JP2011522313A - System and method for incorporating local maximum power point tracking in an energy generation system with central maximum power point tracking - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a system incorporating local maximum power point tracking (MPPT) in an energy generation system (10) having a centralized MPPT.
The system (10) includes a system control loop (16, 32, 22) and a plurality of local control loops (12, 14). The system control loop (16, 32, 22) has a system operating frequency, and each local control loop (12, 14) has a corresponding local operating frequency. Each local operating frequency is at least a predetermined distance away from the system operating frequency. For certain embodiments, the stabilization time corresponding to the local operating frequency of each local control loop (12, 14) is at least five times faster than the time constant corresponding to the system operating frequency.
[Selection] Figure 1A

Description

  The present disclosure generally relates to energy generation systems. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a system and method that incorporates local maximum power point tracking in an energy generation system with central maximum power point tracking.

  Solar and wind energy provides a renewable and non-polluting energy source as compared to conventional non-renewable polluting energy sources such as coal or oil. For this reason, solar and wind energy are becoming increasingly important as energy sources that can be converted to electricity. In the case of solar energy, photoelectric panels arranged in an array typically provide a means for converting solar energy into electrical energy. Similar arrays can be implemented to extract energy from wind or other natural energy sources.

  When operating a photoelectric array, maximum power point tracking (MPPT) to automatically determine the voltage or current at which the array should operate to generate maximum power output for a particular temperature and solar irradiance, That is, maximum power point tracking is usually used. If the array is operating under ideal conditions (ie, the same irradiance, temperature, and electrical characteristics for each panel of the array), it is possible to have MPPT performed on the entire array. While relatively easy, the MPPT for the array as a whole is more complex when there is a mismatch or a partially shadowed condition. In this case, the MPPT technique may not give accurate results due to the relative optimum of the multi-peak power-voltage characteristics of the mismatched array. As a result, only a few of the panels in the array may be operating ideally. This drastically reduces power generation. This is because, in the case of an array containing a plurality of columns of strings, the least efficient panel in a column determines the current and efficiency for that entire column.

  To this end, some photoelectric systems provide a DC-DC converter for each panel in the array. Each of these DC-DC converters performs MPPT to find the maximum power point for the corresponding panel. However, currently proposed systems that implement such a distributed MPPT process typically do not suggest using central (centralized) MPPT control in the DC-AC conversion stage in conjunction with distributed MPPT control. . Instead, either distributed MPPT or central or centralized MPPT is realized. As such, the interaction between the MPPT controller embedded in the DC-AC stage and the MPPT controller in the DC-DC converter for each of the panels is for a system that implements both types of MPPT control. It remains a design issue.

  If the DC-DC converters lack certain features that allow different types of MPPT controls to operate in conjunction with each other, these DC-DC converters can be operated without central or centralized MPPT control. It may only be suitable for the operation of In particular, the dynamic interaction between distributed MPPT control and centralized MPPT control may cause the system to vibrate and cause the panel to operate out of their maximum power point. Also, if no synchronization is provided between these two different types of MPPT controllers, the DC-DC converter may begin operation before the DC-AC stay begins operation. In this case, the DC-AC stage is unable to disperse or convert the power supplied by the DC-DC converter, resulting in an unlimited increase in string voltage and as much as possible of some of the systems Damage to components may occur. In addition, if no communication is provided between the MPPT controller and the inverter, the DC-DC converter continues to generate power while the DC-AC stage no longer sinks power. Under certain conditions, an islanding event or a grid break may occur.

  The various examples used to illustrate the principles of the present invention in FIGS. 1-12 described below and in this patent document are merely exemplary and are to be construed in a manner that limits the scope of the present invention. It shouldn't be. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the principles of the invention may be implemented in any suitably configured device or system.

  FIG. 1A illustrates an energy generation system 10 that can integrate local maximum power point tracking (MPPT) with a centralized MPPT, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. The energy generation system 10 includes a plurality of energy generation devices (EGDs) 12 each coupled to a corresponding local transducer 14, which together form an energy generation array 16. Yes. The illustrated photovoltaic system 10 also includes a DC-AC converter 22 that is coupled to the local converter 14 and is capable of receiving current and voltage from the local converter 14.

  As described in this disclosure, in certain embodiments, the energy generation system 10 may include a photoelectric system and the energy generation device 12 may include a photoelectric (PV) panel. is there. However, it will be appreciated that the energy generation system 10 may have any other suitable type of energy generation system, such as a wind turbine system, a fuel cell system, and the like. In these embodiments, the energy generator 12 can include a wind turbine, a fuel cell, and the like. Also, the energy generation system 10 can be either a land-mounted system or a floating system.

  The PV panels 12 in the array 16 are arranged in a plurality of rows 24. In the illustrated embodiment, the array 16 has two columns, and each column 24 has three panels 12. However, it is understood that the array 16 can have any suitable number of columns 24 and each column 24 can have any suitable number of panels 12. In the illustrated embodiment, the panels 12 in each row 24 are realized in series connection. As a result, although the output voltage of each local converter 14 may still be close to its input voltage, it provides a high voltage to the input port of the DC-AC converter 22, which is a number of implementations. In an example, it may operate with an input voltage between 150V and 500V. Thus, there is no need for a transformer-based converter such as would be used in a parallel configuration column, resulting in a highly efficient and low cost local converter 14. Is possible.

  Each PV panel 12 can convert solar energy into electrical energy. Each local transducer 14 is coupled to its corresponding panel 12 and by the panel 12 so that the electrical energy generated by the panel 12 can be used by a load for the array 16 (not shown in FIG. 1A). It is possible to reconstruct the voltage-current relationship of the supplied input. A DC-AC converter 22 is coupled to the array 16 and to a load alternating current (AC) that can couple the direct current (DC) generated by the local converter 14 to the DC-AC converter 22. It is possible to convert. The DC-AC converter 22 has a central MPPT control block 22 that can provide a centralized MPPT by calibrating the MPPs of the array 16.

  The MPPT automatically determines the voltage or current at which the array 16 or panel 12 should operate in order to generate maximum power output for a particular temperature and solar irradiance. Centralized MPPT for the entire array 16 is performed when the array 16 is operating under ideal conditions (ie, the same irradiance, temperature and electrical characteristics for each panel 12 in the array 16). It is relatively easy to do. However, the centralized MPPT for the entire array 16 is more complex, for example when there is a mismatch or a partially shaded condition. In this case, the MPPT technique may not give accurate results due to the relative optimal conditions of the multi-peak power and voltage characteristics of the array 16 in a mismatched state. As a result, only a few of the panels 12 in the array 16 may be operating ideally and may dramatically reduce power generation. Thus, to solve this problem, each local transducer 14 can provide a local MPPT to its corresponding panel 12. In this way, each panel 12 is capable of operating at its own maximum power point (MPP) in both ideal and mismatched or shadowed conditions. In the embodiment where the energy generator 12 has a wind turbine, the MPPT can be used to adjust the pitch of the blades of the wind turbine. It is also understood that MPPT can be used to optimize a system 10 having other types of energy generators 12.

  The energy generation system 10 provides a system control loop for the overall system 10 controlled by the central MPPT control block 32 and is local to each of the panels 12 controlled by the corresponding local transducer 14. Give a control loop. The operating frequencies of each of these loops are separated from each other by at least a predetermined distance to prevent system vibration and to prevent the panels 12 from operating out of their MPP. In one embodiment, the system control loop is a closed loop system that includes an array 16, a central MPPT control block 32, and a DC-AC converter 22. Further, each local control loop is a closed loop system that includes a panel 12 and a corresponding local transducer 14.

  In some embodiments, each local converter 14 is configured such that the local control loop settling time for that converter 14 is faster than the time constant for the system control loop. . In certain embodiments, the stabilization time of each local control loop is at least five times faster than the time constant of the system control loop. As a result, in steady state, the array 16 of panels 12 is viewed by the DC-AC converter 22 as a power source having a power amount that is the sum of the maximum powers obtainable in each panel 12. May be possible. At the same time, the central MPPT control block 32 can implement its normal optimization algorithm, and ultimately the central MPPT control block 32 strings to values that maximize the efficiency of the local converter 14. It is possible to set the (column) voltage.

  In this way, system vibrations that can arise from dynamic interactions between the system control loop and the local control loop are avoided. Furthermore, the panels 12 can usually be operated in their MPP. It is also possible to provide synchronization between the system loop and the local loop in order to avoid damage that may occur as a result of the string voltage increasing without limit. Finally, the DC-AC converter 22 is prevented from islanding, which stops the DC-AC converter 22 from sinking power and generates an uncontrolled growth of its input voltage. Is done.

  FIG. 1B illustrates an energy generation system 100 that can be centrally controlled in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The energy generation system 100 includes a plurality of energy generation devices (EGDs) 102 that are each coupled to a corresponding local transducer 104, which together form an energy generation array 106. Yes. In certain embodiments, as described in this disclosure, energy generation system 100 can include a photoelectric system, and energy generation device 102 can include a photoelectric (PV) panel. is there. However, it will be appreciated that the energy generation system 100 may have any other suitable type of energy generation system, such as a wind turbine system, a fuel cell system, and the like. In these embodiments, the energy generating device 102 can include a wind turbine, a fuel cell, and the like. Also, the energy generation system 100 can be either a land-mounted system or a floating system.

1 is a schematic diagram of an energy generation system capable of integrating local maximum power point tracking (MPPT) with centralized MPPT according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an energy generation system capable of centralizing control according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. Schematic illustrating the local transducer of FIG. 1A or 1B according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating details of the local transducer of FIG. 2 in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method for implementing MPPT in the local transducer of FIG. 2 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method for implementing MPPT in the local transducer of FIG. 2 according to another embodiment of the present disclosure. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an energy generation system including a central array controller that can be selected between a centralized MPPT and a distributed MPPT for the energy generation system in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating the array of FIG. 5 under partially shaded conditions according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. (A) thru | or (C) is each graph which each illustrated the voltage and electric power characteristic corresponding to three of the photoelectric panels of FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a method for selecting between centralized MPPT and distributed MPPT for the energy generation system of FIG. 5 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a system for activating and deactivating a local controller for a local transducer in an energy generation system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating an example of device voltage variation with respect to time for the system of FIG. 9 in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating the activator of FIG. 9 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. 10 is a flowchart illustrating a method for activating and deactivating the local transducer of FIG. 9 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.

  The illustrated photovoltaic system 100 has a central array controller 110 and may also have a DC-AC converter 112 or other suitable load when the system 100 is operated as an on-grid system. Is possible. However, system 100 can operate as an off-grid system by coupling array 106 to a battery charger or other suitable energy storage device instead of DC-AC converter 112. It is understood that

  The plurality of PV panels 102 in the array 106 are arranged in a plurality of strings 114. In the illustrated embodiment, the array 106 has two strings 114 and each string 114 has three panels 102. However, the array 106 can have any suitable number of strings 114 and each string 114 can have any suitable number of panels 102. In the illustrated embodiment, the panels 102 in each string 114 are realized in series connection. As a result, while supplying a high voltage to the input port of the DC-AC converter 112, the output voltage of each local converter 104 can still be close to the input voltage. 112 can operate with input voltages between 150V and 500V in some embodiments. Thus, there is no need for a transformer based converter as used in the case of a parallel configuration string, and as a result, a highly efficient and low cost local converter 104 can be realized. .

  Each PV panel 102 can convert solar energy into electrical energy. Each local transducer 104 is coupled to its corresponding panel 102 and is supplied by the panel 102 so that electrical energy generated by the panel 102 can be used by a load for the array 106 (not shown in FIG. 1B). It is possible to reconfigure the input voltage / current relationship. The DC-AC converter 112 is coupled to the array 106 and to a load alternating current (AC) that can couple the direct current (DC) generated by the local converter 104 to the DC-AC converter 112. It is possible to convert.

  Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) automatically determines the voltage or current at which the panel 102 should be operated to generate maximum power output for a particular temperature and solar radiation exposure. MPPT for the entire array 106 may be performed if the array 106 is operating under ideal conditions (ie, the same irradiance, temperature and electrical characteristics for each panel 102 in the array 106). It is relatively easy. However, the MPPT for the array 106 as a whole becomes more complex, for example, in the case of a mismatch present or partially shaded condition. In this state, the MPPT technique may not give accurate results due to the relative optimum of the multi-peak power versus voltage characteristics of the array 106 in a mismatched state. As a result, only a few of the panels 102 in the array 106 may be operating ideally, dramatically reducing power generation. Thus, to solve this problem, each local transducer 104 can provide a local MPPT for its corresponding panel 102. In this way, each panel 102 can operate at its own optimum power point (MPP) in both ideal conditions and in the presence of mismatches or shadows. In the embodiment where the energy generator 102 has a wind turbine, the MPPT can be used to adjust the pitch of the blades of the wind turbine. It will also be appreciated that MPPT can be used to optimize a system 100 having other types of energy generators 102.

  The central array controller 110 is coupled to the array 106 and can communicate with the array 106 via either a wired link (such as a serial or parallel bus) or a wireless link. The central array controller 110 can have a diagnostic module 120 and / or a control module 125. The diagnostic module 120 can monitor the photoelectric system 100 while the control module 125 can control the photoelectric system 100.

  Diagnostic module 120 may receive both local transducer data for local transducer 104 and device data for local transducer 104 corresponding to panel 102 from each local transducer 104 in array 106. Is possible. As used herein, “device data” means output voltage, output current, temperature, irradiance, output power, and the like for panel 102. Similarly, “local converter data” means local converter output voltage, local converter output current, local converter output power, and the like.

  The diagnostic module 120 can also generate reports for the system 100 and provide the reports to the operator. For example, the diagnostic module 120 may be able to display some or all of the device data and local transducer data to the operator. Further, the diagnostic module 120 may be able to supply some or all of the device data and local transducer data to the control module 125. The diagnostic module 120 can also analyze the data in any suitable manner and provide the analysis results to the operator and / or control module 125. For example, the diagnostic module 120 can determine statistics for each panel 102 based on any suitable time frame such as hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, etc.

  The diagnostic module 120 can also provide defect monitoring for the array 106. Based on the data received from the local transducer 104, the diagnostic module 120 may have one or more defects that are the panel 102, such as failed, malfunctioned, shaded, or contaminated. The sex panel 102 can be identified. The diagnostic module 120 can also notify the operator if the defective panel 102 should be replaced, repaired, or cleaned.

  The control module 125 can actually control the array 106 by sending control signals to one or more local transducers 104. For example, the control module 125 can send a bypass control signal to a particular local transducer 104 that has a corresponding panel 103 that is failing. The diversion control signal prompts the local converter 104 to divert the panel and from the array 106 to the panel without affecting the operation of other panels 102 in the same string 114 as the diverted panel 102. 102 is effectively removed.

  In addition, the control module 125 can send a control signal to one or more local converters 104 that direct the output voltage or current of the local converter 104 to be adjusted. . In some embodiments, the MPPT functionality of the local converter 104 can be transferred to the central array controller 110. In these embodiments, the control module 125 also calibrates the MPP of each panel 102 and converts ratio command to operate each panel 102 in its own MPP as determined by the control module 125. Can be sent to each local transducer 104 based on the calibration.

  The control module 125 is also capable of receiving and operating on instructions from an operator. For example, an operator can instruct the control module 125 that the system 100 should go on-grid or off-grid, and the control module 125 causes the system 100 to be on-grid or to turn the system 100 off-grid. It is possible to respond by letting

  Thus, by implementing the central array controller 110, the photovoltaic system 100 provides a better utilization on a per panel basis. The system 100 also provides increased flexibility by allowing mixing of different sources. The central array controller 110 also provides better protection and data collection for the entire system 100.

  FIG. 2 illustrates a local transducer 204 according to one embodiment of this disclosure. The local converter 204 may represent one of the local converters of FIG. 1A or one of the local converters 104 of FIG. 1B, but the local converter 204 is It will be understood that it can be implemented in any suitably configured energy generation system without departing from the scope. Further, although shown coupled to an energy generator 202, referred to as a PV panel, the local converter 204 can be a single cell of the PV panel or a subset of multiple panels in a photovoltaic array, or a window. It will be appreciated that it can be coupled to another energy generator 202 such as a turbine, fuel cell or the like.

  The local converter 204 includes a power stage 206 and a local controller 208 that further includes an MPPT module 210 and an optional communication interface 212. The power stage 206 can receive as input the panel voltage and current from the PV panel 202 and reconfigure the input voltage-current relationship to generate the output voltage and current.

  The communication interface 212 of the local controller 208 can provide a communication channel between the local transducer 204 and a central array controller, such as the central array controller 110 of FIG. 1B. However, in embodiments where the local transducer 204 does not communicate with the central array controller, the communication interface 212 can be omitted.

  The MPPT module 212 can receive panel voltage and current from the panel 202 as input and can receive output voltage and current from the power stage 206 if required by the implemented algorithm. It is. Based on these inputs, the MPPT module 210 can provide signals for controlling the power stage 206. In this manner, the MPPT module 210 of the local controller 208 can provide MPPT to the PV panel 202.

By providing the MPPT, the MPPT module 210 maintains the corresponding panel 202 to function at a basically fixed operating point (ie, a fixed voltage V _pan and current I _pan corresponding to the maximum power point of the panel 202). . Thus, for a given fixed solar irradiance, in steady state, the input power to the local transducer 204 is fixed because it corresponds to the relative or absolute maximum power point of the panel 202 ( That is, P _pan = V _pan · I _pan ) _. Furthermore, the local converter 204 has a relatively high efficiency, so the output power is approximately equal to the input power (ie, P _out ≈P _pan ).

  FIG. 3 illustrates details of the local transducer 204 according to one embodiment of this disclosure. In this embodiment, power stage 206 is implemented as a single-inductor, four-switch synchronous buck-boost switching regulator, and MPPT module 210 includes: It has a power stage regulator 302, an MPPT control block 304, and two analog-to-digital converters (ADC) 306 and 308.

The ADC 306 can scale and quantize the analog panel voltage V _pan and the analog panel current I _pan to generate a digital panel voltage and a digital panel current, respectively. Although illustrated and described as panel voltage and panel current, V _pan can mean output device voltage for any suitable energy generator 202 such as a wind turbine, fuel cell, etc. And it is understood that I _pan can mean output device current. The ADC 306 coupled to the MPPT control block 304 and the communication interface 212 can also provide digital panel voltage and current signals to both the MPPT control block 304 and the communication interface 212. Similarly, the ADC 308 can scale and quantize the analog output voltage and analog output current to generate a digital output voltage and a digital output current, respectively. An ADC 308 coupled to the MPPT control block 304 and the communication interface 212 may provide digital output voltage and current signals to both the MPPT control block 304 and the communication interface 212. The communication interface 212 can supply the digital panel voltage and current signals generated by the ADC 306 and the digital output voltage and current signals generated by the ADC 308 to the central array controller.

  An MPPT control block 304 coupled to the power stage regulator 302 can receive the digital panel voltage and current from the ADC 306 and the digital output voltage and current from the ADC 308. Based on at least some of these digital signals, the MPPT control block 304 can generate a conversion ratio command for the power stage regulator 302. The conversion ratio command has a conversion ratio for the power stage regulator 302 for use when operating the power stage 206. In an embodiment in which the MPPT control block 304 can generate the conversion ratio command based on digital panel voltage and current rather than based on digital output voltage and current, the ADC 308 is Instead, the digital output voltage and current can be supplied only to the communication interface 212.

  In some embodiments, the power stage regulator 302 includes buck-boost mode control logic and a digital pulse width modulator. The power stage regulator 302 differs in mode by generating a pulse width modulation (PWM) signal based on the conversion ratio provided by the MPPT control block 304 that can calibrate the conversion ratio of the PWM signal to the power stage 206. Thus, the power stage 206 can be operated.

  The power stage regulator 302 is coupled to the power stage 206 and is based on the conversion ratio from the MPPT control block 304 by operating the power stage 206 using a duty cycle and mode determined based on the conversion ratio. The power stage 206 can be operated. In the illustrated embodiment where the power stage 206 is implemented as a buck-boost converter, possible modes for the power stage 206 include buck mode, boost mode, buck-boost mode, bypass mode, and shutdown mode. It is possible.

In this embodiment, the power stage regulator 302 is in buck-boost mode when the conversion ratio CR is within the buck-boost range, in buck mode when CR is below the buck-boost range, and CR is When it is larger than the buck-boost range, the power stage 206 can be operated in the boost mode. The buck-boost range encompasses values that are substantially equal to one. For example, in the specific embodiment, the buck-boost range can have 0.95 to 1.05. When the power stage 206 is in the buck mode, the power stage regulator 302 can operate the power stage 206 in a completely back configuration if CR is less than _{the maximum buck} conversion ratio CR _{book, max} . Similarly, when the power stage 206 is in boost mode, if the CR is greater than the maximum boost conversion ratio CR _{boost, min} , the power stage regulator 302 can operate the power stage 206 in a fully boosted form. .

Finally, the power stage regulator 302 can alternately operate the power stage 206 in the buck mode and the boost mode when the conversion ratio is greater than CR _{book, max} and less than CR _{boost, min.} . In this case, the power stage regulator 302 can perform time division multiplexing to alternately operate between the buck mode and the boost mode. Accordingly, when the conversion ratio is closer to CR _{book, max} , the power stage regulator 302 can operate the power stage 206 in the buck mode more frequently than in the boost mode. Similarly, when the conversion ratio is closer to CR _{boost, min} , the power stage regulator 302 can operate the power stage 206 in the boost form more frequently than the buck form. When the conversion ratio is near the midpoint between CR _{book, max} and CR _{boost, min} , the power stage regulator 302 can cause the power stage 206 to operate in the buck mode with approximately the same frequency as the boost mode. It is. For example, when the power stage 206 is in the buck-boost mode, the power stage regulator 302 can operate the power stage 206 alternately alternately in the buck mode and the boost mode.

  In the illustrated embodiment, the power stage 206 includes four switches 310a-d, an inductor L, and a capacitor C. In some embodiments, switch 310 may comprise an N-channel power MOSFET. In certain embodiments, these transistors can have gallium nitride-on-silicon devices. However, it is understood that the switch 310 can be implemented in other ways as appropriate without departing from the scope of this disclosure. In addition, the power stage 206 can have one or more drivers (not shown in FIG. 3) to drive the switch 310 (eg, the gate of the transistor). For example, in certain embodiments, a first driver can be coupled between power stage regulator 302 and transistors 310a and 301b to drive the gates of transistors 310a and 310b, while the second A driver can be coupled between the power stage regulator 302 and the transistors 310c and 310d to drive the gates of the transistors 310c and 310d. In this embodiment, the PWM signal generated by the power stage regulator 302 is supplied to the driver, which drives the gates of their respective transistors 310 based on these PWM signals.

  In the illustrated embodiment, when operating the power stage 206, the power stage regulator 302 can generate digital pulses to control the switch 310 of the power stage 206. In the case of the embodiment described below. The switch 310 includes a transistor. In the buck configuration, power stage regulator 302 turns off transistor 310c and turns on transistor 310d. The pulses then alternately turn on and off transistors 310a and 310b so that power stage 206 operates as a buck regulator. The duty cycle of transistor 310a for this embodiment is equal to duty cycle D included in the conversion ratio command generated by MPPT control block 304. In the boost mode, the power stage regulator 302 turns on the transistor 310a and turns off the transistor 301b. The pulse then turns transistors 310c and 310d alternately on and off so that power stage 206 operates as a boost regulator. The duty cycle of transistor 310c for this embodiment is equal to 1-D.

In the buck-boost mode, the power stage regulator 302 performs time division multiplexing between the buck mode and the boost mode as described above. The power stage regulator 302 generates control signals for the buck switch pair of transistors 310a and 310b and the boost switch pair of transistors 301c and 301d. The duty cycle for transistor 310a is fixed at a duty cycle corresponding to CR _{book, max} , and the duty cycle for transistor 310c is fixed at a duty cycle corresponding to CR _{boost, min} . The ratio between buck mode and boost mode operation over a specified time period is linearly proportional to D.

  The power stage 206 is operated in the buck-boost mode when the output voltage is close to the panel voltage. In this state, in the illustrated embodiment, the stress due to the inductor current ripple and voltage switch is much lower than that of the SPEIC and conventional buck-boost converter. The illustrated power stage 206 also achieves higher efficiency compared to a conventional buck-boost converter.

  In some embodiments, as will be described in more detail below with respect to FIG. 4A, the MPPT control block 304 has four modes: dormant, tracking, and holding. And in one of the bypasses. If the panel voltage is less than a predetermined primary threshold voltage, the MPPT control block 304 can operate in dormant mode. While in the dormant mode, the MPPT control block 304 turns off the transistors 310a-d. For example, in some embodiments, the MPPT control block 304 generates a conversion ratio command that prompts the power stage regulator 302 to turn off the transistors 310a-d when the MPPT control block 304 is in the dormant mode. It is possible. Accordingly, the power stage 206 is put into a shutdown mode and the panel 202 is bypassed, effectively removing the panel 202 from the photovoltaic system in which it is implemented.

  When the panel voltage rises above the primary threshold voltage, the MPPT control block 304 can operate in tracking mode. In this mode, the MPPT control block 304 can perform maximum power point tracking for the panel 202 to determine the optimal conversion ratio for the power stage regulator 302. In this mode, the power stage regulator 302 causes the power stage 206 to enter the buck mode, the boost mode, or the buck boost mode depending on the currently generated conversion ratio command.

  Further, in some embodiments, the MPPT control block 304 can also have a shutdown register that allows the MPPT control block 304 to maintain the power stage 206 in shutdown mode. Can be modified by the system operator or any suitable control program such as a control program implemented in the central array controller. In this embodiment, the MPPT control block 304 allows (i) the panel voltage to exceed the primary threshold voltage, and (ii) the shutdown register allows the MPPT control block 304 to take the power stage 206 out of shutdown mode. The operation in tracking mode will not begin until both of these conditions are satisfied.

  If the MPPT control block 304 finds the optimal conversion ratio, the MPPT control block 304 can operate in the holding mode for a predetermined time period. In this mode, the MPPT control block 304 can continue to supply the same conversion ratio determined to be the optimal conversion ratio in the tracking mode to the power stage regulator 302. In this mode, as in the tracking mode, the power stage 206 is set to the buck mode, the boost mode, or the buck boost mode depending on the optimum conversion ratio given in the conversion ratio command. . After the predetermined time period has elapsed, the MPPT control block 304 confirms that the optimum conversion ratio has not changed, or if the condition for the panel 202 changes, sets a new optimum conversion ratio. To find out, it is possible to return to tracking mode.

  As described in more detail below in connection with FIGS. 5-8, if each panel, such as panel 202 in the photoelectric array, is under uniform illumination and there is no mismatch between panels 202, The central array controller can cause the MPPT control block 304 and thus the power stage 206 to be in bypass mode. In the bypass mode, in some embodiments, transistors 310a and 310d are turned on and transistors 310b and 310c are turned off so that the panel voltage is equal to the output voltage. In other embodiments, an optional switch 312 can be included in the power stage 206, which can couple the input port to the output port to make the output voltage equal to the panel voltage. . Thus, if MPPT is not required locally, the local converter 204 can be essentially removed from the system, thereby reducing the losses associated with the local converter 204 and Maximize efficiency by increasing lifetime.

  Thus, as described above, the MPPT control block 304 can operate in a dormant mode and cause the power stage 206 to enter a shutdown mode, which bypasses the panel 202. The MPPT control block 304 can also operate in a tracking mode or a holding mode. In any of these modes, the MPPT control block 304 can cause the power stage 206 to be in one of a buck mode, a boost mode, and a buck-boost mode. Finally, the MPPT control block 304 can operate in bypass mode and cause the power stage 206 to be in bypass mode, which allows the panel 202 to be directly coupled to other panels 202 in the array. While local transducer 204 is bypassed.

  By operating the local converter 204 in this manner, the string current for a string of columns including the panel 202 is independent of the individual panel current. Instead, the string current is set by the string voltage and the total string power. In addition, the shadowless panel 202 can continue to operate at the peak power point regardless of the shadow conditions of the other panels in the string.

  In an alternative embodiment, if MPPT control block 304 finds the optimal conversion ratio, MPPT control block 304 determines that the optimal conversion ratio corresponds to the buck-boost mode for power stage 206. It is possible to operate in bypass mode instead of holding mode. In the buck-boost mode, the output voltage is close to the panel voltage. Thus, the panel 202 can be operated near its maximum power point by bypassing the local transducer 204, which increases efficiency. As in the previously described embodiment, the MPPT control block 304 periodically returns from this bypass mode to the tracking mode to verify that the optimal conversion ratio remains within the buck-boost mode range. It is possible.

  In some embodiments, the MPPT control block 304 uses a conversion ratio for the power stage regulator 302 rather than the normal step change to avoid stress on the transistors, inductors and capacitors of the power stage 206. It is possible to adjust gradually. In some embodiments, the MPPT control block 304 can implement different MPPT techniques to adjust panel voltage or conductance instead of conversion ratio. Furthermore, the MPPT control block 304 can adjust the reference voltage instead of the conversion ratio for dynamic input voltage regulation.

  In addition, the MPPT control block 304 can allow a relatively fast and smooth transition between the shutdown mode and other modes for the power stage 206. The MPPT control block 304 can have non-volatile memory, which can store a previous maximum power point state, such as a conversion ratio. In this embodiment, when the MPPT control block 304 is transitioning to dormant mode, the maximum power point state is stored in this non-volatile memory. If the MPPT control block 304 subsequently returns to tracking mode, the stored maximum power point state can be used as the initial maximum power point state. In this way, the transition between the shutdown mode and other modes can be significantly reduced for the power stage 206.

In some embodiments, the MPPT control block 304 can also provide overpower and / or overvoltage protection for the local converter 204. The MPPT control block 304 attempts to extract the maximum power. This is because the signals V _pan and I _pan are feedforward to the MPPT control block 304 via the ADC 306. The output voltage for local converter 204 reaches a maximum when there is an open circuit at the output of power stage 206. Thus, in the case of excess power protection, the output current of the local converter 204 can be used as a signal for turning the MPPT control block 304 on and off. In this embodiment, if the output current drops too low, the conversion ratio can be set by the MPPT control block 304 so that the panel voltage is approximately equal to the output voltage.

  In the case of overvoltage protection, the MPPT control block 304 may have a maximum conversion ratio for conversion ratio commands that the MPPT control block 304 does not exceed. Thus, if the conversion ratio continues to be higher than the maximum conversion ratio, the MPPT control block 304 limits the conversion ratio to its maximum value. This ensures that the output voltage does not increase beyond the corresponding maximum value. The maximum conversion ratio value can be fixed or adaptive. For example, adaptive conversion ratio limiting can be achieved by sensing the panel voltage and calculating an estimate of the output voltage corresponding to the next programmed value of the conversion ratio according to the conversion ratio of power stage 206. Is possible.

  Further, in the illustrated embodiment, the power stage 206 has an optional unidirectional switch 314. This optional switch 314 can be provided to allow the panel 202 to be bypassed when the power stage 206 is in the shutdown mode, thereby removing the panel 202 from the array while the other panels 202 are It is possible to continue to operate. In certain embodiments, the unidirectional switch 314 can include a diode. However, the unidirectional switch 314 can have any other suitable type of unidirectional switch without departing from the scope of this disclosure.

  FIG. 4A illustrates a method 400 for implementing MPPT in the local converter 204 according to one embodiment of this disclosure. This embodiment of method 400 is merely exemplary. Other embodiments of the method 400 may be implemented without departing from the scope of this disclosure.

  The method 400 begins with the MPPT control block 304 operating in dormant mode (step 401). For example, the MPPT control block 304 generates a conversion ratio command to prompt the power stage regulator 302 to turn off the transistors 310a-d of the power stage 206, thereby putting the power stage 206 into shutdown mode and bypassing the panel 202. Is possible.

While in the dormant mode, the MPPT control block 304 monitors the panel voltage V _pan and compares the panel voltage to the primary threshold voltage V _th (step 402). For example, the ADC 306 can convert a panel voltage from an analog signal to a digital signal and provide the digital panel voltage to the MPPT control block 304, which can be used to compare the primary voltage to the digital panel voltage. Stores the threshold voltage.

  As long as the panel voltage remains below the primary threshold voltage (step 402), the MPPT control block 304 continues to operate in dormant mode. Further, as described above, the MPPT control block 304 can remain in the dormant mode if the shutdown register indicates that the power stage 206 should remain in the shutdown mode. However, when the panel voltage exceeds the primary threshold voltage (step 402), the MPPT control block 304 generates a conversion ratio command to operate the power stage 206 that includes the initial conversion ratio (step 403). . For example, in one embodiment, the MPPT control block 304 can start with a conversion ratio of 1. Alternatively, the MPPT control block 304 can store the optimal conversion ratio determined during the previous tracking mode. In this embodiment, the MPPT control block 304 can initialize the conversion ratio to be the same as the optimal conversion ratio previously determined. The conversion ratio command generated by the MPPT control block 304 is also provided to the power stage regulator 302, which operates the power stage 206 using the initial conversion ratio.

At this point, the MPPT control block 304 monitors the panel current I _pan and output current I _out and compares the panel current and output current to the threshold I _th (step 404). For example, ADC 306 can convert the panel current from an analog signal to a digital signal and supply the digital panel current to MPPT control block 304, and ADC 308 can convert the output current from an analog signal to a digital signal. The digital output current can be supplied to the MPPT control block 304. The MPPT control block 304 stores a threshold current for comparison with the digital panel current and the digital output current. As long as at least one of these currents I _pan and I _out remains below the threshold current (step 404), the MPPT control block 304 continues to monitor the current level. However, when both of these currents exceed the threshold current (step 404), the MPPT control block 304 starts operating in tracking mode, which initially sets the tracking variable T to 1 and counts. Is included (step 406).

  Although not shown in the method 400 of FIG. 4A, the MPPT control block 304 continues to monitor the panel voltage while in the tracking mode, and the panel voltage is set to a secondary threshold voltage less than the primary threshold voltage. It is understood that comparisons are possible. When the panel voltage falls below this secondary threshold voltage, the MPPT control block 304 can return to dormant mode. By using a secondary threshold voltage that is less than the primary threshold voltage, the MPPT control block 304 is given noise immunity, which indicates that the MPPT control block 304 frequently switches between dormant and tracking modes. To prevent.

After setting the value of the tracking variable and initializing the count, the MPPT control block 304 calculates the initial power for the panel 202 (step 408). For example, the ADC 306 can provide digital panel current and panel voltage signals (I _pan and V _pan ) to the MPPT control block 304, which multiplies these signals together to produce the device (ie, , Panel) determine an initial value for the power (I _pan · V _pan ).

  After calculating the initial power, the MPPT control block 304 corrects the conversion ratio in the first direction and generates a conversion ratio command having the corrected conversion ratio (step 410). For example, in some embodiments, the MPPT control block 304 may increase the conversion ratio. In other embodiments, the MPPT control block 304 may decrease the conversion ratio. After providing system time to stabilize, MPPT control block 304 calculates the current power for panel 222 (step 412). For example, the ADC 306 can provide digital panel current and panel voltage signals to the MPPT control block 304, which multiplies these signals together to determine a current value for panel power.

  The MPPT control block 304 then compares the current calculated power with the previously calculated power, which is initially the initial power (step 414). If the current power is greater than the previous power (step 414), the MPPT control block 304 modifies the conversion ratio in the same direction as the previous modification and generates an updated conversion ratio command (step 416). In some embodiments, the conversion ratio can be corrected higher or lower in the same dimensional increment. In other embodiments, the conversion ratio can be corrected higher or lower in linear or non-linear increments to optimize the system response. For example, if the conversion ratio is far from the optimal value, it may be desirable for some systems to use a larger increment initially and then use a smaller increment as it approaches the optimal value. is there.

  The MPPT control block 304 is also modified in the same direction as for the previous calculation if the tracking variable T is equal to 1, that is, if the conversion ratio is modified relative to the previous calculation of the previous calculation. (Step 418). Thus, when T = 1, the panel power has increased in the same direction with the previous modification of the conversion ratio. In this case, after providing system time to stabilize, MPPT control block 304 again calculates the current power for panel 202 (step 412) and compares it to the previous power (step 414). ). However, T is not equal to 1, that is, the conversion ratio has been modified in the opposite direction to the previous calculation (step 418) as if it had been modified for the previous calculation. If the MPPT control block 304 determines that it is indicating, the MPPT control block 304 sets T to 1 and increments the count (step 420).

Next, the MPPT control block 304 determines whether or not the count exceeds the count threshold C _th (step 422). If the count threshold has not been exceeded by the current value of the count (step 412), after providing system time to stabilize, the MPPT control block 304 again calculates the current power for the panel 202. (Step 412) and compare it with the previous power (step 414) to determine whether the panel power is increasing or decreasing.

  When MPPT control block 304 determines that the current power is not greater than the previous power (step 414), MPPT control block 304 has modified and updated the conversion ratio in the opposite direction to the previous modification. A conversion ratio command is generated (step 424). The MPPT control block 304 also determines whether the tracking variable T is equal to 2, that is, in the opposite direction to the previous calculation if the conversion ratio was modified for the previous calculation. It is determined whether or not it has been corrected (step 426). In this case, after providing system time to stabilize, MPPT control block 304 again calculates the current power for panel 202 (step 412) and compares it with the previous power (step 414). ).

However, T is not equal to 2, indicating that the conversion ratio has been modified in the same direction as for the previous calculation when modified for the previous calculation of the previous calculation, If the MPPT control block 304 determines, the MPPT control block 304 sets T to 2 and increments the count (step 428). Next, the MPPT control block 304 determines whether or not the count exceeds the count threshold C _th as described above (step 422).

  If the count exceeds the count threshold (step 422), i.e., indicates that the conversion ratio has been alternately modified in the first and second directions for a number of times greater than the count threshold, MPPT control block 304 has found the optimal conversion ratio corresponding to the maximum power point for panel 202, and MPPT control block 304 begins operation in holding mode (step 430).

  While in the holding mode, the MPPT control block 304 can set a timer and reinitialize the count (step 432). When the timer expires (step 434), the MPPT control block 304 returns to tracking mode (step 436) and calculates the current power (step 412) when the MPPT control block 304 was previously in tracking mode. It can be compared with the calculated last power (step 414). In this way, the MPPT control block 304 can ensure that the optimal conversion ratio has not changed, or can find a different optimal conversion ratio if the conditions for the panel 202 change. Is possible.

  Although FIG. 4A illustrates one example of a method 400 for tracking the maximum power point for the energy generator 202, various variations on the method 400 may be configured. For example, although the method 400 has been described with respect to a photovoltaic panel, the method 400 can be implemented for other energy generators 202 such as wind turbines, fuel cells, and the like. Further, although the method 400 has been described with respect to the MPPT control block 304 of FIG. 3, the method 400 may be implemented in any suitably configured MPPT control block without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Understood. Further, in some embodiments, if the MPPT control block 304 determines that the optimal conversion ratio corresponds to the buck-boost mode for the power stage 206, the MPPT control block 304 It is possible to operate in dormant mode instead of holding mode. In these embodiments, the amount of time after which the timer elapses during the dormant mode may be the same as or different from the amount of time associated with the timer during the holding mode. Also, although shown as a series of steps, the steps in method 400 can overlap, occur in parallel, occur multiple times, or occur in a different order.

  FIG. 4B illustrates a method 450 for implementing MPPT in the local converter 204 in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure. In one particular embodiment, the method 450 of FIG. 4B may correspond to a portion of the method 400 of FIG. 4A. For example, the steps described with respect to method 450 may generally correspond to steps 403, 408, 410, 412, 414, 416, 424 of method 400. However, additional details regarding these steps are included within method 450. In another particular embodiment, method 450 can be implemented independently of method 400 and is not limited by the implementations described above with respect to method 400. Further, as in method 400, the embodiment of method 450 described below is merely exemplary. Other embodiments of the method 450 may be implemented without departing from the scope of this disclosure.

Method 450 begins with a startup sequence that includes steps 452, 454, and 456. Initially, the MPPT control block 304 sets the converter conversion ratio M to the minimum conversion ratio M _min (step 452). The MPPT control block 304 then sets the previous converter conversion ratio M _old , which is the conversion ratio used during the last MPPT iteration, to M, and the conversion ratio M for the current MPPT iteration to M _old + ΔM. Note that ΔM gives the incremental difference in conversion ratio for each iteration (step 454). If the value of M set in this step is less than the value of the initial conversion ratio M _start to be used when performing MPPT (step 456), both _Mold and M are updated as described above. As a result, both values are increased by ΔM (step 454). When the value of M reaches or exceeds the value of M _start (step 456), the startup sequence is complete and the method continues at step 458.

The MPPT control block 304 sets the value of M to M _start and sets the value of “sign” or “sign” to 1, which gives the direction to the MPPT disturbance at each iteration of the MPPT process (step 458). At this point, the MPPT control block 304 senses input voltage and current (V _in and I _in ) provided by the ADC 306 and senses output voltage and current (V _out and I _out ) provided by the ADC 308. The MPPT control block 304 also calculates the average input voltage and current (V _{in av} and I _{in av} ) and the average output voltage and current (V _{out av} and I _{out av} ), then as V _{in av} × I _{in av} The calculated input power is calculated (step 460).

  In some embodiments, the average input voltage and current and the average output voltage and current are calculated over the second half of the MPPT disturbance period. For certain embodiments with a 50 MHz clock, the input voltage and current can be sampled at 12.5 kHz, and the average input voltage and current and average output voltage and current can be calculated at 750 Hz. It is.

  The MPPT control block 304 then determines whether the temperature and current are acceptable before enabling the MPPT process (step 462). In certain embodiments, the MPPT control block 304 may have an over temperature pin that can receive an over temperature signal if the temperature exceeds a predetermined threshold. In this embodiment, if the excess temperature signal indicates that the threshold has been exceeded, the MPPT control block 304 determines that the temperature is not acceptable.

In certain embodiments, the output current I _out and average input current I _{in av} are set to the upper minimum current to ensure that the output current and average input current are high enough before starting the MPPT process, respectively. MPPT control block 304 by comparing the average output current I _{out av} with the maximum output current I _{out max} by comparing to the threshold I _{min hi} and ensuring that the average output current is not too high. Can determine whether the current is acceptable. In this embodiment, the MPPT control block 304 is current when both the output current and the average input current are greater than the upper minimum current threshold and the average output current is less than the maximum output current. Is determined to be acceptable. Alternatively, if either the output current or the average input current is less than the upper minimum current threshold, or if the average output current is greater than the maximum output current, the MPPT control block 304 cannot accept the current. It is determined that

  In this particular embodiment, the MPPT control block 304 may also have an excess current pin that can receive an excess current signal if the average output current exceeds the maximum output current. For example, the value of the maximum output current can be assigned to the excess current pin via a resistor divider. The excess current pin then receives an excess current signal if the maximum output current is exceeded.

If the MPPT control block 304 determines that the temperature and / or current is unacceptable (step 462), the value of M is reset to M _start and the value of the "sign" or sign Is reset to 1 (step 458). Setting the value of M to M _start when the temperature is too high will typically cause the panel 202 to operate away from its MPPT, thereby reducing the power carried by the converter 204. . In addition, M _start can be selected as the operating point, where the local converter 204 loss is minimized. For example, for certain embodiments, M _start can be selected as 1. Thus, if the temperature is unacceptably high to some extent, returning to M _start usually reduces the temperature as a result of the power reduction. Further, if the average output current is too high due to the output short circuit, setting the value of M to M _start forces the panel voltage to zero.

If the MPPT control block 304 determines that both temperature and current are acceptable (step 462), the MPPT process is enabled, ie, ready for operation. In the particular embodiment described above, the MPPT control block 304 can tolerate temperature and current if the temperature and average output current are each sufficiently low and the output current and average input current are each sufficiently high. Determine that it is possible. This is the ability to provide startup and shutdown synchronization between the local converter 204 and the DC-AC converter 22 or 112. In this embodiment, at start-up, each local converter 204 has a fixed conversion ratio and is operated in such a state for a time sufficient to bring the system 10 or 100 to a steady state. If the DC-AC converter 22 or 112 has not started its operation at this point, the local converters 204 can quickly charge their output capacitors to a fixed voltage. For example, this fixed voltage can be given by the open circuit panel voltage and the initial conversion ratio _Mstart . When this state is reached, the input and output currents of local converter 204 are virtually zero.

  In this embodiment, synchronization can be provided by sensing the output (or input) current of local converter 204 and allowing MPPT only if the sensed current exceeds a certain threshold. is there. When DC-AC converter 22 or 112 initiates its normal operation, the output (or input) current of local converter 204 exceeds the minimum threshold and DC-AC converter 22 or 112 has its MPPT operation. All of the local converters 204 start their MPPT operations at the same time. Similarly, the same technique provides a synchronous shutdown of the local converter 204 if the DC-AC converter 22 or 112 is interrupted for any reason (eg, islanding).

In the case of the method 450 of FIG. 4B, the MPPT process begins with the previous input power P _{in old} value set to the current input power P _in value (step 464). Thus, initially, the previous input power is set to the input power value calculated in step 460. The MPPT control block 304 sets the value of M to M _old + sign × ΔM, and then sets the value of M _old to M (step 466). Thus, the conversion ratio is adjusted by the value of ΔM in the direction specified by the value of “sign”, and the resulting conversion ratio can be used in subsequent iterations by changing the value of _Mold to the same value. It is said.

Next, the MPPT control block 304 determines whether the conversion ratio M is within a predetermined range and whether the average output voltage is not too high. In the illustrated embodiment, the conversion ratio is within a predetermined range when the conversion ratio is less than the maximum conversion ratio M _max and greater than the minimum converter M _min . Also, in the illustrated embodiment, the average output voltage is considered too high if it exceeds the maximum output voltage V _{out max} .

Thus, if either M is greater than M _max or V _{out av} is greater than V _{out max} (step 468), MPPT control block 304 sets the value of sign to -1. (Step 470), which results in a decrease in conversion ratio in subsequent iterations of the MPPT process if such a process continues, as will be described in more detail below. Similarly, if M is less than M _min (step 472), the MPPT control block 304 sets the value of sign to 1 (step 474), resulting in this as described in more detail below. If such a process continues, there will be an increase in conversion ratio in subsequent iterations of the MPPT process.

  Thus, if the average output voltage is greater than the maximum output voltage (step 470), instead of simply turning off the switch in the conversion stage, the local converter 204 increases the maximum output voltage via a decrease in conversion ratio. It is allowed to continue operation while being exceeded by the MPPT control block 304. This has the advantage of allowing energy harvesting, even in dramatic mismatch conditions where the average output voltage usually exceeds the voltage rating of some components. Yes.

At this point, the MPPT control block 304 senses the input voltage and current (V _in and I _in ) supplied by the ADC 306 and senses the output voltage and current (V _out and I _out ) supplied by the ADC 308. The MPPT control block 304 also calculates average input voltage and current (V _{in av} and I _{in av} ) and average output voltage and current (V _{out av} and I _{out av} ), and then V _{in av} × I _{in av} Is calculated (step 476).

The MPPT control block 304 then determines whether this current input power P _in is greater than the previous input power P _{in old} calculated in the previous iteration (step 478). If the current input power is not greater than the previous input power (step 478), the MPPT control block 304 changes the value of "sign" by setting sign to -sign _old , where sign _old is The current value of sign before being multiplied by -1 (step 480). Thus, as will be described in more detail below, when the MPPT process continues, the conversion ratio is modified in a different direction in subsequent iterations of the MPPT process as compared to the direction of modification in the current iteration.

  If the current input power is greater than the previous input power (step 478), the MPPT control block 304 maintains the value of “sign” (step 482). Thus, the conversion ratio is corrected in the same direction in subsequent iterations of the MPPT process, as will be explained in more detail below, as the MPPT process continues, as compared to the direction of correction in the current iteration. .

  The MPPT control block 304 determines whether the temperature and current are acceptable for continuing the MPPT process (step 484). In the particular embodiment described above where the MPPT control block 304 has an overtemperature pin, if the MPPT control block 304 indicates that the overtemperature signal exceeds the threshold, the temperature will be It is possible to determine that it is unacceptable.

In certain embodiments, MPPT control block 304, in order to ensure that the output current and the average input current before continuing the MPPT process is respectively sufficiently high, the output current I _out and the average input current In order to compare I _{in av} with the lower minimum current threshold I _{min low} and to ensure that the average output current is not too high, the average output current I _{out av} is taken as the maximum output current I _{out max} It is possible to determine whether or not the current is acceptable. In this embodiment, if the output current and / or average input current is greater than the lower minimum current threshold and the average output current is less than the maximum output current, the MPPT control block 304 may Is determined to be acceptable. Alternatively, if both the output current and average input current are below the lower minimum current threshold, or if the average output current is greater than the maximum output current, the MPPT control block 304 cannot accept the current. Is determined. Using the upper minimum current threshold (step 462) to enable the MPPT process (step 462) and the lower minimum current threshold (step 484) to disable the MPPT process. The MPPT control block 304 allows the MPPT process that can occur if the output current and average input current are near the single current threshold used to both enable and disable the MPPT process. Prevent multiple start and stop, ie start and stop.

If the MPPT control block 304 determines that the temperature and / or current is unacceptable (step 484), the MPPT process is disabled. At this point, the value of M is reset to M _start and the value of “sign” is reset to 1 (step 458), and the method continues as previously described. If the MPPT control block 304 determines that both temperature and current are acceptable (step 484), the previous input power P _{in old} is set to the value of the current input power P _in (step 464). And the MPPT control block 304 initiates subsequent iterations of the MPPT process, as described above.

  Although FIG. 4B illustrates an example of a method 450 for implementing MPPT for the energy generator 202, various modifications may be made to this method 450. FIG. For example, although method 450 describes a photovoltaic panel, method 450 can be implemented for other energy generators 202 such as wind turbines, fuel cells, and the like. Further, although the method 450 is described with reference to the MPPT control block 304 of FIG. 3, the method 450 may be implemented in any suitably configured MPPT control block without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. It is understood that it is possible. Also, although shown as a series of steps, the steps in method 450 can overlap, occur in parallel, occur multiple times, or occur in a different order. In certain embodiments, the determination by the MPPT control block 304 regarding temperature and current acceptability in step 484 is continuously performed during the MPPT process instead of once during each repetition period as illustrated. It is understood that it can be implemented.

  FIG. 5 illustrates an energy generation system 500 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure, which includes a plurality of energy generation devices 502 and a centralized (centralized) MPPT and distributed with respect to the energy generation system 500. And a central array controller 510 that can be selected between MPPTs. In the embodiment described herein, the energy generation system will be described with reference to a photovoltaic system 502 having an array of a plurality of photovoltaic panels 502 each coupled to a corresponding local transducer 504. .

  Each local converter 504 includes a power stage 506 and a local controller 508. Further, in some embodiments, each local converter 504 can be bypassed via an optional internal switch, such as switch 312. When bypassed, the output voltage of local converter 504 is essentially equal to its input voltage. In this way, the losses associated with the operation of the local converter 504 can be minimized or eliminated if the local converter 504 is not required.

  In addition to the central array controller 510, the illustrated embodiment of the system 500 can also include a conversion stage 512, a grid 514, and a data bus 516. The central array controller 510 includes a diagnostic module 520, a control module 525, and an optional conversion stage (CS) optimizer 530. Further, the illustrated embodiment provides a global controller 540 within the conversion stage 512. However, it is understood that the global controller 540 can be implemented in the central array controller 510 instead of the conversion stage 512. The CS optimizer 530 can also be implemented in the conversion stage 512 instead of the central array controller 510.

  In some embodiments, panel 502 and local converter 504 represent panel 102 and local converter 104 of FIG. 1B and / or panel 202 and local converter 204 of FIG. 2 or 3. The central array controller 510 can represent the central array controller 110 of FIG. 1B, and / or the conversion stage 512 can represent the DC-AC converter 112 of FIG. 1B. Is possible. Further, the diagnostic module 520 and the control module 525 can represent the diagnostic module 120 and the control module 125, respectively. However, it is understood that the components of the system 500 can be implemented in any suitable manner. Conversion stage 512 may comprise a DC-AC converter, a battery charger or other energy storage device, or any other suitable component. The grid 514 can have any suitable load that can operate on the energy generated by the photovoltaic system 500.

  Each local controller 508 may provide device data and local converter data for the corresponding panel 502 to the central array controller 510 via a data bus 516, or alternatively, a wireless link. Is possible. Based on this data, the diagnostic module 520 determines whether or not the panel 502 is operating in quasi-ideal conditions, i.e., the panels 520 are not mismatched and are essentially illuminated with the same amount of each other. It is possible to determine. In this case, the diagnostic module 520 can prompt the control module 525 to place the system 500 in a centralized MPPT (CMPPT) mode. To accomplish this, the control module 525 passes the data bus 516 to each of the local controllers 508 to disable the local converter 504 by operating the local converter 504 in bypass mode. It is possible to transmit a disable signal. The control module 525 can also send an enable signal to the global controller 540.

  In bypass mode, local controller 508 no longer performs MPPT and the output voltage of power stage 506 is essentially equal to the panel voltage from panel 502. Thus, losses associated with operating local converter 504 are minimized and the efficiency of system 500 is maximized. When local converter 504 is operating in bypass mode, global controller 540 can perform CMPPT on an array of panels 502.

  The diagnostic module 520 also has some of the panels 502 shaded and in a mismatched state (ie, some panels 502 have different characteristics compared to the other panels 502 in the array). It is possible to determine whether or not. In this case, the diagnostic module 502 can prompt the control module 525 to place the system 500 in a distributed MPPT (DMPPT) mode. To accomplish this, the control module 525 passes via a data bus 516 to each of the local controllers 508 to enable the local converter 504 by allowing normal operation of the local converter 504. An enable signal can be transmitted. The control module 525 can also send a disable signal to the global controller 540.

  If some of the panels 502 are shaded, the diagnostic module 520 can determine that some of the shaded panels 502 may be partially shaded. is there. In this case, in addition to prompting the control module 525 to place the system 500 in DMPPT mode, the diagnostic module 520 determines that the local controller 508 for the partially shaded panel 502 has a local maximum. It is also possible to perform a complete diagnostic scan of the system 500 to ensure that they have found their actual maximum power points. In an embodiment where the energy generator 520 has a wind turbine, the diagnostic module 520 may change the wind pattern, hills, or other structures that block the wind, or other conditions that affect the wind. Hence, it is possible to determine whether some of the wind turbines are “shaded”.

  A partially shaded state for the photoelectric system 500 is illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7A-7C. FIG. 6 illustrates a photoelectric array 600 under partially shaded conditions. 7A to 7C are graphs 700, 705, and 710 illustrating voltage / power characteristics corresponding to three of the photoelectric panels in FIG.

  The illustrated array 600 has three strings (columns) 610 composed of a plurality of photoelectric panels. Three of the panels in string 610c are labeled panel A, panel B, and panel C. It is understood that these panels can represent panel 502 in FIG. 5 or any other suitably configured panel in a photovoltaic system. Some of these panels are completely or partially covered by shaded areas 620.

  In the illustrated example, panel A is fully illuminated, while panel B is partially shaded and panel C is fully shaded by shaded area 620. The voltage vs. power characteristic in graph 700 of FIG. 7A corresponds to panel A, the voltage vs. power characteristic in graph 705 of FIG. 7B corresponds to panel B, and the voltage vs. power characteristic in graph 710 of FIG. Corresponds to panel C.

  Thus, as shown in graph 705, partially shaded panel B has a local maximum 720 that differs from its actual maximum power point 725. The diagnostic module 520 of the central array controller 510 can determine that panel B is partially shaded and that panel B has its actual maximum power point 725 rather than the local maximum 720. A full diagnostic scan can be performed to ensure that it is being operated by its local controller 508. A panel 502 operating at a local maximum power point such as point 720 instead of an actual maximum power point such as point 725 is referred to as an “under-performing” panel 502.

In certain embodiments, the diagnostic module 520 can identify the partially shaded panel 502 as follows. First, the diagnostic module 520 includes panels 1,. . . , N is a subset of panels 502 in the array under consideration having the same properties, and P _{pan, i} is a set [1,. . . , N] is assumed to be the output power of the i-th panel 502. Then, suppose that it is as follows.

P _{pan, max} is the output power of the best performance panel 502, and P _{pan, min} is the output power of the worst performance panel 502.

The diagnostic module 520 also defines the variable φ _i by the following equation:

The probability that the i-th panel 502 is fully or partially shaded can be expressed as:

Note that k is a constant that is 1 or less. Therefore, the following equation is obtained.

still,

The diagnostic module 520 also defines ρ _DMPPT as the minimum value of the probability function ρ _max so that DMPPT is required. Therefore, if ρ _max is greater than ρ _DMPPT , DMPPT is enabled. Furthermore, the minimum of the probability function ρ _max so that a diagnostic function is required to determine whether any panels 502 that may be partially shaded are operating in their MPP. Ρ _diag is defined as the value. Thus, if ρ _max is greater than ρ _diag , the diagnostic module 520 identifies panels 502 that may be partially shaded and performs a scan on these identified panels 502.

The diagnostic module 520 can enable DMPPT even in the case of a relatively small mismatch between the panels 502, but in the case of a larger mismatch, the diagnostic module 520 should perform a full or complete diagnostic scan. Is possible. As such, the value of ρ _DMPPT is typically less than ρ _diag .

Thus, in some embodiments, the diagnostic module 520 is in CMPPT mode when the system 500 is ρ _max <ρ _DMPPT , and when ρ _DMPPT <ρ _max <ρ _diag If it is DMPPT mode and ρ _max > ρ _diag it can be determined that it should be in DMPPT mode with a full diagnostic scan.

For these embodiments, a full diagnostic scan can include a complete scan of the voltage versus power characteristics of each panel j for ρ _j > ρ _diag . The diagnostic module 520 can individually scan the characteristics of each such panel 502 based on the timing provided by the central array controller 510. In this way, the conversion stage 512 can continue to operate normally.

  When the system 500 is operating in the DMPPT mode, the CS optimizer 530 can optimize the operating point of the conversion stage 512. In one embodiment, the operating point of the conversion stage 512 can be set to a constant value. However, in the embodiment in which the CS optimizer 530 is implemented, the operating point of the conversion stage 512 can be optimized by the CS optimizer 530. In one embodiment, the operating point of the conversion stage 512 can be set to a constant value. However, in the embodiment in which the CS optimizer 530 is implemented, the operating point of the conversion stage 512 can be optimized by the CS optimizer 530.

In certain embodiments, the CS optimizer 530 can determine an optimized operating point for the conversion stage 512, as described below. For the i-th power stage 506, the duty cycle is defined as D _i and its conversion ratio is defined as M (D _i ). Power stage 506 is configured to have a nominal conversion ratio of _{M 0.} Therefore, operating the power stage 506 as close to M ₀ as possible provides higher efficiency, reduces stress, and reduces the probability of output voltage saturation. In the case of a power stage 506 with a step-up converter, M ₀ may be 1.

  Therefore, the optimization principle can be defined as follows.

Therefore, the following equation is obtained.

Where I _{pan, i} is the input current of the i-th power stage 506, I _{out, i} is the output current of the i-th power stage 506, η _i is the efficiency of the i-th power stage 506, and I _LOAD is This is an input current to the conversion stage 512. As a result, the optimization principle can be rewritten as follows.

The CS optimizer 530 can achieve this optimization by using standard current mode control techniques at the input port of the conversion stage 512 such that the input current of the conversion stage 512 is set to _ILOAD. is there.

  FIG. 8 illustrates a method 800 for selecting between a centralized MPPT and a distributed MPPT for an energy generation system 500 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. The embodiment of method 800 is merely exemplary. Other embodiments of the method 800 may be implemented without departing from the scope of this disclosure.

The method 800 begins with the diagnostic module 520 setting a timer (step 802). The timer can be used by the diagnostic module 520 to trigger the initialization of the iteration based method 800. The diagnostic module 520 analyzes the energy generating device 502 such as a panel in the energy generating system 500 (step 804). For example, in some embodiments, the diagnostic module 520 calculates the panel power P _pan for each panel 502 and then these calculations of P _pan as described in more detail above in connection with FIG. The panel 502 can be analyzed by determining a number of other values based on the determined values. For example, the diagnostic module 520 determines the maximum and minimum values of the calculated P _pan values (P _{pan, max} and P _{pan, min, respectively} ), and then the panel 502 is fully or partially shaded. It is possible to use these maximum and minimum values to calculate the probability (ρ) for each panel 502 to be. The diagnostic module 520 can also determine a maximum value (ρ _max ) of the calculated probability.

After analyzing panel 502 (step 804), diagnostic module 520 operates under sub-ideal conditions (step 806). For example, in some embodiments, the diagnostic module 520 may determine the maximum calculated probability (ρ _max ) that the panel 502 is shaded as a predetermined DMPPT threshold (ρ _DMPPT ). It is possible to compare. When ρ _max is less than ρ _DMPPT , it can be considered that the maximum output power and the minimum output power of the panel 502 are sufficiently close to each other, and the probability of mismatch between the panels 502 is extremely small. And the system 500 can be considered operating under sub-ideal conditions. Similarly, when ρ _max is _not less than ρ _DMPPT , the maximum output power and the minimum output power of the panel 502 are sufficiently separated from each other, and the probability of mismatch between the panels 502 cannot be considered very low. The system 500 can be considered not operating under sub-ideal conditions.

  If the diagnostic module 520 determines that the system 500 is not operating under sub-ideal conditions (step 806), the control module 525 enables the local controller 508 (step 808) and the global controller 540. Is disabled (step 810), thereby causing system 500 to enter DMPPT mode. Thus, in this state, the local controller 508 performs MPPT on each individual panel 502.

Since the DMPPT mode is used even in the case of a relatively small mismatch between panels 502, the diagnostic module 520 is not yet considered to have a very low probability of the shaded panel 502 but still low. Even when considered to be a thing, it can be determined that the system 500 is not operating under sub-ideal conditions. Accordingly, after entering the DMPPT mode, the diagnostic module 520 determines whether the probability of the shaded panel 502 is high (step 812). For example, the diagnostic module 520 can compare the maximum probability (ρ _max ) that the panel 502 is shaded with a predetermined diagnostic threshold (ρ _diag ). If ρ _max is greater than ρ _diag , the maximum and minimum output powers of panels 502 are sufficiently far apart, and the probability of mismatch between panels 502 is relatively high, so at least one shadow is present. It can be considered that the probability of the panel 502 marked with is high.

If the probability of shaded panel 502 is high (step 812), diagnostic module 520 performs a full characteristic scan on all potentially shaded panels 502 ( Step 814). For example, the diagnostic module 520 can potentially be shaded for each panel 502 by comparing the probability (ρ) that the panel 501 is shaded with the diagnostic threshold (ρ _diag ). The characteristic panel 502 can be identified. If ρ for a particular panel 502 is greater than ρ _diag , the output power of that particular panel 502 is far enough away from the maximum output power provided by panel 502 in system 500, and that particular panel 502 The probability that is at least partially shaded is relatively high.

  When performing a full characteristic scan, the diagnostic module 520 scans the voltage versus power characteristic for each potentially shaded panel 502 based on the timing provided by the central array controller 510. It can be done individually. In this way, the conversion stage 512 can continue to operate normally during the scan period.

  During the process of performing a full characteristic scan, either panel 502 is under-performing (ie, instead of an actual MPP such as MPP 725, a local maximum power point (MPP such as local MPP 720). If the diagnostic module 520 determines that it is operating at), the control module 525 can correct these underperformed panels 502 (step 816).

  At this point, or if there is no high probability of shaded panel 502 (step 812), diagnostic module 520 determines whether the timer has expired (step 818), ie, method 800 It is determined whether or not it should be initialized again. If the timer has expired (step 818), the diagnostic module 520 resets the timer (step 820) and again begins analyzing the panel 502 (step 804).

  If the diagnostic module 520 determines that the system 500 is operating under sub-ideal conditions (step 806), the control module 525 disables the local controller 508 (step 822) and the global controller. 540 is enabled (step 824), thereby placing the system 500 in CMPPT mode. Therefore, in this state, the global controller 540 performs MPPT for the entire system 500.

  At this point, the diagnostic module 520 also determines whether the timer has expired, i.e., whether the method 800 should be re-initialized (step 818). If the timer has expired (step 818), the diagnostic module 520 resets the timer (step 820) and begins analyzing the panel 502 again (step 804).

  Although FIG. 8 illustrates one example of a method 800 for selecting between centralized MPPT and distributed MPPT, various changes can be made to this method 800. For example, although the method 800 is described with reference to a photovoltaic system, the method 800 can be implemented for other energy generation systems 500 such as wind turbine systems, fuel cell systems, and the like. Further, although the method 800 is described with reference to the system of FIG. 5, the method 800 can be implemented in any suitably configured energy generation system without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. . Further, although shown as a series of steps, the steps in method 800 may overlap, occur in parallel, occur multiple times, or occur in a different order.

  FIG. 9 illustrates a system 900 that activates and deactivates a local controller 908 for a local converter 904 in an energy generation system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. The system 900 includes an energy generator 902 referred to as a photoelectric panel 902 and a local transducer 904. Local converter 904 includes a power stage 906, a local controller 908, and an activator or activator 910.

  The local converter 904 represents one of the local converters 104 of FIG. 1B, the local converter 204 of FIG. 2 or 3, and / or one of the local converters 504 of FIG. While it is possible, it is understood that the local converter 904 can be implemented in any suitably configured energy generation system without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, system 900 can be coupled in series and / or in parallel to other similar systems 900 to form an energy generating array.

  In the illustrated embodiment, activator 910 is coupled between panel 902 and local controller 908. In some embodiments, activator 910 can activate and deactivate local controller 908 based on the output voltage of panel 902. If the output voltage of panel 902 is too low, activator 910 can supply a supply voltage that is essentially zero to local controller 908, thereby shutting off local controller 908. Let If the panel 902 output voltage is higher, the activator 910 can supply a non-zero supply voltage to the local controller 908 so that the local controller 908 is operational.

  The activator 910 can activate and deactivate the local controller 908 in any suitable manner other than providing a supply voltage to the local controller 908. For example, in one alternative, the activator 910 can set one or more pins of the local controller 908 to activate and deactivate the local controller 908. It is. In another alternative, activator 910 writes a first predetermined value to a first register in local controller 908 to activate local controller 908, and local controller 908 is activated. A second predetermined value in either the first register or the second register in the local controller 908 for deactivation (this is the same as or different from the first predetermined value, depending on the particular implementation) Can be written).

Thus, the system 900 provides autonomous operation of the local converter 904 without using a battery or external power source. If the solar irradiance is high enough, the output panel voltage V _pan increases to a level that causes the activator 910 to begin generating a non-zero supply voltage V _cc . In this regard, the local controller 908 and / or the central array controller (not shown in FIG. 9) may perform register initialization, preliminary voltage comparison between panels 902, analog to digital converter calibration, clock synchronization. Alternatively, it is possible to begin performing an activation procedure such as interleaving, synchronous activation of the power stage 906, or the like. Similarly, before deactivating system 900, it is possible to perform deactivation procedures such as synchronization with a backup unit and synchronous deactivation of power stage 906 in the case of a stand-alone application. . During these deactivation procedures, activator 910 can remain activated itself.

Further, in some embodiments, activator 910 can provide overpower protection for local controller 904. As described above in connection with FIG. 3, the MPPT control block 304 that is part of the local controller 208 can provide overpower protection. However, as an alternative to a system that includes an activator 910, the activator 910 can instead provide this protection. Thus, in this alternative case, if the output current drops too low, the activator 910 switches off the MPPT functionality of the local controller 908 so that the panel voltage V _pan is approximately equal to the output voltage V _out. It is possible to make it.

FIG. 10 is a graph 920 illustrating an example of device voltage change over time for a system 900 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. In the case of the photoelectric panel 902, the same voltage activation as the voltage deactivation level (V _t-off ) in a state where the solar irradiance level oscillates around the voltage activation level (V _t-on ) for the activator 910 Using the level will cause undesired activations and deactivations of the system 900. Thus, as shown in graph 920, a lower voltage deactivation level can be used to prevent this. By using this lower voltage deactivation level, the system 900 is consistent until the solar irradiance level is sufficiently reduced so that the panel voltage drops to a level somewhat lower than the voltage activation level. Can remain activated. As a result, frequent activations and deactivations are avoided, giving the system 900 noise immunity.

  In some embodiments, after the panel voltage exceeds the voltage activation level and the local controller 908 is activated, the local controller 908 may further increase the panel voltage beyond the voltage deactivation level. Initiate a deactivation procedure when the panel voltage falls below the voltage deactivation level, so that it can be deactivated more quickly if it continues to drop to a lower level Is possible. Further, in some embodiments, the local controller 908 can shut off the activator 910 and thus itself before reaching the voltage deactivation level for a particular condition. is there.

  FIG. 11 illustrates an activator 910 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. In this embodiment, the activator 910 has a power source 930, a plurality of resistors R1, R2, R3, and a diode D. Resistors R1 and R2 are coupled in series between the input node (IN) of power supply 930 and ground. The diode and resistor R3 are coupled in series between the output node (OUT) of the power source 930 and a node 940 to which resistors R1 and R2 are coupled together. In addition, a shutdown node (SD) for power supply 930 is also coupled to node 940.

The power supply 930 can receive a panel voltage V _pan at its input node and generate a supply voltage V _cc for the local controller 908 at its output node. The shutdown node of power supply 930 enables operation of power supply 930 when the voltage level at the shutdown node exceeds a specified voltage V ₀ as determined by the control circuit of power supply 930, and the voltage level at the shutdown node There when falling below the voltage V ₀ which is the identified, thereby disabling the operation of the power supply 930.

  When power supply 930 is turned off, the diode is non-conducting and the voltage at the shutdown node is given by:

When the voltage V _{SD, t-on} exceeds the value V ₀ , the diode begins to conduct and the voltage at the shutdown node is:

Where V _d is the diode voltage drop, and

It is. When the voltage V _{SD, t-off} drops below V ₀ , the power supply 930 is turned off. Accordingly, turn-on and turn-off voltage thresholds are determined based on resistance values provided by resistors R1, R2, and R3.

  FIG. 12 illustrates a method 1200 for activating and deactivating the local transducer 904 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. The embodiment of method 1200 is merely exemplary. Other embodiments of the method 1200 may be implemented without departing from the scope of this disclosure.

The method 1200 begins with an energy generator or panel 902 operating in open circuit conditions (step 1202). In this condition, activator 910 has not activated local controller 908. This is because the panel voltage output by panel 902 is too low. The activator 910 monitors this panel voltage (V _pan ) until the voltage activation level (V _t-on ) is exceeded (step 1204).

When activator 910 determines that the panel voltage has exceeded the voltage activation level (step 1204), activator 910 initiates activation of local converter 904 by turning on local controller 908 (step 1204). 1206). For example, activator 910 can initiate activation of local converter 904 by generating a non-zero supply voltage V _cc for local controller 908. In other embodiments, the activator 904 writes the first predetermined value by setting one or more pins of the local controller 908 or to a first register in the local controller 908. It is possible to start the activation of the local transducer 904. The local controller 908 and / or the central array controller then performs an activation procedure for the local transducer 904 (step 1208). For example, the activation procedure may include register initialization, preliminary voltage comparison between panels 902, analog-to-digital converter calibration, clock synchronization or interleaving, synchronous synchronization of strings of panels including power stage 906, etc. Activation can be included.

The local controller 908 operates the power stage 906 with a predetermined conversion ratio (step 1210) until the other power stage 906 in the string is in an operating state (step 1212). When each of the panels 902 in the string has an active power stage 906 (step 1212), the local controller 908 compares the panel current (I _pan ) with the activation current level (I _min ) ( Step 1214). If the panel current is greater than the activation current level (step 1214), the local controller 908 begins normal operation (step 1216). Accordingly, the local controller 908 starts performing MPPT on the power stage 906.

  In this way, the activation of all local controllers 908 in the energy generation system can be automatically synchronized. Further, if only a subset of the panels 902 in the photoelectric system only generate a voltage high enough to be activated by the activator 910, a unidirectional switch, such as switch 314, is connected to the power stage 906. Can be included to allow the remaining panels 902 to be operated.

  The local controller 908 continues to compare the panel current to the activation current level (step 1218). If the panel current is below the activation current level (step 1218), the local controller 908 sets a deactivation timer (step 1220). The local controller 908 then returns to operating the power stage 906 with a predetermined conversion ratio (step 1222). The local controller 908 and / or the central array controller then performs a deactivation procedure for the local transducer 904 (step 1224). For example, the deactivation procedure can include synchronization with a backup unit, synchronous deactivation of the power stage 906, etc. in the case of a standalone application.

  The local controller 908 then determines whether the deactivation timer has expired (step 1226). This allows the panel current to increase above the activation current level. Thus, the local controller 908 prepares for deactivation, but waits to ensure that deactivation should actually take place.

  Thus, as long as the deactivation timer does not expire (step 1226), the local controller 908 compares the panel current to the activation current level (step 1228). If the panel current continues to stay below the activation current level (step 1228), the local controller 908 continues to wait for the deactivation timer to expire (step 1226). If the panel current becomes greater than the activation current level (step 1228) before the deactivation timer expires (step 1226), the local controller 908 again performs MPPT on the power stage 906. To operate normally (step 1216).

However, if the deactivation timer expires (step 1226) while the panel current is below the activation current level (step 1228), the local controller 908 turns off the power stage 906 and the local controller 908. The panel 902 is again operated under open circuit conditions (step 1230). In some embodiments, activator 910 may complete deactivation of local converter 904 by generating a zero supply voltage V _cc for local controller 908. In other embodiments, the activator 910 may either set one or more pins of the local controller 908 or either the first register or the second register in the local controller 908. The deactivation of the local converter 904 may be completed by writing a second predetermined value to. At this point, activator 910 again monitors the panel voltage until the voltage activation level is exceeded (step 1204) to initiate the activation process.

  Although FIG. 12 illustrates one example of a method 1200 for activating and deactivating the local transducer 904, various modifications can be made to the method 1200. For example, although the method 1200 is described with reference to a photovoltaic panel, the method 1200 can be implemented for other energy generators 902 such as wind turbines, fuel cells, and the like. Further, although the method 1200 is described with reference to the local controller 908 and activator 910 of FIG. 9, the local controller 908 and activator 910 may be any suitable without departing from the scope of this disclosure. It is understood that this can be realized in an energy generation system configured as follows. Also, although shown as a series of steps, the steps in method 1200 can overlap, occur in parallel, occur multiple times, or occur in a different order.

  Although the above description refers to particular embodiments, some of the components, systems, and methods described are subcells, single cells, panels (ie, cell arrays), panel arrays, and / or multiple panel arrays. It is understood that the present invention can be applied to a system consisting of For example, the local transducers described above are each associated with one panel, but for each cell in a panel or for each string of panels. It is possible to implement a system with a local transducer as well. Furthermore, some of the components, systems and methods described can be applied to energy generating devices other than optoelectronic devices such as wind turbines and fuel cells.

  It is useful to explain the definitions of certain words and terms used in this patent document. The term “coupled” and its derivatives means any direct or indirect communication between two or more components and asks whether these components are in physical contact with each other. It is not a thing. The terms “transmit”, “receive” and “communicate” and their derivatives encompass both direct and indirect communication. The terms “including” and “having” and their derivatives are meant to include without limitation. The term “or” is inclusive, meaning and / or. The term “each” is any of at least a subset of a plurality of identified items. The terms “related” and “related to” and their derivatives are included, included in, interconnected with, included in, included in, Connected to, connected to, connected to, coupled to, communicable with, collaborated with, interleaved, juxtaposed, close to it, bound to it or to it May mean having, having, or having that characteristic.

  While this disclosure has been described with reference to certain embodiments and commonly associated methods, variations and substitutions of these embodiments and methods will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the above description of example embodiments does not define or constrain this disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and modifications are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, as defined by the following claims.

Claims (20)

In a system that incorporates local maximum power point tracking (MPPT) in an energy generation system comprising a centralized MPPT,
A system control loop having a system operating frequency,
A plurality of local control loops, each having a corresponding local operating frequency, each local operating frequency being at least a predetermined distance away from the system operating frequency Control loop,
Having a system.   2. The system of claim 1, wherein the system control loop has a closed loop system and each local control loop has a closed loop system.   The system control loop of claim 1, wherein the system control loop comprises an array of energy generators and a DC-AC converter comprising a central MPPT control block capable of providing MPPT to the array. System that has.   2. The system of claim 1, wherein each local control loop includes an energy generator and a local converter capable of providing MPPT to the energy generator.   The system of claim 1, wherein the system operating frequency has a corresponding time constant for the system control loop.   6. The system of claim 5, wherein each of the local operating frequencies has a corresponding stabilization time for the local control loop that corresponds to the local operating frequency.   7. The system according to claim 6, wherein the stabilization time of each local control loop is faster than the time constant for the system control loop.   7. The system according to claim 6, wherein the stabilization time of each local control loop is at least 5 times faster than the time constant for the system control loop. In a system that incorporates local maximum power point tracking (MPPT) in an energy generation system comprising a centralized MPPT,
An array of energy generators, and a DC-AC converter having a central MPPT control block capable of providing MPPT to the array, based on system operating frequency System control loop, which can work
A plurality of local control loops, each local control loop having one of the plurality of energy generators and a local converter capable of providing MPPT to the energy generators A plurality of local control loops capable of operating based on a corresponding local operating frequency, and wherein each local operating frequency is at least a predetermined distance away from the system operating frequency. Local control loop,
Having a system.   10. The system of claim 9, wherein the system control loop has a closed loop system and each local control loop has a closed loop system.   10. The system of claim 9, wherein the system operating frequency has a corresponding time constant for the system control loop.   12. The system according to claim 11, wherein each local operating frequency has a corresponding stabilization time for a local control loop corresponding to that local operating frequency.   13. The system of claim 12, wherein the stabilization time for each local control loop is faster than the time constant for the system control loop.   13. The system of claim 12, wherein the stabilization time for each local control loop is at least 5 times faster than the time constant for the system control loop. In a method of incorporating local maximum power point tracking (MPPT) into an energy generation system comprising a centralized MPPT,
Providing a system control loop having a system operating frequency;
Providing a plurality of local control loops, each local control loop having a corresponding local operating frequency, each local operating frequency being at least a predetermined distance away from the system operating frequency;
The method that encompasses that.   The method of claim 15, wherein the system operating frequency has a corresponding time constant for the system control loop.   The method of claim 16, wherein each of the local operating frequencies has a corresponding stabilization time for a local control loop corresponding to the local operating frequency.   18. The method of claim 17, wherein the stabilization time for each local control loop is faster than the time constant for the system control loop.   18. The method of claim 17, wherein the stabilization time of each local control loop is at least 5 times faster than the time constant for the system control loop.   The DC-AC converter of claim 15, wherein the system control loop comprises an array of a plurality of energy generators, and a central MPPT control block capable of providing MPPT to the array; And each local control loop has one of the plurality of energy generators and a local transducer capable of providing MPPT to the energy generators. How.

Images