JP2010128288A - Radar control simulator device, and control state take-over method - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To take over the control state of an aircraft before changing a scenario time in a changed state while suppressing the enlargement of a system scale and an increase of cost. <P>SOLUTION: This simulator system has a generator 1 for generating flight schedule data of the aircraft based on a scenario, a flight schedule processing part 21 for recording flight schedule data and flag information indicating which aircraft is in a controlled aircraft state or a semi-controlled aircraft state into a flight schedule table 211, a tracking processing part 22 for conducting the tracking processing of the aircraft, and generating wake data including track data and the flag information, and a control device 2 for receiving a control operation, and conducting display to indicate the wake data of the aircraft and the presence of the controlled aircraft state based on the wake data, The control device 2 informs the flight schedule processing part 21 of the purport of receiving an operation for setting the aircraft to the controlled aircraft state when receiving it, and the flight schedule processing part 21 sets the flag information to the semi-controlled aircraft state to be recorded into the flight schedule table 211, and changes the flag information to the controlled aircraft state when informed from the control device 2. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a radar control simulator device and a control state takeover method, and more particularly to a technique for taking over the control state of an aircraft before rewinding after rewinding a scenario of simulation training of control work.

  A radar control simulator system that performs simulation training of radar control work of an air traffic controller is known.

  In radar control systems that are actually used in radar control operations by air traffic controllers, when an aircraft is detected by a radar device, the information processing device uses the target data including information such as the detected aircraft position and altitude, Based on the flight plan data indicating the flight plan of the aircraft, the tracking processing of the aircraft is started. When the information processing apparatus starts the tracking process for the aircraft, the information processing apparatus transmits the track data of the aircraft based on the result of the tracking process to the control console where the controller performs the control work. Then, the aircraft track based on the track data is displayed on the display unit of the control console together with information such as the altitude and position of the aircraft. The aircraft tracking process performed by the information processing device refers to the flight plan data of the aircraft, target data, the time when the aircraft was detected by the radar device, the actual aircraft movement performance, etc. This is a process of calculating a target detection position, which is a position expected to be detected by the radar device, and tracking the aircraft based on the calculation result.

  The state of an aircraft that has been newly detected by a radar device and tracking processing by an information processing device has been started, but has not been controlled by the controller, is called a quasi-control device state. In order to draw attention, a BGN display is displayed on the display section of the control console. Specifically, for an aircraft that has been newly detected by the radar device and has started tracking processing, the information processing device includes information indicating that fact in the wake data and sends it to the control console. Based on the above, the display of the aircraft is set as the BGN display. When the control console performs a control accept process for setting the aircraft to the state of the controlled aircraft being controlled by the controller, the information processing apparatus informs the information processing apparatus that the BGN display is displayed on the control console. Is output and the BGN display of the aircraft disappears. Thus, on the display section of the control console, the aircraft in the semi-control state and the aircraft in the control state are distinguished and displayed according to the presence or absence of the BGN display.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of display on a display unit of a control console of a general radar control system.

  In the example shown in FIG. 5, the aircraft with the call sign ABC500 (upper left) and the aircraft with the ZZZ30 (lower right) are displayed, and the aircraft with the call sign ZZZ30 has a BGN display. This indicates that the aircraft is in the semi-control aircraft state in which the tracking process is started. Further, since the aircraft with call sign ABC500 does not display the BGN display, it indicates that the aircraft is in the state of air traffic control under control by the air traffic controller. In addition, D where the call sign is displayed on the aircraft of ABC500 means that control is performed at the departure control console that controls the departure aircraft, and A where the call sign is displayed on the aircraft of ZZZ300 is It shows that the control is performed at the entrance control console that controls the arrival aircraft. The numbers displayed below the call sign indicate the speed and altitude of the aircraft.

