JP2010052502A - Pneumatic tire - Google Patents

Pneumatic tire Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2010052502A
JP2010052502A JP2008217591A JP2008217591A JP2010052502A JP 2010052502 A JP2010052502 A JP 2010052502A JP 2008217591 A JP2008217591 A JP 2008217591A JP 2008217591 A JP2008217591 A JP 2008217591A JP 2010052502 A JP2010052502 A JP 2010052502A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
pneumatic tire
region
tire
noise generated
pattern noise
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2008217591A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5251362B2 (en
Inventor
Hiroyuki Sato
寛之 佐藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd filed Critical Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority to JP2008217591A priority Critical patent/JP5251362B2/en
Publication of JP2010052502A publication Critical patent/JP2010052502A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5251362B2 publication Critical patent/JP5251362B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Tires In General (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a pneumatic tire capable of simply and precisely determining a tire exchanging timing based on a change in dispersion of the frequency of a pattern noise generated by a tire. <P>SOLUTION: In this pneumatic tire, design elements including a combination of a plurality of pitches with different pitch lengths in a tire circumferential direction Y are aligned on a tread face 1. In this tire, the design elements arranged in a central area R1 contacted until tread friction reaches to 50-80% of a friction limit are made different from design elements arranged in shoulder areas R2, R2 contacted until the tread friction reaches to 100% of at least the friction limit on both sides. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は空気入りタイヤに関し、さらに詳しくは、タイヤが発生するパターン騒音の周波数分散の変化によりタイヤの交換時期を簡易的かつ的確に判定できるようにした空気入りタイヤに関する。   The present invention relates to a pneumatic tire, and more particularly, to a pneumatic tire that can easily and accurately determine the replacement time of a tire based on a change in frequency dispersion of pattern noise generated by the tire.

従来、空気入りタイヤの摩耗レベルを認知する方法として、タイヤの残溝深さを目視又は実測することにより確認し、タイヤの交換時期を判定することが広く行われてきた。しかし、この方法は確実である反面、多頻度にわたって直接的な確認作業を行う必要があるため極めて煩雑であること、さらにはその確認作業が専らドライバーに委ねられているため的確な交換時期を判定することが極めて難しいこと、などの欠点を有していた。   Conventionally, as a method for recognizing the wear level of a pneumatic tire, it has been widely performed to determine the tire replacement time by checking the depth of the remaining groove of the tire by visual observation or actual measurement. However, this method is reliable, but it is very complicated because it is necessary to perform direct confirmation work over many times, and moreover, since the confirmation work is left exclusively to the driver, the exact replacement time is determined. It had drawbacks such as being extremely difficult to do.

この対策として、タイヤトレッド面に深さの異なる溝を形成しておき、これらの溝によって区画された陸部の表面積が摩耗の進行と共に変化することに伴って車両の振動数が変化することを利用して、この振動数の変化を読み取ることにより摩耗状況を推定するようにした提案(例えば、特許文献1参照)がある。しかし、これらの提案では、摩耗状況を推定するために特別な装置を必要とすると共に、これら装置をそれぞれの車両に搭載しておく必要があるため、経済性の面からして、タイヤ残溝深さの認知方法としては採用し難いという問題があった。
特開2005−186702号公報
As a countermeasure, grooves with different depths are formed on the tire tread surface, and the frequency of the vehicle changes as the surface area of the land section defined by these grooves changes with the progress of wear. There is a proposal (see, for example, Patent Document 1) in which the wear state is estimated by reading the change in frequency. However, these proposals require a special device for estimating the wear situation, and it is necessary to install these devices in each vehicle. There was a problem that it was difficult to adopt the depth recognition method.
JP 2005-186702 A

本発明の目的は、かかる従来の問題点を解消するもので、タイヤが発生するパターン騒音の周波数分散の変化によりタイヤの交換時期を簡易的かつ的確に判定できるようにした空気入りタイヤを提供することにある。   An object of the present invention is to solve such a conventional problem, and to provide a pneumatic tire in which a tire replacement time can be easily and accurately determined by a change in frequency dispersion of pattern noise generated by the tire. There is.

