JP2016024713A - Parameter selection method, parameter selection program and parameter selection device - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To efficiently calculate an optimum value of a parameter.SOLUTION: There is provided a parameter selection method which is composed of: an adjustment rule using primary optimum value calculation step for acquiring a primary optimum value being a parameter optimum value of a plurality of factors by using a known adjustment rule; a secondary optimum value candidate calculation step for calculating a plurality of secondary optimum value candidates on the respective factors on the basis of the acquired primary optimum value; an experimental plan formulation step for formulating an experimental plan which uses an orthogonal sequence list by using a plurality of the acquired secondary optimum value candidates; an integrated value calculation step for calculating an integrated value which is indicated by a control evaluation function which sets a plurality of the evaluation values obtained by an experiment which is implemented on the basis of the formulated experiment plan as variables; and a parameter optimum value selection step for selecting the parameter optimum value being each parameter value which is obtained by optimizing a plurality of the calculated integrated values and integrated values from the secondary optimum value candidates being the respective parameter values which are used in the calculation of the calculated integrated values.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 6

Description

  The present invention relates to a parameter selection method, a parameter selection program, and a parameter selection device.

  In order to control the state, it is necessary to make the setting value governing the state a suitable value. PID control is known as one of the control methods. PID control is a control method for determining a value such as an applied voltage in accordance with a deviation (P) between an output value and a target value, an integral (I) of the deviation, and a differential (D) of the deviation.

  In PID control, when parameters are defined for state control of a newly designed product, it is generally difficult to select the parameters. For this reason, an apparatus that uses PID control may incorporate an automatic selection program for PID parameters called auto-tuning. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a technique related to auto-tuning.

JP 58-68106 A

  Control using parameters selected by auto-tuning may not always achieve the target state. Auto-tuning is a theoretically optimal parameter, and there are cases where it is different from what is actually required. As a method for selecting the optimum parameter, a method of performing an experiment with all possible combinations of values of the respective parameters can be considered, but this method is very time consuming and is inefficient to actually use.

  In order to solve the problems as described above, the first invention is an optimum value of a total value obtained by combining a plurality of evaluation values derived by a plurality of factors from a combination of a plurality of parameter values assigned to each of the plurality of factors. A parameter selection method for calculating an optimum value of a parameter for determining a first optimum value that is a parameter optimum value of a plurality of factors using a known adjustment rule; A second optimum value candidate calculating step for calculating a plurality of second optimum value candidates for each factor based on the obtained first optimum value, and a plurality of obtained second optimum value candidates. An experiment plan formulation step that formulates an experiment plan using an orthogonal array table based on the experiment design method, and a system that uses a plurality of evaluation values obtained by experiments conducted based on the established experiment plan as variables. A total value calculation step for calculating a total value indicated by the evaluation function, a plurality of calculated total values, and an optimal total value from the second optimal value candidates that are parameter values used for the calculation of the total value We propose a parameter selection method comprising a parameter optimum value selection step for selecting an optimum parameter value which is each parameter value.

  The second invention calculates an optimum value of a parameter for determining an optimum value of a total value obtained by combining a plurality of evaluation values derived by a plurality of factors from a combination of a plurality of parameter values assigned to each of the plurality of factors. A parameter selection program for calculating a first optimum value that is a parameter optimum value of a plurality of factors using a known adjustment law, and a first optimum value calculation step that is obtained A second optimum value candidate calculating step for calculating a plurality of second optimum value candidates for each factor based on the above, and an experiment plan using an orthogonal sequence table using the obtained plurality of second optimum value candidates. This is indicated by an experiment plan formulation step based on the experiment design method and a control evaluation function with multiple evaluation values obtained by experiments conducted based on the established experiment plan as variables. A total value calculating step for calculating a total value, a plurality of calculated total values, and each parameter that optimizes the total value from the second optimal value candidates that are parameter values used for calculating the total value A parameter selection program is described in which a parameter optimum value selection step for selecting a parameter optimum value as a value is described in a computer so that it can be read and executed.