  On the other hand, in the radar control simulator system described above, a scenario generation device that generates and outputs aircraft target data, flight plan data, and the like based on a simulation training scenario is provided instead of the radar device. Tracking processing or the like is performed based on the data generated by the scenario generation device, and wake data is output from the information processing device to the control console. Therefore, the controller can perform a simulation training of the aircraft control operation based on the scenario.

  By the way, in the radar control simulator system, there is a need specific to the simulator such that the scenario time indicating the passage of time in the scenario is rewound and the control work is re-executed and reflected for convenience of simulation training. In addition, in order to faithfully simulate an actual radar control system, an information processing device of actual operation equipment of the radar control system or an information processing device equivalent thereto may be incorporated in the radar control simulator system.

  However, in the radar control simulator system that incorporates the information processing device of actual operation equipment, since the information processing device does not support the time flow going back, the scenario generation device rewinds the scenario time, and from any scenario time When the scenario is resumed, the following problems will occur.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining the operation before and after the scenario time is rewound in a general radar control simulator system incorporating an information processing device for actual operation equipment. FIG. 6 (a) is before the scenario time is rewound. The figure which shows an example of the display of the display part of the control console of (b), the figure which rewinds scenario time and shows an example of the display of the display part of the control console after scenario resumption, (c) is an aircraft after scenario resumption, It is a figure which shows an example of the display of the display part of the control console after control accept operation is performed with respect to.

  Here, as shown in FIG. 6 (a), when the aircraft with call sign ABC500 (upper left) and the aircraft with ZZZ30 (lower right) are set in the controller state, the scenario time is rewound, Let us consider a case where the scenario is restarted from the scenario time.

  In the information processing apparatus of actual operation equipment, it is determined whether or not the position indicated by the position information included in the target data is included in the target detection position of the aircraft predicted by the tracking process. It is determined that the aircraft was detected by the radar device. Normally, when the scenario time is rewound and the scenario is resumed from any scenario time, the position indicated by the location information included in the target data input to the information processing device after the scenario was resumed was performed before the scenario was rewound. The target detection position deviates from the expected tracking process of the aircraft. Therefore, when the target data is input from the scenario generation unit after the scenario is resumed, the information processing apparatus corresponds to a new aircraft that is different from the aircraft that was performing the tracking process before the scenario rewind. Judgment is made and the tracking process of the aircraft is started. As described above, since a new aircraft that has started tracking processing is displayed as BGN on the display unit of the control console, as shown in FIG. 6B, an aircraft that has been in the controller state before the scenario rewind is displayed. After the scenario is resumed, all display returns to BGN display. Therefore, after resuming the scenario, it is necessary for the controller to perform control accept processing for each aircraft again and set it to the controller state again. When the controller performs the control accept process, each aircraft is set to the control state again, and the BGN display disappears as shown in FIG.

  In this way, in the radar control simulator system that incorporates actual operation equipment, the controller knows the control status indicating whether each aircraft before the scenario time rewind is in the control status, and is necessary after the scenario restarts. It is necessary to reset the aircraft to the control device state, and when a large number of aircrafts are set to the control device state, there is a problem that the work load of the controller increases.

Therefore, in Patent Document 1 and the like, by recording all the control operation contents performed at the control console at the time of scenario execution, the scenario time is rewound and the control state of each aircraft is changed when resuming from a predetermined scenario time. A radar control simulator system that can be taken over has been released.
JP 58-144240 A

  However, as in the technique disclosed in Patent Document 1, in order to record all the control operation contents at the time of scenario execution, it is necessary to install a large-capacity recording device or the like in the radar control simulator system. There is a problem that it becomes large or costs increase.

  The object of the present invention is to reduce the workload of the controller by taking over the control state of each aircraft before the scenario time is rewound after the scenario time is rewound, without increasing the system scale or increasing the cost. It is an object of the present invention to provide a radar control simulator system and a control state takeover method that can be performed.

