JP2009294884A - Financing system for settlement and computer program - Google Patents

Financing system for settlement and computer program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2009294884A
JP2009294884A JP2008147505A JP2008147505A JP2009294884A JP 2009294884 A JP2009294884 A JP 2009294884A JP 2008147505 A JP2008147505 A JP 2008147505A JP 2008147505 A JP2008147505 A JP 2008147505A JP 2009294884 A JP2009294884 A JP 2009294884A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
amount
customer
credit
available
loan
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2008147505A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Yoshimi Taira
佳巳 平
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Promise Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Promise Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Promise Co Ltd filed Critical Promise Co Ltd
Priority to JP2008147505A priority Critical patent/JP2009294884A/en
Publication of JP2009294884A publication Critical patent/JP2009294884A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To improve the convenience of a customer by further additional financing regardless of a predetermined lending upper limit sum by examining the latest halfway credit of a customer when a balance insufficiency is generated. <P>SOLUTION: This financing system for settlement includes: a first insufficient sum comparison means 14 for receiving the balance insufficiency information of an account for settlement from a bank server 20, and for comparing the available sum of the customer with an insufficient sum; a halfway credit examination means 15 for, when it is decided that the available sum is less than an insufficient sum by the first insufficient sum comparison means 14, examining the halfway credit using the latest customer information at the current point of time of the customer, and for searching an additional financing sum; and a second insufficient sum comparison means 16 for comparing the latest available sum including the additional financing sum to be obtained by the halfway credit examination means 15 with the insufficient sum. Thus, it is possible to achieve further additional financing by the halfway crediting, and to more reduce such circumstances that settlement becomes impossible due to the insufficiency of a balance than a conventional manner, and to improve the convenience of the customer. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、顧客の決済用口座から引き落とされる金額が、口座残高に満たない場合に、必要に応じて顧客の決済用口座への資金融資を行う決済用融資システム及びコンピュータプログラムに関する。   The present invention relates to a settlement financing system and a computer program for performing financing of a customer settlement account as needed when the amount withdrawn from the customer settlement account is less than the account balance.

商品等の購入の際にクレジットカードを利用した場合、住宅ローンなどの各種ローンの返済、公共料金の支払い等において、信販会社等の収納依頼機関からの依頼に基づき、銀行等の金融機関が、顧客の口座からそれらの費用を引き落として決済することが行われている。かかる場合、顧客の口座残高が引き落としに必要な金額以上であればよいが、残高不足の場合には必要な費用の引き落としができない。残高不足で決済できない場合には、その旨が顧客に通知されるが、決済が指定期日以降になると、遅延損害金を求められる等の不都合が生じる。このような不都合を回避するため、特許文献1及び特許文献2では、残高不足の場合に、貸金業者から必要な費用の融資を受ける仕組みを提案している。
特開2003−157363号公報 特開2004−78474号公報
When credit cards are used when purchasing products, etc., financial institutions such as banks, based on requests from storage agencies such as credit sales companies, for repayment of various loans such as mortgages and payment of utility charges, Payments are made by deducting those expenses from the customer's account. In such a case, it is sufficient if the customer's account balance is equal to or greater than the amount necessary for withdrawal, but if the balance is insufficient, the necessary expenses cannot be withdrawn. If payment is not possible due to a shortage of balance, the customer is notified of this. In order to avoid such inconveniences, Patent Document 1 and Patent Document 2 propose a mechanism for receiving a loan at a necessary cost from a money lender when the balance is insufficient.
JP 2003-157363 A JP 2004-78474 A

特許文献1では、単に、残高不足の場合に貸金業者から融資を受けて決済を行うことが記載されているだけであり、貸金業者からどのような条件で融資を実行するかについての具体的内容については触れられていない。一方、特許文献2では、残高不足の場合に、貸金業者と顧客との間で予め定められた貸付上限額の範囲で融資を行って、残高不足を解消することが記載されている。しかしながら、貸付上限額に至った以降は、一切融資は不可能になるため、その場合には、残高不足を解消することができない。   Patent Document 1 simply describes that a loan is received from a money lender in the case of a shortage of balance and the settlement is performed, and the specific contents regarding under what conditions the loan is executed from the money lender Is not mentioned. On the other hand, Patent Document 2 describes that when a balance is insufficient, a loan is provided within a predetermined loan upper limit between a money lender and a customer to solve the shortage. However, after reaching the lending limit, lending is impossible, and in that case, the shortage of balance cannot be resolved.

本発明は上記に鑑みなされたものであり、残高不足が生じた時点における顧客の最新の途上与信の審査を行うことにより、予め定められた貸付上限額に拘わらず、更なる追加融資を可能とし、顧客の便宜を図る決済用融資システム及びコンピュータプログラムを提供することを課題とする。これに加え、本発明は、残高不足による決済処理の滞りを防止しつつ、融資金額の必要以上の増加を防ぐことができる決済用融資システム及びコンピュータプログラムを提供することを課題とする。   The present invention has been made in view of the above, and by examining the customer's latest credit at the time of a shortage of balance, it is possible to make further additional loans regardless of a predetermined loan upper limit. It is an object of the present invention to provide a settlement financing system and a computer program for customer convenience. In addition, an object of the present invention is to provide a settlement financing system and a computer program that can prevent an unnecessarily increase in a loan amount while preventing a delay in settlement processing due to a shortage of balance.

