JP2009208095A - Aluminum alloy die-casting component - Google Patents
Aluminum alloy die-casting component Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2009208095A JP2009208095A JP2008051614A JP2008051614A JP2009208095A JP 2009208095 A JP2009208095 A JP 2009208095A JP 2008051614 A JP2008051614 A JP 2008051614A JP 2008051614 A JP2008051614 A JP 2008051614A JP 2009208095 A JP2009208095 A JP 2009208095A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- aluminum alloy
- casting
- alloy die
- die
- area ratio
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Abstract
Description
本発明は、車両操舵装置のコラムハウジング、ラックハウジング、ギヤハウジングとして好適なアルミニウム合金製ダイカスト鋳物部品に関する。 The present invention relates to an aluminum alloy die-casting part suitable for a column housing, a rack housing, and a gear housing of a vehicle steering apparatus.
アルミニウム合金鋳物部品は、形状精度が高く、安価であると言った理由から、輸送、電気、航空、建設などの幅広い分野で使用されている。
特に、省エネルギー化、低燃費化の観点から軽量化が求められている車両操舵装置では、部品の薄肉化および軽量化が可能であり、かつ形状が複雑であってもきれいな鋳肌を得られるなどの理由から、普通ダイカスト法でアルミニウム合金鋳物からなるコラムハウジングやラックハウジングを製造している。
Aluminum alloy casting parts are used in a wide range of fields such as transportation, electricity, aviation, and construction because of their high shape accuracy and low cost.
In particular, in a vehicle steering apparatus that is required to be light in terms of energy saving and low fuel consumption, it is possible to reduce the thickness and weight of parts and obtain a clean casting surface even if the shape is complicated. For this reason, column housings and rack housings made of aluminum alloy castings are manufactured by ordinary die casting.
普通ダイカスト法で製造されるアルミニウム合金鋳物部品(コラムハウジング、ラックハウジング、ギヤハウジング)は、アルミニウム合金溶湯を金型に高速で射出する方法なので、粗大α相、鋳巣欠陥といった鋳造欠陥の混入が避けられず、強度保証が困難である。
近年の車両操舵装置は、高トルク化、高出力化といった機能向上がなされ、従来よりも大きな荷重がアルミニウム合金鋳物部品(コラムハウジング、ラックハウジング、ギヤハウジング)に負荷されるようになってきており、アルミニウム合金鋳物部品には実体強度の高いものが要求されている。
Aluminum alloy casting parts (column housing, rack housing, gear housing) manufactured by ordinary die casting method are a method of injecting molten aluminum alloy into a mold at a high speed. Inevitable, it is difficult to guarantee strength.
In recent years, vehicle steering systems have been improved in function such as higher torque and higher output, and a larger load than before has been applied to cast aluminum alloy parts (column housing, rack housing, gear housing). The aluminum alloy casting parts are required to have high physical strength.
このような安定した強度のアルミニウム合金鋳物部品を得るには、強度に影響を及ぼす鋳造欠陥を制御する必要がある。現在、鋳造欠陥を減らす技術として、特殊ダイカスト法など、様々な要素技術が開発されているが、これらの技術は製造コストが高く、製品の形状が限られるなど様々な問題点がある。
アルミニウム合金鋳物部品の実体強度を把握するには、製造した部品の製品を用いて製品内部に混入されている鋳造欠陥の影響を含んだ強度を調査する必要がある。
In order to obtain such an aluminum alloy casting part having a stable strength, it is necessary to control casting defects affecting the strength. At present, various elemental technologies such as a special die casting method have been developed as techniques for reducing casting defects. However, these techniques have various problems such as high manufacturing costs and limited product shapes.
In order to grasp the actual strength of an aluminum alloy cast part, it is necessary to investigate the strength including the influence of casting defects mixed in the product using the product of the manufactured part.
例えば、普通ダイカスト法で製造されたアルミニウム合金鋳物部品は、鋳造欠陥(粗大α相、鋳巣欠陥)の面積率が10%以下では、強度への欠陥の影響が低いのでビッカース硬さと引張強度との間に相関が認められる。しかし、鋳造欠陥の面積率が10%を超えると、ビッカース硬さと引張強度と相関関係が成り立たない。
ここで、アルミニウム合金鋳物の機械的性質への鋳造欠陥の影響を評価する技術として、例えば特許文献1には、引け巣とガス欠陥を合わせた空孔の面積率及び空孔の円相当径を規定したものがある。
Here, as a technique for evaluating the influence of casting defects on the mechanical properties of aluminum alloy castings, for example, Patent Document 1 discloses the area ratio of holes combined with shrinkage cavities and gas defects and the equivalent circle diameter of the holes. There is what we have specified.
しかし、この特許文献1は、巣ができにくいアルミニウム合金鋳物を対象としており、アルミニウム合金溶湯を金型に高速で射出し、鋳造欠陥(粗大α相、鋳巣欠陥)が発生しやすい普通ダイカスト法で製造される車両操舵装置のコラムハウジング、ラックハウジング、ギヤハウジングに対して、同様の方法で機械的性質への鋳造欠陥の影響を評価することはできない。 However, this patent document 1 is directed to an aluminum alloy casting that is difficult to form a nest, and a normal die casting method in which a molten aluminum alloy is injected into a mold at a high speed and casting defects (coarse α phase, voids) are likely to occur. The influence of casting defects on the mechanical properties cannot be evaluated in the same way for column housings, rack housings and gear housings of vehicle steering systems manufactured in
本発明は上述した事情に鑑みてなされたものであり、その目的は、車両操舵装置のコラムハウジング、ラックハウジング、ギヤハウジングとして好適であり、製造コストの低減化を図ることができ、鋳造欠陥が生じていても高強度、高品質で製造することができるアルミニウム合金ダイカスト鋳物部品を提供することにある。 The present invention has been made in view of the above-described circumstances, and the object thereof is suitable as a column housing, a rack housing, and a gear housing of a vehicle steering apparatus, can reduce the manufacturing cost, and has a casting defect. An object of the present invention is to provide an aluminum alloy die cast part that can be produced with high strength and high quality even if it occurs.
そこで、本発明に係る請求項1記載のアルミニウム合金ダイカスト鋳物部品は、アルミニウム合金を材料として普通ダイカスト鋳造法により製造されるものであって、肉厚を5mm以下とした状態でロックウェル硬さをHRB50以上として製造したアルミニウム合金ダイカスト鋳物部品である。
また、請求項2記載の発明は、請求項1記載のアルミニウム合金ダイカスト鋳物部品において、基地組織の所定基準面積の等価円形内に存在する粗大α相の面積率が20%以下となるように製造したものである。
Accordingly, the aluminum alloy die cast part according to claim 1 of the present invention is manufactured by a normal die casting method using an aluminum alloy as a material, and has a Rockwell hardness of 5 mm or less. It is an aluminum alloy die-casting part manufactured as HRB50 or more.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the aluminum alloy die cast part according to the first aspect of the invention, the area ratio of the coarse α phase existing in an equivalent circle of a predetermined reference area of the base structure is 20% or less. It is a thing.
また、請求項3記載の発明は、請求項1又は2記載のアルミニウム合金ダイカスト鋳物部品において、基地組織に存在する鋳巣欠陥の引張軸方向への投影面積率が15%以下となるように製造したものである。
さらに、請求項4記載の発明は、請求項1乃至3の何れか1項に記載のアルミニウム合金ダイカスト鋳物部品において、前記アルミニウム合金は、JIS H5302のAl−Si−Cu系アルミニウム合金ADC12である。
According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the aluminum alloy die-cast casting part according to the first or second aspect of the present invention, the projected area ratio in the tensile axis direction of a casting hole defect existing in the base structure is 15% or less. It is a thing.
Furthermore, the invention according to claim 4 is the aluminum alloy die cast part according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the aluminum alloy is an Al-Si-Cu-based aluminum alloy ADC12 of JIS H5302.
さらにまた、請求項5記載の発明は、請求項1乃至4の何れか1項に記載のアルミニウム合金ダイカスト鋳物部品を、車両操舵装置のコラムハウジング、ラックハウジング、或いはギヤハウジングとして製造した。 Furthermore, in the invention according to claim 5, the aluminum alloy die-cast casting part according to any one of claims 1 to 4 is manufactured as a column housing, a rack housing, or a gear housing of a vehicle steering apparatus.
本発明に係るアルミニウム合金ダイカスト鋳物部品によると、普通ダイカスト鋳造法により製造されているので、薄肉化および軽量化が可能であり、形状が複雑であってもきれいな鋳肌を低コストで得ることができる。また、肉厚を5mm以下とした状態でロックウェル硬さをHRB50以上として製造したことから、鋳造欠陥が生じていても高強度を確保して製造することができる。 According to the aluminum alloy die casting part according to the present invention, since it is manufactured by a normal die casting method, it is possible to reduce the thickness and weight, and to obtain a clean casting surface at a low cost even if the shape is complicated. it can. In addition, since the Rockwell hardness is set to HRB50 or more in a state where the wall thickness is set to 5 mm or less, high strength can be ensured even if a casting defect occurs.
以下、本発明に係るアルミニウム合金ダイカスト鋳物部品(以下、ダイカスト鋳物部品)の特性について図面を参照して説明する。
本実施形態のダイカスト鋳物部品は、JIS H5302のAl−Si−Cu系アルミニウム合金ADC12を材料として普通ダイカスト鋳造法により製造されている。
また、本実施形態のダイカスト鋳物部品は、肉厚が5mm以下とした状態でロックウェル硬さ(HRB硬さ)が50以上となり、金属組織中に存在する粗大α相の面積率が20%以下であり、さらに、金属組織中に存在する鋳巣欠陥の引張軸方向への欠陥投影面積率が15%以下となるように製造されている。
Hereinafter, the characteristics of an aluminum alloy die cast part (hereinafter referred to as a die cast part) according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
The die-casting part of this embodiment is manufactured by a normal die-casting method using JIS H5302 Al—Si—Cu-based aluminum alloy ADC12 as a material.
In addition, the die cast part of the present embodiment has a Rockwell hardness (HRB hardness) of 50 or more with a wall thickness of 5 mm or less, and an area ratio of coarse α phase present in the metal structure is 20% or less. Furthermore, it is manufactured so that the defect projected area ratio in the direction of the tensile axis of the defect in the mold cavity existing in the metal structure is 15% or less.
ここで、前述した本実施形態のダイカスト鋳物部品の各数値の臨界的意義について説明する。
(1)肉厚が5mm以下として採取した試験片の表面及び内部のHRB硬さを50以上とする。
本発明者等は、ダイカスト鋳物部品の強度値の予測について鋭意研究を行った結果、ロックウェル硬さ(HRB硬さ)はビッカース硬さよりも荷重が大きいために塑性域が広く、HRB硬さで内部欠陥の影響も含んだ強度を正しく評価できることがわかった。
Here, the critical significance of each numerical value of the above-described die cast part of this embodiment will be described.
(1) The HRB hardness of the surface and the inside of the specimen collected with a wall thickness of 5 mm or less is 50 or more.
As a result of intensive studies on the prediction of the strength value of die cast parts, the present inventors have found that the Rockwell hardness (HRB hardness) is larger than the Vickers hardness, so the plastic range is wide, and the HRB hardness is It was found that the strength including the influence of internal defects can be correctly evaluated.
そこで、発明者等は、Al−Si−Cu系アルミニウム合金ADC12を普通ダイカスト鋳造法により製造し、図1に示す形状の試験片(全長L1:230mm、中央平行部の長さL2:60mm、標点距離L3:50.0±0.1mm、中央部平行幅w:6.4±0.1mm)を、肉厚tを変化させて16個作製し、各試験片について引張強度(破断強度)及びHRB硬さを測定した。 Therefore, the inventors manufactured an Al—Si—Cu-based aluminum alloy ADC12 by a normal die casting method, and formed a test piece having the shape shown in FIG. 1 (total length L1: 230 mm, central parallel portion length L2: 60 mm, standard 16 points having a distance L3 of 50.0 ± 0.1 mm and a parallel width w of the center portion of 6.4 ± 0.1 mm) with varying thickness t were prepared. Tensile strength (breaking strength) of each test piece And HRB hardness was measured.
各試験片の引張強度の測定は、各試験片をインストロン社製万能試験機にセットして引張強度試験をクロスヘッド移動速度:0.5mm/minの試験条件で行い、各試験片の歪みをビデオ伸び計で測定した。そして、試験片に負荷された引張応力とビデオ伸び計の測定値から応力−歪み曲線を作成し、得られた応力−歪み曲線から引張強度を求めた。また、各試験片のHRB硬さの測定は、引張強度試験後の試験片のつかみ部の部位で行った。 The tensile strength of each test piece is measured by setting each test piece on an universal testing machine manufactured by Instron and conducting a tensile strength test under the test condition of crosshead moving speed: 0.5 mm / min. Was measured with a video extensometer. And the stress-strain curve was created from the tensile stress applied to the test piece and the measured value of the video extensometer, and the tensile strength was obtained from the obtained stress-strain curve. Moreover, the measurement of the HRB hardness of each test piece was performed in the part of the grip part of the test piece after a tensile strength test.
表1には、各試験片のHRB硬さ及び引張強度を示し、図2には、HRB硬さ及び引張強度の相関関係を曲線で示した。 Table 1 shows the HRB hardness and tensile strength of each test piece, and FIG. 2 shows the correlation between the HRB hardness and tensile strength as a curve.
図2から明らかなように、試験片の肉厚が5mm以下の場合に、HRB硬さ及び引張強度の間に相関関係が確認され、HRB硬さが50以上としたときに、引張強度が250MPa以上を満足して優れた機械的性質を示す。 As is clear from FIG. 2, when the thickness of the test piece is 5 mm or less, a correlation is confirmed between the HRB hardness and the tensile strength. When the HRB hardness is 50 or more, the tensile strength is 250 MPa. It satisfies the above and exhibits excellent mechanical properties.
一方、試験片の肉厚が5mmを上回ると、HRB硬さ及び引張強度の間の相関関係がなくなる。これは、試験片の肉厚が増大すると、HRB硬さの塑性域には含まれない組織情報が発生するからである。また、試験片の肉厚が増大すると、アルミニウム合金溶湯の凝固時の冷却速度の低下を招き、引け巣が発生しやすくなり、あまり好ましい状態になるとはいえない。 On the other hand, when the thickness of the test piece exceeds 5 mm, there is no correlation between the HRB hardness and the tensile strength. This is because when the thickness of the test piece is increased, structure information not included in the HRB hardness plastic region is generated. Further, when the thickness of the test piece is increased, the cooling rate at the time of solidification of the molten aluminum alloy is reduced, and shrinkage cavities are likely to be generated, which is not preferable.
したがって、本実施形態のダイカスト鋳物部品は、肉厚が5mm以下とした状態でロックウェル硬さ(HRB硬さ)が50以上であると、鋳造欠陥が生じていても優れた機械的性質製造することができる。 Therefore, the die-cast casting part of the present embodiment is manufactured with excellent mechanical properties even when casting defects occur when the thickness is 5 mm or less and the Rockwell hardness (HRB hardness) is 50 or more. be able to.
(2)基地組織中に存在する粗大α相の面積率を20%以下とする。
また、本発明者等は、ダイカスト鋳物部品の強度低下の因子を検討した結果、基地組織中に存在する鋳巣欠陥が大きく強度に影響するという知見を得た。
(2) The area ratio of the coarse α phase existing in the base organization is 20% or less.
In addition, as a result of studying the factor of strength reduction of die cast parts, the present inventors have found that a casting hole defect existing in the base structure greatly affects the strength.
粗大α相とは、図3に示すように、共晶Si、基地α相、金属間化合物が存在する基地組織中に、純アルミニウムの組成に近いα相と呼ばれる組織がデンドライトアームの太い粗大な状態で散在する形態である。
粗大α相は、普通ダイカスト鋳造法でアルミニウム合金溶湯を金型内に射出する際に、スリーブ内に供給されたアルミニウム合金溶湯がスリーブ壁に熱を奪われて冷却されて凝固層として形成され、これがキャビティ内に流れて温度の高いアルミニウム合金溶湯に加熱されて粒成長したものであり、基地組織と比べて硬さが低く、鋳物全体に散在することでHRB硬さ、強度を減少させる。
As shown in FIG. 3, the coarse α phase is a matrix structure in which eutectic Si, a matrix α phase, and an intermetallic compound exist, and a structure called α phase close to the composition of pure aluminum is a thick and coarse dendrite arm. It is a form scattered in the state.
The coarse α phase is formed as a solidified layer by cooling the aluminum alloy molten metal supplied in the sleeve when the aluminum alloy molten metal is injected into the mold by a normal die casting method, This flows into the cavity and is heated by molten aluminum alloy having a high temperature to grow grains. The hardness is lower than that of the base structure, and the HRB hardness and strength are reduced by being scattered throughout the casting.
そこで、本実施形態は、図1に示した形状と同形状の試験片を13個作製し、引張強度試験後の試験片の中央平行部の断面組織観察による評価を行う。すなわち、図3に示すように、各試験片の断面組織に対して、2次元画像解析処理により所定基準面積の等価円形内に存在する粗大α相の面積率を測定した。より具体的には、日本ローパー社製の画像解析ソフトであるImage-Pro・Plusを使用して各試験片の断面組織の観察及び粗大α相の面積率を測定した。 Therefore, in the present embodiment, 13 test pieces having the same shape as that shown in FIG. 1 are produced, and evaluation is performed by observing the cross-sectional structure of the central parallel portion of the test piece after the tensile strength test. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, the area ratio of the coarse α phase existing in an equivalent circle having a predetermined reference area was measured by a two-dimensional image analysis process on the cross-sectional structure of each test piece. More specifically, the cross-sectional structure of each test piece was observed and the area ratio of the coarse α phase was measured using Image-Pro · Plus, an image analysis software manufactured by Nippon Roper.
表2には、各試験片の粗大α相の面積率及び引張強度を示し、図4には、粗大α相の面積率及び引張強度を曲線で示した。 Table 2 shows the area ratio and tensile strength of the coarse α phase of each test piece, and FIG. 4 shows the area ratio and tensile strength of the coarse α phase as curves.
表2及び図4から明らかなように、所定基準面積の等価円形内に存在する粗大α相の面積率が20%以下であれば、引張強度に大きな変化がないが、20%を超えると引張強度が低下することがわかる。なお、望ましくは粗大α相の面積率を15%以下とすると安定した引張強度が得られる。
したがって、本実施形態のダイカスト鋳物部品は、基地組織中の所定基準面積の等価円形内に存在する粗大α相の面積率が20%以下のときに、優れた機械的性質を示す。
As is apparent from Table 2 and FIG. 4, if the area ratio of the coarse α phase existing in the equivalent circle having a predetermined reference area is 20% or less, there is no significant change in tensile strength. It can be seen that the strength decreases. Desirably, when the area ratio of the coarse α phase is 15% or less, a stable tensile strength can be obtained.
Therefore, the die cast part of the present embodiment exhibits excellent mechanical properties when the area ratio of the coarse α phase existing in the equivalent circular shape having a predetermined reference area in the base structure is 20% or less.
(3)基地組織中に存在する鋳巣欠陥の引張軸方向への投影面積率を15%以下とする。
また、本発明者等は、基地組織中に存在する鋳巣欠陥が大きく強度に影響するという知見を得た。
(3) The projected area ratio in the direction of the tensile axis of the defect in the mold cavity existing in the base structure is set to 15% or less.
In addition, the present inventors have obtained the knowledge that the defects in the mold cavity existing in the base structure greatly affect the strength.
鋳巣欠陥は、ダイカスト鋳物部品の内部の空洞であり、金型のキャビティに充填されたアルミニウム合金溶湯が凝固時に体積収縮することによって発生する空孔の引け巣と、スリーブ内、或いは金型内の空気や、離型剤・潤滑剤がアルミニウム合金溶湯中に巻き込まれて発生する空孔としてのブローホールに分類される。この鋳巣欠陥が多くなると、ダイカスト鋳物部品の密度、比重が下がる。硬さと密度は一般的に相関があることが知られており、鋳巣欠陥が大きくなれば硬さ・強度は低下する。 The cavity defect is a cavity inside the die-cast part, and the cavity shrinkage generated by the volumetric shrinkage of the molten aluminum alloy filled in the mold cavity during solidification, in the sleeve, or in the mold. Air, release agents, and lubricants are categorized as blowholes as holes generated by the aluminum alloy melt. When the number of defects in the cast hole increases, the density and specific gravity of the die cast part are lowered. It is known that hardness and density are generally correlated with each other, and hardness / strength decreases as the defects in the casting hole increase.
そこで、図1に示した形状と同形状の試験片を13個作製し、引張強度試験前に、中央平行部の横断面CTスキャンを行い、図5に示すように、その横断面の陰影から画像解析ソフトにより基地組織中の所定基準面積に対する鋳巣欠陥の面積率を測定した。
表3には、各試験片の鋳巣欠陥の面積率及び引張強度を示し、図6には、鋳巣欠陥の面積率及び引張強度の相関関係を曲線で示した。
Therefore, 13 test pieces having the same shape as that shown in FIG. 1 were prepared, and before the tensile strength test, a cross-sectional CT scan of the central parallel portion was performed. As shown in FIG. Using the image analysis software, the area ratio of the defects in the mold cavity relative to the predetermined reference area in the base structure was measured.
Table 3 shows the area ratio and tensile strength of the defect in each test piece, and FIG. 6 shows the correlation between the area ratio of the defect and the tensile strength in a curve.
表3及び図6から明らかなように、鋳巣欠陥の面積率が15%以下であれば、引張強度に大きな変化がないが、15%を超えると引張強度が低下することがわかる。なお、望ましくは鋳巣欠陥の面積率を10%以下とすると安定した引張強度が得られる。 As is apparent from Table 3 and FIG. 6, it can be seen that if the area ratio of the casting defect is 15% or less, the tensile strength does not change greatly, but if it exceeds 15%, the tensile strength decreases. Desirably, a stable tensile strength can be obtained when the area ratio of the defect in the cast hole is 10% or less.
したがって、本実施形態のダイカスト鋳物部品は、基地組織中の所定基準面積に対する鋳巣欠陥の面積率(鋳巣欠陥の引張軸方向への投影面積率)が15%以下のときに、優れた機械的性質を示す。
[実施例]
発明の効果を確認するために、本発明者等は、JIS H5302のAl−Si−Cu系アルミニウム合金ADC12を用いて、図4に示す自動車操舵装置のコラムハウジング1を、普通ダイカスト鋳造法により複数個製造した。そして、図1と同形状の試験片を肉厚の異なる部分より切り出した。また、各試験片について、鋳造欠陥(粗大α相、鋳巣欠陥)と機械的性質(HRB硬さ、引張強度)の評価を行った。そして、表4には、上述した各試験片の鋳造欠陥と機械的性質を示し、図8には、各試験片のHRB硬さと引張強度の相関関係を示した。
Therefore, the die-cast casting part of this embodiment is an excellent machine when the area ratio of the casting hole defect to the predetermined reference area in the base structure (projected area ratio of the casting hole defect in the tensile axis direction) is 15% or less. The physical properties.
[Example]
In order to confirm the effect of the present invention, the present inventors use a JIS H5302 Al-Si-Cu-based aluminum alloy ADC12 to form a plurality of column housings 1 of the automobile steering system shown in FIG. Individually manufactured. And the test piece of the same shape as FIG. 1 was cut out from the part from which thickness differs. Moreover, about each test piece, the casting defect (coarse alpha phase, a casting hole defect) and mechanical properties (HRB hardness, tensile strength) were evaluated. Table 4 shows the casting defects and mechanical properties of each test piece described above, and FIG. 8 shows the correlation between the HRB hardness and tensile strength of each test piece.
なお、表4において、実施例1〜4及び比較例1〜4は、HRB硬さ及び引張強度に対する肉厚tへの影響を比べたものである。これによると、実施形態1,2及び比較例1,2とを比べて明らかなように、HRB硬さが50以上確保できていても、肉厚tが5mmを上回っている場合には、図8に示す正規のHRB硬さ及び引張強度の関係には合致せず、引張強度が低下してバラツキが大きくなる。 In Table 4, Examples 1 to 4 and Comparative Examples 1 to 4 compare effects on the wall thickness t with respect to HRB hardness and tensile strength. According to this, as is clear from the comparison between Embodiments 1 and 2 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2, even when the HRB hardness is 50 or more, the thickness t exceeds 5 mm. 8 does not match the relationship between the regular HRB hardness and the tensile strength shown in FIG. 8, and the tensile strength decreases and the variation increases.
また、実施形態3,4及び比較例3,4が示すように、肉厚tが5mm以下では正規のHRB硬さ及び引張強度の関係になり、HRB硬さを50以上にすると引張強度が向上する。比較例6,7が示すように、HRB硬さが50を下回ると引張強度が大きく低下する。
また、実施形態5,6及び比較例7,8を比べて明らかなように、粗大α相の面積率が20%を超えると引張強度が低下する。このとき、比較例7,8は、HRB硬さも影響を受けて低下する。そして、実施形態5,6が示すように、粗大α相の面積率が20%を下回ると引張強度が向上する。
In addition, as shown in Embodiments 3 and 4 and Comparative Examples 3 and 4, when the thickness t is 5 mm or less, there is a relationship between normal HRB hardness and tensile strength, and when the HRB hardness is 50 or more, the tensile strength is improved. To do. As Comparative Examples 6 and 7 show, when the HRB hardness is less than 50, the tensile strength is greatly reduced.
Further, as apparent from comparison between Embodiments 5 and 6 and Comparative Examples 7 and 8, when the area ratio of the coarse α phase exceeds 20%, the tensile strength is lowered. At this time, in Comparative Examples 7 and 8, the HRB hardness is also affected and decreases. As shown in the fifth and sixth embodiments, when the area ratio of the coarse α phase is less than 20%, the tensile strength is improved.
また、実施形態7,8及び比較例9,10を比べて明らかなように、鋳巣欠陥の面積率が15%を上回ると、引張強度及びHRB硬さも影響を受けて低下する。
したがって、実施形態9,10から明らかなように、粗大α相の面積率が20%以下で、鋳巣欠陥の面積率が15%以下であると、引張強度及びHRB硬さの両者ともに優れた値を示す。
In addition, as apparent from the comparison between Embodiments 7 and 8 and Comparative Examples 9 and 10, when the area ratio of the defect in the casting hole exceeds 15%, the tensile strength and the HRB hardness are also affected and lowered.
Therefore, as apparent from
ここで、比較例11,12から明らかなように、粗大α相の面積率が20%を上回り、鋳巣欠陥の面積率が15%を上回ると、相互作用により引張強度及びHRB硬さの値が単独で影響するよりも大きく低下する。 Here, as is clear from Comparative Examples 11 and 12, when the area ratio of the coarse α phase exceeds 20% and the area ratio of the casting defect exceeds 15%, the values of tensile strength and HRB hardness are caused by the interaction. Is much lower than it affects alone.
1…コラムハウジング 1 ... Column housing
Claims (5)
肉厚を5mm以下とした状態でロックウェル硬さをHRB50以上として製造してなることを特徴とするアルミニウム合金ダイカスト鋳物部品。 It is manufactured by ordinary die casting method using aluminum alloy as a material,
An aluminum alloy die-casting part produced by producing Rockwell hardness of HRB 50 or more with a wall thickness of 5 mm or less.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2008051614A JP2009208095A (en) | 2008-03-03 | 2008-03-03 | Aluminum alloy die-casting component |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2008051614A JP2009208095A (en) | 2008-03-03 | 2008-03-03 | Aluminum alloy die-casting component |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2009208095A true JP2009208095A (en) | 2009-09-17 |
Family
ID=41181759
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2008051614A Pending JP2009208095A (en) | 2008-03-03 | 2008-03-03 | Aluminum alloy die-casting component |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP2009208095A (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150044090A1 (en) * | 2012-02-29 | 2015-02-12 | Nsk Ltd. | Strength Evaluation Method of Die Casting Product and Die Casting Product |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH11293375A (en) * | 1998-04-14 | 1999-10-26 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Aluminum alloy die casting with high toughness and its production |
JP2000073852A (en) * | 1998-08-31 | 2000-03-07 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Aluminum alloy cylinder block and its manufacture |
JP2001121248A (en) * | 1999-10-27 | 2001-05-08 | Mitsuba Corp | Casting method of housing for electric type power steering device and metallic mold for casting |
JP2002294380A (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2002-10-09 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Heat resistant aluminum diecast material |
JP2004124181A (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2004-04-22 | Tsuta Kikai Kinzoku Kk | High tensile aluminum die casting alloy material for heat treatment |
JP2007023330A (en) * | 2005-07-15 | 2007-02-01 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Aluminum alloy casting and its manufacturing method |
-
2008
- 2008-03-03 JP JP2008051614A patent/JP2009208095A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH11293375A (en) * | 1998-04-14 | 1999-10-26 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Aluminum alloy die casting with high toughness and its production |
JP2000073852A (en) * | 1998-08-31 | 2000-03-07 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Aluminum alloy cylinder block and its manufacture |
JP2001121248A (en) * | 1999-10-27 | 2001-05-08 | Mitsuba Corp | Casting method of housing for electric type power steering device and metallic mold for casting |
JP2002294380A (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2002-10-09 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Heat resistant aluminum diecast material |
JP2004124181A (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2004-04-22 | Tsuta Kikai Kinzoku Kk | High tensile aluminum die casting alloy material for heat treatment |
JP2007023330A (en) * | 2005-07-15 | 2007-02-01 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Aluminum alloy casting and its manufacturing method |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20150044090A1 (en) * | 2012-02-29 | 2015-02-12 | Nsk Ltd. | Strength Evaluation Method of Die Casting Product and Die Casting Product |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20160250683A1 (en) | Secondary cast aluminum alloy for structural applications | |
Girelli et al. | Investigation of cavitation erosion resistance of AlSi10Mg alloy for additive manufacturing | |
CA2658350C (en) | Combination of casting process and alloy composition | |
US20150152526A1 (en) | Aluminum member | |
JP2009108409A (en) | Al-Mg TYPE ALUMINUM ALLOY FOR FORGING, WITH EXCELLENT TOUGHNESS, AND CAST MEMBER COMPOSED THEREOF | |
US5846348A (en) | High strength and toughness aluminum alloy casting by high-pressure casting method and method of manufacturing same | |
Wannasin et al. | GISS technology: principle and applications in die casting | |
Jolly | Prof. John Campbell’s ten rules for making reliable castings | |
Salarvand et al. | Effect of cooling rate on the microstructure and mechanical properties of high-zinc AA 5182 aluminum wrought alloy cast by the ablation green sand mold casting process | |
Arami et al. | Microporosity control and thermal-fatigue resistance of A319 aluminum foundry alloy | |
Okayasu et al. | Comparison of mechanical properties of die cast aluminium alloys: cold v. hot chamber die casting and high v. low speed filling die casting | |
JP2009208095A (en) | Aluminum alloy die-casting component | |
JP2009208094A (en) | Die casting for vehicle steering gear housing, and method for producing the same | |
Qi et al. | Comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ91D alloy formed by rheomolding and high-pressure die casting | |
Goto et al. | Deformation behavior of pure copper castings with as-cast surfaces for electrical parts | |
JP2004292885A (en) | Aluminum alloy casting material having excellent mechanical property | |
Gjestland et al. | Optimizing the magnesium die casting process to achieve reliability in automotive applications | |
KR102356486B1 (en) | Nodular graphite cast iron, a cast article made therefrom, structural parts for automobiles, and a method for manufacturing a cast article made of nodular graphite cast iron | |
LeBeau et al. | Evaluation of Thixomolded, magnesium alloy components for structural automotive applications | |
JP2009022972A (en) | Casting of die-casting for vehicle steering apparatus housing | |
Forsmark et al. | A microstructural and mechanical property study of an AM50 HPDC magnesium alloy | |
Czerwinski et al. | The influence of primary solid content on the tensile properties of a thixomolded AZ91D magnesium alloy | |
Ji et al. | Casting development with a high strength aluminium alloy | |
Granath et al. | Porosity reduction possibilities in commercial Aluminium A380 and Magnesium AM60 alloy components using the RheoMetalTM process | |
Mackay et al. | The use of the Weibull statistical method to assess the reliability of cast aluminum engine blocks made from different casting processes |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
RD03 | Notification of appointment of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7423 Effective date: 20101022 |
|
RD04 | Notification of resignation of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424 Effective date: 20101022 |
|
A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20110224 |
|
RD04 | Notification of resignation of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424 Effective date: 20111216 |
|
A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20120713 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20120724 |
|
A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20120912 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20121106 |
|
A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20121221 |
|
A02 | Decision of refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02 Effective date: 20130326 |