JP2012002602A - Method for probing, identifying, and removing hazardous body - Google Patents

Method for probing, identifying, and removing hazardous body Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2012002602A
JP2012002602A JP2010136464A JP2010136464A JP2012002602A JP 2012002602 A JP2012002602 A JP 2012002602A JP 2010136464 A JP2010136464 A JP 2010136464A JP 2010136464 A JP2010136464 A JP 2010136464A JP 2012002602 A JP2012002602 A JP 2012002602A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
magnetic
excavation
exploration
confirmation
casing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2010136464A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Susumu Uehara
進 上原
Yokichi Gushiken
用吉 具志堅
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
HOSHIN KENSETSU CO Ltd
Original Assignee
HOSHIN KENSETSU CO Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by HOSHIN KENSETSU CO Ltd filed Critical HOSHIN KENSETSU CO Ltd
Priority to JP2010136464A priority Critical patent/JP2012002602A/en
Publication of JP2012002602A publication Critical patent/JP2012002602A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method for removing a hazardous body, capable of accurate probe and identification.SOLUTION: A mechanical excavation is carried out down to a approximate depth where a magnetic body exists in the state that a casing made of stainless steel is pressed in the ground. Subsequently, a magnetometric sensor probes the magnetic body in the casing made of stainless steel while a human-powered excavation is carried out. A hazardous body is thus found and then removed.

Description

本発明は危険物の磁気探査方法に関する。詳しくは地中に残存する爆弾等の危険物を磁気による探査を行いながら確認する危険物の確認探査による除去方法に係るものである。   The present invention relates to a method for magnetic exploration of dangerous goods. Specifically, the present invention relates to a method for removing dangerous materials such as bombs remaining in the ground by confirming and exploring dangerous materials while conducting magnetic exploration.

従来より地中(特に沖縄県内)には戦争により使用された砲弾・爆弾等が何等かの原因で不発弾となって残されており、例えば水道工事等の地下工事中に何らかの衝撃が加えられることで爆発し人的、物的被害を被っているのが現状である。   Conventionally, shells and bombs used in the war have been left unexploded for some reason in the ground (especially in Okinawa Prefecture), and some impact is applied during underground construction such as waterworks. The current situation is that it exploded and suffered human and material damage.

そのため、地下工事を安全かつ円滑に進めるには、これらの不発弾等による危険物を事前に調査し、確認しながら掘削作業を行って危険物を撤去することが肝要となる。   Therefore, in order to proceed underground construction safely and smoothly, it is important to investigate the dangerous materials caused by these unexploded bombs in advance and remove the dangerous materials by excavating while confirming them.

この不発弾等の危険物を調査する方法として、一般的に鉄類の強磁性を応用した磁気探査が用いられている。   As a method for investigating such dangerous materials such as unexploded bombs, magnetic exploration using iron ferromagnetism is generally used.

この磁気探査には、地表面した1.0m迄の探査を行う水平探査と地下1.0m以上の深い所まで磁気有無を検知する鉛直探査がある。   This magnetic exploration includes a horizontal exploration for exploring up to 1.0 m above the ground surface and a vertical exploration for detecting the presence of magnetism up to a depth of 1.0 m or deep underground.

水平探査は、異常点位置が地下1.0m以下である危険物を確認するためのものであり、地表面で行う。具体的には、磁気探査センサーによる磁気確認、掘削、再度の磁気確認といった工程を繰り返しながら危険物の確認を行うといったものである。   The horizontal exploration is for confirming a dangerous object whose abnormal point position is 1.0 m or less underground, and is performed on the ground surface. Specifically, a dangerous object is confirmed while repeating processes such as magnetic confirmation by a magnetic exploration sensor, excavation, and magnetic confirmation again.

鉛直探査は、ボーリングマシン等で探査孔を削孔し、その中に磁気探査センサーを挿入することによって、地下の深いところまで磁性体の有無を検知するものである。   Vertical exploration is to detect the presence or absence of a magnetic material deep in the basement by drilling an exploration hole with a boring machine or the like and inserting a magnetic exploration sensor therein.

ここで、鉛直探査深さが地下1.0m〜2.0m程度の比較的浅い場合には、掘削に際して土留は不要であり、機械掘削と人力掘削及び確認作業によって異常物の確認を行う。一方、鉛直探査深さが地下2.0m〜10m程度と比較的深い場合には、掘削に際して土留が必要となる。この場合には、土留工法として、以下の(1)〜(3)の様な工法が採用されている。   Here, when the vertical exploration depth is relatively shallow, such as about 1.0 m to 2.0 m underground, no earth retaining is necessary for excavation, and abnormal objects are confirmed by mechanical excavation, manual excavation, and confirmation work. On the other hand, if the vertical exploration depth is relatively deep, about 2.0m to 10m underground, earth retaining is necessary for excavation. In this case, the following construction methods (1) to (3) are employed as the earth retaining method.

(1)ライナープレート式土留工、軽量鋼矢板土留等により土留を行い掘削、磁気確認、更なる掘削といった工程を繰り返しながら機械掘削、人力掘削、確認作業により危険物の確認を行う。
(2)鋼矢板土留支保工等により大がかりな仮設土留を行った上で、掘削、磁気確認、更なる掘削を繰り返しながら機械掘削、人力掘削により危険物の確認を行う。
(3)危険物がある位置をずらし、構造物又は仮設物の設計変更を行い施工する。
(1) Check the hazardous material by mechanical excavation, manual excavation, and confirmation work while repeating the excavation, magnetic confirmation, and further excavation processes by excavating, magnetic confirmation, and further excavation, using liner plate type earth retaining, lightweight steel sheet pile retaining.
(2) After carrying out a large temporary earth retaining by means of steel sheet pile retaining works, etc., check for dangerous materials by excavation, magnetic confirmation and further excavation by mechanical excavation and manual excavation.
(3) Shift the position where there is a dangerous object, change the design of the structure or temporary structure, and install it.

一方、磁気センサーを用いての磁気探査方法として、例えば特許文献1に記載されたものが知られている。
具体的には、特許文献1に記載された磁気探査方法は、図6に示すように、打撃式掘削により非磁性体製のケーシング101を地中に圧入して探査孔102を掘削する。次いで、ケーシング102に磁気センサー103を挿入し、この磁気センサー103により地中の磁気量の変化を測定して磁性体の地中の存在を探査するといった具合である。
On the other hand, as a magnetic exploration method using a magnetic sensor, for example, a method described in Patent Document 1 is known.
Specifically, in the magnetic exploration method described in Patent Document 1, as shown in FIG. 6, the exploration hole 102 is excavated by press-fitting a non-magnetic casing 101 into the ground by hitting excavation. Next, the magnetic sensor 103 is inserted into the casing 102, and the magnetic sensor 103 is used to measure the change in the amount of magnetic force in the ground to search for the presence of the magnetic material in the ground.

特開平11−183633号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-183633

しかしながら、上述した危険物の磁気探査で深い確認探査が必要な場合では、大型仮設土留工となり、周辺への安全、環境等に影響があり工程、費用等も増加する問題がある。   However, in the case where deep confirmation exploration is necessary for the magnetic exploration of the dangerous materials described above, there is a problem that it becomes a large temporary earth retaining work, which affects the surrounding safety, environment, etc., and increases the process and cost.

また、鉛直確認探査において、掘削〜磁気確認〜掘削作業の繰り返し作業で危険物の確認を行う場合に、一般的な土留材は鋼材のために土留材の磁気と危険物の磁気が重なり危険物の位置や物体を確認することが困難となる問題がある。   Also, in the vertical confirmation exploration, when checking dangerous materials by repeating excavation, magnetic confirmation, and excavation work, the general earth retaining material is a steel material, and the magnetism of the earth retaining material and the magnetism of the dangerous material overlap, making it dangerous. There is a problem that it is difficult to confirm the position and the object.

また、大掛かりな仮設工(鋼矢板土留工法等)の場合では、大型クレーン及び鋼矢板打ち込み機械等の大型重機が必要となり、その為の広い設置スペースが必要となる問題がある。   In the case of large-scale temporary work (steel sheet pile earth retaining method or the like), there is a problem that large heavy machinery such as a large crane and a steel sheet pile driving machine is required, and a large installation space is required for that purpose.

更に、市街地での作業では騒音、振動等の発生による近隣のオフィスや住宅等へ悪影響を及ぼす問題がある。   Furthermore, when working in urban areas, there is a problem of adversely affecting nearby offices and houses due to the occurrence of noise and vibration.

また、上述した特許文献1に記載の発明では、磁気センサーが挿通可能な内径を有するケーシングを土中に打ち込み、ケーシング内に磁気センサーを挿入して磁気量の変化を測定して地中の危険物の存在を探査するものである。   Further, in the invention described in Patent Document 1 described above, a casing having an inner diameter through which a magnetic sensor can be inserted is driven into the soil, and the magnetic sensor is inserted into the casing to measure a change in the amount of magnetism to detect a danger in the ground. It explores the existence of things.

しかしながら、危険物を発見した場合では、この危険物の除去のために、前述したように大掛かりな仮設工(鋼矢板土留工法等)が必要となる問題がある。   However, when a dangerous material is found, there is a problem that a large-scale temporary work (such as a steel sheet pile earth retaining method) is required to remove the dangerous material as described above.

本発明は、以上の点に鑑みて創案されたものであって、大掛かりな設備を不要とすると共に、正確な確認探査が実現可能である危険物の確認探査による除去方法を提供することを目的とするものである。   The present invention was devised in view of the above points, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a method for removing dangerous materials by confirmation exploration, which does not require large-scale equipment and can realize accurate confirmation exploration. It is what.

上記の目的を達成するために、本発明に係る危険物の確認探査による除去方法は、磁気センサーで地中に存在する磁性体の位置を確認する工程と、確認された磁性体の存在位置を略中心として、磁性体の周囲に非磁性体から構成されたケーシングを配置する工程と、その周囲に前記ケーシングが配置された磁性体の近傍深さまで第1の掘削速度で掘削を行い、続いて、第1の掘削速度よりも小さな第2の掘削速度で掘削を行いながら磁気センサーで磁性体を見つけ出して除去する工程とを備える。   In order to achieve the above-described object, the method for removing dangerous substances according to the present invention includes a step of confirming a position of a magnetic substance existing in the ground with a magnetic sensor, and a confirmed existence position of the magnetic substance. A step of disposing a casing made of a non-magnetic material around the magnetic body as a substantial center, and excavating at a first excavation speed to a depth near the magnetic body around which the casing is disposed. And a step of finding and removing a magnetic substance with a magnetic sensor while excavating at a second excavation speed lower than the first excavation speed.

ここで、確認された磁性体の存在位置を略中心として、磁性体の周囲に非磁性体(例えば、ステンレス鋼等の非磁性体)から構成されたケーシングを配置することによって、磁気センサーで磁性体である危険物を見つけ出す際に、ケーシングが磁気センサーに反応することが無く、危険物の正確な位置の特定の容易化が実現することとなる。   Here, the magnetic sensor is magnetized by placing a casing made of a non-magnetic material (for example, a non-magnetic material such as stainless steel) around the magnetic material, with the confirmed location of the magnetic material as the center. When the dangerous object that is the body is found, the casing does not react to the magnetic sensor, and it is possible to easily identify the exact position of the dangerous object.

また、磁性体の近傍深さまで機械掘削等による第1の掘削速度で掘削を行い、続いて、第1の掘削速度よりも小さな人力掘削等による第2の掘削速度で掘削を行うことによって、危険物(磁性体)の近傍までは迅速に掘削を行う一方、それ以後は慎重かつ安全な掘削を行うことができ、迅速性と安全性を両立することができる。   In addition, it is dangerous to perform excavation at a first excavation speed by mechanical excavation or the like up to a depth near the magnetic body, and then perform excavation at a second excavation speed by human-powered excavation or the like that is smaller than the first excavation speed. While excavating quickly to the vicinity of the object (magnetic material), careful and safe excavation can be performed thereafter, and both rapidity and safety can be achieved.

ここで、複数の磁性体が存在することも考えられるために、磁性体の除去を行った後に、再度、磁気センサーで磁性体の存在を確認し、更なる磁性体の存在を確認できた場合には、同磁性体をも除去することによって、磁性体の存在を見逃してしまうことを低減し、より一層充分に危険物の除去を行うことができる。   Here, since there may be multiple magnetic bodies, after removing the magnetic body, the presence of the magnetic body can be confirmed again with the magnetic sensor, and the presence of a further magnetic body can be confirmed. In addition, by removing the magnetic material, it is possible to reduce the possibility of overlooking the presence of the magnetic material, and to remove dangerous substances more sufficiently.

本発明の危険物の確認探査による除去方法によれば、非磁性体より構成されるケーシングを用いることで磁性体の検知の誤認を低減することができ、磁性体の確認が明確、かつ安全に行うことが可能となる。   According to the method for removing dangerous substances according to the present invention, by using a casing made of a non-magnetic material, detection errors of the magnetic material can be reduced, and the confirmation of the magnetic material is clear and safe. Can be done.

本発明を適用した危険物の確認探査による除去方法の一例の磁気探査の施工手順を説明するためのフロー説明図である。It is flow explanatory drawing for demonstrating the construction procedure of the magnetic exploration of an example of the removal method by the confirmation exploration of the dangerous material to which this invention is applied. 本発明を適用した危険物の確認探査による除去方法の一例の探査状況を説明するための模式図である。It is a schematic diagram for demonstrating the search condition of an example of the removal method by the confirmation search of the dangerous material to which this invention is applied. 本発明を適用した危険物の確認探査による除去方法の一例の異常点確認探査工手順を説明するためのフロー説明図である。It is flow explanatory drawing for demonstrating the abnormal point confirmation exploration procedure of an example of the removal method by confirmation exploration of the dangerous material to which this invention is applied. 本発明を適用した危険物の確認探査による除去方法の一例の異常物確認探査の施工状況を説明するための模式図である。It is a schematic diagram for demonstrating the construction situation of the abnormal thing confirmation search of an example of the removal method by confirmation search of the dangerous goods to which this invention is applied. 本発明を適用した危険物の確認探査による除去方法の一例の異常物確認探査の人力による検査状況を説明するための模式図である。It is a schematic diagram for demonstrating the test | inspection condition by the human power of the abnormal thing confirmation search of an example of the removal method by the confirmation search of the dangerous material to which this invention is applied. 従来の地中における磁性体の探査方法の一例を説明するための模式図である。It is a schematic diagram for demonstrating an example of the search method of the magnetic body in the conventional underground.

以下、本発明の実施の形態を図面を参酌しながら説明し、本発明の理解に供する。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings to provide an understanding of the present invention.

図1は本発明を適用した危険物の確認探査による除去方法の一例の磁気探査の施工手順を説明するためのフロー説明図、図2は本発明を適用した危険物の確認探査による除去方法の一例の探査状況を説明するための模式図である。   FIG. 1 is a flow explanatory diagram for explaining the construction procedure of magnetic exploration as an example of a removal method by confirmation exploration of dangerous goods to which the present invention is applied, and FIG. 2 is a diagram of the removal method by confirmation exploration of dangerous goods to which the present invention is applied. It is a schematic diagram for demonstrating an example search condition.

本発明を適用した危険物の確認探査による除去方法の一例では、先ず、調査個所の地中に存在する不発爆弾等の危険物の存在を把握するために、鉛直探査範囲内の地表面1での水平探査を行う。この水平探査は、両コイル型磁気センサー(図示せず。)を使用し、地表面1下1.0mの範囲内で危険物が無いかの確認にために行う(図1中符号S1)。   In an example of the removal method by confirmation exploration of the dangerous material to which the present invention is applied, first, in order to grasp the existence of dangerous materials such as unexploded bombs existing in the ground of the investigation site, the ground surface 1 in the vertical exploration range is used. Perform horizontal exploration. This horizontal exploration is carried out using a double-coil magnetic sensor (not shown) in order to confirm whether there is any dangerous object within 1.0 m below the ground surface 1 (reference S1 in FIG. 1).

次に、水平探査により地表面1下1.0mの範囲内で危険物が確認された場合には、人的作業により撤去作業を行う。また、危険物が確認されなかった場合には、続いて鉛直探査を行う。   Next, when a dangerous object is confirmed within 1.0 m below the ground surface 1 by horizontal exploration, the removal work is performed by human work. If no dangerous goods are found, a vertical survey is performed.

この鉛直探査は、ボーリングマシン2により探査孔3を削孔し、その中に磁気サンサーを挿入して磁性体の有無を確認する。この削孔の方法は、有水のノンコアボーリングで地表面から行う。また、探査孔3の孔壁を保護するために、ガイドパイプ(ステンレスパイプ)4として挿入し、探査開始位置から孔底の安全を確認しながら削孔〜探査作業を繰り返して計画深度(例えば、平均深さh=16.06m)まで削孔する(図1中符号S2)。   In this vertical exploration, the exploration hole 3 is drilled by the boring machine 2, and a magnetic sensor is inserted therein to confirm the presence or absence of a magnetic material. This method of drilling is performed from the ground surface with non-core boring with water. Moreover, in order to protect the hole wall of the exploration hole 3, it inserts as a guide pipe (stainless steel pipe) 4, repeats drilling-exploration work, confirming the safety of a hole bottom from an exploration start position, for example, plan depth (for example, Drilling to an average depth h = 16.06 m) (reference S2 in FIG. 1).

このようにして、鉛直探査範囲内で磁気センサーにより地中の磁気量の変化を測定して磁性体の反応を検知し、磁性体の存在を確認して記録する(図1中符号S3)。   In this way, the change in the magnetic quantity in the ground is measured by the magnetic sensor within the vertical exploration range, the reaction of the magnetic substance is detected, and the presence of the magnetic substance is confirmed and recorded (reference S3 in FIG. 1).

探査終了後に、ガイドパイプ4を引き抜き、削孔の埋戻しを行う。この埋戻しは沈下防止のため、下層、中間層及び表層に分け行い各層毎にその層に適した埋戻し材を使用する(図1中符号S4)。   After the exploration is completed, the guide pipe 4 is pulled out and the hole is backfilled. This backfilling is divided into a lower layer, an intermediate layer, and a surface layer to prevent settlement, and a backfilling material suitable for each layer is used for each layer (reference S4 in FIG. 1).

そして磁性体の有無の判断は、磁性体が存在しない場合はほとんど直線状態の波形に対して、磁性体が存在する場合には波状の波形が検出される。これを解析して磁性反応の埋没深度、磁気センサーから磁性体までの距離、磁気量等を計算して鉛直探査範囲内で磁性体の位置及び大きさを記録した報告書を作成する(図1中符号S5)。   In the determination of the presence or absence of a magnetic material, a wave-like waveform is detected when the magnetic material is present, while the waveform is almost linear when the magnetic material is not present. Analyzing this, calculating the buried depth of the magnetic reaction, the distance from the magnetic sensor to the magnetic material, the amount of magnetism, etc., and creating a report that records the position and size of the magnetic material within the vertical exploration range (Fig. 1) Medium code S5).

なお、前記鉛直探査によって異常物(磁性体)の存在が確認されなかった場合には通常の工事を遂行することとなる。   In addition, when the presence of an abnormal object (magnetic material) is not confirmed by the vertical exploration, normal work is performed.

次に、図3は本発明を適用した危険物の確認探査による除去方法の一例の異常点確認探査工手順を説明するためのフロー説明図、図4は本発明を適用した危険物の確認探査による除去方法の一例の異常点確認探査の施工状況を説明するための模式図である。   Next, FIG. 3 is a flow explanatory diagram for explaining an abnormal point confirmation exploration procedure as an example of a removal method by confirmation exploration of dangerous materials to which the present invention is applied, and FIG. 4 is confirmation exploration of dangerous materials to which the present invention is applied. It is a schematic diagram for demonstrating the construction situation of the abnormal point confirmation survey of an example of the removal method by.

ここで、施工に先立ち、前記の鉛直探査範囲内での磁性体の存在が確認された報告書に基づいて地表での異常点の位置出しを行い使用機械等の配置計画を行う。クレーン据付箇所や圧入機を設置する場所について、事前に地盤確認を行い、必要に応じて不陸整正や敷鉄板を設置する(図3中符号S10)。   Here, prior to construction, an abnormal point is located on the ground surface based on the report confirming the presence of the magnetic substance in the vertical exploration range, and the arrangement plan of the machines used is made. The ground is checked in advance for the crane installation location and the location where the press-fitting machine is installed, and if necessary, unevenness correction and a laid iron plate are installed (reference S10 in FIG. 3).

次に、全周回転式又は揺動式圧入機及び使用機材をトレーラにて搬入し、25tクレーンで所定の位置に据え付ける(図3中符号S11)。   Next, the all-round rotation type or rocking type press-fitting machine and the equipment to be used are carried by a trailer and installed at a predetermined position by a 25 t crane (reference S11 in FIG. 3).

この全周回転式又は揺動式圧入機10は、異常点位置の中央に据え付けられ、水準器と調整ジャッキにより水平にセットされる。更に、油圧ホース、キャップタイヤ(図示せず。)などを接続する(図3中符号S12)。   This all-round rotating or swinging press-fitting machine 10 is installed at the center of the abnormal point position, and is set horizontally by a level and an adjustment jack. Further, a hydraulic hose, a cap tire (not shown), etc. are connected (reference S12 in FIG. 3).

なお、全周回転式又は揺動圧入などの試運転を行い、必要に応じて共回り防止用アンカー及びカウンターウエイト(図示せず。)を設置する。
また、ケーシング搬入後に非磁性体であるステンレスケーシングの磁気確認を探知機(マグネチックロケーター)にて確認する。
In addition, a trial run such as an all-round rotation type or a rocking press-fitting is performed, and an anti-corotation anchor and a counterweight (not shown) are installed as necessary.
Moreover, the magnetic confirmation of the stainless steel casing, which is a non-magnetic material, is confirmed with a detector (magnetic locator) after carrying the casing.

続いて、全周回転式又は揺動式圧入機10の上部フレームのチャックを開放し、クレーン(図示せず。)でケーシング11を建込む(図3中符号S13)。そしてチャックを締め付け、ケーシング11を固定する。   Subsequently, the chuck of the upper frame of the all-round rotary type or swing type press-fitting machine 10 is released, and the casing 11 is built with a crane (not shown) (reference S13 in FIG. 3). Then, the chuck is tightened and the casing 11 is fixed.

ここで、全周回転式又は揺動式圧入機10を作動させてケーシング11を地盤A内に貫入させながら全周回転又は揺動圧入させる。続いて、油圧クラムシェル12(本発明の第1の掘削の一例として)により掘削排土する(図3中符号S14)。   Here, the all-round rotation or swing type press-fitting machine 10 is operated to rotate the entire circumference or swing and press-fit while allowing the casing 11 to penetrate into the ground A. Subsequently, excavation and soiling is performed by the hydraulic clam shell 12 (as an example of the first excavation of the present invention) (reference S14 in FIG. 3).

なお、本実施例では図4に示すように、高さ2m、内径2mのケーシング11を用いるために異常点が存在する深度まで幾つかのケーシングを継ぎ足しながら地盤A内に圧入しなければならない。   In the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4, in order to use the casing 11 having a height of 2 m and an inner diameter of 2 m, it is necessary to press-fit into the ground A while adding several casings to a depth where an abnormal point exists.

この場合における1段から2段目までのケーシング11は、非磁性体(本実施例ではステンレス鋼)より構成されるものを使用し、続いて継ぎ足されるケーシング11は鋼製のものを使用する。また、これらのケーシング11の接続はボルト接合とする。   In this case, the casing 11 from the first stage to the second stage is made of a non-magnetic material (stainless steel in this embodiment), and the subsequently added casing 11 is made of steel. The casings 11 are connected with bolts.

このようにして異常点13深度の上方0.5mの深さまで油圧クラムシェル12により掘削排土して揺動圧入、掘削作業を停止する。   In this way, excavation and excavation is carried out by the hydraulic clamshell 12 to a depth of 0.5 m above the depth of the abnormal point 13, and rocking press-fitting and excavation work are stopped.

次に、鉛直磁気探査測定記録の異常波形により解析された結果を基に人力手掘(本発明の第2の掘削の一例として)によって図5に示すようにステンレスケーシング11内にて確認探査を実施する(図3中符号S15)。   Next, based on the result analyzed by the abnormal waveform of the vertical magnetic exploration measurement record, a confirmation exploration is carried out in the stainless steel casing 11 as shown in FIG. 5 by manual digging (as an example of the second excavation of the present invention). Implement (reference S15 in FIG. 3).

ここで、マグネチックロケーター13(本発明における磁性体の確認を行う手段の一例として)のセンサー部分を前後左右に動かしながら探知対象物に接近させることによりスピーカーの出力音が高音となり磁気反応物の位置を特定する。   Here, when the sensor portion of the magnetic locator 13 (as an example of means for confirming the magnetic substance in the present invention) is moved back and forth and left and right, the output sound of the speaker becomes high and the magnetic reaction product Identify the location.

このようにして磁気異常反応物の確認を行い、例えば確認された反応物が鉄筋等のように危険性の無い場合には、作業員のみによる撤去作業を行う。
また、確認された反応物が不発弾等の危険物である場合には爆弾処理斑等に連絡をして周囲の安全を確保した上で撤去作業を行う。
In this way, the magnetically abnormal reactant is confirmed. For example, when the confirmed reactant is not dangerous like a reinforcing bar, the removal work is performed only by the worker.
If the confirmed reactant is dangerous, such as an unexploded bomb, contact the bomb disposal spot to ensure the safety of the surroundings and then remove it.

更に、磁気反応物の撤去を行った後に、再度マグネチックロケーター13による磁気異常反応の消滅を確認後、確認探査完了とする。   Further, after the magnetic reactant is removed, after confirming the disappearance of the magnetic abnormal reaction by the magnetic locator 13 again, the confirmation exploration is completed.

続いて、確認探査完了後に埋め戻し及びケーシングの引き抜き作業を行う。この場合には掘削等で発生した土砂を埋め戻し材として流用し、1層厚さ20cm毎にタンパ等で十分締固めを行い、沈下が生じないように施工する。また、引き抜きは全周回転式又は揺動式圧入機で行い、埋め戻しとケーシング引抜きを交互に行う(図3中符号S16)。   Subsequently, after completion of the confirmation exploration, backfilling and casing removal are performed. In this case, earth and sand generated by excavation or the like is used as a backfill material, and each layer 20 cm thick is sufficiently compacted with a tamper or the like so as to prevent subsidence. Further, the drawing is performed by an all-round rotary type or a swinging type press-fitting machine, and backfilling and casing drawing are alternately performed (reference S16 in FIG. 3).

更に、引抜いたケーシングの撤去を行った後に、全周回転式又は揺動式圧入機、油圧クラムシェルの撤去、搬出を行う(図3中符号S17)。   Further, after the removed casing is removed, the all-round rotating or swinging press-fitting machine and the hydraulic clamshell are removed and carried out (reference S17 in FIG. 3).

最後に撤去した後の地表面を整地して施工完了となる(図3中符号S18)。   The ground surface after the last removal is leveled and the construction is completed (reference S18 in FIG. 3).

なお、本実施例では非磁性体のケーシングとしてステンレス鋼を用いるものであるが、必ずしもステンレス鋼とする必要性はなく、例えばコンクリート製、あるいはチタン製のケーシングであっても構わない。   In this embodiment, stainless steel is used as the non-magnetic casing. However, it is not always necessary to use stainless steel, and for example, a casing made of concrete or titanium may be used.

また、非磁性体は磁性反応異常物の磁気サンサーによる磁性反応範囲内に位置した状態であればよく、継ぎ足される全てのケーシングを非磁性体より構成する必要性は無い。   Further, the nonmagnetic material only needs to be in a state of being within the magnetic reaction range by the magnetic sensor of the abnormal magnetic reaction, and it is not necessary to configure all the casings to be added from the nonmagnetic material.

以上の構成よりなる本発明に係る危険物の確認探査による除去方法では、異常物の確認、除去を行うための掘削に非磁性体より構成されるケーシングを用いることで大型の重機を用いることなく作業を行うことが可能となる。   In the removal method by confirmation exploration of dangerous materials according to the present invention having the above-described configuration, a large-sized heavy machine is not used by using a casing made of a non-magnetic material for excavation for confirming and removing abnormal materials. Work can be performed.

また、その内径が2mのケーシングでの土留めが可能となることにより掘削箇所が深くとも、あるいは狭い場所でも掘削作業を行うことができる。   Moreover, since the earth retaining in a casing having an inner diameter of 2 m is possible, excavation work can be performed even in a deep excavation site or a narrow location.

また、非磁性体より構成されるケーシングを用いることで鋼製のケーシングと比べて磁性体の検知の誤認を防止することができるために異常物の確認が明確、かつ安全に行うことが可能となる。   In addition, by using a casing made of a non-magnetic material, it is possible to prevent misidentification of the detection of magnetic material compared to a steel casing, so that it is possible to confirm abnormal objects clearly and safely. Become.

1 地表面
2 ボーリングマシン
3 探査孔
4 ガイドパイプ
10 全周回転式又は揺動式圧入機
11 ケーシング
12 油圧クラムシェル
13 マグネチックロケーター
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Ground surface 2 Boring machine 3 Exploration hole 4 Guide pipe 10 All-around rotation type or rocking type press-fitting machine 11 Casing 12 Hydraulic clamshell 13 Magnetic locator

Claims (4)

磁気センサーで地中に存在する磁性体の位置を確認する工程と、
確認された磁性体の存在位置を略中心として、磁性体の周囲に非磁性体から構成されたケーシングを配置する工程と、
その周囲に前記ケーシングが配置された磁性体の近傍深さまで第1の掘削速度で掘削を行い、続いて、第1の掘削速度よりも小さな第2の掘削速度で掘削を行いながら磁気センサーで磁性体を見つけ出して除去する工程とを備える
危険物の確認探査による除去方法。
A step of confirming the position of the magnetic substance existing in the ground with a magnetic sensor;
Arranging a casing made of a non-magnetic material around the magnetic material, with the confirmed location of the magnetic material as the center, and
Excavation is performed at a first excavation speed to a depth near the magnetic body around which the casing is disposed, and then magnetically detected by a magnetic sensor while excavation is performed at a second excavation speed smaller than the first excavation speed. A method for removing dangerous substances by confirming and exploring.
磁性体の除去を行った後に、再度、磁気センサーで磁性体の存在を確認する
請求項1に記載の危険物の確認探査による除去方法。
The method for removing dangerous substances according to claim 1, wherein the presence of the magnetic substance is confirmed again by a magnetic sensor after removing the magnetic substance.
磁性体の近傍深さまで機械掘削を行い、続いて、人力掘削を行いながら磁気センサーで磁性体を見つけ出す
請求項1または請求項2に記載の危険物の確認探査による除去方法。
The method for removing dangerous substances according to claim 1 or 2, wherein mechanical excavation is performed to a depth near the magnetic substance, and then the magnetic substance is detected by a magnetic sensor while performing manual excavation.
確認された磁性体の存在位置を略中心として、磁性体の周囲にステンレス鋼より形成されたケーシングを配置する
請求項1、請求項2または請求項3に記載の危険物の確認探査による除去方法。
4. A method for removing dangerous substances by confirmation exploration according to claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein a casing made of stainless steel is arranged around the magnetic substance, with the presence position of the confirmed magnetic substance as a substantial center. .
JP2010136464A 2010-06-15 2010-06-15 Method for probing, identifying, and removing hazardous body Pending JP2012002602A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010136464A JP2012002602A (en) 2010-06-15 2010-06-15 Method for probing, identifying, and removing hazardous body

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010136464A JP2012002602A (en) 2010-06-15 2010-06-15 Method for probing, identifying, and removing hazardous body

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2012002602A true JP2012002602A (en) 2012-01-05

Family

ID=45534771

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2010136464A Pending JP2012002602A (en) 2010-06-15 2010-06-15 Method for probing, identifying, and removing hazardous body

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2012002602A (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH08319791A (en) * 1995-05-23 1996-12-03 Taisei Corp Construction method of vertical shaft
JP3064258B2 (en) * 1997-10-28 2000-07-12 株式会社森本組 Construction method of casing shaft
JP2005127006A (en) * 2003-10-23 2005-05-19 Jfe Metal Products & Engineering Inc Immersion earth retaining wall and construction method of the immersion earth retaining wall
JP2005320702A (en) * 2004-05-06 2005-11-17 Copros Co Ltd Segment type vertical shaft casing
JP2009257009A (en) * 2008-04-18 2009-11-05 Shin Nihon Kogyo:Kk Buried object environment survey method

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH08319791A (en) * 1995-05-23 1996-12-03 Taisei Corp Construction method of vertical shaft
JP3064258B2 (en) * 1997-10-28 2000-07-12 株式会社森本組 Construction method of casing shaft
JP2005127006A (en) * 2003-10-23 2005-05-19 Jfe Metal Products & Engineering Inc Immersion earth retaining wall and construction method of the immersion earth retaining wall
JP2005320702A (en) * 2004-05-06 2005-11-17 Copros Co Ltd Segment type vertical shaft casing
JP2009257009A (en) * 2008-04-18 2009-11-05 Shin Nihon Kogyo:Kk Buried object environment survey method

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
JPN6014002643; 角田龍也: '新幹線工事における不発弾調査の結果' 土木学会年次学術講演会講演概要集 63rd Disk 2, 20080813, ROMBUNNO.6-045 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5735329B2 (en) Sinking amount measuring device, soft ground improvement method using the same, ground dynamics grasping method where embankment structure is built, and ground dynamics grasping method where underground buried object is buried
CN106638729B (en) A kind of Novel steel sheet pile inclinometer pipe protection device for installing
JP6209625B2 (en) Hazardous material exploration method by casing type earth retaining method and casing type earth retaining method
JP2012026222A (en) Method of detecting presence/absence of filling defective part of tunnel secondary lining concrete using ri moisture meter and improvement method
KR101620278B1 (en) Apparatus for detecting sink hole and ground settlement using embeded sensing part
JP2017172115A (en) Ground evaluation system, precast pile with acceleration sensor
KR101034722B1 (en) Measurement method for a granular compaction pile using crosshole seismic testing
JP6775970B2 (en) Buried object exploration equipment, excavation system and buried object exploration method
Feng The Meuse/Haute-Marne underground research laboratory: Mechanical behavior of the Callovo-Oxfordian claystone
CN102645198B (en) Detection method and device for dynamic consolidation foundation material displacement
CN106592654A (en) Monitoring method for perpendicularity of steel pipe pile
JP2012002602A (en) Method for probing, identifying, and removing hazardous body
JP5918435B1 (en) Pile construction management method
CN108589704A (en) Concrete pouring of punched hole piles method
CN106734106B (en) A kind of positioning that sealing Polychlorinated biphenyls capacitor up for safekeeping and take method innoxious time
JP6825262B2 (en) Foreign matter identification method and foreign matter identification device
JP6696934B2 (en) Method and device for extracting pile elements from the ground
Nagy et al. Integrated compaction control based on the motion behavior of a deep vibrator
KR101531697B1 (en) A method for sink hole investigation by using equipment for sink hole investigation
JP7337715B2 (en) How to install steel pipes in the ground
KR101531698B1 (en) Equipment for sink hole investigation
JP2003155736A (en) Method for discriminating support force of back filled soil and device therefor
JP6317980B2 (en) Protection structure for buried objects
Whiteley Seismic imaging of ground conditions from buried conduits and boreholes
CN114086950B (en) Geological exploration sampling method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20130531

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20140117

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20140128

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20140325

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20140527