JP2010093509A - Determining method of influence of power transmission steel tower affecting digital terrestrial broadcasting - Google Patents

Determining method of influence of power transmission steel tower affecting digital terrestrial broadcasting Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2010093509A
JP2010093509A JP2008261038A JP2008261038A JP2010093509A JP 2010093509 A JP2010093509 A JP 2010093509A JP 2008261038 A JP2008261038 A JP 2008261038A JP 2008261038 A JP2008261038 A JP 2008261038A JP 2010093509 A JP2010093509 A JP 2010093509A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
electric field
transmission tower
influence
power transmission
measuring
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2008261038A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4955638B2 (en
Inventor
Mikio Minato
幹夫 湊
Kazuhiko Ito
和彦 伊藤
Yukito Morimoto
幸仁 森本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chubu Electric Power Co Inc
Original Assignee
Chubu Electric Power Co Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chubu Electric Power Co Inc filed Critical Chubu Electric Power Co Inc
Priority to JP2008261038A priority Critical patent/JP4955638B2/en
Publication of JP2010093509A publication Critical patent/JP2010093509A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4955638B2 publication Critical patent/JP4955638B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a logical determining method of specifying at an early stage whether or not a cause for digital electric waves which cannot be received is simple shielding phenomena due to terrain, whether or not the cause is the generation of sneaked waves or whether or not the cause is the generation of scattered waves, and a duration when the cause of reception failure arises and remains. <P>SOLUTION: The method has a step of measuring a reception electric field at each measuring height while changing the measuring height every 50 cm between 4 m and 10 m from ground in a shielding side area 11, and a step of determining that the power transmission steel tower 2 is affecting the digital terrestrial broadcasting when an amount of variation of the reception electric field between adjacent measuring heights is ≥3 dB and the number of generated times is twice or more. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に及ぼす影響の判定方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a method for determining the influence of a power transmission tower on terrestrial digital broadcasting.

従来から回り込み波の発生は、デジタル電波が鉄塔等の構造物や地形により反射することによって発生することが知られているが、そのレベルが大きい場合、所定のサービスエリアにおいて、デジタル電波を受信できないといった問題があり(特許文献1)、その対策として、デジタル電波を受信できない特定のエリアに対し、湾曲形状の反射板によって、送信所からのデジタル電波を放射状に反射させ、特定のエリアに向けて送信するようにする方法が知られている(特許文献2)。   Conventionally, the generation of sneak waves is known to occur when digital radio waves are reflected by structures such as steel towers or topography. However, when the level is high, digital radio waves cannot be received in a predetermined service area. (Patent Document 1), and as a countermeasure against the specific area where the digital radio wave cannot be received, the digital radio wave from the transmitting station is reflected radially by the curved reflector, and directed toward the specific area. A method for transmitting is known (Patent Document 2).

特開2003−332961号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2003-329661 特開2003−298485号公報JP 2003-298485 A

しかし、送電鉄塔の近辺においては、デジタル電波を受信できない場合、送電設備に電波が入射することで、電線と送電鉄塔から無数の散乱波が発生するため、受信電波の品質に影響を与えるといった問題も考えられる。さらに、送電鉄塔から生ずる散乱波の発生機構が複雑であることや、散乱波の実測データの不足などから、電波受信に際してどのような影響を及ぼし得るのか明確ではなかった。他にも、建物が複数存在する場合や、地形によって受信が困難となっている場合など、受信障害は何が原因であるのか精度良く特定することが困難であった。それ故、この対策をする為には、デジタル電波を受信できない原因が地形による遮蔽現象であるのか、回り込み波の発生によるものなのか、散乱波の発生によるものなのか、その原因を特定する必要があった。   However, in the vicinity of the transmission tower, when digital radio waves cannot be received, radio waves are incident on the power transmission equipment, and countless scattered waves are generated from the wires and the transmission tower, affecting the quality of the received radio waves. Is also possible. In addition, it is not clear what effect it may have on radio wave reception due to the complex mechanism of the scattered wave generated from the power transmission tower and the lack of measured data of the scattered wave. In addition, when there are a plurality of buildings or when reception is difficult due to topography, it is difficult to accurately identify the cause of the reception failure. Therefore, in order to take this measure, it is necessary to identify the cause of the inability to receive digital radio waves due to the terrain shielding phenomenon, the occurrence of sneak waves, or the occurrence of scattered waves was there.

他にも、送電設備が新設・変更される際は、工事前にその地域を調査することで、工事後のデータと比較する方法によって、受信障害に対し、従来は比較的明確に判定が可能である。しかし、地上デジタル放送は、後発現象であり、送電設備の所有者によっては、既設設備についても影響があれば対策を行う方針をとる場合も考えられる。さらには、今後法整備によって、建造物の設置時期に関わらず、対策を行う義務が建設物設置者に課されることも考えられる。このような場合、送電設備と受信障害との因果関係を明らかにすることは困難であった。   In addition, when a transmission facility is newly installed or changed, it is possible to make a relatively clear judgment on reception failure by investigating the area before construction and comparing it with data after construction. It is. However, terrestrial digital broadcasting is a late phenomenon, and depending on the owner of the power transmission equipment, it may be possible to take measures if there is an effect on the existing equipment. Furthermore, due to legal developments in the future, it is possible that the duty to take countermeasures will be imposed on the installers regardless of when the buildings are installed. In such a case, it has been difficult to clarify the causal relationship between the power transmission equipment and the reception failure.

そこで、本発明は、上記従来の問題点を解消し、送電鉄塔の近辺において、デジタル電波を受信できない原因が単に地形による遮蔽現象なのか、回り込み波の発生によるものなのか、散乱波の発生によるものなのか、また、受信障害の原因がいつから発生しているのか、これらの原因を早期に特定する論理的な判断手法を提供することにある。   Therefore, the present invention solves the above-mentioned conventional problems, whether the cause of the inability to receive digital radio waves in the vicinity of the transmission tower is simply a shielding phenomenon due to landforms, or due to the generation of sneak waves, due to the generation of scattered waves It is an object of the present invention to provide a logical judgment method for identifying at an early stage whether or not the cause of the reception failure has occurred, and the cause of the reception failure.

上記目的を達成するため、請求項1に記載の発明は、送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に及ぼす影響を判定する方法であって、所定の測定地点から垂直方向へ所定量ずつ測定高さを変化させて各測定高さでの受信電界を測定するステップと、隣接する測定高さ間での受信電界の変動量が所定以上となる場合が所定回数以上発生した際に、前記送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に影響を及ぼしている可能性が高いと判断するステップと、を有することにある。   In order to achieve the above object, the invention described in claim 1 is a method for determining the influence of a power transmission tower on terrestrial digital broadcasting, wherein a measurement height is changed by a predetermined amount from a predetermined measurement point in a vertical direction. And measuring the received electric field at each measurement height, and when the amount of fluctuation of the received electric field between adjacent measurement heights exceeds a predetermined number of times, the power transmission tower performs terrestrial digital broadcasting. And a step of determining that it is highly likely that the process is affected.

請求項2に記載の発明は、送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に及ぼす影響の判定方法であって、所定の測定地点から垂直方向へ所定量ずつ測定高さを変化させて各測定高さでの受信電界を測定するステップと、隣接する測定高さ間での受信電界の変動量が所定以上となる場合が所定回数以上発生した際に、前記所定の測定地点において、デジタル電波を測定し、前記デジタル電波が障害物に入射することで発生する回り込み波を確認するステップと、前記回り込み波が測定されない場合、送電鉄塔による影響が発生していると判断するステップと、を有することにある。   The invention according to claim 2 is a method for determining the influence of a power transmission tower on terrestrial digital broadcasting, wherein reception at each measurement height is performed by changing the measurement height in a vertical direction from a predetermined measurement point. A step of measuring an electric field and measuring a digital radio wave at the predetermined measurement point when the amount of fluctuation of the received electric field between adjacent measurement heights exceeds a predetermined number of times. There are a step of confirming a sneak wave generated when a radio wave is incident on an obstacle, and a step of judging that an influence by a power transmission tower is generated when the sneak wave is not measured.

請求項3に記載の発明は、請求項1又は2に記載の発明に加え、前記測定するステップでは、地上4mから10mの間で、50cm毎に測定高さを変化させることにある。   According to a third aspect of the present invention, in addition to the first or second aspect of the invention, in the measuring step, the measurement height is changed every 50 cm between 4 m and 10 m above the ground.

