JP2016051458A - Selection method of power transformer - Google Patents
Selection method of power transformer Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2016051458A JP2016051458A JP2014189401A JP2014189401A JP2016051458A JP 2016051458 A JP2016051458 A JP 2016051458A JP 2014189401 A JP2014189401 A JP 2014189401A JP 2014189401 A JP2014189401 A JP 2014189401A JP 2016051458 A JP2016051458 A JP 2016051458A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- transformer
- update
- load factor
- existing
- candidate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は、変圧器更新時の選定作業に係り、既設変圧器と異なる容量を含む多種の更新候補変圧器について、使用可能負荷率領域を勘案しながら更新による変圧器損失の改善効果(更新変圧器の生涯節約電力料金や生涯排出CO2低減量など)と更新変圧器の累積利益(累積節約金額から更新投資費用を差し引いた金額)を容易に評価できるようにして、更新に最適な変圧器を確実に選択する技術に関する。 The present invention relates to selection work at the time of transformer update, and for various update candidate transformers having different capacities from existing transformers, the transformer loss improvement effect by update while considering the usable load factor region (update transformer) (Estimated lifetime saving electricity charges, lifetime CO2 reduction amount, etc.) and renewal transformer cumulative profit (accumulated savings minus renewal investment cost) It relates to the technology to select reliably.
変圧器巻線間や変圧器巻線と変圧器鉄心間に装着される絶縁紙の熱的劣化などによる寿命時期を考慮した老朽化対策として、長期間使用している変圧器を新しい変圧器に更新する検討が行われ、このときにエネルギー資源節約のための省エネルギー策として変圧器損失低減策を織り込んだ変圧器の更新を行うことが進められている。 Transformers that have been in use for a long time as new transformers as a countermeasure against aging due to thermal deterioration of insulation paper between transformer windings and between transformer windings and transformer cores At this time, as an energy-saving measure for saving energy resources, it is being promoted to upgrade a transformer incorporating a transformer loss reduction measure.
変圧器の更新に際しては、既設変圧器と数種類の更新候補変圧器のそれぞれについて、使用負荷率における変圧器の年間損失を既知の計算式
変圧器年間損失=(無負荷損+(使用負荷率/100)2×定格時負荷損)×24×365・・・・・・式(1)
(ここに使用負荷率は使用負荷容量(kVA)/変圧器容量(kVA)×100(%))
により算出し、既設変圧器と各更新候補変圧器との損失差による改善効果(年間節約電力料金や年間排出CO2低減量)と回収年数(変圧器更新投資費用/年間節約電力料金)に換算して比較評価することで、改善効果の大きな変圧器を選択する方法がとられている。
(Here, the load factor used is the load load capacity (kVA) / transformer capacity (kVA) x 100 (%))
Calculated by, existing transformers and converted into improving effect due to loss difference between each update candidate transformers (annual savings power rate and annual emissions CO 2 reduction amount) and the recovery period (transformer replacement investment costs / year savings electricity rate) Thus, a method of selecting a transformer having a large improvement effect by comparing and evaluating is employed.
従来の変圧器更新検討では、既設変圧器と数種類の更新候補変圧器についてそれぞれ各変圧器の年間損失を前記式(1)によって算出し、使用負荷率における既設変圧器と各更新候補変圧器との変圧器損失差による前記改善効果を比較して改善効果が大きな変圧器を選択する方法がとられている。 In the conventional transformer renewal study, the annual loss of each transformer is calculated for the existing transformer and several types of renewal candidate transformers by the above formula (1). Compared with the improvement effect due to the transformer loss difference, a method of selecting a transformer having a large improvement effect is employed.
特許文献1では、前記式(1)に電力料金単価を乗じた変圧器の年間損失電力料金
変圧器年間損失電力料金=変圧器年間損失×電力料金単価 ・・・・・・・・式(2)
に置き換えて使用負荷率の大きさ(0〜100%)に応じた既設変圧器と各更新候補変圧器の損失をグラフで示し、想定される使用負荷率における年間損失電力料金が最も小さな変圧器を選択するようにしている。In
The loss of the existing transformer and each update candidate transformer according to the size of the load factor used (0 to 100%) is shown in a graph, and the transformer with the lowest annual power loss at the assumed load factor To choose.
しかしながら、特許文献1に示されている選定グラフは更新候補変圧器の種類が既設変圧器と同一容量で損失特性が異なるものだけに限られているため、更新変圧器の範囲が狭く最適な変圧器を見逃すことがあった。 However, the selection graph shown in
既設変圧器の使用負荷率が小さいケースでは、変圧器費用低減のために既設変圧器より小さな容量の変圧器も含めた多種の変圧器について、更新による前記変圧器損失改善効果や前記変圧器更新投資費用の回収年数が最良なものを探す検討がなされるが、既設変圧器より小さな容量の変圧器への更新にあたっては、使用負荷容量が一定で変圧器容量のみ小さくなることから更新候補変圧器の使用負荷率が大きくなることを考慮する必要があり、各更新候補変圧器について
更新候補変圧器の換算使用負荷率=既設変圧器の使用負荷率×変圧器容量比 ・・・・・・・ (式3)
(ここに変圧器容量比は、既設変圧器容量/更新候補変圧器容量)
を用いて前記式(1)や前記式(2)の計算を行うとともに、
更新候補変圧器の使用可能負荷率上限値
更新候補変圧器の使用可能負荷率上限値=既設変圧器の使用可能負荷率上限値/変圧器容量比 ・・・・・・・・・ 式(4)
を計算して使用可能負荷率上限値をチェックするという手間をかけた選定作業が必要であり、更新に最適な変圧器を選定から漏らしてしまうことや、手間を省いて使用可能負荷率上限値をチェックせずに変圧器損失の改善効果や変圧器更新費用の回収年数だけで更新変圧器を選定してしまうことによって過酷な負荷率での使用となり変圧器の寿命が著しく短くなることを見逃す恐れがあった。In cases where the load factor of the existing transformer is small, the transformer loss improvement effect due to the update or the transformer update for various types of transformers including transformers with smaller capacities than the existing transformer in order to reduce transformer costs. Consideration will be made to find the best investment cost recovery year, but when upgrading to a transformer with a smaller capacity than the existing transformer, the load capacity used is constant and only the transformer capacity becomes smaller, so the candidate transformer for the update It is necessary to consider that the usage load factor of the transformer increases, and for each update candidate transformer, the conversion use load factor of the update candidate transformer = the use load factor of the existing transformer x the transformer capacity ratio ... (Formula 3)
(Here, the transformer capacity ratio is the existing transformer capacity / update candidate transformer capacity)
While calculating the said Formula (1) and the said Formula (2) using,
Usable load factor upper limit of update candidate transformer Usable load factor upper limit of update candidate transformer = Usable load factor upper limit of existing transformer / transformer capacity ratio Equation (4) )
It is necessary to take the trouble of selecting the upper limit value of the usable load factor by calculating the maximum load factor, and it is necessary to eliminate the trouble of selecting the optimal transformer for the update or to save the effort. Overlooking the effect of transformer loss improvement and selecting the renewal transformer based only on the years of recovering the renewal cost of the transformer without checking the condition, it will be overlooked that it will be used at severe load factor and the life of the transformer will be significantly shortened There was a fear.
また、変圧器の更新は老朽化による事故防止のための重要な施策なのに、更新に係る投資費用の回収年数だけで順序付けする短期的評価が重視され、変圧器更新よりも初期節約効果が大きく回収年数の少ない別の省エネルギー策を優先させてしまうことによって、変圧器の更新が実施されず変圧器劣化に起因する事故発生の事態を招いてしまう恐れもあった。 In addition, although transformer renewal is an important measure for preventing accidents due to aging, short-term evaluations that place an order only by the number of years of recovery of investment costs related to renewal are emphasized. By giving priority to another energy-saving measure with fewer years, there was a risk that the transformer was not updated and an accident occurred due to transformer deterioration.
本発明はこのような事情に鑑みてなされたもので、変圧器更新検討において近傍変圧器との統合や負荷分担の見直しをも考慮した広範囲な評価ができるように、既設変圧器の容量と異なる容量を含めた多種の変圧器につき種々の負荷率における変圧器損失の改善効果(更新変圧器の生涯節約電力料金や生涯排出CO2低減量)と利益転化年数(更新変圧器の更新投資費用/年間節約電力料金)を、各変圧器の使用可能負荷率上限値をチェックしながら行えるようにした選定グラフまたは選定表を用いて多種の更新候補変圧器について同時に評価することで改善効果の高い更新候補変圧器の絞り込みが容易に行なえるようにするとともに、前記選定グラフまたは選定表に採択使用負荷率(近傍変圧器との統合や負荷分担の見直しをも考慮した広範囲な検討を行ったうえで決定した既設変圧器基準の使用負荷率)に基づいて算出した各更新候補圧器の累積利益(累積節約電力料金から変圧器更新費用を差し引いた金額)を表記することによって更新候補変圧器の生涯利益(前記累積利益の更新変圧器使用予定年数における値)が確認できるようにし、使用年数の長い更新変圧器の長期的節約効果の評価が確実に行なえるようにすることで、老朽化更新が後回しにされることなく適正な時期に実施されるようにして予防保全の確保に寄与することを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and differs from the capacity of an existing transformer so that a wide range of evaluations can be performed in consideration of integration with neighboring transformers and review of load sharing in transformer renewal studies. Transformer loss improvement effect at various load factors for various transformers including capacities (lifetime saving electricity charges and lifetime CO2 reduction amount of renewal transformer) and profit conversion years (renewal investment cost of renewal transformer / year (Electricity savings) can be updated while checking the upper limit value of the usable load factor of each transformer, using a selection graph or selection table to evaluate various update candidate transformers at the same time. In addition to making it easy to narrow down transformers, the selection graph or selection table adopts the selected load factor (a wide range that also considers integration with nearby transformers and review of load sharing). Indicate the cumulative profit of each renewal candidate pressure generator calculated based on the existing transformer standard use load rate determined after a close examination (the amount obtained by subtracting the renewal cost of the transformer from the accumulated power savings) Can confirm the lifetime profit of the candidate transformer (the value of the accumulated profit in the expected number of years of use of the renewal transformer), and ensure that the long-term saving effect of the renewal transformer with a long service life can be evaluated. Therefore, the purpose is to contribute to ensuring preventive maintenance so that the aging update is carried out at an appropriate time without being postponed.
前期目的を達成するために、請求項1に記載の選定方法は、既設変圧器と異なる容量を含めた多種の更新候補変圧器について、更新による変圧器の前記変圧器損失改善効果と前記利益転化年数を、既設変圧器の負荷率の大きさ(0〜100%)に応じて更新候補変圧器の使用可能負荷率領域または使用不適合負荷率領域を認識できる手段を織り込んで一括表記したことと、前記選定グラフまたは選定表に前記採択使用負荷率における各更新候補変圧器の累積利益(累積節約金額から変圧器更新費用を差し引いた金額)を使用年数に応じて表記したことを特徴としている。 In order to achieve the purpose of the previous term, the selection method according to
本発明の選定方法によれば、前記選定グラフまたは前記選定表によって多種の更新候補変圧器における変圧器損失の前記改善効果と前記利益転化年数を、各更新候補変圧器の使用可能負荷率領域内で同時に評価できるので、改善効果の高い更新候補変圧器を容易に且つ誤りなく絞り込むことがで、前記採択負荷率における各更新候補変圧器の前記生涯利益によって最も生涯利益が大きな更新候補変圧器を選定できるとともに、初期的な節約効果が小さい変圧器であっても長期的には改善効果が大きいことが認識でき、老朽化更新が後回しになることなく実施されことによって変圧器の劣化に起因する事故発生の未然防止ができる。 According to the selection method of the present invention, according to the selection graph or the selection table, the improvement effect of the transformer loss and the profit conversion years in the various update candidate transformers are within the usable load factor region of each update candidate transformer. Therefore, it is possible to easily and efficiently narrow down candidate update transformers having a high improvement effect without error, so that an update candidate transformer having the largest lifetime benefit can be obtained by the lifetime benefit of each update candidate transformer at the selected load factor. It can be selected and it can be recognized that even a transformer with a small initial saving effect has a large improvement effect in the long term, and it is caused by deterioration of the transformer because it is implemented without aging update Accidents can be prevented.
以下、添付図面に従って本発明に係る変圧器選定を実施するための最良の形態について詳説する。 Hereinafter, the best mode for carrying out selection of a transformer according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
図2から図7までの表またはグラフは、最適更新変圧器選定用コンピュータの記憶装置から前記コンピュータの処理装置に読み出される更新変圧器選定プログラムに織り込ませたもので、図3に示す数値入力表は、既設変圧器と各選定候補変圧器の変圧器容量、無負荷損、定格時負荷損、変圧器更新投資費用、電力料金単価、CO2排出係数、更新変圧器の使用予定年数及び既設変圧器の使用可能負荷率上限値を入力すると、前記更新変圧器選定プログラムに具備させたデータ転送機能によって前記数値入力表から図4に示す更新変圧器選定表の該当する各変圧器の数値欄に前記入力値が転送される。The tables or graphs from FIG. 2 to FIG. 7 are woven into the update transformer selection program read from the storage device of the optimum update transformer selection computer to the processor of the computer, and the numerical input table shown in FIG. Is the transformer capacity, no-load loss, rated load loss, transformer replacement investment cost, unit price of electricity, CO 2 emission factor, planned years of use of the existing transformer and the existing transformer When the upper limit value of the usable load factor of the transformer is entered, the data transfer function provided in the update transformer selection program enters the numeric value column for each applicable transformer in the update transformer selection table shown in FIG. The input value is transferred.
図4に示す更新変圧器選定表には、既設変圧器と異なる容量を含めた各更新候補変圧器の前記改善効果と前記利益転化年数を既設変圧器の負荷率の大きさ(0〜100%)に応じて一括して比較させるために、前記式(1)内の使用負荷率を更新候補変圧器換算使用負荷率に置き換えた更新候補変圧器の年間損失計算式
更新候補変圧器の年間損失=(無負荷損+(更新候補変圧器換算負荷率/100)2)×24×365 ・・・・・式(5)
と、年間節約電力料金計算式
年間節約電力料金=(既設変圧器の年間損失−更新候補変圧器の年間損失)×電力料金単価 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・式(6)
及び利益転化年数計算式
利益転化年数=変圧器更新投資費用/年間節約金額 ・・・・・・ 式(7)
と、生涯節約金額計算式
生涯節約金額=年間節約金額×更新変圧器の使用予定年数・・・ 式(8)
が織り込まれており、それぞれの変圧器毎に前記入力値(変圧器容量、無負荷損、定格時負荷損、変圧器更新投資費用、電力料金単価、CO2排出係数、更新変圧器使用予定年数及び既設変圧器の使用可能負荷率上限値)が与えられると、各変圧器の前記生涯節約電力料金や前記生涯排出CO2低減量(図示省略)と更新変圧器の前記利益転化年数が更新候補変圧器毎に算出され、既設変圧器の負荷率基準に一括表示されるとともに、前記式(3)の更新候補変圧器換算使用負荷率を既設変圧器負荷率に対応する行に表記し、更新候補変圧器換算使用負荷率が前記図3に示す入力表に入力された変圧器の使用可能負荷率上限値を超過した行については、前記選定表の各変圧器損失、生涯節約金額や生涯排出CO2低減量(図示省略)と利益転化年数の欄に数値以外(図4の例ではU.D)が表記される手段が講じられている。The update transformer selection table shown in FIG. 4 shows the improvement effect of each update candidate transformer including the capacity different from that of the existing transformer and the profit conversion year of the load factor of the existing transformer (0 to 100%). ) The annual loss calculation formula of the update candidate transformer in which the load factor in the formula (1) is replaced with the update candidate transformer conversion load factor to be compared in a batch. = (No load loss + (Update candidate transformer equivalent load factor / 100) 2 ) x 24 x 365 Equation (5)
Annual saving electricity charge calculation formula Annual saving electricity charge = (annual loss of existing transformer-annual loss of renewal candidate transformer) x electricity charge unit price ... Formula (6)
And profit conversion years calculation formula profit conversion years = transformer renewal investment cost / annual savings formula (7)
Life saving amount calculation formula Life saving amount = Annual saving amount x Expected years of use of renewal transformer ... Formula (8)
For each transformer, the input values (transformer capacity, no-load loss, rated load loss, transformer renewal investment cost, unit price of electricity charge, CO 2 emission factor, number of years of planned use of renewal transformer And the usable load factor upper limit value of the existing transformer), the lifetime saving power charge of each transformer, the lifetime CO2 reduction amount (not shown), and the profit conversion years of the update transformer are the update candidate transformers. Calculated for each unit and displayed collectively on the load factor standard of the existing transformer, and the update candidate conversion use load factor of the formula (3) is indicated on the line corresponding to the existing transformer load factor, and the update candidate For rows where the transformer-converted use load factor exceeds the upper limit value of the usable load factor of the transformer entered in the input table shown in FIG. 3, each transformer loss, lifetime saving amount and lifetime emission CO2 in the selection table are as follows. Reduction amount (not shown) and profit change A means is provided in which a value other than a numerical value (UD in the example of FIG. 4) is written in the conversion year column.
図4に示す選定表には、前記採択使用負荷率に基づいて算出される累積利益計算式
累積利益=既設変圧器の累積損失電力料金−更新候補変圧器の累積損失電力料金−変圧器の更新投資費用 ・・・・・ (式9)
(ここに累積損失電力料金=年間損失電力料金×使用年数)
が織り込まれており、種々の負荷率検討のうえ決定された前記採択負荷率における各更新候補変圧器の累積利益が使用年数別に表記される。In the selection table shown in FIG. 4, the cumulative profit calculation formula calculated based on the adopted use load factor is: cumulative profit = cumulative power loss for existing transformer−cumulative power loss for update candidate transformer−update of transformer Investment cost (Formula 9)
(Here, cumulative power loss = annual power loss x years of use)
Is accumulated, and the cumulative profit of each candidate replacement transformer at the adopted load factor determined after various load factor considerations is indicated by the years of use.
図5は、前記更新変圧器選定プログラムに織り込まれたグラフ化手段によって図4に示す更新変圧器選定表から作成される更新変圧器の前記利益転化年数グラフで、各更新候補変圧器をパラメータとして既設変圧器の負荷率の大きさ(0〜100%)に応じた利益転化年数を表している。横軸を既設変圧器基準負荷率とすることで、既設変圧器と異なる容量の変圧器を含めて一括してグラフに表すことができ、各更新候補変圧器の使用可能負荷率を超過した負荷率領域の利益転化年数については、前記グラフ化手段に具備させた図4の更新変圧器選定表で数字以外を表記した部分をグラフ表記させない手段によって表記されない。 FIG. 5 is the profit conversion years graph of the update transformer created from the update transformer selection table shown in FIG. 4 by the graphing means incorporated in the update transformer selection program, and each update candidate transformer is used as a parameter. It represents the number of years of profit conversion according to the load factor (0 to 100%) of the existing transformer. By setting the horizontal axis as the standard load factor of the existing transformer, it is possible to represent the graph collectively including transformers with different capacities from the existing transformer, and the load exceeding the usable load factor of each update candidate transformer The rate of profit conversion in the rate area is not expressed by means that does not display a part that is not a number in the update transformer selection table of FIG. 4 provided in the graphing means.
図6は、前記更新変圧器選定プログラムに織り込まれたグラフ化手段によって図4に示す変圧器選定表の前記生涯節約金額グラフで、各更新候補変圧器をパラメータとして既設変圧器の負荷率の大きさ(0〜100%)に応じた生涯節約金額を表している。横軸を既設変圧器基準負荷率とすることで、既設変圧器と異なる容量の変圧器を含めて一括してグラフに表すことができ、各更新候補変圧器の使用可能負荷率を超過した負荷率領域の生涯節約金額については、前記グラフ化手段に具備させた図4の更新変圧器選定表で数字以外を表記した部分をグラフ表記させない手段によって表記されない。
図7は、前記更新変圧器選定プログラムに織り込まれたグラフ化手段によって図4に示す更新変圧器の前記採択使用負荷率における前記累積利益(式9)グラフで、各更新候補変圧器をパラメータとし横軸を更新変圧器の使用年数として一括表示される。
(各更新候補変圧器の生涯利益は、横軸を使用予定年数にとったときの累積利益となる)(採択使用負荷率において更新変圧器換算使用負荷率が使用可能負荷率上限値を超える変圧器は図示から除外される)FIG. 6 is the lifetime saving amount graph of the transformer selection table shown in FIG. 4 by the graphing means incorporated in the update transformer selection program, and the load factor of the existing transformer is large with each update candidate transformer as a parameter. This represents the lifetime saving amount according to the amount (0 to 100%). By setting the horizontal axis as the standard load factor of the existing transformer, it is possible to represent the graph collectively including transformers with different capacities from the existing transformer, and the load exceeding the usable load factor of each update candidate transformer The lifetime saving amount in the rate area is not expressed by means that does not display a portion that is not a number in the update transformer selection table of FIG. 4 provided in the graphing means.
FIG. 7 is a graph showing the cumulative profit (equation 9) in the adopted usage load factor of the update transformer shown in FIG. 4 by the graphing means incorporated in the update transformer selection program, and each update candidate transformer is a parameter. The horizontal axis is displayed collectively as the years of use of the renewal transformer.
(The lifetime profit of each update candidate transformer is the cumulative profit when the horizontal axis is the expected number of years of use.) (Transformer whose update transformer equivalent use load factor exceeds the usable load factor upper limit at the adopted use load factor Is excluded from the illustration)
図2は、本発明による既設変圧器負荷率を基準とした各変圧器の損失電力比較グラフで、既設変圧器と各変圧器の使用可能な負荷率領域だけがグラフ化される。 FIG. 2 is a loss power comparison graph of each transformer based on the existing transformer load factor according to the present invention, and only the load factor region where the existing transformer and each transformer can be used is graphed.
Claims (1)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2014189401A JP5807263B1 (en) | 2014-09-01 | 2014-09-01 | Transformer selection method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2014189401A JP5807263B1 (en) | 2014-09-01 | 2014-09-01 | Transformer selection method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP5807263B1 JP5807263B1 (en) | 2015-11-10 |
JP2016051458A true JP2016051458A (en) | 2016-04-11 |
Family
ID=54545774
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2014189401A Expired - Fee Related JP5807263B1 (en) | 2014-09-01 | 2014-09-01 | Transformer selection method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP5807263B1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110472820A (en) * | 2019-07-04 | 2019-11-19 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | A kind of analysis calculation method of distribution transforming health degree |
JP2020028137A (en) * | 2018-08-09 | 2020-02-20 | 株式会社豊田中央研究所 | Energy system optimization device |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105703371B (en) * | 2016-03-11 | 2018-05-01 | 石家庄铁道大学 | A kind of economical operation control method of distribution transformer |
CN105762792B (en) * | 2016-03-16 | 2018-07-10 | 国家电网公司 | The configuration method of capacity of distribution transform per family based on user behavior |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2005348507A (en) * | 2004-06-02 | 2005-12-15 | Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The | Optimal system determination method for power receiving and transforming facility |
JP5560433B1 (en) * | 2013-08-19 | 2014-07-30 | 義和 寺上 | Transformer selection method |
-
2014
- 2014-09-01 JP JP2014189401A patent/JP5807263B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2005348507A (en) * | 2004-06-02 | 2005-12-15 | Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The | Optimal system determination method for power receiving and transforming facility |
JP5560433B1 (en) * | 2013-08-19 | 2014-07-30 | 義和 寺上 | Transformer selection method |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2020028137A (en) * | 2018-08-09 | 2020-02-20 | 株式会社豊田中央研究所 | Energy system optimization device |
CN110472820A (en) * | 2019-07-04 | 2019-11-19 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | A kind of analysis calculation method of distribution transforming health degree |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP5807263B1 (en) | 2015-11-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR101942647B1 (en) | Apparatus for asset management of power transformers | |
JP5807263B1 (en) | Transformer selection method | |
US20120209549A1 (en) | Equipment-related risk assessment from electrical event anaysis | |
KR102489581B1 (en) | Power Transformer Maintenance Management Method | |
WO2017175449A1 (en) | Maintenance plan assistance system for power generation unit group | |
Wang et al. | Economic life assessment of power transformers using an improved model | |
JP5560433B1 (en) | Transformer selection method | |
CN107563536A (en) | A kind of 10kV distribution transformer Optimal Maintenance methods for considering power networks risk | |
CN114707950A (en) | Method and device for monitoring carbon emission efficiency of discrete production equipment | |
KR20220143920A (en) | The optimal calculation method of energy operating conditions in a steelworks, the optimal calculation apparatus of the energy operating conditions in a steelworks, and the operation method of a steelworks | |
JP2013025323A (en) | Environmental effect calculation device and environmental effect calculation method | |
Nelson et al. | Economical aspects of remote conditon monitoring system for distribution transformer | |
JP5524145B2 (en) | Power supply / demand balance check method and power supply / demand balance check device | |
JP6411628B2 (en) | Method, apparatus and computer program product for calculating maintenance date of technical equipment based on condition | |
JP2015198523A (en) | Facility apparatus operation system and facility apparatus operation method | |
Zhou et al. | A maintenance decision optimization method based on life cycle cost of converter transformer | |
JP2018025982A (en) | Energy plant plan support device and energy plant plan support system | |
JP5009775B2 (en) | Integrated maintenance management system | |
CN109375145A (en) | No-voltage fault monitoring method and device based on phase three-wire three meter equipment | |
JP6426803B2 (en) | Equipment management system, equipment management apparatus and equipment management method | |
Vitolina | Development of lifetime data management algorithm for power transformers | |
JP4764236B2 (en) | Power quality evaluation system and method, and program | |
CN105550494B (en) | A kind of use aid decision towards ship redundance unit supports method and system | |
JP2006048267A (en) | Facility reinforcement plan support system | |
Sun et al. | Cost-benefit assessment challenges for a smart distribution system: A case study |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A871 | Explanation of circumstances concerning accelerated examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A871 Effective date: 20141001 |
|
A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20141001 |
|
A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20141001 |
|
A975 | Report on accelerated examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971005 Effective date: 20150123 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20150217 |
|
A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20150331 |
|
TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20150811 |
|
A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20150812 |
|
R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 5807263 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |