a portion of less than 3 mm and a portion of more than 26 mm.

(6)前記金属板は合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板である、2〜5項のいずれかに記載の金属板のパウダリング特性の評価装置。   (6) The apparatus for evaluating powdering characteristics of a metal plate according to any one of 2 to 5, wherein the metal plate is an alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel plate.

(7)前記金属板は曲げ割れを生じる金属板であるとともに、前記限界曲げ半径は曲げ割れを生じない限界曲げ半径である、1項に記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   (7) The apparatus for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate according to item 1, wherein the metal plate is a metal plate that generates a bending crack, and the limit bending radius is a limit bending radius that does not generate a bending crack.

(8)前記パンチの先端には、該先端の曲げ半径をR(mm)とするとともに前記金属板の板厚をt(mm)とした場合に、R/tが3以下である箇所がある、7項に記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   (8) The tip of the punch has a portion where R / t is 3 or less when the bending radius of the tip is R (mm) and the thickness of the metal plate is t (mm). The evaluation apparatus of the limit bending radius of the metal plate of Claim 7.

(9)靭性に乏しい表層を有する金属板に曲げ半径が連続的に変化するV形型曲げ加工を行った後に曲げ戻すことにより前記金属板の表面に圧縮ひずみを付与して表層剥離を発生させ、曲げ半径の連続的な変化に伴う表層剥離の発生から、前記金属板の、表層剥離を生じない限界曲げ半径を求める、金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価方法。   (9) A metal plate having a surface layer with poor toughness is subjected to a V-shaped bending process in which the bending radius continuously changes, and then bent back to give a compressive strain to the surface of the metal plate to cause surface layer peeling. A method for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate, wherein a limit bending radius of the metal plate that does not cause surface layer peeling is determined from occurrence of surface layer peeling accompanying a continuous change in bending radius.

(10)曲げ割れを発生する金属板に曲げ半径が連続的に変化するV形型曲げ加工を行うことにより、曲げ加工された金属板の稜線の方向へひずみを断続的に変化させて曲げ割れを発生することにより、前記金属板の、曲げ割れを生じない限界曲げ半径を求める、金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価方法。   (10) By performing V-shaped bending with a bending radius continuously changing on a metal plate that generates a bending crack, the strain is intermittently changed in the direction of the ridgeline of the bent metal plate to cause a bending crack. An evaluation method of the limit bending radius of the metal plate, in which the limit bending radius of the metal plate that does not cause bending cracking is obtained.

(11)曲げ曲げ戻し割れを発生する金属板に、曲げ半径が連続的に変化するV形型曲げ加工を行い、曲げ加工された金属板の稜線の方向へひずみを断続的に変化させた後に、曲げ戻すことによって曲げ曲げ戻し割れを発生させることにより、前記金属板の、曲げ曲げ戻し割れを生じない限界曲げ半径を求める、金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価方法。   (11) After performing a V-shaped bending process in which the bending radius continuously changes on a metal plate that generates bending-bending back cracks, and the strain is intermittently changed in the direction of the ridgeline of the bent metal sheet. A method for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate, wherein a limit bending radius of the metal plate that does not cause a bending / bending return crack is determined by generating a bending / bending return crack by bending back.

(12)前記V形型曲げ加工は、パンチ先端の曲げ半径、およびダイ底の曲げ半径が、いずれも、加工方向と交差する一の方向へ連続的かつ徐々に変化するパンチおよびダイを用いて行う、9〜11項のいずれかに記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価方法。   (12) The V-shaped bending process uses a punch and die in which the bending radius of the punch tip and the bending radius of the die bottom both change continuously and gradually in one direction intersecting the processing direction. The evaluation method of the limit bending radius of the metal plate in any one of 9-11 performed.

本発明により、V形型曲げ曲げ戻しによる例えば合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板のパウダリング特性評価といった、金属板の表層剥離の従来の評価方法よりも評価試験に要する工数およびコストの増加や、V形型曲げによる鋼板の曲げ割れ性評価の試験に要する工数およびコストの増加を、いずれも大幅に抑制できる。   According to the present invention, the number of man-hours and costs required for the evaluation test can be increased more than the conventional evaluation method for peeling the surface of a metal plate, such as the powdering property evaluation of an alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet by V-shaped bending and bending back. Both the man-hour and cost increase required for the test for evaluating the bending crackability of the steel sheet by die bending can be greatly suppressed.