上記目的を達成するための本発明の空気入りタイヤは、トレッド面にタイヤ周方向に対するピッチ長が異なる複数のピッチの組合せからなるデザイン要素を配列した空気入りタイヤにおいて、前記デザイン要素を、トレッド摩耗が摩耗限度の50〜80%に至るまで接地する中央領域と、該中央領域の両側における少なくとも摩耗限度の100%に至るまで接地するショルダー領域とで異ならせ、前記中央領域のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の周波数分散と前記ショルダー領域のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の周波数分散とを異ならせたことを特徴にする。   In order to achieve the above object, a pneumatic tire according to the present invention is a pneumatic tire in which design elements composed of a combination of a plurality of pitches having different pitch lengths in the tire circumferential direction are arranged on the tread surface. Is different between a center region that contacts 50 to 80% of the wear limit and a shoulder region that contacts at least 100% of the wear limit on both sides of the center region, thereby generating a design element for the center region. The frequency dispersion of the pattern noise and the frequency dispersion of the pattern noise generated by the design element of the shoulder region are different.

また、上述する構成において、前記ショルダ領域のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の音圧レベルを前記中央領域のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の音圧レベルよりも大きくすることが好ましい。この場合において、以下(1)〜(5)に記載するように構成することが好ましい。
(1)前記ショルダー領域におけるピッチ長の種類数を前記中央領域におけるピッチ長の種類数よりも少なくする。
(2)前記ショルダー領域における最大ピッチ長と最小ピッチ長との比を前記中央領域における最大ピッチ長と最小ピッチ長との比よりも小さくする。
(3)前記ショルダー領域における総ピッチ数を前記中央領域における総ピッチ数の1.25倍以上にする。
(4)前記ショルダー領域に、ピッチ長の比が1.1〜2.0である2種類のピッチをタイヤ周方向に交互に1〜4の周期で配置する。
(5)前記ショルダー領域におけるピッチ配列をタイヤ幅方向に延びるラグ溝に区画されたブロック列で構成する。この場合において、前記ラグ溝のタイヤ周方向に対する角度を60°以上にするとよい。
In the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the sound pressure level of the pattern noise generated by the design element in the shoulder region is higher than the sound pressure level of the pattern noise generated by the design element in the central region. In this case, it is preferable to configure as described in (1) to (5) below.
(1) The number of types of pitch length in the shoulder region is made smaller than the number of types of pitch length in the central region.
(2) The ratio between the maximum pitch length and the minimum pitch length in the shoulder region is made smaller than the ratio between the maximum pitch length and the minimum pitch length in the central region.
(3) The total pitch number in the shoulder region is 1.25 times or more the total pitch number in the central region.
(4) In the shoulder region, two types of pitches having a pitch length ratio of 1.1 to 2.0 are alternately arranged in a cycle of 1 to 4 in the tire circumferential direction.
(5) The pitch arrangement in the shoulder region is constituted by a block row partitioned into lug grooves extending in the tire width direction. In this case, the angle of the lug groove with respect to the tire circumferential direction may be 60 ° or more.

本発明によれば、トレッド面にタイヤ周方向に対するピッチ長が異なる複数のピッチの組合せからなるデザイン要素を配列した空気入りタイヤにおいて、このデザイン要素を、トレッド摩耗が摩耗限度の50〜80%に至るまで接地する中央領域と、中央領域の両側における少なくとも摩耗限度の100%に至るまで接地するショルダー領域とで異ならせ、中央領域のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の周波数分散とショルダー領域のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の周波数分散とを異ならせたので、摩耗が進行してショルダー領域が接地した時点において、タイヤから発生するパターン騒音が変化することにより、摩耗限界に近づいたことを知らせるため、ドライバーがタイヤの交換時期を簡易的かつ的確に判定することができる。   According to the present invention, in a pneumatic tire in which design elements each having a combination of a plurality of pitches having different pitch lengths in the tire circumferential direction are arranged on the tread surface, the tread wear is reduced to 50 to 80% of the wear limit. The frequency distribution of the pattern noise generated by the design element in the central area and the design element of the shoulder area are made different between the central area that contacts the ground area and the shoulder area that contacts at least 100% of the wear limit on both sides of the central area. Since the pattern noise generated from the tire changes when the wear progresses and the shoulder area touches down, the pattern noise generated from the pattern noise is different from the frequency dispersion of the pattern noise generated. The driver can easily and accurately determine when to change tires. .

以下、添付図面を参照して本発明の実施形態を詳細に説明する。
図1は本発明の実施形態による空気入りタイヤのトレッド面の一例を展開して示す一部平面図、図2は図1のタイヤのトレッド部の構造を示す半断面図である。
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 is a partial plan view showing an example of a tread surface of a pneumatic tire according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a half sectional view showing a structure of a tread portion of the tire of FIG.

本発明の空気入りタイヤのトレッド面1には、タイヤ周方向Yに対するピッチ長が異なる複数のピッチの組合せからなるデザイン要素が配列され、これによりパターン騒音の周波数分散が施されるようになっている。そして、本発明の空気入りタイヤでは、図1及び図2に示すように、トレッド摩耗が摩耗限度の50〜80%に至るまでに接地する中央領域R1に配置したデザイン要素と、この両側における少なくとも摩耗限度の100%(図では摩耗限度の100%)に至るまでに接地するショルダー領域R2、R2に配置するデザイン要素とを互いに異ならせ、中央領域R1のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の周波数分散とショルダー領域R2、R2のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の周波数分散とを異ならせている。   On the tread surface 1 of the pneumatic tire of the present invention, design elements composed of a combination of a plurality of pitches having different pitch lengths with respect to the tire circumferential direction Y are arranged, and thereby frequency dispersion of pattern noise is performed. Yes. And in the pneumatic tire of this invention, as shown in FIG.1 and FIG.2, the design element arrange | positioned in the center area | region R1 to which a tread wear reaches 50 to 80% of a wear limit, and at least in this both sides The frequency dispersion of the pattern noise generated by the design elements in the central region R1 is made different from the design elements arranged in the shoulder regions R2 and R2, which are grounded until reaching the wear limit of 100% (in the figure, 100% of the wear limit). And the frequency dispersion of the pattern noise generated by the design elements of the shoulder regions R2 and R2.

すなわち、図1の実施形態では、中央領域R1におけるデザイン要素を略並行四辺形状のブロック2をタイヤ周方向Yに配列した6本のブロック列により構成し、ショルダー領域R2、R2におけるデザイン要素をそれぞれ略矩形状のブロック3をタイヤ周方向Yに配列した1本のブロック列により構成している。なお、図中CLはタイヤ赤道線を示している。   That is, in the embodiment of FIG. 1, the design elements in the central region R1 are configured by six block rows in which substantially parallelogram-shaped blocks 2 are arranged in the tire circumferential direction Y, and the design elements in the shoulder regions R2 and R2 are respectively A substantially rectangular block 3 is constituted by one block row arranged in the tire circumferential direction Y. In the figure, CL indicates a tire equator line.

これにより、摩耗が進行してショルダー領域R2、R2が接地した時点において、タイヤから発生するパターン騒音が変化することにより、摩耗限界に近づいたことを知らせるため、ドライバーがタイヤの交換時期を簡易的かつ的確に判定することができる。   As a result, when the wear progresses and the shoulder regions R2 and R2 come in contact with the ground, the pattern noise generated from the tire changes to notify that the wear limit has been approached. And it can be determined accurately.

なお、図2において、トレッド部4に表示された点線P、Qは、それぞれ摩耗の進行に伴いトレッド摩耗が摩耗限度の50〜80%に達した時点と摩耗限度の100%に達した時点とにおけるトレッド面1の仮想線を示しており、それぞれの時点における接地領域の外側端をX1、X2で示している。また、図中Sはトレッド部4に形成された主溝5の溝
底を相互に結ぶ包絡線を示している。
In FIG. 2, dotted lines P and Q displayed on the tread portion 4 respectively indicate the time when the tread wear reaches 50 to 80% of the wear limit and the time when the wear limit reaches 100% as the wear progresses. The imaginary line of the tread surface 1 is shown, and the outer end of the grounding region at each time point is indicated by X1 and X2. In the figure, S indicates an envelope connecting the groove bottoms of the main grooves 5 formed in the tread portion 4 to each other.

図1の実施形態では、ショルダー領域R2、R2におけるブロック3、3がそれぞれショルダー領域R2、R2を超えてタイヤ幅方向の外側に延びている場合を示しているが、ブロック3、3はそれぞれショルダー領域R2、R2内に留めて配置する場合がある。   In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the blocks 3 and 3 in the shoulder regions R2 and R2 extend outward in the tire width direction beyond the shoulder regions R2 and R2, respectively. There are cases in which they are arranged in the regions R2 and R2.

上述する摩耗限度の100%に達した時点におけるトレッド面1の仮想線Qは、トレッド面1に形成された主溝5における残溝深さが1.6mmとなったときのトレッド面1の位置を示している。したがって、本発明の空気入りタイヤでは、摩耗限界を主溝5の深さを基準にして設定しており、トレッド面1に形成された主溝5の深さが異なる場合には、深さが最も小さい主溝5を基準にして設定するようにしている。   The virtual line Q of the tread surface 1 when the wear limit reaches 100% is the position of the tread surface 1 when the remaining groove depth in the main groove 5 formed on the tread surface 1 is 1.6 mm. Is shown. Therefore, in the pneumatic tire of the present invention, the wear limit is set based on the depth of the main groove 5, and when the depth of the main groove 5 formed in the tread surface 1 is different, the depth is The smallest main groove 5 is set as a reference.

なお、本発明において、上述する中央領域R1を摩耗限度の50〜80%に至るまでに接地する領域としたのは、タイヤの種類や大きさに応じて、摩耗限界に近づいたことを知らせるタイミングがそれぞれ異なるからであり、一般の乗用車用の空気入りタイヤの場合には、中央領域R1を摩耗限度の50〜60%、好ましくは摩耗限度の50%に至るまでに接地する領域とすることができる。   In the present invention, the above-described central region R1 is a region that contacts the ground until reaching the wear limit of 50 to 80%, depending on the type and size of the tire, and the timing for notifying that the wear limit has been approached. In the case of a general pneumatic tire for a passenger car, the central region R1 is set to be a region that contacts 50 to 60% of the wear limit, and preferably reaches 50% of the wear limit. it can.

本発明において、中央領域R1のデザイン要素とショルダ領域R2のデザイン要素とを互いに異ならせるに際して、ショルダ領域R2のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の音圧レベルが中央領域R1のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の音圧レベルよりも大きくなるように設定するとよい。これにより、ショルダー領域R2が接地した時点におけるパターン騒音の変化が聴覚により認識され易くなるので、ドライバーに対して摩耗限度が近づいたことを確実に認知させることができる。   In the present invention, when the design element in the central region R1 and the design element in the shoulder region R2 are different from each other, the pattern in which the design element in the shoulder region R2 is generated and the sound pressure level of the noise is the pattern in which the design element in the central region R1 is generated. It may be set to be larger than the sound pressure level of noise. This makes it easier for the auditory to recognize the change in pattern noise when the shoulder region R2 comes into contact with the ground, so that the driver can be surely recognized that the wear limit is approaching.

このように設定された本発明の空気入りタイヤは、摩耗の進行に応じて、図3(a)及び(b)に示すような騒音特性を示す。すなわち、摩耗限界の50〜80%に至るまでの摩耗初期の段階では図3(a)に示すような騒音特性を示し、これより摩耗が進行した摩耗末期においては、図3(b)に示すように、中央領域R1から発生する騒音の周波数域とショルダー領域R2から発生する騒音の周波数域とがそれぞれ互いにずれ合って並存し、かつショルダー領域R2から発生する騒音の音圧レベルが中央領域R1から発生する騒音の音圧レベルよりも大きくなった騒音特性を示す。   The pneumatic tire of the present invention set as described above exhibits noise characteristics as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B as the wear progresses. That is, noise characteristics as shown in FIG. 3 (a) are shown in the initial stage of wear up to 50 to 80% of the wear limit, and in the last stage of wear where the wear has advanced from this, it is shown in FIG. 3 (b). As described above, the frequency range of the noise generated from the central region R1 and the frequency range of the noise generated from the shoulder region R2 are shifted from each other, and the sound pressure level of the noise generated from the shoulder region R2 is the central region R1. The noise characteristic which became larger than the sound pressure level of the noise which generate | occur | produces from is shown.

上述する中央領域R1のデザイン要素とショルダ領域R2のデザイン要素との調整にあっては、ショルダー領域R2におけるピッチ長の種類数を中央領域R1におけるピッチ長の種類数よりも少なくするか、又はショルダー領域R2における最大ピッチ長と最小ピッチ長との比を中央領域R1における最大ピッチ長と最小ピッチ長との比よりも小さくするとよい。あるいは、これらの手法を相互に組み合わせて調整するとよい。これにより、ショルダー領域R2が接地した時点におけるパターン騒音の変化を一層確実に高めることができる。   In adjusting the design element of the central region R1 and the design element of the shoulder region R2 described above, the number of types of pitch length in the shoulder region R2 is less than the number of types of pitch length in the central region R1, or the shoulder The ratio between the maximum pitch length and the minimum pitch length in the region R2 may be smaller than the ratio between the maximum pitch length and the minimum pitch length in the central region R1. Or it is good to adjust combining these methods mutually. Thereby, the change of the pattern noise at the time when the shoulder region R2 is grounded can be further increased.

さらに好ましくは、ショルダー領域R2における総ピッチ数を中央領域R1における総ピッチ数の1.25倍以上、好ましくは1.5〜3.0倍に設定するとよい。ここで、ショルダー領域R2における総ピッチ数が中央領域R1における総ピッチ数の1.25倍未満では、ショルダー領域R2が接地した時点におけるパターン騒音の変化がやや低下することになるため、摩耗限度が近づいたことを認知させることが難しくなる恐れがある。しかしながら、この値を大きくし過ぎるとショルダー領域R2におけるブロック3の剛性が低下するため、ショルダー領域R2から発生するパターン騒音が低下することになるため、前記と同様に、摩耗限度が近づいたことを認知させることが難しくなる恐れがある。   More preferably, the total pitch number in the shoulder region R2 is set to 1.25 times or more, preferably 1.5 to 3.0 times the total pitch number in the central region R1. Here, when the total number of pitches in the shoulder region R2 is less than 1.25 times the total number of pitches in the central region R1, the change in the pattern noise at the time when the shoulder region R2 contacts the ground is slightly reduced, so the wear limit is limited. There is a risk that it will be difficult to recognize that you are approaching. However, if this value is increased too much, the rigidity of the block 3 in the shoulder region R2 is reduced, so that the pattern noise generated from the shoulder region R2 is reduced, so that the wear limit is approaching as described above. It may be difficult to recognize.

さらに、ショルダー領域R2では、ピッチ長の比が1.1〜2.0、好ましくは1.26〜1.50である2種類のピッチ(ブロック3)をタイヤ周方向に交互に1〜4の周期で配置するようにするとよい。これにより、ショルダー領域R2から発生するパターン騒音を確実に高めることができる。なお、図4はショルダー領域R2に配置するピッチをピッチ長の比が異なるA、Bの2種類にしたうえで、これらA、BをタイヤTの周方向に交互に2周期で配置した状態を示している。   Further, in the shoulder region R2, two types of pitches (block 3) having a pitch length ratio of 1.1 to 2.0, preferably 1.26 to 1.50 are alternately set to 1 to 4 in the tire circumferential direction. It is good to arrange at a period. Thereby, the pattern noise generated from the shoulder region R2 can be reliably increased. FIG. 4 shows a state in which the pitches arranged in the shoulder region R2 are two types A and B having different pitch length ratios, and these A and B are alternately arranged in the circumferential direction of the tire T in two cycles. Show.

なお、本発明の空気入りタイヤでは、ショルダー領域R2に配置するピッチを1種類で構成し、単一のピッチ構成にすることができる。これにより、ショルダー領域R2から発生するパターン騒音を一層確実に高めることができる。   In the pneumatic tire of the present invention, one pitch can be arranged in the shoulder region R2 to form a single pitch configuration. Thereby, the pattern noise generated from the shoulder region R2 can be more reliably increased.

本発明におけるショルダー領域R2におけるピッチ配列は、図1に例示するように、タイヤ幅方向に延びるラグ溝6に区画されたブロック列により構成するとよい。この場合において、ラグ溝6のタイヤ周方向に対する角度を略90°、好ましくは60°以上、最も好ましくは80〜90°となるようにするとよい。これにより、ラグ溝6の全長が同時に路面と接触するようになるので、ショルダー領域R2から発生するパターン騒音の音圧レベルを、図3(b)に示すように中央領域R1から発生するパターン騒音の音圧レベルに比して大きくすることができる。   As illustrated in FIG. 1, the pitch arrangement in the shoulder region R <b> 2 in the present invention may be configured by a block row partitioned into lug grooves 6 extending in the tire width direction. In this case, the angle of the lug groove 6 with respect to the tire circumferential direction is approximately 90 °, preferably 60 ° or more, and most preferably 80 to 90 °. As a result, since the entire length of the lug groove 6 comes into contact with the road surface at the same time, the sound pressure level of the pattern noise generated from the shoulder region R2 is changed to the pattern noise generated from the central region R1 as shown in FIG. The sound pressure level can be increased.

ここで、ラグ溝4のタイヤ周方向に対する角度を低く設定した場合には、ラグ溝6が路面と接触する際に、ラグ溝6の長手方向がタイヤの接地前端縁と交差することになるため、ショルダー領域R2から発生するパターン騒音の音圧レベルが中央領域R1から発生する騒音の音圧レベルに比して低下することになる。なお、図5はラグ溝6のタイヤ周方向に対する角度を60°に設定した場合の騒音特性を示し、図6はこの角度を30°に設定した場合の騒音特性を示している。   Here, when the angle of the lug groove 4 with respect to the tire circumferential direction is set low, the longitudinal direction of the lug groove 6 intersects the front contact edge of the tire when the lug groove 6 contacts the road surface. Therefore, the sound pressure level of the pattern noise generated from the shoulder region R2 is lower than the sound pressure level of the noise generated from the central region R1. 5 shows noise characteristics when the angle of the lug groove 6 with respect to the tire circumferential direction is set to 60 °, and FIG. 6 shows noise characteristics when this angle is set to 30 °.

上述するように、本発明の空気入りタイヤは、トレッド摩耗が摩耗限度の50〜80%に至るまでに接地する中央領域R1に配置するデザイン要素と、この両側における少なくとも摩耗限度の100%に至るまでに接地するショルダー領域R2、R2に配置するデザイン要素とを異ならせることにより、摩耗が進行して摩耗限界に近づいたときにタイヤから発生するパターン騒音の変化によりタイヤの交換時期を認知させるもので、特別な判定手段を設けることなしに、摩耗限界を簡易的かつ的確に判定することが可能であることから、タイヤの摩耗限界判定方法として幅広く利用することができる。   As described above, the pneumatic tire of the present invention reaches at least 100% of the wear limit on both sides of the design element disposed in the central region R1 where the tread wear reaches the ground until 50 to 80% of the wear limit. By changing the design elements placed in the shoulder areas R2 and R2 that are in contact with each other, the tire replacement period is recognized by the change in pattern noise generated from the tire when wear progresses and approaches the wear limit. Thus, the wear limit can be easily and accurately determined without providing any special determination means, and thus can be widely used as a tire wear limit determination method.

タイヤサイズを195/70R17.5、タイヤパターンを図1として、トレッド面の接地領域のうち、中央領域R1におけるトレッド幅を130mm、ピッチ長の種類数を3、総ピッチ数を76に設定すると共に、左右のショルダー領域R2、R2において、それぞれトレッド幅を10mm、ピッチ長の種類数を1(単一ピッチ)、総ピッチ数を114に設定して本発明タイヤを作製した。   With the tire size set to 195 / 70R17.5 and the tire pattern shown in FIG. In the left and right shoulder regions R2 and R2, tires of the present invention were manufactured by setting the tread width to 10 mm, the number of types of pitch length to 1 (single pitch), and the total number of pitches to 114, respectively.

このタイヤをリムサイズ17.5×5.25のホイールに組み込み、空気圧600kPaを充填して排気量3000ccの車両の前後車輪に装着し、トレッド摩耗が摩耗限界の45%に至るまで一般車道を走行させた後、摩耗末期におけるパターン騒音に起因する車内騒音の発生状況を調べるために、アスファルト路面からなるテストコースを平均速度70km/hで走行させたときの車内騒音(dB)を運転席の窓側に設置したマイクロフォンにより測定した。この摩耗末期における走行試験を通じて、摩耗量が摩耗限度の50%に至った時点から徐々に、タイヤから発生するパターン騒音が高まることを聴覚により確認した。この状況をマイクロフォンによる車内騒音の測定結果と照合させて検証したところ、摩耗限度の60%に至った時点から周波数975Hz近傍域における車内騒音が71dBから75dBに上昇していたことを確認した。   This tire is installed in a wheel with a rim size of 17.5 x 5.25, filled with air pressure of 600 kPa and mounted on the front and rear wheels of a vehicle with a displacement of 3000 cc, and the general road is run until the tread wear reaches 45% of the wear limit. Afterwards, in order to investigate the occurrence of in-vehicle noise due to pattern noise at the end of wear, the in-vehicle noise (dB) when driving on an asphalt road test course at an average speed of 70 km / h is displayed on the driver's seat window side. Measured with an installed microphone. Through this running test at the end of wear, it was confirmed by hearing that the pattern noise generated from the tire gradually increased from the time when the amount of wear reached 50% of the wear limit. When this situation was verified by collating with the measurement result of the in-vehicle noise by the microphone, it was confirmed that the in-vehicle noise in the region near the frequency of 975 Hz was increased from 71 dB to 75 dB from the time when the wear limit reached 60%.

本発明の実施形態による空気入りタイヤのトレッド面の一例を展開して示す一部平面図である。It is a partial top view which expands and shows an example of the tread surface of the pneumatic tire by the embodiment of the present invention. 図1のタイヤのトレッド部の構造を示す半断面図である。FIG. 2 is a half sectional view showing a structure of a tread portion of the tire of FIG. 1. (a)及び(b)は、それぞれ摩耗初期及び摩耗末期におけるタイヤの騒音特性を示すグラフである。(A) And (b) is a graph which shows the noise characteristic of the tire in a wear initial stage and a wear end stage, respectively. ショルダー領域におけるブロック配列の一例を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of the block arrangement | sequence in a shoulder area | region. ショルダー領域におけるラグ溝の角度をタイヤ周方向に対して60°に設定したときの騒音特性を示す図3(b)に相当するグラフである。It is a graph equivalent to FIG.3 (b) which shows the noise characteristic when the angle of the lug groove in a shoulder area | region is set to 60 degrees with respect to the tire circumferential direction. ショルダー領域におけるラグ溝の角度をタイヤ周方向に対して30°に設定したときの騒音特性を示す図3(b)に相当するグラフである。It is a graph equivalent to FIG.3 (b) which shows the noise characteristic when the angle of the lug groove in a shoulder area | region is set to 30 degrees with respect to the tire circumferential direction.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 トレッド面
2、3 ブロック
4 トレッド部
5 主溝
6 ラグ溝
R1 中央領域
R2 ショルダー領域
Y タイヤ周方向
1 tread surface 2, 3 blocks 4 tread portion 5 main groove 6 lug groove R1 central region R2 shoulder region Y tire circumferential direction

Claims (9)

トレッド面にタイヤ周方向に対するピッチ長が異なる複数のピッチの組合せからなるデザイン要素を配列した空気入りタイヤにおいて、
前記デザイン要素を、トレッド摩耗が摩耗限度の50〜80%に至るまで接地する中央領域と、該中央領域の両側における少なくとも摩耗限度の100%に至るまで接地するショルダー領域とで異ならせ、前記中央領域のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の周波数分散と前記ショルダー領域のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の周波数分散とを異ならせた空気入りタイヤ。
In a pneumatic tire in which design elements composed of a combination of a plurality of pitches having different pitch lengths with respect to the tire circumferential direction are arranged on the tread surface,
The design element is differentiated between a central region where the tread wear is grounded to 50-80% of the wear limit and a shoulder region which is grounded to at least 100% of the wear limit on both sides of the central region; A pneumatic tire in which frequency dispersion of pattern noise generated by a design element in a region is different from frequency dispersion of pattern noise generated by a design element in the shoulder region.
前記ショルダ領域のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の音圧レベルを前記中央領域のデザイン要素が発生するパターン騒音の音圧レベルよりも大きくした請求項1に記載の空気入りタイヤ。   The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein a sound pressure level of pattern noise generated by the design element in the shoulder region is larger than a sound pressure level of pattern noise generated by the design element in the central region. 前記ショルダー領域におけるピッチ長の種類数を前記中央領域におけるピッチ長の種類数よりも少なくした請求項2に記載の空気入りタイヤ。   The pneumatic tire according to claim 2, wherein the number of types of pitch length in the shoulder region is smaller than the number of types of pitch length in the central region. 前記ショルダー領域における最大ピッチ長と最小ピッチ長との比を前記中央領域における最大ピッチ長と最小ピッチ長との比よりも小さくした請求項2又は3に記載の空気入りタイヤ。   The pneumatic tire according to claim 2 or 3, wherein a ratio between the maximum pitch length and the minimum pitch length in the shoulder region is smaller than a ratio between the maximum pitch length and the minimum pitch length in the central region. 前記ショルダー領域における総ピッチ数を前記中央領域における総ピッチ数の1.25倍以上にした請求項2〜4のいずれか1項に記載の空気入りタイヤ。   The pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein the total number of pitches in the shoulder region is 1.25 times or more the total number of pitches in the central region. 前記ショルダー領域に、ピッチ長の比が1.1〜2.0である2種類のピッチをタイヤ周方向に交互に1〜4の周期で配置した請求項2〜5のいずれか1項に記載の空気入りタイヤ。   6. The device according to claim 2, wherein two kinds of pitches having a pitch length ratio of 1.1 to 2.0 are alternately arranged in the tire circumferential direction at a cycle of 1 to 4 in the shoulder region. Pneumatic tires. 前記ショルダー領域におけるピッチ配列をタイヤ幅方向に延びるラグ溝に区画されたブロック列で構成した請求項1〜6のいずれか1項に記載の空気入りタイヤ。   The pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the pitch array in the shoulder region is configured by a block row partitioned into lug grooves extending in a tire width direction. 前記ラグ溝のタイヤ周方向に対する角度を60°以上にした請求項7に記載の空気入りタイヤ。   The pneumatic tire according to claim 7, wherein an angle of the lug groove with respect to a tire circumferential direction is set to 60 ° or more. 請求項1〜8のいずれか1項に記載の空気入りタイヤが発生するパターン騒音の周波数分散の変化によりタイヤの交換時期を判定するようにした空気入りタイヤの摩耗限界判定方法。   A method for determining the wear limit of a pneumatic tire, wherein the tire replacement timing is determined based on a change in frequency dispersion of pattern noise generated by the pneumatic tire according to any one of claims 1 to 8.
JP2008217591A 2008-08-27 2008-08-27 Pneumatic tire Expired - Fee Related JP5251362B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008217591A JP5251362B2 (en) 2008-08-27 2008-08-27 Pneumatic tire

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008217591A JP5251362B2 (en) 2008-08-27 2008-08-27 Pneumatic tire

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2010052502A true JP2010052502A (en) 2010-03-11
JP5251362B2 JP5251362B2 (en) 2013-07-31

Family

ID=42068885

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008217591A Expired - Fee Related JP5251362B2 (en) 2008-08-27 2008-08-27 Pneumatic tire

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5251362B2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012001129A (en) * 2010-06-18 2012-01-05 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic tire
JP2012001148A (en) * 2010-06-18 2012-01-05 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic tire
JP2013514226A (en) * 2009-12-18 2013-04-25 コンパニー ゼネラール デ エタブリッスマン ミシュラン Clear detection method for tire wear threshold
JP2014148221A (en) * 2013-01-31 2014-08-21 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic tire
JP2014148219A (en) * 2013-01-31 2014-08-21 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic tire
KR101568094B1 (en) 2014-09-24 2015-11-10 현대오트론 주식회사 Apparatus and method for monitoring tire inflation pressure
JP2016074243A (en) * 2014-10-02 2016-05-12 東洋ゴム工業株式会社 Pneumatic tire
KR20230032324A (en) * 2021-08-30 2023-03-07 넥센타이어 주식회사 Tires using wear alarm structure

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH08207515A (en) * 1995-02-01 1996-08-13 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire
JPH1134615A (en) * 1997-07-15 1999-02-09 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire
JP2000043522A (en) * 1998-07-27 2000-02-15 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co Ltd Pneumatic tire
JP2004074862A (en) * 2002-08-12 2004-03-11 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire
JP2008143240A (en) * 2006-12-06 2008-06-26 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic tire

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH08207515A (en) * 1995-02-01 1996-08-13 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire
JPH1134615A (en) * 1997-07-15 1999-02-09 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire
JP2000043522A (en) * 1998-07-27 2000-02-15 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co Ltd Pneumatic tire
JP2004074862A (en) * 2002-08-12 2004-03-11 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire
JP2008143240A (en) * 2006-12-06 2008-06-26 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic tire

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013514226A (en) * 2009-12-18 2013-04-25 コンパニー ゼネラール デ エタブリッスマン ミシュラン Clear detection method for tire wear threshold
JP2012001129A (en) * 2010-06-18 2012-01-05 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic tire
JP2012001148A (en) * 2010-06-18 2012-01-05 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic tire
JP2014148221A (en) * 2013-01-31 2014-08-21 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic tire
JP2014148219A (en) * 2013-01-31 2014-08-21 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Pneumatic tire
KR101568094B1 (en) 2014-09-24 2015-11-10 현대오트론 주식회사 Apparatus and method for monitoring tire inflation pressure
US9757993B2 (en) 2014-09-24 2017-09-12 Hyundai Autron Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for monitoring tire pressure
JP2016074243A (en) * 2014-10-02 2016-05-12 東洋ゴム工業株式会社 Pneumatic tire
KR20230032324A (en) * 2021-08-30 2023-03-07 넥센타이어 주식회사 Tires using wear alarm structure
KR102550752B1 (en) 2021-08-30 2023-07-04 넥센타이어 주식회사 Tires using wear alarm structure

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5251362B2 (en) 2013-07-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5251362B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5012357B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5316591B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP4829994B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
CN106183650B (en) Winter tire
US20070240801A1 (en) Pneumatic Tire
JPWO2007145177A1 (en) Pneumatic tire
CN102083639A (en) Pneumatic tire
CN105711342A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2009143450A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP5746324B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2019107941A (en) tire
JP5560894B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
EP3508356A1 (en) Pneumatic tire
CN109591520B (en) Tyre for vehicle wheels
CN106604833A (en) Pneumatic tire
CN105764708A (en) Tire for winter
JP2008290521A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP4935507B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP4675736B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2014172484A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP6107242B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP4935508B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP7097179B2 (en) Pneumatic tires
CN104812594A (en) Tyre tread with directional design

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110819

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20121017

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20121113

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20121220

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20130319

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20130401

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5251362

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20160426

Year of fee payment: 3

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees