JP2016131646A - Fight command simulator, method for that purpose or programming - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a game processed so that a file describing the content of a game designed by a user can be executed as a rule of the game on a computer.SOLUTION: A file is processed so as to be executed on a computer as a rule of a game and a model, the file that describes contents of especially the one performed between 2 individuals or more, especially the one matched by 2 individuals, and especially the fighting game being fair in the skill permissible in each of 2 individuals (hereinafter called as "fighting games"), among the game and play or mutual activities (comprising business negotiations, conversation in general, massage, treatment, love, sexual relations, and the like) performed between people or animals and plants (especially, having physical, chemical, psychological, electrical, magnetical and optical movement), of the game (not limited to one with victory or defeat (comprising 2 players or more cooperating to aim high scores and the goal)) designed by a user.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

The present invention is not limited to games with wins or losses (including those in which two or more cooperate to aim for high scores and goals), humans, animals and plants, etc. (especially physical / chemical / psychological / electrical) Among games / plays / interactions (including business negotiations, conversations in general, massage, treatment, romance, sex negotiations, etc.) The present invention relates to a fighting game in which two players play each other, particularly a fighting game in which the skills allowed for each of the two individuals are fair (hereinafter referred to as “fighting game etc.”).

Among conventional games, a general fighting game is a game in which a player operates a character appearing in the game to fight a character operated by another player or a computer. The content is controlled by changing the state (physical strength, mental strength, etc.) by operating each other to fight your character against the opponent character (punch, kick, guard, special move, etc.) If you meet (removes the opponent's physical strength, the set time limit is 0, etc.), you win.

These contents can be selected from the range designed by the developer (changing the character, changing the physical strength at the start, applying the handicap, removing the time limit, etc.). From Patent Document 1, there is also a game in which the posture (upper stage, interruption, lower stage, etc.) can be changed. Depending on the posture, the character's movement and ability change, and the character can be strengthened or advantageous.

JP-A-11-156048 (JP, A)

However, if the player tries to change or expand the content of the fighting game, the player can freely select the content within the range designed by the developer. Creating a free view of the world (such as martial arts or heterogeneous martial arts that you have thought of yourself) is limited in expansion (adding rules, deleting states, etc.) (the criteria for winning or losing cannot be changed, physical strength cannot be lost, etc.) difficult.

In addition, if a player tries to design the content of a fighting game, a fighting game with a complicated state change (such as judo or sumo) is a model that is required to perform a skill or calculate the effect of the technique ( There is no standard for whether or not it is accurate (modeling that is close to the actual content). However, when trying to increase the accuracy of the model by modification or expansion, the conventional fighting game is a technique that makes it easy to gradually increase the accuracy of the model (programs with high independence of one line and one line with open variables and source code) (Language) is not designed, so it is difficult to change the accuracy.

In the present invention (Claim 1), a file describing the contents of a game designed by the user (not limited to games with wins or losses (including those in which two or more cooperate to aim for a high score or goal)) is stored on a computer. It is characterized by processing so that it can be executed as a game rule. As a result, it is possible to expand the world view of a fighting game in which a technique is calculated and the effect of the technique is calculated.

The present invention (Claim 2) can be executed as a game rule on a computer by reading a file describing the contents of a rule defined by the user, expanding the file, and converting it into a form that can be easily executed on the computer. It is characterized in that processing is performed. As a result, the user can reflect the designed contents without any expertise in programming. In addition, you can change the file to be read and use the contents of the game to be executed properly.

In the present invention (Claim 3), in order to make it easier for the user to access a model of the content that the user wants to create a game rule with a complicated state change, when the computer processes the rule, it is divided line by line or sentence. It is characterized by using a grammar with increased independence so that the contents of the file can be easily improved by reducing the influence on other lines and sentences. This makes it easier to improve the rules so that they are gradually closer to the content of the game you want to create, and can increase accuracy. If there is a grammar error in the rule description, reading will be interrupted and the error will be displayed.

According to the present invention (Claim 4), the computer determines how close to the victory from the content of the rule so that if the user changes the content of the rule, the criteria for determining whether the rule is good or inferior can be changed. It is characterized by creating a standard. Thus, when designing a game with a complicated state change, it is automatically created from the winning conditions when it is computerized without deciding what state is advantageous and what state is close to winning. In this program, the rules for determining how close to victory the “advantageous conditions” can be described in the rules. This is different from the automatically generated criteria, even if you do not specify it. The user can describe what state is advantageous and what state is close to winning.

The present invention (Claim 5) is designed by searching for the best command input by changing the state according to the contents designed on the file by the computer based on the judgment standard created in Claim 4. It is characterized in that a user and a computer can compete for victory or defeat in the contents of the game. In this way, in a fighting game defined by the user, it is possible to experience the world view of the game and to make the model closer to a real game by competing with the computer trying to use the best hand.

In the present invention (Claim 6), when a file describing the contents of a game is stored, the description about the rules is expanded and converted into a new rule and stored, thereby reducing the amount of the file that does not describe all the rules. It is characterized by being easy to edit and editing. As a result, by expanding or converting the contents to be described, the amount described in the file is reduced, so that complicated rule adjustment can be facilitated. The expansion is a process of replacing the content with a macro.

The present invention (Claim 7) searches until the winning / losing is determined according to the rules of the game so that the user can confirm from what the game is designed to determine the procedure by which the user wins. The procedure is displayed. This makes it possible to confirm the pattern to win before developing or running a game, without creating a pattern or standard that the computer thinks. This procedure is based on “which command is input alternately between the human side and the CPU side in order for the human side to win”.

Since the source is not written in the form of a general procedural programming language (C language, C ++, JAVA (registered trademark), PHP, etc.), even if there is no technology related to such a programming language, the user can play the game (especially The fighting game etc.) can be shaped by the user and the rules can be adjusted.

A user can freely design a game by using a term freely determined by the user (that is, using a free concept, a freely defined game state or command, or a rule that is a combination thereof). Sumo, karate, and martial arts that you have thought of can be programmed. You can also design different martial arts freely.

Rules can be selected from files written in text format by the user, so you can prevent rut by changing the rules and how to play and using them in a variety of ways.

Overall design drawing (function-related drawing) Example of operation statement Processing to expand victory evaluation conditions Rule program example 1 Rule program example 2 Rule program example 3 Rule program example 4 Rule program example 4

FIG. 1 is an overall design diagram (function-related diagram) for the processing that is performed from when the computer stores the game contents until it is executed. The entire control function / main routine performs the process from selecting the text file to executing the game contents designed and edited by the user. The file describes the necessary game rules regarding what kind of effect is exhibited under what conditions. Pre-game start processing is performed by selecting, reading, and reloading the rule program. The content of the game to be executed is read from a file stored in a text format as a rule program. The game execution process is executed by executing the rule program. The game contents designed and edited by the user, converted into a form that can be easily executed on a computer, and stored are executed.

The rule program is highly independent, and processes each line at the time of reading and execution, and the game rules are “condition 1, condition 2,...” And the effect is “effect 1, effect. “...,” and so on. Therefore, if you want to describe complex contents, increase the number of conditions and effects, and if you want to gradually bring the rules closer to the actual game, change the conditions and effects one by one. And partial reuse become easier.

For the condition and effect of the rule program, not only constants but also calculation results of multiple state values can be used by using operation statements. In the condition as shown in FIG. 2, in the conditional statement, the magnitude relationship between the calculation result of the calculation statement and the calculation result of the calculation statement can be used as the conditional statement. In the executable statement, the calculation result of the operation statement can be substituted for the state value.

Victory evaluation conditions are created from the conditions of the rule as a standard for the computer to guide “how to win”. FIG. 2 shows the process of creating victory evaluation conditions. The victory evaluation condition is created from the rule program as a criterion for judging how close to the victory. So the criteria for judging how close you are to victory can be created automatically whenever you change the content of the rule program. Search the rules program to determine the effect of winning or losing the game. Create new victory evaluation conditions from the searched rules and store them. After searching for conditions to win, we will further expand the conditions for winning evaluation. Check the range for the state value to meet the victory criteria. A rule having an effect of changing the state value so as to satisfy the victory evaluation condition is searched. The rule conditions that have been found are stored as victory evaluation conditions. By repeating this, the conditions for winning are systematically listed.

The basic idea of computer thinking is to evaluate all possible operations, and finally to the best hand that is considered the highest. The criteria for making this evaluation are those prepared in claim 4. Since it is created from a rule program rather than a fixed evaluation standard, the judgment standard changes if the rule program is changed. So you can design rules without creating patterns and standards that the computer thinks about.

The development of the rule program is to reduce the description and facilitate design and editing. "Right and left symmetrical rule" that duplicates another rule in which the computer swaps left and right, "Macro processing" that calls and uses a pre-defined content, automatic criteria for judging how close it is to victory We are developing the “victory evaluation conditions” to be created.

When developing victory evaluation conditions, the conditions that can be used in the calculation statements in the “effect of changing the state value to meet the range of victory evaluation conditions” and “conditions stored as expanded victory evaluation conditions” in the rules are It becomes one kind.
If there is an operation statement having a plurality of state types in the effect, it is determined that it is not “an effect that changes the state value to be within the range of the victory evaluation condition”. Further, if there is an operation statement having a plurality of types of conditions in the condition, it is determined that the condition is not “a condition to be stored as an expanded victory evaluation condition”.
If there are multiple status types in the calculation statement, if the status becomes a fixed point, the rule will fire after that, and it will not be advantageous or disadvantageous, so change it to meet the victory evaluation condition range You can no longer search for effects. It is possible to avoid the winning evaluation condition after performing the fixed point analysis, but the winning evaluation condition becomes complicated.
Whether the state approaches or leaves the condition varies depending on the calculation result of the subexpression. The victory evaluation condition may be developed by deriving a condition that results in a calculation result that the sub-expression approaches the condition, but this also complicates the victory evaluation condition.
Therefore, in order to speed up, assignments with multiple types of states in the statement are not used to expand the victory evaluation condition.

Expand all the procedures when the user and the CPU input commands to each other, and memorize only the procedures from which they can win. As a result, it is possible to check the procedure for winning when it is impossible to determine from the rules what the content, strategy, and winning method of the game are, and what to do. Also, when designing the rules, when checking what the current rules are, check the rules for winning if the current rules are based on the displayed winners. Can be used as a reference. When checking the contents of a rule from the viewpoint of how to win, you can execute it without knowing how to win and check it before moving.

A fighting game according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

FIG. 4 shows a rule program example 1. The contents of Example 1 are “Command [Press] reduces the opponent's back margin by 1 from 10 to 0” and “Set the opponent's back margin to 0 and wins [Press]”.

For Example 1, the meaning of each line is that the first line is “In the initial state, the human and CPU state“ rear margin ”has an initial value of 10.” The second line is “without condition, The command [Push] can be used. "The third line is" Command [Press], the opponent's back margin is reduced by 1. "The fourth line is" The opponent's "back margin" is 0. If you execute the command [press] at the following times, you will win. "

For “!: H. Back margin = 10, c. Back margin = 10”, “!:” Represents the initial state and initial command. The initial state and the initial command indicate what the state value is immediately before the game is executed and whether the command is valid or invalid. The initial state is divided into two parts, “,” and “h. Back margin = 10” and “c. Back margin = 10”.

  The description “A: state P symbol value” means “if condition A is satisfied, state P is calculated by the value according to the symbol”. “Mental power-1” means “subtract 1 mental power”. “Mental power = 0” means “when mental power is 0” if it is a condition, and “Mental power = 0” means “sets mental power to 0” if it is an effect.

The description “[command X]: B” means “if command [X] is executed, effect B is exhibited”. The description “[command X], [command Y]: B” means “effect B will be exhibited if executed in succession with the command [X] and command [Y]”.

The description “A: state P symbol value” means “if condition A is satisfied, state P is calculated by the value according to the symbol”. “Mental power-1” means “subtract 1 mental power”. “Mental power = 0” means “when mental power is 0” if it is a condition, and “improves mental power” if it is an effect.

“S.” and “O.” represent the person and the opponent, respectively, if the turn is human, the opponent is a CPU, and if the CPU is turn, the opponent is a human.

“S. Victory” is an effect of making one's state “Victory”. In Example 1, the victory condition is “execute the command [press] with the opponent's“ back margin ”less than or equal to 0”.

FIG. 5 shows rule program example 2. The content of Example 2 is the result of adding the state “Mental Power” to Example 1, “Command [Press] can only be used when the mental power is greater than 0”, ““ Mental Power ”continues to increase and increases to 999 And become -999 ".

Regarding Example 2, the meaning of each line is that the first line is “Mental power keeps increasing by 1”, the second line is “Mental power keeps increasing by 1 per turn”, the third line is “Mental power” Will continue to increase by 1 in 10 turns ”, 4th line will be“ -999 when mental power increases to 999 ”, 5th line will be“ the state of the opponent if the command [press] is executed ” "Rear margin" is decreased by 1. "Line 6," If the opponent's condition "Rear margin" is 0 or less, if you execute the command [Press], you will win. ", Line 7 "If your mental power is greater than 0, the command [press] is valid.", Line 8 says, "If your mental power is smaller than 0, the command [press] is invalid." The 9th line is “the state of human and CPU“ rear margin ”is an initial value of −999”.

The description of “@” indicates how many times the line is processed. If it is "@ X / ~", it is processed once per X turn. Lines without "@ ~" or @ are processed at most once per turn.

FIG. 6 shows a rule program example 3. The contents of Example 3 are “take left and right sardines with [take left sardine], [take right sardine]” and “take left and right sardines and [throw] and win”.

In the description of “':”, the line indicates the key input setting. If “C = [throw]” is described, it can be executed if the command [throw] is valid by entering C from the keyboard. Use the Shift key for capital letters.

The meaning of “! S. Take left sardine: [Take left sardine]” means “When you get true” Yes, "S. Take left sardine :! [Left sardine take]" means "Your status" Take left sardine "is false. It is.

  “Condition :: Effect” means “If any condition written to the left of ::: is false, the logic opposite to the effect written to the right of :: is invalid (valid if the command is valid, valid if invalid). The meaning of "! S. Take right sardine == [Take right sardine]" means that the command [Take right sardine] cannot be used when true is "My state has been taken right sushi". "When you get false, you can use the command [Take right sardine] when your status is" taken right sardine "" and "! S. Take right sardine: [Take right sardine]" And "S. Take right sardine :! [Take right sardine]".

The level of the CPU is adjusted by “interrupt cycle, computer processing thinning rate, reading depth, reading error rate” by a line describing “˜”. If it is `` ~ P50, S3, D1, E0 '', `` The time for hitting each other is 50 ms in one turn, the depth of prefetching to think is 3 hands, and X of the established Xb for thinning out the hand is 1 and 0 out of 10 computers use other than the best. "

FIG. 7 shows a rule program example 4. The contents of Example 4 are the same as Example 3 with the addition of a symmetric rule and an advantageous condition. “Duplicate a rule in which the right is replaced with the left and the left is replaced with the right.” "Left sardine" is set as "higher evaluation".

The description “%” indicates that the description from “%” to “}” is processing of the advantageous condition. Used to calculate the value of the evaluation function. If “% 0.6 {S. Left mashe was taken: 100}”, the second to fourth lines are the description of the advantageous condition.

The description “&” indicates that the description from “&” to “}” is the processing of the symmetrical rule. Another rule in which the right is replaced with the left and the left is replaced with the right is duplicated in the line “{}”. In Example 3, “[Left sardine removed]: S. Left sardine removed,! O. Right sardine removed” is within “{}”, so “Right sardine removed”: S. Right sardine removed,! O "Left mashashi" is duplicated, meaning two lines.

FIG. 8 shows a rule program example 5. The content of Example 5 is “In a macro process, a command [attack] can be expanded and used as a command [slay] and a command [kick]”.

The description of “$” indicates that the line in “{}” is the contents expanded by macro processing. If [[Attack]: [Round]; [Kick]], the command [Attack] is expanded as a command [Right] and a command [Kick]. If there is a rule of “S. Health> 0: [Hat], [Attack]”, “S. Health> 0: [Hat], [Swap]” and “S. Health> 0: [Hat] , [Kick] "is expanded and used. At this time, the command [attack] is used when being expanded into the command [keep] and the command [kick], and cannot be used at the time of execution.

By making various rules, general people such as children, women, and elderly people can become familiar with martial arts.

Depending on the rules, it can be used for countermeasure training against dangerous animals, thugs, etc.

Rule program

Victory evaluation conditions

Claims (7)

(Inventor contributors) A file on the computer that describes the contents of a game designed by Nakamura users (not limited to games with wins or losses (including those with two or more working together to achieve high scores and goals)) A game program characterized by being processed and executed so that it can be executed as a rule. (Inventor contributor remarks) In order to perform processing so that it can be executed as a game rule on a Nakamura computer, a file describing the contents of a rule defined by the user is read, expanded, and easily executed on a computer A game program characterized by being converted into a game. (Inventor contributor remarks) To make it easier for Nakamura + Ando users to create content for a game with complicated state changes, when the computer processes the rules, it is divided line by line or sentence by sentence. 2. The game program according to claim 1, wherein a grammar with increased independence is used so that the contents of the file can be easily improved by reducing influence on other lines and sentences. (Inventor contributor remarks) If Nakamura + Ando users change the content of the rule, the criteria for judging how close to victory the computer will be based on the content of the rule so that the criteria for judging how close it is to victory can also be changed. The game program according to claim 1, wherein the game program is created. (Inventor contributors) Nakamura + Ando Based on the judgment criteria created in claim 4, the computer changes the state according to the contents designed on the file and searches for the best command input. The game program according to claim 1, wherein a user and a computer can compete for victory or defeat based on the contents of the played game. (Inventor contributor remarks) When storing a file describing the contents of Nakamura + Ando game, by expanding the description about the rules, converting them into new rules, and storing them, the amount of files that do not describe all the rules 2. The game program according to claim 1, wherein the game program can be reduced to simplify the editing work. (Inventor contributor remarks) Find out the procedure to win according to the rules of the game, so that Nakamura + Ando users can confirm from the contents of the game designed to determine the procedure to win, results The game program according to claim 1, wherein the game program is displayed.

Images