請求項4に記載の発明は、請求項3に記載の発明に加え、前記測定するステップでは、受信電界の変動量が3dB以上、発生回数が2回以上となるチャンネルが測定された際に、前記送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に影響を及ぼしていると判断することにある。   In addition to the invention of claim 3, the invention of claim 4 is characterized in that, in the step of measuring, when a channel in which the amount of fluctuation of the received electric field is 3 dB or more and the number of occurrences is 2 or more is measured, It is determined that the power transmission tower has an influence on terrestrial digital broadcasting.

本発明によれば、デジタル電波を受信できない原因が回り込み波の発生によるものなのか、散乱波の発生によるものなのか、その原因を特定し、送電鉄塔と受信障害との因果関係を明らかにすることが可能となる。そして、原因が早期に、論理的に解決されるため、その受信障害に対し、無駄な対策をすることなく、効果的な対策をすることができる。加えて、電波障害の当事者又は第三者に対して論理的説明が可能となり、地域での電波障害におけるトラブルを軽減することも可能となる。   According to the present invention, whether the cause of the inability to receive digital radio waves is due to the occurrence of sneak waves or the occurrence of scattered waves, the cause is identified, and the causal relationship between the transmission tower and reception interference is clarified. It becomes possible. Since the cause is resolved logically at an early stage, effective countermeasures can be taken without taking unnecessary measures against the reception failure. In addition, a logical explanation can be given to the parties or third parties of the radio disturbance, and troubles due to radio disturbance in the area can be reduced.

以下、本発明の実施の形態を図面に基づいて説明する。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

図1は、デジタル電波の受信状況を示す説明図である。図2は、デジタル電波の測定方法を示す説明図である。図3は、電界強度と測定高さとの関係を示す説明図である。   FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing the reception status of digital radio waves. FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing a method for measuring digital radio waves. FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing the relationship between the electric field strength and the measured height.

図1に示すように、デジタル電波は、直接波7,7・・として、一般的に送信アンテナ1から送信アンテナ1と送電鉄塔2との間に位置する前方側エリア10の一般住宅6,6・・と、送電鉄塔2の後方に位置する遮蔽側エリア11の一般住宅6,6・・のアンテナに送信される。この時に、一部の直接波8,8・・が送電鉄塔2と電線とに入射することによって、散乱波9が発生する。この散乱波9が、遮蔽側エリア11の一般住宅6,6・・のアンテナに直接波7とともに受信されることによって受信品質に影響を与える。なお、送電鉄塔2から前方側エリアに発生する散乱波9,9・・については、特定の方向からのみ受信するアンテナの特性から、この影響は除外される。   As shown in FIG. 1, digital radio waves are directly transmitted as direct waves 7, 7, etc., in general houses 6 and 6 in the front area 10 located between the transmitting antenna 1 and the transmitting antenna 1 and the power transmission tower 2. .. and transmitted to the antennas of the ordinary houses 6, 6... In the shielding side area 11 located behind the power transmission tower 2. At this time, a part of the direct waves 8, 8... Is incident on the power transmission tower 2 and the electric wire, thereby generating a scattered wave 9. The scattered wave 9 is received together with the direct wave 7 by the antennas of the general houses 6, 6. For scattered waves 9, 9,... Generated in the front area from the power transmission tower 2, this influence is excluded from the characteristics of the antenna that receives only from a specific direction.

そして、図2に示すように、送電鉄塔2の前方側エリア10の車3で、直接波8を測定地点で測定する。この時、アンテナ5は、地上から約4m〜10mの高さで、1m毎に測定する。同様に、遮蔽側エリア11の車4で、散乱波9もアンテナ5で測定する。
また、送電鉄塔2の遮蔽側エリア11において、図3(a)は、送電鉄塔2から20m離れた地域の電界強度と測定高さとの関係を示し、図3(b)は、60m離れた地域とにおける電界強度と測定高さとの関係を示したものである。
Then, as shown in FIG. 2, the direct wave 8 is measured at the measurement point with the car 3 in the front area 10 of the power transmission tower 2. At this time, the antenna 5 is measured every 1 m at a height of about 4 m to 10 m from the ground. Similarly, the scattered wave 9 is also measured by the antenna 5 in the car 4 in the shielding side area 11.
Moreover, in the shielding side area 11 of the power transmission tower 2, FIG. 3 (a) shows the relationship between the electric field strength and measurement height of the area 20m away from the power transmission tower 2, and FIG. 3 (b) shows the area 60m away. This shows the relationship between the electric field strength and the measured height at.

