JP2015045593A - Method of inspecting numeric value of color of exterior material, and correction tool therefor - Google Patents

Method of inspecting numeric value of color of exterior material, and correction tool therefor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2015045593A
JP2015045593A JP2013177504A JP2013177504A JP2015045593A JP 2015045593 A JP2015045593 A JP 2015045593A JP 2013177504 A JP2013177504 A JP 2013177504A JP 2013177504 A JP2013177504 A JP 2013177504A JP 2015045593 A JP2015045593 A JP 2015045593A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
color
exterior material
correction tool
exterior
photographing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2013177504A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5893593B2 (en
Inventor
雅之 今仲
Masayuki Imanaka
雅之 今仲
謙吾 石丸
Kengo Ishimaru
謙吾 石丸
将平 渡辺
Shohei Watanabe
将平 渡辺
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daiwa House Industry Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Daiwa House Industry Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Daiwa House Industry Co Ltd filed Critical Daiwa House Industry Co Ltd
Priority to JP2013177504A priority Critical patent/JP5893593B2/en
Publication of JP2015045593A publication Critical patent/JP2015045593A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5893593B2 publication Critical patent/JP5893593B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)
  • Spectrometry And Color Measurement (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method of inspecting a numeric value of a color of an exterior material, and a correction tool therefor, by and with which numeralization of a color of an exterior material can be performed regardless of image-capturing environment such as sunshine even in the case of the exterior material being rugged, without a dedicated measuring instrument.SOLUTION: Numeralization of a color of an exterior material is performed as follows. A correction tool 1 is prepared which is divided into a gray part 1a and a white part 1b, of which numeric values of colors are known, and is provided with an evaluation window 3 in a part surrounded by the gray part 1a. The correction tool 1 is put on the exterior material 4 such as an exterior wall so that the evaluation window 3 is located in an inspection position of the exterior material 4 and the white part 1a is located below. In this state, the correction tool 1 is image-captured by digital imaging-capturing means 2 along with the exterior material 4 within the evaluation window 3. A color of an image of captured digital image data is compared with the known color numeric values of the correction tool 1 to correct differences between the captured image data and the known color numeric values, respectively, whereby a numeric value of a color of the exterior material 4 is calculated. The calculated numeric value of the color is compared with an initial value of the color or the like to determine deterioration of the exterior material.

Description

この発明は、住宅やその他の建物における、外壁材,屋根材などの外側に面する部材である外装材の劣化の程度の判定や、外装材の新築時や生産段階での品質管理等のために色の数値を検査する外装材の色数値検査方法およびその補正ツールに関する。   This invention is used for judgment of the degree of deterioration of exterior materials that are members facing the outside such as outer wall materials and roof materials in houses and other buildings, quality control at the time of new construction of the exterior materials and the production stage, etc. In particular, the present invention relates to a color numerical inspection method and a correction tool thereof for inspecting color numerical values.

建物における外壁等の外装材は、日射熱や水分、紫外線等の影響で劣化し、経年で塗膜の色変化やチョーキング、汚れ等が出て来る。特に、色の変化は、チョーキングや汚れに至る前段階で起こる場合が多い。このため、色を数値化し、初期との差で劣化の程度を把握することが一般的である。色の数値化には、色差計が用いられている。   Exterior materials such as outer walls in buildings deteriorate due to the effects of solar heat, moisture, ultraviolet rays, etc., and color changes, choking, dirt, etc. appear over time. In particular, the color change often occurs at a stage before choking or smearing. For this reason, it is common to digitize the color and grasp the degree of deterioration based on the difference from the initial value. A color difference meter is used for digitizing the color.

色を数値化する方法としては、色差計等を用い、「Lab」等で表す方法が一般的に行われている。ここで、「L」は明度、「ab」は、緑、赤、青、黄色の彩度を表し、明度差、彩度差、およびそれらを総合的に評価する色差が劣化の進行度の評価指標して用いられる。なお、上記「Lab」および「ab」は、一般的に「L* a* b* 」,「a* b* 」の表色系で示す数値のことであるが、この明細書では以下の説明においても、簡明のためにスターの記号を省略して示す。   As a method for digitizing the color, a method represented by “Lab” or the like using a color difference meter or the like is generally performed. Here, “L” represents lightness, and “ab” represents green, red, blue, and yellow saturation, and evaluation of the degree of progress of deterioration by brightness difference, saturation difference, and color difference that comprehensively evaluates them. Used as an indicator. Note that “Lab” and “ab” are numerical values generally indicated by the color systems of “L * a * b *” and “a * b *”. In this specification, the following explanation is given. The star symbol is also omitted in FIG.

色差計は、φ8mm程度の感知部を直接に外壁等に接触させて、多方向から拡散光を当て、反射する鉛直方向の色を計測する仕組みになっている。φ8mm程度の感知部の周辺は、試料と感知部との密着性を良くし、外部から余計な光が入らないようにするためのφ40mm程度の水平の補助部材(アタッチメント)が設置された構造である。   The color difference meter has a mechanism for measuring a vertical color reflected by directing diffused light from multiple directions by directly contacting a sensing portion of about 8 mm in diameter with an outer wall or the like. The structure around the φ8mm sensor is equipped with a horizontal auxiliary member (attachment) of φ40mm to improve the adhesion between the sample and the sensor and prevent extra light from entering from the outside. is there.

通常、外壁材には柄など、目視でも判断できる程度の凹凸がある。また、幅20mm程度の溝加工が施されている場合もある。このため、色差計のアタッチメントが干渉し、密着できない場合があり、正しく測定できない可能性がある。また、外壁の溝ピッチが狭い場合には、感知部に凹部が含まれてしまう可能性がある。この他、感知部が小さいために、多色の試料の場合には、測定部位毎にばらつきが大きくなる問題がある。さらには、色差計は高額な上に、有線のため、実現場では操作性が悪かったり、測定に制限が出るなどの欠点がある。   Usually, the outer wall material has unevenness such as a handle that can be judged visually. In some cases, a groove having a width of about 20 mm is provided. For this reason, the attachment of the color difference meter interferes and may not be in close contact, and there is a possibility that measurement cannot be performed correctly. In addition, when the groove pitch of the outer wall is narrow, there is a possibility that a recess is included in the sensing unit. In addition, since the sensing unit is small, there is a problem that variation is large for each measurement site in the case of a multicolor sample. Furthermore, since the color difference meter is expensive and wired, it has disadvantages such as poor operability in the realization field and limitations on measurement.

色差計は、上記のように凹凸のある外装材等では正しく測定できない可能性があり、また高価な専用の機器であるため、色差計を使わずに、劣化した部位などの色を簡易に数値化する方法が提案されている。例えば、市販のデジタルカメラを用いて、Labなどの色の数値が既知のカラーカードと評価したい部位とを含めて撮影し、既知色部分の色補正をすることで、評価部位を含めた全体の色を補正する簡易的かつ安価な方法が提案されている。
カラーカードとしては、静物や人物をカメラで撮影する際に、露出や色調整をするために用いられる18%グレーカードや、立方体面に18%グレーや絶対黒、純白を組み合わせ、そのうちの2色を基準点で補正するようなキューブ状のものがある。
As described above, the color difference meter may not be able to measure correctly with uneven exterior materials, etc., and is an expensive dedicated device, so it is easy to numerically calculate the color of degraded parts etc. without using a color difference meter. A method has been proposed. For example, using a commercially available digital camera, a photograph including a color card with a known color value such as Lab and a part to be evaluated is taken, and color correction of the known color part is performed, so that the entire part including the evaluation part is corrected. A simple and inexpensive method for correcting the color has been proposed.
Color cards include 18% gray cards used to adjust exposure and color when shooting still life and people with a camera, and 18% gray, absolute black, and pure white are combined on a cube surface. There is a cube shape that corrects the image at the reference point.