上記課題を解決するため、請求項1記載の本発明では、顧客の決済用口座を管理する金融機関の管理コンピュータと通信回線を介して接続された決済用融資システムであって、
前記金融機関の管理コンピュータから前記決済用口座の残高不足情報を受信する情報送受信手段と、
前記情報送受信手段により、残高不足情報を受信した場合に、顧客データベースにアクセスし、少なくとも貸付上限額と利用可能額を含む顧客情報を照会する顧客情報照会手段と、
前記顧客情報照会手段により得られた利用可能額と、前記情報送受信手段により受信した前記残高不足情報に含まれる不足額とを比較する第1の不足額比較手段と、
前記第1の不足額比較手段により、利用可能額が不足額未満と判定された場合に、前記顧客の現時点における最新の顧客情報を用いた途上与信を審査して追加融資可能額を求める途上与信審査手段と、
前記途上与信審査手段により得られる追加融資可能額を含めた最新の利用可能額と前記不足額とを比較する第2の不足額比較手段と、
前記第1の不足額比較手段において利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合、又は、前記第2の不足額比較手段において最新の利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合に、少なくとも前記不足額に相当する金額を前記顧客の口座に充当する処理を行う不足額充当処理手段と
を備えることを特徴とする決済用融資システムを提供する。
請求項2記載の本発明では、前記顧客データベースには、顧客情報として融資履歴が記録されており、
前記途上与信審査手段は、前記融資履歴を含む顧客情報を参照して途上与信の審査を実行する構成であることを特徴とする請求項1記載の決済用融資システムを提供する。
請求項3記載の本発明では、前記顧客が特定会員の場合には、前記顧客データベースに記録される顧客情報として、前記貸付上限額未満の金額で決定される利用可能限度額が設定されていることを特徴とする請求項1又は2記載の決済用融資システムを提供する。
請求項4記載の本発明では、前記第1の不足額比較手段は、前記顧客が前記特定会員以外の通常会員の場合、前記貸付上限額と既融資額との差額を前記利用可能額として不足額と比較し、
前記顧客が前記特定会員の場合、前記利用可能限度額と既融資額との差額を前記利用可能額として不足額と比較する手段であることを特徴とする請求項1〜3のいずれか1に記載の決済用融資システムを提供する。
請求項5記載の本発明では、前記途上与信審査手段は、途上与信の審査対象である顧客が、前記特定会員以外の通常会員の場合、途上与信によって新たに設定される最新の貸付上限額と途上与信前の貸付上限額との差額を前記追加融資可能額として求める第1の途上与信審査手段と、
前記途上与信の審査対象である顧客が、前記特定会員の場合、途上与信によって新たに設定される最新の貸付上限額未満の金額で決定される最新の利用可能限度額と途上与信前の利用可能限度額との差額を前記追加融資可能額として求める第2の途上与信審査手段と
を備えることを特徴とする請求項1〜4のいずれか1に記載の決済用融資システムを提供する。
請求項6記載の本発明では、前記第2の途上与信審査手段は、決済対象項目が公共料金であるか否かにより、追加融資可能額の算出基準を異ならせることを特徴とする請求項5記載の決済用融資システムを提供する。
請求項7記載の本発明では、決済対象項目が公共料金である場合に、前記第2の途上与信審査手段により得られた最新の利用可能限度額を次回以降の利用可能限度額として前記顧客データベースの顧客情報を更新し、決済対象項目が公共料金以外である場合に、前記第2の途上与信審査手段により得られた最新の利用可能限度額と前回までの利用可能限度額とのうち、いずれか低い方を次回以降の利用可能限度額として前記顧客データベースの顧客情報を更新する顧客情報更新手段を有することを特徴とする請求項5又は6記載の決済用融資システムを提供する。
請求項8記載の本発明では、顧客の決済用の口座を有する金融機関の管理コンピュータと通信回線を介して接続された決済用融資システムに導入されるコンピュータプログラムであって、
前記金融機関の管理コンピュータから前記決済用口座の残高不足情報を受信する情報送受信手段と、
前記情報送受信手段により、残高不足情報を受信した場合に、顧客データベースにアクセスし、少なくとも貸付上限額と利用可能額を含む顧客情報を照会する顧客情報照会手段と、
前記顧客情報照会手段により得られた利用可能額と、前記情報送受信手段により受信した前記残高不足情報に含まれる不足額とを比較する第1の不足額比較手段と、
前記第1の不足額比較手段により、利用可能額が不足額未満と判定された場合に、前記顧客の現時点における最新の顧客情報を用いた途上与信を審査して追加融資可能額を求める途上与信審査手段と、
前記途上与信審査手段により得られる追加融資可能額を含めた最新の利用可能額と前記不足額とを比較する第2の不足額比較手段と、
前記第1の不足額比較手段において利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合、又は、前記第2の不足額比較手段において最新の利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合に、少なくとも前記不足額に相当する金額を前記顧客の口座に充当する処理を行う不足額充当処理手段と
を備えることを特徴とするコンピュータプログラムを提供する。
請求項9記載の本発明では、前記顧客データベースには、顧客情報として融資履歴が記録されており、
前記途上与信審査手段は、前記融資履歴を含む顧客情報を参照して途上与信の審査を実行する構成であることを特徴とする請求項8記載のコンピュータプログラムを提供する。
請求項10記載の本発明では、前記顧客が特定会員の場合には、前記顧客データベースに記録される顧客情報として、前記貸付上限額未満の金額で決定される利用可能限度額が設定されており、
前記第1の不足額比較手段は、前記顧客が前記特定会員以外の通常会員の場合、前記貸付上限額と既融資額との差額を前記利用可能額として不足額と比較し、
前記顧客が前記特定会員の場合、前記利用可能限度額と既融資額との差額を前記利用可能額として不足額と比較する手段であることを特徴とする請求項8又は9記載のコンピュータプログラムを提供する。
請求項11記載の本発明では、前記途上与信審査手段は、途上与信の審査対象である顧客が、前記特定会員以外の通常会員の場合、途上与信によって新たに設定される最新の貸付上限額と途上与信前の貸付上限額との差額を前記追加融資可能額として求める第1の途上与信審査手段と、
前記途上与信の審査対象である顧客が、前記特定会員の場合、途上与信によって新たに設定される最新の貸付上限額未満の金額で決定される最新の利用可能限度額と途上与信前の利用可能限度額との差額を前記追加融資可能額として求める第2の途上与信審査手段と
を備えることを特徴とする請求項8〜10のいずれか1に記載のコンピュータプログラムを提供する。
請求項12記載の本発明では、前記第2の途上与信審査手段は、決済対象項目が公共料金であるか否かにより、追加融資可能額の算出基準を異ならせることを特徴とする請求項11記載のコンピュータプログラムを提供する。
請求項13記載の本発明では、決済対象項目が公共料金である場合に、前記第2の途上与信審査手段により得られた最新の利用可能限度額を次回以降の利用可能限度額として前記顧客データベースの顧客情報を更新し、決済対象項目が公共料金以外である場合に、前記第2の途上与信審査手段により得られた最新の利用可能限度額と前回までの利用可能限度額とのうち、いずれか低い方を次回以降の利用可能限度額として前記顧客データベースの顧客情報を更新する顧客情報更新手段を有することを特徴とする請求項11又は12記載のコンピュータプログラムを提供する。
In order to solve the above problems, the present invention according to claim 1 is a settlement financing system connected via a communication line to a management computer of a financial institution that manages a settlement account of a customer,
Information transmitting / receiving means for receiving balance shortage information of the settlement account from a management computer of the financial institution;
When the information transmission / reception means receives balance shortage information, the customer information reference means for accessing the customer database and inquiring customer information including at least a loan upper limit and an available amount;
A first deficient amount comparing means for comparing the available amount obtained by the customer information inquiry means with a deficient amount included in the balance shortage information received by the information transmitting / receiving means;
In the case where the first shortage amount comparison unit determines that the available amount is less than the shortage amount, the halfway credit using the latest customer information of the customer at the present time is examined to obtain an additional loanable amount. Screening means,
A second shortage amount comparing means for comparing the shortage amount with the latest available amount including the additional loan possible amount obtained by the developing credit examination means;
At least when the first available amount comparison means determines that the available amount is equal to or greater than the insufficient amount, or when the second available amount comparison means determines that the latest available amount is equal to or greater than the insufficient amount, at least There is provided a settlement loan system comprising a deficiency appropriation processing means for performing a process of appropriating an amount corresponding to the deficit amount to the customer's account.
In the present invention according to claim 2, a loan history is recorded as customer information in the customer database,
The payment credit system according to claim 1, wherein the halfway credit examination unit is configured to perform halfway credit examination with reference to customer information including the loan history.
In the present invention according to claim 3, when the customer is a specific member, an available limit determined by an amount less than the loan upper limit is set as customer information recorded in the customer database. The settlement financing system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the settlement financing system is provided.
In the present invention according to claim 4, the first shortage amount comparison means is short as the available amount when the customer is a normal member other than the specific member as a difference between the loan upper limit and the existing loan amount. Compared to the forehead,
When the customer is the specific member, the difference between the available limit amount and the existing loan amount is a means for comparing the shortage amount as the available amount with the shortage amount. Provide the settlement financing system described.
In the present invention as set forth in claim 5, when the customer who is subject to the screening of the developing credit is a normal member other than the specific member, the developing credit reviewing means A first developing credit screening means for obtaining a difference from a loan upper limit before developing credit as the additional lending possible amount;
If the customer subject to review of the above credit is the specific member, the latest available limit determined by the amount less than the latest loan limit newly set by the mid credit and the availability before the mid credit 5. The settlement financing system according to claim 1, further comprising: a second credit examination unit that calculates a difference from a limit amount as the additional loanable amount.
6. The invention according to claim 6, wherein the second credit review means changes the calculation criteria for the additional loan possible amount depending on whether the item to be settled is a public fee or not. Provide the settlement financing system described.
According to the seventh aspect of the present invention, when the item to be settled is a public bill, the customer database includes the latest available limit obtained by the second credit review means as the next available limit. If the customer's information is updated and the payment target item is other than the utility bill, either the latest available limit amount obtained by the second in-progress credit review means or the previous available limit amount 7. A settlement financing system according to claim 5 or 6, further comprising customer information updating means for updating customer information in the customer database with the lower one as the next available limit.
In the present invention described in claim 8, a computer program installed in a settlement financing system connected via a communication line with a management computer of a financial institution having a customer settlement account,
Information transmitting / receiving means for receiving balance shortage information of the settlement account from a management computer of the financial institution;
When the information transmission / reception means receives balance shortage information, the customer information reference means for accessing the customer database and inquiring customer information including at least a loan upper limit and an available amount;
A first deficient amount comparing means for comparing the available amount obtained by the customer information inquiry means with a deficient amount included in the balance shortage information received by the information transmitting / receiving means;
In the case where the first shortage amount comparison unit determines that the available amount is less than the shortage amount, the halfway credit using the latest customer information of the customer at the present time is examined to obtain an additional loanable amount. Screening means,
A second shortage amount comparing means for comparing the shortage amount with the latest available amount including the additional loan possible amount obtained by the developing credit examination means;
At least when the first available amount comparison means determines that the available amount is equal to or greater than the insufficient amount, or when the second available amount comparison means determines that the latest available amount is equal to or greater than the insufficient amount, at least A computer program comprising: a deficiency appropriation processing means for performing a process of appropriating an amount corresponding to the deficit amount to the account of the customer is provided.
In the present invention according to claim 9, a loan history is recorded as customer information in the customer database,
9. The computer program according to claim 8, wherein the halfway credit examination unit is configured to perform halfway credit examination with reference to customer information including the loan history.
In the present invention described in claim 10, when the customer is a specific member, an available limit determined by an amount less than the loan upper limit is set as customer information recorded in the customer database. ,
When the customer is a normal member other than the specific member, the first shortage comparison means compares the difference between the loan upper limit and the existing loan amount as the available amount with the shortage amount,
10. The computer program according to claim 8, wherein, when the customer is the specific member, the computer program according to claim 8, wherein the computer program is a means for comparing a difference between the available limit amount and an existing loan amount as the available amount with a shortage amount. provide.
In the present invention as set forth in claim 11, when the customer who is subject to the screening of the developing credit is a normal member other than the specific member, the developing credit reviewing means A first developing credit screening means for obtaining a difference from a loan upper limit before developing credit as the additional lending possible amount;
If the customer subject to review of the above credit is the specific member, the latest available limit determined by the amount less than the latest loan limit newly set by the mid credit and the availability before the mid credit 11. The computer program according to claim 8, further comprising a second credit examination unit that calculates a difference from a limit amount as the additional loanable amount.
The invention according to claim 12 is characterized in that the second credit examination means changes the calculation criteria for the additional loan possible amount depending on whether or not the item to be settled is a public fee. A computer program as described is provided.
In the present invention according to claim 13, when the payment target item is a public bill, the customer database is set with the latest available limit obtained by the second credit review means as the next available limit. If the customer's information is updated and the payment target item is other than the utility bill, either the latest available limit amount obtained by the second in-progress credit review means or the previous available limit amount 13. The computer program according to claim 11 or 12, further comprising customer information updating means for updating customer information in the customer database with a lower one as a usable limit amount after the next time.

本発明は、顧客の決済用口座を管理する金融機関の管理コンピュータから決済用口座の残高不足情報を受信し、顧客の利用可能額と不足額とを比較する第1の不足額比較手段を有すると共に、第1の不足額比較手段により、利用可能額が不足額未満と判定された場合に、顧客の現時点における最新の顧客情報を用いた途上与信を審査して追加融資可能額を求める途上与信審査手段を有する。また、途上与信審査手段により得られる追加融資可能額を含めた最新の利用可能額と不足額とを比較する第2の不足額比較手段を有する。従って、途上与信によって更なる追加融資が可能であり、残高不足で決済不能に陥る事態を従来よりも少なくすることができ、顧客の便宜を図ることができる。   The present invention includes first shortage amount comparison means for receiving balance shortage information of a settlement account from a management computer of a financial institution that manages the settlement account of the customer and comparing the available amount of the customer with the shortage amount. At the same time, when the first shortage amount comparison means determines that the available amount is less than the shortage amount, the intermediate credit for examining additional credits using the latest customer information of the customer at present and obtaining additional loanable amounts Has examination means. Moreover, it has the 2nd shortage amount comparison means which compares the newest amount of money available including the additional loan possible amount obtained by the credit evaluation means on the way with the shortage amount. Therefore, further additional financing is possible due to the credit on the way, and the situation where settlement is impossible due to a shortage of balance can be reduced as compared with the conventional case, and the convenience of the customer can be achieved.

また、第1及び第2の不足額比較手段において用いる顧客の利用可能額は、顧客の希望等により、貸付上限額から既融資額を差し引いた金額ではなく、貸付上限額未満の利用可能限度額を設定し、この利用可能限度額から既融資額を差し引いて求める構成とすることが好ましい。そして、途上与信審査手段においては、上記利用可能限度額の設定のない顧客の場合には、途上与信によって新たに設定される最新の貸付上限額をもとに追加融資可能額を求めるが、上記利用可能限度額を設定した顧客の場合には、途上与信によって新たに設定される最新の貸付上限額未満の金額で決定される最新の利用可能限度額をもとに前記追加融資可能額を求める構成とすることが好ましい。利用可能限度額を設定していることにより、仮に、途上与信によって最新の貸付上限額が増加した場合であっても、最新の貸付上限額と最新の利用可能限度額との差額分は、常に、未融資資金として確保できているため、顧客の利用可能額が仮にゼロになったとしても、実際には、貸付上限額未満であり、顧客が借り過ぎに陥るような事態を防止でき、より安全な取引に資する。   In addition, the customer's available amount used in the first and second shortage comparison means is not the amount obtained by subtracting the existing loan amount from the loan upper limit amount, but the available limit amount less than the loan upper limit amount, depending on the customer's wishes. It is preferable to set it as the structure which calculates | requires and subtracts the amount of existing loans from this available limit amount. Then, in the case of a customer who does not set the above available limit, the developing credit screening means calculates the additional lending possible amount based on the latest lending limit newly set by the developing credit. In the case of a customer who has set an available limit, the additional loanable amount is calculated based on the latest available limit determined by the amount less than the latest loan limit newly set by the credit in progress. A configuration is preferable. By setting the available limit, the difference between the latest loan limit and the latest available limit is always the case even if the latest loan limit is increased due to the credit in progress. However, even if the customer's available amount becomes zero, it is actually less than the maximum loan amount, and it is possible to prevent the situation where the customer falls into excessive borrowing. Contributes to safe transactions.

以下、本発明の実施形態を図面に基づいて更に詳しく説明する。図1は、本発明の一の実施形態に係る決済用融資システム10の概略構成を示す図である。決済用融資システム10は、CPUなどの制御部10aを備えたコンピュータから構成され、融資を実行する貸金業者などの金融機関に設置され、顧客の決済用の口座を管理する金融機関(主に銀行)の管理コンピュータ(以下、「銀行サーバ」)20と通信回線を介して接続されて情報のやり取りが可能となっている。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of a settlement financing system 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The settlement loan system 10 is composed of a computer having a control unit 10a such as a CPU, and is installed in a financial institution such as a money lender that performs a loan, and manages a customer settlement account (mainly a bank). ) Management computer (hereinafter referred to as “bank server”) 20 via a communication line to exchange information.

なお、銀行サーバ20は、制御部21を介して決済用融資システム10や収納依頼機関のコンピュータ30との間で情報のやり取りを行う情報送受信手段22と、収納依頼機関のコンピュータ30から送信される振替金額を顧客の決済用口座から引き落とす振替実行手段23と、振替実行手段23による振替結果を出力する振替結果出力手段24等のコンピュータプログラムが設定されている。これらの機能は、決済用口座からの引き落としを行う銀行サーバ20に通常設定されており、残高不足を理由に、振替実行手段23による引き落としができなかった場合には、その旨の情報が振替結果出力手段24により出力され、通常、その情報が収納依頼機関に報告されるだけである。しかしながら、本実施形態では、振替結果出力手段24から引き落としができなかった旨の情報、すなわち、決済用口座の口座残高が不足していたという残高不足情報が、情報送受信手段22を介して、決済用融資システム10に送信される構成となっている。   The bank server 20 is transmitted from the settlement financing system 10 and the storage requesting institution computer 30 via the control unit 21 and the information transmitting / receiving means 22 for exchanging information with the storage requesting institution computer 30 and the storage requesting institution computer 30. Computer programs such as a transfer execution means 23 for debiting the transfer amount from the customer settlement account and a transfer result output means 24 for outputting a transfer result by the transfer execution means 23 are set. These functions are normally set in the bank server 20 that withdraws from the settlement account. If the debit cannot be made by the transfer executing means 23 due to a shortage of balance, information to that effect is displayed in the transfer result. It is output by the output means 24, and the information is usually only reported to the storage requesting organization. However, in the present embodiment, information indicating that the transfer result output means 24 could not be deducted, that is, balance shortage information indicating that the account balance of the settlement account was insufficient is sent via the information transmission / reception means 22. It is configured to be transmitted to the loan system 10 for use.

決済用融資システム10を構成するコンピュータの記憶部には、情報送受信手段11、顧客情報照会手段12、特定会員判定手段13、第1の不足額比較手段14、途上与信審査手段15、第2の不足額比較手段16、不足額充当処理手段17、顧客情報更新手段18等のコンピュータプログラムがインストールされている。また、顧客情報が記録された顧客データベース(顧客DB)19を備えている。顧客データベース19に登録された顧客情報は、図2に示したように、年齢、性別、職業、年収等の顧客の属性情報のほか、貸付上限額、利用可能限度額、利用可能額、融資履歴等の融資関連情報が記憶されている。なお、コンピュータプログラムは、フレキシブルディスク、ハードディスク、CD−ROM、MO(光磁気ディスク)、DVD−ROMなどの記録媒体へ記憶させて提供することもできるし、通信回線を通じて伝送することも可能である。   The storage unit of the computer constituting the settlement loan system 10 includes an information transmission / reception unit 11, a customer information inquiry unit 12, a specific member determination unit 13, a first shortage comparison unit 14, an on-going credit screening unit 15, a second Computer programs such as a shortage amount comparison unit 16, a shortage amount appropriation processing unit 17, and a customer information update unit 18 are installed. A customer database (customer DB) 19 in which customer information is recorded is provided. As shown in FIG. 2, the customer information registered in the customer database 19 includes customer attribute information such as age, gender, occupation, annual income, etc., as well as a loan upper limit, usable upper limit, usable amount, and loan history. The loan related information such as is stored. The computer program can be provided by being stored in a recording medium such as a flexible disk, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an MO (magneto-optical disk), a DVD-ROM, or can be transmitted through a communication line. .

情報送受信手段11は、銀行サーバ20及び顧客端末40との間で情報の送受信を行う。銀行サーバ20からは、上記残高不足情報や引き落とし結果を受信し、顧客端末40に対しては、銀行サーバ20から得られた情報を転送し、また、途上与信を行うか否か等の情報をやり取りする。なお、顧客端末40は、携帯電話等の携帯端末41でもよいし、パーソナルコンピュータ42等でもよい。   The information transmission / reception means 11 transmits / receives information between the bank server 20 and the customer terminal 40. From the bank server 20, the above shortage balance information and the withdrawal result are received, the information obtained from the bank server 20 is transferred to the customer terminal 40, and information such as whether to perform credit on the way is provided. Interact. The customer terminal 40 may be a mobile terminal 41 such as a mobile phone, or a personal computer 42 or the like.

顧客情報照会手段12は、情報送受信手段11により、残高不足情報を受信すると、顧客データベース19にアクセスして顧客情報を照会する。照会する顧客情報は、属性情報のほか、少なくとも貸付上限額と利用可能額を含む融資関連情報であるが、後述の第2の途上与信審査手段152の対象となる特定会員の場合には、融資関連情報として、利用可能限度額も併せて照会する。   When the information shortage information is received by the information transmission / reception means 11, the customer information inquiry means 12 accesses the customer database 19 and inquires customer information. In addition to the attribute information, the customer information to be inquired is loan-related information including at least a loan upper limit and an available amount. However, in the case of a specific member that is a target of the second on-going credit screening means 152 described later, As related information, the available limit is also inquired.

ここで、「貸付上限額」は、本実施形態の決済用融資システム10を運営する貸金業者などの金融機関と顧客との間で、入会時に行った与信審査で決められた貸付可能な金額の上限である。後述のように、途上与信審査手段15により、入会時以降に途上与信を行っている場合には、直近の途上与信で判定された貸付可能な金額の上限が貸付上限額として記録されている。「利用可能額」は、貸付上限額から既融資額を差し引いた未利用分の金額をいう。「利用可能限度額」は、後述の第2の途上与信審査手段152の対象となる特定会員に適用され、貸付上限額未満で設定された、当該顧客に貸付可能な金額の実質的な上限として機能する金額である。貸付可能な金額の上限は、本来は、上記の貸付上限額となるが、特定会員の場合には、この貸付上限額よりも低い利用可能限度額を実質的な貸付可能な金額の上限としたものである。これにより、貸付上限額と利用可能限度額との差額分、常に、未融資資金を確保でき、顧客の借り過ぎを抑制する効果が期待でき、また、必要に応じて未融資資金を利用することで顧客の便宜を迅速に図ることができる。   Here, the “loan limit amount” is an amount of money that can be lent determined by a credit examination performed at the time of membership between a financial institution such as a money lender operating the settlement loan system 10 of the present embodiment and a customer. It is an upper limit. As will be described later, in the case where the credit on credit is determined by the credit credit screening means 15 after joining, the upper limit of the lent amount determined by the latest credit is recorded as the loan upper limit. “Available amount” refers to the amount of unused portion obtained by subtracting the amount of existing loan from the loan upper limit. “Usable limit” is applied to a specific member who is the target of the second mid-term credit screening means 152 described later, and is set as a substantive upper limit of the amount that can be lent to the customer, which is set to be less than the maximum loan limit A functioning amount. The upper limit of the loanable amount is essentially the above loan upper limit, but in the case of a specific member, the usable upper limit lower than the upper limit of the loan is the upper limit of the actual loanable amount. Is. As a result, the amount of difference between the maximum loan amount and the maximum available amount can always be secured unfunded funds, the effect of suppressing excessive borrowing of customers can be expected, and unfunded funds can be used as necessary The customer's convenience can be achieved quickly.

利用可能限度額を設定する特定会員となるか否かは、顧客が決済用融資システム10にその旨を申し込む情報を送信することにより設定されるようにすることができる。図2においては、「特許太郎」、「商標次郎」が特定会員であり、「意匠花子」は通常会員になっている。また、顧客の属性等を考慮して、借り過ぎを防止するために、決済用融資システム10を運営、管理する貸金業者等の金融機関側が独自に設定するようにすることも可能である。利用可能限度額は、上記のように貸付上限額未満であればよく、例えば、貸付上限額の90%、80%というように設定できる。   Whether or not to become a specific member who sets the available limit amount can be set by transmitting information for applying to the settlement loan system 10 by the customer. In FIG. 2, “Patent Taro” and “Trademark Jiro” are specific members, and “Design Hanako” is a normal member. Further, in consideration of customer attributes and the like, it is also possible for the financial institution side such as a money lender operating and managing the settlement loan system 10 to set it uniquely in order to prevent over borrowing. The available limit may be less than the loan upper limit as described above, and can be set to 90% and 80% of the loan upper limit, for example.

第1の不足額比較手段14は、情報送受信手段11により受信した残高不足情報に含まれる不足額を、顧客情報照会手段12により得られた利用可能額とを比較し、利用可能額を充当することで不足額を解消できるか否か、すなわち、利用可能額が不足額未満か否かを判定する。なお、不足額と比較する利用可能額は、上記したように、顧客が上記特定会員以外の通常会員の場合には、貸付上限額と既融資額との差額であり、顧客が上記特定会員の場合には、利用可能限度額と既融資額との差額である。このため、本実施形態のコンピュータプログラムには、顧客情報照会手段12により得られた顧客情報から、特定会員か否かを判定する特定会員判定手段13も設定されている。   The first shortage amount comparison means 14 compares the shortage amount included in the balance shortage information received by the information transmitting / receiving means 11 with the available amount obtained by the customer information inquiry means 12 and applies the available amount. It is determined whether or not the shortage amount can be resolved by this, that is, whether or not the available amount is less than the shortage amount. As described above, the available amount to be compared with the shortage amount is the difference between the maximum loan amount and the existing loan amount when the customer is a regular member other than the specific member. In some cases, it is the difference between the available limit and the existing loan amount. For this reason, the computer program of this embodiment is also set with specific member determination means 13 for determining whether or not the user is a specific member from the customer information obtained by the customer information inquiry means 12.

途上与信審査手段15は、第1の不足額比較手段14によって、利用可能額が不足額未満と判定された場合に動作し、顧客の現時点における最新の顧客情報を用いた途上与信を審査して追加融資可能額を求める。   The credit credit review unit 15 operates when the first shortage amount comparison unit 14 determines that the available amount is less than the shortage amount, and examines the midstream credit using the latest customer information of the customer at the present time. Ask for additional financing.

途上与信審査手段15として、本実施形態では、第1の途上与信審査手段151と第2の途上与信審査手段152とが設定されている。第1の途上与信審査手段151は、顧客が、上記特定会員以外の通常会員の場合に実行される。第1の途上与信審査手段151において、途上与信を行うことにより、新たに貸付上限額が求められる。そこで、第1の途上与信審査手段151は、この新たに求めた最新の貸付上限額と途上与信前の貸付上限額との差額を追加融資可能額として求める。最新の貸付上限額が、途上与信前に設定されていた貸付上限額を上回っていれば、追加融資可能額が得られることになる。但し、途上与信によって得られた最新の貸付上限額が、途上与信前に設定されていた貸付上限額以下の場合には、追加融資可能額が得られないことはもちろんである。   In the present embodiment, a first half credit review unit 151 and a second half credit review unit 152 are set as the half credit review unit 15. The first on-going credit screening means 151 is executed when the customer is a normal member other than the specific member. In the first developing credit examination means 151, the lending upper limit is newly determined by performing the developing credit. Therefore, the first developing credit examination means 151 obtains the difference between the newly obtained latest lending upper limit and the lending upper limit before the entrusting credit as an additional lending possible amount. If the latest lending ceiling amount exceeds the lending ceiling amount set before the mid-term credit, an additional lending amount can be obtained. However, if the latest lending limit amount obtained by developing credits is less than or equal to the lending limit amount set before developing credits, it is a matter of course that no additional lending amount can be obtained.

途上与信を行うに当たっては、顧客情報照会手段12により得られる顧客情報(属性情報、融資関連情報)を用いて行われるが、特に、融資関連情報の中の融資履歴が参照される。融資履歴は、本実施形態の決済用融資システム10によってそれまでに顧客に融資が行われた状況(振込年月、不足額、追加融資額など)であり、例えば、振り込み回数が頻繁にある場合、追加融資額の金額が大きい場合等には、より厳しい基準で判断されることになる。途上与信を行うに当たって、信用調査機関の情報(他の金融機関からの新たな借入情報等)を入手して行うことができることはもちろんであり、その場合には、この信用調査機関の情報も加味して行われる。   In making the credit on the way, the customer information (attribute information, loan related information) obtained by the customer information inquiry means 12 is used. In particular, the loan history in the loan related information is referred to. The loan history is a situation in which the customer has been financed by the settlement loan system 10 of the present embodiment (transfer date, shortage, additional loan amount, etc.), for example, when the number of transfers is frequent If the amount of additional loan is large, it will be judged according to stricter standards. It is possible to obtain credit institution information (new borrowing information from other financial institutions, etc.) when conducting credit on the way. Of course, in this case, this credit institution information is also taken into account. Done.

第2の途上与信審査手段152は、顧客が上記の特定会員の場合に実行される。まず、第2の途上与信審査手段152においても、融資履歴を含む最新の顧客情報を利用して審査され、第1の途上与信審査手段151と同様に新たに貸付上限額を求める。そして、第2の途上与信審査手段152では、この新たな貸付上限額から利用可能限度額を求め、新たな利用可能限度額と途上与信前の利用可能限度額との差額を追加融資可能額として求める。   The second halfway credit examination means 152 is executed when the customer is the specific member. First, the second credit review means 152 also examines using the latest customer information including the loan history, and similarly obtains a new loan upper limit in the same way as the first credit review means 151. Then, the second credit review means 152 obtains the usable limit amount from the new loan upper limit amount, and sets the difference between the new usable limit amount and the usable limit amount before the past credit as the additional loan possible amount. Ask.

図3に示したように、通常会員の場合、例えば、途上与信前の貸付上限額が20万円で、第1の途上与信審査手段151において、新たに算出された貸付上限額が22万円の場合には、追加融資可能額が2万円(22万円−20万円)と算出される。   As shown in FIG. 3, in the case of a normal member, for example, the maximum loan amount before development credit is 200,000 yen, and the first maximum credit screening means 151 calculates a maximum loan amount of 220,000 yen. In this case, the additional loan possible amount is calculated as 20,000 yen (220,000 yen-200,000 yen).

一方、特定会員の場合、途上与信前の貸付上限額が20万円で、利用可能限度額が貸付上限額の90%で18万円であるとすると、第2の途上与信審査手段152によって、新たに算出された貸付上限額が22万の場合には、その90%の19万8千円が新たな利用可能限度額となる。そして、1万8千円(19万8千円−18万円)が追加融資可能額となる(図3の公共料金以外の場合に相当)。   On the other hand, in the case of a specific member, assuming that the maximum loan amount before development credit is 200,000 yen and the maximum available amount is 180,000 yen, 90% of the maximum loan amount, the second credit examination means 152 If the newly calculated upper limit of loans is 220,000, 90% of that amount is 198,000 yen, which becomes the new available limit. Then, 18,000 yen (198,000 yen-180,000 yen) is an additional loan possible amount (corresponding to the case other than the utility bill in FIG. 3).

しかしながら、第2の途上与信審査手段152で求める追加融資可能額は、貸付上限額未満に設定される利用可能限度額であるため、利用可能限度額まで全て融資しても、本来、貸付上限額との差額分余力がある。そこで、第2の途上与信審査手段152では、上記のように常に一定の率で求めるのではなく、この余裕分を利用し、残高不足となった原因である決済対象項目等に応じて、算出する追加融資可能額の算出基準を異ならせることもできる。例えば、決済対象項目が公共料金の支払いの場合には、日常生活に必需の費用であることから、利用可能限度額を増額するような審査を行うことが考えられる。これに対し、決済対象項目が公共料金の支払い以外の場合、例えば、レジャー、レストランでの飲食等の費用である場合には、日常生活に必需の費用とは言い難いことから、借入金額の増加を防止するために、利用可能限度額の増額を行わないようにすることができる。   However, since the additional creditable amount calculated by the second credit review means 152 is an available limit set below the upper limit of the loan, even if the entire available limit is financed, the upper limit of the loan There is room for the difference. Therefore, the second credit review means 152 does not always obtain a constant rate as described above, but uses this margin to calculate according to the settlement target item that is the cause of the shortage of balance. It is also possible to vary the calculation criteria for the amount of additional financing available. For example, when the payment target item is a public bill payment, since it is a necessary cost for daily life, it is conceivable to perform an examination so as to increase the usable limit. On the other hand, if the item to be settled is other than the payment of utility bills, for example, if it is expenses for eating and drinking at leisure, restaurants, etc., it is difficult to say that it is a necessary expense for daily life, so the amount of borrowing increases In order to prevent this, it is possible not to increase the available limit.

例えば、図3に示したように、公共料金の支払いの場合には、第2の途上与信審査手段152において新たに算出された貸付上限額22万円の95%を新たな利用可能限度額として求める。この場合、20万9千円となる。そうすると、追加融資可能額が2万9千円(20万9千円−18万円)となり、上記の1万8千円よりも増額される。公共料金以外の場合には、例えば、当初の設定値である90%を採用して、上記の原則通り、19万8千円を算出し、追加融資額を1万8千円と算出する。   For example, as shown in FIG. 3, in the case of paying public utility charges, 95% of the maximum loan amount of 220,000 yen newly calculated by the second developing credit screening means 152 is set as a new usable limit amount. Ask. In this case, it will be 200,000 yen. In this case, the additional loan possible amount is 29,000 yen (209,000 yen-180,000 yen), which is higher than the above 18,000 yen. In cases other than utility charges, for example, the initial set value of 90% is adopted, 198,000 yen is calculated according to the above principle, and the additional loan amount is calculated as 18,000 yen.

第2の不足額比較手段16は、第1の途上与信審査手段151又は第2の途上与信審査手段152によって得られる追加融資可能額を含めた最新の利用可能額を不足額と比較する。例えば、不足額が2万円で、途上与信前の利用可能額が1万円であったとすると、顧客が通常会員の場合、上記の例では第1の途上与信審査手段151により2万円が追加融資可能額となるため、3万円が新たな利用可能額となる。一方、特定会員であって、融資利用目的が公共料金の場合には、不足額が2万円で、途上与信前の利用可能額が1万円であったとすると、上記の例では第2の途上与信審査手段152により2万9千円が追加融資可能額となるため、3万9千円が新たな利用可能額となる。公共料金以外の場合には、1万8千円が追加融資可能額となるため、2万8千円が新たな利用可能額となる。第2の不足額比較手段16はこのようにして得られた新たな利用可能額を充当することで不足額を解消できるか否か、すなわち、新たな利用可能額が不足額未満か否かを判定する。上記の例では、新たな利用可能額は、3万円、3万9千円又は2万8千円であるため、いずれも不足額(2万円)以上と判定される。   The second shortage amount comparison unit 16 compares the latest available amount including the additional loan available amount obtained by the first halfway credit examination unit 151 or the second halfway credit examination unit 152 with the shortage amount. For example, if the shortage amount is 20,000 yen and the available amount before the credit in progress is 10,000 yen, in the above example, if the customer is a regular member, 20,000 yen is calculated by the first credit review means 151 in the above example. Because it is an additional loanable amount, 30,000 yen will be a new available amount. On the other hand, if you are a specific member and the purpose of loan is a utility bill, the shortage amount is 20,000 yen, and the available amount before the credit on the way is 10,000 yen. Since the entrusted credit screening means 152 makes 29,000 yen an additional loanable amount, 39,000 yen becomes a new available amount. In cases other than utility charges, 18,000 yen will be the additional loanable amount, so 28,000 yen will be the new available amount. The second shortage amount comparison means 16 determines whether or not the shortage amount can be resolved by applying the new available amount thus obtained, that is, whether or not the new available amount is less than the shortage amount. judge. In the above example, since the new available amount is 30,000 yen, 39,000 yen, or 28,000 yen, both are determined to be the deficient amount (20,000 yen) or more.

なお、上記の例において、特定会員の場合、決済対象項目が公共料金の場合には、常に、公共料金以外の場合よりも追加融資可能額が増えるが、公共料金の場合であっても、不足額が一定の基準額を超える場合には、公共料金以外に適用される基準を適用するようにすることが好ましい。例えば、2万5千円を基準額として設定し、不足額が2万5千円以上の場合には、決済対象項目が公共料金であるか否かに拘わらず、一律に、公共料金以外の基準を適用する。この結果、上記の例では、決済対象項目が公共料金であっても、仮に不足額が基準額以上の2万6千円だとすると、新たな利用可能額は3万9千円ではなく、公共料金以外の場合と同じ2万8千円となる。また、後述のように、公共料金以外の場合には、利用可能限度額を、今回行った途上与信前の基準に戻すように設定して、顧客の借り過ぎを予防する措置も考えられが、公共料金の場合であっても、基準額を超える場合には、その適用を受けるようにすることもできる。   In the above example, in the case of a specific member, if the item to be settled is a public fee, the amount of additional lending will always increase compared to the case other than the public fee. In the case where the amount exceeds a certain reference amount, it is preferable to apply a criterion that is applied in addition to the utility fee. For example, if 25,000 yen is set as the base amount and the shortage is 25,000 yen or more, regardless of whether the item to be settled is a public fee, it is uniformly Apply the criteria. As a result, in the above example, even if the payment target item is a public fee, if the shortage is 26,000 yen, which is more than the standard amount, the new available amount is not 39,000 yen. It is the same 28,000 yen as other cases. In addition, as described below, in cases other than utility bills, it may be possible to prevent the customer from over-borrowing by setting the usable limit back to the pre-development credit standard. Even in the case of public charges, if the amount exceeds the standard amount, it can be applied.

不足額充当処理手段17は、第1の不足額比較手段14において利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合、又は、第2の不足額比較手段16において最新の利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合に、少なくとも不足額に相当する金額を顧客の口座に充当する処理を行う。例えば、不足額が2万円で、利用可能額がそれ以上の場合には、不足額に相当する2万円を充当するか、あるいは、それ以上の金額を充当する。充当する金額(以下、「充当額」という)として不足額以上充当するか否かは、顧客と決済用融資システム10を運営、管理する貸金業者等の金融機関との間の取り決め次第であり、決済用口座に余裕を持たせるために、例えば、不足額プラス10%を充当するように決めておくこともできる。   The deficiency appropriation processing means 17 is used when the first deficiency comparison means 14 determines that the available amount is equal to or greater than the deficient amount, or the second available amount comparison means 16 indicates that the latest available amount is equal to or greater than the deficiency amount. If it is determined that, at least the amount corresponding to the shortage amount is applied to the customer's account. For example, when the shortage amount is 20,000 yen and the available amount is more than that amount, 20,000 yen corresponding to the shortage amount is appropriated, or an amount larger than that is appropriated. Whether the amount to be appropriated (hereinafter referred to as “appropriated amount”) is to be applied more than the shortage depends on the agreement between the customer and a financial institution such as a money lender operating and managing the settlement financing system 10, In order to give a margin to the settlement account, for example, it may be decided to apply a shortage plus 10%.

不足額充当処理手段17は、第1の不足額比較手段14又は第2の不足額比較手段16において利用可能額が求められたならば、銀行サーバ20に対して、上記の充当額を直接振り込み処理する手段であってもよいし、銀行サーバ20に対して、上記の充当額を銀行等が立て替えて顧客の決済用口座に充当させる指示情報を出力する手段であってもよい。   The deficiency appropriation processing means 17 transfers the above appropriation amount directly to the bank server 20 when the available amount is obtained by the first deficiency comparison means 14 or the second deficiency comparison means 16. It may be a means for processing, or may be means for outputting instruction information to the bank server 20 to allow the above-mentioned appropriate amount to be rewritten by the bank or the like and applied to the customer settlement account.

顧客情報更新手段18は、途上与信審査手段15により最新の貸付上限額等が出力された場合、あるいは、顧客に融資を実行した場合等において、顧客データベース19に記録された貸付上限額、利用可能限度額、利用可能額、融資履歴などの融資関連情報の更新処理を行うプログラムである。図4に示したように、例えば、上記第1の途上与信審査手段151により、新たな貸付上限額が22万円と算出された場合には、その金額が登録され、充当額(2万円)として利用した分を除いた金額が新たに利用可能額(1万円)として登録される。   The customer information update means 18 can use the loan upper limit amount recorded in the customer database 19 when the latest credit upper limit amount is output by the credit review means 15 or when a loan is made to the customer. It is a program that performs processing for updating loan-related information such as limit amount, available amount, and loan history. As shown in FIG. 4, for example, when the first lending credit screening means 151 calculates a new maximum loan amount of 220,000 yen, the amount is registered and the appropriate amount (20,000 yen) ), The amount excluding the amount used is newly registered as an available amount (10,000 yen).

また、第2の途上与信審査手段152においては、決済対象項目が公共料金であるか否かにより追加融資可能額の算出基準を異ならせている。すなわち、利用可能限度額を求めるために貸付上限額にかける率を異ならせることによって、異なる追加融資可能額を算出している。このため、貸付上限額はいずれも同じであるが(上記の例では22万円)、利用可能限度額は、上記の例では、決済対象項目が公共料金の場合には、20万9千円となり、公共料金以外の場合には、19万8千円となる。従って、顧客情報更新手段18は、これらを反映し、決済対象項目が公共料金の場合には、図4に示したように、新たな貸付上限額22万円、新たな利用可能限度額20万9千円、利用可能額1万9千円を登録する。公共料金以外の場合も、新たな貸付上限額22万円、新たな利用可能限度額19万8千円を登録するようにしてもよいが、次述のように、本実施形態では、公共料金以外の場合は、途上与信前の条件で据え置くようにしている。   Further, in the second developing credit screening means 152, the calculation standard of the additional loan possible amount is varied depending on whether or not the settlement target item is a public fee. That is, different additional loanable amounts are calculated by varying the rate applied to the loan upper limit in order to obtain the available limit. For this reason, the maximum loan amount is the same (220,000 yen in the above example), but the available limit is 209,000 yen in the above example when the payment target item is a public charge. In the case of other than utility charges, it will be 198,000 yen. Therefore, the customer information updating means 18 reflects these, and when the payment target item is a public charge, as shown in FIG. 4, a new loan upper limit of 220,000 yen and a new usable upper limit of 200,000 are provided. Register 9,000 yen and the available amount 19,000 yen. In cases other than public charges, a new maximum loan limit of 220,000 yen and a new usable upper limit of 198,000 yen may be registered. In cases other than the above, the conditions before the credit on the way are kept unchanged.

すなわち、第2の途上与信審査手段152による途上与信の結果、利用可能限度額が増加したのは、最新の信用力に基づくものであるが、公共料金以外の場合においてもこれをそのまま認めると、当該顧客のさらなる借入を利用しての消費を助長する可能性もある。そこで、公共料金以外の場合には、上記のように利用可能限度額が19万8千円に増えたとしても、これは今回の不足額を解消するためだけの一時的なものとして扱い、次回以降適用される貸付上限額及び利用可能限度額は、それぞれ、途上与信前の20万円及び18万円のままに据え置くようにすることが好ましい。これにより、利用可能額がプラスになるまでは先に返済を済ませないと、次回以降の追加融資ができなくなり、顧客の借入増加を抑制できる。また、決済対象項目が公共料金の場合であっても、上記した所定の基準額を超える不足額であった場合にはこれと同様に取り扱うことが好ましい。   That is, the increase in the usable limit as a result of the credit in progress by the second credit screening means 152 is based on the latest creditworthiness. There is also the potential to encourage consumption using additional borrowings from the customer. Therefore, in cases other than utility charges, even if the available limit increases to 198,000 yen as described above, this will be treated as temporary only to resolve this shortage, It is preferable that the lending upper limit amount and the usable upper limit amount applied thereafter are left unchanged at 200,000 yen and 180,000 yen before the credit on the way. As a result, if the repayment is not completed before the available amount becomes positive, the additional loan after the next time cannot be made, and the increase in borrowing by the customer can be suppressed. Even if the payment target item is a public bill, if it is a shortage amount exceeding the above-mentioned predetermined reference amount, it is preferably handled in the same manner.

なお、公共料金以外の場合における次回以降に適用される利用可能限度額として、上記の例では、途上与信前の18万円を採用しているが、第2の途上与信審査手段152による審査の結果、途上与信後の方が低い金額の場合には、途上与信後の金額を採用することが好ましい。すなわち、途上与信前後の利用可能限度額のうち、低い方の金額を次回以降に適用される利用可能限度額として顧客データベース19に登録することが好ましい。   Note that, in the above example, 180,000 yen before the credit on the way is used as the maximum available amount that will be applied after the next time in cases other than public charges, but the second credit review means 152 As a result, when the amount after the credit on the way is lower, it is preferable to adopt the amount after the credit on the way. That is, it is preferable to register the lower amount of the available limit amount before and after the entrusted credit in the customer database 19 as the available limit amount applied after the next time.

また、上記の第2の途上与信審査手段152では、公共料金であるか否かにより、異なる基準で追加融資可能額を算出しているが、第2の途上与信審査手段152の段階では同じ基準で算出し、顧客情報更新手段18においてのみ、次回以降に適用される利用可能限度額で差をつける取り扱いを実施するようにしてもよい。すなわち、第2の途上与信審査手段152の審査段階では、例えば、いずれも新たな貸付上限額に対して90%を利用可能限度額として、上記の例では、いずれの場合も19万8千円を新たな利用可能限度額としても算出する一方で、顧客情報更新手段18において、次回以降に適用される利用可能限度額を登録する際には、公共料金を対象の場合には19万8千円を、公共料金以外を対象の場合には途上与信前の18万円をそれぞれ登録するようにしてもよい。   Further, in the second developing credit screening means 152, the additional creditable amount is calculated based on different standards depending on whether or not it is a utility bill. However, the same standard is used in the stage of the second developing credit screening means 152. It is possible to carry out a process of making a difference in the available limit amount applied after the next time only in the customer information update means 18. That is, in the screening stage of the second developing credit screening means 152, for example, 90% of the new loan upper limit is set as the usable limit, and in the above example, 198,000 yen in any case. Is also calculated as a new usable limit, while the customer information updating means 18 registers 198,000 for the utility charge when registering the usable limit applied after the next time. In the case of a target other than public utility charges, 180,000 yen before the credit on the way may be registered.

次に、本実施形態の作用を図5及び図6に基づいて説明する。
まず、収納依頼機関は、コンピュータ30から銀行サーバ20に対して自動振替を依頼する情報を送信する(S101)。銀行サーバ20は、この自動振替依頼情報を情報送受信手段22によって受信すると、振替実行手段23が所定の期日に顧客の決済用口座から第1回目の引き落とし処理を実行する(S102)。引き落としができた場合(S103で「YES」)には、その旨が収納依頼機関のコンピュータ30に通知される(S130)。引き落としができなかった場合(S103で「NO」)には、残高不足情報が銀行サーバ20から送信され、決済用融資システム10の情報送受信手段11によって受信される(S104)。情報送受信手段11が残高不足情報を受信すると、顧客情報更新手段18が、その情報を融資履歴情報の一つとして顧客データベース19に記録する(S105)。
Next, the effect | action of this embodiment is demonstrated based on FIG.5 and FIG.6.
First, the storage requesting organization transmits information for requesting automatic transfer from the computer 30 to the bank server 20 (S101). When the bank server 20 receives the automatic transfer request information by the information transmission / reception means 22, the transfer execution means 23 executes the first withdrawal process from the customer settlement account on a predetermined date (S102). If the withdrawal was successful (“YES” in S103), the fact is notified to the computer 30 of the storage requesting organization (S130). When the withdrawal has failed (“NO” in S103), the shortage balance information is transmitted from the bank server 20 and received by the information transmitting / receiving unit 11 of the settlement financing system 10 (S104). When the information transmitting / receiving unit 11 receives the balance shortage information, the customer information updating unit 18 records the information in the customer database 19 as one piece of loan history information (S105).

次に、決済用融資システム10の情報送受信手段11から顧客の端末装置40に、残高不足情報を送信すると共に、不足額の充当を希望するか否かの問い合わせ情報も確認のため送信する(S106)。顧客は、受信した問い合わせ情報に対して不足額の充当を希望するか否かの情報を返信する。不足額の充当を希望しない場合(S107において「NO」)には、その旨が顧客情報更新手段18により融資履歴情報の一つとして顧客データベース19に記録される。不足額の充当を希望する場合(S107において「YES」)には、顧客情報照会手段12が起動する。   Next, shortage balance information is transmitted from the information transmission / reception means 11 of the settlement loan system 10 to the customer's terminal device 40, and inquiry information as to whether or not to approve the shortage amount is also transmitted for confirmation (S106). ). The customer returns information as to whether or not he / she wishes to allocate the shortage amount to the received inquiry information. When it is not desired to allocate the deficient amount (“NO” in S107), the fact is recorded in the customer database 19 as one piece of loan history information by the customer information updating means 18. When it is desired to allocate the deficient amount (“YES” in S107), the customer information inquiry unit 12 is activated.

顧客情報照会手段12は、顧客データベース19にアクセスして、属性情報と共に、融資履歴情報を読み込む(S108)。これらの属性情報及び融資履歴情報は、第1の不足額比較手段14に設定された特定会員判定手段13にまず受け渡され、当該顧客が、上記特定会員か通常会員かを判定する(S109)。   The customer information inquiry means 12 accesses the customer database 19 and reads the loan history information together with the attribute information (S108). These attribute information and loan history information are first transferred to the specific member determination means 13 set in the first shortage amount comparison means 14 to determine whether the customer is the specific member or the normal member (S109). .

通常会員の場合(S109において「NO」)には、第1の不足額比較手段14は、顧客情報照会手段12により照会した利用可能額(貸付上限額と既融資額との差額)と不足額とを比較し(S110)、利用可能額が不足額以上の場合には、不足額充当処理手段17による処理が実行される(S127)。なお、不足額充当処理手段17の処理の詳細については後述する。S110において、利用可能額が不足額を下回っていると判定された場合は、第1の途上与信審査手段151により途上与信が実施される(S111)。この際には、上記のように、最新の融資履歴などを参照して実施され、その結果、新たな貸付上限額が算出され、新たな貸付上限額と途上与信前の貸付上限額との差から追加融資可能額が求められる(図3参照)。新たな貸付上限額や追加融資可能額を含めた新たな利用可能額は、顧客情報更新手段18によって顧客データベース19に書き込まれて更新される(S112、図4参照)。   In the case of a normal member (“NO” in S109), the first shortage amount comparison unit 14 uses the available amount (difference between the loan upper limit and the existing loan amount) inquired by the customer information inquiry unit 12 and the shortage amount. (S110), and when the available amount is equal to or greater than the shortage amount, processing by the shortage amount allocation processing means 17 is executed (S127). Details of the processing of the shortage amount appropriation processing means 17 will be described later. In S110, when it is determined that the available amount is less than the shortage amount, the first credit review unit 151 executes the credit in progress (S111). At this time, as described above, the latest loan history is referred to, and as a result, a new loan upper limit is calculated, and the difference between the new loan upper limit and the loan upper limit before developing credits. The amount of additional financing available is calculated from (see Fig. 3). The new usable amount including the new lending upper limit and the additional lending possible amount is written and updated in the customer database 19 by the customer information updating means 18 (see S112, FIG. 4).

次に、第2の不足額比較手段16により、第1の途上与信審査手段151により求められた上記の追加融資可能額を含めた最新の利用可能額と不足額とを比較する(S113)。その結果、最新の利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合に、不足額充当処理手段17による処理が実行される(S127)。最新の利用可能額が不足額未満と判定された場合には、顧客の端末装置40に不足額の充当が行えない旨の情報を通知する(S114)。   Next, the second shortage amount comparison unit 16 compares the latest available amount including the above-mentioned additional loanable amount obtained by the first on-going credit examination unit 151 with the shortage amount (S113). As a result, when it is determined that the latest available amount is equal to or greater than the shortage amount, processing by the shortage amount allocation processing unit 17 is executed (S127). When it is determined that the latest available amount is less than the shortage amount, information indicating that the shortage amount cannot be allocated is notified to the customer terminal device 40 (S114).

特定会員判定手段13により特定会員と判定された場合、すなわち、S109において「YES」と判定された場合には、第1の不足額比較手段14は、顧客情報照会手段12により照会した利用可能額(利用可能限度額と既融資額との差額)と不足額とを比較する(S120)。利用可能額が不足額以上の場合には、不足額充当処理手段17による処理が実行される(S127)。利用可能額が不足額を下回っている場合は、第2の途上与信審査手段152により途上与信が実施される(S121〜S124)。   When it is determined that the specific member is a specific member, that is, when “YES” is determined in S109, the first shortage amount comparing unit 14 uses the available amount inquired by the customer information inquiry unit 12. The difference between the available limit amount and the existing loan amount is compared with the shortage amount (S120). If the available amount is equal to or greater than the shortage amount, processing by the shortage amount allocation processing unit 17 is executed (S127). If the available amount is less than the shortage amount, the second credit review means 152 implements the credit on the way (S121 to S124).

この際には、上記のように、最新の融資履歴などを参照して実施され、その結果、新たな貸付上限額と新たな利用可能限度額が算出され、新たな利用可能限度額と途上与信前の利用可能限度額との差から追加融資可能額が求められるが、第2の途上与信審査手段152は、その前に、決済対象項目が公共料金か否かを判定する(S121)。決済対象項目が公共料金の場合には、さらに、不足額が所定の基準額以内か否かを判定し(S122)、基準額以内の場合には、公共料金についての算出基準が適用されて追加融資可能額が求められる(S123、図3参照)。一方、S121において、決済対象項目が公共料金以外と判定された場合、並びに、公共料金であっても、S122において不足額が基準額以上と判定された場合には、公共料金以外についての算出基準が適用されて追加融資可能額が求められる(S124、図3参照)。新たな貸付上限額、利用可能限度額、追加融資可能額を含めた新たな利用可能額は、顧客情報更新手段18によって顧客データベース19に書き込まれて更新される(S125、図4参照)。   At this time, as described above, it is carried out with reference to the latest loan history, etc., and as a result, a new loan ceiling amount and a new usable limit amount are calculated, and a new usable ceiling amount and an intermediate credit are calculated. The additional loan possible amount is determined from the difference from the previous available limit amount. The second credit review unit 152 determines whether or not the settlement target item is a public fee before that (S121). If the payment target item is a public charge, it is further determined whether or not the shortage amount is within a predetermined reference amount (S122). If it is within the reference amount, the calculation reference for the public charge is applied and added. A loanable amount is determined (S123, see FIG. 3). On the other hand, if it is determined in S121 that the item to be settled is other than a public fee, and even if it is a public fee, if it is determined in S122 that the deficient amount is greater than or equal to the reference amount, the calculation criteria for other than the public fee Is applied to obtain an additional loanable amount (S124, see FIG. 3). The new available amount including the new loan upper limit, the available limit, and the additional available loan amount is written and updated in the customer database 19 by the customer information updating means 18 (S125, see FIG. 4).

次に、第2の不足額比較手段16により、第2の途上与信審査手段152により求められた上記の追加融資可能額を含めた最新の利用可能額と不足額とを比較する(S126)。その結果、最新の利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合に、不足額充当処理手段17による処理が実行される(S127)。最新の利用可能額が不足額未満と判定された場合には、顧客の端末装置40に不足額の充当が行えない旨の情報を通知する(S114)。   Next, the second shortage amount comparison unit 16 compares the latest available amount including the above-mentioned additional loanable amount obtained by the second mid-term credit examination unit 152 with the shortage amount (S126). As a result, when it is determined that the latest available amount is equal to or greater than the shortage amount, processing by the shortage amount allocation processing unit 17 is executed (S127). When it is determined that the latest available amount is less than the shortage amount, information indicating that the shortage amount cannot be allocated is notified to the customer terminal device 40 (S114).

S127においては、不足額充当処理手段17により、上記のように少なくとも不足額に相当する金額を充当額として銀行サーバ20に振り込みするか、あるいは、銀行サーバ20に対して、上記の充当額を銀行等が立て替えて顧客の決済用口座に充当させる指示情報を出力すること等によって行われる。その後、S102において引き落としを実行した後、所定時間経過すると、銀行サーバ20は、振替実行手段23により、顧客の決済用口座から第2回目の引き落とし処理を実行する(S128)。   In S127, the shortage appropriation processing means 17 transfers at least the amount corresponding to the shortage amount to the bank server 20 as the appropriation amount as described above, or the above appropriation amount is transferred to the bank server 20 by the bank This is performed by, for example, outputting instruction information to be applied to the customer's settlement account. Thereafter, when the predetermined time has elapsed after executing the withdrawal in S102, the bank server 20 executes a second withdrawal process from the customer settlement account by the transfer execution means 23 (S128).

図1は、本発明の一の実施形態に係る決済用融資システムの概略構成を説明するための図である。FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining a schematic configuration of a settlement financing system according to an embodiment of the present invention. 図2は、顧客データベースに記録される属性情報、融資関連情報の一例を示した図である。FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of attribute information and loan-related information recorded in the customer database. 図3は、途上与信前後における貸付上限額、利用可能限度額、利用可能額等の変化を示した図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram showing changes in the loan upper limit, the usable upper limit, the usable amount, etc. before and after the credit on the way. 図4は、途上与信後に更新される顧客データベースの融資関連情報の内容を説明するための図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining the contents of the loan related information in the customer database that is updated after the credit on the way. 図5は、上記実施形態に係る決済用融資システムを用いた融資の過程を説明するためのフローチャートである。FIG. 5 is a flowchart for explaining a loan process using the settlement loan system according to the embodiment. 図6は、図5の続きの過程を示したフローチャートである。FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a continuation process of FIG.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

10 決済用融資システム
11 情報送受信手段
12 顧客情報照会手段
13 特定会員判定手段
14 第1の不足額比較手段
15 途上与信審査手段
151 第1の途上与信審査手段
152 第2の途上与信審査手段
16 第2の不足額比較手段
17 不足額充当処理手段
18 顧客情報更新手段
19 顧客データベース(顧客DB)
20 銀行サーバ
30 収納依頼機関のコンピュータ
40 顧客端末
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Settlement loan system 11 Information transmission / reception means 12 Customer information reference means 13 Specific member determination means 14 First shortage comparison means 15 Ongoing credit examination means 151 First Ongoing credit examination means 152 Second Ongoing credit examination means 16 2 deficiency comparison means 17 deficiency appropriation processing means 18 customer information update means 19 customer database (customer DB)
20 Bank server 30 Storage requesting organization computer 40 Customer terminal

Claims (13)

顧客の決済用口座を管理する金融機関の管理コンピュータと通信回線を介して接続された決済用融資システムであって、
前記金融機関の管理コンピュータから前記決済用口座の残高不足情報を受信する情報送受信手段と、
前記情報送受信手段により、残高不足情報を受信した場合に、顧客データベースにアクセスし、少なくとも貸付上限額と利用可能額を含む顧客情報を照会する顧客情報照会手段と、
前記顧客情報照会手段により得られた利用可能額と、前記情報送受信手段により受信した前記残高不足情報に含まれる不足額とを比較する第1の不足額比較手段と、
前記第1の不足額比較手段により、利用可能額が不足額未満と判定された場合に、前記顧客の現時点における最新の顧客情報を用いた途上与信を審査して追加融資可能額を求める途上与信審査手段と、
前記途上与信審査手段により得られる追加融資可能額を含めた最新の利用可能額と前記不足額とを比較する第2の不足額比較手段と、
前記第1の不足額比較手段において利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合、又は、前記第2の不足額比較手段において最新の利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合に、少なくとも前記不足額に相当する金額を前記顧客の口座に充当する処理を行う不足額充当処理手段と
を備えることを特徴とする決済用融資システム。
A settlement financing system connected via a communication line to a management computer of a financial institution that manages a customer settlement account,
Information transmitting / receiving means for receiving balance shortage information of the settlement account from a management computer of the financial institution;
When the information transmission / reception means receives balance shortage information, the customer information reference means for accessing the customer database and inquiring customer information including at least a loan upper limit and an available amount;
A first deficient amount comparing means for comparing the available amount obtained by the customer information inquiry means with a deficient amount included in the balance shortage information received by the information transmitting / receiving means;
In the case where the first shortage amount comparison unit determines that the available amount is less than the shortage amount, the halfway credit using the latest customer information of the customer at the present time is examined to obtain an additional loanable amount. Screening means,
A second shortage amount comparing means for comparing the shortage amount with the latest available amount including the additional loan possible amount obtained by the developing credit examination means;
At least when the first available amount comparison means determines that the available amount is equal to or greater than the insufficient amount, or when the second available amount comparison means determines that the latest available amount is equal to or greater than the insufficient amount, at least A settlement financing system, comprising: a deficiency appropriation processing unit that performs processing for appropriating an amount corresponding to the deficit amount to the account of the customer.
前記顧客データベースには、顧客情報として融資履歴が記録されており、
前記途上与信審査手段は、前記融資履歴を含む顧客情報を参照して途上与信の審査を実行する構成であることを特徴とする請求項1記載の決済用融資システム。
In the customer database, a loan history is recorded as customer information,
2. The settlement loan system according to claim 1, wherein the halfway credit examination unit is configured to perform halfway credit examination with reference to customer information including the loan history.
前記顧客が特定会員の場合には、前記顧客データベースに記録される顧客情報として、前記貸付上限額未満の金額で決定される利用可能限度額が設定されていることを特徴とする請求項1又は2記載の決済用融資システム。   When the customer is a specific member, an available limit determined by an amount less than the loan upper limit is set as customer information recorded in the customer database. 2. The settlement loan system according to 2. 前記第1の不足額比較手段は、前記顧客が前記特定会員以外の通常会員の場合、前記貸付上限額と既融資額との差額を前記利用可能額として不足額と比較し、
前記顧客が前記特定会員の場合、前記利用可能限度額と既融資額との差額を前記利用可能額として不足額と比較する手段であることを特徴とする請求項1〜3のいずれか1に記載の決済用融資システム。
When the customer is a normal member other than the specific member, the first shortage comparison means compares the difference between the loan upper limit and the existing loan amount as the available amount with the shortage amount,
When the customer is the specific member, the difference between the available limit amount and the existing loan amount is a means for comparing the shortage amount as the available amount with the shortage amount. The loan system for settlement described.
前記途上与信審査手段は、途上与信の審査対象である顧客が、前記特定会員以外の通常会員の場合、途上与信によって新たに設定される最新の貸付上限額と途上与信前の貸付上限額との差額を前記追加融資可能額として求める第1の途上与信審査手段と、
前記途上与信の審査対象である顧客が、前記特定会員の場合、途上与信によって新たに設定される最新の貸付上限額未満の金額で決定される最新の利用可能限度額と途上与信前の利用可能限度額との差額を前記追加融資可能額として求める第2の途上与信審査手段と
を備えることを特徴とする請求項1〜4のいずれか1に記載の決済用融資システム。
When the customer who is subject to credit review is a regular member other than the specific member, the credit credit review means determines whether the latest credit ceiling newly set by the credit and the credit ceiling before the credit A first on-going credit screening means for determining a difference as the additional loanable amount;
If the customer subject to review of the above credit is the specific member, the latest available limit determined by the amount less than the latest loan limit newly set by the mid credit and the availability before the mid credit 5. The settlement financing system according to claim 1, further comprising a second credit examination unit that calculates a difference from a limit amount as the additional loanable amount.
前記第2の途上与信審査手段は、決済対象項目が公共料金であるか否かにより、追加融資可能額の算出基準を異ならせることを特徴とする請求項5記載の決済用融資システム。   6. The settlement loan system according to claim 5, wherein the second on-the-shelf credit examination unit varies a calculation criterion for an additional loan possible amount depending on whether or not the settlement target item is a public charge. 決済対象項目が公共料金である場合に、前記第2の途上与信審査手段により得られた最新の利用可能限度額を次回以降の利用可能限度額として前記顧客データベースの顧客情報を更新し、決済対象項目が公共料金以外である場合に、前記第2の途上与信審査手段により得られた最新の利用可能限度額と前回までの利用可能限度額とのうち、いずれか低い方を次回以降の利用可能限度額として前記顧客データベースの顧客情報を更新する顧客情報更新手段を有することを特徴とする請求項5又は6記載の決済用融資システム。   When the payment target item is a public charge, the customer information in the customer database is updated with the latest available limit obtained by the second developing credit examination means as the next available limit, and the payment target When the item is other than the utility bill, the lower of the latest available limit obtained by the second credit review means and the previous available limit can be used from the next time 7. The settlement loan system according to claim 5, further comprising customer information updating means for updating customer information in the customer database as a limit amount. 顧客の決済用の口座を有する金融機関の管理コンピュータと通信回線を介して接続された決済用融資システムに導入されるコンピュータプログラムであって、
前記金融機関の管理コンピュータから前記決済用口座の残高不足情報を受信する情報送受信手段と、
前記情報送受信手段により、残高不足情報を受信した場合に、顧客データベースにアクセスし、少なくとも貸付上限額と利用可能額を含む顧客情報を照会する顧客情報照会手段と、
前記顧客情報照会手段により得られた利用可能額と、前記情報送受信手段により受信した前記残高不足情報に含まれる不足額とを比較する第1の不足額比較手段と、
前記第1の不足額比較手段により、利用可能額が不足額未満と判定された場合に、前記顧客の現時点における最新の顧客情報を用いた途上与信を審査して追加融資可能額を求める途上与信審査手段と、
前記途上与信審査手段により得られる追加融資可能額を含めた最新の利用可能額と前記不足額とを比較する第2の不足額比較手段と、
前記第1の不足額比較手段において利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合、又は、前記第2の不足額比較手段において最新の利用可能額が不足額以上と判定された場合に、少なくとも前記不足額に相当する金額を前記顧客の口座に充当する処理を行う不足額充当処理手段と
を備えることを特徴とするコンピュータプログラム。
A computer program installed in a settlement financing system connected via a communication line to a management computer of a financial institution having a customer settlement account,
Information transmitting / receiving means for receiving balance shortage information of the settlement account from a management computer of the financial institution;
When the information transmission / reception means receives balance shortage information, the customer information reference means for accessing the customer database and inquiring customer information including at least a loan upper limit and an available amount;
A first deficient amount comparing means for comparing the available amount obtained by the customer information inquiry means with a deficient amount included in the balance shortage information received by the information transmitting / receiving means;
In the case where the first shortage amount comparison unit determines that the available amount is less than the shortage amount, the halfway credit using the latest customer information of the customer at the present time is examined to obtain an additional loanable amount. Screening means,
A second shortage amount comparing means for comparing the shortage amount with the latest available amount including the additional loan possible amount obtained by the developing credit examination means;
At least when the first available amount comparison means determines that the available amount is equal to or greater than the insufficient amount, or when the second available amount comparison means determines that the latest available amount is equal to or greater than the insufficient amount, at least A computer program comprising: a deficiency appropriation processing means for performing a process of appropriating an amount corresponding to the deficit amount to the account of the customer.
前記顧客データベースには、顧客情報として融資履歴が記録されており、
前記途上与信審査手段は、前記融資履歴を含む顧客情報を参照して途上与信の審査を実行する構成であることを特徴とする請求項8記載のコンピュータプログラム。
In the customer database, a loan history is recorded as customer information,
9. The computer program according to claim 8, wherein the halfway credit examination unit is configured to perform halfway credit examination with reference to customer information including the loan history.
前記顧客が特定会員の場合には、前記顧客データベースに記録される顧客情報として、前記貸付上限額未満の金額で決定される利用可能限度額が設定されており、
前記第1の不足額比較手段は、前記顧客が前記特定会員以外の通常会員の場合、前記貸付上限額と既融資額との差額を前記利用可能額として不足額と比較し、
前記顧客が前記特定会員の場合、前記利用可能限度額と既融資額との差額を前記利用可能額として不足額と比較する手段であることを特徴とする請求項8又は9記載のコンピュータプログラム。
When the customer is a specific member, as customer information recorded in the customer database, an available limit determined by an amount less than the loan upper limit is set,
When the customer is a normal member other than the specific member, the first shortage comparison means compares the difference between the loan upper limit and the existing loan amount as the available amount with the shortage amount,
10. The computer program according to claim 8, wherein when the customer is the specific member, the computer program is a means for comparing a difference between the available limit amount and the existing loan amount as the available amount with a shortage amount.
前記途上与信審査手段は、途上与信の審査対象である顧客が、前記特定会員以外の通常会員の場合、途上与信によって新たに設定される最新の貸付上限額と途上与信前の貸付上限額との差額を前記追加融資可能額として求める第1の途上与信審査手段と、
前記途上与信の審査対象である顧客が、前記特定会員の場合、途上与信によって新たに設定される最新の貸付上限額未満の金額で決定される最新の利用可能限度額と途上与信前の利用可能限度額との差額を前記追加融資可能額として求める第2の途上与信審査手段と
を備えることを特徴とする請求項8〜10のいずれか1に記載のコンピュータプログラム。
When the customer who is subject to credit review is a regular member other than the specific member, the credit credit review means determines whether the latest credit ceiling newly set by the credit and the credit ceiling before the credit A first on-going credit screening means for determining a difference as the additional loanable amount;
If the customer subject to review of the above credit is the specific member, the latest available limit determined by the amount less than the latest loan limit newly set by the mid credit and the availability before the mid credit The computer program according to any one of claims 8 to 10, further comprising a second on-going credit examination unit that obtains a difference from a limit amount as the additional loanable amount.
前記第2の途上与信審査手段は、決済対象項目が公共料金であるか否かにより、追加融資可能額の算出基準を異ならせることを特徴とする請求項11記載のコンピュータプログラム。   12. The computer program according to claim 11, wherein the second mid-course credit examination unit varies a calculation criterion for an additional loan possible amount depending on whether or not the item to be settled is a public bill. 決済対象項目が公共料金である場合に、前記第2の途上与信審査手段により得られた最新の利用可能限度額を次回以降の利用可能限度額として前記顧客データベースの顧客情報を更新し、決済対象項目が公共料金以外である場合に、前記第2の途上与信審査手段により得られた最新の利用可能限度額と前回までの利用可能限度額とのうち、いずれか低い方を次回以降の利用可能限度額として前記顧客データベースの顧客情報を更新する顧客情報更新手段を有することを特徴とする請求項11又は12記載のコンピュータプログラム。   When the payment target item is a public charge, the customer information in the customer database is updated with the latest available limit obtained by the second developing credit examination means as the next available limit, and the payment target When the item is other than the utility bill, the lower of the latest available limit obtained by the second credit review means and the previous available limit can be used from the next time 13. The computer program according to claim 11, further comprising customer information updating means for updating customer information in the customer database as a limit amount.
JP2008147505A 2008-06-04 2008-06-04 Financing system for settlement and computer program Pending JP2009294884A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008147505A JP2009294884A (en) 2008-06-04 2008-06-04 Financing system for settlement and computer program

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008147505A JP2009294884A (en) 2008-06-04 2008-06-04 Financing system for settlement and computer program

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009294884A true JP2009294884A (en) 2009-12-17

Family

ID=41543021

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008147505A Pending JP2009294884A (en) 2008-06-04 2008-06-04 Financing system for settlement and computer program

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2009294884A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2015087947A (en) * 2013-10-30 2015-05-07 三井住友カード株式会社 Method and device for scheduling money transfer
JP2015228120A (en) * 2014-05-30 2015-12-17 株式会社三井住友銀行 Electronic recording credit occurrence management system and method
KR20160072655A (en) * 2014-12-15 2016-06-23 주식회사 핑거 System and method for managing loan based on sale credit
JP2020102013A (en) * 2018-12-21 2020-07-02 株式会社メルカリ Method for processing information, program, and information processor
JP2020205085A (en) * 2020-09-03 2020-12-24 アルトア株式会社 Account management apparatus and program

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2015087947A (en) * 2013-10-30 2015-05-07 三井住友カード株式会社 Method and device for scheduling money transfer
JP2015228120A (en) * 2014-05-30 2015-12-17 株式会社三井住友銀行 Electronic recording credit occurrence management system and method
KR20160072655A (en) * 2014-12-15 2016-06-23 주식회사 핑거 System and method for managing loan based on sale credit
KR101666084B1 (en) * 2014-12-15 2016-10-13 주식회사 핑거 System and method for managing loan based on sale credit
JP2020102013A (en) * 2018-12-21 2020-07-02 株式会社メルカリ Method for processing information, program, and information processor
JP7156934B2 (en) 2018-12-21 2022-10-19 株式会社メルカリ Information processing method, program and information processing device
JP2020205085A (en) * 2020-09-03 2020-12-24 アルトア株式会社 Account management apparatus and program
JP7049417B2 (en) 2020-09-03 2022-04-06 アルトア株式会社 Account management equipment and programs

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2005100968C4 (en) Process, system, software arrangement and storage medium which is capable of providing various financing options
WO2017204310A1 (en) Fractional funds transfer/accumulation system, program, and method
US20140316965A1 (en) Method and System for Managing Sovereign/Non-Sovereign Dual Debit Accounts
JP4414572B2 (en) Securities trading system and trading method
Argent et al. The regulation of mobile money in Rwanda
JP2009294884A (en) Financing system for settlement and computer program
JP2015524125A (en) Collateral transaction service method
JP2018106242A (en) Debiting apparatus
JP5103488B2 (en) Securities trading system and method, and program
JP2009075925A (en) Salary payment management server and computer program
JP6231652B1 (en) Savings and investment systems, methods, and programs
JP7045259B2 (en) Payment management system and payment management method
JP5421017B2 (en) Information processing apparatus and information processing method
JP2005174362A (en) Risk evaluation method
US20070203829A1 (en) System and methods for transmitting funds and instituting loans
JP7061992B2 (en) Asset management systems and programs
JP2006031589A (en) Securities sales transaction system, method therefor and program
CN112132688A (en) Capital processing method, device and equipment
JP5979800B1 (en) Financial product trading order system and program
KR20180043767A (en) System and method for loan managing connected with user&#39;s deposit
JP2019220103A (en) Financing system, program, information processing method, and server device
JP2005056095A (en) System which processes execution of right of stock option, and method
JP7029560B2 (en) Credit management device and credit management method
Svetiev et al. Financialization and Sustainable Credit: Lessons from Non-Intermediated Transactions?
KR20170097429A (en) System and method for loan managing connected with user&#39;s deposit