JP2008256505A - Evaluation method of painting pattern and painting pattern sample - Google Patents

Evaluation method of painting pattern and painting pattern sample Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2008256505A
JP2008256505A JP2007098343A JP2007098343A JP2008256505A JP 2008256505 A JP2008256505 A JP 2008256505A JP 2007098343 A JP2007098343 A JP 2007098343A JP 2007098343 A JP2007098343 A JP 2007098343A JP 2008256505 A JP2008256505 A JP 2008256505A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
pattern
image data
paint
evaluation method
evaluating
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2007098343A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5167674B2 (en
Inventor
Takahiro Domoto
隆裕 道本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nikon Corp
Original Assignee
Nikon Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nikon Corp filed Critical Nikon Corp
Priority to JP2007098343A priority Critical patent/JP5167674B2/en
Publication of JP2008256505A publication Critical patent/JP2008256505A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5167674B2 publication Critical patent/JP5167674B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)
  • Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method for evaluating a particulate painting pattern having irregularities on the surface, having excellent correspondence to sensual inspection. <P>SOLUTION: In step 4, a brightness image is binarized, and a particle part is separated from a bedding part. In this case, the binarized brightness image is inverted. Then, in step 5, an area rate to the whole area of binarized image data (particle part) having higher brightness is calculated. Excellent correlation exists between the area rate determined in this way and the number of the particle parts determined by the sensual inspection. In step 6, lines are drawn at equal intervals at least in either direction of a longitudinal direction and a lateral direction on the whole image data domain, and length data of a line segment on which the lines and the binarized image data (particle part) having higher brightness cross together are acquired. Excellent correlation exists between a value of relative frequency determined in this way and the size of the particle part determined by the sensual inspection. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2009,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、表面に凹凸のある粒子状の塗装模様を評価する方法、および、表面に凹凸のある粒子状の塗装模様を有する塗装模様標本に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a method for evaluating a particulate coating pattern having irregularities on the surface, and a coating pattern specimen having a particulate coating pattern having irregularities on the surface.

カメラ等の塗装方法の一つに、予め下塗りされた均一な塗装面の上から、液滴状の塗料を塗布することにより、凹凸のある粒子状の塗装模様を形成する方法がある。このような、凹凸のある塗装模様を定量的に評価する方法として、例えば特許第２６１７７９号公報（特許文献１）には、模様の凹凸データをフーリエ解析し、(振幅)２／(波長)２で評価する方法が記載されている。又、特開平１１−４５３３７号公報には、模様の粒子部の個数を算出して、それを特徴量として評価する方法が記載されている。
特許第２６１７７９号公報 特開平１１−４５３３７号公報 As one of painting methods for cameras and the like, there is a method of forming an uneven particle-like paint pattern by applying a droplet-like paint from a uniform painted surface previously primed. For example, Japanese Patent No. 261779 (Patent Document 1) discloses a method for quantitatively evaluating such an uneven coating pattern by performing Fourier analysis on the pattern unevenness data to obtain (amplitude) 2 / (wavelength) 2. The method of evaluation is described. Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 11-45337 describes a method of calculating the number of pattern particle portions and evaluating it as a feature amount.
Japanese Patent No. 261779 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-45337

しかしながら、特許文献１に記載されるような、フーリエ解析による方法では、振幅と波長の関係から模様の大きさを表現することはできるが模様の数量を表現することができない。また、特許文献２に記載されるような、粒子部の個数を数える手法は、粒子状の模様の数が非常に多く、ひとつひとつの模様が隣接する模様と重なってしまった場合、その重なった粒子状の模様を分離して計測することは困難である。   However, in the method based on Fourier analysis as described in Patent Document 1, the size of the pattern can be expressed from the relationship between the amplitude and the wavelength, but the number of patterns cannot be expressed. In addition, the method of counting the number of particle parts as described in Patent Document 2 has a very large number of particulate patterns, and when each pattern overlaps an adjacent pattern, the overlapping particles It is difficult to measure the pattern separately.

本発明はこのような事情に鑑みてなされたものであり、官能検査との対応が良い、表面に凹凸のある粒子状の塗装模様を評価する方法、および、表面に凹凸のある粒子状の塗装模様を有する塗装模様標本を提供することを課題とする。   The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, a method for evaluating a particulate coating pattern with irregularities on the surface, which has a good correspondence with a sensory test, and a particulate coating with irregularities on the surface It is an object to provide a painted pattern specimen having a pattern.

前記課題を達成するための第１の手段は、表面が粒子状の塗装模様の評価方法であって、塗装表面の画像データを取得して、その画像データを輝度に応じて二値化し、二値化されたデータのうち、輝度の高い方のデータが、画像データ領域全体に占める面積率を演算し、得られた面積率の大小から、前記塗装模様の凸部の数の多少を求めることを特徴とする塗装模様の評価方法である。   A first means for achieving the above object is a method for evaluating a painted pattern having a particle-like surface, obtains image data of the painted surface, binarizes the image data according to luminance, Of the quantified data, the higher luminance data calculates the area ratio of the entire image data area, and calculates the number of convex portions of the paint pattern from the obtained area ratio. It is the evaluation method of the coating pattern characterized by this.

前記課題を解決するための第２の手段は、表面が粒子状の塗装模様の評価方法であって、塗装表面の画像を取得して、その画像データを輝度に応じて二値化し、画像データ領域全体に亘って、一つの基準方向又は前記基準方向と略直交する方向の少なくともどちらかの方向に等間隔の線を引き、その線と前記二値化された画像データのうち輝度が高い方のデータの領域とが交差する線分の長さのうち、所定範囲の長さのものの数が、前記線分全体の数に占める割合（相対頻度）から、前記塗装模様の凸部の大小を求めることを特徴とする塗装模様の評価方法である。   A second means for solving the above-mentioned problem is a method for evaluating a painted pattern with a particulate surface, obtains an image of the painted surface, binarizes the image data according to the brightness, A line with equal intervals is drawn in at least one of one reference direction or a direction substantially orthogonal to the reference direction over the entire region, and the higher luminance of the line and the binarized image data. From the ratio (relative frequency) of the number of lines having a predetermined range of the length of the line segment intersecting with the data area to the total number of the line segment, the size of the convex part of the paint pattern is determined. It is the evaluation method of the coating pattern characterized by calculating | requiring.

前記課題を解決するための第３の手段は、前記第２の手段であって、前記基準方向は、画像データの水平又は垂直方向であることを特徴とするものである。   A third means for solving the above problem is the second means, wherein the reference direction is a horizontal or vertical direction of the image data.

前記課題を解決するための第４の手段は、前記第２の手段であって、前記基準方向は、前記画像データの対角線方向であることを特徴とするものである。   A fourth means for solving the above-mentioned problem is the second means, wherein the reference direction is a diagonal direction of the image data.

前記課題を解決するための第５の手段は、前記第１の手段の塗装模様の評価方法によって求められる前記面積率を一方の軸に、前記第２の手段の塗装模様の評価方法によって求められる前記相対頻度を他方の軸にして、求められた前記面積率と前記相対頻度を二次元座標上にプロットし、その位置から、前記塗装模様の凸部の数と大小を評価することを特徴とする塗装模様の評価方法である。   The fifth means for solving the above-mentioned problem is obtained by the paint pattern evaluation method of the second means, with the area ratio obtained by the paint pattern evaluation method of the first means as one axis. With the relative frequency as the other axis, the obtained area ratio and the relative frequency are plotted on a two-dimensional coordinate, and from the position, the number and size of convex portions of the paint pattern are evaluated. This is a method for evaluating a painted pattern.

前記課題を解決するための第６の手段は、前記第１の手段の塗装模様の評価方法によって求められた前記面積率と、前記第２の手段の塗装模様の評価方法によって求められた前記相対頻度との少なくとも一方が付された塗装模様標本である。   Sixth means for solving the above-mentioned problems are the above-mentioned area ratio obtained by the paint pattern evaluation method of the first means and the relative value obtained by the paint pattern evaluation method of the second means. It is a painted pattern specimen with at least one of frequency.

本発明によれば、官能検査との対応が良い、表面に凹凸のある粒子状の塗装模様を評価する方法、および、表面に凹凸のある粒子状の塗装模様を有する塗装模様標本を提供することができる。   According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a method for evaluating a particulate coating pattern with irregularities on the surface, and a coating pattern specimen having a particulate coating pattern with irregularities on the surface, which has good correspondence with the sensory test. Can do.

以下、本発明の実施の形態の例を、図を用いて説明する。図１は、本発明の実施の形態である塗装模様の評価方法を実施するための、画像データを採取する装置の概要を示す図である。被測定物である模様塗装サンプル１を画像取得手段２の下に設置し、被測定物の表面画像データを得ることができる。画像取得手段２から得られた画像データは輝度画像データとして取得され、例えばパーソナルコンピュータのような画像処理手段３によって記録・演算される。   Hereinafter, an example of an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an outline of an apparatus for collecting image data for carrying out a paint pattern evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present invention. A pattern coating sample 1 which is an object to be measured can be placed under the image acquisition means 2 to obtain surface image data of the object to be measured. Image data obtained from the image acquisition unit 2 is acquired as luminance image data, and is recorded and calculated by an image processing unit 3 such as a personal computer.

この装置においては、前記画像取得手段２としてデジタルカメラを使用し、前記輝度画像データは、例えば2560×1920ピクセルの画素数で256階調の輝度データとして得ることができる。   In this apparatus, a digital camera is used as the image acquisition means 2, and the luminance image data can be obtained as luminance data of 256 gradations with a pixel number of 2560 × 1920 pixels, for example.

図２は、本発明の実施の形態の一例である塗装模様の評価方法のフローチャートである。まず、ステップ１で、模様塗装サンプル１の表面を画像取得手段２で輝度画像データとして取得する。続いてステップ２で、得られた輝度画像データに対してシェーディング補正を行い、照明ムラを除去する。シェーディング補正は、輝度画像データから、その輝度画像データに100×100マスクフィルターを用いた平均化処理をおこなったものの輝度画像データをピクセル毎に減算し128を加える。これにより各ピクセルの輝度値の中心が128となる。   FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a paint pattern evaluation method which is an example of an embodiment of the present invention. First, in step 1, the surface of the pattern coating sample 1 is acquired as luminance image data by the image acquisition means 2. Subsequently, in step 2, shading correction is performed on the obtained luminance image data to remove illumination unevenness. In the shading correction, the luminance image data obtained by averaging the luminance image data using a 100 × 100 mask filter is subtracted for each pixel from the luminance image data, and 128 is added. As a result, the center of the luminance value of each pixel becomes 128.

続いてステップ３で、輝度データの低い値はより低く、高い値はより高くすることで、輝度画像のコントラストを大きくする。次にステップ４で、輝度画像の二値化を行い粒子部と下地部の分離を行う。一般に、原画像データでは、粒子部（凸部）の輝度は低く、下地部の輝度は高く撮像される。よって、このとき、二値化された輝度画像を反転させ、粒子部（凸部）は輝度の高い方、下地部は輝度の低い方に二値化するようにする。   Subsequently, in step 3, the low value of the luminance data is lower and the higher value is higher, thereby increasing the contrast of the luminance image. Next, in step 4, the luminance image is binarized to separate the particle portion and the background portion. Generally, in the original image data, the brightness of the particle part (convex part) is low and the brightness of the base part is high. Therefore, at this time, the binarized luminance image is inverted, and the particle portion (convex portion) is binarized to the higher luminance and the base portion is binarized to the lower luminance.

続いてステップ５で、輝度の高い方の二値化画像データ（粒子部）の、全領域に対する面積率を算出する。本発明者らが得た知見によれば、このようにして求めた面積率と、官能検査による粒子部の数（模様の数）との間には良好な相関が見られる。   Subsequently, in step 5, the area ratio of the binarized image data (particle part) having the higher luminance with respect to the entire region is calculated. According to the knowledge obtained by the present inventors, there is a good correlation between the area ratio thus obtained and the number of particle parts (number of patterns) obtained by sensory inspection.

次にステップ６で、画像データ領域全体に亘り、基準方向（ここでは縦方向又は横方向）、又はこの基準方向と直交する方向（ここでは横方向又は縦方向）の少なくともどちらかの方向に等間隔の線を引き、その線と、輝度の高い方の二値化画像データ（粒子部）とが交差する線分の長さデータを得る。このとき、基準方向は、画像データの対角線方向としてもよい。本実施の形態では、図３に示すように、１００ピクセルのピッチ間隔で横方向に直線を引く。得られた線分の長さデータは５０ピクセル間隔毎の長さデータの相対頻度のヒストグラムとして表記し、例えば150から200ピクセル長の線分の数の、全線分の数に対する相対頻度の値を特徴量とする。   Next, in step 6, over the entire image data area, the reference direction (here, the vertical direction or the horizontal direction) or at least one of the directions orthogonal to the reference direction (here, the horizontal direction or the vertical direction), etc. The interval line is drawn, and the length data of the line segment where the line and the binarized image data (particle part) having higher luminance intersect are obtained. At this time, the reference direction may be a diagonal direction of the image data. In the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3, straight lines are drawn in the horizontal direction at a pitch interval of 100 pixels. The obtained line segment length data is expressed as a histogram of the relative frequency of the length data at intervals of 50 pixels. For example, the relative frequency value of the number of line segments 150 to 200 pixels long with respect to the total number of line segments is expressed. The feature value.

本発明者らが得た知見によれば、このようにして求めた相対頻度の値と、官能検査による粒子部の大きさ（模様の大きさ）との間には良好な相関が見られる。また、このようにすることにより、小さな粒子部が重なっている場合でもこれらを分離して測定することができ、大きな粒子がある場合と区別できることも分かった。   According to the knowledge obtained by the present inventors, there is a good correlation between the value of the relative frequency thus obtained and the size of the particle part (pattern size) obtained by the sensory test. It was also found that, by doing this, even when small particle portions overlap, they can be measured separately, and can be distinguished from the case where there are large particles.

長さがどの範囲にある線分の相対頻度を特徴量とするかは、塗料、塗装方法、塗装条件によって異なるので、これらの変化に応じて、官能検査と相関の強い、長さの範囲を見いだし、その相対頻度を特徴量とすればよい。   Since the relative frequency of the line segment in which range is the feature value depends on the paint, painting method, and painting conditions, the length range that has a strong correlation with the sensory test is selected according to these changes. It can be found and its relative frequency can be used as a feature amount.

続いてステップ７で、ステップ５およびステップ６で得られた、粒子部の面積率と相対頻度の値のマトリックスから模様の定量評価を行う。   Subsequently, in Step 7, the pattern is quantitatively evaluated from the matrix of the area ratio of the particle part and the relative frequency obtained in Step 5 and Step 6.

本発明の実施例として、官能評価によって、
模様が小さくて数が多いとされたサンプル(a)、
模様が小さくて数が少ないとされたサンプル(b)、
模様が大きくて数が多いとされたサンプル(c)、
模様が大きくて数が少ないとされたサンプル（d）
とサンプル(a)から(d)の中間にあるとされたサンプル(e)
の５種類を定量的に評価した。図４に、それぞれのサンプルの二値化結果を示す。白い部分が輝度の高い側を示し粒子部に対応する。 As an example of the present invention, by sensory evaluation,
Sample (a) with a small pattern and a large number,
Sample (b), whose pattern is small and small in number,
Sample (c), which is said to have a large pattern and a large number,
Sample with large pattern and few numbers (d)
And sample (e) that is said to be between samples (a) to (d)
Were quantitatively evaluated. FIG. 4 shows the binarization result of each sample. The white part indicates the higher brightness side and corresponds to the particle part.

表１にそれぞれのサンプルでの二値化による画像データ領域全体に占める粒子部の面積率計算の結果を示す。模様の数が多い(a)や(c)で面積率は大きな値を示し、模様の数が少ない(b)や(d)では面積率の値は小さい。

Figure 2008256505
Table 1 shows the result of calculating the area ratio of the particle portion in the entire image data area by binarization in each sample. When the number of patterns is large (a) or (c), the area ratio shows a large value, and when the number of patterns is small (b) or (d), the area ratio value is small.
Figure 2008256505

次に、画像データ領域全体に縦方向に100ピクセル毎に等間隔の線を引き、その線と、輝度の高い方の二値化画像データ（粒子部）とが交差する線分の長さデータを得る。得られた線分データは５０ピクセル間隔毎の相対頻度のヒストグラムとして図５に示す。図５において、横軸は線分の長さをピクセルで表したもの、縦軸はその相対頻度（全線分数に対する割合で対数目盛）である。０〜５０ピクセルの長さの線分の相対頻度を横軸５０ピクセルの場所に、５０〜１００ピクセルの長さの線分の相対頻度を横軸100ピクセルの場所に、というようにプロットしている。前記ヒストグラムの結果から得られた150から200ピクセル長の線分の長さデータの相対頻度の値を表２に示す。模様の大きさが小さい(a)や(b)で相対頻度は小さい値を示し、模様の大きさが大きい(c)や(d)では相対頻度の値は大きい。   Next, a line of equal intervals is drawn vertically every 100 pixels over the entire image data area, and the length data of the line segment where the line and the binary image data (particle part) with higher luminance intersect Get. The obtained line segment data is shown in FIG. 5 as a relative frequency histogram for each 50 pixel interval. In FIG. 5, the horizontal axis represents the length of the line segment in pixels, and the vertical axis represents the relative frequency (logarithmic scale in proportion to the total line segment). Plot the relative frequency of the 0-50 pixel long line segment at the horizontal axis of 50 pixels, the relative frequency of the 50-100 pixel long line segment at the horizontal axis of 100 pixels, and so on. Yes. Table 2 shows the relative frequency values of the length data of the line segment of 150 to 200 pixels obtained from the result of the histogram. When the pattern size is small (a) or (b), the relative frequency shows a small value, and when the pattern size is large (c) or (d), the relative frequency value is large.

なお、この例においては、横方向に等間隔の線を引いたが、縦方向に引いても良く、又、縦横両方向に引いて、縦横両方向についてそれぞれ、上述のように線分の長さデータを求め、これらの数の和に基づいて上述のような処理を行ってもよい。

Figure 2008256505
In this example, equidistant lines are drawn in the horizontal direction. However, the lines may be drawn in the vertical direction. Alternatively, the line length data may be drawn in both the vertical and horizontal directions as described above. And processing as described above may be performed based on the sum of these numbers.
Figure 2008256505

図６は、表１と表２の結果から、各サンプルの相関関係を２次元のデータとして示したもので、これを見ると模様の状態が視覚的に分かりやすくなる。例えばサンプル(a)から(d)を模様の限界見本と仮定すると、図６のマトリックスにおいてサンプル(a)から(d)で形成される４辺形の内部に位置するサンプル（例えば、(e)）を良品として判断することが可能となる。   FIG. 6 shows the correlation of each sample as two-dimensional data based on the results of Tables 1 and 2, and it is easy to visually understand the state of the pattern. For example, if samples (a) to (d) are assumed to be the limit sample of the pattern, samples located inside the quadrilateral formed by samples (a) to (d) in the matrix of FIG. 6 (for example, (e) ) Can be determined as non-defective products.

又、官能検査で得られた標本に、本実施の形態の方法によって得られた面積率と相対頻度との少なくとも一方を刻印等で付することにより、定量的な指標を有する標本とすることができる。   In addition, it is possible to obtain a sample having a quantitative index by attaching at least one of the area ratio and the relative frequency obtained by the method of the present embodiment to the sample obtained by the sensory test with an imprint or the like. it can.

本発明の実施の形態である塗装模様の評価方法を実施するための、画像データを採取する装置の概要を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the outline | summary of the apparatus which extract | collects image data for enforcing the evaluation method of the coating pattern which is embodiment of this invention. 本発明の実施の形態の一例である塗装模様の評価方法のフローチャートである。It is a flowchart of the evaluation method of the coating pattern which is an example of embodiment of this invention. 画像データ領域全体に、横方向に等間隔の線を引いた様子を示す図である。It is a figure which shows a mode that the line of equal intervals was drawn on the whole image data area | region. それぞれのサンプルの二値化結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the binarization result of each sample. 等間隔に引いた線と、輝度の高い方の二値化画像データ（粒子部）とが交差する線分の長さデータを、５０ピクセル間隔毎の相対頻度のヒストグラムとして示した図である。It is the figure which showed the length data of the line segment which the line pulled at equal intervals and the binarized image data (particle part) of a higher brightness | luminance crossed as a histogram of the relative frequency for every 50 pixel intervals. 表１と表２の結果から、各サンプルの相関関係を２次元のデータとして示した図である。It is the figure which showed the correlation of each sample as two-dimensional data from the result of Table 1 and Table 2. FIG.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

