JP2014199476A - Machine translation device, machine translation method and program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a machine translation device or the like configured to facilitate recognizing content of claim described in a foreign language.SOLUTION: A server 30 comprises: a morphological analysis unit 301 which morphologically analyzes an original sentence described in a claim; a component unit division unit 302 which detects a separation pattern used for separating a component of an invention from the claim, and divides the claim by component; a component name specifying unit 303 which extracts a component name on the basis of a result of morphological analysis from the component, to specify the component name; a description pattern sentence unit division unit 304 which divides the component by description pattern sentence when a description pattern sentence for describing the component appears in the component; a translation unit 305 which translates the original sentence of the claim; and an output unit 307 which outputs a translation result to a communication terminal 10.

Description

  The present invention relates to a translation device for performing machine translation of a sentence described in claims.

  In recent years, there have been increasing opportunities to conduct technical research by searching patent documents filed in various countries. For this reason, the expectation for machine translation has increased greatly. For example, a known translation apparatus can accurately translate by dividing a sentence to be translated (Patent Document 1).

JP 2004-110583 A

  As described above, although there exists a translation device that divides a sentence and translates it, there is no translation device that facilitates understanding of the contents of claims described in foreign patent documents, and such a translation device is desired. It was.

  The present invention has been made in the above-described situation, and provides a machine translation device, a machine translation method, and a program that can facilitate understanding of the contents of claims described in a foreign language.

  When a machine translation apparatus for solving the above-described problems receives a request for translation of a claim described in a first language from a communication terminal, the morpheme of the original text described in the first language in the claim Based on the result of the morpheme analysis and the morpheme analysis unit that performs analysis, a delimiter pattern used to delimit the constituent elements of the invention is detected from the claims, and the claim is determined for each of the constituent elements. In the component, a component unit dividing unit to be divided, a component name is extracted from the component based on the result of the morpheme analysis, a component name specifying unit that specifies the component name, and the component, When an explanation pattern sentence for explaining the constituent element appears, an explanation pattern sentence division unit that divides the constituent element for each explanation pattern sentence, and the specified constituent element name, A translation unit that translates the claim having the division into a second language, a storage unit that stores the translation of the claim, and an output unit that outputs the translation of the storage unit to the communication terminal. Including.

  When the machine translation method for solving the above-described problem receives a request for translation of a claim described in a first language from a communication terminal, the morpheme of the original text described in the first language in the claim Based on the result of the analysis and the result of the morphological analysis, a delimiter pattern used for delimiting the constituent elements of the invention is detected from the claims, and the claims are divided for each constituent element A step of extracting a constituent element name from the constituent elements based on the result of the morphological analysis, specifying the constituent element name, and an explanation pattern for explaining the constituent element in the constituent element If a sentence appears, the step of dividing the constituent element for each of the explanation pattern sentences; and the claim including the specified constituent element name and having the division To include a step of translating, and outputting the result of said translation in said communication terminal.

  A program for solving the above problem is for causing a computer to execute the machine translation method.

  ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the machine translation which promotes the understanding of the content of the claim described in the foreign language can be provided.

It is a figure which shows the example of a schematic structure of the translation system of embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the server of 1st Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the communication terminal of 1st Embodiment. It is a figure for demonstrating the outline of the translation process implement | achieved by the translation system of 1st Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the function structural example of a server. It is a figure for demonstrating the example of a division | segmentation pattern, the extraction example of a component element name, and the example of an explanatory pattern sentence. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the whole control processing in the translation system of 1st Embodiment. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an example of details of translation processing in the server of the first embodiment. It is a figure which shows the aspect of the description pattern sentence when a subject is added. It is a figure for demonstrating an example of the translation of the description pattern containing a subject in connection with the description pattern in case a subject is not included. It is a figure which shows the display mode of the translation at the time of being translated based on the original text data containing each tag. It is a figure for demonstrating the process which made the subject consolidate. It is a figure which shows the display mode of a translation. FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining an example of a delimiter pattern, an example of extraction of component element names, and an example of an explanation pattern sentence in Modification Example 2; It is a figure for demonstrating the outline of the division | segmentation of the component implement | achieved with the translation system of the example 2 of a change. It is a figure for demonstrating the outline of the provision of the tag implement | achieved with the translation system of the example 2 of a change, and the division | segmentation of an explanatory pattern sentence. It is a figure which shows the display mode of a translation in the translation system of the example 2 of a change. It is a figure which shows the example of a list display of the display part of a communication terminal in the translation system of the example 4 of a change.

<First Embodiment>
Hereinafter, the translation system according to the first embodiment of the present invention will be described. This translation system translates English (first language) described in claims into Japanese (second language) in response to a request from the communication terminal 10.

  A configuration example of the translation system 1 of the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a translation system 1 according to an embodiment.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the translation system 1 includes a communication terminal 10, a server (machine translation device) 30 that can be connected to the communication terminal 10 via a communication network 20 such as the Internet, and an external system 40. It consists of

  In the translation system 1, HTTP (HyerText Transfer Protocol) communication is performed between the communication terminal 10 and the server 30.

  The external system 40 is a server system group that is provided on a network transmission line and capable of API communication with the server 30 on the network. The server system group of the external system 40 includes, for example, an analysis system that provides a morphological analysis service and a machine translation system that provides a machine translation service.

  The external system 40 may be provided for each different language (English, Chinese, etc.).

[Configuration of communication terminal 10]
Next, a configuration example of the communication terminal 10 shown in FIG. 1 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the communication terminal 20.

  As shown in FIG. 2, a communication terminal 10 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 11, a ROM (Read Only Memory) 12, a RAM (Random Access Memory) 13, an input unit 14, a display unit 15, and a communication. And an interface 16. In this embodiment, the communication terminal 10 is a laptop computer as an example, but may be a portable terminal, a PDA (Personal Digital Assist), a personal computer, or the like.

  The CPU 11 performs various programs for executing the operation of the entire communication terminal 10, arithmetic processing, timing processing, and the like.

  The ROM 12 stores a program such as a web browser. The RAM 13 temporarily stores programs and various data.

  The input unit 14 is an input device for accepting an operation input performed by a user. The input unit 14 includes operation buttons, a touch panel, an input pen, a sensor, and the like. The display unit 15 may be a flat panel display such as a liquid crystal display or EL (Electro-Luminescence).

  The communication interface 16 has an interface function that complies with, for example, HTTP communication.

[Configuration of Server 30]
Next, a configuration example of the server 30 illustrated in FIG. 1 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the server 30.

  As shown in FIG. 3, the server 30 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 31, a ROM (Read Only Memory) 32, a RAM (Random Access Memory) 33, a communication interface 34, and an external access unit 35. .

  The CPU 31 is connected to each component via a bus and transfers control signals and data, and executes a program for executing the operation of the entire server 30, arithmetic processing, and the like.

  The ROM 32 stores a program, and the server 30 according to the present embodiment is realized by executing the program. The RAM 33 temporarily stores the program and various data. Note that the above-described program may be stored in a storage medium such as a CD-ROM.

  The communication interface 16 has a network interface function and performs communication with the communication terminal 10.

  The external access unit 35 is an interface through which the CPU 31 accesses the external system 40 and communicates with the external system 40 based on an operating environment such as an API (Application Programming Interface). In this embodiment, the external system 40 includes an external analysis system for providing an English morphological analysis service and an external translation system for providing a machine translation service from English to Japanese. A processing result in the system is transmitted to the CPU 31 via the external access unit 35. In the translation system 1 of this embodiment, the server 30 is configured to call each service of the external system 40 using an API. For example, the server 30 is a single unit that has the service function of the external system 40. You may comprise as one server apparatus.

[Outline of translation processing]
Next, an outline of translation processing realized by the translation system 1 will be described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 4. FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining an example of a change mode of the original text at the time of translation processing, where (a) is a text description in a claim, (b) is a claim divided for each component, (C) shows a claim in which a tag is added to the component name, and (d) shows a claim divided for each explanation pattern sentence. FIG. 4A exemplarily shows claim 1 of US Published Patent No. 20050123138.

  In response to a request from the communication terminal 10, the server 30 translates, for example, a claim written in English beginning with “A communication apparatus” as shown in FIG.

  Based on the result of the morphological analysis of the claim, the server 30 detects a delimiter pattern used for delimiting the constituent elements of the invention from the claims, and divides the claims into units of constituent elements.

  In this embodiment, a <HAVE> tag and a <DIV> tag are used as shown in FIG. In the example of FIG. 4, the <HAVE> tag is used as a tag for separating the “invention name” from the “invention component set”. “Invention component set” means a part composed of a plurality of components of the invention. For example, in the case of English claims in the United States, the notation “comprising:” is generally written between the “invention name” and the “invention component set”, so the <HAVE> tag is assigned to this notation. Is done.

  The <DIV> tag is used as a tag that separates the constituent elements of each invention. For example, in the case of an English claim in the United States, in general, notations such as “; and” and “.” Are described in the positions (start and end) of individual invention components. > A tag is given.

  For example, in FIG. 4B, the server 30 includes a pattern C1 in which “:” (colon) appears after “comprising”, a pattern C2 in which “and” appears after “;” (semicolon), and “. All the patterns C3 in which “(period) appear are recognized as delimiter patterns, and the claims are divided into the components CA1 to CA3. For example, in the example of FIG. 4B, a tag <HAVE> is given before “comprising”, and a tag </ HAVE> is given after “:” (colon). Furthermore, the tag <DIV> is added before ";" (semicolon) and "." (Period), and the tag </ DIV> is added after "and" and "." (Period) Thus, the components CA1 to CA3 are divided.

  In the description of each embodiment, the name (named “A communication apparatus” in the example of FIG. 4) described in the preamble portion of the claim is referred to as a component name of the invention.

  Next, for example, as illustrated in FIG. 4C, the server 30 extracts the component element names of the component elements CA <b> 1 to CA <b> 3 and specifies the component element names. In this embodiment, as an example of specifying each component name, a case where tags 61, 62, and 63 are assigned to the positions of the component names is shown.

  In this example, in order to specify a component name, a <NAME> tag and an <ITEM> tag are used as shown in FIG. In the example of FIG. 4, the <NAME> tag is used as a tag for specifying “name of invention”. For example, in the case of an English claim in the United States, “name of invention” is generally described as a noun or a noun phrase at the beginning of an English claim, so a <NAME> tag is given to this notation.

  The <ITEM> tag is used as a tag for specifying the name (component name) of the component of the second and subsequent inventions. For example, in the case of an English claim in the United States, a component name generally consists of a noun or noun phrase that appears at the beginning of the corresponding component, so the <ITEM> tag is assigned to these nouns or noun phrases .

  In the example of FIG. 4C, tags 61 such as <NAME> and </ NAME> are added between the component names “A communication apparatus”, for example. Further, tags 62 and 63 such as <ITEM> and </ ITEM> are assigned between the constituent element names “a propagation environment determining section” and “a first data acquiring section”, for example.

  Then, as shown in FIG. 4D, the server 30 divides the constituent elements CA1 to CA3 into units of explanation pattern sentences appearing inside the constituent elements CA1 to CA3. In the example of FIG. 4 (d), the server 30 respectively describes a sentence starting from a relative pronoun “that”, a sentence starting from the present participle “using”, and a sentence starting from the past participle “obtained”. And the components CA2 and CA3 are divided into units of explanation pattern sentences. For example, in the example of FIG. 4D, the tags 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 <ACTION> and </ ACTION> are added, so that the constituent elements CA2, CA3 are in units of explanation pattern sentences. Will be divided.

  As described above, the server 30 of the present embodiment divides the original text in the claim according to the reference relationship between the constituent elements in the claim (relationship between the constituent element name, the constituent element, and the explanation pattern sentence). This is equivalent to easy translation whenever an English claim is translated into Japanese, thereby facilitating understanding of the content of a claim written in a foreign language.

[Functional configuration of server 30]
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of the server 30 realized on the hardware configuration illustrated in FIG. 3. As shown in FIG. 5, the server 30 includes a morphological analysis unit 301, a component element unit dividing unit 302, a component name specifying unit 303, an explanation pattern sentence unit dividing unit 304, a translation unit 305, a storage unit 306, and an output unit 307. And a sentence structure changing unit 308.

  The storage unit 306 includes the ROM 32 and the RAM 33 shown in FIG. 3, and stores the original text data (claims) to be translated and a translation as data associated with the original text data.

  Components other than the storage unit 307 illustrated in FIG. 5 are appropriately referred to in the following description of the operation of the server 30.

[Operation of translation system 1]
Hereinafter, the operation of the translation system 1 for realizing this translation process will be described.

  First, various data processed in the server 30 in order to realize this translation processing will be described with reference to FIG. 1, FIG. 5, and FIG. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of (a) a delimiter pattern, (b) an example of component name extraction, and (c) an example of an explanatory pattern sentence.

  The data shown in FIG. 6A is managed by the component unit division unit 302 shown in FIG. 5, and the management data shown in FIG. 6B is managed by the component name specifying unit 303 shown in FIG. The management data shown in FIG. 6C is managed by the explanation pattern sentence unit dividing unit 304 shown in FIG.

  The server 30 detects a delimiter pattern that appears in a complaint based on the management data shown in FIG. For example, if a <clam-Text> tag, “:” (colon), “;” (semicolon), or “comprising” appears in a claim, it is recognized as a component boundary.

  As shown in FIG. 6B, the server 30 extracts and specifies the noun (noun phrase) located at the head of the constituent element as the constituent element name in the constituent element.

  As shown in FIG. 6C, the server 30 extracts the explanation pattern sentence with reference to the management data. When a sentence that begins with any of the related pronouns, the present participle / past participle of an adjective usage, and ends with a noun (noun phrase), it means that the sentence is an explanatory pattern sentence.

  Next, the entire process executed to realize this translation process will be described with reference to FIGS. 1 and 3 to 7. FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the entire control process of the translation system 1.

  In FIG. 7, when the communication terminal 10 makes a translation request (including an English claim to be translated) to the server 30 via the communication network 20 (step S101), the CPU 31 of the server 30 makes a translation request. The morphological analysis is performed on the text sentence of the corresponding English claim (see FIG. 4A) (step S102). According to the flowchart of FIG. 7, the CPU 31 of the server 30 calls the analysis system of the external system 40 via the external access unit 35 and obtains the result of the morphological analysis of the text sentence of the corresponding English claim. In other words, the CPU 31 divides the English claim into a row of morphemes (the smallest unit having meaning in the language), and determines the part of speech of each morpheme.

  Here, the CPU 31 in step S <b> 102 functions as the morphological analysis unit 301 in cooperation with the external access unit 35.

  Next, based on the result of the morpheme analyzed in step S101, the CPU 31 of the server 30 detects a delimiter pattern used to delimit the constituent elements of the invention from the English claims to be translated, and The text text of the claim is divided every time (step S103). In the example of FIG. 4B, when “comprising”, “:” (colon), “;” (semi-colon), and “.” (Period) appear, the CPU 31 sets the patterns as delimiter patterns C1 to C3. By detecting and assigning tags 51 to 53 corresponding to the delimiter patterns C1 to C3, the text sentence is divided into units of the constituent elements CA1 to CA3. This step S103 is detected based on an example of a delimiter pattern (FIG. 6A).

  Here, the CPU 31 in step S <b> 103 functions as the component unit division unit 302.

  Next, the CPU 31 of the server 30 extracts the component name from the components divided in step S103 based on the result of the morphological analysis in step S101, and specifies the component name (step S104). In the example of FIG. 4C, the CPU 31 extracts the noun phrases “A communication apparatus”, “a propagation environment monitoring section”, and “a first data acquiring section” as the component names of the components CA1 to CA3, Tags 61 to 63 for specifying each component name are assigned to each component name position. This step S104 is determined based on an example of extraction of component element names (FIG. 6B).

  In step S <b> 104, the CPU 31 functions as the component name specifying unit 303.

  Next, when an explanation pattern sentence for explaining the constituent element appears in the constituent elements divided in step S103, the CPU 31 of the server 30 divides the constituent element for each explanation pattern sentence (step S105). ). In the example of FIG. 4D, the CPU 31 detects when a sentence starting from the relative pronoun “that”, a sentence starting from the present participle “using”, and a sentence starting from the past participle “obtained” appear. Are determined as explanation pattern sentences, and tags 71 to 76 corresponding to these explanation pattern sentences are assigned, thereby dividing the constituent elements CA2 and CA3 into units of explanation pattern sentences. This step S105 is determined based on an example of the explanation pattern sentence (FIG. 6C).

  In step S <b> 105, the CPU 31 functions as the explanation pattern sentence unit division unit 304.

  Next, the CPU 31 of the server 30 performs the English complaint translation processing set based on the processing results of steps S102 to S105 (step S106). According to the flowchart of FIG. 7, the CPU 31 of the server 30 calls an external translation system, which is the external system 40, via the external access unit 35, and translates a translation sentence (for example, a translation processing result of an English claim to be translated) Japanese). Then, the CPU 31 stores the translated sentence in the ROM 32.

  In step S <b> 106, the CPU 31 functions as the translation unit 305 in cooperation with the external access unit 35. The process in step S106 is shown in a detailed flowchart in FIG.

  Next, the CPU 31 of the server 30 outputs a translated sentence (for example, Japanese) as a result of the translation processing in step S106 to the communication terminal 10 via the communication network 20 (step S107).

  In step S <b> 107, the CPU 31 functions as the output unit 307 in cooperation with the communication interface 34.

  In FIG. 7, the communication terminal 10 receives the translated text output from the server 30 via the communication network 20 and displays it on the display unit 15 (step S108). This display example is shown in FIG.

[Translation processing of server 30]
Hereinafter, the translation process executed by the server 30 will be described.

  First, a description will be given with reference to FIGS. 1, 5, and 7 to 9 regarding a change in syntax processed in the server 30 in order to realize this translation processing. FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating an example of translation processing. FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing (a) an English sentence, (b) a translated sentence, (c) a syntax conversion example of an explanation pattern sentence, and (d) to (i) a procedure for determining a noun phrase.

  In FIG. 8, the CPU 31 of the server 30 calls an external translation system, which is the external system 40, and translates the component name (step S1061). As shown in FIG. 9A, in the English claim 50, the component name t10 “a propagation environment monitoring section” is described, and the component related to the component name t10 is “that estimates a It includes three explanatory pattern sentences: “propagation environment”, “using a signal”, and “transmitted from a community party”.

  In this case, the CPU 31 obtains a Japanese translation td50 “propagation environment is an estimation unit” as a translation result of the component name t10 (see FIG. 9B).

  In step S <b> 1061, the CPU 31 functions as the translation unit 305 in cooperation with the external access unit 35.

  Next, the CPU 31 changes the sentence structure so that the explanation pattern sentence becomes a sentence including the subject and the predicate verb (step S1062). In this embodiment, the subject of the explanation pattern sentence consists of a noun or noun phrase that the explanation pattern sentence modifies.

  As an example of changing the sentence structure of the explanation pattern sentence, in the example of FIG. 9C, the CPU 31 omits the relative pronoun “that” in the explanation pattern sentence, and further uses “using” in the explanation pattern sentence. The present participle form is converted to the original "use". Further, the CPU 31 adds the be verb “is” before the past participle form “transmitted” in the explanation pattern sentence.

  Then, the CPU 31 refers to the noun (noun phrase) immediately before the explanation pattern sentence, and adds the noun (noun phrase) as the subject of the explanation pattern sentence. In the example of FIG. 9D, the words “section”, “a propagation environment”, and “a signal” are added as the subject of the corresponding description pattern sentence. This step S1062 is changed based on a preset conversion pattern.

  In step S1062, the CPU 31 functions as the sentence structure changing unit 308.

  Next, the CPU 31 calls an external translation system, which is the external system 40, and translates the explanation pattern sentence (step S1063). As a result of the translation, for example, a Japanese translation as shown in FIG.

  Here, the CPU 31 functions as the translation unit 305 in cooperation with the external access unit 35.

  Next, the CPU 31 determines whether or not the subject of the translated explanatory pattern sentence in step S1064 appears in the immediately preceding component or the translated translation of the explanatory pattern sentence (step S1064). As a result of the determination, for example, as shown in FIG. 9E, if the subject consisting of the noun “section” and the “estimating part” consisting of the immediately preceding noun phrase do not match (No in step S1064) ), Proceeding to step S1062, the CPU 31, for example, as shown in FIG. 9 (f), a change process (step S1062) for further adding the word “estimating”, a translation process (step S1063), and a comparison process ( Step S1064: See FIG. 9G). The CPU 31 repeats the processes of steps S1062 to S1064 until the subject of the explanation pattern sentence matches the immediately preceding noun (noun phrase) (step S1064). In this way, the subject in the explanation pattern sentence is “section” / (section) (FIG. 9C) → “estimating section” / (estimating section) ((FIG. 9F) →→ environment In other words, the CPU 31 changes the original sentence in which the noun phrase is described and the subject included in the explanation pattern sentence. The subject included in the noun phrase is complemented to determine the subject in the explanation pattern sentence so that the candidate translation matches.

  In step S <b> 1064, the CPU 31 functions as the sentence structure changing unit 308.

  A display example of the translation result that has been translated in this way will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining a display example of the translation result on the display unit 15 of the communication terminal 10, and (a) is an example of changing the sentence structure of an English claim (the processing results of steps S1061 to S1064 in FIG. 8). (B) shows an example of a translation when the sentence structure is changed, and (c) shows an example of a translation when the sentence structure is not changed.

  According to the translation example of FIG. 10B, the Japanese translation is displayed in units of the constituent elements CA1 to CA3, and the contents of the constituent elements CA1 to CA3 are easy to understand. On the other hand, the translation example of FIG. 10C is not an appropriate expression and is difficult to understand.

  As a display example of the translation result in FIG. 10B, the translation results are displayed in a hierarchy in units of the components CA1 to CA3. This is because the CPU 31 of the server 30 attaches a tag in the translated text output process (step S107 in FIG. 7) so that the interrelationship between the component name, the component, and the explanation pattern sentence can be visually recognized. It is because it outputs. The basic setting mode of the tag at this time is shown in FIG.

  FIG. 11 is a diagram showing an example of tag setting, where (a) shows an example of tag setting, (b) shows an example of display according to the tag, and the configuration of the tag of FIG. This is the same as that shown in FIG.

  In FIG. 11, (1) the <HAVE> tag is associated with the <NAME> tag, (2) the <ITEM> tag is associated with the <HAVE> tag, and (3) the first of the consecutive <ACTION> tags Is associated with the immediately preceding <ITEM> tag, (4) the <ACTION> tag following the <ACTION> tag is associated with the immediately preceding <ACTION> tag, and (5) the associated tag is Displayed with one line indented and connected with a line between tags.

  Therefore, in the communication terminal 10, the reference relationship in the claim (correlation between the component element name, the component element, and the explanation pattern sentence) can be visually recognized on the display unit 15 when displaying the translated sentence according to the tag. Displayed in form. In addition, as a method of displaying a component name, a component, and / or an explanation pattern sentence, for example, the character string corresponding to each may be displayed in different colors, or the thickness of the character string may be changed. You may make it display.

  As described above, according to the server 30 of the present embodiment, the machine translation is performed by classifying the claims to be translated into components, component names, and explanation pattern sentences. Here, since the description, expression peculiar to the claim (claim) and the foreign language is often used for the component, the component name, and the explanation pattern sentence, the component, The component name and the explanation pattern sentence are divided. This facilitates understanding of the content of claims written in a foreign language.

  Next, a modified example of the present embodiment will be described.

(Modification 1)
In the above description, the aspect in which the subject is duplicated in the explanation pattern sentence is not mentioned, but the component names that repeatedly appear may be integrated into one (component name that appears first).

  12A and 12B are explanatory diagrams showing such an aggregation example, where FIG. 12A is a text sentence, FIG. 12B is a division example of components and explanation pattern sentences in the text sentence, and FIG. 12C is a subject in the explanation pattern sentence. An example of aggregation is shown.

  In the example of FIG. 12B, since there are two component names “a plurality of antennas” (multiple antennas), the second “a plurality of antennas” is deleted, and the first “a plurality of antennas” is deleted. antennas ". In this case, in step S1062 of FIG. 8, the CPU 31 (sentence structure changing unit 308) of the server 30 repeatedly displays the component name (“a plurality of antennas” in the example of FIG. 12) within the same component. If so, the sentence structure is changed by consolidating the repeated component names. By doing so, the expression in the constituent element related to the constituent element name is simplified and mistranslation is reduced.

  FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a display example of the translation result display unit 15 implemented based on such change processing. In the example of FIG. 13, a plurality of constituent elements related to the constituent element name “plurality of antennas” are integrated into one, and the relationship in the constituent elements is easily understood.

(Modification 2)
In the above, the case where translation from English to Japanese was performed was explained. Apart from this, it may be applied to translation from Chinese to Japanese.

  FIG. 14 is an example similar to FIG. 6, and (a) an example of a delimiter pattern, (b) an example of extraction of component names, and (c) an example of an explanation pattern sentence so as to correspond to Chinese. An example to make it.

  The delimiter pattern in FIG. 14A includes a symbol such as “;” (semi-colon) and a feature expression such as “inclusive”. An example of extracting the component element names in FIG. 14B is the same as that in FIG. That is, a noun (noun phrase) positioned at the head of the component is extracted as the component name of the component. As an example of the explanation pattern sentence in FIG. 14C, a sentence that starts with “description” immediately after “:” (colon) and ends with a noun (noun phrase), and a sentence that starts with “follow” and ends with a noun (noun phrase). is there.

  If processing is performed in accordance with the example shown in FIG. 14, the server 30 attaches tags as shown in FIG. 15 and FIG. FIGS. 15A and 15B are explanatory forms corresponding to FIGS. 4A and 4B, respectively. FIGS. 16A and 16B are explanatory modes corresponding to FIGS. 4C and 4D, respectively.

  In the example of FIG. 15A, the server 30 detects “inclusion”, “;” (semicolon), “follow” and “.” (Period), and a Chinese claim is made in the unit of the components CA1 to CA3. It is divided. At this time, the server 30 first assigns a corresponding tag as in step S103 of FIG. 7 (FIG. 15B).

  Then, the server 30 extracts the component element names and assigns the tags 61, 62, and 63, similarly to step S104 in FIG. 7 (FIG. 16A). Furthermore, similarly to step S105 in FIG. 7, the server 30 assigns tags 71 to 75 and divides the constituent elements for each explanation pattern sentence (FIG. 16B).

  Thus, when the server 30 performs processing in the same manner as steps S106 and S107 in FIG. 7, the communication terminal 10 displays a translated sentence as shown in FIG. 17A, for example, in step S108 in FIG.

  FIG. 17B shows a display example of a translation translated by the server 30 without performing steps S102 to S107 of FIG. This display makes it difficult to understand the content of the claim.

(Modification 3)
The tag exemplified in the first embodiment and the modification described in the first embodiment may be information for indicating a component, a component name, and an explanation pattern sentence, and is known to those skilled in the art. This information can also be applied.

(Modification 4)
The case where the claims are translated corresponding to each language has been described above. However, in a specific technical field (for example, a machine), depending on the content of the invention, it may be easier to understand the invention by checking the drawings, or a specific technical field (for example, information technology). Then, there are cases where it is desired to confirm the contents of claims of similar inventions from a plurality of published patent documents. Therefore, it is preferable that a list including the translation of claim 1 and a representative diagram can be displayed for each related patent document.

  FIG. 18 shows a display example of the display unit 15 of the communication terminal 10 including such a list. In the example of FIG. 18, for each search result, a translation of claim 1 (similar to the display example of FIG. 13) and a representative diagram are displayed as a list.

  In this case, the CPU 31 of the server 30 responds to a request from the communication terminal 10 (for example, the number of the European Patent Publication described at the top of FIG. 18), and obtains a patent document corresponding to the request, for example, an external database server. The same step process as the flowchart of FIG. 7 and FIG. 8 is implemented for this patent document. Further, the CPU 31 acquires other patent publications (for example, those in the second and third stages in FIG. 18) related to the target patent document from, for example, the above external database server, and FIG. Step processing similar to the flowchart of FIG. 8 is performed. Retrieval of other related patent publications is performed based on terms in claim 1, related terms registered in advance, and the like.

  Further, the CPU 31 acquires a representative diagram of the target patent document from, for example, the external database server, associates it with the translation of each patent document, and outputs it to the communication terminal 10.

  Such a list display plays a role of visually promoting further understanding of the contents of the related invention.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Communication terminal 30 Server 301 Morphological analysis part 302 Constituent element division | segmentation part 303 Constituent element name specific | specification part 304 Explanation pattern sentence unit division part 305 Translation part 306 Storage part 307 Output part 308 Sentence structure change part

Claims (7)

A machine translation device communicably connected to a communication terminal,
A morpheme analyzer that performs a morphological analysis of the original text described in the first language in the claim when receiving a translation request for the claim described in the first language from the communication terminal;
Based on the result of the morphological analysis, a delimiter pattern used to delimit the constituent elements of the invention is detected from the claims, and a component unit dividing unit that divides the claim for each component element ,
A component name is extracted from the component based on the result of the morphological analysis, and the component name specifying unit for specifying the component name;
When an explanation pattern sentence for explaining the constituent element appears in the constituent element, an explanation pattern sentence unit dividing unit that divides the constituent element for each explanation pattern sentence;
A translation unit including the identified component name and translating the claim having the division into a second language;
A storage unit for storing the translation of the claim;
An output unit that outputs the translated sentence in the storage unit to the communication terminal.   According to the sentence structure of the explanation pattern sentence, further includes a sentence structure changing unit that changes the sentence structure of the explanation pattern sentence so as to include a subject consisting of a noun or a noun phrase modified by the explanation pattern sentence and a predicate verb. The machine translation apparatus according to claim 1.   When the subject is a noun phrase consisting of two or more words, the sentence structure changing unit matches the translated sentence of the original sentence in which the noun phrase is described with the translated candidate sentence included in the explanation pattern sentence The machine translation apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the subject is determined by complementing a word included in the noun phrase.   4. The sentence structure changing unit, when the component name repeatedly appears in the same component, aggregates the repeated component names to change the sentence structure. The machine translation device according to any one of the above.   The output unit is configured to output in such a manner that a mutual relationship between the divided component element, the identified component element name, and the divided explanation pattern sentence is displayed in the communication terminal in a visible form. The machine translation device according to any one of claims 1 to 4. A machine translation method executed by a computer,
When receiving a request for translation of a claim written in the first language from the communication terminal, performing a morphological analysis of the original text described in the first language in the claim;
Detecting a delimiter pattern used to delimit components of the invention from the claims based on the result of the morphological analysis, and dividing the claim for each component;
Extracting a component name from the component based on the result of the morphological analysis, and specifying the component name;
When an explanation pattern sentence for explaining the constituent element appears in the constituent element, dividing the constituent element for each explanation pattern sentence;
Translating the claim comprising the identified component name and having the partition into a second language;
Outputting the result of the translation to the communication terminal. A machine translation method comprising:   A program for causing a computer to execute the machine translation method according to claim 6.

Images