その結果、前方側エリア10においては、電界強度と測定高さとの間にほぼ一定の相関関係があると認められる。この場合、鉄塔の影響を受けていない前方側エリア10の計測地点では、アンテナ5を地上から約4m〜10mの高さで約50cm上下させても、電界変動量が約3dB以上発生したところは殆どない。また、その変動回数に至っては、皆無である。   As a result, in the front area 10, it is recognized that there is a substantially constant correlation between the electric field strength and the measured height. In this case, at the measurement point in the front area 10 that is not affected by the steel tower, even if the antenna 5 is moved up and down about 50 cm at a height of about 4 m to 10 m from the ground, an electric field fluctuation amount of about 3 dB or more is generated. Almost no. In addition, the number of fluctuations is none.

これに対し、遮蔽側エリア11においては、電界強度と測定高さとの間に相関があるとは認められず、激しい振幅変化を示している。また、鉄塔の影響を受ける遮蔽側エリア11の計測地点における電界変動量は、最大で10dBを越える場合がある。その発生頻度は、前方側エリア10の計測地点に比べて圧倒的に高く、変動回数も増加傾向にある。
この結果から、前方側エリアに10おいては、デジタル電波7のうち、直接波8,8・・のみ受信しているが、遮蔽側エリア11では、直接波8に散乱波9も加えられた電波をデジタル電波7として受信しているため、散乱波9の影響によって激しい振幅変化を生じたものであるといえる。
On the other hand, in the shielding side area 11, it is not recognized that there is a correlation between the electric field strength and the measurement height, and a severe amplitude change is shown. Moreover, the electric field fluctuation amount at the measurement point in the shielding side area 11 affected by the steel tower may exceed 10 dB at the maximum. The frequency of occurrence is overwhelmingly higher than the measurement points in the front area 10 and the number of fluctuations tends to increase.
From this result, in the front side area 10, only the direct waves 8, 8... Are received in the digital radio wave 7, but in the shielding side area 11, the scattered wave 9 is also added to the direct wave 8. Since the radio wave is received as the digital radio wave 7, it can be said that a severe amplitude change is caused by the influence of the scattered wave 9.

他にも、表1においては、送電鉄塔2の前方側エリア10及び遮蔽側エリア11と、アンテナ5の高さにおける受信電界変動量に対するチャンネル群との関係を示す。この場合においても、遮蔽側エリア11では、前方側エリア10に比べ、電界変動量が大きい。また、アンテナ5の高さが変わるに従い、電界変動量が不規則に変化するため、アンテナ5の高さと電界変動量との間に相関があるとは認められない。   In addition, Table 1 shows the relationship between the front side area 10 and the shielding side area 11 of the power transmission tower 2 and the channel group with respect to the received electric field fluctuation amount at the height of the antenna 5. Even in this case, the shielding-side area 11 has a larger electric field fluctuation amount than the front-side area 10. Further, since the electric field fluctuation amount irregularly changes as the height of the antenna 5 changes, it is not recognized that there is a correlation between the height of the antenna 5 and the electric field fluctuation amount.

さらに、計測したチャンネル群は、遮蔽側エリア11において、受信電界変動量が3dB以上で、変動回数が2回以上のものが含まれている。また、何れか一方を備えたものも含まれている。これに対し、前方側エリア10では、計測したチャンネル群に受信電界変動量が3dB以上変動するものはなく、変動回数が2回以上のものもない。   Further, the measured channel group includes those in which the received electric field fluctuation amount is 3 dB or more and the fluctuation frequency is two or more in the shielding side area 11. Moreover, the thing provided with either one is also included. On the other hand, in the front side area 10, there is no measured channel group in which the received electric field fluctuation amount fluctuates by 3 dB or more, and there is no fluctuation number of two or more.

Figure 2010093509
Figure 2010093509

これらにより、送電鉄塔2の遮蔽側エリア11においては、デジタル電波7が大地に反射することの影響や、通常の回り込み波の影響などでは起こり得ないような電界変動特性観測されるときは、送電鉄塔2の影響によって、電界変動が発生しているため、受信不可となっている可能性が高いと判断することができる。   As a result, in the shielding-side area 11 of the power transmission tower 2, when electric field fluctuation characteristics that cannot occur due to the influence of the digital radio wave 7 reflected on the ground or the influence of a normal sneak wave are observed, It can be determined that there is a high possibility that reception is impossible because the electric field fluctuates due to the influence of the steel tower 2.

以上のように、本形態の判定方法は、遮蔽側エリア11の地上4mから10mの間で、50cm毎に測定高さを変化させて各測定高さでの受信電界を測定するステップと、隣接する測定高さ間での受信電界の変動量が3dB以上、発生回数が2回以上発生したチャンネルが測定された際に、送電鉄塔2が地上デジタル放送に影響を及ぼしていると判断するステップと、を有することにある。
その結果、デジタル電波7を受信できない原因が回り込み波の発生によるものなのか、散乱波9の発生によるものなのか、その原因を特定し、送電鉄塔2と受信障害との因果関係を明らかにすることが可能となる。そして、原因が早期に、論理的に解決されるため、その受信障害に対し、無駄な対策をすることなく、効果的な対策をすることができる。加えて、電波障害の当事者又は第三者に対して論理的説明が可能となり、地域での電波障害におけるトラブルを軽減することも可能となる。
As described above, the determination method of the present embodiment includes a step of measuring the received electric field at each measurement height by changing the measurement height every 50 cm between 4 m and 10 m above the ground in the shielding side area 11, and adjacent Determining that the transmission tower 2 has an influence on digital terrestrial broadcasting when a channel in which the amount of fluctuation of the received electric field between the measurement heights is 3 dB or more and the number of occurrences is 2 or more is measured; , To have.
As a result, whether the cause of the inability to receive the digital radio wave 7 is due to the generation of the sneak wave or the generation of the scattered wave 9, the cause is identified, and the causal relationship between the transmission tower 2 and the reception failure is clarified. It becomes possible. Since the cause is resolved logically at an early stage, effective countermeasures can be taken without taking unnecessary measures against the reception failure. In addition, a logical explanation can be given to the parties or third parties of the radio disturbance, and troubles due to radio disturbance in the area can be reduced.

また、遮蔽側エリア11の地上4mから10mの間で、50cm毎に測定高さを変化させて各測定高さでの受信電界を測定するステップと、隣接する測定高さ間での受信電界の変動量が3dB以上、発生回数が2回以上となるチャンネルが測定された際に、送電鉄塔2が地上デジタル放送に影響を及ぼしていると判断するステップと、遮蔽側エリア11において、デジタル電波7を測定し、このデジタル電波7が障害物に入射することで発生する回り込み波を確認するステップと、回り込み波が測定されない場合、送電鉄塔2による影響が発生していると判断するステップと、を有することにある。
その結果、デジタル電波7を受信できない原因が回り込み波の発生によるものなのか、散乱波9の発生によるものなのか、その原因を特定し、送電鉄塔2と受信障害との因果関係を明らかにすることが可能となる。そして、原因が早期に、論理的に解決されるため、その受信障害に対し、無駄な対策をすることなく、効果的な対策をすることができる。加えて、電波障害の当事者又は第三者に対して論理的説明が可能となり、地域での電波障害におけるトラブルを軽減することも可能となる。
Further, the step of measuring the reception electric field at each measurement height by changing the measurement height every 50 cm between 4 m and 10 m above the ground in the shielding side area 11 and the reception electric field between the adjacent measurement heights. When a channel whose fluctuation amount is 3 dB or more and the number of occurrences is 2 times or more is measured, the step of determining that the transmission tower 2 has an influence on the digital terrestrial broadcasting, and the digital radio wave 7 in the shielding side area 11 A step of confirming a sneak wave generated when the digital radio wave 7 is incident on an obstacle, and a step of judging that the influence of the power transmission tower 2 is occurring when the sneak wave is not measured. Is to have.
As a result, whether the cause of the inability to receive the digital radio wave 7 is due to the generation of a sneak wave or the generation of the scattered wave 9, the cause is identified, and the causal relationship between the transmission tower 2 and the reception failure is clarified. It becomes possible. Since the cause is resolved logically at an early stage, an effective countermeasure can be taken without taking a wasteful countermeasure against the reception failure. In addition, a logical explanation can be given to a party or a third party having a radio disturbance, and troubles due to radio disturbance in the area can be reduced.

なお、本発明の判定方法は、上記実施形態の態様に何ら制限されるものではなく、計測地点における構成を、本発明の趣旨を逸脱しない範囲で必要に応じて適宜変更することができる。   Note that the determination method of the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and the configuration at the measurement point can be appropriately changed as necessary without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

例えば、アンテナの地上からの高さや計測する間隔、電界変動量の比較値や、その発生頻度等の構成を変更しても良く、電界変動量を比較するものであれば、適宜設計変更可能である。特に、アンテナの地上からの高さは、一般住宅の立地条件に影響されるため、必ずしも地上から10mの高さまでに限定されるものではなく、それ以上の高さであっても良く、適宜変更することができる。同様に、アンテナの各測定高さも一般住宅の立地条件に影響されるため、必ずしも50cm毎の測定高さに限定されるものではなく、適宜変更することができる。   For example, the height of the antenna from the ground, the measurement interval, the comparison value of the electric field fluctuation amount, the occurrence frequency, etc. may be changed, and if the electric field fluctuation amount is compared, the design can be changed as appropriate. is there. In particular, since the height of the antenna from the ground is affected by the location conditions of ordinary houses, it is not necessarily limited to a height of 10 m from the ground, and may be higher than that and may be changed as appropriate. can do. Similarly, since the measured heights of the antennas are also affected by the general housing location conditions, they are not necessarily limited to the measured heights of every 50 cm, and can be changed as appropriate.

また、電界変動量の計測は、必ずしもアンテナを使用する必要はなく、電界変動量を測定するものであれば、適宜変更しても良い。   In addition, the measurement of the electric field fluctuation amount does not necessarily need to use an antenna, and may be appropriately changed as long as the electric field fluctuation amount is measured.

なお、都市部においては、送電鉄塔以外による影響以外に、ビル等の建造物からの反射波によっても送電鉄塔に似た電界変動特性を生じる場合がある。しかし、この場合、送電鉄塔から発生する散乱波は、遅延時間が殆どない状態でアンテナに到達するため、妨害電波の遅延時間を測定する方法によって、送電鉄塔からの散乱波の影響による電界変動特性であるか否かを判断することができる。   In urban areas, electric field fluctuation characteristics similar to those of power transmission towers may be generated by reflected waves from buildings such as buildings, in addition to the effects other than those of power transmission towers. However, in this case, since the scattered wave generated from the transmission tower reaches the antenna with almost no delay time, the electric field fluctuation characteristics due to the influence of the scattered wave from the transmission tower are measured by the method of measuring the delay time of the jamming radio wave. It can be determined whether or not.

他にも、直接波より遅延した散乱波を受信すると、デジタル電波の波形には、直接波が測定されてから散乱波が測定されるまでの時間である遅延時間に応じた周期でリップル(周期的な波形歪み)が生ずるため、波形の観測をすることによっても、電波障害が発生した場合に、送電鉄塔からの散乱波の影響による電界変動特性であるか否かを判断することができる。   In addition, when a scattered wave delayed from the direct wave is received, the digital radio wave waveform has a ripple (periodic period) corresponding to the delay time, which is the time from when the direct wave is measured until the scattered wave is measured. Therefore, by observing the waveform, it is possible to determine whether or not the electric field fluctuation characteristic is due to the influence of the scattered wave from the power transmission tower when the radio wave interference occurs.

また、回り込み波の確認方法としては、遅延時間を測定する方法が一般的に知られているが、必ずしもこれに限定されるものではなく、他の方法で確認できれば適宜変更しても良い。   Further, as a method for confirming a sneak wave, a method for measuring a delay time is generally known, but is not necessarily limited to this, and may be appropriately changed as long as it can be confirmed by another method.

デジタル電波の受信状況を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the reception condition of a digital radio wave. デジタル電波の測定方法を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the measuring method of a digital radio wave. 電界強度と測定高さとの関係を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the relationship between electric field strength and measurement height.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1・・送信アンテナ、2・・送電鉄塔、3・・測定器、4・・測定器、5・・アンテナ、6・・一般住宅、7・・デジタル電波、8・・直接波、9・・散乱波、10・・前方側エリア、11・・遮蔽側エリア。   1 .... Transmitting antenna, 2 .... Transmission tower, 3 .... Measuring instrument, 4 .... Measuring instrument, 5 .... Antenna, 6 .... General housing, 7 .... Digital radio wave, 8 .... Direct wave, 9 .... Scattered waves, 10 .... front area, 11 .... shielded area.

Claims (4)

送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に及ぼす影響を判定する方法であって、
所定の測定地点から垂直方向へ所定量ずつ測定高さを変化させて各測定高さでの受信電界を測定するステップと、
隣接する測定高さ間での受信電界の変動量が所定以上となる場合が所定回数以上発生した際に、前記送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に影響を及ぼしている可能性が高いと判断するステップと、
を有することを特徴とする、送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に及ぼす影響の判定方法。
A method of determining the effect of a transmission tower on terrestrial digital broadcasting,
Measuring the received electric field at each measurement height by changing the measurement height by a predetermined amount in a vertical direction from a predetermined measurement point;
Determining that the power transmission tower is likely to have an influence on digital terrestrial broadcasting when the amount of fluctuation of the received electric field between adjacent measurement heights exceeds a predetermined number of times. ,
A method for determining the influence of a power transmission tower on terrestrial digital broadcasting, characterized by comprising:
送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に及ぼす影響の判定方法であって、
所定の測定地点から垂直方向へ所定量ずつ測定高さを変化させて各測定高さでの受信電界を測定するステップと、
隣接する測定高さ間での受信電界の変動量が所定以上となる場合が所定回数以上発生した際に、前記所定の測定地点において、デジタル電波を測定し、前記デジタル電波が障害物に入射することで発生する回り込み波を確認するステップと、
前記回り込み波が測定されない場合、前記送電鉄塔による影響が発生していると判断するステップと、
を有することを特徴とする、送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に及ぼす影響の判定方法。
A method for determining the effect of a transmission tower on terrestrial digital broadcasting,
Measuring the received electric field at each measurement height by changing the measurement height by a predetermined amount in a vertical direction from a predetermined measurement point;
When the amount of fluctuation of the received electric field between adjacent measurement heights exceeds a predetermined number, a digital radio wave is measured at the predetermined measurement point and the digital radio wave is incident on an obstacle when a predetermined number of times occurs. A step of confirming the sneak wave generated by
If the sneak wave is not measured, determining that an influence by the transmission tower has occurred,
A method for determining the influence of a transmission tower on terrestrial digital broadcasting, characterized by comprising:
前記受信電界を測定するステップでは、地上4mから10mの間で、50cm毎に測定高さを変化させることを特徴とする請求項1又は2に記載の送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に及ぼす影響の判定方法。   3. The determination of the effect of the transmission tower on terrestrial digital broadcasting according to claim 1 or 2, wherein in the step of measuring the received electric field, the measurement height is changed every 50 cm between 4 m and 10 m above the ground. Method. 前記受信電界を測定するステップでは、受信電界の変動量が3dB以上、発生回数が2回以上となるチャンネルが測定された際に、前記送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に影響を及ぼしていると判断することを特徴とする請求項3に記載の送電鉄塔が地上デジタル放送に及ぼす影響の判定方法。
In the step of measuring the received electric field, it is determined that the power transmission tower has an influence on digital terrestrial broadcasting when a channel in which the amount of fluctuation of the received electric field is 3 dB or more and the number of occurrences is 2 or more is measured. The determination method of the influence which the power transmission tower of Claim 3 has on terrestrial digital broadcasting characterized by the above-mentioned.
JP2008261038A 2008-10-07 2008-10-07 How to determine the effect of transmission towers on terrestrial digital broadcasting Expired - Fee Related JP4955638B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008261038A JP4955638B2 (en) 2008-10-07 2008-10-07 How to determine the effect of transmission towers on terrestrial digital broadcasting

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008261038A JP4955638B2 (en) 2008-10-07 2008-10-07 How to determine the effect of transmission towers on terrestrial digital broadcasting

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2010093509A true JP2010093509A (en) 2010-04-22
JP4955638B2 JP4955638B2 (en) 2012-06-20

Family

ID=42255829

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008261038A Expired - Fee Related JP4955638B2 (en) 2008-10-07 2008-10-07 How to determine the effect of transmission towers on terrestrial digital broadcasting

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4955638B2 (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004104482A (en) * 2002-09-10 2004-04-02 Sharp Corp Digital terrestrial broadcast channel selecting system, digital terrestrial broadcast reception terminal, communication station, digital terrestrial broadcast station, which constitute the same, and digital terrestrial broadcast channel selecting method
JP2004166078A (en) * 2002-11-14 2004-06-10 Sharp Corp Service information distribution system relating to digital broadcasting
JP2005252965A (en) * 2004-03-08 2005-09-15 Sharp Corp Digital broadcast receiver, reception channel setting system, and recording medium recording reception channel setting method and reception channel setting program
JP2006013984A (en) * 2004-06-28 2006-01-12 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd System and device for displaying radio wave direction in portable television broadcasting receiver

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004104482A (en) * 2002-09-10 2004-04-02 Sharp Corp Digital terrestrial broadcast channel selecting system, digital terrestrial broadcast reception terminal, communication station, digital terrestrial broadcast station, which constitute the same, and digital terrestrial broadcast channel selecting method
JP2004166078A (en) * 2002-11-14 2004-06-10 Sharp Corp Service information distribution system relating to digital broadcasting
JP2005252965A (en) * 2004-03-08 2005-09-15 Sharp Corp Digital broadcast receiver, reception channel setting system, and recording medium recording reception channel setting method and reception channel setting program
JP2006013984A (en) * 2004-06-28 2006-01-12 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd System and device for displaying radio wave direction in portable television broadcasting receiver

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4955638B2 (en) 2012-06-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10334460B2 (en) System and method for passive intermodulation source localization
CN108243444B (en) Interference detection method and device
JP4453760B2 (en) Intruder detection system, intruder detection method and defect detection method
JP4201189B2 (en) Transmission line fault location system
CN102353952A (en) Line spectrum detection method by coherent accumulation of frequency domains
Chiriyath et al. Effect of clutter on joint radar-communications system performance inner bounds
TWI662800B (en) Radar device and method for avoiding radio wave interference
WO2016013190A1 (en) Electromagnetic interference wave measurement device, electromagnetic interference wave measurement method, and recording medium for electromagnetic interference wave measurement program
JP4955638B2 (en) How to determine the effect of transmission towers on terrestrial digital broadcasting
JP2010096658A (en) Device and method for evaluating noise environment
WO2015072045A1 (en) Electromagnetic interference wave measurement device, electromagnetic interference wave measurement method, and non-transitory computer readable medium
CN109450569B (en) Method for rapidly predicting frequency point mutual interference of electronic equipment
JP2012189584A (en) Target detector
WO2015118794A1 (en) Monitoring device, radio communication system, failure cause determination method and non-temporary computer-readable medium storing a program
US10313808B1 (en) Method and apparatus to sense the environment using coupled microphones and loudspeakers and nominal playback
JP6115635B2 (en) Usage management device and usage management method
CN114143640A (en) Head-mounted equipment and far-field noise elimination method, device and system thereof
JP2015175793A (en) Noise measurement system, noise measurement program, and noise measurement method
US8374556B2 (en) Method for determining audio broadcast transmission signal coverage
Denkovska et al. DTT performance degradation in presence of coexisting LTE network interference
JP2013156115A (en) Signal processing apparatus, pri estimation apparatus and pri estimation method
JP5857516B2 (en) Transmitting apparatus and transmitting method
JP4791511B2 (en) Digital broadcast reception signal evaluation apparatus, evaluation method, and evaluation program
CN114459710A (en) Memory, submarine cable fault detection and diagnosis method, device, equipment and system
Singh et al. Performance improvement in sensing error probability for low SNR scenarios in cognitive radio networks

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110818

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20120214

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20120315

R150 Certificate of patent (=grant) or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20150323

Year of fee payment: 3

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees