JP2011004295A - Moving picture showing managing apparatus, moving picture showing managing method, and moving picture showing managing program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide novel moving picture showing managing techniques for promptly loading a plurality of contents to a plurality of moving picture showing managing apparatuses in optimal timings.SOLUTION: A data transfer time of each of contents is predicted and on the basis of utilization period information of the contents in each moving picture showing apparatus, for each of the contents, until when and to which moving picture showing apparatus transfer data should be transferred is specified. A data transfer job is generated which describes the specified information and the predicted data transfer time. For all performance order combinations of the data transfer job, under a restriction condition for data transfer, an evaluation value of data transfer designated in the performance order is calculated and on the basis of the calculated evaluation value, the optimal performance order combination is specified. Thus, a schedule of content data transfer from a data storage apparatus to the moving picture showing apparatus is determined and on the basis of the schedule, data transfer of the contents is controlled.

Description

  The present invention is used in a theater (screening facility) including a screening device and a data storage device, and manages a loading of content from the data storage device to the screening device, its method, and its screening management device And, more particularly, a screening management apparatus and method for loading a plurality of contents to a plurality of screening apparatuses in accordance with a screening schedule and at an optimum timing. The present invention relates to a screening management program used to realize the screening management apparatus.

  With the widespread use of digital cinema standards, it has become common to install a plurality of digital screening devices in theaters (see, for example, Non-Patent Documents 1 and 2).

  In digital screening, a storage device for storing video content (hereinafter simply referred to as content) is installed in the theater, and content distributed from an external distribution source stored in the storage device in advance is stored in the screening device. Although it is necessary to perform screening after loading, it is common in conventional digital cinema to connect the distributed media such as a magnetic disk directly to the screening device and load the content manually into the screening device. there were.

  However, according to this conventional technology, as the number of screening devices and screening content in the theater increases, the content is loaded into each screening device in accordance with the screening schedule, and the screening schedule of the content in the screening device is managed. It has become difficult to do.

  As a means for solving such problems, a screening management device for managing the inside of a theater is used (for example, Non-Patent Document 3).

  One of the roles of the screening management device is that the screening management device controls and monitors the playback of content on the screening device online according to the screening schedule created by the theater manager. This is content management in which content distributed from an external distribution source to the theater via media or a network is loaded into a screening device in time for the screening, and the finished content is deleted from the screening device.

"Digital Cinema System Specification V1.2", Digital Cinema Initiatives, LLC, March 07, 2008 <http://www.dcimovies.com/DCIDigitalCinemaSystemSpecv1 _2.pdf> “Current Status of Digital Cinema and Future Business Development” NTT Technical Journal (2006.4) <http://www.ntt.co.jp/journal/0604/files/jn200604042.pdf> "KODAK Theater Management System", <http://motion.kodak.com/US/en/motion/Products/Distribution_And _Exhibition / Kodak_Digital _Cinema / tms.htm>

  In conventional screening management devices, although loading of content can be centrally controlled, the function of managing the content loading schedule itself is not supported, and theater managers load content onto the screening device at an appropriate time. It was necessary to perform control manually.

  Furthermore, it takes several hours to load digital cinema content, and a general screening device cannot load and display content at the same time, so the content is loaded onto the screening device. The work was a heavy burden on theater managers.

  In addition, if the number of content increases, content management becomes complicated, and content may not be loaded before the screening schedule, or the screen will overflow when loading content. The possibility of causing was increased.

  The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and allows a plurality of contents to be continuously loaded to a plurality of screening apparatuses and optimizes the execution order of the load processing according to a screening schedule. The purpose is to provide new screening management technology for scheduling.

  In order to achieve this object, the screening management device of the present invention is suitable for use in a theater comprising a plurality of screening devices and one or more data storage devices for storing content to be loaded into the screening devices. (1) storage means for storing content usage period information in each screening device generated based on the screening schedule of each screening device; (2) prediction means for predicting the data transfer time of each content; 3) Based on the content usage period information stored in the storage means, for each content, it is specified to which screening device by which data should be transferred, and the specified information and the predicted data transfer of the prediction means Generation means for generating a data transfer job describing time, and (4) the execution order of all the data transfer jobs generated by the generation means By calculating the data transfer evaluation value specified in the execution order under the constraints imposed on the data transfer, and identifying the optimal execution order combination based on the calculated evaluation value A scheduling means for determining the data transfer schedule of the content from the data storage device to the screening device; and (5) controlling the data transfer of the content from the data storage device to the screening device based on the data transfer schedule determined by the scheduling means. And a control means.

  Each of the above processing means can also be realized by a computer program. This computer program is provided by being recorded on an appropriate computer-readable recording medium or provided via a network, and is used when implementing the present invention. The present invention is realized by being installed and operating on a control means such as a CPU.

  In the screening management device of the present invention configured as described above, first, based on the screening schedule of each screening device, content usage period information in each screening device is generated and stored in storage means, Further, for example, the data transfer time of each content is predicted based on the past data transfer rate history.

  Next, based on the content usage period information, for each content, specify to which screening device data should be transferred by when, and describe the specified information and the predicted data transfer time Is generated.

  Subsequently, for all combinations of the execution order of the data transfer job, under the constraint imposed on the data transfer, the evaluation value of the data transfer specified in the execution order is calculated, and based on the calculated evaluation value By specifying the optimal combination of execution order, the data transfer schedule of content from the data storage device to the screening device is determined.

  At this time, if (a) the number of data transfers that can be executed simultaneously is set as a constraint imposed on the data transfer, the data transfer schedule is determined under the constraint, and (b) When it is set whether or not the screening process and data transfer in the apparatus can be executed in parallel, the data transfer schedule is determined under the constraint conditions, and (c) time for which data transfer is prohibited If a band is set, the data transfer schedule is determined under the constraint conditions.

  Subsequently, based on the determined data transfer schedule, content data transfer from the data storage device to the screening device is controlled.

  When this configuration is adopted, the deletion schedule of the content transferred to each screening device is determined based on the content usage period information, and the deletion of the content transferred to the screening device is determined based on the determined deletion schedule. Control.

  If there is a difference between the data transfer process from the data storage device to the screening device executed based on the determined data transfer schedule and the data transfer schedule, the data transfer schedule Perform rescheduling.

  In the case where a plurality of data storage devices are provided, it is possible to transfer data from a plurality of data storage devices in parallel. Therefore, such a form of data transfer is scheduled.

  In this way, in the screening management device of the present invention, based on the content usage period information in each screening device generated based on the screening schedule of each screening device, data describing the content to be loaded and the screening device Transfer jobs are extracted, and an optimal combination of execution orders of the data transfer jobs is determined as a data transfer schedule under the constraints imposed on the data transfer.

  From now on, for example, it is possible to finish loading the content before the start of showing the content, and to generate a data transfer schedule that finishes loading the content earliest while ensuring that the disc does not overflow during loading. become able to.

  The screening management device of the present invention automatically executes data transfer of a plurality of data transfer jobs based on the optimized data transfer schedule, so that the theater manager can load the content and execute it. There is no need for manual management with respect to the content, and loading of the content is performed quickly and automatically.

  Furthermore, since the screening management device of the present invention automatically executes not only the content data transfer but also the deletion of the content from the screening device, there is no disc overflow due to forgetting to erase the content, and the content deletion timing is considered. The data transfer schedule can be generated.

  Furthermore, since the screening management device of the present invention predicts the data transfer rate based on the past history, it is possible to accurately predict the execution time of the data transfer of the content, thereby enabling an accurate data transfer schedule. Can be evaluated.

  Furthermore, in the screening management device of the present invention, if a deviation occurs between the scheduled screening and data transfer schedule and the actual screening and data transfer execution progress, the content data transfer is automatically restarted. By performing the schedule, the content data transfer process can be executed in an optimal order even when a delay in screening or data transfer occurs.

  Furthermore, in the screening management device of the present invention, “when multiple data transfers can be performed in parallel”, “when content loading and screening can be performed in parallel in the screening device”, “data transfer is prohibited. When there is a time zone, an optimal data transfer schedule can be generated.

  For example, when there is a time zone in which the network in the theater is occupied for the purpose of real-time stream distribution, it is possible to schedule data transfer of content while avoiding the time zone.

  Furthermore, in the screening management device of the present invention, when a plurality of data storage devices are provided, the content can be transferred in parallel from the plurality of data storage devices. Since data transfer is scheduled, an optimal data transfer schedule corresponding to the number of data storage devices can be generated.

As described above, according to the present invention, it is used in a theater having a screening device and a data storage device, and is used when managing the loading of content from the data storage device to the screening device. The load processing for the apparatus and the plurality of contents can be continuously executed with the optimum schedule.

  Furthermore, according to the present invention, in the scheduling, whether or not parallel transfer is possible, the use of multiple data storage devices, the simultaneous processing of screening and data transfer, the setting of a transfer prohibition time zone, and the like are performed. Therefore, it is possible to perform optimal data transfer scheduling under each constraint condition.

1 is an overall configuration diagram of a theater system configured according to the present invention. It is explanatory drawing of the management data of a screening schedule management means. It is a flowchart of the determination process of a data transfer schedule. It is explanatory drawing of the management list of a data transfer job. It is explanatory drawing of the execution timing of a data transfer job. It is explanatory drawing of a data transfer schedule. It is explanatory drawing of the prediction method of the execution time of a data transfer job. It is explanatory drawing of the prediction method of the execution time of a data transfer job. It is explanatory drawing of the prediction method of the execution time of a data transfer job. It is explanatory drawing of a data transfer schedule. It is explanatory drawing of a data transfer schedule. It is explanatory drawing of a data transfer schedule. It is explanatory drawing of a data transfer schedule. It is explanatory drawing of a data transfer schedule.

  Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail according to embodiments.

  FIG. 1 shows the overall configuration of a theater system constructed according to the present invention.

  As shown in this figure, a theater system constructed according to the present invention includes a plurality of screening devices 10-i (i = 1 to n), a data storage device 20 for storing the contents to be screened, and the present invention. And a screening management device 30.

  Here, there may be a plurality of data storage devices 20 in the theater, or there may be a built-in disk system of the screening management device 30.

  The screening management apparatus 30 of the present invention includes a screening schedule management means 31, a data transfer restriction condition management means 32, a data transfer schedule management means 33, and a data transfer control means 34.

  The screening schedule management means 31 manages the information on the screening schedule of each screening device 10-i, and also manages the information on the content usage period in each screening device 10-i (it can also be created from the screening schedule). To do.

  FIG. 2 shows an example of management data of the screening schedule management means 31.

  As shown in this figure, in the screening schedule information managed by the screening schedule management means 31, “what screen (screening apparatus 10-i), which content is to be screened in what time schedule” is managed. It is used as a constraint condition when loading content while avoiding the screening time zone. In the content usage period information managed by the screening schedule management means 31, the effective period of the content in each screening apparatus and the loading state of the content on the screening apparatus are managed, and the start date and time of the effective period is the data transfer schedule. The valid period end date and time are used for content deletion schedules, and the load status is used for extracting a list of data transfer jobs.

  The data transfer restriction condition management means 32 manages information on restriction conditions imposed on data transfer between the data storage device 20 and the screening device 10-i. For example, when there is a constraint that content cannot be loaded during the screening, this is managed. If there is a constraint that loading of a plurality of contents cannot be executed at the same time, this is managed. In this management, regarding the restrictive condition having a variation value such that the disc capacity inside the screening device 10-i is not insufficient (in this case, the remaining amount of the disc becomes a variation value), the screening device 10 The variable value is acquired by inquiring -i, or is acquired by estimating the variable value according to its own execution processing result such as the execution processing result of load / deletion.

  The data transfer schedule management unit 33 executes a process for generating a data transfer schedule of content, and manages the screening schedule management unit 31 while referring to the information on the constraint conditions managed by the data transfer constraint condition management unit 32. The content that needs to be loaded and the screening device 10-i to be loaded are extracted based on the valid period information of the content to be played, and the screening device is based on the screening schedule and the free disk capacity of the screening device 10-i. Optimal control of content loading timing to 10-i.

  Here, “extract” means that the content must be transferred to the inside of the screening device 10-i before the screening, so “the content scheduled to be screened” In addition, this means that information on which screen (screen apparatus 10-i should be loaded) is extracted.

  The data transfer control means 34 controls content data transfer (content loading) between the data storage device 20 and the screening device 10-i, and the content loaded in the screening device 10-i. Perform deletion of. Since the data transfer of content executed by the data transfer control means 34 is managed by the data transfer schedule management means 33, data transfer of a plurality of contents can be executed continuously.

  FIG. 3 shows an example of a flow chart of content data transfer schedule determination processing executed by the screening management apparatus 30 of the present invention configured as described above.

  Next, content data transfer schedule determination processing executed by the screening management apparatus 30 of the present invention will be described with reference to this flowchart.

  When there is a content data transfer schedule decision request, the screening management device 30 of the present invention firstly displays each screening device on the basis of the screening schedule by the screening schedule management means 31 as shown in the flowchart of FIG. The first presentation start timing and the last presentation end timing of the content at 10-i are extracted (S101).

  Here, this is called content validity period information. If it is found on the screening schedule that “No screening is scheduled after this”, there is no problem even if the content is deleted from the screening device 10-i at that time. The “timing at which the content is finally played back by the device 10-i)” is also extracted from the time table (screening schedule).

  In this way, first, the content schedule period information as shown in FIG. 2 is extracted by the screening schedule management means 31 according to the information of the screening schedule as shown in FIG.

  Subsequently, in the data transfer schedule management means 33, information on the validity period of the content managed by the screening schedule management means 31 and information indicating whether the content has already been loaded on the screening device 10-i (content loaded) In such a case, a list of necessary data transfer operations is generated (S102). Here, each data transfer operation is called a data transfer job.

  FIG. 4 shows an example of a list for managing data transfer jobs. As shown in this figure, the data transfer job is information on the content to be transferred, information on the predicted value of the data transfer time of the content (load time predicted value), and a screening to which the content is loaded. Information on the device 10-i and information on the start date and time of the effective period of the content in the screening device 10-i are held. Such a list of data transfer jobs is created by listing all the contents that need to be loaded in each screening apparatus 10-i with reference to the information on the effective period of the contents managed by the screening schedule management means 31. The

  Subsequently, it is determined whether or not all combinations in the execution order of the data transfer jobs constituting the list have been processed (S103), and when determining that all combinations have not been processed, the data transfer job An unprocessed combination is selected from the combinations of the execution orders (S104).

  Subsequently, the data transfer schedule management unit 33 obtains the execution timing of each data transfer job that satisfies the specified constraint condition for the combination of execution orders of the selected data transfer job, so that A transfer schedule is determined (S105).

  That is, the data transfer schedule management unit 33 predicts the execution time of each data transfer job for the generated list of data transfer jobs, and sets the data transfer jobs in the list to the time axis under the specified constraints. Thus, the execution start and end times of each data transfer job are predicted. Here, when the data transfer job is arranged along the time axis, it is possible to apply a data transfer restriction condition (constraint condition) described later.

  In this way, when determining the data transfer schedule for each combination of the execution order of the data transfer jobs that make up the list, when determining that the processing has been completed for all combinations, Whether or not even one data transfer schedule that satisfies the above can be determined is determined (S106), and when it is determined that no data transfer schedule can be determined, a schedule error is output and the process ends (S107). .

  On the other hand, when it is determined that even one data transfer schedule that satisfies the constraint conditions has been determined, the final data transfer can be performed by selecting an optimal data transfer schedule from the determined data transfer schedules. A schedule is determined (S108).

  In this way, the data transfer schedule management means 33 determines whether an optimum data transfer schedule is determined in order to determine an optimal data transfer schedule if the only constraint is that no disk overflow occurs in the screening device during data transfer. The data transfer job execution order is changed as appropriate to repeatedly evaluate the execution timing of the data transfer job, the data ends before the valid period of the content, and the disc overflow does not occur in the screening device during the data transfer For example, a data transfer schedule that ends data transfer earliest is obtained while satisfying the constraint condition.

  Here, as the index of the optimality of the data transfer schedule, the time until the start of the effective period is reduced by using “the minimum value of the“ execution end time of each data transfer job—the effective period start date ””. Content can be scheduled preferentially. If this evaluation index becomes negative, it can be seen that there is a data transfer job whose content has not been loaded by the scheduled start of the screening, so it is said that "the transfer has been completed before the scheduled screening" It is possible to simultaneously verify that the constraint conditions are satisfied.

In this way, the data transfer schedule management means 33, for example, when there are three data transfer jobs, data transfer jobs 1 to 3,
・ Data transfer job 1 → Data transfer job 2 → Data transfer job 3
・ Data transfer job 1 → Data transfer job 3 → Data transfer job 2
Data transfer job 2 → Data transfer job 1 → Data transfer job 3
・ Data transfer job 2 → Data transfer job 3 → Data transfer job 1
Data transfer job 3 → Data transfer job 1 → Data transfer job 2
・ Data transfer job 3 → Data transfer job 2 → Data transfer job 1
For the combinations of the execution order of the six data transfer jobs, evaluate when each data transfer job can be executed under the constraints, select the optimal one based on the evaluation results, It is processed so as to be determined as a final data transfer schedule.

  At this time, as an index for selecting the optimum one, for example, information on the time at which the data transfer process by the third data transfer job is completed, and each data transfer job is loaded by the data transfer job. Information about how long the content to be loaded is loaded from the start date of use is used.

  Next, an example of evaluating the execution timing of the data transfer job will be described with reference to FIG. Here, in this figure, the vertical axis indicates the passage of time, and shows the screening schedule in each screening apparatus 10-i and the evaluation result of the execution timing of the data transfer job to be evaluated.

  In this example, three data transfer jobs 1 to 3 are designated as “data transfer jobs” under the constraint that “contents cannot be loaded during screening” and “loading of a plurality of contents cannot be performed simultaneously”. The evaluation results of the execution timing when the processes are executed in the order of 1 → data transfer job 2 → data transfer job 3 ″ are shown.

  The data transfer job 1 is data transfer to the screening device 1, but data transfer cannot be performed at the same time as the screening. Therefore, the data transfer can be started after the end of the screening schedule 1-2. Since there is a constraint that a plurality of data transfers cannot be executed at the same time, the data transfer jobs 2 and 3 are sequentially executed after the data transfer jobs 1 and 2 are completed. In the screening device 2, the effective period of the content B starts with the screening schedule 2-3. According to the evaluation result of the data transfer schedule shown in this example, the data transfer job 2 that transfers the content B to the screening device 2 is performed. Since it has ended before the screening schedule 2-3, the restriction condition “transfer has ended before the content use period” is satisfied.

  Next, an example of evaluating the data transfer schedule when there is no data deletion and no free disk space will be described with reference to FIG.

  In this example, the screening device 1 ends the screening in the screening schedule 1-2, but the data transfer job 1 cannot be started because the disk capacity inside the screening device 1 is insufficient. On the other hand, the screening management device 30 of the present invention has a function of automatically deleting data, and since the valid period of the content B ends in the screening schedule 1-3 in the screening device 1, the screening schedule 1-3 After the completion, the content B deletion operation is set. Since a free capacity for loading the content C after the deletion is secured, the data transfer job 1 can be scheduled after the screening schedule 1-3. As described above, the screening management device 30 of the present invention performs data transfer scheduling including data deletion.

  When the data transfer jobs 1 and 2 are executed in the order of “data transfer job 1 → data transfer job 2”, the data transfer job 2 is executed only after the data transfer job 1 is finished as shown in FIG. However, as is apparent from FIG. 6, the data transfer job 2 can be completed at an earlier timing by using the pattern (data transfer order) of “data transfer job 2 → data transfer job 1”. is there. The data transfer schedule management means 33 in the screening management apparatus 30 of the present invention selects the latter by comparing the execution timings of the two patterns.

  Next, a method for predicting the execution time of the data transfer job will be described with reference to FIGS.

  The predicted value (expected value) of the data transfer speed is calculated based on the history information of the data transfer speed measured in the past data transfer. As shown in FIG. The screening apparatus 10-i, the speed reduction when a plurality of data transfers are executed simultaneously, and the conditions such as the limitation of the maximum transfer rate due to the network bandwidth are taken into account for more precise evaluation. In FIG. 7, reference numeral 100 denotes a data transfer rate prediction unit, 101 denotes a data transfer history information storage unit, and 102 denotes a data transfer job execution time prediction unit.

  FIG. 8 shows an example of a method for predicting the execution time of a data transfer job.

  The throughput obtained in the data transfer to the screening device 10-i is limited by the data reading speed of the data storage device 20 and the network bandwidth.

  Thus, in the execution time prediction method shown in FIG. 8, first, these limit values are calculated, and the smaller one is used as the limit value for the throughput.

  Here, when a plurality of data storage devices 20 are used, the limit value of the data reading speed of the data storage device 20 is given in total. In addition, when reading a plurality of data in parallel from one data storage device 20, the data reading speed is generally lower than when reading one data, so the limit value of the data reading speed is read simultaneously. Using the number of data as a parameter, it is possible to estimate more precisely according to, for example, the following calculation formula.

Limit value of data read speed = Limit value of single data read speed
× Speed reduction coefficient (number of simultaneous readouts)
In the execution time prediction method shown in FIG. 8, next, a predicted value of data transfer throughput expected when data transfer is performed only to one screening apparatus 10-i is obtained. This predicted value can be obtained by recording the history of throughput obtained in the past in the data transfer to each screening device and averaging the values. Naturally, the predicted value is lower than the above limit value. When the screening device 10-i has a function of performing screening and data transfer in parallel, the expected data transfer throughput differs between when the screening is not performed and when the screening is performed. The screening management apparatus 30 of the present invention can evaluate the accurate data transfer throughput by separately storing the history values of the data transfer throughput for these two cases.

  On the other hand, when data is transferred in parallel to a plurality of screening devices 10-i, the data transfer throughput expected in each screening device 10-i is the expected throughput and data transfer in the case of each screening device alone. The limit value (the limit value determined first) can be determined as follows.

1. 1. Obtain the “screening device min”, which is the screening device 10-i having the smallest expected data transfer throughput among the screening devices 10-i to be transferred. When there are N screening devices 10-i, the data transfer throughput “expected value min” expected in “screening device min” is the data when it is considered that the data transfer bandwidth is allocated to each screening device 10-i. When the transfer rate limit value is larger than the “data transfer rate limit / N”, the bandwidth is evenly distributed to each screening device 10-i, and the expected data transfer bandwidth is “data transfer rate limit / N”. 3. On the other hand, if “expected value min” is smaller than “data transfer rate limit / N”, the data transfer rate expected in “screening device min” is not “data transfer rate limit / N”, but “expected value”. Since the band of “expected value min” is assigned to “screening device min” from “data transfer speed limit” by the step of 4.3, which is “value min”, the remaining data transfer band is assigned to “data transfer "Speed limit-expected value min", and repeat steps from 1 for N-1 screening devices excluding "predicted value min" By this procedure, the expected value of the data transfer rate in each screening device 10-i Then, a predicted value of the data transfer rate based on the limit value of the data reading speed of the data storage device 20 and the limit value of the network bandwidth is obtained.

  The content data transfer time is obtained by dividing the content size by the expected value of the data transfer rate obtained in this way. The content data transfer time is expected when the content data transfer is completed or started. By re-evaluating the value, it is possible to accurately evaluate the data transfer time when a plurality of contents are transferred in parallel at different timings.

  FIG. 9 shows another example of predicting the execution time of the data transfer job.

  In this prediction method, obtaining the predicted value (expected value) of the data transfer rate from the average value of the data transfer throughput history obtained in the past data transfer is the same as the prediction method described in FIG. In order to improve the prediction accuracy, even when data transfer is performed in parallel to a plurality of screening devices 10-i, the history value of data transfer for the set of the screening devices 10-i performed simultaneously is recorded as it is. When data transfer is performed again with the combination, the expected throughput is evaluated based on the average value of the history recorded for the combination.

  The problem with this prediction method is that the history must be stored for all combinations of the screening devices 10-i, but “the number of screening devices 10-i that simultaneously transfer data” “data to be used. By storing the history value using “the number of storage devices 20” as a parameter, the number of target patterns can be limited. On the other hand, in the environment of a general screening management device 30 in which the number of screening devices 10-i is about 10 and the number of screening devices 10-i to be loaded simultaneously is two to three, history values are set for all patterns. It is also possible to save it.

  In the screening management device 30 of the present invention, when a shift occurs between the progress of the screening and data transfer processing and the schedule of the screening and data transfer, the data transfer is rescheduled.

  For example, as shown in FIG. 10, when the screening schedule 1-2 in the screening device 1 is delayed, the data transfer schedule management means 33 reevaluates the data transfer schedule when the delay occurs. In the example shown in FIG. 10, the data transfer schedule management unit 33 re-evaluates the data transfer schedule to switch the execution order of the two data transfer jobs 1 and 2 from the planned pattern 1 to the pattern 2. .

  In this way, according to the screening management device 30 of the present invention, a more optimal data transfer schedule is automatically selected based on the progress of actual screening and data transfer.

  In the screening management apparatus 30 of the present invention, when a plurality of data transfers can be executed simultaneously, the data transfer schedule management means 33 can execute a plurality of data transfers simultaneously. Under that, scheduling is done.

  For example, when it is impossible to execute a plurality of data transfers at the same time, the data transfer schedule is determined in the form shown in the pattern 1 on the left side of FIG. If the simultaneous execution is possible, the data transfer schedule is determined in the form shown in the pattern 2 on the right side of FIG.

  As described above, when a plurality of data transfers can be executed simultaneously, the data transfer schedule management means 33 performs scheduling so that the data transfers to different screening devices 10-i are executed in parallel. . When data transfer is executed in parallel, the data transfer rate of each data transfer job may decrease due to data read rate of the data storage device 20 and network bandwidth restrictions. According to the data transfer rate prediction method shown in FIG. 7, the execution time of the data transfer job taking into account the decrease in the data transfer rate is calculated, and the data transfer is scheduled based on the result.

  In the screening management device 30 of the present invention, when the screening and the data transfer can be performed simultaneously, the data transfer schedule management means 33 can execute the screening and the data transfer simultaneously. Scheduling is performed under the constraints.

  For example, when it is impossible for the screening device 1 to simultaneously perform screening and data transfer, the data transfer schedule is determined in the form shown in the pattern 1 on the left side of FIG. If the screening apparatus 1 can simultaneously perform the screening and the data transfer, the data transfer schedule is determined in the form shown in the pattern 2 on the right side of FIG. That is, when the screening device 1 can simultaneously perform screening and data transfer, the screening schedule 1-2 and the data transfer job 1 are scheduled in parallel. In the example of FIG. 12, it is assumed that a plurality of data transfers can be executed simultaneously.

  Here, whether or not loading is possible during the screening depends on the performance of the screening device 10-i. Therefore, the screening management device 30 of the present invention determines whether or not parallel loading is possible for the screening device 10-i. Provide a flag to indicate. In addition, if loading is performed at the same time as the screening, there is a possibility that the screening may be hindered due to the effect of the transfer speed of the disc. The user can select whether to allow or not. In the example shown in FIG. 12, the screening device 2 is not executed in parallel, and the screening device 1 is not scheduled to execute the screening schedule 1-1 and the data transfer job 1 in parallel. .

  In the screening management device 30 of the present invention, when a plurality of data storage devices 20 are provided, the data transfer schedule management means 33 is a data transfer schedule under the constraint that a plurality of data storage devices 20 can be used. Like to do.

  The scheduling operation executed at this time is basically the same as the scheduling operation executed when a plurality of data transfers described with reference to FIG. 11 is permitted, and when only one data storage device 20 is provided. 13 determines the data transfer schedule in the form as shown in the pattern 1 on the left side of FIG. 13, whereas when a plurality of data storage devices 20 are provided, as shown in the pattern 2 on the right side of FIG. Determine the data transfer schedule in the form. At this time, scheduling is performed so as to reduce the load on the data storage device 20 by assigning the data transfer jobs transferred in parallel to different data storage devices 20.

  In the screening management apparatus 30 of the present invention, it is possible to designate a time zone for prohibiting data transfer. When a time zone for prohibiting data transfer is designated, the data transfer schedule management means 33 is shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 5, the data transfer schedule is performed under the constraint that the transfer process of the data transfer job is not performed during the prohibited time period.

  In the example shown in FIG. 14, two data transfer schedules of pattern 1 and pattern 2 are shown. However, since data transfer job 1 cannot end before the data transfer prohibition time period, data transfer job in pattern 1 Both 1 and 2 are arranged after the data transfer prohibition time zone. On the other hand, in pattern 2, since data transfer job 2 can be executed before the data transfer prohibition time period, the data transfer process can be completed earlier than pattern 1. From this, the data transfer schedule management means 33 selects the pattern 2 as the optimum data transfer schedule.

  The present invention can be applied to a theater equipped with a screening device and a data storage device. By applying the present invention, content loading processing from the data storage device to the screening device is continuously performed with an optimal schedule. Be able to run.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Screening device 20 Data storage device 30 Screening management device 31 Screening schedule management means 32 Data transfer restriction condition management means 33 Data transfer schedule management means 34 Data transfer control means

Claims (10)

A screening management device used in a theater comprising a plurality of screening devices and one or a plurality of data storage devices for storing content to be loaded into the screening devices,
Storage means for storing content usage period information in each screening device generated based on the screening schedule of each screening device;
A prediction means for predicting the data transfer time of each content;
Based on the content usage period information stored in the storage means, by which time to which data transmission data should be transferred is specified for each content, and the specified information and the predicted data transfer time Generating means for generating a data transfer job to be described;
For all combinations of execution orders of the data transfer job, under the constraint imposed on the data transfer, the evaluation value of the data transfer specified in the execution order is calculated, and the optimum value is calculated based on the calculated evaluation value. Scheduling means for determining a data transfer schedule of content from the data storage device to the screening device by specifying a combination of execution order; and
Control means for controlling data transfer of content from the data storage device to the screening device based on the determined data transfer schedule;
A featured screening management device. The screening management device according to claim 1,
The scheduling means determines a deletion schedule for content transferred to each screening device based on the content usage period information,
The control means controls the deletion of the content transferred to the screening device based on the deletion schedule.
A featured screening management device. In the screening management device according to claim 1 or 2,
The predicting means predicts the data transfer time of each content based on a history of past data transfer speeds.
A featured screening management device. In the screening management device according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
The scheduling means, when a deviation occurs between the progress of the data transfer process of the content from the data storage device to the screening device executed based on the determined data transfer schedule and the data transfer schedule, To perform rescheduling of the data transfer schedule,
A featured screening management device. In the screening management device according to any one of claims 1 to 4,
The scheduling means, when a plurality of data storage devices are provided, scheduling data transfer in a form of transferring contents in parallel from a plurality of data storage devices,
A featured screening management device. In the screening management device according to any one of claims 1 to 5,
When the number of simultaneously executable data transfers is set as the constraint condition, the scheduling unit determines a data transfer schedule under the constraint condition,
A featured screening management device. In the screening management device according to any one of claims 1 to 5,
The scheduling means determines the data transfer schedule under the restriction condition, when it is set as the restriction condition whether the screening process and the data transfer in the screening device can be executed in parallel. To do the
A featured screening management device. In the screening management device according to any one of claims 1 to 5,
In the case where a time zone for prohibiting data transfer is set as the constraint condition, the scheduling means determines a data transfer schedule under the constraint condition,
A featured screening management device. A screening management method executed by a screening management device used in a theater comprising a plurality of screening devices and one or a plurality of data storage devices for storing content to be loaded into the screening devices,
Based on the screening schedule of each screening device, a process of generating content usage period information in each screening device and storing it in storage means;
The process of predicting the data transfer time for each content,
Based on the content usage period information stored in the storage means, by which time to which data transmission data should be transferred is specified for each content, and the specified information and the predicted data transfer time Creating a data transfer job to describe;
For all combinations of execution orders of the data transfer job, under the constraint imposed on the data transfer, the evaluation value of the data transfer specified in the execution order is calculated, and the optimum value is calculated based on the calculated evaluation value. A process of determining a data transfer schedule of content from the data storage device to the screening device by specifying a combination of execution order; and
Controlling the data transfer of the content from the data storage device to the screening device based on the determined data transfer schedule,
A featured screening management method.   9. A screening management program for causing a computer to function as means for constituting the screening management apparatus according to claim 1.

Images