JP2007271510A - Visual inspection method and visual inspection device - Google Patents

Visual inspection method and visual inspection device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2007271510A
JP2007271510A JP2006099007A JP2006099007A JP2007271510A JP 2007271510 A JP2007271510 A JP 2007271510A JP 2006099007 A JP2006099007 A JP 2006099007A JP 2006099007 A JP2006099007 A JP 2006099007A JP 2007271510 A JP2007271510 A JP 2007271510A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
reflection
image
inspected
reflection image
irregular
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2006099007A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Shiro Inoue
志朗 井上
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tsubakimoto Chain Co
Original Assignee
Tsubakimoto Chain Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tsubakimoto Chain Co filed Critical Tsubakimoto Chain Co
Priority to JP2006099007A priority Critical patent/JP2007271510A/en
Publication of JP2007271510A publication Critical patent/JP2007271510A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a visual inspection method and device capable of identifying at high speed surface state of an inspection object part as whether being "color irregularity" or "fault spot accompanied by unevenness, such as flaws" caused by surface processing, or "both of them" or "non-defective free of either". <P>SOLUTION: By sequentially picking up regular reflection images and irregular reflection images of the inspection object part 40 by one image pickup means 20 and determining presence of the fault spot in each image, it is possible to determine whether the inspection object part be "non-defective", "color irregularity", "fault spot accompanied by unevenness, such as flaws" or "color irregularity and fault spot, such as flaws". <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、例えば、チェーンなどの製造工場の現場において、リンクプレートや連結ピンなどの被検査部品の外観検査を行う際の外観検査方法及び外観検査装置に関するものであり、さらに詳しくは、前記被検査部品に光を照射し、その反射画像によって前記被検査部品の表面状態を検査する外観検査方法及び外観検査装置に関するものである。   The present invention relates to an appearance inspection method and an appearance inspection apparatus for performing an appearance inspection of a part to be inspected such as a link plate or a connecting pin at a site of a manufacturing factory such as a chain. The present invention relates to an appearance inspection method and an appearance inspection apparatus for irradiating an inspection part with light and inspecting the surface state of the part to be inspected by a reflection image thereof.

画像処理を用いた被検査部品の外観検査方法において、一般的な検査方法として正反射光観察を用いる方法が知られている。これは、被検査部品の正常な表面で正反射した光をカメラで撮像できるようにカメラと照明装置を設置した場合、キズ等の不良箇所があるところでは、表面に凹凸があることによって乱反射するため、撮像された画像では、正常な表面と不良箇所の間でコントラストがつく。すなわち、キズ等の不良箇所では、正常な表面に比べて明度が低く(暗く)なる。これにより、キズ等の不良箇所を検出し、所定の判断基準に基づいて外観検査を行っていた(以下、「引用発明1」という)。   In a method for inspecting the appearance of a component to be inspected using image processing, a method using regular reflection light observation is known as a general inspection method. This is because, when a camera and a lighting device are installed so that the light regularly reflected on the normal surface of the part to be inspected can be imaged by the camera, the surface is irregularly reflected due to irregularities on the surface where there are defective parts such as scratches. For this reason, in the captured image, there is a contrast between the normal surface and the defective portion. That is, in a defective part such as a scratch, the brightness is low (darker) compared to a normal surface. As a result, defective portions such as scratches were detected, and an appearance inspection was performed based on a predetermined criterion (hereinafter referred to as “Cited Invention 1”).

また、ラインセンサを用いて、正反射光観察と乱反射光観察を行って、得られた2つの画像から色むらやキズ等の不良箇所を光学的手法によって検査する外観検査も知られている(以下、「引用発明2」という)。(例えば、特許文献1参照)。   In addition, an appearance inspection is also known in which a line sensor is used to perform specular reflection light observation and irregular reflection light observation, and an optical method is used to inspect defective portions such as color unevenness and scratches from the obtained two images ( Hereinafter referred to as “Cited Invention 2”). (For example, refer to Patent Document 1).

特開2002−71576号公報JP 2002-71576 A

ところが、引用発明1による外観検査方法では、被検査部品が鋼鉄などの金属であって、且つ、熱処理や窒炭化処理などの表面処理を施している場合は、キズ等の凹凸を伴う不良箇所とは別に前記表面処理の処理具合によって前記被検査部品の表面に色むら(暗い模様)ができることがある。この色むらのある被検査部品と、キズ等の凹凸を伴う不良箇所を有する被検査部品とを選別するときには、上述した正反射光観察では、被検査部品を人間が見たのと同じように画像を映すので、被検査部品の表面に色むらがある場合、撮像された画像は色むらのある箇所も明度が低く(暗く)なり、キズ等の凹凸を伴う不良箇所と色むらによる不良箇所を区別することができない。   However, in the appearance inspection method according to Cited Invention 1, when the part to be inspected is a metal such as steel and has been subjected to a surface treatment such as heat treatment or nitrocarburizing treatment, In addition, color unevenness (dark pattern) may occur on the surface of the part to be inspected depending on the processing condition of the surface treatment. When selecting the inspected part with uneven color and the inspected part having a defective portion with irregularities such as scratches, in the above-mentioned specular reflection observation, the part to be inspected is the same as a human being sees. Since the image is displayed, if there is uneven color on the surface of the part to be inspected, the captured image will have low brightness (darkness) even in the part with uneven color, and the defective part with unevenness such as scratches and the defective part due to uneven color Cannot be distinguished.

また、色むらがキズ等の凹凸を伴う不良箇所とは明らかに異なる色である場合、カラー画像処理を行うことによって、色むらとキズ等の凹凸を伴う不良箇所を区別する方法が考えられる。しかしながら、カラー画像処理を行うには、撮像手段としてのカメラ等の装置が非常に高価となり、また、情報処理量も増えるため、実用化は困難である。さらに色むらがキズ等の凹凸を伴う不良箇所と似たような色である場合、カラー画像処理を行ったとしても識別することは困難である。   Further, in the case where the color unevenness is clearly different from the defective portion having unevenness such as scratches, a method of distinguishing the defective portion having unevenness such as color unevenness and scratches by performing color image processing can be considered. However, in order to perform color image processing, a device such as a camera as an imaging unit becomes very expensive, and the amount of information processing increases, so that practical application is difficult. Furthermore, when the color unevenness is a color similar to a defective portion having irregularities such as scratches, it is difficult to identify even if color image processing is performed.

一方、引用発明2による外観検査方法では、反射光の取得をラインセンサを用いて、被検査面をライン状に走査し検査を行っているため、検査に要する時間が長かった。また、正反射画像と乱反射画像の比較を行っていないため、色むらとキズ等の凹凸を伴う不良箇所とを区別することができなかった。   On the other hand, in the appearance inspection method according to Cited Invention 2, since the inspection is performed by scanning the surface to be inspected in a line shape by using a line sensor to obtain the reflected light, the time required for the inspection is long. In addition, since the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image are not compared, it is impossible to distinguish the color unevenness and the defective portion having irregularities such as scratches.

そこで、本発明の目的は、被検査部品の表面状態を表面処理の結果生じた「色むら」なのか、「キズ等の凹凸を伴う不良箇所」であるのか、あるいは、「その両方である」のか、「何れでもない良品」であるのかを高速で識別することが可能な外観検査方法及び外観検査装置を提供することにある。   Therefore, the object of the present invention is “uneven color” generated as a result of the surface treatment of the surface state of the part to be inspected, “defect spot with irregularities such as scratches”, or “both” It is an object of the present invention to provide an appearance inspection method and an appearance inspection apparatus capable of identifying at high speed whether the product is “non-defective product”.

請求項1に係る外観検査方法は、被検査部品に光を照射し、その反射画像によって前記被検査部品の表面状態を検査する外観検査方法において、前記被検査部品の正常箇所に光を照射した際に正反射光が撮像手段に入射するように正反射光用照明手段と前記撮像手段を設置し、前記被検査部品の不良箇所に光を照射した際に乱反射光が前記撮像手段に入射するように乱反射光用照明手段を設置し、前記正反射光によって前記撮像手段が取得した正反射画像の中で明度が所与の正反射閾値SN以下の箇所(地の明るさに対して、暗く映っている箇所)を正反射不良箇所とし、前記乱反射光によって前記撮像手段が取得した乱反射画像の中で明度が所与の乱反射閾値SR以上の箇所(地の暗さに対して、明るく映っている箇所)を乱反射不良箇所とし、前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「良品」と判断し、前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がある場合で、且つ、前記乱反射画像の中に前記乱反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「色むら品」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が異なる場合、前記被検査部品は、「色むら品であって、且つ、キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が同じ位置である場合、前記被検査部品は、「キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断することによって、上記の課題を解決するものである。なお、この方法では、上述の記載から明らかなように1つの撮像手段(カメラ)と2つの照明手段(正反射光用及び乱反射光用)を使用する。   An appearance inspection method according to claim 1 irradiates light to a part to be inspected, and in the appearance inspection method for inspecting a surface state of the part to be inspected by a reflection image thereof, irradiates light to a normal part of the part to be inspected. When the specularly reflected light illumination means and the imaging means are installed so that the specularly reflected light is incident on the imaging means, the irregularly reflected light is incident on the imaging means when the defective part of the part to be inspected is irradiated with light. In the specular reflection image acquired by the imaging unit with the specular reflection light, the brightness is less than a predetermined specular reflection threshold SN (darker than the ground brightness). The spot that is reflected) is a specular reflection failure spot, and the spot whose brightness is equal to or greater than a given diffuse reflection threshold SR in the diffuse reflection image acquired by the imaging means by the diffusely reflected light (becomes bright against the darkness of the ground) Where there is irregular reflection If the regular reflection image does not include the regular reflection defect portion, the part to be inspected is determined as “good”, and the regular reflection image includes the regular reflection defect portion, and When the irregular reflection image does not include the irregular reflection defective portion, the part to be inspected is determined to be “color irregularity product”, and the regular reflection defective portion and the irregular reflection defective portion are included in the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image, respectively. If the position is different in some cases, the part to be inspected is determined to be “color irregularity product and defective part such as a scratch”, and each of the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image includes the regular reflection image. In the case where there is a defective reflection portion and the irregular reflection defective portion, and the position is the same position, the part to be inspected solves the above problem by determining that there is a defective portion such as a scratch. . In this method, as is apparent from the above description, one imaging means (camera) and two illumination means (for regular reflection light and irregular reflection light) are used.

請求項2に係る外観検査装置は、被検査部品に光を照射し、その反射画像によって前記被検査部品の表面状態を検査する外観検査装置において、前記被検査部品の正常箇所に光を照射した際に正反射光が“撮像手段”に入射するように“正反射光用照明手段”と前記撮像手段が設置され、前記被検査部品の不良箇所に光を照射した際に乱反射光が前記撮像手段に入射するように“乱反射光用照明手段”が設置され、前記正反射光によって前記撮像手段が取得した正反射画像の中で明度が所与の正反射閾値SN以下の箇所を正反射不良箇所とし、前記乱反射光によって前記撮像手段が取得した乱反射画像の中で明度が所与の乱反射閾値SR以上の箇所を乱反射不良箇所とする“不良箇所判別手段”を有し、前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「良品」と判断し、前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がある場合で、且つ、前記乱反射画像の中に前記乱反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「色むら品」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が異なる場合、前記被検査部品は、「色むら品であって、且つ、キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が同じ位置である場合、前記被検査部品は、「キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断する“不良原因識別手段”を有することによって、上記の課題を解決するものである。   The appearance inspection apparatus according to claim 2 irradiates light to a part to be inspected, and in the appearance inspection apparatus that inspects the surface state of the part to be inspected by a reflection image thereof, irradiates light to a normal part of the part to be inspected. When the specularly reflected light is incident on the “imaging means”, the “illuminating means for specular reflection light” and the imaging means are installed, and the irregularly reflected light is captured when the defective part of the part to be inspected is irradiated with light. “Irradiating means for irregularly reflected light” is installed so as to be incident on the means, and in the specular reflection image acquired by the imaging means by the specular reflection light, a portion having a lightness equal to or less than a predetermined specular reflection threshold SN is defective in specular reflection And a “defect location determination unit” that makes a location where the brightness is a given irregular reflection threshold SR or more in the irregular reflection image acquired by the imaging unit by the irregular reflection light, and the irregular reflection defect location, Inside the regular reflection failure If there is no place, the part to be inspected is determined as “non-defective”, and when there is the specular reflection defective portion in the regular reflection image, and when the irregular reflection defective portion is not present in the irregular reflection image, If the part to be inspected is determined to be “color uneven product” and the position of the specular reflection image and the irregular reflection image are different from each other when the specular reflection defect location and the irregular reflection defect location are present, Is determined to be "color irregularity product and there are defective spots such as scratches", and in the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image, there are the regular reflection defective spot and the irregular reflection defective spot, respectively. When the positions are the same, the part to be inspected has “defect cause identifying means” for determining that “there is a defective portion such as a scratch”, thereby solving the above-described problem.

請求項3に係る外観検査方法は、被検査部品に光を照射し、その反射画像によって前記被検査部品の表面状態を検査する外観検査方法において、前記被検査部品に光を照射する1台の照明手段と、前記照明手段を点灯させた際に、正反射光が入射する位置に設置された正反射光用撮像手段と、乱反射光が入射する位置(前記正反射光が入射しない位置)に設置された乱反射光用撮像手段を有し、前記乱反射光用撮像手段で得られた乱反射画像と、前記正反射光用撮像手段で得られた正反射画像とを、所与の補正係数を用いて、前記乱反射画像と前記正反射画像の一方の画像のサイズを他方の画像のサイズに補正し、その結果、得られた正反射画像と乱反射画像に対して、前記正反射画像の中で明度が所与の正反射閾値SN以下の箇所(地の明るさに対して、暗く映っている箇所)を正反射不良箇所とし、前記乱反射画像の中で明度が所与の乱反射閾値SR以上の箇所(地の暗さに対して、明るく映っている箇所)を乱反射不良箇所とし、前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「良品」と判断し、前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がある場合で、且つ、前記乱反射画像の中に前記乱反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「色むら品」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が異なる場合、前記被検査部品は、「色むら品であって、且つ、キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が同じ位置である場合、前記被検査部品は、「キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断することによって、上記の課題を解決するものである。なお、この方法では、上述の記載から明らかなように2つの撮像手段(正反射光用及び乱反射光用)と1つの照明手段を使用する。   An appearance inspection method according to claim 3 is an appearance inspection method for irradiating light to a part to be inspected and inspecting a surface state of the part to be inspected by a reflection image thereof. Illumination means, imaging means for specular reflection light installed at a position where regular reflection light is incident when the illumination means is turned on, and a position where irregular reflection light is incident (position where the regular reflection light is not incident) An irregularly reflected light imaging means installed, and the irregular reflection image obtained by the irregularly reflected light imaging means and the regular reflection image obtained by the regular reflected light imaging means, using a given correction coefficient; Then, the size of one of the irregular reflection image and the regular reflection image is corrected to the size of the other image. As a result, the brightness of the regular reflection image with respect to the obtained regular reflection image and irregular reflection image is corrected. Is located below the given specular reflection threshold SN (brightness of the ground On the other hand, a spot that appears dark is defined as a specular reflection failure spot, and a spot whose brightness is greater than or equal to a given diffuse reflection threshold SR in the diffuse reflection image (a spot that appears bright relative to the darkness of the ground) If the regular reflection image does not include the regular reflection defect location, the part to be inspected is determined to be “non-defective”, and the regular reflection image includes the regular reflection failure location. When the irregular reflection image does not include the irregular reflection defective portion, the part to be inspected is determined to be “color irregularity product”, and the regular reflection defective portion and the irregular reflection image respectively in the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image. If there is a irregular reflection defective part and the position is different, the part to be inspected is determined to be “color irregularity product and defective part such as a scratch”, and among the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image Each of the specular reflection defects and the If the location if there is reflection defective portion is the same position, the inspection part, by determining that "there is a defective portion such as a scratch", is intended to solve the foregoing problems. In this method, as is apparent from the above description, two imaging means (for regular reflection light and irregular reflection light) and one illumination means are used.

請求項4に係る外観検査装置は、被検査部品に光を照射し、その反射画像によって前記被検査部品の表面状態を検査する外観検査装置において、前記被検査部品に光を照射する1台の“照明手段”と、前記照明手段を点灯させた際に、正反射光が入射する位置に設置された“正反射光用撮像手段”と、乱反射光が入射する位置に設置された“乱反射光用撮像手段”を有し、前記正反射光用撮像手段で得られた正反射画像と前記乱反射光用撮像手段で得られた乱反射画像とを、所与の補正係数を用いて、前記正反射画像と前記乱反射画像の一方の画像のサイズを他方の画像のサイズに補正する“画像サイズ補正手段”を有し、その結果、得られた正反射画像と乱反射画像に対して、前記正反射画像の中で明度が所与の正反射閾値SN以下の箇所を正反射不良箇所とし、前記乱反射画像の中で明度が所与の乱反射閾値SR以上の箇所を乱反射不良箇所とする“不良箇所判別手段”を有し、前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「良品」と判断し、前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がある場合で、且つ、前記乱反射画像の中に前記乱反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「色むら品」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が異なる場合、前記被検査部品は、「色むら品であって、且つ、キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が同じ位置である場合、前記被検査部品は、「キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断する“不良原因判別手段”を有することによって、上記の課題を解決するものである。   According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in the appearance inspection apparatus that irradiates light to the part to be inspected and inspects the surface state of the part to be inspected by a reflection image thereof, one unit that irradiates the part to be inspected with light. “Illuminating means”, “imaging means for specularly reflected light” installed at a position where specularly reflected light is incident when the illuminating means is turned on, and “diffusely reflected light” installed at a position where irregularly reflected light is incident The regular reflection image obtained by the regular reflection light imaging means and the irregular reflection image obtained by the irregular reflection light imaging means using a given correction coefficient. An “image size correcting unit” that corrects the size of one of the image and the irregular reflection image to the size of the other image. As a result, the regular reflection image is obtained with respect to the obtained regular reflection image and irregular reflection image. Locations where the brightness is less than the given specular reflection threshold SN A part having a regular reflection failure, and having a part having a lightness of a given diffuse reflection threshold SR or more in the irregular reflection image as a irregular reflection defective part, has a “defective part determination unit”, and the regular reflection defect is included in the regular reflection image. If there is no location, the part to be inspected is determined as “non-defective”, and if there is the regular reflection failure location in the regular reflection image, and if there is no irregular reflection failure location in the irregular reflection image, If the part to be inspected is determined to be “color uneven product” and the position of the specular reflection image and the irregular reflection image are different from each other when the specular reflection defect location and the irregular reflection defect location are present, Is determined to be "color irregularity product and there are defective spots such as scratches", and in the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image, there are the regular reflection defective spot and the irregular reflection defective spot, respectively. The same position If the inspection part, by having a determining that "there is a defective portion such as a scratch," "failure cause determining means" is intended to solve the foregoing problems.

請求項1に係る外観検査方法及び請求項2に係る外観検査装置によれば、被検査部品の正反射画像及び乱反射画像を一つの撮像手段で順次撮像し、それぞれの画像中の不良箇所の有無を判定することによって、前記被検査部品が、「良品」なのか、「色むら品」なのか、「キズ等の不良箇所あり」なのか、「色むら品であって、且つ、キズ等の不良箇所あり」なのかを、判定することが可能になる。   According to the appearance inspection method according to claim 1 and the appearance inspection apparatus according to claim 2, the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image of the part to be inspected are sequentially picked up by one image pickup means, and the presence or absence of a defective portion in each image is detected. Whether the part to be inspected is a “non-defective product”, a “color uneven product”, “a defective part such as a scratch”, “a color uneven product, and a scratch, etc. It is possible to determine whether or not there is a defective portion.

請求項3に係る外観検査方法及び請求項4に係る外観検査装置によれば、被検査部品の正反射画像及び乱反射画像を二つの撮像手段で同時に撮像し、それぞれの画像中の不良箇所の有無を判定することによって、前記被検査部品が、「良品」なのか、「色むら品」なのか、「キズ等の不良箇所あり」なのか、「色むら品であって、且つ、キズ等の不良箇所あり」なのかを、高速で判定することが可能である。   According to the appearance inspection method according to claim 3 and the appearance inspection apparatus according to claim 4, the specular reflection image and the irregular reflection image of the part to be inspected are simultaneously picked up by two image pickup means, and the presence or absence of a defective portion in each image is detected. Whether the part to be inspected is a “non-defective product”, a “color uneven product”, “a defective part such as a scratch”, “a color uneven product, and a scratch, etc. It is possible to determine at high speed whether there is a defective portion.

以下、本発明に係る外観検査方法及び外観検査装置について、図面に基づき詳述する。なお、実施例1は、請求項1及び請求項2に係る発明に対応しており、実施例2は、請求項3及び請求項4に係る発明に対応している。請求項2に係る外観検査装置は、請求項1に係る外観検査方法を具現化するものであり、請求項4に係る外観検査装置は、請求項3に係る外観検査方法を具現化するものであるので、以下の説明では、外観検査方法に焦点を当てて説明する。   Hereinafter, an appearance inspection method and an appearance inspection apparatus according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. The first embodiment corresponds to the inventions according to claims 1 and 2, and the second embodiment corresponds to the inventions according to claims 3 and 4. The appearance inspection apparatus according to claim 2 embodies the appearance inspection method according to claim 1, and the appearance inspection apparatus according to claim 4 embodies the appearance inspection method according to claim 3. Therefore, the following description will focus on the visual inspection method.

図1は、実施例1の外観検査方法を実施する際の装置構成を示している。符号10で示した装置は、被検査部品40の正常箇所に光を照射した際に正反射光が撮像手段20に入射するように配置された正反射光用照明手段である。ここで、撮像手段20は、例えば市販されている工業用白黒ビデオカメラが好適に用いられる。正反射光用照明手段10から照射された照射光のうち被検査部品40の表面で正反射したものだけが撮像手段20に入射するため、撮像手段20から得られる画像は、被検査部品に色むらもキズ等の不良箇所もない場合、全体が明るく映る。一方、被検査部品40にキズ等の不良箇所42がある場合、正反射光用照明手段10から照射された照射光は、不良箇所では正反射せずに乱反射し、撮像手段20に入射しないため、その部分が暗く映る。また、色むら44がある場合も、その部分での反射率が低下するため、その部分が暗く映る。その結果、得られる正反射画像は、図2(a)に示すような画像になる。   FIG. 1 shows an apparatus configuration when performing the appearance inspection method of the first embodiment. The apparatus denoted by reference numeral 10 is an illumination means for specular reflection light arranged so that specular reflection light is incident on the image pickup means 20 when light is irradiated on a normal part of the component 40 to be inspected. Here, for example, a commercially available industrial black-and-white video camera is preferably used as the imaging unit 20. Of the irradiation light emitted from the illumination device 10 for specular reflection light, only the light that is regularly reflected on the surface of the component 40 to be inspected is incident on the image pickup device 20, so that the image obtained from the image pickup device 20 has a color on the component under inspection. If there are no defects such as unevenness or scratches, the whole image appears bright. On the other hand, when there is a defective portion 42 such as a scratch on the component to be inspected 40, the irradiation light irradiated from the specular reflection light illumination means 10 is diffusely reflected without being regularly reflected at the defective portion, and does not enter the imaging means 20. , That part looks dark. Also, when there is color unevenness 44, the reflectance at that portion decreases, so that portion appears dark. As a result, the specular reflection image obtained is an image as shown in FIG.

また、乱反射光用照明手段30は、正反射光が撮像手段20に入射しない位置に設置されているため、被検査部品40が良品である場合、全体が暗く映る。一方、被検査部品40にキズ等の不良箇所42がある場合、その箇所で乱反射が発生し乱反射光の一部が、撮像手段20に入射するため、撮像手段20によって得られる乱反射画像は、図2(b)に示すように不良箇所42が明るく映る。また、色むら44のある場所では、反射角が変わらないため、乱反射画像には現れない。   Further, since the irregularly reflected light illuminating means 30 is installed at a position where the specularly reflected light does not enter the imaging means 20, when the part under test 40 is a non-defective product, the whole appears dark. On the other hand, when there is a defective portion 42 such as a scratch on the component to be inspected 40, irregular reflection occurs at that portion and part of the irregularly reflected light is incident on the imaging means 20. Therefore, the irregular reflection image obtained by the imaging means 20 is shown in FIG. As shown in 2 (b), the defective portion 42 appears bright. In addition, the reflection angle does not change at a place where the color unevenness 44 exists, and thus does not appear in the irregular reflection image.

以下に、図3に示したフローチャートに基づき実施例1の外観検査方法を詳述する。なお、以下の記述において括弧書きで示したS1、S2・・・は、図3のフローチャートに示したステップを意味している。また、撮像手段は、フローチャートの中では、単に「カメラ」と記載している。   Hereinafter, the appearance inspection method according to the first embodiment will be described in detail based on the flowchart shown in FIG. In the following description, S1, S2,... Shown in parentheses mean the steps shown in the flowchart of FIG. The imaging means is simply described as “camera” in the flowchart.

被検査部品が供給される(S1)と正反射光用照明手段の電源がオンになり、乱反射光用照明手段の電源がオフになる(S2)。そして、撮像手段により正反射画像を取得する(S3)。次に、正反射光用照明手段の電源をオフにし、乱反射光用照明手段の電源をオンにする(S4)。そして、撮像手段により乱反射画像を取得する(S5)。   When the component to be inspected is supplied (S1), the power of the regular reflection light illumination means is turned on, and the power of the irregular reflection light illumination means is turned off (S2). Then, a regular reflection image is acquired by the imaging means (S3). Next, the power source of the regular reflection light illumination unit is turned off, and the power source of the irregular reflection light illumination unit is turned on (S4). Then, an irregular reflection image is acquired by the imaging means (S5).

次に、正反射画像の中に正反射閾値SN以下の箇所があるか(S6)、乱反射画像の中に乱反射閾値SR以上の箇所があるか(S8)を判定する。ここで、正反射閾値SNと乱反射閾値SRの決定方法は、例えば、明度の階調を256階調とした場合、64階調(下から4分の1)をSNとし、192階調(上から4分の1)をSRとすることができる。しかしながら、SNとSRの決定は最終的な判定結果に大きく影響するため、予め同じ不良箇所を撮像してみて、正反射画像が暗部として捉えた形状と、乱反射画像が明部として捉えた形状ができるだけ等しくなるように試行錯誤で調整することが好ましい。   Next, it is determined whether or not there is a portion that is equal to or less than the regular reflection threshold SN in the regular reflection image (S6) or whether there is a portion that is equal to or greater than the irregular reflection threshold SR in the irregular reflection image (S8). Here, the method of determining the regular reflection threshold SN and the irregular reflection threshold SR is, for example, when the brightness gradation is 256 gradations, 64 gradations (one-fourth from the bottom) is SN, and 192 gradations (upper) Can be set to SR. However, since the determination of SN and SR greatly affects the final determination result, the shape of the specular reflection image captured as a dark portion and the shape of an irregular reflection image captured as a bright portion after capturing the same defective portion in advance are determined. It is preferable to adjust by trial and error so as to be as equal as possible.

また、基準部品を用いて、最も明度が高い場合(濃度値の最大値)を256階調とし、最も明度が低い場合(濃度値の最小値)を1階調と決めることによって、ダイナミック・レンジを大きくすることができ、判別精度を向上させることができる。   In addition, by using a reference part, the dynamic range is determined by determining 256 gradations when the brightness is the highest (maximum density value) and 1 gradation when the brightness is the lowest (minimum density value). Can be increased, and the discrimination accuracy can be improved.

S6において、正反射閾値SN以下の箇所がない場合、被検査部品は「良品」と判断され排出される(S7)。また、正反射閾値SN以下の箇所がある場合であって、乱反射閾値SR以上の箇所がない場合、被検査部品は「色むら品」と判断され排出される(S9)   In S6, when there is no portion equal to or less than the regular reflection threshold SN, the part to be inspected is determined as “good” and discharged (S7). In addition, when there is a portion that is equal to or less than the regular reflection threshold SN and there is no portion that is equal to or greater than the irregular reflection threshold SR, the part to be inspected is determined to be “color uneven product” and discharged (S9).

さらに、正反射画像の中に正反射閾値SN以下の箇所があり(S6)、しかも、乱反射画像の中に乱反射閾値SR以上の箇所がある(S8)場合、両方の画像において不良と判断された箇所は、同じ位置だけかを判定する(S10)。その結果、同じ位置だけではない場合、被検査部品は、「色むら品であり、且つ、キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断され排出される(S11)。一方、両方の画像において不良と判断された箇所は、同じ位置だけである場合、被検査部品は、「キズ等の不良箇所のみがある」と判断され排出される(S12)。以上のフローが繰り返されることによって、人手によらず、客観的に被検査部品の良否が判断される。   Furthermore, when there are locations that are less than or equal to the regular reflection threshold SN in the regular reflection image (S6) and there are locations that are greater than or equal to the irregular reflection threshold SR in the irregular reflection image (S8), it is determined that both images are defective. It is determined whether the location is the same position (S10). As a result, if it is not only at the same position, the part to be inspected is judged to be “color uneven product and defective part such as a scratch” and discharged (S11). On the other hand, if only the same position is determined to be defective in both images, it is determined that “there is only a defective portion such as a flaw” and the component to be inspected is ejected (S12). By repeating the above flow, the quality of the part to be inspected is objectively determined regardless of the manual operation.

次に照明手段を1つとして、正反射光用及び乱反射光用の2つの撮像手段を用いることによって、検査速度をより高速にした外観検査方法を説明する。   Next, an appearance inspection method in which the inspection speed is increased by using two imaging means for regular reflection light and irregular reflection light with one illumination means will be described.

図4は、実施例2の外観検査方法を実施する際の装置構成を示している。符号110で示した装置は、被検査部品140を照射する照明装置である。そして、被検査部品140の表面で正反射した正反射光が入射する位置に正反射光用撮像手段120(以下、「カメラ1」という)が配置され、乱反射した乱反射光が入射する位置(すなわち、正反射光が入射しない位置)に乱反射光用撮像手段130(以下、「カメラ2」という)が配置されている。   FIG. 4 shows an apparatus configuration when performing the appearance inspection method of the second embodiment. The device denoted by reference numeral 110 is an illumination device that irradiates the component to be inspected 140. Then, the specularly reflected light imaging means 120 (hereinafter referred to as “camera 1”) is arranged at a position where the specularly reflected light that is specularly reflected by the surface of the component to be inspected 140, and a position where the irregularly reflected irregularly reflected light is incident (that is, the camera 1). The irregularly reflected light imaging means 130 (hereinafter referred to as “camera 2”) is disposed at a position where the regular reflected light is not incident.

図4に示したように2台のカメラ、すなわち、カメラ1及びカメラ2を用いて、一つの被検査部品を撮像すると被検査部品と2台のカメラとの角度が、それぞれのカメラで異なるため、正反射画像と乱反射画像とを比較すると図5にXで示したように被検査部品とカメラの視線のなす角度の大きなカメラ2で撮像された乱反射画像の方がカメラ1で撮像された正反射画像よりも若干長く撮像される。   As shown in FIG. 4, when one part to be inspected is imaged using two cameras, that is, the camera 1 and the camera 2, the angle between the part to be inspected and the two cameras is different for each camera. When the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image are compared, as shown by X in FIG. 5, the irregular reflection image captured by the camera 2 having a larger angle formed by the part to be inspected and the line of sight of the camera is captured by the camera 1. The image is taken slightly longer than the reflected image.

しかし、カメラ1とカメラ2を図6に示したように被検査部品とカメラの視線のなす角度を、それぞれ、角度θ1及びθ2とし、2台のカメラは、被検査部品の中央から同一の垂直面における円周上の距離r(半径)に設置する。被検査物品のサイズ(紙面上では横方向の長さ)をdとすると、これらの既知の値θ1、θ2、r、dを用いて、一方の画像を他方の画像のサイズに補正することが可能である。そのときの補正係数m1、n1、m2、n2の導出方法を図7、図8を用いて説明する。   However, as shown in FIG. 6, the angles formed between the parts to be inspected and the camera's line of sight are the angles θ1 and θ2, respectively, and the two cameras have the same vertical from the center of the parts to be inspected. It is installed at a distance r (radius) on the circumference of the surface. If the size of the article to be inspected (the length in the horizontal direction on the paper surface) is d, it is possible to correct one image to the size of the other image using these known values θ1, θ2, r, and d. Is possible. A method for deriving the correction coefficients m1, n1, m2, and n2 at that time will be described with reference to FIGS.

カメラ1、カメラ2が、それぞれ撮像した正反射画像及び乱反射画像は、カメラ1及びカメラ2が被検査部品に対して角度がついているので、歪んだ画像になる。すなわち、正反射光用のカメラ1では図7に、乱反射光用のカメラ2では図8に示したように、図中に「カメラに撮像された画像」とキャプションを付したものが、実際にカメラを通して見ている画像になる。すなわち、2台のカメラともレンズの中心から紙面で言うとカメラと被検査部品の中心を結んだ線に対して、右側と左側で歪み方が異なる。図7では、m1とn1、図8では、m2とn2がどちらも被検査部品のd/2に相当する。   The specular reflection image and the irregular reflection image captured by the camera 1 and the camera 2, respectively, are distorted images because the camera 1 and the camera 2 are angled with respect to the component to be inspected. That is, as shown in FIG. 7 for the specularly reflected light camera 1 and FIG. 8 for the irregularly reflected light camera 2, the caption “Image captured by the camera” in the figure is actually attached. The image you see through the camera. That is, in the case of the two cameras in terms of the paper surface from the center of the lens, the distortion differs between the right side and the left side with respect to the line connecting the camera and the center of the part to be inspected. In FIG. 7, m1 and n1, and in FIG. 8, both m2 and n2 correspond to d / 2 of the component to be inspected.

図7において、既知の値θ1、r、dから、m1及びn1を求めるには、次の三角関数を交えた計算式に基づき導出できる。
h1=r・sinθ1 ・・・ (1)
s1=r・cosθ1−d/2 ・・・ (2)
φ1=tan-1(h1/s1) ・・・ (3)
δ1=tan-1(h1/(d+s1)) ・・・ (4)
α1=π/2+θ1−φ1 ・・・ (5)
γ1=φ1−δ1 ・・・ (6)
β1=π−α1−γ1=θ1+φ1−γ1 ・・・ (7)
W1=(d/2)・cosθ1 ・・・ (8)
t1=r−w1 ・・・ (9)
m1=(d/2)・sinθ1 ・・・ (10)
n1=t1/tanβ1 ・・・ (11)
In FIG. 7, in order to obtain m1 and n1 from known values θ1, r, and d, they can be derived based on a calculation formula including the following trigonometric functions.
h1 = r · sin θ1 (1)
s1 = r · cos θ1−d / 2 (2)
φ1 = tan −1 (h1 / s1) (3)
δ1 = tan −1 (h1 / (d + s1)) (4)
α1 = π / 2 + θ1-φ1 (5)
γ1 = φ1−δ1 (6)
β1 = π−α1−γ1 = θ1 + φ1−γ1 (7)
W1 = (d / 2) · cos θ1 (8)
t1 = r−w1 (9)
m1 = (d / 2) · sin θ1 (10)
n1 = t1 / tanβ1 (11)

同様にして、図8において、既知の値θ2、r、dから、m2及びn2を求めるには、次の三角関数を交えた計算式に基づき導出できる。
h2=r・sinθ2 ・・・ (12)
s2=r・cosθ2−d/2 ・・・ (13)
φ2=tan-1(h2/s2) ・・・ (14)
δ2=tan-1(h2/(d+s2)) ・・・ (15)
α2=π/2+θ2−φ2 ・・・ (16)
γ2=φ2−δ2 ・・・ (17)
β2=π−α2−γ2=θ2+φ2−γ2 ・・・ (18)
W2=(d/2)・cosθ2 ・・・ (19)
t2=r−w2 ・・・ (20)
n2=t2/tanβ2 ・・・ (21)
m2=(d/2)・sinθ2 ・・・ (22)
Similarly, in FIG. 8, in order to obtain m2 and n2 from known values θ2, r, and d, they can be derived on the basis of a calculation formula including the following trigonometric functions.
h2 = r · sin θ2 (12)
s2 = r · cos θ2−d / 2 (13)
φ2 = tan −1 (h2 / s2) (14)
δ2 = tan −1 (h2 / (d + s2)) (15)
α2 = π / 2 + θ2−φ2 (16)
γ2 = φ2−δ2 (17)
β2 = π−α2−γ2 = θ2 + φ2−γ2 (18)
W2 = (d / 2) · cos θ2 (19)
t2 = r−w2 (20)
n2 = t2 / tanβ2 (21)
m2 = (d / 2) · sin θ2 (22)

このようにして得られたm1、m2、n1、n2を用いて、カメラ1で撮像された撮像画像を、カメラ2の撮像画像と同等なサイズに変換するには、カメラ1に撮像された右側の任意の点をXR、左側の任意の点をXLとし、補正された左右の点をXRXLとすれば、
XR=(m2/m1)・XR
XL=(n2/n1)・XL
として表すことができる。図9(a)に示したようにカメラ1で検出した色むら、キズ等の不良箇所等を有する正反射画像を上記補正式にて位置変換を行うと、図9(b)のようになり、図9(c)に示したカメラ2で撮像された乱反射画像と同等なサイズになる。
In order to convert the captured image captured by the camera 1 into a size equivalent to the captured image of the camera 2 using m1, m2, n1, and n2 obtained in this way, the right side captured by the camera 1 is used. XR any point, left any point of the XL, if the point of the corrected left and right XR, and XL,
XR = (m2 / m1) · XR
XL = (n2 / n1) · XL
Can be expressed as As shown in FIG. 9B, when the position of a specular reflection image having a defective portion such as color unevenness or a flaw detected by the camera 1 is converted by the above correction equation as shown in FIG. 9A. The size is equivalent to the irregular reflection image captured by the camera 2 shown in FIG.

上記のようにして補正係数m1、n1、m2、n2を決定して、その補正係数に基づいて補正後の前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像をする工程は、図10に示したフローチャートのS1からS5に相当している。その後、フローチャートのS6からS12にしたがって、「良品である」、「色むら品である」、「色むら品、且つ、キズ等による不良箇所あり」、「キズ等の不良箇所のみがある」の4種類に判別することができる。なお、S6からs12の工程は、実施例1で説明したものと同じであるため、詳細な説明については割愛する。また、この例では、カメラ1の画像を補正してカメラ2の画像にマッチングさせたが、カメラ2の画像を補正してカメラ1の画像にマッチングさせても良い。   The steps of determining the correction coefficients m1, n1, m2, and n2 as described above and performing the corrected regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image based on the correction coefficients are from S1 of the flowchart shown in FIG. This corresponds to S5. After that, according to S6 to S12 of the flowchart, “non-defective product”, “color uneven product”, “color uneven product and defective part due to scratches”, “only defective part such as scratches” There are four types. In addition, since the process of S6 to s12 is the same as what was demonstrated in Example 1, it abbreviate | omits about detailed description. In this example, the image of the camera 1 is corrected and matched with the image of the camera 2. However, the image of the camera 2 may be corrected and matched with the image of the camera 1.

さらに、補正したデータを実際に画像として表す必要はなく、例えば、不良箇所を特定した段階で、不良箇所固有の情報、例えば、不良箇所の重心位置などを距離補正し、補正していないカメラの画像との不良箇所判定を行う方法をとっても良い。   Furthermore, it is not necessary to actually represent the corrected data as an image. For example, at the stage where the defective portion is identified, information specific to the defective portion, for example, the position of the center of gravity of the defective portion is corrected for distance, and the uncorrected camera A method of determining a defective portion with an image may be taken.

なお、上記の実施例では、被検査部品として鋼鉄などの金属を例示しているが、光を反射するものであれば、ガラスやプラスチック製の部品に対しても適用可能である。   In the above-described embodiment, a metal such as steel is exemplified as the part to be inspected. However, it can be applied to a part made of glass or plastic as long as it reflects light.

本発明の外観検査方法によれば、特に高価なカメラや照明装置、偏向フィルタ等を必要とすることなく、被検査物品の表面における正反射と乱反射を撮像することによって、不良品の態様、すなわち「色むら品」、「キズ等の凹凸を有する不良品」等を同定することができ、その結果、発見された不良品の再生処理を素早く行うことができる等、その産業上の利用可能性は、きわめて高い。   According to the appearance inspection method of the present invention, by capturing regular reflection and irregular reflection on the surface of the article to be inspected without particularly requiring an expensive camera, illumination device, deflection filter, or the like, It is possible to identify "color uneven products", "defective products with irregularities such as scratches", etc., and as a result, it is possible to quickly reprocess the found defective products, and its industrial applicability Is extremely expensive.

本発明の実施例1における外観検査方法の装置構成を示した図面である。It is drawing which showed the apparatus structure of the external appearance inspection method in Example 1 of this invention. 本発明の実施例1において撮像手段で撮像された画像であって、(a)が正反射画像であり、(b)が乱反射画像である。It is the image imaged with the imaging means in Example 1 of this invention, Comprising: (a) is a regular reflection image, (b) is an irregular reflection image. 本発明の実施例1における外観検査方法のフローチャートである。It is a flowchart of the external appearance inspection method in Example 1 of this invention. 本発明の実施例2における外観検査方法の装置構成を示した図面である。It is drawing which showed the apparatus structure of the external appearance inspection method in Example 2 of this invention. 本発明の実施例2において撮像手段で撮像された画像であって、左が正反射画像であり、右が乱反射画像である。In Example 2 of this invention, it is the image imaged with the imaging means, Comprising: The left is a regular reflection image and the right is an irregular reflection image. 本発明の実施例2におけるカメラと被検査部品の位置関係を示した図である。It is the figure which showed the positional relationship of the camera and to-be-inspected part in Example 2 of this invention. 本発明の実施例2における正反射画像の変換式を求める図面である。It is drawing which calculates | requires the conversion formula of the regular reflection image in Example 2 of this invention. 本発明の実施例2における乱反射画像の変換式を求める図面である。It is drawing which calculates | requires the conversion type | formula of the irregular reflection image in Example 2 of this invention. 本発明の実施例2における正反射画像のサイズを乱反射画像のサイズに変換させる過程を説明した図であり、(a)が変換前の正反射画像であり、(b)が変換後の正反射画像であり、(c)が乱反射画像である。It is a figure explaining the process in which the size of the regular reflection image in Example 2 of this invention is converted into the size of an irregular reflection image, (a) is a regular reflection image before conversion, (b) is regular reflection after conversion. (C) is an irregular reflection image. 本発明の実施例2における外観検査方法のフローチャートである。It is a flowchart of the external appearance inspection method in Example 2 of this invention.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

10 ・・・ 正反射光用照明手段
20 ・・・ 撮像手段
30 ・・・ 乱反射光用照明手段
40 ・・・ 被検査部品
42 ・・・ キズ等の不良箇所
44 ・・・ 色むら
110 ・・・ 照明手段
120 ・・・ 正反射光用撮像手段
130 ・・・ 乱反射光用撮像手段
140 ・・・ 被検査部品
142 ・・・ キズ等の不良箇所
144 ・・・ 色むら
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 ... Illumination means 20 for specular reflection light ... Imaging means 30 ... Illumination means 40 for irregular reflection light ... Parts 42 to be inspected ... Defect 44 such as a flaw ... Color unevenness 110 ... Illuminating means 120: specularly reflected light imaging means 130 ... diffusely reflected light imaging means 140 ... inspected part 142 ... defective part 144 such as scratches ... color unevenness

Claims (4)

被検査部品に光を照射し、その反射画像によって前記被検査部品の表面状態を検査する外観検査方法において、
前記被検査部品の正常箇所に光を照射した際に正反射光が撮像手段に入射するように正反射光用照明手段と前記撮像手段を設置し、
前記被検査部品の不良箇所に光を照射した際に乱反射光が前記撮像手段に入射するように乱反射光用照明手段を設置し、
前記正反射光によって前記撮像手段が取得した正反射画像の中で明度が所与の正反射閾値SN以下の箇所を正反射不良箇所とし、
前記乱反射光によって前記撮像手段が取得した乱反射画像の中で明度が所与の乱反射閾値SR以上の箇所を乱反射不良箇所とし、
前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「良品」と判断し、
前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がある場合で、且つ、前記乱反射画像の中に前記乱反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「色むら品」と判断し、
前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が異なる場合、前記被検査部品は、「色むら品であって、且つ、キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断し、
前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が同じ位置である場合、前記被検査部品は、「キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断することを特徴とする外観検査方法。
In the appearance inspection method of irradiating the part to be inspected with light and inspecting the surface state of the part to be inspected by its reflection image,
The specular reflection light illumination unit and the imaging unit are installed so that the specular reflection light is incident on the imaging unit when light is emitted to the normal part of the component to be inspected.
When irradiating light to a defective part of the part to be inspected, an illuminating means for irregularly reflected light is installed so that irregularly reflected light enters the imaging means,
In the regular reflection image acquired by the imaging means by the regular reflection light, a spot whose brightness is a given regular reflection threshold SN or less is a regular reflection failure spot,
In the irregular reflection image acquired by the imaging means by the irregular reflection light, a location where the brightness is a given irregular reflection threshold SR or more is an irregular reflection defective location,
If the specular reflection image does not have the specular reflection defect, the part to be inspected is determined to be “good”,
If the regular reflection image includes the irregular reflection defective portion and the irregular reflection image does not include the irregular reflection defective portion, the part to be inspected is determined to be a “color uneven product”;
When the specular reflection image and the irregular reflection image have the specular reflection defect portion and the irregular reflection defect portion, respectively, and the positions thereof are different, the inspected part is “color irregularity product and scratches etc. It is judged that there is a defective part of
In the case where there are the regular reflection defect location and the irregular reflection defect location in the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image, respectively, and when the position is the same position, the part to be inspected is "there is a defect location such as a scratch" An appearance inspection method characterized by judging.
被検査部品に光を照射し、その反射画像によって前記被検査部品の表面状態を検査する外観検査装置において、
前記被検査部品の正常箇所に光を照射した際に正反射光が“撮像手段”に入射するように“正反射光用照明手段”と前記撮像手段が設置され、
前記被検査部品の不良箇所に光を照射した際に乱反射光が前記撮像手段に入射するように“乱反射光用照明手段”が設置され、
前記正反射光によって前記撮像手段が取得した正反射画像の中で明度が所与の正反射閾値SN以下の箇所を正反射不良箇所とし、前記乱反射光によって前記撮像手段が取得した乱反射画像の中で明度が所与の乱反射閾値SR以上の箇所を乱反射不良箇所とする“不良箇所判別手段”を有し、
前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「良品」と判断し、前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がある場合で、且つ、前記乱反射画像の中に前記乱反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「色むら品」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が異なる場合、前記被検査部品は、「色むら品であって、且つ、キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が同じ位置である場合、前記被検査部品は、「キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断する“不良原因識別手段”を有することを特徴とする外観検査装置。
In the appearance inspection apparatus that irradiates the part to be inspected with light and inspects the surface state of the part to be inspected by its reflection image,
The “illuminating means for specular reflection light” and the imaging means are installed so that the specularly reflected light is incident on the “imaging means” when the normal part of the part to be inspected is irradiated with light,
"Irradiating means for irregularly reflected light" is installed so that irregularly reflected light is incident on the imaging means when irradiating light on a defective part of the part to be inspected,
Of the specular reflection image acquired by the imaging means by the specular reflection light, a part having a lightness equal to or less than a given specular reflection threshold SN in the specular reflection image acquired by the imaging means is used as a specular reflection defective part. And having a “defective part discriminating means” in which a part having a lightness equal to or greater than a given irregular reflection threshold SR is used as an irregular reflection defective part,
If the regular reflection image does not include the regular reflection defect portion, the part to be inspected is determined as “non-defective”, the regular reflection image includes the regular reflection defect portion, and the irregular reflection image. When the irregular reflection defective portion is not present in the case, the part to be inspected is determined to be “color uneven product”, and the regular reflection defective portion and the irregular reflection defective portion are present in the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image, respectively. If the position is different, the part to be inspected is determined to be “color irregularity product and defective part such as a scratch”, and the regular reflection defect is included in each of the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image. If the location and the irregular reflection defective location are the same position, the part to be inspected has “defect cause identifying means” for determining that “there is a defective location such as a scratch” Inspection device.
被検査部品に光を照射し、その反射画像によって前記被検査部品の表面状態を検査する外観検査方法において、
前記被検査部品に光を照射する1台の照明手段と、前記照明手段を点灯させた際に、正反射光が入射する位置に設置された正反射光用撮像手段と、乱反射光が入射する位置に設置された乱反射光用撮像手段を有し、
前記正反射光用撮像手段で得られた正反射画像と前記乱反射光用撮像手段で得られた乱反射画像とを、所与の補正係数を用いて、前記正反射画像と前記乱反射画像の一方の画像のサイズを他方の画像のサイズに補正し、その結果、得られた正反射画像と乱反射画像に対して、
前記正反射画像の中で明度が所与の正反射閾値SN以下の箇所を正反射不良箇所とし、
前記乱反射画像の中で明度が所与の乱反射閾値SR以上の箇所を乱反射不良箇所とし、
前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「良品」と判断し、
前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がある場合で、且つ、前記乱反射画像の中に前記乱反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「色むら品」と判断し、
前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が異なる場合、前記被検査部品は、「色むら品であって、且つ、キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断し、
前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が同じ位置である場合、前記被検査部品は、「キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断することを特徴とする外観検査方法。
In the appearance inspection method of irradiating the part to be inspected with light and inspecting the surface state of the part to be inspected by its reflection image,
One illumination unit that irradiates light to the component to be inspected, an imaging unit for regular reflection light that is installed at a position where regular reflection light is incident when the illumination unit is turned on, and irregular reflection light is incident Having an imaging means for diffusely reflected light installed at a position;
The specular reflection image obtained by the specular reflection light imaging means and the irregular reflection image obtained by the irregular reflection light imaging means, using a given correction coefficient, one of the specular reflection image and the irregular reflection image. The size of the image is corrected to the size of the other image, and as a result, the obtained regular reflection image and irregular reflection image are
In the regular reflection image, a spot whose brightness is not more than a given regular reflection threshold SN is a regular reflection failure spot,
In the irregular reflection image, a portion having a lightness equal to or higher than a given irregular reflection threshold SR is defined as an irregular reflection defective portion,
If the specular reflection image does not have the specular reflection defect, the part to be inspected is determined to be “good”,
If the regular reflection image includes the irregular reflection defective portion and the irregular reflection image does not include the irregular reflection defective portion, the part to be inspected is determined to be a “color uneven product”;
When the specular reflection image and the irregular reflection image have the specular reflection defect portion and the irregular reflection defect portion, respectively, and the positions thereof are different, the inspected part is “color irregularity product and scratches etc. It is judged that there is a defective part of
In the case where there are the regular reflection defect location and the irregular reflection defect location in the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image, respectively, and when the position is the same position, the part to be inspected is "there is a defect location such as a scratch" An appearance inspection method characterized by judging.
被検査部品に光を照射し、その反射画像によって前記被検査部品の表面状態を検査する外観検査装置において、
前記被検査部品に光を照射する1台の“照明手段”と、前記照明手段を点灯させた際に、正反射光が入射する位置に設置された“正反射光用撮像手段”と、乱反射光が入射する位置に設置された“乱反射光用撮像手段”を有し、
前記正反射光用撮像手段で得られた正反射画像と前記乱反射光用撮像手段で得られた乱反射画像とを、所与の補正係数を用いて、前記正反射画像と前記乱反射画像の一方の画像のサイズを他方の画像のサイズに補正する“画像サイズ補正手段”を有し、
その結果、得られた正反射画像と乱反射画像に対して、前記正反射画像の中で明度が所与の正反射閾値SN以下の箇所を正反射不良箇所とし、前記乱反射画像の中で明度が所与の乱反射閾値SR以上の箇所を乱反射不良箇所とする“不良箇所判別手段”を有し、
前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「良品」と判断し、前記正反射画像の中に前記正反射不良箇所がある場合で、且つ、前記乱反射画像の中に前記乱反射不良箇所がない場合、前記被検査部品を「色むら品」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が異なる場合、前記被検査部品は、「色むら品であって、且つ、キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断し、前記正反射画像及び前記乱反射画像の中に各々前記正反射不良箇所及び前記乱反射不良箇所がある場合でその位置が同じ位置である場合、前記被検査部品は、「キズ等の不良箇所あり」と判断する“不良原因判別手段”を有することを特徴とする外観検査装置。
In the appearance inspection apparatus that irradiates the part to be inspected with light and inspects the surface state of the part to be inspected by its reflection image,
One “illuminating means” for irradiating light to the component to be inspected, “imaging means for specularly reflected light” installed at a position where regular reflected light is incident when the illuminating means is turned on, and irregular reflection “Imaging means for diffusely reflected light” installed at a position where light enters,
The specular reflection image obtained by the specular reflection light imaging means and the irregular reflection image obtained by the irregular reflection light imaging means, using a given correction coefficient, one of the specular reflection image and the irregular reflection image. “Image size correction means” for correcting the size of the image to the size of the other image,
As a result, with respect to the obtained regular reflection image and irregular reflection image, the regular reflection image has a portion whose lightness is not more than a given regular reflection threshold SN as a regular reflection failure portion, and the lightness in the irregular reflection image is Having a “defect location determination means” that makes a location where the irregular reflection threshold SR or more is an irregular reflection defect location;
If the regular reflection image does not include the regular reflection defect portion, the part to be inspected is determined as “non-defective”, the regular reflection image includes the regular reflection defect portion, and the irregular reflection image. When the irregular reflection defective portion is not present in the case, the part to be inspected is determined to be “color uneven product”, and the regular reflection defective portion and the irregular reflection defective portion are present in the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image, respectively. If the position is different, the part to be inspected is determined to be “color irregularity product and defective part such as a scratch”, and the regular reflection defect is included in each of the regular reflection image and the irregular reflection image. If there is a spot and the irregular reflection defective part, and the position is the same position, the part to be inspected has “defect cause determining means” for determining that “there is a defective part such as a scratch” Inspection device.
JP2006099007A 2006-03-31 2006-03-31 Visual inspection method and visual inspection device Pending JP2007271510A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006099007A JP2007271510A (en) 2006-03-31 2006-03-31 Visual inspection method and visual inspection device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006099007A JP2007271510A (en) 2006-03-31 2006-03-31 Visual inspection method and visual inspection device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007271510A true JP2007271510A (en) 2007-10-18

Family

ID=38674453

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006099007A Pending JP2007271510A (en) 2006-03-31 2006-03-31 Visual inspection method and visual inspection device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2007271510A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009122037A (en) * 2007-11-16 2009-06-04 Tsubakimoto Chain Co Appearance inspecting device of chains and appearance inspecting method using it
CN103512886A (en) * 2012-06-14 2014-01-15 北汽福田汽车股份有限公司 Measuring instrument for measuring distortion on surface of workpiece
JP6117398B1 (en) * 2016-03-30 2017-04-19 日新製鋼株式会社 Steel plate surface defect inspection apparatus and surface defect inspection method
CN113960044A (en) * 2021-10-12 2022-01-21 湄洲湾职业技术学院 Visual acquisition equipment for jade processing degree inspection and use method thereof

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04204144A (en) * 1990-11-30 1992-07-24 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Surface-defect inspecting apparatus
JPH04204148A (en) * 1990-11-30 1992-07-24 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Surface-defect inspecting apparatus
JPH06137844A (en) * 1992-10-30 1994-05-20 Mitsubishi Kasei Corp Outer contour inspection method for body to be inspected
JPH07128240A (en) * 1993-11-04 1995-05-19 Konica Corp Inspection device of electrophotographic photoreceptor defect
JPH07128241A (en) * 1993-11-05 1995-05-19 Konica Corp Inspection device of electrophotographic photoreceptor defect
JPH10206335A (en) * 1997-01-20 1998-08-07 Ricoh Co Ltd Surface defect inspecting device and inspecting method
JPH11311510A (en) * 1998-04-27 1999-11-09 Asahi Glass Co Ltd Method and apparatus for inspection of very small uneven part
JPH11326236A (en) * 1998-05-13 1999-11-26 Ricoh Co Ltd Surface layer defect-detection device
JPH11326224A (en) * 1998-03-15 1999-11-26 Omron Corp Inspection method and device
JP2003075363A (en) * 2001-06-21 2003-03-12 Ricoh Co Ltd Device and method for inspecting defect

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04204144A (en) * 1990-11-30 1992-07-24 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Surface-defect inspecting apparatus
JPH04204148A (en) * 1990-11-30 1992-07-24 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Surface-defect inspecting apparatus
JPH06137844A (en) * 1992-10-30 1994-05-20 Mitsubishi Kasei Corp Outer contour inspection method for body to be inspected
JPH07128240A (en) * 1993-11-04 1995-05-19 Konica Corp Inspection device of electrophotographic photoreceptor defect
JPH07128241A (en) * 1993-11-05 1995-05-19 Konica Corp Inspection device of electrophotographic photoreceptor defect
JPH10206335A (en) * 1997-01-20 1998-08-07 Ricoh Co Ltd Surface defect inspecting device and inspecting method
JPH11326224A (en) * 1998-03-15 1999-11-26 Omron Corp Inspection method and device
JPH11311510A (en) * 1998-04-27 1999-11-09 Asahi Glass Co Ltd Method and apparatus for inspection of very small uneven part
JPH11326236A (en) * 1998-05-13 1999-11-26 Ricoh Co Ltd Surface layer defect-detection device
JP2003075363A (en) * 2001-06-21 2003-03-12 Ricoh Co Ltd Device and method for inspecting defect

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009122037A (en) * 2007-11-16 2009-06-04 Tsubakimoto Chain Co Appearance inspecting device of chains and appearance inspecting method using it
CN103512886A (en) * 2012-06-14 2014-01-15 北汽福田汽车股份有限公司 Measuring instrument for measuring distortion on surface of workpiece
CN103512886B (en) * 2012-06-14 2015-10-28 北汽福田汽车股份有限公司 For the measuring instrument of measuring workpieces surface distortion
JP6117398B1 (en) * 2016-03-30 2017-04-19 日新製鋼株式会社 Steel plate surface defect inspection apparatus and surface defect inspection method
JP2017181222A (en) * 2016-03-30 2017-10-05 日新製鋼株式会社 Steel plate surface defect inspection device and surface defect inspection method
WO2017168780A1 (en) * 2016-03-30 2017-10-05 日新製鋼株式会社 Device and method for inspecting surface defect in steel plate
KR20170137222A (en) * 2016-03-30 2017-12-12 닛신 세이코 가부시키가이샤 Apparatus for inspecting surface defects of steel sheet and method for inspecting surface defects
CN107533013A (en) * 2016-03-30 2018-01-02 日新制钢株式会社 The surface defect inspection apparatus and surface defect inspection method of steel plate
KR101867256B1 (en) * 2016-03-30 2018-06-12 닛신 세이코 가부시키가이샤 Apparatus for inspecting surface defects of steel sheet and method for inspecting surface defects
CN107533013B (en) * 2016-03-30 2018-11-27 日新制钢株式会社 The surface defect inspection apparatus and surface defect inspection method of steel plate
EP3364173A4 (en) * 2016-03-30 2018-12-05 Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. Device and method for inspecting surface defect in steel plate
US10267747B2 (en) 2016-03-30 2019-04-23 Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. Surface defect inspecting device and method for steel sheets
CN113960044A (en) * 2021-10-12 2022-01-21 湄洲湾职业技术学院 Visual acquisition equipment for jade processing degree inspection and use method thereof
CN113960044B (en) * 2021-10-12 2023-09-01 湄洲湾职业技术学院 Visual acquisition equipment for jade machining degree inspection and application method thereof

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6945245B2 (en) Visual inspection equipment
JP6531579B2 (en) Wafer inspection method and wafer inspection apparatus
KR20180009792A (en) Surface flaw detection device, surface flaw detection method, and manufacturing method for steel material
JP2012078144A (en) Surface defect inspection device for transparent body sheet-like material
JP4739044B2 (en) Appearance inspection device
KR20170137222A (en) Apparatus for inspecting surface defects of steel sheet and method for inspecting surface defects
WO2011086634A1 (en) Liquid crystal panel inspection method and device
JP2017120232A (en) Inspection device
JP2007285983A (en) Method and device for detecting damage or the like of workpiece
KR20150099956A (en) Lens inspection apparatus
KR101490830B1 (en) Thin film obverse face inspection method and inspection device
JP2007271510A (en) Visual inspection method and visual inspection device
JP2012026858A (en) Device for inspecting inner peripheral surface of cylindrical container
WO2022030325A1 (en) Inspection device, inspection method, and piston manufacturing method
JP6605772B1 (en) Defect inspection apparatus and defect inspection method
JP5634390B2 (en) Glass container defect inspection method and apparatus
JP2018155548A (en) Defect inspection method, defect inspection program, and defect inspection device
JP2014142256A (en) Printing inspection device of glass bottle
JP2006177852A (en) Surface inspection device and its method
JP5415162B2 (en) Cylindrical surface inspection equipment
JP2019207114A (en) Acceptance/rejection determination method and acceptance/rejection determination device for dull-finished material surface
JP2004125396A (en) Inspection method of drive transmission belt
JP2010230450A (en) Object surface inspection apparatus
JP6870262B2 (en) Flat glass inspection method and flat glass inspection equipment
JP4967132B2 (en) Defect inspection method for object surface

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080311

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100928

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20100930

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20101111

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110816

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20111213