JP2009241650A - Security consciousness evaluation system - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a security consciousness evaluation system, adequately evaluating the level of the security consciousness of a user of a vehicle. <P>SOLUTION: The security consciousness evaluation system has: a determination means for determining whether the vehicle is set in a security state higher than the predetermined reference level when one parking is defined from the time of completion of the vehicle traveling state to the starting time of the next traveling state via an OFF state of a power source of the vehicle, and a state in which any operation by the user is not performed at all continuously for the predetermined time after one operation is performed by the user during one parking is detected; and an index value calculating means for increasing the index value indicating the level of the security consciousness of a user when the determination means determines that the vehicle is set to a security state higher than the predetermined reference. The index value calculating means determines the increase of the index value in a range not exceeding the predetermined upper limit value when the determination means determines a plurality of times during one parking that the vehicle is set in a security state higher than the predetermined reference. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a security awareness evaluation system for evaluating the height of security awareness of a vehicle user.

Conventionally, paying attention to the fact that there is a regional difference in the probability of theft of the vehicle, based on the location information of the parked vehicle, determine the insurance premium rate for insurance payment for theft of the vehicle Thus, an insurance system is known in which the insurance premium is set to a reasonable amount corresponding to the risk of theft (see, for example, Patent Document 1).
JP 2005-100212 A

  By the way, giving a privilege (for example, setting the insurance premium as described above) according to the height of security awareness of the user of the vehicle increases the security awareness of the user and makes it difficult for the vehicle to be stolen. It is useful because it contributes.

  Here, as a method of evaluating the height of security awareness of the vehicle user, the user should have high security awareness, for example, locking all doors or closing all door windows. It is conceivable that a point serving as an index value indicating the height of security consciousness is given to the user when a predetermined operation that is prominent is performed. However, although such a method can evaluate the height of security awareness of the user in a simple manner, points may be excessively given one after another by the user repeatedly performing a predetermined operation.

  Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a security awareness evaluation system that can appropriately evaluate the height of security awareness of a vehicle user.

In order to achieve the above object, the security consciousness evaluation system according to the first aspect of the present invention provides a single parking from the end of the travel state of the vehicle to the start of the next travel state via the power-off state of the vehicle. When defined, when a state in which no operation is performed by the user for a certain period of time after a certain operation is performed by the user during one parking is detected, the vehicle enters a high security state that exceeds a predetermined standard. A determination means for determining whether or not it is set;
When it is determined by the determination means that the vehicle is set in a high security state that is equal to or higher than a predetermined standard, an index value calculation means that increases an index value indicating the height of security awareness of the user,
The index value calculation means exceeds a predetermined upper limit value when the determination means determines that the vehicle is set in a high security state equal to or higher than a predetermined standard a plurality of times during one parking. The increase amount of the index value is determined in a range that does not exist.

The second invention is the security awareness evaluation system according to the first invention.
The index value calculation means is only once when it is determined by the determination means that the vehicle is set in a high security state equal to or higher than a predetermined standard continuously twice during one parking. The index value is increased by the same increase amount as that when the same determination is made.

3rd invention is the above-mentioned security consciousness evaluation system comprised by the onboard equipment and the center server which can perform two-way wireless communication with the onboard equipment,
The determination means is realized by the vehicle-mounted device,
The index value calculation unit is realized by the center server that receives a determination result of the determination unit from the vehicle-mounted device.

  ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the security consciousness evaluation system which can evaluate appropriately the height of the security consciousness of the user of a vehicle is obtained.

  The best mode for carrying out the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram showing a main configuration of an embodiment of a security awareness evaluation system 10 according to the present invention. The security consciousness evaluation system 10 of this embodiment is a business managed by an in-vehicle device 201 mounted on a vehicle, a center server 301 disposed in a center, and an affiliated service provider that provides various services to users. A user terminal 401. A plurality of business operator terminals 401 may be provided for each affiliated service business operator. The center server 301 may be composed of a plurality of servers, but in this case also, the center server 301 functions as one center server 301 in cooperation with each other.

  The affiliated service provider includes a store 501 as shown in FIG. The store 501 can take various forms depending on the service provided by the corresponding partner service provider. For example, in the case where the partner service provider is a provider that provides food and drink, the store 501 is provided in which the user directly enters and exits.

  In the example illustrated in FIG. 1, the vehicle-mounted device 201 and the operator terminal 401 are configured to be able to communicate via the center server 301. In addition, the user can perform communication necessary for exchanging various types of information with the center server 301 or the operator terminal 401 via the mobile phone 601 owned by the user.

  The vehicle-mounted device 201 may be embodied as a body ECU or an immobilizer ECU, for example. The in-vehicle device 201 includes a microcomputer including a CPU, a ROM, a RAM, and the like that are connected to each other via a bus (not shown) and a communication module.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the in-vehicle device 201 includes a communication unit 204, a parking determination unit 206, an anti-theft determination unit 208, and an in-vehicle sensor 210. The in-vehicle sensor 210 is a sensor or switch mounted on the vehicle, and may include a plurality of sensors capable of acquiring various information described below. The in-vehicle sensor 210 includes a type of sensor that acquires information that directly or indirectly indicates whether the user has performed an operation with security in mind on the vehicle. This type of vehicle-mounted sensor 210 is typically a sensor that detects a locked / unlocked state of a door lock, a sensor that detects an open / closed state of a door, a sensor that detects a fully closed state of a window glass, or the like. The function of each part 204,206,208 of the onboard equipment 201 is mentioned later.

  The center server 301 includes a network gateway 302, a point database 303, and an information management unit 305 as shown in FIG.

  The business entity terminal 401 includes a service use processing unit 402 and a point setting unit 403.

  In the following, first, the configuration on the vehicle side will be described.

  FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the anti-theft determination process executed by the anti-theft determination unit 208 of the vehicle-mounted device 201. The anti-theft determination processing routine shown in FIG. 2 is started when the anti-theft determination processing is reset in the parking determination processing shown in FIG. 3 described later (that is, when parking start described later is detected).

  In step 100, based on the information from the vehicle-mounted sensor 210, it is determined whether the user's operation on the vehicle has been continuously performed for a certain period of time. The fixed time is an appropriate time necessary and sufficient for accurately determining whether the user has left the vehicle with the intention of parking, and may be, for example, 5 minutes. The operation to be detected is arbitrary and may be plural. The operations to be detected are typically all operations that can be detected. If the user's operation on the vehicle has not been performed for a certain period of time, it is determined that the user's leaving action has been detected, and the process proceeds to step 102. Otherwise, the process returns to step 100.

  In step 102, the vehicle state is confirmed based on the information from the in-vehicle sensor 210. The vehicle state to be checked is a vehicle state related to security. The vehicle state to be checked is typically a door lock state, a door glass open / close state, or an on / off state of the security system in the case of a vehicle equipped with a security system.

  In step 104, as a result of the confirmation in step 102, it is determined whether or not the vehicle state is a predetermined security state, that is, whether or not the vehicle state is a result of an operation conscious of theft prevention. For example, when the vehicle state to be confirmed in step 102 is a door lock state, a door glass opening / closing state, and a security system on / off state, the door locks of all doors are in a locked state, When the door glass of all the doors is in a fully closed state and the security system is in an on state, it may be determined that the vehicle state is a predetermined security state. On the other hand, if at least one of the door lock of all doors is locked, the door glass of all doors is fully closed, and the security system is on is not satisfied, It may be determined that the vehicle state is not a predetermined security state. When it is determined that the vehicle state is the predetermined security state, the process proceeds to step 106, and when it is determined that the vehicle state is not the predetermined security state, the process proceeds to step 108.

  In step 106, information indicating that the vehicle state is set to a security state equal to or higher than a predetermined standard (here, referred to as a security OK signal) is transmitted to the center server 301 via the communication unit 204. As will be described later, the security OK signal is used for evaluation of security awareness and contributes to an increase in points representing the height of security awareness of the user.

  In step 108, information indicating that the vehicle state is not set to a security state equal to or higher than a predetermined standard (here, referred to as a security NG signal) is transmitted to the center server 301 via the communication unit 204. As will be described later, the security NG signal is used for evaluation of security awareness, and contributes in the negative direction to an increase in points representing the height of security awareness of the user.

  In step 110, based on the information from the in-vehicle sensor 210, it is determined whether or not any operation on the vehicle by the user has been performed. The operation to be detected is arbitrary, but may be the same as all detectable operations similar to step 100 above. If any operation is performed on the vehicle by the user, the process proceeds to step 112. On the other hand, if any operation on the vehicle by the user is not performed, the process returns to step 110.

  In step 112, based on the information from the in-vehicle sensor 210, it is determined whether or not an operation on the vehicle by the user has been continuously performed for a predetermined time. This determination method may be the same as in step 100 above. If the user's operation on the vehicle has not been performed for a certain period of time, it is determined that a new leaving action of the user has been detected, and the process proceeds to step 114. Otherwise, the process returns to step 112. .

  In step 114, the vehicle state is confirmed based on the information from the in-vehicle sensor 210. This confirmation process may be the same as in step 102 described above.

  In step 116, as a result of the confirmation in step 114, it is determined whether or not the vehicle state confirmed this time matches the vehicle state confirmed last time. Note that the previously confirmed vehicle state includes the vehicle state confirmed in step 102. If the process in step 114 is performed twice or more thereafter, the previous vehicle state confirmed in step 114 will be described. It becomes a vehicle state. When the vehicle state confirmed this time matches the vehicle state confirmed last time, the process returns to step 110. On the other hand, when the vehicle state confirmed this time does not match the vehicle state confirmed last time, the process returns to step 104.

  Here, the vehicle state that is the predetermined security state has been confirmed last time, and if the vehicle state that is the predetermined security state is also confirmed this time, the process returns to step 110. Therefore, in such a case, since the process does not return to step 104, the security OK signal is not transmitted to the center server 301 again. This prevents points described later from being excessively added due to repeated operations by the user. In addition, the vehicle state that is not in the predetermined security state has been confirmed last time, and if the vehicle state that is not in the predetermined security state is also confirmed this time, the process returns to step 110. Therefore, in such a case, the security NG signal is not transmitted to the center server 301 again.

  On the other hand, the vehicle state that is the predetermined security state was confirmed last time. If the vehicle state that is not the predetermined security state is confirmed this time, the process returns to step 104. In such a case, a security NG signal is transmitted to the center server 301. As a result, for example, an action with a low security awareness such as when the user returns to the vehicle to pick up something left behind but forgets to lock it can be reflected as a negative factor when evaluating security awareness. In addition, the vehicle state that is not the predetermined security state was confirmed last time, but if the vehicle state that is the predetermined security state is confirmed this time, the process returns to step 104. In such a case, a security OK signal is transmitted to the center server 301. As a result, for example, an action with a high security awareness such that the user locks after noticing that the user forgets to lock can be reflected as a positive factor when evaluating security awareness.

  FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the parking determination process executed by the parking determination unit 206 of the vehicle-mounted device 201.

  In step 150, for example, based on information from the IG switch or the power supply ECU or the vehicle speed sensor, it is determined whether or not the IG power supply is turned on and the vehicle is in a running state. The determination as to whether or not the vehicle is in a traveling state is realized based on the vehicle speed information. For example, when the vehicle speed becomes a predetermined value (for example, 20 km / h) or more, it is determined that the vehicle is in a traveling state. It is good. The vehicle speed information may be acquired from a wheel speed sensor or may be acquired from a GPS receiver. If it is determined that the IG power source is turned on and the vehicle is in a traveling state, the process proceeds to step 152. If at least one of the conditions is not satisfied, the process returns to step 150.

  In step 152, information indicating that parking has ended (here, referred to as a parking end signal) is transmitted to the center server 301 via the communication unit 204. The parking end signal is used to determine the end point of one parking on the center server 301 side. At this time, the anti-theft determination process shown in FIG. 2 may be ended with the generation of the parking end signal.

  In step 154, for example, based on information from the IG switch or the power supply ECU, it is determined whether or not the IG power supply has been turned off. If the IG power source is turned off, the process proceeds to step 156. If the IG power source is on, the process returns to step 154.

  In step 156, information indicating that parking has started (here, referred to as a parking start signal) is transmitted to the center server 301 via the communication unit 204, and the process proceeds to step 158. The parking start signal is used for determining the start time of one parking on the center server 301 side.

  In step 158, the antitheft determination process shown in FIG. 2 is reset, and the antitheft determination process shown in FIG. 2 is started again from the beginning.

  In the process shown in FIG. 3, when the IG power source is turned on and the vehicle is in a running state, it is determined that parking has ended, so when the IG power source is simply turned on and the vehicle is not running. Is not determined to have been parked. Therefore, for example, if the user simply turns on the IG power supply in order to close the window, it is not determined that the parking has ended, thereby preventing excessive points given later.

  Next, the configuration on the center side will be described.

  FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an example of the point grant process (security awareness indexing process) executed by the information management unit 305 of the center server 301.

  In step 200, it is determined whether or not a parking start signal (see step 156 in FIG. 3) is received from the vehicle-mounted device 201. If a parking start signal is received, the process proceeds to step 202. If a parking start signal is not received, the process returns to step 200.

  In step 202, it is determined whether or not a security OK signal (see step 106 in FIG. 2) is received from the vehicle-mounted device 201. If the security OK signal has been received, the process proceeds to step 204. If the security OK signal has not been received, step 204 is skipped and the process proceeds to step 206.

  In step 204, the security OK counter is incremented by 1, and the process proceeds to step 206. The initial value of the security OK counter is zero, and the significance of the security OK counter will be described later.

  In step 206, it is determined whether or not a security NG signal (see step 108 in FIG. 2) from the vehicle-mounted device 201 has been received. If a security NG signal is received, the process proceeds to step 208. If a security NG signal is not received, step 208 is skipped and the process proceeds to step 210.

  In step 208, the security NG counter is incremented by 1, and the process proceeds to step 210. The initial value of the security NG counter is zero, and the significance of the security NG counter will be described later.

  In step 210, it is determined whether a parking end signal (see step 152 in FIG. 3) is received from the vehicle-mounted device 201. If the parking end signal is received, the process proceeds to step 212. If the parking end signal is not received, the process returns to step 202. In this manner, when the parking start signal is received, the values of the security OK counter and the security NG counter are changed according to the reception status of the security OK signal and the security NG signal during the period until the parking end signal is received. The

  In step 212, a point determination regarding a point representing the height of security awareness of the user is performed. That is, the point addition amount ΔP is determined based on the values of the security OK counter and the security NG counter. At this time, an upper limit value T is set for the point addition amount ΔP per one point determination. In this example, the upper limit value T = 1 is taken as an example. For example, the point addition amount ΔP = (security OK counter) / (security OK counter + security NG counter). Therefore, for example, when the security OK counter = 1 and the security NG counter = 0, that is, when the security OK signal is received only once, one point is added with the point addition amount ΔP = 1. When the security OK counter = 1 and the security NG counter = 1, that is, when the security OK signal and the security NG signal are received only once, 0.5 points are added with the point addition amount ΔP = 0.5. Will be. When the security OK counter = 0 and the security NG counter = 1, that is, when the security NG signal is received only once and the security OK signal is not received, the point addition is performed with the point addition amount ΔP = 0. It will not be broken.

  When the point addition amount ΔP is determined in this way, the points in the point database 303 are updated. That is, the addition amount ΔP is added to the current point of the user in the point database 303, and the number of points of the user is updated. Note that the user identification may be realized using a user ID included in a signal at the time of communication. In the point database 303, as schematically shown in FIG. 5, data indicating the current point situation is stored for each user. In the example shown in FIG. 5, only four users are representatively shown, but actually, data of a large number of users is stored. In the example shown in FIG. 5, the data in the point database 303 includes the current total number of points. The total number of points in the point database 303 may be periodically transmitted to each user, or may be supplied in response to a request from the user (for example, a request from the mobile phone 601). Thus, each user can know the current total number of points at regular or desired times.

  In step 214, the security OK counter is cleared (initialized), and the process proceeds to step 216.

  In step 216, the security NG counter is cleared (initialized), and the process returns to step 200.

  As described above, according to the process shown in FIG. 4, the period from the reception of the parking start signal to the reception of the parking end signal is set as one parking, and the security OK signal is received a plurality of times during one parking. Even in the case that the point is added, the points are not added exceeding the upper limit T of the point addition amount ΔP per parking. That is, according to the process shown in FIG. 4, unless the vehicle is driven once, for example, even if the door lock operation is repeatedly performed, points are not added exceeding the upper limit value T. Thereby, it is possible to prevent the points from being excessively added during one parking, and to determine the point addition amount that appropriately indicates the user's security awareness.

  Next, the configuration will be explained to the partner service provider side. Hereinafter, the configuration related to one affiliated service provider A will be described, but the configuration related to other affiliated service providers may be the same. Here, it is assumed that partner service provider A is a provider that provides service A1 and service A2. The service includes providing the service itself at a lower price (including free of charge) than usual, or adding a higher added value to the service than usual. For example, when the partner service provider A is a provider of a rental car service, the service A1 may be a service for upgrading the type of vehicle used, and the service A2 may be a service for extending usage time.

  The point setting unit 403 determines and sets the number of points necessary for using the services A1 and A2. The number of points required to use the services A1 and A2 depends on the characteristics or features of the services A1 and A2, but may vary from day to day, such as exchange rates, or a fixed value that does not vary for a certain period of time. It may be. Information on the number of points required to use the services A1 and A2 and information on the contents of the service itself can be viewed on an information sheet or Internet web page sent to the user at the time of change or periodically. Alternatively, it may be transmitted to the vehicle-mounted device 201 together with the advertisement information and presented to the user.

  When the service usage processing unit 402 receives a request from the user to use the service A1, for example, the service usage processing unit 402 inquires of the information management unit 305 of the center server 301 about the current total point number of the user. In response to this, the information management unit 305 of the center server 301 extracts the total number of points of the user from the data stored in the point database 303 and supplies it to the service use processing unit 402. If the number of points necessary for using the service A1 is within the range of the total number of points of the user, the service use processing unit 402 sends an approval message via the center server 301 or directly. Call 201. At the same time, the service use processing unit 402 notifies the store 501 under the control of the user to use the service A1 as necessary.

  When a service contract is established (an acceptance message is transmitted), the service use processing unit 402 transmits the number of points to be subtracted by providing the service to the center server 301. In response to this, the information management unit 305 of the center server 301 subtracts the number of points consumed by using the service from the total number of points of the user in the point database 303. Note that the subtraction of the actual total number of points may be realized when the service is actually used.

  According to the security consciousness evaluation system 10 of the present embodiment described above, the following excellent effects are achieved, among others.

  As described above, in this embodiment, the determination as to whether or not the user has performed an operation conscious of security is performed by the user after some operation (including the operation at the time of getting off at the start of parking) as described above. This is performed when it is detected that the operation on the vehicle is not continuously performed for a certain period of time. Therefore, for example, the operation of the parked user is also considered in comparison with the case where it is determined whether or not the user has performed an operation conscious of security only from the vehicle state immediately after getting off the vehicle or the vehicle state immediately before getting on the vehicle. Therefore, it is possible to accurately evaluate the user's security awareness. On the other hand, considering the user's operation during parking, on the other hand, security consciousness is overestimated for the same operation during parking (for example, repeated door lock and unlock operations). However, according to the present embodiment, as described above, an upper limit value is set for the points to be given for each parking, and a plurality of operations (security consciousness) are performed during the one parking. The operation to represent is comprehensively determined and the points to be given for each parking are determined, so that the inconveniences as described above can be avoided. Further, in this embodiment, by accurately evaluating the user's security awareness, the user's security awareness can be stimulated and increased, and theft can be reduced.

  The preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above. However, the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and various modifications and substitutions can be made to the above-described embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention. Can be added.

  For example, in the above-described embodiment, part or all of the functions of the center server 301 may be realized by the vehicle-mounted device 201. For example, the process illustrated in FIG. 4 may be realized by the vehicle-mounted device 201. In this case, from the generation of the parking start signal to the generation of the parking end signal is regarded as one parking, and the point addition amount ΔP per one parking is similarly calculated on the vehicle-mounted device 201 side. In this case, the vehicle-mounted device 201 notifies the calculated point addition amount ΔP to the center server 301 side, whereby the number of points stored in the point database 303 of the center server 301 is updated.

  Moreover, in the above-mentioned Example, it is set as one parking until it receives a parking end signal after receiving a parking start signal (that is, it is 1 from the time when IG is turned off until the vehicle enters the next running state). However, it is also possible to make a single parking from when the IG is turned off and the door is opened and closed (which may be accompanied by a door lock when the vehicle is closed) until the vehicle enters the next running state. Also in this case, when the IG is turned off and the door is opened and closed, a parking start signal is generated, and the antitheft determination process of FIG. 2 may be reset.

  In the above-described embodiment, the on / off state of the IG power source is used for parking determination. However, the on / off state of a predetermined device (for example, engine) generated in conjunction with the on / off state of the IG power source is determined for parking. You may use it. In addition, when the concept of IG power supply does not exist, such as in the case of an electric vehicle, the IG power supply may be replaced with the main power supply of the vehicle.

  In the above-described embodiment, the system is such that points are reduced by receiving services, but a system in which points are not reduced is also possible. For example, if a predetermined number of points or more are accumulated, a system in which a user is recognized as a user with high security awareness and can receive a specific service (for example, preferential treatment such as an insurance premium rate) is possible. A service that does not require the store 501 is also possible.

  In the above-described embodiment, the point addition amount ΔP = (security OK counter) / (security OK counter + security NG counter), but various other addition modes are possible. In short, as long as it is an aspect in which excessive points are not given per parking as described above. For example, the point addition amount ΔP = (security OK counter−security NG counter) / (security OK counter + security NG counter) may be used. Alternatively, when (security OK counter−security NG counter) ≧ 0, point addition amount ΔP = (security OK counter) / (security OK counter + security NG counter), and (security OK counter−security NG counter) < When 0, the point addition amount ΔP = (security OK counter−security NG counter) may be set.

  In the above-described embodiment, the parking end signal is generated and transmitted when the IG power source is turned on and the vehicle is in a running state, but the IG power source is turned on and the vehicle is A parking end signal may be generated and transmitted when the vehicle travels a predetermined distance or more. Whether the vehicle has traveled more than a predetermined distance may be determined based on information from a vehicle speed sensor or information from a GPS receiver.

  Further, in the above-described embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, after the vehicle state which is the predetermined security state is confirmed during one parking, there is an operation again, and the vehicle state which is the predetermined security state again. Is confirmed, the security OK signal is not transmitted again to the center server 301 to prevent excessive points from being added. However, the vehicle state that is in a predetermined security state during one parking. After the confirmation, the operation is performed again, and when the vehicle state that is the predetermined security state is confirmed again, the security OK signal may be transmitted to the center server 301 again. That is, step 116 in FIG. 2 may be eliminated, and the process from step 114 may be returned to step 104. In this case, the security OK signal is repeatedly sent to the center server 301 for repeated operations. However, as described above, the upper limit value of the number of points given per parking at the center server 301 side is set. By setting, excessive addition of points is prevented. Alternatively, when the security OK signal is continuously transmitted to the center server 301, it is possible to prevent excessive addition of points in the same manner by treating it as reception of one security OK signal.

1 is a system configuration diagram showing a main configuration of an embodiment of a security awareness evaluation system 10 according to the present invention. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an example of an anti-theft determination process executed by an anti-theft determination unit 208 of the in-vehicle device 201. 5 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a parking determination process executed by a parking determination unit 206 of the vehicle-mounted device 201. 7 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a point giving process executed by the information management unit 305 of the center server 301. It is a figure which shows an example of the data stored in the point database.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Security consciousness evaluation system 201 Onboard equipment 204 Communication part 206 Parking determination part 208 Anti-theft determination part 210 Car-mounted sensor 301 Center server 302 Network gateway 303 Point database 305 Information management part 401 Service provider terminal 402 Service use process part 403 Point setting part 501 Store 601 Mobile phone

Claims (3)

When a vehicle is defined as one parking from the end of the driving state to the start of the next driving state via the vehicle power off state, an operation is performed by the user during one parking. Determination means for determining whether or not the vehicle is set in a high security state equal to or higher than a predetermined reference when detecting a state in which no user operation is performed for a certain period of time from
When it is determined by the determination means that the vehicle is set in a high security state equal to or higher than a predetermined standard, the index value calculation means for increasing an index value indicating the height of security awareness of the user,
The index value calculation means exceeds a predetermined upper limit value when the determination means determines that the vehicle is set in a high security state equal to or higher than a predetermined standard a plurality of times during one parking. A security consciousness evaluation system, wherein an increase amount of the index value is determined within a range.   The index value calculation means is only once when it is determined by the determination means that the vehicle is set in a high security state equal to or higher than a predetermined standard continuously twice during one parking. The security consciousness evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the index value is increased by an increase amount similar to the case where the same determination is made. The security consciousness evaluation system according to claim 1 or 2, comprising a vehicle-mounted device and a center server capable of bidirectional wireless communication with the vehicle-mounted device,
The determination means is realized by the vehicle-mounted device,
The index value calculation unit is a security consciousness evaluation system realized by the center server that receives a determination result of the determination unit from the in-vehicle device.

Images