In order to achieve the above object, the radar control simulator system of the present invention includes:
A scenario generation device for generating flight plan data including an identifier of the aircraft and a flight plan, and target data including the identifier and position information of the aircraft based on a simulation training scenario of an aircraft control operation;
A flight plan table, wherein the flight plan data of the aircraft includes flag information indicating whether the aircraft is under control or a new semi-control state where tracking processing is started A flight plan processing unit that records the flight plan data corresponding to the target data based on the identifier from the flight plan table, and performs tracking processing of the aircraft based on the flight plan data and the target data And an information processing apparatus comprising a tracking processing unit that generates track data including track data based on the result of the tracking process and the flag information;
A control device that receives a control operation of the aircraft, and that displays, based on the wake data, a wake of the aircraft and a display indicating whether the aircraft is in the controller state,
When the control device receives an operation for setting the aircraft as a control device, the control device notifies the flight plan processing unit to that effect,
When the flight plan processing unit records the flight plan data in the flight plan table, the flag information is set to a semi-control device state, and when the notification is received from the control device, the flag information is transmitted to the control device. Set to state.

In order to achieve the above object, the control state handover method of the present invention includes:
A control state takeover method performed by a radar control simulator system having a flight plan table for recording flight plan data including an aircraft identifier and a flight plan, and a track table for recording track data based on the tracking processing result of the aircraft. And
Generating the flight plan data of the aircraft and target data including identifier and position information of the aircraft based on a simulated training scenario of an aircraft control operation;
Flag information indicating whether the aircraft is in a controlled state where the aircraft is under control or a new controlled state where tracking processing has been started is set in the semi-controlled state and included in the flight plan data of the aircraft A flight plan recording step for recording in a flight plan table;
Each time the target data is generated, the flight plan data corresponding to the target data is retrieved from the flight plan table based on the identifier, and the aircraft tracking process is performed based on the flight plan data and the target data. Tracking process step of recording track data based on the result of the tracking process in the track table;
A wake data generation step for generating wake data each time track data is recorded in the track table, the track data and flag information recorded in the flight plan table;
A display step for displaying the wake of the aircraft and whether or not the aircraft is in the controller state based on the wake data each time the wake data is generated;
A flag information setting step of accepting an operation of setting the aircraft as the controller and setting the flag information of the aircraft to a controller state.

  As described above, according to the present invention, the flight plan data is recorded including flag information indicating whether the aircraft is in the control state or the semi-control state, and the aircraft is controlled by the control device based on the flag information. Displays whether or not is in the control state.

  Therefore, even if the scenario indicated by the position information included in the target data newly output from the scenario generation device to the information processing device is not included in the target detection position, the simulation training scenario of the control operation is rewound. Based on the information, it can be determined that the target data is the target data corresponding to the aircraft that was being controlled before the scenario was rewound, so that the control state of the aircraft can be taken over after the scenario is resumed. In addition, flag information is added to the flight plan data, and the control status is taken over based on the flag information. Therefore, a large-capacity storage device or the like is not required, and the control size is not increased without increasing the system scale or cost. Can take over the state.

  The best mode for carrying out the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram showing a configuration of an embodiment of a radar control simulator system of the present invention.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the radar control simulator system of the embodiment includes a scenario generation device 1, an information processing device 2, and a control device 3.

  The scenario generation device 1 obtains flight plan data including an aircraft identifier and a flight plan, an aircraft identifier, position information, and time information at which the aircraft is located at the position based on a simulation training scenario of an aircraft control operation. Including target data. The position information includes distance information, direction information, and altitude information. The scenario generation device 1 can also generate aircraft target data indicating a flight pattern based on a user operation. In addition, it accepts an operation from the user, and creates and registers a scenario based on the operation content, and performs time control such as initial setting and rewinding of the scenario time of the scenario.

  The information processing device 2 includes a flight plan processing unit 21 and a tracking processing unit 22, and is based on target data and flight plan data between the scenario generation device 1 and the control device 3, and a control operation performed by the control device 3. It is a device that performs information processing such as aircraft tracking processing using control operation data and the like, and also has a communication interface function between the scenario generation device 1 and the control device 3.