特開2011−099709号公報JP 2011-099709 A 特許第4158350号公報Japanese Patent No. 4158350 特開2010−117259号公報JP 2010-117259 A

デジタルカメラ等のカメラは、被写体の明るさが中間色の18%グレーで認識されるため、白いものは暗く写り、黒いものは明るく写る。一方、18%グレーの反射板を自動露出で撮影すると、常に適正露出となるように設計されているため、写り込んだ周辺の色は、自然に近い色で撮影されることになる。   In a camera such as a digital camera, the brightness of a subject is recognized as 18% gray, which is an intermediate color, so that white objects appear darker and black objects appear brighter. On the other hand, when the 18% gray reflector is photographed with automatic exposure, it is designed so that the appropriate exposure is always obtained. Therefore, the reflected peripheral colors are photographed with colors close to natural.

従来技術のグレーカードは、表面が18%グレーに近い中間色で構成されたもので、それを被写体に含むことで、カメラのオート機能により、最適な露出が得られたり、色の数値が明確になった18%グレーが写り込むことで、撮影後の画像の色調整が行い易くなる利点がある。しかし、外壁などの大きな平面の一部を撮影したい場合は、必然的にカード以外の比較的大きな面積の外壁が含まれることになり、例えば白い外壁色の場合、撮影範囲の半分程度の面積に外壁の白い部分が含まれるだけで、露出が合わず、実物よりも暗くなってしまうという問題がある。   The gray card of the prior art is composed of an intermediate color whose surface is close to 18% gray. By including it in the subject, the camera's auto function can provide optimal exposure and color values are clear. The resulting 18% gray is reflected, which has the advantage of making it easier to adjust the color of the image after shooting. However, if you want to shoot a part of a large plane such as the outer wall, it will inevitably include an outer wall with a relatively large area other than the card.For example, in the case of a white outer wall color, the area is about half the shooting range. There is a problem that only the white part of the outer wall is included, the exposure does not match, and it becomes darker than the real thing.

一方、立方体のツールを含めて壁面を撮影する場合は、18%グレーの部分がそもそも少なく、グレーカードの場合と同じように露出が合わない問題が発生するほか、被写体である壁面とツール面の角度が異なるため、住戸間の路地に面した壁面で用いた場合には、ツールの上半分は日照の影響で明るく写り、下半分が暗く写ってしまう。また、ツールが立体的であるため、被写体が立方体ツールの影になってしまう場合があるため、撮影後の色補正まで精度が上がらないという問題がある。   On the other hand, when shooting a wall surface including a cubic tool, the 18% gray part is small in the first place, and the problem is that the exposure does not match as in the case of the gray card, as well as the subject wall surface and the tool surface. Because the angles are different, when used on the wall facing the alley between the dwelling units, the upper half of the tool appears brighter due to sunlight and the lower half appears darker. In addition, since the tool is three-dimensional, the subject may become a shadow of a cube tool, and there is a problem that the accuracy is not improved until color correction after shooting.

この発明の目的は、専用の測定機器を用いることなく、凹凸のある外装材でも、また日照等の撮影環境が異なっていても、色の数値化を正しく行える外装材の色数値検査方法およびその補正ツールを提供することである。
この発明の他の目的は、色の数値化を正しく行えて、精度の良い劣化判定が行えるようにすることである。
An object of the present invention is to provide a color numerical value inspection method for an exterior material that can correctly digitize the color even if the exterior material has unevenness or the shooting environment such as sunshine is different, without using a dedicated measuring instrument, and its It is to provide a correction tool.
Another object of the present invention is to make it possible to correctly quantify a color and to perform deterioration determination with high accuracy.

この発明の外装材の色数値検査方法は、面材状に形成されて表面が、Lab表示におけるLが既知でそれぞれLが45〜55の部分とLが98〜105の部分との2つの部分に色分けされ、前記Lが45〜55の部分で囲まれる箇所に評価窓を有する補正ツールを準備する準備過程(S1)と、
検査対象となる外装材の検査箇所に前記評価窓が位置するように、かつ前記Lが45〜55の部分が周囲の環境の明るい側に位置するように前記外装材に前記補正ツールを重ねる重ね過程(S2)と、
この補正ツールを重ねた状態で前記評価窓内の前記外装材の表面と共に前記補正ツールの表面をデジタル撮影手段で撮影する撮影過程(S3)と、
この撮影されたデジタルデータの画像の色から、前記外装材の前記評価窓内の部分の色の数値を算出する色数値算出過程(S4)と、
を含む。
例えば、前記外装材が、建てられた状態の外壁であり、前記重ね過程および撮影過程では、前記補正ツールの前記Lが45〜55の部分を上側に位置させる。前記Lが45〜55の部分およびLが98〜105の部は、無彩色では、それぞれグレーおよび白となる部分である。
The method for inspecting the color value of an exterior material according to the present invention is a surface material, and the surface has two parts, a part where L in the Lab display is known, L is 45 to 55, and L is 98 to 105. And a preparation step (S1) of preparing a correction tool having an evaluation window at a position where L is surrounded by a portion of 45 to 55.
Overlaying the correction tool on the exterior material so that the evaluation window is located at the inspection location of the exterior material to be inspected and the portion where L is 45 to 55 is located on the bright side of the surrounding environment Process (S2);
A photographing step (S3) of photographing the surface of the correction tool together with the surface of the exterior material in the evaluation window with a digital photographing means in a state where the correction tool is overlaid,
A color numerical value calculating step (S4) for calculating a numerical value of the color of the portion of the exterior material in the evaluation window from the color of the image of the photographed digital data;
including.
For example, the exterior material is a built-up outer wall, and the L of the correction tool is positioned on the upper side in the overlapping process and the photographing process. The portion where L is 45 to 55 and the portion where L is 98 to 105 are portions that become gray and white, respectively, in an achromatic color.

外壁等の外装材2の劣化の程度は通常色差ΔEで評価される場合が多いが、ΔEはLabの中でもΔL(明るさの変化)で決定されることが多い。カメラ撮影においては、被写体の「明るさ」を決める要素は「露出」であるが、この発明はこれに着目し、これを精度良く、かつ再現性の高い撮影を実現する手段として、前記補正ツールを用いる。色数値につき、Labで表現する場合に限らず、RGBやCMKYで示す場合も同様である。   In many cases, the degree of deterioration of the exterior material 2 such as the outer wall is usually evaluated by the color difference ΔE, but ΔE is often determined by ΔL (change in brightness) in Lab. In camera shooting, the element that determines the “brightness” of the subject is “exposure”. The present invention focuses on this, and the correction tool is used as means for realizing shooting with high accuracy and high reproducibility. Is used. The color values are not limited to being expressed in Lab, and the same applies to the case where they are expressed in RGB or CMKY.

この方法によると、色の数値が既知の補正ツールを、評価窓内の外装材と一緒にデジタル撮影手段で撮影するため、日照、天候等の撮影時の環境の変化や、デジタル撮影手段の機種による特性の違いがあっても、画像中の補正ツールの部分についての色の写り方の変化に応じて外装材の画像を色補正することで、外装材の色を適切に色補正し、数値化できる。
また、前記補正ツールの評価窓の周囲はLが45〜55の部分とするため、撮影自体も適切に行える。すなわち、デジタル撮影手段、いわゆるデジタルカメラには、一般時に撮影画面を18%グレーに平均化して撮影する特性があるため、18%グレーが大部分を占める色既知面を一緒に撮影すると、写り込んだ周辺の色は自然に近い色で撮影されたことになる。このように、撮影時により自然に近い色で撮影されるため、色の数値がより精度良く求まる。
According to this method, a correction tool whose color value is known is photographed with digital photographing means together with the exterior material in the evaluation window, so the environment changes during photographing such as sunlight and weather, and the model of the digital photographing means Even if there is a difference in characteristics due to, the color of the exterior material is color-corrected appropriately by correcting the color of the exterior material according to the change in the color image of the correction tool part in the image, and numerical values Can be
Moreover, since the periphery of the evaluation window of the correction tool is a portion where L is 45 to 55, photographing itself can be performed appropriately. That is, since the digital photographing means, so-called digital camera, has a characteristic that the photographing screen is averaged to 18% gray at the time of photographing in general, when a color known surface in which 18% gray is the majority is photographed together, it is reflected. The surrounding colors were taken with colors close to nature. In this way, since the image is captured with a color closer to natural at the time of shooting, the numerical value of the color can be obtained with higher accuracy.

さらに、補正ツールは、Lが45〜55の部分とLが98〜105の部分との2つの部分に色分けされ、Lが45〜55の部分が周囲の環境の明るい側に位置するように前記外装材に補正ツールを重ねるため、撮影環境に方向による明暗があっても、光の影響を平準化できる。
例えば、外装材が建てられた状態の外壁である場合、補正ツールの前記Lが45〜55の部分を上側に位置させる。
外壁面は、上部は日照の影響を強く受け、明るく見える。一方、下部は地面からの反射の影響を受けて、上部よりも暗く見える。この影響をそれぞれ相殺する方向となるように、つまり補正ツールは上部にLが45〜55の部分、下部にLが98〜105の部分を配置することで、光の影響を平準化できる。
建てられた状態の外壁に限らず、室内で生産段階の外装材を検査する場合であっても、撮影する照明の環境が方向性や偏りを生じている場合が多くあり、そのような場合、Lが45〜55の部分が周囲の環境の明るい側に位置するように前記外装材に補正ツールを重ねることで、光の影響を平準化できる。
Further, the correction tool is color-coded into two parts, L part of 45 to 55 and L part of 98 to 105, and the part of L 45 to 55 is positioned on the bright side of the surrounding environment. Since the correction tool is stacked on the exterior material, the influence of light can be leveled even if the shooting environment is light and dark depending on the direction.
For example, in the case of an outer wall in a state where an exterior material is built, the portion of the correction tool where L is 45 to 55 is positioned on the upper side.
The upper part of the outer wall is strongly affected by sunlight and looks bright. On the other hand, the lower part appears darker than the upper part due to the influence of reflection from the ground. In order to cancel the influences, that is, the correction tool is arranged such that L is in the upper part of 45 to 55 and lower part is in the lower part of 98 to 105, so that the influence of light can be leveled.
Not only the exterior wall in the built state, but also when inspecting the exterior materials at the production stage indoors, the lighting environment to shoot often has directionality and bias, in such cases, The effect of light can be leveled by overlaying the correction tool on the exterior material so that the portion of L of 45 to 55 is positioned on the bright side of the surrounding environment.

撮影した画像は、例えば、市販等の画像編集ソフトウェアなどを用いて、評価したい範囲を選択し、選択した範囲の平均のLabを読み取ることで、色の数値を知ることができる。あるいは、色の数値の既知の18%グレーの部分を範囲選択し、選択した範囲の平均のLabを読みとり、既知のLabとの差異の割合で補正する方法としても良い。
このように、日照等の撮影環境が異なっていても、色の数値化を正しく行うことができる。
For a photographed image, for example, a commercially available image editing software or the like is used to select a range to be evaluated, and an average Lab of the selected range is read, so that the numerical value of the color can be known. Alternatively, a method may be used in which a known 18% gray portion of the numerical value of the color is selected as a range, the average Lab of the selected range is read, and the difference is compared with the known Lab.
In this way, even when the shooting environment such as sunshine is different, it is possible to correctly perform color digitization.

この発明の外装材の色数値検査方法において、前記色数値算出過程で算出された前記外装材の色の数値から前記外装材の劣化の判定を行う劣化判定過程を含んでも良い。
例えば、予め用意された初期のLabと、実建物においてデジタル撮影手段(2)で撮影した画像から求めたLabから、明度、彩度差、色差を求める。このように明度、彩度差、色差等の色の数値の差を知ることで、これを、予め用意された劣化の予測線図等と照らし合わせることで、外装材の劣化の度合い、さらに余寿命、メンテナンスの時期の適切な提示が可能となる。
The exterior numerical value inspection method of the present invention may include a deterioration determination process for determining deterioration of the exterior material from the color value of the exterior material calculated in the color numerical value calculation process.
For example, the brightness, saturation difference, and color difference are obtained from the initial Lab prepared in advance and the Lab obtained from the image photographed by the digital photographing means (2) in the actual building. In this way, by knowing the difference in the numerical values of the color such as brightness, saturation difference, color difference, etc., by comparing this with a prediction diagram of deterioration prepared in advance, the degree of deterioration of the exterior material, and the remainder Appropriate presentation of service life and maintenance time is possible.

前記補正ツールは、上部をLが50程度のグレー、下部がL100程度の白とし、前記補正ツールの表面に撮影範囲を示す撮影枠を設け、この撮影枠内における、前記白の部分の割合を前記補正ツールの表面の全体に対する15〜25%とすることが好ましい。
撮影枠を設けて白の部分の割合が適切な範囲となるように撮影することで、色の数値化を正しく行えて、精度の良い劣化判定が行える。白の部分の適切な割合は、試験により15〜25%の範囲であることが判明した。
The correction tool has an upper portion of gray with L of about 50 and a lower portion of white with about L100, and a shooting frame indicating a shooting range is provided on the surface of the correction tool, and the ratio of the white portion in the shooting frame is determined. It is preferable to set it to 15 to 25% with respect to the whole surface of the correction tool.
By providing a photographing frame and photographing so that the ratio of the white portion falls within an appropriate range, it is possible to correctly quantify the color and perform accurate deterioration determination. Appropriate proportions of white parts have been found to be in the range of 15-25% by testing.

この発明の外装材の色数値検査用の補正ツールは、この発明の外装材の色数値検査方法に用いられる補正ツールであって、面材状に形成されて表面が、Lab表示におけるLが既知でそれぞれLが45〜55の部分とLが98〜105の部分との2つの部分に色分けされ、前記Lが45〜55の部分で囲まれる箇所に評価窓を有することを特徴とする。
この補正ツールによると、この発明の外装材の色数値検査方法につき前述したように、専用の測定機器を用いることなく、凹凸のある外装材でも、また日照等の撮影環境が異なっていても、色の数値化を正しく行える。
The correction tool for color value inspection of an exterior material according to the present invention is a correction tool used in the color value inspection method for exterior material according to the present invention, and is formed into a face material and the surface has L known in Lab display. And L is divided into two parts, that is, a part of 45 to 55 and a part of L is 98 to 105, and an evaluation window is provided at a place surrounded by the part of L of 45 to 55.
According to this correction tool, as described above for the color value inspection method of the exterior material of the present invention, without using a dedicated measuring instrument, even with an uneven exterior material, or even in a shooting environment such as sunshine, Color can be digitized correctly.

この発明の外装材の色数値検査方法は、面材状に形成されて表面が、Lab表示におけるLが既知でそれぞれLが45〜55の部分と98〜105の部分との2つの部分に色分けされ、前記Lが45〜55の部分で囲まれる箇所に評価窓を有する補正ツールを準備する準備過程と、検査対象となる外装材の検査箇所に前記評価窓が位置するように、かつ前記Lが45〜55の部分が周囲の環境の明るい側に位置するように前記外装材に前記補正ツールを重ねる重ね過程と、この補正ツールを重ねた状態で前記評価窓内の前記外装材の表面と共に前記補正ツールの表面をデジタル撮影手段で撮影する撮影過程と、この撮影されたデジタルデータの画像の色から、前記外装材の前記評価窓内の部分の色の数値を算出する色数値算出過程とを含む方法であるため、専用の測定機器を用いることなく、凹凸のある外装材でも、また日照等の撮影環境が異なっていても、色の数値化を正しく行うことができる。
この発明の外装材の色数値検査用の補正ツールは、外装材の色数値検査方法に用いられる補正ツールであって、面材状に形成されて表面が、Lab表示におけるLが既知でそれぞれLが45〜55の部分とLが98〜105の部分との2つの部分に色分けされ、前記Lが45〜55の部分で囲まれる箇所に評価窓を有するため、専用の測定機器を用いることなく、凹凸のある外装材でも、また日照等の撮影環境が異なっていても、色の数値化を正しく行うことができる。
According to the method for inspecting the color values of the exterior material according to the present invention, the surface is formed into a face material and the surface is color-coded into two parts, that is, L in the Lab display and L is 45 to 55 and 98 to 105, respectively. And a preparation process for preparing a correction tool having an evaluation window at a location surrounded by the portion of L of 45 to 55, the evaluation window is positioned at the inspection location of the exterior material to be inspected, and the L And a process of superimposing the correction tool on the exterior material so that a portion of 45 to 55 is positioned on the bright side of the surrounding environment, and with the surface of the exterior material in the evaluation window in a state of overlapping the correction tool A photographing process for photographing the surface of the correction tool with a digital photographing means, and a color numerical value calculating process for calculating a numerical value of a color of the portion in the evaluation window of the exterior material from the color of the image of the photographed digital data Including Because it is, without using a dedicated measuring instrument, in exterior materials an uneven, also be different shooting environment sunshine, etc., it is possible to perform color digitizing correctly.
A correction tool for color value inspection of an exterior material according to the present invention is a correction tool used in a color value inspection method for an exterior material. The correction tool is formed into a face material and has a surface whose L in the Lab display is known and L Is divided into two parts, that is, a part of 45 to 55 and a part of L is 98 to 105, and the evaluation window is provided in a place surrounded by the part of L to 45 to 55 without using a dedicated measuring instrument. Even if the exterior material is uneven, and the photographing environment such as sunshine is different, the numerical value of the color can be correctly obtained.

この発明の一実施形態に係る外装材の色数値検査方法に用いる補正ツールの正面図である。It is a front view of the correction tool used for the color numerical value inspection method of the exterior material which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. 同外装材の色数値検査方法の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the color numerical value inspection method of the exterior material. 補正ツールの白色の配分と外壁L値の関係を示すグラフである。It is a graph which shows the relationship between white distribution and the outer wall L value of a correction tool. 同色数値検査方法に用いる色数値検査装置のハードウェア構成例を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the hardware structural example of the color numerical value inspection apparatus used for the same color numerical value inspection method. 同色数値検査装置の概念構成を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the conceptual structure of the same color numerical inspection apparatus.

この発明の一実施形態を図面と共に説明する。この外装材の色数値検査方法は、図1,図2に示すカラーカードからなる補正ツール1を準備する準備過程(S1)と、検査対象となる外装材4の検査箇所に補正ツールを重ねる重ね過程(S2)と、この重ねた状態で補正ツール1の評価窓3内の前記外装材4の表面と共に補正ツール1の表面をデジタル撮影手段2で撮影する撮影過程(S3)と、その撮影されたデジタルデータの画像Gの色を補正して外装材4の色の数値を算出する色数値算出過程(S4)とを含む。なお、画像Gの色補正は、必ずしも行わなくても良い。この色の数値の算出の後、外装材4の劣化等の判断を判断過程(S5)で行う。前記色数値算出過程(S4)と劣化等の判断過程(S5)は、情報処理手段5により行う。   An embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. This exterior color material inspection method includes a preparation process (S1) for preparing the correction tool 1 composed of the color card shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, and an overlap of the correction tool over the inspection location of the exterior material 4 to be inspected. In step (S2), in this overlapped state, a photographing step (S3) in which the surface of the correction tool 1 together with the surface of the exterior material 4 in the evaluation window 3 of the correction tool 1 is photographed by the digital photographing means 2, A color numerical value calculating step (S4) for correcting the color of the image G of the digital data and calculating the numerical value of the color of the exterior material 4. Note that the color correction of the image G is not necessarily performed. After the calculation of the numerical value of the color, determination of deterioration of the exterior material 4 is performed in a determination process (S5). The information processing means 5 performs the color value calculation process (S4) and the determination process (S5) such as deterioration.

外壁等の外装材4の劣化の程度は通常色差ΔEで評価される場合が多いが、ΔEはLabの中でもΔL(明るさの変化)で決定されることが多い。カメラ撮影においては、被写体の「明るさ」を決める要素は「露出」であるが、これに着目し、これを精度良く、かつ再現性の高い撮影を実現する手段として、前記補正ツールを用いる。色数値につき、Labで表現する場合に限らず、RGBやCMKYで示す場合も同様である。   In many cases, the degree of deterioration of the exterior material 4 such as the outer wall is usually evaluated by the color difference ΔE, but ΔE is often determined by ΔL (change in brightness) in Lab. In camera shooting, the factor that determines the “brightness” of the subject is “exposure”. Focusing on this, the correction tool is used as means for realizing shooting with high accuracy and high reproducibility. The color values are not limited to being expressed in Lab, and the same applies to the case where they are expressed in RGB or CMKY.

デジタル撮影手段2は、カラーのデジタル画像が撮影できる手段であり、デジタルカメラ(いわゆるデジカメ)の他、カメラ機能を有する携帯電話端末や、他の携帯情報処理端末(PDA,タブレット)等であっても良い。
情報処理手段5は、パーソナルコンピュータや、いわゆるスマートフォン等の多機能携帯電話端末、PDAやタブレット型の携帯情報処理端末等である。
The digital photographing means 2 is a means capable of photographing a color digital image, such as a digital camera (so-called digital camera), a mobile phone terminal having a camera function, another portable information processing terminal (PDA, tablet) or the like. Also good.
The information processing means 5 is a personal computer, a multifunctional mobile phone terminal such as a so-called smart phone, a PDA or a tablet-type mobile information processing terminal.

補正ツール1は面材状であり、図1に示すように、この例では横長の矩形の基板1Aの表面を、色の数値がそれぞれ既知であるグレーの部分1aと白の部分1bとの2つの部分1a,1bとに上下に色分けしたカラーカードとされ、前記グレーの部分1aで囲まれる箇所に評価窓3を設けた構成とされている。また、補正ツール1の表面には、前記撮影時の撮影すべき適切な範囲を示す撮影枠6が印刷等で施されている。グレーの部分1aと白の部分1bとは、必ずしも無彩色でなくても良いが、前記グレーの部分1aはLが45〜55、前記白の部分1bはLが98〜105とする。   The correction tool 1 is in the form of a face material, and as shown in FIG. 1, in this example, the surface of a horizontally long rectangular substrate 1A is divided into two parts, a gray portion 1a and a white portion 1b, each having a known numerical value of color. The color card is divided into upper and lower parts 1a and 1b, and an evaluation window 3 is provided at a location surrounded by the gray part 1a. On the surface of the correction tool 1, a photographing frame 6 indicating an appropriate range to be photographed at the time of photographing is provided by printing or the like. The gray portion 1a and the white portion 1b are not necessarily achromatic, but the gray portion 1a has L of 45 to 55, and the white portion 1b has L of 98 to 105.

補正ツール1は、より具体的には、グレーの部分1aは18%グレーとされ、白の部分1bは純白にできるだけ近い白色とされる。Lab表示で言うと、グレーの部分1aはLが50程度のグレー、下部がL100程度の白とされる。
18%グレーは、Lab表示において、L=50、a=0、b=0であるが、これに限定されることなく、例えば、L=50、a=50、b=50のようなレッド系のもの、L=50、a=0、b=20のようなブルー系のもの、L=50、a=30、b=0のようなグリーン系のものなど、グレースケールにおける中間色とすれば良い。
More specifically, in the correction tool 1, the gray portion 1a is 18% gray, and the white portion 1b is white as close as possible to pure white. In terms of Lab display, the gray portion 1a is gray in which L is about 50 and white in which the lower portion is about L100.
18% gray is L = 50, a = 0, b = 0 in Lab display, but is not limited to this, for example, a red system such as L = 50, a = 50, b = 50 Intermediate colors in gray scale, such as blue ones such as L = 50, a = 0, b = 20, green ones such as L = 50, a = 30, b = 0 .

補正ツール1の材質として、純白に近い白色の素材としてはケント紙がある。この例では、グレーの部分1aはスタジオ用のグレーテープを、白の部分1bはケント紙を前記基板1Aの表面にそれぞれ貼り付けて設けられている。基板1Aは、弾力性があって、折れ曲がりなどが起こらない材質、例えばプラスチック板が用いられるが、厚過ぎると評価窓3内の評価部位に影ができてしまうため、厚みは0.5mm程度のものが適切である。この他に、プラスチック製の基板1Aを設ける代わりに、ケント紙に18%グレーテープを貼り付けてケント紙を基板1Aと白の部分1bとに兼用させても良い。   As a material of the correction tool 1, a white material close to pure white is Kent paper. In this example, the gray portion 1a is provided with a studio gray tape, and the white portion 1b is provided with a Kent paper attached to the surface of the substrate 1A. The substrate 1A is made of a material that is elastic and does not bend, for example, a plastic plate. However, if the substrate 1A is too thick, a shadow is formed on the evaluation part in the evaluation window 3, and the thickness is about 0.5 mm. Things are appropriate. In addition to this, instead of providing the plastic substrate 1A, 18% gray tape may be attached to the Kent paper so that the Kent paper can be used as the substrate 1A and the white portion 1b.

評価窓3は、検査対象の外装材4を評価撮影する開口部分であり、補正ツール1の中央付近に設けられる。評価窓3は、例えば縦横の寸法h,wとも20mm程度の矩形とされる。評価窓3の大きさは、小さすぎると検査対象となる外装材4である外壁などの凹凸により、この補正ツール1と外装材4との間に隙間ができ、評価部位に影ができてしまう可能性があるため、好ましくない。また大き過ぎると、現場で着目し指定した外装材4の部位と、その撮影した画像の再生,補正時に選択した評価部位とが異なることになる可能性がある他、被写体の撮影面積が大きくなり、従来技術と同じような問題が発生する。それを解消する方法として、被写体とデジタル撮影手段2との距離を長く取る方法があるが、その場合、解像度が粗くなってしまう問題がある。補正ツール1の全体の大きさは、例えば縦 150〜300mm、横200〜300mm程度の大きさとされる。   The evaluation window 3 is an opening for evaluating and photographing the exterior material 4 to be inspected, and is provided near the center of the correction tool 1. The evaluation window 3 is, for example, a rectangle having vertical and horizontal dimensions h and w of about 20 mm. If the size of the evaluation window 3 is too small, a gap is formed between the correction tool 1 and the exterior material 4 due to irregularities such as the outer wall that is the exterior material 4 to be inspected, and a shadow is formed on the evaluation site. This is not preferable because there is a possibility. On the other hand, if it is too large, the part of the exterior material 4 that is focused and specified in the field may be different from the evaluation part selected at the time of reproduction and correction of the photographed image, and the photographing area of the subject becomes large. A problem similar to that of the prior art occurs. As a method for solving this problem, there is a method of increasing the distance between the subject and the digital photographing means 2, but in this case, there is a problem that the resolution becomes coarse. The overall size of the correction tool 1 is, for example, about 150 to 300 mm in length and about 200 to 300 mm in width.

撮影枠6が示す上下方向の範囲Hは、グレーの部分1aを含む範囲H1が、上側から75〜85%の範囲、白の部分1bを含む範囲H2が残りの25〜15%の範囲とされる。   The range H in the vertical direction indicated by the photographing frame 6 is set such that the range H1 including the gray portion 1a is 75 to 85% from the upper side, and the range H2 including the white portion 1b is the remaining 25 to 15%. The

つぎに、各過程(S1)〜(S5)につき説明する。重ね過程(S2)では、外装材4の色検査したい箇所、例えば垂直に建てられた既存の外壁である外装材4の前面に、補正ツール1を、上側がグレーの部分1a、下側が白の部分1bとなるように重ねる。このとき、色数値の検査をしたい箇所が評価窓3に入るように重ねる。なお、外装材4は、同図の例では煉瓦状に凹凸模様の目地模様部4aが設けられている。   Next, each process (S1) to (S5) will be described. In the superimposing process (S2), the correction tool 1 is placed on the front surface of the exterior material 4 which is an existing outer wall that is vertically built, for example, the portion to be color-inspected, and the gray portion 1a on the upper side and the white on the lower side are white. Overlay to be part 1b. At this time, the overlapping is performed so that the portion to be inspected for the color numerical value enters the evaluation window 3. In the example of the figure, the exterior material 4 is provided with a joint pattern portion 4a having a concavo-convex pattern in a brick shape.

撮影過程(S3)では、上記のように重ねた補正ツール1の、撮影枠6内の全体が丁度撮影範囲となるようにデジタル撮影手段2で撮影する。図2(C)は、その撮影した撮影画像Gの概念図である。   In the photographing process (S3), the digital photographing means 2 photographs the correction tool 1 superimposed as described above so that the entire photographing frame 6 is just within the photographing range. FIG. 2C is a conceptual diagram of the photographed captured image G.

色数値算出過程(S4)では、このように撮影した撮影画像Gから、この撮影画像Gにおける評価窓3に対応する画像部分Gaとなる外装材4の画像につき、色の数値を算出する。このとき、デジタルデータである撮影画像Gの色を、前記補正ツール1の前記既知の色の数値と比較して差異を補正して、この補正後の値で前記外装材4の前記評価窓3内の部分の色の数値を算出する。   In the color numerical value calculation step (S4), the numerical value of the color is calculated for the image of the exterior material 4 that is the image portion Ga corresponding to the evaluation window 3 in the captured image G from the captured image G thus captured. At this time, the color of the photographed image G, which is digital data, is compared with the numerical value of the known color of the correction tool 1 to correct the difference, and the evaluation window 3 of the exterior material 4 is corrected with the corrected value. The numerical value of the color of the inside is calculated.

劣化判定過程(S5)では、前記色数値算出過程(S4)で算出された外装材4の色の数値から、定められた規則に従い、前記外装材4の劣化の判定を行う。   In the deterioration determination process (S5), the deterioration of the exterior material 4 is determined according to a predetermined rule from the color value of the exterior material 4 calculated in the color value calculation process (S4).

この方法によると、色の数値が既知の補正ツール1を、評価窓3内の外装材4と一緒にデジタル撮影手段2で撮影するため、日照、天候等の撮影時の環境の変化や、デジタル撮影手段2の機種による特性の違いがあっても、画像中の補正ツール1の部分についての色の写り方の変化に応じて外装材2の画像を色補正することで、外装材2の色を適切に色補正し、数値化できる。
また、前記補正ツール1の評価窓3の周囲はグレーとするため、撮影自体も適切に行える。すなわち、デジタル撮影手段2、いわゆるデジタルカメラには、一般時に撮影画面を18%グレーに平均化して撮影する特性があるため、18%グレーが大部分を占める色既知面を一緒に撮影すると、写り込んだ周辺の色は自然に近い色で撮影されたことになる。このように、撮影時により自然に近い色で撮影されるため、色の数値がより精度良く求まる。
According to this method, since the correction tool 1 whose color value is known is photographed by the digital photographing means 2 together with the exterior material 4 in the evaluation window 3, the change in the environment during photographing such as sunlight and weather, Even if there is a difference in characteristics depending on the model of the photographing means 2, the color of the exterior material 2 is corrected by color-correcting the image of the exterior material 2 in accordance with the change in the color image of the portion of the correction tool 1 in the image. Can be color-corrected and digitized.
Since the periphery of the evaluation window 3 of the correction tool 1 is gray, photographing itself can be performed appropriately. That is, since the digital photographing means 2, that is, a so-called digital camera, generally has a characteristic that the photographing screen is averaged to 18% gray and is photographed. The surrounding colors were taken with colors close to nature. In this way, since the image is captured with a color closer to natural at the time of shooting, the numerical value of the color can be obtained with higher accuracy.

さらに、補正ツール1は、グレーの部分1aと白の部分1bとの2つの部分に色分けされ、グレーの部分1aが周囲の環境の明るい側に位置するように前記外装材2に補正ツール1を重ねるため、撮影環境に方向による明暗があっても、光の影響を平準化できる。
外装材2が建てられた状態の外壁である場合、補正ツール1の前記グレーの部分1aを上側に位置させる。
外壁面は、上部は日照の影響を強く受け、明るく見える。一方、下部は地面からの反射の影響を受けて上部よりも暗く見える。この影響をそれぞれ相殺する方向となるように、つまり補正ツール1は上部にグレーの部分1a、下部に白の部分1bを配置することで、光の影響を平準化できる。
Further, the correction tool 1 is color-coded into two parts, a gray part 1a and a white part 1b, and the correction tool 1 is applied to the exterior material 2 so that the gray part 1a is located on the bright side of the surrounding environment. Therefore, the effect of light can be leveled even if the shooting environment is light and dark depending on the direction.
When the exterior wall 2 is an outer wall in a state where it is built, the gray portion 1a of the correction tool 1 is positioned on the upper side.
The upper part of the outer wall is strongly affected by sunlight and looks bright. On the other hand, the lower part appears darker than the upper part due to the influence of reflection from the ground. The correction tool 1 can level the influence of light by arranging the gray portion 1a in the upper portion and the white portion 1b in the lower portion so as to cancel out these influences.

これら外壁面の上部と下部とで受ける光の影響を精度良く平準化するには、補正ツール1のグレーの部分1aと白の部分1bの割合が定まった割合となるように撮影する必要がある。これにつき、補正ツール1に撮影枠6が設けられていると、グレーの部分1aと白の部分1bの撮影配分にばらつきが出ないように撮影できる。また、撮影枠6があることによって、撮影距離を安定させることができ、色の数値を求めるのに必要な画像の質と精度向上が得られる。   In order to level the effects of light received at the upper and lower portions of the outer wall surface with high accuracy, it is necessary to photograph so that the ratio of the gray portion 1a and the white portion 1b of the correction tool 1 becomes a fixed ratio. . In this regard, when the correction tool 1 is provided with the shooting frame 6, it is possible to take an image so that there is no variation in the shooting distribution of the gray portion 1a and the white portion 1b. Further, the presence of the photographing frame 6 can stabilize the photographing distance and improve the image quality and accuracy necessary to obtain the numerical value of the color.

なお、建てられた状態の外壁に限らず、室内で生産段階の外装材2を検査する場合であっても、撮影する照明の環境が方向性や偏りを生じている場合が多くあり、そのような場合、グレーの部分が周囲の環境の明るい側に位置するように前記外装材2に補正ツール1を重ねることで、光の影響を平準化できる。   It should be noted that the lighting environment to be photographed often has a directionality or a bias even when inspecting the exterior material 2 in the production stage indoors as well as the outer wall in the built state. In this case, the effect of light can be leveled by overlaying the correction tool 1 on the exterior material 2 so that the gray portion is positioned on the bright side of the surrounding environment.

色数値算出過程(S4)では、撮影した画像につき、例えば市販等の画像編集ソフトウェアなどを用いて、評価したい範囲を選択し、選択した範囲の平均のLabを読み取ることで、色の数値を知ることができる。あるいは、色の数値の既知の18%グレーの部分を範囲選択し、選択した範囲の平均のLabを読みとり、既知のLabとの差異の割合で補正する方法としても良い
。このように、日照等の撮影環境が異なっていても、色の数値化を正しく行うことができる。
In the color numerical value calculation process (S4), for a photographed image, for example, commercially available image editing software or the like is used to select a range to be evaluated, and an average Lab of the selected range is read to know the numerical value of the color. be able to. Alternatively, a method may be used in which a known 18% gray portion of the numerical value of the color is selected as a range, the average Lab of the selected range is read, and the difference is compared with the known Lab. In this way, even when the shooting environment such as sunshine is different, it is possible to correctly perform color digitization.

劣化判定過程(S5)では、例えば、予め用意された初期のLabと、実建物においてデジタル撮影手段2で撮影した画像から求めたLabから、明度、彩度差、色差を求める。このように明度、彩度差、色差等の色の数値の差を知ることで、これを、予め用意された劣化の予測線図等と照らし合わせることで、外装材の劣化の度合い、さらに余寿命、メンテナンスの時期の適切な提示が可能となる。   In the deterioration determination step (S5), for example, brightness, saturation difference, and color difference are obtained from an initial Lab prepared in advance and a Lab obtained from an image photographed by the digital photographing means 2 in an actual building. In this way, by knowing the difference in the numerical values of the color such as brightness, saturation difference, color difference, etc., by comparing this with a prediction diagram of deterioration prepared in advance, the degree of deterioration of the exterior material, and the remainder Appropriate presentation of service life and maintenance time is possible.

図3は、屋外に建つ建物で試行した結果を示す。外壁である外装材4の色は、色差計においてL値が82と63の種類である。A社およびB社の2社のいわゆるデジカメであるデジタル撮影手段2を用い、図1の補正ツール1の白の部分1bの割合を変えて撮影した画像からL値を求めた。   FIG. 3 shows the results of trials on a building built outdoors. The color of the exterior material 4 which is an outer wall is a kind of L value 82 and 63 in a color difference meter. Using the digital photographing means 2 which is a so-called digital camera of two companies of Company A and Company B, the L value was obtained from an image photographed while changing the ratio of the white portion 1b of the correction tool 1 in FIG.

外壁色に関係なく(L値が82であって63であっても)、A社、B社とも、白の部分1bの割合が増えるとL値が小さく(暗く)なる傾向にある。色差計のL値を真値とすると、カメラのメーカーに関係なく、かつ外壁色に関係なく、白の部分1bの割合を15〜25%の割合で撮影すれば、デジカメ画像から求めたL値と真値との差が小さくなり、誤差の小さい最適な範囲になることを示している。そのため、前記撮影枠6内の白の部分1bの範囲は前記のように15〜25%とすることが適切な範囲となる。
なお、この図からは、白の部分1bが0%のL値については、カメラによる差異が少ないことから、この発明とは異なるが、撮影時に図1において補正ツール1を全面グレー(白色0%)としたものを用い、図3に示すような近似直線式をカメラ毎に用意して、白色の配分15%程度などの場合の(正しい)色を設定して補正する方法も考えられる。
Regardless of the outer wall color (even if the L value is 82 and 63), both Company A and Company B tend to have smaller (darker) L values as the proportion of the white portion 1b increases. If the L value of the color difference meter is a true value, the L value obtained from the digital camera image can be obtained by photographing the white portion 1b at a rate of 15 to 25% regardless of the camera manufacturer and the outer wall color. This indicates that the difference between the value and the true value is small, and the optimum range with a small error is obtained. For this reason, the appropriate range of the white portion 1b in the photographing frame 6 is 15 to 25% as described above.
From this figure, the L value of the white portion 1b of 0% is different from the present invention because there are few differences depending on the camera, but the correction tool 1 in FIG. 3), an approximate straight line equation as shown in FIG. 3 is prepared for each camera, and a correction can be made by setting a (correct) color in the case of a white distribution of about 15%.

上記実施形態の色数値検査方法による効果を纏め直して次に示す。
・外壁等の外装材4の余寿命を知ることが可能となる。
・屋根材からなる外装材4の余寿命診断も同じ原理を用いて利用できる。
・多色を含む外壁等の外装材4の色を数値化できる。
・汎用のデジタルカメラを用い、安価に余寿命診断が行える。
・時間を掛けない従来方法に近い方法で診断できる。
・診断の機器類を減らすことができる。
・余寿命としてユーザーに提示することで、危険度、緊急度をわかり易くユーザーに説明することが可能になる。
・外壁等の外装材のメンテナンス時期の適切な提示が可能になる。
・メンテナンス工事受注のための営業ツールとしての利用が可能になる。
・パソコンなどの機器と連動させることで、点検直後にその場で診断結果を提示することが可能になる。
・劣化の診断の他、新築時の現場や生産段階でも前記と同じ方法を用いて品質管理が可能になる。
The effects of the color numerical value inspection method of the above embodiment are summarized below.
It becomes possible to know the remaining life of the exterior material 4 such as the outer wall.
The remaining life diagnosis of the exterior material 4 made of a roof material can also be used using the same principle.
-The color of the exterior material 4 such as an outer wall including multiple colors can be quantified.
・ A general-purpose digital camera can be used to diagnose the remaining life at low cost.
・ Diagnosis can be made by a method close to the conventional method without taking time.
・ Diagnosis equipment can be reduced.
-By presenting to the user as the remaining life, it becomes possible to explain the degree of danger and urgency to the user in an easy-to-understand manner.
-Appropriate presentation of maintenance time for exterior materials such as outer walls becomes possible.
・ Use as a sales tool for maintenance work orders.
-By linking with devices such as personal computers, it is possible to present diagnostic results on the spot immediately after inspection.
・ In addition to diagnosing deterioration, quality control can be performed using the same method as described above at the site of construction and production.

つぎに、外装材の色数値検査装置につき、図4,図5と共に説明する。
図4において、情報処理手段5は、パーソナルコンピュータまたはスマートフォン、タブレット端末等の形態端末である。情報処理手段5は、CPU(中央処理装置)15、記憶手段16、および入出力ポート17を有している。記憶手段16に色数値検査プログラム19が記憶され、この情報処理装置5により実行可能な状態にインストールされている。記憶手段16は、ハードディスクやSSD等の大容量記憶装置とメモリ等とを纏めて一つで示している。記憶手段16にはOS(オぺレーションプログラム)(図示せず)が記憶され、また画像データ等のデータを記憶するデータ記憶領域16aが設けられている。前記色数値検査プログラム19は、前記OS上で実行されるアプリケーションプログラムである。
Next, a color numerical value inspection apparatus for an exterior material will be described with reference to FIGS.
In FIG. 4, the information processing means 5 is a form terminal such as a personal computer or a smartphone or a tablet terminal. The information processing means 5 has a CPU (central processing unit) 15, a storage means 16, and an input / output port 17. A color numerical value inspection program 19 is stored in the storage means 16 and installed in a state that can be executed by the information processing apparatus 5. The storage means 16 collectively shows a large-capacity storage device such as a hard disk or SSD and a memory. The storage means 16 stores an OS (operation program) (not shown), and is provided with a data storage area 16a for storing data such as image data. The color value inspection program 19 is an application program executed on the OS.

この他に、入出力ポート17を介して、キーボード、マウス、タッチパネル等の入力機器21と、液晶表示装置等の画像を表示可能な出力機器である画面表示装置22が接続されている。入出力ポート17は、USB規格等のインタフェースを有し、デジタル撮影手段2で撮影された画像は、例えば入出力ポート17を介して情報処理装置5に入力される。デジタル撮影手段2で撮影された画像は、着脱可能なメモリチップ(図示せず)に記憶しておき、そのメモリチップから情報処理装置3に入力するようにしても良い。   In addition, an input device 21 such as a keyboard, a mouse, and a touch panel and a screen display device 22 which is an output device capable of displaying an image such as a liquid crystal display device are connected via the input / output port 17. The input / output port 17 has an interface such as a USB standard, and an image photographed by the digital photographing means 2 is input to the information processing apparatus 5 through the input / output port 17, for example. The image photographed by the digital photographing means 2 may be stored in a removable memory chip (not shown) and input to the information processing device 3 from the memory chip.

前記色数値検査プログラム19と情報処理手段5のハードウェアとで、入力処理手段31、色補正手段32、色数値検査手段33、および出力処理手段34が構成される。入力処理手段31は、前記色数値検査の対象となる外装材4と前記色既知体1とを一緒に撮影したデジタルデータのカラーの画像を、デジタル撮影手段2から記憶手段16の所定の記憶領域16aに記憶する手段である。色補正手段32および色数値検査手段33は、それぞれ図1と共に前述した色数値算出過程(S4)のうち、色補正を行う過程の部分と、その色補正後値で色数値を算出する過程の処理を行う手段である。出力処理手段34は、色数値算出過程(S4)や判断過程(S5)における処理結果を画面表示装置22の画面に表示させる手段である。   The color numerical value inspection program 19 and the hardware of the information processing means 5 constitute an input processing means 31, a color correction means 32, a color numerical value inspection means 33, and an output processing means 34. The input processing means 31 is a predetermined storage area of the storage means 16 from the digital photography means 2 for a color image of digital data obtained by photographing the exterior material 4 to be subjected to the color numerical inspection and the known color body 1 together. It is a means to memorize | store in 16a. The color correction means 32 and the color numerical value inspection means 33 are respectively a part of the color numerical value calculation process (S4) described above with reference to FIG. 1 and a process of calculating a color numerical value based on the value after color correction. It is a means for performing processing. The output processing means 34 is a means for displaying the processing results in the color value calculation process (S4) and the determination process (S5) on the screen of the screen display device 22.

1…補正ツール
2…デジタル撮影手段
3…評価窓
4…外装材
5…情報処理手段
6…撮影枠
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Correction tool 2 ... Digital imaging | photography means 3 ... Evaluation window 4 ... Exterior material 5 ... Information processing means 6 ... Shooting frame

Claims (5)

面材状に形成されて表面が、Lab表示におけるLが既知でそれぞれLが45〜55の部分とLが98〜105の部分との2つの部分に色分けされ、前記Lが45〜55の部分で囲まれる箇所に評価窓を有する補正ツールを準備する準備過程と、
検査対象となる外装材の検査箇所に前記評価窓が位置するように、かつ前記Lが45〜55の部分が周囲の環境の明るい側に位置するように前記外装材に前記補正ツールを重ねる重ね過程と、
この補正ツールを重ねた状態で前記評価窓内の前記外装材の表面と共に前記補正ツールの表面をデジタル撮影手段で撮影する撮影過程と、
この撮影されたデジタルデータの画像の色から、前記外装材の前記評価窓内の部分の色の数値を算出する色数値算出過程と、
を含む外装材の色数値検査方法。
The surface is formed into a face material, and the surface is color-coded into two parts, L in the Lab display, where L is 45 to 55 and L is 98 to 105, and L is 45 to 55. A preparation process for preparing a correction tool having an evaluation window in a place surrounded by
Overlaying the correction tool on the exterior material so that the evaluation window is located at the inspection location of the exterior material to be inspected and the portion where L is 45 to 55 is located on the bright side of the surrounding environment Process,
A photographing process of photographing the surface of the correction tool together with the surface of the exterior material in the evaluation window with a digital photographing means in a state where the correction tool is overlaid,
From the color of the image of the captured digital data, a color numerical value calculation process for calculating the numerical value of the color of the portion in the evaluation window of the exterior material,
Method for color numerical inspection of exterior materials including
請求項1に記載の外装材の色数値検査方法において、前記外装材が、建てられた状態の外壁であり、前記重ね過程および撮影過程では、前記補正ツールの前記Lが45〜55の部分を上側に位置させる外装材の色数値検査方法。   2. The color value inspection method for an exterior material according to claim 1, wherein the exterior material is an outer wall in a built state, and the L of the correction tool is set to 45 to 55 in the overlapping process and the imaging process. A method for inspecting the numerical values of the exterior material placed on the upper side. 請求項1または請求項2に記載の外装材の色数値検査方法において、前記色数値算出過程で算出された前記外装材の色の数値から前記外装材の劣化の判定を行う劣化判定過程を含む外装材の色数値検査方法。   3. The exterior color value inspection method according to claim 1, further comprising a deterioration determination step of determining deterioration of the exterior material from a numerical value of the color of the exterior material calculated in the color value calculation process. Color numerical inspection method for exterior materials. 請求項1ないし請求項3のいずれか1項に記載の外装材の色数値検査方法において、前記補正ツールは、、上部をLが50程度のグレー、下部をLが100程度の白とし、前記補正ツールの表面に撮影範囲を示す撮影枠を設け、この撮影枠内における、前記白の部分の割合を前記補正ツールの表面の全体に対する15〜25%とした外装材の色数値検査方法。   4. The color value inspection method for an exterior material according to claim 1, wherein the correction tool is configured such that the upper part is gray with L of about 50 and the lower part is white with L of about 100, A method for inspecting a color value of an exterior material in which a photographing frame indicating a photographing range is provided on a surface of a correction tool, and a ratio of the white portion in the photographing frame is 15 to 25% with respect to the entire surface of the correction tool. 外装材の色数値検査方法に用いられる補正ツールであって、面材状に形成されて表面が、Lab表示におけるLが既知でそれぞれLが45〜55の部分とLが98〜105の部分との2つの部分に色分けされ、前記Lが45〜55の部分で囲まれる箇所に評価窓を有することを特徴とする外装材の色数値検査用の補正ツール。   A correction tool used in a method for inspecting a color value of an exterior material, wherein the surface is formed in a face material shape, and the surface has a known L in Lab display, a portion of L of 45 to 55, and a portion of L of 98 to 105, respectively. A correction tool for color value inspection of an exterior material, characterized in that an evaluation window is provided at a location where the L is surrounded by the portions of 45 to 55.
JP2013177504A 2013-08-29 2013-08-29 Exterior color inspection method Active JP5893593B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013177504A JP5893593B2 (en) 2013-08-29 2013-08-29 Exterior color inspection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013177504A JP5893593B2 (en) 2013-08-29 2013-08-29 Exterior color inspection method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2015045593A true JP2015045593A (en) 2015-03-12
JP5893593B2 JP5893593B2 (en) 2016-03-23

Family

ID=52671202

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2013177504A Active JP5893593B2 (en) 2013-08-29 2013-08-29 Exterior color inspection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5893593B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2017201249A (en) * 2016-05-02 2017-11-09 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Change degree deriving device, change degree deriving system, change degree deriving method, known color body used for the same, and program
CN107340296A (en) * 2016-05-02 2017-11-10 富士施乐株式会社 Intensity of variation equipment leading out, intensity of variation guiding system and known color body
JP2017203675A (en) * 2016-05-11 2017-11-16 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Change degree derivation device, change degree derivation method, and program

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05223642A (en) * 1992-02-14 1993-08-31 Pola Chem Ind Inc Method and apparatus for colorimetry
JP2006170669A (en) * 2004-12-13 2006-06-29 Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co Ltd Quality inspection device of vegetables and fruits
US20080044082A1 (en) * 2004-07-06 2008-02-21 Susi Axana-Muller Method and System for Automatic Determination of Colors as Well as a Corresponding Computer Program and a Corresponding Computer-Readable Storage Medium
JP2011099709A (en) * 2009-11-04 2011-05-19 Toyota Home Kk Method and system for diagnosing deterioration in appearance of building

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05223642A (en) * 1992-02-14 1993-08-31 Pola Chem Ind Inc Method and apparatus for colorimetry
US20080044082A1 (en) * 2004-07-06 2008-02-21 Susi Axana-Muller Method and System for Automatic Determination of Colors as Well as a Corresponding Computer Program and a Corresponding Computer-Readable Storage Medium
JP2006170669A (en) * 2004-12-13 2006-06-29 Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co Ltd Quality inspection device of vegetables and fruits
JP2011099709A (en) * 2009-11-04 2011-05-19 Toyota Home Kk Method and system for diagnosing deterioration in appearance of building

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2017201249A (en) * 2016-05-02 2017-11-09 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Change degree deriving device, change degree deriving system, change degree deriving method, known color body used for the same, and program
CN107340296A (en) * 2016-05-02 2017-11-10 富士施乐株式会社 Intensity of variation equipment leading out, intensity of variation guiding system and known color body
CN107340296B (en) * 2016-05-02 2021-08-06 富士胶片商业创新有限公司 Degree of change derivation device, degree of change derivation system, and known color body
JP2017203675A (en) * 2016-05-11 2017-11-16 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Change degree derivation device, change degree derivation method, and program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5893593B2 (en) 2016-03-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6234044B2 (en) Exterior material deterioration judging method and judging device
JP6151077B2 (en) Deterioration judgment method for exterior materials
US8289372B2 (en) Method for displaying a thermal image in an IR camera and an IR camera
US10539502B2 (en) Moisture measurement device with thermal imaging capabilities and related methods
US10469807B2 (en) Color measurement and calibration
US9191583B2 (en) Method for displaying a thermal image in an IR camera, and an IR camera
TWI394431B (en) Evaluation method of stereoscopic image display panel and system of the same
US10578426B2 (en) Object measurement apparatus and object measurement method
EP1678485B2 (en) Method and ir-camera for determining the risk of condensation
CN104683793A (en) Detecting method for camera
JP5893593B2 (en) Exterior color inspection method
JP2019082451A (en) Reflection characteristic measuring apparatus, processing system, reflection characteristic measuring method and object processing method
JPWO2014013792A1 (en) Noise evaluation method, image processing apparatus, imaging apparatus, and program
JP2005140547A (en) 3-dimensional measuring method, 3-dimensional measuring device and computer program
US20160165200A1 (en) Measurements of cinematographic projection
CN104427322A (en) Information processing device, imaging device, information processing method, and program
JP6234045B2 (en) Exterior material deterioration judging method and judging device
JP2019168930A (en) Image processing device, image processing method and program
JP2009017158A (en) Camera inspection device
JP2005338359A (en) Imaging unit
CN110174351B (en) Color measuring device and method
JP2018163106A (en) Lens meter
JP2005315728A (en) Apparatus and method for measuring surface profile
JP2018013436A (en) Joint state evaluation method and joint state evaluation device
TW201933178A (en) Method for identifying pointer of analog meter and image capture apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20150722

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20150728

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20150928

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20160209

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20160224

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5893593

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250