１…模様塗装サンプル、２…画像取得手段、３…画像処理手段 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Pattern coating sample, 2 ... Image acquisition means, 3 ... Image processing means

Claims (6)

表面が粒子状の塗装模様の評価方法であって、塗装表面の画像データを取得して、その画像データを輝度に応じて二値化し、二値化されたデータのうち、輝度の高い方のデータが、画像データ領域全体に占める面積率を演算し、得られた面積率の大小から、前記塗装模様の凸部の数の多少を求めることを特徴とする塗装模様の評価方法。   It is a method for evaluating a painted pattern with a particulate surface, and obtains image data of the painted surface, binarizes the image data according to the luminance, and the binarized data has the higher luminance A method for evaluating a paint pattern, wherein the data calculates the area ratio of the entire image data area, and determines the number of convex portions of the paint pattern from the size of the area ratio obtained. 表面が粒子状の塗装模様の評価方法であって、塗装表面の画像データを取得して、その画像データを輝度に応じて二値化し、画像データ領域全体に亘って、一つの基準方向又は前記基準方向と略直交する方向の少なくともどちらかの方向に等間隔の線を引き、その線と前記二値化された画像データのうち輝度が高い方のデータの領域とが交差する線分の長さのうち、所定範囲の長さのものの数が、前記線分全体の数に占める割合（相対頻度）から、前記塗装模様の凸部の大小を求めることを特徴とする塗装模様の評価方法。   The surface is a method for evaluating a particulate paint pattern, and obtains image data of the paint surface, binarizes the image data according to the brightness, and covers the entire image data area in one reference direction or The length of a line segment in which a line at equal intervals is drawn in at least one of the directions substantially perpendicular to the reference direction, and the line and the area of the higher-luminance data among the binarized image data intersect Among them, the paint pattern evaluation method is characterized in that the size of the convex portion of the paint pattern is obtained from the ratio (relative frequency) of the number of the predetermined range length to the total number of the line segments. 請求項２に記載の塗装模様の評価方法であって、前記基準方向は、画像データの水平又は垂直方向であることを特徴とする塗装模様の評価方法。   The paint pattern evaluation method according to claim 2, wherein the reference direction is a horizontal or vertical direction of image data. 請求項２に記載の塗装模様の評価方法であって、前記基準方向は、前記画像データの対角線方向であることを特徴とする塗装模様の評価方法。   3. The method for evaluating a painted pattern according to claim 2, wherein the reference direction is a diagonal direction of the image data. 請求項１に記載の塗装模様の評価方法によって求められる前記面積率を一方の軸に、請求項２に記載の塗装模様の評価方法によって求められる前記相対頻度を他方の軸にして、求められた前記面積率と前記相対頻度を二次元座標上にプロットし、その位置から、前記塗装模様の凸部の数と大小を評価することを特徴とする塗装模様の評価方法。   It was calculated | required by making the said area ratio calculated | required by the evaluation method of the coating pattern of Claim 1 into one axis | shaft, and the said relative frequency calculated | required by the evaluation method of the coating pattern of Claim 2 as the other axis | shaft. A method for evaluating a paint pattern, wherein the area ratio and the relative frequency are plotted on two-dimensional coordinates, and the number and size of the convex parts of the paint pattern are evaluated from the position. 請求項１に記載の塗装模様の評価方法によって求められた前記面積率と、請求項２に記載の塗装模様の評価方法によって求められた前記相対頻度との少なくとも一方が付された塗装模様標本。   A painted pattern specimen to which at least one of the area ratio obtained by the painted pattern evaluation method according to claim 1 and the relative frequency obtained by the painted pattern evaluation method according to claim 2 is attached.
JP2007098343A 2007-04-04 2007-04-04 Evaluation method of paint pattern Expired - Fee Related JP5167674B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007098343A JP5167674B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2007-04-04 Evaluation method of paint pattern

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007098343A JP5167674B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2007-04-04 Evaluation method of paint pattern

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008256505A true JP2008256505A (en) 2008-10-23
JP5167674B2 JP5167674B2 (en) 2013-03-21

Family

ID=39980213

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2007098343A Expired - Fee Related JP5167674B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2007-04-04 Evaluation method of paint pattern

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5167674B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102009028728A1 (en) 2008-10-01 2010-04-08 Tsubakimoto Chain Co. Self-lubricating chain
JP2020018611A (en) * 2018-08-01 2020-02-06 沢井製薬株式会社 Method and device for evaluating binding of tablet

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0838990A (en) * 1994-08-02 1996-02-13 Nippon Paint Co Ltd Panel for coating film sample
JP2000206029A (en) * 1998-11-11 2000-07-28 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd Granular-pattern measuring apparatus and granular- pattern evaluation method as well as computer-readable recording medium with recorded granular-pattern measuring program or recorded granular-pattern evaluation program as well as granular-pattern evaluation apparatus using granular-pattern evaluation method
JP2000332215A (en) * 1999-05-18 2000-11-30 Kokusai Electric Co Ltd Manufacture of semiconductor device
JP2003248176A (en) * 2001-12-19 2003-09-05 Olympus Optical Co Ltd Microscopic image photographing device

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0838990A (en) * 1994-08-02 1996-02-13 Nippon Paint Co Ltd Panel for coating film sample
JP2000206029A (en) * 1998-11-11 2000-07-28 Sekisui Chem Co Ltd Granular-pattern measuring apparatus and granular- pattern evaluation method as well as computer-readable recording medium with recorded granular-pattern measuring program or recorded granular-pattern evaluation program as well as granular-pattern evaluation apparatus using granular-pattern evaluation method
JP2000332215A (en) * 1999-05-18 2000-11-30 Kokusai Electric Co Ltd Manufacture of semiconductor device
JP2003248176A (en) * 2001-12-19 2003-09-05 Olympus Optical Co Ltd Microscopic image photographing device

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102009028728A1 (en) 2008-10-01 2010-04-08 Tsubakimoto Chain Co. Self-lubricating chain
JP2020018611A (en) * 2018-08-01 2020-02-06 沢井製薬株式会社 Method and device for evaluating binding of tablet
JP7048447B2 (en) 2018-08-01 2022-04-05 沢井製薬株式会社 Tablet binding evaluation method and evaluation device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5167674B2 (en) 2013-03-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6620477B2 (en) Method and program for detecting cracks in concrete
JP4006007B2 (en) Crack detection method
JP5385593B2 (en) Crack detection method
JP5421192B2 (en) Crack detection method
KR101635461B1 (en) System and Method for Automatically Detecting a Mura Defect using Mask Filtering in Wavelet Transform
CN108827181B (en) Vision-based plate surface detection method
JP5705711B2 (en) Crack detection method
JP4870016B2 (en) Crack detection method
JP4488308B2 (en) Method for detecting cracks on the surface of structures
JP4906609B2 (en) Imaging apparatus and method
JP6894361B2 (en) Crack direction identification method, crack direction identification device, crack direction identification system and program on concrete surface
JP5167674B2 (en) Evaluation method of paint pattern
JP5435904B2 (en) How to detect fatal wounds
JP6199799B2 (en) Self-luminous material image processing apparatus and self-luminous material image processing method
JP6801366B2 (en) Line width measurement method, line width measurement program, storage medium and information processing device
JP2006155579A (en) Image processing method and image processing apparatus
DE102017106764A1 (en) TEST DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND PROGRAM
JP4980739B2 (en) Crack detection method
JP6818263B2 (en) Fracture surface analysis device and fracture surface analysis method
JP5605010B2 (en) Surface inspection method
JP2018021873A (en) Surface inspection device and surface inspection method
JP4403036B2 (en) Soot detection method and apparatus
JP4115378B2 (en) Defect detection method
CN109142176B (en) Smoke subarea space rechecking method based on space association
JP6909090B2 (en) Quantitative evaluation method, quantitative evaluation device, quantitative evaluation system and program of damaged part on concrete surface

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20100312

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110301

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20111109

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20111115

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20111227

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20120626

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20120807

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20121127

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20121210

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees