JP2007156617A - Work assignment evaluation device and work assignment evaluation program - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a technique for supporting the selection of work to be entrusted to the outside of a company in an entrusting source company. <P>SOLUTION: Work data including information related to work that a user inputted via a terminal 150, and organization data including information related to an organization are received by a transmission/reception section 126. An evaluation value for each evaluation item for evaluating influence in terms of management by entrusting work to the outside of a company is calculated by an evaluation section 125, based on the data, and the calculated evaluation value is shaped and is transmitted to the terminal 150 as an evaluation result. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a technology that supports selection of work to be outsourced.

  As a support technology for outsourcing planning, for example, there is a technology described in Patent Document 1.

  The technology described in Patent Document 1 provides an evaluation sheet for evaluating a contractor company via a network to a plurality of evaluators, and comprehensive evaluation results from the evaluation sheets input by the plurality of evaluators. Create Then, by providing the evaluation result to the entrusting company, the entrusting company can determine whether or not to entrust the business with reference to the evaluation of the entrusted company.

JP 2002-334202 A

  As described above, the conventional technology supports the outsourcing plan by providing information on the outsourced company, and is not a technology that supports the selection of the business to be outsourced in the outsourced company.

  Then, an object of this invention is to provide the technique which supports selection of the operation | work commissioned outside in a consignment former company.

  In order to solve the above-described problems, the present invention provides a technique capable of obtaining an evaluation value for evaluating the management impact when business is shared inside and outside the company from the characteristics of the business and the organization. provide.

  For example, the present invention is a business assignment evaluation device that evaluates the business impact of outsourcing work to the outside, and has storage means, input / output means, and calculation means, and the storage means Business data including business information, organizational data including organizational information, evaluation data including information for calculating an evaluation value for each evaluation item for evaluating the business impact of outsourcing business , Task assignment setting data including information indicating whether to perform in-house or outside for each job is stored, and the calculation means stores the job data, organization data, and job assignment stored in the storage means An evaluation value calculation process for calculating an evaluation value for each evaluation item for evaluating the management impact by outsourcing the business using the setting data and the evaluation data, and the input / output means for calculating the calculated evaluation value Performing an evaluation value output processing for al outputs, and characterized.

  As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to obtain an evaluation value for evaluating the management impact when business is shared internally and externally from the characteristics of the business and the organization. Can support the selection of outsourced work.

  FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a server device 100 according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

  As shown in the figure, the server device 100 according to the present embodiment includes a storage unit 110, an input item selection unit 120, an evaluation item setting unit 121, a business model setting unit 122, an organization model setting unit 123, and a business sharing. A setting unit 124, an evaluation unit 125, and a transmission / reception unit 126 are provided. Server device 100 is connected to terminal 150 via network 140.

  As shown in the figure, the storage unit 110 has an input item selection data storage area 111, a business data storage area 112, an organization data storage area 113, an evaluation item data storage area 114, and a temporary storage area 115. is doing.

  Although not shown in the input item selection data storage area 111, the terminal 150 (to be described later) selects and displays input forms of evaluation item setting data, business data, organization data, and business assignment setting data. Data for generating a selection display form 120a (see FIG. 7) having an evaluation instruction area for calculating an evaluation value based on the obtained data is stored in a table format.

  In the business data storage area 112, a business list table 112a (see FIG. 2) that summarizes data for indicating business to be commissioned in a company and data for inputting parameters that define the business characteristics are collected. A business parameter table 112g (see FIG. 3) is stored.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the work list table 112a has a large classification input field 112b, a small classification input field 112c, a name input field 112d, an ID input field 112e, and a content input field 112f. .

  In the large classification input column 112b, the classification name that is the highest level when the work is classified is input. In the present embodiment, five categories of planning, development, operation, maintenance, and management are provided from the viewpoint of systemization process.

  In the small classification input column 112c, classification names obtained by subdividing the large classification are input. For example, in the present embodiment, as shown in the figure, in addition to providing a small category for IT strategy formulation, a small category such as information strategy formulation and human resource development plan formulation is provided for the major category of planning.

  In the name input field 112d, a business name to be entrusted in the company is input. For example, in this embodiment, operations such as technology trend surveys and strategy planning are input.

  In the ID input field 112e, identification information for uniquely identifying the work input in the name input field 112d is input.

  In the content input field 112f, the contents of the work input in the name input field 112d are input.

  As shown in FIG. 3, the business parameter table 112g has a classification input field 112h, a name input field 112i, an ID input field 112j, a unit input field 112k, and an option input field 112l. Yes.

  In the category input field 112h, a category name for classifying parameters for characterizing the work is input. For example, in this embodiment, it is classified into three categories: workload, confidentiality, and relevance to other business. In other words, in the present embodiment, how much work is performed when performing a task to be entrusted (work load), and how confidential is the information when performing the task ( The characteristics of the business are grasped from the viewpoints of confidentiality) and how much the business is related to other business (relevance to other business).

  In the name input field 112i, a name representing the feature of the work is input. For example, in the present embodiment, the workload classification has characteristics of “work scale”, “work frequency”, and “average work days”. In addition, the classification of confidentiality has the feature of “confidentiality level”, and the classification of relevance with other business includes “number of input / output”, “input source”, “output destination”, “number of exchanges” And “frequency of exchange”.

  Identification information for uniquely identifying the feature name input to the name input field 112i is input to the ID input field 112j.

  In the unit input field 112k, a parameter unit for defining a feature specified by the feature name input in the name input field 112i is input.

  Here, in the present embodiment, “work scale” is entered with “person / day” as a unit in order to specify the total number of people when performing the work.

  As for “operation frequency”, “times / year” is input as a unit in order to specify how many times the operation is performed in one year.

  As for “average work days”, “day” is input as a unit in order to specify the number of days for which work is performed.

  As for “secret level”, “low”, “medium”, and “high” are specified as options as will be described later.

  As for the “number of inputs / outputs”, “unit” is input as a unit in order to specify the number of information and objects to be exchanged with other work when performing the work.

  Since “input source” and “output destination” are selected from the business name input in the name input field 112d of the business list table 112a shown in FIG. 2 as options, a unit is particularly required. "-" Is entered instead.

  As for “number of times of exchange”, “times” is input as a unit in order to specify the number of times of exchange with other business.

  As for “frequency of exchange”, “times / year” is entered as a unit in order to specify the frequency for exchange with other business.

  In the option input field 112l, information for inputting a parameter corresponding to the feature name input in the name input field 112i is input.

  In this embodiment, the blank indicates direct input by the user, “low / medium / high” indicates that the user is requested to make a selection from these, and “business list” is illustrated in FIG. 2 as options. This indicates that the user selects from the business name input in the name input field 112d of the business list table 112a.

  In the organization data storage area 113, an organization list table 113a (see FIG. 4), which is a list data of a department of a consignment source (internal) and a department of a consignment destination (external), and parameters defining the characteristics of the organization are input. And an organization parameter table 113f (see FIG. 5) in which the above data are collected.

  As shown in FIG. 4, the organization list table 113a has a large classification input field 113b, a medium classification input field 113c, a small classification input field 113d, and an ID input field 113e.

  In the large classification input field 113b, the largest classification for classifying the department of the consignment source (internal) and the department of the consignment destination (external) is input. Here, in the present embodiment, information “inside” or “outside” is input in order to classify the company level such as whether it is an internal department or an external department.

  In the middle category input field 113c, a department name obtained by subdividing the major category is input. In this embodiment, since the classification at the copy level is performed in this column, the name of the copy is input, for example, “Information System Portion”.

  In the minor category input field 113d, a department name obtained by subdividing the middle category is input. In the present embodiment, since the classification at the section level is performed in this column, the name of the section is input as “planning section”, for example.

  In the ID input field 113e, identification information for uniquely identifying the department name input in the small category input field 113d is input.

  As shown in FIG. 5, the organization parameter table 113f includes a classification input field 113g, a name input field 113h, an ID input field 113i, a unit input field 113j, and an option input field 113k. Yes.

  In the classification input field 113g, a classification name indicating the classification of parameters for defining the characteristics of the organization is input. In this embodiment, since the characteristics of the organization are specified by human resources, “human resources” is entered in this field.

  A name indicating the characteristics of the organization is input in the name input field 113h. In this embodiment, human resources that specify the characteristics of the organization are defined by personnel (number) and labor costs (expenses). Therefore, “personnel” or “personnel costs” is entered in this column.

  Identification information for uniquely identifying the feature name of the organization input in the name input field 113h is input to the ID input field 113i.

  In the unit input column 113j, a parameter unit corresponding to the feature name of the organization input in the name input column 113h is input.

  In the option input field 113k, a parameter corresponding to the feature name of the organization input in the name input field 113h is input. In this embodiment, this field is left blank so that the user can directly input parameters.

  In the evaluation item data storage area 114, an evaluation item data table 114a (see FIG. 6) showing a list of evaluation items to be evaluated when assignment of work is selected, and evaluation in each evaluation item of the evaluation item data table 114a. Evaluation data (not shown) including a corresponding evaluation formula is stored.

  As shown in FIG. 6, the evaluation item data table 114a has a classification input field 114b, a name input field 114c, an ID input field 114d, and an evaluation content input field 114e.

  In the category input field 114b, a category name that serves as a guideline for sharing work is entered. In this embodiment, two classifications of “management strategy” and “management efficiency” are input as guidelines for business assignment.

  In the name input field 114c, the name of the evaluation item for business assignment is entered. In this embodiment, “concentration of management resources”, “possibility of new business creation”, “decrease degree of internal skills”, “degree of risk of information leakage”, “degree of replenishment of management resources”, “improvement of business quality” Evaluation is possible on items such as “Possibility of business”, “Degree of inefficiency of business”, and “Cost”.

  Here, although not shown, evaluation data including an evaluation formula corresponding to the evaluation in each evaluation item is included in each evaluation item input in the name input field 114c, as will be described later. It is stored in the item data storage area 114.

  Identification information for uniquely identifying an evaluation item input to the name input field 114c is input to the ID input field 114d.

  In the evaluation content input column 114e, the specific content of the evaluation evaluated by the evaluation item input in the name input column 114c is input.

  Here, returning to FIG.

  As will be described later, the temporary storage area 115 is input via the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, the evaluation item setting data, the business data input via the business data input form 122a, and the organization data input form 123a. In addition to storing the organization data and the task assignment setting data input form 124a, the data such as evaluation results are stored.

  The input item selection unit 120 generates an input item selection form 120a (see FIG. 7) from an input item selection table (not shown) stored in the input item selection data storage area 111 of the storage unit 110, which will be described later. It transmits to the terminal 150 mentioned later via the transmission / reception part 126. FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 7, the input item selection form 120a includes an evaluation item setting data input form selection region 120b, a business data input form selection region 120c, an organization data input form selection region 120d, and a business assignment setting data input form selection. An area 120e and an evaluation instruction input area 120f are provided.

  Here, when there is an execution instruction specifying the evaluation item setting data input form selection area 120b in the terminal 150 to be described later, the evaluation item setting data input form as shown in FIG. 121a is generated and transmitted to the terminal 150.

  Further, when there is an execution instruction specifying the business data input form selection area 120c in the terminal 150, which will be described later, as described later, a business data input form 122a as shown in FIG. It is transmitted to the terminal 150.

  Further, when there is an execution instruction specifying the organization data input form selection area 120d in the terminal 150, which will be described later, an organization data input form 123a as shown in FIG. It is transmitted to the terminal 150.

  Further, when there is an execution instruction specifying the task assignment setting data input form selection area 120e in the terminal 150 described later, the task assignment setting data input form 124a as shown in FIG. Is generated and transmitted to the terminal 150.

  Further, when there is an execution instruction specifying the evaluation input instruction selection area 120f in the terminal 150, which will be described later, an evaluation value is calculated in the evaluation unit 125 based on data input in each input form, as described later, Is sent to the terminal 150 as an evaluation result.

  Returning to FIG. 1, the evaluation item setting unit 121 uses an evaluation item setting data input form as shown in FIG. 8 from the evaluation item data table 114 a (see FIG. 6) stored in the evaluation item data storage area 114 of the storage unit 110. 121a is generated and transmitted to the terminal 150 to be described later.

  As shown in FIG. 8, the evaluation item setting data input form 121a includes a classification field 121b, a name field 121c, an evaluation content field 121d, a selection input field 121e, a setting instruction input field 121f, and a cancellation instruction input field 121g. And have.

  In the category column 121b, the category name input in the category input column 114b in the evaluation item data table 114a shown in FIG. 6 is displayed.

  In the name column 121c, the name input in the name input column 114c in the evaluation item data table 114a shown in FIG. 6 is displayed.

  In the evaluation content column 121d, the evaluation content input in the evaluation content input column 114e in the evaluation item data table 114a shown in FIG. 6 is displayed.

  The selection input column 121e is a column for selecting whether or not to perform evaluation based on the evaluation item displayed in the name column 121c of each row. Here, in this embodiment, the evaluation specified by the checked line is executed by inputting an instruction to check in this field via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150 described later.

  In the setting instruction input field 121f, the evaluation item setting data input in the evaluation item setting data input form 121a is received from the terminal 150 by designating this field and issuing an execution instruction via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150 described later. The evaluation that is transmitted to the server device 100 and specified by the row in which the selection input field 121e is checked in the evaluation unit 125 of the server device 100 is executed.

  Note that the evaluation item setting data input in the evaluation item setting data input form 121 a is stored in the temporary storage area 115 of the server device 100.

  The cancel instruction input field 121g is configured such that the check entered in the selection input field 121e can be removed by designating this field and issuing an execution instruction via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150 described later. .

  Returning to FIG. 1, the business model setting unit 122 starts from the business list table 112 a (see FIG. 2) and the business parameter table 112 g (see FIG. 3) stored in the business data storage area 112 of the storage unit 110. A business data input form 122a as shown is generated and transmitted to the terminal 150 to be described later.

  As shown in FIG. 9, the business data input form 122a includes a business list selection field 122b and a parameter input field 122c.

  The business list selection field 122b is a selection field for selecting a business for which a parameter is to be input. The business name input in the name input field 112d of the business list table 112a (see FIG. 2) is classified into a large classification and a small classification. They are listed separately. Then, the listed business names are selected by the input unit 152 of the terminal 150, which will be described later, and the necessary parameters are input to the value input field 122f provided in the parameter input field 122c, thereby specifying the parameters for each business. Have been able to.

  The parameter input field 122c includes a classification field 122d, a name field 122e, a value input field 122f, a unit field 122g, a setting instruction input field 122h, and a cancel instruction input field 122i.

  In the category column 122d, the category name input in the category input column 112h of the business parameter table 112g shown in FIG. 3 is displayed.

  In the name column 122e, the name input in the name input column 112i of the business parameter table 112g shown in FIG. 3 is displayed.

  The value input field 122f is a field for inputting a parameter indicating the feature of the business, and requests input of necessary data according to the option input field 112l of the business parameter table 112g shown in FIG.

  In the present embodiment, the user directly inputs a necessary value for an item in which the option input field 112l of the business parameter table 112g shown in FIG. When the option “low / medium / high” is input in the column 112l, the user is allowed to select from this option, and “operation list” is input in the option input column 112l. The user selects from the list of business names input in the name input field 112d of the business list table 112a shown in FIG.

  In the unit column 122g, the unit inputted in the unit input column 112k of the business parameter table 112g shown in FIG. 3 is displayed.

  For all the tasks listed in the task list selection field 122b, input necessary parameters and input an execution instruction specifying the setting instruction input field 122h via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150. The obtained parameters are stored in the temporary storage area 115 of the server apparatus 100 for each business as business data.

  Also, by designating the cancel instruction input field 122i via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150 and issuing an execution instruction, the input parameter is canceled and the value input field 122f returns to the blank field.

  The input of necessary parameters is performed for all the tasks displayed in the task list selection field 122b.

  Returning to FIG. 1, the organization model setting unit 123 uses the organization list table 113 a (see FIG. 4) and the organization parameter table 113 f (see FIG. 5) stored in the organization data storage area 113 of the storage unit 110, in FIG. 10. The organization data input form 123a as shown is generated and transmitted to the terminal 150 described later.

  As shown in FIG. 10, the organization data input form 123a includes an organization list selection field 123b and a parameter input field 123c.

  The organization list selection field 123b is a selection field for selecting an organization for inputting parameters, and the name of the department (section) input to the small classification input field 113d of the organization list table 113a (see FIG. 4) is large. The list is divided into categories and intermediate categories. Then, the names of the listed departments (sections) are selected by the input unit 152 of the terminal 150, which will be described later, and necessary parameters are input to the value input field 123f provided in the parameter input field 123c. The parameters for each department can be specified.

  The parameter input field 123c includes a classification field 123d, a name field 123e, a value input field 123f, a unit field 123g, a setting instruction input field 123h, and a cancel instruction input field 123i.

  In the classification column 123d, the classification name input in the classification input column 113g of the organization parameter table 113f shown in FIG. 5 is displayed.

  In the name column 123e, the name input in the name input column 113h of the organization parameter table 113f shown in FIG. 5 is displayed.

  The value input field 123f is a field for inputting parameters indicating the characteristics of the organization.

  In this embodiment, the user directly inputs the number of personnel and the daily salary per person via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150 for each department (section).

  In the unit column 123g, the unit input in the unit input column 113j of the organization parameter table 113f shown in FIG. 5 is displayed.

  Then, by inputting necessary parameters for every department shown in the organization list selection field 123b, by specifying the setting instruction input field 123h via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150, and issuing an execution instruction, The input data is transmitted to the server apparatus 100, and the server apparatus 100 stores these data as organization data in the temporary storage area 115 for each department.

  Also, by specifying the cancel instruction input field 123i via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150 and issuing an execution instruction, the input parameter is canceled and the value input field 123f is returned to the blank.

  The necessary parameters are input for all departments (sections) displayed in the organization list selection field 123b.

  Returning to FIG. 1, the task assignment setting unit 124 reads the task assignment setting data input form 124a as shown in FIG. 11 from the task list table 112a (see FIG. 2) stored in the task data storage area 112 of the storage unit 110. Is transmitted to the terminal 150 to be described later.

