JP2014075723A - Roadside antenna - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a roadside antenna which has necessary performance although using a patch antenna including one antenna element.SOLUTION: A roadside antenna includes a conductor ground plate 1, a patch antenna 2 which is arranged on the conductor ground plate 1 and includes one antenna element 5, and a plurality of conductor rods 3 which are stood on the conductor ground plate 1. The plurality of conductor rods 3 are stood on the conductor ground plate 1 nearby edges thereof at equal intervals including four corners of the conductor ground plate 1 to surround the patch antenna 2 so that equal number of conductor rods are at respective sides, and electrically connected to the conductor ground plate 1 respectively, 3/4×λa≤L≤λa and λa/3×95.5%≤g≤λa/3×99.0% being satisfied, where λa is a wavelength in a vacuum at an object frequency, L is a length of each conductor rod 3, and g is a mutual interval between conductor rods 3.

Description

  The present invention relates to a roadside antenna using a patch antenna.

  With the spread of electronic toll collection system (ETC), DSRC (Dedicated Short Range Communications) is expected as a technology that can be used in various scenes. In recent years, DSRC roadside machines are being considered not only for toll gates on highways, but also for drive-through and parking, as well as for further development in the future.

Japanese Patent No. 4053486 (proposed by the present applicant)

  In order to further promote the spread of DSRC, a DSRC roadside antenna with low cost and excellent installation performance is required. For this purpose, it is necessary to reduce the size, particularly the xy plane size that determines the installation area. On the other hand, the current DSRC roadside antenna generally uses a directional antenna to form a radio wave area, and is generally a 2 × 2 or 3 × 3 patch array antenna. In the patch array antenna, the xy plane size is almost determined by the number of antenna elements. That is, reducing the number of antenna elements leads to miniaturization. However, if the number of antenna elements is reduced, it is difficult to obtain desired characteristics.

  The present invention has been made in view of such a situation, and an object of the present invention is to provide a roadside antenna having a required performance while using a patch antenna having one antenna element.

One embodiment of the present invention is a roadside antenna. This roadside antenna
A conductor ground plane;
A patch antenna having one antenna element provided on the conductor ground plane;
A plurality of conductor rods erected on the conductor ground plate,
The plurality of conductor rods are erected at equal intervals so as to surround the patch antenna, and are electrically connected to the conductor ground plane,
When the wavelength in vacuum at the target frequency is λa, the length of each conductor rod is L, and the mutual distance between the conductor rods is g,
3/4 × λa ≦ L ≦ λa, and λa / 3 × 95.5% ≦ g ≦ λa / 3 × 99.0%
It is characterized by being.

When the wavelength in vacuum at the axial ratio center frequency that is the optimal axial ratio of the patch antenna alone is λop,
λop ≒ g × 3
It may be.

Another aspect of the present invention is a roadside antenna. This roadside antenna
A conductor ground plane;
A patch antenna having one antenna element provided on the conductor ground plane;
A plurality of conductor rods erected on the conductor ground plate,
The plurality of conductor rods are erected at equal intervals so as to surround the patch antenna, and are electrically connected to the conductor ground plane,
When the wavelength in vacuum at 5.8 GHz is λa, the length of each conductor rod is L, and the distance between the conductor rods is g,
3/4 × λa ≦ L ≦ λa and 16.45 mm ≦ g ≦ 17.05 mm
It is characterized by being.

  The axial ratio center frequency that is the optimum axial ratio of the patch antenna alone may be in the range of 6.0 GHz to 6.1 GHz.

  The plurality of conductor rods may be erected so as to include the four corners of the conductor ground plane in the vicinity of the edge on the conductor ground plane and to have the same number on each side.

  A plurality of parasitic conductor elements having a smaller area than the antenna element of the patch antenna may be disposed on the front end side of the plurality of conductor rods.

  The patch antenna substrate may be a fluororesin substrate.

  It should be noted that any combination of the above-described constituent elements, and those obtained by converting the expression of the present invention between methods and systems are also effective as aspects of the present invention.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a roadside antenna having a required performance while using a patch antenna having one antenna element.