  The third invention calculates an optimum value of a parameter that determines an optimum value of a total value obtained by combining a plurality of evaluation values derived by a plurality of factors from a combination of a plurality of parameter values assigned to each of the plurality of factors. A parameter selection device for adjusting a primary optimal value that is a parameter optimal value of a plurality of factors using a known adjustment law, and a primary optimal value that is obtained A second optimum value candidate calculation unit for calculating a plurality of second optimum value candidates for each factor based on the above, and an experiment plan using an orthogonal sequence table using the obtained plurality of second optimum value candidates. An experiment plan formulation unit that formulates based on the experiment design method, and a total that calculates the total value indicated by the control evaluation function that takes multiple evaluation values obtained by experiments conducted based on the established experiment plan as variables Select the parameter optimal value that is the parameter value that optimizes the total value from the calculation unit, the calculated multiple total values, and the secondary optimal value candidates that are the parameter values used to calculate the total value A parameter selection device including a parameter optimum value selection unit is proposed.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to efficiently calculate an optimum parameter value, and it is possible to efficiently improve controllability in various scenes.

Example of functional block diagram of parameter selection device Example of second optimal value candidate calculation step An example of an orthogonal array table used in the experiment planning step (L9 orthogonal array table) An example of experimental design in the experimental step Example of hardware configuration of parameter selection device Example of parameter selection device processing flow (parameter selection method)

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. In addition, this invention is not limited to description of this specification at all, and can be implemented with various aspects within the range which does not deviate from the summary.
<Configuration>

  FIG. 1 shows an example of functional blocks in the parameter selection device. For example, the parameter selection device 0101 includes an adjustment rule utilization primary optimal value calculation unit 0102, a secondary optimal value candidate calculation unit 0103, an experiment plan formulation unit 0104, an overall value calculation unit 0105, and a parameter optimal value selection. Part 0106.

  Each functional block described above can be realized as hardware, software, or both hardware and software. Furthermore, a software product used for causing a computer to execute software, a recording medium on which the product is recorded, and the like are naturally included in the technical scope of the present invention.

In addition, each functional block described above can be configured to function by the same hardware, or can be configured as separate hardware. There are various types of data for associating such as a configuration acquired from an external storage medium, a configuration for receiving an input via an operation input device, and a configuration acquired from another device on a network via a communication device. Conceivable.
<Configuration of each part>

  The “adjustment rule use first optimum value calculation unit” 0102 has a function of obtaining a first optimum value that is a parameter optimum value of a plurality of factors using a known adjustment rule. As the “plural factors”, for example, there may be three deviations of output value and target value (P), integral of deviation (I), differential of deviation (D), etc. in PID control. Although the details are not particularly limited as the “known adjustment rule”, it is preferable to use a Ziegranikols adjustment method, an Edgar adjustment method, a CHR method, or the like.

  “Secondary optimum value candidate calculation unit” 0103 calculates a plurality of second optimum value candidates for each factor based on the first optimum value obtained by the adjustment rule using first optimum value calculation unit 0102. It has the function to do. In order to calculate a plurality of second optimal value candidates for each factor, for example, each factor may be calculated within an amplitude within + 25% and −25% around the first optimal value. Incidentally, the number of levels may be any number, but three is more preferable.

  FIG. 2 shows an example of the second optimal value candidate calculation unit 0103. For example, each value of P, I, and D obtained by auto tuning is set as the second level, the value reduced by 25% with respect to each value is set as the first level, and the value increased by 25% is set as the third level. Three secondary optimal value candidates are calculated for the factor.

  The “experiment plan formulation unit” 0104 formulates an experiment plan using the orthogonal arrangement table using the plurality of second optimum value candidates obtained by the second optimum value candidate calculation unit 0103 based on the experiment design method. It has a function. The design of experiment is a statistical technique used for conducting experiments efficiently.

  FIG. 3 shows an example of the orthogonal array table used in the experiment plan formulation unit 0104. The orthogonal array table shown in FIG. 3 is called an L9 orthogonal array table. One row represents one experiment, and an experiment plan is formulated so that the experiment is performed using the second optimal value candidates shown in the row. The experiment is preferably performed in the order shown on the rightmost side of the figure. As a result of the experiment, a plurality of evaluation values are obtained for each combination of secondary optimum value candidates of a plurality of factors. As the evaluation value, for example, overshoot, settling time, rise time, and the like are conceivable, but any value or any number may be obtained. Usually, when there are three values as the optimum value candidates for the three parameters, 27 experiments are required to try all combinations. However, in the experiment design method using the orthogonal arrangement table, it is possible to search for the optimum value of the parameter by nine kinds of experiments, which is very efficient.

  In addition to the PID parameter, factors such as the target value filter reduction width and the filter time constant can be increased as parameters. In that case, the orthogonal arrangement table is enlarged and the experiment plan is formulated. For example, by increasing the size from the L9 orthogonal array table to the L27 orthogonal array table, and further to the L81 orthogonal array table, it is possible to calculate optimum values for more parameters.

  The experiment plan formulation unit 0104 may formulate an experiment plan using Taguchi method instead of all or part of the experiment design method. The “Taguchi method” is also called quality engineering, and it is known as a method for efficient technical development, similar to the experimental design method. In the Taguchi method, in addition to using an orthogonal array table as in the experimental design method, the concept of SN ratio (signal-noise ratio) and loss function is further introduced.

  The “total value calculation unit” 0105 has a function of calculating a total value indicated by a control evaluation function having a plurality of evaluation values obtained as a variable based on an experiment performed based on the experiment plan formulated by the experiment plan formulation unit 0104. Have In each experiment, as a result of calculation by substituting the obtained plurality of evaluation values into the control evaluation function, a total value is calculated for each combination of secondary optimum value candidates of a plurality of factors.

FIG. 4 shows an outline of experimental results in the total value calculation unit 0105. The “control evaluation function” is expressed as, for example, Equation 1. The evaluation value may be less or more than three. The denominator of each term may be, for example, a plurality of evaluation values obtained by using the primary optimum value obtained by the adjustment rule utilization primary optimum value calculation unit 0102 (Y _i ). The numerator of each term indicates a plurality of evaluation values for each combination of secondary optimum value candidates of a plurality of factors obtained by the total value calculation unit 0105 (Y _{i, n} ). This control evaluation function is a unitless control evaluation function that makes a unitless by using a ratio for each of a plurality of evaluation values obtained by experiments. This makes it possible to derive a total value by linearly combining a plurality of evaluation values. As a result, it is possible to incorporate a plurality of evaluation values as parameter selection elements.

<Formula 1>

  At the time of linear combination, a weighting coefficient is added to each evaluation value. Each coefficient satisfies the condition of Equation 2. For example, when the user attaches importance to the evaluation value 1, the coefficient α of the evaluation value 1 is set larger than the coefficients β and γ of the evaluation values 2 and 3. This evaluation function makes it possible to select parameters more in line with user requirements.

<Formula 2>

  The “parameter optimum value selection unit” 0106 includes a plurality of total values calculated from the result of the experiment by the total value calculation unit 0105, and secondary optimal value candidates that are parameter values used to calculate the total value. From the above, it has a function of selecting the parameter optimum value that is each parameter value that optimizes the total value.

  The parameter optimum value selection unit 0106 may include parameter optimum value selection sub means 0107. “Parameter optimum value selection sub means” 0107 is a parameter optimum that is a parameter value that minimizes or maximizes the population average of the overall value based on an equation for estimating the population average of the overall value from the result of the overall value calculation unit 0105. Has a function to select a value.