  As shown in FIG. 11, the business assignment setting data input form 124a includes a large classification field 124b, a small classification field 124c, a name field 124d, a content field 124e, an internal selection input field 124f, and an external selection input field. 124g, a setting instruction input field 124h, and a cancellation instruction input field 124i are provided.

  In the major category column 124b, the category name input in the major category input column 112b of the task list table 112a shown in FIG. 2 is displayed.

  In the small classification column 124c, the classification name input in the small classification input column 112c of the task list table 112a shown in FIG. 2 is displayed.

  In the name column 124d, the business name input in the name input column 112d of the business list table 112a shown in FIG. 2 is displayed.

  In the content column 124e, the content of the business entered in the content input column 112f of the business list table 112a shown in FIG. 2 is displayed.

  In the in-house selection input field 124f, when the work specified in the name field 124d is performed in the company, the number of persons who perform the work in the company is input.

  In the outside selection input field 124g, when the work specified in the name field 124d is performed outside, the number of persons who perform the work outside the company is input.

  Then, it is specified in the internal selection input field 124f or the external selection input field 124g whether all work is performed in-house or outside, and the setting instruction input field 124h is designated via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150. By issuing the execution instruction, the input work assignment setting data is sent to the server device 100. The server device 100 stores the work assignment setting data in the temporary storage area 115, and an evaluation value based on this work assignment is described later. To be calculated by the evaluation unit 125.

  In addition, by designating the cancel instruction input field 124i via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150 and issuing an execution instruction, the values input in the internal selection input field 124f or the external selection input field 124g are canceled, and these fields Returns to blank.

  Returning to FIG. 1, the evaluation unit 125 uses the data input by the user via the business data input form 122a, the organization data input form 123a, and the business assignment setting data input form 124a, via the evaluation item setting data input form 121a. The evaluation value corresponding to the selected evaluation item is calculated using an evaluation formula stored as evaluation data.

  The evaluation formula for each evaluation item is as follows.

  When the degree of concentration of management resources is selected on the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, an evaluation value is calculated based on an increase function (Fs1) with respect to the number of in-house human resources allocated to planning work and management work. . Here, as an example of the increase function (Fs1), there is the following equation (1).

  Formula (1) is the ratio of the total number of in-house human resources in the company and the number of in-house human resources in charge of planning and the number of in-house human resources in charge of management.

  Here, Np is the number of in-house personnel in charge of the planning work, and among the work included in the planning in the large classification field 124b of the work assignment input form 124a, the internal selection input field of the work selected to be done in the company This is the total number of people entered in 124f.

  Nq is the number of in-house personnel in charge of management work, and is input to the internal selection input field 124f of the work selected to be done in the company among the work included in the management in the large classification field 124b of the work assignment input form 124a. It is the total number of people.

  N is the total number of human resources in the company, and is the sum of the values input as internal employees in the value input field 123f of the organization data input form 123a.

  When the possibility of creating a new business is selected on the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, an evaluation value is calculated based on an increase function (Fs2) with respect to the number of outside personnel assigned to the planning work. Here, as an example of the increase function (Fs2), there is the following equation (2).

  Formula (2) is the number of external personnel in charge of planning operations plus the number of external personnel in charge of planning operations plus the number of internal personnel in charge of planning operations (number of all operations) And the ratio.

  Here, Mp is the number of external personnel in charge of planning work, and out of the work included in the planning in the large classification field 124b of the work assignment input form 124a, the external selection input field for the work selected to be performed outside. This is the total number of people entered in 124g.

  Np is the number of in-house human resources in charge of planning work, as described above.

  When the degree of reduction of the in-house skill is selected on the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, the evaluation value is calculated based on the reduction function (Fs3) with respect to the number of tasks to be outsourced. Here, as an example of the decreasing function (Fs3), there is the following expression (3).

  The formula (3) is obtained by subtracting the number of operations outsourced from “1”, and the number of operations outsourced to the number of operations outsourced (the number of all operations). The ratio of

  Here, K is the number of tasks entrusted to the outside, and is the total number of tasks whose numerical values are entered in the outside selection input field 124g of the task assignment input form 124a.

  In addition, L is the number of tasks performed in the company, and is the total number of tasks for which numerical values are entered in the in-house selection input field 124f of the task assignment input form 124a.

  When the risk level of information leakage is selected on the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, an evaluation value is calculated based on a decreasing function (Fs4) with respect to the number of operations with a high confidentiality level entrusted to the outside. Here, as an example of the decreasing function (Fs4), there is the following equation (4).

  Formula (4) is the work that is entrusted to the outside from “1” and subtracts the number of highly confidential levels, and the work that is entrusted to the outside and that is carried out in-house to the number of highly confidential levels It is a ratio of the sum of the number of high confidential levels.

  Here, Kc is the number of high-confidence tasks outsourced to the outside, and the value input in the business data input form 122a among the tasks in which numerical values are entered in the external selection input field 124g of the business assignment input form 124a. This is the total number of tasks whose security level is set to “high” in the column 122f.

  In addition, Lc is the number of high-confidential operations performed in the company, and among the operations in which numerical values are input in the internal selection input field 124f of the business assignment input form 124a, the value input field of the business data input form 122a. This is the total number of tasks whose security level is set to “high” in 122f.

  When the replenishment degree of management resources is selected on the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, based on the increase function (Fs5) for the number of personnel in charge of the business with respect to the personnel required for each business. An evaluation value is calculated. Here, as an example of the increase function (Fs5), there is the following equation (5).

  Formula (5) calculates and adds the ratio of the number of human resources in charge of each job multiplied by the average number of work days for that job and the number of people required for that job for all jobs. In the formula (5), the addition is divided by the total number of tasks.

  Here, j is an index assigned so as to be unique to each business.

  Ne (j) is the number of human resources in charge of business j, and is the number of people input to the internal selection input field 124f or the external selection input field 124g of the business assignment setting data input form 124a for each business j.

  wd (j) is the average number of work days for job j and uses the value entered in the value input field 122f corresponding to the name column 122e for average work days in the job data input form 122a for job j.

  ws (j) is the work scale of the work j, and uses the value input in the value entry field 122f corresponding to the work scale name field 122e in the work data input form 122a of the work j.

  Σj means that the formula in [] is calculated in each business and all the calculated values are added.

  Similarly to the above, K is the number of tasks outsourced and L is the number of tasks performed in the company.

  When the possibility of improving the work quality is selected on the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, the evaluation value is calculated based on the increase function (Fs6) with respect to the number of outside personnel assigned to each work. Here, as an example of the increase function (Fs6), there is the following equation (6).

  Formula (6) is the ratio of the number of external human resources in charge of each business and the number of external human resources in charge of the business plus the number of internal human resources in charge of the business. In the equation (6), the addition is divided by the number of all tasks.

  Here, j is an index assigned so as to be unique to each business.

  Mj is the number of external personnel in charge of business j, and is the number of people entered in the external selection input field 124g of the business assignment setting data input form 124a in each business j.

  Nj is the number of in-house personnel in charge of the task j, and is the number of people entered in the in-house selection input field 124f of the task assignment setting data input form 124a in each task j.

  Σj means that the formula in [] is calculated in each business and all the calculated values are added.

  Similarly to the above, K is the number of tasks outsourced and L is the number of tasks performed in the company.

  When the degree of business inefficiency is selected on the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, an increase function (Fs7) is added to the number of exchanges between internal and external business and the frequency of exchange between internal and external business. Based on this, an evaluation value is calculated. Here, as an example of the increase function (Fs7), there is the following equation (7).

  The formula (7) is obtained by multiplying the number of exchanges between work performed in-house and work performed outside the company by the frequency of exchanges between work performed internally and work performed outside the company. It is calculated and added in all operations. In the formula (7), in addition to the additions in this way, the operations are performed in-house and are exchanged with operations performed outside the company. The number is multiplied by the number of tasks that are performed outside the company and that are exchanged between tasks performed in the company.

  Here, m is an index allocated so as to be unique to each business performed in the company, and n is an index allocated so as to be unique to each business performed outside the company.

  C (m, n) is the number of exchanges in the business m and the business n, and uses the value input in the value input field 122f corresponding to the number of exchanges in the business data input form 122a.

  F (m, n) is the frequency of exchanges in the business m and the business n, and uses the value input in the value input field 122f corresponding to the frequency of exchange in the business data input form 122a.

  Σmn means that the formulas in [] are calculated for all combinations of the business m performed in the company and the business n performed outside the company, and all the calculated values are added.

  When the cost is selected on the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, an evaluation value is calculated based on an increase function (Fs8) with respect to the work scale and work frequency of the work outsourced to the outside. Here, as an example of the increase function (Fs8), there is the following equation (8).

  Equation (8) is calculated by adding the work scale of each work outsourced, the work frequency of the work, and the labor costs of the human resources outside the company for all the work outsourced. In the equation (8), the number of all operations entrusted outside the company is multiplied by the addition in this way.

  Here, n is an index assigned so as to be unique to each business performed outside the company.

  ws (n) is the work scale of the work n executed outside the company, and uses the value input in the value input field 122f corresponding to the work scale in the work data input form 122a of the work n.

  wf (n) is the work frequency of work n executed outside the company and uses the value input in the value input field 122f corresponding to the work frequency in the work data input form 122a of work n.

  p is a unit cost of personnel expenses of an external organization, and uses a value input in the value input field 123f corresponding to the labor costs in the external organization data input form 123a.

  Σn means that the formulas in [] are calculated for all operations n performed outside the company, and all the calculated values are added.

  Further, the evaluation unit 125 shapes the calculated evaluation value into a graph or the like, and transmits it to the terminal 150 via the transmission / reception unit 126 described later.

  The transmission / reception unit 126 transmits / receives data via the network 140.

  The server apparatus 100 configured as described above can be realized by a so-called computer. For example, the storage unit 110 can be realized by storing necessary data in an auxiliary storage device such as a hard disk, and includes an input item selection unit 120, an evaluation item setting unit 121, a business model setting unit 122, an organization model setting unit 123, The business assignment setting unit 124 and the evaluation unit 125 can be realized by reading a program stored in an auxiliary storage device such as a hard disk into a CPU (Central Processing Unit), and the transmission / reception unit 126 is configured by a NIC (Network Interface Card). Can be realized.

  The terminal 150 includes a control unit 151, an input unit 152, a display unit 153, and a transmission / reception unit 154. The data sent from the server device 100 is displayed on the display unit 153, and the input unit 152 is displayed. Necessary data can be input via the server device 100 and sent back to the server device 100.

  The terminal 150 can also be realized by a so-called computer.

  A processing flow in the server apparatus 100 configured as described above will be described with reference to a flowchart shown in FIG.

  First, the server apparatus 100 waits for reception of an access request from the terminal 150 (S160).

  When receiving an access request from the terminal 150 (S161), the server apparatus 100 creates an input item selection form 120a and transmits it to the terminal 150 together with the web page data (S162).

  Here, a display example of the web page 153a displayed on the display unit 153 of the terminal 150 is shown in FIG.

  The web page 153a is divided into a selection area 153b, a work area 153c, and a result display area 153d. The input item selection form 120a is displayed in the selection area 153b, and the evaluation item setting data input form 121a and the business data are displayed. The input form 122a, the organization data input form 123a, or the work assignment setting data input form 124a is displayed in the work area 153c, and the evaluation result calculated by the server device 100 is displayed in the result display area 153d.

  Returning to the flowchart of FIG. 12, when the user selects an input item from the input item selection form 120a displayed in the selection area 153b of the web page 153a via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150, the terminal 150 displays the selected input. The information regarding the item is transmitted to the server apparatus 100, and the server apparatus 100 receives the information regarding the selected input item (S163).

  In the server device 100 that has received the information regarding the selected input item, the data corresponding to the selected input item is read from the storage unit 110, and the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, the business data input form 122a, and the organization data input are read out. The form 123a or the business assignment setting data input form 124a is created and transmitted to the terminal 150 as an input form (S164).

  In the terminal 150, the received input form is displayed in the work area 153c of the web page 153a, the user inputs necessary data via the input unit 152, and the setting instruction input area provided in each input form. When 121f, 122h, 123h, and 124h are selected by the input unit 152 and a setting instruction is issued, the terminal 150 transmits information related to the setting instruction and the input data to the server apparatus 100, and the server apparatus 100 sets the setting instruction. The information about and the input data are received (S165).

  Then, the evaluation unit 125 of the server apparatus 100 confirms whether the received data has been input with necessary data in all input fields, and when necessary data is not input in all input fields. (S166) transmits a data input request to the terminal 150 (S167), and returns to step S165.

  On the other hand, when necessary data is input in all input fields (S166), the evaluation unit 125 of the server apparatus 100 stores the received data in the temporary storage area 115 (S168).

  Then, when the user selects the evaluation instruction input area 120f of the input item selection form 120a displayed in the selection area 153b of the web page 153a via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150 with the input unit 152, the evaluation instruction is issued. The terminal 150 transmits information related to the evaluation instruction to the server apparatus 100, and the server apparatus 100 receives information related to the evaluation instruction (S169).

  The server device 100 that has received the information related to the evaluation instruction checks whether or not data has been input for all items. If no data has been input for all items (S170), the input that has not been input. An item input request is transmitted to the terminal 150 (S171), and the process returns to step S163.

  On the other hand, when data is input for all items (S170), the evaluation unit 125 of the server device 100 calculates an evaluation value based on the data stored in the temporary storage area 115 (S172).

  Then, the calculated evaluation value is shaped into a predetermined graph, table, or the like, and transmitted to the terminal 150 as an evaluation result (S173).

  The terminal 150 that has received the evaluation result displays the evaluation result in the result display area 153d of the web page 153a. When the user of the terminal 150 who has obtained such an evaluation result wants to change the work assignment and obtain the evaluation result again, the user returns to step S163 and re-assigns the work assignment setting data input form 124a to the work on the web page 153a. The task assignment may be changed by displaying in the area 153c.

  As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to obtain an evaluation value by selecting whether to carry out work internally or externally, so what kind of work is left in the company, what kind of It is possible to easily select whether to outsource business.

  In the evaluation item data table 114a (see FIG. 6) described above, the management strategy and management efficiency are raised as a large classification of evaluation items, but the present invention is not limited to such a mode. It can also be evaluated from a guideline such as whether or not it can be easily performed (transition efficiency).

  When evaluating such transition efficiency, for example, as shown in FIG. 14, a line of “transition efficiency” is added to the classification input field 212h of the business parameter table 212g, and the name input field 212i includes: The lines of “business procedure presence / absence”, “business procedure document presence / absence” and “document template presence / absence” are added, and “Yes / No” is entered in the option input field 212l corresponding to these rows, respectively. . By creating such a business parameter table 212g, “business procedure presence / absence”, “business procedure documentation” and “document template availability” are selected in the value input field 122f of the business data input form 122a. A column is formed.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 15, a line “contract / management” is added to the classification input field 213g of the organization parameter table 213f, and “policy”, “standard” and “system” are added to the name input field 213h. And “Yes / No” are entered in the option entry fields 213k corresponding to these rows. By creating such an organization parameter table 213f, fields for selecting “policy presence / absence”, “reference presence / absence”, and “system presence / absence” are formed in the value input field 123f of the organization data input form 123a. In the present embodiment, such “contract / management” data need only be input for “external”.

  Then, by selecting the presence / absence of these items, for example, as shown in the following formula (9), the work procedure, the procedure manual, the degree of maintenance of related document templates, the contract / management when outsourcing the work The evaluation value of the transition efficiency can be calculated by the increasing function (Fs9) with respect to the degree of maintenance of the policy, standard and system regarding

  The formula (9) is for the case where there is a predetermined numerical value when there is a business procedure for each business outsourced, a predetermined numerical value when there is a business procedure manual for that business, and a document template related to that business. The value obtained by adding the specified numerical value is calculated and added for all the work outsourced to the outside. In equation (9), the addition is divided by the number of work outsourced to the outside. In addition, when there is a contract or management policy when outsourcing work, and when there is a standard regarding contract or management when outsourcing work, When there is a contract or management system for entrusting business, a predetermined numerical value is added.

  n is an index assigned so as to be unique to each business performed outside the company.

  wp (n) is the presence / absence of the business procedure of the business n executed outside the company, and “1”, “when” is selected in the value input field 122f corresponding to the presence / absence of the business procedure in the business data input form. When “None” is selected, “0” is set.

  wm (n) is the presence / absence of a business procedure manual for business n executed outside the company, and “1” is selected when “Yes” is selected in the value input field 122f corresponding to the presence / absence of the business procedure document in the business data input form. When “None” is selected, “0” is set.

  wg (n) is the presence / absence of a document template related to the business n executed outside the company, and “1” is selected when “Yes” is selected in the value input field 122f corresponding to the presence / absence of the document template in the business data input form. When “None” is selected, “0” is set.

  “op” is the presence or absence of a policy regarding contract or management when entrusting work outside the company. When “Yes” is selected in the value input field 123f corresponding to the presence or absence of the policy in the organization data input form, “1”, “ When “None” is selected, “0” is set.

  oc is the presence / absence of a contract or management standard when entrusting work outside the company. When “Yes” is selected in the value input field 123f corresponding to the presence / absence of the standard in the organization data input form, “1”, “ When “None” is selected, “0” is set.

  os is the presence / absence of a contract or management system when outsourcing work, and if “Yes” is selected in the value input field 123f corresponding to the presence / absence of the system on the organization data input form, “1”, “ When “None” is selected, “0” is set.

  Σn means that the formulas in [] are calculated for all operations n performed outside the company, and all the calculated values are added.

  Similarly to the above, K is the number of operations outsourced.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 14, a line of “importance” is added to the classification input field 212h of the business parameter table 212g, and “importance” is added to the corresponding name input field 212i and the option input field 212l. Enter “Low / Medium / High”. By creating such a business parameter table 212g, a column for selecting the “importance” of each business from “low / medium / high” is formed in the business data input form 122a.

  By selecting the importance of such work on the business data input form, the user calculates an evaluation value related to the degree of reduction of the in-house skill based on, for example, a reduction function (Fs10) for a highly important work outsourced to the outside. It is also possible to do. Here, as an example of the decreasing function (Fs10), there is the following equation (10).

  Formula (10) is the work that is outsourced from “1” and subtracts the number of highly important tasks, and the work that is outsourced to the number of highly important tasks that are entrusted outside the company. It is the ratio of the sum of the number of highly important ones.

  Here, Ki is the number of high-priority tasks out of the tasks entrusted to the outside. In the task assignment input form 124a, among the tasks whose numerical values are entered in the external selection input field 124g, in the task data input form 122a. This is the total number of tasks with “importance” set to “high”.

  Li is the number of tasks of high importance among the tasks performed in the company. Among the tasks in which a numerical value is entered in the in-house selection input field 124f in the task assignment input form 124a, “ This is the total number of tasks with “High importance” as “High”.

  FIG. 16 is a schematic diagram of a server device 200 according to the second embodiment of the present invention.

  As shown in the figure, the server device 200 according to the present embodiment includes a storage unit 210, an input item selection unit 220, an evaluation item setting unit 121, a business model setting unit 222, an organization model setting unit 123, and a business sharing. A setting unit 224, an evaluation unit 225, a human resource model setting unit 227, and a transmission / reception unit 126 are provided. Compared to the first embodiment, the storage unit 210, the input item selection unit 220, and the business model setting. Since the part 222, the business assignment setting part 224, the evaluation part 225, and the human resource model setting part 227 are different, the items related to the different parts will be described below.

  As shown in the figure, the storage unit 210 includes an input item selection data storage area 111, a business data storage area 112, an organization data storage area 113, a capability definition data storage area 216, a human resource data storage area 217, and an evaluation. It has an item data storage area 114 and a temporary storage area 115. Unlike the first embodiment, the capability definition data storage area 216 and the human resource data storage area 217 are different. Explain the matters related to the part.

  The capability definition data storage area 216 stores a capability definition data table 216a (see FIG. 17) that is a list of data relating to capabilities required for each job.

  As shown in FIG. 17, the capability definition data table 216a includes a large classification input field 216b, a small classification input field 216c, an ID input field 216d, and a content input field 216e.

  In the large classification input field 216b, the largest classification name for classifying the ability required for the work is input. Here, in the present embodiment, classification names such as “project management” and “IT architect” are input in accordance with the classification of the IT skill standard Ver 1.1 (2003) of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.

  In the small classification input field 216c, a classification name for fine classification of the classification name input in the large classification input field 216c is input. In this embodiment, for example, with regard to the major classification of “project management”, small classifications such as “total management” for project planning, etc., and “time management” for management of work definition and progress are input. ing.

  Identification information for uniquely identifying the ability input to the content input field 216e described later is input to the ID input field 216d.

  In the content input field 216e, the specific content of the ability required for business is input.

  Returning to FIG. 16, the human resource data storage area 217 includes a human resource list table 217 a (see FIG. 18) that summarizes data for specifying human resources belonging to each organization (department), and parameters that define the characteristics of the capabilities of each human resource. A capability parameter table 217e (see FIG. 19) that summarizes data to be input is stored.

  As shown in FIG. 18, the personnel list table 217a includes an ID input field 217b, a name input field 217c, and an affiliation input field 217d.

  In the ID input field 217b, identification information for uniquely identifying human resources inside and outside the company is input.

  In the name input field 217c, the names of internal and external human resources are entered.

  In the affiliation input field 217d, identification information for specifying a department to which internal and external human resources belong is input. In this embodiment, the ID input field 113e of the organization list table 113a shown in FIG. The department is identified using the input identification information.

  As shown in FIG. 19, the capability parameter table 217e includes a classification input field 217f, a name input field 217g, an ID input field 217h, a unit input field 217i, and an option input field 217j.

  In the classification input field 217f, a classification name for classifying the ability of the human resource is input. In this embodiment, since IT-related capabilities are defined, the classification name is “technology”, but the present invention is not limited to such a mode.

  In the name input field 217g, the name of the ability of the human resource is input, but in this embodiment, “ability” is simply input.

  Identification information for identifying the ability input to the name input field 217g is input to the ID input field 217h.

  In the unit input field 217i, identification information for identifying the ability input in the name input field 217g is input. However, when there is no unit, “-” is input.

  In the option input field 217j, information for inputting parameters for defining the characteristics of the ability input to the name input field 217g is input. Here, in this embodiment, by inputting “capability definition list”, a necessary capability is selected from the capabilities input in the content input field 216e of the capability definition data table 216a shown in FIG. Have been to.

  Returning to FIG. 16, in the input item selection unit 220 in this embodiment, the evaluation item setting data input form selection region 120b, the business data input form selection region 120c, the organization data formed in the input item selection form 120a shown in FIG. In addition to the input form selection area 120d, the work assignment setting data input form selection area 120e, and the evaluation instruction input area 120f, a human resource data input form selection area (not shown) for selecting a human resource data input form 227a described later is provided. Is formed.

  The business model setting unit 222 includes a business list table 112a (see FIG. 2), a business parameter table 112g (see FIG. 3), and a capability parameter table 217e (see FIG. 19) stored in the business data storage area 112 of the storage unit 210. Then, a business data input form 222a as shown in FIG. 20 is generated and transmitted to the terminal 150 to be described later.

  Here, the business data input form 222a in this embodiment includes a business list selection field 222b and a parameter input field 222c, as in the first embodiment, but unlike the first embodiment, The difference is that it is possible to specify the ability required for the business in the parameter input field 222c. Hereinafter, matters related to the different points will be described.

  In the parameter input field 222c in the present embodiment, a “technology” line is added to the classification field 222d based on the capability parameter table 217e (see FIG. 19), and a name field 222e corresponding to this “technology” line. In the value input column 222f corresponding to this, it is possible to select a necessary capability from the list of capabilities input in the content input column 216e of the capability definition data table 216a (see FIG. 17). It has been made possible.

  Here, also in the present embodiment, necessary parameters are input for all tasks displayed in the task list selection field 222b.

  Returning to FIG. 16, the human resource model setting unit 227 includes an organization list table 113 a (see FIG. 4) stored in the organization data storage area 113 of the storage unit 210 and a human resource list table 217 a stored in the human resource data storage area 217. 21 (see FIG. 18) and the capability definition data table 216a (see FIG. 17) stored in the capability definition data storage area 216, a human resource data input form 227a as shown in FIG. To the terminal 150.

  As shown in FIG. 21, the human resource data input form 227a includes a human resource list selection field 227b and a parameter input field 227c.

  The personnel list selection field 227b is a selection field for selecting personnel to input parameters. The organization list table 113a is divided into a large classification and a middle classification input in the organization list table 113a (see FIG. 4). The names of the human resources belonging to the department (section) input in the small classification input field 113d are read out from the human resource list table 217a and listed.

  The names of the listed human resources are selected by the input unit 152 of the terminal 150, and the capabilities possessed by the personnel are specified by the selection input field 227g provided in the parameter input field 227c. Have been able to identify.

  Here, the parameter input field 227c includes a large classification field 227d, a small classification field 227e, a content field 227f, and a selection field 227g.

  In the major classification field 227d, the classification name input in the major classification input field 216b of the capability definition data table 216a shown in FIG. 17 is displayed.

  In the small classification column 227e, the classification name input in the small classification input column 216c of the capability definition data table 216a shown in FIG. 17 is displayed.

  The content column 227f displays the content input in the content input column 216e of the capability definition data table 216a shown in FIG.

  Then, for each content displayed in the content column 227f, a selection column 227g is provided. When the human resource has the capability of the content displayed in the content input column 227f, the input unit 152 of the terminal 150 is displayed in the selection column 227g. It is possible to input a display (check) indicating that the selection is to be made.

  It should be noted that the necessary parameters are input for all human resources displayed in the human resource list selection field 223b.

  Returning to FIG. 16, the task assignment setting unit 224 in the present embodiment is stored in the task list table 112 a (see FIG. 2) stored in the task data storage area 112 of the storage unit 210 and the organization data storage area 113. A business assignment setting data input form 224a as shown in FIG. 22 is generated from the organization list table 113a (see FIG. 4) and transmitted to the terminal 150 via the transmission / reception unit 126.

  As shown in FIG. 22, the business assignment setting data input form 224a includes a large classification field 224b, a small classification field 224c, a name field 224d, a content field 224e, an internal selection input field 224f, and an external selection input field 224g. And a setting instruction input field 224h and a cancel instruction input field 224i.

  Here, the large classification field 224b, the small classification field 224c, the name field 224d, the content field 224e, the external selection input field 224g, the setting instruction input field 224h, and the cancel instruction input field 224i are the same as in the first embodiment. Therefore, explanation is omitted.

  The in-house selection input field 224f in this embodiment lists all departments (sections) provided in the company based on the small classification input field 113d of the organization list table 113a (see FIG. 4). It is possible to specify which department (section) in the company is responsible for each business identified in 224d by checking the column of the department (section) in charge via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150 by the user. It has been made possible.

  In the outside selection input field 224g, when it is determined that the work specified in the name field 224d is performed outside the company as in the first embodiment, the number of persons who perform the work outside the company is input.

  The evaluation unit 225 in this embodiment calculates an evaluation value for each evaluation item specified in the evaluation item setting data input form 121a as in the first embodiment. In this embodiment, the human resource data input form 227a In addition, since the business data input form 222a and the business assignment setting data input form 224a are different from the first embodiment, the degree of concentration of management resources, the possibility of creating a new business, the degree of replenishment of management resources, The evaluation value calculation method for the possibility of improving the quality of work is different. Hereinafter, a method for calculating these evaluation values will be described.

  The degree of concentration of management resources in this embodiment is an evaluation value based on an increasing function (Fs11) for the degree of conformity between the ability required for planning work and management work and the ability of in-house human resources assigned to these work. Is calculated. Here, as an example of the increase function (Fs11), there is the following equation (11).

  The formula (11) is required for the number of tasks that have the same number of abilities required for each of the planning and management tasks performed in the company and the abilities of the personnel in charge of the tasks. The ratio of the number of abilities to be calculated is calculated and added for all persons and tasks belonging to the planning or management work. In equation (11), this addition is performed in-house. Divided by the number of planning operations plus the number of planning operations determined to be done in-house.

  Here, s is an index assigned so as to be unique to the in-house human resources assigned to the planning work and the management work.

  t is an index assigned so as to be unique to planning work and management work performed in the company.

  G (s, t) is the number of abilities that the human resource s has among the abilities required for the task t. In the present embodiment, in the work assignment input form 224a, the work assignment input form 224a takes charge of the ability (specified by the work data input form 222a) required for the planning work and the management work determined to be implemented in the company. This is the number that coincides with the ability (specified in the human resource data input form 227a) possessed by the human resources belonging to the in-house department (section) who has selected that.

  wa (t) is the number of capabilities required for the task t, and is the capability required for the planning and management tasks determined to be performed in-house in the task assignment input form 224a (specified in the task data input form 222a). Is the number of

  Lp is the number of planning tasks performed in the company, and is the number of planning tasks determined to be performed in the company in the task assignment input form 224a.

  Lq is the number of management tasks performed in-house, and is the number of management tasks determined to be performed in-house in the task assignment input form 224a.

  Σst means to calculate the formulas in [] for the in-house human resources s assigned to the planning and management operations and the planning and management operations t to be performed in-house, and add all the calculated values. Yes.

  The possibility of creating a new business in this embodiment is calculated based on an increase function (Fs12) with respect to the degree of conformity between the ability required for planning work and the ability of external personnel assigned to the planning work. To do. As an example of the increase function (Fs12), there is the following equation (12).

  The formula (12) is required for the planning work outsourced to the outside, and the number of abilities required for each planning work outsourced to the ability of the external human resources in charge of that work. The ratio of the number of abilities to be calculated is calculated by adding and calculating the ratio of human resources and operations belonging to all the planning operations to be outsourced. In equation (12), the added amount is entrusted to the outside. Divide by the number of planning tasks.

  Here, u is an index assigned so as to be unique to outside personnel assigned to the planning work.

  v is an index assigned so as to be unique to the planning work outsourced.

  G (u, v) is the number of abilities that the human resource u has among the abilities required for the work v. In the present embodiment, in the task assignment input form 224a, it is selected that the task assignment input form 224a is out of the abilities required for the planning work determined to be implemented outside the company (specified in the task data input form 222a). The number that matches the capability (specified in the human resource data input form 227a) of the outside human resource is divided by the number of external human resources.

  Ne (v) is the number of human resources in charge of the business v, and is the number of people entered in the external selection input field 224g corresponding to the planning business selected to be in charge of the business on the business assignment input form 224a.

  wa (v) is the number of abilities required for the business v, and is the number of abilities (specified in the business data input form 222a) required for the planning business determined to be performed outside the business sharing input form 224a. is there.

  Kp is the number of planning tasks entrusted to the outside, and is the number of planning tasks determined to be performed outside in the task assignment input form 224a.

  Σuv means that the formula in [] is calculated for the outside human resource u assigned to the planning work and the planning work v to be executed outside, and all the calculated values are added.

  The replenishment degree of management resources in the present embodiment calculates an evaluation value based on an increasing function (Fs13) with respect to the degree of conformity between the ability required for each business and the ability of a human resource assigned to each business. Here, as an example of the increase function (Fs13), there is the following equation (13).

  Formula (13) calculates the ratio between the number of abilities required by each person in the company and outside and the number of abilities required for that action for all the persons and tasks. In equation (13), the addition is divided by the number of all tasks.

  Here, x is an index assigned so as to be unique to all human resources inside and outside the company.

  j is an index assigned so as to be unique to all operations.

  G (x, j) is the number of abilities that the human resource x has among the abilities required for the job j. In the present embodiment, the number of matches between the ability required for each business specified in the business data input form 222a and the ability of the human resource specified in the human resource data input form 227a is calculated for all the inside or outside the company. Divided by the number of human resources.

  Ne (j) is the number of human resources who are in charge of all the operations j, and when selecting the number of people belonging to the department (section) that has been selected to be in-house in the business assignment input form 224a and the case of being in charge outside The total number of persons entered in the external selection input field 224g.

  wa (j) is the number of capabilities required for all tasks j, and is the total number of capabilities required for each task specified in the task data input form 222a.

  Here, K is the number of tasks entrusted to the outside, and is the total number of tasks for which numerical values have been entered in the outside selection input field 224g in the task assignment input form 224a.

  In addition, L is the number of tasks performed in the company, and is the total number of tasks that have been checked in the in-house section selection input field 224f in the task assignment input form 224a.

  Σxj means that the formulas in [] are calculated for the human resources x assigned to all the tasks j, and all the calculated values are added.

  The evaluation value of the possibility of improving the work quality in the present embodiment is calculated based on an increase function (Fs14) with respect to the degree of conformity between the ability required for each work and the ability of an external human resource assigned to each work. Here, as an example of the increase function (Fs14), there is the following expression (14).

  Formula (14) is the ratio of the number of abilities of external human resources out of the abilities required for each business outsourced to the number of all business outsourced to all human resources and business. Formula (14) is divided by the number of tasks outsourced to the outside.

  Here, y is an index assigned so as to be unique to all human resources outside the company.

  n is an index assigned so as to be unique to all the work outsourced to the outside.

  G (y, n) is the number of abilities that the human resource y has among the abilities required for the business n. In the present embodiment, the ability (specified in the business data input form 222a) required for each business selected to be executed outside the business sharing input form 224a and the external human resources specified in the human resource data input form 227a The number that matches the ability is divided by the number of all human resources outside the company.

  Ne (n) is the number of external personnel in charge of the business n, and is the total number of people specified when selecting to be in charge of the external in the business assignment input form 224a.

  wa (n) is the number of abilities required for the business n, and totals the abilities (specified in the business data input form 222a) required for the business selected to be in charge outside the business sharing input form 224a. It is a thing.

  Here, K is the number of tasks entrusted to the outside, and is the total number of tasks for which numerical values have been entered in the outside selection input field 224g in the task assignment input form 224a.

  Σyn means that the formula in [] is calculated for the human resource y assigned to the business n selected to be performed outside the company, and all the calculated values are added.

  As described above, according to the present embodiment, the evaluation accuracy is improved by using the degree of matching between the ability of the human resource and the ability required for the execution of the work for the evaluation of the work sharing, and the work performed by the user. The accuracy of examination of sharing can be improved.

  The degree of concentration of management resources in this embodiment is based on an increasing function (Fs11) for the degree of conformity between the ability required for planning work and management work and the ability of in-house human resources assigned to these work. The evaluation value is calculated, but in this respect, as in the first embodiment, when the division of each business is classified into the internal and the external, it is based on the following increase function (Fs15). To calculate an evaluation value.

  The formula (15) is required for the number of tasks that have the same number of abilities required for each of the planning and management tasks performed in the company and the skills of the personnel in charge of that task. And the ratio of the number of abilities to be calculated and calculated for all people and tasks belonging to the planning or management work. In equation (15), the sum is added to the number of planning work to be carried out in the company. Divided by the sum of the number of planning tasks determined to be done in-house.

  Here, s ′ is an index assigned so as to be unique to in-house human resources.

  t is an index assigned so as to be unique to planning work and management work performed in the company.

  G (t) is the number of capacities possessed by in-house human resources among the capacities required for the task t. In the present embodiment, in the work assignment input form 224a, among the abilities (specified in the work data input form 222a) required for the planning work and management work determined to be carried out in-house, the ability possessed by the in-house human resources (human resources) The number corresponding to (specified in the data input form 227a) is divided by the number of all human resources in the place.

  Ne (t) is the number of personnel in charge of the task t, and is the number of personnel in the company who are in charge of the planning task and the management task in the task assignment input form 124a.

  wa (t) is the number of capabilities required for the task t, and is the capability required for the planning and management tasks determined to be performed in-house in the task assignment input form 224a (specified in the task data input form 222a). Is the number of

  Lp is the number of planning tasks performed in the company, and is the number of planning tasks determined to be performed in the company in the task assignment input form 224a.

  Lq is the number of management tasks performed in-house, and is the number of management tasks determined to be performed in-house in the task assignment input form 224a.

  Σs't is to calculate the formula in [] for the in-house human resources s' assigned to the planning and management operations and the planning and management operations t to be performed in-house, and add all the calculated values. I mean.

  FIG. 23 is a schematic diagram of a server apparatus 300 according to the third embodiment of the present invention.

  As illustrated, the server device 300 according to the present embodiment includes a storage unit 110, an input item selection unit 120, an evaluation item setting unit 121, a business model setting unit 122, an organization model setting unit 123, and a business sharing. The setting unit 124, the evaluation unit 125, the optimization unit 328, and the transmission / reception unit 126 are provided, and are different from the first embodiment in that the optimization unit 328 is provided. Therefore, the matters related to the different points will be described below.

  The optimization unit 328 according to the present embodiment appropriately determines the division of work, and uses the data input by the user on the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, the work data input form 122a, and the organization data input form 123a, and the evaluation value And the evaluation result is generated, and the task assignment when the evaluation value is calculated is transmitted to the terminal 150 via the transmission / reception unit 126.

  Here, the optimization unit 328 in the present embodiment calculates the evaluation value by randomly assigning each business assignment internally or externally, and then randomly changing the assignment of the randomly assigned business to evaluate the evaluation value. If the difference between the evaluation value before the change and the evaluation value after the change is greater than the predetermined threshold, it is assumed that the evaluation value has not converged, and the work assignment is changed randomly again. To calculate an evaluation value. On the other hand, if the difference between the evaluation value before the change and the evaluation value after the change is smaller than the predetermined threshold, the evaluation value is converged and the processing is terminated, and the evaluation value when the convergence is completed And the task assignment when the evaluation value is calculated are transmitted to the terminal 150.

  Note that when task assignment is randomly set and task assignment is changed at random, for example, random numbers can be used. For example, if a random number is an even number, it is “in-house”, and if a random number is an odd number, it is performed “outside”, or a random number is an even number. In such a case, “change is performed”, and when the numerical value that is output as a random number is an odd number, “change is not performed” can be performed.

  The processing in the optimization unit 328 is multivariable optimization processing, and known optimization processing can be used in addition to the above processing.

  Similarly to the first embodiment, when task assignment is set in the task assignment setting data input form 124a, an evaluation value based on the set task assignment is calculated.

  A processing flow in the server apparatus 300 configured as described above will be described with reference to a flowchart shown in FIG.

  First, the server apparatus 300 waits for reception of an access request from the terminal 150 (S360).

  When receiving an access request from the terminal 150 (S361), the server apparatus 300 creates an input item selection form 120a and transmits it to the terminal 150 together with web page data (S362). A display example of the web page 153a displayed on the display unit 153 of the terminal 150 is the same as in FIG.

  When the user selects an input item from the input item selection form 120a displayed in the selection area 153b of the web page 153a via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150, the terminal 150 displays information on the selected input item on the server device 100. And the server apparatus 100 receives information on the selected input item (S363).

  In the server device 300 that has received the information regarding the selected input item, the data corresponding to the selected input item is read from the storage unit 110, and the evaluation item setting data input form 121a, the business data input form 122a, and the organization data input are read out. The form 123a or the business assignment setting data input form 124a is created and transmitted to the terminal 150 (S364).

  The terminal 150 that has received the input form displays the received input form in the work area 153c of the web page 153a, and the user inputs necessary data via the input unit 152, and is provided in each input form. When the setting instruction input areas 121f, 122h, 123h, and 124h are selected by the input unit 152 and a setting instruction is issued, the terminal 150 transmits information related to the setting instruction and the input data to the server apparatus 100, and the server apparatus In 100, the information regarding the setting instruction and the input data are received (S365).

  Then, the server apparatus 300 confirms whether the received data has been input with necessary data in all input fields, and if necessary data has not been input in all input fields (S366). The data input request is transmitted to the terminal 150 (S367), and the process returns to step S365.

  On the other hand, if necessary data is input in all input fields (S366), the received data is stored in the temporary storage area 115 (S368).

  Then, when the user selects the evaluation instruction input area 120f of the input item selection form 120a displayed in the selection area 153b of the web page 153a via the input unit 152 of the terminal 150 with the input unit 152, the evaluation instruction is issued. The terminal 150 transmits information related to the evaluation instruction to the server apparatus 300, and the server apparatus 300 receives the information related to the evaluation instruction (S369).

  In the server apparatus 300 that has received the information related to the evaluation instruction, it is confirmed whether or not the data is input in all items other than the business assignment entered in the business assignment setting data input form 124a. If there is an item that has not been input (S370), an input request for an input item that has not been input is transmitted to the terminal 150 (S371), and the process returns to step S363.

  On the other hand, if data has been input for all items other than the business assignment (S370), the server 300 stores the data related to the business assignment entered in the work assignment setting data input form 124a in the temporary storage area 115. In the case where the data related to the business assignment is not stored in the temporary storage area 115 (S372), the server device 300 randomly sets the internal or external business assignment for each business (S373). ) And the Nth evaluation value is calculated (S374).

  Further, the task assignment when the Nth evaluation value is calculated is randomly changed (S375), and the (N + 1) th evaluation value is calculated (S376).

  If the difference between the Nth evaluation value and the (N + 1) th evaluation value is greater than a predetermined threshold, it is determined that the convergence has not occurred (S377), and “1” is subtracted from N (S378). ), The process of step S375 to step S377 is repeated.

  On the other hand, if the difference between the Nth evaluation value and the (N + 1) th evaluation value is smaller than a predetermined threshold value, it is assumed that the convergence has occurred (S377), and the evaluation result is based on the (N + 1) th evaluation value. It is shaped and transmitted to the terminal 150 (S380).

  If the task assignment setting data is stored in the temporary storage area 115 (S372), an evaluation value is calculated based on the stored task assignment setting data (S379), and the calculated evaluation value is set to a predetermined value. The data is shaped into a graph, a table, etc., and transmitted as an evaluation result to the terminal 150 (S380).

  The terminal 150 that has received the evaluation result displays the evaluation result in the result display area 153d of the web page 153a. When the user of the terminal 150 who has obtained such an evaluation result wants to perform evaluation again after changing the job assignment, the user returns to step S363 and re-assigns the task assignment setting data input form 124a to the work area 153c of the web page 153a. It is sufficient to calculate the evaluation value by changing the assignment of duties by displaying on the screen.

  As described above, according to the present embodiment, it is possible to set the task assignment that seems to be optimal in the server device 300 and calculate the evaluation value. Therefore, the task assignment is appropriately determined with reference to such task assignment. Can be changed.

  In the embodiment described above, the processing is performed by one server apparatus 100, 200, 300, but the processing can be performed by distributing to a plurality of servers. In particular, the data stored in the storage units 110 and 210 can be stored in a database server for processing.

  In the embodiment described above, the server apparatus 100, 200, 300 generates an input form, transmits it to the terminal 150 via the network 140, and inputs necessary data at the terminal 150. However, the present invention is not limited to such a mode. For example, the server apparatus 100, 200, 300 includes a display unit and an input unit, and an input form is displayed on the display unit. May be input.

1 is a schematic diagram of a server device 100 according to a first embodiment. Schematic diagram of a business list table 112a. Schematic diagram of business parameter table 121g. Schematic diagram of organization list table 113a. Schematic diagram of the organization parameter table 113f. Schematic of the evaluation item data table 114a. Schematic of the input item selection form 120a. Schematic of the evaluation item setting data input form 121a. Schematic diagram of business data input form 122a. Schematic of the organization data input form 123a. Schematic diagram of business assignment setting data input form 124a. 4 is a flowchart showing a flow of processing in the server apparatus 100. Schematic which shows the example of a display of the web page 153a. Schematic diagram of business parameter table 221g. Schematic diagram of the organization parameter table 213f. Schematic of the server apparatus 200 which is 2nd embodiment. Schematic of the capability definition data table 216a. Schematic diagram of a personnel list table 217a. Schematic of the capability parameter table 217e. Schematic diagram of business data input form 222a. Schematic diagram of human resource data input form 227a. Schematic diagram of business assignment setting data input form 224a. Schematic of the server apparatus 300 which is 3rd embodiment. The flowchart which shows the flow of a process in the server apparatus.

Explanation of symbols

100, 200, 300 Server device 110 Storage unit 111 Input item selection data storage area 112 Business data storage area 113 Organization data storage area 114 Evaluation item data storage area 216 Capability definition data storage area 217 Human resource data storage area 120 Input item selection section 121 Evaluation item setting unit 122, 222 Business model setting unit 123 Organization model setting unit 124, 224 Business assignment setting unit 125 Evaluation unit 126 Transmission / reception unit 227 Human resource model setting unit 328 Optimization unit 150 Terminal

Claims (19)

A business assignment evaluation device that evaluates the business impact of outsourcing work outside the company,
A storage means, an input / output means, and an arithmetic means;
In the storage means,
Business data including business information, organizational data including organizational information, evaluation data including information for calculating an evaluation value for each evaluation item for evaluating the management impact of outsourcing business, and business Task assignment setting data including information indicating whether to do it in-house or outside the company,
The computing means is
Evaluation that calculates an evaluation value for each evaluation item that evaluates the management impact of outsourcing work by using the business data, organization data, work assignment setting data, and evaluation data stored in the storage means Value calculation processing,
Performing an evaluation value output process for outputting the calculated evaluation value from the input / output means;
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information for identifying business belonging to planning or management,
The business assignment setting data includes information for specifying the number of personnel who perform business when performing business in the company,
The evaluation data has an increasing function with respect to the number of internal personnel in charge of work belonging to planning or management as evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the degree of concentration of management resources,
The calculation means specifies the number of personnel in charge of the business belonging to the planning or management decided to be performed in the company from the business data and the business assignment setting data, and evaluates the concentration level of management resources from the increase function Calculating an evaluation value corresponding to the item;
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information for identifying business belonging to planning or management,
The organizational data includes information on the number of personnel belonging to each department in the company,
The business assignment setting data includes information for identifying a department in which business is performed when performing business in the company,
The evaluation data has, as evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the degree of concentration of management resources, an increase function with respect to the number of employees belonging to an internal department in charge of work belonging to planning or management,
The calculation means specifies the number of personnel belonging to an internal department in charge of business belonging to planning or management from the business data, the organization data, and the business assignment setting data, and concentrates management resources from the increase function. Calculating an evaluation value corresponding to the degree evaluation item,
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information for identifying a business belonging to planning or management, and information for identifying a capability required for a business belonging to planning or management,
The organization data includes information on the number of personnel belonging to each department in the company and information for identifying the capabilities of each person belonging to each department in the company.
The business assignment setting data includes information for identifying a department in which business is performed when performing business in the company,
The evaluation data is the evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the degree of concentration of management resources, the ability required for the business belonging to the planning or management decided to be performed in the company, and the internal in charge of the business belonging to the planning or management. Have an increase function for the number of people in the department
The arithmetic processing means is in charge of the ability required for the business belonging to the plan or management decided to be performed in the company and the business belonging to the plan or management from the business data, the organization data and the business assignment setting data. Identifying the number of matches with the abilities of the personnel belonging to the department in the company, and calculating the evaluation value corresponding to the evaluation item of the concentration level of management resources from the increase function,
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information for identifying the business belonging to the plan,
The work assignment setting data includes information for identifying the number of people who perform work when performing work outside the company,
The evaluation data has an increasing function with respect to the number of outside personnel in charge of work belonging to the plan as evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation items of the possibility of new business creation,
The calculation means specifies the number of external personnel in charge of work belonging to the plan from the work data and the work assignment setting data, and an evaluation value corresponding to an evaluation item of the possibility of creating a new business from the increase function Calculating
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information for identifying the business belonging to the plan and information for identifying the ability required for the business belonging to the plan,
The organization data includes information for identifying the ability of each person outside the company,
The evaluation data is the evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the possibility of creating a new business, the ability required for the work belonging to the plan decided to be carried out outside, and the ability possessed by the outside personnel in charge of the work Have an increasing function for the number of matches, and
The calculation means includes, from the business data, the organization data, and the business assignment setting data, an ability required for a business belonging to a plan decided to be performed outside, and an ability possessed by an external person in charge of the business , And the evaluation value corresponding to the evaluation item of the possibility of creating a new business is calculated from the increase function,
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The evaluation data has, as evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the degree of decrease in in-house skills, a decreasing function for the number of operations decided to be performed outside the company,
The calculation means specifies the number of tasks decided to be performed outside from the task assignment setting data, and calculates an evaluation value corresponding to an evaluation item of the degree of decrease in internal skills from the decrease function,
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information for identifying a heavy business,
The evaluation data has a decreasing function with respect to the number of highly important tasks to be performed outside the company as evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the degree of decrease in internal skills,
The calculation means identifies the number of highly important tasks decided to be performed outside from the task data and the task assignment setting data, and evaluates the evaluation value corresponding to the evaluation item of the degree of decrease in internal skills from the decrease function Calculating
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information for identifying a business with a high confidentiality level,
The evaluation data, as evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the risk degree of information leakage, has a decreasing function with respect to the number of operations with a high confidentiality level to be performed outside the company,
The calculation means specifies the number of high-confidential-level work to be outsourced from the work data and the work assignment setting data, and calculates an evaluation value corresponding to an evaluation item of the risk level of information leakage from the decrease function To do,
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information identifying the number of personnel required for each business,
The task assignment setting data includes information for identifying the person in charge of each task,
The evaluation data has an increasing function with respect to the ratio of the number of personnel in charge of each operation to the number of personnel required for each operation as evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the replenishment degree of management resources,
The computing means specifies the ratio of the number of personnel in charge of each business to the number of personnel required for each business from the business data and the business allocation setting data, and determines the replenishment degree of management resources from the increase function. Calculating an evaluation value corresponding to the evaluation item of
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information for identifying the ability required for each business,
The organization data includes information for identifying the capabilities of each person,
The task assignment setting data includes information for identifying the number of personnel in charge of each task,
The evaluation data is an evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the degree of replenishment of management resources, and the increase in the number corresponding to the number of personnel required for each job and the capability of each employee in charge of each job is the same. Has a function,
The calculation means specifies the number of matches between the capacity of personnel required for each business and the capacity of each personnel in charge of each business from the business data, the organization data, and the business assignment setting data. Calculating an evaluation value corresponding to an evaluation item of the replenishment degree of management resources from the increase function;
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The work assignment setting data includes information for identifying the number of people who perform work when performing work outside the company,
The evaluation data has an increasing function with respect to the number of outside personnel assigned to each business to be performed outside as the evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the possibility of improving the business quality,
The calculation means identifies the number of outside personnel assigned to each job decided to be performed outside from the task assignment setting data, and an evaluation corresponding to an evaluation item of the possibility of improving the job quality from the increase function Calculating the value,
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information for identifying the ability required for each business,
The organization data includes information for identifying the ability of each person outside the company,
The task assignment setting data includes information for identifying the number of personnel in charge of each task,
The evaluation data is the evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation items for the possibility of improving the quality of work, the ability required for each work to be performed outside the company, and the ability possessed by each person outside the company in charge of the work Have an increasing function for the number of matches,
The computing means, from the business data, the organization data and the business assignment setting data, the ability required for each business to be performed outside, the ability possessed by each external person in charge of the business, Identifying the number of matches, and calculating an evaluation value corresponding to an evaluation item of the possibility of improving business quality from the increase function,
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The work assignment setting data includes information on other work to be exchanged for each work, the number of times of exchange with other work, and the frequency of exchange with other work. ,
The evaluation data is the evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the degree of inefficiency of the work, and among the work outsourced, the number of times exchanged with the work carried out in the company and the work carried out in the company. Has an increasing function for the frequency of interaction,
The calculation means specifies, from the task assignment setting data, the number of times of communication with an in-house operation and the frequency of exchange with an in-house operation out of the operations outsourced to the outside, and the increase function Calculating an evaluation value corresponding to the evaluation item of the degree of inefficiency of work from
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information on the work scale and work frequency of each work,
The evaluation data has, as evaluation data corresponding to cost evaluation items, an increase function with respect to the work scale of work to be performed outside and the work frequency of work to be performed outside;
The calculation means specifies the work scale of the work to be performed outside and the work frequency of the work to be performed outside from the work data and the work assignment setting data, and uses the increase function as a cost evaluation item. Calculating a corresponding evaluation value,
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The business data includes information specifying the presence / absence of a business procedure for each business, the presence / absence of a business procedure document, and the presence / absence of a document template,
The evaluation data has an increasing function with respect to the number of business procedures, business procedure documents, or document templates among the business operations to be performed outside the business as evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation items of the transition efficiency,
The calculation means specifies the number of business procedures, business procedure manuals, or document templates out of business outsourced from the business data and the business assignment setting data, and is an evaluation item of transition efficiency from the increase function Calculating an evaluation value corresponding to
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 16,
The organization data specifies whether there are contracts and management policies related to outsourced business, whether there are contracts and management standards related to outsourced business, and whether there are contracts and management systems related to outsourced business. Contains information,
The evaluation data is the evaluation data corresponding to the evaluation item of the migration efficiency, when there is a contract or management policy related to the business outsourced, when there is a contract or management standard regarding the business outsourced, or external If there is a contract or management system related to the work to be entrusted to, there is something that adds a predetermined numerical value to the increase function,
The calculation means includes, from the organization data, business data and the business assignment setting data, whether there is a contract or management policy regarding business to be outsourced, whether there is a contract or management standard regarding business outsourced, and outsourcing Identifying the presence or absence of a contract or management system related to the business to be performed, and calculating an evaluation value corresponding to the evaluation item of the transition efficiency by adding a predetermined numerical value to the increase function,
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by The work assignment evaluation device according to claim 1,
The calculation means performs an optimization process of work assignment whether to be done internally or externally for each work in the work assignment setting data,
Business sharing evaluation device characterized by A work sharing evaluation program for evaluating the business impact of outsourcing work.
Business data including information related to the business of the computer, organizational data including information related to the organization, evaluation data for calculating the evaluation value of each evaluation item for evaluating the management impact of outsourcing the business, and for each business Storage means for storing work assignment setting data indicating whether to be done in-house or outside the company;
An evaluation value for calculating an evaluation value of each evaluation item with respect to management influence by outsourcing the business using the business assignment setting data, business data, organization data and evaluation data stored in the storage means Calculation process,
An evaluation value output process for outputting the calculated evaluation value from the input / output unit;
A task sharing evaluation program characterized by functioning as

Images