The perspective view of the roadside antenna which concerns on Embodiment 1 of this invention. The front view. FIG. The enlarged view of the patch antenna 2 shown in FIGS. FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a state in which three substrates of a DSRC circuit (RF unit) 8, a DSRC circuit (control unit) 9, and a DSRC circuit (interface unit) 10 are sequentially arranged on the back surface side of the roadside antenna shown in FIGS. In the configuration of FIG. 5 and a target frequency of 5.8 GHz (λa = 51.69 mm), the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 6.0 GHz (λop = 49.97 mm), and the thickness of the antenna element 5 is 3. Metal rod with 2 mm, substrate 4 as fluororesin substrate, patch antenna 2 perturbation amount of 6.9%, and conductor ground plane 1 size as 55 mm × 55 mm, with mutual gap g between metal rods 3 as parameters FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram of half width at xz direction with respect to length L of 3; The yz direction half value width characteristic view. The boresight axial ratio characteristic diagram. In FIG. 5, the directivity pattern figure seen from the -yxz direction when the length L of the metal rod 3 is 3/4 × λa and the distance between the metal rods 3 is g = 1/3 × λb. The directivity pattern figure seen from the xyz direction in the same case. The perspective view of the roadside antenna which concerns on Embodiment 2 of this invention. The front view. FIG. The xz direction directivity pattern figure in Embodiment 2. FIG. The yz direction directivity pattern figure. The schematic diagram of the roadside antenna used for the simulation model. At the target frequency of 5.8 GHz (λa = 51.69 mm), the optimal axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 5.8 GHz, and the perturbation amount of the patch antenna 2 is 6.9%. The xz direction half value width characteristic view with respect to the length L of the metal rod 3 using the mutual interval g as a parameter. The yz direction half value width characteristic view. The boresight axial ratio characteristic diagram. At the target frequency of 5.8 GHz (λa = 51.69 mm), the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 5.8 GHz, the perturbation amount of the patch antenna 2 is 6.9%, and the length L of the metal rod 3 is 3 FIG. 4 is a half-value width characteristic diagram in the xz and yz directions when / 4 × λa and the distance g between the metal rods 3 is changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm. The xz and yz direction side lobe characteristic figure in the same case. At the target frequency of 5.8 GHz (λa = 51.69 mm), the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 5.8 GHz, the length L of the metal rod 3 is 3/4 × λa, and the metal rods 3 are mutually connected. The bore sight axial ratio characteristic figure which used the perturbation amount of the patch antenna 2 as a parameter when the interval g was changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm. Patch antenna 2 perturbation when the optimal axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 5.8 GHz, the mutual gap g between the metal rods 3 is 17.25 mm, and the frequency is changed from 5.5 GHz to 6.1 GHz. Bore sight axial ratio characteristic diagram with quantity as parameter. At a target frequency of 5.8 GHz (λa = 51.69 mm), the perturbation amount of the patch antenna 2 is 6.9%, and the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 is changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm. The boresight axial ratio characteristic diagram using the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone as a parameter. Optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 6.05 GHz, and the mutual spacing g between the metal rods 3 is 16.45 mm, 16.65 mm, 16.85 mm, 17.05 mm. The axial ratio versus frequency characteristic diagram when the amount of perturbation of the patch antenna 2 is adjusted so that When the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 6.05 GHz and the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 is changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz, the patch antenna 2 The xz direction half value width characteristic figure which made perturbation amount the parameter. The yz direction half value width characteristic view. The xz direction side lobe characteristic view. The yz direction side lobe characteristic view. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the relationship between the amount of perturbation and the axial ratio of the patch antenna 2 alone when the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 6.05 GHz. Optimal axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 6.0 GHz, and the mutual axial distance g between the metal rods 3 is 16.45 mm, 16.65 mm, 16.85 mm, 17.05 mm. The axial ratio versus frequency characteristic diagram when the amount of perturbation of the patch antenna 2 is adjusted so that When the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 6.0 GHz at the target frequency 5.8 GHz, and the mutual interval g between the metal bars 3 is changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm, the patch antenna 2 The xz direction half value width characteristic figure which made perturbation amount the parameter. The yz direction half value width characteristic view. The xz direction side lobe characteristic view. The yz direction side lobe characteristic view. Optimal axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is set to 6.1 GHz, and the mutual axial distance g between the metal bars 3 is 16.45 mm, 16.65 mm, 16.85 mm, and 17.05 mm. The axial ratio versus frequency characteristic diagram when the amount of perturbation of the patch antenna 2 is adjusted so that When the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is set to 6.1 GHz at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz, and the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 is changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm, the patch antenna 2 The xz direction half value width characteristic figure which made perturbation amount the parameter. The yz direction half value width characteristic view. The xz direction side lobe characteristic view. The yz direction side lobe characteristic view.

  Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. In addition, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected to the same or equivalent component, member, etc. which are shown by each drawing, and the overlapping description is abbreviate | omitted suitably. In addition, the embodiments do not limit the invention but are exemplifications, and all features and combinations thereof described in the embodiments are not necessarily essential to the invention.

  FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a roadside antenna according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a front view of the same. FIG. 3 is a plan view of the same. In these figures, XYZ directions which are three orthogonal directions are defined. The roadside antenna includes a conductor ground plane 1, a patch antenna 2, and a plurality of metal bars 3.

  The conductor ground plane 1 is a substantially square metal plate and functions as a ground. A patch antenna 2 is provided at the center on the conductor ground plane 1. The patch antenna 2 includes a substrate 4 made of a dielectric lined with a conductor ground plane 1 and an antenna element 5 formed as a conductor pattern on the substrate 4. The substrate 4 is preferably a fluororesin (fluorocarbon resin) substrate. As shown in an enlarged view in FIG. 4, the antenna element 5 has a shape in which two opposing corners of an a × b conductor pattern are cut obliquely with a dimension of c × d. Here, a = b and c = d. The amount of perturbation of the patch antenna 2 is defined by (c × d) / (a × b). The coaxial connector 6 of the coaxial cable 7 penetrates from the back side of the conductor ground plane 1 and the patch antenna 2 is fed coaxially. The number of metal bars 3 is 12 in the illustrated example. The metal rods 3 as the conductor rods include the four corners of the conductor ground plane 1 in the vicinity of the edge on the conductor ground plane 1 so as to surround the patch antenna 2 and are equally spaced on each side (in the example shown, one per side). The conductor ground plate 1 is erected perpendicularly so as to be electrically connected to the conductor ground plate 1.

In the roadside antenna of the present embodiment, when the wavelength in vacuum at the target frequency is λa, the length of each metal rod 3 is L (FIG. 2), and the distance between the metal rods 3 is g (FIG. 3). ,
3/4 × λa ≦ L ≦ λa, and λa / 3 × 95.5% ≦ g ≦ λa / 3 × 99.0%
And In addition, the wavelength in vacuum at the axial ratio center frequency fop (hereinafter also referred to as “optimal axial ratio frequency fop”), which is the optimal axial ratio of the patch antenna 2 alone (lowest axial ratio and can be regarded as circular polarization), is denoted as λop When
λop ≒ g × 3
And DSRC uses the 5.8 GHz band, but when the target frequency is 5.8 GHz,
3/4 × λa ≦ L ≦ λa and 16.45 mm ≦ g ≦ 17.05 mm
And the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is in the range of 6.0 GHz to 6.1 GHz. The derivation process of these conditions will be described in detail at the end.

  FIG. 5 shows a state in which three substrates of a DSRC circuit (RF unit) 8, a DSRC circuit (control unit) 9, and a DSRC circuit (interface unit) 10 are sequentially arranged on the back side of the roadside antenna shown in FIGS. FIG. The DSRC circuit (RF unit) 8 and the DSRC circuit (control unit) 9 are connected to each other by a connection cable 11, and the DSRC circuit (control unit) 9 and the DSRC circuit (interface unit) 10 are connected to each other by a connection cable 12. . A power / communication cable 13 is connected to the DSRC circuit (interface unit) 10. As shown in the figure, the xy plane size can be reduced by arranging three substrates that fit within the antenna size on the back side of the roadside antenna.

  6 shows that the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 6.0 GHz (λop = 49.97 mm) and the thickness of the antenna element 5 in the configuration shown in FIG. 5 and the target frequency 5.8 GHz (λa = 51.69 mm). When the thickness is 3.2 mm, the substrate 4 is a fluororesin substrate, the perturbation amount of the patch antenna 2 is 6.9%, and the size of the conductor ground plane 1 is 55 mm × 55 mm, the mutual distance g between the metal bars 3 is a parameter. It is the xz direction half value width (HPBW) characteristic view with respect to the length L of the metal rod 3. FIG. 7 is a half-width characteristic diagram in the yz direction. FIG. 8 is a characteristic diagram of the boresight axial ratio. In these drawings, the length L (horizontal axis) of the metal rod 3 is changed from 0 to λa at intervals of 1/8 × λa, and the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 is λb, 1/2 × λb, 1 / Four types of 3 × λb and 1/4 × λb (where λb = 50.25 mm≈λop) were used. From these figures, the half-value width characteristics suitable for the roadside antenna under the conditions of fop = 6.0 GHz, 3/4 × λa ≦ L ≦ λa, and g = 1/3 × λb≈1 / 3 × λop (45 It is clear that a boresight axial ratio characteristic (below 3 dB) can be realized.

  FIG. 9 is a directivity pattern diagram as seen from the −yxz direction when the length L of the metal rod 3 is 3/4 × λa and the distance between the metal rods 3 is g = 1/3 × λb. FIG. 10 is a directivity pattern diagram seen from the xyz direction in the same case. Also from these figures, good directivity in the present embodiment can be confirmed.

  According to the present embodiment, a roadside antenna (small DSRC roadside antenna) having necessary performance can be realized while using the patch antenna 2 having one antenna element 5.

  FIG. 11 is a perspective view of a roadside antenna according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention. FIG. 12 is a front view of the same. FIG. 13 is a plan view of the same. The roadside antenna of the present embodiment is a plurality of parasitic conductor elements having a smaller area than the antenna element 5 of the patch antenna 2 on the tip side of the metal rod 3 as compared with the one of the first embodiment shown in FIG. 15 is different, and the other points are the same. Specifically, a substrate 14 made of a dielectric is attached and fixed to the tip of the metal bar 3, and the parasitic conductor elements 15 are arranged in a matrix on the substrate 14 so as to be 3 × 3. The position of the parasitic conductor element 15 is defined by a line (indicated by a one-dot chain line in FIG. 13) connecting the metal bars 3 on opposite sides of the conductor ground plate 1. If the length of the metal rod 3 is L = 3/4 × λa, the tip of the metal rod 3 is electrically opened by resonance. For this reason, the substrate 14 of the parasitic conductor element 15 provided on the metal rod 3 and other mounting structures are in an isolated state from the polarization fluctuation caused by the metal rod 3 and can be easily directed. Can be adjusted. FIG. 14 is a directivity pattern diagram in the -yxz direction in the present embodiment. FIG. 15 is an xyz direction directivity pattern diagram. In these drawings, the conditions other than the presence of the parasitic conductor element 15 are the same as those in FIGS. 9 and 10. According to the present embodiment, while using the patch antenna 2 having one antenna element 5, a road-side antenna having a half width of about 35 ° and a half width equivalent to a conventional 3 × 3 patch array antenna can be realized.

  Hereinafter, the process of deriving the conditions in the embodiment (the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2, the length L of the metal rod 3, and the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3) will be described in detail. FIGS. 16A to 16D are schematic views of roadside antennas used in the simulation described below. These models refer to the configuration of Patent Document 1 (proposed by the present applicant), which is expected to obtain directivity with a narrow half-value width with a simple configuration. In the following, the thickness of the antenna element 5 is 3.2 mm, the substrate 4 is a fluororesin substrate, and the size of the conductor ground plane 1 is 55 mm × 55 mm.

  FIG. 17 shows the case where the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 5.8 GHz and the perturbation amount of the patch antenna 2 is 6.9% at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz (λa = 51.69 mm). FIG. 5 is a half-width characteristic diagram in the xz direction with respect to the length L of the metal rod 3 using the mutual distance g between the rods 3 as a parameter. FIG. 18 is a half-width characteristic diagram in the yz direction. FIG. 19 is a boresight axial ratio characteristic diagram. In these drawings, the length L (horizontal axis) of the metal rod 3 is changed from 0 to λa at intervals of 1/8 × λa, and the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 is as shown in FIGS. 16 (A) to (D). As shown, λa, 1/2 × λa, 1/3 × λa, and 1/4 × λa were used. 17 and 18, when the length L of the metal rod 3 is 3/8 × λa to λa and the mutual distance g between the metal rods 3 is 1/3 × λa, the half width is in both the xz and yz directions. It was confirmed that the full width at half maximum corresponding to the conventional 2 × 2 patch array antenna was about 40 °. However, as shown in FIG. 19, when the number of the metal rods 3 is increased (when the mutual gap g between the metal rods 3 is reduced), the electrical coupling between the patch antenna 2 and the metal rod 3 increases, and the patch antenna 2 alone From this state, polarization fluctuations occurred, the axial ratio deteriorated, circular polarization could not be obtained, and the problem of being unable to be used as a DSRC antenna was revealed. In FIG. 19, the length L of the metal rod 3 is 3 / 4λa or more and the axial ratio is low. Therefore, in consideration of the miniaturization of the antenna, the length L of the metal rod 3 is fixed to 3/4 × λa, the mutual distance g between the metal rods 3 and the size of the antenna element 5 (perturbation amount and axial ratio center). The configuration of circular polarization is confirmed while adjusting the frequency fop).

  FIG. 20 shows that the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 5.8 GHz, the perturbation amount of the patch antenna 2 is 6.9%, and the length of the metal rod 3 at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz (λa = 51.69 mm). FIG. 6 is a half-value width characteristic diagram in the xz and yz directions when the length L is 3/4 × λa and the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 is changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm. FIG. 21 is a side lobe characteristic diagram in the xz and yz directions in the same case. The range of 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm corresponds to a range of approximately ± 5% of 1/3 × λa. From these figures, the mutual distance g between the metal bars 3 is 16.45 mm to 17.25 mm and the half width is 45 ° or less, and the mutual distance g between the metal bars 3 is 16.25 mm to 17.05 mm. The lobe can be suppressed to -10 dB or less. Therefore, a range of 16.45 mm to 17.05 mm in which the half width is narrow and the side lobe is suppressed is derived as an appropriate condition for the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3. The range of 16.45 mm to 17.05 mm corresponds to the range of −4.5% to −1% with respect to λa / 3.

  FIG. 22 shows a case where the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 5.8 GHz, the length L of the metal rod 3 is 3/4 × λa at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz (λa = 51.69 mm). FIG. 6 is a boresight axial ratio characteristic diagram using the perturbation amount of the patch antenna 2 as a parameter when the mutual gap g between the three is changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm. From this figure, it is possible to make the axial ratio 3 dB or less that can be regarded as circularly polarized waves by adjusting the amount of perturbation, but the mutual gap g between the metal rods 3 that makes the axial ratio 3 dB or less is 17.25 mm-17. It is 85 mm, and deviates from an appropriate range (16.45 mm to 17.05 mm) derived from the half width and side lobe conditions. Therefore, in the following, the conditions under which the axial ratio is good in the appropriate range (16.45 mm to 17.05 mm) derived from the half width and side lobe conditions will be examined.

  An appropriate range (17.25 mm to 17.85 mm) derived from the axial ratio condition is a range of 0 to + 3.5% with respect to 1/3 × λa. As a result, the wavelength λop in vacuum at the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is not the wavelength λa in vacuum at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz, but the metal rod 3 derived from the half width and sidelobe conditions. If the mutual distance g is set so as to be substantially the same as the reference wavelength λb, it is presumed that the axial ratio can be adjusted by changing only the amount of perturbation while satisfying the half width and side lobe conditions. If the mutual distance g between the metal rods 3 is set to a median value of 16.75 mm within an appropriate range derived from the half width and side lobe conditions, the reference wavelength λb is three times that of 50.25 mm and the frequency is about 6.0 GHz. Become. Therefore, it is verified whether circular polarization occurs at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz when the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 6.0 GHz.

  FIG. 23 shows the patch when the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 5.8 GHz, the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 is 17.25 mm, and the frequency is changed from 5.5 GHz to 6.1 GHz. FIG. 4 is a boresight axial ratio characteristic diagram with the amount of perturbation of the antenna 2 as a parameter. In this figure, the axial ratio characteristic of the single patch antenna 2 is also shown. From this figure, it was confirmed that the patch antenna 2 has a fluctuation in polarization due to the metal rod 3, and the axial ratio tends to be improved at a frequency away from 5.8 GHz by 200 MHz. For this reason, when the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 6.0 GHz, it is estimated that circular polarization can be generated at 5.8 GHz, which is 200 MHz lower than 6.0 GHz.

  FIG. 24 shows that the perturbation amount of the patch antenna 2 is 6.9% at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz (λa = 51.69 mm), and the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 is changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm. FIG. 6 is a boresight axial ratio characteristic diagram using the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone as a parameter. From this figure, by setting the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 to 6.0 to 6.1 GHz, an appropriate range (16) of the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 derived from the half width and side lobe conditions. It was confirmed that the axial ratio can be suppressed to 3 dB or less at .45 mm to 17.05 mm). In order to further optimize the axial ratio, the amount of perturbation may be adjusted.

  Hereinafter, simulation results of the axial ratio, the half-value width, and the side lobe will be described for each of the cases where the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 6.05 GHz, 6.0 GHz, and 6.1 GHz.

  FIG. 25 shows the case where the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 6.05 GHz and the mutual gap g between the metal rods 3 is 16.45 mm, 16.65 mm, 16.85 mm, 17.05 mm. It is an axial ratio versus frequency characteristic diagram when the amount of perturbation of the patch antenna 2 is adjusted so as to obtain an optimal axial ratio. From this figure, when the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 6.05 GHz, the axial ratio can be reduced to 3 dB or less by adjusting the amount of perturbation at any mutual interval at and near the target frequency of 5.8 GHz. It was confirmed that it was possible.

  FIG. 26 shows a case where the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 6.05 GHz at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz, and the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 is changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm. FIG. 5 is a half-value width characteristic diagram in the xz direction using the amount of perturbation of the patch antenna 2 as a parameter. FIG. 27 is a half-width characteristic diagram in the yz direction. FIG. 28 is a characteristic diagram of side lobes in the xz direction. FIG. 29 is a yz-direction side lobe characteristic diagram. From FIG. 25 to FIG. 29, when the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 6.05 GHz, the axial ratio is 3 dB or less, the half-value width is 45 ° or less, and the side lobe in the range of 16.45 mm to 17.05 mm. It was confirmed that characteristics of −10 dB or less can be realized. In particular, a substantially central value of the mutual distance g between the metal rods 3 can be used even when the perturbation amount is in its original state, so that it is designed and characteristics as a circularly polarized patch antenna having an optimum axial ratio frequency fop of about 6.0 GHz. Management becomes easier. In addition, even when the amount of perturbation is changed, as long as the relationship between the amount of perturbation and the axial ratio of the patch antenna 2 alone (FIG. 30) is observed, the range of the amount of perturbation does not disturb the axis ratio characteristics of the patch antenna 2 alone.

  FIG. 31 shows the case where the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 6.0 GHz, and the mutual gap g between the metal bars 3 is 16.45 mm, 16.65 mm, 16.85 mm, 17.05 mm. It is an axial ratio versus frequency characteristic diagram when the amount of perturbation of the patch antenna 2 is adjusted so as to obtain an optimal axial ratio. From this figure, when the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 6.0 GHz, the axial ratio can be reduced to 3 dB or less by adjusting the amount of perturbation at any mutual interval at and near the target frequency of 5.8 GHz. It was confirmed that it was possible.

  FIG. 32 shows a case where the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 6.0 GHz at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz, and the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 is changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm. FIG. 5 is a half-value width characteristic diagram in the xz direction using the amount of perturbation of the patch antenna 2 as a parameter. FIG. 33 is a half-width characteristic diagram in the yz direction. FIG. 34 is a characteristic diagram of side lobes in the xz direction. FIG. 35 is a characteristic diagram of the side lobe in the yz direction. From FIG. 31 to FIG. 35, when the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is 6.0 GHz, the axial ratio is 3 dB or less, the half-value width is 45 ° or less, and the side lobe in the range of 16.45 mm to 17.05 mm. It was confirmed that characteristics of 10 dB or less can be realized.

  In FIG. 36, the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is set to 6.1 GHz, and the mutual gap g between the metal rods 3 is 16.45 mm, 16.65 mm, 16.85 mm, and 17.05 mm. It is an axial ratio versus frequency characteristic diagram when the amount of perturbation of the patch antenna 2 is adjusted so as to obtain an optimal axial ratio. From this figure, when the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 6.1 GHz, the axial ratio can be reduced to 3 dB or less by adjusting the amount of perturbation at any mutual interval at and near the target frequency of 5.8 GHz. It was confirmed that it was possible.

  FIG. 37 shows a case where the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the single patch antenna 2 is 6.1 GHz at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz, and the mutual interval g between the metal rods 3 is changed from 16.25 mm to 18.25 mm. FIG. 5 is a half-value width characteristic diagram in the xz direction using a perturbation amount of the patch antenna 2 as a parameter. FIG. 38 is a half-width characteristic diagram in the yz direction. FIG. 39 is a characteristic diagram of side lobes in the xz direction. FIG. 40 is a characteristic diagram of the side lobe in the yz direction. 36 to 40, when the optimum axial ratio frequency fop of the patch antenna 2 alone is set to 6.1 GHz, the axial ratio is 3 dB or less, the half-value width is 45 ° or less, and the side lobe in the range of 16.45 mm to 17.05 mm. It was confirmed that characteristics of 10 dB or less can be realized.

  Although the verification after FIG. 20 is directed to the case where the length L of the metal rod 3 is 3/4 × λa, the optimal axis of the patch antenna 2 alone is also used when the length L of the metal rod 3 is λa. Small size with necessary performance (axis ratio, half width, and side lobe) by setting the specific frequency fop to 6.0 to 6.1 GHz and the mutual gap g between the metal rods 3 to 16.45 mm to 17.05 mm. It has been confirmed that a DSRC roadside antenna can be realized.

  The present invention has been described above by taking the embodiment as an example. However, it is understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications can be made to each component and each processing process of the embodiment within the scope of the claims. By the way.

1 conductor ground plate, 2 patch antenna, 3 metal rod, 4 substrate, 5 antenna element, 6 coaxial connector, 7 coaxial cable, 8 DSRC circuit (RF part), 9 DSRC circuit (control part), 10 DSRC circuit (interface part) , 11 connection cable, 12 connection cable, 13 power supply / communication cable, 14 substrate, 15 parasitic conductor element

Claims (7)

A conductor ground plane;
A patch antenna having one antenna element provided on the conductor ground plane;
A plurality of conductor rods erected on the conductor ground plate,
The plurality of conductor rods are erected at equal intervals so as to surround the patch antenna, and are electrically connected to the conductor ground plane,
When the wavelength in vacuum at the target frequency is λa, the length of each conductor rod is L, and the mutual distance between the conductor rods is g,
3/4 × λa ≦ L ≦ λa, and λa / 3 × 95.5% ≦ g ≦ λa / 3 × 99.0%
A roadside antenna, characterized in that When the wavelength in vacuum at the axial ratio center frequency that is the optimal axial ratio of the patch antenna alone is λop,
λop ≒ g × 3
The roadside antenna according to claim 1, wherein A conductor ground plane;
A patch antenna having one antenna element provided on the conductor ground plane;
A plurality of conductor rods erected on the conductor ground plate,
The plurality of conductor rods are erected at equal intervals so as to surround the patch antenna, and are electrically connected to the conductor ground plane,
When the wavelength in vacuum at 5.8 GHz is λa, the length of each conductor rod is L, and the distance between the conductor rods is g,
3/4 × λa ≦ L ≦ λa and 16.45 mm ≦ g ≦ 17.05 mm
A roadside antenna, characterized in that   The roadside antenna according to claim 3, wherein an axial ratio center frequency that is an optimum axial ratio of the patch antenna alone is in a range of 6.0 GHz to 6.1 GHz.   5. The plurality of conductor rods are erected so as to include four corners of the conductor ground plane in the vicinity of an edge on the conductor ground plane, and to have the same number on each side. The roadside antenna described in 1.   The roadside antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein a plurality of parasitic conductor elements having a smaller area than an antenna element of the patch antenna are arranged on the front end side of the plurality of conductor rods.   The roadside antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein a substrate of the patch antenna is a fluororesin substrate.