  The flight plan processing unit 21 includes a flight plan table 211 and is in a controller state where the aircraft corresponding to the flight plan data generated by the scenario generation device 1 is under control or a new semi-control device for which tracking processing has been started. The flag information indicating the state is recorded in the flight plan table 211. When the flight plan processing unit 21 records the flight plan data in the flight plan table 211, the flight plan processing unit 21 sets the flag information to the semi-control state, and the control device 3 controls the aircraft corresponding to the flight plan data. When the operation for setting the machine state is accepted, the flag information is set to the controller state. The flight plan table 211 may be provided in a storage unit outside the flight plan processing unit 21.

  The tracking processing unit 22 searches the flight plan table 211 for the corresponding flight plan data based on the identifier included in the target data generated by the scenario generation device 1, and includes the searched flight plan data and target data. The aircraft tracking process is performed based on the information. In addition, the tracking data including the tracking processing result, flag information of the aircraft, target data, flight plan data, and the like is generated and output to the control device 3 for the aircraft that has performed the tracking processing. The tracking processing unit 22 includes a track table 221 that records information including the result of the tracking processing as track data, and performs the tracking processing of the aircraft using the flight plan data, the target data, and the track data. A target detection position indicating a range in which is expected to be detected next is calculated. When the target data is newly generated by the scenario generation unit 1 in the tracking processing unit 22, the position indicated by the position information included in the newly generated target data is not included in the calculated target detection position, and the aircraft's When the flag information is set to the semi-control state, it is determined that the newly generated target data corresponds to the new aircraft, and the tracking processing for the new aircraft is started. Note that the tracking processing performed by the tracking processing unit 22 is the same as the tracking processing performed by the information processing device of the actual operation equipment of the radar control system, and thus detailed description thereof is omitted. Further, the track table 221 may be provided in a storage unit or the like outside the tracking processing unit 22.

  The control device 3 includes an operation unit 31 and a display unit 32.

  The display unit 32 displays an aircraft flight plan, a wake, and the like based on the wake data output from the tracking processing unit 22. Further, based on the flag information included in the wake data, a display indicating whether or not the aircraft corresponding to the wake data is in the control state is performed. Specifically, the display unit 31 displays a BGN display when the aircraft is in a semi-control state, and does not display a BGN display when the aircraft is in a control state.

  The operation unit 31 receives a control operation for the aircraft displayed on the display unit 32. When the operation unit 31 receives an operation of a control accept process for setting the aircraft in the control state, the operation unit 31 outputs the fact to the flight plan processing unit 21 as the control operation data together with the identifier included in the track data of the aircraft. The flight plan processing unit 21 receives the control operation data, and sets the flag information to the controller state.

  In the present embodiment, it is assumed that Secondary Survey Radar data (SSR data: beacon code) is used as an identifier.

  Below, operation | movement of the radar control simulator system of this embodiment is demonstrated.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the flight plan data recorded in the flight plan table 211 shown in FIG. 1 after the scenario starts, before the scenario time change, and after the scenario time change, and (a) after the scenario start. (B) shows an example of the flight plan data before the scenario time change, and (c) shows an example of the flight plan data after the scenario time change.

  3 is a diagram showing an example of the track data recorded in the track table 221 shown in FIG. 1 before the scenario time change and after the scenario time change. FIG. 3A shows the track data before the scenario time change. (B) shows an example of track data after changing the scenario time.

  FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of display after the scenario is started, before the scenario time is changed, and after the scenario time is changed on the display unit 32 shown in FIG. 1, and (a) is an example of the display after the scenario is started. (B) shows an example of the display before the scenario time is changed, and (c) shows an example of the display after the scenario time is changed.

  First, the operation of the radar control simulator system before rewinding the scenario will be described.

  First, upon receiving an operation for registering a simulation training scenario for a control operation, the scenario generation device 1 outputs flight plan data of each aircraft based on the scenario to the flight plan processing unit 21. In response, the flight plan processing unit 21 records flight plan data in the flight plan table. At this time, as shown in FIG. 2 (a), the flight plan processing unit 21 sets all flag information of each aircraft to OFF, which means a semi-controlled state. Further, as shown in FIG. 2A, the flight plan data recorded in the flight plan table corresponds to a flight plan number for identifying flight plan data, a call sign, and a flight plan category indicating a flight plan category. A track number for identifying the track data, SSR data, a controller status flag as flag information, and the like are included. The flight plan classification is information indicating whether the aircraft is a departure aircraft or an arrival aircraft, what flight method the aircraft is flying in, and the like.

  Next, when the scenario generation device 1 accepts an operation for starting a scenario, the scenario generation device 1 outputs scenario time data to the information processing device 2 and the control device 3, performs time adjustment for each device, and sets target data based on the scenario. Generation is started, and the generated target data is output to the tracking processing unit 22. Note that the target data output from the scenario generation device 1 includes time information, position information, SSR data, and the like.

  Next, in the information processing device 2, the tracking processing unit 22 searches the flight plan table 212 for flight plan data corresponding to the target data based on the SSR data included in the target data output from the scenario generation device 1. When the corresponding flight plan data is searched, it is determined that the target data is the aircraft to be tracked, and the tracking process is started based on the information including the searched flight plan data and the target data. In addition, the tracking processing unit 22 tracks the track data including the position information including the distance information, the azimuth information, and the altitude information of the aircraft, the SSR data, and the like based on the result of the tracking process for the aircraft that has started tracking. Record in table 221. Further, as shown in FIGS. 2A and 3A, the tracking processing unit 22 associates the searched flight plan data with the track data, in order to correlate the searched flight plan data with the track number. The value of the track number of the generated track data is recorded, and the value of the flight plan number of the searched flight plan data is included in the generated track data. The tracking processing unit 22 performs the above-described processing and updates the track data recorded in the track table 221 each time target data is generated by the scenario generation unit 1. As shown in FIG. 3A, the track data recorded in the track table 221 includes a track number, distance information, direction information, altitude information, SSR data, a flight plan number, and the like.

  Next, the tracking processing unit 22 generates track data including track data recorded in the track table 221 and an aircraft controller state flag corresponding to the track data, and outputs the track data to the control device 3. In response to this, in the control device 3, the display unit 32 displays the wake based on the track data included in the wake data, and displays a display indicating whether the aircraft is in the control state based on the control state flag. indicate. Here, as shown in FIG. 4A, since the control acceptance process has not yet been performed on the aircraft, the aircraft is displayed in a BGN display indicating the quasi-controller state.

  Next, in the control device 3, when the operation unit 31 receives an operation of a control accept process for setting the aircraft to the control device state, the flight plan unit 21 uses the SSR data included in the wake data as control operation data. Output to. In response to this, as shown in FIG. 2B, the flight plan processing unit 21 stores the flight plan data corresponding to the operated aircraft based on the SSR data included in the control operation data. And the controller state flag included in the searched flight plan data is set to ON indicating the controller state. It is assumed that the flight plan data is recorded in the flight plan table 211 until the scenario generation device 1 changes the scenario to another scenario.

  Thereafter, when new target data is generated by the scenario generation unit 1, tracking processing is performed by the tracking processing unit 22, and track data is output to the control device 3. As shown in FIG. 4B, at this time, since the control state flag is set to ON, which means the control state, the BGN display disappears from the aircraft display on the display unit 32, indicating the control state. Display.

  Next, the operation of the radar control simulator system when a scenario time changing operation such as scenario rewinding is performed in the scenario generation device 1 and the scenario is restarted from the changed scenario time will be described.

  When the scenario generation device 1 accepts an operation to restart the scenario after the change operation of the nario time, the scenario generation device 1 outputs the changed scenario time data to the information processing device 2 and the control device 3, and performs time adjustment for each device. The generation of target data is resumed based on the scenario from the changed scenario time, and the generated target data is output to the tracking processing unit 22. Further, the scenario generation unit 1 notifies the flight plan processing unit 21 and the tracking processing unit 22 that the scenario time has been changed.

  Next, when the flight plan processing unit 21 receives a notification from the scenario generation unit 1 that the scenario time has been changed, the flight plan processing unit 21 is used for associating the flight plan data recorded in the flight plan table 211 with the track data. Delete the track number value. All information other than the track number is retained as it is.

  When the tracking processing unit 22 receives notification from the scenario generation unit 1 that the scenario time has been changed, the tracking processing unit 22 deletes all track data recorded in the track table 221. This is because if the track data is left in the track table 211, the tracking process is continued even after the scenario time is changed, and the wake of the aircraft may become discontinuous.

  Next, the tracking processing unit 22 searches the flight plan table 212 for flight plan data corresponding to the target data based on the SSR data included in the target data generated by the scenario generation device 1 after the scenario time change, Based on the information including the searched flight plan data and target data, the tracking processing of the aircraft corresponding to the target data is started. At this time, since all the track data before the scenario time change is deleted, the tracking processing unit 22 starts a new aircraft tracking process. The tracking processing unit 22 records track data in the track table 221 based on the result of the tracking process for the aircraft that has started tracking. Further, as shown in FIG. 3B, since the tracking process is newly started, a new track number is assigned to the generated track data, which is different from the track number before the scenario time is changed. Further, as shown in FIGS. 2C and 3B, the tracking processing unit 22 tracks the track number of the searched flight plan data in order to associate the searched flight plan data with the generated track data. The track number value of the generated track data is recorded, and the flight plan number of the searched flight plan data is included in the generated track data.

  Next, the tracking processing unit 22 generates wake data and outputs the wake data to the control device 3. Here, as shown in FIG. 2C, the controller state flag included in the flight plan data is set to ON indicating the controller state. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 4C, even in a new aircraft that has started the tracking process, the display on the display unit 31 is a display indicating the controller state, and the BGN display is not displayed. When the control state flag included in the wake data is set to OFF indicating the semi-control state, the aircraft display on the display unit 31 is BGN display.

  As described above, in the radar control simulator system according to the present embodiment, the flight plan data includes flag information indicating whether the aircraft is in the control state or the semi-control state, and is recorded in the flight plan data table 211. Based on the flag information, the control device 3 displays whether or not the aircraft is in the control state.

  Therefore, even if the scenario indicated by the position information included in the target data newly output from the scenario generation device 1 to the information processing device 2 is not included in the target detection position, the simulation training scenario of the control operation is rewound. Since the target data can be determined based on the flag information as the target data corresponding to the aircraft that was being controlled before the scenario was rewound, the control state of the aircraft can be taken over after the scenario is resumed.

  Further, by deleting all the track data recorded in the track table 221 after the scenario time is changed, the tracking process is not continued after the scenario is resumed, so that an unnatural track is not displayed on the display unit 32. Can be.

It is a schematic block diagram which shows the structure of one Embodiment of the radar control simulator system of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example after the scenario start of the flight plan data currently recorded on the flight plan table shown in FIG. 1, before scenario time change, and after scenario time change. It is a figure which shows an example before the scenario time change of the track data currently recorded on the track table shown in FIG. 1, and after a scenario time change. It is a figure which shows an example of the display of the display part shown in FIG. 1 after a scenario start, before scenario time change, and after scenario time change. It is a figure which shows an example of the display of the display part of the control console of a radar control system. It is a figure for demonstrating the operation | movement before and behind the rewind of scenario time in the general radar control simulator system incorporating the information processing apparatus of actual operation equipment.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Scenario production | generation apparatus 2 Information processing apparatus 3 Control apparatus 21 Flight plan process part 22 Tracking process part 31 Operation part 32 Display part 211 Flight plan table 221 Track table

Claims (6)

A scenario generation device that generates flight plan data including an identifier and a flight plan of the aircraft and target data including an identifier and position information of the aircraft based on a simulation training scenario of an aircraft control operation;
A flight plan table, wherein the flight plan data of the aircraft includes flag information indicating whether the aircraft is under control or a new semi-control state where tracking processing is started A flight plan processing unit that records the flight plan data corresponding to the target data based on the identifier from the flight plan table, and performs tracking processing of the aircraft based on the flight plan data and the target data And an information processing apparatus comprising a tracking processing unit that generates track data including track data based on the result of the tracking process and the flag information;
A control device that receives a control operation of the aircraft, and that displays, based on the wake data, a wake of the aircraft and a display indicating whether the aircraft is in the controller state,
When the control device receives an operation for setting the aircraft as a control device, the control device notifies the flight plan processing unit to that effect,
When the flight plan processing unit records the flight plan data in the flight plan table, the flag information is set to a semi-control device state, and when the notification is received from the control device, the flag information is transmitted to the control device. Radar control simulator system set to state. In the radar control simulator system according to claim 1,
The tracking processing unit includes a track table that records the track data, and performs tracking processing of the aircraft based on the flight plan data, the target data, and the track data recorded in the track table, A target detection position indicating a range where the aircraft is expected to be detected next is calculated, and a position indicated by position information included in target data newly generated by the scenario generation unit is included in the target detection position. If the flag information of the aircraft is not set to the semi-control state, the newly generated target data is determined to correspond to the new aircraft, and the tracking processing of the new aircraft is started. Radar control simulator system. In the radar control simulator system according to claim 2,
The scenario generation device changes a time in the scenario based on an operation from a user, restarts the scenario from a time specified by the operation, and generates the target data based on the resumed scenario And informing the tracking processing unit that the time of the scenario has been changed,
The tracking processing unit is a radar control simulator system that receives the notification from the scenario generation device and deletes track data recorded in the track table. A control state takeover method performed by a radar control simulator system having a flight plan table for recording flight plan data including an aircraft identifier and a flight plan, and a track table for recording track data based on the tracking processing result of the aircraft. And
Generating the flight plan data of the aircraft and target data including identifier and position information of the aircraft based on a simulation training scenario of an aircraft control operation; and
Flag information indicating whether the aircraft is in a controlled state where the aircraft is under control or a new controlled state where tracking processing has been started is set in the semi-controlled state and included in the flight plan data of the aircraft A flight plan recording step for recording in a flight plan table;
Each time the target data is generated, the flight plan data corresponding to the target data is retrieved from the flight plan table based on the identifier, and the aircraft tracking process is performed based on the flight plan data and the target data. Tracking process step of recording track data based on the result of the tracking process in the track table;
A wake data generation step for generating wake data each time track data is recorded in the track table, the track data and flag information recorded in the flight plan table;
A display step for displaying the wake of the aircraft and whether or not the aircraft is in the controller state based on the wake data each time the wake data is generated;
A control state takeover method, comprising: a flag information setting step of accepting an operation of setting the aircraft as the control device and setting the flag information of the aircraft to the control device state. In the control state taking over method of Claim 4,
In the tracking process step,
Target detection indicating a range in which the tracking process is performed based on the flight plan data, the target data, and the track data recorded in the track table, and the aircraft that is performing the tracking process is expected to be detected next Calculating a position;
When the information indicating the position included in the newly generated target data is not included in the target detection position, and the flag information of the aircraft is set to the semi-control state, the newly generated target data is A control state taking over method, comprising the step of determining that it corresponds to a new aircraft and starting tracking processing of the new aircraft. In the control state taking over method of Claim 5,
Accepting an operation from the user, changing the time in the scenario based on the operation, restarting the scenario from the time specified by the operation, and generating the target data based on the resumed scenario The control state takeover method further comprising the step of deleting the result of the tracking process recorded in the track table.

Images