Formula 3 shows an example of a formula for estimating the population average of the total value. A _i , B _i , C _i are secondary optimal value candidates of a plurality of factors, and μ (superscript bar) _{Ai, Bi, Ci} are secondary optimal value candidates shown in A _i , B _i, and C _i . It represents the population mean under the combination. Also, x (superscript bar) _Ai , x (superscript bar) _Bi , x (superscript bar) _Ci is the mean value of the second optimal value candidates of multiple factors, x (superscript bar) is the total It represents the average value. The “average value for each second optimal value candidate” is an average value of the total values obtained from an experiment performed using each secondary optimal value candidate in the total value calculation unit 0105. Calculate the population mean of combinations of secondary optimal value candidates of all multiple factors, and use the combination of secondary optimal value candidates of each of multiple factors that minimize or maximize the calculated population average as the parameter optimal value Can be selected.

<Formula 3>

  The formula for estimating the population average of the total value in the parameter optimum value selection unit 0106 may be based on a data structure formula based on analysis of variance. Analysis of variance is a statistical technique for analyzing the effect of factor on data by decomposing data variation into data error and factor affecting data. By performing analysis of variance, it is possible to verify whether each factor has a superior effect on the total value, and an equation that estimates the population average of only the multiple factors that have a superior effect Can be incorporated into.

  Note that what is performed by the parameter optimum value selection sub-unit 0107 described above is that the second optimum value candidate that gives the maximum value or the minimum value of the second optimum value candidate average values for a plurality of factors is determined as the parameter optimum value. Is equivalent to selecting as That is, it is not necessary to formulate a formula for estimating the population mean.

In the second optimum value candidate calculation unit 0103, when there are three levels of second optimum value candidates, the parameter optimum value selection unit 0106 can be performed as follows. That is, for each of a plurality of factors, three-point second optimum value candidate average values are calculated. A quadratic curve passing through the three points is uniquely determined, and a value that takes the maximum value or the minimum value of the quadratic curve can be selected as the parameter optimum value of each of the plurality of factors.
<Hardware configuration>

  FIG. 5 shows an example of the hardware configuration of the parameter selection device. The parameter selection device 0501 includes, for example, “CPU” 0502, “main storage device” 0503, “program storage device” 0504, “secondary storage device” 0505, “external device I / F” 0506, “user I / F” 0507. , “Output I / F” 0508, “bus” 0509, and the like.

  In the “CPU” 0502, processing such as an adjustment rule using primary optimal value calculation step and secondary optimal value candidate calculation step is executed. Calculation instructions, parameters necessary for the calculation, and the like are given from other devices.

  The “main storage device” 0503 provides a work area required when the CPU 0502 executes the program. Further, an orthogonal array table, an evaluation value, and the like obtained during execution of the program are held and provided to the CPU 0502 as necessary.

  The “program storage device” 0504 stores programs necessary for parameter selection such as the adjustment rule use first optimum value calculation step and second optimum value candidate calculation step, and provides the programs to the CPU 0502 and the like.

  The “secondary storage device” 0505 is a storage device that can dynamically rewrite data during program execution, and the stored data is not erased even when the signal processing device is turned off.

  “External device I / F” 0506 indicates a device to be controlled. In response to a command from the CPU 0502, processing such as an experiment in the parameter selection method is performed.

  “User I / F” 0507 indicates, for example, a mouse or a keyboard. The user can input a request regarding parameter selection to the main storage device 0503 or the like through the user I / F 0507.

  “Output I / F” 0508 indicates, for example, a display. The user can check the program execution status and the calculated parameter optimum value through the output I / F 0508.

Note that the devices indicated by 0502 to 0508 may be connected by a “bus” 0509.
<Process flow>

  FIG. 6 shows an example of the processing flow of the parameter selection device. First, in S0601, a first optimum value, which is a parameter optimum value of a plurality of factors, is obtained by a known adjustment rule (adjustment rule utilization first optimum value search step). Next, in S0602, a plurality of second optimum value candidates are calculated for each factor based on the obtained first optimum value (second optimum value candidate calculating step). In step S0603, an experiment plan using the orthogonal array table is formulated based on the experiment design method using the plurality of obtained second optimal value candidates (experiment plan formulation step). After that, in S0604, a total value indicated by a control evaluation function using a plurality of evaluation values obtained as a result of an experiment performed based on the established experiment plan is calculated (total value calculation step). In S0605, a parameter optimum value that is a parameter value that optimizes the overall value is selected from the plurality of calculated overall values and secondary optimum value candidates that are the parameter values used to calculate the overall value. (Parameter optimum value selection step).

Note that the processing flow from S0601 to S0605 can also be implemented as a parameter selection method.
<Effect>

  By adopting this configuration, it is possible to efficiently select the parameter optimum value.

Claims (27)

A parameter selection method for calculating an optimum value of a parameter that determines an optimum value of a total value obtained by combining a plurality of evaluation values derived by a plurality of factors from a combination of a plurality of parameter values assigned to each of a plurality of factors. ,
An adjustment rule using first optimum value calculation step for obtaining a first optimum value which is a parameter optimum value of a plurality of factors by a known adjustment law,
A second optimum value candidate calculating step for calculating a plurality of second optimum value candidates for each factor based on the obtained first optimum value;
An experiment plan formulation step for formulating an experiment plan using the orthogonal arrangement table using the obtained plurality of second optimal value candidates based on the experiment design method,
A total value calculation step for calculating a total value indicated by a control evaluation function having a plurality of evaluation values obtained by an experiment performed based on the established experiment plan as a variable;
A parameter optimum value that selects a parameter optimum value that is a parameter value that optimizes the overall value from a plurality of calculated overall values and a secondary optimum value candidate that is each parameter value used to calculate the overall value. A selection step;
Parameter selection method consisting of The parameter optimum value selection step is a parameter optimum value selection that selects a parameter optimum value that is a parameter value that maximizes or minimizes the population average of the overall value based on an equation for estimating the population average of the overall value from the experimental results. Including substeps,
The parameter selection method according to claim 1. The formula for estimating the population mean of the total value in the parameter optimum value selection sub-step is based on a data structure formula based on analysis of variance.
The parameter selection method according to claim 2. The control evaluation function used in the total value calculation step is a unitless control evaluation function that performs a unitless calculation by using a ratio for each of a plurality of evaluation values.
The parameter selection method according to any one of claims 1 to 3. The second optimal value candidate calculation step calculates each factor within an amplitude within + 25% and −25% around the first optimal value.
The parameter selection method according to any one of claims 1 to 4. Use Taguchi method instead of all or part of the experimental design method,
The parameter selection method according to any one of claims 1 to 5. The factor includes a PID parameter,
The parameter selection method according to any one of claims 1 to 6. The known adjustment law is any one of Ziegranikols adjustment method, Edgar adjustment method, CHR method,
The parameter selection method according to any one of claims 1 to 7. The plurality of evaluation values include overshoot, settling time, and rise time.
The parameter selection method according to any one of claims 1 to 8. A parameter selection program for calculating an optimum value of a parameter for determining an optimum value of a total value obtained by combining a plurality of evaluation values derived by a plurality of factors from a combination of a plurality of parameter values assigned to each of a plurality of factors. ,
An adjustment rule using first optimum value calculation step for obtaining a first optimum value which is a parameter optimum value of a plurality of factors by a known adjustment law,
A second optimum value candidate calculating step for calculating a plurality of second optimum value candidates for each factor based on the obtained first optimum value;
An experiment plan formulation step for formulating an experiment plan using the orthogonal arrangement table using the obtained plurality of second optimal value candidates based on the experiment design method,
A total value calculation step for calculating a total value indicated by a control evaluation function having a plurality of evaluation values obtained by an experiment performed based on the established experiment plan as a variable;
A parameter optimum value that selects a parameter optimum value that is a parameter value that optimizes the overall value from a plurality of calculated overall values and a secondary optimum value candidate that is each parameter value used to calculate the overall value. A selection step;
Is a parameter selection program that can be read and executed on a computer. The parameter optimum value selection program selects a parameter optimum value that is a parameter value that maximizes or minimizes the population average of the overall value based on an equation for estimating the population average of the overall value from the experimental results. Including substeps,
The parameter selection program according to claim 10. The formula for estimating the population mean of the total value in the parameter optimum value selection sub-step is based on a data structure formula based on analysis of variance.
The parameter selection program according to claim 11. The control evaluation function used in the total value calculation step is a unitless control evaluation function that performs a unitless calculation by using a ratio for each of a plurality of evaluation values.
The parameter selection program according to any one of claims 10 to 12. The second optimal value candidate calculation step calculates each factor within an amplitude within + 25% and −25% around the first optimal value.
The parameter selection program according to any one of claims 10 to 13. Use Taguchi method instead of all or part of the experimental design method,
The parameter selection program according to any one of claims 10 to 14. The factor includes a PID parameter,
The parameter selection program according to any one of claims 10 to 15. The known adjustment law is any one of Ziegranikols adjustment method, Edgar adjustment method, CHR method,
The parameter selection program according to any one of claims 10 to 16. The plurality of evaluation values include overshoot, settling time, and rise time.
The parameter selection program according to any one of claims 10 to 17. A parameter selection device for calculating an optimum value of a parameter for determining an optimum value of a total value obtained by combining a plurality of evaluation values derived from a plurality of factors from a combination of a plurality of parameter values assigned to each of a plurality of factors. ,
An adjustment rule using primary optimum value calculation unit for obtaining a first optimum value that is a parameter optimum value of a plurality of factors by a known adjustment rule,
A second optimum value candidate calculating unit for calculating a plurality of second optimum value candidates for each factor based on the obtained first optimum value;
An experiment plan formulation unit that formulates an experiment plan using the orthogonal array table using the obtained plurality of second optimal value candidates based on the experiment design method,
An overall value calculation unit for calculating an overall value indicated by a control evaluation function having a plurality of evaluation values obtained by an experiment performed based on the established experiment plan as a variable;
A parameter optimum value that selects a parameter optimum value that is a parameter value that optimizes the overall value from a plurality of calculated overall values and a secondary optimum value candidate that is each parameter value used to calculate the overall value. A selection department;
Parameter selection device consisting of The parameter optimum value selection unit selects a parameter optimum value that is a parameter value that maximizes or minimizes the population average of the overall value based on an equation for estimating the population average of the overall value from the experimental results. Including sub means,
The parameter selection device according to claim 19. The formula for estimating the population mean of the total value in the parameter optimum value selection sub means is based on a data structure formula based on analysis of variance.
The parameter selection device according to claim 20. The control evaluation function used in the total value calculation unit is a unitless control evaluation function that calculates the unitless by using the ratio for each of the plurality of evaluation values.
The parameter selection device according to any one of claims 19 to 21. The second optimal value candidate calculation unit calculates each factor within the amplitude within + 25% and −25% around the first optimal value.
The parameter selection device according to any one of claims 19 to 22. Use Taguchi method instead of all or part of the experimental design method,
The parameter selection device according to any one of claims 19 to 23. The factor includes a PID parameter,
The parameter selection device according to any one of claims 19 to 24. The known adjustment law is any one of Ziegranikols adjustment method, Edgar adjustment method, CHR method,
The parameter selection device according to any one of claims 19 to 25. The plurality of evaluation values include overshoot, settling time, and rise time.
The parameter selection device according to any one of claims 19 to 26.

Images