図1は、本発明に係る合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板のパウダリング特性の評価装置の構成例を示す分解斜視図である。FIG. 1 is an exploded perspective view showing a configuration example of an apparatus for evaluating powdering characteristics of an galvannealed steel sheet according to the present invention. 図2は、曲げ戻し後の合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板にテープを貼付した状態を示す説明図である。FIG. 2 is an explanatory view showing a state where a tape is stuck on the galvannealed steel sheet after bending back. 図3は、剥離されたテープの状態を模式的に示す説明図である。FIG. 3 is an explanatory view schematically showing the state of the peeled tape. 図4は、パウダリング特性の評価において、本発明により測定された限界曲げ半径と、図8に示す従来の方法により測定された限界曲げ半径との関係を示すグラフである。FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the critical bending radius measured by the present invention and the critical bending radius measured by the conventional method shown in FIG. 8 in the evaluation of the powdering characteristics. 図5は、曲げ加工された鋼板の形状例を示す説明図である。FIG. 5 is an explanatory view showing an example of the shape of a bent steel plate. 図6は、図5におけるA矢視図である。6 is a view taken in the direction of arrow A in FIG. 図7は、曲げ割れ特性の評価において、本発明により測定された限界曲げ半径と、図8に示す従来の方法により測定された限界曲げ半径との関係を示すグラフである。FIG. 7 is a graph showing the relationship between the critical bending radius measured by the present invention and the critical bending radius measured by the conventional method shown in FIG. 図8は、従来のV形型曲げ曲げ戻しによるめっき鋼板のパウダリング特性、および曲げ曲げ戻し割れ特性の評価方法を模式的に示す説明図である。なお,曲げ戻しをせずにV曲げ後に割れを評価した場合は曲げ割れ特性の評価方法となる。FIG. 8 is an explanatory view schematically showing a conventional method for evaluating the powdering characteristics and bending / bending return cracking characteristics of a plated steel sheet by V-shaped bending / bending. Note that when a crack is evaluated after V-bending without bending back, it becomes an evaluation method for bending crack characteristics.

添付図面を参照しながら、本発明を説明する。
1.パウダリング特性の評価
以降の説明では、本発明における靭性に乏しい表層を有する金属板が合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板である場合を例にとる。
The present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
1. Evaluation of Powdering Characteristics In the following description, a case where the metal plate having a surface layer with poor toughness in the present invention is an alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel plate is taken as an example.

(1−1)本発明に係る評価装置10
図1は、本発明に係る合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板13のパウダリング特性の評価装置10の構成例を示す分解斜視図である。
(1-1) Evaluation apparatus 10 according to the present invention
FIG. 1 is an exploded perspective view showing a configuration example of an apparatus 10 for evaluating powdering characteristics of an alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet 13 according to the present invention.

図1に示すように、評価装置10は、パンチ11およびダイ12を備える。評価装置10は、パンチ11およびダイ12により、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板13に一の方向(曲げ加工方向)へのV形型曲げ加工を行う。   As shown in FIG. 1, the evaluation device 10 includes a punch 11 and a die 12. The evaluation device 10 performs V-shaped bending in one direction (bending direction) on the galvannealed steel sheet 13 with the punch 11 and the die 12.

パンチ11の先端11aの曲げ半径R1、およびダイ12の底12aの曲げ半径R2が、いずれも、一の方向と交差する方向へ連続的かつ徐々に変化する。   Both the bending radius R1 of the tip 11a of the punch 11 and the bending radius R2 of the bottom 12a of the die 12 continuously and gradually change in a direction intersecting one direction.

合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板の評価では一桁%のひずみでパウダリング特性の評価がなされることが多い。したがって、パンチ11の先端11aの曲げ半径R1に、例えば5%のひずみを与えるよう、評価対象の合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板の板厚の10倍の曲げ半径の箇所を設ける必要がある。   In the evaluation of alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheets, the powdering characteristics are often evaluated with a single digit% strain. Therefore, it is necessary to provide a portion having a bending radius that is 10 times the thickness of the alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet to be evaluated so as to give, for example, 5% strain to the bending radius R1 of the tip 11a of the punch 11.

具体的には、評価対象の合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板の板厚は0.3〜2.6mmの範囲であることが多いため、パンチ11の先端11aの曲げ半径R1に3〜26mmの範囲内の箇所があればよい。   Specifically, since the plate thickness of the galvannealed steel sheet to be evaluated is often in the range of 0.3 to 2.6 mm, the bending radius R1 of the tip 11a of the punch 11 is within the range of 3 to 26 mm. If there is no place.

パンチ11の先端11aの曲げ半径R1に3mm未満の箇所と26mmより大の箇所があれば、一つの金型でほぼ全ての合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板の評価を行うことができる。   If the bending radius R1 of the tip 11a of the punch 11 is less than 3 mm and more than 26 mm, almost all of the galvannealed steel sheets can be evaluated with one mold.

評価装置10は、このようなパンチ11およびダイ12を備えることにより、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板13の、パウダリングを生じない限界曲げ半径を評価する。   By providing the punch 11 and the die 12, the evaluation apparatus 10 evaluates the limit bending radius of the alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet 13 that does not cause powdering.

上記以外のパンチ11およびダイ12の構成は、この種のパンチおよびダイとして慣用されるパンチおよびダイと同じでよく、これは当業者には周知であるので、これ以上の説明は省略する。   The configurations of the punch 11 and the die 12 other than those described above may be the same as punches and dies commonly used as this type of punch and die, which are well known to those skilled in the art, and thus further description thereof is omitted.

評価装置10は以上のように構成される。次に、本発明に係る評価方法を説明する。以降の説明では、図1に示す評価装置10を用いる場合を例にとるが、本発明に係る評価方法は評価装置10を用いない場合にも適用される。   The evaluation device 10 is configured as described above. Next, the evaluation method according to the present invention will be described. In the following description, the case where the evaluation apparatus 10 shown in FIG. 1 is used is taken as an example, but the evaluation method according to the present invention is also applied to the case where the evaluation apparatus 10 is not used.

(1−2)本発明に係る評価方法
はじめに、図1に示すように、パンチ11およびダイ12を用いて、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板13に、曲げ半径が連続的に変化するV形型曲げ加工を行う。
(1-2) Evaluation Method According to the Present Invention First, as shown in FIG. 1, using a punch 11 and a die 12, a V-shaped bending in which a bending radius continuously changes in an alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet 13 Processing.

次に、例えば図1に示すフラットパンチ4およびフラットダイ5を用いて、V形型曲げ加工された合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板13を平板に曲げ戻す。   Next, for example, using the flat punch 4 and the flat die 5 shown in FIG. 1, the alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet 13 which has been V-shaped bent is bent back into a flat plate.

V形型曲げによって合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板13の表面に圧縮ひずみが付与され,さらに曲げ戻しにより引張りひずみが付与され,パウダリングを生じない限界曲げ半径よりも曲げ半径が小さい部分にはパウダリングが発生する。   Compressive strain is imparted to the surface of the galvannealed steel plate 13 by V-shaped bending, and tensile strain is imparted by bending back. Will occur.

試験片3の曲げ内面へのテープの貼付および剥離を行う。なお,テープの貼付はV形型曲げの前、V形型曲げの後、平板に曲げ戻した後のいずれでもよい。但しテープの剥離は平板に曲げ戻した後である必要がある。   The tape is applied to and peeled from the bent inner surface of the test piece 3. The tape may be attached before bending the V-shaped die, after bending the V-shaped die, or after bending back to a flat plate. However, the tape must be peeled off after being bent back to a flat plate.

図2は、曲げ戻し後の合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板13にテープ6を貼付した状態を示す説明図である。   FIG. 2 is an explanatory view showing a state in which the tape 6 is pasted on the galvannealed steel plate 13 after being bent back.

図2における符号14は、曲げ半径R1が0mm,曲げ半径R2がtmmであった側を示し、符号15は、曲げ半径R1が20mm,曲げ半径R2が20+tmmであった側を示す。また、直線L1,L2に囲まれた領域はテープの貼付範囲を示し、直線L3は、V形型曲げにより曲げの稜線であった部位を示す。   Reference numeral 14 in FIG. 2 indicates a side where the bending radius R1 is 0 mm and the bending radius R2 is tmm, and reference numeral 15 indicates a side where the bending radius R1 is 20 mm and the bending radius R2 is 20 + tmm. Moreover, the area | region enclosed by the straight lines L1 and L2 shows the sticking range of a tape, and the straight line L3 shows the site | part which was the ridgeline of bending by V-shaped bending.

図3は、剥離されたテープ6の状態を模式的に示す説明図である。   FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram schematically showing the state of the peeled tape 6.

剥離されたテープには、図3に示すように、V形型曲げの曲げ半径の連続的な変化に伴ってめっき粉16の付着量、すなわちパウダリング量が徐々に変化する。このため、曲げ半径R1が0mm,曲げ半径R2がtmmであった側14から、めっき粉が付着していない位置17までの距離Dを測定することにより、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板13におけるパウダリングを生じない限界曲げ半径を、一回のV形型曲げ曲げ戻しにより、求めることができる。   As shown in FIG. 3, the amount of adhesion of the plating powder 16, that is, the amount of powdering, gradually changes on the peeled tape as the bending radius of the V-shaped bending is continuously changed. For this reason, powdering in the galvannealed steel sheet 13 is measured by measuring the distance D from the side 14 where the bending radius R1 is 0 mm and the bending radius R2 is tmm to the position 17 where the plating powder is not adhered. The limit bend radius that does not cause the problem can be obtained by one V-shaped bending and bending back.

なお、本発明により測定された限界曲げ半径は、図8に示す従来の方法により測定された限界曲げ半径に一致していた。   The critical bending radius measured according to the present invention coincided with the critical bending radius measured by the conventional method shown in FIG.

このため、本発明によれば、V形型曲げ曲げ戻しによる合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板のパウダリング性の従来の評価方法よりも評価試験に要する工数およびコストの増加を大幅に抑制できる。   For this reason, according to this invention, the increase in the man-hour and cost which an evaluation test requires can be suppressed significantly rather than the conventional evaluation method of the powdering property of the galvannealed steel plate by V-shaped bending bending back.

また、板厚が異なる複数種の合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板に評価試験を行う場合には、ダイ12を、評価試験に供される合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板13の板厚に合わせて一の方向へ移動させてV形型曲げを行うことにより、パンチ11−合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板13−ダイ12に沿った形状にV形型曲げすることができる。すなわち、1セットのパンチ11およびダイ12により様々な板厚の多種の合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板のパウダリング性を評価でき、このような観点からも、評価試験に必要な金型数を削減して評価試験に要するコストを削減できる。   When performing an evaluation test on a plurality of types of alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheets having different plate thicknesses, the die 12 is arranged in one direction according to the thickness of the alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet 13 used for the evaluation test. The V-shaped die can be bent into a shape along the punch 11 -alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel plate 13 -die 12. That is, the powdering properties of various alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheets of various plate thicknesses can be evaluated by one set of punch 11 and die 12, and from this viewpoint, the number of molds required for the evaluation test can be reduced. This can reduce the cost required for the evaluation test.

2.曲げ割れ性の評価
(2−1)本発明に係る評価装置10
以降の説明では、本発明における金属板が曲げ割れを生じる可能性がある鋼板(例えば引張強度が300MPa以上の高張力鋼板)13である場合を例にとる。
2. Evaluation of bending cracking property (2-1) Evaluation device 10 according to the present invention
In the following description, a case where the metal plate in the present invention is a steel plate 13 (for example, a high-tensile steel plate having a tensile strength of 300 MPa or more) 13 that may cause a bending crack is taken as an example.

図1に示す装置10を用いて鋼板13の曲げ割れ性を評価する場合を説明する。   The case where the bending cracking property of the steel plate 13 is evaluated using the apparatus 10 shown in FIG.

図1に示すように、評価装置10は、パンチ11およびダイ12を備える。評価装置10は、パンチ11およびダイ12により、鋼板13に一の方向(曲げ加工方向)へのV形型曲げ加工を行う。   As shown in FIG. 1, the evaluation device 10 includes a punch 11 and a die 12. The evaluation apparatus 10 performs a V-shaped bending process in one direction (bending process direction) on the steel plate 13 by the punch 11 and the die 12.

パンチ11の先端11aの曲げ半径R1、およびダイ12の底12aの曲げ半径R2が、いずれも、一の方向と交差する方向へ連続的かつ徐々に変化する。   Both the bending radius R1 of the tip 11a of the punch 11 and the bending radius R2 of the bottom 12a of the die 12 continuously and gradually change in a direction intersecting one direction.

鋼板13の曲げ割れ性は、鋼板13の曲げ半径をR(mm)とするとともに鋼板13の板厚をt(mm)とした場合に、比(R/t)との間に相関があり、比(R/t)が3以下であると曲げ割れが生じる可能性が高まるとされる。また,鋼板13の延性が高い場合は2以下で、さらに高い場合は1以下であると割れが生じる可能性が高まる。したがって、パンチ11の先端11aには、比(R/t)が3以下である箇所が存在することが好ましい。   The bending cracking property of the steel plate 13 is correlated with the ratio (R / t) when the bending radius of the steel plate 13 is R (mm) and the plate thickness of the steel plate 13 is t (mm). If the ratio (R / t) is 3 or less, the possibility of bending cracks is increased. Moreover, when the ductility of the steel plate 13 is high, it is 2 or less, and when it is even 1 or less, the possibility of cracking increases. Therefore, it is preferable that the tip 11a of the punch 11 has a portion having a ratio (R / t) of 3 or less.

具体的には、評価対象の鋼板13が薄板の場合の板厚は0.3〜3.2mmの範囲であることが多いため、パンチ11の先端11aの曲げ半径R1に0〜10mm程度の範囲内の箇所があればよい。つまり、割れが生じる箇所と生じない箇所ができるように曲げ半径R1を設定すれば良い。   Specifically, since the plate thickness when the steel plate 13 to be evaluated is a thin plate is often in the range of 0.3 to 3.2 mm, the bending radius R1 of the tip 11a of the punch 11 is in the range of about 0 to 10 mm. If there is a place inside. That is, the bending radius R <b> 1 may be set so that a portion where the crack occurs and a portion where the crack does not occur are formed.

評価対象が薄板の場合はパンチ11の先端11aの曲げ半径R1に0.3mm未満の箇所と3.2mmより大の箇所があれば、一つの金型でほぼ全ての鋼板13の曲げ割れ性を評価することができる。   When the evaluation object is a thin plate, if there is a location where the bending radius R1 of the tip 11a of the punch 11 is less than 0.3 mm and a location where it is greater than 3.2 mm, almost all the steel plates 13 can be bent and cracked with one mold. Can be evaluated.

評価装置10は、このようなパンチ11およびダイ12を備えることにより、鋼板13の、曲げ割れを生じない限界曲げ半径を評価する。   By providing the punch 11 and the die 12, the evaluation device 10 evaluates the limit bending radius of the steel plate 13 that does not cause bending cracking.

上記以外のパンチ11およびダイ12の構成は、この種のパンチおよびダイとして慣用されるパンチおよびダイと同じでよく、これは当業者には周知であるので、これ以上の説明は省略する。   The configurations of the punch 11 and the die 12 other than those described above may be the same as punches and dies commonly used as this type of punch and die, which are well known to those skilled in the art, and thus further description thereof is omitted.

評価装置10は以上のように構成される。次に、本発明に係る評価方法を説明する。以降の説明では、図1に示す評価装置10を用いる場合を例にとるが、本発明に係る評価方法は評価装置10を用いない場合にも適用される。   The evaluation device 10 is configured as described above. Next, the evaluation method according to the present invention will be described. In the following description, the case where the evaluation apparatus 10 shown in FIG. 1 is used is taken as an example, but the evaluation method according to the present invention is also applied to the case where the evaluation apparatus 10 is not used.

(2−2)本発明に係る評価方法
図1に示すように、パンチ11およびダイ12を用いて、鋼板13に、曲げ半径が連続的に変化するV形型曲げ加工を行う。
(2-2) Evaluation Method According to the Present Invention As shown in FIG. 1, using a punch 11 and a die 12, a V-shaped bending process in which the bending radius continuously changes is performed on the steel sheet 13.

図5は、曲げ加工された鋼板13の形状例を示す説明図であり、図6は図5におけるA矢視図である。   FIG. 5 is an explanatory view showing an example of the shape of the bent steel sheet 13, and FIG. 6 is a view taken in the direction of arrow A in FIG.

図5,6に示すように、曲げ加工された鋼板13には、その稜線13aが延びて存在する方向へ、曲げ半径R1が最小の部位(例えばR:0mm)から最大の部位(例えばR:5.0mm)へ向けて、曲げ割れ20が発生する。   As shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, the bent steel sheet 13 extends in a direction in which the ridge line 13 a extends to exist in a direction in which the bending radius R <b> 1 is the smallest (for example, R: 0 mm) to the largest part (for example, R: Bending cracks 20 occur toward 5.0 mm).

このため、図6に示すように、曲げ半径R1が最小の部位から曲げ割れ20の端部までの距離を求めることにより、曲げ割れを生じない限界曲げ半径を求めることができる。   For this reason, as shown in FIG. 6, the limit bending radius which does not produce a bending crack can be calculated | required by calculating | requiring the distance from the site | part with the minimum bending radius R1 to the edge part of the bending crack 20. FIG.

なお、本発明により測定された限界曲げ半径は、図8に示す従来の方法により測定された限界曲げ半径に一致していた。   The critical bending radius measured according to the present invention coincided with the critical bending radius measured by the conventional method shown in FIG.

このため、本発明によれば、V形型曲げによる鋼板の曲げ割れ性の従来の評価方法よりも評価試験に要する工数およびコストの増加を大幅に抑制できる。   For this reason, according to this invention, the increase in the man-hour and cost which an evaluation test requires can be suppressed significantly rather than the conventional evaluation method of the bending cracking property of the steel plate by V-shaped bending.

また、板厚が異なる複数種の鋼板に評価試験を行う場合には、ダイ12を、評価試験に供される鋼板13の板厚に合わせて一の方向へ移動させてV形型曲げを行うことにより、パンチ11−合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板13−ダイ12に沿った形状にV形型曲げすることができる。すなわち、1セットのパンチ11およびダイ12により様々な板厚の多種の鋼板のパウダリング性を評価でき、このような観点からも、評価試験に必要な金型数を削減して評価試験に要するコストを削減できる。   When performing an evaluation test on a plurality of types of steel plates having different plate thicknesses, V-shaped bending is performed by moving the die 12 in one direction in accordance with the plate thickness of the steel plate 13 provided for the evaluation test. Accordingly, the punch 11-alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet 13-shaped along the die 12 can be bent in a V shape. That is, the powdering properties of various steel plates with various plate thicknesses can be evaluated by one set of punch 11 and die 12, and from this viewpoint, the number of molds required for the evaluation test is reduced and required for the evaluation test. Cost can be reduced.

図1に示す装置10と、図8に示す従来の試験装置をそれぞれ用い、表1に示す5種類の合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板A〜E(引張強度340MPa,板厚0.7mm)、図2,3に示すようにV形型曲げ曲げ戻しによる評価試験を行って、限界曲げ半径を測定した。   Using the apparatus 10 shown in FIG. 1 and the conventional test apparatus shown in FIG. 8, five types of galvannealed steel sheets A to E (tensile strength 340 MPa, plate thickness 0.7 mm) shown in Table 1 are shown in FIG. , 3, an evaluation test by V-shaped bending bending back was performed, and the critical bending radius was measured.

Figure 2016170165
Figure 2016170165

図4は、本発明により測定された限界曲げ半径と、図8に示す従来の方法により測定された限界曲げ半径との関係を示すグラフである。   FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the critical bending radius measured by the present invention and the critical bending radius measured by the conventional method shown in FIG.

図4のグラフに示すように、本発明により測定された限界曲げ半径は、図8に示す従来の方法により測定された限界曲げ半径に完全に一致しており、本発明の信頼性が確認された。   As shown in the graph of FIG. 4, the critical bend radius measured by the present invention completely matches the critical bend radius measured by the conventional method shown in FIG. 8, confirming the reliability of the present invention. It was.

図1に示す装置10と、図8に示す従来の試験装置をそれぞれ用い、表2に示す5種類の高聴力鋼板A〜E(引張強度1025〜1189MPa,板厚1.0〜2.0mm)に、図1に示すようにV形型曲げによる評価試験を行って、曲げ割れを生じない限界曲げ半径を測定した。なお、この評価試験ではV曲げ後に、曲げ戻しを行わず、V曲げした状態において評価した。   Using the apparatus 10 shown in FIG. 1 and the conventional test apparatus shown in FIG. 8 respectively, five types of high hearing steel plates A to E shown in Table 2 (tensile strength 1025 to 1189 MPa, plate thickness 1.0 to 2.0 mm) In addition, as shown in FIG. 1, an evaluation test by V-shaped bending was performed, and a limit bending radius at which no bending crack was generated was measured. In this evaluation test, evaluation was performed in the state of V bending without performing bending return after V bending.

Figure 2016170165
Figure 2016170165

図7は、本発明により測定された限界曲げ半径と、図8に示す従来の方法においてV曲げ後に測定された限界曲げ半径との関係を示すグラフである。   FIG. 7 is a graph showing the relationship between the critical bending radius measured according to the present invention and the critical bending radius measured after V bending in the conventional method shown in FIG.

図7のグラフに示すように、本発明により測定された限界曲げ半径は、図8に示す従来の方法により測定された限界曲げ半径に完全に一致しており、本発明の信頼性が確認された。   As shown in the graph of FIG. 7, the critical bending radius measured according to the present invention completely coincides with the critical bending radius measured by the conventional method shown in FIG. 8, confirming the reliability of the present invention. It was.

10 本発明に係る評価装置
11 パンチ
11a 先端
12 ダイ
12a ダイ
13 合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Evaluation apparatus 11 according to the present invention Punch 11a Tip 12 Die 12a Die 13 Alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet

Claims (12)

パンチおよびダイを備え、金属板に一の方向へのV形型曲げ加工を行うことにより前記金属板の限界曲げ半径を評価する装置であって、
前記パンチの先端の曲げ半径、および前記ダイの底の曲げ半径が、いずれも、前記一の方向と交差する方向へ連続的かつ徐々に変化する、金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。
An apparatus that includes a punch and a die and evaluates a limit bending radius of the metal plate by performing a V-shaped bending process in one direction on the metal plate,
An apparatus for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate, wherein the bending radius at the tip of the punch and the bending radius at the bottom of the die both continuously and gradually change in a direction intersecting the one direction.
前記金属板は靭性に乏しい表層を有する金属板であるとともに、前記限界曲げ半径は表層剥離を生じない限界曲げ半径である、請求項1に記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   The apparatus for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate according to claim 1, wherein the metal plate is a metal plate having a surface layer with poor toughness, and the limit bending radius is a limit bending radius that does not cause surface peeling. 前記パンチの先端の曲げ半径には、前記金属板の板厚の10倍の箇所がある、請求項2に記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   The apparatus for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate according to claim 2, wherein the bending radius at the tip of the punch has a portion that is ten times the thickness of the metal plate. 前記パンチの先端の曲げ半径には、3〜26mmの範囲内の箇所がある、請求項2に記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   The apparatus for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate according to claim 2, wherein the bending radius at the tip of the punch has a location within a range of 3 to 26 mm. 前記パンチの先端の曲げ半径には、3mm未満の箇所と26mm超の箇所がある、請求項2に記載された金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   3. The apparatus for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate according to claim 2, wherein the bending radius at the tip of the punch includes a portion of less than 3 mm and a portion of more than 26 mm. 前記金属板は合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板である、請求項2〜5のいずれかに記載の金属板のパウダリング特性の評価装置。   The said metal plate is a galvannealed steel plate, The evaluation apparatus of the powdering characteristic of the metal plate in any one of Claims 2-5. 前記金属板は曲げ割れを生じる金属板であるとともに、前記限界曲げ半径は曲げ割れを生じない限界曲げ半径である、請求項1に記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   The apparatus for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate according to claim 1, wherein the metal plate is a metal plate that generates a bending crack, and the limit bending radius is a limit bending radius that does not generate a bending crack. 前記パンチの先端には、該先端の曲げ半径をR(mm)とするとともに前記金属板の板厚をt(mm)とした場合に、R/tが3以下である箇所がある、請求項7に記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価装置。   The tip of the punch has a portion where R / t is 3 or less when a bending radius of the tip is R (mm) and a thickness of the metal plate is t (mm). The evaluation apparatus of the limit bending radius of the metal plate according to 7. 靭性に乏しい表層を有する金属板に曲げ半径が連続的に変化するV形型曲げ加工を行った後に曲げ戻すことにより前記金属板の表面に圧縮ひずみを付与して表層剥離を発生させ、曲げ半径の連続的な変化に伴う表層剥離の発生から、前記金属板の、表層剥離を生じない限界曲げ半径を求める、金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価方法。   A metal plate having a surface layer with poor toughness is subjected to a V-shaped bending process in which the bending radius changes continuously, and then bent back to impart compressive strain to the surface of the metal plate to cause surface peeling, and the bending radius A method for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate, wherein a limit bending radius of the metal plate that does not cause surface layer peeling is determined from the occurrence of surface layer peeling due to a continuous change in the metal plate. 曲げ割れを発生する金属板に曲げ半径が連続的に変化するV形型曲げ加工を行うことにより、曲げ加工された金属板の稜線の方向へひずみを断続的に変化させて曲げ割れを発生することにより、前記金属板の、曲げ割れを生じない限界曲げ半径を求める、金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価方法。   By performing a V-shaped bending process in which the bending radius continuously changes on a metal plate that generates a bending crack, the strain is intermittently changed in the direction of the ridgeline of the bent metal sheet to generate a bending crack. The evaluation method of the limit bending radius of a metal plate which calculates | requires the limit bending radius which does not produce a bending crack of the said metal plate by this. 曲げ曲げ戻し割れを発生する金属板に、曲げ半径が連続的に変化するV形型曲げ加工を行い、曲げ加工された金属板の稜線の方向へひずみを断続的に変化させた後に、曲げ戻すことによって曲げ曲げ戻し割れを発生させることにより、前記金属板の、曲げ曲げ戻し割れを生じない限界曲げ半径を求める、金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価方法。   Bend-bend-back cracking is performed on a metal plate that generates a bending-bending crack, and the bending radius is continuously changed. After bending the plate in the direction of the ridgeline of the bent metal plate, the bending is returned. A method for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate, wherein a limit bending radius of the metal plate that does not cause a bending / bending return crack is determined by generating a bending / bending return crack. 前記V形型曲げ加工は、パンチ先端の曲げ半径、およびダイ底の曲げ半径が、いずれも、加工方向と交差する一の方向へ連続的かつ徐々に変化するパンチおよびダイを用いて行う、請求項9〜11のいずれかに記載の金属板の限界曲げ半径の評価方法。   The V-shaped bending process is performed using a punch and a die in which the bending radius of the punch tip and the bending radius of the die bottom both continuously and gradually change in one direction intersecting the processing direction. Item 12. A method for evaluating a limit bending radius of a metal plate according to any one of Items 9 to 11.
JP2016019111A 2015-03-11 2016-02-03 Bending resistance evaluation device and evaluation method for metal plates Active JP6766365B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2015048625 2015-03-11
JP2015048625 2015-03-11

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2016170165A true JP2016170165A (en) 2016-09-23
JP6766365B2 JP6766365B2 (en) 2020-10-14

Family

ID=56983573

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2016019111A Active JP6766365B2 (en) 2015-03-11 2016-02-03 Bending resistance evaluation device and evaluation method for metal plates

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6766365B2 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110487653A (en) * 2019-09-05 2019-11-22 首钢集团有限公司 A kind of surface quality of high-strength steel steel plate bending and strain stress relation test method
CN111751229A (en) * 2020-06-23 2020-10-09 武汉钢铁有限公司 Metal sheet constant amplitude circulation fatigue performance test control method
JP2021058910A (en) * 2019-10-07 2021-04-15 日本製鉄株式会社 Mold for evaluating powdering resistance, powdering resistance evaluation device, and powdering resistance evaluation method
JP7327595B1 (en) 2022-07-04 2023-08-16 Jfeスチール株式会社 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ACQUIRING FORMING LIMIT OF METAL PLATE
JP7369088B2 (en) 2020-05-15 2023-10-25 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Evaluation method of crack resistance properties of plate materials
JP7436841B2 (en) 2020-06-29 2024-02-22 日本製鉄株式会社 Evaluation method for bending edge cracking of plate materials

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6149614U (en) * 1984-08-31 1986-04-03
US4625563A (en) * 1985-10-28 1986-12-02 Dawson Richard S Portable bend tester
JPS63155047U (en) * 1987-03-31 1988-10-12
JPH0641913U (en) * 1992-11-25 1994-06-03 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Jig for bending test of plate material
JPH0873993A (en) * 1994-09-02 1996-03-19 Nkk Corp Hot rolled steel plate excellent in hot dip galvanizing suitability and its production
JPH116827A (en) * 1997-06-17 1999-01-12 Nippon Steel Corp Method for continuous automating of powdering performance inspection of galvanized steel plate and apparatus therefor
JP2011117063A (en) * 2009-11-02 2011-06-16 Kobe Steel Ltd Method for manufacturing hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6149614U (en) * 1984-08-31 1986-04-03
US4625563A (en) * 1985-10-28 1986-12-02 Dawson Richard S Portable bend tester
JPS63155047U (en) * 1987-03-31 1988-10-12
JPH0641913U (en) * 1992-11-25 1994-06-03 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Jig for bending test of plate material
JPH0873993A (en) * 1994-09-02 1996-03-19 Nkk Corp Hot rolled steel plate excellent in hot dip galvanizing suitability and its production
JPH116827A (en) * 1997-06-17 1999-01-12 Nippon Steel Corp Method for continuous automating of powdering performance inspection of galvanized steel plate and apparatus therefor
JP2011117063A (en) * 2009-11-02 2011-06-16 Kobe Steel Ltd Method for manufacturing hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110487653A (en) * 2019-09-05 2019-11-22 首钢集团有限公司 A kind of surface quality of high-strength steel steel plate bending and strain stress relation test method
CN110487653B (en) * 2019-09-05 2022-05-20 首钢集团有限公司 Method for testing relation between surface quality and strain of high-strength steel plate bending
JP2021058910A (en) * 2019-10-07 2021-04-15 日本製鉄株式会社 Mold for evaluating powdering resistance, powdering resistance evaluation device, and powdering resistance evaluation method
JP7265165B2 (en) 2019-10-07 2023-04-26 日本製鉄株式会社 Mold for evaluation of powdering property, apparatus for evaluating powdering property and method for evaluating powdering property
JP7369088B2 (en) 2020-05-15 2023-10-25 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Evaluation method of crack resistance properties of plate materials
CN111751229A (en) * 2020-06-23 2020-10-09 武汉钢铁有限公司 Metal sheet constant amplitude circulation fatigue performance test control method
CN111751229B (en) * 2020-06-23 2023-11-10 武汉钢铁有限公司 Method for testing and controlling constant-amplitude cyclic fatigue performance of metal sheet
JP7436841B2 (en) 2020-06-29 2024-02-22 日本製鉄株式会社 Evaluation method for bending edge cracking of plate materials
JP7327595B1 (en) 2022-07-04 2023-08-16 Jfeスチール株式会社 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ACQUIRING FORMING LIMIT OF METAL PLATE
WO2024009566A1 (en) * 2022-07-04 2024-01-11 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method and device for obtaining forming limit of metal sheet

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6766365B2 (en) 2020-10-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6766365B2 (en) Bending resistance evaluation device and evaluation method for metal plates
JP6160793B1 (en) Plated steel sheet
JP2017087294A (en) Component of surface treated steel plate having cut end face, and cutting method thereof
EP3939714A1 (en) Cutting method and cut article
WO2014207947A1 (en) Mold for ironing and method for manufacturing molded material
JP5272518B2 (en) Zinc-based galvanized steel sheet, galvanized steel sheet cutting method and die for cutting
AU2019204435B2 (en) Formed material manufacturing method and surface treated metal plate used in same
US20110229733A1 (en) Magnesium alloy joined part
JP2020032437A (en) Cut article
WO2015111233A1 (en) Die for ironing process, and shaped material production method
JP2015157314A (en) PUNCHING METHOD OF Zn BASED GALVANIZED STEEL SHEET
TW201822910A (en) Surface-treated steel plate component with cut end face and method of cutting processing thereof provides a component having a cut end face with excellent corrosion resistance
JP2018003040A (en) Metallic component
JP6331257B2 (en) Method for evaluating powdering resistance of plated steel sheets
KR20150084066A (en) Hard coating film having excellent adhesion resistance to soft metal
JP6386525B2 (en) Surface-treated metal plate used for molding material manufacturing method
JP6776908B2 (en) Molded product manufacturing method and molded product
JP7265165B2 (en) Mold for evaluation of powdering property, apparatus for evaluating powdering property and method for evaluating powdering property
JP2004298906A (en) Method for drawing coated metal plate
KR102393026B1 (en) Parts of surface-treated steel sheet having a cut section and cutting processing method therefor
EP4275810A1 (en) Damage evalulation device and damage evalulation method for press-forming dies
JP2020175421A (en) Cutting work method for surface-treated steel plate
Srinivasan et al. Comparison of artificial neural network and response surface methodology in the prediction of springback and bend force in air bending of electrogalvanised steel sheets
JP2014238282A (en) Method for evaluating powdering resistance of plated steel sheet
JP6198244B2 (en) Evaluation method of mold resistance

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20181003

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20190724

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20190730

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20190920

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20200128

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20200317

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20200818

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20200831

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 6766365

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151